Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
ANNEXATIONS NEC COOK STREET/44TH AVENUE NO 11 1979
L RESOLUTION NO. 79- 147 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNEXING CERTAIN CON- TIGUOUS TERRITORY TO SAID CITY UNDER THE PROVI- SIONS OF THE MUNICIPAL ORGANIZATION ACT OF 1977 , WHICH PROCEEDINGS ARE DESIGNATED AS ANNEXATION NO. 11 . WHEREAS , the City Council did, by Resolution No. 79-88 , adopted on July 26 , 1979 , initiate annexation proceedings for Annexation No. 11 ; and WHEREAS , the Local Agency Formation Commission held a public hearing relative to Annexation No . 11 on October 11 , 1979 , and approved said annexation with the recommendation that the City Council of the City of Palm Desert be authorized to proceed; and WHEREAS, a duly noticed Public Hearing was held by the City Council at their regularly scheduled meeting of December 13 , 1979 , at which time all persons desiring to be heard did give input , and no written protests were filed by any owners of land and improve- ments within the territory to be annexed. NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert , California, as follows : 1. That the territory described in Exhibit "A" , attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference, be , and the same is hereby annexed, by this Resolution, to the City of Palm Desert . 2 . That the City Clerk is hereby instructed and directed to transmit a certified copy of this Resolution to LAFCO along 1 with any other required submittals . Ji PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 13th day of December > 1979 , by the following vote, to wit : AYES : Brush, McPherson, Newbrander, Wilson & Mullins NOES : None ABSENT : None ABSTAIN: None l� i ARD D. M LINS , MAYOR ATTEST: SHEILA R. GIL IGAN, C CLERK CITY OF PALM DESERT; CALIFORNIA /m J , t._...., ...,_ :.�.:.... _ ...__,.,:_ _ RESOLUTION NO. 79-147 EXHIBIT "A" l LAFCO 179-64-4 PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 11 TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT ANNEXATION DESCRIPTION Beginning at a point in the easterly boundary of the City of Palm Desert, County of Riverside, State of California, said point being the common section corner of `Section 15 and 16 and Section 21 and 22, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian. 1. Thence, North 000 02' 13" East, a distance of 1505.72 l feet; 1 2. Thence, North 780 28' 18" East, a distance of 338.25 3 feet; •3. Thence, South 890 10' 07" East, a distance of 160. 58 feet; 4.. Thence, South 650 25' 20" East, a distance of 922. 94 ,feet; 5. Thence , South 000 04' 13" West, a distance of 1181.52 feet; 6. Thence , South 890 46' 10" West, a distance of 1330. 83 feet to the point or beginning. This parcel contains 43.99 acres more or less. zFlss taco. DF =?TIox AP"OVED 97 nY RIVc"RSIDE PAA SllRVEY, L EXHIBIT- "All RESOLUTION NO. 79-147 EXHIBIT "A" e • O W G J 2 7 ` 46 TH. G AVENUE W J Y F o O O O u) W , F F . ! � HIGHw'4V S Iii l}`1' �- PgPgPq y COUNTY OF LOCATION MAP RIVERSIDE _ NOT TO SCALE � 7 i � lI T oR F,q a M 33 , �160.58\\ S' BSo Cy4AI e'T .rg `.2 5.99°10'07 E.� 23.20 } COUNTY Or- RIVERSIDE "I I W w of \ PROPOSED PALM DESERT ; m / O� DI i Y LIMIT n _ z SECTION 15 1 '� cT- 5 - S , R - 6 - E f o a 0 S - B . S . M. — c NI y ACRES H i_ —4 ATu I +•I _ _ L _�1- -AA'-E-r+b F- i P.O. 8. I?IDIAN WELL -- COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY LIMIT L.A. F. C .79-64- 4 a a.j.°. PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. II 1 "=400' DATE 3 - 5 - 79 .* SCALE TO THE CITY Or PAUM DESER IN SECTION 15 T-5 S rc-O-E S.B.B.& M, STD. LING NO. CITY ENGINEER ENG,NEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF PALM DESERT L- I 1 —A MINUTES REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING .. :C .. •. .. i. .. •. .: .. .. i. .. •. is .. i. .. i. i. .. .. .: �: .. .. •. .: .. �: •. .: �: .: `� i. it .. VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS B. CASE NO . TT 13915 - GEORGETOWN PARK, LTD. /E. GEORGE MARZICOLA, APPLICANT : Consideration Of Approval Of A One-Year Extension Of The Approval Of A Tentative Tract Map To Create A 40-Lot Industrial Subdivision On Approximately 34. 7 Gross Acres Within The S. I . , S .P . Zone At The Southeast Corner Of Cook Street And Hovely Lane Extended. Mayor Mullins declared the Public Hearing open and asked for Staff' s report . Mr. Williams advised that the Council did consider this matter on December 28 , 1978 , as a Tentative Tract Map. Approval was granted. The applicant is requesting a one-year extension of time, and Staff finds that all conditions are still in order and recommends approval by Resolution No . 79-145 . Mayor Mullins invited input in FAVOR of the request. None was offered. He invited input in OPPOSITION to the request , and none was offered. He declared the Public Hearing closed. Councilman Brush inquired as to when the developer would be ready to commence, and Mr. Williams advised that the developer was finalizing his improvement plans and was prepared to go forward with it as soon as they were complete. Councilman McPherson moved and Councilman Wilson seconded to waive further reading and adopt Resolution No. 79-145 . Motion carried unanimously. C . CASE NO. PALM DESE4, ANNEXATION NO 11 Consideration Of pproval Or TheposedAnnexation No.: 11 , Located At The Northeast Corner Of"Ge St-r-ee-tnd 44th Avenue, To The City Of Palm Desert , California. Mr. Williams reviewed the Staff report , pointing out that Council had previously reviewed it as a zone change request . He stated that LAFCo had approved the annexation as a logi- cal extension of the City' s boundaries . Staff recommended approval. Mayor Mullins declared the Public Hearing open and invited input in FAVOR of the annexation. None was offered. He invited input in OPPOSITION to the annexation, and none was offered. He declared the Public Hearing closed. Upon question by Council , Mr. Williams noted that the City of Indian Wells had been notified of this public hearing, and no response was received. Councilman McPherson moved and Councilman Brush seconded to waive further reading and adopt Resolution No. 79-147 . Motion carried unanimously. VIII . RESOLUTIONS jA. RESOLUTION NO . 79-148 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT , ANNEXING CERTAIN CONTIGOUS TERRITORY TO SAID CITY UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE MUNICIPAL ORGANIZATION ACT OF 1977 , WHICH PROCEEDINGS ARE DESIGNATED AS ANNEXATION NO. 10 . Mr. Williams stated that this was a 40-acre parcel which Council had considered for prezoning for mobilehomes . It is a logical extension of the City' s boundaries , and Staff recommended approval . Councilman McPherson moved and Councilman Newbrander seconded to waive further reading and adopt Resolution No . 79-148 . Motion carried unanimously. December 13 , 1979 Page 3 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 11 TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert City Council to consider adding.,the proposed Annexation No. 11, located at the northeast corner of Cook Street and 44th Avenue, to the City of Palm Desert, California. !e by 5 i j j i � �^ PROP• \\\ N 'Talc !•B,s,• ,yasLs1 I . 'OM SAID Public Hearing will be held on December 13 , 1979, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall , 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. This request will annex 42.48 acres to the City 'of Palm Desert. S?IEILA D, GILLIGAN, City Clerk City of Palm. Desert, California PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post November 21, 1979 LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER 4080 Lemon Street, 12th Floor Riverside, California 92501 October 5, 1979 TO: Local Agency Formation Commission FROM: Ho:-!ard L. Powell , LAFCO Planner SUBJECT: LAFCO #79-64-4--Annexation #11 to City of Palm Desert PROPOSAL: This is a proposal to annex 43.99 acres to the City of Palm Desert. SUBMITTED BY: The City of Palm Desert. LEGAL REQUIREMENTS: This proposal has met all requirements of the law. The map and legal description were approved by "the County Surveyor on August 8, 1979. The Planning Director filed a Negative Declaration and the appeal period ended on September 26, 1979. There were no appeals. POPULATION: Population is zero. LAND USE: Existing zoning is R-1 (Single-Family Residential) . New zoning is not proposed. ASSESSED VALUATION: Land is assessed at $63,750 (1978-79 assessed values) . COMMENTS: This proposal by the City of Palm Desert, would add approximately 44 acres to the City, at the northeasterly corner of the intersection of 44th Avenue and Cook Street, south of the Whitewater River Storm Channel . The area is within the sphere of influence of the City. The area is vacant at the present time, but is being planned for clustered condo- miniums. The City has submitted a plan of municipal services for the proposed annexation and states that while the City would furnish administration, planning and building services, public works, parks, and code enforcement, the services of police, fire, and trash disposal would be contract services. Ultimate development aauueld ODAVI Ilamod •I paemoH `Pa43twgns Rllnj oadsaa 44iaog4ne 6ui p aq laasa0 wled ;onpuoo Paq.eu6sa -4° 4410 a44 4PO PUP panoadda aq 3aasa0 wled .0 4;to aq4 0q ' saIT# uo�lexasaOUUV 4e41 =NOI1V0 3WN WWOJ 2! a4P'4ue4sgns oq Pa44iwgns uaaq ss4 aouapina L'ae4uawnoop ou °UOL42x@uue pagsanbaj ane4 saaumo L'gaadoad a43 3o quaoaad paapunq auo 1e44 sages 44 0 a44 46noglLV a44 pue 4a94S 4003 qp 6ULssoaJ ad is a ' lauue40 aa4ema4jgM P. 9 PUP �uawanoadw� }aaags aainbaa Plnom Z a6ed 6L6T `5 aago*Do b-V9-60 00dV1 STAFF REPORT TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL ' REPORT ON: PALM DESERT ANNEXATION NO. 11. b LAFCO a public heari ng has been noticed for City As requiredy p g Y Annexation No. 11 for the Council meeting of December 13 , 1979 . No written protests by property owners within said territory have been filed. RECOMMENDATION : Order the territory to be annexed by waiving further reading and adopting Resolution No . 79- RESOLUTION NO. 79- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT , CALIFORNIA, ANNEXING CERTAIN CON- TIGUOUS TERRITORY TO SAID CITY UNDER THE PROVI- SIONS OF THE MUNICIPAL ORGANIZATION ACT OF 1977 , WHICH PROCEEDINGS ARE DESIGNATED AS ANNEXATION NO. 11 . WHEREAS , the City Council did, by Resolution No . 79-88 , adopted on July 26 , 1979 , initiate annexation proceedings for Annexation No. 11; and WHEREAS , the Local Agency Formation Commission held a public hearing relative to Annexation No . 11 on October 11 , 1979 , and approved said annexation with the recommendation that the City Council of the City of Palm Desert be authorized to proceed; and WHEREAS , a duly noticed Public Hearing was held by the City Council at their regularly scheduled meeting of December 13 , 1979 , at which time all persons desiring to be heard did give input , and no written protests were filed by any owners of land and improve- ments within the territory to be annexed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert , California, as follows : 1. That the territory described in Exhibit A" , attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference, be , and the same is hereby annexed, by this Resolution, to the City of Palm Desert . 2 . That the City Clerk is hereby instructed and directed to transmit a certified copy of this Resolution to LAFCO along with any other required submittals . PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1979 , by the following vote, to wit : AYES : NOES : ABSENT : ABSTAIN: EDWARD D. MULLINS , MAYOR ATTEST: SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, CITY CLERK CITY OF PALM DESERT , CALIFORNIA /m ` I W n p W O 2 qq TH. Q AVENUE ,J; N W Q a Y O O u f HIGHWAY a III i COUNTY OF - LOCATION .MAP RIVERSIDE NOT TO SCALE I \ \ W/y/TF \ ST 'V4PF \ o a 19 E. O3 R \ 33.. `160.58". S• 6s0Cf4 .F 2 S.89610,07 "E.�� 9, "s. I N� \ COUNTY - OF RI VE R SI OE III I w w o PROPOSED PALM DESERT CITY LIMIT m g z SECTION 15 �g Y5 - S , R - 6 - E o T . Q a o S . B . B. M. o { N I ^I 43.99 ACRES 0 -All �I C. / 6 J 1330.83 S . 89^ 46 10 W / -4-Ti- I q4 P.O. B. INDIAN WELL "' COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY LIMIT L,A.FC .79-64- 4 A.i.°. PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. II 1 "=4co' DATE 3 - 5 - 79 TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT s ALE _ IN SECTION 15 T-5 -S R-6-E S.B. B.& M. STD. DRAWING NO.' CITY ENGINEER ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF PALM DESERT L- 11 -A - OATAPIIIMT INII>G . } j J AFCO f79-64-4 --PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 11 -TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT ANNEXATION DESCRIPTION Beginning at a point in the easterly boundary of the City of Palm Desert , County of Riverside, State of California, said point being the common section corner of 'tection 15 and 16 and Section 21 and 22, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian. 1. ' Thence, North 000 02' . 13" East, a distance of 1505.72 r_ feet; 1 2. Thence, North 780 28' 18" East, a distance of 338.25 feet; •3. Thence, South 890 10' 07" East, a distance of 160.53 feet: 4.. Thence, South 650 25' 20" East, a distance of 922. 94 feet; S. Thence, South 000 04' 13" West, a distance of 1181. 52 feet; 6. Thence , South 890 46' 10" West, a distance of 1330. 83 feet to the point of beginning. This parcel contains 43.99 acres more or less_ `4 d tECu. DPSMIPTION AMOVED 97 aY RIVERSIDE Famix .SyRVEIDA. EXHIB IT' °A R E ' OCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION OCTC 10 1979 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE PAI V. PT Qt-RT 01113 STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITY C�!_N., ' n- F— COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CERTIFICATE OF FILING I > rgy a B. Curren Assistant Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of Riverside, do hereby certify that: 1. The application hereinafter referenced and described has been submitted to me and has been found to be in the form prescribed by the Riverside County Local Agency Formation Commission. 2. The application contains the information and date requested and required by said Commission and provisions of State Law. 3. The application has been accepted for filing by me on September 26, 1979 4. The application has been set for hearing before the Local Agency Formation Commission on October 11, 1979. The staff report will be mailed to you on the Friday before the Commission meeting. Applicant: City of Palm Desert Address: 4r;-275 Prickly Pear lane Palm Desert, CA g2260 Application Title: Annexation #11 to City of Palm Desert General Location: NnrthPact rnrnPr of Cook Street and 44th Avenue This Certificate of Filing is issued pursuant to authority and requirements of Section 54791 of the Government Code, State of California. All time requirements and limitations for processing and consideration of the aforementioned application specified by State Law and/or rules and regulations of the Riverside County Local Agency Formation Commission shall become effective and run from the date of issuance of this Certificate of Filing. October 2 9 U Pili— Date Assistant ecutive Officer Local Ageng Formation Commission County of Riverside VII . PUBLIC HEARINGS A. REQUEST FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AND P4AP TO IMPLEMENT THE RE1,O1111ENDATIONS CONTAINED IN THE PALM VALLEY STORMWATER CHANNEL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN. CASE NO CZ Oh-79 ACID ZOA 02-79 Mayor Mullins declared the Public Hearing OPEN and asked Staff for their report : -_ Mr . Crump reported that by its action on April 18 , 1979 , 1 the Planning Commission enacted to hold a Public Hearing on this Case No. The Planning Commission made five changes to Planning Commission Resolution No. 497 , four of those pertaining to wording of the Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment. The remaining change pertained to the Resolution wording of the justification for the Zone Change. Based on Justification Recommendation from Staff, it was recommended to approve the Change of Zone by adoption of Ordinance No . 212 . Mayor Mullins invited input in FAVOR of the Request , and none was offered. Ile invited input in OPPOSITION and none was offered. He declared the Public Hearing CLOSED. On a motion by Councilman McPherson, seconded by Councilman Brush, Ordinance 212 passed to second reading by a 4-0-1 vote . VIII . RESOLUTIONS 77 A. RESOLUTION NO 79-88 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PAL RT, CALIFORNIA, IIAKING APPLICATION TO THE LOCAL. AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION FOR A CHANGE OF ORGAN- IZATION KNOWN AS "PALM DESERT ANNEXATION W_. 1L'_' , PURSUANT TO SECTION 35140 OF THE STKTE GOVERNMENT CODE . Mr. Crump reported that the Council had approved Annexa- tion Zoning in April . A Plan for Services has been pre- pared, and Staff requests adoption of Resolution 79-88 to allow making application. Councilman Wilson moved and Councilman McPherson seconded to waive further reading and adopt Resolution No. 79-88 . Motion carried by a 4-0-1 vote . IX. ORDINANCES For Introduction: None For Adoption: None X. CONSENT ITEMS HELD OVER J . LETTER OF SUPPORT from Janet E. and Donald D. Thompson, 73-553 Haystack Road, Palm Desert , Relative to the Frontage .Road Conversion Project . . Councilman Wilson stated he thought it commendable that Citizens in favor of what the City is doing turn out with support . He suggested a letter of thank you be sent to the Thompsons . Council in Agreement . XI . CONTINUING BUSINESS None July 26 , 1979 Page 5 �rxm-uvm..+•m..-ran�n-.vxea.mwr.+au.,a.. ..e.mur...s�a:._ _ — aa,aa ,avew.��.wve.-a+ru...r::ncp;, I e .1�i 1 Ji I°�� b �•1• by xj U - a, TH. 4I AVENUE kl _j nI uI H,cHanv L0CFTj0N MAP q { COUNTY OF J -A— RIVERSIDE NOT TO SCALE 1 I \ ( ray "a R ' ;� y 4 \ IQ'G7 E. ,. �. r3 '�'1♦1�iL'. f {q lo' - PROP0S "> DESERT QED � ALAI; w CITY L!M; T SEC ii0N 15 s � C) " 5 _ S R " 6 — F e 'L _; . 9 . 8 . M. JyI' 1 ' r•� ;1 i 2 . •; 8 k C as E S ' SP i �PtA n 9 —�1.."-+tea—'^• _S`v�w.ki�+.-Yy3 ..�.....(4.... r.�.r.-� .�. .��.�i"♦iY_'-- —r1-yt-E..i'#44�c._ ,f { ll• -,IAN WELLS CITY. L1!A;T. CvUN T'f OF it1YER Sl DEf L � •aao «,��ew�n�e�aerlc�,mwAas,•�vw,mrcaw.�.x�l..—_______ �•,n"..,it..rreeaa•..a.,�s.:nx�,af..�?uum:.,# DATE 23 — 7.. — 4 0 THr MTY O ?ALA DE S E F T SCALE _—n--a PC j /"' E eA. STD. DRAWING NO'4 S-NGIVE:ER 1 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF PALM DESERT y �"! f ° _A .'J.�•x:ti,:cr•.a+n�vram�s:aa+avo�;aeavw�vsa. - - '�a.zuv.":a,..e�;useluw'e�.aarrarw-----•e...,� i E-1 jE::jT COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION COUNTY ADM IN ISTRATIVE CENTER . 4090 LEMON STREET o 12TH FLOOR a RIVERSIDE,CALIFORN I A 92501 o (714) 787-2786 ROBERT J. FITCH WAYNE B. CURREN HOWARD L. POWELL EXECUTIVE OFFICER ASS'T EXEC. OFFICER LAFCO PLANNER DATE: Novemher q, ]q79 LAFC NO. : 79-64-4 Honorable Mayor & City Council City of Palm Desert PROPONENT: f.ity of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, California 92260 Gentlemen: You are hereby notified that the proposal for annexation to City of Palm Dpo prt (No_ 11). was approved by the Local Agency Formation commission of the County of Riverside at a public hearing on October 11, 1979 A copy of the legal description of this proposal as approved by the Local Agency Formation Commission, is attached to this notice and is the legal description which must be used in all further actions re- garding this proposal. Any previous descriptions which do not conform to this description should be corrected or destroyed. Any special conditions, authorizations, or amendments are noted below: City is designated as conducting authority. It is now the responsibility of your council to proceed to complete this annexation in accordance with the laws governing annexations to cities. Please notify your Local Agency Formation commission by letter when the annexation has been completed. If the proposal is abandoned or not completed, please notify us within 90 days. Sincerely, Wayne '8. Curren Assistant Executive Officer Attachment: Map & legal description Resolution It I Local Agency Formation Commission County of Riverside 2 RESOLUTION 3 APPROVING PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY NO. 11 4 TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT 5 BE IT RESOLVED AND DETERMINED by the Local Agency 61 Formation Commission in regular session assembled on October 11, 7 1979, that the annexation of 43. 99 acres located at the north- 8 east corner of the intersection of Cook Street and Avenue 44, as 9� more particularly described in Exhibit "A" , attached hereto and 10I made a part hereof, to the City of Palm Desert is approved. lli BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND FOUND THAT: 121 1. The distinctive short form designation of the pro- 13 posed annexation is City of Palm Desert LAFC 79-64-4 (Annexation 14 No. 11) . 15I 2. An environmental assessment of the proposal was made 16 and negative declaration filed thereon pursuant to the California 17 Environmental Quality Act. 18 3. The boundaries of the territory as set forth in 19 Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this 20 reference, and approved by the County Surveyor, are contiguous 21 to the City and are approved. 22 4. The territory to be annexed is uninhabited there 23 being no registered voters residing therein. 24 5. The annexation shall be subject to the terms and 25 conditions which are presently imposed on similar .annexations to 26 the City. 27 6. The City Of Palm Desert is designated conducting 28 authority and authorized to proceed upon noticed public hearing. AMES H.ANGELL COUNTY COUNSEL - - LAW LIBRARY BLDG, JERSIDE.CALIFORNIA - 1 - M 1 7. The Executive Officer is directed to transmit a certi- fied copy of this Resolution to the above designated conducting 3 authority, to the chief petitioners, if different from the con- 4 ducting authority, and to each affected agency. 5 / 6 712 / � L 7 PHIL REED, Ch i man 8 9 I certify the avove Resolution was passed and adopted 10 by the Local Agency Formation Commission of Riverside County on 11I October 11, 1979. 12 ROBERT. FITCH 13 Executive Officer 14 _� Ol�t, B 151 WAYNE B. CURPPN 16 Assistant Exe utive Officer 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 VPM:im 27 ' LO/26/79 28 kMES H.ANGELL COUNTY COUNSEL 2 AW LIBRARY CLOG. .� !ERSIDE,CALIFORNIA I - I LAFCO #79-64-4 `PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 11 'TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT ANNEXATION DESCRIPTION Beginning at a point in the easterly boundary of the City of Palm Desert, County of Riverside, State of California, said point being the common section corner of 'Section 15 and 16 and Section 21 and 22, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian. 1, Thence, North 000 02' . 13" East, a distance of 1505.72 feet; 2. Thence, North 780 28' 18" East, a distance of 338.25 feet; 3. Thence, South 890 10' 07" East, .a distance of 160.58 feet; 4.. Thence, South 650 25 ' 20" East, a distance of 922. 94 feet; 01 S. Thence, South 000 04' 13" West, a distance of 1181.52 feet; 6. Thence, South 890 46' 10" West, a distance of 1330. 83 feet to the point of beginning: 'This parcel contains 43.99 acres more .or less. ! L OLSCftIP?I ON APPROVED 97 Y RIVERSIDE SMVEIOR. EXHIBIT "A W W C F o w w p• W 44 TH. Q AVENUE ` ' ¢ O O O U 2 HIGHWAY u lil COUNTY OF LOCATION MAP ` RIVERSIDE NOT TO SCALE 1\\ \ sroRM�gr� R \ S.89^IO'07 "15'-<2a-?3. _ P J \ \ 4 \ COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE L) W it y of PROPOSED PALM DESERT ; W oI CITY LIMIT n - _ R _ SECTION 15 Io J Yo T- 5 S , R 6 E o . a0 S . B . B. M. J[\/ a 43.99 ACRES 0 y o h � 1330.83 S . 89° 46 10" W . _• � v d d Tu I el I$ 44 2 44 INDIAN WELL1 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY LIMIT - A.F.C .79- -L. 64 4 DATE 3 - 5 - i9 PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. I I SCALE 1 "=400' TO : THE CITY OF PALM DESERT �- s IN SECTION 15 T-5-S R-6-E S.B.B.& M. STD. DRAWING NO. CITY ENGINEER ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF PALM DESERT L- 1 I -A DATA��INT fM11?h J ' RESOLUTION NO. 79-88 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, MAKING APPLICATION TO THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION FOR A CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION KNOWN AS, "PALM DESERT ANNEXATION NO. 11" , PURSUANT TO SECTION 35140 OF THE STATE GOVERNMENT CODE. WHEREAS, one hundred percent of the property owners have requested, by petition, within the area hereafter known as , "Palm Desert Annexation No. 11" , and more particularly described in the attached map and legal description; and WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act has been complied with, pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 78-32, in that all responsible agencies have been contacted and a Negative Declaration has been prepared in conjunction with pre-annexation zoning; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the proposed change of organization is appropriate for the following reasons : 1. The request is a logical expansion of the City boundaries. 2 . The proposed annexation is consistent with the Municipal Organization Act of 1977 which en- courages limiting the number of annexations to those areas considered logical growth areas. 3. The proposed area to be annexed is of satisfactory size to provide municipal services without ad- versely affecting the rest of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. The above recitations are hereby determined to be true and correct and represent the findings of the Council in this matter. 2 . The City Clerk is hereby instructed to file an official application with the Local Agency Formation Commission for Palm Desert Annexation No. 11, pursuant to the Municipal Organization Act of 1977 for uninhabited territory since less than twelve registered voters reside in the area. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert City Council, held on this 26th day of July, 1979 , by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Brush, McPherson, Wilson, Mulli NOES: None ABSENT: Newbrander ABSTAIN: None EDWARD D. MULLINS, May r, or JAMES E . , cPHERSON, Mayor Pro-Tempore ATTEST: SHEILA R. . GILLIGAN, City Clerk i City of Palm Desert, California a: PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 11 TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT ANNEXATION DESCRIPTION Beginning at a point in the easterly boundary of the City of Palm Desert, County of Riverside, State of California, said point being the common section corner of Section 15 and 16 and Section 21 and 22 , Township 5 South, Range 6 East , San Bernardino Base and Meridian. 1. Thence, North 000 02 ' 13" East , a distance of 1505 . 72 feet ; 2. Thence , North 780 28' 18" East , a distance of 338. 25 feet; 3. Thence , South 890 10' 07" East , a distance of 160. 58 feet; 4. Thence , South 650 25 ' 20" East , a distance of 922 . 94 feet; 5. Thence , South 000 04' 13" West , a distance of 1181. 52 feet ; 6 . Thence , South 890 46' 10" West , a distance of 1330. 83 feet to the point of beginning. This parcel contains 42. 48 acres more or less . D---1 t W W - i _F 46 TN. ¢ AVENUEIN yI! S f st �Ilt - x I W r � � COUNTY OF LOCGTION� A' --- nIVERSICc NOT i0 SCALE d i till \ O,07 E.'-_.� 9 <S ?•4'�C 'a COUNTY OF N r PROPOSED -ALM DESERT CITY Llif; T � O �n SEC T ! 0 N 15 �T to T- S - $ F, - b - E I �a ? � S . 8. F3 . M. ; ! iY 42 . 48 ACRES } i ��i . 1330.H5 ©90 'IS 1O` 'k •/' � �w f ----�F+4--ram:--• IN IVDIAN WELLS / CITY. LI!filT. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ' L.A.i. C .79- DATE 3 - 5 - 79 �RlJrOSEJ YvNa�' lSY.TiO ���O. le "_app' TO HE CITY OF PALM DESERT � SCALE T rY7 !N SEC-9,ON 15 T-5 S R-6-F c B.Q S! DRAWING' CIT`t E 4rolf,EERINS DEPA,17NENT CITY OF PALM DESERT ! / ENiiiNEEft fiscwmac.. m..,a.:a..w..aa�a..r..�<v.ay.a>IDnwsuv.....w..rarr�z.m.,.woi.o w-�--�as1 -� APPLICATION TO THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY ' LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION Mail or bring to: County Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street, 12th Floor Riverside , California 92501 FOR LAFC USE ONLY INTRODUCTION: The questions in this form are designed to obtain enough data about the proposed project and project site to allow the staff and LAFC to assess the project. You may include any additional information which you believe is pertinent. Use additional sheets where necessary. Do not leave any blanks. If an item is not applicable, so indicate. Submit this form in one copy. Applicant City of Palm Desert (Holstein Industries ) Telephone: (714 ) 346-0611 Address: 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane , Palm Desert , California 92260 Name & title of person to contact regarding this application: Martin J . Bouman City Manager City of Palm Desert Address 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane , Palm Desert , C6� Telephone: ( 714 ) 346-0611 r4ZPROPOSED PROJECTOR ACTION: Annexation No . 11 GENERAL LOCATION: (Area , cross streets, etc.) Northeast corner of Cook Street and 44th Avenue A. OWNERSHIP 1. Is the applicant a property owner in the area of the proposed project: Yes X No 2. Is the applicant sole owner of this property? Yes X No B. AREA INFORMATION 1 . Land area in acres 42 42 Arrpc 2 . Number of dwellings in the proposed area at present time None 3 . Expected increase in the number of dwellings in the proposed area which will result . from this proposal 212 . By what date? 1982 (state type of dwelling units , e.g. , single family residences, mobile homes .) clustered condominium 4 . Population in the proposed area at the present time None 5 . Expected change in the population in the proposed area which will result from this proposal 424 By when 1982 6. Amount of publicly-owned land in the proposed area (identify as federal, state or local) None 7. Assessed value at present time: Land $63 , 750. 00 Improvements None 8. Number of land parcels in the proposed area 1 r- C. .VOTER INFORMATION ' 1 . -Number of registered voters in area at the None g' present time 2 . Does the proposed boundary cut across precinct boundaries ? Unknown 3 . Does the proposed boundary cut across tax rate areas ? Unknown D. LAND USE 1 . Current zoning R-1-9 ,000 ( Riverside County) 2. Pre-zoning (Assigned by cities only) PR-5(U .A . ) ( 5 DU/AC , Upon Annexation ) 3 . Current land use vacant land 4. County General Plan designation Low density residential ( 3-5 DU/AC ) 5. City General Plan designation Medium density residential ( 5-7 DU/AC) 6. Is the proposal in consonance with the City & County General Plans Yes 7. Probable or proposed land use for next five years -- include known or probable plans for development (Submit any available plans) clustered condominiums E. DETAILS OF YOUR PROPOSAL 1 . Describe the proposed project in as much detail as possible. Identify the project, including annexations to, detachments from, or formation of new entities (use additional sheets if necessary) Annexation No . 11 would annex approximately 42 . 5 Acres at the northeast corner of Cook Street and 44th Avenue to . the City of Palm Desert under the statutory provisions of the Municipal Organization Act of 1977 . a . The reasons which justify this proposal are as follows: (for example -- service needs , health mandate, economic benefits, etc.) Property owners of proposed annexation would receive higher level of service obtainable from the City ; proposed annexation is a logical expansion of City limits -b. Specific services to be added, changed, or eliminated: ( See attached plan —,-e-r--s-ery;;ee-ter (1) Without additional cost to residents/owners.- (2) With additional cost to residents/owners: 2. Will the project be subject to existing bonded indebtedness ? No 3 . What will be the approximate annual costs to accomplish the goals of this proposal? t4 2OO per annum 4. What are the specific sources of revenue to pay for the service(s) ? State subven- tions , sales tax , new, construction tax � . What is annual cost to each resident/property uwner_(specify which)? None ; costs will be accounted for by revenue sources inuicated in Item 4 above F. PROPERTY OWNERS' DESIRES 1 . How many property owners make up total ownership of project area ? (Include with this application copies of all letters/correspondence you have relating to above items) I 2 . How many property owners have been contacted regarding project? 1 3 . How many property owners are in favor of project? ) 4. How many property owners are not in favor of project? None G. FOR -LIGHTING DISTRICTS AND ROAD MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS ONLY 1 . If street lights will be installed, how many, what type (mercury or sodium) and what intensity (e.g. , 7000 lumen)? KA, 2. Is approved plan by utility company for street lights submitted at this time?—N .A (Approved plan must be submitted before energy charges will be'assumed by Service Area) . 3. If road maintenance district, how many miles of road to maintain? N . A . 4 . Is it your intention to bring any roads to Count standards for future acce tance into Y p in o the County Maintained Road System? N .A . H. PLAN OF SERVICE (City Annexations only) A plan for providing services within the affected territory must be submitted with this application. Use separate sheets. . I. In your own words, how would your proposal benefit the community? The proposed annexation represents a logical .expansion of the present City limits. The City is in a position to offer future residents a higher level of community . and public services . NOTICES AND COMMUNICATIONS -- List below the names and addresses of people to whom notices and communications should be directed. (3 maximum) Name City of Palm Desert Telephone ( 714 )346-0611 Address45-275 Prickly Pear Lane City & Zip Palm Desert , CA. Name Holstein Industries (George Holstein III ) Telephone (714) 642-9660 Address_ 170 E . 17th Street City & Zip Costa Mesa CA . 9 Name Maxwell M. Freeman Telephone ( 209 ) 944-5770 Address 45 Hunter Square Plaza City & Zip Stockton , CA . LUC Signature of applicant or authorized representative Martin J . Bouman Typed or printed name City Manager Title (3) CITY OF PALM DESERT TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council SUBJECT: Plan for Services for Palm Desert Annexation NO. 11 I. INTRODUCTION: Pursuant to Section 35102 of the State Government Code, the City is required to file with any new Annexations effective January 1, 1978 , a plan outlining the method by which services will be provided in the area to be annexed. This report represents the required plan for services for Proposed Annexation No. 11. The City of Palm Desert, being a contract City, must rely on many other agencies to provide for -services both in the com- munity and areas subsequently annexed. In addition, many services provided such as water and sewer, electri- city, gas, are provided without regard to city limit lines. Therefore, the area proposed to be annexed is presently served or has the capability of being served by many of these agencies. The fact is substantiated by the letters received from responsibile agencies as a part of the EDvironmental Review process, and in con- junction with preannexation zoning considerations. The major emphasis of this report is to address those services provided directly by the City either through City Staff or direct contract with the City by other agencies. In addition, wherever possible, this report will address the methods by which other service agencies would provide needed facilities in the area. II. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES : The utilities which would be extended into the area proposed to be annexed would be as part of actual deve- lopment and they would consist of the services of the Coachella Valley County Water District in the area of water and sewer, Southern California Edison Company in the area of electricity, Southern California Gas Company in the area of gas, and Able Cable in the area of cable television. The services provided by this City directly would be in planning and building, public works, parks, administration and code enforcement services. By contract the City would also provide for trash disposal, police and fire services. Public transportation would be pro- vided by the Sunline Agency. The major road improvements would include the widening and improvement of Cook Street and 44th Avenue which border the site on the West and South, respectively. The creation of any local streets would be on the basis of specific projects and would be the responsibility of the developer. Ultimate development of the subject annexation and adjacent properties will necessitate a bridge crossing at the Cook Street crossing of the Whitewater Storm- water Channel. This facility would be constructed with a combination of federal grants and local participation very similar to existing bridges in the Valley. Public park needs in the area to be annexed will partially be fulfilled by on-site recreational amen- ities. Residents will also be able to take advantage of the proposed 120-acre Sand Dune Park to the north- west of the subject area. III. LEVEL AND RANGE OF SERVICES: The level and range of services provided would include sufficient sized water and sewer, gas, and electrical facilities to service development proposed for the area. Planning and building, public works, and code enforcement services as provided by the City directly, would be on the basis of need. Police and fire services capability exist to meet the need of the area at its present stage of development and are proposed to be expanded to meet the needs of subsequent development in the area. Public transportation would be provided by the expansion of the existing system to serve the area. Subsequent development will result in the need for the City to add an additional police vehicle and the need for an additional fire station in the vicinity of Country Club Drive. Since fire services are provided on a volunteer basis in conjunction with the County of Riverside and State Department of Forestry, the City would be required to provide for a facility in the area which would be manned by these agencies. A fire station has been planned for in the City' s General Plan in this area and will be pro- vided at the time it is needed. In addition, said area will be served by a proposed fire station at 44th Avenue and San Pablo (Civic Center Complex) , which is tentatively proposed for construction in 1980/81 budget year. in the meantime, the area would be served by the existing Palm Desert Station at E1 Paseo and Highway 74 with backup being provided by the Rancho Mirage, Thousand Palms and Bermuda Dunes stations. The basic administration services of Planning, Building, Public Works, and Code enforcement would be provided by existing City Staff. IV. TIMING FOR SERVICE EXTENSIONS: Basic utility services would occur as a part of develop- ment. The City has on file letters from the various utilities assuring us that these services would be available. The City services would be available immediately in the area of planning, building and code enforcement, public works, and police and fire. Road improvements would occur as a part of new development. The construction of the new fire station near Country Club Drive would result from the City ' s new construc- tion tax which would be accrued from the new development in the area, which would be 20 cents per sq. ft. of building area. Parks would be developed in the area under the City' s Subdivision Ordinance which provides for the dedication of land and/or payment of fee for community facilities and would provide for sites for the fire station and parks. The proposed residential development contemplated for the area is a condominium project, which would include a majority of necessary recreational facilities to serve the ultimate residents of the area. V. REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT AND FINANCING: New development would be required to extend roads around the area and to provide for needed sites for fire, parks and other related municipal facilities provided through the City's Subdivision Ordinance. The new Construction Tax of 20 cents per sq. ft. of building area would provide for construction and additional acquisition of these facilities. The provision of planning and building services would be provided through the fees generated from new development. On-going maintenance of roads, created in the area, would be ,provided through State Gas Taxes generated as a result of population within the area. Police ser- vices and parks maintenance would be provided on the basis of Sales Tax generated from commercial facilities in the area. In summary, it is felt that development fo this area would result in a balance between needed services and the revenues to provide said services. RESOLUTION NO.'79- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, MAKING APPLICATION TO THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION FOR A CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION KNOWN AS, "PALM DESERT ANNEXATION NO. 1101 , PURSUANT TO SECTION 35140 OF THE STATE GOVERNMENT CODE. WHEREAS , one hundred percent of the property owners have requested, by petition, within the area hereafter known as, "Palm Desert Annexation No 11" , and more particularly described in the attached map and legal description; and WHEREAS , the California Environmental Quality Act has been complied with, pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 78-32, in that all responsible agencies have been contacted and a Negative Declaration has been prepared in conjunction with pre-annexation zoning; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the proposed change of organization is appropriate for the following reasons: 1. The request is a logical expansion of the City boundaries . 2 . The proposed annexation is consistent with the Municipal Organization Act of 1977 which en- courages limiting the number of annexations to those areas considered logical growth areas . 3 . The proposed area to be annexed is of satisfactory size to provide municipal services without ad- versely affecting the rest of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows : 1. The above recitations are hereby determined to be true and correct and represent the findings of the Council in this matter. 2. The City Clerk is hereby instructed to file an official application with the Local Agency Formation Commission for Palm Desert Annexation No. 11, pursuant to the Municipal Organization Act of 1977 for uninhabited territory since less than twelve registered voters reside in the area. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert City Council, held on this day of 1979, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES : ABSENT: ABSTAIN: EDWARD D. MULLINS, Mayor ATTEST: SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, City Clerk City of Palm Desert, California PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 11 TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT ANNEXATION DESCRIPTION Beginning at a point in the easterly boundary of the City of Palm Desert, County of Riverside, State of California, said point being the common section corner of Section 15 and 16 and Section 21 and 22, Township 5 South, Range 6 East , San Bernardino Base and Meridian. 1. Thence, North 000 02 ' 13" East , a distance of 1505 . 72 feet ; 2 . Thence , North 780 28' 18" East, a distance of 338. 25 feet ; 3. Thence, South 890 10 ' 07" East, a distance of 160. 58 feet; 4. Thence, South 65' 25 ' 20" East , a distance of 922. 94 feet ; 5 . Thence , South 000 04' 13" West , a distance of 1181. 52 feet ; 6. Thence , South 890 46' 10" West , a distance of 1330. 83 feet to the point of beginning. This parcel contains 42. 48 acres more or less . l • ztL lI REC1 VED-D �f,fig• 'I 1,2 4 1979 T{IIfRS DE CUUNIY HOAU ULPT. COOK STREET %. pant deed May, 19n 7 - 2-3 -7 / -.' ROBERT C. MDRREY and EDITH K. MORREY , r L7 ......................................_.........._...._.................................-........................ t I -• � Grant to ti ic fnunty of Riverside all that real property in Rivonide County, California, described as follows: I That portion of the west one-half of the southwest one-quarter of Section 15, T. 5 S. , R. 6 E. , S.B.M., described as follows: i A triangular shaped parcel of land bounded on the north by the { i south right of e+ay line of the Coachella Valley County water iil;tr'ict Channel , as described in that certain deed recorded January 11, 1967, as Instrument 140. 2542, Records of Riverside County, California; bounded on the south by I i the north line of that certain parcel of land described as Parcel 2 con- veyed to Bernard H. Vander Steen by deed recorded December 14, 1956, in Book Z012, page ill of Cfficial Records of Riverside County, California; I and. bounded on. the west:by a. line 44 feet easterly of, parallel with and met tired at rr.ght-angles-tp the west.line of said southwest one-quarter I T Cate f 1 % n x G b... . 57Ah: OF G4IFOIL`iU Edl to�k' e .... ........ 'COUhIY OF a, \ � . u After recording return to Road Commissioner, JJJ C-vartbovsr, Riverside, California. On _Y) before x. t/K' rndfro,enxl. a Nma Public 1n aad for/.0 (:runty ar'l SW" Ca+ouallY rpprareA luwwv •o ax to be the pa,u__vho,e w u Sir a ` 1 r trub bed yto tYx +ithia 1us4umrot and ,ekm,vled8rd OC a'•+ E_,�, 3 tM _._�r'�J-ct"_ ea.t d the reo,. BQ m a^H e bfiStm 3 >_ ' � r.� ID " 'tea z 4 1979 f. �.. ,�.,•,. s F 'ERSID'E COUNTY ROAD UtPT, . i. ; • e - J)PSERT RRAN . f G / 557 COOK STREET Grant Dead October, 1971 (^` _ Ben van der Steen and Seph, Harris._Cohen,,,,Cg-(1dm1D�.$CxF.S.oX.6..�Jf,tkl..:l;hE---W.i11 _ .._.........................................._..... ----...... Annexed of._the„Estate._og„Hernard.Ht„yan-_der„Steen.,,,,deceased.,,............................. Grant to the County of kiversido all that real property in Riversidg County,California,described as follows: A portion of the west one-half of the southwest one-quarter of Section 15, T. 5 S., R. 6 E., S.B.fi., described as follows: Beginning at a point on the northerly line of that parcel of land, described as Parcel 2, conveyed to Bernard H. Vander Steen by deed recorded December 14, 1956, in Book 2012, page 117, Records of Riverside County, California, distant 30 feet easterly of and measured at right angles to the west line of said southwest one-quarter of Section 15; Thence N. 78e28'18" E., along said northerly line, to a point which is distant 44 feet easterly, measured at right angles, from the westerly line of said southwest quarter of Section 15; - Thence southerly in a direct line to a point which is 30 feet easterly of and 1100 feet northerly of the southwest corner of said Section 15; Thence northerly along a line 30 feet easterly of and parallel with the westerly line of said Section 15 to the point of beginning. i W_ O K i Dated:........._!1....-- -:.. f r•Y l � em van-aer'=£6eatT . , •. �� �. ....... ........... AYYfS...C6NEfi.......... ..... STATE OP CALIFORNIA - + COUNTY of ss. .- I i Orartre After recording return to Road Commissioner, CbudTmw, Riverside, California. na Nov. 0, 1971Hall ot records a—•WCaV"d • N=u vpa*ed :•n Vander Stnee and Toa ph Rgrris Behan f fEr_ • k.W me re be the prnobA whxa -•"�` V • ,uL,onwd U aw w:'uwn :nstruwuca:su1 ar'rraainigcd osavW the 4 WNSESS mi b•ed. d emr.ml. ad n T� iS11 7— i D n a p N ; m m Z A p m m '" D D y O r N a m O N O Z D m z - m n m < y T N C o a _ m < m m � a p:o z c 0 0 a p O p i m N at. po - a , N a -i m z y N 9) •V N y Vow CD z 91 "� En ai tv m m ro N N P. N t " I• dii MAXWELL M.FREEMAN LAW OFFICES ROBERT J.R15HWAIN OF JERRY D.HALL FREEMAN, RISHWAIN, HALL & SPATOLA CHARLES R.SPATOLA PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ROBERT 0.HARDWICK 45 HUNTER SQUARE PLAZA STOCKTON. CALIFORNIA 95202 TELEPHONE(209)944-5790 October 13, 1978 To: Honorable City Council Palm Desert, California PETITION FOR ANNEXATION Pursuant to the Municipal Organization Act of 1977 , the undersigned do hereby petition the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, for annexation of the hereinafter described property to the City of Palm Desert and, in furtherance thereof, do hereby state the following: 1. The legal description of the property is attached hereto marked Exhibit A. 2. The number of inhabitants of the subject property is: NONE. 3. The owner of the subject property is as follows: Indian Wells — Palm Desert Properties - a General Partnership. The followingnamed persons are all of the partners of said partnership: RJR Development, Inc. , a California corporation MMF Development, Inc. , a California corporation George Holstein C.E. Oranges Robert R. Oranges Jack Gall Kaiser Farms, Inc. , a California corporation Business for all of the above owners is : 45 Hunter Square Plaza Stockton, California 95202 This "Petition of Annexation" is submitted contingent upon agreement by and between the City Council and the Owners on the following conditions: 1. r A. That the entire except the northwesterly property, portion (See Map submitted herewith) , be designated for Residential Use, Medium Density, Six (6) Dwelling Units per acre on an overall average basis (PR6) . B. That the 300 feet of frontage of the property be designated for Neighborhood Commercial Zoning, as shown on the accompanying map. Signed thislday of October, 1978 by: INDIAN WELLS-PALM DESERT PROPERTIES By: RJR Development; ��nc. a California Corp ration R bert(J4, shwain, President i B a we M.. 'F em , ecreta MMF Development Inc. / _�a4Caifor a corporation B1 M: ,. President By / ) Robrt J^^ 11 Y�faain, Secretary ;lN , George ollstein by Robert Ris wa n , Attorney In Fact C.E. Oranges by P&��C J. Rishwain, Attorney In Fact Kaiser Farms, Inc. , a 1`ifornia corporation By Edga A. Kai e_ r, resid t b Ro er J. Rishwain, Fact t By [//� ri Sven A. Kaiser, Secreta by R ' er J. Rishwai , Att r I Fact Rob rt R. Or n s, by Ro6-e-T,.t Ri ai , Attorney In Fact i Ja k Gall, by Robert hwarn, Attorney In Fact 2 . �Hol�tei �Industri January 9, 1979 Mr. Paul Williams Director of Environmental Planning City of Palm Desert . 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert , California Dear Pau : Enclose you will find the application for annexation of the 45 a that we own at the corner of 44th and Cook. I wou d preciate it if you will expedite the same as quickly as s sb1e. N> Very t. uly yours, Geor e Ho tein, III Pres dent enc osure f � VNcLO°�'es�o�SEfi 170 EAST SEVENTEENTH STREET, COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92627 • (AREA 714) 642-9660 OR 548-5548 CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE NO. 272573 SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY The undersigned, INDIAN WELLS - PALM DESERT PROPERTIES, a general partnership, with its principal place of business in Stockton, San Joaquin County , California, does hereby appoint MAXWELL M. FREEMAN and/or ROBERT J. RISHWAIN, of Stockton, California, as their attorney in fact in and for the State of California, for the following purposes: To execute any and all documents required in connection with the purchase, annexation, zoning, subdivision and financing of the improvements for the development of approximately 42 . 87 acres located on the corner of 44th Avenue and Cook Street in the City of Palm Desert , County of Riverside , State of California. The undersigned further give to said attorney in fact full power and authority to do and perform all and every act and thing which may be necessary , or convenient, in connection with the foregoing as fully, to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might or could do if personally present, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney in fact shall lawfully do or cause to be done by authority hereof. DATED: July 1, 1973 INDIAN WELLS - PALM DESERT PROPERTIES a General Partnership, By : RJR DEVELOPMENT, INC. MMF DEVELOPMENT, INC. a California Corporation a"Califo�rnia Corporation By BY f 1�19 t• R C� ) tY BY-R bert J.p1�//Ris wain, President Maxwell M. - Freeman , President A .ln f X_F n—___" By ''M I M. Freenan, Secretary Robert J. Rishwain, Secretary e rge 1-10115tein C. E. Oranges If, rangsIf, Robert R. Oranges Jack Gall Kaiser Farms , Inc.., a California Corporation By Edgar. , A. Kaiserj' President By / .., ✓ i Steven A_ Kaiser; Secretary ONola n n�ine j.OFCALIFORNIA day of. %�Y........in the year one thousa dSAN JOAQUIN 65. undred and..........7�........ befor. ....................... .............!�,jUlffY OF........................................... ry Public, State of California, duty commissioned and sworn,personally appeared......R?T�!�RT...�T: RISHWAIN. . & MAXWELL M. FREEMAN ............................ ...... .............................................. known to me to be the ...........o...f...f...i.c...e...r..s............. of the corporation described in and that executed the within instrument, and also known to me to be the persons..... who executed the within instrument on behalf of the corporation therein named, and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the same...............................................................................................I...................... IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal in the............................. County of..SM...!79�aq:g i.n.......... the day and year in this certificate first above written .... .. .. ... Not ry Pub fate Cowdery's Form No. 28-Acknowledgment Corporation(C.C. Sees. 1190-1190.1) Printed 5/72 STATE OF CALIFORNIA On! this ............................ day of...J.Uly............in the year one thousand nine COUNTY OF...... JOAQUIN hundred and......7.8............ before me.................. .........:......La.... ......... a Notary Public, State of California, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared.....MAXWELL-K.....FBEEKM....FA...RA13 F-.AT ....K�q.HWAIN known to me to be the ficers............... of the corporation described in and that executed the within instrument, and also known to me to be the person....... who executed the within instrument on behalf of the corporation therein named, and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the some.,................................................I......... ..................................................... [:'r 11"::.j: IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal in the............................. County of....Ban,..Zaaquin........ the day and year in this certificate first above written ........................ ............ ......................... Notary Pubfic'*State'W California Cowdcry's Form No.28-Acknowledgment Corporation(C.C.Secs. 1190-1190.1) Printed 5n2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA t On this ....... ....... day of....JU1.y............in the year one thousand nine hundred and....................... before me_..6.Za�.4!..../if 4/.,/.�..... COUNTY OF.... ......... d and Wally a Notary Public State of Cali orni4:hduly ym�T,,ss,',E%T aA.6ugI gTj� DG)�R A. KAqSE an appeared.. ............................6*f'f'1'c*...e''r"'s'"'*..............*"**......'.......*......... known to me to be the ................. ......................... of the corporation described in and �hat executed the within instrument, and also known to me to be the !rson_.._ who executed the within instrument on behalf of the corporation -Z CIFF herein named, and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the ERBme........I............................................................................................................. IL"). YN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official ........... County of..........s.a-n....i.6.a.q ai.n.-. the day and �eal in the.................. L s" ear in this certificate first above written. .................... ....... ........... i. I................... ...... Notary Public,State of California � 1 Cowdery's Form No. 28-Acknowledgment Corpontion(C.C.Sea. 1190-1190-1) Printed 5/72 i STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ) SS. COUNTY OF_0_�2-- 1 ON _ ulv 1/ 19?8 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared GE9AGE_I0LL=1N L OFFICIAL SEAL known to me, CHARLEPJE R. SANIYER to be the person_whose name_ T C subscribed to the within Instrument, NOTAHY PVOLIC — cnt. rGRNIA and acknowledged to me that _he— executed the same. PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN ORANGE COVNTYmission Expires June 19, ]981 WITNESS my hand and official seal. /) Notary Public in anE for said Stare ACKNOWLEDGMENT—General—WOleatta form 233—Rev. 364 A zOez,oui +RERm+e STATtONERY PRODUCTS CORP. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SS. COUNTY OF_'Hf. ° '^ ON — --July 19 78 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared C. E_ORANGES_ _ oFricin _,known to me, IC µ HARRY CLYDE is subscribed to the within Instrument, m �`_^•;:�inr•.Y PUIG cauvoONl•> to be the person__whose name_ ., SAN JOAQUIN COUr1IY i and acknowledged to me that __he_— executed the same. � rnr commLzwn nx phrz nnul 6. I9�`J S WITNESS my hand and official seal. r� Notary Public in and fo saki Scale. I ACxROWLEOGMENT—General—WOlcattt Form 233—Rev. 3-61 •'wezmuR.or+u En c s+,iOr+c Rr PF000c,z con.. _ STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ' ss. COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN ON July _ 1978, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared _ ROBERT R. ORANGES OFFICIAL SEA known to me, L. F'F.rnY I_. C l YDE to be the person_whose name— i s subscribed to the within Instrument, 1 ^ ' and acknowledged to me that—he_ executed the same. NOTP Ry r,1 C,-ff: ''AN JOAQUII. CuIYvTY , A ' /f `i tdy cnmmisslon xClie�—NpHI G,1979 WITNESS my hand and official seal. �No[ary Public in and for said S ate.\ ACKNDWLEDGA'ENT--General—WolCatts Form 233—Rev. 364 + pCaim•n.or•.+en,u...•.,oncn..anouc.e<on. — ___ �--STATE Of CALIFORNIA, -- _ - _^) SAN JOAQUIN ( ss. COUNTY OF ) ON July 13 19 78 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared JACK GALL - - known to me, OFFICIAL SEAL to be the person—whose name_ is subscribed to the within Instrument, 1 DOLCRES A. hfCB'TION and acknowledged to me that_he_ executed the same. ., �•.Fx V. /) NOTARY PUBLIC-CALIFORNIA \ SAN JOAOUIN COUNTY WITNESS my hand and official seal.My ���� -.-. y:Jmnrison exCres UCl 16. ?ad. —✓/,��—="_f.f"/v_. Notary Public in and for said State. ACGNOWLEDGMEtlT—General—Wolcotts form 233-9ev. 3.64 osmi•nv w•ven,<•.+ e...,oncn oouc.z canr. �... 9 �``� /�1� -� ��`' � �\ p _ Y .. < oEoe 1 f � . 4 , -` J.c ., -v,'4 't,. .�. �. ` ', '.�, �. +� s;..r�� 1 f' y}V�ti►•':i. f � � \_ .."•*•f y\�r �1\ ,\ .T �Mm, � ,� \�� i� f. � a \ ♦e'y.. � +Y ... se � _. � 1 1 \ f�ti.(-' . _ ii �`� .. �`\.... , f� \ .. 1 • ,yp�� •e'y ro 1 i'�6+ � � a",My �►a1�'��a74�1�"st �•� �6�.4 ��v4" ,r4 � _ a..•� {� e v �Jr , • y ti. i"• lr , ._ .., .� " ,;. "�,w , , •, �, ai per., \ 4\ I� '` hs .e � r AV 14 lit i(oe r 4 C56 1 ri J 7 s J T(i.A 4 1. v of = 14TOr.(I a � i' „ c• f' �4'v %Ilk 40 '4b .� u AL J ' - r - - —-.4 set,41 ems. �� d r• x j'• r y -+ i I I