HomeMy WebLinkAboutRes No 1874PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1874
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE RE -MAPPING
OF PART OF THE EAST SIDE OF MESA GRANDE DRIVE IN
INDIAN RIDGE COUNTRY CLUB TO SUBDIVIDE SIX EXISTING
LOTS INTO SEVEN SINGLE FAMILY LOTS.
CASE NO. VESTING TT 28861
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the
7th day of July, 1998, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of
SUNRISE COMPANY for approval of Vesting TT 28861 to subdivide six existing lots into
seven lots; and
WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm
Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution
No. 97-18," in that the Director of Community Development has determined that the project
is substantially similar to that previously approved under Vesting TT 26123 and Vesting TT
28227 which were reviewed for compliance with CEQA and no further documentation is
necessary; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission
did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify approval of said map:
(a) That the proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans.
(b) That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with
applicable general and specific plans.
(c) That the site is physically suitable for the type of development (i.e. residential).
(d) That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development.
(e) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely
to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably
injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
(f) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to
cause serious public health problems.
(g) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict
with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of
property within the proposed subdivision.
WHEREAS, in the review of this tentative tract map the planning commission has
considered the effect of the contemplated action on the housing needs of the region for
purposes of balancing these needs against the public service needs of the residents of the
City of Palm Desert and its environs, with available fiscal and environmental resources.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1874
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm
Desert, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of
the Commission in this case.
2. That Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 28861 is hereby approved for the
reasons set forth in this resolution and in the staff report dated July 7, 1998,
and subject to the attached conditions, Exhibit "A".
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning
Commission, held on this 7th day of July, 1998, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: BEATY, FERNANDEZ, FINERTY, JONATHAN, CAMPBELL
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ATTEST:
PHILIP DRELLI Secretary
Palm Desert PPanning Commission
SONIA M. CAMPBELL, Chairperson
2
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1874
EXHIBIT "A"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
CASE NO. VESTING TT 28861
Department of Community Development/Planning:
1. All Department of Community Development conditions applied to Vesting TT 26123
and TT 28227 shall be applicable to this map.
Department of Public Works:
1. All applicable provisions, conditions and requirements contained within that certain
development agreement between the City of Palm Desert and Sunrise Desert Partners
as approved by the City Council on January 10, 1995, as Ordinance 627, as well as
City Council Resolutions 90-145 and 90-146 approving Vesting Tentative Map
26123 and Precise Plan 90-21 and Planning Commission Resolution 1967 adopted
September 5, 1998, shall be considered as conditions of approval for this map.
3