The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About0503 AGENDA PALM�,,,z„SERT PLANNING COMMISSION�ETING THURSDAY - MAY 3, 1979 7: 00 P.M. - CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * � * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * I . CALL TO ORDER II . PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Conmissioner FlesYanan I I I . ROLL CALL - All present IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Minutes of regular meeting of April 18, 1979 Act ion: Qn a motion by Corrmissioner Berkey, seconded by Corrmissioner Kryder, the minutes of April 18, 1979 were approved as amended; carried unanirr�usly (4-0). V. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - None VI . PiJBLIC HEARINGS A. Case No. CUP 03-79 - JACK WISE, Applicant Request for approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow a racquetball and health club on property located on the north side of Alessandro Drive, west of DeAnza Way on Lots 6 & 7, Palma Village Unit #3. Staff Recommendation : Approve CUP 03-79 by adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. , subject to development standards and operational conditions. Act ion: On a motion by Comnissioner Berkey, seconded by Comnissioner Kryder, the case was approved by Planning Camnission Resolution No. 481, as presented; carried unanimously (4-0). B. Case No. DP 05-79 - GERALD J. CHAZEN, Applicant Request for approval of a Development Plan for a planned commercial development on approximately 7. 9 acres within the P.C. (3) , S.P, zone at the westerly side of Palms to Pines shopping area, between El Paseo and Highway 111 . Staff Recommendation : Continue to Planning Commission meeting of May 29, 1979 to address design concerns. Act ion: On a motion by Comnissioner Kryder, seconded by Corrmissioner Berkey, the ca.se was continued to the Planning Comnission meeting of Ma,y 29,1979; carried unanimously (4-0). C. Case No. VAR 03-79 - DANIEL L. DWORSKEY, FAIA for COLUMBIA SAVINGS & LOAN, Applicant Request for approval for an exception to the Sign Ordinance to allow an additional identification sign next to the south entrance of their building now under construction at the southwest corner of Highway 111 and Highway 74. Staff Recommendation : Deny VAR 03-79 by adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. Act ion: On a motion by Corrmissioner Kryder, seconded by Comnissicner Berkey, the case was approved by Planning Cotrrnission Resolution No. 482, subje-ct to conditions suggested; carried unanimously (4-0). � ---- Agenda �; � Page Two Palm Desert Planning Commission May 3, 1979 VI . (cont . ) D. Case No. C/Z 05-?9 - WAYNE 0. AND MARIE HUTCHESON, Applicant Request for approval of a Change of Zone from R-1 (Single-Family Residential) to C-1 (General Commercial) for property containing zpproximately 10, 000 sq. ft . located at the northeast corner of Lantana Avenue and Larrea Street . Staff Recommendation : Deny C/Z 05-79 by adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. Act ion : �i a motion by Comnissioner Kryder, seconded by Comnissioner Fleshman, the ca,se wa.s denied by Planning Comnission Resolution No. 483; carried unanimously (4-0). E. Case No. CUP 02-79 and VAR 02-79 - DELOS H. BOBO, Applicant Request for approval of a Conditional Use Permit to operate a restaurant and a related Parking Variance in the San Pablo Village project on the east side of San Pablo Avenue, between E1 Paseo and Highway 111, within the C-1 , S.P. zone. Staff Recommendation: Approve CUP 02-79 and VAR 02-79 by adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. , subject to conditions. Act ion: On a motion by Comnissioner Berkey, seconded by Corrmissioner Kryder, the case was approved by Flanning Comnission No. 484, as presented; carried unanimously (4-0). F. Case No. CUP 16-78 (Amendment) - GARY LOHMAN for C. G. DUNHAM, Applicant Request for approval of a modification to a previously approved Conditional Use Permit to operate a restaurant in the El Paseo Village praject , and a related Parking Variance to reduce the number of parking spaces from 38 spaces required by the Municipal Code to 22 spaces on property located on the south side of El Paseo, between Sun Lodge Lane and Lupine Lane, within the C-1, S.P. zone. Staff Recommendation : Approve CUP 16-78 (Amendment) by adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. Act ion: On a motion by Comnissioner Berkey, seconded by Colrmissioner Kryder, the case was approved by Flanning Comnission Resolution No. 485, as presented; carried unanimously (4-0). G. Case No. DP 03-79 (continued case) - JAMES E. KAUL, Applicant Request for approval of a Residential Development Plan to allow 36 condominium units on approximately 7. 5 acres within the PR-5 zone on the south side of Country Club Drive, between Monterey and Portola Avenues. Staff Recommendation : Continue DP 03-79 by minute motion to Planning Commission meeting of May 29, 1979. Act ion: On a motion by Comnissioner Berkey, seconded by Cormiissioner Kryder, the case was continued to the Planning Calmission meeting of Ma,y 16, 1979 (rather than the suggested da.te of Ma.y 29); carried unanimously (4-0). Agenda � � Page Three Palm Desert Planning Commission May 3, 1979 VI . (cont . ) H. Case No. PM 14625 - SIEGEL ENTERPRISES, Applicant Request for approval of a Tentative Parcel Map to divide 77 net acres into two parcels upon annexation; proposing one parcel to contain approximately 9 acres in the P.C. -2, S.P. (U.A. ) (Planned Commercial, District , Scenic Preservation Overlay, Upon Annexation) zone, and the other parcel to contain approximately 66. 5 acres in the PR-4, S.P. (U.A. ) (Planned Residential, max. 4 d.u. /ac. , Scenic Preservation Overlay, Upon Annexation) zone and approximately 1. 5 acres in the P (U.A. ) (Public/Institutional , Upon Annexation) zone, located south and east of the intersection of Country Club Drive and Cook Street . Staff Recommendation : Approve PM 14625 by adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. , subject to conditions. Act io n : On a motion by Conmissioner Fleshman, seconded by Comnissioner Kryder, the case was approved by Planning Corrmission Resolution No. 486, as amended; carried unanimously (4-0). I . Case No. C/Z 04-79 and DP 04-79 - SILVER SPUR ASSOC. , Applicant Request for approval of a Change of Zone from PR-1, D. , S .P. (Planned Residential, maximum 1 d.u. /ac. , Drainageway, Floodplain, Watercourse Overlay, Scenic Preservation Overlay) to PR-5, S.P. (Planned Residential, max. 5 d.u. /ac. , Scenic Preservation Overlay) ; PR-1, D. to PR-5; and PR-7, D. to PR-5 on approximately 101 . 5 acres; and related Development Plan providing for 805 dwelling units in a combination of single-family, duplex and townhouses on approximately 179. 5 acres of land, generally located on the east side of Highway 74, north and south of the existing flood control dike, extending south to the southern City limits. Staff Recommendation: Recommend approval to the City Council of Change of Zone Case No. C/Z 04-79, and related preliminary Development Plan DP 04-79, by adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. , subject to conditions. Act ion : On a motion by Corimissioner Berkey, seconded by C',onmissioner Kryder, approval of the cases wa,s recormlended to the City Council by adopting Planning C�miission Resolution No. 487, as amended.; carried 3-0-1 (AYES: Berkey, Kryder, Snyder; ABSTAIN: Fleshma.n). VII . OLD BUSINESS - None VIII . NEW BUSINESS A. Request for comments from Riverside County Planning Dept . regarding Change of Zone Case No. 2842, R-2-4000 to I-P. IX. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ITEMS Consideration of cases acted on by the Design fteview Board at their April 24, 1979 meeting. Staff Recommendation : Approve Design Review Board actions by adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. Act ion: On a motion by Comnissioner Fleshman, seconded by Comnissioner Kryder, the actions of the Design Review Boaxd at their meeting of April 24, 1973 were approved by Planning Corrmission Resolution No. 488; carried unanimously (4-0). Agenda � � Page Four Palm Desert Planning Commission May 3, 1979 X. ORAL COr.�n4UN ICAT I ONS Any persons wishing to discuss any items not on the agenda may address the Planning Commission by stepping to the lectern and giving their name and address for the record. Remarks shall be limited to a maximum of five minutes unless additional time is authorized by the Planning Commission. XI . COMMENTS A. City Staff B. City Attorney C. Planning Commissioners XII . ADJOURNMENT