Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRes No 367PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 367 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING AP- PROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR A PLANNING COMMIS- SION INITIATED CHANGE OF ZONE FROM 'S' TO PC(2), R-2 8,000(8), R-1-12,000, PR-4, PR-5, AND O.S., UPON ANNEXATION ON PROPERTY KNOWN AS CITY ANNEXA- TION NO. 5. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert. California, did hold a duly noticed Public Hearing on the 17th day of May, 1978, and a continued Public Hearing on the 14th day of June, 1978, to consider a Planning Commission initiated prezoning from '8' (Study) to P.C.(2)(U.A.) (Planned Commercial, District, Upon Annexation), R-2 8,000(8)(U.A.) (Single-family residential, 8,000 sq. ft. min. lot area, min. 8,000 sq. ft./du, Upon Annexation), R-1 12,000 (U.A.) (Single-family residential, 12,000 sq. ft. min. lot area, Upon Annexa- tion), PR-5(U.A.) (Planned Residential, max. 5 du/acre, Upon Annexation), PR-4(U.A.) (Planned Residential, max. 4 du/acre, Upon Annexation), O.S. (U.A.) (Open Space, Upon Annexation), PR-3(U.A.) (Planned Residential, max. 3 du/acre, Upon Annexation), PR-10(U.A.) (Planned Residential, max. 10 du/acre, Upon Annexation) or any other zone deemed appropriate on property generally located between Country Club Drive and the White - water Storm Channel and between Monterey Avenue and Cook Street, and more particularly described as: Beginning at a point in the northerly boundary land of the City of Palm Desert, County of Riverside, State of California, said point being the common 4 Section, corner of Section 7 and 8, Township 5 south, Range 6 east, San Bernardino base and meridian. Said point also being in the boundary line of the City of Rancho Mirage of said Riverside County. THENCE northerly along the aforementioned common Section line of Sections 7 and 8 and along the easterly boundary line of the City of Rancho Mirage, a dis- tance of 2,652.82 feet to the common section corner of Sections 7 and 8 and Sections 5 and 6. THENCE north 89° 33' 48" east along the northerly line of the aforementioned Section 8, a distance of 2,629.98 feet to a point. THENCE north 89° 42' 08" east, along the northerly line of the aforementioned Section 8, a distance of 2,670.86 feet to the northeasterly corner of said Section 8 said point being the common corner of Sections 8 and 9, said point also being the centerline intersection of Por- tola Avenue and Country Club Drive. THENCE continuing north 89° 42' 00" east along the northerly line of said Section 9, a distance of 5,307.00 feet to a point. Said point being the northeasterly corner of said Section 9, said point also being the centerline intersection of Cook Street and said Country Club Drive. THENCE south 00' 06' 00" west along the easterly line of the aforementioned Section 9, a distance of 3,979.72 feet to a point. Said point also being the most northeasterly corner in the boundary line of the City of Palm Desert. THENCE continuing along the boundary line of the City of Palm Desert the following courses and distance. Thence south of 89° 46' 32" west, a distance of 3,981.26 feet. THENCE south 00'° 07' 20" west, a distance of 1,325.52 feet. THENCE south 896' 48' 00" west, a distance of 1,327.45 feet. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 367 Page Two THENCE south 00° 01' 50" west, a distance of 1,592.03 feet. THENCE north 76° 32' 56" west, a distance of 3,166.84 feet. THENCE north 00° 09' 12" east, a distance of 2,168.56 feet. THENCE north 89° 45' 08" east, a distance of 3,052.69 feet. THENCE north 88° 06' 40" east, a distance of 660.00 feet. THENCE south 89° 45' 08" west, a distance of 1,325.00 feet. THENCE north 00° 06' 40" east, a distance of 664.68 feet. THENCE south 89° 44' 27" west, a distance of 3,977.43 feet to the point of beginning. WHEREAS, said application has met the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Environmental Quality Procedure Resolution No. 78-32," in that an expanded initial study was developed for the project; and on this basis a negative declaration was issued and the appeal period has expired; and, WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and argument did find the following facts and reasons to exist to revise its initial proposal to as shown on the attached Exhibit labeled Exhibit A: 1. The revised recommendation does conform to the Palm Desert General Plan to a greater degree than the initial recommendation. 2. The revised recommendation is more compatible to exist- ing and proposed zones in the area. 3. The revised recommendation provides increased mitigation measures considered appropriate after review of an ex- panded initial study conducted on the project. 4. The revised recommendation would better meet the objec- tives of the Palm Desert adopted General Plan. 5. The application of Planned Zones on a majority of the subject property provides the City the vehicle by which to control development in terms of timing; mitigation measures related to blowsand and protection of unique animals and landforms; and, compatibility of development to City Standards. 6. The area being considered for prezoning is considered a logical expansion of the Community, and the recommended zoning designations are considered compatible to the existing development in the Community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and con- stitute the findings of the Commission in this case; 2. That it does hereby recommend approval to the City Council of a Change of Zone as shown on Exhibit A attached hereto. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 367 Page Three PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, held on the 14th day of June, 1978, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: BERKEY, FLESHMAN, KRYDER NOES: KELLY, SNYDER ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE GEORtE BERKEY, Chairman ATTEST: PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary /ks PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 367 FXHTRTT _A • --�- Z— 00 3nN3W O1C1a0d COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 0 u • z a OL 6L6£ 301S213A121 AO AJNno3 3 2 J U 0 • m or 28'ZS92 a1 0090 a00.S ll �� CO NO v O C'0<. 0 6!'f99 - .r3,00,90e00\\\\N om 3„60 SO , 00 N • MAP 9378 CO 90o Q DESERT CITY LIMIT i -J J 11 WI1 A113 39V2111•1 ONONVN ,ZS S2£1 1 W r z 0 U CASE NO. C/Z 01-78) PALM DESERT CITY LIMIT ,£6'd6S7-M „0£,10000S • O z 30 0 c.if!' U 3 U U 2 0 W z 6) 2 Q v = w .0 0 W N r 9£'691d 3„21,60000 N �-- 3NV1 AO N013 12 w O 0 0 J A 3a31NOW