Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0801 � ~S' , � �� AGENDA PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY - AUGUST 1, 1978 7:00 PM - CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + I. CALL TO ORDER II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. ROLL CALL IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. MINUTES of regular meeting of July 19, 1978. Action: On a motion by Commissioner Kryder, seconded by Commission�n Snyder, the minutes were approved as corrected. Motion carried unanimously (4-0). U. WRITTEN COMMUNICATION - None VI . PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Continued Case Nos. CZ 05-78, CZ 05-78 (EIR) , DP 10-78 and 133MF, BUREAU OF TEACHER AID AND RETIREMENT SERVICES, Applicant. Request for approval of a Change of Zone from R-1 10,000 to R-2 6,000 on approximately 11 acres located east of Alamo, south of Skyward Way and west of Chia Drive, the related EIR and approval of a related Development Plan and preliminary Design Review to allow for a 72- unit retirement apartment project on said site. Staff Recommendation: 1) By Planning Commission Resolution No. 386 � recommend denial to the City Council of the proposed Change of Zone and approval and certification of the final environmental impact report as complete. 2) By Planning Commission Resolution No. 387 , deny the request for approval of the proposed Development Plan. Action: On a motion by Commissioner Kryder, seconded by Commissioner Fleshman, the Commission denied the Change of Zone and approved as final the EIR by Planning Commission Resolution No. 386; carried unanimously (3-0). (over) B. Continued Case Nos. DP 09-78 and 126MF, CHACAHUALA, LTD. , Applicant. Request for approval of a Revised Development Plan and Preliminary Design Review for a 116-unit condominium project on approximately 3�9 acres located south of Little Bend Trail and north of Mesa View extended between Alamo and Arrow Trail . The applicant has filed a slightly revised Plan which will be addressed in this report. Staff Recommendation: Approve the Development Plan 'and Preliminary Design Review by planning Commission Resolution No. 38g . Action: On a motion by Commissioner Snyder, seconded by Commissioner Kryder, the Commission approved the Development Plan and Preliminary Design Review by Planning Commission Resolution No. 388; carried unanimously (4-0) . , ''" ! � � On a motion by Commissioner Fleshman, seconded by Commissioner Kryder, the Commission denied the request far a proposed Development Plan by Planning Commission Resolution No. 387; carried unanimously (3-0). /R µ d ♦ � � Agenda Palm Desert Planning Commission August 1, 1978 Page Two C. Case Nos. CZ 07-78, TT 13236, CUP 08-78, CLIFFORD SWANSON, Applicant. Request for approval of a Change of Zone from 'S' Study to S.I. (U.A. ) on approximately 29 acres located on the east side of Cook Street northerly of the Whitewater Channel and related 40-lot industrial subdivision and a related request for Approval of a Conditional Use Permit and Preliminary Design Review to allow an Industrial Park De- velopment on the site. Staff Recommendation: 1) Recommend approval of the Change of Zone to the City Council by Planning Commission Resolution No. 389 . 2) Recommend approval of the Tentative Tract Map to the City Council by Planning Commission Resolution No. 3) Approve the Conditional Use Permit and Pre- liminary Design Review by Planning Commission Resolution No. Action: On a motion by Commissioner Kryder, seconded by Com- missioner Snyder, the Commission approved the proposed Change of Zone by! Planning Commission Resolution No. 389; and continued Case No. TT 13236 and CUP 08-78 to the Sept. 5th meeting for further review; carried unanimously (3-0). VII . OLD BUSINESS - None. VIII . NEW BUSINESS _ None IX. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ITEMS A. Review of Cases acted on by the Design Review Board at their meeting of July 25, 1978. Staff Recommendation: Approve the Design Review Board actions by Planning Commission Resolution No. 390 • Action: On a motion by Commissioner Kryder, seconded by Commissioner Snyder, the Commission approved the actions of the DRB by PC Res. No. 390; carried unanimously (3-0). X. DISCUSSION ITEMS - None XI . ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Any person wishing to discuss any item not on the Agenda may address the Planning Commission at this point by stepping to the podium and giving their name and address for the record. Remarks shall be limited to a maximum of five (5) minutes unless additional time is authorized by th� Planning Commission. XII. COMMENTS A. City Staff B. City Attorney C. Planning Commissioners XIII. ADJOURNMENT