Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRes No 2512PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2512 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A VARIANCE FOR AN EXCEPTION TO PALM DESERT MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 25.68, SIGNS, TO PERMIT A SECOND WALL SIGN ON THE SAME BUILDING FRONTAGE FOR CAMBRIA LOCATED AT 42-210 COOK STREET. CASE NO. VAR 09-330 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 6t" day of October, 2009, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request by Cambria, for the above noted Variance; and WHEREAS, said application is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further documentation is necessary; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify denial of said request: A. That the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the ordinance codified in this title. Due to the property having visibility and frontage along Cook Street, and being able to have another sign facing the parking lot, there is no difficulty or physical hardship related to the property in question. Cook Street is highly traveled and the existing signs are easily seen from Cook Street. B. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. The property is not of a highly irregular shape, and there are no extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to this property. The building is located within an existing shopping center and has excellent visibility from Cook Street. The building is positioned at an angle allowing two frontages viewed from Cook Street. C. That strict or literal interpretations and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same vicinity and zone. No other variances have been approved for signage in the vicinity. The applicant is not deprived of any privileges that others enjoy in the same area. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2512 D. That the granting of the variance or adjustment will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. The applicant was approved to install the two wall signs, one per frontage, that currently exist. The applicant installed an additional sign that was not permitted and allowed by code. The proposed sign would not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties in the vicinity. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, Califomia, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission in this case. 2. That Variance 09-330 is hereby denied. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on the 6th day of October, 2009, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: CAMPBELL, DELUNA, LIMONT, TANNER NOES: NONE ABSENT: SCHMIDT ABSTAIN: NONE ATTEST: LAURI AYLAIAN, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission 2 VAN G. i'ANNER, Chairperson