Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRes No 1044PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.1044 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 25.68. CASE NO. ZOA 84-3 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 18th day of December, 1984, hold a duly noticed public hearing which was continued to a special public hearing held January 15, 1985 and to a regular public hearing held February 5, 1985 to consider amendments to Section 25.68. WHEREAS, on February 5, 1985 planning commission adopted its resolution number 1029 recommending approval of certain amendments to the sign regulation; and WHEREAS, on February 28, 1985 city council held a public hearing concerning the regulation of signs and at that time returned the matter to the planning commission for review of the provisions relating to freestanding monument signs and illuminated signs; and WHEREAS, on April 2, 1985 planning commission held a public hearing to consider the provisions relating to freestanding monument signs and illuminated signs; and WHEREAS, it was the decision of the planning commission that the existing provisions relating to illuminated signs were adequate and acceptable; and WHEREAS, it was the decision of the planning commission that although the existing provisions relating to freestanding monument signs were generally acceptable and adequate, that the architectural commission should review freestanding monument signs relative to specific criteria not presently codified; and WHEREAS, on April 16, 1985 staff submitted the necessary resolution to create specific criteria to be reviewed by the architectural commission; and WHEREAS, even though commission on April 16, 1985 expressed support for the new criteria, the matter was continued until May 7, 1985 to allow staff to prepare a report concerning whether an additional freestanding sign should be permitted under unique circumstances; and WHEREAS, the commission concurred with the staff recommendation to allow an additional freestanding sign on unique large developments while at the same time strictly limiting the copy content of the signs in accordance with architectural commission policy. WHEREAS, said amendment complies with the requirements of the City of Palm Desert Procedures to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89", in that the director of environmental services has determined the project to be a Class 5 Categorical Exemption; WHEREAS, at said public hearings upon hearing and considering the testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts to justify its recommendation as described below: 1. That the zoning ordinance amendment is consistent with the objectives of the zoning ordinance. 2. That the zoning ordinance amendment is consistent with the adopted General Plan and affected specific plans. 3. That the zoning ordinance amendment would better serve the public health, safety, and general welfare than the current regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1044 2. That the planning commission does hereby recommend to the city council approval of a zoning ordinance text amendment contained in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 14th day of May, 1985, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: ERWOOD & WOOD NOES: CRITES ABSENT: DOWNS ABSTAIN: RICHARDS ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secrey /d1g BUFORD CRITES, Chairman