HomeMy WebLinkAboutRes No 0940PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 940
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN A DRAINAGE AND
HILLSIDE OVERLAY ZONE LOCATED IN IRONWOOD
COUNTRY CLUB.
CASE NO. CUP 21-83 (Amendment #1)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on
the 7th day of February, 1984, hold a duly noticed public hearing and continued hearing on
March 6, 1984, and April 3, 1984, to consider a request by SILVER SPUR ASSOCIATES for
approval of an amendment to a previously approved conditional use permit for a
residential development on 27.5 acres located in the PR-7 (Planned Residential, maximum
7 d.u./acre) PR-7 D (Planned Residential, maximum 7 d.u./acre with a drainage way
overlay) and PR H (Planned Residential, maximum 7 d.u./acre with hillside overlay) zones
located in Ironwood Country Club on the south side of Mariposa Drive at the easterly end
of Poinciana Place, more particularly described as:
APN 631-270-052 and portions of 631-270-010, 016, 051
WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of
Palm Desert Procedures to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act,
Resolution No. 80-89", in that the director of environmental services has determined that
the project has been previously assessed in connection with Case No. CUP 21-83 and
therefore, no additional documentation is deemed necessary.
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said commission did find the
following facts and reasons to exist to justify the granting of said conditional use permit:
1. The proposed location of the conditional use is in accord with the objectives
of the zoning ordinance and the purpose of the district in which the site is
located.
2. The proposed location of the conditional use and the conditions under which
it will be operated and maintained will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety or general welfare, or be materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
3. The proposed conditional use will comply with each of the applicable
provisions of this title, except for approved variances or adjustments.
4. The proposed conditional use complies with the goals, objectives, and
policies of the city's adopted general plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of
Palm Desert, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings
of the commission in this case.
2. That approval of Conditional Use Permit 21-83 (Amendment #1) is hereby
granted for reasons subject to the attached conditions.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert
Planning Commission, held on this 3rd day of April, 1984, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: CRITES, DOWNS, ERWOOD, RICHARDS
NOES: WOOD
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
RALPH B. WOOD, Chairman
AT
, ----
,RAMN A. DIAZ, ecr tary
/lr
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 940
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Case No. CUP 21-83 (Amendment #1)
Department of Environmental Services:
1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file
with the department of environmental services, and modified by the following
conditions and subsequent revisions.
2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any uses
contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first complete all the procedural
requirements of the city which include, but are not limited to architectural review,
subdivision process and building permits procedures.
3. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the
restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal
ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be
in force.
4. When residences are built on this tract, setbacks to comply with site plan on file in
department of environmental services; setback s can be slightly varied if approved
through architectural review process.
5. All conditions of TT 19640 (Amendment f#1) shall be met.
6. The applicant shall have twenty-four (24) months from the date of approval to
implement said CUP, unless an extension of time as permitted by code is granted
by the planning commission.
Conditions added by Planning Commission:
7. Lots 7, 8, and 9 are to be lowered 2, 4, and 6 feet respectively.
8. Lots 35, 36, 37, 38, and 39 are to be deleted.
9. This approval rescinds the earlier approval granted on October 18, 1983, pertaining
to this tract map.