HomeMy WebLinkAboutANNEXATIONS NEC GERALD FORD DRIVE/MONTEREY AVENUE NO 25 1988 Y r
I�Y
I
(c) The petition shall be filed with the
r
conducting authority within 30 days after the �,(}
public hearing required by subdivision (a) has
been held. If a petition has been filed, the
conducting authority shall approve the YI
proposal subject to confirmation by the voters
of the district pursuant to Sections 57077 and
57103.
ting 57082. Any resolution ordering a change
of organization or a reorganization shall
contain all of the following:
(a) A statement that the action is being
taken pursuant to this division.
(b) A statement of the type of change of
organization or reorganization being acted on.
(c) A description of the exterior boundaries
of the territory for each change of
organization or reorganization approved by the � I•
commission. t')
(d) The name or names of any new or
consolidated city or district.
(e) All of the terms and conditions upon the � }
change of organization or reorganization
approved by the commission.
(f) The reasons for the change of
organization or reorganization.
(g) A statement as to whether the regular
county assessment roll or another assessment l
roll will be utilized.
(h) A statement that the affected territory
will or will not be taxed for existing general
bonded indebtedness of any agency whose
boundaries are changed.
(i) Any other matters which the conducting
authority deems material.
a
57083. (a) In any resolution ordering a j
S dissolution, the conducting authority shall
it
make findings upon one or more of the
following matters:
(1) That the corporate powers have not been
used, as specified in Section 56759, and that
there is a reasonable probability that those
powers will not be used in the future.
(2) That the district is a registered-voter
district and is uninhabited.
(3) That the board of directors of the
district has, by unanimous resolution,
consented to the dissolution of the district.
(b) If the conducting authority makes any of
the findings specified in subdivision (a) , the
conducting authority may, except as otherwise
.provided in Section 57083.5, order the
dissolution of the district without election.
109 -
NOTICE E OF DETER IINATION 1
NHZATIVE DECLARATION
TO: (X) Clerk of the Board of Supervisors ( ) Secretary for Resources
County of Riverside 1416 Ninth St. Rm 1311
4080 Lemon Street Sacramento, CA 95814
Riverside, CA 92502
FRCM: City of Palm Desert
73-510 Fred Waring Drive
Palm Desert, CA 92260
SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108
or 21152 of the public resources code.
Project Title/Common Name: Monterey Avenue Associates
Date of Project Approval: July 14, 1988
State C leari mbous a Number (if submitted): N/A
Contact Person: Stephen Smith, Associate Planner
Project Location: Northeast corner of Gerald Ford Dr. and Monterey Ave.
Project Description: General Plan Amendment and Prezone of site.
This is to advise that the City of Palm Desert has made the following
determinations regarding the above described project:
1. The project ( ) will, (X) will not, have a significant effect on the
environment.
2. An environmental impact report was prepared for this project
pursuant to the provisions of C&]QA. A copy of the environmental
impact report may be examined at the above city hall address.
X A negative declaration was prepared for this project pursuant
to the provisions of Cam. A copy of the negative declaration may
be examined at the above city hall address.
3. Mitigation measures ( ) were, (X) were not, made a condition of the
approval of the project.
4. A statement of overriding considerations ( ) was, (X) was not,
adopted for this project.
Signature Title
Date Received for Filing
Please return date-stamped copy in the enclosed envelope.
NOTICE OF DEPFld4BMTION
NEGATIVE DECLARATIGN
TO: (X) Clerk of the Hoard of Supervisors ( ) Secretary for Resources
County of Riverside 1416 Ninth St. Rm 1311
4080 Lemon Street Sacramento, CA 95814
Riverside, CA 92502
FRCM: City of Palm Desert
73-510 Fred Waring Drive
Palm Desert, CA 92260
SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108
or 21152 of the public resources code.
Monterey Project Title/Co mon Name: Mon Avenue Associates
�
Date of Project July 14, 1988
State Clean*Km,se Number (if submitted): N/A
Contact Person: Stephen Smith, Associate Planner
Project Location: Northeast corner of Gerald Ford Dr. and Mcnterey Ave.
Project Description: General Plan Amendment and Prezone of site.
This is to advise that the City of Palm Desert has made the following
determinations regarding the above described project:
1. The project ( ) will, (X) will not, have a significant effect on the
i environment.
2. An environmental impact report was prepared for this project
pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. A copy of the environmental
impact report may be examined at the above city hall address.
X A negative declaration was prepared for this project pursuant
to the provisions of CEQA. A copy of the negative declaration may
be examined at the above city hall address.
3. Mitigation measures ( ) were, (X) were not, made a condition of the
approval of the project.
4. A statement of overriding considerations ( ) was, (X) was not,
adopted for this project.
Signature Title
Date Received for Filing
Please return date-stamped copy in the enclosed envelope.
• i"- ' — •'•-x;:.al LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSIONS-County.of Riverside • (714) 797-2786
ROBERT T. ANDERSEN ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER • 4060 LEMON STREET • 12TH FLOOR-.-R'IVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501-3651
November 3, 1988 Ci; 7 it J
State Board of Equalization
Tax Area Services Section
Post Office Box 1713
Sacramento, California 95808
RE: LAFCO #88-67-4--Annexation No. 25 to City of Palm Desert
Gentlemen:
Pursuant to California law, you will find enclosed the following documents
relating to the above referenced action:
1 . Resolution No. 88-131 .
2. Certificate of Completion (Recorded on October 27, 1988) .
3. Map and legal description.
4. Warrant to cover cost of filing.
Property tax transfer negotiations have been completed as required by the
Revenue & Taxation Code, and resolutions of affected agencies are on file in
this office.
Please file the above documents and acknowledge receipt at your earliest
convenience. Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
WaA•daha Q�vy1 `�eQ
Barbara Ann Beegle
LAFCO Secretary
Enclosures
cc: Assessor
Auditor-Controller
Elections Department
Survey Department
Fire Department
Communications Department
Sheriff's Department
Environmental Health
Superintendent of Schools
CalTrans, District 08
California Highway Patrol
Thomas Brothers Maps
LAFCO File
Applicant
Affected Agencies
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION 0 � �s
I �--
Pursuant to the Cortese/Knox Local Government Reorganization cof 198VO ns,
57201, 57202, and 57205, this Certificate is hereby issued by � Executi % 4
Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Riverside Ginty, California.
1. Short-form designation, as designated by LAFCO is 88-67-4.
2. The names of each city involved in this change of organization or reorgani-
tion and the kind or type of change of organization ordered for each city
are as follows:
City Type of Change of Organization
Palm Desert Annexation No. 25
3. The above-listed city(ies) are located within the following county(ies) :
County of Riverside
4. A description of the boundaries of the above-cited change of organization or
reorganization are shown on the attached map and legal description, marked
Exhibit "A" and by reference incorporated herein.
5. This change of organization or reorganization has been approved subject to the
following terms and conditions, if any:
None.
6. The date of adoption of the Resolution ordering this change of organization or
reorganization (with or without election) was October 13, 1988. A certified
copy of Resolution No. 88-131 is attached hereto and by reference incorporated
herein.
I hereby certify that as Executive Officer for the Local Agency Formation Com-
mission of Riverside County, the above-listed agency has completed a change of
organization or reorganization pursuant to the Cortese/Knox Local Government Act
of 1985.
Dated: October 26, 1988 By:
KENN M. MOHR
Executive Officer
RFSOI7JTION NO. 88-131
00 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OM NCIL OF THE CITY OF
4 PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNEXING CERTAIN
r� CONTIGUOUS TERRITORY TO SAID CITY UNDER THE
PROVISIONS OF THE CORTESE/KNOX LOCAL GOVE MRa
REORGANIZATION ACT OF 1985, WHICH PROCEEDINGS ARE
DESIGNATED AS PALM DESERT ANNEXATION NO. 25,
LAFOO NO. 88-67-4.
WHEREAS, on July 14, 1988, the City Council did adopt Resolution No. 88-79
initiating annexation proceedings for Annexation No. 25; and
WHEREAS, the Local Agency Fonoaticn Cbrtmission held a public hearing
relative to Annexation No. 25 on September 22, 1988, and approved said
annexation with the determination that the City Council of the City of Palm
Desert be authorized to proceed without notice and hearing; and
WHEREAS, the proposed annexation represents a logical extension of the
City of Palm Desert's boundaries and will not be taxed for existing general
bonded indebtedness by the City of Palm Desert, and the regular Riverside
County assessment roll shall be utilized in the future.
• NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm
Desert, California, as follows:
I. That the territory described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto
and made a part hereof by reference, be and the same is hereby, by
this resolution annexed to the City of Palm Desert.
2. That the city cleric is hereby instructed and directed to transmit
fifteen (15) certified copies of this resolution to LAFCO along with
any other required submittals.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert City
Council, held on this 13th day of October, 1988, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: CRITES, SNYDER, WILSON, AND BENSON
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: KELLY
-'1
ABSTAIN: NONE
M. BENSON, Mayor
ATTEST:
SHEILA R. GIMIGAN, Ci lark
City of Palm Desert, ifornia
RESOLUTION NO. 88-131
LAFro 88-67-4
ANNEXATION NO. 25
CITY OF PALM DESERT
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That portion of the Southwest quarter of Section 29, Township 4 South, Range
6 East, San Bernardino Base 6 Meridian, in Riverside County, . California• more
particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the Southwest corner of Section 29;
Thence, North 0000'47" West a distance of 1 ,332.84 feet;
Thence, North 0`01'27" West a distance of 137. 16 feet;
Thence, North 89' 53'30" East a distance of 2,631 .46 feet to the quarter
section line;
Thence, South 0009'41" East a distance of 1 ,470 feet to the South limit of
Section 29;
Thence, South 89053' 30" West a distance of 2,635.20 feet to the point of
beginning.
The preceding five courses are per IRS 40/69.
This parcel contains 88.876 acres, more or less.
BY:
CHARD J. OCKERS
CiTY ENGINEER
CITY OF PALM DESERT
R.C.E. 25320
?,%c
vXESS/OH
Q• �,\ 0 ..... q�
0. 4568
Exp• Ogle nr W �_� No.25320 m? m
THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION APPROVED J'. 9��O-q1 .r 0a N�
Ago : l�i�� CIVIL
BY R-11�I RS—IDE COUNTY SURVEYOR F IF O �. " * ENGINEERING:
' OIMAM SNOR!0 _
x• tir x
• S�rhkl
i
� W
i a
C'7 �
i
• y
W
y 1
y
T• W
O 6
' W V
1
3/4"I.P.42"LONG1-11 c �
W. 1/4 CORD. BRAS!CAI C V4 COP. SEC. 29 _t
N89.57'43'E
0
rc
i`
f R1NR SINATRA OR
M VICINITY MAP
M
R1
3 � 3
Iv
� Nv o
N A O
O
o COUNTY OFR/VERS/OE
Z N89.53'30"E 2631.46' ._
137.16' PALM O C/TY LlmlT
U.a D. C.BRASS ��0 LAIJ� S/`
a CAP 1/I6 CDR. `�t1- SA �'�i/\\
coti 0\
M �
!2 88.87 ACRES
NO. 4568 i
3 3 1 Exp.�x�e
ao
2 z �OF CAI�Fi
U.S.O.L.O. BRASS
CAP S.W.COR.BEC.2a 1/2•I.P. TAGGED 4S.2S44 3.1/4 COR.
3 N B9.93'30-E 2635.20'
-- __ GERALD FORD DRIVE
31 32 PALM DESERT C/TY L/M/T
Q�pf ESSIpyd
•f•OH ••
NOTEI f—~a ;'Q' O<;• c
RECORD DATA IPS 0/69 PREPARED
ANDE No. 25320
DOES NOT ,y? �Q m• m
REPRESENT A SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY THIS MAP APPROVED O° �C E'er• It'JI'�y: '�
SHOWN HEREIN. A..�� %L9 , am CIVIL
BY RIViRSIDE COUNTY SURVEYOR * %.ENGINLLRING.- 7k�
eY 1•�au�-S�2�nna.>y f�gTf OF Ct111��`��\�
LAFCO NO. 88-67-4
Drawn by:
]at@:' PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO.25 t�
TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT Nan San P-
R. PORTION OF SOUTHWEST 1/4 SEC. 29-T4S R6E S.B.B.& M.RICHA »G'AL€:
lLOPMENT/PLANNING, PALM DESERT
1 Board of Supervisors County of Riverside
r� 2
C'9
3 RESOLUTION NO. 81-362
DETERMINING THE AMOUNT OF PROPERTY TAX REVENUE TO BE EXCHANGED
4 BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AND THE CITY OF
PALM DESERT RELATING TO ANNEXATIONS TO
5 THE CITY OF PALM DESERT
6I BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Superviars of the County
7 of Riverside, State of California, in regular session assembled on
8 October 13, 1981, that:
9 1. The County of Riverside and the City of Palm Desert
10 are the agencies whose area or responsibility for service would be
11 affected by annexations to the City of Palm Desert.
12 2. Representatives of each of the affected agencies have
13 met and negotiated an exchange of property tax revenue to become
14 effective for tax purposes beginning July 1, 1981, for all areas .
151annexed to the City until such time as this Resolution is rescinded
16 or superseded, as follows:
17 a. The City of Palm Desert shall assume the responsi
18. bility for all general municipal services to areas annexe
19 as are required by law or presently provided throughout
20 the. City, and for such service shall receive 2551. of that
21 portion of the property tax revenue generated within
22 territories annexed under the ad valorem tax rate estab-
23 lished by Article XIII A of the Constitution of the State
24 of California, that represents the County of Riverside ' s
25 share of such property tax revenue.
26 b. The County Auditor shall upon annexation by the
27 City convert the above-established percentage figure into
28 actual dollar figures and thereafter allocate to the City
JAMES H.ANGELL -
u auRYBLDG. such property tax revenue in accord with the provisions
RIVERSIDE-CALIFORNIA
-1-
`j /
11l
I of Sections 95 et seq. , of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
QO 2 3. The City Council of the City of Palm Desert and the
. rl 3 Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside do hereby agree to
4 the above-recited exchange of property tax revenue.
5 4. The Clerk of this Board shall transmit a certified
6 copy of this Resolution to each affected agency and to the Executiv
7 Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission and to the County
8 Auditor pursuant to Section 99 of the Revenue and Taxation Code .
9
10
11 Roll Call resulted as follows:
Ayes: Abraham, Younglove and McCandless
12 Noes : None
Absent: Schroeder and Ceniceros
13
14
151
16
17
18. .
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
PC:jf 27
10/8/81 28
DAMES K ANGELL
COUIIDE.COUNSEL
LAW LIBRARY BLDG.
RIVERSIDE,CALIFORNIA -2- .o
RESOLUTION NO. 81-133
Ci
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE
AMOUNT OF PROPERTY TAX REVENUE TO BE EXCHANGED
BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AND THE CITY
OF PALM DESERT RELATING TO ANNEXATIONS TO THE
CITY OF PALM DESERT, CLAIFORNIA.
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm
Desert in regular session assembled on this 24th day of Sept .
1981, that:
1. The County of Riverside and the City of Palm Desert
are the agencies whose area or responsibility for service
would be affected by annexations to the City of Palm Desert.
2. Representatives of each of the affected agencies have
met and negotiated an exchange of property tax revenue as follows ,
to become effective for tax purposes beginning July 1 , 1981,
for all areas annexed to the City until such time as this
resolution is rescinded or superceded.
A. The City of Palm Desert shall assume responsibility
for all general municipal services to areas annexed as are
required by law or presently provided throughout the City, and
for such service, the City shall receive 25% of that portion
of the property tax revenue generated within territories annexed
under the ad valorem tax rate established by Article XIII A of
the Constitution of the State of California, that represents
the County of Riverside' s share of such property tax revenue.
B. The County Auditor shall upon annexation by the City
convert the above-established percentage figure into actual
dollar figures and thereafter allocate to the City such property
[ tax revenue in accord with the provisions of 'Section 95 et. seq.
of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
3 . The City Council of the City of Palm Desert does hereby
agree to the above-recited exchange of property tax revenue.
4. The Clerk shall transmit a certified copy of this
resolution to each affected agency and to the Executive Officc
of the Local Agency Formation Commission and to the Auditor of
the County of Riverside pursuant to Section 99 of the Revenue
and Taxation Code.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
Palm Desert City Council, held on this 24th day of September,
1981 , by the following vote, to wit :
AYES: McPherson, Newbrander, Puluqi, Snyder & Wilson
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None r
4YLSiON, Mayor
ATTEST:
1
HEILA R. GIL AId,CqCa ;oXrnia'
City of Palm Desert,
(Mqw oo a&IlntL'� mc�)O(�D�pt�'
73.510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611
November 7 , 1988
General Manager
Palmer Cablevision
P . O . Box 368
Palm Desert , California 92260
Gentlemen :
Subject : Palm Desert Annexation No. 25
I am enclosing one copy each of the final approval of the subject
annexation , as well as the legal description and map . The
annexation was recorded by the County of Riverside on October 27 ,
1988 , as No . 312484 .
The property annexed is totally uninhabited .
If you have any questions or require further information , please
do not hesitate to contact us .
Sincerely ,
SHEILA R . GIL IGAN
CITY CLERK/PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER
SRG :mpf
Enclosures ( as noted )
G�nnzF
73.510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
TELEPHONE (619) 346.0611
November 7 , 1988
Mr . Tom Levy
General Manager
Coachella Valley Water District
P. O . Box 1058
Coachella , California 92236
Dear Mr . Levy :
Subject : Palm Desert Annexation No. 25
I am enclosing one copy each of the final approval of the subject
annexation , as well as the legal description and map . The
annexation was recorded by the County of Riverside on October 27 ,
1988 , as No. 312484 .
The property annexed is totally uninhabited .
If you have any questions or require further information , please
do not hesitate to contact us .
Sincerely,
1 GGt a�
SHEILA R . GILLIGAN v
CITY CLERK/PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER
SRG :mpf
Enclosures (as noted )
(Maw of yslIlntL,� Dc@OGnPQ,
73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611
November 7 . 1988
Mr . Kermit Martin
General Manager
Southern California Edison Co .
44-425 Town Center Way
Palm Desert , California 92260
Dear Kermit :
Sub3ect : Palm Desert Annexation No. 25
I am enclosing one copy each of the final approval of the subject
annexation , as well as the legal description and map . The
annexation was recorded by the County of Riverside on October 27 ,
1988 , as No. 312484 .
The property annexed is totally uninhabited .
If you have any questions or require further information , please
do not hesitate to contact us .
Sincerely ,JA�
SHEILA R . GILLIGAN
CITY CLERK/PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER
SRG :mpf
Enclosures (as noted )
9nC�u of ° �IIlML M)(�)OGEPQ'
73.510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
TELEPHONE (619) 346.0611
November 7 , 1988
Mr . Ernie Moreno
Division Manager
General Telephone Company
295 No . Sunrise
Palm Springs , California 92262
Dear Ernie :
Subject : Palm Desert Annexation No. 25
1 am enclosing one copy each of the final approval of the subject
annexation , as well as the legal description and map . The
annexation was recorded by the County of Riverside on October 27 ,
1988 , as No. 312484 .
The property annexed is totally uninhabited .
If you have any questions or require further information , please
do not hesitate to contact us .
Sincerely ,
SHEILA R . GILLIGAN
CITY CLERK/PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER
SRG :mpf
Enclosures ( as noted )
73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611
November 7 , 1988
The General Manager
Southern California Gas Company
45- 123 Towne Avenue
Indio , California 92201
Gentlemen :
Sub.iect : Palm Desert Annexation No 25
1 am enclosing one copy each of the final approval of the subject
annexation , as well as the legal description and map . The
annexation was recorded by the County of Riverside on October 27 ,
1988 , as No. 312484 .
The property annexed is totally uninhabited .
If you have any questions or require further information , please
do not hesitate to contact us .
Sincerely,
SHEILA R . GILLIGAN
CITY CLERK/PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER
SRG : mpf
Enclosures (as noted )
Maw off' 1pg-ZalL� MDO(E)M�a
73.510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611
November 7 , 1988
Tax Assessor ' s Office
County of Riverside
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside , California 92502
Gentlemen :
Subject : Palm Desert Annexation No. 25
1 am enclosing one copy each of the final approval of the subject
annexation , as well as the legal description and map . The
annexation was recorded by the County of Riverside on October 27 ,
1988 , as No. 312484 .
The property annexed is totally uninhabited .
If you have any questions or requi.re further information, please
do not hesitate to contact us .
Sincerely .
J�"
SHEILA R . GILLIGAN
CITY CLERK/PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER
SRG : mpf
Enclosures (as noted )
0.
Gnaw og 7g-IlMD.
73.510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611
November 7 , 1988
Postmaster
Palm Desert Post Office
45-300 Portola Avenue
Palm Desert , California 92260
Dear Postmaster :
Subject : Palm Desert Annexation No. 25
1 am enclosing one copy each of the final approval of the subject
annexation , as well as the legal description and map . The
annexation was recorded by the County of Riverside on October 27 ,
1988 , as No . 312484 .
The property annexed is totally uninhabited .
If you have any questions or require further information , please
do not hesitate to contact us .
Sincerely,
'V
SHEILA R . GILLIGAN L
CITY CLERK/PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER
SRG : mpf
Enclosures (as noted)
�nqu oo
73.510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611
November 7 , 1988
Area Code Clerk
State Board of Equalization
P. O. Box 942879
Sacramento , California 94279-0001
Gentlemen :
Subject : Palm Desert Annexation No. 25
1 am enclosing one copy each of the final approval of the subject
annexation , as well as the legal description and map . The
annexation was recorded by the County of Riverside on October 27 ,
1988 , as No . 312484 .
The property annexed is totally uninhabited .
If you have any questions or require further information , please
do not hesitate to contact us .
Sincerely ,
n
SHEILA R . GILLIGAN
CITY CLERK/PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER
SRG :mpf
Enclosures (as noted )
Gav7 of 21�IlMD- D(3)0G�:PQ'
73.510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611
November 7, 1988
County Administrator
County of Riverside
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside , California 92502
Gentlemen :
Subiect : Palm Desert Annexation No. 25
1 am enclosing one copy each of the final approval of the subject
annexation , as well as the legal description and map . The
annexation was recorded by the County of Riverside on October 27 ,
1988 , as No . 312484 .
The property annexed is totally uninhabited .
If you have any questions or require further information , please
do not hesitate to contact us .
Sincerely,
SHEILA R. GILLIGAN
CITY CLERK/PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER
SRG :mpf
Enclosures (as noted )
73.510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611
November 7 , 1988
Capt . Mike Lewis
Riverside County Sheriff' s Department
P. O . Box FFFF
Indio , California 92202
Dear Mike :
Subject : Palm Desert Annexation No. 25
I am enclosing one copy each of the final approval of the subject
annexation , as well as the legal description and map . The
annexation was recorded by the County of Riverside on October 27 ,
1988 , as No . 312484 .
The property annexed is totally uninhabited .
If you have any questions or require further information , please
do not hesitate to contact us .
Sincerely ,
!1 �
SHEILA R . GILLIGAN
CITY CLERK/PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER
SRG :mpf
Enclosures (as noted )
Ga-aw off' M�Il�
73.610 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611
November 7 , 1988
Mr . Eric Vogt
Eastern Division Chief
Riverside County Fire Department
44-400 Town Center Way
Palm Desert , California 92260
Dear Eric :
Sub.iect : Palm Desert Annexation No. 25
1 am enclosing one copy each of the final approval of the subject
annexation , as well as the legal description and map . The
annexation was recorded by the County of Riverside on October 27 .
1988 , as No. 312484 .
The property annexed is totally uninhabited .
If you have any questions or require further information , please
do not hesitate to contact us .
Sincerely,
SHEILA R . GILLIGAN
CITY CLERK/PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER
SRG :mpf
Enclosures (as noted )
Gagw of
73.610 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611
November 7 , 1988
Department of Finance
Population Research Unit
1025 P Street . 5th Floor
Sacramento, California 95814
Gentlemen :
Subject : Palm Desert Annexation No. 25
1 am enclosing one copy each of the final approval of the subject
annexation , as well as the legal description and map . The
annexation was recorded by the County of Riverside on October 27 ,
1988 , as No . 312484 .
The property annexed is totally uninhabited .
If you have any questions or require further information , please
do not hesitate to contact us .
Sincerely,
SHEILA R . GILLIGAN
CITY CLERK/PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER
SRG :mpf
Enclosures (as noted )
CITY OF PALM DESERT
TO: Riverside County Local Agency Formation Cmnission
DATE: July 14, 1988
APPLICANT: City of Palm Desert
SUBJECT: Plan for Services for Palm Desert Annexation No. 25
I. INTRODUCTION:
Pursuant to Section 56653 of the State Government Code, the city is
required to file with any new annexations a plan outlining the method by
which services will be provided in the area to be annexed. This report
represents the required plan for services for proposed Annexation No.
25. The City of Palm Desert, being a contract city, must rely on many
other agencies to provide for services both in the community and areas
subsequently annexed. In addition, many services provided such as water
and sewer, electricity and gas are provided without regard to city limit
lines; therefore, the area proposed to be annexed is presently served or
has the capability of being served by many of these agencies.
The major emphasis of this report is to address those services provided
directly by the city either through city staff or direct contract with
the city by other agencies. In addition, wherever possible this report
will address the methods by which other service agencies would provide
needed facilities in the area.
II. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES:
The utilities which would be extended into the area proposed to be
annexed would be as part of actual development and they would consist of
the services of the Coachella Valley County Water District for water and
sewer, Southern California Edison Company, Southern California Gas
Company, General Telephone Company and Palmer Cable. The services
provided by this city directly would be in planning and building, public
works, parks, administration and code enforcement services. By contract
the city would also provide for trash disposal, police and fire services.
Public transportation would be provided by the Sunline Agency.
There are no major road improvements necessary to facilitate access to
the area.
III. LEVEL OF SERVICE:
The level and range of services provided would include sufficient sized
water, sewer, gas and electrical facilities to service development
proposed for the area. Planning, building, public works and code enforce-
ment services as provided by the city directly would be on the basis of
need.
PAIM DESERT ANNEXATION NO. 25
The area is within the five minute response zone of the Portola and
Country Club station. Backup would be provided by the E1 Paseo/Town
Center, Indian Wells, Rancho Mirage, Bermuda Dunes and Thousand Palms
stations.
Paramedic ambulance services would be provided by the Indian Wells Fire
Station. The city presently contracts from Riverside County Sheriff
Department for 120 hours per day for citywide patrols which will be
expanded as needs require.
IV. TIMING FOR SERVICE EXTENSIONS:
Basic utility services exist adjacent to the property. The city services
would be available immediately in the area of planning, building and code
enforcement, public works, police and fire. Road improvements (widening
of Monterey Ave. ) would occur as a part of new development.
V. REQUIREMENTS OF NET DEVELOPMENT AND FINANCING:
New development would be required to provide for needed municipal
facilities through the city's development ordinances. A fire facilities
fee of $100.00 per residential unit will be used to finance the necessary
fire facilities.
The provision of planning and building services would be provided through
the fees generated from new development. Ongoing maintenance of roads
created in the area, would be provided on the basis of sales tax generated
from commercial facilities in the area. In summary, it is felt that
development of this area would result in a balance between needed services
and the revenue to provide said services.
/fr
2
1
_ INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
CITY OF PALM DESERT
TO: Mayor Benson and City Council
FROM: Department of Community Development
DATE: July 6, 1988
SUBJECT: Annexation #25 - Monterey Avenue Associates - Resolution requesting
LAFCO to proceed
Attached is a resolution requesting LAFCO to take proceedings for the annexation
of 89 acres in the . southwest quarter of Section 29. The prezoning of this
property was approved by council in June 1988.
This resolution, when approved, will complete the city's application.
SRS/dlg
1
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION BY THE CITY OF
PALM DESERT REQUESTING THE LOCAL AGENCY
FORMATION COMMISSION TO TAKE PROCEEDINGS FOR
THE CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION KNOWN AS PALM
DESERT ANNEXATION NO. 25.
RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, that
WHEREAS, the City of Palm Desert desires to initiate proceedings pursuant to the
Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, Division 3, commencing with
Section 56000 of the California Government Code, for annexation; and
WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be annexed is uninhabited and a description
for the boundaries of the territory is set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by
this reference incorporated herein; and
WHEREAS, this proposal is consistent with the sphere of influence of the City of
Palm Desert; and
WHEREAS, the reasons for this proposed annexation are as follows:
1. The proposed territory to be annexed is adjacent to and substantially
surrounded by the City of Palm Desert and therefore represents a logical
expansion of the city's boundary.
2. The area is experiencing development pressures and requires a higher level
of urban services then are currently offered by the County of Riverside.
The City of Palm Desert can provide these services.
NOW, THEREFORE, this Resolution of Application is hereby adopted and approved by
the City Council of the City of Palm Desert and the Local Agency Formation Commission
of Riverside County is hereby requested to take proceedings for the annexation of
territory as described in Exhibit "A", according to the terms and conditions stated
above and in the manner provided by the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization
Act of 1985.
PASSED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert at a regular
meeting thereof held on the _ day of 1988 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
JEAN M. BENSON, Mayor
ATTEST:
SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, City Clerk
City of Palm Desert, California
E MIT 'A'
LFOAL DESCRIMON
Annexation No. 25
City of Palm Desert
That portion of the southeftSt quarter of section 29, tchmship 4 south range 6
east, SBM, in Riverside County, California more pazticularly described as
follows:
Beginning at the southwest corner of section 29;
0
Thence North 0 00' 47" West a distance of 1332.84 feet.
0
Thence North 0 01' 27" West a distance of 137.16 feet.
0
Thence North 89 53' 30" East a distance of 2631.46 feet to the quarter
section lire.
0
Thence South 0 09' 41" East a distance of 1470 feet to the south limit
of section 29.
0
Thence South 89 53' 30" West a distance of 2635.20 feet to the point of
beginning-
Contains
approximately 89 acres.
y
A -
. ", ; y c�„♦ MONTEREY AVE.
Ll
y
u r�
V oz
I �c OD ♦
' ; n
q •�
o a
v I,�
w
\ A h fm
S
I3
♦. O, o
ow
q _ c
I ., C17Y
,\ 4
v •b
~ I ~ vl
�1 A
a D
o ; o
m . q
o to
W b
U n .
I. o
� y
D
Y• li I W �
f1'
h
y
Qj
Hy
O
a
o�
y 53 N S 40169
/IlI
$J° t4 m
P �
1 '--Il s
LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION • County of Riverside • (714) 787-2786
ROBERT T. AN➢ERSEN ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER 4080 LEMON STREET . 12TH FLOOR • RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 92501-3651
DATE: September 26, 1988
City of Palm Desert LAFCO NO. : 88-67-4
Attn: Sheila Gilligan , Clerk PROPONENT: City of Palm Desert
Post Office Box 1977
Palm Desert, California 92260
Gentlemen:
You are hereby notified that the proposal for Annexation #25 to the City of
Palm Desert was approved by the Local
Agency Formation Commission of the County of Riverside at a public hearing on
September 22, 1988
A copy of the legal description of this proposal as approved by the Local
Agency Formation Commission, is attached to this notice; and it is the legal
description which must be used in all further actions regarding this
proposal . Any previous descriptions which do not conform to the attachment
should be corrected or destroyed.
Any special conditions, authorizations, or amendments are noted in the
attached resolution, and must be complied with by your Council in its role as
Conducting Authority.
It is now the responsibility of your Council to complete proceedings in
accordance with, the laws governing this approved application (Cortese-Knox
Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, Section 57000) .
Upon completion of proceedings, it is requested that you furnish LAFCO with
fifteen certified copies of your resolution and a check made payable to the
State Board of Equalization in the amount of $ -350.00
You should keep in mind that unless proceedings are completed within twelve
months from the date of LAFCO' s approval, the application will automatically
be abandoned (Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985,
Section 57001) . If there are extenuating circumstances, please notify us in
writing at least 30 days prior to the end of this one-year period to secure an
authorized extension of time.
If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact our office.
Sincerely,
Attachments KENN TH M. MOHR
c: Clerk of the Board Executive Officer
1
4
1 Local Agency Formation Commission County of Riverside
2
3 RESOLUTION NO. 69-88
APPROVING THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY
4 TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT
LAFCO NO. 88-67-4
5
6 BE IT RESOLVED AND DETERMINED by the Local Agency Formation
7 Commission in regular session assembled on September 22, 1988, that the
8 annexation of approximately 88.87 acres generally located at the northeast
g corner of Monterey Avenue and Gerald Ford Drive, as more particularly described
10 in attached Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part hereof, to the City of
11 Palm Desert, is approved.
12 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND FOUND that:
13 1 . Commission proceedings were commenced by the resolution of
14 application by the City of Palm Desert.
15 2. The annexation is proposed to provide more municipal services by
16 the City of Palm Desert.
17 3. The distinctive short form designation of the proposed annexation
18 is LAFCO No. 88-67-4, Annexation No. 25 to the City of Palm Desert.
lg 4. An environmental assessment was made on the proposal and a
20 negative declaration filed thereon by the City of Palm Desert pursuant to the
21 California Environmental Quality Act. The negative declaration has been
22 reviewed and considered.
23 5. The boundaries of the territory as set forth in Exhibit "A",
24 attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, have been approved
25 by the County Surveyor, are contiguous to the City of Palm Desert, and are
26 approved.
27 6. The territory to be annexed is uninhabited, there being less than
28 12 registered voters residing therein.
RIVERSIDE
LOCAL AGENCY
FORMATION
COMMISSION
AMO LEMON STREET
1STM MOOR
RIVEREIGE. CALIFORNIA
92501.3651
(714) 787.2796
r -
l
1 7. The proposed annexation is consistent with the City of Palm
2 Desert' s sphere of influence and the spheres of influence of all affected local
3 agencies.
4 8. The City of,Palm Desert is designated conducting authority and is
5 authorized to proceed without notice, hearing or election.
6 9. The Executive Officer is directed to transmit a certified copy of
7 this Resolution to the above-designated conducting authority, to the chief
8 petitioners, if different from the conducting authority, and to each affected
9 agency.
10
11 �'
12 if I
ILL R BOYD R. , irman
13
14 I certify the above resolution was passed and adopted by the Local Agency
Formation Commission of Riverside County on September 22, 1988.
15
16
7 y1�
KENNUH M. MOHR
5� 8 Executive Officer
AS �4Y. �9
�u N
� 0
m
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RIVERSIDE
LOCAL AGENCY
FORMATION
COMMISSION
4 LEMON !TREK
12TN FLOOR
RIVEREIOE. CiALIIORNIA
92501-36 51
(714) 767-2766
LAFCO 88-67-4
ANNEXATION NO. 25
CITY OF PALM DESERT
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That portion of the Southwest quarter of Section 29, Township 4 South, Range
6 East, San Bernardino Base 8 Meridian, in Riverside County, . California, more
particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the Southwest corner of Section 29;
Thence, North 0000'47" West a distance of 1.332.84 feet;
Thence, North 0001'27" West a distance of 137. 16 feet;
Thence, North 89' 53'30" East a distance of 2,631 .46 feet to the quarter
section line;
Thence, South 0009'41" East a distance of 1 ,470 feet to the South limit of
Section 29;
Thence, South 89053'30" West a distance of 2,635.20 feet to the point of
beginning.
The preceding five courses are per RS 40/69.
This parcel contains 88.876 acres, more or less.
BY: a4a
__A
CHARD J. KERS
CITY ENGINE R
CITY Of PALM DESERT
R.C.E. 25320
f�
j%VESSI!#
1
Exp• Ugl-e W Sv No. 25320 mi ter„
•_ =
THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION APPROVED CIVIL to
A..n ; (e 1�1�9 \�. 4`/ �[ '•• ENGINEERING.-'.
BY RBI RSIDE' COUNTY SURVEYOR .•
BY IJI_ eu�-S• 1 w�� 'Pfgt(••...••�� ON,
DINAH$MORE 0
2f ql E
.
q
l4r
i
I W
_ J
W D,
> >
I
r ,
W
AN AN D RA FO
RD ..
F I
z
o r
W
� 5
W W
F 1
U.S.O.L.O. BRASS CAP 3/4"I.P 42"LONG z �
W. 1/4 COR. C V4 COR. SEC. 29
N89°57'43'E 2628j5' —r J
0
r
iq
aFRANK SINATRA OR.
ro VICINITY MAP
o --- as
ro =
M
3 in
3
Io
0
O O
O Z COUNTY OFR/V£RS/DE
Z N89.53'30NE _ 2631.46' _
137.16' PAtAt D 6/TY L/M/r
� Af.% eRASS sl
eaPi16 on
N DO b V \
3 88.87 ACRES v ND 45 7N 11
b o 9-30-91
$ `rho QC,P
Z i OF CNLF
LLS.O.L.O. BRASS
CAP S.W.COR.SEC.29 1/2"I.P. TAGGED L.S.2344 S.1/4 COR.
3 N 8945S3O'E 2635.20'
-- GERALD FORD DRIVE
31 32 PALM DESERT C/TY L/M/T
Q%OfESSIpp
Q`�� .••'�OHN'.��F
NOTEI k' r�Q` 'n0. yc,
THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED FROM
RECORD DATA IRS 40/69)AND DOES NOT .�. No.25320 m, T
REPRESENT A SURVEY Of THE PROPERTY THIS MAP APPROVED
SHOWN HEREIN. AL� ILo ,'9gg CIVIL y
BY RIVLRSIDE COUNTY SURVEYOR * �•.,ENGINLERINGO'�
lgjf OF Ct�UEo��\�
LAFCO NO- 88-67-4
Date:' —/— Drawn by'.Zy ' PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO.25 f/ i�t
TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT Nan San Pe
VAICHARD' J. FOLKERS PORTION OF SOUTHWEST 1/4 SEC. 29 T4S RIBE S.B.B.& M.
SCALE: 1'::6C
RCE ND.25320 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/PLANNING, PALM DESERT
F =
STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
SCHEDULE OF PROCESSING FEES
Section 54902.5, Government Code
Effective July 1, 1984
1. GENERAL APPLICATION. The fees set forth in this schedule shall apply to all statements filed pursuant to
Sections 54900 to 54902 of the Government Code. Statements must be filed by January 1 if they are to be
reflected on the next tax roll. (See Section 3 (1).) The provisions and definitions given in Sections 2 and 3
below are to help you compute the fees and serve as guidelines to insure acceptence of maps and legal descrip-
tions. Fees shall accompany the statements (See Section 3 (a).) Mail statements, maps and fees to, Valuation
Division, State Board of Equalization, P.O. Box 1713, Sacramento, CA 95808.
2. DESCRIPTIONS AND MAPS. After our initial processing has been completed, all filed documents are micro-
filmed and then destroyed. Any document that will not produce a readable photographic image must be reiected
and returned to the sender for replacement.. See Section 2 (g).
(a) Every description must be self-sufficient within itself and without the necessity of reference to any
extraneous document. When a description refers to a deed of record, the deed should be used only as a second-
ary reference.
(b) When writing a metes and bounds description of a contiguous annexation,all details of the contiguous
portions) of the boundary may be omitted. The points of departure from the existing boundary must be clear!y
established-
(c) A _=eclf:c pc-cc! Caicrlption in sectionalized land (e.g., The SW % of Section 22, TIN, RYN) is
permissible without a metes and bounds description of the perimeter boundary.
(d) A parcel description making reference only to a subdivision or a lot within a subdivision is not
acceptable, unless all dimensions n !ed to plot the boundaries are given on an accompanying plat. The
relationship of lot lines with street rig,.t-of-ways must be clearly indicated.
(a) Every map must clearly indicate all existing streets, roads and highways within and adjacent to the
subject territory, together with the current names of these thoroughfares.
(f) Every map shall bear a scale and a north point. If a reduced map is to be filed, the original map
must have a graphic scale affixed to it before the reduction is mode.
(g) The point of beginning of the legal description must be shown on the map. The boundaries of the sub-
ject territory must be distinctively shown on the map without obliterating any essential geographic or political
features. The use of yellow lines to highlight the boundaries is urged,as this color photographs as a light gray.
(h) All maps must be professionally drawn or copied. Rough sketches of maps or plats will not be
accepted.
3. DEFINITIONS AND SPECIAL FEE PROVISIONS.
(a) "Single area" means any separate geographical area regardless of ownership. A lot, a subdivision
or a township could each be a "Single area". For the purpose of this schedule a geographical area which is
divided into two or more parcels by a roadway, railroad right-of-way, river or stream shall be considered a
"Single area". A "Single area" does not include two areas that arc contiguous only at a point or two areas
that are contiguous to an existing boundary or a city or district but not to each other.
(b) "Zones" include temporary zones in highway lighting districts, other zones, improvement districts,
or any other sub-units of a city or parent district.
(c) "Concurrent transaction" includes any combination of formations, annexations and withdrawals of a
sinole area under one resolution or ordinance. The fee shall be according to the fee Schedule (4(a) ), there is
no additional costs for the number of transactions involved. If more than one resolution or ordinance, each
single area must be separately computed under the fee schedule (4(a) ).
(d) The fees in Section 4 of this schedule are based on the concept that any given action is confined to
a single county. If more than one county is involved, add $150.00 for second and each additional county
involved.
s
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNEXING CERTAIN
CONTIGUOUS TERRITORY TO SAID CITY UNDER THE
PROVISIONS OF THE CORTESE/K OX LOCAL GOVERN-1ENT
REORGANIZATION ACT OF 1985, WHICH PROCEEDINGS ARE
DESIGNATED AS PALM DESERT ANNEXATION NO. 25,
LAFCO NO. 88-67-4.
WHEREAS, on July 14, 1988, the City Council did adopt Resolution No. 88-79
initiating annexaticn proceedings for Annexation No. 25; and
WHEREAS, the Local Agency Formation Commission held a public hearing
relative to Annexation No. 25 on September 22, 1988, and approved said
annexation with the determination that the City Council of the City of Palm
Desert be authorized to proceed without notice and hearing; and
WHEREAS, the proposed annexation represents a logical extension of the
City of Palm Desert's boundaries and will not be taxed for existing general
bonded indebtedness by the City of Palm Desert, and the regular Riverside
County assessment roll shall be utilized in the future.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm
Desert, California, as follows:
1. That the territory described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto
and made a part hereof by reference, be and the same is hereby, by
this resolution annexed to the City of Palm Desert.
2. That the city clerk is hereby instructed and directed to transmit
fifteen (15) certified copies of this resolution to LAFOD along with
any other required submittals.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert City
Council, held on this day of 1988, by the following vote, to
wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
JEAN M. BENSON, Mayor
ATTEST:
SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, City Clerk
City of Palm Desert, California
/tm
,1
LAFCO 88-67-4
ANNEXATION NO. 25
CITY OF PALM DESERT
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That portion of the Southwest quarter of Section 29, Township 4 South, Range
6 East, San Bernardino Base & Meridian, In Riverside County, - California, more
particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the Southwest corner of Section 29;
Thence, North 0`00'47" West a distance of 1 ,332.84 feet;
Thence. North 0`O1 '27" West a distance of 137. 16 feet;
Thence, North 89' S3'30" East a distance of 2,631 .46 feet to the quarter
section line;
Thence, South 0009'41" East a distance of 1 ,470 feet to the South limit of
Section 29;
Thence, South 89* 53'30" West a distance of 2,635.20 feet to the point of
beginning.
The preceding five courses are per IRS 40/69.
This parcel contains. 88.876 acres, more or less.
BY:
CHARD J. KERS
CITY ENGINEER
CITY OF PALM DESERT
R.C.E. 25320
Of ESSIOp
NO. 4568 • s
Ey' �a1e n;' W :U No. 25320 m: 9
THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION APPROVED ;a CIVIL* ••.,ENGINE[RINGv,••
Ago re 1`l�� -:T
BY RI SIDE COUNTY SURVEYOR
•: 7�
BY
o- l 01 HAM SHORE 0
2E 4J 2
. N
l4
l
i
W
y
y
a � a
s ,
V
K
c RaLA r R
z
o y
a ¢
W >
U.9.O.LA. eflA3!CAP 3/4"I.P.w. o i
I/4 CDR. � C V4 CDR. 3Ec.C. Q9 a
N89.57'43"E 2628.55'
___ —r a —
J
0
in 8
- FRaNR SINAT RA OR,
r o VICINITY MAP
M —
M
"nf 3
3 N Q
N rl O
O O
O Z
Z N89.53'30"E _ 2631.46' COUNTY OFR/VERSIOE
137.16' PAtM. D - C/TY L/M/T'
U.S.0.1-C.BRA!! I '
v CAP 1/16 COR. S.
B
cp N o p
v v 9
3
88.87 ACRES — 2 N NO. 4568
I
I
° 3 1 Exp.J)v4-e
o v 9-30-91
U.l.O.L.O. BRASS
CAP S.W.COR.BEC.29
3 N 89.53'30"E 2635.20' 1/2• I.P. TAGGED L3.2344 S.1/4 COR.
GERALD FORD DRIVE
31 32 PALM DESERT C/TY L/M/T
Q�6f ESS/p,�q
O oHiv !
NOTEI ti�''�� �O'•, yal
THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED FROM _ `^9 f Ir `
RECORD DATA IRS 40/e9)AND DOES NOT W �U No. 25320 m�
REPRESENT A SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY THIS MAP APPROVED C= 6AP. 12.31•61 �0: 7O
SHOWN HEREIN. q\Ack llo v
119E38 CIVIL :'
BY RIVtRSIDE COUNTY SURVEYOR * '•.•ENGINLLRING;By xz
' 7k
�jf Of CIIL1����
LAFCO NO. 88-67-4
Date:* 7� LP _ Drawn Dy:
PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO.25 � �'�
TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT Nan San Pe
RICHARD J. FOLKERS- PORTION OF SOUTHWEST 1/4 SEC. 29-T4S R6E S.8.8.6 M.
SCALE: 1'::6C
RCE No.25320 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/PLANNING PALM
1AFC0
LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION . County of Riverside • (714) 787-2786
ROBERT T. ANDERSEN ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER • 4080 LEMON STREET • 12TH FLOOR • RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501-3651
September 22, 1988
TO: Local Agency Formation Commission
FROM: Ken Mohr, Executive Officer
SUBJECT: LAFCO 88-67-4--ANNEXATION 25 TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT
PROPOSAL:
This is a proposal to annex approximately 88.87 acres to the City of Palm
Desert for municipal services.
INITIATED BY:
City of Palm Desert, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California 92260.
LEGAL REQUIREMENTS:
This proposal has met all legal filing requirements. The map and legal
description were approved by the County Surveyor on August 16, 1988. The City
of Palm Desert conducted an Environmental Assessment which resulted in the
filing of a negative declaration.
POPULATION:
The applicant states the population within the proposed boundaries is zero.
The Registrar of Voters reports there are no registered voters within the
proposed annexation boundaries.
LAND USE:
The proposed annexation is located within the Upper Coachella Valley Land Use
Planning Area and is subject to the Western Coachella Valley policies. The
area is designated 3-A (Rural Residential ) on the Western Coachella Valley
Plan. This designation permits residential densities of .4 to 2 dwelling
units per acre or one-half to two-and-one-half acre lots. The site is also
designated as Areas Not Designated As Open Space on the Open Space and
Conservation Map of the Riverside County Comprehensive General Plan. Current
LAFCO 88-67-4
September 22, 1988
Page 2
zoning on the site is W-2-20 (Controlled Development Area) . The City of Palm
Desert has prezoned the area PC-2 (Neighborhood Commercial ) and P-5 (Planned
Residential , five dwelling units per acre) . There are no agricultural
preserves located within the proposed annexation site.
COMMENTS:
The proposed annexation consists of approximately 88.87 acres of vacant
property generally located at the northeast corner of Monterey Avenue and
Gerald Ford Drive. The site is uninhabited, contiguous to the City of Palm
Desert and consistent with the City's sphere of influence. Written
documentation in support of the annexation has been submitted from all
affected landowners. The City initiated this proposal in response to a
petition from the affected landowners who requested annexation to the City of
Palm Desert. The affected landowners plan to develop the property and desire
the urban services available from the City of Palm Desert.
The City of Palm Desert has prezoned the eastern 62 acres of the proposed
annexation PR-5 (Planned Residential , five dwelling units to the acre) . The
remaining acreage to the west has been prezoned PC-2 (Neighborhood
Commercial ) . The City of Palm Desert is presently reviewing preliminary plans
for a commercial development to be located on that portion of the site
prezoned PC-2. Buildout for the commercial development and residential
development is planned for 1993.
ASSESSMENT OF THE POTENTIAL FISCAL IMPACTS:
The County Auditor-Controller reports the total taxes generated within the
affected area are $18,569. At present, the County's share of the property tax
is approximately 33.2 percent or $6, 165 annually. In accordance with the
negotiated property tax agreement between the County of Riverside and the City
of Palm Desert, the City would receive 25 percent of the County's share or
approximately $1 ,541 . The remainder of the taxes generated will continue to
be divided among the other affected agencies including: Coachella Valley
Water District, Coachella Valley Recreation and Park District and Desert Sands
Unified School District, just to name a few.
Additionally, the City of Palm Desert indicates that future development will
include approximately 26,000 square feet of retail/commercial space, and up to
310 single-family dwelling units. Although build-out is not anticipated until
1993, it can be projected that future residential development will provide
approximately $434,000 in additional property tax revenue to the affected
agencies; and, commercial development will result in approximately $175,500 in
sales tax revenue.
The County' s portion of the projected property tax resulting from future
development amounts to approximately $144,088, while the City's share would be
approximately $36,022. If annexed, all future sales tax revenues would go to
the City of Palm Desert.
LAFCO 88-67-4
September 22, 1988
Page 3
It should also be pointed out that approval of this annexation would result in
a corresponding exchange in service responsibility. For example, the County
would no longer be responsible for providing a number of services, including
but not limited to: police and fire protection (except by contract), planning
and land use regulations, street cleaning and maintenance, and building
inspection. However, certain Countywideservices h H 1
p y such as Health, Genera
Hospital , Social Services and Justice Systems would continue to be the
responsibility of the County.
PLAN FOR THE PROVISION OF MUNICIPAL SERVICES:
To support its application, the City of Palm Desert has submitted a plan for
the provision of municipal services. Following are excerpts from that plan:
Water and Sewer--At present, the area is within the service boundary of
the Coachella Valley Water District. The District currently has water and
sewer lines located along Gerald Ford Drive immediately adjacent to the
proposed annexation site. The Coachella Valley Water District intends to
provide service to the site through line extensions from these existing
facilities.
Police Protection--If annexed, the City of Palm Desert would provide
police protection services under contract with the Riverside County
Sheriff ' s Department. Existing manpower and equipment include four cars,
twenty officers and a full-time Crime Prevention Officer. The City
estimates emergency response time to the annexation site would be three to
five minutes.
Fire Protection--If annexed, the City of Palm Desert would provide fire
protection services under contract with the Riverside County Fire
Department. The area is within a five-minute response zone of the Portola
Fire Station. Paramedic ambulance services would be provided by the
Indian Wells Fire Station which is also within a five-minute response zone
of the subject site.
SUMMARY:
- The proposed annexation is contiguous to the City of Palm Desert and
consistent with the City's sphere of influence.
- The site is legally defined as uninhabited, as there are fewer than 12
registered voters within the proposed boundaries.
- Written documentation in support of the annexation has been submitted
from all affected landowners.
- The City of Palm Desert has prezoned the site PR-5 (Planned Residential ,
five dwelling units per acre) and PC-2 (Neighborhood Commercial ) .
LAFCO 88-67-4
September 22, 1988
Page 4
- The City of Palm Desert is willing and able to extend municipal services
as required.
- The proposed annexation is a logical extension of the City' s boundaries.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Based upon the factors outlined above, it is recommended that the Commission:
1 . Certify it has reviewed and considered the City of Palm Desert' s
Environmental Assessment which resulted in a filing of a negative
declaration;
2. Find the annexation is uninhabited;
3. Find that all affected landowners have provided written documentation in
support of the annexation;
4. Find the annexation is consistent with the City of Palm Desert' s sphere of
influence and the spheres of influence of all affected local agencies;
5. Approve LAFCO 88-67-4, Annexation No. 25 to the City of Palm Desert; and,
6. Designate the City of Palm Desert as conducting authority and authorize
the City of proceed without notice, hearing or election.
Respec fully submitted,
Ke Mohr
Executive Officer
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS
LAFCO 88-67-4
Gftllor OO :ff IBDml�
73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
(Pursuant to Title 14, Division 6, Article 7, Section 15083,
of the California Administrative CodO.
Case Nos: GPA 84-3, C/Z 84-18, and PM 20560
Applicant/Project Sponsor: MONTEREY AVENUE ASSOCIATES, ATTN: Lionel
Steinberg, P.O. Box 501, Thermal, CA 92274.
Project Description/Location: Approval of a general plan amendment from low density
residential 3-5 du acre to district commercial, a preannexation change of zone from W-2-
20 (Riverside County zoning) to PC (2) (district commercial) and PR-5 (planned
residential, five dwelling units per acre), a parcel map to divide two existing lots into four
parcels for 88.9 acres located at the future northeast corner of Gerald Ford Drive and
Monterey Avenue.
The director of environmental services, City of Palm Desert, California, has found that
the described project will not have a significant effect on the environment. A copy of the
initial study has been attached to document the reasons in support of this finding.
Mitigation measures, if any, included in the project to avoid potentially significant
of a ts, may also be found attached.
?RAMON A. DIA DATE
Director of Envir TiIntal Services
RAD/tm
NOTICE OF DEPERMINATION
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
TO: (X) Clerk of the Board of Supervisors ( ) Secretary for Resources
County of Riverside 1416 Ninth St. Rm 1311
4080 Lemon Street Sacramento, CA 95814
Riverside, CA 92502
FROM: City of Palm Desert
73-510 Fred Waring Drive
Palm Desert, CA 92260
SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108
or 21152 of the public resources code.
Project Title/Conn Name: Monterey Avenue Associates
Date of Project Approval: July 14, 1988
State QParimhouse Number (if submitted): N/A
Contact Person: Stephen Smith, Associate Planner
Project Location: Northeast corner of Gerald Ford Dr. and Monterey Ave.
Project Description: General Plan Amendment and Prezone of site.
This is to advise that the City of Palm Desert has made the following
determinations regarding the above described project:
11. The project ( ) will, (X) will not, have a significant effect on the
envircrment.
/ 2. An environmental impact report was prepared for this project
Pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. A copy of the environmental
impact report may be examined at the above city ball address.
X A negative declaration was prepared for this project pursuant
to the provisions of CEQA. A copy of the negative declaration may
be examined at the above city hall address.
3. Mitigation measures ( ) were, (X) were not, made a condition of the
approval of the project,
4. A statement of overriding considerations ( ) was, (X) was not,
adopted for this project.
Signature Title IF
U LL F T
Li' 1�\
Date Received for Filinxg
JUL 2O1988
Please return date-stamped copy in the enclosed envelope.
C .•...
INITIAL STUDY
Case Nos: GPA 84-3 C/Z 84-18 and PM 20560
ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION CHECKLIST COMMENTS AND POSSIBLE MITIGATION
MEASURES (CATEGORIES PERTAIN TO ATTACHED CHECKLIST).
5. ANIMAL LIFE:
It has been determined that the Coachella Valley Fringe-Toed Lizard (UMA
INORNATA) exists on the property. This lizard has been designated as a
threatened species by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and endangered by
California Department of Fish and Game.
Mitigation Measures:
Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide
mitigation measures in the form of fees of $750 per acre for a Fringe-Toed
Lizard (UMA INORNATA) habitat preserve. Any fees collected are to be
placed in a fund to be used for acquisition of land for a lizard preserve in
the Coachella Valley. Any excess fees will be refunded to the developer if
fee is lowered. The fee is being requested at this time because of the fact
that it should be paid at the earliest approval stage. In this case meaning
the parcel map.
11. LAND USE:
With this proposal, the westerly 20 acres are proposed to be redesignated
on the general plan from low density residential to district commercial and
subsequently rezoned to PC (2) district commercial.
Mitigation Measures:
The change of the site to district commercial will not have any adverse
impacts on land use plans for the area. Therefore, no mitigation measures
will be necessary.
17. PUBLIC SERVICES:
The request as proposed will not have an impact on the public services at
this time since no development is proposed. However, it can be expected
that there will impact of some degree depending on the type and intensity
of development.
19. UTILITIES:
The request as proposed will not have an impact on the utilities. The major
utilities have indicated that they can and will serve the property without
major problems.
NOTE: This negative declaration applies only to the above cases and annexation. Any
future applications will require further environmental review.
q:
/ CASE NO. d �`� 3
PN. -Los 6 t
EN'7I1101rMENTAL SERVICES DEPT.
INITIAL STUDY
ENVIRO`ME111TAL EVALUATIOtI CHECKLIST
NOTE: The availability of data necessary to address the topics listed
below shall form the basis of a decision as to whether the
application is considered complete for purposes of environmental
assessment.
ENV IROI•IMENTAI IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers, possible mitigation
measures and comments are provided on attached sheets) . ,
Yes Maybe No
1 . Earth. Will the proposal result in: ,
a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in
geologic substructures?
b. Disruptions, displacements , compaction, or _
overcovering of the soil? —
c. Change in topography or ground surface relief
features?
d. The destruction, covering,, or modification
of any unique geologic or physical features? _
e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of
soils, either on or off the site?
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air
quality?
b. The creation of objectionable odors?
c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or
temperature, or any change in climate,
either locally or regionally?
No
3. water. Will the proposal result in: Leas Maybe
a_. Changes. in currents, or the course or
t • direction of water movements?
'` . b. Changes in-absorpt3bn rates, drainage
patterns, or the rate and-amount of
surface water runoff? `
C. Alterations to the course or flow of v
flood waters?
d. Alteration of-the direction or rate of
flow of ground waters?
e. Change in the quantity of ground waters,
either through direct additions or with- J
drawals, or through interception of an
aquifer by cuts or excavations?
f. Reduction in the amount of water other-
wise available for public water supplies?
4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species , or
numbers of any species of plants
(incluing trees , shrubs, grass , and
crops)?
\,
v
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare,or endangered species of plants? , %
C. Introduction of new species of plants into
an area, or in a barrier to the normal
replenishment of existing species?
Animal. Life. Will ,the proposal result in:
a. Changes in the diversity of species, or
numbers of any species of animals (birds ,
land animals including reptiles , or
insects)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
rare, or endangered species of animals? �v
C. Introduction of new species of animals
into an area, or result in a barrier to
the migration or movement of animals? \,
d. Deterioration to existing wildlife habitat ? v
3
Yes Maybe No
6. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increase in ;.the rate of use of any natural
resources?
b. Depletion af ,any resource? non-renewable natural
7. Enervv, Will the proposal result in: \
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? _ 4 .
b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or re-
quire the.development of new sources of
energy?
8. Risk of Up -' - ' Does the proposal involve a
risk of an explosion or the release of ,
hazardous substances (including, but not limited
to, pesticides, oil , chemicals, or radiation) in \
the event of an accident or upset conditions? _ V
9. Economic Loss. Will the proposal result in:
a. A change in the value of property and
improvements endangered by flooding? _
b. A change in the value of property and
improvements >exposed to geologic hazards
_ beyond accepted co=unity risk standards?
10. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing
noise levels to -the point at which accepted .
coamnunity noise and vibration levels are
exceeded? \
11. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the
a tTeration of the present developed or
planned land use of an area?
12. Open Space. Will the proposal lead to a
decrease in the +amount of designated open
space?
13. Phu_ 1_n, . Will the proposal result in: — —
a. Alteraticn of the location, distribution,
density, or growth rate of the human
Population of the Citv?
b. Change in the population distribution by ,
aye, income, 'religion, racial , or ethnic h.
group, occupational class , household type? _
4.
° Yes Maybe No
14. Emoloyment. Will the proposal result in
additional new long-term jobs provided, or a
change in the number and per cent employed,
unemployed, and underemployed? V
IS. Housing. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in number and per cent of housing
units by type (price or rent range,
zoning category, owner-occupied and rental , �.
etc. ) relative to demand or to number of
families in various income classes in the City? _
b. Impacts on existing housing or creation of a
demand for additional housing?
16. Tr�anspo�rtation/Circulation. Will the proposal /
rest tn: \
a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? °
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking?
c. Impact upon existing transportation systems?
d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation
or movement of people and/or goods?
e. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists, or pedestrians?
17. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect
upon , or result in a need for, new or altered
governmental services in any of the following
areAs:
a. Fire protection? _
•b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational facilities?
e. Maintenance of public facilities , including
roads?
f. Other governmental services? _ _
5.
Yes Maybe No
18. Public Fiscal Balance. Will the proposal
result in a net change in government fiscal
flow (revenues less operating expenditures
and annualized capital expenditures)?
19. Utilities.' Will the proposal result in a
need for new systems, or alterations to the
following utilities:
r
a. Power or natural gas?
b. Communications system?
c. Water?
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste and disposal?
20. Human Health. Will the proposal result in:
a. The creation of any health hazard or
potential health hazard? b
b. A change in the level of community health
care provided?
21. Social Services Will the proposal result in
_ an increased demand for provision of general \
social services?
22. Aesthetics . Will the proposal result in:
a. Obstruction of any scenic vista or view
open to the public? G
b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive
site open to public view?
c. Lessening of the overall neighborhood
(or area) attractiveness, pleasantness,
and uniqueness?
23. Li ht and Glara. Will the proposal produce
new ig t or g are?
24. Archeoloaical/Historical . Will the proposal
resu t in an a teration of a significant \
archeological or historical site, structure, \V
object, or building?
6.
• Yee Maybe No
25. Mandatory Findings gf Significance.
a. Does the project have the potential to degrade
the quality of the environment or to curtail
the diversity in the environment?
b. Does the project have the potential to achieve `
short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term,
environmental goals? (A short-term impact on
the environment is one which occurs in a
relatively brief, definitive period of time
while long-term impacts will endure well into
the future. ) J
C. Does the project have impacts which are indi-
vidually limited, but cumulatively considerable?
(A project may impact on two or more separate
resources where the impact on each resource
is relatively small , but where the effect of
the total of those impacts on the environment
is significant. )
d. Does the Project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings , either directly or indirectly? _
Initial Study Prepared By:
PLAN FOR THE PROVISION OF MUNICIPAL SERVICES
CITY OF PALM DESERT
TO: Riverside County Local Agency Formation Caimission
DATE: July 14, 1988
APPLICANT: City of Palm Desert
SUBJECT: Plan for Services for Palm Desert Annexation No. 25
I. INTRODUCTION:
Pursuant to Section 56653 of the State Government Cade, the city is
required to file with any new annexations a plan outlining the method by
which services will be provided in the area to be annexed. This report
represents the required plan for services for proposed Annexation No.
25. The City of Palm Desert, being a contract city, must rely on many
other agencies to provide for services both in the oor==ty and areas
subsequently annexed. In addition, many services Provided such as water
and sewer, electricity and gas are provided without regard to city limit
lines; therefore, the area proposed to be annexed is presently served or
has the capability of being served by many of these agencies.
The major emphasis of this report is to address those services provided
directly by the city either through city staff or direct contract with
the city by other agencies. In addition, wherever possible this report
will address the methods by which other service agencies would provide
needed facilities in the area.
II. DESCR2IPTION OF SERVICES:
The utilities which would be extended into the area proposed to be
annexed would be as part of actual development and they would consist of
the services of the Coachella Valley County Water District for water and
sewer, Southern California Edison Company, Southern California Gas
Company, General Telephone Company and Palmer Cable. The services
provided by this city directly would be in planning and building, public
works, parks, administration and code enforcement services. By contract
the city would also provide for trash disposal, police and fire services.
Public transportation would be provided by the Sunline Agency.
There are no major road improvements necessary to facilitate access to
the area.
III. LEVEL OF SERVICE:
The level and range of services, provided would include sufficient sized
water, sewer, gas and electrical facilities to service development
Proposed for the area. Planning, building, public works and code enforce-
ment services as provided by the city directly would be on the basis of
need.
PAIM DESERT ANNEXATICN AD. 25
The area is within the five minute response zone of the Portola and
Country Club station. Backup would be provided by the E1 Paseo/Town
Center, Indian Wells, Rancho Mirage, Bermuda Dunes and Thousand Palms
stations.
Paramedic ambulance services
i ces would be provided by the Indian Wells Fire
Station. The city presently contracts from Riverside County Sheriff
Department for 120 hours per day for citywide patrols which will
�l Ira 11 be
expanded as needs require.
IV. TIMING FOR SERVICE EXTENSIONS:
Basic utilityservices exist
st adjacent to the property. The city services
would be available immediately in the area of planning, buildingR and node
enforcement, public works, police and fire. Road improvements (wi
dening
of Monterey Ave. ) would occur as a part of new developnant.
V. REWIREvJEN S OF NEW DEVELOPMRgT AND FINANCING:
New development would be required to provide for needed municipal
facilities through the city's development ordinances. A fire facilities
fee of $100.00 per residential unit will be used to finance the necessary
fire facilities.
The provision of planning and building services world be provided through
the fees generated from new development. Ongoing maintenance of roads
created in the area, would be provided on the
pxovi basis of sales tax generated
from commercial facilities in the area. In summary, it is felt that
development of this area would result in a balance between needed services
and the revenue to provide said services.
/fr
2
MAPS
36 �31 1 36 N —3
I �
1 6 I a 1 6
THOUSAND
PALMS
RAMDN RD
T4S IR6E ,
0
�j u
z
36 31 36 c 31
I
6 6
R NHO
MIRA T5S R6E I 10
' MI rEW4TEA . P LM • f•�.•1 4
DES {•: :�
RIVfR
� ill
a ••
- -�- - INDIAN '•- �- �-
WELLS 36 31
` TSS R
Annexation No. 25 to the City of Palm Desert
_LAFCO No. 88-67-4
1
LEGEND 31
Annexation No. 25 to the City of Palm Desert ® 6
Palm Desert city limits —• ••— --
Palm Desert sphere of Influence boundary
DINAH SHORE DR.
VIA VAIL
•
30
29
w
a
L
ERALD FORD DR.
CITY w
w >
X
OF o CITY
a
RANCHO 31 OF 32
MIRAGE PALM
0
DESERT a
FRANK SINATRA DR
T5S R6E
Annexation No. 25 to the City of Palm Desert
LAFCO No. 88-67-4
LEGEND
Annexation No. 25 to the City of Paton Desert
Palm Desert city limits —• ••—
RESOLUTION No. 88-131 (�
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF v
PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNEXING CERTAIN
CONTIGUOUS TERRITORY TO SAID CITY UNDER THE
PROVISIONS OF THE CORTESE/KNOX LOCAL GOVMW4Rgr
REORGANIZATION ACT OF 1985, WHICH PROCEEDINGS ARE
DESIGNATED AS PALM DESERT ANNEXATION NO. 25,
LAFOO NO. 88-67-4.
WHEREAS, on July 14, 1988, the City Council did adopt Resolution No. 88-79
initiating annexation proceedings for Annexation No. 25; and
WHEREAS, the Local Agency Formation Commission held a public hearing
relative to Annexation No. 25 on September 22, 1988, and approved said
annexation with the determination that the City Council of the City of Palm
Desert be authorized to proceed without notice and hearing; and
WHEREAS, the proposed annexation represents a logical extension of the
City of Palm Desert's boundaries and will not be taxed for existing general
bonded indebtedness by the City of Palm Desert, and the regular Riverside
County assessment roll shall be utilized in the future.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm
Desert, California, as follows:
1. That the territory described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto
and made a part hereof by reference, be and the same is hereby, by
this resolution annexed to the City of Palm Desert.
2. That the city clerk is hereby instructed and directed to transmit
fifteen (15) certified copies of this resolution to LAFOO along with
any other required submittals.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert City
Council, held on this 13th day of October, 1988, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: CRITES, SNYDER, WILSON, AND BENSON
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: KELLLY
ABSTAIN: NONE
M. BENS ON, Mayor
j�ATTEST: �
SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, Cit lerk
City Of Palm Desert, Qifornia
/tm
R SO;,TJTION NO. 88-131
LAFCO 88-67-4
ANNEXATION NO. 25
CITY OF PALM DESERT
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That portion of the Southwest quarter of Section 29, Township 4 South, Range
6 East, San Bernardino Base 6 Meridian, In Riverside County, - California, more
particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the Southwest corner of Section 29;
Thence, North 0000'47" West a distance of 19332.84 feet;
Thence, North 0°01 '27" West a distance of 137. 16 feet;
Thence, North 89' 53'30" East a distance of 2,631 .46 feet to the quarter
section line;
Thence, South 0009'41" East a distance of 1 ,470 feet to the South limit of
Section 29;
Thence, South 89' 53'30" West a distance of 2,635.20 feet to the point of
beginning.
The preceding five courses are per RS 40/69.
This parcel contains 88.876 acres, more or less.
BY:
1ROCHARD J. KERS
CITY ENGINE R
CITY OF PALM DESERT
R.C.E. 25320
0 ;,r40 S,
4 .a )OHNF�'• �y
N0. 4568 I `�` o ,
Exp. Dn1-e .� No. 25320
WLL'
THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION APPROVED tf', 9
Auc I�i�� \^•:T�. Q;`:- CIVIL BY NECRINC�\�;
BY RS�ICOUNTY SURVEYOR �c CALF: ' * flENGI
i
DiN1N TNOR[
20 yr
. L rr
49
T
W
> W
I
I a
}
r✓
L
z
x Y
x W
R
W
U.9.O.L.O. BRASS CAP 3/4"I.P.42"LONO to i
w. 1/4 COR. C 1/4 COR. SEC. 21 i
N 89.57'43•E 2628. —r
J
O
aC
� 8
Q - [RANI TIN1r IA OA
[tn VICINITY MAP
c --- m
M —
3
� 3
• ni a
N ^ O
� O
A
N89.53'30'E _ 2631.46'
Z COUNTY OFR/VERS/0£
137.16' PALM O rr C/TY L/M/T
CA
i i e con RA!! LAWQ S✓�'
0\
3 88.87 ACRES
I
a 3 ' EXP.lo,4e
o J,T R-30-91
Z z OF
US.O.L.o. BRASS
CAP lx Con.BEC.29
3 N 89.53'300E 2635.20' 1/2" I.P. TAGOED L3.2344 3.1/4 COR.
—. GERALD FORD CRIVE
31 32 PALM OESERT C/TY L/M/T
lofESSIpy
NOTE[ .� p
THIS PLAY WAS PREPARED FROM C.0 :ZP `•• Z
RECORD DATA (R! 40/49)AND OOf! N07 W Mo.25320 m� m
REPRESENT SURVEY Of THE PROPERTY THIS MAP APPROVED s tc iAP. It-11• �: Cp
lnowR NatIN• _9.L� ll0 1 t9P59 CIVIL ��:'
BY R'IVAcRSID/E� COUNTY SURVEYOR �C•••.•ENCINERINC.�
BY N\OIAY S,-I4 e1.MlO� ,jj'••.....•••'��Q
elf OF CRII��`��
LAFCO NO. 88-67-4
i
�f� LPDrawn DY'
PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO.25��y4� TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT Nanifi San Pe
PORTION OF SOUTHWEST t/4 SEC. 29•T4S R6E S.8.8.6 M.
No.25920 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/PLANNINQ,_Put,4 SCALE:
ANNEXATION NO. 25
CITY OF PALM DESERT
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That portion of the Southwest quarter of Section 29, Township 4 South, Range
6 East, San Bernardino Base 8 Meridian, in Riverside County, California, more
particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the Southwest corner of Section 29;
Thence, North 0 00'47" West a distance of 1 ,332.84 feet;
Thence, North 0 01'27" West a distance of 137. 16 feet;
Thence, North 89 53'30" East a distance of 2,631 .46 feet to the quarter
section line;
Thence, South 0 09'41" East a distance of 1 ,470 feet to the South limit of
Section 29;
Thence, South 89 53'30" West a distance of 2,635.20 feet to the point of
beginning.
The preceding five courses are per RS 40/69.
This parcel contains 88.876 acres, more or less.
BY: // 16z--
/RUCHARD J. OLKERS
CITY ENGINEER
CITY OF PALM DESERT
R.C.E. 25320
11WESSM
�Q�O��jOHijr'of Fyn
ti
Z
Q .UP No.25320 rnt „�^,
CIVIL ;
�C•�•.•ENGINEERING,
'�j9tf•�F�C�I\\���@
I
73.510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611
June 30 , 1988 " `� � �.�t✓
J U L 1 1988
COhIMWMTY OEVELOPMEN! DEPARTMENT
C11Y OF PALM DESERT
Mr . Lionel Steinberg
Monterey Avenue Associates
P.O. Box 501
Thermal , California 92275
Dear Mr . Steinberg:
At its regular meeting of June 23 , 1988, the Palm Desert City
Council considered and approved an amendment to the land use
element of the General Plan and approved a tentative parcel map
for land located at the northeast corner of Gerald Ford Drive and
Monterey Avenue .
Enclosed for your records is a fully executed copy of Resolution
No . 88-62 taking the above mentioned action .
If you have any questions or require any additional information ,
please do not hesitate to contact us .
Sincerely,
SHEILA R . GILLIGAN
CITY CLERK/PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER
SRG :mpf
Enclosure (as noted)
cc : Housley Associates
74-040 El Paseo, Suite A
Palm Desert , CA 92260
RESOLUrIC d N- 88-62
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AbEMMI M
TO THE LAND USE ELIIMa OF THE GENERAL PLAN AND
APPROVIM A TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP FOR LAND LOCATED
AT THE FUTURE NORTHEAST CORNER OF GERALD FORD
DRIVE AND MONTEREY AVENUE.
CASE NOS. GPA 84-3 and PM 20560
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on
the 9th day of June, 1988, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the
request of MONPEREY AVENUE ASSOCIATES (Lionel Steinberg) for approval of a
general plan amendment from low density residential (3-5 du/acre) to district
commercial for 22.1 gross acres, and a parcel map to create two parcels, and a
negative declaration of envirormental impact as it relates to the above for
88.86 gross acres located at the future northeast corner of Gerald Ford Drive
and Monterey Avenue, more particularly described as:
APN 653-260-003 and 004
WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City
of PaLn Desert Procedures to Implement the California Environmental Qualiy Act, Resolution No. 80-89", in that the director of cm u,n;ty development has determined that the project will not have an adverse impact on the environment
and a negative declaration has been prepared: and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all
testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said city
council did find the following facts and reasons to Justify approval of the
general plan amendment:
1. The location of the proposed commercial designation is adjacent to
Commercial zoning to the south.
2• The proposed commercial designation would cluster commercial zoning
along Monterey Avenue.
3. The commercial designation will not be detrimental to the health,
safety, or general welfare of adjacent properties.
4. The location of the proposed commercial designation is on major
thoroughfares which will be able to accommodate traffic generated.
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering the
testily and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be
heard, said city council did find the following facts and reasons to exist to
Justify approval of the parcel map:
1. That the proposed map is consistent with applicable general and
specific plans.
2. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is
consistent with applicable general and specific plans.
RESCU"ICN NO. 88-62 • `
3. That the site is physically suitable for the type of development.
4. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density' of
development.
5. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are
not likely to cause substantial errArornental damage or substantially
and avoidable injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
6. That'the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not
likely to cause serious public health problems.
7. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will
not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for
access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm
Desert, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the
findings of the city council in this case.
2. That it does hereby approve the above described general plan
amendnent.
3. That it does hereby approve the above described Tentative Parcel Map
No. 20560, subject to fulfillment of the attached conditions.
4. That a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact is hereby
approved.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert City
Council, held an this 9th y of June 1988 by the following vote, to
wit:
AYES: CRITES, KELLY, SNYDER, WILSON
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: BENSON / s
ABSTAIN: NONE �{
JE, J M. BENSON; Mayor
ATTEST: b� S. Roy Wilsoq, Mayor Pro-Tempore
SHEILA R, GILL GAN, City erk
City of Palm Desert, California
AM
2
-RESOLUTION M. 88-62
CU♦DITIONS OF APPAOVJM
C?= NO. PM 20560
Department of Cbumunity Development:
1. Parcel Map 20560 is granted for the land as described in the attactment
hereto, and as shown on exhibits on file with the department of community
development and the requirements herein.
2. All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of the state, city
and any other applicable government entity, shall be complied with as a
part of this map.
3. Pursuant to municipal code requirements, tentative parcel map shall be
recorded within two years from date of approval, unless an extension of
time is granted, otherwise, said approval shall became null, void and of
no effect whatsoever.
4. Prior to recordation of final map, the applicant shall provide mitigation
measures in the form of fees of $750 per acre for a Fringe-Toed Lizard
(U,A INORNATA) habitat preserve. Any fees collected are to be placed in a
fund to be used for acquisition of land for a lizard preserve in the
Coachella Valley._ If fee is lowered, excess fees shall be refunded to
developer.
I
Department of Public Works:
1. Dedication of 55 feet of right-of-way on Monterey Avenue and 50 feet of
right-of-way on Gerald Ford Drive shall be done prior to recordation of
final map.
2. Installation of one-half landscaped median in Monterey Avenue or cash
payment for one-half the cost of landscaped median at the option of the
director of public works.
3. Drainage and signalization fund fees, as required by city ordinance, shall
be paid prior to recordation of the final map.
4. Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218 and the
Master Drainage Plan, to the specifications of the director of public
works.
5. Storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the
private engineer that is approved by the department of public works.
6. Landscaping maintenance on Monterey Avenue and Gerald Ford Drive shall be
provided by the property owner.
3
4
gzSCLUrICN ND. 88-62
7. Full half-street public inprovenents, including traffic safety lighting,
etc., shall be installed in accordance with city standards.
AM
4
1
LEGEND
High Density 7•I8 du/cc ES Elsmemary School. I; "
INTERSTATE 10(FREEWAY)
Medium Oentlry S;7 du/aa CC Clrle Cenlsw . 'I"i,�SOMENOM � MAJOR HIGHWAY '
� .I" Density 3-Sdu/ae Park '
O MAJOR STREET
Very Low Density 1.3 du/cc EEI Public Utility
R STREET
L
Service Industrial OP Dare Polm Preservollan — -.— PD.CITY LIMIT'--
Core Area Commercial and .P F Public Facllllles PC). SPHERE
Rotated Uses
DlsrrlCI Commercial - OFFP Wilke Proleesf,nar IUInn1uII111VIIIIIINI S.PACIFIC RAILROAD
® Resort Commercial Ii:l Golf Course
Reglonot Commercial L`1J NOTE:
RC ® Programs
alive Research
Programs � . SPECIFIC LOCATION OF PUBLIC FACILIT
MS Middle School H.P.R. Hillside Planned ResldeMlal NOt INTENDED
LESS SITE ALREAD)
OWNED EAGENCY.
HS High School
A.H.D. Affordable High Density
N.
1
20 21
rr.
GRAPHIC- SCALE "
500 2000 4000 6"
1000 3000 3000
-25 9/p 8
1w6yr- TO
Drsrr ICT rA^(tM��uAL / '
20 AC s �'-
: , .;
— ----- ---36"TH--AVE-: � j•
36 31
FRANK-1311NATIRA--DRIVE
1 Uj
I
-@AUNT -Y--C_L-U9-DRIVE ? /
CITY OF PALM DESERT
I
Gen. Plan Amend . ! ( >> CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 88-62
A DATE June 9, 1988
73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260
TELEPHONE(619)346-0611
May 24, 1988
CITY OF PALM DESERT
LEGAL NOTICE
CASE NOS. GPA 84-3 AND C/Z 84-18
NOTICE 15 HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the City
Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, to consider a request by
MONTEREY AVENUE ASSOCIATES (Lionel Steinberg) for approval of a general plan
amendment from low density residential (3-5 dujacre) to district commercial for
22. 1 gross acres, a preannexation change of zone from W-2-20 (Riverside County
zoning) to PC (2) (District Commercial ) for 22. 1 gross acres and PR-5 (Planned
Residential , 5 dwelling units per acre) for 66.76 gross acres, and a negative
declaration of environmental impact as it relates to the above for 88.96 gross
acres located at the northeast corner of Gerald Ford Drive and Monterey Avenue,
more particularly described as:
APN 653-260-003 and 004
4-*4----- PALM DESERT
ADOPTED SPHERE.
COUNTY
f •
s
1Z
I
�(� I COUNT OF RIVE SIDE
7 17 PALM DESERT CITY LIMIT AVC- -"--
it �iVFwrV �IV.�
P.C. (2) i
PR- 5
SAID public hearing will be held on Thursday, June 9, 1988, at 7:00 p.m. in the
Council Chamber at the Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm
Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited
to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions in court, you
may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the
public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered
to the planning commission (or city council ) at, or prior to, the public
hearing.
.PUBLISH: Desert Post SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, City Clerk
May 27, 1988 City of Palm Desert, California
1
ale S227S,e-
�/ �u
�-0 -:.00s — 1G c/v _S �e ss,c[� C-& -,Q0' ..Fe, co,
bag
lw:� P�-
sz.s
-
�`�-��v
o cPS 04s�,,/
�P• /'lil C'a � 9ZZ7Zj i
I
Smith Peroni & pox [) MEMORAIOUM
PLANNING CONSULTANTS .NC.
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
TO DATE SAL64kr,_ PROJECT 1'L1kr{1,,!e �
CJL" to uGvw O SUBJECT sSjf m f�
PYYnQPn�tf OUl>LpiJ (n�
ATTENTION ny�
WE ARE SENDING. Attached ❑ Under separate cover via:
❑ Originals ❑ Prints ❑ Mylar sepias ❑ Sepias ❑ Photocopies
❑ Maps ❑ Plans ❑ Reports ❑ Copy of letter ❑
Copies Data No. Description
/Q
TRANSMITTED: ❑ For approval _ For your use [�<As requested ❑ For review
❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections ❑
REMARKS
COPY TO SIGNED: �'�'L
980 E. Tahquitz Way, Suite C, Palm Springs, California 92262
(619) 322-0900
I
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT EC�r RiCAF� TITLE RISURANCE
(OMPAR
PROPERTY OWNERS CERTIFICATION
LYSA DELEON
'l. certify that on
MAY 24, 1988 the attached property owners list was
prepared byyFIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE CUPAICY pursuant to application
requirements furnished by the Riverside County Planning Department. Bald
list is a complete and true compilation of owner of the subject property
and all other property owners within 300 feet of the property involved
is the application and is baded upon the latest equalized assessment roils.
2 further certify that the information tiled is true .and correct to the
best of my knowledge; I understand that incorrect or erroneous Information
may be grounds for rejection or denial of the application.
Sun: LYSA DELEON
TITLE/
REGISTRATION Customer Service Representative
ADDRESS: 3625 Fourteenth Street
Riverside California 92502
VZOM (8-5) 714-787-2730
SIGNATURE:
1UTZ: MAY 1988 CM SEE ATTACHED
PD BS-35
Monterey Palms Monterey Palms
c/o Gale S. Messick o Gale S. Messick
P.O. Box 1315 r.0. Box 1315
Glendora, CA 91740 Glendora, CA 91740
(A.P. 653-260-005) (A.P. 653-260-005)
MC Properties MC Properties
525 Riverleigh Avenue 525 Riverleigh Avenue
Riverhead, NY 11901 Riverhead, NY 11901
(A.P. 653-260-008) (A.P. 653-260-008)
West World Properties, Inc. West World Properties, Inc.
David Freedman & Co. , Inc. David Freedman & Co. , Inc. d'
P.O. Box 501 P.O.Box 501 y
Thermal, CA 92274 Thermal, CA 92274
(A.P. 653-260-012) (A.P. 653-260-012)
Peoples Mortage Company Peoples Mortage Company
c/o Peoples Savings & Loan Ass. c/o Peoples Savings & Loan Assoc.
P.O. Box 16429 P.O. Box 16429
San Antonio, Texas 78216 San Antonio, Texas 78216
(A.P. 653-360-006) (A.P. 653-360-006)
Peoples Mortage Company Peoples Mortage Company _
P.O. Box 130 P.O. Box 130
Llano, Texas 78643 Llano, Texas 78643
(A.P. 653-360-007) (A.P. 653-360-007)
David Freedman & Company, Inc. David Freedman & Company, Inc.
P.O. Box 501 P.O. Box 501
Thermal, CA 92274 Thermal, CA 92274
(A.P. 653-360-008) (A.P. 653-360-008)
St. Cloud Company NV St. Cloud Company NV
Bellagio Realty NV Bellagio Realty NV
c/o Munger Tolles & Olson c/o Munger Tolles & Olson
2049 East Century Park #2910 2049 East Century Park #2910
Los Angeles, CA 90067 Los Angeles, CA 90067
(A.P. 618-410-005) (A.P. 6187410-005) _
AGRUME NV AGRUME NV
Bernard Debonne Bernard Debonne
Linrim Land Corporation Linrin Land Corporation
P.O. Box 1935 P.O. Box 1935
Palm Desert, CA 92261 Palm Desert, CA 92261
(A.P.. 618-500-011) (A.P. . 618-500-011)
Marion Mosick Marion Mosick
Est. of Jim Mitcheltree Est. of Jim Mitcheltree
416 Redlands Street 416 Redlands Street
Playa Del Rey, CA 90291 Playa Del Rey, CA 90291
(A.P. 618-510-020) (A.P. 618-510-020)
Louis B. Noble Louis B. Noble
1377 West Sixth Street 1377 West Sixth Street
Reno, Nevada 89503 Reno, Nevada 89503
(A.P. 618-510-021) (A.P. 618-510-021)
Ob
{ '• ; n 1 ��ICM/ ��(~1
1 •^• ± ! •�yK� NV�1N �TN
OP,
MC;
Ti �+�,,,,« C
xNn ev tw .� „i Fawmw 072,49
S t
FROM
�tNYI F^1m t't �rc.M -
O p � o lii= NC 1� •t
ice_ �� a
dV
!i
Ant
p + q+ �i"• jt >
ew . !�o
twa
«Qf1 ODM
Ice
rn
a
i
;M�j
:
R _ r; r
i
r, r«
30 s f
/ < a
r'• � i � � �"'-Ian
P M !1 C3 p gyp•/ N TJ M
1` d Q as
� •, p tD O M � O' 7��
D<
aas WE
WS
CC GG 1 � 4SC6�
f ' oog600
O
060 V.
., -a - ' w i
3001
. ;
ob
r= i ..
► ► � x� `' j` `� `�,� �, 'cam`s
rci « rc
P�� vN
O M O 5
2 3! Mco
• �FjCC;;;;
�a� to
fffii
1
L
V
�1 7 30
N
w CI Big 1 Z 1/err H
Mc
. 1 � �
OsM� S .�
to n < r71w V ~ �Lrnl 1>D * r
fnl s fw -+ eff� .1 i v`�atx M
a e„rw/ a /ex .e�.ar..s� e+r� ytr1 p_prDs r[ _G
..mow a ; .ate.. «a.«. CEO w 7E O 7.LL µ 1 s D
1 /1a�0, -8 =-4 / S y M Ois, �O 1
1w �A ,J' JS/A BSI*
D 91D AA40 ± 30 a:DMt �;Mr j eDi► �ls �;10l co >'s
,o w„ qo
N o l! = w ci �i sl
AND1 =
ORWO _
_ _ ![_ ! is
to
c � so m,
N M go w Alb i M N = O/ = tra
w=l 37 rr7 �r7�. 1 22 i o OVa= T
w j q W /JI / / fM 1 l7
1 / / / /
i CT MR
T i CT MR
w
1'iw v
qtp
.}.
r+ e e
rt
rS •. IWO
,fir.+..: �'' � � �•_
*.Of or T � ~
wi Q w
rt i 37 to
/ate
M M w M Mso
M w
bas
M P 8 V P• � Y _a
J
. . / e
Mw.�
p.1 J1 4I ?1 O1 �i JI JI 0 N
op1 COI i mC/1 va 1 '901 i a Icier
pM
f M1r wJ CPS i �.�a— i a. wo i V.t�Ewo i rm.-�
1 f ON N a O• V��ppp[[[��C�j�fff _
cp^W�pJ I 1 a aJ 1'��pp 1 ro i i�I~.1 i 1 i w maw
aN
8;2?:. r_ ��e+«.u/ _ern Jr cJ go PPP000 � 77�m�����rrtt�i fCA ��i i on -a i w+ -
��.N����< CP SEW -
1 Swn..
P'TYAS/tn M pOf� _rn �yp�t1
awr-
IOt1a�Jf1"I /Ta 1.1 I M ist i m 1 w+ I r i�n,��iwn 1 q=ACCT 1 N
N\�12N /Na 9V /ya� yam 1 N
f1r 119r>r ~ �,,i�,,�
1 N ' i _ i�riaa '$ � 1 i Ei= i$ a
am
�y-4 y 1
r4 s 1 N i��pay 1"Q1a / �T3 1 fIM11r < /y 111tI1J` 1
10590 i i ii /Y�' _ ITJ A i_
i
1
N r�
q�! / pC
enhj J 1 I;Y.s �`/INIMff J 1 Itta J N+'o' V/1/nt� V V 1 Nr V V
T VIIIIIII Vft`sIn V1M u I 1 � '
TJ yj�1i J yfI _y.�/!� yJyI1fTMOw Jfln� 'OJlugtp�i� Owwwyyyp-t
INj.� O I VNff O it O 1 w� O I iNtIN 01 I ^_ 1 RT '" 1 T
T f 11t 1 1 r 1
ffnc3 1 q /NJ /No Nef 1 frYe+
I Nit
`w t Mp(� 1 I seta .Y 1 1 1
Net M i�N�rypfl 1 MI" iy11
M17 0 110 I C' �t
1 N 1 pp.
M tg
f! /NV 1 N I / III 1 m ; �R
N I I M / SIP- t. / I 1
Iw jl 1 p} I w V 1-41 1 1 T
Flt 1 I SIR
O 1 A
t
_ 1
CD- i 01 1 v
• i i t f 1 i Ir
Y t 1 i 1 1 1
O CAR 1 .�Iltrr
i
.. 1 $ RVO
I i
�a
f's t A f A l I Nple�f 1 /.Itlt I SCS
UM
IZ I y 1 O 1
IS
N A 1 M T 1 ppM 1 00�yl�
n 1 ell. 1 A1 A I e2Y
A I T 1
T 1 An T I T1 N 1 N / N 1~ r^coo N 1 CA N S / I <
1 1 I Is
Is 1 1 1 1 ii
1 1 1
1
I 1
1 1 1 1 1 I TSO
I 1 1 .y1f
CIS
1 s 1 m
s '
t�IIMIII 1 s i
.OUIi,I ,M,V.'V .ppp :IIN.
10
10
• C1 \JJ ` C Ct CC O4KC(
Zii''iiKCC I'
K
I
j; • ; 1 1 M I a -N
d 1 6pa I {pia 1 --6Qa/ FM
NO 1 Htl�1 ]pV�y>7�hy1vN'
r!<�p 1' sD.C�; +liPO�i �44 i f�NCri r, �' ^� G400
"i'�/'O"'i a S`" x' �0 �'r OFM/vr J 1 T�NS7
FFMM G P��[[ !!�� 1 7� 1 C1�t^{yN
n' { :�..M'�yt i �' 1 rGL �.
()p�rraN 1 M rnna!1 MP`+�+L'YI I�/1D++-�3N }II�f1
T� t I N 01_ 1 Nam 'VCP^ 1 1 O 1 O >
O^III 1 077� 1 01'IT 1 OPf I RM1 / 11 T>O� n
aM rr / /Ii f 1 N^ppfp4- 1 N> r '^7 � 1 T WOW
yr.-y_ /
/BIOS fN / a 1 L 71� 1 � �<r yr 1 na..pp Ty 1 y N
y g 7 1 r ! N t f•'f� N 1 f�f� N 1}� ;a j Nc
9
22
O n g
I _ CJ hl 1 N
1 1 _ j9 �1 y
y VNT V;IIIIt1 V I >
0 ( y1 1 / x
oH
y 1 i \a OI is' 1 I's1 *1}� 01
♦♦♦r IJJ��� 1 N\ !�1 }
\O �; 0I M OI VOI Olpy OIT! PI T
y� It N 1 N ; y ' >
N 'NO 1
y pO i 7 1 7 1 N i MT
30 r1\Am%It 10 ; 29 1is
'
i' i IYI i 1 ; m
; 1.
CD ...r.i NIr1 Is w j._ ^I^ v 1 o f
�
Is
zMa
46
^J QQ
M 1 N ; N 1 Ky /Ii
� i�essr
i " i ^.T
i 1 iID40
1 1 1
-.cccc
i 1 � s
w 1� ,.pOppdppppv��1
1 J �Y: a1
� \1
cc aA<cc
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
CITY OF PALM DESERT
TO: Mayor Benson and City Council
FROM: Department of Community Development
DATE: July 6, 1988
SUBJECT: Annexation #25 - Monterey Avenue Associates - Resolution requesting
LAFCO to proceed
Attached is a resolution requesting LAFCO to take proceedings for the annexation
of 89 acres in the southwest quarter of Section 29. The prezoning of this
property was approved by council in June 1988.
This resolution, when approved, will complete the city's application.
SRS/dlg
J •'
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION BY THE CITY OF
PALM DESERT REQUESTING THE LOCAL AGENCY
FORMATION COMMISSION TO TAKE PROCEEDINGS FOR
THE CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION KNOWN AS PALM
DESERT ANNEXATION NO. 25.
RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, that
WHEREAS, the City of Palm Desert desires to initiate proceedings pursuant to the
Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, Division 3, commencing with
Section 56000 of the California Government Code, for annexation; and
WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be annexed is uninhabited and a description
for the boundaries of the territory is set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by
. this reference incorporated herein; and
WHEREAS, this proposal is consistent with the sphere of influence of the City of
Palm Desert; and
WHEREAS, the reasons for this proposed annexation are as follows:
1. The proposed territory to be annexed is adjacent to and substantially
surrounded by the City of Palm Desert and therefore represents a logical
expansion of the city's boundary.
2. The area is experiencing development pressures and requires a higher level
of urban services then are currently .offered by the County of Riverside.
The City of Palm Desert can provide these services.
NOW, THEREFORE, this Resolution of Application is hereby adopted and approved by
the City Council of the City of Palm Desert and the Local Agency Formation Commission
of Riverside County is hereby requested to take proceedings for the annexation of
territory as described in Exhibit "A", according to the terms and conditions stated
above and in the manner provided by the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization
Act of 1985.
PASSED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert at a regular
meeting thereof held on the day of 1988 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
JEAN M. BENSON, Mayor
ATTEST:
SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, City Clerk
City of Palm Desert, California
i
EXHIBIT 'A'
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Annexation No. 25
City of Palm Desert
That portion of the southeast quarter of section 29, township 4 south range 6
east, SBM, in Riverside County, California more particularly described as
follows:
i
Beginning at the southwest corner of section 29;
0
Thence North 0 00' 47" West a distance of 1332.84 feet.
0
Thence North 0 O1' 27" West a distance of 137.16 feet.
0
Thence North 89 53' 30" East a distance of 2631.46 feet to the quarter
section line.
0
Thence South 0 09' 41" East a distance of 1470 feet to the south limit
of section 29.
0
Thence South 89 53' 30" West a distance of 2635.20 feet to the point of
beginning-
Contains approximately 89 acres.
Monterey Avenue Associates
Lionel Steinberg, General Partner
June 21 , 1988 ]" �" �S
'UAI 2 s 1988
Mr. Ray Diaz -. y,,,
Assistant City Manager/Director of c r tnlnavr�
Community Development/Planning
City of Palm Desert
73-510 Fred Waring Drive
Palm Desert, California 92260
Subject: Petition for Annexation of Property at Northeast Corner of
Monterey venue an era or rive
Dear Ray:
On behalf of Monterey Avenue Associates I have prepared the enclosed
petition for annexation of property noted as Assessors Parcels 653-26-010
and 653-26-011 . These parcels have been reviewed for pre-general plan
and zone designation by the Planning Commission and City Council via
C/Z 84-18 (Ordinance No. 419) and G PA 84-3 (Resolution No. 88-62) .
We are hopeful that the City will immediately pursue annexation with
LAFCO. Please notify my office or that of Smith, Peroni & Fox,
Planning Consultants, if you need any additional information.
Very truly yours,
Lionel Steinberg
General Partner
LS:MAP:km
Enclosure
cc: MAPeroni , Smith, Peroni & Fox, Palm Springs, California
Box 501 Thermal, California 92274 (619) 345 1143
JUN 2 3 1988
PETITION
COMMUAIIY DEYELUPA^.LN1 DEPARIMENT
CITY Of PALM DESERT
TOt , THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA
In accordance with the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985
Code Section 56000, Monterey Avenue Associates (Lionel Steinberg General
Partner)
owners of all subJect property legally described below (see map attached
hereto) respectfully request said property be annexed to the City of Palm
Desert.
;1
Legal Description:
Assessors Parcel Nos. 653-26=010
653-26-011
Petitioner ' reserves the right to withdraw at �ny time prior to Its
finalization.
Datet —June 20, 1988jj
By: ` oCJXfl ! p
Address: Monterey Avenue Associates (Lionbl Steinberg, General Partner)
Post Office Box 501
Thermal, California 92274
f {[I l
3I� hhlNlhlhihi �, I �
fig ; •� �f
,00b
BS . 6B5
"Q zff/
M . bs.
V V
Q
� SS
1
O r OV &S 6L
'} h
a0 Q
4.,
W
az 26.1Z - -
94?
£'S9
I
ss
`I
I
O h g P N
♦ a h b N A
N O D P P
Q Q Q Q Q Q
BOO b/lM S[b!F L
'
�+ O
V "
m
Sf Yz fv+
I
O m r�V 6S bl
m x3
W m
N
pff m
O �I
tl ^ N Z
O rIVOOS j r9VOOS
OCB9 b O O
a
b/ m
m
n
I ,So oEf ,Sa o4f .aG b/4/
JOV 000//
£
7 X3
SCi O
NJ
or b V
5V bZ/
8 . m
ou
r OVOF'A V
Z/ 2 W
00
h
W
6 BlBf9a — ,woos=,As c�10 �7wilS Wwa QQ
OZ I 61 6� L( 3AV Hl b£ A7H3/V6fO.d J
{ --
,^�^
L• <1
1yl'' IN/l!A/
r
Pr
Q
O
O
� O
V
I
N
N
T 0
+ N
q
W "
U
O Q
L6 V O O 4 w
(��V
W Q
Sir
li
w �
t
O � 00 o N
h Le,
O � Ir
P
r'1
i
i
N
n
w
M
O
N
r
h
(j
. o
00
W �
o£,�..or vz•lcF.
Q �
N �
ko
.....r.r....r M
/ ` � bV
/1 ` . . . - �...... .5910rs d .<.. ):
Ss m\x2v
Q "
I by
�Ck:
• h�
Q
a
e M
h m Q `•
� O .
a • � h
J
Q I Q
b • �
W O . O
Q Q �
h I Q
V °
n _ n
Iv W
"J O
a 7
M ,
CO
ko
I
O �
M
Q ..I H
O
H \
C ` �
n
• p w �l
. h
! Q�
` w
90/L oadf9/ GB/L / f9/
91
'3AV A3Y31NOPV
Ji mNT
TJ a o
r
. sr 11
1F 8p ° n
h �o
V
N
1 W
n
b W
n
b Q
oW LV k"T T7'vlr w r
y z Jvsz a '�
A a
Q x
p e
N a N v Iq R Q U
=Q n N •,Q
N
n w
J \ Q
N In
�m� 8
o;a
^ N w ,ziizti, Sl/W/7 [tphii.11/7 w 1d3530 JV7B'd 40
Pei �, 3 ib i 43Y31 NOW 1� h
M
U oN
"J ^• I b � M1 �
Q
•� I � V � M
Il N
w�
i
w
\
\
n
• � b
m n �
I �
m
~ y•^ q N q I � N q �
w•�
•• I 1 ., Nqi
w
39 d
ip a[/►-9Btrr_ (70S 730 0/t96►/sstrt 2/O 3dOH 909 \ 3 H i° % m
M • t...•. w - RvU
♦v.rt� ., Q �i
W
v O
: ILK "
' i e
(, o =
O Q , w ` ti
I, N
!
O 1 a +
I J
'^ O
b ti b O O
M b
V
bON -
000
Q
N „1
f..SC.pi,o N
3A d oc ,
_ I a rn O tvn e n
LAj
y
N S
li
ti
� h
bI ep
oa
h \ — — - — - — — — — — r — — — — - - - — — — —
n n of ti q I q ti q �
^1 ^
�r o ? 2 • m a ti 2 v �
o p „
y .oii -«o rvt o :u 0 m
9sIlr,
h b : 044 -WEE c,/r P-WOOS 730 Cvbl'HO 3doH 9OB "'r,so,oN 3se cp
NM M
f w
...aoi-dlo rei J o
1p
K PP b
14
Q \ p O
tl-
1 Q 14
x a w
O N
c ]]
H J tk m F�
a
•xa
F � e
W c Sn W
i N R
h h
W
c y IAJ
Q R