Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutANNEXATIONS HIGHWAY 74 BELLA VISTA NO 16 1989 11 - 88 04 : 48PM ® SYC& R IJewport Beach CA P22/32 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into this .._, 1988, by and between BEACHSTONE JOINT VENTURE, LIMITED, a California Limited Partnership ( "Property Owner" ) and the CITY OF PALM DESERT ( "City") , a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of California . R E C I T A L S This Agreement is predicated upon the following facts: 1 . Government Code Sections 65864 through 65869 . 5 authorize the City to enter into binding development agreements with persons having legal or equitable interests in real property for the development of such property in order to establish certainty in the development process; 2 . Under Government Code Section 65865 the City has adopted rules and regulations establishing procedures and requirements for consideration of development agreements; 3 . Property owner has requested the City to consider entering into a development agreement and review proceedings have been taken in accordance with the City' s rules and regulations and Government Code Section 65867; 4 . The City Council has found that this Agreement is consistent with the objectives, policies , general land uses and programs specified in the City' s General Plan; and 5 . The long-term character of the development of the Project gives rise to certain development risks and uncertainties that could, in the absence of this Development Agreement, deter and discourage the Property Owner, its lenders and successor owner from making the long term commitments necessary to successfully complete the contemplated development and the attainment by the City of its objectives as above discussed . "6 . On 19_,_, theACity Council of the City adopted Ordinance No. approving this Agreement with Property Owner and Ordinance No. thereafter took effect on 19_1 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree: 1 . Definitions. In this Agreement , unless the context otherwise requires : 11 - 88 04 : 49PM ■ SYC& R Newport Beach CA P23/32 a . "Annexation" shall mean the annexation of the Property to the City of Palm Desert . b. "City" is the City of Palm Desert . C . "District Regulations" shall mean the pre-annexation zoning ordinance known as Villages of Bella Vista Planned Community District Regulations approved by the City pursuant to Ordinance No , as amended by Ordinance No . d. "Effective Date" of this Aareement shall be thirty (30) days after adoption. �— Le . "Project" is the development of the Property pursuant to this Agreement and the District Regulations . "Property" is the real property referred to in Paragraph 4 hereof . n g . "Property Owner" is Beachstone Joint Venture, Limited, and their successors and assigns . 2 . Exhibits . The following documents are referred to in this Agreement, attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference: Exhibit 2.t nation Description A Legal Description of the Property. B Ordinance Nos . and , Villages of Bella Vista Planned Community District Regulations and Amendments . 3 . Cgnditions Conc'W�IC t to Execution and Approval of Develp ent Agreement, A Currently herewith, the City is considering an Amendment to the District Regulations . Upon approval of said Amendment , said Amendment shall be part of this Agreement as Exhibit B entitled, "Villages of Bella Vista Planned Community District Regulations, as amended. " 4 . D..flScription of._Property. The Property which is the subject to this Agreement is described in Exhibit "A" . 5 . Interest o Pro_perty Own_.er . Property Owner represents that it is the fee simple owner of the Property. 6 . Binding, Effect of Agreement . The burdens of this Agreement bind and the benefits of the Agreement inure to the successors in interest to the parties hereto . 10/11/88 0620n/2058/030 -2- I 11 - 88 04 : 49PM ■SYC& R Newport Beach CA P24/32 I 7. Relationship of Parties . It is understood that the contractual relationship between the City and Property Owner is such that the Property Owner is an independent contractor and not the agent of the City. 8 , City' s Aapyoval_Froceed.kngs for Project. On , 19_, the City completed the approval of pre-annexation zoning for the Property. These are described in proceedings designated Villages of Bella Vista Planned Community District Regulations on file in the office of the City Clerk to which reference is made for further particulars . 9 . Hold Harmless . Property Owner agrees to and shall hold the City, its officers, agents, employees and representatives harmless from liability for damage or claims for damage for personal injury including death and claims for property damage which may arise from the direct or indirect operations of the Property Owner or those of its contractor, subcontractor, agent, employee or other person acting on his behalf which relate to the Project . The Project includes the Palm valley Channel Right of way Improvements or such other public improvements as may be dedicated to the City or any other public entity. 10 . Obligations of City and Property Owner . a . City shall provide Property Owner with all necessary and appropriate easements over or through property owned by the City, at no cost to Property Owner and as identified by Property Owner, through or within the public right of way owned or controlled by the City for the drilling of water and for the transmission of water from water sources within the City to the Property or to the Palm Valley Channel, as the case may be . b. Property Owner shall convey clear title to the City or its designeeAto the Palm Valley Channel Right of Way as described in Section 12 hereof . ^ C . City warrants and re resents that the Cityhas completed all genera plan and other entitlements necessary _to- allow the fulfillment of this Agreement . All areas designated as natural or public open space within the Villages of Bella Vista Planned Community District Regulations shall be dedicated to the City upon annexation and recordation of a parcel map dividing Planning Area 13 and l0a from the balance of the Property, n i I i 10/11/88 0620n/2058/030 -3- 11 - 88 04 : 50PM ■ SYC& R Newport Beach CA P25/32 City covenants : ( 1) to not de-annex theAProperty, and (2) to forever waive any and all open space dedication requirement or payment of fees in lieu thereof with respect to the property. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the covenants set forth immediately above shall , upon dedication of Planning Area 13 and 10a, survive the termination of this Agreement by default or otherwise. d . Planning Area 11 shall be retained by the Property Owner until a suitable replacement site is dedicated to the City or the commencement of construction of Sun Creek (the approximately 103 acre parcel immediately across State Highway 79 from the Property whichever first occurs, ..being the intent o the parties to retain the flexibility to incorporate Planning Area 11 into a development proposal , to be approved or rejected by the City, in its sole and absolute discretion, which integrates the Property with Sun Creek. The City and the Property Owner further acknowledge that the Property Owner is seeking to effectuate a land exchange with the Bureau of Land Management ( "BLM" ) with respect to Planning Areas 13 and 10a and each agree to cooperate with the other to that end so as to expand the golf course/open space land for any such integrated development . 11 . Specific Restrictions on Development of Property. The permitted uses of the Property, density and intensity of use, the maximum height and size of proposed buildings and provisions for reservation and/or dedication of land for public purposes are specifically set forth in the District Regulations and Site Plan attached hereto as Exhibit "B" . 12 . Public Improvements , Facill.tdQS and Services . Property Owner agrees to provide the Palm valley Channel Right of Way as described in Exhibit "C" to the City or its designee . Property Owner shall offer to convey such Right of Way at any time after the effective date of this Agreement pursuant to the Acquisition and Reimbursement Agreement attached to the Settlement Agreement as Exhibit "D" . Such conveyance shall be accepted upon Annexation of the Property to the City of Palm Desert . The City agrees to impose a condition on any other development approvals (other than Sun Creek and Villages of Bella Vista) which development will benefit from the Site Improvements (as defined in the Acquisition and Reimbursement Agreement) requiring the owner of any other such 2roperty or properties to enter into a reimbursement agreement and/or pay 10/11/88 0620n/2058/030 -4- I - 88 04 : 51PM ■ SYC& R Newport Beach CA P26/32 fees to the City and/or Coachella Valley Water District , as appropriate, to reimburse the Property Owner with respect to such Site Improvements . 13 . EubseauQnt Di*cretionary Action8 Of the__City. The City acknowledges that by electing to enter into contractual agreements such as this one, the obligations of which shall survive beyond the term or terms of the present members of the City Council, such action will serve to bind the City and future City Councils to the obligations thereby undertaken, and this Development Agreement shall limit the future exercise�\of certain governmental and proprietary powers of the City. By obligating the City pursuant to this Development Agreement, the City Council has elected to exercise certain governmental and proprietary powers at the time of entering into this Development Agreement rather than deferring its actions to some undetermined future date such that no subsequent discretionary actions of the City shall limit development of the project . The terms and conditions of this Development Agreement have been reviewed by the City and its City Council and have been found to be fair , just and reasonable and in the interest of the public health, safety, welfare and economic well being . 14 . fffect of A ree ent on Land Use Rggulation�. The rules, regulations and official policies governing permitted uses of the Property, the density of the Property, the design, improvement and construction standards and specifications applicable to development of the Property are those rules , regulations and official policies that have been approved, adopted and amended as of the effective date of the Ordinance approving this Development Agreement, and as set forth in the District Regulations . During the term of this Agreement , the Property owner shall have the right to develop the Project in accordance with the standards set forth in the District Regulations and City shall not interpret such standards so as to limit development to less than 1, 066 units , a 325 unit hotel (or some combination thereof as set forth in the District Regulations) and an 18 hole golf course unless requested to do so- by Property Owner . The City shall process the development of the Project , including without limitation, Annexation of the Property to the City of Palm Desert and all discretionary and administerial approvals with all due diligence . Master Plan Drainage fees shall be determined on a er acre basis within six (6) months from the Effective Date of this Agreement based on a master plan drainage study applicable to the area of which the Property is a part . Any such fee shall be applied only to that portion of the Property which does not drain into the Palm Valley Channel and shall be uniform throughout the area so studied . Such fees shall be payable incrementally upon recordation of subdivision maps . 10/11/88 0620n/2058/030 -5- I _ 1'1 - 88 04 : 51PM ■ SYC& R Newport Beach CA P27/32 This Development Agreement will promote and encourager the development of the Project by providing the Prop erty ownand its creditors with a grea�oredonomically certainty complete the Project .the Property Owner ' s ability its The City acknowledges and agrees that addition the ooproject in contractual obligation to permit development Owner has made a accordance with this agreement, the Property substantial expenditure of funds in good faith reliance on the discretionary approvals set forth in the District Regulations and , therefore, creates a vested right on behalf of the Property Owner , and/or its successors or assigns , to develop the Project in accordance with the standards set forth in this Agreement and the District Regulations under the Constitutions of the United States and the State of California. 15 . Pei; ^d; Reviewoomp ian ;e with A9eMe a , The City shall review this Agreement at least once every 12 month period from the date this Agreement is executed. b. During each periodic review by the City, the property Owner is required to demonstrate good faith compliance with the terms of the Agreement . The property Owner agrees to furnish such evidence of good faith compliance as the City in the exercise of its discretion may require . c, city does not waive any claim of defect in performance by Property Owner implied if on periodic review the City does not propose to modify or terminate the Agreement . 16 . Am n�men r nc lla1�of�L�g This Agreement may be amended or cancelled in whole or in part only by mutual consent of the parties and in the manner provided for in Government Code Section 65B68 , except that failure by the Property Owner to meet those obligations set forth in item 10 P shall make this Agreement and all approvals, contracts , and agreements related to this Development Agreement null and void and of no effect . 17 . En or ement . Unless amended or cancelled as provided in Paragraph 16, this Agreement is enforceable by either generaiparty hereto notwithstanding a change in the applicable specific plan, zoning , fees imposed as a condition to Development, subdivision or building regulations adopted by the City which alter or amend the rules , regulation or policies governing permitted uses of the land, density, de improvement and construction standards and specifications; provided, however , that this Agreement shall not prevent the City, in subsequent actions applicable to the Project and/or Property, from applying new rules , regulations and policies which do not conflict with this Agreement and those rules , 10/11/88 -6- 062on/2058/030 11 - 88 04 : 52PM ■ SYC& R Newport Beach CA P28/32 regulations and policies applicable on the date this Development Agreement is approved . For purposes of this Paragraph, the term "do not conflict" means the rules, regulations and policies which do not: a . modify the permitted types of land uses, the density or intensity of use, the maximum height and size of proposed buildings on the Property , or impose requirements for reservation or dedication of land or payment of fees , assessments, taxes, or other governmentally imposed exactions, however denominated, other than those provided for in this Development Agreement ; or b. prevent the Property Owner from obtaining all necessary approvals, permits, certificates and the like at such dates and under such circumstances as the Property owner, its assigns and/or successor owners would otherwise be entitled by existing rules, regulations and official policies ; or C . prevent the Property Owner, its assigns and/or successor owners from commencing , prosecuting and finishing grading of the land, constructing public and private improvements and satisfying the schedules as the Property owner, it assigns and/or successor owners would otherwise be entitled to do so by existing rules , regulations and official policies; or d, escalate the cost of construction or of selling land, housing, and/or other structural improvements in the Property. The Property Owner and the City agree that the Property Owner and the City shall cooperate in good faith in an effort to agree upon any and all future changes in or amendments to existing rules, regulations and official policies, which may be proposed for adoption. 18 . Default b roperty Owne-L. Property Owner is in default under this Agreement upon the happening of one or more of the following events or conditions : a . If a warranty, representation or statement made or furnished by Property owner to the City is false or proves to have been false in any material respect when it was made; b. a finding and determination by the City made following a periodic review under the procedure provided for in Government Code Section 65865 . 1 that upon the basis of substantial evidence the Property Owner has not complied in good faith with the conveyance of the Palm Valley Channel Right of way. Failure of the Property owner to develop the Project shall not result in liability of the Property Owner. A 10/11/88 0620n/2058/030 -7- 11 - 88 04 : 52PM ■ SYC& R Newport Beach CA P29/32 19 • Q0fault �git City is in default under this Agreement if it fails to accept, review, approve or issue , orland necessary development permits , entitlemly fashiontasrdefinedsby or building approvals for use in a timely this Development Agreement or City otherwise defaults under the terms of this Agreement . 20 . Pure TJPon, Default. a. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, the City may terminate this Agreement in accordance with the procedure adopted by the City. b, An express repudiation, refusal or renunciation of the contract , if the same is in writing and signed by the Property Owner, shall be sufficient to terminate the Agreement and a hearing on the matter shall not be required . C . Non-performance shall be excused only when it is prevented or delayed by acts of God or an emergency declared by the Gvenor of stateoorr federal tlaw he swhich delays tate of forn prevents ia , or h e adoption f a performance. d. All other remedies at law or in equity which are not otherwise provided for in this Agreement or in City' s regulations governing development agreements are available to the parties to pursue in the event there is a breach.. 21 . R;ght to Convey. The Property Owner may convey all or any portion of its rights , title and interest and obligations existing from time to time under this Development Agreement , including the Land Use Entitlements, to successor owners . Such conveyance shall be in written form recorded in the Official Records of the County of Riverside, California, and indexed in the grantor-grantee index. Likewise, the successor owners may establish their own successor owners . The Property Owner will represent to purchasers of the property or portion thereof that the obligations of the City herein undertaken are in full force and effect and cknowlinure that to he benefit of such mighthe City substantial liability if edges the Property Ownerer magu the City were to default in its obligations herein undertaken. 22 . A rn s es., and Costa• if legal action by either is brought because of breach of this Agreement or to party prevailing party enforce a provision of this Agreement , the p shall be entitled to attorneys fees and court costs . 23 RM-cordatior. The Clerk of the City Council shall record this Development Agreement with the Riverside County 10/11/88 _8_ 0620n/2058/030 f/ -88 04 : 53PM ® SYC& R Newport Beach CA P30/32 Recorder no later than ten this days after the effective date of the ordinance approving this Development Agreement• 24 • Notices• All notices required el provided for under this Agreement shall be inwriting aniildelNOtice reqred in uiredntorbe sent by certified mail , Postage given to City shall be addressed as follows : Ramon A_ Diaz Assistant City Manager/Director of Community Development City of Palm Desert Drive 73_510 Fred Waring Palm Desert , California 92260 Notices required to be given to Property Owner shall be addressed as follows : Beachstone Joint venture, Lited 1650 South Pacific Coast Highway Suite 308 Redondo Beach, California 90277 copy to : 660aNewportYCenter Carlson & Rauth Drive Suite 1600 Newport Beach, California 92660 Attn: Thomas P. Clark, Jr , A party may change the address by giving notice in writing to the other. party and the thereafter her of ter not shall be addressed ed new 25 . u„ias CSL5�r��—and Mierm& of . a • The singular includes the plural ; the masculine gender includes the feminine; "shall" is mandatory, "may" is permissive - b• if a part of this Agreemereementnis not l held affected. invalid, the remainder of the Agreement C . If there is more than one signer of this Agreement their obligations are joint d. The time limits set forth inthis Agreement mwi aif A th onsent of the be extended by mutual cgreement • the procedures for adoption of an 10/11/88 _g_ 0620n/2058/030 -88, 04 : 53PM ■ SYC& R Newport Beach CA P31 /32 rtiA e. It is intended and determined that the provisions of this Development Agreement shall constitute covenants which shall run awith nd the all land not representnpersonal obligations g the property for hofbenefit individual members of the Property Owner, its successors or assigns . 26 Du i n oAgreement . This Agreement shallaanp tinge . upon the effective and ate of the shallaexpi�e sevf the e City nteen (17) this Development Agreementunless said years after completion of annexation proceedings, ursuant to term is otherwise terminated, modified or extended p Section 16 herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by the parties on the day and year first above written. CITY Approved as to form: By: Attest:�� PROPERTY OWNER BEACHSTONE JOINT VENTURE, LIMITED By. president of its General Partner I 10/11/88 _lp� 0620n/2058/030 4 i 1 A ! ow AP om 1: Ell S:M 1 � a W cc r l KA 41 kk Y oarlxf k - hyiy k a ,.y x t �Y+'� +) .g r `{T' ,p y�y � � 1,iV,,�A, y, � "''r t�k y t�;�c� ,� �.•,,,7�`�s Fp 88AB "'hhh�� r G1 -© © o hekR 0 ©- fl FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS THE VILLAGES OF BELLA VISTA CITY OF PALM DESERT Prepared for: The Proposed Annexation of The Villages of Bella Vista to The City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, California 92260 February 28, 1989 STANLEY R. HOHMAN Planning and Development Services A s s 0 c i A T e s 11661 San Vicente Boulevard.Suite 505 Los Angeles,California 90049 (213)820-2680 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables and Figures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i i i Chapter 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.1 Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.2 Approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.3 Overview of the Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Chapter 2. Summary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.1 Projected Fiscal Impacts to the City of Palm Desert. . . 3 2.2 Projected Fiscal Impacts to the Redevelopment Agency . . 5 2.3 Projected Fiscal Impacts to the County of Riverside. . . 7 2.4 Capital Facility Fees and One-Time Charges . . . . . . . 7 Chapter 3. Land Use Description and Assumptions . . . . . . . . . 10 3.1 Proposed Land Uses and Estimated Population. . . . . . . 10 3.2 Projected Assessed Valuation and Market Assumptions. . . 14 3.3 Project Infrastructure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Chapter 4. Fiscal Impact Analysis: City of Palm Desert . . . . . . 19 4.1 Projected Fiscal Impact to the City of Palm Desert . . . 19 4.2 Projected Recurring Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 4.3 Projected Recurring Costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 Chapter 5. Fiscal Analysis to the Redevelopment Agency . . . . . . 29 5.1 Property Tax Projection Prior to Project Development . . 29 5.2 Property Tax Revenues After Project Development . . . . 31 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Chapter 6. Fiscal Analysis To The County of Riverside . . . . . . . 36 6.1 County of Riverside Fiscal Impact. . . . . . . . . . . . 36 6.2 Projected Revenues to the County General Fund . . . . . 36 6.3 Projected Costs to the Count General Fund . . . . . . . 38 y 6.4 County of Riverside Capital Improvement Fund . . . . . . 39 Appendix A. Fiscal Revenue and Cost Factors. . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES Table Page 2-1 Summary of Projected Revenues and Costs to the City of Palm Desert General Fund . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2-2 Allocation of Buildout Property Tax Revenues . . . . . . . . 6 2-3 Summary of Projected Revenues and Costs to the County of Riverside . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3-1 Land Use Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 3-2 Projected Population . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 3-3 Projected Assessed Valuation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 3-4 Comparable Destination Resort Hotel Data . . . . . . . . . . 18 4-1 Summary of Projected Revenues and Costs to the City of Palm Desert General Fund . . . . . . . . . . . 20 5-1 Projection of Base Year Property Tax Revenues to the County of Riverside . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 5-2 Projection of Net New Property Tax Valuation . . . . . . . . 32 5-3 Allocation of Buildout Property Tax Revenues . . . . . . . . 33 6-1 Summary of Projected Revenues and Costs to the County of Riverside . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 A-1 Summary of Annual Fiscal Revenue Factors . . . . . . . . . . 41 A-2 Summary of Annual Fiscal Cost Factors . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 Figure Page 3-1 Land Use Development Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 -iii- CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background This report presents a fiscal impact analysis for the proposed Villages of Bella Vista project. The fiscal impact analysis is prepared in conjunction with an application to the Riverside County Local Area Formation Commission (LAFCO) for annexation of the project area to the City of Palm Desert. The project is located within Redevelopment Project Area 1 of the City of Palm Desert. The analysis projects the likely fiscal impacts to the City of Palm Desert and to the Redevelopment Agency upon annexation of the project area to the City, as well as the impacts to the County of Riverside. All analyses are presented at buildout of the project and in constant 1988-89 dollars. The project is located west of Highway 74, just south of the existing boundary of the City of Palm Desert. On a total of 675 acres, the project is planned for a 325-room destination resort hotel , a championship golf course, a maximum of 1,066 dwelling units, including single family units, duplexes and condominiums, and 350 acres of open space. The project is planned for a five- year development period. 1.2 Approach The projected fiscal impacts of the proposed project are identified separately for the City of Palm Desert and the County of Riverside. In projecting the fiscal impacts to the City, both the case study approach and the per capita -1- -2- multiplier approach have been used. City costs were derived through interviews with key City staff and analysis of the City of Palm Desert budget- Financial Plan: Fiscal Year 1988-1989. The property tax increment which would accrue to the Redevelopment Agency and other jurisdictions is projected based on information from staff of the City Redevelopment Agency. County of Riverside costs were derived on a per capita multiplier basis, based on the latest County budget and the County of Riverside General Guidelines for Fiscal Impact Reports - County Services, March 4, 1988. 1.3 Overview of the Report Chapter 2 presents a summary of the fiscal impact analysis and a discussion of capital facility fees and one-time charges. Chapter 3 describes the proposed project, including land uses, projected population, market data, and infrastructure. Chapter 4 provides the detailed discussion of the projected fiscal impacts to the City of Palm Desert. Chapters 5 and 6 present the fiscal analysis to the Redevelopment Agency and the County of Riverside, respectively. Appendix A provides City of Palm Desert revenue and cost factors used in the analysis. CHAPTER 2 SUMMARY This chapter presents a summary of the fiscal impact analysis for the proposed Villages of Bella Vista project. The project area is currently located in unincorporated Riverside County and is within the City's Redevelopment Project Area 1. The fiscal impact report is prepared in conjunction with an application to LAFCO for incorporation of the area into the City of Palm Desert. The project is planned for a 325-room destination resort hotel , a championship golf course, a maximum of 1,066 dwelling units, including single family units, duplexes and condominiums, and 350 acres of open space. The project area totals 675 acres. Section 2.1 presents the fiscal impacts to the City of Palm Desert. Section 2.2 presents the fiscal impacts to the Redevelopment Agency and Section 2.3 presents the fiscal impacts to the County of Riverside. Section 2.4 presents information on capital facility fees and one-time charges. 2.1 Projected Fiscal Impacts to the City of Palm Desert Table 2-1 presents the projected fiscal impact to the City of Palm Desert. Annually recurring revenues are projected to total $1.39 million and annually recurring costs are projected to total $296.7 thousand. The net fiscal impact to the City of Palm Desert is a positive fiscal balance projected at $1 .10 million annually. -3- -4- TABLE 2-1 CITY OF PALM DESERT THE VILLAGES OF BELLA VISTA SUMMARY OF PROJECTED REVENUES AND COSTS TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT GENERAL FUND (In Constant 1988-89 Dollars) Percent Amount of Total Recurring Revenues Property tax/1 $0 0.0% Real property transfer tax 27,069 1.9% Sales tax 111,590 8.0% Transient occupancy tax 1,067,624 76.6% Business license tax 6,215 0.4% Franchises 25,499 1 .8% Revenue from other agencies 45,643 3.3% Fire tax 51,370 3.7% Other revenues 5,518 0.4% Interest 53,621 3.8% ---------- ------------ Total Revenues $1,394,150 100.0% Recurring Costs Police $121,179 40.8% Fire protection 51,370 17.3% Public works 5,000 1 .7% Library 0 0.0% Community services 0 0.0% Community development 36,480 12.3% Citywide administrative overhead 82,704 27.9% ---------- ------------ Total Costs $296,732 100.0% Net Recurring Surplus $1,097,417 Revenue/Expenditure Ratio 4.70 Source: Stanley R. Hoffman Associates, Inc. Note: 1 . All property tax revenues accrue to the Redevelopment Agency and County of Riverside taxing jurisdictions. -5- The major source of projected recurring revenues is the proposed hotel development. Transient occupancy taxes are projected to yield $1 .07 million annually, while taxable sales from shops and restaurants associated with the hotel are projected to yield $111 .6 thousand in annual revenues to the City of Palm Desert. 2.2 Projected Fiscal Impacts to the Redevelopment Agency The Redevelopment Agency has pass-through agreements with the County of Riverside and other County Agencies whereby 10 percent of the gross one property tax increment is distributed to the County General Fund and other agencies. The County Capital Improvement Fund and a low and moderate income housing fund also receive shares of the gross increment. Table 2-2 presents the projected allocation of the $6.47 million property tax increment. 0 The County General Fund receives 3.66 percent of the gross increment, or $236.7 thousand. a The School District receives 3.76 percent of the increment, or $243.2 thousand. o The College of the Desert receives 0.78 percent, or $50.5 thousand. The Library District receives 0.28 percent, or $18. 1 thousand. o All other districts receive the remaining 1.52 percent of the 10 percent pass-through, or $98.3 thousand. 0 The low and moderate income housing fund is allocated 20 percent of the gross increment, or $1 .29 million. o The County Capital Improvement Fund (CIF) is allocated a 12.45 percent share of the total property tax increment, or $805.3 thousand annually. o Net annual property tax revenues to the Redevelopment Agency at project buildout are projected at $3.72 million. This amount is equal to 57.6 percent of total revenues. d n m II « n x c V d II a U II w 2 L II d II L 6 r n H n N P O n M A Y n P II 1Ny d C II A p 11 N L II O VC 11 O .f �r y 11 N m « m dE1\ n « 11 y n m N g0 2All L wOI1M Z I d J N II P ' J z O v n W » d wxn .- rLNI1M y Q p i c y ii gi °CC O v ii N O W y Luxn � W cn N O W6� CD CD � mouw N C o CU J CL ^I o aIa[ Nv LL CC y H O i.7 CD C d o ii Ipn n C » n A m o r op I~4 1J-1 m 1 U « n E O p U 11 N r W 0 CJ 8 L IIM m F Z H U w^ Inl N Y 0 V N r M 11 N 6 1�1 p v 11 m r 11 U Od LL n M T Y 9 0 x n U « J C Q > M 11 N C Y T K4J v „ � (yEC� m yE^y m 11 1p�1p m d L m n .O O d CCi O � n t w8 u aL L n C L i 11 10 d � ql G n EO C N w n m E T r n d L � ii rw n a o T n C > Y 11 « M u n O 11 L II 6 H a n u ii a n e n » z -7- 2.3 Projected Fiscal Impacts to the County of Riverside While the County of Riverside will not provide municipal-type services after the annexation, the County will still be responsible for countywide services, such as courts, welfare and probation. The County will receive revenues from property tax, property transfer tax, and state subventions. As shown in Table 2-3, projected County General Fund revenues of $300. 1 thousand exceed projected costs of $147.6 thousand by $152.5 thousand. This annually recurring surplus is projected at project buildout and for each year thereafter. The projected surplus to the County General Fund results from relatively low costs and a large amount of property tax revenues from the RDA pass-through. The revenues to the Capital Improvement Fund are in addition to the projected surplus to the General Fund, and are projected at $805,280. 2.4 Capital Facility Fees and One-Time Charges Capital Facilities Streets and Roads. As a private, gated community, the Villages of Bella Vista project will provide much of its own infrastructure. All project streets will be built by the developer and privately maintained. In addition, the project developer is responsible for widening and improving the west side of Highway 74 along the project frontage to Caltrans standards. Parks. The project includes an 18-hole championship golf course, club house, and pro shop. A dedication of 350 acres of hillside open space to be left in a natural state will be made in lieu of the parks and recreation facility fees. Fire Stations and Eouioment. According to City staff, the project is not required to pay fire facility fees, as it is located within 5 miles of an existing fire station. -8- TABLE 2-3 CITY OF PALM DESERT THE VILLAGES OF BELLA VISTA PROJECT SUMMARY OF PROJECTED REVENUES AND COSTS TO THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE (In Constant 1988-89 Dollars) Per Capita Projected Percent Revenues to the General Fund Factor Amount of Total Property Tax (from RDA pass-through) $236,733 78.9% Property Transfer Tax (@ $0.55/$100 valuation) $27,069 9.0% Vehicle License Fees $28.94 $26,738 8.9% 2104 State Gasoline Tax $10.37 $9,581 3.2% ---------- ---------- Total Revenues to County General Fund $300,121 100.0% Costs to the General Fund/1 General Government $27.43 $25,343 17.2% Public Protection $90.83 $83,919 56.8% Mental Health $4.71 $4,352 2.9% Health $11 .73 $10,837 7.3% Public Assistance $15.13 $13,979 9.5% Education Recreation $2.11 $1,949 1.3% Other $7.86 $7,262 4.9% ----------- ----------- ---------- Total Costs to County General Fund $159.80 $147,640 100.0% Net Fiscal Balance to the County General Fund $152,480 Revenue/Expenditure Ratio 2.03 Amount to County Capital Improvement Fund/2 $805,280 Source: Stanley R. Hoffman Associates, Inc. County of Riverside, General Guidelines for Fiscal Impact Reports for County Services. Note: 1 . County costs net out Surveyor, Building and Safety, and Planning costs, as these costs are only incurred in unincorporated areas. 2. The projection of the Capital Improvement Fund amount is shown in Chapter 6. -9- Drainage. A drainage fee will be charged to the project to account for increased drainage requirements. The amount of this fee is under negotiation, but projects in similar areas have fees of about $2,500 per acre. One-Time fees The development of the Villages of Bella Vista project will require payment of several one-time fees to the City and to the School District, including new construction taxes, signalization fees, art in public places fees, and school fees, as follows: 0 New construction taxes are assessed at $0.40 per square foot for both residential and commercial development. o Signalization fees are assessed at $50 per dwelling unit and $500 per $1,000 in building valuation for commercial development. o Art in public places funding is one half of one percent of building valuation for all development 0 School fees are assessed at $1 .53 per square foot for residential development and $0.25 per square foot for nonresidential development. CHAPTER 3 LAND USE DESCRIPTION AND ASSUMPTIONS The Villages of Bella Vista project is located west of Highway 74, just south of the existing boundary of the City of Palm Desert. On a total of 675 acres, the project is planned for a 325-room destination resort hotel , a championship golf course, a maximum of 1,066 dwelling units, including single family units, duplexes and condominiums, and 350 acres of open space. The Palm Valley Channel , a major flood control facility, bisects the easterly portion of the property generally in a north/south direction. Figure 3-1 shows the land uses by area planned for the Villages of Bella Vista project. Section 3. 1 describes the land uses proposed for the Villages of Bella Vista, as well as estimated project population. Section 3.2 presents market assumptions and the projection of assessed valuation. Section 3.3 discusses project infrastructure. 3.1 Proposed Land Uses and Estimated Population Residential Development. Table 3-1 presents a summary of the proposed land uses for the Villages of Bella Vista project. As shown in Table 3-1, a maximum of 1,066 dwelling units are planned, encompassing six different product types. Residential land uses account for 277.5 acres of the total 675-acre project. For the purposes of this fiscal study, market information has been compiled based on comparable projects. Condominiums units are planned for 42 acres, at target densities ranging from 6.5 to 7.0 units per acre. A total of 283 condominiums units are planned, at an average estimated price of $275,000. As shown in Table 3-1, condominium -10- -u- i- 13 12 13 10 E 1 T f.- .✓4 V l.1 ri l.. 11 r L� AREA# LAND USE/DENSITY RANGE TARGET DENSITY ACRES DU4 1 LOW .2-5 5.0 17.5 87 2 LOW .2-5 3.D 50L 151 3 LOW .2-5 4.0 35.0 140 4 LOW .2-5 3b 25.0 87 5 VERY LOW .2-3 1.0 "A 44 6 LOW .2-5 3.6 27L go T MEDIUM .2-7 7.0 17.6 1" a MEDIUM .2-7 &a 24.5 161 g LOW .2-5 5.0 35.8 176 10 HOTEL - 13.5 - 11 POTENTIAL AEC AREA - 5.0 - 12 PALM VALLEY CHANNEL - 29.0 - 13 OPEN SPACE - 35MO - FIGURE 3-1 TOTALS &6 IAVpI 675.0 1D" LAND USE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 0� Dcem- -12 TABLE 3-1 CITY OF PALM DESERT THE VILLAGES OF BELLA VISTA LAND USE SUMMARY Target Planning Density/ Dwelling Year Average Area Dwelling Unit Type Acre Acres Units Comparable Project Developed Price vcvececeevice eeoccecccceeccccccee=ce= =eeeeece cececec= v_cc:ee ==e==ceeeceececeee=vevccee ccceee===e eeeecve=ee 1 Duplex 5.0 17.5 87 Rancho Mirage Country Club 1 9450,000 2 Single Family Detached 3.0 50.5 151 Monterra 1,2 S400,000 3 Single Family Detached 4.0 35.0 140 Monterra 1,2,3 S400,000 4 Single Family Detached 3.5 25.0 87 N/A 3,4 $750,000 5 Single Family Detached 1.0 44.5 44 Morning Side 4,5 $1,500,000 6 Single Family Detached 3.5 27.5 98 Morning Side 3,4 $1,500,000 7 Condos 7.0 17.5 122 PGA Nest/Legends 4,5 $275,000 8 Condos 6.5 24.5 161 PGA Hest/Legends 3,4,5 $275,000 9 Duplex 5.0 35.5 176 Rancho Mirage Country Club 2,3 S450,000 ........ ........ Subtotal--Residential 277.5 1,066 10 Hotel 13.5 325 Rooms 11 Potential Recreation Area 5.0 12 Palm Valley Channel 29.0 13 Open Space 350.0 TOTAL 675.0 Source: The Planning Center Stanley R. Hoffman Associates, Inc. Note: 1. According to the land use planners, The Planning Center, the $750,000 single family homes are assumed to fill a market need not currently served in the desert area. -13- units in the Villages at Bella Vista project are planned to be comparable to units at the nearby PGA West/Legends development. Duplex units, similar to those at the Rancho Mirage Country Club, are planned for 53 acres, at a target density of 5.0 units per acre. A total of 263 duplexes are planned, at an average estimated price of $450,000. Single family detached units, at target densities ranging from 3.0 to 4.0 per acre are planned for 85.5 acres. A total of 291 single family units, similar to dwelling units in the Monterra development, are planned at a price of $400,000. Single family detached units priced at $750,000 are planned for 25 acres and 87 dwelling units at a density of 3.5 units per acre. Dwelling units in this price range are assumed to fill a need currently under-served in the desert area. Finally, 142 single family detached units priced at $1,500,000 are planned on 72.0 acres at densities ranging from 3.5 to 1.0 per acre. The $1,500,000 single family homes are considered similar to those in the Morning Side development. Non-Residential Development The proposed 325-room hotel is planned for 13.5 acres, a potential 5-acre recreation area on the east side of Highway 74, the Palm Valley Channel accounts for 29 acres, and the remaining 350 acres is devoted to open space in a hillside area. The 18-hole golf course is interspersed throughout the residential areas of the project. -14- Projected Population Table 3-2 presents the projected population of the project. The population of the proposed project is estimated at an average household population of 2.6, based on City of Palm Desert average household sizes. At this rate, the 1,066 housing units yield a total population of 2,772. However, in discussion with staff of the City Finance Department, it is estimated that only about one-third of residents of similar developments in the City are full -time residents, due to the estimated number of second homes. For purposes of the fiscal impact analysis, only full -time residents are used in per capita calculations. Therefore, full-time residents of the Bella Vista project are estimated at 923, or one-third of 2,772. 3.2 Projected Assessed Valuation and Market Assumptions Projection of Assessed Valuation Residential . Table 3-3 presents the projected assessed valuation for the proposed Villages of Bella Vista project. As shown previously in Table 3-1, the valuation of housing units ranges from $400,000 to $1,500,000, based on comparable projects in the desert area. The total estimated valuation from the residential units is $590,825,000. Hotel . The hotel is assumed to have an estimated valuation of $150,000 per room, in land and building value and an additional $15,000 per room in unsecured value for fixtures and furnishings. At a total estimated valuation of $165,000 per room, the 325-room hotel has a projected value of $53,625,000, as shown in Table 3-3. Golf Course. The golf course is estimated to have a value of $300,000 per hole, or $5,400,000 for the 18-hole course. In addition, a pro shop and restaurant, assumed to be associated with the golf course, have an estimated value of $720,000, based on a 1,000-square foot pro shop and a 5,000-square feet -15- v a� Y ro E Y c Y N H E N 4 i ev ro L G Y N p O .+ n Y G) \ II 1n U.•�tP) CoIn tD N 1 fM V C II I� in l . M M00LL'! 1 N G) C E .+Gl E 0 II .--1 .--1 1 ON 3 ro •� 1II 1 G u l— Y u 1 d 1 ro n r rlL ,0r 11 ro 7 II Y h L 7 G 11 O d W O II Y > G Y 11 d •� G= II M •o to-W � W" LO. r Nv 6) L U 'D O= 11 to N M to Rr mr r f Y •� p II N M .--rN M MN « r 1� N Y u \ 11 U )FL rotD 11 1 N OY N r 11 7 N 11 E 0 G 11 L O L O Y 11 L G Cl. ro 11 Y ¢ v n 1 r c F. rn 11 n +o n vw .to 1 to ev o y c w n MLn -WWgrC Nton 1 to c •, .. r Y n .. .» -. o o Y 9 z r , II r . ro 1y N II to 3 I O p O tH N p W = II LO In O O In )n )n )n )n 1 to Y G r m G N 11 •M • � •^ O G) 11 ^ C;In � 4 rl: 1\ o 1 V t 1 1\ N C C. W Q O S. 11 .-r LO M N < N .--1 N M 1 1\ Y O J G u 11 N U 4 ti 1y W ¢ 11 r U •"d H O Q ~ Oi ro Y J W \ It CD CD O to O In O m CD G� HJ ^J Y >1 II . . . . . . . . . N 4+ d 11 1n MG M � M to LL•! V1 0 U C M., i 11 d � N C L 0 u 11 Y d w ro C¢ 11 ro C E _ w n 0 0 ~ p n O 4 L i n 0 ro V ea N r 0, n d d d m m ¢ c. UE n .c===.a c o W ., 11 u u u u u ro Gen en G 11 YYYY -0 tE NV- M >, n ma) www w Eoe n F— II ppppp O •� •rY II S Y $- 'C U n >I >' >' >, >1 II rr-rr rd ro •n •C II r C r E 01 O I, 11 b •eEc b m to >, ti C i 0. Q) II U- W W W WIt d II X N d d 0) G) N N X C 11 G)rrrrr O O G) J ro r II r 01 Of O) O) 01� r Q Y G. G II C C C C C C C G N H 3 .--1 11 n +- 0 0 7 O - O pNtnNNNUUp H n n ci o+ n u C II L N Y c ro n 11 0 ci n -+NMVInto1� corn z ro ¢ n n a n II -16- u Il000000000 0 000 0 u000000000 o 000 o II C C C C C C C 0 0 o 0 0 0 o u n LO C. o L7 0 o Ln 1� 0 LA C, Ln uNi oON 0 0 I I L A O O L A CD O Ln � N i t II r1� 0 NOO LA NN i O tOR � i LA r CID 11 I �✓4 IO 7 II o1 O tD Ln to l\ M d' 01 O MIA i O Yr II M to lA 40 to d• m d' n i C1 LA fA i lA O m II 6A 49 iA 69 69.-I 69 69 W. I LA 69 I -tD H 9 II to I Y9 i fA Y 4 E d 00 or S- L L N \\\ II O Cl Cl O O O O O O O C. C. N 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O N m N II 00000'0000 OO .--I A U 11 �W i •- II OOOOOO LA LAO Lll O LU L II Ln O O LA O O I� I�Ln IDO > a- II Rd' -crI� LA LAN tV V. M Q It IA/YY W f19 .•W fA Vi b9 W ww Y II N N W II E N . . I O r H O L II IY 2 L) �••� F- 11 b OI II ^ O I\ d• co N •--i to I LO LA m O C N II MIA d' m d• O, N tDn I t0 C-J CD W Q J O r II ~ ~ O M O Ln J Q - r G II I '-I tD Ol II I I O m m CO fm It W Q O N 8 N I11 I LA lA O O LA IA LA LA LA I Ln LA J 1 W Im LU II ir.� O LA LA d' t\ r�: f\ M m Ln N '� i I •--� LL9 M N N .--I N M i t` .--I H O 67 Q Y Q II i N . Q G 11 LO U H J OW 4�fA 11 IAO LA OLACl, W O N Y N II LA MAY M M I� LD to H W 1j U O•, i 11 a) H 5 G ro c ¢ 11 ••- � U II O N I Y H II �LC'O� C Q II G! fU fU at N r A II L L L L cc L C II U U U to 16 ro A 0 11 A A A b N Y C II YYYYY C Y 4- a II N 01 N N N LU N 4- F- 5 2 Yn aaaaa � n rr Lu•c n z L>, a Iz II H6EEE I Inrt II 19 to 10 16 I i a O II W W W W W r 0 G! C 11 to 0 r r 11 N rrrrr O O N O r Ln J Y 1 r II r Ol Ol OL�'O r Y LU 4. Q Cl) 11 C. a OI G C C C G C .0Y N r S- F- m3 =II m N Ln Ln Ln Ln L.) L.) m Ln 2GO C- � II •• N fT II U G Id II � C d II O O C L II .-I N M V, LA t0 fv m Ot •--� h IO Q II I d II -17- As shown in Table 3-3, the total valuation of the Villages of Bella Vista is projected at $650,570,000. Market Assumptions Table 3-4 presents information on average room rates and average occupancy rates for three comparable destination resort hotels in the area. As shown in Table 3- 4, room rates vary during the year, with averages ranging from $240 to $265 per room in the high season (January through May) ; from $70 to $105 during the off- season (June through September) ; and $170 to $220 during the shoulder season (October through December) . Conservatively, the hotel in the Villages at Bella Vista project is estimated to obtain annual average room rates of $150. Hotel occupancy rates for comparable hotels are in the range of 75 percent. For the Villages of Bella Vista project, a 75 percent occupancy rate is used. 3.3 Project Infrastructure The Villages of Bella Vista project is proposed as a private, gated community. All project streets, lighting, and landscaping are assumed to be privately built and maintained. In addition, all recreation and open space land and facilities are assumed to be privately developed and maintained. A traffic signal will be required at the project entrance off Highway 74. The project developer is assumed to provide funding for the installation of this signal . Annual operations and maintenance costs to the City of Palm Desert for this traffic signal are estimated at $5,000, based on average cost data. The project developer will improve the west side of Highway 74 along the project frontage to Caltrans standards. I _- I it N Q C) U II h h Z m C C) II IV e0 Y II i G m II C) 7 d' 11 > U II Q V II O 11 u II i U it O LL7 O 1 N c C) 11 h h N i •O O C N C) tv � II 69 fA V! CZ Y 7 to 0 0) Y II 2 = N O II O N J O Y II Lo UA O Q W O O. II O O) h C C C) ff! N O V- O N II 1A V) S T O t0 N 11 C II W Q K b N 11 N J Ocm 11 W J V) C 11 m C O) T II O O u7 Z i L OE II N N N J 1 O N O) i II 69 Vi bq C > r C Cwi 11 N 7) II ~ O C7 Z v o- II II N11 to O fh H FJ•y W L E II a N l0 U U O O II �-•) W W E a II S J 7 11 ^ CO Z w II N O 11 C) Y Q II A O II £ II C) U O It T 0 O U C II t6 N to O It r Y Q eC II C C U II O O t0 O II L L c E J I I U V d W C C 4 LC c J S II II II to II tv n E T n a u ea r- _ n a c n c o CD O Y Y Y J II .1 N O 11 r tC 2 11 i Y II Y rt C 0 O U •r Q) II •r 7 U 11 i N d i i Y 7 11 O •r 0 O 11 � K J N CHAPTER 4 FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS: CITY OF PALM DESERT This chapter presents the analysis of recurring revenues and costs to the City of Palm Desert projected to result from development of the proposed Villages of Bella Vista project. Section 4.1 presents the projected net fiscal impact, including total annually recurring revenues and costs, the net fiscal balance, and the projected revenue/expenditure ratio. Section 4.2 presents the detailed recurring revenues to the City, including property transfer tax, transient occupancy tax, sales tax, fire taxes, business license tax, franchise fees, other revenues, and interest income. Section 4.3 presents projected recurring costs, including police services, fire protection, planning and community development, public works operations and maintenance, and citywide administrative costs. 4.1 Projected Fiscal Impact to the City of Palm Desert Table 4-1 presents the projected fiscal impact to the City of Palm Desert. Annually recurring revenues are projected to total $1.39 million and annually recurring costs are projected to total $296.7 thousand. The net fiscal impact to the City of Palm Desert is a positive fiscal balance projected at $1 .10 I million annually. The revenue/expenditure ratio is 4.70, indicating that for every dollar in projected costs, there are 4.70 dollars available in projected revenues. 4.2 Projected Recurring Revenues The City of Palm Desert receives no revenues from the undeveloped project property. All base revenues accrue to the County of Riverside or to the Redevelopment Agency, and are presented in Chapter S. -19- -20- TABLE 4-1 CITY OF PALM DESERT THE VILLAGES OF BELLA VISTA SUMMARY OF PROJECTED REVENUES AND COSTS TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT GENERAL FUND (In Constant 1988-89 Dollars) Percent Amount of Total Recurring Revenues Property tax/1 $0 0.0% Real property transfer tax 27,069 1.9% Sales tax 111,590 8.0% Transient occupancy tax 1,067,624 76.6% Business license tax 6,215 0.4% Franchises 25,499 1.8% Revenue from other agencies 45,643 3.3% Fire tax 51,370 3.7% Other revenues 5,518 0.4% Interest 53,621 3.8% ---------- ------------ Total Revenues $1,394,150 100.0% Recurring Costs Police $121,179 40.8% Fire protection 51,370 17.3% Public works 5,000 1 .7% Library 0 0.0% Community services 0 0.0% Community development 36,480 12.3% Citywide administrative overhead 82,704 27.9% ---------- ------------ Total Costs $296,732 100.0% Net Recurring Surplus $1,097,417 Revenue/Expenditure Ratio 4.70 Source: Stanley R. Hoffman Associates, Inc. Note: 1 . All property tax revenues accrue to the Redevelopment Agency and County of Riverside taxing jurisdictions. -21- After project annexation and development to the City, recurring revenues to the City of Palm Desert are projected to total $1 .39 million, as shown in Table 4-1. Transient occupancy taxes are projected as the largest source of recurring revenues at $1.07 million and 76.6 percent of the total . Sales taxes from ancillary hotel uses comprise the second largest source of projected recurring revenues, at $111 .6 thousand and 8.0 percent. Other revenue sources account for smaller percentages of total revenues, ranging from 0.4 percent for business license taxes up to 3.8 percent for interest income. All property tax revenues accrue to the Redevelopment Agency, the Riverside County General Fund, or other taxing jurisdictions. Real Property Transfer Tax As shown in Table 4-1, real property transfer taxes are projected at $27.1 thousand annually at project buildout. The City receives an amount equal to $0.55 per $1 ,000 of value of transferred property. Residential property is assumed to turnover at a rate of once every ten years. Commercial property is assumed to turn over once in 20 years. Transient Occupancy Tax Gross room receipts are based on a 325-room hotel , with an average room rate of $150 and an average occupancy rate of 75 percent. These average room and occupancy rates are considered comparable to similar destination resorts in the area, and reflect an average of rates throughout the year. Comparable hotel data is shown previously in Chapter 3. -22- The City's General Fund receives 8 percent of gross .hotel room receipts. Total gross room receipts are projected at $13.3 million annually at project buildout. Transient occupancy tax revenues are projected to total $1.07 million annually. Sales Tax Sales tax revenues are projected to total $111.6 thousand annually at project buildout. Sales tax revenues are generated through sales from restaurants and shops associated with the hotel and from a pro shop and restaurant associated with the golf course. Hotel sales tax revenues are projected as a percentage of hotel room receipts. Based on data from Trends in the Hotel Industry: 1987, by Pannell Kerr Foster, a resort hotel is estimated to generate taxable sales equal to about 75 percent of gross room receipts. With annual hotel gross receipts projected at $13.3 million, taxable sales are projected at $10.0 million, and the City's General Fund receives I percent of this amount in sales tax revenues, or $100.0 thousand. In addition, a 1,000 square foot pro shop is estimated to generate taxable sales of $150 per square foot, and a 5,000 square foot restaurant is estimated to generate taxable sales of $200 per square foot, based on information from the Urban Land Institute, Dollars and Cents of Shopping Centers, 1987. Golf course retail uses are projected to generate sales tax revenues of $1,150. Business License Tax Business license revenues are projected at $6.2 thousand annually. Business license tax revenues are projected based on the City's fee schedule and the estimated receipts for the hotel and associated businesses. The hotel 's -23- estimated gross receipts of $13.3 million yield a business license tax of $2,063 annually. The additional $10.1 million in receipts from the hotel shops and restaurants are split among an estimated 10 establishments assumed to generate about $1 million each, for business license tax revenue of $376 per establishment, or $3,760 in total . In addition, the pro shop and restaurant associated with the golf course are assumed to generate an additional $91 and $301 in business license tax revenues, respectively, based on estimated gross receipts. Franchise Fees Franchise fees are projected to total $30.6 thousand annually at project buildout. Franchise fees are estimated on a per capita basis, using information from the 1988-89 budget. Estimated 1987-88 franchise fee revenues of $600,000 are divided by January 1, 1988 year-round City population of 18,100 from the State Department of Finance, to yield per capita franchise revenues of $33.15. This per capita factor is applied to the estimated 923 year-round residents of the proposed project. i Revenue from Other Agencies Revenue from other agencies are projected to total $45.6 thousand annually at project buildout. These revenues are projected on a per capita basis, and include State Gasoline Tax Revenues 2106 and 2107, motor vehicle in-lieu fees, and cigarette taxes. The per capita factors are estimated based on the 1987- 88 budget amounts and a population of 18,100, as shown below: 1987-88 Per Capita Revenue Source Amount Factor State Gasoline Tax 2106 $81,500 $4.50 State Gasoline Tax 2107 $146,600 $8.10 Motor Vehicle In-Lieu $595,000 $32.87 Cigarette Tax $71,890 $3.97 Total $49.44 -24- Revenue from other agencies projected from the Villages of Bella Vista project is based on the $49.44 per capita figure and the estimated year-round population of the project of 923. Other Revenues Other revenues are projected to total $5.5 thousand annually at project buildout. These revenues are projected on a per capita basis, using the 1987- 88 budget figures, and include: Per 1987-88 Capita Revenue Source Amount Factor Motor vehicle fines $78,000 $4.31 General fines $10,000 $0.55 Miscellaneous (includes sale of maps and rentals) $20,200 $1.12 Total $5.98 Other revenues are projected based on the $5.98 per capita figure and the estimated year-round population of the project of 923. Proposition A Fire Tax Proposition A Fire Tax revenues are projected to total $51.4 thousand annually. These revenues are assumed to offset costs for fire protection services. Fire tax revenues are based on the City's ordinance and fee schedule of $48 per dwelling unit per year, an equivalent dwelling unit charge for the hotel which amounts to $154 annually, and a charge of $48 per year for the golf course land. The number of dwelling units in the proposed project totals 1,066, yielding $51 .2 thousand in fire tax revenues. -25- The equivalent dwelling unit (EDU) calculation for the hotel is based on required fire flow for a fire-resistant, fully-sprinklered, 325,000-square foot structure. Based on the City of Palm Desert schedule, the 8,000 gallons per minute requirement for a structure of this size is cut in half for a fully-sprinklered structure. At 1,250 gallons per EDU, the resultant 4,000 gallon per minute requirement is equal to 3.2 equivalent dwelling units. The hotel fire tax charge is equal to 3.2 times $48, or $154. Interest Income It is assumed that any excess of revenues over costs generated by the proposed project could be invested in short-term instruments at interest rates of about 8 percent. For purposes of this analysis, interest income is projected at one-half this amount, or 4 percent. This accounts for the fact that revenues are received over the course of an entire year and not in one lump sum. Interest income is projected as a percentage of all other projected revenues. As shown in Table 4-1, interest income is projected to total $53.5 thousand annually. 4.3 Projected Recurring Costs As also shown in Table 4-1, costs to the City of Palm Desert General Fund are projected to total $296.7 thousand annually at project buildout. Projected costs include police and fire protection, planning and community development, public works maintenance and citywide administrative overhead. Police costs account for the largest percentage of projected total costs at 40.8 percent. Fire costs are projected to account for 17.3 percent of costs, citywide overhead for 27.9 percent, community development for 12.3 percent, and public works maintenance costs for the remaining 1 .7 percent of projected costs. -26- No costs are projected for street maintenance, lighting, landscaping or for parks, as the project will have privately operated and maintained streets, roads, and parks. Library services are provided by the County of Riverside and recreation programs are provided to the City through the Coachella Valley Recreation and Parks District, and are not projected to have any fiscal impacts on the City. Police Costs Police costs are projected to total $121 .2 thousand annually at project buildout. Police costs are projected on a per capita basis, using the current budget information for 1987-88. Total police costs in 1987-88 are $2,376,125. When this amount is divided by the 18,100 year-round population, a per capita police cost factor of $131.28 is obtained. When multiplied by the projected year-round Bella Vista population of 923, police costs of $121.2 thousand are obtained. Fire Costs Costs for fire protection of $51 .4 thousand annually are projected based on the City's fee schedule for the fire tax, assuming that the fee structure is designed to offset costs. Fire fees of $48 per year per dwelling unit are charged, as well as an equivalent dwelling unit charge of $154 for the hotel and $48 for the golf course land. Planning and Community Develooment Planning and Community Development costs are projected to total $36.5 thousand annually. These costs are projected on a per capita basis, using 1987-88 budget figures. Total 1987-88 planning and community development costs are $719,313. When this amount is divided by the year-round population of 18, 100, -27- a per capita cost of $39.74 is derived. When multiplied by. the projected year-round Villages of Bella Vista population of 923, planning and community development costs of $36.5 thousand are obtained. Public Works Operations and Maintenance Public works operations and maintenance costs for the Villages of Bella Vista are incurred only for the traffic signal at the project entrance off Highway 74. All streets, lights, landscaping and parks are assumed to be privately maintained. Annual operations and maintenance costs for one traffic signal are projected at $5,000, as shown in Table 4-1. Citywide Overhead Citywide overhead costs of $82.7 thousand are projected on a per capita basis for citywide functions assumed to experience increases in costs due to development of the Villages of Bella Vista project. Citywide costs not anticipated to increase include: City Council , Community Promotion, Hauteline, Art Committee, and Economic Development. Using the current budget--1987-88 figures, the following administrative and citywide activities likely to increase as a result of project development were identified: Per Capita Department 1897-88 Amount Factor City Clerk $146,230 $8.08 Elections $11,150 $0.62 Attorney $39,310 $2.17 Special Legal $286,000 $15.80 City Manager $393,957 $21.77 Finance $290,896 $16.07 Audit $23,000 $1.27 Personnel Admin. $121,804 $6.72 General Services $309,334 $17.09 -------- -------- Total $1,621,681 $89.60 -28- When multiplied by the projected year-round Villages of Bella Vista population of 923, citywide overhead costs of $82.7 thousand are obtained. CHAPTER 5 FISCAL ANALYSIS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY This chapter presents the projection and allocation of property tax revenues both before and after project development. Section 5. 1 presents the allocation of projected property tax revenues prior to project development. Section 5.2 presents the allocation of projected property tax revenues after project development. 5.1 Property Tax Projection Prior to Project Development The proposed Villages of Bella Vista project is located in unincorporated Riverside County on the southern border of the City of Palm Desert. In 1981-82 the entire area was put into the City of Palm Desert's Redevelopment Project Area 1 . Base Year Revenues to the County of Riverside In 1981-82, the assessed valuation of the project property was about $3.2 million, as shown in Table 5-1 . At the one percent property tax levy, property tax revenues were $32,723. Of the total base-year property tax increment of $32,723, the County General Fund received 36.6 percent, or about $11,977. The Unified School District received 37.6 percent of the total , or about $12,304. The College of the Desert received 7.8 percent, or about $2,552. The Library District is projected to receive 2.8 percent, or $916. Finally, the remaining 15.2 percent, or $4,974, is split among remaining districts. _P9- -30- n •a � i N II O1 c 0) • 11 Qt IA II V ++ ti 11 W O m I I ro II T 4+ L U Z-� II tD ro 00 II .y L L • II D1 L F� N 11 W N II J • (c 11 O ro II tti a+ II O i 11 N 0) It lA 0) N 3$ II Ln 0) 0) 00 II (DO II N n It w 0) II O L N I I to U a•� ro II . W II O Y 3� 11 -cr Z V to II O W O •, 11 M W L iJ M II N OC U N II •-•� N 4j II M F Q W N O ro 11 It G m 11 It= W Q C W O YN� It Ot o--� I m CC co d U 11 fq 10 ID -i d W I O ro II J U. 00 L O II J cc L O C Y CA d +� 11 cc re I— CD co Z.- 4J U Q W O C G Y J to C••) rom cm 0) r~r ti m W N M N • Q I� U li ~ O C ++ I-i M 01 N W N O. rO v fM 01 O F w a+ v ro > W � � N 0) d y C Q 0p .•-� C L i ro 0) ti Y E N (n ro 4- a rn ~ O .. x o � T ro 2 E S- H G L ro O 0) T d d 4J d Y O L aw m L 0) 0) O 7 d O O C ro u i ro f �! d Y •� 0) N U L n L ro o ro O L N Y d Y d O ti-• 0) i m O VI 7 ro ro m N m -31- Increase in Assessed Valuation to the Redevelopment Agency The undeveloped property is assumed to increase in value by 2 percent per year, as shown in Table 5-2. In the seven years from 1981-82 to 1988-89, the increase in value is estimated at $486,549, for a total undeveloped property valuation of $3,758,883. 5.2 Property Tax Revenues After Project Development Net New Property Valuation. The estimated 1988-89 undeveloped valuation of $3.76 million is subtracted from the projected $650.57 million valuation of the Villages of Bella Vista development to yield net new valuation of $646.81 million, at project buildout as shown in Table 5-2. The one percent property tax on $646.81 million yields a projected $6.47 million in property tax increment. Property Tax Allocation. The Redevelopment Agency has pass-through agreements with the County of Riverside and other County Agencies whereby 10 percent of the gross one property tax increment is distributed to the County General Fund and other agencies. In addition, once the total gross increment to the RDA exceeds three million and then five million dollars, the County Capital Improvement Fund receives an 18.3 and a 36.6 percent share, respectively, of the gross increment. An additional mandatory element of RDA funds is the allocation of 20 percent of the increment to a low and moderate income housing fund. Table 5-3 presents the projected allocation of the $6.47 million property tax increment. A pass-through amount totalling 10 percent of the gross increment is allocated to Riverside County and various agencies and districts. -32- TABLE 5-2 CITY OF PALM DESERT THE VILLAGES OF BELLA VISTA PROJECTION OF NET NEW PROPERTY TAX VALUATION Base Year Valuation (1981-82) of Project Property/1 $3,272,334 Current Year Valuation (1988-89) Increased at 2% per Year/2 $3,758,883 Projected New Valuation of Project/3 $650,570,000 Net New Property Valuation $646,811, 117 Projected Total Property Tax Increment $6,468, 111 Source: Stanley R. Hoffman Associates Notes: 1 . Base year valuation data is from the Redevelopment Agency 2. The RDA receives revenues from the increase in valuation after 1981-82; the County and other affected jurisdictions receive revenues from the base year valuation, plus any negotiated pass-throughs. 3. The net new valuation is the subtraction of current year valuation from the projected new project valuation. -33— 15 II � d n « d ii XO omll � yu « d II d u 11 O d u L a � a a 0 h M f� < 11 N O• of V p It N �p dO 11 A p II M P 11 N L n o « n o .r O to, \ 11 N w II �O(pp M U d L W {i O 11 y E 11 C d 11 N Q ri L d O W 11 M y O �v „ W z 11 M d II N d Q N lain >( r L N 11 M y to F1y- �"- <M II P <CC > ^ O v 11 M O W W J W I O WCc A. 0 00 R C; 11 cc J•-vll on E W d CO i n rj Jd .�-I 0 .xx+ ii In IL Q LL W O O d N m 11 V C F" O C7011 C Sll o o " M 1�1 d O L v n O FN IN m C 4 U 61 20 li. X _ « II O E6 W � g•�d ii n m Z C 50 ."m « W.-M 11 M •a 1••M `/ p v 11 11 U Q 11 d SOX iiA Q wo1l ~ � � $ n yEyE (1 ¢i d do E II � 0 r V % It Y d C D d If O V d O 6d L « T 11 O Q CI O 1 Vy 11 M V 2L 6 1 W d01: uES E r 8 p 11 O p N N d II • d L d u > r n d o too 8y ii C > d 11 N U �- OII L n d 11 d u u n L d ii o 0 N 2 -34- Pass-Through Revenue Allocation. As shown in Table 5-3, the County General Fund receives 3.66 percent of the gross increment, or $236.7 thousand. This is in addition to the estimated $11 .9 thousand the County General Fund receives from the 1981-82 base year valuation, as shown previously in Table 5-1. The School District receives 3.76 percent of the increment, or $243.2 thousand. The College of the Desert receives 0.78 percent, or $50.5 thousand. The Library District receives 0.28 percent, or $18.1 thousand. All other districts receive the remaining 1.52 percent of the 10 percent pass-through, or $98.3 thousand. Again, these amounts are in addition to the estimated amounts received for the 1981-82 base year, as shown in Table 5-1 . Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund. The low and moderate income housing fund is allocated 20 percent of the gross increment, or $1 .29 million. County Capital Improvement Fund. The County Capital Improvement Fund (CIF) is allocated varying amounts, depending upon the amount of the total gross increment to the RDA from Project Area 1. Based on information from the Redevelopment Agency, once the RDA receives gross property tax revenues over three million, the Capital Improvement Fund receives an 18.3 percent share of the gross increment. After the increment reaches five million, the Capital Improvement Fund receives a 36.6 percent share of the gross increment. Using data from projected RDA property tax allocations for 1996-97, the County Capital Improvement Fund is allocated a 12.45 percent share of the total property tax increment, or $805.3 thousand annually. -35- Net Property Tax Increment to the Redevelopment Agency After subtracting all pass-through revenues, revenues to the low and moderate income housing fund, and revenues to the County Capital Improvement Fund, the net property tax revenues to the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency is projected at $3.72 million annually in 1988-89 constant dollars. This amount is equal to 57.6 percent of total revenues, as shown in Table 5-3. CHAPTER 6 FISCAL ANALYSIS OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE This chapter presents the fiscal analysis to the County of Riverside. Revenues and costs to the County General Fund are projected based on per rs from the County's General Guidelines for Fiscal Impact capita multipliers act Y ° Services. All per-capita multipliers are used with an Reports County p p P estimated full-time project population of 923, as shown in Chapter 3. Property tax and property transfer tax revenues are projected based on assessed valuation, the pass-through agreement with the Redevelopment Agency (RDA) , and the County's $0.55 per $1,000 of valuation transfer tax allocation. Also included in this chapter are projected revenues to the County's Capital Improvement Fund resulting from agreements with the City of Palm Desert Redevelopment Project Area 1. 6.1 County of Riverside Fiscal Impact As shown in Table 6-1, projected County General Fund revenues of $300. 1 thousand exceed projected costs of $147.6 thousand by $152.5 thousand. This annually recurring surplus is projected at project buildout and for each year thereafter. The revenue/expenditure ratio is projected at 2.03. 6.2 Projected Revenues to the County General Fund Projected revenues include property taxes from the RDA pass-through, property transfer taxes, vehicle license fees, and Section 2104 Gasoline Tax revenues, as shown in Table 6-1 . In total , revenues to the County General Fund are projected at $300.1 thousand annually. -36- -37- TABLE 6-1 CITY OF PALM DESERT THE VILLAGES OF BELLA VISTA PROJECT SUMMARY OF PROJECTED REVENUES AND COSTS TO THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE (In Constant 1988-89 Dollars) Per Capita Projected Percent Revenues to the General Fund Factor Amount of Total Property Tax (from RDA pass-through) $236,733 78.9% Property Transfer Tax (@ $0.55/$100 valuation) $27,069 9.0% Vehicle License Fees $28.94 $26,738 8.9% 2104 State Gasoline Tax $10.37 $9,581 3.2% ---------- ---------- Total Revenues to County General Fund $300,121 100.0% Costs to the General Fund/1 General Government $27.43 $25,343 17.2% Public Protection $90.83 $83,919 56.8% Mental Health $4.71 $4,352 2.9% Health $11.73 $10,837 7.3% Public Assistance $15.13 $13,979 9.5% Education Recreation $2.11 $1,949 1.3% Other $7.86 $7,262 4.9% ----------- ----------- ---------- Total Costs to County General Fund $159.80 $147,640 100.0% Net Fiscal Balance to the County General Fund $152,480 Revenue/Expenditure Ratio 2.03 Amount to County Capital Improvement Fund/2 $805,280 Source: Stanley R. Hoffman Associates, Inc. County of Riverside, General Guidelines for Fiscal Impact Reports for County Services. Note: 1 . County costs net out Surveyor, Building and Safety, and Planning costs, as these costs are only incurred in unincorporated areas. 2. The projection of the Capital Improvement Fund amount is shown in Chapter 6. -38- The County of Riverside is allocated 3.66 percent of total property tax revenues from the project, in a pass-through arrangement with the RDA _ (described in Chapter 5) . Property tax revenues account for the largest source of recurring revenues to the County General Fund, at $236.7 thousand and 78.9 percent of the projected total . Property transfer taxes totalling $27.1 thousand are projected, accounting for 9.0 percent of total revenues. Transfer taxes are projected based on assumed project turnover rates and the County's $0.55 per $1,000 valuation share. Vehicle license fees and Section 2104 State Gasoline Tax revenues are projected using County of Riverside per capita multipliers of $28.94 and $10.37 per capita, respectively. Vehicle license fees are projected to total $26.7 thousand annually--8.9 percent of the total , and Section 2104 Gas Tax revenues are projected to total $9.6 thousand annually--3.2 percent of the total . 6.3 Projected Costs to the County General Fund County of Riverside per capita cost multipliers used for incorporated areas are shown in Table 6-1, and include: o General Government $27.43 o Public Protection $90.83 o Mental Health $4.71 o Health $11 .73 o Public Assistance $15.13 o Education/Recreation $2.11 o Other $7.86 TOTAL $159.80 -39- Per capita cost multipliers are from the County's Fiscal Guidelines. Costs for surveying, building and safety and planning have been netted out, as these cost apply only in unincorporated areas. With projected Villages of Bella Vista full -time population of 923, and total per capita costs of $159.80, total costs to the County General Fund are projected at $147.6 thousand annually. Public protection accounts for 56.8 percent of projected costs; general government for 17.2 percent; public assistance for 9.5 percent; and health for 7.3 percent. Other costs, mental health, and education/recreation account for the remaining projected costs. 6.4 County of Riverside Capital Improvement Fund In addition to the net recurring surplus of $152.5 thousand projected to the County General Fund, the County of Riverside is projected to receive $805.3 thousand annually, in 1988-89 constant dollars, to the Capital Improvement Fund. Capital Improvement Fund monies are received out of property tax . revenues to the Redevelopment Agency, as shown previously in Chapter 5. APPENDIX A FISCAL REVENUE AND COST FACTORS: CITY OF PALM DESERT -40- -41-_ TABLE A-1 CITY OF PALM DESERT THE VILLAGES OF BELLA VISTA SUMMARY OF ANNUAL FISCAL REVENUE FACTORS VALUE EXPLANATION GENERAL 18,100 EXISTING POPULATION FOR CALCULATING MULTIPLIERS LOCAL TAXES 1 .00% PROPERTY TAX RATE, TOTAL 0.00% PROPERTY TAX ALLOCATION, PALM DESERT GENERAL FUND 0.00055 PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX RATE 0.80 CONSIDERATION RATE (for transfer tax) 0. 10 TURNOVER RATES--RESIDENTIAL 0.05 --HOTEL 0.05 --RETAIL 8% TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX RATE FRANCHISE FEES $27.62 FRANCHISE FEES PER CAPITA REVENUE FROM OTHER AGENCIES $8.10 STATE GASOLINE TAX-2107 PER CAPITA $4.50 STATE GASOLINE TAX-2106 PER CAPITA $32.87 MOTOR VEHICLE LICENSE FEES PER CAPITA $3.97 CIGARETTE TAX PER CAPITA OTHER REVENUES 4.31 MOTOR VEHICLE FINES PER CAPITA 0.55 GENERAL FINES PER CAPITA 1.12 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES--PER CAPITA 4.00% INTEREST FACTOR Source: Stanley R. Hoffman Associates, Inc. Note: These factors have been derived from the City budget and interviews with City staff. I - -42- TABLE A-2 CITY OF PALM DESERT THE VILLAGES OF BELLA VISTA SUMMARY OF ANNUAL FISCAL COST FACTORS VALUE EXPLANATION POLICE DEPARTMENT 131 .28 POLICE COSTS PER PERSON FIRE DEPARTMENT 48.00 FIRE DEPARTMENT COSTS PER DWELLING UNIT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 5,000 TRAFFIC SIGNAL 0 & M PER INTERSECTION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 40.00 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT LINE COSTS 0.00% COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OVERHEAD CITYWIDE COSTS 89.60 CITYWIDE ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS PER PERSON Source: Stanley R. Hoffman Associates, Inc. Note: These cost factors have been derived from the City's 1988-89 budget, and from interviews with City staff. -- IIMIt OF 1ABM DEYELOAIEMT •\ o _ _- r _ ` , h � _ li di '~fir 12 / 13 yam:' i 1 �r -/1 1 w�er�s X 5 AREA* LAND USE/DENSITY RANGE TARGET DENSITY ACRES DU4 P,7 1 q 13 I LOW .2-5 5.0 17.5 87 2 `./G "!h z Low .z-s 30 SGS 151 3 LOW .2-5 4.0 35.0 140 •I•JII £ 4 LOW .2-5 3.5 25.0 81 5 VERY LOW .2-3 1.0 44.8 44 �� 6 LOW .2-5 3.6 27Z IB h+ T MEDIUM .2-7 T. 14.5 1 \ 8 MEDIUM .2-1 6.6 24.6 16161 8 LOW .2-5 5.0 35.5 176 10 HOTEL - - 13.5 - \ 0� 11 POTENTIAL REC AREA S.0 \ O 12 PALM VALLEY CHANNEL - 20.0 - 13 OPEN SPACE - 350.0 - TOTALS 18(Av ) 6T5.0 1066 LAND USE DEVELOPMENT PLAN �� � 0� D PALM DESERT 18 MONTH SCHEDULE ,tea rove A M J J A S O N 0 J F M A M J J A S O N D Nofino Land Plan mw .. scRRs aeaao�aw,ar. Goff me Ca pt 01A ,O. .D �gwnZq a ndwy Ian R vie & z SdISEGeotetlmkal RP ^ ppr va Dom.Water SWOP weo 4rigationSup.Study Rig Rpff Tentative Tract Map ti Domestic Water RbaOew/ Tu+aR NI,RRWt i wtQrn IRIgaUon water ,PrsRr T Sawa, /aPW iR TYYW Nh%uut L�b Slate Gauto 76 o+v+.y �* r,bs.waarpw.r Domestic Water R° RnprNial(yd'i laigalion Water Lw ^y"e"awpwy � Sewer ^'+ ^�+MPR•s � w a.o.wiaaaww+ � t� HoadwaYs i Dralnage69rldge RRR aw+i*akpwa C_ wv rm.ewam wR GdlCoursa Grading pBCUia ow.W.rR.pvem.aenrpynunr,pu.uon Telephano o.wur.wava+wacmb yrw Mr.mm Orj N aw�l'grtWrllWrafMpvYlNnr,pvWn - Gas ab+wa +aCaowvw n,pww Drainage Plan T,uR.r. R.oa PlariN Process FFS MM.Plan S Me.a 0f Teems of Site Monitor tY��f Water bfXA9 gWMvr< - U Sewer /t�W�b11i Wa GWMYYt Mau Gmcl-mg ea w,awen Dminegetrnp, se cow�bw w Gd/Coursa Grading c=ru wn oz Gall Course Imp. Q° � Oc outs Water ad eat 8j Gall CoursaSWMg G.C.Temp.Water T^101m°' �8 Phase l Grading r as caewn Phase 1 fbeOs,W S S G.C.Clubhouse llMties(FL,Tel.) 7 G.C.Seeclmg M ll6l OF 51�A54viL6hOR ,�. _ - - I :.a ---- - 13 t �e 1 i .�� E41 / .�`i 1\ 1\1\ ��;cam. I0.�\✓�1.��`Rf��rr / AREAS LAND USE/DENSTY RANGE TARGET DENSITY ACRES DUs 1 LOW .2-5 5.0 17.3 67 2 LOW .2-5 &0 50.5 151 3 LOW .2-5 a0 36.0 160 4 LOW .2-5 3.6 25.0 01 5 VERY LOW .2-3 10 ".6 M 6 LOW .2-5 &6 21A 95 T MEmm .2-1 7.0 17.3 122 6 MEOIUM .2-1 16 26.5 161 9 LOW .2-5 5.0 35.5 175 10 HOTEL - _ 13.6 - 11 POTENTIAL AEC AREA - 5.0 - 12 PALM VALLEY CHANNEL - 29.0 - 13 OPEN SPACE _ 350.0 _ TOTALS &5(A 9) 675.0 1066 LAND USE DEVELOPMENT PLAN MD K3DE I , i Local Agency Formation Commission County of Riverside 2 3 RESOLUTION NO. 22-89 APPROVING THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO 4 CITY OF PALM DESERT LAFCO NO. 88-107-4 5 6 BE IT RESOLVED AND DETERMINED by the Local Agency Formation 7 Commission in regular session assembled on March 23, 1989, that the 8 annexation of approximately 680 acres generally located southwest of the City 9 limits west of Highway 74, as more particularly described in Exhibit "A", 10 attached hereto and made a part hereof, is approved. 11 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND FOUND that: 12 1 . Commission proceedings were commenced by resolution of the City 13 of Palm Desert. 14 2• All owners of land within the territory to be annexed have 15 given written consent to the annexation. 16 3. The annexation is proposed to provide more municipal services 17 by the City of Palm Desert. 18 4. The distinctive short form designation of the proposed 19 annexation is LAFCO No. 88-107-4, Annexation No. 16 to the City of Palm 20 Desert. 21 5. An environmental assessment was made on the proposal and a 22 negative declaration filed thereon by the City of Palm Desert pursuant to the 23 California Environmental Quality Act. The negative declaration has been 24 reviewed and considered. 25 6. This annexation is consistent with the spheres of influence of 26 the City of Palm Desert and all other affected local agencies. 27 7. The territory to be annexed is uninhabited, there being fewer 28 than 12 registered voters residing therein. -1- 1. 8. The City of Palm Desert is designated conducting authority and 2 is authorized to proceed without notice, hearing or election. 3 9. The Executive Officer is directed to transmit a certified copy 4 of this Resolution to the above-designated conducting authority, to the chief 5 petitioners, if different from the conducting authority, and to each affected 6 agency. 7 8 10 . GILLAR BOYD, hairman 11 12 I certify the above resolution was passed and adopted by the Local Agency Formation Commission of Riverside County on March 23, 1989. 13 4 5 ' KENNETH M. MONR 's Executive Officer �o 0 6 <Z 02 o� 7 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 It 3/23/89 28 -2- 26 25 30 29 2e M uv 1 J.'IiS iln�a 35 36 DI 32 33 r cm 'i No 25320 ,�: m 2 1 5 4 C : 9 11 12 9 9 14 13 T 6 KEY MAP j .Z EXISTING PALM DESERT Ap CITY LIMIT 36 2 S89.49'54"W 2,645.60' S89.51'08"W 2,644.1yp'pIN7 OF N88.45'37"W BEGINNING p M CD n N W � I - l c 680 ACRES ± �, O) A EXISTING PALM DESERT CITY LIMIT N89.55'12"W 50.CO' m N % In In fV W cNIT°55'43"E NOTE: O THIS PUT WAS PREPARED FROM RECORD DATA AND DOES NOT REF11ESENT A NN 89•56'004 W 58.21' 00 SURVEY QF THE PROPERTY SHORN RENEON. d o N O M Z 2 JU S89°47'19"E 2 63923' S89.56-52-E 2 642.87' I 1 12 Revised 12 7 ( LAFCO 88 - 107 -4 DDrr December /,'r ,1988 Drawn by; .. PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO.16 TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT Na San Pedro (CHAR ,1. FOLKERS SEC.I I T6S R 5 E & POR. SEC.6 T6S R6E S.B.M. Scale: RCE NO.25320 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/PLANNING, PALM DESERT 16-1000'00 EXHIBIT "A" LAFCO 88-107-4 THENCE. N 17 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 43 SECONDS E. ALONG SAID CENTER LINE TO- AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SECTION 6: THENCE, N 88 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 37 SECONDS W. ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION i BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THIS PARCEL CONTAINS 680 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION WAS COMPILED FROM RECORD DATA AND DOES NOT REPRESENT A SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED. BY: ��. � QQ,pFESS1pN IC RD J. gOKERS • .. q� CITY ENGINE Q`c .� )OH/V Fy CITY OF PALM DESERT R.C.E. 25320 W �v No.25320 m, m m .�tJIR �s Jl-8}N: s • CIVIL •'. ENGIi1_ERING; f�gjf.OF�CP:I\F����� T LEGAL .ECRIP I N APPROVED 14 Y RI SID OU Y SURVEYOR BY 2 REVISED EXHIBIT "A" LAFCO 88-107-4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION. RANCHO BELLA VISTA Palm Desert Annexation 16 ALL OF SECTION I . TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH. RANGE 5 EAST AND A PORTION OF SECTION 6. TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 6 EAST. SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP 16259. PARCEL MAP BOOK 89. PAGES 35 THROUGH 37. RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY. BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 1 : THENCE, S 89 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 08 SECONDS W. 2.644. 15 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION I TO THE NORTH 1 /4 CORNER THEREOF: THENCE. 5 89 DEGREES 49 MINUTES 54 SECONDS W. 2,645.60 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION I TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF: THENCE. S 0 DEGREES 06 MINUTES 19 SECONDS E. 2.589.30 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION I TO THE WEST 1 /4 CORNER THEREOF : THENCE. 5 0 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 46 SECONDS E. 2.635.28 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION I TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF: THENCE. S 89 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 19 SECONDS E. 2.639.23 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION I TO THE SOUTH 1 /4 CORNER THEREOF: THENCE. S 89 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 52 SECONDS E. 2,642.87 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION I TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF: THENCE. N 0 DEGREES 01 MINUTES 00 SECONDS W. 1 .320.02 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 : THENCE. N 89 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 00 SECONDS W. 58.21 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF STATE HIGHWAY 74: THENCE. N 17 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 43 SECONDS E ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID STATE HIGHWAY lU ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1 /4 OF SECTION 6: (HENCE. N 89 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 12 SECONDS W. 50. 00 FEET ALONG SAID LINE TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE CENTER LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY 74: STATE OF CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION WILLIAM M. BENNETT First District. Kent ield 1020V STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA CONWAY H. COLLIS (P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO,CA 94279.0001) Second District,Los Angeles Telephone (916) 739-3712 11n�yqR t! ERNEST I. DRONENBURG, JR. {�r3�V✓,�8 Gg ,iJ' Third District,San Diego PAUL CARPENTER July 31,1989 .tJ(� 1989 Fourth District,Los Angeles GRAY DAVIS City of Palm Desert bOF,'1'Ur„P! ?g.c1, ,`NI tP "i Mthi Controller,Sacramento Planning CitY Pt 7AU: 1'+SER7 De t P . r� Q� CINDY RAMBO P.O. Box 1977 $' ` I'�/ L Executive Seerererr Palm Desert, CA. 92261 eil IMa((d Gc Annexation # 16 (Res. #89-26) Cb(0 IN REPLY REFER TO: W Local Tax Unit Gentlemen: The maps of the above-noted annexation provided by your city: [ ] do not show any streets. Please provide maps which show the streets with inclusive address numbers. If the area is undeveloped please so state on the maps. Please do not use the word "uninhabited" for undeveloped areas. [ do not clearly indicate where the annexed parcel is located. Please send a locator or vicinity map which shows adjacent existing city streets. [Stl do not show street address numbers and a list of numbers was not attached. [�_]\ lack sufficient detail, do not clearly define the existing city boundaries, the area that has been annexed, are illegible, and/or do not have boundary dimensions, [_] are incomplete because you provided a list of addresses of property owners rather than the street address numbers assigned to the annexed area. [_] can not be processed since only one map was received. Please provide one additional map. We would appreciate your furnishing us with this information. It would also help us in recording future boundary changes if the above information is included on the maps at the time of making an annexation filing. Please send the maps directly to the Local Tax Unit, Department of Business Taxes, at the above address. The annexation will be processed for local tax purposes as soon as the information requested is received. Sincerely, Mary U. Lin reh Area Code Technician MJL: 1461A/3/LM A-3 r at� 1AF _ LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION• County of Riverside • (714) 787-2786 ROBERT T. ANDERSEN ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER • 4080 LEMON STREET . 12TH FLOOR • RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501-3651 May 3, 1989 State Board of Equalization Tax Area Services Section Post Office Box 1713 Sacramento, California 95808 RE: LAFCO 88-107-4--Annexation #16 to City of Palm Desert Gentlemen: Pursuant to California law, you will find enclosed the following documents relating to the above referenced action: 1 . Resolution No. 89-26. 2. Certificate of Completion (Recorded on April 27, 1989) . 3._ Map and legal description. 4. Warrant to cover cost of filing. Property tax transfer negotiations have been completed as required by the Revenue & Taxation Code, and resolutions of affected agencies are on file in this office. Please file the above documents and acknowledge receipt at your earliest convenience. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, a�8ar�c o, i ` J" Barbara Ann Beegle LAFCO Secretary Enclosures cc: Assessor Auditor-Controller Elections Department Survey Department Fire Department . Communications Department Sheriff's Department Environmental Health Superintendent of Schools CalTrans, District 08 California Highway Patrol Thomas Brothers Maps LAFCO File /Appl icant Affected Agencies 1� — o w 1\ a) CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION 8 9 n. Pursuant to the Cortese/Knox Local Government Reorganizatio C. of 1915 ion 57201 , 57202, and 57205, this Certificate is hereby issued Executive M Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Riversid! nty, California. 1. Short-form designation, as designated by LAFCO is 88-107-4. 2. The names of each city involved in this change of organization or reorgani- tion and the kind or type of change of organization ordered for each city are as follows: City Type of Change of Organization City of Palm Desert Annexation No. 16 3. The above-listed city(ies) are located within the following county(ies) : County of Riverside 4. A description of the boundaries of the above-cited change of organization or reorganization are shown on the attached map and legal description, marked Exhibit "A" and by reference incorporated herein. 5. This change of organization or reorganization has been approved subject to the following terms and conditions, if any: None. 6. The date of adoption of the Resolution ordering this change of organization or reorganization (with or without election) was March 23, 1989. A certified copy of Resolution No. 89-26 is attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein. I hereby certify that as Executive Officer for the Local Agency Formation Com- mission of Riverside County, the above-listed agency has completed a change of organization or reorganization pursuant to the Cortese/Knox Local Government Act of 1985. Dated: April 24, 1989 BY:kE N Executive Officer P { Resolution No. 89-26 CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT C'1 i Q7 RESOLUTION ORDERING TERRITORY DESIGNATED AS "RANCHO BELLA VISTA" ANNEXED TO THE c-1 CITY OF PALM DESERT WHEREAS. the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of Riverside adopted its Resolution No. 22-89 on 3=23. 1989. making determinations and approving the proposed annexation to the City of Palm Desert of territory described in Exhibit A attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein: and WHEREAS, the reasons for this annexation are: A logical extension of city boundaries and better delivery of services: and WHEREAS. the regular county assessment roll is utilized by this city: and WHEREAS, the affected territory will not be taxed for existing general bonded indebtedness of this city: and WHEREAS. the Local Agency formation Commission has authorized this Council to approve this annexation without notice and hearing and without an election. NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Palm Desert hereby orders the territory described in Exhibit A annexed. and directs the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert to transmit a certified copy of this resolution with applicable fees required by Section 54902.5 of the Government Code to the executive officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Riverside County. Passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert t_his23rd day of March. 1989, by the following,.vdtd C"'_.' ,,r,pi=la '1 AYES: KELLY, SNYDER, WILSON�;:_': - NOES: NONE ABSENT: BENSON AND CRITES = '- C:.. ^ r. ABSTAINED: NONE ATTEST: S. ROY WILSON, MA�',0�R � ' SHEILA. R. GILLI -AN, CITY C4Z 1 ' Y a) REVISED EXHIBIT "A" ei LAFCO 88-107-4 LEGAL DESCRIP ION. RANCHO BELLA VISTA Palm Desert Annexatlon 16 ALL OF SECTION 1 . TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH. RANGE 5 EAST AND A PORTION OF SECTION 6. TOWNSH I P 6 SOUTH. RANGE 6 EAST. SAN BERNARD I NO BASE AND MERIDIAN AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP 16259. PARCEL MAP BOOK 89. PAGES 35 THROUGH 37. RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY. BEGINNING AI THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 1 : (HENCE. 5 89 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 08 SECONDS W. 2.644. 15 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 TO THE NORTH 1 /4 CORNER THEREOF: THENCE. 5 89 DEGREES 49 MINUTES 54 SECONDS W. 2,645.60 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION I TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF: THENCE. S 0 DEGREES 06 MINUTES 19 SECONDS E . 2.589.30 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE ' OF SAID SECTION I TO 1HE Wf ST 1 /4 CORNER THEREOF: THENCE. 5 0 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 46 SECONDS E. 2.635.28 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF : THENCE. S 89 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 19 SECONDS E. 2.639.23 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION I TO THE SOUTH 114 CORNER THEREOF : THENCE . 5 89 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 52 SECONDS E. 2,642.87 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION I TO IHE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF : THENCE. N 11 UEGREES 01 MINUTES UO SECONDS W. 1 . 320.02 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION I : THENCE. N 89 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 00 SECONDS W. 58.21 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF STATE HIGHWAY 74: THENCE. N 17 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 43 SECONDS E ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID STATE HIGHWAY 10 ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 114 OF SECTION b: THENCE . N 89 DEGPEE5 55 MINUTES 12 SECONDS W. 50. 00 FEET ALONG SAID LINE TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE CENTER LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY 74: I 1 Cfj EXHIBIT "A" "LAFCO 88-107-4 f) THENCE. N 17 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 43 SECONDS E. ALONG SAID CENTER LINE TO- AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SECTION 61 THENCE. N 88 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 37 SECONDS W. ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION I BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THIS PARCEL CONTAINS 680 ACRES. MORE OR LESS. THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION WAS COMPILED. FROM RECORD DATA ANO DOES NOT REPRESENT A SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED. BY: .�`�� � ✓ �OfESS/ON IC RD J. F KERS CITY ENGINE �Q.;0 )OHty �y CITY OF PALM DESERT R:C.E. 25320 axe N6. 25320 s ;jyE7fP 11�.71-Bty� s y CIVIL �a •., ENGIiI�C81NC.� TrLEGAL �CRIP I N APPROVED �,. P?99 Y Re S10 OU Y SURVEYOR BY 2 30 i 2m M $r R 35 39 33 �Q _ J Fy W ' zs3zo Ti EXHIBIT / 1 I 14 4 1? 16 KEY MAP EXISTING ._ • „-��� PALM DESERT A: r. ...c CITY LIMIT i 36 36 I 2 S89.49'54"W 2,645.60' S89.51'08"W 2,644.1INT Of N88.45'37"W h8 GINNING C NS 01 m In N A 0 680 ACRES ± Z3 P In 1 Z EXISTING PALM DES CITY UNIT N69.55'12"W 7 C4 N % h M f0 N W p N17•SS'43 [ NOTE: n O THIS ►ec to D MCC FRom DATA A, O DOES NOT REPoICSENT y N 89.56'00"W 58.21' o SURVEY Qf THE Polo• SHOWN HEREON. O � N O NIj 2 LS89.47'19'E 263923' S89.56'52'E 2642.87' 1112 Revised 12 LAFCO 88 - 107 -4 17 Date: December is' '1988 PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO.I6 Drawn or: TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT Nc ICHAR J FOLKERS SEC.I T6S R5E 8 POR. SEC.6 T6S R6E S. B.M. Scale RCE NO.25320 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/PLANNING, PALM DESERT le!1000'O l = i RESOLUTION No. 81-133 '�•,� A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY H OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE AMOUNT OF PROPERTY TAX REVENUE TO BE EXCHANGED BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AND THE CITY OF PALM DESERT RELATING TO ANNEXATIONS TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CLAIFORNIA. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm C Desert in regular session assembled on this 24th day of Sept. 1981, that: 1. The County of Riverside and the City of Palm Desert are the agencies whose area or responsibility for service would be affected by annexations to the City of Palm Desert. 2. Representatives of each of the affected agencies have met and negotiated an exchange of property tax revenue as follows, to become effective for tax purposes beginning July 1, 1981, for all areas annexed to the City until such time as this resolution is rescinded or superceded. i A.' The City of Palm Desert shall assume responsibility for all general municipal services to areas annexed as are required by law or presently provided throughout the City, and i for such service, the City shall receive 25% of that portion of the property tax revenue generated within territories annexed under the ad valorem tax rate established by Article XIII A of the Constitution of .the State of .Califarnia,. that..represents... the 'Couhty of Ri'vergide'§ share of such property tax revenue. . B. The County Auditor shall upon annexation by the City r convert the above-established percentage figure into actual 1 dollar figures and thereafter allocate to the City such property Il tax revenue in accord with the provisions of Section 95 et. seq. of the Revenue and Taxation Code. 3. The City Council of the City of Palm Desert does hereby agree to the above-recited exchange of property tax revenue. 4. The Clerk shall transmit a certified copy of this resolution to each affected agency and to the Executive Office of the Local Agency Formation Commission and to the Auditor of the County of Riverside pursuant to Section 99 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the k. Palm Desert City Council, held on this 24th day of September, 1981, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: McPherson, Newbrander, Puluqi, Snyder 6 Wilson NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Nonc � LSON, r yor ATTEST: H ILA R. GIL AN,City C City of Palm Desert, Ca ornia ` S I Board of Supervisors County of Riverside 2 M 3 RESOLUTION NO. 81-362 cam" DETERMINING THE AMOUNT OF PROPERTY TAX REVENUE TO BE EXCHANGED n 4 BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AND THE CITY OF PALM DESERT RELATING TO ANNEXATIONS TO 5 TILE CITY OF PALM DESERT 6I BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervises of the County 7 of Riverside, State of California, in regular session assembled on 8 October 13, 1981, that: 9 1. The County of Riverside and the City of Palm Desert 10 are the agencies whose area or responsibility for service would be 11 affected by annexations to the City of Palm Desert. 12 2. Representatives of each of the affected agencies have 1$ met and. negotiated :an exchange..of, property tax.,revenue to become 14 effective for tax purposes beginning July 1, 1981, for all areas . 151annexed to the City until such time as this Resolution is rescinded 16 or superseded, as follows: 17 a. The City of Palm Desert shall assume the responsi- 18 bility for all general municipal services to areas annexec 19 as are required by law or presently provided throughout 20 the. City, and for such service shall receive 25°% of that 21 portion of the property tax revenue generated within 22 territories annexed under the ad valorem tax rate estab- 23 lished by Article XIII A of the Constitution of the State 24 of California, that represents the County of Riverside ' s 25 share of such property tax revenue. 26 b_ The County Auditor shall upon annexation by the 27 City convert the above-established percentage figure into 28 actual dollar figures and thereafter allocate to the City JAMES N.ANGELL COUNTYCOUNSEL LAW LIBRARY BLDG. such property tax revenue in accord with the provision RIVERSIDE.CAUFORNIA -1- 1 of Sections 95 et se q. , of the Revenue and Taxation Cod . ~' 2 3. The City Council of the City of Palm Desert and the C1 3 Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside do hereby agree to 4 the above-recited exchange of property tax revenue. 5 4. The Clerk of this Board shall transmit a certified 6 copy of this Resolution to each affected agency and to the Executiv 7 Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission and to the County 8 Auditor pursuant to Section 99 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. 9 10 11 Roll Call resulted as follows : 12 Ayes: Abraham, Younglove and McCandless Noes: None 13 Absent: Schroeder and Ceniceros 14 151 16 17 18. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 PC:jf 27 10/8/81 28 JAMES H.ANGELL LAW LIBRARY NSEL BLDG. NIVFASiDE,CALIFORNIA �I 1� 73.510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 D n March 24 , 1989 f.iAR 2 4 1989 �UA'+7UNITM CEvtlU;WrN7 1APARIMEIg C'TY VF PA>91 DESERT Mr . Thomas P . Clark , Esq . Stradling , Yocca , Carlson 8 Rauth 660 Newport Center Drive Suite 1600 Newport Beach , California 92660-6401 Dear Mr . Clark : Resolution No. 89-26 - Annexation No . 16 At its regular meeting of March 23 , 1989 , the Palm Desert City Council , by unanimous vote , added consideration of the subject resolution ordering territory designated as Palm Desert Annexation No . 16 (Rancho Bella Vista ) annexed to the City . This letter is to confirm and certify that said resolution was adopted by unanimous vote of the Council . I am attaching a certified copy for your records . Please let me know if you require any further information or assistance in this matter . incerely, SHEI -66 CITY C R . 1A �GAN CITY CLERK Resolution No. 89-26 CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT RESOLUTION ORDERING TERRITORY DESIGNATED AS "RANCHO BELLA VISTA" ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT WHEREAS, the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of Riverside adopted its Resolution No. 22-89 on 3-23. 1989, making determinations and approving the proposed annexation to the City of Palm Desert of territory described in Exhibit A attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, the reasons for this annexation are: A logical extension of city boundaries and better delivery of services; and WHEREAS, the regular county assessment roll is utilized by this city; and WHEREAS, the affected territory will not be taxed for existing general bonded indebtedness of this city; and WHEREAS, the Local Agency Formation Commission has authorized this Council to approve this annexation without notice and hearing and without an election. NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Palm Desert hereby orders the territory described in Exhibit A annexed, and directs the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert to transmit a certified copy of this resolution with applicable fees required by Section 54902.5 of the Government Code to the executive officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Riverside County. i f f f • i f • • i f i f f f i f f f Passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert this 24 day of March. 1989, by the following vote: AYES: KELLY, SNYDER, WILSON NOES: NONE ABSENT: BENSON AND CRITES ABSTAINED: NONE' S. ROY WILSON, MA R ATTEST: SHEILA R. GILLI AN, CITY C REVISED EXHIBIT "A" LAFCO 88-107-4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION. RANCHO BELLA VISTA Palm Desert Annexation 16 ALL OF SECTION I . TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH. RANGE 5 EAST AND A PORTION OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH. RANGE 6 EAST. SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP 16259. PARCEL MAP BOOK 89. PAGES 35 THROUGH 37. RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY. BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 1 : THENCE. S 89 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 08 SECONDS W. 2.644. 15 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION I TO THE NORTH 1 /4 CORNER THEREOF: THENCE, S 89 DEGREES 49 MINUTES 54 SECONDS W. 2.645.60 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION I TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF: THENCE. S 0 DEGREES 06 MINUTES 19 SECONDS E. 2.589.30 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 To THE WEST 114 CORNER THEREOF : THENCE. 5 0 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 46 SECONDS E. 2.635.28 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION I TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF: THENCE. 5 69 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 19 SECONDS E. 2.639.23 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 TO THE SOUTH 1 /4 CORNER THEREOF: THENCE. 5 89 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 52 SECONDS E. 2.642.87 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION I TU THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF: THENCE. N 0 DEGREES 01 MINUTES U0 SECONDS W. 1 ,320.02 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION I : THENCE. N 89 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 00 SECONDS W. 58.21 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF STATE HIGHWAY 74: THENCE. N 17 DEGREES. 55 MINUTES 43 SECONDS E ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID STATE HIGHWAY To ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1 /4 OF SECTION 6: THENCE. N 89 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 12 SECONDS W. 50.00 FEET ALONG SAID LINE TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE CENTER LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY 74: 1 EXHIBIT "A" LAFCO 88-107-4 THENCE. N 17 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 43 SECONDS E, ALONG SAID CENTER LINE TO- AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SECTION 6; THENCE. N 88 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 37 SECONDS W. ALONG SAID. NORTHERLY LINE TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION I BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THIS PARCEL CONTAINS 680 ACRES. MORE OR LESS. THIS LEGAL OESCRIPTION WAS COMPILED FROM RECORD DATA AND DOES NOT REPRESENT A SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED. BY: �� WESS/p IC F M RD J. ERS Q •.....• N4 CITY ENGINE Q`t; ;•'•3OHry''•,�F CITY OF PALM DESERT R.C.E. 2532U EVP No. Z5320 ac ;jLE7fP Il-�l-B�y; 7O CIVIL �rArf�Of•��t��E���\Q T LEGAL ZZ ESCRIP I N APPROVED d'f RI SID OU Y SURVEYOR BY 2 ze zs to a I :e Q' . 35 38 as 12 33 -•1!.i 7: -.+,�Fy W :"i No 25320 1 ,,� �^ EXHIBIT E cc:: 1 5 4 a /-� 7� S O 14 13 T e KEY MAP icw �G.2 EXISTING PALM DESERT ^o- CITY LIMIT 36 36 I 2 7 S89.49'54"W 2,645.60' S89.51'08"W 2,644.1 OF N88.45'37"W hINTNNI1NN 8 GIG G In al t to c WAW ` A 0 68 ACRES ± (n b A ? EXISTING PALM DESERT CITY LIMIT N 89.55'12"W 50JX m N 47 / m N W o N IT-55'41"t NOTE: in O TNIe FIAT WAS DATA AND D • DOES n r RK EeT4 4N0 O DEte Naf ntMtPtOT H N 89.56 00"w 58.21' o wnvcr qD TNc ►NortnTr 5NOWN N[ntDO. O •O N O M 2 2 LS89.47'19'E 2 63923' S89.56'52"E 2 642.87' 1 112 Revised 12 7 LAFCO 88 - 107 -4 Dab: Dectm Ev '.r ,1988/ Drawn Ey� - PROPOSED ANNEXATION N0. 16 �� TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT NE San Pcdre ICHAR J. PECKERS SEC.I T6S R5E 6 POR. SEC.6 T6S R6E S. B.M. Se01i: RCE N0.25320 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/PLANNING, PALM DESERT 1"21000'00 LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION • County of Riverside • (714) 787-2786 ROBERT T. ANDERSEN ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER . 4080 LEMON STREET • 12TH FLOOR • RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 92501-3651 PUBLIC NOTICE March 9:00 A.M. Board of Supervisors' Meeting Room 4080 Lemon Street, 14th Floor Riverside, California AGENDA 1 . CALL TO ORDER AND SALUTE TO THE FLAG. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 23, 1989. 3. HEARINGS: Consent Items: a. LAFCO 88-79-3--Annexation to Beaumont-Cherry Valley Water District b. LAFCO 88-92-3--Reorganization to Include Annexation to Eastern Municipal Water District and Concurrent Annexation to The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California C. LAFCO 88-107-4--Annexation 16 to City of Palm Desert Continued Items: d. LAFCO 88-83-3--Annexation 3 to County Service Area 145, Tract 22564 e. LAFCO 88-94-5--Sphere of Influence Amendment--City of Perris f. LAFCO 88-95-5--Annexation 32 to City of Perris New Items: g. LAFCO 88-70-1--Reorganization to Include Incorporation of the Communities of Rancho California, Temecula, and Murrieta; the Establishment of a Subsidiary Community Services District; Dissolution of County Service Area 75; and, .Detachment from Santa Rosa Community Services District and County Service Areas 103 and 143. 4. POSSIBLE HEARINGS FOR APRIL 27, 1989. 5. ADJOURNMENT. A closed session may be held on pending litigation and/or personnel matters. '<••=` - LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION • County of Riverside (714) 787-2786 ROBERT T. ANDERSEN ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER • 4080 LEMON STREET • 12TH FLOOR • RIVERSIDE., CALIFORNIA 92501-3651 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held by the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of Riverside, State of California, in the Board of Supervisors' Meeting Room, 4080 Lemon St. , 14th Flr. , Riverside, CA on Thursday, March 23, 1989, at 9:00 a.m. , on the following proposals: ! 1 . LAFCO 88-70-1--Reorganization to Include Incorporation of the Communities of Rancho California, Temecula and Murrieta; the Establishment of a ! Subsidiary Community Services District; Dissolution of County Service Area 75; and, Detachment from Santa Rosa Community Services District and County Service Areas 103 and 143, south of the community of Wildomar, east and west of the Rancho-Temecula line and north of the Riverside/San Diego County line, includes the communities of Rancho Calfiornia, Temecula, Murrieta and Murrieta Hot Springs. 2. LAFCO 88-79-3--Annexation to Beaumont-Cherry Valley Water District, east of Overland Trail and north. of Brookside Avenue, encompassing the Glen Eyrie Heights Tract. 3. LAFCO 88-92-3--Reorganization to Include Annexation to Eastern Municipal Water District and Concurrent Annexation to The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, northeast corner of Antelope Road and Benton Road (Clinton Keith Road) , South Menifee area. 4. /LAFCO 88-107-4--Annexation 16 to City of Palm Desert, westerly of State Highway 74, all of Section 1 , Township 6 South, Range 5 East, and that portion of Section 6, Township 6 South, Range 6 East, S.B.M. For a particular description of the land involved, reference is hereby made to maps and legal descriptions on file in the office of the Local Agency Formation Commission, 4080 Lemon St. , 12th Flr. , Riverside, CA 92501-3651 . If a copy of the staff report is desired for a particular proposal listed above, please submit a written request to the address above. LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION RIVERS DE KENNETH M. MOHR Executive Officer February 28, 1989 i t " ----- - - LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION • County of Riverside • (714) 787-2786 ROBERT T. ANDERSEN ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER • 4080 LEMON STREET . 12TH FLOOR • RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501-3651 March 23, 1989 TO: Local Agency Formation Commission FROM: Ken Mohr, Executive Officer SUBJECT: LAFCO 88-107-4--ANNEXATION 16 TO CITY OF PALM DESERT PROPOSAL: This is a proposal to annex approximately 680 acres to the City of Palm Desert for municipal services. INITIATED BY: City of Palm Desert, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California 92260. LEGAL REQUIREMENTS: This proposal has met all legal filing requirements. The map and legal description were approved by the County Surveyor on December 22, 1988. The City of Palm Desert conducted an environmental assessment which resulted in the filing of a negative declaration. POPULATION: The applicant indicates the population within the proposed boundaries is zero. The Registrar of Voters reports there are no registered voters within the subject area. LAND USE: The proposed annexation is located within the Upper Coachella Valley Land Use Planning Area, and also within the boundaries of the Western Coachella Valley Community Plan, adopted by the Board of Supervisors on December 31 , 1985. The Community Plan designates the area as follows: Mountainous, Wildlife/Vegetation, Category 2B and Resort Development. The subject area is within Groundshaking Zones IIA, IIB, IIIA and IIIB and is not subject to any significant hazards. I j LAFCO 88-107-4 Page 2 March 23, 1989 Current zoning for the area is N-A (Natural Assets) and R-1 (Single-family Residential) . The City of Palm Desert has prezoned the area PCD (Planned Commercial District with Low Density Residential ) . The City' s General Plan also provides for open space designations within the area. MARKET VALUE: The County Assessor reports the full 1988-1989 land value is $3,121,326 and structure value is $1,485 for a total market value of $3,122,811. GENERAL COMMENTS: This is a proposal to annex approximately 680 acres to the City of Palm Desert for the provision of municipal services. The proposed annexation is generally located southwest of the City limits just west of Highway 74. The site is uninhabited, contiguous to the City of Palm Desert and consistent with the City' s sphere of influence. Surrounding land uses include mostly vacant land to the south, east and west and some single-family residences and a mobilehome park to the north. The City of Palm Desert has initiated this annexation in order to provide municipal services to the planned Villages of Bella Vista project which is located within the proposed boundaries. The project is planned for a 325-room destination resort hotel , a championship golf course, a maximum of 1,066 dwelling units (including single-family units, duplexes and condominiums) and open space land uses. The project is planned for a five-year development period. All affected landowners have given written consent to the annexation. PLAN FOR THE PROVISION OF MUNICIPAL SERVICES: To support its application, the City of Palm Desert has submitted a Plan for the Provision of Municipal Services. Following are excerpts from that Plan: - Water and Sewer: Services will be provided by the Coachella Valley Water District CVWD) whose service area the property lies within. The City estimates the water requirements for the proposed development are between 553,000 and 1,066,000 gpd. The anticipated sewer demand is approximately 400,000 gpd. CVWD presently has water and sewer lines located approximately one-quarter mile north of the site along Highway 74. In addition, the District's sewer treatment plant which would provide wastewater disposal service is rated at 20 mgd. and is currently operating at 6 mgd. - Police Protection: The City of Palm Desert would provide police protection services to the area under a contract with the Riverside County Sheriff's Department. At present, the City contracts for 20 officers per 24-hour shift along with one full-time crime prevention officer. The City will be constructing a Sheriff's sub-station located immediately adjacent to City Hall . Estimated response time to the proposed annexation would be less than 5 minutes. LAFCO 88-107-4 Page 3 March 23, 1989 - Fire Protection: Fire protection services would be provided under a contract a ween the City of Palm Desert and the Riverside County Fire Department in conjunction with the California Division of Forestry. The City presently contracts for 54 full-time personnel and has an additional accompaniment of 15 volunteers. Equipment includes 4 pumpers, 2 rescue squads, 2 rescue-salvage units and 2 paramedic units. Response would be from the Mesa View Fire Station located at Mesa View Drive and Portola Avenue and is estimated to be within 5 minutes. POTENTIAL FISCAL IMPACTS: The independent consulting firm of Stanley R. Hoffman Associates, prepared a fiscal impact analysis for the proposed annexation utilizing the Villages of Bella Vista development scenario to project future impacts. Under the development scenario, at build-out, recurring annual revenues to the City of Palm Desert are projected to total $1 .39 million and annual recurring costs are projected to total $296.7 thousand. Therefore, it is projected that the development will have a positive fiscal impact of approximately $1.1 million annually. The major sources of projected revenues are from the proposed hotel development through transient occupancy taxes ($1.06 million), and from taxable sales ($111 .5 thousand) . Major projected expenditures are police protection ($121 .1 thousand) , fire protection ($51 .3 thousand) and Citywide administrative overhead ($82.7 thousand) . It should be pointed out that the area is presently within the City of Palm Desert's Redevelopment Project Area 1 . Under the terms of the cooperative agreement between the County of Riverside, the City of Palm Desert and the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency, annexation will not impact the property tax revenues which will accrue to the County of Riverside, the Redevelopment Agency and other County taxing jurisdictions (i .e. , school district, College of the Desert, etc.) . The development scenario is also projecting a positive fiscal impact for the County. The projected County General Fund revenues are estimated at $300.1 thousand at project build-out and are projected to exceed costs of $147.6 thousand by $152.5 thousand. In addition, under the pass-through agreement between the Redevelopment Agency and the County, approximately $805.2 thousand will accrue to the County's Capital Improvement Fund annually. SUMMARY: - The proposed annexation encompasses approximately 680 acres, is contiguous to the City of Palm Desert and consistent with the City's sphere of influence. - The area is legally defined as uninhabited, as there are fewer than 12 registered voters within the proposed boundaries. - All affected landowners have given written consent to the annexation. LAFCO 88-107-4 Page 4 March 23, 1989 - The City of Palm Desert has prezoned the site PCD (Planned Commercial District with Low Density Residential). - Future development will include the Villages of Bella Vista project. The project is planned for a 325-room destination resort hotel , a championship golf course, a maximum of 1,066 dwelling units and open space uses. - The City of Palm Desert and affected agencies are willing and able to extend services to the area as required. - The proposed annexation will facilitate the provision of municipal services to the site. RECOMMENDATIONS: Based upon the factors outlined above, IT IS RECOMMENDED that the Commission: 1 . Certify it has reviewed and considered the City of Palm Desert' s environmental assessment which resulted in the filing of a negative declaration; 2. Find the annexation is uninhabited; 3. Find that all affected landowners have given written consent to the annexation. 4. Find the annexation is consistent with the City of Palm Desert's sphere of influence and the spheres of influence of all other affected local agencies; 5. Approve LAFCO 88-107-4--Annexation 16 to City of Palm Desert; and, 5. Designate the City of Palm Desert as conducting authority and authorize the City to proceed without notice, hearing or election. Respectfully submitted, Ken Mohr Executive Officer MAY s 36 �31 �36 .j31 4- 6 I o 6 1 t + THOUSAND PALMS RAMON RO T4S R6E Annexation No. 16 + %\ to the City of Palm Desert j- -�— �- NORTH- 7NR I 6 6 36 31 1I 36 31 I NHO MIRA I I 'o VICINITY MAP —E -I- INDIAN 36 WELLS 36 31 r .�.. . -� �•••� LAFCO 88-107-4. ' I LEGEND T6S 461 I • Annexation No.16 to •• _ the City of Palm Desert • • � Palm Desert city limits �•••� _�••. i � Palm Desert Sphere of — . . � • 74 � � � Influence boundary • 7- 36 31 1 � � 36 31 _.IL • 6 — F a r a � a �fivb 2 Annexation No. 16 ;R ha4 ,? z m2 . ✓3}gp �ar�.r�" F v to the City of Palm Desert PAt.1M;17t:5te#tT .. ,�d SRea�� e � �F $., 5136 36 J �xza < L ✓„r 4 aa; s x 3i 2F ae r r s SF s .a II 680 ACRES ± xf i i Y9 6 Zn i a z Sig° NORTH ' II 2 1lj12 1217 LAFCO 88-107-4 LEGEND Annexation No.16 to the City of Palm Desert Palm Desert city limits 0 PLAN FOR THE PROVISION OF MUNICIPAL SERVICES LAFCO #88-107-4 1111MMCB MSMORANM M City of Palm Desert TO: Riverside County Local Agency Formation Commission FKM: City of Palm Desert SLUIE.T: Plan for services for Palm Desert Annexation No. 16 DATE: October 28, 1988 I. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES: The area proposed to be annexed is vacant and will be served by the Southern California Edison Electric Company, Southern California Gas Company, reran Telephone Company, Palmer Cable Vision, Coachella Valley Water District and the Coachella Valley Recreation and Paris District. The provisicns of these utilities will not be impacted by the proposed annexation. Services provided directly by the City of Palm Desert would be in lard use planning, building and safety, building code review and inspections, public works - street cleaning maintenance and repair, abatement of public nuisances and general code enforcement. By contract, the city provides for trash disposal with Palm Desert Disposal and police, fire and paramedic service with the County of Riverside through the Tri-Cities District. II. LEVEL OF SERVICE: Current utility service would be maintained and improved as required bg the Various utility companies and special districts. Land use planning, building and safety review and inspection, and general code enforcement would be provided on the basis of need. Police Services: The City of Palm Desert provides, under contract with Riverside Canty Sheriff's Department, 4 cars and 20 officers per 24 hour period in addition to a full-time crime prevention office at city hall. On a daily basis 112 hours of police services are provided. Fire Services: Fire protection is provided by Riverside County Fire Department, 54 full-time personnel, 15 volunteers, 4 pumpers, 2 rescue squads, 2 rescue-salvage, 2 paramedic units. Back-up coverage by County Fire Department stations in Bermuda Dimes and Rancho Mirage. Mutual aid agreement with the City of Indio. Response time would be within 5 minutes from the Mesa View Station with back-up from surrounding stations. Fire Insurance Classification: Source of rating: Robinson's Rating Service, II-9, with development the rating is anticipated to be lowered to II-5- III. TIMDG OF SERVICE EXTENSIONS: City services would be available immediately in the areas of planning, building permits, code enforcement, road maintenance, police, fire and paramedics. The extension of new facilities such as water and sewer would be timed with future development. An agreement with the Coachella Valley Water District for the delivery of water and extension of sewer is included to further clarify. IV. FINANCING: Generalized city services for the area would be financed through property taxes and state subventions tied to increased population. The expanded level of police, fire and paramedic services would be financed through the special fire tax of approximately S40/year for a typical 5,000 square foot industrial building. New commercial buildings would be required to pay a one time fire facility fee of S.10 per square foot. The city in general has experienced a substantial increase in sales tax and hotel occupancy tax revenues which will provide increasing levels for existing and new services to Palm Desert residents. PHILLIP ASSOCIATE LANNER /fr y ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS LAFCO #88-107-4 CD (Z9*1WW ®O zPa3 1 m"n MMCNOPIQ5 43-273 PRIMLY PEAR. LANE, PALM DESERT,CAUFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 NEGATIVE DECLARATION Pursuant to Title 14, Division 6, Article 7, Section 15083, of the California Administrative Code Case No:. C/Z 09-81 Common Project Name: Villages of Bella Vista Applicant/Project Sponsor: Western Allied Properties, Inc. 18700 Beach Blvd.,.Suite 100 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Project Description/Location: Villages of Bella Vista would be. a 1266 unit- resort/residential. development on 675 acres located at the southerly limit of the City of Palm Desert within Section 1, Township 69 south Range 6 East S.B.M. Reference: 1978 Certified EIR Resolution No. 413 and 1980 Draft EIR SCH #80120505 The director of the department of environmental services, City of Palm Desert, California, has found that the described project will not have a significant effect on the environment. A copy of the Initial. Study has been attached to document the reasons in support of this finding. A discussion of impacts and required mitigation measures to avoid significant effects is attached. AMON A. DIAZ DIRECTOR OF ENVIRO ENTAL 5ERV ES RAD/lcr . . .......... ....�.n _ - ,' i ._ .. .. '''ter'''_S. . .:�•1'<c : �ly.i... LAFCO• #,88-107- �(.. CA& IM: Z 0141. MU>Mxw s>ravzcss nzsx. ==I," S=Y S1gY18.0M[6:M= EPU='Z01? =C=.n ' I NOTEt The availability of data. neeassary to address the topics iists&* below, shall form the basis of a docisia:r M to whether the aPPlicaticn is COTMUered: complete for purposes of anvilanowrtat assessment_ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of a1T •yes" arrd: 'maybe answers. Possible mltigatiorr measures and commarrm are Provided art attached sheets). . Les Maybe No- 1. Earttr... N111 the proposal result in: a.. Unstable earth conditions or ire changes irr 91Mlag c: suhstrucLuresl' tr.. alsruotions, displaeesaents, compaction,. or ovarcavering: of the sai17 c_ Change in topography or-ground surface relief ✓ i features? d- The• dastruction,. covering, or modification i - of any unique geologic or physical features? a. Any increase in wind:or watar erosion of / soils, althar on br a" the site? _ _ ✓ Z_ Air. Will the proposal result in: a.. Air emissions or detarloration of ambient air quality? b_ The creation of Old actionabia aderst' c- Alteration of air-movement. moisture, or- temperature, or- any change in eltrttta, either locally car regionally? t. Y: 1L i . �� L • 1 1 1. :.a. � F LAFCO 489-10T=, t _ Yes Maybe ko 3. Water• Will the proposal result in: -.changar.in' aorrents, 'or the eew-se or directiorr of watar movementsr f/` hr Changes in-ahs13 Won Patas,. 4ralnaga patters,. or the ratan and amount of surface water ronam c_ Altarattons to the course or ftow of flood waters? dr Alteatiart of.the direction errata of / flaw of ground waters? ✓ Chang", for the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additionx or with draswls,. or through intartapti0or of an aquifer by cu= ar excavation? f_ Reduction•in• the amount of water atiar- wish• avai l ahl a• for public water,supp l i at t ✓ 4'♦. PTanr Lift W1TT the proposal' raault irt:• ar Chang", in- the-- diversity of, speetes, or nu0borT of uding �treesWe i s, of plants crops)?(incl , grass:, and / b.. Reduction• of the m=ers of any'unlque, rare, i or endangared. specias of plants.? • cr Introduction of new species of plants into •-tL an area, ar in a barrier to, the, normal l replenishment of existing species? ✓ 5.. 'Animal. Life'. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in the diversity of, species, or numbers. ofany species of animals (birds, land animals: including reptiles, or Insects)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered speei as: of animals? c_ Introduction- of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier Co — the migratloRarmovemeni of- animals? d. Deterioratiorr to existing wildlife hab{{tat? 3s Yes Maybe Na 6: Natural_ Ae� so—urces. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in:the rate Of use of anyy natural resources? ✓ b.. Oepletian Of,MY,m r-renearabte natural resource? T. En- ervy. WiiT thr proposal result in: a Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b:. Oemend upon existInq sources of energy, or re- Quire the.dove Iopment of nor source, of energy? B • Aisk of U set.. Qpei the Proposal involve a i nsk a an explosion or- the release of- hazardous substancas (including, but not limited to. Pesticides, oil,.-chemicals,. or radiation) in • thr event of an• actiderre or upset condltlonsl 9'.. Economic Lass_ W1TT tbeproposal result 1rr — .A change in•the value of Property and imPrwements endangered by flooding? _ b:. A change in thr vaIur of property and ..i iorproveoents exposed- to geologic hazards beyond accapud; cc=mmlty risk standards? _ "i 10.. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing i noise levels to the' Point at which accepted community noise and vibration levels art exceeded? / 11. Land Use. Wtll.,the• proposal result in the ✓ a ccaracion Of the Present developed or planned. land use of an: area? / 12. . Open Soace. Will the Proposal lead to a _rC decreasain the rfimunt of designated. open' / space? ✓ 17.. Population. Will the: proposal result: in: a. Altaraticn or the: location,. distribution,. density, or growth- rate. of the human Population of the. city? . b.. Change in the: Population distribution by age, income, 'religion, racial , or ethnic: I group,• occupational class, household type? R"�- t' f4 '4 k J. I ' f 4, i T" maybe WL 14. Emolo t. W111 the proposal result in ad rt onaT new long-term jobs provided. or a change to the number and par cent =played. I unemployed, and underemployed?' ✓ i 13. Meusina Wi11 the proposal result in: A- Change in number and percant of housing units by type (Price or-'rent range, i zoning category, owner-occupied and rental,. etc) relative: to demand: or tQ number of families irc various income classes in the City? _ b. Impacts an existing housing or creation of A. demand: for additional housing? 16, Transportation/Circulation Will the proposal / rwuult—in:. A. Generatiam of additional, vehicular movement?.. b- Effec= = existing paridng•facilities. ar demand: for not parking?. c- Impactuporr existing; transportation• systams?' i d.. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or-mmtemant of peopit and/or goo. s? ✓ e. Increase irr traffic hazards to motor vehicles,. I bicyclists.. or pedestrians? ✓ 1% Public Ser!ices• Will the proposal have art effect upon, or resu [ 1n a need Por,. new' or altered governmental services in a" of the following aress: j a. Fire protection? •b. Police protection? , � i c.. Schools?' d.. Parks or other recreational' facilities? _ Jl e_ Maintenance of pub lle fati11tias, including roads? 1/ f.. Other-governmental services.t ... ... 777 l.. ... .. ?_s maybe No 18. Public Fiscal Balance. Will. the proposal resu t IFT a net change in goverment fiscal flow (revenues less operating expenditures / and annualized capital expenditures)?' I • 19. Utilities. N111 the Proposal result in a _ needor ne+ systems, or alterations: to the r following utilities: R a_ Power or natural gasT b- Camm+nications: systemi c_ Water? d_ S041- or septic tanks? �a< e_ Stornrwater-dreinager f• Solid waste: and:disposai7 Human Health_ Will the Proposal. result in. _ a— The creatfOR'of any has lth• haft or- Potential haxit t ha2ard? b. A change im ehr•lerel' of cweamity health _ i care Providedr 2T. Social Services, Will the Proposal'.result in an increased demand for provision 4f general social .services? / ZL Aesthetics. Will the,prnposal result in: I i a. Obstructiarr of any scenic vista or view. open to the public? b. The creation at an aesthetically offensive i site apart to Pubifc view? c_ Lessening of thr overall neighborhood (OrAnd area) attractiveness,. Pleasantness, and uniqueness?, 27: L1 ht and G1ara. Will the Proposal produce new lghr- ar g are? 24•. Archeolaofcal/Hfstorical. Will' the proposal result in an AA t raation of a. significant archeological or historical site,. structure, / atJect, oror building? ✓ I T_e maybe do ! ZS. Mandatory Findings of Significance.. a- Does the project have the potential to degrade . q the quality of the ertvirarmant or to curtail the diversity it the environment? ,� I b« Ooes the project have the potential to achieve short-tarn. to the disadvantage of tang-term, errvirgrmentaI gas Ist (A short-tam impact on the enviror®errt is One,which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-tore impacts will endure well into / the future.) c- Does the project have.. impacts which are indi- vidually limited. butcunmulatively considerable? , (A- project may impact Orr two. or Mori- separate resource where the macs on each resource. is: relatively small,. but where the effect of thr total of those impacts art the environment is, significant.) d- Oats the project have! environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects Orr human beings, either directly or indirectly? ' I Ili Initial Study Prepared ay:. `�` ��^�•� � t - I� S TAN LEY R. _ OFFMAN _ ==- = _--- H- - - -_ - Planning and Development Services n s s o c a r e s 11661 San Vicente Boulevard,Suite 505 Los Angeles,California 90049 (213)820-2680 February 23, 1989 Mr. Ken Mohr Executive Officer LAFCO 4080 Lemon Street, 12th floor Riverside, California 92501-3651 SUBJ: Fiscal Impact Report for the Villages at Bella Vista Project: LAFCO #88-107-4--Annexation #16 to City of Palm Desert Dear Mr. Mohr: Enclosed please find a copy of the draft fiscal impact report for the Villages at Bella Vista project. As I mentioned the other day, I will call you on P J i Monday for your comments so that we may incorporate any necessary changes into a final draft by the March 1st deadline. Thank you for your assistance. Please do not hesitate to call me if you have any questions. Very truly yours, SITANLEEYY R. HOFFMAN ASSOCIATES, Inc. Stanley R. Hoffma President cc: Phil Joy, City of Palm Desert Dick Ramella, The Planning Center i 11AFM ------ - — --- -- LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION • County of Riverside • (714) 787-2786 RORERT T. ANDERSEN ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER • 4080 LEMON STREET • 12TH FLOOR • RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501-3651 February 1 , 1989 Mr. Phil Joy, Associate Planner City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, California 92260 Subject: LAFCO #88-107-4--Annexation #16 to City of Palm Desert Dear Mr. Joy: In order to continue processing the above-referenced annexation proposal , additional information needs to be submitted to our office. Please provide our office with the following: 1 . Additional information/clarification regarding the fiscal impacts of annexation. The information submitted does not sufficiently address the criteria identified in the Guidelines For Filing and Processing Proposals (criteria enclosed) . 2. Updated map/legal description. It is our understanding that the County Surveyor returned the original map/legal description to your Engineer for revisions to be made as recommended by the County Road Department. Our office will continue to process this proposal once the requested information has been received. In the meantime, if you should have any questions, please feel free to give me a call . Sincerely, 4 � Ken Mohr Executive Officer Enclosures as noted ANNEXATIONS TO CITIES The Commission requires all city annexation proposals to include an analysis directly assessing the fiscal effects the proposed action would have on all governmental agencies presently providing service to the area. The assessment of fiscal impact should include but not be limited to: 1 . The probable revenues generated by the City and County and any other affected local agency (e.g. , property taxes - tax transfers, state subventions, etc. ) . Revenue analysis should identify the base revenue plus any projected as a result of probable development. 2. The probable costs for services the City will assume from existing service providers and on-going countywide services provided by the County (e.g., d health, hospital, social services, justice systems, etc. ) . Cost analysis should identify the base costs plus any incremental costs resulting from probable develooment. My Off NAM o 0 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 January 26. 1989 Lvnda Thorson. Executive Secretary Local Agency Formation Commission 4080 Lemon Street. 12th Floor Riverside. CA 92501 Re: LAFCO 88-77-4 Dear Lynda: Enclosed are the map and leqal description of the subject annexation Proposal with the additions that were requested by the County Surveyor's Office. The additions requested were contrary to corrections previously requested and 1 understand our application Is still incomplete until the surveyor's office approves the map. I spoke to Doug Beecroft, Gary Bowen's Supervisor. and explained that one of the corrections requested required annexation of a portion of an adjacent parcel of property. As discussed earlier, this annexation facilitates settlement of a lawsuit between one single landowner and the city, any expedient processing In this matter would be greatly appreciated. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have further questions. Sincerely. PHILLIP JOY ASSOCIATE PLANNER /fr REVISED EXHIBIT "A" LAFCO 88-107-4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION, RANCHO BELLA VISTA Palm Desert Annexation 16 ALL OF SECTION 1 . TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 5 EAST AND A PORTION OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH. RANGE 6 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP 16259. PARCEL MAP BOOK 89. PAGES 35 THROUGH 37, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY. BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION l ; THENCE. S 89 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 08 SECONDS W. 2,644. 15 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 10 THE NORTH 1/4 CORNER THEREOF; THENCE, S 89 DEGREES 49 MINUTES 54 SECONDS W, 2,645.60 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION I TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE. S 0 DEGREES 06 MINUTES 19 SECONDS E. 21589.30 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION I TO THE WEST 1/4 CORNER THEREOF; THENCE. S 0 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 46 SECONDS E, 2,635.28 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE, S 89 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 19 SECONDS E. 2.639.23 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION I TO THE SOUTH 1/4 CORNER THEREOF; THENCE, S 89 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 52 SECONDS E. 2,642.87 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION I TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE, N 0 DEGREES 01 MINUTES 00 SECONDS W. 1 ,320.02 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 ; THENCE. N 89 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 00 SECONDS W. 58.21 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF STATE HIGHWAY 74. THENCE. N 17 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 43 SECONDS E ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID STATE HIGHWAY 1'D ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1 /4 OF SECTION 6; THENCE, N 89 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 12 SECONDS W. 50.00 FEET ALONG SAID LINE TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE CENTER LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY 74; EXHIBIT "A" LAFCO 88-107-4 THENCE, N 17 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 43 SECONDS E, ALONG SAID CENTER LINE Ta- AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SECTION 6; THENCE. N 88 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 37 SECONDS W, ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 1 BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THIS PARCEL CONTAINS 680 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION WAS COMPILED FROM RECORD DATA AND DOES NOT REPRESENT A SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED. BY: Z ,J. ERS Q CITY ENGINEF K �Q`�� :Q30HN*-.�Fy CITY OF PALM DESERT ti Q� O� c R.C.E. 2532U • s .v No.25320 ml m ac ;��IQ. 12^Jl�Bq aY� �O CIVIL �;* '� �•.•ENGIN�ENING,•' ...••••• fl9jl OF CftUE���\� 2 26 25 30 29 28 M 35 36 /31 32 33 lo.25320 2 1 6 5 4 c= at? 1Z'3/� a • 9 �s ° U)e 11 12 6 9 Jai:;^_'^^°ec^r.' ,��• 14 13 IB 17 16 r!tl° NMO AMMOVED KEY MAP ?EXISTg PgLMING DESERT �a t; •/' SIJ LEiNTY SURVEYOR CITY LIMIT i BY - 536 3.6151 2 S89049'54°W 2,645.60' S89051'08"W 2,644.15' -N88045'37"W POINT OF BEGINNING o � . M UD h N h U C OI 0 680 ACRES ± M •O P 01 h� at EXISTING PALM DESERT CITY LIMIT-2 N89°55'12"W 50.00' N M C4 U y N IT°55'43"E NOTE: O 3 THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED ° RECORD DATA AND DOES NOT REPRESENT A N N 89°56'00'W 58.2I' p DOES SURVEY pQF THE PROPERTY SHOWN 1{EREON. O N O M Z 2 S89°47'19'E 2 63923'-L ;;;�� S89°56'52"E 2 642.87' 11I 12 Revised ( LAFCO 88 - 107 -412 ' Date: December /S ,1988 Drawn by: PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO.16 y TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT Na ' p San Pedro fICHA'ReJFERS SEC.I,T6S R 5 E BI POR. SEC.6 T6S R6E S.B.M. Scale: RCE NO.25320 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/PLANNING, PALM DESERT I"-1000'00 LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION • County of Riverside • (714) 787-2786 ROBERT T. ANDERSEN ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER • 4080 LEMON STREET • 12TH FLOOR • RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501-3651 January 20, 1989 Mr. Phil Joy Associate Planner City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, California 92260 RE: LAFCO 88-77-4--Annexation 3 to County Service Area 13 Dear Phil : Enclosed are a copies of the map and legal description for the above referenced annexation proposal . The County Surveyor' s Office has again reviewed the map and legal description and found them incorrect. If you have any questions, please contact Gary Bowen at (714) 787-6482. Thank you for your assistance. 4da reelly, A-1 Thorson Executive Secretary Enclosures n TO: LYNDA THORSON JANUARY 18, 1989 FROM: GARY BOWEN, ROAD & SURVEY DEPT. RE: ANNEXATION #16 TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT LAFCO NO. 88-107-4 MAP AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION ARE BEING RETURNED FOR THE FOLLOWING REVISIONS: MAP REVISIONS: 1. PLEASE MAKE ALL CORRECTIONS INDICATED IN RED. LEGAL REVISIONS: 1 . PLEASE MAKE ALL CORRECTIONS INDICATED IN RED. 2. CHANGE LEGAL TO AGREE WITH CORRECTED MAP. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CALL GARY BOWEN OF THE SURVEY DEPARTMENT AT 787-6482 . � I 26 25 30 29 28 M 35 36 31 32 33 6, VJ m 12 8 9 L' C I{ 13 IT 16 1 KEY MAP EXISTING PALM DESERT �P CITY LIMIT-- 36 36 I r 2 S89.49'34"W 2,643.60' S89.51'08"W 2,644.1 P N88.45'37"W OINT BEGINNININ G 0 M m n N W OI b 68 ACRES ± w) 7 A EXISTING PALM DESERT CITY,LIMIT N89•55'12'W50.00' ' —7-4,tr — n, EAyf N 1 .P�U/ GiN2 N R-EhD(I�(i W N 0.01'00"W 324.56' ro c NOTE: N17.55'43"E 188.93' THIS Fur WAS D DATA ANDPREPARED wry ' FROM REcaeD wo H N 89.56'00'W 38.21' DOES "Or REPRESENTSURVEY 9F THE PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON. M � �vGLtX-.i SEcf+on 2 S89.47'19'E 2 63923' . S89 56'32'E 2 642.87' sc�cruv� w�N I II12 7 EAS-f- ,TIE, LrNE �evtse• c� LAFCO 88- 107 -4 Don: Docwnber Jr ,1988 D„Ow„ Dy, PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO.16 TO THE CITY Of PALM DESERT (CHAR �. FOLKERS� SEC.I T6S R5E a POR.SEC.6 T6S R6E ND Son Poaro S.B.M. RCE NO.25320 COMMUNITY DEVFI.OPYFYria nwwluc a.. .. ___ Sc01e• . - �i'evised EXHIBIT "A" LAFCO 88-107-4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION. RANCHO BELLA VISTA Palm Desert Annexation 16 ALL OF SECTION 1 . TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH. RANGE 5 EAST AND A PORTION OF SECTION 6. TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH. RANGE 6 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP 16259, PARCEL MAP BOOK 89. PAGES 35 THROUGH 37. RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY. BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 1 ; THENCE. S 89 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 08 SECONDS W. 2.644. 15 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION I TO THE NORTH 1/4 CORNER THEREOF% THENCE, S 89 DEGREES 49 MINUTES 54 SECONDS W. 2.645.60 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION I TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE, S 0 DEGREES 06 MINUTES 19 SECONDS E. 2,589.30 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION I TO THE WEST 1/4 CORNER THEREOF; THENCE. 5 0 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 46 SECONDS E. 2.635.28 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION I TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE, S 89 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 19 SECONDS E. 2,639.23 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION I TO THE SOUTH 1 /4 CORNER THEREOF; THENCE. S 89 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 52 SECONDS E. 2,642.87 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE, N 0 DEGREES 01 MINUTES 00 SECONDS W. 1 ,320.02 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 ; THENCE. N 89 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 00 SECONDS W. 58.21 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF STATE HIGHWAY 74; THENCE . N 17 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 43 SECONDS E. 188.93 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID STATE HIGHWAY TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 ; THENCE. N 0 DEGREES 01 MINUTES 00 SECONDS W. 324.56 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID STATE HIGHWAY; THENCE. N 17 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 43 SECONDS E. ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID STATE HIGHWAY. TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1 /4 OF SECTION 6; THENCE, N 89 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 12 SECONDS W. 50.00 FEET ALONG SAID LINE TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE CENTER LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY 74; EXHIBIT "A" LAFCO 88-107-4 THENCE. N 17 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 43 SECONDS E. ALONG SAID CENTER LINE TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SECTION 6: THENCE. N 88 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 37 SECONDS W. ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION I BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THIS PARCEL CONTAINS 680 ACRES. MORE OR LESS. THIS LEGAL OESCRIPT1ON WAS COMPILED FROM RECORD DATA AND DOES NOT REPRESENT A SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED. BY: Q�OFESSIn IC RD J. F KERS CITY ENGINE �Q�••� �OHN;�•.• Fy CITY OF PALM DESERT :g�`` ���:y R.C.E. 25320 _� :� No.25320 ,U ;iz� 12 31�Bt y; a ^!VIL � •. Ei!5.., �'"PSG.' 'PHS i;:G, : DE" ;:" al AFPROVED BY r� 2 .t �7 73.510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 December 15. 1988 Lynda Thorson Executive Secretary Local Agency Formation Commission County of Riverside 4080 Lemon Street, 12th Floor Riverside. CA 92501-3651 Subject: LAFCO 88-107-4 - Annexation 16 Dear Lynda: Please find 15 copies of the corrected legal description and map plus a reproducible. The corrections were made in accordance with the corrections enumerated by Mr. Bowen of the County Surveyor's office. Also, in accordance with Mr. Bowens request the map and legal description have been signed by Richards Folkers. City Public Works Director/Registered Civil Engineer. Please contact me if you have any further questions. Sincerely, PHILLIP JOY ASSOCIATE PLANNER /fr t -- 26 25 30 29 28 M _ QgOFESS/p�y9 uv 35 36 31 32 33 C �m^p� jONIV*.•�(`� . :U No.25320 rn Tyem 2 W 6 5 4 G n5� �. 123�'� �: r CIVIL ; ••.•ENGI11,1EMING.0 14 13 IB 17 IB KEY MAP EXISTING v I PALM DESERT A. j CITY LIMIT I J 5 36 36 I 2 ��' S69°49'54"W 2,645.60' S89°51'08"W ,2,644.%OINT OF IN88°45'37"W — BEGINNING /I 0 , M � 0 O N ,} W Y 0 680 ACRES ± M o r z EXISTING PALM DESERT CITY LIMIT N89055'12" 50.00' f i N 1�6 N °OI'OO"W 324.56' WOTE: N17°55'43' E 188.93'O HIS PLAT WAS PREPARED ° ROM RETARD DATA AND OES NOT REPRESENT A O N89°56'OO•W SB.2URVEY JE THE PROPERTY N '� NOWN HEREON. I 2 S89047'19"E 2 63923' S89°56'52"E 2 642.87' 4 11112 1 127 LAFC0 ..88- 107 -4 Date: December /s ,1988 PROPOSED ANNEXATION, NO.16 Drawn by: TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT Na g San Pedro 1CHAR01/d. FOLKERS SEC.I T6S R5E a POR. SEC.6 T6S RISE S. B.M. Scale: RCE N0.25320 COMMUNITY DEVELOPM ENT/PLAN NINO, PALM DESERT I"=1000'00 EXHIBIT "A" LAFCO 88-107-4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION, RANCHO BELLA VISTA Palm Desert Annexation 16 ALL OF SECTION 1 . TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 5 EAST AND A PORTION OF SECTION 6. TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 6 EAST. SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP 16259, PARCEL MAP BOOK 89, PAGES 35 THROUGH 37, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY. BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 1 ; THENCE, 5 89 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 08 SECONDS W, 2,644. 15 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 TO THE NORTH 1/4 CORNER THEREOF; THENCE, S 89 DEGREES 49 MINUTES 54 SECONDS W. 2,645.60 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE, S 0 DEGREES 06 MINUTES 19 SECONDS E, 2,589.30 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION I TO THE WEST 1/4 CORNER THEREOF; THENCE, S 0 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 46 SECONDS E, 2,635.28 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE,. S 89 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 19 SECONDS E, 2.639.23 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION I TO THE SOUTH 1/4 CORNER THEREOF; THENCE, S 89 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 52 SECONDS E. 2,642.87 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION I TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE, N 0 DEGREES 01 MINUTES 00 SECONDS W, 1 ,320.02 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 ; THENCE, N 89 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 00 SECONDS W. 58.21 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF STATE HIGHWAY 74; THENCE , N 17 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 43 SECONDS E, 188.93 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID STATE HIGHWAY TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 ; THENCE, N 0 DEGREES O1 MINUTES 00 SECONDS W, 324.56 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION I TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID STATE HIGHWAY; THENCE, N 17 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 43 SECONDS E, ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID STATE HIGHWAY. TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 6; THENCE, N 89 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 12 SECONDS W, 50.00 FEET ALONG SAID LINE TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE CENTER LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY 74; EXHIBIT "An LAFCO 88-107-4 THENCE. N 17 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 43 SECONDS E, ALONG SAID CENTER LINE TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SECTION 6; THENCE. N 88 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 37 SECONDS W, ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION I BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THIS PARCEL CONTAINS 680 ACRES. MORE OR LESS. THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION WAS COMPILED FROM RECORD DATA AND DOES NOT REPRESENT A SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED. BY: f/ Q%,OFESSIn dldhARDi J. F KERS CITY ENGINE �cQ�� O)OHiy�,o••Fy� C I TY OF PALM DESERT Q � . y R.C.E. 25320 ;Z No.25320 m7 m ,U • CIVIL ; �C•••.•ENGIN_ERING Jl/ 2 I w f LALF(X) LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION • County of Riverside • (714) 787-2786 ROBERT T. AN➢ERSEN ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER • 4080 LEMON STREET • 12TH FLOOR • RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501-3651 December 5, 1988 Mr. Phil Joy Associate Planner City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Driver Palm Desert, California 92260 RE: LAFCO 88-107-4--Annexation 16 to City of Palm Desert Dear Phil : Enclosed are copies of the map and legal description for the above referenced annexation proposal . The County Surveyor' s Office has reviewed the map and legal description and requests that changes be made in accordance with the attached memorandum. Please feel free to contact Mr. Bowen, should you have any questions. Please return all corrected copies of the map and legal description (15 copies of the map plus a reproducible, and 15 copies of the legal description) to this office for further processing of the application. As you know, this proposal will be held in abeyance pending receipt of the corrected map and legal description. Si cerely, jLdThorson Executive Secretary Enclosures TO: 1030 LYNDA THORSON DECEMBER 2 , 1988 FROM: 1080 GARY BOWEN, ROAD AND SURVEY DEPT. MAP AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION ARE BEING RETURNED FOR THE FOLLOWING REVISIONS: MAP REVISIONS: 1. PLEASE MAKE ALL CORRECTIONS INDICATED IN RED. 2 . PLEASE DARKEN THE BOUNDARY LINES. 3 . PLEASE NOTE ACREAGE ON MAP. 4 . MUST BE STAMPED AND SIGNED BY A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR OR A REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER. ( PLEASE SEE ATTACHED COPIES OF PAGES 39 AND 40 OF THE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS ACT, 1988 LEGAL REVISIONS: 1 . PLEASE MAKE ALL CORRECTIONS INDICATED IN RED. 2 . CHANGE POINT OF BEGINNING AS NOTED. 3. CHANGE LEGAL DESCRIPTION AS NOTED AND IN AGREEMENT WITH MAP. 4 . NOTE ACREAGE ON LEGAL. 5 . LEGAL MUST BE STAMPED AND SIGNED BY A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR OR A REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CALL GARY BOWEN OF THE SURVEY DEPT. AT 787-6482 LAB �8 -1v7-¢ >urd oror a r��S/¢rrsd ' C�!/iL e�iw/EEr LEGAL DESCRIPTION, RANCHO BELLA .VISTA Palm Desert Annexation 16 BEING A DIVISION OF SECTION I , 1OWNSIIIP 6 SOUTII, RANGE 5 EAST A14D A PORTION OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH , RAIJGE 6 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN AS . SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP 16259 , PARCEL MAP BOOK, 89 , PAGEs :35 THROUGH 37, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY. S4;AR:F 1 AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION l ; THENCE, S S9° 10T( . 00 FE-Ef- G THE RTkI-EHPE�F- S1�D�104—�0 TFI, PO J N1JIN THENCE , S 89051 ' OEi"iJ Zlo4Q./�rrFS FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION I TO THE NORTH 1 /!i CORNER THEREOF; THEIJCE , S 09°49 ' 54"W, 2 , 6115 . 60 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; - THENCE, S 00OG' 19"E , 2 ,589. 30 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 TO THE WEST 1 /4 CORNER THEREOF; 1. THENCE, S 00O5146"E , 2 ,635 . 28 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTIO14 I TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE, S 89°47 ' 19" E., 2 ,639 . 23 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OFyA1i) SECTIO14 I TO THE SOUTH 1 /4 CORNER THEREOF ; THENCE , S 89056 ' 52"E, 2 ,6112 . 87 FEET ALOIJG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF ; THENCE , N 0°01100"W, 1 , 320.02 FEET ALOIJG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 ; THENCE , N 89056 ' 00" WEST , 58. 21 FEET TO A POIIJT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF STATE HIGHWAY 74 ; THENCE, 14 17°55 ' 113"E , 188. 93 FEET .ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID STATE HIGHWAY TO ITS INTERSECTION idlTH THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 ; THENCE , N 0001 ' 00"W, 324 . 56 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION I TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID STATE HIGHWAY; THENCE, N 17°55 ' 43"E , ' , '—� Tv —i- FEET ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF ,Uor�r w i oF STATE If ICYlui.4-h 7/7a- 5-4X The 0 of s ° Lfwy :7¢. TG�tit�.f/07oSS"r13 E ALotit/ svio ¢ �e Awl iwgisf��.av w/e/Le� GK�2� of Src. !o yh¢hc2 U�e ¢r"37'w ACohy SQ ,i/ Ua� -/-o r/aZ .�/E. ter. oh L ?.i'['. Cd/oS2cj Ga�icJ st/rt�ft or Polrh Desert - . _..Fc._•__L__-- City Llmit < ' qq 15rV ,a n �� ii=• I �c is 351L36 - S89°49'54"W 2645.60' �I se9°el'os"w� 3 I � I ��\ // 1 6 N 88°45 37 W° Riverside C 00 /. o N,3 3823W 11) m 38.53' m tn R N SG7ow L7fj)^k1Ls•-. �o!/NCfvy y w 0 'o 0 o r N '"7-A�- bouHtfea ry -fp !v � NO°o1'00'W - / 324.5G' co N tn 6 m M 10 N 17°55'43"Q 188.93' N w N89° 55'00'W/ to 0 os I �u�eJ. o 3 N N O p O �_ t O O i , N M � S09047'19''E2,63923' S89°56'52°E2,642-87' �. 6 II 12 1 2 7 0 LA FGv DATE: JULY 1983 PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 16 Drown by: TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT i RnMON A. DIAZ IN SEC. I T6S, R5E, & POR. SEC. 6, T6S, R6E, S.B.M. SCALE: ui 14 L-:CroR GN VIRON MFNW, W3VIOf-;S AIVISION i CITY n 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA92260 TELEPHONE(619)346.0611 November 17. 1988 Ken Mohr, Executive Director Local Agency Formation Commission Robert T. Anderson, Administrative Center 4060 Lemon Street. 12th Floor Riverside, CA 92501-3651 Dear Ken: Enclosed Is our entire application package for an annexation proposal for a project area commonly referred to as Villages of Bella Vista. As an attached sheet indicates, the property is owned by a single landowner who also owns 103 acres of land adjacent to the proposed annexation and is depicted on an attached map. Due to the rather simplistic nature of this application, the city requests that any expediency of the process be applied ( i .e. placement on consent calendar rather than as a public hearing Item) . All correspondence should be addressed to myself, and If there are further questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (619) 346-0611 ex. 489. Sincerely, � - �Philli oy Associate Planner /fr Attachments: check in the amount of $1 ,500 payable to Riverside County application form - 15 copies authorizing resolution legal description and boundary map - 15 copies, 1 mylar plan for services agreement for provision of water and sewer fiscal Impact prepared by city co-operative agreement with County and Redevelopment Agency property ownership in area zoning map for subject area planned community development pre-annexation master plan for annexation area ordinance no. 347 approving pre-zoning negative declaration, notice of determination and check list form - 2 copies RESOLUTION NO. W137 A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION BY THE CITY OF PALM DESERT REQUESTING THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION TO TAKE PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNEXATION OF 680 ACRES LOCATED SOUTHWEST OF PRESENT CITY BOUNDARIES. RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert. that WHEREAS. the City of Palm Desert desires to Initiate proceedings pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, Division 3, commencing with Section 56000 of the California Government Code, for the annexation of the above described property: and WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be annexed is uninhabited and a description of the boundaries of the territory Is set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference Incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, this proposal is consistent with the sphere of influence of the City of Palm Desert: and WHEREAS, the reasons for this proposed annexation are as follows: 1 . The area Is a natural extension of city boundaries due to the topography in the area and will allow the city to control development on the property and provide necessary city services. NOW, THEREFORE, this Resolution of Application Is hereby adopted and approved by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert and the Local Agency Formation Commission of Riverside County is hereby requested to take proceedings for the annexation of territory as described in Exhibit "A", according to the terms and conditions stated above and in the manner provided by the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985. PASSED and ADOPTED by the City Counc i 1 of the City of Pa 1 m Desert at a regular meeting thereof held on the 27th day of October, 1988 by the following vote. to wit: AYES: CRITES, KELLY, SNYDER, WILSON, BENSON NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE M. BENSON, Mayor ATTEST: / // SHEILA R. GILLIG N. CIty/0 erk City of Palm Desert, Ca fornla rl j 11 r I — 159, _ate _ mn 71 77 �' Water •• _-����f� \ it f Palm Desert ARE UGk'�.�` � .) UNU Y- : B 791 -� °' r) l c i - I c � P J SITE �l ° 134 860 USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP RANCHO MIRAGE QUADRANGLE , 1957A4\ EXHIBIT PHOTOREVISED 1972 — - LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION • County of Riverside (714) 787-2786 RORERT T. ANDERSEN ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER • 4080 LEMON STREET • 12TH FLOOR • RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501-3651 November 7, 1988 Mr. Phillip Joy Associate Planner City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, California 92260 Dear Mr. Joy: Enclosed are the documents you transmitted to us on November 3, 1988, for proposed annexation 16 to the City of Palm Desert. In order to process the application we will need the following information/documents: 1 . 15 copies of the map and legal description, plus a mylar copy of the map. 2. 15 copies of the LAFCO application (not stapled) . 3. 2 copies of the environmental documents, including Notice of Determination, Negative Declaration and checklist form. 4. A check in the amount of $1 ,500 made payable to County of Riverside. 5. The fiscal assessment submitted is dated May 1980. Please provide us with an updated fiscal assessment to current year, as well as the assessment of future fiscal impacts based on planned development. Also enclosed are several copies of our most recent application package for your reference, and future use. Please ask all of your City personnel to destroy any other applications which they may have. Si cerely, Ly da Thorson LAFCO Secretary Enclosures 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA92260 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 November 3. 1988 Ken Mohr. Executive Director Local Agency Formation Commission Robert T. Anderson. Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street. 12th Floor Riverside. CA 92501-3651 Dear Ken: Enclosed is our entire application package for an annexation proposal for a project area commonly referred to as Villages of Bella Vista. As an attached sheet indicates. the property is owned by a single landowner who also owns 103 acres of land adjacent to the proposed annexation and is depicted on an attached map. Due to the rather simplistic nature of this application, the city requests that any expediency of the process be applied ( i .e. placement on consent calendar rather than as a public hearing item) . All correspondence should be addressed to myself, and if there are further questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (619) 346-0611 ex. 489. Sincerely, Phillip Jov Associate Planner /fr ' Attachments: application form authorizing resolution legal description and boundary map plan for services agreement for provision of water and sewer fiscal impact prepared by city fiscal impact analvsis prepared for property owner co-operative agreement with County and Redevelopment Agency property ownership in area zoning map for subject area planned community development pre-annexation master plan for annexation area ordinance no. 347 approving pre-zoning negative declaration of environmental impact for pre-zoning APPLICATION TO THE RIVERSIDE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION Mail or deliver to: Local Agency Formation Commission Robert T. Andersen Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street, 12th Floor Riverside, CA 92501-3651 FOR LAFCO USE ONLY INTRODUCTION: The questions on this form are designed to obtain sufficient data about the proposed project and site to allow the staff and LAFCO to assess this proposal. Additional background information is encouraged which may be pertinent to the proposal. Use additional sheets where necessary. Do not leave any blanks If an item is not applicable, so indicate. Submit this original form and 15 copies.(Note: No other application form will be accepted.) APPLICANT: City of Palm Desert ' Telephone: 619-346-0611 ADDRESS: 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92260 Name and title of person to contact regarding this application: Phil Joy, Associate Planner Address: 73-610 Fred Waring Dr. , Palm Desert, CA 9226?efephone: 619-346-0611 APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE TO: nnnpx Suhiprt Property (Describe proposal or action requested) LOCATION OF PROJECT: 630 acres southwest of present city boundaries. (Describe boundaries specifically, and refer to major highway, roads, rivers, and topo raphical fgatur s) 680 acres southwest of the City of Palm Desert,.includgng Section �, TGS, R5E and the portion of Section 6, T6S , R5E west of Highway 74. A. OWNERSHIP: 1. Is the applicant a property owner in the area of the proposed project? ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Is the applicant sole owner of this property? 0 Yes 0 No B. AREA INFORMATION: 1. How many square miles, or acres, of territory are included In this proposal? 680 acrP�_ 2. Number'of structures or dwellings In the proposed area at the present time? 0 (Specifically describe how the property is improved) 3. Expected increase in the number of dwellings and/or structures In the proposed area which will result from this proposal (describe specifically the number and residences, mobllehomes, commercial, etc,) 1066rygof truct cal Improvements: e.g., single-family 300 room hotel m By what date? 15 years incrementally 4. Population in the area at the present time? 0 5. Expected change in the population which will result from this proposal? Plus 964 nerm�nA,r By when? 1445 2409 Total - BY Year 2013 6. Number of registered voters within the boundaries at the present time? 0 7. Assessed value: $ G3 0427,616 Land $ $3 046 1�1 Improvements $ _$ l .an 8. Identity the number of parcels within the boundaries by Assessor's number: 771-02 -' (If necessary, attach printout showing Assessor's Parcel number(s) and landowners) LAND USE: i• Current zoning 2. Current General Plan designation 3. Prezoning and General Plan designation assigned b City Space prezoning) PCD Zon i n Low Dens ' y ry(attach certif ed copy of City ordinance with assigned 4• Specifically describe how the territory is presently used , vacant, groves, single-family residences, etc.) Vacant 5. Describe how adjacent lands are used: North: Sin le Famil South: acanEaSideorpq an and East. Vacant Land and a S ' West: Vacant Land D. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: 1. Describe the proposed project in as much detail as possible: Has a subdivision or lot split been approved by the County or a city?) ❑ Yes [� No. If so,what agency has approved the map,and what is its reference number? The pre zoninq of planned rommunity dpyplonmant appr voc a conceptual plan which includes 1066 dwelling units a 300 mpm hnte1, nnlf course and 300 acres dedicated to the city for o pn cn r�pncp, - — 2. State reasons which justify this proposal: (For example, service needs, health mandate, economic benefit, etc.) The site is surrounded by the city on two sides anal by mnuntain harriprc by the other two sides therbv making annexation to the fits of Palm npcprt -a natural extension of cif boundaries and its as provides (police, fire, etc. ) . E. PLAN FOR THE PROVISION OF MUNICIPAL SERVICES (Government Code section 56653): In addition to responding to the questions listed below, attach a detailed narrative plan which thoroughly outlines the full range of municipal services which will be extended to the property, their availability, and the cost of extending these services to the landowner and/or future residents. 1. Water will be supplied by? Coachella Valley I-later District - What is the distance to the closest water line and where is it located? 1/4 mile north in Highway 74 Is the agency prepared to immediately furnish the necessary service? Yes If not, explain. What is the anticipated water demand for this project?»_ Between 553,000 & 1 066 000 nali^n< per day. 2. Sewer service will be provided by? Coachella Valley Water District What is the distance to the closest sewer line and where is it located? 1/4 mile north in Highway 74. Is the agency prepared to immediately furnish the necessary service? Yes If not, explain. What is the anticipated demand for this project? 400.000 gallons raw spwanp npr_d y 3. Fire & Police: What jurisdiction will provide fire and police services? County and State respectively under Where is the nearest fire station located? Kesa View & Portola — Response time 3 minutes — Where is the nearest law enforcement facility located? San Pablo. & Fred Waring (Prnpnsed) Response time 24 hour patrols in area 1 4. Transportation: a. Designate the names and types of roads which the project will use for primary and secondary access (including direct access streets from the project site to the nearest freeway) Highway 74 will provide the only access which leads to the freeway nters a e 1 b. Is widening of an existing street necessary? Yes c. Is the project served by County-maintained roads? No d. Is construction of new access streets necessary? No 5. Special Revenues: Does the annexing agency have current plans to establish any new assessment district or fees which would include this area, in order to pay for new or extended services? No Please detail. 6. Will the project be subject to existing bonded indebtedness? No P. PROPERTY OWNER'S POSITION: 1. How many landowners make up total ownership of the project area? (Include with this application copies of all fetters/correspondence you have relating to this proposal.) 1 2. How many property owners have been contacted regarding the project? 1 3. How many property owners are in favor of the project? 1 4. How many property owners are not in favor of the project? 0 G. LIGHTING & ROAD MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS ONLY: t. If street lights are to be installed, list how many, what typegpnd.intensity (e.g., 5-22,000 LPSV and 20-9,000 HPSV) 2. If the application affects a road maintenance district, how many miles of road are to be maintained? 3. Is it your intention to bring any roads to County standards for future acceptance into the County Maintained Road System? li. COMMUNITY BENEFIT: In your own words, how would your proposal benefit the community) brie s a ver visible area under c The annPXatjQn NOTICES AND COMMUNICATIONS: List below the names and addresses of people to who notices and communica- tions should be directed, (3 maximum) Name Phillip lrr Telephone 639 sa6 ull .Address 73-510 Fred idaring Drive City & Zip Palm Desert CA 92260 Name Richard Ramella , The Planning Center Telephone 714-851-9444 Address 1300 Dove Street City & Zip Newport Beach, CA 92660 Name Telephone Address City & Zip Signature of applicant or authorized representative Bruce A. Altman Typed or printed name City Manager Title November 3 .1988 Date RESOLUTION NO. 88-137 A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION BY THE CITY' OF PALM DESERT REQUESTING THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION- COMMISSION TO TAKE PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNEXATION OF 680 ACRES LOCATED SOUTHWEST OF PRESENT CITY BOUNDARIES. RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, that WHEREAS. the City of Palm Desert desires to initiate, proceedings pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, Division 3, commencing_ with Section 56000 of the California Government Code, for the annexation of the above described property: and WHEREAS, the territory proposed. to be annexed is uninhabited and a description of the boundaries of the territory is set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference Incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, this proposal is consistent with the sphere of influence of the City of Palm Desert: and WHEREAS, the reasons for this proposed annexation are as follows: 1 . The area is a natural extension of city boundaries due to the topography in the area and will allow the city to control development _ on the property and provide necessary city services. NOW, THEREFORE , this Resolution of Application Is hereby adopted and approved by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert and the Local Agency Formation Commission of Riverside County Is hereby requested to take proceedings for the annexation of territory as described in Exhibit "A", according to the terms and conditions stated above and In the manner provided by the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985. PASSED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert at a regular meeting thereof held on the 27th day of October, 1988 by the following vote, to wit: AYES: CRITES, KELLY, SNYDER, WILSON, BENSON NOES: NONE ABSENT:. NONE ABSTAIN: NONE M. BENSON, Mayor ATTEST: / SHEILA R. GILLIG N. City ark City of Palm Desert. Cap form a V LEGAL DESCRIPTION, RANCHO BELLA .VISTA Palm Desert Annexation 16 BEING A DIVISION OF SECTION 1 , TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 5 EAST AND A PORTION OF SECTION 6 , TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTII, _ RA14GE 6 EAST, SAN BERNARD1140 BASE AND PIERIDIAN AS . SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP 16259 , PARCEL MAP BOOK 89 , PAGES :35 THROUGH 37, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY. STARTING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 1 ; THENCE, S 89051 '08"W 50.00 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTIO14 1 . T0 THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING ; THENCE , S 85051 ' 08"W, 2 ,5911 . 15 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION l TO . THE NORTH 1 /11 CORNER THEREOF; THENCE , S 89049 ' 54"W, 2 ,645.60 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE, S 0006 ' 19"E , 2 ,589 . 30 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 TO THE WEST 1A CORNER THEREOF; THENCE, S 0005 ' 46"E 2 ,635 . 28 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE, S 89047 ' 19" E 2 ,639 . 23 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SECTION 1 TO THE SOUTH 1 /4 CORNER THEREOF; THENCE , S 89°56 ' 52"E, 2 ,642 . 87 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF ; THENCE , N 000100"W, 1 , 320.02 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF .SAID SECTION I ; THENCE, N 89°Wool, NEST, 58. 21 FEET TO A POINT ON TIIE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF STATE HIGHWAY 74 ; THENCE, Id 17°55 ' 43"E , 188. 93 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID STATE HIGHWAY TO ITS INTERSECTION -WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION l ; THENCE , N 0001 ' 00"W, 324 . 56 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID STATE HIGHWAY; THENCE , N 17055 ' 43"E , 3 , 481 . II FEET ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID STATE HIGHWAY ; THENCE, N 33038 ' 23"W, 38. 53. FEET; THENCE , N 88°45 ' 37"W 1 , 101 . 118 FEET; THENCE , 14 00O1 ' OO"W, 60 . 01 FEET TO THE 1RUE POINT OF BEGINNING . 1 j C I > City Limit 's -Beglnning Point JJ 36 7_,G45.60, --�.{I,r— S89051,08°W -2,594.15' 3 31 1 6 N 88.45 37 W Riverside Cc t I S89°51'08"W 1,101.48' J 50'-00 / N 33°38'23'W 1y 38.53' i N B ct) Y W 7 in ' O b h N 0°01'00'W 324.5G 7 I { � N N 17°55'43" 19B.63' N r W N89° 5V00' I � g io 56 .21' to O / t 3 � o N p ( O p o 6 I r ro O 589°47'19°E2,639.23' S89°56'52°E2,642.87' _i- � 6 11�12 1 ? 7 3 DATE JULY 1983 - Drawn by: PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 16 / TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT I' RAMON A. DIAZ IN SEC. I , T6S, R5E, 6 POR. SEC. 6,T6S, R6E, S.B.M. SCALE: City of Palm Desert Annexation No. 16 Fiscal Impact The entire annexation area is currently vacant and is bisected by a flood control channel constructed by the Coachella Valley Water District and financed by the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency. All developable acreage on the site is within the boundaries of the Redevelopment Agency's project area.— An agreement exists between the agency and county that allows the subject area to be within the agency's boundaries even though it is unincorporated. The provisions of the agreement are that the same pass-through allocations exist on the increments received from a parcel of property whether or not it is incorporated. Thereby, the annexation will not impact or alter property tax allocations that will occur with future developments although the future development will increase the amounts of property tax to be divided amongst the agencies identified by the aforementioned agreement. A project for the entire annexation area is currently being ratified by the processing of a development agreement between the property owner and city. The agreement for the project will allow a maximum number of 1,066 dwelling units at differing densities and a 300 rocm hotel. The hotel will generate transient occupancy tax to the city and any ancillary commercial uses would generate additional sales tax. t INTEROFFTCE rffN0PJUuJCM City of Palm Desert TO: Riverside County Local Agency Formation Commission FROM: City of Palm Desert SUBJECT: Plan for services for Palm Desert Annexation No. 16 DATE: October 28, 1988 I. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES: The area proposed to be annexed is vacant and will be served by the Southern California Edison Electric Company, Southern California Gas Company, General Telephone Company, Palmer Cable Vision, Coachella Valley Water District and the Coachella Valley Recreation and Park District. The provisions of these utilities will not be impacted by the proposed annexation. Services provided directly by the City of Palm Desert would be in land use planning, building and safety, building code review and inspections, public works . - street cleaning maintenance and repair, abatement of public nuisances and general code enforcement. By contract, the city provides for trash disposal with Palm Desert Disposal and police, fire and paramedic service with the County of Riverside through the Tri-Cities District. II. LEVEL OF SERVICE: Current utility service would be maintained and improved as required by the various utility companies and special districts. Land use planning, building and safety review and inspection, and general code enforcement would be provided on the basis of need. Police Services: The City of Palm Desert provides, under contract with Riverside County Sheriff's Department, 4 cars and 20 officers per 24 hour period in addition to a full-time crime prevention office at city hall. On a daily basis 112 hours of police services are provided. Fire Services: Fire protection is provided by Riverside County Fire Department, 54 full-time personnel, 15 volunteers, 4 pumpers, 2 rescue squads, 2 rescue-salvage, 2 paramedic units. Back-up coverage by County Fire Department stations in Bermuda Dimes and Rancho Mirage. Mutual aid agreement with the City of Indio. Response time would be within 5 minutes from the Mesa View Station with back-up from surrounding stations. J A Fire Insurance Classification: Source of rating: Robinson's Rating Service II- 9, with development the rating is anticipated to be lowered to II-5. III. Tlb'M4G OF SERVICE EXTENSIONS: City services would be available immediately in the areas of planning, building permits, code enforcement, road maintenance, police, fire and paramedics. The extension of new facilities such as water and sewer would be timed with future development. An agreement with the Coachella Valley Water District for the delivery of water and extension of sewer is included to further clarify. IV. FINANCING: Generalized city services for the area would be financed through property taxes and state subventions tied to increased population. , The expanded level of police, fire and paramedic services would be financed through the special fire tax of approximately $40/year for a typical 5,000 square foot industrial building. New commercial buildings would be required, to pay a one time fire facility fee of $.10 per square foot. The city in general has experienced a ' substantial increase in sales tax and hotel occupancy tax revenues which will provide increasing levels for existing and new services to Palm Desert residents. PHILLIP POf ASSOCIATE LANNER /fr h K01'I EFe Unli (i e: 1 1 . 1J. 1 >ut 12: 42 P. 2 \' ' �. . t f • I • �_/ ( i - .• .<_._.. - -"__�. J �14 , , ••Male' � •welr ck C,ahui)Ia Iliiis Y�/ 1 4 'i'Q �• \1 <cr+ V l DEVELOPABLE: A� \\\ `JV V v r -�' _ - _ �\.. Ali rl7�)1.' —. �,� : ��•`� � �--- 1• 'Y 11 Iv SW 1346 1660 c_ PROPE�Ty �►N���' f5h , ��Q1� 8\5HIP _. E/�URCE ' U.S.G.$. TOPOGRAPHIC MAP { RANCHO MIRAGE QUADRANGLE, 1957 ATTACHMENT NO . 1 PHnT0RFV1Crn 1077 v ' 1 " '1�` �, I fir„ •. I' : �t 1 r, � .. o. ♦ I y`.� - LL CC cr J- 1 O r) Im T guy • cc ;K InEC ac s � r S t ,�• �1 �2 I � w d i ! �_ 1 � < is I'.•� �4 1 1; a .�cwivf Iva �� _ 'ti• u M .R-9 U n� i• •• . . _ / 6! r { tl2 �lti l ti 13 v� 1oa 1 10 \ `IDA. IAREA♦ LAND USE/DENSITY RANGE TARGET DENSITY ACRES DUs 1 LOW 3-5 6.0 17.5 B7 2 LOW 3-5 3.0 $0.5 151 3 MEDIUM 5-7 6.0 35.0 210 , A t LOW'; 3-5 3.5 25.0 B] t 5 VERY LOW 1-3 1.0 / 44.5 44 B LOW 3-5 AS 27.5 123 I 7 MEDIUM 5-7 7.0 17.5 122 B HIGH 7-18 7.4 24.5 181 9 HIGH 7-18 7.4 35.5 261 10 HOTEL — 13.5 — 10u CONDITIONAL HOTEL — 47.0 — 11 POTENTIAL REC AREA 5.0 12 PALM VALLEY CHANNEL — 29.0 — 13 B.L.M.DEDICATED NAT'L 0.S. — 303.3 — �l T TOTALS 4.5(A,og) 675.0 1266 '` ( �•/' LAND USE DEVELOPMENT PLAN INFEROFFICE N1a4XVSIDIM City of Palm Desert TO: CITY MANAGER AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: OXIDTIUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUBJECT: ANNEXATION APPLICATION FOR BELLA VISTA PROPERTY (ANNEX. 16) DATE: OCTOBER 27, 1988 REW41E RATION: Adopt Resolution No. requesting LAFOD to take annexation proceedings for the Bella Vista Property. DISCUSSION: The Resolution is part of an application package to be submitted to LAFOO. Pre-zoning of the property to planned community development (P.C.D. ) has previously taken place and the . landowner does not object to the annexation proposal. The property is contiguous to present city boundaries and is within the city's sphere of influence. PHILLIP J RAMON DIAZ BRUCE A. ALTMAN ASSOCIATE PLANNER ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER/ CITY MANAGER DIRECTOR COW]UNITY DEVELOPMENT /£r a RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION BY THE CITY OF PALM DESERT REQUESTING THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION Ca411ISSION TO TAKE PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNEXATION OF 680 ACRES LOCATED SOUTHWEST OF PRESENT CITY BOUNDARIES. RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, that WHEREAS, the City of Palm Desert desires to initiate proceedings pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, Division 3, commencing with Section 56000 of the California Government Code, for the annexation of the above described property; and WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be annexed is uninhabited and a description of the boundaries of the territory is set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, this proposal is consistent with the sphere of influence of the City of Palm Desert; and WHERFAS, .the reasons for this proposed annexation are as follows: 1. The area is a natural extension of city boundaries due to the topography in the area and will allow the city to control development on the property and provide necessary city services. NOW, THEREFORE, this Resolution of Application is hereby adopted and approved by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert and the Local Agency Formation Commission of Riverside County is hereby requested to take proceedings for the annexation of territory as described in Exhibit "A", according to the terms and conditions stated above and in the manner provided by the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985. PASSED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of 1988 by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JEAN M. BENSON, Mayor ATTEST: SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, City Clerk City of Palm Desert, California I - - �j .:wst _2e6S :3 591 el) L W Z' ter,. 4r j — X/ \1 •Water �(D x \\\N re J6 'Z C� I� �'l�`-�\r9J,�\��a\��f�\ `�i_1�� ', � �l_.`���` --Mlls r V\ v A." I it f Palm Desert RE U G NU"Y- ice 8 791 1 S., L N I 06� Ik L; it 'Wat cleeA > "Z. Z" '; j (Bou IV li�, E- i *n V 'po N) �2, ..... ..... y 1.34 L 17 1640L. 01 591 Water IN,IN USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP EXHIBIT RANCHO MIRAGE QUADRANGLE . 1957 PHOTOREVISED 1972 4\ A 4-� CITY OF PALM DESERT TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council ' o DATE: October 13, 1983 APPLICANT: City of Palm Desert SUBJECT: Plan for Services for Palm Desert Annexation No. 16 I. INTRODUCTION: .Pursuant to Section 35102 of the State Government Code, the city is required to file with any new annexations, a plan outlining the method by which services will be provided in the area to be annexed. This report represents the required plan for services for proposed Annexation No. 16. The City of Palm Desert, being a contract city, must rely on many other agencies to provide for services both in the community and areas subsequently annexed. In addition, many services provided such as water and sewer, electricity and gas are provided without regard to city limit lines; therefore, the area proposed to be annexed is presently served or has the capability of being served by many of these agencies. The fact is substantiated by the letters received from responsible agencies as a part of the environmental review process and in conjunction with preannexation zoning considerations. The major emphasis of this report is to address those services provided directly by the city either through city staff or direct contract with the city by other agencies. In addition, wherever possible this report will address the methods by which other service agencies would provide needed facilities in the area. II. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES: The utilities which would be extended into the area proposed to be annexed would be as part of actual development and they would consist of the services of the Coachella Valley County Water District in the area of water and sewer, Southern California Edison Company in the area of electricity, Southern California Gas Company in the area of gas, General Telephone Company in the area of telephone and Able Cable in the area of cable television. The services provided by this city directly would be in planning and building, public works, parks, administration and code enforcement services. By contract the city would also provide for trash disposal, police and fire services. Public transportation would be provided by the Sunline Agency. Major road improvements will involve the development of Highway 74 abutting the area to its ultimate 50 foot half cross-section. Public park needs in the area to be annexed will partially be fulfilled by on-site recreational amenities. In addition, land dedication and in-lieu fees will be collected as development occurs for the implementation of the recreation element of the Palm Desert General Plan. III. LEVEL OF SERVICE: The level and range of services provided would include sufficient sized water and sewer, gas and electrical facilities to service development proposed for the area. Planning and building, public works and code enforcement services as provided by the city directly would be on the basis of need. The area is within the five minute response zone of the Mesa View Fire Station, backup would be provided by the new El Paseo/Town Center Station, Rancho Mirage, Indian Wells, Bermuda Dunes and Thousand Palms Stations. Paramedic ambulance services would be provided by the Indian Wells Fire Station. The present Riverside County Sheriff contracts 60 hours per day citywide patrols which will be expanded as needs require. PALM DESERT ANNEXATION NO. 16 IV. TIMING FOR SERVICE EXTENSIONS: Basic utility services would occur as a part of development. The city has on file letters from the various utility companies assuring us that these services would be available. The city services would be available immediately in the area of planning, building and code enforcement, public works, police and fire. Road improvements would occur as a part of new development. Parks would be built as development occurs through dedication and collection of in-lieu fees. V. REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT AND FINANCING: New development would be required to extend roads throughout the area and to provide for needed municipal facilities through the city's subdivision ordinance. A fire facilities fee of $100.00 per residential unit and $100.00 per 1,000 square feet of commercial space will be used to finance the necessary fire facilities. The provision of planning and building services would be provided through the fees generated from new development. Ongoing maintenance of roads created in the area, would be provided on the basis of sales revenues generated from commercial and residential developments in the area. In summary, it is felt that development of this area would result in a balance between needed services and the revenue to provide said services. /pa RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, MAKING APPLICATION TO THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION FOR A CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION KNOWN AS, "PALM DESERT ANNEXATION NO. 1611, PURSUANT TO SECTION 35140 OF THE STATE GOVERNMENT CODE. WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act has been complied with, pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 80-89, in that all responsible agencies have been contacted and a negative declaration has been prepared; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the proposed change of organization is appropriate for the following reasons: 1. The request is a logical expansion of the city boundaries. 2. The proposed annexation is consistent with the Municipal Organization Act which encourages limiting the number of annexations to those areas considered logical growth areas. 3. The proposed area to be annexed is of satisfactory size to provide municipal services without adversely affecting the rest of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. The above recitations are hereby determined to be true and correct and represent the findings of the council in this matter. 2. The city clerk is hereby instructed to file an official application with the Local Agency Formation Commission for Palm Desert Annexation No. 16 as described in Exhibit "At', pursuant to the Municipal Organization Act for uninhabited territory because fewer than twelve (12) registered voters reside in the area. 3. A Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact is hereby certified. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert City Council, held on this day of , , by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ROMEO S. PULUQI, Mayor ATTEST: SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, City Clerk City of Palm Desert, California /pa RESOLUTION NO. EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION CITY OF PALM DESERT ANNEXATION NO. 16 The land referred to in this report is situated in the County of Riverside, State of California and is described as follows: "BEING A DIVISION OF SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 5 EAST AND A PORTION OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 6 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP 16259, PARCEL MAP BOOK 89, PAGES 35 THROUGH 37, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY". "STARTING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 1; THENCE, S 8905110811W, 50.00 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE, S 8905110811W, 2,594.15 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 TO THE NORTH Y4 CORNER THEREOF; THENCE, S 8904915411W, 2,645.60 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE, S 000611911E, 2,589.30 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 TO THE WEST Y4 CORNER THEREOF; THENCE, S 000514611E, 2,635.28 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE, S 89047119"E, 2,639.23 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SECTION 1 TO THE SOUTH Y4 CORNER THEREOF; THENCE, S 8905615211E, 2,642.87 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE, N 0001'00"W, 1,320.02 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 1; THENCE, N 89056100" WEST, 58.21 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF STATE HIGHWAY 74; THENCE, N 17055143"E, 188.93 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID STATE HIGHWAY TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 1; THENCE, N 0001100"W, 324.56 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID STATE HIGHWAY; THENCE, N 170551431-E, 3,481.11 FEET ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID STATE HIGHWAY; THENCE, N 3303812311W, 38.53 FEET; THENCE, N 8804513711W, 1,101.48 FEET; THENCE, N 0001'0011W, 60.01 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING". i RESOLUTION NO. ep b p.pZy��i'yy�'° ♦� ' Opp 5 A J ,. i - i i0 u I i2 c 9 is iA Palm Desert City Limit Beginning Point 35 I — S89°4915411W 2,645.60' I S89.51'08"W 2.594.15 3 31 :':::.: :>:'»:':::::::'i:•:iiSiii'::•:::i>:; ii:;:'i»:t;;•:':•i:>::'i)i t;•i>:'>::'n>iii>::i ' ..:..............................................'................... .ii:88.*. ::s: .':i. . Riverside Co. �: ii::': .... i::;g":':......::'::':: :::::::•::::::::::._::•::::.:::::::::':::::•::•:.-::.::::::::::::::::::::':::. :: '.y ................................................................................... . ..............::....� . :v:::::::::::.•::::::...�:::.::'.�..•..•........�. ::::::..........::......::'::': :>:•iiii:'::::'::'::i•::::i:':'iii:•:iii•:_::':iii}iiiiii:'::iiii .. ii>rri>:i«•>:::;;;':::::'......::::':::::::: :':::::.::'::.: :::. :::.:.•:::.•:.:•::::::.-::::::::.-:.:::•:.':::::::::::•:::F89"S>!t�6"W.-::........:............::..,... . ::'iz :=.:N: :.: :::::::::::::: :'::. :::•::::::::::::::'::::::::::•::::::::::::::::::::::::•. ':::::::::;;;::::::.i:'i:'i:::::':i:'::':::::':'isi•:•:iSi•::•:::':ii'ii:': :::'::::•ii•:::'ii:..':.i::.:::�.}.p....:.....�.::.�::: :•:':.................................. v x iiii:::•:�i:::::::':::'::: :'iii::•iii(:'::� i.........................................' ' ' ''. . ' ' ' :'::'::'::::::':iii:ii::ii is :i::':::::':'i:'i:'i i:(•::'::'::iiii:::'ii:'i::::::•::•:;::'.::i:'ii::::•..:i:::i:'i..:':: h• ......... .....i W �:'::'::'::':'....�::....ii.:::.......::.iii':':':': ....:'i:...::::.:.....:'::::.........'::i�: i::.:iCii:!iiji i:':i:i•:::':}?iiii:ij::::::::::':•:::iiC!:':iiiiiji•::::'i:ii:'}�!;i':i':ii•::i'::'::'iii:':i':'i: d' ':i:::i:i:'i:'ii:-•i::::::i:: O1'isisi:•i:'i::-':'::i:.::(:i:'i:'ii:':;i iii•_::':: :-:'iii:::':':'::":':.....':....:i.:':':�:': :'ii2:ii:::ii•:i::i..'}iii::i::':':':'i:::.::':!:'i:'iii iiS•:.:'::::'::'::::ii i::�i':'ii v::c?:':::iii:ii::::::-::::•::::: iSii':i:'::'iii:ii:::isi::':':':'::':':::=:::::i.::isii:'iiii':iti•:::::::': ......................:'''' i:':':'ii.`::�:::_iS:i:i jiii:•ii!i::::':ii}::iii:::p • ' ''' ' .:-:::i:•'::'ii::'i::'ii::'i: :ii::::'::::iiisi i::.'}:i;iS:!(:•:i':::'ii::?:ii:ii}i':::'::::':i.::'::::''::'':':ii::'•i::::::L":•::'::':i:i .!.-.':........':... : :::::....... .... p .........................................j: ................. ' : iii::':ii}?ii::::i:' :::::iiiii:iCCi_::::::iii::i':.: .... siii:i:j::i i:i: :: ' •:C•::i':�:'iiiiivii:�:':i::iCC::i:1t.' y i:':::: ::':::'........ i.................' : ::;:i:::.:i.::.:i.:.: !:i::':::::i::':::::• ' :iii•:'::'::'.`:'iii:':iii:'::::::::::':::::::::::a'. :::::::.w'.. ::::�':::::w::i'iiii'': :i•::•:::ii::ii: i:': ::iiii•::•: :::'i:::.:•::::::::::::.::'::::...:::::::::::::::::::::. :_::':. ::.'. ::.':.'.'::.':.:'..':.': ::'.... .:.:.'.:::::'.':.':::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::'.:".:':::::. x' ..'.......'..':: : :: :::.':::::.'..'..':.:':::'..:.':.'..::'::::.':::::.'.:':.':::::.::::..::'.�.'::.' ':.'::.' :::':::.':.::::':.'::::::::.':.':.' ::.:�::'.':::. ::::::::. ::. :::::::::::::.....:::::::::::::..:.::':.�:::::. .:::.�:::::::::'.::':::::::::'. . . .' �yl�. ::::::::...... 0 1 1 .......r >:'i:;•iiirr: :ii:'ir 'r:'r:'i:. :>`.'iiiii:i:?ii>:;�ii':`:::i:;;;:: ;;: ::�iitiiiii=i:ii::i:`:ii::iiii:.:i'::.�.::•:...:.:. NO O10 D W i:ii:: :i ......iiii iiiiii:::.....:.':.':::.:.•:::::.:::::::•::.. ........-:..................................................,...........:..::.::::::. .•:': 4.5 G' iii: :':............ . ......... .: i ......:...........:.: .?...>::...:..=:.i:;i::'c: is ';4;:;; i '.:::::'itt:;'::.::::•::.:: m ::? :: : ... ............. .:::" ..... N W :Ci!:':::'i:':::':::':'i:'ii:iii:.....' ::::(: :':::......:'::'::::.....:::::'::% .......::'::::: :iii:: i::-::'isiiiS•::.i'::' :::::::::':::::::::i':: .:::::::: ':. .:':'iiii....:': :::::'::':::::........::':'::':::.::................ ':':i•:::':::':::::ii:'ii:'i: :'::•:i::::':::':iiii:'i:'::'i:::'::':':::.:..... ......i..-.../F:?ii:......::....; te :......::::isi�iiiii::::::'::'i:•i::::�:'ii:: :'i:'i:':::::'::'::'::'.�::'iii:: `iii ............:::......................:::....................::..........:......:..........>• pj :.::;i::'iiiiii:'::::: .i:.i:. . isi i::X:::ii:'i: :':i'i:'i:'i ::•:�::: 'i................................' •:•: ii:'ii:i':'i:::::':•::'::?'':'iiii i•:_:'iiii}:`:::?:':::.::':'::': N89 56'00 w :cii2:i:s:: :: F:ii:::;::::::iiiiiiiiii::;=i :....................... : :s: iii::;::: .............................: : <t . ......... i:...si r.............::........... . . ::'::'i:'f>. 56.21 ......` i::;'-:%::::::?: Si iii>: ;'.;;;':: :i.................................................... .'. ':': 2•>: v ::':>i:'::::'::'::i::: ......:'::::'.....II....:'»:::'i:'i:'iii: :'::i':':<;;i':;'r>r>::i•>:':c::'>:'>:'>::>:'>:'isr;;i;:'ii:'iix»:c:::'i:'i:;;::<ii•>:'::»:::'i:'ii:iii:i:'>:;i:': _ :::::: ::.: :::::::.:•::::::::::......':.:::::::::::.......::::.:::::.:.•.::::::::::::::::::::.:::•:.::::.:::::::::::::::::::.::'::............. n ;:i':':::::::'i'::'::;:;•>:;•>:'::'ii;>: i:'::'::'i:'i:'::'i:':............................' ' :;i:ii>rrr:;;i:cc ::':»::'i:'rr:r>:c':::>:'rsi:'>:'i:;:::i :;;;:ci:i:.............. 3 p :•i:':::'::'::':i:. :::::::.:i:'is:::::::'.`:•::':::::'::::::�i:':::'......�:•::'::::':':'i:iii:'ii•:: :: '::'::'::: ':'iiii:;iSii':::::-::i:':::::'i:'iiiiCiC•::::':iii:.:•::::::..::::.::'::.':.•. ti:xi:idt.- o :`c"t:': is t: _:_:r: % ifi: ................:; : :':: .is..... y : isitiiiiii;;;<;;;:>;ii„'iiiiiiiiit p y .....................................• '%iii:'iiiiiii::'i::::'::• :::':iii:.i:.ii:... iiC:'::::::'::.i:.i:.::i:'::':::::':::::::'isSC:•::::::::'iiiii:ii•::': #}1 % . i(•.i•:::::::: O e :ii!::::i:.�i::'::'iiii ij:i:i:iLiii �:. ):>............................: :i: :: :ii:iii:i:::::ii:i:'�: .:::iiii<_:i:i:iiii .:.:...iiii;::."`:jii::::::;:::(i :ii is ii::................... Z •:.::::':::::::::::::::. :::....'.: ::i :.:::'::'i:':::::::(i('::':::'i:':ii:4i:•::'::':::' ?:'::':'::•:'?}:'::::.:':::::::.: ::::::::.:.:::':::::.�.::':::::.� i:':'i:'ii"i•: i::':iiii: '::"?::... ..::.. :... .::::.i:::'::'::':':•::'::'::':::::':::i i:':::'::::::::!..:::..:.:::::.:::,i.::«Ciii:'.:::::.•.�:::;':::`k:ii'::'::''::':: ":::._::::::::::::. ::::.::::::': 0 *ewk as�s:<;;;'::i:;iii<i..... II 12 12I7 ......................... E ArrLICATION TO THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION f Mail or bring to: 2 County Administrative Center 4 4080 Lemon Street, 12th Floor Riverside, California 92501 E FOR LAFC USE ONLY INTRODUCTION: The questions in this form are designed to obtain enough data about the proposed project and project site to allow the staff and LAFC to assess the project. You may include any additional information which you believe is pertinent. Use additional sheets where necessary. Do not leave any blanks. If an item is not applicable, so indicate. Submit this form in one copy. Applicant City of PaIril Desert Telephone: 346-0611 Address: 45-276 Prickly Pear Lane Pala Desert CA 92260 Name & title of person to contact regarding this application: Phil Drell Assistant Planner Address 4o-27b Prickly Pear Lane, Palri Desert, CA 92260 Telephone: 346-0611 Ext. 52 PROPOSED PROJECT OR ACTION: Annexation of 675 acres to the City of Palm Desert. GENERAL LOCATION: (Area, cross streets, etc.) 675± arr g v.pst of Highway 74 rontigimu, to the city's southern boundary. A. OWNERSHIP 1. Is the applicant a property owner in the area of the proposed project: Yes No X 2. Is the applicant sole owner of this property? Yes No X B. AREA INFORMATION 1 . Land area in acres 675± 2. Number of dwellings in the proposed area at present time 'None 3. Expected increase in the number of dwellings in the proposed area which will result from this proposal 1266 . By what date? 199i1 (state type of dwelling units, e.g. , single family residences, mobile homes.) Coribination of single family attached and detached units and hotel . 4 . Population in the proposed area at the present time :done 5 . Expected change in the population in the proposed area which will result from this proposal 5bU . By when 1990 6. Amount of publicly-owned land in the proposed area (identify as federal, state or local) hone 7. Assessed value at present time: Land 510.490.552 Improvements 8. Number of land parcels in the proposed area 16 C. ',.VOTER INFORMATION 1 . Number of registered voters in area at the present time (lone 2. Does the proposed boundary cut across precinct boundaries ? ilo 3 . Does the proposed boundary cut across tax rate areas? 'do D. LAND USE 1 . Current zoning R-1 (7200) Riverside County 2. Pre-zoning (Assigned by cities only) Planned Coramunity Development - 2 d.u../acre 3. Current land use Vacant 4 . County General Plan designation 40 acre very low 0-3 d.u./ac. , 230 Ac. loci y.u./ac. , 390 ac. - open space/planned development S. City General Plan designation �'- G.U./ac. Open snare and lou density Residential 3-: d.u./ac. 6. Is the proposal in consonance with the City & County General Plans Yes 7. Probable or proposed land use for next five years -- Include known or probable plans for development (Submit any available plans) 1266 unit resort residential development E. DETAILS OF YOUR PROPOSAL 1 . Describe the proposed project in as much detail as possible. Identify the project, including annexations to, detachments from, or formation of new entities (use additional sheets if necessary) Annexation of 675 acres contiguous to City of Palm Deser and i•laster Plan for 1266 resort residential units , 300 unit, hotel and 300 acres of wildlife reserve. a . The reasons which.justify this proposal are as follows: (for example -- service needs, health mandate, economic benefits, etc.) The property' s location contiguous to the City of Palm Desert but geographically isolated from other developable county area; makes the City of Palm Desert the logical purveyor of urban services. b. Specific services to be added, changed, or eliminated: (1) Without additional cost to residents/owners: Regular police patrols (2) With additional cost to residents/owners: Expand fire and paramedic services. 2. Will the project be subject to existing bonded indebtedness? ilo 3 . What will be the approximate annual costs to accomplish the goals of this proposal? y00,0o0 4. What are the specific sources of revenue to pay for the service(s) ? State subventions , sales taxes , construction and fire facility fees and special fire taxes. (2) 4 e 5 . What is annual cos* to each resident/property owner '-pecify which)? 3.Go ' e' F. PROPERTY OWNERS' DESIRES 1 . How many property owners make up total ownership of project area? (Include with this; application copies of all letters/correspondence you have relating to above Items) One 2 . How many property owners have been contacted regarding.project? One 3. How many property owners are in favor of project? One 4. How many property owners are not in favor of project? Ilone G. FOR LIGHTING DISTRICTS AND ROAD MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS ONLY 1 . If street lights will be installed, how many, what type (mercury or sodium) and what intensity (e.g„ 7000 lumen)? 2. Is approved plan by utility company for street lights submitted at this time? (Approved plan must be submitted before energy charges will be assumed by Service Area) . 3. If road maintenance district, how many miles of road to maintain? 4 . Is it your intention to bring any roads to County standards for future acceptance into the County Maintained Road System? H. PLAN OF SERVICE (City Annexations only) A plan for providing services within the affected territory must be submitted with this application. Use separate sheets. I. In your own words, how would your proposal benefit the community? Tliis annexation will insure that the area Wi 11 be develoo d to the Sara ctand,rds and will rnrpix/p rho sanie level of services as existing incorporated area. Revenues from, the Hotel development will help funs; increased public services citywide NOTICES AND COMMUNICATIONS -- List below the names and addresses of people to whom notices and communications should be directed. (3 maximum) Name Telephone Address City & Zip Name Telephone Address City & Zip Name Telephone Address City & Zip Signature of applicant or authorized representative Typed or printed name Title (3) RESOLUTION NO. 81-133 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE AMOUNT OF PROPERTY TAX REVENUE TO BE EXCHANGED BETWEEN THE COU14TY OF RIVERSIDE AND THE CITY OF PALM DESERT RELATING TO ANNEXATIONS TO THE . CITY OF PALM DESERT, CLAIFORNIA. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert in regular session assembled on this 24th day of Sept . 1981, that : 1. The County of Riverside and the City of Palm Desert are the agencies whose area or responsibility for service would be affected by annexations to the City of Palm Desert. 2. Representatives of each of the affected agencies have met and negotiated an exchange of property tax revenue as follows , to become effective for tax purposes beginning July 1 , 1981, for all areas annexed to the City until such time as this resolution is rescinded or superceded. A. The City of Palm Desert shall assume responsibility for all general municipal services to areas annexed as are required by law or presently provided throughout the City, and for such service, the City shall receive 25% of that portion of the property tax revenue generated within territories annexed under the ad valorem tax rate established by Article XIII A of the Constitution of the State of California, that represents the County of Riverside' s share of such property tax revenue. B. The County Auditor shall upon annexation by the City convert the above-established percentage figure into actual dollar figures and thereafter allocate to the City such property f tax revenue in accord with the provisions of Section 95 et, seq. of the Revenue and Taxation Code. 3 . The City Council of the City of Palm Desert does hereby agree to the above-recited exchange of property tax revenue. 4. The Clerk shall transmit a certified copy of this resolution to each affected agency and to the Executive Office of the Local Agency Formation Commission and to the Auditor of the County of Riverside pursuant to Section 99 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a. regular meeting of the Palm Desert City Council, held on this 24th day of September, 1981, by the following vote, to wit : AYES: McPherson, Newbrander, Puluqi, Snyder & Wilson NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None S Y,,WTLSON, Playor ATTEST: SHE ILA R. GIL AN,City C City of Palm Desert, Ca ornia RESOLUTION NO. r 7..i 26 25 .Y 1. bkF'r c '• Js 35 o" � 10 II I 12 4 9 10 Palm Desert City limit I 6 H Beginning Point 30 — S89-4454"W 2.645.60a r ..:.:..:..:....::..:..:...:..:..:..:..:..::..::..::..::..::..:.::..:.:.:.:.:..:.:.:.:..::..::..::..::.:.:..::..::..::..::.:.:.:.:..:.:..:.:.:.:.:.:...:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:..:.:.:.::..:..:�..:..:...:....:.:.:.:.:.:..:..:...:...:...:.....:...�.....:..:..:..:..:..:.:..:..:..:..:........:....:.:..:.:..:..:.: ....................S...8..9...°..:51,0..8...°.W .2,..5..9...4....15. 3..:.:.:. . 31 .......... :::: ...... ..�:::::: .... . iversde . . . . ::: . . . . ........... Co. ar ....:::.....:::.:....:::. ...:::.:....::.:............................................... ....::::.........................................;,....::::::::::. .....:.. :;:;:;:>:::::::;;; r�»i: :e>iir>:: c >:: .::.%...:......:::s:;cc::eiii»>:.::t;:::e:i>ii>r::�i:iir:»::;:;::::«� :»:::»>:.: :::.... .. o rr;ii::;; ::>;>;>: »>:: : :>: ri;:: a:::iii:: ::>:e:::.. ..... .............: 38:53`::ii:tt: iiii.':t :t ; iii.`i:;ii:>;i� ;ii:;i r:tb.ttttiiii;;'r;i:ttt2iiiirr;;i:ttit :::>:; :tiiiiiii':isi:2tt:iiiS:i:: >:;;. iii;::':: tt:::i: ::>:.:. m ::>::::::::: >:.....::.;::a::::::>:::>:::>: : :>:::a:: >;:; aii:»:::;; :»: >:: c:::>:»:; :::>:r:::o-:::iiii::iii::;;;:;iiii>:- :;;;::;::>::::: If3 5iliiiii}i?:iivici;;;:}}::::v::r6::((riiii?: :...................................... : : :ii: }:iii:viiiii})}}:4i:::viiiiii}?iiii:((riiii}?:Pii:(riiiiiii??isci:(iiEiiii}:2i:Fii:4: :?iiiiiiiii::vi:.... ;;. rii':3:(CSii:r......:.i............. i'i??i:_iiiiiiiii:Ei?:ci:iii:=i:i :!ri 9ii.`:2i}iii:6:'.`:Sii}.`i};i :v:P&ii:!.,,iR. `:::Ciii?i.':ii:ci?:'r:i: :c::ii::a:ii:...... . »s=: :2 `: 3 `£ ............ .' i ; ;;':?iiir"'ri:ai:i?' ................ s' " ....;iii : ..... :i :;:i: ` :ii";St :>{< '. . 2' . ? ... p ....... .: : 'iii: :;. . . :: :... . ................. " : s:?..i " ? "" ;..... . 'i: ; ;:s:tt::iii »: i:ir:::i i...... N ^::::::::e::::::::::.::c:r:: _:r.c:iP:ii iiii}?iii?:ii4......:::::-: .......... ::::::::::::..::......::::.......... :......}}iii:r.:5ii)ii}:i iii:r:: :.::c::::: iP:i::?i.....`....�i c......ii;ii}?:iiia a ......... i?`:iiE:iv ]i?: iii[:v: i::ci: :!'.ii:d:!iiF::�iii:5ii:r:r3iiiiii:i.' .................5i:.i ...................................:: : ...... ii:;.}:iriiiii: ....................... . ......................... ..................................................................................... ................................................ ;>::>t: it;; i' :tt' .......... ..... 0 I 00 i Ws :: :k N 3fi; ::?'y`': ?:::_i'':`i.::`iy; ::':':'i:; :tt':`::: : ::iri::':ii":': `iat'i;:i.">i::::>::: :`: 324.5 Ga ttt is:.tiiaii'.`i.:: t:34..:ir...... ..i.:.::s :.i.i.iioi ........... ................ :::S:E.ii??:cii:i.......?.'i?iii.... :i .iii:ii.....ri:..iii:i.??? ................................... ::: :: ... c ............................... � ciiii:ici:i5i:v?: : ::: 6: i:. iv , i9 . ......::::....... .,.....: ' : : : . : . . =. . . . : : : : .. ... ' :—%ry ..................................... i : : N89 SB 00v = : : ai y........................ i i. .' i ii: : iii... 7:: 56.21 io ti.2:i.%Icti ..a.......................... : ts i.':; ii3; :'. i>i i :' . is iiF : 'r i: i::' i.i........................:.:iii»»::-»::. Ic a ti:ti......::`::ti i?;: ..............: : : r:i ::; : ..................................... ......................... » :._:« :a:::::cciiiii: :ii;iii......::::ii:::::.........I........': ;r.....iii:......r:tii:....I......i::.....i;.............. 3 o ":is . : ..... . '....... i:::: :i i: ::: r'":it: 0 yc » i;::::;;:a: ii:e::i»»::;; >::< :i:ii;i:i: ii>::»:>:;:'S:::tiii:::>:i>:::';ttttii::>iii»:;r>:::::e:(9:::.o.c ::2<f p ;i;:;:1:;: ::i+:- :»»r ;: ::»::: : 'i2i:`.... iii ... ...:;• ....... . 0 a l$. 0 I z i:t ::,�ii: :_rri'::tii;:i:::iiii:'.'; :z'ci :::':i:'::;:': ..�.. ........... .....::::::::::::. ::�:::.ia3i:89,47';i4'::'E.2i�83s2 `ii >?': 3i; """..i:r :`'":939"Sai:Ssiiie�yfr.�1'zx67:;<i 6 Y n 11 12 a LEGAL DESCRIPTION, RANCHO BELLA VISTA BEING A DIVISION OF SECTION 1 , TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 5 EAST AND A PORTION OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 6 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP 16259, PARCEL MAP BOOK 89, PAGES 35 THROUGH 37, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY. STARTING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 1 ; THENCE, S 89°51 '08"W, 50.00 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; k'THENCE, S 89051 '08"W, 2,594. 15 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 TO THE NORTH 1/4 CORNER THEREOF; 'HENCE, S 89049'54"w, 2,645.60 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 TO J THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; 7 THENCE, S 0°06' 19"E, 2,589. 30 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 TO THE / WEST 1/4 CORNER THEREOF; F/-N THENCE, S 0°05'46"E, 2,635.28 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE, S 89047' 19"E, 2,639.23 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SECTION 1 TO / THE SOUTH 1/4 CORNER THEREOF; J'THENCE, S 89056'52"E, 2,642.87 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; k THENCE, N 0°01 '00"W, 1 ,320.02 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 ; . THENCE, N 89056'0o" WEST, 58.21 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF STATE HIGHWAY 74; THENCE, N 17°55'43"E, 188.93 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID STATE HIGHWAY TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION l ; THENCE, N 0001 '00"W, 324.56 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION I TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID STATE HIGHWAY; ' THENCE, N 17055' 43"E, 3,481 . 11 FEET ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID STATE HIGHWAY; THENCE, N 33038'23"W, 38. 53 FEET; ' THENCE, N 88045'37"W, 1 , 101 .48 FEET; THENCE, N 00Ol '00"W, 60.01 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. y i Vy I I , u t l � I o , ow9 ILI z = I n rl 7cn F O nWjY to Nop A m 4, C_ I J I C D = OIL-----1 L 7 o s � O In z m m zmo F' -1A\ P I z w \ \ $r n v a $ a \ \Mm v r \ a r \ 9 fn K ^ - �- �- cn Ly LA ? aLA oW I I -' IOI' -A I N I ST� \ - T• �) p � AK Gll � 1 Z w-e -� O m [ o r^ F tDo m 9 r r �° 1 z I a � I u 3 o rri ` - - -------U -° oJ- - - - A T cl to O i Z F�