Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRes No 805PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 805 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNIONG COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 25.68. CASE NO. ZOA 06-82 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 1st day of June, 1982, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider amendments to Section 25.68. WHEREAS, said amendment complies with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedures to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89", in that the Director of Environmental Services has determined the project to be a Class 11 Categorical Exemption; WHEREAS, at said public hearing upon hearing and considering the testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts to justify their recommendations as described below: 1. That the Zoning Ordinance Amendment is consistent with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. That the Zoning Ordinance Amendment is consistent with the adopted General Plan and affected Specific Plans. 3. That the Zoning Ordinance Amendment would better serve the public health, safety, and general welfare than the current regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission. 2. That the Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council approval of a Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment to rescind Sections 25.68.640 through 25.68.760 inclusive and replace same with those provisions contained in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 1st day of June, 1982, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: KRYDER, MILLER, WOOD NOES: NONE ABSENT: CRITES ABSTAIN: RICHARDS ATTEST: /pa 1'41t‘l--) GEOR D. KRYDER CHAP' AN PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 805 EXHIBIT "A" ON PREMISES SIGNS Section 25.68.640 - Lawful Nonconforming Signs. A. Lawful existing on premises signs at the time of the adoption of the Sign Ordinance on February 24, 1977, which do not comply with the requirements of Municipal Code Section 25.68, "Signs", as amended, shall be deemed lawful nonconforming uses and shall be made to comply, be removed or demolished upon the transfer of ownership of the business or upon the altering of sign, copy, size, color or the addition of new signage to the site or structure upon which the nonconforming sign is located. B. Nonconforming signs may not be expanded, extended, rebuilt, altered or reconstructed in any way, except for normal maintenance or to protect public safety. C. It shall be the express responsibility of the vendor to advise the vendee of the provisions of this section relating to the removal of nonconforming signs upon the transfer of ownership of a business. Section 25.68.650 - Lawful Nonconforming Signs to be Removed. Any nonconforming signs shall be demolished, removed or made to conform within thirty days of the issuance of a valid sign permit. Prior of the issuance of a sign permit for a property on which a nonconforming sign (s) exists, said applicant or owner shall file with the city an irrevocable bond in the amount to twenty-five thousand dollars (25,000.00) to guarantee that said nonconforming sign(s) shall be demolished, removed or made to conform within the specified time. Section 25.68.660 - Lawful Nonconforming Status Shall Not Apply to Billboards. Nothing contained in this section shall be construed to imply or confer a lawful nonconforming use status to any offsite sign or advertising device, designed or used for periodically changing advertising copy (i.e. billboard).