HomeMy WebLinkAboutRes No 547PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 547
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNOUNCING FINDING AND DENYING
A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT TO ALLOW AN ADDITION-
AL DRIVEWAY ACCESS FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 74 AND EL PASEO.
CASE NO. CUP 09-78 (Amendment)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert,
California, did on the 2nd day of October, 1979, hold a duly noticed
Public Hearing and continued Public Hearing on October 30, 1979, to
consider the request by Bank of Indio (Hughes Investments) for approval
of an amendment of an approved Conditional Use Permit to allow an
additional driveway entrance on El Paseo to facilitate access to a
proposed bank building on approximately 5.4 acres (total Hughes Invest-
ment site) within the C-1, S.P. (General Commercial, Scenic Preserva-
tion Overlay) zone, generally located at the northeast corner of
Highway 74 and El Paseo, more particularly described as:
APN 627-192-036 (previously 627-192-27)
WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements
of the "City of Palm Desert Environmental Quality Procedure Resolution
No. 78-32", in that the Director of Environmental Services has determined
that the project has been previously assessed in connection with the
original use permit review, and that further documentation is not deemed
necessary; and
WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering
all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring
to be heard, said Commission did find the following facts and reasons to
exist to justify the denial of said Conditional Use Permit amendment:
1. The proposed location of the conditional use amendment
access and the conditions under which it could be operated
and maintained will be detrimental to the public health,
safety, or general welfare, or be materially injurious to
the properties or improvements in the vicinity.
2. The proposed conditional use does not comply with the goals,
objectives, and policies of the City's adopted General Plan.
3. The proposed conditional use does not comply with the goals,
objectives, and policies of the City's adopted Redevelopment
Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the
City of Palm Desert, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct and consti-
tute the findings of the Commission in this case;
2. That the Conditional Use Permit (CUP 09-78, Amendment) is
hereby denied.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm
Desert Planning Commission, held on this 30th day of October, 1979, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Berkey, Fleshman, Miller, Snyder
NOES: Kryder
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
WALTER H. SNYDER, Chai,an
ATTEST:
PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary