HomeMy WebLinkAboutANNEXATIONS NEC COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE/MONTEREY AVENUE NO 12 1980 ISSN b
►60*
tf 7 W Q(d Wn
RESOLUTION NO. 80- 15
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT,
CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE AMOUNT OF PROPERTY TAX REVENUE
TO BE EXCHANGED BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AND THE CITY
OF PALM DESERT RELATING TO ANNEXATION NUMBER 12 TO THE CITY
OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA.
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert in regular
session assembled on February 14, 1980, that:
1 . The County of Riverside and the City of Palm Desert are the agencies
whose area or responsibility for service would be affected by Annexation No. 12
to the City of Palm Desert.
2. Representatives of each of the affected agencies have met and nego-
tiated an exchange of property tax revenue to become effective for tax pur-
poses beginning July 1 , 1980, as follows :
a) The City of Palm Desert shall assume the responsibility for
all general municipal services to the area to be annexed as
are required by law or presently provided throughout the City,
and for such service assumption shall receive 25% of that
portion of the property tax revenue generated within the
territory to be annexed under the ad valorem tax rate
established by Article XIII A of the Constitution of the
State of California, that represents the County of Riverside's
share of such property tax revenue.
b) The County Auditor shall convert the above established per-
centage figures into actual dollar figures and thereafter
allocate such property tax revenue in accord with the provi-
sions of Section 95 et seq. of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
J 3. The City Council of the City of Palm Desert does hereby agree to the
Jabove-recited exchange of property tax revenue.
4. The Clerk shall transmit a certified copy of this resolution to each
affected agency and to the Executive Office of the Local Agency Formation
Commission and to the Auditor of the County of Riverside pursuant to Section
No. 99 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Palm
Desert, California, on this 14th day of February 1980, by the fol-
lowing vote, to wit:
AYES: Brush, McPherson, Newbrander, Wilson & Mullins
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
c
t1ll RD D. M LLINS, MAYOR
I ATTEST:
111
SHEILA R. GI IGAN, CIT LERK
CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL STING
,. ..
VIII. RESOLUTIONS (Continued)
A. RESOLUTION NO. 80-14 (Continued)
Councilman Brush moved and Mayor Pro-Tempore McPherson seconded to
waive further reading and adopt Resolution No . 80-14. Motion carried
unanimously.
B. RESOLUTION NO. 80-15 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF PALM DESERT , CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE AMOUNT OF
PROPERTY TAX REVENUE TO BE EXCHANGED BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF
RIV OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, RELATING
TO NNEXATION NUMBER 1 TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA.
Mr. Bouman stated that this is an action that Council will be
taking with every annexation pursuant to the Agreement with all
cities and with the County for a share of the property tax.
Councilman Wilson moved and Councilman Brush seconded to waive
further reading and adopt Resolution No. 80-15 . Motion carried unanimously .
C. RESOLUTION NO. 80-16 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 79-69
AND THUS ESTABLISHING A REVISED TABLE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS FOR
THE 1979/80 FISCAL YEAR.
D. RESOLUTION NO. 80-17 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO . 79-79 ,
SECTION 1 , TABLE OF SALARY RANGES FOR CLASSIFICATIONS AND POSI-
TIONS AND THUS ESTABLISHING A REVISED TABLE OF AUTHORIZED SALARY
RANGES FOR CLASSIFICATIONS AND POSITIONS FOR THE 1979/80 FISCAL
YEAR.
Councilman Wilson moved and Mayor Pro-Tempore McPherson seconded to
continued Resolution Nos . 80-16 and 80-17 to the meeting of February 28 ,
1980. Motion carried unanimously.
E. RESOLUTION NO . 80-18 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF- PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE 1979/80 BUDGET
TO REFLECT REQUIRED MID-YEAR BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS .
Mr. Bouman reported that the mid-year adjustment reflected an
anticipated increase in revenues of $91, 000 . Expenditures have
been revised in the operating budget for both general and
special funds rather drastically. Certain projects that we
simply cannot get to and the excess or surplus will go into
capital improvement program for future years . The net reduc-
tion in expendures is about $856 , 000 .
He noted that one element of the special funds is the large
reduction in the drainage fund - close to $ . 5 million short
fall . However, that is not necessarily bad in that Staff and
Council can only guestimate this fund as it is dependent on
actual development, plus the fact that we accept physical
improvements rather than the funds themselves . By the time
the in lieu physical features accepted are added in, the fund
balances out . This budget adjustment does not include any
provision for mid-year mileage and salary adjustments, and
another adjustment will be required for those.
Councilman Newbrander moved and Mayor Pro-Tempore McPherson seconded
to waive further reading and adopt Resolution No. 80-18. Motion carried
unanimously.
IX. ORDINANCES
For Introduction:
None
February 14, 1980 Page 7
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
VII . PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued)
C. CASE NO. 14080 (Continued) :
Councilman Wilson moved and Mayor Pro-Tempore McPherson seconded to
continued the matter to the meeting of March 13 , 1980. Motion carried
unanimously.
VIII. RESOLUTIONS
A. RESOLUTION NO. 80-4 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, MAKING APPLICATION TO THE
LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION C CHANGE OF .ORGANIZATION
KNOWN AS "PALM DESERT NEXATION N0. 12" I
PURSUANT TO SECTION
35140 OF THE STATE GOVERTINEINI CODE.
Mr. Williams stated that this was a followup to Council ' s
approval of the project itself. The annexation is a logical
extension of our boundaries , and Staff recommended approval .
Mayor Pro-Tempore McPherson moved and Councilman Brush seconded to
waive further reading and adopt Resolution No . 80-4. Motion carried
unanimously.B. RESOLUTION NO. 80-5 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
ITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, CONCURRING WITH THE USE OF
THE SCAG-78 GROWTH FORECAST POLICY FOR USE IN REGIONAL PLANS .
Mr. Williams stated that we have been urged by C-VAG,
the County, and S-CAG to endorse their approval to their
calculation of population. They feel this will be sufficient
support to convince the State officials that their way is
incorrect .
Councilman Wilson moved and Councilman Brush seconded to waive
further reading and adopt Resolution No . 80-5. Motion carried unanimously .
C. RESOLUTION NO. 80-6 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SUBMISSION TO
THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF SAID CITY OF A QUESTION RELATING TO
UPGRADING FIRE PROTECTION, RESCUE/PARAMEDIC SERVICES .
Mr. Bouman reported that he had been updating the Council
for the past year and a half on a number of important meetings
and work sessions regarding fire protection. These meetings
have taken place between the cities of Indian Wells , Palm
Desert , and Rancho Mirage and the County. Council is aware
that our only funding at the present time for fire protection
comes from part of the property tax. This funding has not
expanded enough to keep up with the growth and development
and the subsequent fire protection needs . Proposition #13
eliminated any hope for funding increased protection. Recog-
nizing this , the State Legislature enacted AB 618 which
allows cities or counties to assess a special purpose tax for
fire suppression. We have determined that this seems to be
the only reasonable way to go . f
He pointed out that it was on the Agenda because Council had L
felt it was important enough to get it on the April 8th ballot .
He stated that he could not give every detail. Reports from
the County Fire Department need to be updated soon so that
exact figures can be decided. However, it was Staff' s feeling
that the $60/year for developed parcels and $30/year for vacant
parcels was an appropriate maximum to establish at this time.
He stressed that this was a maximum and if the measure were
approved by a 2/3 vote of the voters , the exact fee would
be established by the Council only after a public hearing
process . With these maximums , the City could have the
possibility of raising between $360, 000 and $480, 000 for
fire protection.
January 24, 1980 Page 4
RESOLUTION NO. 80- 15
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT,
CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE AMOUNT OF PROPERTY TAX REVENUE
TO BE EXCHANGED BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF VRI ERSIDE AND THE CITY
OF PALM DESERT RELATING T&'A >NNEXATION NUMBER 12 THE CITY
OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA.
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert in regular
_ session assembled on February 14, 1980, that:
1 . The County of Riverside and the City of Palm Desert are the agencies
l whose area or responsibility for service would be affected by Annexation No. 12
to the City of Palm Desert.
2. Representatives of each of the affected agencies have met and nego-
tiated an exchange of property tax revenue to become effective for tax pur-
poses beginning July 1 , 1980, as follows:
a) The City of Palm Desert shall assume the responsibility for
all general municipal services to the area to be annexed as
are required by law or presently provided throughout the City,
and for such service assumption shall receive 25% of that
portion of the property tax revenue generated within the
territory to be annexed under the ad valorem tax rate
established by Article XIII A of the Constitution of the
State of California, that represents the County of Riverside' s
share of such property tax revenue. I
b) The County Auditor shall convert the above established per-
centage figures into actual dollar figures and thereafter
allocate such property tax revenue in accord with the provi-
sions of Section 95 et seq. of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
3. The City Council of the City of Palm Desert does hereby agree to the
above-recited exchange of property tax revenue.
4. The Clerk shall transmit a certified copy of this resolution to each
affected agency and to the Executive Office of the Local Agency Formation
Commission and to the Auditor of the County of Riverside pursuant to Section
No. 99 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Palm
Desert, California, on this day of 1980 , by the fol-
lowing vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
EDWARD D. MULLINS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, CITY CLERK
CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA
s�.
RESOLUTION NO. 80-4
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT,
CALIFORNIA, MAKING APPLICATION TO THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION
COMMISSION FOR A CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION KNOWN AS, "PALM
DESERT ANNEXATION NO. 12" , PURSUANT TO SECTION 35140 OF THE
STATE GOVERNMENT CODE.
WHEREAS, one hundred percent of the property owners have requested,
by petition, within the area hereafter known as, "Palm Desert Annexation
No. 12", and more particularly described in the attached map and legal
description; and
WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act has been
complied with, pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 78-32, in that all
responsible agencies have been contacted and a Negative Declaration has
been prepared in conjunction with preannexation zoning considerations; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the proposed change
of organization is appropriate for the following reasons:
1. The request is a logical expansion of the City boundaries.
2. The proposed annexation is consistent with the Municipal
Organization Act of 1977 which encourages limiting the
number of annexations to those areas considered logical
growth areas.
3. The proposed area to be annexed is of satisfactory size
to provide municipal services without adversely affecting
the rest of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Palm Desert, California, as follows:
1. The above recitations are hereby determined to be true
and correct and represent the findings of the Council in
this matter.
2. The City Clerk is hereby instructed to file an official
application with the Local Agency Formation Commission
for Palm Desert Annexation No. 12, pursuant to the Muni-
cipal Organization Act of 1977 for uninhabited territory
since less than twelve registered voters reside in the area.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm
Desert City Council , held on this 24th day of January 1979,
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Brush, McPherson, Newbrander, Wilson & Mullins
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None /
Li
D D. MULL INS, Mayor
ATTEST:
SHEILLA R. GILtXAN, City Cl
City of Palm Desert, Califo nia
/lr
Resolution 80-4
COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE
W
w HOVLEY LANE
w ---
a
CLANCY
LANE
\VI W w
W y
~ W
y >
O
a 44 TH a AVENUE
a
J
0
0
0
HIGHWAY 6 III
LOCATION MAP
NOT TO SCALE
PROPOSED PALM DESERT
CITY LIMIT
N. 69p 40' 12" E.
13 2 3. 1 1 ' O �'
i
w 3
n a
e „ SECTION 5
;p m T-5-S , R -6-E I; A
p S.B. B. M. ^' -
n n p
2i 39.54 ACRES O
6 5 1324.96 10 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
m
P.O.B
'
COUNTRY-- 'S.89p 37' 30 " W'� CLUB — DRIVE
7 8
w
m
PALM DESERT CITY LIMIT
RANCHO MIRAGE > -
CITY LIMIT
w
W
w
W
F
2 '
O � '
a
L.A .F.C .79-
A.J.D. PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 12
DATE 10 -15 -79 SCALE 1 7-7
TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT
IN SECTION 5 T-5-S R-6-E S.B-B.a M. STD. DRAWING NO.1
CITY ENGINEER ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF PALM DESERT 1- 12 A
Resolution 80A
Ilk
PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 12
To the City of Palm Desert
County of Riverside
State of California
Annexation Description:
Beginning at a point in the northerly boundary line of the City of Palm
Desert, County of Riverside, State of California , said point being the
common section corner of Sections 5 and 6 and Sections 7 and 8, Township
5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian.
1 . Thence North 01016'48" East along the section line of the afore-
mentioned Sections 6 and 7 a distance of 1 ,328.36 feet.
2. Thence North 89040' 12" East a distance of 1 ,325. 11 feet.
3. Thence South 01017' 17" West a distance of 1 ,327.32 feet.
4. Thence Westerly along the common section line of Sections 7 and 8
to the point of beginning.
Excepting herefrom the southerly 44.00 feet as conveyed to the County of
Riverside by deeds recorded April 28, 1958 as Instrument No. 30640 and
April 29, 1958 as Instrument No. 30961 .
This parcel contains 39. 54 acres more or less.
Mtier Construction Inc.
8121 East Florence Avenue
Downey, California 90240
,A,f,o0 (213)927-3341
September 27, 1979
P E T I T 1 0 N
TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA
In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabited Territory Act of 1939,
as amended, Government Code Sections 35,300 - 35,326, MAYER GROUP INC.
AND B & J INVESTMENTS respectfully request the following described
property to be annexed to the City of Palm Desert, subject to the approval
of zoning and development plans in conformance with the adopted General
Plan of the City of Palm Desert.
The Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 5,
Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Meridian, in the
County of Riverside, State of California, according to the
official plat thereof.
Except the Southerly 44.00 feet thereof conveyed to the County of
Riverside by deeds recorded April 28, 1958 as Instrument No. 30640
and April 29, 1958 as Instrument No. 30961 .
Total acreage - 40 + acres.
The above request is subject to obtaining zoning and development plan
approval that is acceptable to the petitioners.
MAY R G OUP INC. , BY
Mic ael A. ohler
Vic President
B & J I VESTMENTS, BY:
U•A- t�KNA,rzD .
CITY OF PALM DESERT
TRANSMITTAL LETTER
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
SUBJECT: Plan for Services for Palm Desert Annexation No. 12
I. INTRODUCTION:
Pursuant to Section 35102 of the State Government Code, the City is
required to file with any new Annexations effective January 1, 1978,
a plan outlining the method by which services will be provided in
the area to be annexed. This report represents the required plan
for services for Proposed Annexation No. 12. The City of Palm Desert,
being a contract City, must rely on many other agencies to provide
for services both in the community and areas subsequently annexed.
In addition, many services provided such as water and sewer, elec-
tricity &gas, are provided without regard to city limit lines. There-
fore, the area proposed to be annexed is presently served or has the
capability of being served by many of these agencies. The fact is
substantial by the letters received from responsible agencies as a
part of the Environmental Review process, and in conjuntion with
preannexation zoning considerations.
The major emphasis of this report is to address those services pro-
vided directly by the City either through City Staff or direct con-
tract with the City by other agencies. In addition, wherever possible,
this report will address the methods by which other service agencies
would provide needed facilities in the area.
II. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES:
The utilities which would be extended into the area proposed to be
annexed would be as part of actual development and they would consist
of the services of the Coachella Valley County Water District in the
area of water and sewer, Southern California Edison Company in the
area of electricity, Southern California Gas Company in the area of
gas, General Telephone Company in the area of telephone, and Able
Cable in the area of cable television. The services provided by this
city directly would be in planning and building, public works, parks,
administration and code enforcment services. By contract the City
would also provide for trash disposal , police and fire services.
Public transportation would be provided by the Sunline Agency.
The major road improvements would include the extension and improve-
ment of Monterey Avenue along the west side of the site. Country Club
Drive which borders the site on the south, would be improved. The
creation of any local streets would be on the basis of a specific
project and would be the responsibility of the developer.
Ultimate development of the subject annexation and adjacent properties
will necessitate a bridge crossing at the Monterey Avenue crossing of
the Whitewater Stormwater Channel . This facility would be constructed
with a combination of federal grants and local participation very
similar to existing bridges in the Valley.
Public park needs in the area to be annexed will partially be fulfilled
by on-site recreational amenities. As a part of this annexation and
subsequent development, the developer is dedicating nine (9) acres (net)
of the site for a public park. Additionally, the developer may pay for
all or a portion of the improvement of the park.
III. LEVEL AND RANGE OF SERVICES:
The level and range of services provided would include sufficient
sized water and sewer, gas, and electrical facilities to service
development proposed for the area. Planning and building, public
works, and code enforcement services as provided by the City directly,
would be on the basis of need. Police and fire services capability
exist to meet the need of the area at its present stage of develop-
ment and are proposed to be expanded to meet the needs of subsequent
development in the area. Public transportation would be provided by
the expansion of the existing system to serve the area. Subsequent
development will result in the need for the City to add an additional
Lo
police vehicle and the need for an additional fire station in the
vicinity of Country Club Drive.
Since fire services are provided on a volunteer basis in conjunction
with the County of Riverside and state Department of Forestry, the
City would be required to provide for a facility in the area which
would be manned by these agencies. A fire station has been planned
for in the City's General Plan in this area and will be provided
at the time it is needed. In addition, said area will be served by
a proposed fire station on the extension of El Paseo, south of 44th
Avenue. In the meantime, the area would be served by the existing
Palm Desert Station at El Paseo and Highway 74 with backup being
provided by the Rancho Mirage, Thousand Palms and Bermuda Dunes
stations. The basic administration services of Planning, Building,
Public Works, and Code Enforcement would be provided by existing
City Staff.
IV. TIMING FOR SERVICE EXTENSIONS:
Basic utility services would occur as a part of development. The
City has on file letters from the various utilities assuring us
that these services would be available. The City services would
be available immediately in the area of planning, building and code
enforcement, public works, and police and fire. Road improvements
would occur as a part of new development. The construction of the
fire station near Country Club Drive would result from the City's
new construction tax which would be accrued from the new development
in the area, which would be .40¢ per square foot. Parks would be
developed in the area under the City's Subdivision Ordinance which
provides for the dedication of land and/or payment of fee for com-
munity facilities and would provide for sites for the fire station
and parks.
The proposed residential development contemplated for the area is a
condominium complex, which would include a majority of necessary
recreational facilities to serve the ultimate residents of the area.
The proposed nine acre park would also provide recreational facilities.
V. REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT AND FINANCING:
New development would be required to extend roads around the area
and to provide for needed sites for fire, parks and other related
municipal facilities provided through the City's Subdivision
Ordinance. The new Construction Tax of .40t per square foot would
provide for construction and additional acquisition of these facili-
ties. The provision of planning and building services would be
provided through the fees generated from new development. On-going
maintenance of roads, created in the area, would be provided on the
basis of Sales Tax generated from commercial facilities in the area.
In summary, it is felt that development of this area would result
in a balance between needed services and the revenues to provide
said services.
RESOLUTION NO. 80-4
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT,
CALIFORNIA, MAKING APPLICATION TO THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION
COMMISSION FOR A CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION KNOWN AS, "PALM
DESERT ANNEXATION NO. 12", PURSUANT TO SECTION 35140 OF THE
STATE GOVERNMENT CODE.
WHEREAS, one hundred percent of the property owners have requested,
by petition, within the area hereafter known as, "Palm Desert Annexation
l No. 12", and more particularly described in the attached map and legal
description; and
WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act has been
complied with, pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 78-32, in that all
responsible agencies have been contacted and a Negative Declaration has
been prepared in conjunction with preannexation zoning considerations; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the proposed change
of organization is appropriate for the following reasons:
1. The request is a logical expansion of the City boundaries.
2. The proposed annexation is consistent with the Municipal
Organization Act of 1977 which encourages limiting the
number of annexations to those areas considered logical
growth areas.
3. The proposed area to be annexed is of satisfactory size
to provide municipal services without adversely affecting
the rest of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Palm Desert, California, as follows:
1. The above recitations are hereby determined to be true
and correct and represent the findings of the Council in
this matter.
2. The City Clerk is hereby instructed to file an official
application with the Local Agency Formation Commission
for Palm Desert Annexation No. 12, pursuant to the Muni-
cipal Organization Act of 1977 for uninhabited territory
since less than twelve registered voters reside in the area.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm
Desert City Council , held on this day of 1979,
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
EDWARD D. MULLINS, Mayor
ATTEST:
SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, City Clerk
City of Palm Desert, California
/lr
Resolution 80-4
Ak
COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE
W
= HOVLEV LANE
W
a
CLANCY
LANE
n 1 r
\V' W W
C �
W =
~ W
z >
O
$ 44 TH a AVENUE '
t
J
O
F
0
O
HIGHWAY 11I
LOCATION MAP
NOT TO SCALE -
PROPOSED PALM DESERT .
CITY LIMIT
N. 89° 40' 12" E.
!V* 1325 . 1 1 O �'
1
W
o n SECTION 5 M
m m T-S-S , R -6-E 9
o S.B. B. M. n °
=�O 39.54 ACRES O E� COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
P.O.8 I�
6 5 1324.96'
- COUNTRY--- 'S.89° 37 30" W��Q CLUB - - DR VE - -
7 8
W
= PALM DESERT CITY LIMIT
RANCHO MIRAGE >
CITY LIMIT
y
x
W
f
O=
L.A .F.C .79-
A.J.D. PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 12
DATE 10 - 15 -79 TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT SCALE i = eoJNO.
IN SECTION 5 T-5-S R-6-E S.B.B.a M. STD. DRAWING
CITY ENGINEER ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF PALM DESERT !'- 12 -A
Resolution 80r4
PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 12
To the City of Palm Desert
County of Riverside
State of California
Annexation Description:
Beginning at a point in the northerly boundary line of the City of Palm
Desert, County of Riverside, State of California , said point being the
common section corner of Sections 5 and 6 and Sections 7 and 8, Township
5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian.
1 . Thence North 01016'48" East along the section line of the afore-
mentioned Sections 6 and 7 a distance of 1 ,328. 36 feet.
2. Thence North 89040' 12" East a distance of 1 ,325.11 feet.
3. Thence South 01017' 17" West a distance of 1 ,327.32 feet.
4. Thence Westerly along the common section line of Sections 7 and 8
to the point of beginning.
Excepting herefrom the southerly 44.00 feet as conveyed to the County of
Riverside by deeds recorded April 28, 1958 as Instrument No. 30640 and
April 29, 1958 as Instrument No. 30961 .
This parcel contains 39. 54 acres more or less.
Ari'LICATION TO THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY
LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
Mail or bring to:
County Administrative Center
4080 Lemon Street, 12th Floor
Riverside, California 92501
FOR IAFC USE ONLY
INTRODUCTION: The questions in this form are designed to obtain enough data about the
proposed project and project site to allow the staff and LAFC to assess the project. You
may include any additional information which you believe is pertinent. Use additional sheets
where necessary. _Do not leave any blanks. If an item is not applicable, so indicate.
Submit this form in one copy.
Applicant CITY OF PALM DESERT (Mayer Group, Inc. and Telephone. (714) 346-0611
81 nvestmen s
Address: 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, Ca 92260
Name & title of person to contact regarding this application:
Martin J. Bouman, City Manager, City of Palm Desert
Address 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, CA 92260 Telephone: Same As Above
PROPOSED PROJECT OR ACTION: Annexation No. 12
GENERAL LOCATION: (Area , cross streets, etc.) Northeast corner of Country Club Drive
and Monterey Avenue.
A . OWNERSHIP
1. Is the applicant a property owner in the area of the proposed project: Yes X No
2. Is the applicant sole owner of this property? Yes X No
B. AREA INFORMATION
1 . Land area in acres 40 ± Acres
2. Number of dwellings in the proposed area at present time -0
3 . Expected increase in the number of dwellings in the proposed area which will result
from this proposal 264 . By what date? 1982 (state type of dwelling
units, e.g. , single family residences, mobile homes .)
6 - plex complexes
4 . Population in the proposed area at the present time -0-
5 . Expected change in the population in the proposed area which will result from this
proposal 530 By when 1982
6. Amount of publicly-owned land in the proposed area (identify as federal , state or
local) 9 acres (net) to be dedicated to City of Palm Desert as part of this
development
7. Assessed value at present time: Land $58,650.
Improvements -0-
8. Number of land parcels in the proposed area one (1)
. o
0. .YOTE'R INFORMATION ~
` 1 . -Number of registered voters in area at the -0-g' present time
2. Does the proposed boundary cut across precinct boundaries ? Unknown
3. Does the proposed boundary cut across tax rate areas ? Unknown
D. LAND USE
1 . Current zoning R-1, 12,000 (Riverside County)
2. Pre-zoning (Assigned by cities only) PR-7 (U.A.) Presently Proposed
3 . Current land use Vacant Land
4. County General Plan designation Very Low Density Residential (Max. 3 d.u./ac. )
5. City General Plan designation Park site and Medium Density Residential (5-7 d.u./ac. )
6. Is the proposal in consonance with the City '4021114W General Plans 'M
7. Probable or proposed land use for next five years -- include known or probable plans
for development (Submit any available plans) 264 Unit Condominium Complex
E. DETAILS OF YOUR PROPOSAL
1 . Describe the proposed project in as much detail as possible. Identify the project,
including annexations to, detachments from, or formation of new entities (use
additional sheets if necessary) Annexation No. 12 would annex approximately
40 ± acres at the Northeast corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue to
the City of Palm Desert under the statutory provisions of the Municipal Organization
Act of 1977.
a . The reasons which justify this proposal are as follows: (for example -- service
needs, health mandate, economic benefits , etc.) Property owners of proposed
annexation would receive higher level of service obtainable from the City;
proposed expansion is a logical expansion of the City limits.
1). Specific services to be added, changed, or eliminated:_ (See attached plan
for services)
(1) Without additional cost to residents/owners:
(2) With additional cost to residents/owners:
2 . Will the project be subject to existing bonded indebtedness ? No.
3 . What will be the approximate annual costs to accomplish the goals of this proposal?
$4,000 per annum
4 . What are the specific sources of revenue to pay for the service(s) ? State
subventions, sales tax, new construction tax.
(2)
a . wnot is annual cost to eacn resicent/property uwner (specify which) None;
rnctc will hp , ,ounted for by revenue sources .icated in item 4-above
F. PROPERTY OWNERS' DESIRES
1 . How many property owners make up total ownership of project area ? (Include with thi:
application copies of all letters/correspondence you have relating to above items)
� 1
2 . How manproperty
Y owners have been contacted regarding project?4 9 P 7 ct . 1
3 . How many property owners are in favor of project? 1
4 . How many property owners are not in favor of project? -0-
G. FOR -LIGHTING DISTRICTS AND ROAD MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS ONLY
1 . If street lights will be installed, how many, *what type (mercury or sodium) and what
intensity (e.g. , 7000 lumen)? . N.A.
2 . Is approved plan by utility company for street lights submitted at this time? N.A.
(Approved plan must be submitted before energy charges will be'assumed by Service
Area) .
)
3. If road maintenance district, how many miles of road to maintain? N.A.
4 . Is it your intention to bring any roads to County standards for future acceptance into
the County Maintained Road System? N.A.
H.- PLAN OF SERV
ICE ICE (City Annexations only)
A plan for providing services within the affected territory must be submitted with this
application. Use separate sheets . .
I. In your own words , how would your proposal benefit the community? The proposed
annexation represents a logical expansion of the present city limits. The City is.
in a position to offer future residents a higher level of community and public services.
NOTICES AND COMMUNICATIONS -- List below the names and addresses of people to
whom notices and communications should be directed. (3 maximum)
Name City of Palm Desert Attn: Martin J. Bouman Telephone (714) 346-0611
Address 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane City & Zip Palm Desert 92260
Name Mayer Group, Inc.' Attn: Michael A. Mohler Telephone (213) 927-3341
Address 8121 E. Florence Avenue City & Zip Downey, Ca 90240
Name B & J Investments, Attn: G.A. Bernard
Telephone (714) 454-9136
Address 7113 Fay St. City & Zip La Jolla, CA 92037
Signature of applicant or authorized
representative
Martin J. Bou man
Typed or printed name
City Manager
Title
(3)
r �
RESOLUTION NO. 80-85
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNEXING CERTAIN
CONTIGUOUS TERRITORY TO SAID CITY UNDER THE
PROVISIONS OF THE MUNICIPAL ORGANIZATION ACT
OF 1977 , WHICH PROCEEDINGS ARE DESIGNATED AS
ANNEXATION NO. 12 .
WHEREAS , the City Council did, by Resolution No. 80-4,
adopted on January 24, 1980 , initiate annexation proceedings for
Annexation No . 12; and
WHEREAS, the Local Agency Formation Commission held a
Public Hearing relative to Annexation No . 12 on June 12, 1980 ,
and approved said annexation with the recommendation that the
City Council of the City of Palm Desert be authorized to proceed
without notice and hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Palm Desert , California, as follows :
1 . That the territory described in Exhibits "A" and
"B" attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference , be , and
the same is hereby, by this Resolution, annexed to the City of
Palm Desert .
2 . That the City Clerk is hereby instructed and directed
to transmit a certified copy of this Resolution to LAFCO along with
any other required submittals .
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 10th day of July
1980, by the following vote, to wit :
AYES : McPherson, Newbrander, Puluqi , Snyder & Wilson
NOES : None
ABSENT : None
ABSTAIN : None
17
S . 'RJOY�WIL�N, MAYOR
ATTEST:
SHEILA R. GI-ELIGAN, CITx CLERK
City of Palm Desert, (d ifornia
/dj
I
i
LAFCO 9480-13-4 Resolution 80-85
PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 12
To the City of Palm Desert
County of Riverside
State of California
ANNEXATION DESCRIPTION:
Beginning at a point in the northerly boundary line of the City of Palm
Desert, County of Riverside, State of California, said point being the
common section corner of Sections 5 and 7 and Sections 7 and 8, Township
5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian.
1 . Thence North 01016'48" East along the west section line of the said
Section 6 a distance of 1 ,328.36 feet.
2. Thence North 89040'12" East a distance of 1 ,325.11 feet.
3. Thence South 01017' 17" West a distance of 1 ,327.32 feet.
4. Thence Westerly along the common section line of Sections 5 and 8
to the point of beginning.
This parcel contains 39.54 acres more or less.
I
Revision #1
March 18, 1980
i
THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION APPROVED
26�/990 BY RI'vZRSIDE
JCOUNTY S'URV YOR.
BY
EXHIBIT "A"
RESOLUTION NO. 80-85
j Exhibit V
COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE
W
z NOVLEY LANE -
m
4 -
CLANCY -
LANE
m >w
s �
W
- > -'
- 44 TN AVENUE
O
NIONWAY A. III -
_ -- - LOCATION MAP -
- - NOT TO SCALE.
PROPOSED PALM DESERT _ - -
CITY LIMIT.
• �_ _ N. S9- 4_0' 12" E.
132 S. It ' r -
. " SW. 1/4 -SW. 1/4 ;
SE CT TON 5
- e v T-5-S I R-6-E
e S.B. B. M. n e
39.54 ACRES C j° COUNTY OF .RIVERSIDE - -
P.O.a : �
6 5 1324.96' '0
COUNTRY--- .* T
a S.89° 37 30 1YT CLUB DRIVE-
7
RANCHO MIR4G �
= PALM DESERT CITY LIMIT - -
E - ' W - ..
a
CITY LIMIT
THIS MAP APPROVED!//�i Ze
BY RIVERSIDE COUNTY SURVEYOR
L.A .F.C .
A.Q.D. PRO PO SED ANNEXATION NO. 12
DATE i0 -I5 -79 TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT SCALE I"= 800'
IN SECTION 5 T-5-S R-6-E S.B-$.a M STD. DR1 rA�tlVING NO.
CITY ENGINEER ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF PALM DESERT
o�r4�wl4r Nn.to
4 �+
RESOLUTION NO. 80-85
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNEXING CERTAIN
CONTIGUOUS TERRITORY TO SAID CITY UNDER THE
PROVISIONS OF THE MUNICIPAL ORGANIZATION ACT
OF 1977 , WHICH gR@CEEDINGS ARE DESIGNATED AS
ANNEXATION-NO. 12 .
l
WHEREAS , the City Council did, by Resolution No. 80-4,
adopted on January 24, 1980 , initiate annexation proceedings for
Annexation No . 12 ; and
WHEREAS, the Local Agency Formation Commission held a
Public Hearing relative to Annexation No . 12 on June 12, 1980 ,
and approved said annexation with the recommendation that the
City Council of the City of Palm Desert be authorized to proceed
without notice and hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Palm Desert , California, as follows :
1 . That the territory described in Exhibits "A" and
"B" attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference , be, and
the same is hereby, by this Resolution, annexed to the City of
Palm Desert .
2 . That the City Clerk is hereby instructed and directed
to transmit a certified copy of this Resolution to LAFCO along with
( any other required submittals .
i PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of
l 1980 , by the following vote, to wit :
AYES :
NOES :
ABSENT :
ABSTAIN:
S . ROY WILSON , MAYOR
ATTEST:
SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, CITY CLERK
City of Palm Desert , California
/dj
i
LAFCO #80-13-4 Resolution 80-85
PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 12
To the City of Palm Desert
County of Riverside
State of California
ANNEXATION DESCRIPTION:
Beginning at a point in the northerly boundary line of the City of Palm
Desert, County of Riverside, State of California, said point being the
common section corner of Sections 5 and 7 and Sections 7 and 8, Township
5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian.
1 . Thence North 01016'48" East along the west section line of the said
Section 6 a distance of 1 ,328.36 feet.
2. Thence North 89040' 12" East a distance of 1 ,325.11 feet.
3. Thence South 01017' 17" West a distance of 1 ,327.32 feet.
4. Thence Westerly along the common section line of Sections 5 and 8
to the point of beginning.
This parcel contains 39.54 acres more or less.
Revision #1
March 18, 1980
I
THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION APPROVED
C lVm. lyi ?6z /990 BY Ra'vaRSIDE
COUNTY SURIV-ZOR.
BY e a-
EXHIBIT "A"
RESOLUTION NO. 80-85
Exhibit "B"
COUNTRY / CLUB DRIVE
W
�.
z NOVLEY LANE -
at
- CLANCY
LANE
W Y
a �
W _
44 TN AVENUE
O
z
O
NIDNWAY a I.l ..
LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE,
PROPOSED PALM DESERT_` - - -
CITY LIMIT \ -
_LN °_40, 12- E.
I32 S. is
W SW. I/4 -SW. 1/4 � ;
SECTION 5 '
o m T-5-S , R-6-E
e n S.B. S. M. -
it� 39.54 ACRES C 10 _ COUNTY Of RIVERSIDE
P,O.B
6 5 Iaz4 ,9e' 40 - -
- COUNTRY--- �; T 5.09° 37 !O 'br— CLUlB — DRIVE
RANCHO MIRAGE Wf - PALM . DESERT CITY .LIMIT -
CITY LIMIT a
THIS MAP APPROVED -//� Zo"/qBo
BY RIVERSIDE COUNTY SURVEYOR
h
I'
L.A .F.C .
A.A.E. PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 12 �
DATE 10 - �5 -73 70 THE CCITYY OF PALM DESERT SCALESCALE 1 = 800*
IN SECTION 5 1 -5-S R-6-E� S.S. B.a M STD. DRAWING NO.
ENGINEER
, L- 112 -A
CITY ENGINEER ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY Of PALM DESERT
ow r�.�ixr wreo
LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER
4080 ,Lemon Street, 12th Floor E C E }, V E
Riverside, California 92501
JUN 5 1980
PUBLIC HEARING
Thursday, June 12, 1980 PALM' DESERT CITY HALL
9:00 A.M. CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
Board of Supervisors' Meeting Room
Riverside, California
AGENDA
1. Call to Order and. Salute to the. Flaq.
2. Approval of Minutes of May 8, 1980.
3. HEARINGS:
Consent Item: .
a. LAFCO #,80-12-5--Annexation #1 to County Service Area #48
New Items:
b. LAFCO #80-08-2--Annexation to Rubidoux Community Services District
C. LAFCO #80-09-3--Anne emet
d. #80-1 -4--Annexation #12 to City of Palm esert
e. LAFCO #80-14-1--Detachment #1 from County Service rea #124
4. Possible Hearings for July 10, 1980.
5. Adjournment.
LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION E (; i g
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER
4080 Lemon Street, 12th Floor J UN 198U
Riverside, California 92501
PALM GESERI CITY HALL
June 4, 1980 CITY CL Ehi4.'S OFFIC
TO: Local Agency Formation Commission 1a1�
FROM: Howard L. Powell , LAFCO Planner
SUBJECT: LAFCO #80-13-4--Annexation #12 to City of Palm Desert
PROPOSAL:
This is a proposal to annex approximately 40 acres to the City of Palm Desert.
SUBMITTED BY:
The City of Palm Desert.
LEGAL REQUIREMENTS:.
This proposal has met all requirements of the law. The map and legal description
were approved by the County Surveyor on March 26, 1980. The Planning Director
filed a Negative Declaration and the appeal period ended on May 20, 1980. There
were no appeals.
POPULATION:
Population is zero.
LAND USE:
Current zoning is R-1 (Single—family Residential ) . Prop6sed new zoning (City) is
PR-7 (Planned Residential , 7 units to the acre) .
ASSESSED VALUATION:
The 1979-80 roll shows assessed valuation at $58,650.
COMMENTS:
This proposal by the City of Palm Desert to annex approximately 40 acres northeasterly
of the intersection of Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue, was requested of the
City by the Mayer Group, Inc. , and B & J Investments. The .application states that the
above two parties are sole owners , however, there has been no documentation submitted
verifying that fact.
uauueld OOdVI
nLl
Y Il/aM�od •l PJPM IN
v//Uj,•rJIYID�I
°paggtwgns ktpjgoadsaa
-RgLaoq;ne 6uL,onpuoo se pag2u5Lsap aq g.aasaO wLrd
10 figLO agg gegg pue pano.adde aq g.aasaO wL2d do FgLO aqg 04 M uoL}2xauuV gegl
:NOIIVONNWOOTa
•paggLwgns uaaq seq aoLn,aas 40 u2[d agenbape uV
•u2ld Le.aauag S A Q agg g4LM aoueuosuoo uL sL Iesodoud
agg pue g,aasaO wLed Jo k4 Q aqg }o aouanlguL 40 aaagds ayg ULg4LM sL R4.aadoud aql
•Z861 aeaR aqg Fq saLLLweg tqZ aoj swnLuLw0pu03 xald-.g Aoj pasodoud sL lgaadoid aql
Z abed
0861 It aunp
b-£I-08# OOiVI
I
LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER
4080 ,Lemon Street, 12th Floor 1b E C �_.
Riverside, California 92501 _Tk
1IN :> 1080
PUBLIC HEARING
Thursday, June 12, 1980 PALM DESERT CITY HIALI_
9:00 A.M. CITY CL ERK'S 0?"FIC'::
Board of Supervisors' Meeting Room
Riverside, California
AGENDA
1. Call to Order and. Salute to the. Flag.
2. Approval of Minutes of May 8, 1980.
3. HEARINGS:
Consent Item: .
a. LAFCO #,80-12-5--Annexation #1 to County Service Area #48
New Items:
b.. LAFCO #80-08-2--Annexation to Rubidoux Community Services District
C. LAFCO no-09-3--Annexation #73 to City of Hemet
d. LAFCO #80-13-4--Annexation #12 to City of Palm Desert
e. LAFCO #80-14-1--Detachment #1 from County Service Area #124
4. Possible Hearings for July 10, 1980.
5. Adjournment.
I
LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 4 g
COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER
4080 Lemon Street, 12th Floor `
Riverside, California 92501 ]030
June 4, 1980 CITY ! ..
TO: Local Agency Formation Commission
FROM: Howard L. Powell , LAFCO Planner
SUBJECT: LAFCO r80-13-4--Annexation #12 to City of Palm Desert
PROPOSAL:
This is a proposal to annex approximately 40 acres to the City of Palm Desert.
SUBMITTED BY:
The City of Palm Desert.
LEGAL REQUIREMENTS:.
This proposal has met all requirements of the law. The map and legal description
were approved by the County Surveyor on March 26, 1980. The Planning Director
filed a Negative Declaration and the appeal period ended on May 20, 1980. There
were no appeals.
POPULATION:
Population is zero.
LAND USE:
Current zoning is R-1 (Single-family Residential ) . Proposed new zoning (City) is
PR-7 (Planned Residential , 7 units to the- acre) .
ASSESSED VALUATION:
The 1979-80 roll shows assessed valuation at $$58,650.
COMMENTS:
This proposal by the City of Palm Desert to annex approximately 40 acres northeasterly
of the intersection of Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue, was requested of the
City by the Mayer Group, Inc. , and B & J Investments. The .application states that the
above two parties are sole owners, however, there has been no documentation submitted
verifying that fact.
r r
C
LAFCO #80-13-4
June 4, 1980
Page 2
The property is proposed for 6-plex condominiums for 264 families by the year 1932.
The property is within the sphere of influence of the City of Palm Desert and the
proposal is in consonance with the City' s General Plan.
An adequate Plan of service has been submitted.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Annexation =12 to the City of Palm Desert be approved and that the City of
Palm Desert be designated as conducting authority.
Respectfully submitted,
oward L. Powe �
LAFCO Planner
CITY OF PALM DESERT
STAFF REPORT
To: Planning Commission
Report on: Preannexation Zoning and Related Development Plan
Applicant: Mayer Group, Inc. , 8121 E. Florence Avenue, Downey,
CA 90240
Case No(s) : C/Z 09-79 and DP 15-79 (Upon Annexation)
Date: December 4, 1979
I. REQUEST:
Request for approval of a Change of Zone from R-1, 12,000 (Riverside County Zone)
to PR-7 (U.A. ) (Planned Residential District, max. 7 d.u./ac. ) (Upon
Annexation) or other zone as deemed appropriate, and approval of a
Planned Residential Development to allow construction of 264 condominium
units and a nine acre public park on 39.1 gross acres, located at the
northeast corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey Drive.
LOCATIONAL MAP:
r c/z o9-7
� , e,< < , u•I. IU
3nn.a.3Y-11�6LI63 rP�.>C-,3
Q
W
ti
II . BACKGROUND:
A. ADJACENT ZONING:
North: Riverside County, R-T (Mobile Home Zoning)
South: P.C. (2)
East: Riverside County, R-T (Mobile Home Zoning)
West: Rancho Mirage
B. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION:
Park Site and Medium Density Residential , 5-7 d .u./ac.
C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT:
The Director of Environmental Services has determined that the pro-
posed project will not have a significant adverse impact on the
environment and a Negative Declaration has been prepared.
STAFF REPORT
December 4, 1979 Page -2-
D. PERIMETER TREATMENT:
- Dedication and improvement of Monterey and Country Club Drives.
- Wind/(Interim) Blowsand protection on the north and west boundaries.
I
E. CONCEPTUAL PLAN FEATURES:
1. Access - internal private street system with one entrance to
Monterey Drive and one to Country Club Drive.
2. Density - 264 dwelling units on 39. 1 gross acres = 6.75 d.u./ac.
3. Dwelling Description - modules of six units from one bedroom, two
bath to two bedroom, two bath and den; one to two stories.
4. Open Space/Recreational Amenities -
- 9 acre park site
- 8 swimming/recreation areas within the residential portion of
the project
- Calculated open space, 59.69% of the net site.
5. Parking Provided -
- covered, 568 spaces
- bay, 42 spaces
- street, 99 spaces
III . DISCUSSION:
A. ZONING/DESIGN CONSIDERATION: .
The subject request for preannexation zoning is accompanied by the
required plan of development. In this instance, considerations for
the Change of Zone and conceptual Development Plan overlap, because
the density requested is at the high end of range provided by the
General Plan.
Each new residential development in the City is subject to payment of
fees for park and recreation purposes , and/or dedication of land if
the project site is located in an area designated in the General Plan
for a future park facility. Typically, the payment of fees on raw
land dedication does not satisfy the objective for providing a full
range of recreation amenities for specific project occupants. Public
park facilities are not intended to satisfy the needs of any specific
project, but rather the community as a whole.
Reviewing the subject cases, the following is observed:
• The General Plan depicts a park site on the subject property, for
which dedication is required per the Subdivision Ordinance formula ,
with reservation for public acquisition of the balance.
e The Development Plan proposes dedication of a 9 acre (net) park site.
• As provided by the Zoning Ordinance, the park site in this project is
proposed to be used to satisfy a portion of the common open space
required of developments in the Planned Residential zone.
• Since the overall site density is proposed at the high end of the
range provided by the General Plan, and because 5 acres of usable
open space is contained in the park site, the resulting conceptual
design of the residential use portion of the site reduces opportunity
to provide a full range of recreational and open space amenities.
The conceputal design is, therefore, dependent upon the park site to
provide some of these amenities.
With the above in mind, it is the Staff's position that the proposed
density and design is justifiable with the park site being developed
along with the project construction. A less acceptable alternative
would be to reduce the density and redesign the project to contain a
complete amenities package, and only dedicate land. The proposed project
with the park being developed at the level indicated on the site
plan would appear to be an acceptable "trade-off".
STAFF REPORT
December 4, 1979 Page -3-
B . CONCEPTUAL PLAN:
The residential plan, while being "tightly" arranged, creates a
unique onclave of units with courtyard access. The internal street
system connects project entrances on Monterey Drive and Country Club
Drive. Driveways off these streets lead to parking courts which
serve two building groups containing six dwelling units each. The
site plan satisfies the City objective for providing variety and
imagination in housing types.
C. CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS:
The architectural elevations submitted show a movement in building
planes and vertical relief with two-story elements. Predominant
materials are stucco walls and the roofs.
D. PROJECT "ACCESS:
Access to the project on Country Club Drive must be reconciled with
the McBail property to the south. Country Club Drive is planned to
contain a raised center median island, therefore, left turn lanes and
median breaks will need to be coordinated.
E. DESIGN REVIEW:
The Design Review Board viewed the conceptual plans as a discussion
item on the November 27, 1979, agenda, but had no specific comments on
the project design.
.F. FIRE MARSHAL RESPONSE:
The Fire Marshal has forwarded an initial recommendation of project
denial , based on the present response time to the site from existing
facilities. This situation would change in the future when additional
facilities are constructed, but at the present time it points the need
to associate the actual construction of major new projects with faci_li.-
ties being "on line" and a reasonable response time being achieved (a
Special Condition addresses this subject) . A future fire station is
planned at Cook Street and Country Club Drive.
IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the justification contained in the draft Resolution:
Recommend approval to the City Council of Case Nos C/Z 09-79 and DP 15-79
(Upon Annexation) by adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. ,
subject to conditions.
e
f
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE
CITY COUNCIL OF A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM R-1 12,000
(RIVERSIDE COUNTY ZONE) TO PR-7 (U.A. ) AND A PLANNED
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF 264
CONDOMINIUM UNITS AND A NINE ACRE PARK, LOCATED AT THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND MONTEREY
DRIVE.
CASE NOS. DP 15-79 and C/Z 09-79
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert,
California, did on the 4th day of December, 1979, hold a duly noticed
Public Hearing to consider a request by MAYER GROUP, INC. for approval
of a Change of Zone from R-1 12,000 (Riverside County Zone) to PR-7
(U.A. ) (Planned Residential District, max. 7 d.u./ac. ) (Upon Annexation)
or other zone as deemed appropriate, and approval of a Planned Residential
Development to allow construction of 264 condominium units and a nine
acre public park on 39.1 gross acres, located at the northeast corner
of Country Club Drive and Monterey Drive, more particularly described as:
APN 620-180-003
WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements
of the City of Palm Desert "Environmental Quality Procedure, Resolution
No. 7832," in that the Director of Environmental Services has determined
that this project will not have a significant adverse effect on the
environment and a Negative Declaration has been prepared; and,
WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering
the testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring
to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts to
justify their recommendations and actions as described below:
1. Change of Zone:
a. The land use resulting from the Change of Zone
would be compatible with adjacent existing and
proposed land uses.
b. The density resulting from the Change of Zone
would be compatible with densities permitted
in the adjacent areas.
C. The proposed Change of Zone would be compatible
with the adopted Palm Desert General Plan.
2. Development Plan:
a. That proposed development Plan is consistent with
the City's adopted General Plan.
b. The proposed use is similar to and compatible
with those contemplated on nearby properties.
C. The design or improvement of the proposed develop-
ment will be consistent with the Palm Desert
Zoning Ordinance.
d. The site is physically suited for both the type of
development proposed and the proposed density.
e. The design of the development and the proposed
improvements are not likely to cause substantial
environmental damage or have a serious effect on
the public health, safety, or general welfare.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. Page -2-
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of
the City of Palm Desert, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct and
constitute the findings of the Commission in these cases;
2. That the Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the
City Council approval of a Change of Zone from R-1 12,000
(Riverside County Zone) to PR-7, S.P. (U.A. ) (Planned
Residential , max. 7 d.u./ac. , Scenic Preservation
Overlay) (Upon Annexation to the City of Palm Desert) , as
shown on the attached map lebeled Exhibit "A".
3. That the Planning Commission does hereby recommend to
the City Council approval of the overall conceptual
Development Plan (Exhibit "B") as part of their consider-
ation of the related Change of Zone, subject to those
conditions labeled Exhibit "C", attached hereto.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm
Desert Planning Commission, held on this 4th day of December, 1979, by
the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
WALTER SNYDER, Chairman
ATTEST:
PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary
R- 1 12,000
TO
m. P,R.-71 S. P.
co
N
M10
COUNTY OF �1324.56� RIVERSIDE
78 .. .. -C6CN'fi'RY--CLttB--BRttt� -
CITY OF CITY OF
RANCHO MIRAGE PALM DESERT
w
CITY OF PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION
c� 'A'`�?cc-M u " "� `� RESOLUTION NO.
d; C�� ED �� �, DATE
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. Page -1-
EXHIBIT "C"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
CASE NO. DP 15-79
Standard Conditions:
1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with Exhibit
A (Case No. DP 15-79) on file with the Department of Environmental
Services, as modified by the following conditions.
2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of
any uses contemplated by this approval , the applicant shall first
complete all the procedural requirements of the City which include,
but are not limited to, Design Review, Subdivision process, and building
permit procedures.
3. Construction of the total development may be done in phases; however,
each individual phase shall meet or exceed all Municipal Code require-
ments to the degree that the City could consider each phase as a
single project.
4. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one
year from the date of final approval otherwise said approval shall
become null , void and of no effect whatsoever.
5. Prior to the issuance of any City permits for the commencement of
construction on said project, the applicant shall agree in writing to
these Conditions of Approval .
6. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to
the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in additions
to all municipal ordinances and State and Federal Statutes now in force,
or which hereafter may be in force.
7. All existing electrical distribution lines, telephone, cable antenna
television, and similar service wires or cables, which are adjacent
to the property being developed shall be installed underground as a
part of development from the nearest existing pole not on the property
being developed.
8. All requirements of the City Fire Marshal shall be met as part of the
development of this project per attached letter dated November 27,
1979 (as listed in items 1 through 7) .
9. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City Fire
Marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall
be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall
be issued until completed.
10. Traffic control provisions shall be provided as required by the Director
of Public Works.
11. Curb, gutter, sidewalk or approved pathways, and tie-in paving shall be
provided in conformance with City Standards and/or as required by the
Director of Public Works.
12. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use
contemplated by this approval , the applicant shall first obtain permits
and/or clearance from the following agencies:
Riverside County Department of Health
Palm Desert Design Review Board Process
City Fire Marshal
Coachella Valley County Water District
Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be
presented to the Dept. of Building and Safety at the time of issuance
of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith.
13. No development shall occur on the subject property prior to the record-
ation of a tract map.
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO.
EXHIBIT "C" S% Page -2-
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
1. That the 9 acre (net) park site shown on Exhibit "B" shall be
dedicated to the City of Palm Desert as a part of any final sub-
division map; and, shall be developed in accordance with a plan
approved by the Planning Commission prior to final occupancy
permit being granted for the last 50% of the dwelling units
contemplated in this approval .
2. A detailed plan of park development shall be submitted to the
Design Review Board and City Park and Recreation Commission for
recommendation to the Planning Commission, prior to approval of
final construction drawings for the dwelling units. As a part
of the review of this plan the level of developer participation
in the improvements to the park site shall be defined.
3. Plans submitted for the Design Review process shall reconcile
entrance location and median island design with property entrances
on the south side of Country Club Drive.
AGREEMENT
I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval , to comply with
all the conditions set forth, and understand that the Department of Building
and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on the use
permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department
or Environmental Services.
Date Applicant's Signature
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. Page -3-
EXNIBIT "C"
«A..
F DEPARTMENT OF FIRE PROTECTION
IN COOPERATION WITH THE
COUNTS' Jr� CALIFORNIA DIVISION OF FORESTRY
C
RIVERSIDE .i;.; DAVID L. FLAKE
COUNTY FIRE WARDEN P.O. Rox 248
� 210 WEST SAN JA CIN TD STREET
PERRIS, CALIFORNIA 92370
TELEPHONE (7T4) 657-3103
November 27, 1979
Paul A. Williams
Director of Environmental Services
City of Palm Desert
45-275 Prickly Pear Lane
Palm Desert, Ca. 92260
Re: Case No : DP 15-79
Dear Mr. Williams,
We request denial of this project for the following reasons :
1. This development is beyond the 5 minute response limit for
existing stations.
2. A development of this size will have substantial impact on
our already overtaxed fire protection system.
Should this development be approved, the following requirements shall
apply.
David J. Ortegel
Fire Marshal
DJO:dt
Attachment
i
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. Page -4-
EXHIBIT "C"
Re: Case No: DP 15-79
Prior to construction of any of the proposed buildings, the following conditions
must be met:
1. Install a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow for a two (2)
hour duration in addition to domestic or other supply. The computation shall
be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply
main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement.
2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building
is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular
travel ways.
A. Hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building.
B. Exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome
yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green.
C. Curbs (if installed) , shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction
from each hydrant.
3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original
and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review.
Upon approval , one copy will be sent to the Building Department, and the original
will be returned to the developer.
4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, and approved
by the water company, with the following certification : "I certify that the
design of the water system in Case Number DP 15-79 is in accordance with the
requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal . "
5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required
water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow.
6. Interior street shall be a minimum of 28' excepting streets less than 150' in
length may have a width of 24' .
7. Any cul-de-sac street greater than 150' in length shall have a turn-around.
n l:a T•G ,..ls.bi:.y^k}�'. y ...f... '/' _ i::J.7. . . .. .. '-. _.l .. a .. '.
COUNTY ESTABLISHED IN 1918 AS A PUBLIC AGENCY
�TSTRI�T
COACHELLA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
POST OFFICE BOX 1058 • COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA 92236 • TELEPHONE (714) 398-2651
DIRECTORS OFFICERS
RAYMOND R, RUMMONDS, PRESIDENT LOWELL O. WEEKS,GENERAL MANAGER-OIIEF ENGINEER
TELLIS COOEKAS,VICE PRESIDENT BERNARDINE SIfT , SECRETARY
C. J. FROST DENNIS M. HACKETT. AUDITOR
WILLIAM D. GARDNER REDWINE AND SIIERRILL, ATTORNEYS
STEVE D. BUXTON
November 26, 1979 File: 0163. 11
o421 . 1
0721 . 1
Dept. of Environmental
Services
City 'of Palm Desert
P. 0. Box 1977
Palm Desert , California 92260
Re: Change of Zone 09-79 and
D. P. 15-79
Sblz, Sec. 5, T5S, RISE
Gentlemen:
This area is protected from stormwater flows by the Whitewater River
Stormwater Channel and may be considered safe from stormwater flows
except in rare instances .
The District will furnish domestic water and sanitation service to said
area in accordance with the currently prevailing regulations of this
District.
The District will need additional facilities to provide for the orderly
expansion of its domestic water system. These facilities may include
wells, reservoirs and booster pumping stations. The developer will be
required to provide land on which some of these facilities will be
located. These sites shall be shown on the tract map as lots to be deeded
to the District for such purpose.
There may be conflicts with existing District facilities . We request
the appropriate public agency to withhold the issuance of a building
permit until arrangements have been made with the District for the
relocation of these facilities. j
Very ly your, , /
z
Lot Y �'
General Man ger- r.nl nee r
DBP:je
cc: Riverside County Dept.
of Public Health/Indio
i
4
3 �
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Agas ICOMPANY
3700 CENTRAL AVENUE • RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA
R.W.RIDDELL
Eastern Dmsian
Meiling Address P.O. BOX 2200, RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 92516
Distribution Planning Supervisor
November. 23, 1979
Location of Nearest Gas Main:
In Country Club Drive _
City of Palm Desert
45-275 Prickly Pear Lane
Palm Desert, CA. 92260
Re: Case No. C/Z 09-79 & DP 15-79 .
This letter is not to be interpreted as a contractual commitment to
serve the proposed project; but only as an information service. Its
intent is to notify you that the Southern California Gas Company has
facilities in the area where the above named project is proposed. Gas
service to the project could be provided from an existing main without
any significant impact on the environment. The service would be in
accordance with the Company's policies and extension rules on file with
the California Public Utilities Commission at the time contractual
arrangements are made.
The availability of natural gas service , as set forth in this letter,
is based upon present conditions of cas supply and regulatory policies.
As a public utility, the Southern California Gas -Company is under the
jurisdiCtIon of the California Public Utilities Commission. We can
also be affected by actions of federal regulatory agencies. Should
these agencies take any action which affects gas supply or the condition
under ahich service is available, gas service will be provided in accordance
with revised conditions.
We have developed several programs which are available, upon request, to
provide assistance in selecting the most effective applications of energy
conservation techniques for a particular project. If you desire further
information on any of our energy conservation programs , please contact
this office for assistance.
1
e,,�, �, RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
COUNTY,�
< -1 �A { PLANNING COMMISSION
�- 'R IVERS%DE nri.n'
ELMER M.KATZENSTEIN,Chairman,Rubidoux
KAY S.CENICEROS,Hemet DAVID W. TER BEST, Calimesa
JESS E.LILLIBRIDGE,Corona RUSSELL E.CAMPBELL,Blythe
KAY H.OLESEN,Palm Desert MARION V.ASHLEY.Perris
PATRICIA NEMETH — A.I.P. — PLANNING DIRECTOR
4080 LEMON STREET,9th FLOOR, RIVERSIDE.CALIFORNIA 92501
November 14, 1979 Indio Administrative Center
46-209 Oasis Street, Room 304
JLL:7077DO Indio, California 92201
(714) 342-8277
Paul A. Williams
Director of Environmental Services
City pf Palm Desert
45-275 Prickly Pear Lane
Palm Desert, CA 92260
RE: DP 15-79
Dear Paul :
We have completed our review of the subject development. The following comments are
provided:
1 . The Cove Communities General Plan designates this area as Very Low Density Resi-
dential with a maximum density of three dwelling units per acre. Major projects
in this area under review by the County are maintaining an average density of
three units per acre. We believe the proposed density to be too great.
2. Your transmittal reflects County zoning as R-1-1200. This is incorrect. Zoning
is R-1-12,000. This zone requires a 12,000 sq. ft. lot and limits development to
1 single family units.
3. Section 18.5 of the County Zoning Ordinance establishes planned residential develop-
ment standards. We have enclosed a copy of those standards. We find the project
deficient under those standards. Specifically, (a) No subdivision map proposed,
(b) Density appears to exceed standard; 40% open area calculated on net project
area may not be met, (c) Setbacks not consistent to standard, (d) Structures not
consistent with zone limitation, i .e. , R-1 clusters not to exceed two units,
I (e) Trash enclosures not provided, and (f) Substandard parking.
4. Recreational areas adjacent to street would appear to require some lighting for
usage. The review package does not indicate method or restrictions to prevent
conflict to adjacent residences or streets.
5. Streets within the project are substandard to County allowable private streets
(36 ft. major interior and 32 ft. minor interior) .
6
1
Paul A. Williams November 14, 1979
DP 15-79
Page 2.
6. No indication has been made as to right of way along Monterey or Country Club.
The County Circulation Element classes both streets as Arterial Highways (110 ft.
R/W).
7. Other concerns:
a. Water services
b. Sewer provision
C. Traffic/Circulation - signalization potentials
d. Air Resources - effects on quality
e. Energy Conservation/Impacts
f. Population - effects on schools
g. Blowsand hazard
h. Archaeology
We believe an E.I.R. should be required before final review or approval , further, we
believe a redesign to be required to reduce densities. Should the City annex the
project area, we would suggest density be restricted to 4 - 4.5 units per acre gross
to insure transition from the more high urban city density to the lower, more rural
density required by the County.
We request that suggested conditions for approval be supplied to us when available.
We appreciate the opportunity to review the proposal . We look forward to continued
planning cooperation.
Very truly yours,
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Patricia Nemeth, A.I .P. - Planning Director
Johir L. Libiez - Associa a Planner
JLL:mj
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
City of Palm Desert
7FUROM:
Director of Public Works
Director of Environmental Services
CT: Annexation No. 12 DATE: October 9, 1979
Please are re Annexation Description and Proposed Annexation
prepare P P
Map for Annexation No. 12. Attached is the petition for Annexa-
tion describing the property.
Should you have any questions, contact Stan at Extension 52.
PAUL A. WILLIAMS
PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 12
To the City of Palm Desert
County of Riverside
State of California
Annexation Description:
Beginning at a point in the northerly boundary line of the City of Palm
Desert, County of Riverside, State of California, said point being the
common section corner of Sections 5 and 6 and Sections 7 and 8, Township
5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian.
1 . Thence North 01016'48" East along the section line of the afore-
mentioned Sections 6 and 7 a distance of 1 ,328.36 feet.
2. Thence North 89040' 12" East a distance of 1 ,325.11 feet.
3. Thence South 01017' 17" West a distance of 1 ,327.32 feet.
4. Thence Westerly along the common section line of Sections 7 and 8
to the point of beginning.
Excepting herefrom the southerly 44.00 feet as conveyed to the County of
Riverside by deeds recorded April 28, 1958 as Instrument No. 30640 and
April 29, 1958 as Instrument No. 30961 .
This parcel contains 39. 54 acres more or less.
LAFCO #80-13-4 Resolution 80-4
PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 12
To the City of Palm Desert
County of Riverside
State of California
ANNEXATION DESCRIPTION:
Beginning at a point in the northerly boundary line of the City of Palm
Desert, County of Riverside, State of California, said point being the
common section corner of Sections 5 and 7 and Sections 7 and 8, Township
5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian.
1 . Thence North 01016'48" East along the west section line of the said
Section 6 a distance of 1 ,328.36 feet.
2. Thence North 89040' 12" East a distance of 1 ,325. 11 feet.
3. Thence South 01017' 17" West a distance of 1 ,327.32 feet.
4. Thence Westerly along the common section line of Sections 5 and 8
to the point of beginning.
This parcel contains 39.54 acres more or less.
Revision #1
March 18, 1980
1 _
e --
Wyer Construction Inc.
8121 East Florence Avenue
Downey, California 90240
AA&UP (213)927-3341
September 27, 1979
Honorable Edward J. Mullins
Mayor of the City of Palm Desert
45-275 Prickly Pear Lane
Palm Desert, CA 92260
Dear Mr. Mayor:
The attached petition is contingent upon obtaining an acceptable
zoning and development plan approval from the City Council of
Palm Desert for the petitioners.
Should you have any questions regarding this petition, please
contact the signator(s) below.
J
rely,
RO INC.a .el A. Mohle
President
m
Attachment