Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRes No 1641PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1641 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO AN EXISTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO PERMIT AN 1800 SQUARE FOOT EXPANSION OF THE EXISTING ANDREINOS RESTAURANT. CASE NO. CUP 94-2, AMENDING CUP 89-14 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 5th day of April, 1994, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of MICHAEL CASTELLI for approval of an amendment to a conditional use permit to permit an 1800 square foot expansion of an existing restaurant at 73-098 Highway 111; and WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89," in that the director of community development has determined that the project is a class 1 categorical exemption; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify the granting of said conditional use permit: 1. The proposed use and design of the expansion is consistent with the standard goals and objectives of the general commercial zone, the Commercial Core Area Specific Plan and Palm Desert General Plan. 2. The project will not depreciate values, restrict the lawful use of adjacent properties or threaten the public health, safety or general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case. 2. That approval of Conditional Use Permit 94-2 amending Conditional Use Permit 89-14 is hereby granted, subject to conditions. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 5th day of April, 1994, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: BEATY, JONATHAN, WHITLOCK, SPIEGEL NONE NONE NONE RAM A. DIAZ, 9iec -' ary Palm Desert Planniā€¢- Commission PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1641 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. CUP 94-2, AMENDING CUP 89-14 Department of Community Development: 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of community development/ planning, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any uses contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first complete all the procedural requirements of the city which include, but are not limited to, architectural commission and building permit procedures. 3. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null, void and of no effect whatsoever. 4. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Riverside County Department of Health Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 6. That prior to issuance of building permit the owner (developer) provide the city with evidence that he has paid the required school mitigation fee. 7. Applicant shall execute and maintain a lease for valet parking for at least 11 additional spaces within a minimum 300 feet of the restaurant. 8. That the applicant shall pay the required transportation uniform mitigation fee (TUMF) in an amount to be determined pursuant to Ordinance No. 573. 9. That all conditions of the original case CUP 89-14 and VAR 89-7 shall continue in effect. 10. The restaurant shall not be permitted to open for business before 5:00 p.m. daily. 2