The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutANNEXATIONS COOK STREET/JONI DRIVE NO 22 FILE 2 1988 �t City of Palm Desert STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Philip Drell, Associate Planner DATE: June 23, 1988 SUBJECT: Public Hearing and Final Resolution for Annexation #22. LAFOD No. 88-12-4 A: BAC[CGROUDD: Annexation #22 involves the Valley Industrial Park and Country Club Estates Residential area on the west side of Cook Street north of the Whitewater Channel. I On May 26 LAFOD approved the annexation and directed the city to proceed. . Since it is an inhabited annexation, there must be a hearing with opportunity for voter and property owner protests. If protests total less than 25% of the registered voters residing within the territory and less than 25% of the number of owners of land owning less than 25% of the assessed value, than the attached final resolution can be approved. If the land owner protests exceed 25% and the voter protest is less than 50% than an alternate resolution would have to be prepared ordering an election. If voter protests exceed 50% than a termination resolution world have to be prepared. There was no negative testimony given at the LAFOD hearing. LAFCO's Resolution No. 47-88 can be summarized as follows: 1. Preliminary proceedings were commenced by the resolution of the City of Palm Desert. 2. The annexation is proposed to provide more municipal services by the City of Palm Desert. 3. An environmental assessment was made on the proposal and a negative declaration filed thereon by the City of Palm Desert pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. The negative declaration has been reviewed and considered. 4. This annexation is consistent with the spheres of influence of the City of Palm Desert and all other affected local agencies. 5. The City of Palm Desert is designated conducting authority. " 1 r i CITY COUNCIL STAFF. REPCgT ANNMTICN NO. 22 JUKE 23, 1988 II. OMATION: Open than 25-W,puubblica hearing for determination of protests. If protests are less Resolution Protests exceed 25$ do RR 7� completing next meet t staff to Prepare fixation No. 22. If �9• appropriate resolution for Prepared by: �I Reviewed and by: /tn r 2 I 'ION DD. 88-70 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COJNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNEXING CERTAIN CONTIGUOUS TERRITORY TO SAID CITY UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE CORTESE/KNOX LOCAL GCVMW4E FT REORGANIZATION ACT OF 1985, WHICH PROCEEDINGS ARE DESIGNATED AS PALM DESERT ANNEXATION NO. 22 LAFUD NO. 88-12-4. WHEREAS, on November 12, 1987, the City Council did adopt Resolution No. 87-102 initiating annexation proceedings for Annexation No. 22; and WHEREAS, the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of Riverside adopted its Resolution No. 47-88 on May 26, 1988, making determinations and approving the proposed annexation to the City of Palm Desert of territory described in Exhibits A & B, attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, the reasons for the annexation are: 1. The proposed territory to be annexed is adjacent to and substantially surrounded by the City of Palm Desert, and, therefore, represents a logical expansion of the city's boundary. 2. The area is predominately urban in character and requires a higher level of urban services than are currently offered by the County of Riverside. The City of Palm Desert can provide these services which include higher levels of police, fire, paramedic and general code enforcement and participation in the local Palm Desert political process. WHEREAS, the regular county assessment roll is utilized by this city; and WHEREAS, the affected territory will not be taxed for existing general bonded indebtedness of this city; and WHEREAS, a public hearing on this annexation was called for and held by this council on June 23, 1988, and this council finds and determined that the value of written protests filed and not withdrawn is less than 25 percent of the registered voters residing within the territory proposed to be annexed and less than 25 percent of the number of owners of land owning less than 25 percent of the assessed value of land within the territory. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Palm Desert hereby orders the territory described in Exhibit A annexed, and directs the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert to transmit a certified copy of this resolution with applicable fees required by Section 54902.5 of the Government Code to the executive officer of the Local Agency Fbrmaticn Commission of Riverside County. r , RESOLUTION NO. 8 8-7 0 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED Desert on this day of by the City Council of the City of Palm 1988, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES. ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JEAN M. BENSON Mayor ATTEST: SHE ILA III GILLIGAN, City Clerk City of Palm Desert, California /tn 2 f 1 RESOLUTION NO. 88-70 ESELIBIT "A" CITY OF PALM DFSEW AMEXATION[ NO. 22 LAFCO NO. 88-12-4 That portion of the east half of Section 16, Township 5 South Range 6 east S.B.M. as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of Section 16, Township 5 Range 6 east; Thence south O° 03' 16" west 3026.02' along the east line of said Section 16, also being the centerline of Cook Street, to a point located along the northern easement line of, the Whitewater Storm Channel also being the Palm Desert City boundary. Thews continuing along the existing city limits of Palm Desert along the following courses and distances: Thence northwesterly R=14500 12° 52' 0" a distance of 2777.19' to a point on the centerline of said Section 16; Thence north .00° 14' 38" east a distance of 913.87' along said centerline of Section 16; Thence north 89° 49' 13" east a distance of 1328.29; Thence north 00° 06' 28" east a distance of 1326.36' to a point on the north line of said Section 16; Thence north 890 47' 20" east along said north line of Section 16 1327.05' to the northeast corner thereof also being the point of beginning. Area equals approximately 119 acres. THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTIO'1 APPROLO sY R ERSIDE CUUNT�URVEYO'i 8Y c 9 �0 a2ndAvE. EXHIBIT B KEY MAP m Not to scale - w uJ a ~ I cr (n J O H S o O V 16 FRED WARING DRIVE I615 f POINT OF BEGINNING N89°47'20"E 1327.03- \9 to — l6 1� N VELIE WAY O C O PALM DESERT COUNTY OF O CITY LIMIT ;, RIVERSIDE) M� PROPOSED W PALM DESERT m • �' JONI DRIVE o CITY LIMIT PALM DESERT CITY UMI• 8 z COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE �g/N890013"E 1328.29- MERLE li RIV au A a W N O F R N 0 y O M A V1 �p 8 GART ZI\1 J AVE LL J N + a u O O U U d 12 e, 12' 9NERYL AVE P4`41 '19.1gSOO a at, I EH) CITY d1 �777 /9, I AREA APPROXIMATELY tt• eo. THIS MAP APPROVED 3 — Z S— ,TcY BY RIVERSIDE COUNTY SURVEYOR BY A72 zgedm;z45 -yL LAFCO No. 80-t2-4 oarE PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 22 rDraWnbp TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT . SAN PEDR RAMON A. DIAZ IN SEC.'I6 T 5 SR 6E ALE 1 �L1FCO LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION • County of Riverside • (714) 787-2786 ROBERT T. ANDERSEN ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER • 4080 LEMON STREET 12TH FLOOR • RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501-3651 DATE: ., _. _ . Mau-27, 1988 Honorable Mayor & City Council L A F C 0 NO. : 88-12-4 City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive PROPONENT: City of Palm Desert Palm Desert, California 92260 Gentlemen: You are hereby notified that the proposal for Annexation 22 Pa Deswas approved by the 'Laoca gency`,Formation Commission of the ounty of Riverside at a public hearing on May 26. 1988 A copy of the legal description of this proposal as approved by the Local Agency Formation Commission, is attached to this notice; and 'it is the legal description which must be used in all further actions regarding this proposal . Any previous descriptions which do not conform to the attachment should be corrected or destroyed. Any special conditions, authorizations, or amendments are noted in the attached resolution, and must be complied with by your Council in its role as Conducting Authority. It is now the responsibility of your Council to complete proceedings in accordance with the laws governing this approved application (Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, Section 57000) . Upon completion of proceedings, it is requested that you furnish LAFCO with fifteen certified copies of your resolution and a check made payable to the State Board of Equalization in the amount of $ 480.00 You should keep in mind that unless proceedings are completed within twelve months from the date of .LAFCO's approval, the application will automatically be abandoned (Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, Section 57001) . If there are extenuating circumstances, please notify us in writing at least 30 days'prior to the end of this one-year period to secure an authorized extension of time. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact our office. 4erely, THORSON Executive Secretary cc: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors 1 Local Agency Formation Commission County of Riverside 2 3 RESOLUTION NO. 47-88 APPROVING THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY 4 TO CITY OF PALM DESERT LAFCO NO. 88-12-4 5 6 BE IT RESOLVED AND DETERMINED by the Local Agency Formation Commission 7 in regular session assembled on May 26, 1988, that the annexation of 8 approximately 119 acres generally located north of the Whitewater Channel , 9 south of 42nd Avenue, west of Cook Street and east of the City limits of Palm 10 Desert, as more particularly described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made 11 a part hereof, to the City of Palm Desert, is approved. 12 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND FOUND that: 13 1 . Preliminary proceedings were commenced by the resolution of the 14 City of Palm Desert. 15 2. The annexation is proposed to provide more municipal services by 16 the City of Palm Desert. 17 3. The distinctive short form designation of the proposed annexation 18 is LAFCO No. 88-12-4, Annexation No. 22 to City of Palm Desert. 19 4. An environmental assessment was made on the proposal and a 20 negative declaration filed thereon by the City of Palm Desert pursuant to the 21 California Environmental Quality Act. The negative declaration has been 22 reviewed and considered. 23 5. The boundaries of the territory as set forth in Exhibit "A", 24 attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, have been approved 25 by the County Surveyor, are contiguous to the City of Palm Desert, and are 26 approved. 27 6. The territory to be annexed is inhabited, there being 12 or more 28 registered voters residing therein. RIVERSIDE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION _ COMMISSION -1 A"O LKMON ATR2{T 12TN FLOOR RIVRRRIOR. CALIFORNIA 92D07-9651 J 1 7. This annexation is consistent with the spheres of influence of 2 the City of Palm Desert and all other affected local agencies. 3 S. The City of Palm Desert is designated conducting authority. 4 9. The Executive Officer is directed to transmit a certified copy of 5 this Resolution to the above-designated conducting authority, to the chief 6 petitioners, if different from the conducting authority, and to each affected 7 agency. 8 9 / 1 10 e^ 11 F R B D, R. Cpirman 12 13 I certify the above resolution was passed and adopted by the Local Agency Formation Commission of Riverside County on May 26, 1988. 14 15 / y, 6 t. / LNNt I M M.MOHR o 17 Executive Officer J18 00 .'119 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- J 1 RESOLUTICN NO. 87-102 E XWEIIT "A" MY OF PALM DESERT ANNEXRTICN NO. 22 LAF O ND. 88-12-4 That portion of the east half of Section 16, Township 5 South Range 6 east S.B.M. as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of Section 16, Township 5 Range 6 east; Thence south 0° 03' 16" west 3026.02' along the east line of said Section 16, also being the centerline of Ccok Street, to a point located along the northern easement line of the Whitewater Storm Channel also being the Palm Desert City boundary. Thence continuing along the existing city limits of Palm Desert along the following courses and distances: Thence northwesterly R=14500 L1 = 120 52' 0" a distance of 2777.19, to a point on the centerline of said Section 16; Thence north 00° 14' 38" east a distance of 913.87' along said centerline of Section 16; Thence north 89° 49' 13" east a distance of 1328.29j Thence north 00° 06' 28" east a distance of 1326.36' to a point on the north line of said Section 16; Thence north 89° 47' 20" east along said north line of Section 16 1327.05' to the northeast corner thereof also being the point of beginning. Area equals approximately 119 acres. THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTI0N1 APPR0:;0 BY R ERSIDE COUN}TY�JSU/RVE'(O:T BY i RE5Q11PION DD. 8 8-7 0 `✓ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNEXING CERTAIN QNTIGUOUS TERRITORY TO SAID CITY UNDER THE C PROVISIONS OF THE CORTESE/KNOX LOCAL GOVEpMENr REORGANIZATION ACT OF 1985, WHICH PROCEEDINGS ARE �2 DESIGNATED AS PALM DESERT ANNEXATION NO. 22 C2 LAFCO NO. 88-12-4. WHEREAS, on November 12, 1987, the City Council did adopt Resolution No. 87-102 initiating annexation proceedings for Annexation No. 22; and WHEREAS, the Local AGency Formation COTMissien of the Ck�nity of Riverside adopted its Resolution No. 47-88 on May 26, 1988, r I. approving the proposed annelcation to the Ci making determinations and described in Exhibits A & B, attached hereto and of is Desert of territory herein; and by this reference incorporated. WHEREAS, the reasons for the annexation are: 1. The Proposed territory to be annexed is adjacent to and substantially surrounded by the City of Palm Desert, and, therefore, represents a logical expansion of the city s boundary. 2. The area is pTedominately urban in character and requires a higher level of urban services than are currently offered by the Countyof Riverinclus higher The City of Palm Desert can provide these services which. levels of police, fire, paramedic and general code enforcement and participation in the local Palm Desert political process- WHEREAS, the regular county assessment roll is utilized by this city; and WHEREAS, the affected territory will not be taxed for existing general bonded indebtedness of this city; and ut k �.AS, a j t +mac an t'+-'s ar'.s�- %rrs called for and VOW-ICUfir and � ms a#k r• the Tcsswttm= - TM • Y » f J \ ,.y�'Pi ys Ski- ' • t tY> — s RESOLUTION 81-133 t A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE r AMOUNT OF PROPERTY TAX REVENUE TO BE EXCHANGED BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AND THE CITY ^t OF PALM DESERT RELATING TO ANNEXATIONS TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CLAIFORNIA. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert in regular session assembled on this 24th day of Sept- 1 981, that: 1. The County of Riverside and the City of Palm Desert are the agencies whose area or responsibility for service would be affected by annexations to the City of Palm Desert. 2. Representatives of each of the affected agencies have met and negotiated an exchange of property tax revenue as follows, to become effective for tax purposes beginning July 1, 1981, for all areas annexed to the City until such time as this resolution is rescinded or superceded. A. The City of Palm Desert shall assume responsibility for all general municipal services to areas annexed as are required by law or presently provided throughout the City, and for such service, the City shall receive 25% of that portion of the property tax revenue generated within territories annexed under the ad valorem tax rate established by Article XIII A of the Constitution of the State of California, that represents the County of Riverside's share of such property tax revenue. B. The County Auditor shall upon annexation by the City convert the above-established percentage figure into actual dollar figures and thereafter allocate to the City such property tax revenue in accord with the provisions of Section 95 et, seq. of the Revenue and Taxation Code. 3. The City Council of the City of Palm Desert does hereby agree to the above-recited exchange of property tax revenue. 4. The Clerk shall transmit a certified copy .of this resolution to each affected agency and to the Executive Office of the Local Agency Formation Commission and to the Auditor of the County of Riverside pursuant to Section 99 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert City Council, held on this 24th day of September, 1981, by the following vote, to wit: 4 AYES: McPherson, Newbrander, Puluqi, Snyder & Wilson NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None �R Y N, Mayor ATTEST: H ILA R. GI AN,city c City of Palm Desert, Ca ornia � 1 REsc[Lr ICN No. 88-70 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OOUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNEXING CERTAIN CONTIGUOUS TERRITORY TO SAID CITY UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE CORTESE/1=X LOCAL GOVERNMENT REORGANIZATION ACT OF 1985, WHICH PROCEEDINGS ARE DESIGNATED AS PALM DESERT ANNEXATION NO. 22 LAFOD NO. 88-12-4. WHEREAS, on November 12, 1987, the City Council did adopt Resolution No. 87-102 initiating annexation proceedings for Annexation No. 22; and WHEREAS, the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of Riverside adopted its Resolution No. 47-88 on May 26, 1988, making determinations and approving the proposed annexation to the City of Palm Desert of territory described in Exhibits A & B, attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, the reasons for the annexation are: 1. The proposed territory to be annexed is adjacent to and substantially surrounded by the City of Palm Desert, and, therefore, represents a logical expansion of the city's boundary. 2. The area is predominately urban in character and requires a higher level of urban services than are currently offered by the County of Riverside. The City of Palm Desert can provide these services which l include higher levels of police, fire, paramedic and general code enforcement and participation in the local Palm Desert political process. WHEREAS, the regular county assessment roll is utilized by this city; and WHEREAS, the affected territory will not be taxed for existing general bonded indebtedness of this city; and WHEREAS, a public hearing on this annexation was called for and held by this council on June 23, 1988, and this council finds and determined that the value of written protests filed and not withdrawn is less than 25 percent of the registered voters residing within the territory proposed to be annexed and less than 25 percent of the number of owners of land owning less than 25 percent of the assessed value of land within the territory. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Palm Desert hereby orders the territory described in Exhibit A annexed, and directs the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert to transmit a certified copy of this resolution with applicable fees required by Section 54902.5 of the Government Code to the executive officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Riverside County. RESOLUTICN No. 8 8-7 0 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED by the CitY Council of the City of Palm Desert on this 14th day of July , 1988, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: CRITES, KELLY, SNY➢ER, WILSON, SENSON NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE �l/ M BENSCN, Mayor ATTEST: USHEILA . GI GAN, City City of Palm Desert, Ca]tf ornia /tn 2 RESOLUTION NO. 88-70 �. EXHIBIT "A" CITY OF PALM DESERT ANNEXATION NO. 22 LAF00 NO. 88-12-4 That portion of the east half of Section 16, Township 5 South Rangy 6 east S.B.M. as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of Section 16, Township 5 Range 6 east; Thence south O' 03' 16" west 3026.02' along the east line of said Section 16, also being the centerline of Cook Street, to a point located along the northern easement line of the Whitewater Storm Channel also being the Palm Desert City boundary. Thence ocntinuing along the existing city limits of Palm Desert along the following courses and distances: Thence northwesterly R=14500 12' 52' 0" a distance of 2777.19' to a point on the centerline of said Section 16; Thence north .00° 14' 38" east a distance of 913.87' along said centerline of Section 16; Thence north 89° 49' 13" east a distance of 1328.29; Thence north 00° 06' 28" east a distance of 1326.36' ,to a point on the north line of said Section 16; Thence north 89' 47' 20" east along said north line of Section 16 1327.05' to the northeast corner thereof also being the point of beginning. Area equals approximately 119 acres. THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTIO'1 APPR0;:0 BY R ERSIDE CUUHTY SURVEIv f0:t BY �1h ! i i 9 I S 10 EXHIBIT B IE i I KEY MAP 42nd,\ Not to scale - W , 4 ° W Q Q: I� v1 Zk H O Y a o ' o V Id FRED WARI G DRIVE 1617 1 POINT OF BEGINNING � N09047'20"E 1327.03' \ 6 I@ a VELIE WAY O O O PALM DESERT COUNTY OF O CITY LIMIT „ RIVERSIDE) n' PROPOSED WI PALM DESERT m JONI DRIVE PALM DESERT CITY LIMIT $ CITY LIMIT s COUNTY OFRIVERSIDE g-,N69°4917"E I32 B.29' z¢ M RL DRIVE o Q W N eJ ^ W O `FJ Q N N � :e O n o 8 GARY _ AVE e LL a 0 J O d l2e � u u SNERYL AVE PALM'J2' R'I4�00, o DESERT Carr d/71. 27� 1 a 1+6 9 AREA APPROXIMATELY 119 ec- THIS MAP APPROVED 9 2 S- TY BY RIVERSIDE COUNTYS.�UURVEYOR BY AL- e�tdm LAFCO No. 88-12- DATE PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 22 Drawneyl TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT N. SAN PEDRO RAMON A. DIAZ IN SEC.'16 T 5 S R 6 E SCALE comm.00Y JPlennl ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION PALM OESFRT_ 1" a 600' CITY OF PALM DESERT STAFF REPORT TO: City Council FROM: Philip Drell, Associate Planner DATE: July 14, 1988 SUBJECT: Value of written and oral protests against Annexation t22 I. BACKGROUND: Section 57051, attached, provides explicit standards for the evaluation or protests. Protest signatures must be dated on or after the publication date of the notice of hearing (June 8) . All signatures without a date or bearing a date prior to the date of publication must be disregarded. Written protests can only be accepted up to the commencement of the hearing. Once the hearing has been closed, no new protests are possible. A 25% protest by owners or voters would trigger an election. II. ANALYSIS: A. PROPERTY OWNER PETITIONS Fourty eight (48) property owner protests were submitted of which eight (8) were dated after the June 8th publication date. One of those eight, Hugh Hoard (74-992 Joni Drive) withdrew his protest at the hearing leaving seven (7) valid protests. There are 209 individual property owners in the area. The seven (7) property owners account for $1,849,623 in assessed valuation. Total assessed valuation in the area is $30,555,455. Conclusion: Valid property owner protest numbers equal 3.3% of owners and 6% of total valuation. B. REGISTERED VOTER PETITIONS Twenty three (23) voter protest signatures were submitted of which twelve (12) were dated after June 8th. Eleven (11) signatures were undated. There are 191 registered voters in the area. Conclusion: Registered voter protests total 6.2%. it III. RECOMMENDATION: Upon finding that the value of written protests filed and not withdrawn is less than 25% of the registered voters residing within the territory proposed to be annexed and less than 25% of the number of owners of land owning less than 25% of the assessed valuation; adopt Resolution No. 88-70 annexing the territory Palm Desert Annexation #22, LAFCO #88-12-4. Prepared by— Reviewed and Approved by attachment: Draft Resolution /dlg 1 .Local Agency Formation Commission County of Riverside 2 3 RESOLUTION NO. 47-88 APPROVING THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY 4 TO CITY OF PALM DESERT LAFCO NO. 88-12-4 5 6 BE IT RESOLVED AND DETERMINED by the Local Agency Formation Commission 7 in regular session assembled on May 26, 1988, that the annexation of 8 approximately 119 acres generally located north of the Whitewater Channel, 9 south of 42nd Avenue, west of Cook Street and east of the City limits of Palm 10 Desert, as more particularly described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made 11 a part hereof, to the City of Palm Desert, is approved. 12 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND FOUND that: 13 1 . Preliminary proceedings were commenced by the resolution of the 14 City of Palm Desert. 15 2. The annexation is proposed to provide more municipal services by 16 the City of Palm Desert. 17 3. The distinctive. short form designation of the proposed annexation 18 is LAFCO No. 88-12-4, Annexation No. 22 to City of Palm Desert. 19 4. An environmental assessment was made on the proposal and a 20 negative declaration filed thereon by the City of Palm Desert pursuant to the 21 California Environmental Quality Act. The negative declaration has been 22 reviewed and considered. 23 5. The boundaries of the territory as set forth in Exhibit "A", 24 attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, have been approved 25 by the County Surveyor, are contiguous to the City of Palm Desert, and are 26 approved. 27 6. The territory to be annexed is inhabited, there being 12 or more 28 registered voters residing therein. RIVERSIDE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION -I- COMMISSION 4080 LEMON 1ITRLR I ATM MOOR RIVERSIDE. CALIRORMIA 226O1-3681 (714) 787.2706 1 1 7. This annexation is consistent with the spheres of influence of 2 the City of Palm Desert and all other affected local agencies. 3 8. The City of Palm Desert is designated conducting authority. 4 9. The Executive Officer is directed to transmit a certified copy of 5 this Resolution to the above-designated conducting authority, to the chief 6 petitioners, if different from the conducting authority, and to each affected 7 agency. 8 9 10 ^✓ ' �� I 11 g D, irman 12 13 I certify the above resolution was passed and adopted by the Local Agency Formation Commission of Riverside County on May 26, 1988. 14 15 6 KENNETH M. MOHR o 7 Executive Officer oz c►r J18 00 LL -119 L m' 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- City of Palm Desert STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FRCM: Philip Drell, Associate Planner DATE: June 23, 1988 SUBJECT: Public Hearing and Final Resolution for Annexation #22. LAFCO No. 88-12-4 A: BACKGRCAA ID: Annexation #22 involves the Valley Industrial Park and Country Club Estates Residential area on the west side of Cook Street north of the k1hitewater Channel. On May 20 LAFCO approved the annexation and directed the city to proceed. Since it is an inhabited annexation, there must be a hearing with opportunity for voter and property owner protests. If protests total less than 25$ of the registered voters residing within the territory and less than 25% of the number of owners of land owning less than 25% of the assessed value, than the attached final resolution can be approved. If the land owner protests exceed 25% and the voter protest is less than 50%- than an alternate resolution would have to be prepared ordering an election. If voter protests exceed 50% than a termination resolution would have to be prepared. There was no negative testimony given at the LAFCO hearing. LAFCO's Resolution No. 47-88 can be summarized as follows: 1. Preliminary proceedings were wed by the resolution of the City of Palm Desert. 2. The annexation is proposed to provide more municipal services by the City of Palm Desert. 3. An environmental assessment was made on the proposal and a negative declaration filed thereon by the City of Palm Desert pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. The negative declaration has been reviewed and considered. 4. This annexation is consistent with the spheres of influence of the City of Palm Desert and all other affected local agencies. 5. The City of Palm Desert is designated conducting authority. CITY CJNCIL STAFF RE.---`T ANNEXATION NO. 22 JUNE 23, 1988 II. RECU4IE4DATION: Open public hearing for determination of protests. I£ than 25�, adopt Resolution No. protests are less Protests exceed 25$ direct staff to completing Annexation No. 22. If next meeting. prepare appropriate resolution for Prepared by: Reviewed and Approved by: /tm 2 RESOIAMON NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNEXING CERTAIN CONTIGUOUS TERRITORY TO SAID CITY UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE OORTESE/KNOX LOCAL GOVERNMENT REDUZGANIZATION ACT OF 1985, WHICH PROCEEDINGS ARE DESIGNATED AS PALM DESERT ANNEXATION NO. 22 LAFOO NO. 88-12-4. WHEREAS, on November 12, 1987, the City Council did adopt Resolution No. 87-102 initiating annexation Proceedings for Annexation No. 22; and WHEREAS, the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of Riverside adopted its Resolution No. 47-88 on May 26, 1988, making determinations and approving the propcsefl annexation to the City of Palm Desert of territory described in Exhibits A & B, attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, the reasons for the annexation are: I. The Proposed territory to be annexed is adjacent to and substantially surrounded by the City of Palm Desert, and, therefore, represents a logical expansion of the city's boundary. 2. The area is predominately urban in character and requires a higher level of urban services than are currently offered by the County of Riverside. The City of Palm Desert can provide these services which include higher levels of police, fire, paramedic and general code enforcement and participation in the local Palm Desert political process. WHEREAS, the regular county assessment roll is utilized by this city; and WHEREAS, the affected territory will not be taxed for existing general bonded indebtedness of this city; and WHEREAS, a public hearing on this annexation was called for and held by this council on June 23, 1988, and this council finds and determined that the value of written Protests filed and not withdrawn is less than 25 percent of the registered voters residing within the territory Proposed to be annexed and less than 25 percent of the number of owners of land owning less than 25 Percent Of the assessed value of land within the territory. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Palm Desert hereby Orders the territory described in Exhibit A annexed, and directs the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert to transmit a certified copy of this resolution with applicable fees required by Section 54902.5 of the Government Code to the executive officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Riverside County. RESOLUTICN NO. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert on this day of 1988, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JEAN M. BENSON, Mayor ATTEST: SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, City Clerk City of Palm Desert, California Am 2 RFSOUMION NO. 87-102 F�IT "A" MY OF PALM DESM ANNEXRTION NO. 22 LAFCO NO. 88-12-4 That portion of the east half of Section 16, Township 5 South Range 6 east S.B.M. as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of Section 16, Township 5 Range 6 east; Thence south O° 03' 16" west 3026.02' along the east line of said Section 16, also being the centerline of Cook Street, to a point located along the northern easement line of the Whitewater Storm Channel also being the Palm Desert City boundary. Thence continuing along the existing city limits of Palm Desert along the following courses and distances: Thence northwesterly R=14500 L1 = 12° 52' 0" a distance of 2777.19' to a point on the centerline of said Section 16; Thence north 00' 14' 38" east a distance of 913.87' along said centerline of Section 16; Theme north 89° 49' 13" east a distance of 1328.29; Thence north 00° 06' 28" east a distance of 1326.36' to a point on the north line of said Section 16; Thence north 89° 47' 20" east along said north line of Section 16 1327.05' to the northeast corner thereof also being the point of beginning. Area equals approximately 119 acres. THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION APP110:'=0 BY R ERSIDE CUUHTY SURVEYO,� BY 9I10 42, ✓E. EXHIBIT B KEY MAP I s Not:to scale - h W �y W ] 0: Q F- N m Q \ J • O H p� Y a O O U e FRED WARI G DRIVE 16 Is I POINT OF BEGINNING � N89047'20"E 1327.05- \ �- 4e.. � 9, 10 6 I@ N O vELIE WAY � O O PALM DESERT COUNTY OF RIVERSIDES CITY LIMIT NI PROPOSED w PALM DESERT C aoNl DRIVE PALM DESERT CITY LIMI' CITY LIMIT COUNTY OFRIVERSIDE + p�-14e900V13"E 1328_29 MERLE RIV A Q W ry lFl Q N A W R za ; a � A ap 8 OARY 7 4ve a LL J � u u O d 12 e_B2, SNERYL Ave. N PQcnr'0 9"�oSOo' a �t^ fSERT C1T 91 y, dl�/• ` T' �7 AREA APPROXIMATELY 119 aa. THIS MAP APPROVED - 3- ZS- Jvf BY RIVERSIDE COUNTY SURVEYOR BY�'�r ��— LAFCO No. 8e- 12-4 oarE PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. QQ Drarnby, TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT N. SAN PEOF RAMON A. DIAZ IN SEC.'16 T 5 SIR 6 E SCALE comm.0a1/ /P1ann1 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION PALM DESERT I�� ` e00' ti the petition has been found to be insufficient. Assessed value;,,how 56710. For purposes of evaluating the "determined for.public, sufficiency of any petition signed by owners agency,;:joint tenancy of land: ` legal representative, (a) The assessed value to be given land j. nerspuzchaser Y exempt from taxation or owned by a public: ` agency shall be determined by the county assessor, at the request of the executive officer, in the same amount as the county assessor would assess that land, if the land were not exempt from taxation or owned by a public agency. (b) The value given land held in joint 3 tenancy or tenancy in common shall be determined in proportion to the proportionate interest of the petitioner in that land. (c) The executive officer shall disregard .Y the signature of any person not shown as owner on the last equalized assessment roll unless ¢prior;4.to.;certi-ficitionMthe executive officer is furnished with written evidence, satisfactory to the executive officer, that the signer meets any of the following requirements: (1) Is a legal representative of the owner. (2) is entitled to be shown as owner of land on the next assessment roll. (3) Is a purchaser of land under a recorded written agreement of sale. (4) Is authorized to sign for, and on behalf of, any public agency owning land. Public agency deemed 56711. Any public or federal agency landowner for signing owning land within the territory which is and certification of the subject of the proposed change of petition organization or reorganization shall be deemed a landowner for the purpose of the signing and certification of a petition for the change of organization or reorganization. That agency may authorize the petition to be signed for the agency, and on behalf of the agency, by any duly authorized 'officer or employee. CHAPTER 3. SIGNATURE REQUIREMENTS FOR ' PETITIONS III Incorporation 56750. A petition for the incorporation of a city shall be signed by either of the following: (a) Not less than 25 percent of the f registered voters residing in the area to be F{ incorporated, as determined by the commission pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 56375. dI - 73 - PART 4. CONDUCTING AUTHORITY PROCEEDINGS FOR CHANGES OF ORGANIZATION f OR REORGANIZATION CHAPTER 1. GENERAL Change of organization 57000. (a) After completion of proceedings or reorganization by the commission pursuant to Part 3 proceedings to follow (commencing with Section 56650) , proceedings _ r this part for a change of organization or reorganization ! ' shall be taken pursuant to this part. 1 Conducting authority (b) If a;,proposal is approved by the proceedings to comply commission, with or without amendment, wholly, ?. with commission resolution partially, or conditionally, the conducting. , . approval authority shall conduct proceedings in accordance with this part. The proceedings shall be conducted and completed pursuant to those provisions which are applicable to the proposal and the territory contained in the proposal as it is approved by the commission. If the commission approves the proposal with modifications or conditions, proceedings shall be conducted and completed in compliance with • those modifications or conditions. Proceedings abandoned 57001. If the conducting authority does not if not completed complete a proceeding within one year after within one year the commission approves a proposal 'for that proceeding, the proceeding shall be deemed abandoned unless prior to the expiration of that year the commission authorizes an extension of time for that completion.,. The. inability of the conducting authority to complete a proceeding because of the order or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, temporarily enjoining or restraining the proceedings shall not be deemed a failure of completion and the one-year period shall be tolled for the time that order or decree is in effect. Conducting authority 57002. (a) Within 35 days following the clerk to set for public adoption of the commission's resolution making hearing within 35 days determinations, the clerk of the conducting ff authority shall set the proposal for hearing and give notice of that hearing by mailing, ° publication, and posting, as provided in . Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 56150) of Part 1. The date of that hearing hearing i. Anthorityto2appYovethout shall not be less than 15 or more than 60 �notYce;hearing or election days, after the notice is given. (b) If authorized by the commission pursuant to Section 56837, a change of organization or reorganization may be approved by resolution - 97 - L . L, of the conducting authority without notice, hearing, and election. o�conflicting pioposal 57003. Once notice is given by the clerk of maylbeUiled the conducting authority pursuant to this Z. chapter, jurisdiction over the proceedings is acquired by the legislative body of the ti;•ni a ..': conducting authority, and until those proceedings are completed or terminated < • . + pursuant to this part, no conflicting petition a• ,1 . . . �� or resolution of application seeking the change of organization or reorganization of =J all or part of the territory described by the notice given by the clerk shall be filed with, r �i ' r`.t •. , � ' or acted on, by the commission. f Processing fees; 57004. The conducting authority may -conducting authority establish a schedule of processing fees for the estimated expenses of complying with procedures required or authorized by this part or local ordinance. The fees shall not exceed the amount reasonably required by the conducting authority to comply with those - " procedures. Notification of the fee schedule ` shall be given to the chief petitioners. The ' ., processing fee shall be deposited with the ryvr ✓ �.-• conducting authority. The deposit of the processing fee shall be made within the period jF +,,; .. .. - .;- •. specified by the conducting authority. No further action shall be taken until the 'processing fee is deposited. Failure. to conduct 57005. After the expiration of 60 days from Proceedings; commission the date of adoption of the commission's -,.,certification ' resolution making determinations, the Y -'`tc: i•';t:.t' -+c+ commission may by resolution certify either of the following to the board of supervisors of n the principal county in which the affected {) territory is located: f ; (a) That the executive officer was unable to effect mailing or delivery of a certified copy tM1 of the commission's resolution making determinations to any conducting authority for �" ;,;• i" either of the following reasons: u' > (1) The conducting authority did not make 31 1r.+ the filing required by Section 53051. (2) The return, undelivered, of that certified copy after having been mailed to the "I clerk of a conducting authority at the address specified in the filing required by Section l 53051. (b) That the conducting authority has not initiated, conducted, or completed proceedings for the change of organization or i reorganization in compliance with the commission's resolution making determinations or has not complied with any terms or conditions of that resolution. � Authority to assume 57006. At any time after the adoption of a jurisdiction by board resolution of certification pursuant to of supervisors Section 57005, the board of supervisors and the clerk and the officers of the county shall assume jurisdiction to conduct and complete any proceedings for the change of organization or reorganization and to enforce compliance 6p with any terms or conditions referred to in that resolution. Upon the assumption of that jurisdiction, the board of supervisors and the clerk and other officers of the county shall have exclusive jurisdiction with respect to those proceedings and shall exercise all powers and duties vested in the conducting authority and the clerk or other officers of the conducting authority for the purpose of completing those proceedings. Any jurisdiction assumed and exercised by the board of supervisors and the clerk or other officers of the county pursuant to this II section shall be given the same force and l ' effect as if taken by the conducting authority and the clerk or officers of the conducting authority. District formation 57007. Except when a district formation is proceedings follow part of a reorganization, formation I ` district principal act proceedings shall be conducted as set forth in k the principal act of the district to be formed, and this part shall not apply, except ' e for the provisions relating to the completion and effective date of a change of organization or reorganization contained in Chapter 8 ! ` (commencing with Section 57200) . When the district formation is part of a reorganization, all of the proceedings shall be conducted pursuant to this part. i i CHAPTER 2. NOTICE OF REARING Public, riofice=required 57025. Upon receipt of a copy of the for conducting . � commission's resolution making determinations, 'authority=proceedings"; the clerk of the conducting authority shall publication, postiri41 1 give notice of the hearingto be held on the Il tt mailingj mailed„notice= proposal by publication pursuant to Sections G iequirements,r•• 56153 and 56154 and by posting pursuant to Sections 56158 and 56159. The clerk shall !` also give mailed notice to each affected city, affected district, or affected county, the 99 1: '. commission, the chief petitioners, if any, all landowners owning land within any territory proposed to be formed into, or to be annexed to, or detached from, an improvement district within any city or district, and to persons requesting special notice, in accordance with the provisions of Sections 56155 to 56157, inclusive. ntent Voof not# 57026. The mailed notice required to be ffigiven by Section 57025 shall contain all of the following information: (a) A statement of the distinctive short form designation assigned by the commission to the proposal. (b) A statement of the manner in which, and by whom, proceedings were initiated. However, a reference to the chief petitioners, if any, shall be sufficient where proceedings were initiated by a petition. (c) A description of the exterior boundaries of the subject territory. (d) A description of the particular change or changes of organization proposed for each of the subject districts or cities and new districts or new cities proposed to be formed, and any terms and conditions to be applicable. The description may include a reference to the commission's resolution making determinations for a full and complete description of the change of organization or reorganization, and the terms and conditions. (e) A statement of the reason or reasons for I ' the change of organization or reorganization as set forth in the proposal submitted to the commission. (f) (1) Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (2) , a statement of the time, date, k'. and place of the hearing on the proposed change of organization or reorganization. (2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1) , if inhabited territory is proposed to be annexed to a city with more than 100,000 residents which is located in a county with a population of over 4,000,000 the date shall be at least 90 but not more than 105 days after the date of adoption of the resolution initiating the proceedings. The resolution shall specify a date 90 days prior to the hearing when registered voters may begin to file protests. Written protest; notification (g) If the subject territory is inhabited and the change of organization or `• reorganization provides for the submission of written protests, a statement that any owner dil - 100 - Z Alt a of land within the territory, or any 2. registered voter residing within the territory, may file a written protest against IP the proposal with the clerk of the conducting " N, authority at any time prior to the time f. specified for commencement of the hearing by µ :. the conducting authority on the proposal. (h) If the subject territory is uninhabited and the change of organization or reorganization provides for submission of written protests, a statement that any owner of land within the territory may file a written protest against the proposal with the . clerk of the conducting authority at any timeII Prior to the tim e specified for commencement of the hearing by the conducting authority on t � the proposal. ! i CHAPTER 3. CONDUCT OF HEARING Hearing date and time; 57050. (a) The hearing on the proposal continuance up to 60 days shall be held by the conducting authority on the date and at the time specified in the notice given by the clerk. The hearing may be continued from time to time but not to exceed 60 days from the date specified for the hearing in the notice. HearinV,is,�t—'—sider (b) At the hearing, prior to consideration commission, iesoliition,� of protests, the commission's resolution l,,,protests; evidence making determinations shall be summarized. At that hearing, the conducting authority shall hear and receive any oral or written . Withdrawal of protest protests, objections, or evidence which is made, presented, or filed. Any person who has t filed a written protest may withdraw that protest at any time prior to the conclusion of the hearing. written protest submitted; 57051. At any time prior to the time time specified for commencement of the hearing in i the notice given by the clerk, but not thereafter, any owner of land or any registered voter within inhabited territory proposed to be. annexed or detached, or any owner of land within uninhabited territory proposed to be annexed or f Written protest; contents detached, may file a written protest against and who may file the annexation or detachment. Each written protest shall state whether it is made by a landowner or registered voter and the name and address of the owner of the land affected and the street address or other description sufficient to identify the location of the land or the name and address of the �I AUU 25 1988 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION / COMMUNITY DEVLLUPMENT DEPARTMENT I" !'I CITY OF PALM DESERT iK C7 OPursuant to the Cortese/Knox Local Government Reorganizatio t of 1� i ns 57201 , 57202, and 57205, this Certificate is hereby issued he Execu Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Riversi ounty, Califo nia. 1. Short-form designation, as designated by LAFCO is 88-12-4. 2. The names of each city involved in this change of organization or reorgani- tion and the kind or type of change of organization ordered for each city are as follows: City Type of Change of Organization City of Palm Desert Annexation No. 22 3. The above-listed city(ies) are located within the following county(ies) : County of Riverside 4. A description of the boundaries of the above-cited change of organization or reorganization are shown on the attached map and legal description, marked Exhibit "A" and by reference incorporated herein. 5. This change of organization or reorganization has been approved subject to the following terms and conditions, if any: None. 6. The date of adoption of the Resolution ordering this change of organization or reorganization (with or without election) was July 14, 1988. A certified copy of Resolution No. 88-70 is attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein. I hereby certify that as Executive Officer for the Local Agency Formation Com- mission of Riverside County, the above-listed agency has completed a change of organization or reorganization pursuant to the Cortese/Knox Local Government Act of 1985. Dated: August 10, 1988 By: KENN17TH M. MOHR Executive Officer s 42nd AVE. n 3 KEY MAP Not to scalevq m W s W • Q N O H O Y 0 0 U 1a FRED WART G DRIVE IG 13 I POINT OF BEGINNING N89°4T'20"E 1327.05' \ 10 6 1 III N VELIE WAY 0 O O PALM DESERT a COUNTY OF CITY LIMIT RIVERSIDE) m PROPOSED W PALM DESERT aonl DRIVE PALM DESERT CITY LIMIT 8 CITY LIMIT COUNTY OFRIVERSIDE qII N89149 13 E 1328.29' - _-- ER IE IV ti F � Q O 0 Y= F N A A >a Qa Loo s o y 8 GARY 7 AVE u J 1J Z LL O U O U O b 12°_32, SNERYL AVE. d Poly` R'14300, o N 0£SfR7. C/ dial. 27?y !t /9 AREA APPROXIMATELY 1111 ac. THIS MAP PPROVED 3 �,S— V BY RIVERSIDE COUNTY SURVEYOR BY LAFCO No. se-12-4 DATE PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 22 Drawn by, TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT N. SAN PEDRO RAMON A. DIAZ IN SEC. 16 T 5 SIR 6 E SCALE I Comm.00Y /Planning ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION PALM DESERT I" = 600' MlT��fw "All CM OF PAIL$ DFSa.PRT T ANNEXATION NO. 22 1,AEM M. 88-12-4 That portion of the east half of Section 16, Township 5 South Range 6 east S.B.M. as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of Section 16, Township 5 Range 6 east; Thence south 0° 03' 16" west 3026.02' alcag the east line of said Section 16, also being the centerline of Cook Street, to a point located alag the northern easement line of the Whitewater Storm Channel also being the Palm Desert City boundary. Thence continuing along the existing city limits of Palm Desert alag Ift following courses and distances: Thence northwesterly R=14500 12° 52' 0" a distance of 2777.19' to a point on the centerline of said Section 16; Thence north 00° 14' 38" east a distance of 913.87' along said centerline of Section 16; Thence north 890 49' 13" east a distance of 1328.29, Thence north 00° 06' 28" east a distance of 1326.36' to a point on the north line of said Section 16; Thence north 89. 47' 20" east along said north line of Section 16 1327.05' to the northeast corner thereof also being the point of beginning. Area equals approximately 119 acres. TNIS LEGAL DESCRIPTI AIFROJ:D BY R RSIDE COUf1UR BY 1 of Sections 95 et seq., of the Revenue and Taxation Code. O 2 3. The City Council of the City of Palm Desert and the 3 Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside do hereby agree to 4 the above-recited exchange of property tax revenue. 5 - 4. The Clerk of this Board shall transmit a certified 6 copy of this Resolution to each affected agency and to the Executiv 7 Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission and to the County 8 Auditor pursuant to Section 99 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. 9 10 11 Roll Call resulted as follows: Ayes: Abraham, Younglove and McCandless 12 Noes: None 13 Absent: Schroeder and Ceniceros 14 151 16 17 18. . 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 PC:jf 27 10/8/8128 JAMES H.ANGELL COUNTYCOUNSEL -- - -- .� LAW UMUAV OLOO. NIYWOOF-CAUFORNIA -2- (c , J 1 Board of Supervisors County of Riverside 2 t"1:D 3 RESOLUTION NO. 81-362 O DETERMINING THE AMOUNT OF PROPERTY TAX REVENUE TO BE EXCHANGED 7` 4 BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AND THE CITY OF :2 PALM DESERT RELATING TO ANNEXATIONS TO 5 THE CITY OF PALM DESERT 6 BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervises of the County 7lof Riverside, State of California, in regular session assembled on 8 October 13, 1981, that: 9 1. The County of Riverside and the City of Palm Desert 10 are the agencies whose area or responsibility for service would be n affected by annexations to the City of Palm Desert. 12 2. Representatives of each of the affected agencies have 13 met and negotiated an exchange of property tax revenue to become 14 effective for tax purposes beginning July 1, 1981, for all areas . 151annexed to the City until such time as this Resolution is rescinded 16 or superseded, as follows: 17 a. The City of Palm Desert shall assume the responsi 18. bility for all general municipal services to areas annexe 19 as are required by law or presently provided throughout 20 the City, and for such service shall receive 25% of that 21 portion of the property tax revenue generated within 22 territories annexed under the ad valorem tax rate estab- 23 lished by Article XIII A of the Constitution of the State 24 of California, that represents the County of Riverside' s 25 share of such property tax revenue. 26 b. The County Auditor shall upon annexation by the 27 City convert the above-established percentage figure into 28 actual dollar figures and thereafter allocate to the City DAMES N.ANGELL EL u'�e ma:DGG. such property tax revenue in accord with the provision RWEMDE.CAUFOIWU -1- G� 5 > ESOL[7rIC" AD. 88-70 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNEXING CERTAIN ry CONTIGUOUS TERRITORY TO SAID CITY UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE CORTESE/n= LOCAL GOVERNMENT NT Q REIMCANIZATION ACT OF 1985, RICH PROCEEDINGS ARE .� DESIGNATED AS PALM DESERT ANNEXATION NO. 22 :2 LAF'OD NO. 88-12-4. WHEREAS, on November 12, 1987, the City Council did adopt Resolution No. 87-102 initiating annexation proceedings for Annexation No, 22; and WHEREAS, the Local AGency Formation Cartnissien of the County of Riverside adopted its Resolution No. 47-88 on May 26, 1988, approving the Proposed annexation to the Citymaking determinations and described in Exhibits A & B, attached hereto and of Palm Desert of territory. herein; and by this reference incorporated WHEREAS, the reasons for the annexation axe: 1. The proposed territory to be annexed is adjacent to and substantially surrounded by the City of Palm Desert, and, therefore, represents a logical expansion of the city's boundary. 2. The area is predominately urban in character and requires a higher level of urban services than are currently offered by the Cbu my of Riverside. The City of Palm Desert can provide these services which include higher levels of police, fire, paramedic and general oode enforcement and participation in the local Palm Desert political process. WHEREAS, the regular county assessment roll is utilized by this city; and WHEREAS, the affected territory will not be taxed for existing general banded indebtedness of this city; and WHEREAS, a public hearing on this annexation was called for and held by this council on Jame 23, 1988, and this council finds and determined that the value of written protests filed and not withdrawn is less than 25 percent of the registered esters residing within the territory proposed to be annexed and ler— percent of the number of owners of land owning less than 25 Parcent of the assessed value of land within the territory. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the 'Ci tY Council of the City of Palm Desert hereby orders the territory described in Exhibit A annexed, and directs the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert to transmit a certified copy of this resolution with applicable fees required by Section 54902.5 of the Government Code to the executive officer of the Local Agency Formation Camuission of Riverside County. cACH DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS CERTffICATEIS ATTACHED, IS CERTIFIED TOBEA FULL,TRUEANG CORRECT( OPY,' :7,HEORIG'NALON FILE AND ON RECORD IN M F c Dated: SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, City Clerti City of Palm Desert,Califorrra RES(Sd1PICN ND. 88-70 , PASSED, APYFW and ADQP�ED by the City CbL=il of the City of Palm Desert on his thday of Dully 1988, by the follaaing vote, to wit: P AYES: CRITSS,_ BELLY, SNYDER, WILSON, BENSON GD NOES: NONE cl ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE M. BENSCMN Mayor ATTEST: SHEILA R. GI GAN, City City of Palm Desert, Cal3dcrnia /tm I � > i ! 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 June 3, 1988 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. ANNEXATION NO. 22 LAFCO NO. 88-12-4 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert City Council to consider a resolution approving an annexation of approximately 119 acres to the City of Palm Desert generally bounded by Cook Street on the east, the Whitewater Storm Channel on the south, 42nd Avenue on the north and existing Palm Desert boundary on the west. The annexation was initiated by the City of Palm Desert on behalf of a group comprising 21% of the registered voters in the area. The reasons for annexation include: 1 . The proposed territory to be annexed is adjacent to and substantially surrounded by the City of Palm Desert, and, therefore, represents a logical expansion of the city's boundary. 2. The area is predominately urban in character and requires a higher level of urban services than are currently offered by the County of Riverside. The City of Palm Desert can provide these services which include higher levels of police, fire, paramedic and general code enforcement and participation in the local Palm Desert political process. KEY ET- MAP 4 Nat b Keb F �pl UYillfY -I. PALM OE°ERt OF'•VEFeIe! CI II'U41T RAW OESE� CRY II MIT n. PF M NSEW a"UMR CdIXiY ePMKIIIIe( x e a . 8 OebF9, E tlq,l»1 .. . Y!1 a/A021WTlLT II//a ENrs Au Aiv�A�M[� . eR!Me°IOf 1p�l'ett�w�mEre° u/00 ea,e/-IE-a SAID public hearing will be held on Thursday, June 23, 1988, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are Invited to attend and be heard. Any land owner within the territory or any registered voter, may file a written protest against the proposal with the City Clerk at any time prior to the public hearing. PUBLISH: Desert Post SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, City Clerk June 8, 1988 City of Palm Desert, California LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION • County of Riverside (714) 787-2786 ROBERT T. ANDERSEN ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER • 4090 LEMON STREET • 12TH FLOOR • RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501-3651 U 2 �c DATE: ma, _9Z 1988 Honorable Mayor & City Council LAFCO NO. : 88-12-4 City of Palm Desert PROPONENT: ri ty of Palm nPSPrt 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, California 92260 Gentlemen: are hereby notified that the proposal for You Y was approved by the Local D r gency ormation ommisslon of t e ounty o Riverside at a public hearing on May 26 long A copy of the legal description of this proposal as approved by the Local Agency Formation Commission, is attached to this notice; and it is the legal description which must be used in all further actions regarding this proposal . Any previous descriptions which do not conform to the attachment should be corrected or destroyed. Any special conditions, authorizations, or amendments are noted in the attached resolution, and must be complied with by your Council in its role as Conducting Authority. It is now the responsibility of your Council to complete proceedings in accordance with the laws governing this approved application (Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, Section 57000) . Upon completion of proceedings, it is requested that you furnish LAFCO with fifteen certified copies of your resolution and a check made payable to the State Board of Equalization in the amount of $ 480.00 You should keep in mind that unless proceedings are completed within twelve months from the date of LAFCO' s approval, the application will automatically be abandoned (Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, Section 57001) . If there are extenuating circumstances, please notify us in writing at least 30 days'prior to the end of this one-year period to secure an authorized extension of time. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact our office. 4e1rely, THORSON Executive Secretary cc: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors V, . 11AF LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION • County of Riverside • (714) 787-2786 ROBERT T. ANDERSEN ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER • 4080 LEMON STREET • 12TH FLOOR • RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501-3651 PUBLIC NOTICE May 26, 1988 9:00 A.M. Board of Supervisors' Meeting Room 4080 Lemon Street, 14th Floor Riverside, California AGENDA 1 . CALL TO ORDER AND SALUTE TO THE FLAG. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF APRIL 7, 1988. 3. HEARINGS: Consent Items: a. LAFCO 87-22-1--Annexation 2 to County Service Area 52, Tract 21291 b. LAFCO 88-07-1--Annexation 4 to County Service Area 30, Tract 22649 C. LAFCO 88-14-1--Annexation 1 to County Service Area 142, Tract 22273 d. LAFCO 88-15-1--Annexation 2 to County Service Area 142, Tract 22274 e. LAFCO 88-16-1--Annexation 20 to County Service Area 103, Tracts 22104, 22105, 21738, 21740 and 21741 f. LAFCO 88-05-3--Annexation 41 to County Service Area 69, Tract 19963 g. LAFCO 88-17-4--Annexation 11 to County Service Area 121, Plot Plan 10396 h. LAFCO 88-18-4--Annexation 7 to County Service Area 131 , Tract 19386 i . LAFCO 88-21-3--Annexation to Mission Springs Water District j. LAFCO 88-08-5--Annexation 4 to County Service Area 132, Tract 17215-1 over---- LAFCO AGENDA May 26, 1988 Page 2 New Items: k. LAFCO 87-60-3--Sphere of Influence Amendment--City of Hemet 1 . LAFCO 88-11-3--Annexation 121-87 to City of Hemet M. LAFCO 87-110--3--Sphere of Influence Amendments--County Service Area 145, Valley-Wide Recreation and Park District and Lake Elsinore Recreation and Park District n. LAFCO 88-28-3--Annexation ervice Area 145 0. :LAFCO 88-12-4--Annexation 22 to City of Palm Desert 4. PUBLI 5. POSSIBLE HEARINGS FOR JUNE 23, 1988. 6. ADJOURNMENT. A closed session may be held on pending litigation and/or personnel matters. LAFCO AGENDA May 26, 1988 Page 2 New Items: k. LAFCO 87-60-3--Sphere of Influence Amendment--City of Hemet 1. LAFCO 88-11-3--Annexation 121-87 to City of Hemet M. LAFCO 87-110--3--Sphere of Influence Amendments--County Service Area 145, Valley-Wide Recreation and Park District and Lake Elsinore Recreation and Park District n. LAFCO 88-28-3--Annexation 1 to County Service Area 145 o. LAFCO 88-12-4--Annexation 22 to City of Palm Desert 4. PUBLI MM 5. POSSIBLE HEARINGS FOR JUNE 23, 1988. 6. ADJOURNMENT. A closed session may be held on pending litigation and/or personnel matters. i 1 L 1 FCO ` LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION • County of Riverside • (714) 787-2786 ROBERT T. ANDERSEN ADMINISTRATIVE. CENTER • 4080 LEMON STREET • 12TH FLOOR • RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501-3651 '88 F,fly 31 Pal 2 27 DATE : dyav' 2;7':UgL L; E Honorable Mayor & City Council LAFCO NO. : 88-12-4 City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive PROPONENT: City of Palm Desert Palm Desert, California 92260 Gentlemen: You are hereby notified that the proposal for Annexation 22 to Deser was approved by the Loca Agency Formation Commission of t e ounty of Riverside at a public hearing on May 26, 1988 A copy of the legal description of this proposal as approved by the Local Agency Formation Commission, is attached to this notice; and it is the legal description which must be used in all further actions regarding this proposal . Any previous descriptions which do not conform to the attachment should be corrected or destroyed. Any special conditions, authorizations, or amendments are noted in the attached resolution, and must be complied with by your Council in its role as .Conducting Authority. It is now the responsibility of your Council to complete proceedings in accordance with the laws governing this approved application (Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, Section 57000) . Upon completion of proceedings, it is requested that you furnish LAFCO with fifteen certified copies of your resolution and a check made payable to the State Board of Equalization in the amount of $ 480.00 You should keep in mind that unless proceedings are completed within twelve months from the date of LAFCO's approval, the application will automatically be abandoned (Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, Section 57001 ) . If there are extenuating circumstances, please notify us in writing at least 30 days'prior to the end of this one-year period to secure an authorized extension of time. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact our office. Si erely, LY A THORSON Executive Secretary cc: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors C 11 1 Local Agency Formation Commission County of Riverside 2 3 RESOLUTION NO. 47-88 APPROVING THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY 4 TO CITY OF PALM DESERT LAFCO NO. 88-12-4 5 6 BE IT RESOLVED AND DETERMINED by the Local Agency Formation Commission 7 in regular session assembled on May 26, 1988, that the annexation of 8 approximately 119 acres generally located north of the Whitewater Channel , 9 south of 42nd Avenue, west of Cook Street and east of the City limits of Palm 10 Desert, as more particularly described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made 11 a part hereof, to the City of Palm Desert, is approved. 12 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND FOUND that: 13 1. Preliminary proceedings were commenced by the resolution of the 14 City of Palm Desert. 15 2. The annexation is proposed to provide more municipal services by 16 the City of Palm Desert. 17 3. The distinctive short form designation of the proposed annexation 18 is LAFCO No. 88-12-4, Annexation No. 22 to City of Palm Desert. 19 4. An environmental assessment was made on the proposal and a 20 negative declaration filed thereon by the City of Palm Desert pursuant to the 21 California Environmental Quality Act. The negative declaration has been 22 reviewed and considered. 23 5. The 'boundaries of the territory as set forth in Exhibit "A", 24 attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, have been approved 25 by the County Surveyor, are contiguous to the City of Palm Desert, and are 26 approved. 27 6. The territory to be annexed is inhabited, there being 12 or more 28 registered voters residing therein. RIVERSIDE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION I- COMMISSION 4000 LEMON STREET ISTN FLOOR RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92801-88E1 1(714) 767.2786 I I 11 1 7. This annexation is consistent with the spheres of influence of 2 the City of Palm Desert and all other affected local agencies. 3 8. The City of Palm Desert is designated conducting authority. 4 9. The Executive Officer is directed to transmit a certified copy of 5 this Resolution to the above-designated conducting authority, to the chief 6 petitioners, if different from the conducting authority, and to each affected 7 agency. 8 9 10 11 R B YD, R. , C116irman 12 13 I certify the above resolution was passed and adopted by the Local Agency Formation Commission of Riverside County on May 26, 1988. 14 15 QQ 6 Gto !' cif - 17 Executive Officer GAT J18 00 19 m' 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- I __ RESOL MON NO. 87-102 �IT "A" CITY OF PALM DESERT ANNFKRTION NO. 22 LAFOD NO. 88-12-4 That portion of the east half of Section 16, Township 5 South Range 6 east S.B.M. as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of Section 16, Township 5 Range 6 east; Thence south O° 03' 16" west 3026.02' along the east line of said Section 16, also being the centerline of Cook Street, to a point located along the northern easement line of the whitewater Storm Channel also being the Palm Desert City boundary. Thence continuing along the existing city limits of Palm Desert along the following courses and distances: Thence northwesterly R=14500 L\ = 12° 52' 0" a distance of 2777.19, to a Point on the centerline of said Section 16; Thence north 00' 14' 38" east a distance of 913.87' along said centerline of Section 16; Thence north 89° 49' 13" east a distance of 1328.29; Thence north W 06' 28" east a distance of 1326.36' to a point on the north line of said Section 16; Thence north 89° 47' 20" east along said north line of Section 16 1327.05' to the northeast corner thereof also being the point of beginning. Area equals approximately 119 acres. THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION APPRO; D -- aY R ERSIDE COUNTY SURYEYO;t BY L 9I0 KEY MAP 42nd AVE. t Not to scale - F W W :�S�7 W 1 N I O 1— a O O U 16 FRED WAR G DRIVE 16 m 1 tj POINT OF BEGINNING N89°a7'20"E 1327.03' 9 10 6 I� N O VE LIE WAY 0 O PALM DESERT 'm COUNTY OF O I CITY LIMIT RIVERSIDE) M! PROPOSED W PALM DESERT -m JONI DRIVE CITY LIMIT PALM DESERT CITY LIMIT 8 COUNTY OFRIVERSIDE z IV/N89*41V13"E 1328.29' K MERLE RIV a w m f F N P m M S GARr AVE u J H LL Q V V U O d/ a 9NE RYL AVE. 2 �2' N PAuW--- R'430 , a OESERT o dls1. ?77j !tL1449 AREA APPROXIMATELY 11Y at.. THIS MAP PPROVED BY RIVERSIDE COUNTY SURVEYOR 8Y_l..n.`L �— LAFCO No. 88-12-4 DATE PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 22 DrawnEyi TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT N. SAN PEDRO IN SEC.'16 T 5 S R 6 E SCALE RAMON A. OIAZ Comm.0ow ipjannifto— ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES'DIVISION I" a 600, mmmmmmm� PALM DESERT � r�V^- .� 1 F C v LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION • County of Riverside • (714) 787-2786 ROBERT T. ANDERSEN ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER • 4080 LEMON STREET • 12TH FLOOR • RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501-3651 May 26, 1988 TO: Local Agency Formation Commission FROM: Ken Mohr, Executive Officer SUBJECT: LAFCO 88-12-4--ANNEXATION 22 TO CITY OF PALM DESERT PROPOSAL: This is a proposal to annex approximately 119 acres to the City of Palm Desert for municipal services. INITIATED BY: City of Palm Desert, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California 92260. LEGAL REQUIREMENTS: This proposal has met all legal filing requirements. The map and legal description were approved by the County Surveyor on March 25, 1988. The City of Palm Desert conducted an environmental assessment which resulted in the filing of a negative declaration. POPULATION: The applicant estimates the population within the proposed annexation boundaries is 400. The Registrar of Voters reports there are 176 registered voters within the affected area. LAND USE: The Open Space and Conservation Map of the Riverside County Comprehensive General Plan identifies the property as "Areas Not Designated As Open Space." The Land Use Element of the General Plan shows the property to be located within the Upper Coachella Valley Planning Area. Additionally, the property is within the Western Coachella Valley Community Plan area, and is subject to the categorical land use designations therein. The northern 40 acres of the LAFCO 88-12-4 May 26, 1988 Page 2 subject property is designated as M ( Industrial/Manufacturing) land uses. The existing zoning is M-SC (Manufacturing-Service Commercial) , and the City of Palm Desert' s prezoning is SI (Service-Industrial ) . The eastern 16 acre portion of the property is designated 2A-MF (Residential, Multi-family) . The existing zoning is R-2-4000 (Multiple Family Dwelling, Minimum Lot Size of 4,000 square feet) . The prezoning is R-3 (Multiple Family Dwellings) . The remaining 63 acres of the property is designated as Category 2B (Urban Residential ) . The existing zoning is a mixture of R-1 (One Family Dwellings), R-1-8,000 (One Family Dwelling, Minimum Lot Size of 8,000 square feet) , and R-2-4,000 (Multiple Family Dwellings, Minimum Lot Size of 4,000 square feet) . The City' s prezoning is R-1 (One Family Dwellings) . The County Planning Department finds the proposed annexation to be consistent with the County Comprehensive General Plan. The Environmental Resources and Hazards Element identifies the property as not being subject to any significant environmental hazards. The northeast portion of the property lies within Groundshaking Zone IVC, with the southwestern portion in Zone IIIC. The proposed land uses are designated as "Generally Suitable" for these seismic/geologic conditions. The property is within an area known for the existence of archeological artifacts; the probable existence level for the area is designated as "low." MARKET VALUE: The County Assessor reports the total 1987-88 land value is $7,600,673 and structure value is $21 ,686, 179 for a total market value of $29,346,852. COMMENTS: The proposed annexation encompasses approximately 119 acres and is generally located north of the Whitewater Channel, south of 42nd Avenue, west of Cook Street and east of the City limits of Palm Desert. The affected territory is inhabited, contiguous to the City of Palm Desert and consistent with the City's sphere of influence. The area contains 291 parcels of land and is substantially developed with industrial and mixed residential land uses. The City of Palm Desert gives the following reasons for initiating the proposed annexation: 1 . The proposed territory to be annexed is adjacent to and substantially surrounded by the City of Palm Desert, and, therefore, represents a logical expansion of the City' s boundary. 2. The area is predominately urban in character and requires a higher level of urban services than are currently offered by the County of Riverside. The City of Palm Desert can provide these services. Additionally, the City of Palm Desert indicates the proposal is supported by a group of residents within the area who wish to be represented by, and to fully participate in, the local political process. Written documentation in support of the proposed annexation has been submitted by 21 percent of the registered t LAFCO 88-12-4 May 26, 1988 Page 3 voters within the affected territory. The City of Palm Desert has prezoned the property and as previously mentioned, the City's prezoning designations are consistent with the County's Comprehensive General Plan. FISCAL IMPACTS: The County Auditor-Controller reports the total property taxes generated within the affected area are $293,468. At present, the County's share of the property tax is approximately 28.92 percent or $84,871 . In accordance with the negotiated property tax split agreement between the County of Riverside and the City of Palm Desert, the City would receive 25 percent of the County' s share or approximately $21 ,376. The remainder of the taxes generated will continue to be divided among the other affected agencies including: County Free Library, Desert Sands Unified School District, Coachella Valley Water District and Coachella Valley Recreation and Park District just to name a few. It should be pointed out that approval of this annexation would also result in a corresponding exchange in service responsibility. For example, the County would no longer be responsible for providing a number of services, including, but not limited to: police and fire protection (unless by contract) , planning and land use regulations, street cleaning and maintenance and building inspection. However, certain countywide services such as health, general hospital, social services and justice systems would continue to be the responsibility of the County. To provide for these on-going services, the County would retain approximately $63,495 of the property tax generated within the affected area. PLAN FOR THE PROVISION OF MUNICIPAL SERVICES: To support its application, the City of Palm Desert has submitted a Plan for the Provision of Municipal Services. Following are excerpts from that Plan: - Water and Sewer: Portions of the area are presently being provided with water and sewer services from the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) . The District currently has water and sewer lines located along Cook Street which forms the eastern boundary of the annexation. If necessary, CVWD could provide additional service through line extensions from existing facilities. In addition, CVWD' s sewage treatment plant is located east of Cook Street immediately adjacent to the proposed annexation. - Police Protection: If annexed, the City of Palm Desert would provide police protection services under contract with the Riverside County Sheriff' s Department. Existing manpower and equipment include four cars, 20 officers and a full-time crime prevention officer. The City estimates emergency response time to the annexation site would be 3-5 minutes. - Fire Protection: If annexed, the City of Palm Desert would provide fire LAFCO 88-12-4 May 26, 1988 Page 4 protection services under contract with the Riverside County Fire Department. The area is within a 5-minute response zone of both the Portola and Indian Wells fire stations. Manpower and equipment include 54 full-time personnel , 15 volunteers, 4 pumpers, 2 rescue squads, 2 rescue-salvage vehicles and 2 paramedic units. SUMMARY: - The proposed annexation is contiguous to the City of Palm desert and consistent with the City's sphere of influence. - The area is legally defined as inhabited, as there are 176 registered voters within the proposed boundaries. - Written documentation in support of the annexation has been submitted by 21 percent of the registered voters within the affected territory. - The City of Palm Desert has prezoned the site S-I (Service-Industrial) , R-1 (Single-family Residential ) and R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) which is consistent with the County's Comprehensive General Plan. - The City of Palm Desert is willing and able to extend municipal services as required. - The proposed annexation is a logical extension of the City' s boundaries. RECOMMENDATIONS: Based upon the factors outlined above, IT IS RECOMMENDED that the Commission: 1 . Certify it has reviewed and considered the City of Palm Desert' s environmental assessment which resulted in the filing of a negative declaration; 2. Find the annexation is inhabited; 3. Find the annexation is consistent with the City of Palm Desert' s sphere of influence and the spheres of all affected local agencies; 4. Approve LAFCO 88-12-4--Annexation 22 to City of Palm Desert; and, 5. Designate the City of Palm Desert as Conducting Authority. Respectfully submitted, Ke Mohr Executive Officer I MAPS C N II I I JDf 4 � tl 3.IrY0 �_ 1 �� Ib1/IS I,/ � 11.. •tl �. .. x • � tla••' 9<'+�J � � 4 � 'lr:.Y _ x :. `�'- _ / Ill foean �I y tl tl a k tl tl Ynt t s§ dJ I(Io]rro e 11 � u n tl Y tl � n o � ..Q Y m n� j 'xl i]mrJ s> 3 7 I W N rA C4 II W .-I xs arr,s! ,3311--- -- ----------� — ---_ _YJOJ in 01 —a trio I' F+ "�W ail °II w (etan tr'" BZo.Y nVs li i W Is Jda 1 - �i � • n III] II � aer n / ^yp1 do ]]n "I �I bIs,c I q - OI V 3]JdIJ 3 C w tl N_S9r � m � o I oarDn z I rb �Il � 3]JY J NI 31t Q 3 dla' xtONl1 I.' • I I~, 'Otl JJ36]Y 6/69.Y 'ry.1G ot 11.37 CI v Ob xOINIJI I3]O iU III 11 I g a` + i II .. ]]l• lfY'^ts^A3�](rY I J F r''n\ � I I, Iln W ,tlr oJ��f' I 11�m.. Ir lo<< q�, 3sobnua p s � ® '.:' '^ Y K 0 i '� * a 3•...q�l L ! I �btT� 110109/b In SL ,vi01b0e IZON n'VJ y:: y C` F �r� f Jr'J LL. b i C - ,^ hC`9 Y J r tI v)I)nwlY) ]AI ]IOJSb�f wn Jr q9- w•fnri sv.. urxvrvin peh Bd_ Qn ralm ,. 31— r_ s.:]:ea,e'� a 11 I I h YO fJ Ydt I.I bois I a III ♦CY 6 0ll Y 'I n S ). )ION]]SMI NIS / ml FT AG t4 > II 3 aY d]rdve m i ... 4:• a,.. - .. f i I �J ) s2o.Y. ny� II 1 j II of _�_� II O fN321i Idlf]J --j'' alr 1 II r IV` ,11 omLJL�I ' mo 0o VI I 11 - � �i�\ S rao srxooe ` +oN t.r`y: i Ili li L II �—d�^I. nvnvxYru 'gyp++[ tgG' `Q 4�vtrQ2t vm a 1. I YY'J ne01f •.Y y is;Jw2~ ew "';IO�urOt it r _� •!°dot. M.00°�f m\!0-'�y.�m II JNI]rY t'N v., Ox JMOYI Llf �� 1 r II ^ 2 I >.eo.. `ko+tea°:�i°m 7,9imo:moo I: II `il +II rmt,m Stoz� +i�o4 QN: ai ii: I e1, "II W 0 .� Gv or il' II W ; I� II gr44{ 7;'Lo el ell ,� ' ol _ii-6 i 0 Sle 42ndAVE. Resolution No. 87-102 KEY MAP Not to scale F W 41 W Q f- I h J N0 � Y S g U Ie FRED WARING DRIVE le Is j- i 1327.05' PO- - IO 6 1� N O VELIE WAY C O O PALM DESERT COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) CITY LIMIT cI PROPOSED e PALM DESERT JONI oRIVE — PALM DESERT CRY OMIT CITY LIMIT --- COUNTY OFRIVER3IDE II --1320' — I MEL a 'a a O O O •aa as N di z a W I a ¢ W J sARr :j Av LL J a O J Q U U U d12e_SZ, SMERYL AVE. H p4LM'-- R-R 10 a DESF p' dlst' Z7�j 1t 9^ DATE PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. . ESANPEORO TO THE QTY OF PALM DESERT IN SEC. 16 T 5 S R 6 E RAMON A. DIA2 Director:Env. Services Div. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION PALM DESERT , ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS EXHIBIT "A" LAFCO #88-12-4 (�MvANAM 73.510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 NEGATIVE DECLARATION Pursuant to Title 14, Division 6. Article 7, Section 15083 of the California Administrative Code. CASE NO: C/Z 87-12 APPLICANT/PROJECT SPONSOR: CITY OF PALM DESERT PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATION: A negative declaration of environmental impact and preannexation zoning of approximately 119 acres directly adjacent to the City of Palm Desert's eastern boundary, west of Cook Street between the Whitewater Storm Channel and 42nd Avenue. City of Palm Desert zoning shall be consistent with the existing County of Riverside zoning and will include service industrial (S. I . ) for the northerly 40 acre existing industrial park, multi-family residential R-3 4,000 (one unit per 4000 square feet of lot area) for properties east of Clifford and Christian Streets and R-1 single family for the existing single family areas to the west of those streets. The Director of the Department of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, California. has found that the described project will not have a significant effect on the environment. A copy of the initial study has been attached to document the reasons in support of this finding. Mitigation measures. if any. included in the project to avoid potentially significant effects, may also be found attached. RAMON A. DIAZ DATE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT /dlg CASE N0. " ®o �® FYi CIRONHEXTAL SERVICES DEPT. ITITIAL STUDY F"NVIROITl,MNTAL EVALUATI011 CHECXLIST VOTE: The availability of data necessary to address the topics listed below shall form the basis of a decision as to whether the application is considered complete for purposes of environmental assessment. E`1VIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers , possible mitigation measures and comments are provided on attached sheets) . Yes Maybe No 1 . Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions , displacements , compaction, or overcovering of the soil? — -- c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction , covering , or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? J b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement , moisture , or temperature , or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? L.� c 2, Yes Maybe No 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a_. Changes . in currents , 'Or the course or ' direction of water movements? _ b. Changes in-abscrptibn rates , drainage Patterns, or the rate and-amoilnt of surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Alteration of -the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? e. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or with- I drawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? f. Reduction in the amount of water other- ` wise available for public water supplies? 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of plants (including trees , shrubs , grass and crops )? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area , or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? 5. Animate fe. dill the proposal result in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds , land animals including reptiles , or Insects )? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of animals? C. Introduction of new species -� into an area, or result inaobarrierlto the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing wildlife h3b,t2t? c�` 3. 6. Natural Resources . Yes tap No Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in :.the rate of resources? use of any natural b. Depletion of any non-rene resource? wable natural 7. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? _ b. Demand upon existing sources of en quire the .development of new sour or re- energy? 8• Risk Risk of U5et, . ' Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of , hazardous substances ( including, but not limited to, pesticides , oil , chemicals, or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? 9. Economic Loss Will 1 the Proposal result in: a. A change in 'the value of property and improvements endangered by flooding? b• A change in the value of property and impro +erients exposed to geologic hazards beyond accepted cerrunity risk standards ? 10. Noise. Will the noise levels Lothe point atcre which accepted co eeded7 noise and vibration levels are i: . Land Use Will of Will the Proposal result in the Ci a t- e—r-- l ano planned land useeofraneareant eveloped or 12. 01)en soave. Will the proposal decrecseini the amountofdesignatedtopen space? 13. Pcou_ l` ation. Will the proposal result in: a. Alteraticn or the loc3tion, distribution , density, or growth rate of the human Population of the Citv? b, Change in the — — �•population distribution by aue , income , religion , racial , or ethnic group, occupational class , household YPe• t ? • 4. Yes Maybe No 14. Employment. Will the proposal result in additiona new long-tern jobs provided, or a change in the number and per cent employed, unemployed, and underemployed? 15. Housing. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in number and per cent of housing units by type (price or rent range, zoning category, owner-occupied And rental , etc. ) relative to demand or to number of families in various income classes in the City? _ b. Impacts on existing housing or creation of a demand for additional housing? 16 . Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in : a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? _ b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? C. Impact upon existing transportation systems? _ d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists , or pedestrians? 17 . Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon , or result in a need for, new or altered governmental services in any of the following a,•e�� • a. Fire protection? _ — b. Police protection? C. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? f. Other governmental services? i/ 'S. Yes Maybe No 18. Public Fiscal Balance. Will the proposal result in a net change in government fiscal flow (revenues less operating expenditures and annualized capital expenditures)? 19• Utilities. Will osal reult in a ne new systems ,porpalterati ed forons to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications system? _ C. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal ? L 20. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. The creation of any health hazard or Potential health hazard? b. A change in the level of community health v care provided? 21 . Social Services . Will the proposal result in an increased demand for provision of general social .services? 22. Aesthetics . Will the proposal result in: — a. Obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public? b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? c. Lessening of the overall neighborhood (or area ) attractiveness , pleasantness , and uniqueness? 22. Liaht and Glare. `— ✓ ne.v nt or W� 11 the proposal produce 9 9Tare. 24. Archeolooical/Historical . Will the c� resu C in an a teration of a significanposal archeological or historical site, structure ,object, or building? / 6. Yes Maybe No 25. Mandatory Findinqs of Siani'Ficance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment or to curtail the diversity in the environment? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future. ) C. Does the project have impacts which are indi- vidually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small , but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant. ) L� d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings , either directly or indirectly? Initial Study Prepared By: PLAN FOR THE PROVISION OF MUNICIPAL SERVICES LAFCO #88-12-4 , 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA92260 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 TO: Riverside County Local Agency Formation Commission FROM: City of Palm Desert DATE: December 8. 1987 SUBJECT: Plan for services for Palm Desert Annexation No. 22 I . DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES The area proposed to be annexed is substantially developed and is currently served by the Southern California Edison Electric Company, Southern California Gas Company, General Telephone Company, Palmer Cable Vision, Coachella Valley Water District and the Coachella Valley Recreation and Park District. The provisions of these utilities will not be impacted by the proposed annexation. Services provided directly by the City of Palm Desert would be in land use planning, building and safety. building code review and inspections, public works - street cleaning maintenance and repair, abatement of public nuisances and general code enforcement. By contract. the city provides for trash disposal with Palm Desert Disposal and police, fire and paramedic service with the County of Riverside through the Tri-Cities District. Ii . LEVEL OF SERVICE Current utility service would be maintained and improved as demands requires by the various utility companies and special districts. Land use planning, building and safety review and inspection and general code enforcement would be provided on the basis of need. Police Services: The City of Palm Desert provides. under contract with Riverside County Sheriffs Department. four cars and 20 officers per 24 hour period in addition to a full-time crime prevention officer at city hall . On a daily basis 112 hours of police services are provided. See attached memo from Lieutenant Bowser for more details. I ANNEXATION NO. 22 , Fire Services: F ' protection is r Fire prote o provided by Riverside County Fire Department. 54 full-time personnel . 15 volunteers. 4 pumpers. 2 rescue squads. 2 rescue-salvage. 2 paramedic units. Back-up coverage by County Fire Department stations in Bermuda Dunes and Rancho Mirage. Mutual aid agreement with City of Indio. Fire Insurance Classification: source of rating: Robinson's Rating Service. 4 to 6. Adjacent unincorporated area. 6 to 9. The area is within the five minute response zone of both the Portola and Indian Wells fire stations. Backup would be provided by the Town Center. Rancho Mirage. Bermuda Dunes and Thousand Palms stations. Paramedic ambulance service would be provided by the Indian Wells fire station. Ill . TIMING OF SERVICE EXTENSIONS Citv services would be available immediately in the areas of planning. building and General code enforcement, road maintenance and repair, Police, fire and paramedic. The extension of new utilities ( le: sewers) and road redesign ( le: curb, autters and storm drains) would be timed according to the needs and desires of the residents and property owners in the area. IV. FINANCING Generalized city services for the area would be financed through property taxes and state subventions tied to increased population. The expanded level of police, fire and paramedic services would be financed through the special fire tax of $48/year for a single family unit. $36/apartment unit and approximately $40/year for a typical 5,000 square foot Industrial building. New units would be required to pay a $100 fire facility fee. The city in general has experienced a substantial increase in sales tax and hotel occupancy tax revenues which will provide increasing_ levels for existing and new services to Palm Desert residents. To make the annexation a more logical expansion of the city's boundary. the 40 acre industrial park directly north of the residential area has been added to the proposal creating a total of 119 acres. 3 II. I 1u l=ii'1 ll L 3� LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION C&MMf N STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CERTIFICATE OF FILING I , Kenneth �— ohr Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of Riverside, do hereby certify that : 1 . The application hereinafter referenced and described has been submitted to me and has been found to be in the form prescribed by the Riverside County Local Agency Formation Commission. 2. The application contains the information and date requested and required by said Commission and provisions of State Law. 3. The application has been accepted for filing by me on May 3. 1988 4. The application has been 'set for hearing before the Local Agency Formation Commission on'Mav 26. 1988 i The Commission meets monthly in the Hearing Room on t e Fri— ou-R enth Floor of the Robert T. Andersen Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California; and the hearing begins at . 9:00 a.m. The staff report will be mailed to you on the Friday before the Commission meeting. Applicant: City of Palm Desert Address : 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert. California 92260 APPLICATION LAFCO 88-12-4=-An6exation 22-to City of Palm Desert 'f< TITLE: 4" GENERAL West of Cook Street between Whitewater Channel and 42nd Avenue" LOCATION: This Certificate of Filing is issued pursuant to authority and requirements of Section 56828 of the Government Code, State of California. All time requirements and limitations for processing and consideration of the aforementioned application specified by State Law and/or rules and regulations of the Riverside County Local Agency Formation Commission shall become effective and run from the date of issuance of this Certificate of Filing. Mav il. 1988 DAT xec 1ve officer 2/86 A 11AFC0 j.C1. 11i eel LOCAL AGENYVJRNIATION COMMISSION • County of Riverside • (714) 787-2786 ROBERT T, ANDERSEN ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER.•, 4080 LEMgN�STREFT112TIIFLOOR • RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501-3651 CLcftiCS NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held by the Local Agency Formation commission of the County of Riverside, State of California, in the Board of Supervisors' Meeting Room, 4080 Lemon St. , 14th Flr. , Riverside, CA on Thursday, May 26, 1988, at 9:00 a.m. , on the following proposals: 1 . LAFCO 87-22-1--Annexation 2 to County Service Area 52, intersection of Indiana Ave. and McKinley St. , Home Gardens area, street lights, Tract 21291. 2. LAFCO 87-60-3--Sphere of Influence Amendment--City of Hemet, north of Florida Ave. , east of Hewitt St. , south of Washington Ave. , and west of Meridian Ave. 3. LAFCO 87-110-3--Sphere of Influence Amendments--County Service Area 145, Valley-Wide Recreation and Park District and Lake Elsinore Recreation and Park District, generally located north of Garboni Rd. , south of Ethanac Rd. , west of I-215 and west of Canyon Lake, Sun City area. 4. LAFCO 88-05-3--Annexation 41 to County Service Area 69, south of Johnston Ave. and east of Stanford St. , east Hemet area, street lights, Tract 19963. 5. LAFCO 88-07-1--Annexation 4 to County Service Area 30, north and south of Indiana Ave. at Lincoln St. , Home Gardens area, street lights, Tract 22649. 6. LAFCO 88-08-5--Annexation 4 to County Service Area 132, west of La Sierra Ave. , north of El Sobrante Rd. , Lake Mathews area, street lights, Tract 17215-1 . 7. LAFCO 88-11-3--Annexation 121 -87 to City of Hemet, west of Myers St. , east of Warren Rd. , north of Rose Rd, and south of Esplanade Ave. LAFCO 88-12-4--Annexation 22 to City of Palm Desert, bounded by 42nd St. to the north, Whitewater Storm Channel to the south, Cook St. to the east, and Palm Desert City limits to the west. over---- 1 8861 '£ XPW JaOLllO aALln0ax3 ,agoW 'W 41a aN 30ISa3AIa NOISSIWWOO NOI1VWaOj AON39V 1V001 •anogp pa4SLL sseappe a41 o1 lsanba.a ualltam p ltwgns aseaLd 'anoge palstL Lesodo.ad a Aol paaLsap sL laoda,a llpls aq1 to Xdoo e 11 ' LS9£-LOSZ6 VO `apts.aanLa ` 'uLA g1ZL 1 '1S Uowal 080b `UoLSSLwwOO uo1lew.a0j ,COua6V LeO01 aql to aotllo 841 UL aLtl Uo SUoLldl.aosap L26aL pup sdew o4 apew Fga.aa4 sL a3Ua.aala.a 'panLOnUL PULL a44 to UoL1dL.a:)saP .4PLn:)k:p2d a Aoj '06££Z 40PJi 's446LL 1aa.a4s `PDJP 1awaH ` •Spa puPLLoH pup adoLaluy to .aau.aoo 3see43nos `SVL MAV aoLAJ@S F1unoo o1 L uoLlexauuV--£-8Z-88 O3jyl '9L •PaJP s6uL.adS 40H 1.aasaa `ARM UOL,aeW pup matq utplunoW Aaujoo 4Se941nos '1ot.a1SL0 Ja1PM s6UL.adS uOLSSLW 04 UoLlexauuV--£-LZ-88 OOjVI 'bL '98£6L 1oP,a1 `s146LL 18a.als `Pa.ae vasa0 wLed "IS U016ULgSPM 10 lsam `Zb anuanV So apes 41nos ' L£L eaaV a3Ln,aaS Flunoj of L UOL4exauuy--b-8L-88 ODJVI '£L '96£OL UPLd IOLd 'S446L1 laa.als `Pa.ap saun0 Ppnw,aag ` •pa ,aanLa uapptH pue •1S Uo16uL4SPM 10 1sam41JOU `LZL PBJV aOLA,aaS 41unoO 04 LL Uo1lexauuy--b-LL-88 003VI 'ZL ' LbLLZ PUP ObLLZ `8£LLZ 'SOLLZ 'bOLZZ SloPJJ 'S146LL laa,alS 'eaJe .aewOpL tM/oOpaS `lsam a44 01 •any glna pue y1.a0U a41 01 'anV P.aan.aaO Fq papunoq 'COL Pa.ay aOLA.aaS atluno3 o4 OZ uoL4exauuV--L-9L-88 ODAVI ' LL 'bLZZZ loP.al `S146LL laa.als `P8JP a,aOULSL3 alPI `lsam a41 01 •any PURJO pue 4SPa41.a0U aql 04 '1S uoLun 144nos ayl of '1S uPwau01S '41Uou 841 04 'Ld UOSL.a.AOW Aq papunoq 'ZbL eaay aoLnaaS Aluno3 o4 Z uo1lpxauuV--L-SL-88 OOjVI 'OL '£LZZZ 10P,a1 `S146tL 1aa.als 'Pa,aP WOULSL3 alPI 40 FL.aa44nos "IS Uewau0lS 10 lsea `•any apue.ag 10 44.aoU `ZbL ea.ay aDlAjaS klunoO c4 L uOL4exauuV--L-b1-88 OOjVI '6 Z a6ed 886L, `9Z !PW 9NIbV3H OI19nd j0 DUON APPLICATION TO THE RIVERSIDE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION Mail or deliver to: Loral Agency Formation Commission Robert T. Andersen Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street, 12th Floor Riverside, CA 92501-Mi FOR LAFCO USE ONLY INTRODUCTION: The questions on this form are designed to obtain sufficient data about the proposed project and site to allow the staff.and LAFOO to assess this proposal. Additional background information is encouraged which may be pertinent to the proposal. Use additional sheets where necessary. Do not leave any blanks. M an item is not applicable, so indicate. Submit this original form and 15 copies.(Nots: No other application form will be accepted.) APPLICANT: City of Palm Desert Telephone: (619) 346-0611 ADDRESS: 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92260 Name and title of person to contact regarding this application: Philip Drell Address: 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert Telephone: (619) 346-0611 ext. 485 APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE TO: Annexation (Describe proposal or action requested) LOCATION OF PROJECT: Approximately 119 acres west of Cook Street between Whitewater Channel and 42nd Avenue. (Describe boundaries specifically, and refer to major highway, roads, rivers, and topographical features) A. OWNERSHIP: 1. is the applicant a,property owner in the area of the proposed project? ❑ Yes a No 2. Is the applicant sole owner of this property? ❑ Yes 0 No II B. AREA INFORMATION: 1. How many square miles, or acres, of territory are included in this proposal? 119 Acres 2. Number of structures or dwellings in the proposed area at the present time? Area is substantially developed with a 40 acre industrial park, 6 acres of mixed residential and 20 acres (Specifically describe tow the property is improved) vacan 3. Expected increase in the number of dwellings and/or structures in the proposed area which will result from this proposal (describe specifically the number and type of structural improvements: e.g., single-family residences, mobilehomes, commercial, etc.) None By what date? 4. Population in the area at the present time? 400 S. Expected change in the population which will result from this proposal? None By when? I 6. Number of registered voters within the boundaries at the present time? 175 7. Assessed value: $ 30,555,455 Land $ 8,869,276 Improvements $ _2.1,686,179 8. Identify the number of parcels within the boundaries by Assessor's number: 291 parcels (If necessary, attach printout showing Assessor's Parcel number(s) and landowner(s) C. LAND USE: 1. Current zoning R-1 and R-2 4,000 M-S 2. Current General Plan designation 28, 2A-MF. M 3. Prezoning and General Plan designation assigned by City(attach certified copy of City ordinance with assigned prezoning) _ GP- low me density residn ' 1 & service industrial 7nninnRL_B2_& S. 4. S�ecifically describe how the territory is presently used(e.g., vacant, groves, single-family residences, etc.) ifixture of single and multifamiiv residential , and an industrial Dark. S. Describe how adjacent lands are used: North: _ Industrial/Office Park South; _ Storm Channel/High School East: Industrial West: _ Manufactured Hoy ina/Country C1iih Ctihdiiicinn D. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: 1. Describe the proposed project in as much detail as possible. Has a subdivision or lot split been approved by the County or a city?) ❑Yes 291No. if so,what agency has approved the map,and what is its reference number? Annexation of 119 acres of urban unincorporated territory. 2. State reasons which jMstify this proposal: (For example, service needs, heehh mandate, economic benefit, etc) The area is urban in character and is substantially surrounded by the City of Palm Desert The application is being initiated on behalf of a rou of residents in the area who wish to be re resented and full artici ate in the local Pam Desert olitica ro cis s. Iney also wish to benefit from a higher level of police, fire, paramedic and code enforcement services. E. PLAN FOR THE PROVISION OF MUNICIPAL SERVICES (Government code section 56653): In addition to responding to the questions listed below, attach a detailed narrative plan which thoroughly outlines the full range of municipal services which will be extended to the property,their availability,and the cost of extending these services to the landowner and/or future residents. 1. Water will be supplied by? Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) What is the distance to the closest water line and where is it located? Area i s currentl y be ng served No new development is being proposed. Is the agency prepared to immediately furnish the necessary service? Yes N not, explain. N/A What is the anticipated water demand for this project? N/A 2. Sewer service will be provided by? Area has on-site systems CVWD could provide service. What is the distance to the closest sewer line and where is it located? N/A Is the agency prepared to immediately furnish the necessary service? If necessary If not, explain. What is the anticipated demand for this project? 3. Fire 8 Police: What jurisdiction will provide fire and police services? City of Palm Desert under contracts with Riverside County — Where is the nearest fire station located? Portola Avenue/Country Club Drive - 2 miles Response time 3-5 minutes Where is the nearest law enforcement facility located? Indio (substation to be built in Palm Response time 3 minute emergency Desert within next 18 months) ail 4. Transportation: a. Designate the names and types of roads which the project will use for primary and secondary access (including direct access streets from the project site to the nearest freeway) Cook-. Street - arterial with access to Highway 111 and I-10 via Frank Sinatra Drive and Montere Avenue. No b. Is widening of an existing street necessary? Yes c. Is the project served by County-maintained roads? d. Is construction of new access streets necessary? No 5. Special Revenues: Does the annexing agency have,current plans to establish any new ass Y sment district or fees which would Areainclude ouldthis be made order subject pay to8r new or 48 unitxseeceale1` 1 rvice1 olice tax Please detail. 6. Will the project be subject to existing bonded indebtedness? No F. PROPERTY OWNER'S POSITION: 1. How many landowners make up total ownership of the project area? (Include with this application copies of all letters/correspondence you have relating to this proposal.) APprox 210 2. How many property owners have been contacted regarding the project? All 3. How many property owners are in favor of the project? approx 40 4. How many property owners are not in favor o1 the project? aPProx. 39 G. LIGHTING & ROAD MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS ONLY: 1. If street lights are to be installed, list how many, what type and intensity(e.g., 5.22,000 LPSV and 20-9,000 HPSV) 2. If the application affects a road maintenance district, how many miles of road are to be maintained? 3. Is it your intention to bring any roads to County standards for future acceptance into the County Maintained Road System? i H. COMMUNITY BENEFIT: In your own words, how would your proposal benefit the community? The ro osal wi 11 rovide increased levels of police, fire and paramedic and genera co a en orcemen services representation in local land use policy decisions and more direct aCCPt$ to general ❑overnmental services. NOTICES AND COMMUNICATIONS: list below the names and addresses of people to whom notices and communica- tions should be directed, (3 maximum) Name Bruce Altman, City Manager Telephone (619) 346-0611 Address 73-510 Fred Waring Drive City & Zip Palm Desert, CA 92260 Name Kim Borders Telephone 34e" ae'R a, Address 74-607 Gary City & Zip Palm Desert, CA 92260 Name Telephone Address City A Zi Signature of applicant or authorized representative CITY OF PALM DESERT Typed or printed name CITY MANAGER Title FEBRUARY 10 1988 Date oV MOM o 0 0 73.510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 TO: Riverside County Local Agency Formation Commission FROM: City of Palm Desert DATE: December 8. 1987 SUBJECT: Plan for services for Palm Desert Annexation No. 22 1 . DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES The area proposed to be annexed is substantially developed and is currently served by the Southern California Edison Electric Company. Southern California Gas Company, General Telephone Company. Palmer Cable Vision. Coachella Valley Water District and the Coachella Valley Recreation and Park District. The provisions of these utilities will not be impacted by the proposed annexation. Services provided directly by . the City of Palm Desert would be in land use planning, building and safety. building code review and inspections, public works - street cleaning maintenance and repair, abatement of public nuisances and general code enforcement. By contract. the city provides for trash disposal with Palm Desert Disposal and police. fire and paramedic service with the County of Riverside throuah the Tri-Cities District. 11 . LEVEL OF SERVICE Current utility service would be maintained and improved as demands requires by the various utility companies and special districts. Land use planning, building and safety review and inspection and general code enforcement would be provided on the basis of need. Police Services: The City of Palm Desert provides, under contract with Riverside County Sheriffs Department. four cars and 20 officers Per 24 hour Period In addition to a- full-time crime prevention officer at city hall . On a daily basis 112 hours of police services are provided. See attached memo from Lieutenant Bowser for more details. f ANNEXATION NO. 22 Fire Services: Fire protection is provided by Riverside County Fire Department. 54 full-time personnel . 15 volunteers. 4 pumpers. 2 rescue squads. 2 rescue-salvage, 2 paramedic units. Back-up coverage by County Fire Department stations in Bermuda Dunes and Rancho Mirage. Mutual aid agreement with City of Indio. Fire Insurance Classification: source of rating: Robinson's Rating Service. 4 to 6. Adjacent unincorporated area. 6 to 9. The area is within the five minute response zone of both the Portola and Indian Wells fire stations. Backup would be provided by the Town Center, Rancho Mirage. Bermuda Dunes and Thousand Palms stations. Paramedic ambulance service would be provided by the Indian Wells fire station. 111 . TIMING OF SERVICE EXTENSIONS City services would be available immediately in the areas of planning, building and general code enforcement, road maintenance and repair. Police. fire and Paramedic. The extension of new utilities ( ie: sewers) and road redesign ( ie: curb, gutters and storm drains) would be timed according to the needs and desires of the residents and property owners in the area. IV. FINANCING Generalized city services for the area would be financed through property taxes and state subventions tied to increased population. The expanded level of Police. fire and Paramedic services would be financed through the special fire tax of $48/year for a single family unit, $36/apartment unit and approximately $40/year for a tvoical 5.000 square foot industrial building. New units would be required to Pay a $100 fire facility fee. The city in general has experienced a substantial increase in sales tax and hotel occupancy tax revenues which will Provide increasing level's for existing and new services to Palm Desert residents. To make the annexation a more logical expansion of the city's boundary, the 40 acre industrial park d i rect I v north of the residential area has been added to the proposal creating a total of 119 acres. 3 ANNEXATION NO. 22 ill . TIMING OF SERVICE EXTENSIONS City services would be available immediately in the areas of planning, building and general code enforcement, road maintenance and repair, police, fire and paramedic. The extension of new utilities Ile: sewers) and road redesign Ile: curb, gutters and storm drains) would be timed according to the needs and desires of the residents and property owners in the area. IV. FINANCING Generalized city services for the area would be financed through property taxes and state subventions tied to increased population. The expanded level of police, fire and paramedic services would be financed through the special fire tax of $48/year for a single family unit, $36/apartment unit and approximately $40/year for a typical 5,000 square foot industrial building. New units would be required to pay a $100 fire facility fee. The city in general has experienced a substantial Increase in sales tax and hotel occupancy tax revenues which will provide increasing levels for existing and new services to Palm Desert residents. To make the annexation a more logical expansion of the city's boundary, the 40 acre industrial park directly north of the residential area has been added to the proposal creating a total of 119 acres. 2 B I 9110 s 115 42 nd AVE, KEY MAP Not to scale uj w L s w M Q a N I+ a � J O � Y Q. o 0 U 18 FRED WARI G DRIVE 16 15 I POINT OF BEGINNING N89047'20"E 1327.05' 9 lO —�e�o- E--� 6 1$ O VELIE WAY 0 O PALM DESERT COUNTY OF O CITY LIMIT RIVERSIDE) e Mi PROPOSED w' PALM DESERT m JONI DRIVE PALM DESERT CITY LIMIT 0 CITY LIMIT o COUNTY OFRIVERSIDE z 1V/N89°49'13"E 1328_29' _ M RLE DRIVE �� ga M1U a y O y N y y U ui LESLIE 3 M o z o a ¢O O Q K W O GARYZi AVE O y 2 LL 1 LL a O v O J U U U O d 120-52' 9NE RYL AVE. Cq _ N PALM' R-1g500' a DESERT d/af, C1rY ?77.71 , 1+� 9 AREA APPROXIMATELY 119 &C. LAFCO No. 88-12-4 DATE , PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 22 Drawn by: TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT N. SAN PEDRO RAMON A. DIAZ IN SEC. 16 T 5 S R 6 E SCALE Comm.04v IPlannin ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION PALM DESERT I" = 600, RESOLVPIM NO. 87-102 UMBIT "A" CITY OF PALM DESERT ANNEKATIC N NO. 22 LAFCO NO. 88-12-4 That portion of the east half of Section 16, Township 5 South Range 6 east S.B.M. as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of Section 16, Township 5 Range 6 east; Thence south 0° 03' 16" west 3026.02' along the east line of said Section 16, also being the centerline of Cook Street, to a point located along the northern easement line of the Whitewater Storm Channel also being the Palm Desert City boundary. Thence continuing along the existing city limits of Palm Desert along the following courses and distances: Thence northwesterly R=14500 k% = 120 52' 0" a distance of 2777.19' to a point on the centerline of said Section 16; Thence north 00° 14' 38" east a distance of 913.87' along said centerline of Section 16; Thence north 89° 49' 13" east a distance of 1328.29t Thence north 00° 06' 28" east a distance of 1326.36' to a point on the north line of said Section 16.- Thence north 89° 47' 20" east along said north line of Section 16 1327.05' to the northeast corner thereof also being the point of beginning. Area equals approximately 119 acres. PETITION I AM AN OWNER OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE VALLEY INDUSTRIAL PARK SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA. I HEREBY VOTE AGAINST THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF MY PROPERTY BY THE CITY OF PALM DESERT. SIGNATURE: PRINT NAME: TRACT PROPERTY ADDRESS: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NO: DATE: tom' } PETITION I AM AN OWNER OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE VALLEY INDUSTRIAL PARK SITUATED IN TILE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, pP CALIFORNIA. I HEREBY VOTE & THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF MY PROPERTY BY THE CITY OF PALM DESERT. SIG RE: PRINT E: TRACT ADDRESSROPERTY / �6K ne V` L A MAILING ADDRESS: S6 s 'l � f PHONE NO: DATE: �,� %6 SHINN PROPERTIE ///S 73-941 HIGHWAY III, SUITE/*- PALM DESERT. CALIFORNIA 92200-4066 TELEPHONE 16191 566-2116 February 8 , 1988 Dear Country Club Village Estates Property Owners: As you are undoubtedly aware, the City of Palm Desert appears to have its heart set on annexing our housing tract, together with the Velie Way/ionie Street industrial tract, using the request by a minority of the homeowners as justification for its action. We are the owners of property in Country Club Village Estates and Valley Industrial Park; and if you feel as we do (that the proposed annexation would do nothing but cost us money and impose unnecessary restrictions on us ) , please sign the enclosed petition and return it to Cliff Shinn at the address shown above. Respectfully, B LIF INN, Owner N CY V COO Owner Lot 6 & 17 , Velie Way 7 3 S eet Val Industrial Park Country Club Village Estates enclosure J-- SHINN PROPERTIES 93-941 HIGHWAY III, SUITE/j�L PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260.4066 TELEPHONE (619) 566-2116 February 8 , 1988 Dear Country Club Village Estates Property Owners: As you are undoubtedly aware, the City of Palm Desert appears to have its heart set on annexing our housing tract, together with the Velie Way/Jonie Street industrial tract, using the request by a minority of the homeowners as justification for its action. We are the owners of property in Country Club Village Estates and Valley Industrial Park; and if you feel as we do (that the proposed annexation would do nothing but cost us money and impose unnecessary restrictions on us) , please sign the enclosed petition and return it to Cliff Shinn at the address shown above. Respectfully, e IFF N Owner ICY V OOK Owner Lots A 17, Velie Way 7 3 S eet Valley Industrial Park Country Club Village Estates enclosure 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 October 8, 1987 Dear Property Owner/Residents/Business Owners: A group of residents and property owners in your area (see attached map) have submitted petitions requesting annexation to the City of Palm Desert. Presently the area on the west side of Cook Street between the Whitewater Channel and 42nd Avenue is unincorporated Riverside County territory with governmental services originating from Indio or Riverside. Although your neighborhood is profoundly influenced by decisions made by the City of Palm Desert, your unincorporated status prevents you from participating in local elections or representation on the Palm Desert City Council . As citizens of Palm Desert, permanent residents would be able to vote for city council members, local initiatives and referendums, run for local office yourself or serve on various appointed commissions and committees. Non-resident property and business owners, although not eligible to vote in Palm Desert elections, have historically been afforded open access and responsive representation by city officials. Since incorporation the city has consistently pursued policies In consultation with business and property owners to protect and enhance property values and promote a prosperous business environment. in addition to gaining a voice in local affairs, becoming part of Palm Desert will result in expanded urban level police and fire services and free paramedic and ambulance services. These additional services are financed by a special tax of $48 per year for each single family residence and $36 per apartment unit. Commercial buildings are assessed according to their fire rating and range between $30 and $70 per year for a 5,000 square foot structure. Since Palm Desert does not have a property tax there would be no increase over what you currently pay to the county. The first step in the process is the designation of specific land uses and zoning for the area. We are proposing that the uses permitted under the county shall be maintained. Uses currently legal under county zoning would remain legal under city zoning. The City of Palm Desert is looking forward to welcoming you into our city. We feel the advantages to all concerned are substantial . - expanded police, fire and free paramedic services - full representation and participation in local land use and other city policy decisions - more responsive and convenient access to the whole range of city services - low taxes If you have any questions about the annexation process or city services contact Philip Drell , Associate Planner at 346-0611 extension 485. Sincerely, RICHARD S. KELLY MAYOR RSK/PD/dlg 2