Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutANNEXATIONS SOUTH COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE/MONTEREY AVENUE/COOK STREET 1978 IX. COMMENTS A. Commissioners B. Staff X. ADJOURNMENT & 2 `\41 n e � � � ` � # �/ � � RESOLUTION NO. 78-121 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA , INITIATING PRO- CEEDINGS FOR CITY ANNEXATION NO. 5 (LAC #78-34-4) WHEREAS, the City did receive petitions for annexation from more than twenty-five percent of the propertyowners within the area 1 known as City Annexation No. 5; and, WHEREAS , said area designated as City of Palm Desert Annexation No. 5 (LAC #78-34-4) by LAFCO consists of approximately 1 , 046 acres located southerly of Country Club Drive between Monterey Avenue and Cook Street; and, WHEREAS , the Local Agency Formation Commission has determined that the area to be annexed is uninhabited; and, WHEREAS , the purpose of said annexation is to provide municipal services to said area; and, WHEREAS , the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of Riverside did unanimously approve said annexation at their regularly scheduled meeting of September 14, 1978, subject to the City assuming the outstanding indebtedness of County Service Area T98 . NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert , California, as follows : 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Council in this matter. 2 . A Public Hearing to consider the completion of said annexa- tion is hereby established for 7 :00 p .m. , November 9 , 1978 , in the City Hall Council Chambers at 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert , California 3 . Any owner of land within the area to be annexed may file a written protest against said action with the City Clerk at any time prior to the conclusion of said hearing. 4. The City Clerk is hereby instructed, pursuant to Section 56080 of the State Government Code, to forward a copy of this resolution and the attached legal notice, labeled Exhibit A, to the following: a. All propertyowners within the area to be annexed. b . The Board of Supervisors , County of Riverside. C . All agencies providing services to the area to be annexed. d. The Executive Director of LAFCO. e . Publish at least once in the Palm Desert Post . PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm' Desert City Council , held on this day of 1978 , by the following vote , to wit : AYES : NOES : ABSENT ABSTAIN: EDWARD D. MULLINS , mayor ATTEST : SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, City Clerk City of Palm Desert , California 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 October 16, 1978 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR CITY ANNEXATION NO. 5, APPROXIMATELY 1 ,046 ACRES SOUTH OF COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE BETWEEN MONTEREY AVENUE AND COOK STREET. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert City Council to consider proposed City Annexation No. 5 consisting of approximately 1 ,046 acres situated south of Country Club Drive between Monterey Avenue and Cook Street, more particularly described as: Beginning at a point in the northerly boundary line of the City of Palm Desert, County of Riverside, State of California, said point being the common ; Section, corner of Section 7 and 8, Township 5 south, Range 6 each, San Bernardino base and meridian. Said point also being in the boundary line of the City of Rancho Mirage of said Riverside County. I THENCE northerly along the aforementioned common Section line of Sections 7 and 8 and along the easterly boundary line of the City of Rancho Mirage, a distance of 2,652.82 feet to the common section corner of Sections 7 and 8 and Sections 5 and 6. THENCE north 89' 33' 48" east along the northerly line of the aforementioned Section 8, a distance of 2,629.98 feet to a point. THENCE north 89' 42' 08" east, along the northerly line of the aforementioned Section 8, a distance of 2,670.86 feet to the northeasterly corner of said Section 8 said point being the common corner of Sections 8 and 9, said point also being the centerline intersection of Portola Avenue and Country Club Drive. THENCE continuing north 89' 42' 00" east along the northerly line of said Section 9, a distance of 5,307.00 feet to a point. Said point being the northeasterly corner of said Section 9, said point also being the centerline intersection of Cook J Street and said Country Club Drive. r y THENCE south 00' 06' 00" west along the easterly line of the afore- mentioned Section 9, a distance of 3,979.72 feet to a point. Said point also being the most northeasterly corner in the boundary line of the City of Palm Desert. THENCE continuing along the boundary line of the City of Palm Desert the following courses and distances. Thence south of 89' 46' 32" west, a distance of 3,981 .26 feet. J THENCE south 00' 07' 20" west, a distance of 1 ,325.52 feet. I THENCE south 89' 48' 00" west, a distance of 1 ,327.45 feet THENCE south 00' 01 ' 50" west, a distance of 1 ,592.03 feet. THENCE north 76' 32' 56" west, a distance of 3,166.84 feet. THENCE north 00' 09' 12" east, a distance of 2,168.56 feet. THENCE north 89' 45' 08" east, a distance of 3,052.69 feet. THENCE north 00' 06' 40" east, a distance of 660.00 feet. THENCE south 89' 45' 08" west, a distance of 1 ,325.00 feet. THENCE north 00' 06' 40" east, a distance of 664.68 feet. THENCE south 89' 44' 27" west, a distance of 3,977.43 feet to the point of beginning. StO'•' • • ' ' •r � /I •.•• a•••• VO51n MV I[,lar (l♦ [wl l .,!« S to t2(C8,OOO o V au) R-I 12,000 N.A.) en to S to .P.R.-5 IW.A.) P.R.-4 i SO4 5, A[B NA) to nl+ ouur ur,uwr S to ,o : ��—r•v oe s<nr c r uwr P.R.-5 N.A.) C.`— PR. S i}•' �.. Ih coon r. o• nrt+vo[ — -- aru ...... SAID Public Hearing will be held on Thursday, November 9,, 1978, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall , 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard, SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, City Clerk City of Palm Desert, California PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post October 19, 1978 .i CITY OF PALM DESERT TRANSMITTAL LETTER I TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council SUBJECT: Plan for Services for Palm Desert Annexation No. 5 I. INTRODUCTION: Pursuant to Section 35102 of the State Government Code, the City is required to file with any new Annexations effective January 1, 1978, a plan outlining the method by which services will be provided in the area to be annexed. This report represents the required plan for services for Proposed Annexation No. 5. The City of Palm Desert, being a contract City, must rely on many other agencies to provide for services both in the community and areas sub- sequently annexed. In addition, many services provided such as water and sewer, electricity, gas, are provided without regard to city limit lines. Therefore, the area proposed to be annexed is presently served or has the capability of being served by many of these agencies. The fact is substantial by the letters received from responsible agencies as a part of the review births responsible agencies during the Environmental Review process. The major emphasis of this report is to address those services provided directly by the City either through City Staff or direct contract with the City by other agencies. In addition, wherever possible, this report will address the methods by which other service agencies would provide needed facilities in the area. II . DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES: The utilities which would be extended into the area proposed to be annexed would be as part of actual development and they would consist of the services of the Coachella Valley County Water District in the area of water and sewer, Southern California Edison Company in the area of electricity, Southern California Gas Company in the area of gas, and Able Cable in the area of cable television. The services provided by this City directly would be in planning and building, public works , parks, administration and code enforcement services. By contract the City would also provide for trash disposal , police and fire services. Public transportation would be provided by the Sunline Agency. The major road improvements would include the widening of Monterey Avenue, Country Club Drive, Hovely Lane and Cook Street. Road extensions would include Portola Avenue from the Whitewater Storm Channel to Country Club Drive; Hovely Lane from Portola Avenue extended to Cook Street; and the extension of a new road from Hovely Lane northerly to Country Club Drive approximately midway between Monterey Avenue and Portola Avenue (extended) . The creation of any local streets would be on the basis of specific projects and would be the responsibility of the developer. A majority of the public parks needs in the area to be annexed will be met by the propsed Sand Dune Park which totals approximately 120 acres of which approximately 60 acres is included in the area proposed to the annexed. Approximately 17 acres of said parks area would be given to the City as a part of development under the City's subdivision ordinance. The remainder would be aquired by the City with revenues generated from the City's new construction tax. At ultimate development there will be a need for bridges at the Cook Street crossing of the Whitewater Storm Channel and possibly to the Portola Avenue Whitewater Channel . Said facilities would be constructed with a combination of federal grants and . local participation very similar to existing bridges in the valley. If Monterey Avenue ultimately becomes an extension of State High- way 74, a bridge would also be required at its crossing of the Whitewater Channel , which is not in the area to be annexed but would serve said area. The funding for said facility would be the same as the other proposed bridges. Page Two Transmittal Letter III . LEVEL AND RANGE OF SERVICES: The level and range of services provided would include sufficient sized water and sewer, gas, and electrical facilities to service development proposed for the area. Planning and building, public works, and code enforce- ment services as provided by the City directly, would be on the basis of need. Police and fire services capability exist to meet the need of the area at its present stage of development and are proposed to be expanded to meet the needs of subsequent development in the area. Public transportation would be provided by the expansion of the existing system to serve the area. Subsequent development will result in the need for the City to add an addi- tional police vehicle and the need for an additional fire station in the vicinty of Country Club Drive. Since fire services are provided on a volunteer basis in conjuntion with the County of Riverside and State Department of Forestry, the City would be required to provide for a facility in the area which would be manned by these agencies. A fire station has been planned for in the City's General Plan in this area and will be provided at the time it is needed. In addition said area will be served by a proposed fire station at 44th Avenue and San Pablo (Civic Center Complex) , which is tentatively proposed for construction in 1980/91 budget year. In the meantime, the area would be served by the existing Palm Desert Station at E1 Paseo and Highway 74 with backup being provided by the Rancho Mirage, Thousand Palms and Bermuda Dunes stations. The basic administration services of Planning, Building, Public Works, and Code enforcement would be provided by existing City Staff. IV. TIMING FOR SERVICE EXTENSIONS: Basic utility services would occur as a part of development. The City has on file letters from the various utilities assuring us that these services would be available. The City services would be available immediately in the area of planning, building and code enforcement, public works , and police and fire. Road improvements would occur as a part of new development. The construction of the new fire station near Country Club Drive would result from the City's new construction tax which would be accrued from the new development in the area, which would be 20t per square foot of new construc- tion. Parks would be developed in the area under the City' s Subdivision Ordinance which provides for the dedication of land for community facilities and would provide for sites for the fire station and parks. A majority of the proposed residential development contemplated for the area is planned residential which would include a majority of necessary recreational facilities to serve the ultimately residents of the area. V. REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT AND FINANCING: New development would be required to extend roads throughout the area and to provide for needed sites for fire, parks and other related municipal facilities provided through the City's Subdivision Ordinance. The new Construction Tax of 20¢ per square feet would provide for construction and additional acquisition of these facilities. The provision of planning and building services would be provided through the fees generated from new development. On-going maintenance of roads, created in the area, would be provided through State Gas Taxes generated as a result of population within the area. Police services and parks maintenance would be provided on the basis of Sales Tax generated from commercial facilities in the area. In summary it is felt that development of this area would result in a balance between needed services and the revenues to provide said services. J RESOLUTION NO. 78781 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA , MAKING APPLICATION TO THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION FOR A CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION KNOWN AS , "PALM DESERT ANNEXATION NO. 5, " PURSUANT TO SECTION 35140 f OF THE STATE GOVERNMENT CODE . I WHEREAS, over twenty-five percent of the pronerty owners have 1 requested , by petition, within the area hereafter known as , "Palm Desert Annexation No . 5, " and more particularly described in the attached map and legal description ; and, WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act has been com- plied with, pursuant to City Council Resolution No . 78-32 , in that all responsible agencies have been contacted and an expanded initial study has been completed by the City Staff; and, WHEREAS , the City Council has determined that the proposed change of organization is appropriate for the following reasons : 1. The request is a logical expansion of the City boundaries. 2 . Expanding the boundaries of the proposed annexation to in- clude all property south of Country Club Drive is considered consistent with the Municipal Organization Act of 1977 which encourages limiting the number of annexations processed and expanding City boundaries to include logical growth area. 3. The proposed annexation is considered of sufficient size to mitigate the two major environmental concerns related to the area: which are provisions for blowsand protection and pre- servation of unique land forms and animal habitat in the + area. l 4 . The proposed area to be annexed has been determined to be of satisfactory size to provide municipal services without ad- versely affecting the rest of the Community . NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED by the City' Council of the City of Palm Desert , California, as follows : 1 . The above recitations are hereby determined to be true and correct and represent the findings of the Countil in this matter . 2. The City Clerk is hereby instructed to file an official appli- cation with the Local Agency Formation Commission for Palm Desert Annexa- tion No. 5 pursuant to the Municipal Organization Act of 1977 for unin- habited territory since less than twelve registered voters reside in the area. 3. In addition to any required application , the clerk is hereby instructed to forward the attached Plan for Services to LAFCO as required by Section 35140 of the State Government Code . PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert City Council , held this day of 1978, by the following vote , to wit : AYES : NOES : ABSENT: ABSTAIN: EDWARD D. MULLINS , Mayor ATTEST : SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, City Clerk City of Palm Desert , California a Ji •� c ' � � at c' m � m N � — m N r uy —L s CJ`C9HE 2168.16' n m c o a � m F z I rs i m m m y GAL o ° 4 1p 8g f N 1SOo•obo'w— � ��CZ_ _ p i +oo•or'•n: � n ° 6f0... � � nC Li.]:P nn D � mt N m age _ . m w N • ri CSC°°°z'z0" � U23 .:Y, A < l o o p o y r I v a m n q a m I m v A a u ma mo m y - _ am 1 O C) y O O o ZCID -40 0 y tD a C) a r r m I ; v, -oD D y'� � Mm0 IXAi mN soc•cG'co'wi sE-ooz' '0 e ` Si.CET � T O Z " O CIXNTT OF RN ERSIOE o � „ m r.g s m NZ = N Q •wrE.F. a zz m m �N J or 1 o - ANNEXATION NO. 5 OFFICIAL PETITIONERS E C E I V E MAR 3 1978 PETITION PALM DESERT CITY HALL CITY CLERK'S OFFICE TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939 , as amended, Government Code Sections 35, 300-35 , 326 , r/we respectfully represent as follows : 1 . I/We are the owner (s) of Assessor ' s Parcel Number h - /y'c-074' which has an assessed value as shown on the Ecualized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside. 2. I/We recuest that such land be annexed to the City of Palm Desert , subiect to the condition that the City of Palm Desert zone 'the property 4-n conformance with the Palm Desert Lane. Use Plan showing a residential classif_cation with a density of not less than five (5) units aer acre or more than seven (7) units oer acre . If such conditions do not occur, this petition is withdrawn and shall no longer be effective. 3 . There are less than twelve (12) reaistered voters living w' th_n such land . Date : 157,e . �lk1 1 a R E C E I V E MAR 3 1978 PALM DESERT CITY HALL PETITION CITY CLERK'S OFFICE TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939 , as amended, Government Code Sections 35 , 300-35 , 316 , I/we res_oectful'_y represent as follows : 1. I/We are the owner (s) of Assessor ' s Parcel Number(0 .1 lyc-o G4 which has an assessed value as shown on the Equalized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside. 2. I/We request that such land be annexed to the City of Pa'_m Desert , sub;ect to the condition that the C'_tv of Pa'_m Desert zone 'the property in ccn_`ormance with the Palm Desert .Land Use Plan showing a residential classification with a density of no` less than five (5) units per acre or more than seven (7) units per acre. If such conditions do not occur, this petition is withdrawn and shall no longer be effective. 3 . There are less than twelve (12) rec_ stered voters living wit-in such land. Date : E C E I V E MAR 3 1978 PALM DESERT CITY HALL PETITION CITY CLERK'S OFFICE TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939 , as amended, Government Code Sections 35 , 300-35 , 326 , I/we respectfully represent as follows : 1 . I/We are the owners) of Assessor' s Parcel Number 6'11- 110 -064 which has an assessed value as shown on the Equalized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside. 2 . I/rle request that such land be annexed to the City of Palm Desert , subject to the condition that the Cit_v of Palm Desert zone 'the property in conformance with the Palm Desert Land Use Plan showing a residential classification with a density of not less than five (5) units oer acre or more than seven (7) units oer acre. If such conditions do not occur, this petition is withdrawn and shall no longer be effective. 3. There are less than twelve (12 ) registered voters living within such land. Date : p +hti ( 19V kr 1 PETITION TO : THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939 , as amended, Government Cody Sections 35 , 300-35 , 326 , I/we respectfully represent as follows : 1 . I/We are the owner (s) of Assessor ' s Parcel Number 621-190-068-9 which has an assessed value as shown on the Equalized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside. 2 . I/We request that such land be annexed to the City of Palm Desert , subject to the condition that the City of Palm Desert zone the property in conformance with the Palm Desert Land Use Plan showing a residential classification with a density of not' less than five (5) units per acre or more than seven (7) units per acre. If such conditions do not occur, this petition is withdrawn and shall no longer be effective. 3. There are less than twelve ( 12) registered voters living within such land. Datte - Glenn A. Thomas Berna Dean Thomas ® E C E I V E n MAR 31978 PALM DESERT CITY HALL PETITION CITY CLERK'S OFFICE TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939 , as amended , Government Code Sections 35 , 300-35 , 326 , I/we respectfully represent as follows : 1 . I/We are. the owner s) of Assessor' s Parcel Number 6V- I qO -0V which has an assessed - value as shown on the Ecualized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside. 2. I/We request that such land be annexed to the City of Palm Desert , subject to the condition that the City of Palm Desert zone 'the property in conformance with the Palm Desert Land Use Plan showing a residential classification with a density of not less than five ( 5) units per acre or more than seven (7) units per acre. If such conditions do not occur, this pe'_ition is withdrawn and shall no longer be effective. 3 . There are less than twelve (12) registered voters living within such land . Date : u �4>Le4 ( 1911 . I RE C E I V E MAR 3 1978 PETITION PALM DESERT CITY HALL CITY CLERK'S OFFICE TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCI�T OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939 , as amend^d, Government Code Sections 35 , 300-35, 326 , I/ae respectfully represent as follows : 1 . I/We are the owner (s) of Assessor ' s Parcel Number `LI-/y'c-C) q which has an assessed value as shown on the Equalized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside. 2 . I/We request that such land be annexed to the City of Palm Desert , subiect to the condition that the City of Palm Desert zone 'the property +_n conformance with the Palm Desert Land Use Plan showing a residential classifi-cation with a density of not less than five (5) units per acre or more than seven (7) units per acre . If such conditions do not occur, this petition is withdrawn and shall no longer be effective. 3 . There are less than twelve (12) registered voters living within such land. Date : RE C E I V E MAR 3 1978 PALM DESERT CITY HALL PETITION CITY CLERK'S OFFICE TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALI70RNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939 , as amended, Government Code Sections 35, 300-35 , 326 , I/we respectfully represent as follows : 1. I/We are the owner (s) of Assessor' s Parcel Numberra) V Ne-0 which has an assessed value as shown on the Equalized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside. 2 . I/tare request that such land be annexed to the City of Palm Desert , subject to the condition that the City of Palm Desert zone 'the property in conformance with the Palm Desert Land Use Plan showing a residential classification with a density of not less than five (5) units per acre or more than seven (7) units per acre. if such conditions do not occur, this peti-ion is withdrawn and shall no longer be effective. 3. There are less than twelve (12) recistered voters living w__hin such land. Date : 197e . lJUL lt✓KL`.^�.� PETITION TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939 , as amended, Government Code Sections 35, 300-35 , 326, I/we respectfully represent as follows : 1 . I/We are the owner (s) of Assessor' s Parcel Number 621-190-002-9 which has an assessed value as shown on the Equalized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside. 2. I/We request that such land be annexed to the City of Palm Desert, subject to the condition that the City of Palm Desert zone the property in conformance with the plans submitted by the McBail Company and prepared by V.T.N. Consolidated, Inc . , tentative tract number 11791. If such condition does not occur, this petition is withdrawn and shall no longer be effective. 3. There are less than twelve (12) registered voters living within such land. Date :IFi;7,, 14,� Desert Land Investment Co. , No. 2 0. Michael Homme, General Partner PETITION TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939 , as amended, Government Code Sections 35 , 300-35, 326 , I/we respectfully represent as follows: 1. I/We are the owner (s) of Assessor' s Parcel Number 621-190-045-8 which has an assessed value as shown on the Equalized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside. 2 . I/We request that such land be annexed to the City of Palm Desert, subject to the condition that the City of Palm Desert zone the property in conformance with the plans submitted by the MCBail Company and prepared by V.T.N. Consolidated, Inc. , tentative tract number 11791 . If such condition does not occur, this petition is withdrawn and shall no longer be effective. 3. There are less than twelve (12) registered voters living within such land. Date: % ' 19—( Desert Lands Investm nt Co. , a Limited Partnership Woodpecker Development Co. , General Partner O. Michael Homme, President PETITION TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALT70RNI-A In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated. Territory Act of 10, 39 , as amended, Government Code Sections 35 , 300-35 , 326 , T/ae respectfully represent as follows : 1 . I/We are the owners` of Assessor' s Parcel Number 621-190-004-1 w'�ich has an assessed value as shown on the ^naua_ized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside. 2. I/We recuest that such land be annexed_ to the City of Palm Desert , subiect to the condition that the City of Pal- Desert zone the property in conformance with the Palm Desert. wand Use Plan showing a residential classification wit'-, a density o5 not less than five 15) units per acre or snore than seven '7) un:.ts per acre. If suc- conditions do not occar, t.^' s_ -_ct_tion is wi"�_.- _ drawn and shall no loncer be e`.`_ective. 3. There are less than twelve 112) rea stered voters _iv� .na w4 }'4n such land . Dat�e : Walter J ner PETITION TO : THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 193� as aTnended C e-nment n - r � , �OV_ _ Cod. . Sect-ons 35 , 300-35 , 326 , I/we reso_ ectful'_y represent as follows : 1 . T./We are the owners) of Assessor ' s Parcel Number 621-190-005-2 which has an assessed value as shown on the Equalized Assessment Roll of the County Of Riverside. 2 . 1/7N7e request that such land be annexed to the Citv of Palm Desert , subject to the condition that the C___y of ^alm. Desert zone the ^roperty In conformance with the Pal Desert Land Use ?'-an showing a resident_-al classification with a densi_v_ of not less than five (5) units per acre or more than seven (7) units ner acre . If such conditions do not occur, t'^is petition is withdrawn and shall no lonaer be effective . There are less than twelve (12) registered voters liv--a w-t^.; n such land . Date : <<. Itanhe.riue R. cP pie , 9 7 William Mc� PPh e Br�nna Sisen' ein Irving' �Isenwein PETITION TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PA'M DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939 , as anenOed , Government CM2 Sections 35 , 300-35 , 326 , I/we respectfully represent as follows : 1 . I/We are the owner !s) of Assessor ' s Parcel Number 621-190-006-3 which has an assessed value as shown on the Equalized ;'assessment Roil of the County of Riverside. 2. I/We request that such land be annexed to the City of Palm Desert, subiect to the condition that the City of Pa'm Desert zone the Property in conformance with the ?aim Desert Land Use Plan showing a residential c-assificatiOn with a density of not less than five -) units per acre or more than seven (7) unnts per acre. if such conditions do not occur, this petition is withdrawn and shall no longer be effoct'_ve. 3 . There are 'less than twelve (12) registered voters liv.nc within such land . Katherine R. McPhie = Date : 9� — G PTilliam McPhie Branna Sisenwpin Irvin Sj.senwein PETITION TO: THE :ONO?AKI CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Or PALM D SE T, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939, as amended, Government Code Sections 35,300-35, 326, I/cue respectfully represent as follows: 1. I,�Ie a-�e the oswner(s) of Assessor' s Parcel lumber 622-190-047-0 which has an assessed value as shoran on the Equalized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside, 2. I/`le request that such land be annexed to the City of Pain Desert, subject to the condition that the City of Fain Desert zone the property in conforr..ance with the Palm Desert Land Use Plan showing a residential classification with a density of not less than five (5) units per acre or sore than seven (7) units per acre. If such conditions do not occur, this petition is withdrawn and shall no longer be effective, 3. There are less than twelve (12) registered voters livinZ within such land. Date: Fayl (Shapiro) Aaff �' PETITION TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939 , as ascended, Covernmen` Code Sections 35 , 300-35 , 326 , I/sae respectfully represent as follows : 1 . I/We are the owner (s) of Assessor ' s Parcel Number 621-190-051-3 which has an assessed value as shown on the Equalized Assessment Rol'- of the County of Riverside. 2 . I/We request that such land 'ae annexed to the City of Palm Desert, subject to the condition that the C-tv of ?aim Desert zone the property __n con`_o-mange with the Palm. Desert Land Use Kan Vowing a residential classification winh a tensity of net less than f__ve 5) =Ins per acre or more than seven (") units per acre . If such conditions do not occ.r , _ _ , petition is withdre.wn and shall no lcnre.r be e-feative . 3 . There are .'less than. twelve (12) registered is`_ered voters living within such land. Date: fI C lZI?Z �� Ray and Shapiro PETITION TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939 , as amended, Government Code Sections 35 , 300-35 , 326 , I/we resgectfui_y represent as follows : 1 T +• � _ . _ We are no i/ the ow.__r ,s, of Assessor ' s Parcel Number 621-190-054-6 which has ar assessed value as shown on the Ecual` zed Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside. 2 . I/we recuest that such land be annexed to the City of Palm Desert , subject to the condition that the City of 9alm Desert_ zone the property in conformance with the palm Desert Land Use Plan shc-.aina a residential classification with a density of not less than five 15) un_ts -,,er acre or more than seven (;) units per acre. If such conditions do not occur , th'_c petition is withdrawn and shall no '_onaer be ef`ective. 3 . There are less than twelve (l2) registered voters _iv:.nc w_t^._n such land. Date : William McPhie 9 en- McPhie Fe us Homme Martha G. Honge PETITION TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COU?]C_TL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALT70RNIA In accordance with the annexation of 'Jninhabitated Territory Act of 1939 , as amended, Government Code Sections 35 , 300-35, 326 , I/we reso_ ectf,.illy represent as fo11cws : 1 . I/We are 'he Owner !s'' of Assessor ' s Parcel Number 621-190-055-7 which has an assessed value as shown on the Ecualized Assessment Roll of the County .,f Riverside. 2 . I/We reeuest that such land be annexed to '-he City o= Pa_m Desert, sub;ect to the condition --hat the C_ty of Palm Desert zone the property in ccnformance with the Palm Desert -;end Use ?pan showinc a residential class_ficat-On w_.t'? a density Of not less than f_ve (5! '--n-=s per acre or more than seven17! units oe- acre . If such it cond ions do not occ <r, t _s oetition is -;:it-__-awn and shall no '_once- 'De c5fective. 3 . There are less Char twelve ( 1.2) rec_stered voters 'vino W'_th'_n such land . Wllliae .1cP ie��� " - Date : l 9 _ a J ,c e e Phie a Fer s Homme f ;A Martha G. Hq ne PETITION TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of uninhabitated Territory Act of _939 , as amended, Governtrent Code Sections 35 , 30^-35 , 36 , I/we respectfully represent as follows : 1 . I/We are the owner (s) of Assessor ' s Parcel Numbe- 621-190-057-9 whip: has an assessed val-:.e as shown on the Ecualized Assessment Roll of _:_e County of _.ivers_de . 2. I/We recuest that such land be annexed to the City of Palm Desert , snb�ect to the condition that the City of Palm Desert zone the oroper v in confo-mance talth the Palm Dese-t Lan,. r7se P'an Slowing a reg4dentlal class__f__ca_ion wits a density of not 'less than -ive 1,5) un_.s pe:= acre or more than seven - un_ts per acre. T_f such condi_ions do not occur, t:-.=.s petition is withdrawn and sha-1 no lonaer be ef"ective. 3 . There are less than twelve (12) registered voters -._v'_nc within such land. Date - �� 9z. Walter Jit \ r PETITION TO: THE HONORABLE CITY CO'_'NCIT OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of :.'ninhabitated Territory Act of 1939 , as amended, Government Cede Sect''-ons 35 , 300-35, 32G , -/we respectfully represent as follows : I/We are the owners` of Assessor ' s Parcel Number 621-190-059-1 •.which has an assessed value as shown on the Ecaalized Assessment Poll of the Co-n- __, of ?.ivers.de. 2 . I/;'?e recuest that sic_i land be annexed to t'-e Citv of Pal-. Desert , scb�ect to the condit_o^. that the Citv of Pa'm Desert zone t,e o=Derty In cer_`ormance •.,?'_th the Pal- Desert a^.r'l Use _'an s:,O'A'ine a resicential c'assi"_cation wit: a density o-- not less than =-ve 15) Z -De- o ---ts -De- acre or mre _^an Seven M uni-s ,per acre . if suc''' conditions do not oCC'.:r, t_1-s petition is w'_t_^.drawn and shall no _cn cer @ Or~ectl Ve. 3 . There a-e 'ess t''^.an. twelve (12) rer< stered 1 voters 1=V= c w`—^ r ,,,ch land . -_ Date : Walter Jit PETITION T0: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939 , as amended, Government Code Sections 35 , 300-35 , 326 , I/we resn_ ectfully re-oresent as follows : 1 . I/We are the owner (s) of Assessor ' s Parcel Number 621-190-060-1 which has an assessed value as shown on the Eaualized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside. 2 . I/We request that such land be annexed to the C-tv o= "a.lm Desert , subject to the condition that the CitV of Palm Desert zone the nrcoerty conformance with the Palm Desert Banc. Use P'.an snowing a residential classi '_f_ca on wit a density of not less than._ five 5) units der acre or ';to-e than seven (7) units oer acre . If sucln conditions do not occur, ti,_s �De_ttion is withd-,3.srn and shall no _oncer be effective. 3 . There are less than twelve (12) req_istered voters living within such lard . .Date : /f Walter Ji r PETITION TO: THE HONORABLE CITY CCUNCI_L OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939 , as amended, Government Code Sections 35 , 300-35 , 326 , !/we respectfully represent as Follows : 1 . I/nTe are the owner (s) of Assessor ' s Parcel Number 621-190-061-2 which has an assessed value as shown on the Equalized Assessment Rol'_ of the County of aiverside. 2 . I/We request that such land be annexed to the C_ty OF Palm Desert , subsect to the condition that the Cloy of Pal_;. Desert_ zone t`'-e property in conformance with the Palm Desert land Use ?._an showing a residential classification. Koh a density of not less than fiVe 15) units per acre or more tno n seven (7) ,snits per acre . I` such conditions do not occur, tn.s petition is withdrawn and shall no loncer 'le effective. 3. There are 'less than twelve (12) registered voters _ivi^.c within such land. Date :�, Walter Jitn r PETITION TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CA=,I-FOR\IA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of '939 , as amended, Government Code Sections 35 , 300-35 , 326 , I/we re.spectful_y represent as follows : 1 . I/hie are the owner (s) of Assessor ' s Parcel Number 621-190-062-3 which has an assessed value as shown on the equalized Assessment Roll of t'r,e County of Riverside. 2 . I/We request that such land be annexed to the City of Palm Desert, subject to the cor_dition that the City of Palm Desert zone '-he property in conformance with _the Palm Desert Land Use ?'_an showinc a residential classif-cation with a density_ of not less than five (5) ur__ts per acre or more than seven (7; units per acre . If such conditions do not occur, this petition is withdrawn and s'r_al_ no _oncer be effective. 3 . There are less than twelve (12) -eaistered. voters _wing within such land . Date : �7 l�.,w 3� 19 9�. c•C/ Walter Jit e PETITT-ON TO : THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939, as amended, Government Code Sections 35 , 300-35 , 326 , T_/we respectfully represent as follows : 1 . I/We are the owner (s) of Assessor ' s Parcel Number 621-190-071-1 which has an assessed value as shown on the Equalized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside. 2 . I/We r_eauest that such '_and be annexed to the City of Palm Desert, subject to the condition that the C= _v of Palm Desert 7,one the proierty in conformance with the Palm Desert and Use Plan showina a residential c'_assi_`_Caticn with a density o`_ not less than f'_ve (5) un_ts per acre or more than seven (7) units -nor ac--?. If such conditions do not occur, t^is petition is withdrawn and shall no '_or_ce- be effective. 3. '^here a-e less than twelve ( 12) registered voters '_ivina within such land. D e : W to Jitne 19 2 Fe s . Homme Martha G. HW=e PETITION TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA in accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939 , as amender, Government Code Sections 35 , 300-35 , 326 , I/we respectfully represent as follows : 1. I/We are the owner 's) of Assessor ' s Parcel Number 621-190-078-8 wh_ch has an assessed value as shown on the Eaualized Assessment Roil of the County of Riverside. 2.. I/We request that such land be annexed to the City cf Palm Desert , subject to the condition that the City of Palm Desert zone the property _n con`.ormance with the Palm Desert Land Use Plan showinc a residential classification with a density of not 'ess than five '5) units ner acre or more than seven (7) units per acre. if such conditions do not occur, this 'Dotition is Withdrawn and shall no loncer be effective. There are less than twelve (12) rec=_stered voters .__v__ne Wi i_n such land . Date - Walter Jitner PETITION TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939 , as amended, Government Code Sections 35 , 300-33 , 326 , 1/c,•e respectfully represent as follows : 1 . I/We are the owners) of Assessor ' s Parce_ Number 621-190-080-9 which has an assessed value as shown on. the Equalized Assessment Rol-1 of the County of R'.verside. 2 . I/We reauest that such land be annexed to the City of Palm Desert, sub;ect to the condition th,'- the City of 2e.lm Desert zone the property _.n conformance with the Palm Desert Lane_ Use �'an showina a -es_dential c'_assi_`_ca_ion w;_th a density of not less than fire 5! ur.i-=s per acre or more than seven '7? units per acre. if such conditions do not occu-, this petition is withdrawn and shall no lonae- ' e effective. 3 . There are less. t, an twelve U2? reaistered voters living w_thin such land. Date : n alt Ji rr F gus Homme Martha G. Ho e �lerfi�!/Jl�zev(�!L �z��eztdss� 70.LM 1?819 ?66/01)),,L,L,, February 20, 1978 PETITION TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939, as amended, Government Code Sections 35,300-35,326, we respectfully repre- sent as follows: 1 . We are the owners of Assessor's Parcels Numbers 621350023-2, 621350018-8,621350017-7, 621200020-5, 621350016-6, 621200033-7', and 621200032-6, which have an assessed value as shown on the Equalized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside. 2. We request that such land be annexed to the City of Palm Desert, subject to the condition that the City of Palm Desert zone the property in conformance with the Palm Desert Land Use Plan showing a residential classification with a density of not less than five (5) units per acre or more than seven (7) units per acre. If such conditions do not occur, this petition is withdrawn and shall no longer be effective. 3. There are less than twelve (12) registered voters living within such land. Date: 1978. Ted Weiner i i Katheryn Vo, aw, Trustee Ted Weiner Oil Properties Trust f 62/-20 I ica. ),r, 7 5S. FC 6E. fol SEE SEE t.IF� 22 1 _. / •! ��' „ 1 � • •gip' ... L- .,.., � --- � ,;, i $O;S odo f.r 6}r K. F 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 April 26, 1978 Ted Weiner Oil Properties P. 0. Box 12819 Forth Worth, TX 76116 Dear Mr. Weiner : With regards to your request for annexation, upon approval of the proposed development plan for your property , it is my opinion that any subsequent possible moratorium action on the part of the City would exempt your project . Very truly yours , Paul A. Williams , A. I .P . Director of Environmental Services paw/ks ANNEXATION NO. 5 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS I Case l:o . and/or Related Case No. C INITIAL STUDY FOR ANNEXATION NO. 5 CITY OF P ATM DESERT C APRIL 1978 Prepared by: DIVISIO" OF E1;�VIRCNN.EiiTAL SERVICES CITY OF PAIN, DESERT 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane P. 0. Eo 1977 Palm Deser. ', Ca. 92260 ( 714 ) 34E-0511 �t TABLE 05 COi:`ENTS Section Pave yo . I !XTRODUCCION; Project Description , . , , . , , , , Project Location. . , , Project Proponent and/or Lead Agency . II BXVIRUMENTAL CONSIDER.ATIUS Existing Setting . . . . . . . . . . . Natural environment . . . . . , . Ean-made environment. . . . . . . Proposed Setting , , , , , , , , , , , Natural environment , , , , , , Man-made environment . . . . . '_III ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS ' Significant Environmental Effects . , , Adverse . . . . . . . . . . . beneficial . . . . . . . . . . . . MitQatior. •ieasures . . . . . . . . . . IV FINDI_:GS Negative Declaration . . . . . Envircnmental Impact Report. . . . . . V C0IJ�WEPITS AND APPEALS Public Review Responsible A-err!:, Review , Appeals to Initial Stndy Determination. VI APPENDIC cS . A. Informal consultation materials and comments B. Notice of Negative Declaration LIST C^ EXHI_- I. J C °xhibit Title 1 Project Regional Location 2 Project Vicinity Location 3 Photos of Project Site 4 Topographic Map 5 Transportation Facility Map 6 Existing Public Services 7 Existing Public Utilities 8 Proposed Zoning Map 9 Summary Table of Proposed Zoning Acreages and Dwelling Unit and Population Densities 10 General Land Use Plan C This report shall ser're as the basis for compliance with the California �nvirP"m"ntn! I:ualitj` :1Ct Of 1970 and Resolution Yo. 78-32 of the City of -Palm Desert. It is intended herein to provide the reader with fac''ial erv,r- onm:ental information res'arc i.nc the sub?E.^.t pro jeat and therein substantiate the need for the preparation of an Environ.mer.tal Impact Report (EIR) or Negative Declaration (ND) . Project Description : (.;rie`ly describe the project and the action proposed. ) The project to be considered herein is , and shall herein- after be referred to as, "Annexation No. 5" . The proposed project would annex approximately 1050 acres of undeveloped land lying north of and adjacent to the existing Palm Desert City Limits. CProject Location : (Describe the regional and vicinity location of the Project and show on Exhibits 1 and 2 Also include legal description of property or proper71es invloved in the project. ) The project site is situated in Southern California in the upper Coachella Valley near the center of Riverside County as shown on Exhibit 1 . The specific site to be considered in this initial study, as shown on Exhibit 2 , is legally described as follows : Beginning at a point in the northerly boundary line of the City of Palm Desert , County of Riverside, State of California, said point being the common 4 Section corner of Section 7 and 8 , Township 5 south, Range 6 east , San Bernardino base and meridian. Said point also being in the boundary line of the City of Rancho Mirage of said Riverside County. Thence northerly along the aforementioned common Section line of Sections 7 and 8 and along the easterly boundary line of the City of Rancho Mirage , a distance of 2,652 . 82 feet to the common section corner of Sections 7 and 8 and Sections 5 and 6 . Thence north 89 33 ' 48" east along the northerly line of the aforementioned Section 8 , a distance of 2, 629. 98 feet to a point . Thence north 8a 42 ' 08" east , along the northerly line of the aforementioned Section 8 , a distance of 2 ,670. 86 feet to the north- easterly corner of said Section 8 said point being the common corner of Sections 8 and 9, said point also being the centerline intersection of Portola Avenue and Country Club Drive. C EIdVIPOTNM—EN7AL U SIDERATIONS The purpose of this section is to briefly describe the existing environment with respect, to the subject project and to consider the changes that will occur if the project is approved . Environment is defined as "the physical con- ditions which exist within the area which will be affected by a proposed project includin= land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, ambient noise , objects of historic or aesthetic significance. " Existing Setting : In the following sections describe the physical conditions existing at and adjacent to the project site. Natural environment : ( Include information on land, water, air, and flora and fauna. Attach as exhibits an aerial photograph and/or photos of the project site and a topographic map, ) The existing project site is shown in the photos attached hereto or Exhibit 3 . It can be noted from these photos that the site is largely undeveloped. There is no surface water exposed on the site. The land is composed of sandy type soils supporting only natural desert flora such as - the creosote shrub. Wildlife common to this area , include the kit fox and Coachella Valley Fringed Toed Lizard . The project site is located on the floor of the valley a short distance east of an alluvial fan formed by outwash from the mountains through the ravines of Magnesia Canyon. The site slopes gently to the southwest draining to the Whitewater River Storm Channel . The elevations of the site , as shown on the topographic map , labeled Exhibit 4 , range from approximately 200 ' msl along the site ' s southern border to about 260 ' msl at the site-' s norhtern border . Slopes on the site generally range from 0 to 5 percent except in the sand dunes area located in the southeast corner of the subject site . Project Location : (Continued Thence continuing north 89 42 ' 00" east along the northerly line of said Section 9 , a distance of 5 , 307. 00 feet to a point . Said point being the northeasterly corner of said Section 9, said point alos being the centerline intersection of Cook Street and said Country Club Drive. Thence south 00 06 ' 00" west along the easterly line of the aforementioned Section 9, a distance of 3, 979. 72 feet to a point . Said point also being the most northeasterly corner in the boundary line of the City of Palm Desert . Thence continuing along the boundary line of the City of Palm Desert the following courses and distances. Thence south 89 46' 32" west , a distance of 3 ,981 . 26 feet . Thence south 00 07' 20" west , a distance of 1 , 325. 52 feet . Thence south 89 48 ' 00" west , a distance of 1 , 327.45 feet . Thence south 00 O1 ' 50" west , a distance of 1 ,592 . 03 feet . Thence north 76 32 ' 56" west , a distance of 3 ,166. 84 feet . Thence north 00 09 ' 12" east , a distance of 2 , 168. 56 feet . Thence north 89 45' 08" east , a distance of 3 ,052 . 69 feet . Thence north 00 06 ' 40" east , a distance of 660. 00 feet . Thence south 89 45 ' 08" west , a distance of 1 , 325 . 00 feet . Thence north 00 06 ' 40" east , a distance of 664. 68 feet . Thence south 89 44 ' 27" west a distance of 3, 977 .43 feet to the point of beginning. This parcel of land contains 1 , 046. 67 acres more or less. The project site may generally be described as lying north of and adjancet to the existing City limits bounded on the north by Country Club Drive , on the east by Cook Street , on the south by the existing City limits , and on the west by Monterey Avenue. Project Proponent and/or Lead Agency : The proposed project has been initiated by the City of Palm Desert , also the Lead Agency for the project , at the request of property owners within the annexation area . EXHILI T / Project Regional Location Y \ %/' Ay 0 - SrRING - m �-. <<S�:`. RANCH\ /%� •/� lT�`` '` �• MlgAGE:., 'l.S Ir A L Ev, .IN01A IN \ 1.10 WELLS COACHELL \� THE MAL - 66 1 tii� 195 EXHIBIT 2 - Project Vicinity Location I cpvxmy- e oerv� II I, I rl 1 •o — _9 .� �,Illij � l a , I 4/ . 1 1 I { '._i 1. f I+ ♦ / � o' _ I� +� ill /-- �1.� I �,,y(/a�'-"H•AYST.bi-=ROA.T I /4p 1,1 I + •1/ i J� 1 1• Aerial Photo6raph and/or Photos of Project Site C l_ EXHIEIT zw VI '......... •'a _ � I Ri, i, 77:, 714, a. t lot a �/ 1 � !I-1 a;'y y w. ;. .�• y 1• 6� yi� _. C :3YJ ifxl 1 a e. 1911• ! " Palm / D sert "I PqT 360 cif -','�...:. !.. .� colt ': � • " _{c,oo.m[ w u--• T \ t , • 591 :: � ~•�x� / y 1. tL rRHIBIT Transportation Facility Map C IYTERSNTF 10`.:� ■ \S.� ta�1 -■ \•�\ 1 W■ y(0.. I \J2P ra+Nc vvnrae \�i0. �� ~wear COUNTRY QD6 16------ ---- ---- \ - •• a. ■ ■ ■ In ■ rl 1 9 1� �ww -wwww ww--- w--.ww-.•. .uwwy.. , 0 ■ I Y... FIGURE 5.1 _ HIGHWAY NETWORK • . ,:,.: .._ Inman Freeway - .. ••••.Arrer i.11 Higirw ay . Highwav t Highway Iw-w-Indic.Ites E,I>;ing Road ��i "0•�Indicate• Pr�puscd Road - - ® Existing Interchange _ - Q Proposed Int,ichange j - i 1 1 i 1 Railroad - ) - -"'....-Whilewater Flood Control Clunnel 1� Bridge 4P IF I , <J i I ' NORTH 0 _ 1 2 Mlles 3 - �7HIbIP / I -. SQ Bxisting Public Services C - 1: UNT9Y lue ^erve q n J J Ile I I I • I N�.I � y` zl TT il- PSI . h ��\ �1 ,Y�_r ICI ���.Y ;� � I� •1 ! �:y� t; Q ; .-- - - I , I Ire_— ILL ROA IT .. r 1 Existing' Public Titilities C01 T4 I 4 RIVE �� 11 ct i I - \ rl � • C �t � h _ -. •1 Imo^1 , . ��7 ( �t�,�n .�'.•D , -; + w �i/'4l YJ LL cm irk I � /' AatiK'VtaE Si—f' _ �Ir Pill , d ....... I I �P � 1� ( . � i � �� I /aIeH<YS TSCF�tOAII--^^ C' D � I ' _ �- f Proposed Setting: In the following sections describe the proposed changes to the subject site if the project is ap- proved. Relate the chan!-es to the existing; setting and to other projects, both public and private, for the nur_:;ose of examininE cumulative effects. Natural environment : No change in the natural environment is anticipated as a result of the annexation; however , development may occur as effected by such action. Such development will be considered in the following sections. It should be noted that while much of the land surrounding the project site is still in its natural state a mobile home park has developed adjacent to the northern boundary of the annexation area. 1 ?ronosed Setting: (Continued) CMan-made environment: The proposed land use for the subject site can best be explained in terms of the completed pre-zoning study. Attached as Exhibit 8 is a copy of the proposed zoning for the subject annexation . The approximate .acreages and number of units which may be provided are set forth in Exhibit 9. It can be noted from a comparison of this table and the General Land Use Plan attached as Exhibit 10, that the pre-zoning is compatible with this City' s adopted General Plan . Further comparisons of the Land Use Plan with the proposed zoning indicates that the overall density of the area will be reduced if the proposed zoning is approved. Con- sequently it may be concluded that the adverse significant effects associated with growth inducement would be dimineshed. E as i E ° E "2 - E E o ¢ Eo - - a N - d ¢ hE % F F J J d Y Q < J V Z U Q G �I •• !� 2 V V Q ¢ - Q Q ¢ U 2 Q W ti f f o o J e a o z Y 3 s i W E W E a_ I N 1 I Xw cr w (f) zw ^• - i G a ° 0 J ._ 7Z d C ° 1 i__ z LL • o :n z< vro .v+ 0 v V Ti C NWL w o u N ' C U O 6 .1 A W C < O h O ID 6 N H n O ^ y. N Z M m N O� Z h ro P C F a°Aa m a+ V e 121 M CO � W G Z 10 M IC C Z M M U rF-i 3v3 N In ❑❑ Y O iZ z ❑ � 0 0 Ac m N O O C m ❑ ¢ Nu a a w a m A a 0 M O o 6 of <0 3 F h q E ti W N O 10 Y I-I O 1 . a z z M 10 O m I Z m N +� •O O O 1Y N O M- .n N iCC 0. ❑ W G C w z W W p y p I.1 z O 0 6 F Y b F z v a U Z a E N C .7 ] N 6 N q O O Q N N G LVp 5 ❑ y i Z ti NNi h Z rn M O .-1 V) O++ w p O j v n G u y N d W W A V G a � < N N C C N N U U N +1 V Y V Y V A V ti M 0. 0.V-❑ C C C C O C h a h W A 41 O C C O O O G O v o o G Y _ O •A A D 1 O N N .y I I VI I q Z q _ W F a MON SECTION N OF RIVERSIDE ` - .. I(Po NER 1 014TR titry 4 io- 'OSEO PALM DESERT CITY LIMIT �s307 0o f - ' g ._ M N _ 7 SECTION 9, j T-5-S � R•6-E S.B.B.M. j 44 'F... AVENUE - W PROPOSED R4LM DESERT CITY LIMIT - -- - L N s m , LOCATION MAP .r ` �a ?. K NOT- TO-SCALE o _ o T _ i ° PALM DESERT CITY LIMIT 10 .. ..i ..-. ;i •COUNTY:_OF .RIVERSIDE '. ,..< � -. - 7 cam,r���..�i^�+++��yysc S� r�� n'+•ap� +.,ta. :�.s `ei`K,��a.p�r -: DATE 2 - 14 - ,E PROPOSED-ANNEXATION D-r5 �� >{ ; .;'•x oor, ENArMEER ENGINEER E { rCvL71F iK1f4K �LY pESEor ':i.v'JR.�' 'iV_'��_?� "�..S��.v.-_y. •�, lip..- ✓ J fCOMMON SECTION ' COMMON SEC CORNER COUNTY Of RIVERSIDE !\ 6 COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE 89^4= OB"f 2970.86 s f?G Inr, ` ra 9 y r _ r RT- C - .`. SECTION 8 .. ' ' T_ .S -6-E S.B.B.h - ". m pw 167 ACRES . O 5 B9'44'�273 97713 -,. 1 I _ SECTION CORNER O b � :C Q b PARCEL MAP 9378 $ 1325 00 BOOK 36 PAGES 83-85 -' - - s e90ae oew PALM DESERT CITY LIMIT - m c o - N1�89-45'08-E _ 3032.69-' /'r J - - u ( PALM DESERT CITY LIMIT n z i COMMCN SECTION .0 CORNER) 4T 17-- --- - -- - 9i71 16 _ ` . SECTION 17 o T-5-S, R-6- E S.B.B.M. - J PALM C WHITEWAT _ - � �.r,-.,y . . � FR RIVER 'a TB'3r36IV . I s PALM DESERT CITY ElviT e. C 3/B<,84 .. .. Cy fl y Proposed Setting : (Continued) Man-made environment : (Continued) It should be noted that this analysis will not include environmental information previously addressed in the EIR for the General Plan. Open space has been preserved on the site in accordance with the General Plan . The site containing the sand dunes described previously is designated on the prezoning map as O. S. The public utilities and services were contacted concern- ing this annexation. The correspondence received regard- ing the annexation is located in Appendix A. The only critical concern raised as a result of this survey was the need for an additional fire station to service the area; however , it can be noted that such a fire station is proposed in the General Plan. l E:NIVIPCNME TAL IMPACT ANALYSIS C. A significant effect on the environment will occur, as defined by C3QA guidelines , if a " substantial , or potentially substantial , adverse change in any of the physical conditions within the area are affected by the activity, including: land ; air; water; minerals ; flora; fauna; ambient noise ; and , objects Of historic or aesthetic significance. " Ac^ordingly, the purpose of this section is to analyze the foregoing innor.- tio- to determine what, if any, changes to the 'environment will occur and then to determine if the said clanEes may be con- sidered significant. Significant Environmental Effects : List below the adverse and beneficial impacts occurring as a result of the procesed project. Adverse : While minor environmental effects may occur as a result of the proposed action, as noted in the previous sections of this initial study, none are considered substantial enough to warrant the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report . In addition mitigation measure can be provided to reduce or eliminate the minor effects . Additional environmental documentation will be required as development occurs within the project area. 'enefic; -, Annexation will provide control over timeliness of development and coordination and management for the provision of municipal services. C b:itiE,ation Meas•ares : (T)iscuss ways in which an / adverse environmental imF acts may be reduced or eli^ninated. ) Mitigation measures, as listed on environmental check list attached as Appendix A, and plans for municipal services appear to eliminate two environmental concerns considered in initial study. "_'he purpose of this section is to ^rovide a written statement settir,� forth the j)'stificatior. for F'indi-F that an ?nvironmental Impact "erort or Ne�ativP Decla-•ation shall be prepared for 'he Subject project. ' n ETTI means a detailed statement presertin= ti'.e enV1rOnT en t�l eff ec`.' and Cnnsi'?— ations pertainir to a project A '?D is a statement describir , the reasons o:hy a proposed pro.'•ect will not have a s' Fnlfican`:, effect on the environment ar.d, therefore, does not reouire the preparation of an TF.. riccordir. ly, this initial study may be used as the basis for the prepa_ratior of a more de- tailed ervironmental document or the_ Written justification for the preparation of a ID. Negative Declaration : (? riefly describe the jastifiCation for the preparation of a ND. ) Based on the findings of this initial study there will be no substantial significant environmental effects occur- ring as a result of the action proposed by the subject project . See copy of Negative Declaration in Appendix B. Environmental ?-,pact -e^ert: (Dxplain ay an m_lst be nrenared and li3t the si ;_nffic6nt e`ects of they_')*•C"osea project Which are to be considered in more detail in the NT'.. ) "O-P : if on o `. the initial ^tllf?'! it is de ermine,; taa: an .:T= i 11 irPq r�P f.�rPO ina L^._ !1^... '-tip) .^!n 11 an." ^a....a��.� 4.7 flll+• 111 }:'1P Sta t;:at0^J re!7'iiromaT'+i for _ +in^ f er. :irOf:.".?Pnt=1 d.n„cementation , 'he addi `.ior. of 3ectio:^S on : "En i:-onnen `al. Tip^.ante ; JT-a1,roJ -Ja'-.1e Ti:.`.•�3C`.f � ?'O'.. ... T•' .. .�'_" Tmr�aC�G � .�rA , ? ojPc ' Itercatives to t�i ., „i]" Will -.. 7O . C:%Se7 709t7aiA a7+•17�n PlP^. -e . CONKSMS AXD APPEALS C Following determination of the need for the nrop?ra+inr of an Environmental impact Report or Negative Teii aratinn pursuant to the California. Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and Resolution No. 78132 of the City of Palm Desert, pro- cedures require either the notice of preparation of an E,R or a public review period for the MB nVor to project approval. An arpeai period is also provided by law following the completion of any environmental documentation including an initial study determination . This section , therefore , has been reserved for comments received during the presecribed review periods and for the consideration of appeals. Public Review: (Eriefly describe comments received and responses and place correspondpnce in Appendix. ) Responsible Agency Review: (Describe comments received and responses and place ecrrespondprce in Appendix. ) Appeals : (DeFcribe and refer to Appendix. ) APPENDIX A .s 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 345-0611 March 22, 1978 Dear Sir: This is to advise you that the City of Palm Desert is conducting an initial study to determine potential environmental effects of a pro- po�nnexation of approximately 1 ,050 acres of land located generally adjacent to and north of the existing City limits. CIn accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and Resolution No. 77-7 of the City of Palm Desert, the City, as the Lead Agency for this project, herewith requests your comments and recomi:enda- tions prior to determining whether a negative declaration or environmental impact report will be prepared. Enclosed for your review of the proposed project are: a project location map; a proposed zoning map; and, a copy of the City's initial study check- list. Since it is intended herein only to provide for informal consultation with responsible agencies , as prescribed by CEQA, regarding the proposed annexation, we would appreciate receiving any comments or recommendations you may have by April 1 , 1978. We trust the enclosed information will be satisfactory for your review. Should you have any questions regarding this matter or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Ronald R. Knippel of our staff at (714) 346-0611 ext. 53. cVery truly yours ,, Paul A. Williams , A. I .P. Director of Environmental Services rk/p:j/ks Enc. C Mailed to : Lt . Froemming, Sheriff ' s Dept . , Indio D. M. Pinkstaff-,- GTE , Indio Stanley Sayles, P. D. Comm. Svcs . P .D. Kermit Martin , SO. CALIF. Edison , P .D. R. W. Riddel , So. Calif. Gas, Riverside Lowell Weeks , C.V. C.W.D. , Coachella LAFCO, Riverside, CA 92501 County of Riverside Planning Commission, Indio Riverside County Planning Dept . , Riverside C 'i PROJECT LOCATION MAP cc+;,,�ra✓ ccce oa 1IW 6, a N iJL'✓��� ^��, Q 1 U r sae.• r = r1o� II �r t °lrfl N iL. � n 'I ..: �'�l�JLI ill %/� �.. . �li_I a '! +� L ., ` u•=;•i r -;F.+,�, i\ - ;;; � o � E - E t E E n - N d a ^ ¢ R E e " W ' 7 �- `- d o {(� W W � d Q Q Q J _ J U_I �' VI 2 JI _ u • n - I Y J 2 2 2 — f' O O J o a a 2_ �I 3 a LL ¢ y/ = J W w W W_ Q W N W W Q u J W dnp _i a W V O o of i 'J u O i -¢ Ln ¢ o, a 0 sia9Oaa EEOa N 3 o i U.. iTLSa— WLLJ cn li 1 Z LiJ \K I z o I - a IL • Z U- A II 7 i p V i a l 1 l I fn W I O 2 I CL O __-_- -- � -- ( C7`! :,F PAL.: CESERT INITIAL ST,DY OF ZNVIRON^TNT',L I'' 1CT A. PROJECT REFERENCE 1. Case No. Annexation No. 5 2. Project Sponsor City of Palm Desert 3. Project Description (In Brief) Proposed annexation of approximately 1 ,050 acres of land located generally adjacent to and north of the existing City limits. B. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are provided on attached sheets. ) 1. Land (topography, soils, geology) YES or itAY3E 70 (a) Does the project site involve a unique landform or biological area, such as beaches, sand dunes, marshes, etc.? X (b) Will there be construction on slopes —'— of 25% or greater? X — (c) Will the project result in the removal of natural resources for commercial -"' purposes, such as rock, sand, gravel, oil, plants, or minerals? X (d) Will the project involve grading in excess of 300 cubic yards? X (e) Is the project site located on or adjacent to a known earthquake fault or an area of soil in- stability (subsidence, landslide, or severe blowsand)? X 2. Water ` (a) Is the project located within a flood plain, a natural drainage channel, or streambed? X - (b) Will the project significantly increase the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X (c) Will the project result in the contamina- tion or deterioration in quality of ground water? X 3. Flora and Fauna (a) Are there any rare or endangered species of plant life in or near the project area? X (b) !:ill any nature trees be removed? X (c) Is the project site adjacent to, or does it include a habitat, food source, water source, nestin'= place or breedin? cln_ - f,:r . or endangerea wildlife species? (d) Is the project located inside or within 200 feet of a wildl:ce ref•;2e or r=serve? X City Of Fal. Desert S:uay of Znvcron men tai Inp,ct Fame iwo - YES or „E ;O 4. PolLut ion (Air, Water, Noise, Land) (a) Will the project create dust, fumes, smoke, or odors? X (b) Will the project result in the generation of noise levels in excess of those currently existing in the area or in the exposure of People to noise levels above 65dBA? X (c) Will the project involve potentially hazardous materials, including pesticides, herbicides, other toxic substances, or radio-active material? X (d) Will the proposed project produce light or glare? X (e) Does the project require variance from estab- lished environmental standards (e.g. air quality, noise, water quality)? 5. Circulation (a) Is the project expected to cause an increase in motor vehicle traffic patterns or volumes? X (b) Will the project involve the use of off-the- road vehicles? X (c) Will the project overload existing parking facilities? X 6. Public Services and Utility Facilities (a) Will septic tanks be utilized for sewage disposal? X (b) Will the project overload any of the fol- lowing: (1) Fire Protection? X (2) Police Protection? -R— (3) Schools? �- (4) Parks or Other Recreational Facilities? �- - (5) Electric Power or Natural Gas �— (6) Communication Systems? -�-- (7) Water Supply? (8) Sewer System? (9) Stormwater Drainage System? _T- (10) Solid Waste and Disposal? �— (c) Will the project require the extension of existing public utility lines? X (d) Will the project employ equipment which could interfere with existing communication and/or defense systems? X (e) Is the project located within the flight path or noise impact area of an airport? X (f) Does the project incorporate measures for the efficient use or conservation of energy and water? City of Pal; Oeser: Initial St: ;; of c:viron =nta1 I;aict tPaye `arse or !,v.-NO 7. Land Use (a) Is the proposed project expected to result in ocher changes in the land use, either on or off the project site? X (b) Could the project serve to encourage development of presently undeveloped areas, or increase de- velopment intensity of already developed areas? X (c) Is the project inconsistent with any adopted Ceneral Plan, Specific Plan, or present zoning? X (d) Does the project involve lands currently pro- tected under the Williamson Act or an Open Space Easement? X (e) Is the site for the proposed project within the Scenic Preservation Overlay District or will the Cproject obstruct any scenic view from existing residential areas, public lands, or public roads? X (f) Will the proposed project displace a large number - or people from an established area or create a de- mand for additional housing? X _-. 8. Mandatory Findines of Significance _-. (a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially ---- reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or pre-history? X (b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term en- vironmental goals? X (c) Does the project have impacts which are indi- vidually limited, but cumulatively considerable? X (d) Does the project have environmental effects which will c:u1:3e substantial adverse effects on human beings, either direcly or indirectly? X G-C.i Ot P1:W CS2rt In1Cta1 Stuo': OC E�`/1 rJ n.^.C❑Cai .^.,,�d l't Page -our C . Discussion of Imoacts! Please briefly explain your answer to question 6(f) and, if you have answered yes to any of the questions in Section II, why you believe that that aspect of the project will have no significant adverse environmental effect. 1_(a) - Proposed O.S. zoning would protect unique land forms contained within the project area. 1 (e) - Mitigation measures would be required to minimize effects of blow - sand within project boundary. 3 (c) - Proposed O.S. zoning would preserve the habitat of the fringe-toed lizard located in the project area. 7 (a&b) - land proposed to be annexed is presently undeveloped although a development plan has been submitted for a 40-acre parcel located in the northwest corner of the project area. Proposed zoning of site would encourage further develo ment of the area , however, individual pro- jects would be subject to further review by the City when submitted. The area roposed to be annexed lies within the City's sphere of influence and is compatible with the City's General Plan for which an EIR was prepared. The zoning as proposed would reduce the overall densit of the project area from that originally proposed by the General Plan. l TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, Tit :()VE I3'P MTION IS TRUr anm COST cTr (Date) (Proja:C Sponaor) I I Southern California Edison Company 36-100 CATHEORAL CANYON DRIVE CATHEDRAL CITY. CALIFORNIA 92234 March 28 , 1978 Mr. Ronald R. Knippel City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, Calif. 92260 Dear Mr. Knippel: Your proposed annexation of the 1 ,050 acres north of your city limits has been reviewed by the Edison Company as far as P Y distribution facilities are concerned. C Statement 6 (c) of the Initial Environmental Impact Study states that the annexation of that property will not require an extension of existing public utility lines. However, if this property is developed, electrical line extensions will more than likely be re- quired to serve new loads. This would be done in accordance with the tariff rules set forth by the Public Utilities Commission. Street improvements might possibly conflict with our existing facilities if relocations are necessary. A copy of your initial study has been forwarded to our Trans- mission Department for their review since they have facilities on the property in question. If I can be of any further assistance to you, please feel free to contact me at 328-5741, Ext. 33 . Yours truly, Roger W. Maraist P1 ar- ' _ _ .. .. .. .. Palm Springs District Southern California Edison Comoanv RW:4: sg DEPARTMENT OF FIRE PROTECTION >;To' : � �^�. up _•L'• IN COOPERATION WITH THE ! ) COUNTY iT Crs+�: -; CALIFORNIA DIVISION OF FORESTRY ' Yt�t RIVERSIDE ....."; .,, DAVID L. FLAKE COUNTY FIRE WARDEN P.O. Box tag 210 nEST SAN JACIN TJ 3TRFET PERRIS. CALIFORNIA 92370 TELEPHONE (7141 657-3183 Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Dear Paul , After reviewing the information provided by your office with regards to pro- posed annexation number five, we find that the annexation will have no immediate effect on the Fire Department. However, as the area developer , we will have concerns about the fire protection in the area. Some of our concerns are: 1 . The existing Palm Desert Fire Station is already running over the maximum amount of calls it can adequately handle. 2. During the rainy season, our access to the area is Beverly hampered by the C flooding of Monterey Avenue and Cook Street. During these times , fire engines from Bermuda Dunes and Rancho Mirage respond to the area. 3. Any development which occurs in the area of Country Club and Cook Street will be subject to long response times due to the distance from the nearest station. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this annexation proposal , and should you desire any clarification , please let me know. David L. Flake County Fire Warden Bud Engel Fire Marshal BE:dt r i.11i .+Y C.iL.i rrl.� ,ui 6si�.'f`.'=s.�a�^'y='�_�: � awe.---aV+.•v,i,•-. . .. .._ _ .. :,! _ . _ _ ._ _�-r: ^ , c»"�?'`�.���h':�_'�f���`•_. ' O P ^'J0 FOaOjs 5.A o °40 �cP'Cr P %d �: P SP d r - s L y 3 d n P P sys Od 70P da F 6 + 0, o � , °A a6 60 d o� a9 P rdo ado 9P: o �. ccPgF'aG�dC'�s�6r0i"dF ,c °G '7 P �d rPn a a° sb 9(9 0 6P �Ps 0Gl Cy ^ o/ r a a d c 6 o c P ,to d / G�• tP c Od9go O s / n 41 PP F 19: ;P P^ IA) • y�v 9 l '.�. 9�t yF S, � m� 'c 'r ...?:.i 9� � -:J.""": F��3 •.�. 'TZ 'n::u.:is r :. r.�-�'Y.c r:n. :.^-44+4.. _ .Av..�^fas'.S'�'F*,-+'zwE'S.Y - -�a. I k< Mainiero, Smith and Associates, Inc. Civil F1 Environmental Engineering Professional Plaza •Suite 3 2225 East Tahquitz-McCallum Way, Palm Springs,California 92262 Telephone (714) 327-3544 March 31, 1978 Mr. Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, California 92260 Dear Mr. Williams : We have reviewed the proposed Annexation No . 5 as it C relates to the Palm Desert Community Services District . Since the District does not serve the area to be annexed there does not appear to be any direct impact on their water supply and distribution system. However, the development of the area would ultimately result in an increase in the rate at which the groundwater basin is being depleted. If you have any questions in regard to the above , please contact us . Very truly otyts , MAIN I�IERO , SIITH AND ASSOCIATES , INC. RJM/cam CC : Mr. Stanley Sayles C ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT MEMO TO ' DATE PREPARED c _ ` -CE 10-1-2 NEW 1/,, EO 66) FR6 C 31. April 14, 1978 Mr. R. W. Maraist Planning Manager Palm Springs District Reference is made to your memo of March 30, 1978 regarding Transmission facilities in the area of the proposed annexation by the City of Palm Desert. The attached map is marked in red showing the location of existing Transmission facilities. Since part of these existing facilities are now within the city limits, it appears that further annexation would not require an Environ- mental Impact Study. However, other interested departments of the Company should be contacted before a final decision is made. Z. J. A. Eckl Supervising Estimator Eastern Transmission JAE:jw Attachment I March 28, 1978 I Mr. Ronald R. Rnippel City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Pala Desert, Calif. 92260 Dear Mr. Knippel: Your proposed annexation City limits has been reviewedfbthe 2 ,050 acres north of distribution facilities are Y the Edison CompanyYour concerned, as far as Statement 6 (c) of that the annexation of a Initial Environmental Impact Stud C of existing that property will not re Y states devel 9 Public utility lines, IIcwill t quire an extension oPtffeervetnewaloads. extensions will more than likely be re- quired to this Property is the t<~,riff rules set forth by would be done in Y Y the ordance with Public IItilitiesaCommissicn. Street improvements might possibly conflict with o facilities if releca-lcns are necessary, ur. eYistinq mi�sionPDeof Your initial study has been forwarded the Ayr n question.for review since they have tfacilities san proper in If I can be of any further assistance to to contact me at 328-5741, Ext. 33. you, Please feel free Yours truly, Roger w. Maraist Planning Manager Palm Springs District ( Southern California Edison Company RW�t:sq ` E - E - E [ - E E � - E� _ 2 0 Q A _ W N o 4 ? w x p � _ .i E '•- ._ . W 1 f F O - _ p O J 2 2 � � Z O J 0 6 W N Q W w 4 W a0 [p- • i W 4 W m Y Q Q x W w �a0 - ECiaa�00a�aaa�a � 3 o a W ¢ Q Q ¢ s a u 4 0 4 N O Q � I CL X iu Lli CL _ Z wo x ! O J e L,_ f- - a ` I � w I O i lE - CL I— Cki LO .. " I I , � L . �• � N Ocis 1 v APPENDIX B C i t E I R F01331 H1 CITY OF PALM DESERT NEGATIVE DECLARATION Case No. : ANNEXATION NO. 5 Applicant : City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane , P. 0. Box 1977 Palm Desert , CA 92260 Description of Project: The proposed project would annex approximately 1050 PP Y t acres of undeveloped land lying north of and adjacent to the existing Palm Desert City limits . Finding: The project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment and no further environmental documentation will be required. Justification: The project is compatible with the General Plan for the City of Palm Desert . Based on the findings of the initial study, which study is on file at the Palm Desert City Hall , no substantial signffciant environmental effects will occur as a result of the action proposed by the subject project . C Any interested citizen may appeal this determination to the Planning Commission within eight (8) days of the date of the posting of public notice by filing an appeal in accordance with Resolution No. 77_7 with the Department of Environmental Services located at 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California. If no appeal is filed within said time, this determination shall he final. Date Filed with County Cler k (within five days) Mav 1 . 1.97Q Date Public Notice L is Posted: May 4 , 1978 County Clerk - . . . ".spires: File Wav 12 , 1978 Bulletin Board EIR FORM #1 CITY OF PALM DESERT NEGATIVE DECLARATION Case No. : ANNEXATION NO. 5 Applicant : City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, P. O. Box 1977 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Description of Project: The proposed project would annex approximately 1050 acres of undeveloped land lying north of and adjacent to the existing Palm Desert City limits. i Finding: The project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment and no further environmental documentation will be required. Justification: The project is compatible with the General Plan for the City of Palm Desert . Based on the findings of the initial study, which study is on file at the Palm Desert City Hall , no substantial signficiant environmental effects will occur as a result of the action proposed by the subject project . Any interested citizen may appeal this determination to the Planning Commission within eight (8) days of the date of the posting of public notice by filing an appeal in accordance with Resolution No. 77-7 with the Department of Environmental Services located at 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California. If•no appeal is filed within said time, . this determination shall be final. Date Filed with County-Clerk (within five days) May 1 , 1978 Date Public Notice Is Posted: May 4 , 1978 cc: Applicant Date Appeal Period Expires: County Clerk File _ May 12, 1978 Bulletin Board r ' 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 June 26, 1978 Local Agency Formation Commission Riverside County Courthouse Riverside, CA Attn: Howard Powell Dear Howard: I am pleased to be forwarding to you the attached application for Palm Desert Annexation No. 5. Since this is the City's first appli- cation under the Municipal Organization Act of 1977, I thought it appropriate to send this cover letter. Further, this application is somewhat unique in that the City has done the environmental analysis on the project and a negative declaration has been issued on the pro- ject. This procedure was followed with the concurrance of Mr. Joe Richards of the Environmental Planning Section of the County Planning Department. Therefore, it is our belief that no further environmental analysis is required. This should allow you to schedule this matter for the Commissions review very quickly. The City felt it necessary to do the environmental analysis because of the existence of the Sand Dune Park Designation in the area to be annexed. Please note that the petitioners in this matter do not represent a hundred percent, but do represent more than 25% of the total assessed value of the area to be annexed. Therefore, I believe that we do comply with Section 35130 of the State Government Code. Please find attached the required Plan for Municipal Services which answers many of the ques- tions in your application. Finally, please note that the City's Planning Commission has acted on the prezoning on the area to be annexed as shown by the Planning Commission Resolution No. 367, attached hereto. The Council is scheduled to consider the prezoning on July 13, 1978. Upon their action I will forward to you the results of their action. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate contacting me at anytime. Sincerely, Paul A. Williams , A. I .P. Director of Environmental Services PAW/ks Attachments `Tk Y 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 June 26, 1978 Local Agency 'Formation Commission County of Riverside Courthouse, Room 104 Riverside, CA. Gentlemen: Noice is hereby given of intention to annex territory to the follow- ing local agency (city or district) : Palm Desert Annexation No. 5 The annexation is proposed under the following statutory provisions: Municipal Organization Act of 1977 A map and legal description of the specific boundaries of the territory proposed- to be .annexed are attached hereto and are made a part hereof by this reference. In addition, a completed form of questionnaire, as required by the Formation Commission, is submitted. Notice, process and other communications regarding said annexation may be directed to the proponents at: City of Palm Desert Martin J. Bouman, City Manager P. 0. Box 1977 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Attachments LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE PROPOSAL QUESTIONNAIRE Proponent: City of Palm Desert LAFC No. (to be filled Address : P. 0. Box 1977 in by LAFCO Palm Desert, CA 92260 Secretary) Telephone No. 714 346-0611 PROPOSAL DESIGNATION (City or district name. TYPE OF PROPOSAL (CHECK d ) If annexation, desig- nate by number or Incorporate a city other description) : Form a new special district Palm Desert Annex No. 5 Annex to a city X Annex to a special district Other PROPONENTS COMPLETE THIS SIDE OF FORM THIS SIDE RESERVED FOR LAFCO ADVISORY A. General STAFF COMMENTS 1. Statutory provisions under which proposal is filed: Municipal Organization Act of 1977 2. General location of proposed area (use cities and/or communities as points of reference) : Area south of Country Club Drive between Monterey Avenue and Cook Street. —1— NOTE: Questions 'refer only to area under consideration for formation, annexation, or other action--not to surrounding or adjacent areas. B. Physical Features 1. Land area sq. miles I or 1 ,046.67 acres 2. State general description of topography(flat, rolling, etc. ) Area generally rolling terrain except for one area which has tremendous sand dunes. C. Population and Related Matters 1. Population in subject area 2 2. Number of registered voters 2 3. Number of dwelling units 1 4. Likelihood of significant increase in population in proposed area in the next 10 years (indicated est- imated growth in percent) : 8,556 persons estimated total population D. Land Use 1. Existing land use in proposed area: Vacant 2. Existing zoning inproposed area: � W-2, R-1-1 and R-1-12,000 (County) 3. Describe proposed new zoning, if any: Open Space, Planned Residential - 4 and 5 AAunitssp to the acre, single-family -12,000 and 4, rs'O�hegprft. lotssal in colnQnrdmCom with ' See attached Planning Commission Resolution No. 367. appropriate city or county general and specific plans? Yes -2- . . I E. Economic Factors 1. Assessed value in proposed area: a. Land 496,448 b. Improvements c. Amount of publicly-owned land in area (federal, schools, etc. ) : N.A. d. Total acreage in Agricultural Preserve (if proposed area is to be annexed to a city) : N.A. 2. If annexation proposal, will proposed area be subject to any bonded indebt- edness of annexing city or district? NO If answer is "Yes" , state amount of outstanding indebtedness and current debt service tax rate: 3 . If detachment or de-annexation proposal, will proposed area continue to be liable for outstanding bonded indebtedness of city or district from which area will be detached or de-annexed? If answer is "Yes" , state amount of out- standing indebtedness and current debt service tax rate: F. Proposal Justification 1. List governmental services not now provided which are proposed to be provided under this proposal: Property owners of over 25% of the property to be annexed have requested annexation to receive the higher level' of service obtainable from the City. -3- 2. List governmental services presently provided but which will be increased under this proposal: Planning, building, police and administration services. See attached Plan for services for additional information. 3. Describe and evaluate alternative courses of action which would meet the needs described above: Since area is within Palm Desert's Sphere of Influence, no viable alternative exists. 4. Additional justification, if any: Proposed annexation is a logical expansion of the City's border. G. Financial Requirements 1. What will be the approximate annual costs to accomplish the goals of this proposal? 100,000 2 . What are the prospective sources of revenue (including the estimated property tax rate, if any) ? State Subventions Sales Tax New Construction Tax -4- I 3. If proposal requires an extension of public works, what.will be the cost? Area is presently served by utilities and roads. Extensions would only be required for new development. Who is to pay this cost? New development f I H. Additional Information (You are encouraged to include below any additional information which will be helpful to the Commission and Staff in evaluating this proposal) : See attached Plan for Municipal Services and the Environmental Initial Study. (For Staff Use only) _g_ I TRANSMITTAL LETTER CITY OF PALM DESERT TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: ANNEXATION NO. 5 DATE: NOVEMBER 9, 1978 The City Council adopted Resolution No. 78-81 on June 22, 1978, instructing the City Clerk to file an official application with the Local Agency Formation Com- mission for Palm Desert Annexation No. 5.[ On September 14, 1978, the Local ! Agency Formation Commission of Riverside County adopted_ a Resolution approving the. proposed annexation: Resolution No. 78-121 , adopted on September 28, 1978, by the Palm Desert City Council established November 9, 1978, as the hearing date to complete the sub- ject annexation in compliance with Section 35220 of the State Government Code. This .section establishes procedures to be followed td enable persons opposing the subject annexation the opportunity to file written protests and/or register verbal opposition to the annexation before the City Council at a Public Hearing. As the area to be annexed has been determined to be uninhabited, the City Council may, after 30 days from-.November 9, 1978, adopt a resolution ordering the annexa- tion. The only action that need be taken by the City Council at this meeting is to close the Public Hearing after any/all protests have been heard by minute motion. _ The value of any protests would be determined when the matter again comes before the Council for final action. RESOLUTION NO. 78-121 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA , INITIATING PRO- CEEDINGS FOR CITY ANNEXATION NO . 5 (LAC r78-34-4) WHEREAS, the City did receive petitions for annexation from more than twenty-five percent of the propertyowners within the area known as City Annexation No . 5 ; and, WHEREAS , said area designated as City of Palm Desert Annexation No. 5 (LAC #78-34-4) by LAFCO consists of approximately 1 , 046 acres located southerly of Country Club Drive between Alonterey Avenue and Cook Street ; and, WHEREAS , the Local Agency Formation Commission has determined that the area -to be annexed is uninhabited; and, WHEREAS , the purpose of said annexation is to provide municipal services to said area; and, WHEREAS , the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of Riverside did unanimously approve said annexation at their regularly scheduled meeting of September 14, 1978, subject to the City assuming the outstanding indebtedness of County Service Area n98 . NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert , California , as follows : 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Council in this matter. 2. A Public Hearing to consider the completion of said annexa- tion is hereby established for 7 :00 p .m. , November 9, 1978 , in the City Hall Council Chambers at 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert , CaliforniF 3. Any owner of land within the area to be annexed may file a written protest against said action with the City Clerk at any time prior to the conclusion of said hearing. 4. The City Clerk is hereby instructed, pursuant to Section 56080 of the State Government Code, to forward a copy of this resolution and the attached legal notice, labeled Exhibit A, to the following: a. All propertyowners within the area to be annexed. b . The Board of Supervisors , County of Riverside. C . All agencies providing services to the area to be annexed. d. The Executive Director of LAFCO. e . Publish at least once in the Palm Desert Post . PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert City Council , held on this 29th day of Saaptemben 1978 , by the following vote , to wit : — AYES : Brush, McPherson, Newbrander, Wilson & Mullins NOES : None ABSENT None ABSTAIN: None E YARD D. n7ULLNS , nfayor ATTEST : SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, City. erk City of Palm Desert , California . 1 Local Agency Formation Commission County of Riverside 2 3 RESOLUTION 4 APPROVING PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY $5 5 TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT 6 BE IT RESOLVED AND DETERMINED by the Local Agency Forma- 7 tion Commission in regular session assembled on September 14, 1978, 8 that the annexation of 1,046.67 acres located east of Monterey 9 Road, south of Country Club Drive, west of Cook Street and northe_l 10 of present City of Palm Desert, as more particularly described in 11 Exhibit A, attached hereto and made part hereof, to the City of 12 Palm Desert is approved. IJ 13 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND FOUND that: { 14 1. The distinctive short form designation of the prox so:-N.! 15 annexation is City of Palm Desert LAFC 78-34-4 (Annexation $5) . i ' 16 2. An environmental assessment of the proposal was zB=d 17 and negative declaration filed thereon pursuant to the Califo=m_ai 18 Environmental Quality Act. 19 3. The boundaries of the territory as approved by 20 County Surveyor are contiguous to the City and are approved. 21 4. The annexation shall be subject to the terms and corW4 I 22 itions which are presently imposed on similar annexations to the i 23 City. I 24 5. The City of Palm Desert is designated conduct: -t 25 authority. " 26 � 27 PHIL REED, LChairman 28 -1- COYHTV C...SEI W IIOR.R, .LOO. i1VCRR... CAL IIORHI• LAFC #78-34-4� STY OF PALM DESERT 1 I certify the above resolution was passed and adopted by the Local Agency Formation Commission of Riverside County on September 14, 2 1978. 3 4 ROBERT J. FITCH Executive Officer 5 6 By �A )q,,, �a,.� WAYNE B. CUR N 7 Assistant Ex utive Officer 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 151 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 WPM:nlg 28 9/26/78 -2- ce VMTV COUNSEL w ueR Rr eDc. HIV ERfID[. CIIORryII L.A.F.C. 73-34-4 �. _ . PROPOSED ANNEXATIO1 YO. 5 TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT ANNEXATION DESCRIPTION Beginning at a. point in the northerly boundary line of the City of Palm Desert, County of Riverside, State of California , said point being the common ; Section corner of Section 7 and 3, Township 5 south, Range 6 east, San Bernardino base and meridian_ Said point also being in the boundary line of the City of Rancho Mirage of said Riverside County. 1. Thence northerly along the aforementioned common Section line of Sections 7 and 8 and: along the easterly boundary line of the City of Rancho Mirage, a distance of 2,652.82 feet to the common section corner of Sections 7 and '8 and Sections 5 and 6.. 2. Thence north 89 33' 48" east along the northerly line of the aforementioned Section 8, a distance of 2,629.98 feet to a point. 3. Thence north 39'42'08" east, along the northerly line of the aforementioned Section 8, a distance of 2,670.96 feet to the northeasterly corner of said Section 8 said point heinn the common corner of Sections 3 and 9, said point also being the centerline intersection of Portola Avenue and Country Club Drive. . . 4. Thence continuing north 39042'00" east along the northerly line of said Section 9, a distance of 5,307.00 feet to a point. Said point being the northeasterly corner of said Section 9, said point also being the center- line intersection of Cook Street and said Country Club Drive. 5. Thence south 00 06'00" west along the easterly line of the aforementioned Section 9, a distance of 3,979.72 feet to a Point. Said point also being the most northeasterly corner in the boundary line of the City of Palm, Desert. 6. Thence continuing along the boundary line of the City of Palm Desert the folly ing courses and distances. Thence south 89*45'32" west, a distance of 3,931.9-6 feet. i � 7. Thence south 00007'20" west, a distance of 1,325.52 feet. ( 8. Thence south 89*48'00" west, a distance Pf 1,327.45 feet. • t 9. Thence south 00 OV 50" west, a distance of 1,592.03 feet 10. Thence north 76�32'56" west, a distance of 3,166.84 feet. 11. Thence north 00 09'12" east, a distance of 2,185.56 feet. 11A. Thence north 89°45'08" east, a distance of 396:00 feet. 11B. Thence south 00°07'00" west, a distance of 17:00 feet. 12. , Thence north 99*45'08" east, a distance of 2,656 .69 feet. 13. Thence north 00�06'40" east, a distance of 660.00 feet. 14. Thence south 89*45'08" west, .a distance of 1,325.00 feet. 15. 'Thence north 00*06'40" east, a distance of 664.69 feet. 16. Thence south 89044'27" west a distance of 3,977.43 feet to the point of beginning. This parcel of land contains 1,046.67 acres more or less. i iY." [ CdL. APPROVED UPPP: SUi:YcxUI BY / I. C r. , CITY OF PALM DESERT INITIAL STUDY OF ENVISONIENTAL I'•_TACT A. PROJECT REFERENCE 1. Case No. Annexation No. 5 2. Project Sponsor City of Palm Desert 3. Project Description ( In Brief) Proposed annexation of approximately 1 ,050 acres of land located generally adjacent to and north of the existing City limits. B. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are provided on attached sheets. ) C1. Land (topography, soils, geology) YES or MAYBE NO (a) Does the project site involve a unique landform or biological area, such as beaches, sand dunes, marshes, etc.? X (b) Will there be construction on slopes — of 25% or greater? X — -- (c) Will the project result in the removal of natural resources for commercial - - - purposes, such as rock, sand, gravel, oil, plants, or minerals? X (d) Will the project involve grading in excess of 300 cubic yards? X (e) Is the project site located on or adjacent to a known earthquake fault or an area of soil in- stability (subsidence, landslide, or severe blowsand) ? X 2. Water (a) Is the project located within a flood plain, a natural drainage channel, or streambed? X -- (b) Will the project significantly increase the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X (c) Will the project result in the contamina- tion or deterioration in quality of ground water? X 3. Flora and Fauna (a) Are there any rare or endangered species of plant life in or near the project area? X (b) Will any nature trees be removed? X (c) Is the project site adjacent to, or does it include a habitat, food source, water source, nesting place or breeding olac-� .`er a ra-e or endangered wildlife species? X (d) Is the project located inside or within * 200 feet of a wildli_e refuge or -eserve? X. City of Pal-: Desert iZitlal Stud.; of Environmental Impact Page Two YES or XAY3E No 4. Pollution (Air, Water, Noise, Land) (a) Will the project create dust, fumes, smoke, or odors? X (b) Will the project result in the generation of noise levels in excess of those currently existing in the area or in the exposure of people to noise levels above 65dBA? X (c) Will the project involve potentially hazardous materials, including pesticides, herbicides, other toxic substances, or radio-active material? X (d) Will the proposed project produce light or glare? X (e) Does the project require variance from estab- lished environmental standards (e.g. air quality, noise, water quality)? Y 5. Circulation (a) Is the project expected to cause an increase in motor vehicle traffic patterns or volumes? X (b) Will the project involve the use of off-the- road vehicles? X (c) Will the project overload existing parking facilities? X 6. Public Services and Utility Facilities (a) Will septic tanks be utilized for sewage disposal? X (b) Will the project overload any of the fol- lowing: (1) Fire Protection? X (2) Police Protection? -�— (3) Schools? — (4) Parks or Other Recreational Facilities? T- - (5) Electric Power or Natural Gas �- (6) Communication Systems? �— (7) Water Supply? (8) Sewer System? (9) Stormwater Drainage System? —R-- (10) Solid Waste and Disposal? �— (c) Will the project require the extension of existing public utility lines? X (d) Will the project employ equipment which could interfere with existing communication and/or defense systems? X (e) Is the project located within the flight path or noise impact area of an airport? X (f) Does the project incorporate measures for the efficient use or conservation of energy and water? Clty of Pala Desert Initial Study of Environmental Impact Page nree YES or "?Y°E NO 7. Land Use (a) Is the proposed project expected to result in other changes in the land use, either on or off the project site? X (b) Could the project serve to encourage development of presently undeveloped areas, or increase de- velopment intensity of already developed areas? X (c) Is the project inconsistent with any adopted General Plan, Specific Plan, or present zoning? X (d) Does the project involve lands currently pro- tected under the Williamson Act or an Open Space Easement? X (e) Is the site for the proposed project within the Scenic Preservation Overlay District or will the Cproject obstruct any scenic view from existing residential areas, public lands, or public roads? X (f) Will the proposed project displace a large number - or people from an established area or create a de- mand for additional housing? X 8. Mandatory Findings of Significance _.. .. (a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below - self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or pre-history? X _ (b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term en- vironmental goals? X (c) Does the project have impacts which are indi- vidually limited, but cumulatively considerable? X (d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either direcly or indirectly? X 1 City of Palm Desert Initial Study of Environmental Impact Page -,our C. Discussion of Impacts: Please briefly explain your answer to question 6(f) and, if you have answered yes to any of the questions in Section II, why you believe that that aspect of the project will have no significant adverse environmental effect, 1 a) - Proposed O.S. zoning would protect unique land forms contained within the project area. 1 e - Mitigation measures would be required to minimize effects of blow sand within project boundary. 3 (c) - Proposed O.S. zoning would preserve the habitat of the fringe toed lizard located in the project area. 7 (a&b) - Land proposed to be annexed is presently undeveloped although a development plan has been submitted for a 40-acre parcel located in the northwest corner of the project area. Proposed zoning of site would encourage further development of the area however, individual pro- jects would be subject to further review by the City when submitted. The area proposed to be annexed lies within the City' s sphere of influence and is compatible with the City's General Plan for which an EIR was prepared. The zoning as proposed would reduce the overall density of the project area from that originally proposed by the General Plan. TO THE BEST OF MY KNOVLEDGE, TH • ABOVE It'F ;RTION IS T2[J_ P�.`D Gnr r T� (Date) (Project Sponsor) 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 July 18th, 1978 Howard PoweTl Local Agency Formation Commission 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, California 92501 Dear Howard: As a part of our filing, Palm Deser Annexation No. 5, I,d�id indicate that the City Council would be cons `T t ei pre-z ng of this annexation on its regular meeting on July 13th. Said review did occur and the attached ordinance represents the proposed zoning in the area known as Annexation No. 5 which had first reading at the Council meeting of July 13th. With the filing of this ordinance I believe we have complied with all the requirements of Lafco with regards to Annexation No. 5. I would therefore request some acknowledgement as to when this annexation will be scheduled for consideration by the Commission. If possible could you please let me know by phone when this matter will be scheduled. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, , Paul A. Williams, A.I .P. Dept. of Environmental Services PAW/tb a. �1 LL. -AL AG NZY FO S ATION Xlh-le IS. -C'N JOUiM 02 RIVERI;IDZ STATE. OF :ALIi-ORNIA .'�.'''..RTI ICATB OF FILING COUNTY C F RIV,'RsIDO I, Wayne B. Curren , Ass 't Executive Officer of the Local Agency FoXviation ronunission or the ;County of Riverside, do hereby certify that- 1. The application hereinafter referenced and dascribad has been submitted to me and has been found to be in the form prescribed by the Riverside county Local Agency Formation Commission. 2. The application contains the information and data requested and required by said Commission and provisions of State Law. 3. The application has been accepted for filing by me on June 28 19 78 4. The proposal has been set for hearing before the Commission on September 14 , 19 78 The staff report will be mailed to you on the Friday before the Commission meeting. Palm Desert City es Applicant. Y of P Address; P. O. Box 1977 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Application Title-. Annexation #5 to City of Palm Desert General Location: South of Country Club between Monterey and Cook This certificate of filing is issued pursuant to authority and re- quirements of Section 54791 of the Government Code, State of California.. All time requirements and limitations for processing and consideration of aforementioned application specified by State Law and/or rules and regulations of the Riverside County Local Agency Formation Commission shall become effective and run from the date of issuance of this certificate of filing. August 23 , 1978 Date Ass't &x4putive officer Local Ag ncy Formation Commission County of Riverside LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER 4080 Lemon Street, 12th Floor Riverside, California 92501 PUBLIC HEARING Thursday, September 14, 1978 Board of Supervisors' Meeting Room 14th Floor, County Administrative Center Riverside', California A G E N D A 1. Call to Order and Salute to the Flag. 2 . Approval of Minutes of August 10, -1978. 3. HEARINGS• a. LAFC #78-21-3--Annexation #66 to City of Hemet b. LAFC #77-53-4--Annexation #20 to City of Palm Springs C. LAFC #78-25-4--Annexation #1085 to Valley Sanitary District d. LAFC #78-34-4--Annexation #5 to City of Palm Desert e. LAFC #78-22-3--Annexation to Beaumont-Cherry Valley Water District f. LAFC #78-24-3--Annexation #11 to County Service Area #69 g. LAFC #78-13-1--Annexation #46 to City of Corona h. LAFC #78-28-1--Annexation #8 to Home Gardens Sanitary District i. LAFC #78-29-1--Annexation #9 to Rancho California Water District j . LAFC #78-33-1--Formation of County Service Area #124 k. LAFC #78-23-5--Annexation #29 to County Service Area #61 1. LAFC #78-30-5--Annexation #30 to County Service Area #61 i 4. CALAFCO Dues. 5. Possible Hearings for October 12, 1978 Meeting. 6. Adjournment. LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 4080 Lemon Street, 12th Floor Riverside, California 92501 September 8, 1978 TO: Local Agency Formation Commission g Y FROM: Howard L. Powell, LAFCO Planner SUBJECT: LAFC .#78-34-4--Annexation #5 to City of Palm Desert PROPOSAL: This is a proposal to annex 1, 046.67 acres to the City of Palm Desert to provide city municipal services. SUBMITTED BY: The City of Palm Desert. LEGAL REQUIREMENTS: This proposal has met all requirements of the law. The map and legal description were approved by the County Surveyor on June 28, 1978. The Planning Department declares that the proposal has met CEQA requirements . POPULATION• Population is 2. LAND USE: Existing zoning in the area is very low residential. New zoning is proposed for open space, planned residential, 4 & 5 units to the acre, single-family dwellings . The property is within the sphere of influence of the City of Palm Desert. ASSESSED VALUATION: Land is assessed at $496, 448 (1977-78 Equalized Tax Roll) . LAFC #78-34-4 September 8, 1978 Page 2 COMMENTS: This proposed annexation adjoins the northerly city limits of the City of Palm Desert along the entire southerly boundary of the proposal. Palm Desert Greens, an extensive mobilehome development, lies northerly across Country Club Drive which forms the northerly boundary of the proposed annexation. Except for this development the property to the north is vacant. The easterly boundary of the proposal is Cook Street. All adjoin- ing property across Cook Street is vacant. The westerly boundary of the- proposal is Bob Hope Drive, the east- erly city limits of the City of Rancho Mirage. This area is as yet undeveloped and only recently was annexed to Rancho Mirage. That area immediately south of this proposed annexation and east- erly of Monterey Avenue is under construction at the present time with a condominium development known as Monterey Country Club. That area southerly of this proposal and across the Coachella Valley County Water District flood control channel is in a mobile- home development and some vacant property. Further easterly and southerly of the proposal is single family residential and mobile- home development, and industrial development extending to Cook Street. Except for the area immediately adjacent to Hoveley Lane on both sides, the entire parcel is proposed for annexation. There is but one habitable home on the south side and none on the north side. A contractor' s equipment storage yard has been constructed southerly of Hoveley Lane in violation of the zoning. The City of Palm Desert has prezoned the area. All property owners were notified twice during and prior to the prezoning hearings, once for the Planning Commission and once for the City Council hearing and zoning adoption. Prezoning is for planned commercial, single family residential, planned residential, and open space. LAFC #78-34-4 September 8, 1978 Page 3 Applicants for the annexation own about 25% of the property. According to the Palm Desert City Director of .Environmental Services, owners of approximately 60-70% have expressed approval of this annexation. A 9 acre shopping center is proposed for the southeasterly corner of Country Club and Bob Hope Drive, with approximately 30 acres of single family residential adjoining. Nothing is proposed at the present time for the remainder. A plan for extension of services has. been submitted by the City. Water, sewer, electricity and gas would continue to be served by the . same agencies presently serving and to the greater extent necessary, to take care of increased development. The additional services which would be provided by the City of Palm Desert would be in the planning and building, public works, parks administration, and code enforcement services. By contract, the City would provide for trash disposal, police, and fire services. Public transportation would be provided by the Sunline Agency. A copy of the City' s plan for services is attached. County Service Area #98 was formed in 1973 for the purpose of im- proving Hoveley Lane. A loan of $15, 000 was made by the County to be repaid by the property owners with a maximum tax rate of $7. 00 to amortize the loan. Subsequently, the loan was increased to $16, 500, still within the $7. 00 maximum rate. As of June 30, 1978, the amount owing on the loan was $2, 283.96, plus interest. As the Commission is probably aware, upon annexation to a city, any county service areas that would be within the city limits are dissolved automatically. In this case the CSA will live long enough to repay the loan. RECOMMENDATION• That the Commission approve Annexation #5 to the City of Palm Desert and that the City be designated as the conducting authority. Res�p_e�c��tfully submitted, �� ep..'e Howard L. Powell LAFCO Planner a� i f CITY OF PALM DESERT TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council SUBJECT: Plan for Services for Palm Desert Annexation No. 5 I. INTRODUCTION: Pursuant to Section 35102 of the State. Government Code, the Cityis required to file with any new Annexations effective January 1 , 1978, a plan outlining the method by which services will be provided in the area to be annexed. This report represents the required plan for services for Proposed Annexation No. 5. The City of Palm Desert, being a contract City, must rely on many other agencies to provide for services both in the community and areas sub- sequently annexed. In addition, many services provided such as water and sewer, electricity, gas, are provided without regard to city limit lines. Therefore, the area proposed to be annexed is presently served or has the capability of being served by many of these agencies. The fact is substantial by the letters received from responsible agencies as a part of the review births responsible agencies .during -the Environmental Review process. The major emphasis of this report is to address those services provided directly by the City either through City Staff or direct contract with the City by other agencies. In addition, wherever possible, this report will address the methods by which other service agencies would provide needed facilities in the area. , II. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES: , The utilities which would be extended into the area proposed to be annexed would be as part of actual development and they would consist of the services of the Coachella Valley County Water District in the area of water and sewer, Southern California Edison Company in the area of electricity, Southern California Gas Company in the area of gas, and Able Cable in the area of cable television. The services provided by this City directly would be in planning and building, public..works, parks, administration and code enforcement services. By contract the City would also provide for trash disposal , police and fire services. Public transportation would be provided by the Sunline Agency. The major road improvements would include the widening of Monterey Avenue, Country Club Drive, Hovely Lane and Cook Street. Road extensions would include Portola Avenue from the Whitewater Storm Channel to Country Club Drive; Hovely Lane from Portola Avenue extended to Cook.Street; and the extension of a new road from Hovely Lane northerly to Country Club Drive approximately midway between Monterey Avenue and Portola Avenue (extended) . The creation of any local streets would be on the basis of specific projects and would be the responsibility of the developer. A majority of the public parks needs in the area to be annexed will be met by the propsed Sand Dune Park which totals approximately 120 acres of which approximately 60 acres is included in the area proposed to the annexed. Approximately 17 acres of said parks area would be given to the City as a part of development under the City's subdivision ordinance. The remainder would be aquired by the City with revenues generated from the City's new construction tax. At ultimate development there will be a need for bridges at the Cook Street crossing of the Whitewater Storm Channel and possibly to the Portola Avenue Whitewater Channel . Said facilities would be constructed with a combination of federal grants and local participation very similar to existing bridges in the valley. If Monterey Avenue ultimately becomes an extension of State High- way 74, a bridge would also be required at its crossing of the Whitewater Channel , which is not in the area to be annexed but would serve said area. The funding for said facility would be the same as the other proposed bridges. Page Two Transmittal Letter III . LEVEL AND RANGE OF SERVICES: The level and range of services provided would include sufficient sized water and sewer, gas, and electrical facilities to service development proposed for the area. Planning and building, public works, and code. enforce- ment services as provided by the City directly, would be on the basis of need. Police and fire services capability exist to meet the need of the 1 area at its present stage of development and are proposed to be expanded to meet the needs of subsequent development in the area. Public transportation 11 would be provided by the expansion of the existing system to serve the area. Subsequent development will result in the need for the City to add an addi- tional police vehicle and the need for an additional fire station in the vicinty of Country Club Drive. Since fire services are provided on a volunteer basis in conjuntion with the County of Riverside and State Department of Forestry, the City would be required to provide for a facility in the area which would be manned by these agencies. A fire station has been planned for in the City's General Plan in this area and will be provided at the time it is needed. In addition said area will be served by a proposed fire station at 44th Avenue and San Pablo (Civic Center Complex) , which is tentatively proposed for construction in 1980/91 budget year. In the meantime, the area would be served by the existing Palm Desert Station at El Paseo and Highway 74 with backup being provided by the Rancho Mirage, Thousand Palms and Bermuda Dunes stations. The basic administration services of Planning, Building, Public Works, and Code enforcement would be provided by existing City Staff. IV. TIMING FOR SERVICE EXTENSIONS: Basic utility services would occur as a part of development. The City has on file letters from the various utilities assuring us that these services 1 would be available. The City services would be available immediately in the area of planning, building and code enforcement, public works , and police I and fire. Road improvements would occur as a part of new development. The construction of the new fire station near Country Club Drive would result from the City's new const ruction truction tax which would be accrued from the new development in the area, which would be 20 per - � p square foot of new construc- tion. 9 t c tion. Parks would be developed in the area under the City's Subdivision Ordinance which provides for the dedication of land for community facilities and would provide for sites for the fire station and parks. A majority of the proposed residential development contemplated for the area is planned residential which would include a majority of necessary recreational facilities to serve the ultimately residents of the area. V. REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT AND FINANCING- New development would be required to extend roads throughout the area and to provide for needed sites for fire, parks and other related municipal facilities provided through the City's Subdivision Ordinance. The new Construction Tax of 20t per square feet would provide for construction and additional acquisition of these facilities. The provision of planning and building services would be provided through the fees generated from new development. On-going maintenance of roads, created in the area, would be provided through State Gas Taxes generated as a result of population within the area. Police services and parks maintenance would be provided on the basis of Sales Tax generated from commercial facilities in the area. In summary it is felt that development of this area would result in a balance between needed services and the revenues to provide said services. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 367 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA , RECOMMENDING AP- PROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR A PLANNING CO`INIS- SION INITIATED CIIANGE OF ZONE FROM ' S ' TO PC(2) , R-2 8 , 000(8) , R-1-12 , 000, PR-4 , PR-5 , AND O. S . , UPON ANNEXATION ON PROPERTY KNOWN AS CITY ANNEXA- TION NO. 5 . WHEREAS , the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert . California , did hold a duly noticed Public Hearing on the 17th day of ).fay, 1978, and a continued Public Hearing on the l4th day of .June, 1978, to consider a Planning Commission initiated prezoning from 'S' (Study) to P.C. (2)(U.A. ) (Planned Commercial, District, Upon Annexation) , R-2 8,000(8)(U.A. ) (Single-family residential, 8,000 sq. ft . min. lot area, min. 8, 000 sq . ft . /du, Upon Annexation) , R-1 12 , 000 (U.A . ) (Single-family residential , 12, 000 sq. ft . min. lot area , Upon Annexa- tion) , PR-5(U.A. ) (Planned Residential , max. 5 du/acre, Upon Annexation) , PR-4(U.A. ) (Planned Residential , max. 4 du/acre, Upon Annexation ) , O.S . (U. A. ) (Open Space, Upon Annexation), PR-3(U.A. ) (Planned Residential , max. 3 du/acre, Upon Annexation), PR-10(U.A. ) (Planned Residential , max. 10 du/acre, Upon Annexation) or any other zone deemed appropriate on property generally located between Country Club Drive and the White- water Storm Channel and between Monterey Avenue and Cook Street , and more particularly described as : Beginning at a point in the northerly boundary land of the City of Palm Desert , County of Riverside, State of California, said point being the common j Section, corner of Section 7 and 8 , Township 5 south, Range 6 east , San Bernardino base and meridian. Said point also being in the boundary line of the City of Rancho Mirage of said Riverside County. I THENCE northerly along the aforementioned common Section 111 line of Sections 7 and 8 and along the easterly boundary line of the City of Rancho Mirage , a dis- tance of 2 , 652 . 82 feet to the common section corner of Sections 7 and 8 and Sections 5 and 6. THENCE north 890 33 ' 48" east along the northerly line of the aforementioned Section 8, a distance of 2 ,629 . 98 feet to a point . THENCE north 890 42 ' 08" east , along the northerly line of the aforementioned Section 8, a distance of 2 ,670 . 86 feet to the northeasterly corner of said Section 8 said point being the common corner of Sections 8 and 9 , said point also being the centerline intersection of Por- tola Avenue and Country Club Drive. THENCE continuing north 89' 42 ' 00" east along the northerly line of said Section 9 , a distance of 5, 307. 00 feet to a point . Said point being the northeasterly corner of said Section 9, said point also being the centerline intersection of Cook Street and said Country Club Drive . THENCE south 00' 06 ' 00" west along the easterly line of the aforementioned Section 9 , a distance of 3, 979 . 72 feet to a point . Said point also being the most northeasterly corner in the boundary line of the City of Palm Desert . THENCE continuing along the boundary line of the City of Palm Desert the following courses and distance . Thence south of 89' 46 ' 32" west , a distance of 3, 981 . 26 feet . THENCE south W 07 ' 20" west , a distance of 1 , 325 . 52 feet . THENCE south 890 48 ' 00" west , a distance of 1 , 327. 45 feet . PLANNING Co'81ISSION RESOLUTION NO. 367 Page Two THENCE south 000 01 ' 50" west , a distance of 1 , 592 . 03 feet . THENCE north 760 32 ' 56" west , a distance of 3 , 166 . 84 feet . THENCE north 000 09 ' 12" east , a distance of 2 , 168 . 56 feet . THENCE north S90 45' OS" east , a distance of 3, 052 . 69 feet . THENCE north 880 06 ' 40" east , a distance of 660. 00 feet . THENCE south 890 45 ' 08" west , a distance of 1 , 325 . 00 feet . THENCE north 000 06 ' 40" east , a distance of 664 .68 feet . THENCE south 890 44 ' 27" west, a distance of 3, 977. 43 feet to the point of beginning. WHEREAS , said application has met the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Environmental Quality Procedure Resolution No . 78-32, " in that an expanded initial study was developed for the project ; and on this basis a negative declaration was issued and the appeal period has expired; and, WHEREAS , at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and argument did find the following facts and reasons to exist to revise its initial proposal to as shown on the attached Exhibit labeled Exhibit A: 1 . The revised recommendation does conform to the Palm Desert General Plan to a greater degree than the initial recommendation . 2 . The revised recommendation is more compatible to exist- ing and proposed zones in the area. 3 . The revised recommendation provides increased mitigation measures considered appropriate after review of an ex- panded initial study conducted on the project . 4. The revised recommendation would better meet the objec- tives of the Palm Desert adopted General Plan . 5. The application of Planned Zones on a majority of the subject property provides the City the vehicle by which to control development in terms of timing; mitigation measures related to blowsand and protection of unique animals and landforms ; and, compatibility of development to City Standards . 6. The area being considered for prezoning is considered a logical expansion of the Community , and the recommended zoning designations are considered compatible to the existing development in the Community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert , California as follows : 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and con- stitute the findings of the Commission in this case ; 2 . That it does hereby recommend approval to the City Council of a Change of Zone as shown on Exhibit A attached hereto . I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 367 Page Three PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert , California , held on the 14th day of June, 1978 , by the following vote , to wit : AYES : BERKEY, FLESHMAN , KRYDER NOES : KELLY, SNYDER I ABSENT: NONE I ABSTAIN : NONE GEORGE BERKEY, Chairman ATTEST: �J PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary /ks I PLnSVI\G COM-MISSIObi RESOLUTION NO. 367 EYIIIBIT A I , LO ' I 4 z 3 `I' i i 30IStl3Altl JO UWCO \ X W c LLJ W ^ I z o z , F V > r LL ' (n w cr. W z L� a _ z0Q ' F N > •_ I _ lJJ I ' ' n J LLI O T V O • a O bf vl LL In F �y OG� O u n );muoe ci r I n w u v O lL r W I1+f/1 2 - qJV] l Li 90 eL0 V to 1 1 .1 U I 11 Z to h_ ION COco � aa N 1 i o ' 3 i •O I^ llrot \u; �l PETITION TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the Municipal Organization Act of 1977 , as amended, Government Code Sections 35 , 000 etal , I/we respectfully represent as follows : 1. I/We are the owner (s) of Assessor ' s Parcel Number 621-230-010 which has an assessed value as shown on the Equalized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside. 2 . I/We request that such land be annexed to the City of Palm Desert, subject to the condition that the City of Palm Desert zone the property in conform- ance with the Palm Desert Land Use Plan showing a residential classification with a density of not less than five (5) units per acre or more than seven (7) units per acre. If such conditions do not occur , this petition is withdrawn and shall no longer be effective. 3 . There are less than twelve (12) registered voters living within such land. 4 . I/We further authorize E. George Marzicola, P.O. Box 47 , 73-743 Hwy. 111, Palm Desert, or his designated representative, to represent me/us without compen- sation, in obtaining the final acceptance by the City of Palm Desert of this petition of annexation, a parcel map or subdivision map in the City of Palm Desert, as well as any other governmental authority having jurisdiction over the final approval of such maps on the within described property. Except, how- ever, there shall be no final recording of such map or maps unless title to the subject parcel is re- corded in the name of E. George Marzicola, his suc- cessor, assignee, nominee, or designee; provided the option is maintained or exercised. The parties may exercise this petition in two or more counter- parts which shall in the aggregate be signed by all the parties, each counterpart shall be deemed an original instrument as against any party who has signed it. Date: 19rDN . Y ARBER Date: 19-7$ C ARE C. GARBER / Date: / t 19 E. GEORGE MAR COLA-OPTIO E I _ • PETITION TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the Municipal Organization Act of 1977 , as amended, Government Code Sections 35, 000 etal, I/we respectfully represent as follows: 1. I/We are the owner (s) of Assessor's Parcel Number 621-230-010 which has an assessed value as shown on the Equalized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside. 2. I/We request that such land be annexed to the City of Palm Desert, subject to the condition that the City of Palm Desert zone the property in conform- ance with the Palm Desert Land Use Plan showing a residential classification with a density of not less than five (5) units per acre or more than seven (7) units per acre. If such conditions do not occur, this petition is withdrawn and shall no longer be effective. 3. There are less than twelve (12) registered voters living within such land. 4 . I/We further authorize E. George Marzicola, P.O. Box 47 , 73-743 Hwy. 111, Palm Desert, or his designated representative, to represent me/us without compen- sation, in obtaining the final acceptance by the City of Palm Desert of this petition of annexation, a parcel map or subdivision map in the City of Palm Desert, as well as any other governmental authority having jurisdiction over the final approval of such maps on the within described property. Except, how- ever, there shall be no final recording of such map or maps unless title to the subject parcel is re- corded in the name of E. George Marzicola, his suc- cessor, assignee, nominee, or designee. The parties may exercise this petition in two or more counter- parts which shall in the aggregate be signed by all the parties , each counterpart shall be deemed an original instrument as against any party who has signed it. Date: , 19 JOHN D. GARBER Date: , 19 C ARE C. GARBER Date: _, 1918 , E. GEORGE MAR COLA-OPTIO E o N a s ie ul ti � a I a v I a � � n � y w � I v I � � ro 2 i O N l I � I v q I C-D I a as � H � O� �a _J I t 14. Thence south 89�45'08" west, a distance of 1 ,325.00 feet. 15. Thence north 00�06'40" east, a distance of 664.68 feet. 16. Thence south 89044'27" west a distance of 3,977.43 feet to the point of beginning. This parcel of land contains 1,046.67 acres more or less. �✓'� �� Ov I � I _ 07.01-T7 C• Cl- ISl Rs•tr1-Y... . rN ,YC IRA. I?-n .YFr'I : :1 t $383, ppt4ASSE!':, A"H'.5!„El:9t'FLN FT S•�V-t0�{ l�\ 6 .A4: SV .•.ie r.) r4'•: +' S=1 U6ENR, A{lOEE7�1 1F$CA I TMt J�IRff 1. :f1�• 1 1-01 621,4 0. "t 1.•. Fs:4] "JOINV( - ,f, ATrf xir 909 0; Axir1 sr Nx.W FlfYY 722)� ej._x ^ESEf!, 'A 122l: IBC .COE Cl [0199[9Mi[ NE CODE Y COxWE9A4.i 5295 09J4 35.3, ACME• •.'! IC P4- 'x : -- ! _= 10. t w 0101092 NrEM plum AM Y 't' r574 t.'4 5-1 A55'SF`95 Rips rrrr Lf!'�CCj�A i•3!F 1 ' .LA A 10111A0 .l'• P. l.:s 59C01 0';-+.l 1T4QJ!':-O:Y-0 14•:" •• ' x ZQ F'l l tT SJAE* Y, !Ax0PfYAr1YA[LC7MG--0fpp�� n 9 e0M.f1 FA•.IL. 'C 1. uWELOECOE Tcm Tv[9AY5Yut 111t 26•• .r44L:x'vA Aii 13,rclr ulv lxP• '1 _ 919/1 CC' 1 4INIO92 Nr11D WAR M.N ACRE'. • :4 I-+I 4+ 'I , 0 ^' 1 •51' pELj[4 WEE Y. tro -' ROE -:4_ :ES:"] PTA-' SU Ast`S 'R! ( C 8'1 117 .AnIv iANM xI4ACf��WRa b 0 3292 A i YAR41 41900c #I-fl'621 234."6 6 11 2- 3 { IS 1.'492 AARLM • t\;. 1 Ply r C 59 •i i f e r r C YL{ .6 v E xYEY ` S 44 F 9L +frl7 O4 j OCR 1;' r. 16.:` A:Rc+ . YE , 1i•: f ,}v wAc -IGR,C ? RI.294-dID-. If2«: .RAPER .LASE :- + rA F C LA A �0 RA: Ay<-<<1 ,9, r- Af 1,£,Irrt f111�i Olin !Ix AAMKC LA WL� F A AR15 Irldy KEY1 59.IS A F` •. .\ - 4 c 5Y J TO! 51. Cv. -9 rRW rC i6C FCi '1 59:�[a`: A5-�5CR! ,P• 2 •B 020,C"2 44RCY4: r;4A. r A.. y1�A?�iAr AMCF 1 S C2^.492 Rvx:M x[4A -" ASY Slrll AC AEIS, ]°°. A! _; e- T95. :�.AI'J'1.A '. lA 1!'A1 W. .• !•Y ul 2J9-tll IJ%. • GAMY lAAGE, CA N6AAvxx nA {•., RL Kll[.LF mj�NgIA IIIIVIEY4xEr. M,• ,P 9E5 rY� '• " to 7{ 1t21 PIYY 4[0.C17 AAMF,M iJ5E .O:r •, .v4dvA4-t r � ..4 q 1 9 (• «[ i p• M5 LCF- F. iv I 'CrA_ CE-•.. tf. ASSES :.f I Yu5 ' fA,r 'ESEA' CE 20N - 201 1�1 WIN CLAx54 { ..... .Y 14ilk :n:_ zxs!,d 1'b a2{ Q4-2•e ad-z •es.... P". 15Ii E U't2o11 CC b[9RYCC Y 9 01 r 5 I 2J ACLES •Y POx LC' 1 IN 0 R', 5s3$ YOAE T I`YIc1[E 6%41 1 0 E .AN:-El Y ! r _ Av t AQt0164 LDE 1 H r, 159'61 t:V'5 .4 -:• 9 111 9 1'.': 9 T A 14CE2 KLL140 1, Eu !.v -;, ]n[.1'L[4 it A95E9v.14 A.{u0710 AYYA n. S,P i maps �' •• IT 20TI JS4'->a !!. PALn 41x06 1 11 CXAi,F• S, 1'^ di 1'S^2s RY-z• +}• i!I • w 19C9A[[! rr. ix Ippqq yyEE 04101 x'ppAJC Cu.at Il' y�g� ARE 12 TO t AL -[1CAIN' CCOOEE s'_n4 �aC 1•' ! 4 C r,5Y69 L_.,V1 s• fr- 11. rE S..x INC .4Y p�p � Y A4M MAn141.[ CALIF 45E - !1 cm.2r4KC myIC4A-.l 4 ar HogC , SC a eE CO •0•\ Y. ip &'LOL ot TaxES 1 C'OY bz90 99(t6r nPP$ UOF ax YY 4 L14.j 1TY"+19 ,. 't �1 4-xE5 4 +W 5 IM YW, r 9E6 •JI IY:. rYl nE SM I %. t� i:iAl S 91 IL. niE t S.5 .+'S rtFJ � xOr4fl{ CLLIF 1AVCE QI t vv A'.i� •I' IM P1j1 ' +.e. - 9t. 4E. rE rot-n �MpLT y L4tD •ryr<•FEr9 .(t TI,i: 'j 914 121-22(..Ilp-p l �t A Loll is fB W452 Y':CYO III;. Awl 1 t TV j�W�7�10lfi 6ERt{{yy 1pL lM 0D4 C' IS •l I" wl!1M 1Rt0 TFs --� 1,•S� -01-T' pT-pl'TT H,::.wY•-Ii '.a •.. .tA. ' -. ..�r-09 •� � 1` Ig2flC[. A"„^OESS. .S5C1..11L. .,,MEE I�MIESS. DEX11,01 L A N!} if YNO Y1iGCi1UE AD f: bGD'h1NC 11f.'C7r r..Mi CS 'fII "�- �• KI 22'. 'i.. .. G seL,`E�t )A 5JppO.:Ie;.pt `T Tlv.j Nf-A4` .L� (E[ JaRR([yyYT CNiErAv.[ I1�1W 3iTl I pC .f:E .E "trJi rlY[[ 1! fD10-(t,A'ES IN PR _::1 16 PR 15) 6_. Sf YCRES MI'L ;4 .G: 1' 1tl 021 0' F'31:E A\SI 2 CNIOMI1DATED LA4t Lc '•'N' -C "IN, ll," ..11.12:-0:2 i Nil P 0 ux 1906 . .. ..' a2 to 07 v[tDT PALM lPt1Y:t. A 9i: I NIY.'1� 111i� LY I_F__ f. YEb SAID OLUv 4xt5 CIIICCO)0))M//1YY)IKEE-OlNif4746.0• RpLp PCp L 19 { C,C;o '%! JO', !!C 00[ 11 LwYCv\M[C m aU .i -f )SE n 9 t:r LAAm `%'l IN POR �'• .: •6 0'.A.SJ. 1 �n� It S 01810/2 RArAEN.t •:.AEj 10 ESIA:ES :AUAwMA STAID iM1WED LAN: Inhrr:•T 'Oi. L'a-;.. ba•22'.-Pu-A 1. I .,• .2-0 REST 'WELEI %ri 0 P RO' 19Ci ''(' :ANCNf a11 AW ' -If 1 PALM 50•'INmA :1 92;U I SCi: qR )A>%S 19 70000H2A7-0 StppLC ru TfxES :9`F 0.00;'259-!S'- '.b: :OOE n CDN,EIUICE 1 Vt� CCDE IT CLA9F 1AKE I')Ato 11 I PIAh j, 10 M6 020'Sf2 RAKW YIN i:`MTF [s5i4Its tA;.DkkldLN WR,L:IME f 'FC LE 1'MAR PjPY,.PEAi IE! el at r• ' T 1 tfai. ' w: 1E�N:LC i❑\4D icai C. bACN' I •A%L„ id. Uh-"uRO fA'.]N.E••"-c 7 'Yet, rt,IIA 4. NIt pus P60PLRITO PC": LCi 10 NR C: :92 NNE: 9\ EIt 10f�ACE RU:%SOM i. N{ LINECODEti MI, 922 CNif ANtt. 'Jl.11 p• •t 1 yR`If.": 3EEi�6WEEi'N"N NON L: I/.0 \EKES /%'. I. PpP \e I:N ' )'L f vAAc. EIR\'E. LA p{E rDR 1^.VL CCs.ilv•10h 7R 455EM., I T}p`�)pFSF/1 D{ _OWIETAN t YOS V ) YF WC%09' RINrµ C7 77 _ _ .... C. \c.-.at,. -AL ASS(SSEE. "CRESS. CES:RI ASSEY EC, AG:R-Sa, •c9C1:�'1"4 IA 'J 4'W Ah S •. t RMS N EL fSJ 'tiON Pay •. ''S•(re 42L••:' .•1 •'' �IONONi L� ^AL Nct 50r. AM 5 I C. [([hTDN %AIL A. N 1 2. 1�[ECS �MFS tv! Rlf2S0 9NP{ L. 1NAY4 St 72023 J A U OER . 4 ?j2fA RArC% I IRA 2:;: PALM D !bE LOU T' LOWEY" !n- �`. 'b '„Sf ,.DE '. Cprvf T\xCC A(2E6 %�L :4 iCR •_ LP- 1 04 U11092 RAM(NC 012AW ? Ait%t.N: FA16 i 4NP )pp(( ``A ROSE L'1-_.• •21-2: -: _ 1. Y11 DCLL1 R CON91 1AD 2RE'- PNVLLl3 1. YET �K S�WAM CO [ TN SRM F9\M•IbCO 'A ACINA R1 N p0r 4' AAr;_A q!9T Sb.0 Z 11x�S -MEIR00t.51,. YIt 2�Y4 :'..NL IMC4'AE f :hC DOE ❑ hOtnCrll'C ZT :Ov IIM, I LET Me 02CI0f2 RAN:NG MAY TC COOE n ::w414Np. 0�%�) A` )9.)M ALM 01, ;4 �Ci V I l Q' .y M MEE Y, FINEJCI, R:v 1ti NNEND 1{YAa EI a i2:.,. WOF Lr L,�IVf o.CE TAILOR RN5N1RY I.11 1 0059{-� T4.v l i '19 t d f`it0; t•{j+\ K :..-b LCT 4 NB 9R01092 RANCK •:R'A •• P C t.:N 10,142 if" "'El 1 L2 \NRELES. CR 34 lC AN YrlOp`IV.TN. tAE .Ri2f3 9t:12 I 0 16.06 F0A0i11 .'m P09 PME ,;9 •,'•-ld' ' Il iAM:NC ;1S11N F,Awt INl (ACT S MB 0101002 /AF{CMO MIMAd �� ` '26 L't :• ISnf 1"� I DOE. Ry[ CIwKr12p:I,AtET(• f2 -ii i M :SEER R LGN4: Y T 2t'ri swum`C i4 IN2{2 � 1 ial N(RrAM t VIE �4"r It (YNE1axn, R1714 t9:• •IT 39rpyERAINt(Cl C 'A a� Sut_�fOY •AYE9 %'NnEi�MCl�tll EfElt iOR c . �wK pl:CA 5' IS_Lts pe• 1 O[ Y _i T 14 020 rof2 AAN'K F14A% ! 'A? AAlDg,.Lf. N. RAO tl Ala A LAfC EG^^^EEE (r LhYifrlN:E (u S M Q6•N2 24KN0 "it" .o:-I)v. PETITION TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the Municipal Organization Act of 1977 , as amended, Government Code Sections 35, 000 etal, I/we re- spectfully represent as follows : 1. I/We are the owner (s) of Assessor 's Parcel Number 621-230-001 which has an assessed value as shown on the Equalized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside. 2. I/We request that such land be annexed to the City of Palm Desert, subject to the condition that the City of Palm Desert zone the property in conform- ance with the Palm Desert Land Use Plan showing a residential classification with a density of not less than five (5) units per acre or more than seven (7) units per acre. If such conditions do not occur, this petition is withdrawn and shall no longer be effective. 3. There are less than twelve (12) registered voters living within such land. 4 . I/We further authorize E. George Marzicola, P.O. Box 47, 73-743 Hwy. 111, Palm Desert, or his desig- nated representative, to represent me/us without compensation, in obtaining the final acceptance by the City of Palm Desert of this petition of annex- ation, a parcel map or subdivision map, change of zone map including but not limited to a final re- corded parcel map or subdivision map in the City of Palm Desert, as well as any other governmental au- thority having jurisdiction over the final approval of such maps on the within described property. Ex- cept, however, there shall be no final recording of such map or maps unless title to the subject parcel is recorded in the name of E. George Marzicola, his successor, assignee, nominee, or designee. The parties may exercise this petition in two or more counter- parts which shall in the aggregate be signed by all the parties, each counterpart shall be deemed an original instrument as a- gainst any party who has signed it. Ls t ICOLA Date: I 19� • E. GEORGE MARZ LA Date: 19 ARTHUR BAGDASARIAN Date: 19 LOUIS VISCO PETITION TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the Municipal Organization Act of 1977 , as amended, Government Code Sections 35, 000 etal, I/we re- spectfully represent as follows: 1. I/We are the owner (s) of Assessor' s Parcel Number 621-230-006 which has an assessed value as shown on the Equalized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside. 2. I/We request that such land be annexed to the City of Palm Desert, subject to the condition that the City of Palm Desert zone the property in conform- ance with the Palm Desert Land Use Plan showing the Northeast ten (10) acres as a Planned Commercial Classification, the contiguous thirty (30) acres as a Planned Residential Classification with a density of not less than five (5) units per acre or more than seven (7) units per acre. If such conditions do not occur, this petition is withdrawn and shall no longer be effective. 3 . There are less than twelve (12) registered voters living within such land. 4. I/We further authorize E. George Marzicola, P.O.Box 47, 73-743 Hwy. 111, Palm Desert, or his designated representative, to represent me/us without compen- sation, in obtaining the final acceptance by the City of Palm Desert of this petition of annexation, a parcel map or subdivision map in the City of Palm Desert, as well as any other governmental authority having jurisdiction over the final approval of such maps on the within described property. Except, how- ever, there shall be no final recording of such map or maps unless title to the subject parcel is re- corded in the name of E. George Marzicola, his suc- cessor, assignee, nominee, or designee. The parties may exercise this petition in two or more counter- parts which shall in the aggregate be signed by all the par- ties, each counterpart shall be deemed an original instrument as against any party who has signed it. Date: 19 THOMAS H. TAYLOR Date: 19 / ICHAR TAYLOR Date: Qll 19 , E. GEORGE MAR OLA- OPTIODW ��. -�-.��- Cam,- �� C�-��� . T 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 9226O TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 June 26, 1978 Local Agency Formation Commission Riverside County Courthouse Riverside, CA Attn: Howard Powell Dear Howard: I am pleased to be forwarding to you the attached application for Palm Desert Annexation No. 5. Since this is the City's first appli- cation under the Municipal Organization Act of 1977, I thought it appropriate to send this cover letter. Further, this application is somewhat unique in that the City has done the environmental analysis on the project and a negative declaration has been issued on the pro- ject. This procedure was followed with the 'concurrance of Mr. Joe Richards of the Environmental Planning Section of the County Planning Department. Therefore, it is our belief that no further environmental analysis is required. This should allow you to schedule this matter for the Commissions review very quickly. The City felt it necessary to do the environmental analysis because of the existence of the Sand Dune Park Designation in the area to be annexed. Please note that the petitioners in this matter do not represent a hundred percent, but do represent more than 25% of the total assessed value of the area to be annexed. Therefore, I believe that we do comply with Section 35130 of the State Government Code. Please find attached the required Plan for Municipal Services which answers many of the ques- tions in your application. Finally, please note that the City's Planning Commission has acted on the prezoning on the area to be annexed as shown by the Planning Commission Resolution No. 367, attached hereto. The Council is scheduled to consider the prezoning on July 13, 1978. Upon their action I will forward to you the results of their action. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate contacting me at anytime. Sincerely, Paul A. Williams, A. I .P. Director of Environmental Services PAW/ks Attachments GA . 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 June 26, 1978 Local Agency Formation Commission County of Riverside Courthouse, Room 104 Riverside, CA Gentlemen: Noice is hereby given of intention to annex territory to the follow- ing local agency (city or district) : Palm Desert Annexation No. 5 The annexation is proposed under the following statutory provisions: Municipal Organization Act of 1977 A map and legal description of the specific boundaries of the territory proposed to be annexed are attached hereto and are made a part hereof by this reference. In addition, a completed form of questionnaire, as required by the Formation Commission, is submitted. Notice, process and other communications regarding said annexation may be directed to the proponents at: City of Palm Desert Martin J. Bouman, City Manager P. 0. Box 1977 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Attachments LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE PROPOSAL QUESTIONNAIRE Proponent:_ City of Palm Desert LAFC No. (to be filled Address : P. 0. Box 1977 in by LAFCO Palm Desert, CA 92260 Secretary) Telephone No. 714 346-0611 PROPOSAL DESIGNATION (City or district name. TYPE OF PROPOSAL (CHECK d ) If annexation, desig- nate by number or Incorporate a city other description) : Form a new special district Palm Desert Annex No. 5 Annex 'to a city X Annex to a special district Other PROPONENTS COMPLETE THIS SIDE OF FORM THIS SIDE :RESERVED FOR LAFCO ADVISORY A. General STAFF COMMENTS 1. Statutory provisions under which proposal is filed: Municipal Organization Act of 1977 2. General location of proposed area (use cities and/or communities as points of reference) : Area south of Country Club Drive between Monterey Avenue and Cook Street. —1— NOTE: Questions refer only to area under consideration for formation, annexation, or other action--not to surrounding or adjacent areas. B. Physical Features 1. Land area sq. miles I or 1 .046.67 acres 2. State general description of topography(flat, rolling, etc. ) Area generally rolling terrain except for one area which has tremendous sand dunes. C. Population and Related Matters 1. Population in subject area 2 2. Number of registered voters 2 3. Number of dwelling units 1 4. Likelihood of significant increase in population in proposed area in the next 10 years (indicated est- imated growth in percent) : 8,556 persons estimated total population D. Land Use 1. Existing land use in proposed area: Vacant 2. Existing zoning in proposed area: W-2, R-1-1 and R-1-12,000 (County) 3. Describe proposed new zoning, if any: Open Space, Planned Residential - 4 and 5 �RRunitss to the acres, single-family -12,000 and 4, rs'OR sgprft. Ms and Planned dmCom with ' ee attached Planning Commission Resolution No. 367. appropriate city or county general and specific plans? Yes -2- E. Economic Factors 1. Assessed value in proposed area: a. Land 496,448 b. Improvements c. Amount of publicly-owned land in area (federal, schools, etc. ) : N.A. d. Total acreage in Agricultural Preserve (if proposed area is to be annexed to a city) : N.A. 2 . If annexation proposal, will proposed area be subject to any bonded indebt- edness of annexing city or district? NO If answer is "Yes" , state amount of outstanding indebtedness and current debt service tax rate: 3 . If detachment or de-annexation proposal, will proposed area continue to be liable for outstanding bonded indebtedness of city or district from which area will be detached or de-annexed? If answer is "Yes" , state amount of out- standing indebtedness and current debt service tax rate: F. Proposal Justification 1. List governmental services not now provided which are proposed to be provided under this proposal: Property owners of over 25% of the property to be annexed have requested annexation to receive the higher level of service obtainable from the city. -3- 2. List governmental services presently provided but which will be increased under this proposal: Planning, building, police and administration services. See attached Plan for services for additional information. 3. Describe and evaluate alternative courses of action which would meet the needs described above: Since area is within Palm Desert's Sphere of Influence, no viable alternative exists. 4. Additional justification, if any: Proposed annexation is a logical expansion of the City's border. G. Financial Requirements 1. What will be the approximate annual costs to accomplish the goals of this proposal? 100,000 2. What are the prospective sources of revenue (including the estimated property tax rate, if any) ? State Subventions Sales Tax New Construction Tax -4- 3. If proposal requires an extension of public works, what.will be the cost? Area is presently served by utilities and roads. Extensions would only be required for new development. Who is to pay this cost? New development H. Additional Information (You are encouraged to include below any additional information which will be helpful to the Commission and Staff in evaluating this proposal) : See attached Plan for Municipal Services and the Environmental Initial Study. (For Staff Use Only) -5- CITY OF PALM DESERT TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council SUBJECT: Plan for Services for Palm Desert Annexation No. 5 I . INTRODUCTION: Pursuant to Section 35102 of the State Government Code, the City is required to file with any new Annexations effective January 1, 1978, a plan outlining the method by which services will be provided in the area to be annexed. This report represents the required plan for services for Proposed Annexation No. 5. The City of Palm Desert, being a contract City, must rely on many other agencies to provide for services both in the community and areas sub- sequently annexed. In addition, many services provided such as water and sewer, electricity, gas, are provided without regard to city limit lines. Therefore, the area proposed to be annexed is presently served or has the capability of being served by many of these agencies. The fact is substantial by the letters received from responsible agencies as a part of the review births responsible agencies during the Environmental Review process. The major emphasis of this report is to address those services provided directly by the City either through City Staff or direct contract with the City by other agencies. In addition, wherever possible, this report will address the methods by which other service agencies would provide needed facilities in the area. II . DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES: The utilities which would be extended into the area proposed to be annexed would be as part of actual development and they would consist of the services of the Coachella Valley County Water District in the area of water and sewer, Southern California Edison Company in the area of electricity, Southern California Gas Company in the area of gas, and Able Cable in the area of cable television. The services provided by this City directly would be in planning and building, public works, parks, administration and code enforcement.services. By contract the City would also provide for trash disposal , police and fire services. Public transportation would be provided by the Sunline Agency. The major road improvements would include the widening of Monterey Avenue, Country Club Drive, Hovely Lane and Cook Street. Road extensions would include Portola Avenue from the Whitewater Storm Channel to Country Club Drive; Hovely Lane from Portola Avenue extended to Cook Street; and the extension of a new road from Hovely Lane northerly to Country Club Drive approximately midway between Monterey Avenue and Portola Avenue (extended) . The creation of any local streets would be on the basis of specific projects and would be the responsibility of the developer. A majority of the public parks needs in the area to be annexed will be met by the propsed Sand Dune Park which totals approximately 120 acres of which approximately 60 acres is included in the area proposed to the annexed. Approximately 17 acres of said parks area would be given to the City as a part of development under the City's subdivision ordinance. The remainder would be aquired by the City with revenues generated from the City's new construction tax. At ultimate development there will be a need for bridges at the Cook Street crossing of the Whitewater Storm Channel and possibly to the Portola Avenue Whitewater Channel . Said facilities would be constructed with a combination of federal grants and local participation very similar to existing bridges in the valley. If Monterey Avenue ultimately becomes an extension of State High- way 74, a bridge would also be required at its crossing of the Whitewater Channel , which is not in the area to be annexed but would serve said area. The funding for said facility would be the same as the other proposed bridges. Page Two Transmittal Letter III. LEVEL AND RANGE OF SERVICES: The level and range of services provided would include sufficient sized water and sewer, gas, and electrical facilities to service development proposed for the area. Planning and building, public works, and code enforce- ment services as provided by the City directly, would be on the basis of need. Police and fire services capability exist to meet the need of the area at its present stage of development and are proposed to be expanded to meet the needs of subsequent development in the area. Public transportation would be provided by the expansion of the existing system to serve the area. Subsequent development will result in the need for the City to add an addi- tional police vehicle and the need for an additional fire station in the vicinty of Country Club Drive. Since fire services are provided on a volunteer basis in conjuntion with the County of Riverside and State Department of Forestry, the City would be required to provide for a facility in the area which would be manned by these agencies. A fire station has been planned for in the City's General Plan in this area and will be provided at the time it is needed. In addition said area will be served by a proposed fire station at 44th Avenue and San Pablo (Civic Center Complex) , which is tentatively proposed for construction in 1980/91 budget year. In the meantime, the area would be served by the existing Palm Desert Station at E1 Paseo and Highway 74 with backup being provided by the Rancho Mirage, Thousand Palms and Bermuda Dunes stations. The basic administration services of Planning, Building, Public Works, and Code enforcement would be provided by existing City Staff. IV. TIMING FOR SERVICE EXTENSIONS: Basic utility services would occur as a part of development. The City has on file letters from the various utilities assuring us that these services would be available. The City services would be available immediately in the area of planning, building and code enforcement, public works, and police and fire. Road improvements would occur as a part of new development. The construction of the new fire station near Country Club Drive would result from the City's new construction tax which would be accrued from the new development in the area, which would be 20¢ per square foot of new construc- tion. Parks would be developed in the area under the City' s Subdivision Ordinance which provides for the dedication of land for community facilities and would provide for sites for the fire station and parks. A majority of the proposed residential development contemplated for the area is planned residential which would include a majority of necessary recreational facilities to serve the ultimately residents of the area. V. REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT AND FINANCING: New development would be required to extend roads throughout the area and to provide for needed sites for fire, parks and other related municipal facilities provided through the City's Subdivision Ordinance. The new Construction Tax of 20t per square feet would provide for construction and additional acquisition of these facilities. The provision of planning and building services would be provided through the fees generated from new development. On-going maintenance of roads, created in the area, would be provided through State Gas Taxes generated as a result of population within the area. Police services and parks maintenance would be provided on the basis of Sales Tax generated from commercial facilities in the area. In summary it is felt that development of this area would result in a balance between needed services and the revenues to provide said services. CITY OF PALM DESERT TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council SUBJECT: Plan for Services for Palm Desert Annexation No. 5 I . INTRODUCTION: Pursuant, to Section 35102 of the State Government Code, the City is required to file with any new Annexations effective January 1, 1978, a plan outlining the method by which services will be provided in the area to be annexed. This report represents the required plan for services for Proposed Annexation No. 5. The City of Palm Desert, being a contract City, must rely on many other agencies to provide for services both in the community and areas sub- sequently annexed. In addition, many services provided such as water and sewer, electricity, gas, are provided without regard to city limit lines. Therefore, the area proposed to be annexed is presently served or has the capability of being served by many of these agencies. The fact is substantial by the letters received from responsible agencies as a part of the review births responsible agencies during the Environmental Review process. The major emphasis of this report is to address those services provided directly by the City either through City Staff or direct contract with the City by other agencies. In addition, wherever possible, this report will address the methods by which other service agencies would provide needed facilities in the area. II. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES: The utilities which would be extended into the area proposed to be annexed would be as part of actual development and they would consist of the services of the Coachella Valley County Water District in the area of water and sewer, Southern California Edison Company in the area of electricity, Southern California Gas Company in the area of gas, and Able Cable in the area of cable television. The services provided by this City directly would be in planning and building, public works, parks, administration and code enforcement services. By contract the City would also provide for trash disposal , police and fire services. Public transportation would be provided by the Sunline Agency. The major road improvements would include the widening of Monterey Avenue, Country Club Drive, Hovely Lane and Cook Street. Road extensions would include Portola Avenue from the Whitewater Storm Channel to Country Club Drive; Hovely Lane from Portola Avenue extended to Cook Street; and the extension of a new road from Hovely Lane northerly to Country Club Drive approximately midway between Monterey Avenue and Portola Avenue (extended) . The creation of any local streets would be on the basis of specific projects and would be the responsibility of the developer. A majority of the public parks needs in the area to be annexed will be met by the propsed Sand Dune Park which totals approximately 120 acres of which approximately 60 acres is included in the area proposed to the annexed. Approximately 17 acres of said parks area would be given to the City as a part of development under the City's subdivision ordinance. The remainder would be aquired by the, City with revenues generated from the City's new construction tax. At ultimate development there will be a need for bridges at the Cook Street crossing of the Whitewater Storm Channel and possibly to the Portola Avenue Whitewater Channel . Said facilities would be constructed with a combination of federal grants and local participation very similar to existing bridges in the valley. If Monterey Avenue ultimately becomes an extension of State High- way 74, a bridge would also be required at its crossing of the Whitewater Channel , which is not in the area to be annexed but would serve said area. The funding for said facility would be the same as the other proposed bridges. Page Two Transmittal Letter III. LEVEL AND RANGE OF SERVICES: The level and range of services provided would include sufficient sized water and sewer, gas , and electrical facilities to service development proposed for the area. Planning and building, public works, and code enforce- ment services as provided by the City directly, would be on the basis of need. Police and fire services capability exist to meet the need of the area at its present stage of development and are proposed to be expanded to meet the needs of subsequent development in the area. Public transportation would be provided by the expansion of the existing system to serve the area. Subsequent development will result in the need for the City to add an addi- tional police vehicle and the need for an additional fire station in the vicinty of Country Club Drive. Since fire services are provided on a volunteer basis in conjuntion with the County of Riverside and State Department of Forestry, the City would be required to provide for a facility in the area which would be manned by these agencies. A fire station has been planned for in the City's General Plan in this area and will be provided at the time it is needed. In addition said area will be served by a proposed fire station at 44th Avenue and San Pablo (Civic Center Complex) , which is tentatively proposed for construction in 1980/91 budget year. In the meantime, the area would be served by the existing Palm Desert Station at E1 Paseo and Highway 74 with backup being provided by the Rancho Mirage, Thousand Palms and Bermuda Dunes stations. The basic administration services of Planning, Building, Public Works, and Code enforcement would be provided by existing City Staff. IV. TIMING FOR SERVICE EXTENSIONS: Basic utility services would occur as a part of development. The City has on file letters from the various utilities assuring us that these services would be available. The City services would be available immediately in the area of planning, building and code enforcement, public works, and police and fire. Road improvements would occur as a part of new development. The construction of the new fire station near Country Club Drive would result from the City's new construction tax which would be accrued from the new development in the area, which would be 20¢ per square foot of new construc- tion. Parks would be developed in the area under the City's Subdivision Ordinance which provides for the dedication of land for community facilities and would provide for sites for the fire station and parks. A majority of the proposed residential development contemplated for the area is planned residential which would include a majority of necessary recreational facilities to serve the ultimately residents of the area. V. REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT AND FINANCING: New development would be required to extend roads throughout the area and to provide for needed sites for fire, parks and other related municipal facilities provided through the City's Subdivision Ordinance. The new Construction Tax of 20¢ per square feet would provide for construction and additional acquisition of these facilities. The provision of planning and building services would be provided through the fees generated from new development. On-going maintenance of roads, created in the area, would be provided through State Gas Taxes generated as a result of population within the area. Police services and parks maintenance would be provided on the basis of Sales Tax generated from commercial facilities in the area. In summary it is felt that development of this area would result in a balance between needed services and the revenues to provide said services. q Cva A., IOR'.E bl �' O xO °O 5-1 E z- •.a L' x JI p a o _ 0 TO � -Di I 3 mo a `a I � • s g m o O I TO y, r y • ,j T _ o y � e _ m r xaD°D9'i:"E zlse.56' o m _— o I n 0 O 4 3 N N y N TO O fry N n I m O _ a z n $ m 3 666.661' r m I y (�� ` c a; m £ e 0 JP RDD°DC'6o•E _ Ip -66D.OD' m rL d v04vl-E n m V ppon D a3 v n z 3 op DO mg DO a '^ iR L N z O n 600°0] t0 W IJ25.52 ^ C 0 y 9 y O O $ m N a r i y m 3 w m_ — 1 2 x �-, m T� v o o y 1 o N mm I m m m a O t N n y • m (Z _ � ? $ _m r m . . ._ -"'3 P z y til y a 000 f• r �' _ z y m n w CD10 a _ m '< At Z � � oZ m D y r 1'4A..•'V OIN 5'00°06L0-W Jp]9.TL O .E ;J) ;O STREET o Q6 C7 Z o o COENTY Of RIVERSIDE o l w nn a m cnz £ r LAm0 p ,. �. ` zanTER ] ROADaN m 1 0 '- n r' o m N O £ y Cl, o' O roRTot4 RVEHUE DP O i,�•�jS'i` COOS STREET 2 O `L. O ANNEXATION NO. 5 OFFICIAL PETITIONERS R D E C E I V E MAR 31978 PETITION PALM DESERT CITY HALL CITY CLERK'S OFFICE TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939 , as amended, Government Code Sections 35 , 300-35 , 326 , I/we respectfully represent as follows : 1. I/We are the owner (s) of Assessor ' s Parcel Number kt-Ifc-074 which has an assessed value as shown on the Eaualized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside. 2. I/We request that such land be annexed to the City of Palm Desert , subject to the condition that the City of Palm Desert zone 'the property in conformance with the Palm Desert Land Use Plan showing a residential classification with a density of not less than five (5) units oer acre or more than seven (7) units per acre . If such conditions do not occur, this petition, is withdrawn and shall no longer be effective . 3. There are less than twelve (12) registered voters living within such land . Date : R E C E I V E MAR 3 1978 PALM DESERT CITY HALL PETITION CITY CLERK'S OFFICE TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939 , as amended, Government Code Sections 35 , 300-35 , 326 , I/we respectfully represent as follows : 1 . I/We are the owqer (s) of Assessor ' s Parcel Number(U )- (ye-k) &4 which has an assessed value as shown on the Equalized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside. 2 . I/We request that such land be annexed to the City of Palm Desert, subject to the condition that the City of Palm Desert zone 'the property in conformance with the Palm Desert Land Use Plan showing a residential classification with a density of not less than five (5) units oer acre or more than seven (7) units per acre. If such conditions do not occur, this petition is withdrawn and shall no longer be effective. 3. There are less than twelve (12) recistered voters living within such land. Date : RECEIVE MAR 3 1978 PALM DESERT CITY HALL PETITION CITY CLERKS OFFICE TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939 , as amended, Government Code Sections 35, 300-35 , 326 , I/we respectfully represent as follows : 1 . I/We are the ownerfs) of Assessor ' s Parcel Number 6V- Ito -OG which has an assessed value as shown on the Equalized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside. 2 . I/We request that such land be annexed to the City of Palm Desert , subject to the condition that the City of Palm Desert zone 'the property in conformance with the Palm Desert Land Use Plan showing a residential classification with a density of not less than five (5) units per acre or more than seven (7) units per acre . If such conditions do not occur, this petition is withdrawn and shall no longer be effective. 3. There are less than twelve (12) registered voters living within such land . Date : 0 PETITION TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM . DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939 , as amended, Government Cod Sections 35, 300-35 , 326 , I/we respectfully represent as follows : 1 . I/We are the owner (s) of Assessor ' s Parcel o Number 621-190-068-9 which has an assessed Z /S value as shown on the Equalized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside . 2 . I/We request that such land be annexed to the City of Palm Desert , subject to the condition that the City of Palm Desert zone the property in conformance with the Palm Desert Land Use Plan showing a residential classification with a density of not' less than five (5) units per acre or more than seven (7) units per acre. If such conditions do not occur, this petition is withdrawn and shall no longer be effective. 3. There are less than twelve (12) registered voters living within such land. Date : 19 �Glenn A. Thomas Berna Dean Thomas RECEIVE D MAR 3 1978 PETITION PALM DESERT CITY HALL CITY CLERK'S OFFICE TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939 , as amended, Government Code Sections 35 , 300-35 , 326 , I/we respectfully represent as follows : 1 . I/We are the owner (s) of Assessor ' s Parcel Z Number�2/-j9o-074 which has an assessed value as shown on the Equalized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside. 2 . I/We request that such land be annexed to the City of Palm Desert, subject to the condition that the City of Palm Desert zone 'the property in conformance with the Palm Desert Land Use Plan showing a residential classification with a density of not less than five (5) units per acre or more than seven (7) units per acre. If such conditions do not occur, this petition is withdrawn and shall no longer be effective. 3 . There are less than twelve (12) registered voters living within such land. Date : M Lh Q 4i 197,e `111 .o, RECEIVE MAID 31978 PALM DESERT CITY HALL PETITION CITY CLERK'S OFFICE TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939 , as amended, Government Code Sections 35 , 300-35 , 326 , I/we respectfully represent as follows : 1 . I/We are the ownerSs) of Assessor ' s Parcel Number 6 V- f10 -06, which has an assessed < i r� value as shown on the Equalized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside. 2 . I/We request that such land be annexed to the City of Palm Desert , subject to the condition that the City of Palm Desert zone 'the property in conformance with the Palm Desert Land Use Plan showing a residential classification with a density of not less than five (5) units per acre or more than seven (7) units per acre. If such conditions do not occur, this petition is withdrawn and shall no longer be effective. 3. There are less than twelve (12) registered voters living within such land. Date : 191P . (Q� �G ; � 1 RECEIVE MAR 3 1978 PALM DESERT CITY HALL PETITION CITY CLERK'S OFFICE TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939 , as amended, Government Code Sections 35 , 300-35 ,326 , I/we respectfully represent as follows : 1. I/We a e the owner (s) of Assessor ' s Parcel Number � - 1gc-0 64 which has an assessed Z 3 7S value as shown on the Equalized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside . 2. I/We request that such land be annexed to the City of Palm Desert, subject to the condition that the City of Palm Desert zone 'the property in conformance with the Palm Desert Land Use Plan showing a residential classification with a density of not less than five (5) units per acre or more than seven (7) units per acre. If such conditions do not occur, this petition is withdrawn and shall no longer be effective. 3. There are less than twelve (12) registered voters living within such land. Date : M .ate�A PETITION TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939, as amended, Government Code Sections 35, 300-35 , 326 , I/we respectfully represent as follows: 1. I/We are the owner (s) of Assessor' s Parcel Number 621-190-002-9 which has an assessed value as shown on the Equalized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside. 2. I/We request that such land be annexed to the City of Palm Desert, subject to the condition that the City of Palm Desert zone the property in conformance with the plans submitted by the McBail Company and prepared by V.T.N. Consolidated, Inc . , tentative tract number 11791. If such condition does not occur, this petition is withdrawn and shall no longer be effective. 3. There are less than twelve (12) registered voters living within such land. Date : ��_ ' , 19 b. cl N LL, Desert Land Investment Co. , No. 2 O. Michael Homme, General Partner PETITION TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939 , as amended, Government Code Sections 35, 300-35, 326 , I/we respectfully represent as follows : 1 . I/We are the owner (s) of Assessor' s Parcel Number 621-190-045-8 which has an assessed value as shown on the Equalized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside. 2 . I/We request that such land be annexed to the City of Palm Desert, subject to the condition that the City of Palm Desert zone the property in conformance with the plans submitted by the McBail Company and prepared by V.T.N. Consolidated, Inc. , tentative tract number 11791. If such condition does not occur, this petition is withdrawn and shall no longer be effective. 3. There are less than twelve (12) registered voters living within such land. Date: FJE�� rly�s — L VhQ, Desert Lands Investm nt Co. , a Limited Partnership Woodpecker Development Co. , General Partner O. Michael Homme, President 1 PETITION TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939 , as amended, Government Code Sections 35 , 300-35 , 32.6 , I/we respectfully represent as follows : 1. I/We are the owner (s) of Assessor ' s Parcel Number 621-190-004-1 which has an assessed value as shown on the Equalized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside. 2. I/We request that such land be annexed to the City of Palm Desert, subject to the condition that the City of Palm Desert zone the property in conformance with the Palm Desert Land Use Plan showing a residential classification with a density of not less than five (5) units per acre or more than seven (7) units per acre . If such conditions do not occur, this petition is withdrawn and shall no longer be effective . 3. There are less than twelve (12) registered voters living within such land. Dat 3/ 19V . Walter J ner PETITION TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939 , as amended., Government Code Sections 35, 300-35 , 326 , I/we respectfully represent as follows: 1 . I/We are the owner (s) of Assessor ' s Parcel Number 621-190-005-2 which has an assessed value as shown on the Equalized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside. 2. I/we request that such land be annexed to the City of Palm Desert, subject to the condition that the City of Palm Desert zone the property in conformance with the Palm Desert Land Use Plan showing a residential classification with a density of not less than five (5) units per acre or more than seven (7) units per acre. If such conditions do not occur, this petition is withdrawn and shall no longer be effective. 3 . There are less than twelve (12) registered voters living within such land. Date: / j Ra heri e R. cP ie 19A. j Will'iam Mcphie II � Bonna Sise ein - Irvin senwein PETITION TO : THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939 , as amended., Government Code Sections 35,300-35, 326 , I/we respectfully represent as follows : 1 . I/We are the owner (s) of Assessor ' s Parcel Number 621-190-006-3 which has an assessed value as shown on the Equalized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside. 2. I/We request that such land be annexed to the City of Palm Desert, subject to the condition that the City of Palm Desert zone the property in conformance with the Palm Desert Land Use Plan showing a residential classification with a density of not less than five (5) units per acre or more than seven (7) units per acre. If such conditions do not occur, this petition is withdrawn and shall no longer be effective. 3. There are less than twelve (12) registered voters living within such land. \ Katherine R. McPhie Date: 19 i—�wti William McPhie Br na Sisenw i i Irvin 6Sgsenwein PETITION TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939, as amended, Government Code Sections 35000-35, 326, I/we respectfully represent as follows: 1. I/We are the owner(s) of Assessorts Parcel Number 621-190-047-0 which has an assessed value as shown on the Equalized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside. 2. I/We request that such land be annexed to the City of Paln Desert, subject to the condition that the City of Palm Desert zone the property in conformance with the Palm Desert Land Use Plan showing a residential classification with a density of not less than five (5) units per acre or more than seven (7) units per acre. If such conditions do not occur, this petition is withdrawn and shall no longer be effective. 3. There are less than twelve (12) registered voters living within such land. Date: i9 Fayr (Shapiro) 10aff PETITION TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939 , as amended, Government Code Sections 35 , 300-35, 326 , I/we respectfully represent as follows : 1 . I/We are the owner (s) of Assessor' s Parcel Number 621-190-051-3 which has an assessed value as shown on the Equalized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside. 2. I/We request that such land be annexed to the City of Palm Desert, subject to the condition that the City of Palm Desert zone the property in conformance with the Palm Desert Land Use Plan showing a residential classification with a density of not less than five (5) units per acre or more than seven (7) units per acre. If such conditions do not occur, this petition is withdrawn and shall no longer be effective. 3. There are less than twelve (12) registered voters living within such land . Date : I 197z 1Zl7 / 6- Ray and Shapiro PETITION TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939 , as amended, Government Code Sections 35, 300-35, 326 , I/we respectfully represent as follows : 1. I/We are the owner (s) of Assessor ' s Parcel Number 621-190-054-6 which has an assessed value as shown on the Equalized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside. 2 . I/We request that such land be annexed to the City of Palm Desert, subject to the condition that the City of Palm Desert zone the property in conformance with the Palm Desert Land Use Plan showina a residential classification with a density of not less than five (5) units per acre or more than seven (7)' units per acre . If such conditions do not occur, this petition is withdrawn and shall no longer be effective. 3. There are less than twelve (12) registered voters living within such land. J lav�- Date : William McPhie 19_ en McPhie Hommee Martha G. Horae PETITION TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939 , as amended, Government Code Sections 35, 300-35 , 326, I/we respectfully represent as follows : 1. I/We are the owner (s) of Assessor ' s Parcel Number 621-190-055-7 which has an assessed value as shown on the Equalized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside. 2 . I/We request that such land be annexed to the City of Palm Desert , subject to the condition that the City of Palm Desert zone the property in conformance with the Palm Desert Land Use Plan showing a residential classification with a density of not less than five (5) units per acre or more than seven (7) units per acre. If such conditions do not occur, this petition is withdrawn and shall no longer be effective. 3 . There are less than twelve (12) registered voters living within such land. Wiiliam 1cP ie Date: 19_ ` — e e Phie Fer s . Homme Martha G.Hrme PETITION TO : THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939 , as amended, Government Code Sections 35 , 300-35, 326 , I/we respectfully represent as follows : 1 . I/We are the owner (s) of Assessor ' s Parcel Number 621-190-057-9 which has an assessed value as shown on the Equalized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside. 2. I/We request that such land be annexed to the City of Palm Desert, subject to the condition that the City of Palm Desert zone the property in conformance with the Palm Desert Land Use Plan showing a residential classification with a density of not less than five (5) units per acre or more than seven (7) units per acre. If such conditions do not occur, this petition is withdrawn and shall no longer be effective. 3. There are less than twelve (12) registered voters livina within such land. Date 3� 19�. W Walter Jit PETITION TO : THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939 , as amended, Government Code Sections 35, 300-35 , 326 , I/we respectfully represent as follows : 1 . I/We are the owner (s) of Assessor' s Parcel Number 621-190-059-1 which has an assessed value as shown on the Equalized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside. 2 . I/We request that such land be annexed to the City of Palm Desert, subject to the condition that the City of Palm Desert zone the property in conformance with the Palm Desert Land Use Plan showing a residential classification with a density of not less than five (5) units per acre or more than seven (7) units Per acre. If such conditions do not occur, this petition is withdrawn and shall no longer be effective. 3. There are less than twelve (12) registered voters living within such land . Date : ai 197 / . Walter Jit PETITION TO : THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939 , as amended, Government Code Sections 35, 300-35, 326 , I/we respectfully represent as follows : 1. I/We are the owner (s) of Assessor' s Parcel Number 621-190-060-1 which has an assessed value as shown on the Equalized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside. 2 . I/We request that such land be annexed to the City of Palm Desert , subject to the condition that the City of Palm Desert zone the property in conformance with the Palm Desert Land Use Plan showing a residential classification with a density of not less than five (5) units per acre or more than seven (7) units per acre. If such conditions do not occur, this petition is withdrawn and shall no longer be effective. 3 . There are less than twelve (12) registered voters living within such land. Date : 19 Walter Ji r PETITION TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939 , as amended, Government Code Sections 35 , 300-35 , 326 , I/we respectfully represent as follows : 1. I/We are the owner (s) of Assessor' s Parcel Number 621-190-061-2 which has an assessed value as shown on the Equalized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside. 2 . I/We request that such land be annexed to the City of Palm Desert , subject to the condition that the City of Palm Desert zone the property in conformance with the Palm Desert Land Use Plan showing a residential classification with a density of not less than five (5) units per acre or more than seven (7) units per acre . If such conditions do not occur, this petition is withdrawn and shall no longer be effective. 3. There are less than twelve (12) registered voters living within such land. Date : 31 Walter Jitn PETITION TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939 , as amended, Government Code Sections 35, 300-35 , 326 , I/we respectfully represent as follows : 1 . I/We are the owner (s) of Assessor ' s Parcel Number 621-190-062-•3 which has an assessed value as shown on the Equalized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside. 2 . I/We request that such land be annexed to the City of Palm Desert , subject to the condition that the City of Palm Desert zone the property in conformance with the Palm Desert Land Use Plan showing a residential classification with a density of not less than five (5) units per acre or more than seven (7) units per acre. If such conditions do not occur, this petition is withdrawn and shall no longer be effective. 3. There are less than twelve (12) registered voters living within such land. Dat 19 Walter Jit e PETITION TO : THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939 , as amended, Government Code Sections 35, 300-35 , 326 , I/we respectfully represent as follows : 1. I/We are the owner (s) of Assessor ' s Parcel Number 621-190-071-1 which has an assessed value as shown on the Equalized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside. 2. I/We request that such land be annexed to the City of Palm Desert, subject to the condition that the City of Palm Desert zone the property in conformance with the Palm Desert Land Use Plan, showing a residential classification with a density of not less than five (5) units per acre or more than seven (7) units per acre . If such conditions do not occur, this petition is withdrawn and shall no longer be effective. 3. There are less than twelve (12) registered voters living within such land. D te : p W ite Jitne 19 f7n L�� Fe ns Homme Martha G. H e PETITION TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939 , as amended, Government Code Sections 35, 300-35 , 326 , I/we respectfully represent as follows : 1 . I/We are the owner (s) of Assessor ' s Parcel Number 621-190-078-8 which has an assessed value as shown on the Equalized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside. 2 . I/We request that such land be annexed to the City of Palm Desert, subject to the condition that the City of Palm Desert zone the property in conformance with the Palm Desert Land Use Plan showina a residential classification with a density of not less than five (5) units per acre or more than seven (7) units per acre. If such conditions do not occur, this Uetition is withdrawn and shall no longer be effective. 3. There are less than twelve (12) recistered voters living within such land. Dat- I 19 �Ja e��, Walter Jitner PETITION TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939 , as amended, Government Code Sections 35, 300-35 , 326 , I/we respectfully represent as follows : 1 . I/We are the owner (s) of Assessor' s Parcel Number 621-190-080-9 which has an assessed value as shown on the Equalized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside. 2 . I/We request that such land be annexed to the City of Palm Desert, subject to the condition that the City of Palm Desert zone the property in conformance with the Palm Desert Land Use Plan showina a residential classification with a density of not less than five (5) units per acre or more than seven (7) units per acre . If such conditions do not occur, this petition is withdrawn and shall no longer be effective. 3. There are less than twelve (12) registered voters living within such land . Date : alt Ji r 19 //n . V. F gus Homme Martha G. Ho4ge PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 5 TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT ANNEXATION DESCRIPTION Beginning at a point in the northerly boundary line of the City of Palm Desert, County of Riverside, State of California, said point being the common -4 Section corner of Section 7 and 3, Township 5 south, Range 6 east, San Bernardino base and meridian. Said point also being in the boundary line of the City of Rancho Mirage of said Riverside County. 1. Thence northerly along the aforementioned common Section line of Sections 7 and 8 and along the easterly boundary line of the City of Rancho Mirage, a distance of 2,652.82 feet to the common section corner of Sections 7 and 8 and Sections 5 and 6. 2. Thence north 89033' 48" east along the northerly line of the aforementioned Section 8, a distance of 2,629.98 feet to a point. 3. Thence north 39042'08" east, along the northerly line of the aforementioned Section 8, a distance of 2,670.86 feet to the northeasterly corner of said Section 8 said point heing the common corner of Sections 8 and 9 , said point also being the centerline intersection of Portola Avenue and Country Club Drive. - 4. Thence continuing north 89*42'00" east along the northerly line of said Section 9, a distance of 5,307.00 feet to a point. Said point being the northeasterly corner of said Section 9, said point also being the center- line intersection of Cook Street and said Country Club Drive. 5. Thence south 00006' 00" west along the easterly line of the aforementioned Section 9, a distance of 3,979.72 feet to a point. Said point also being the most northeasterly corner in the boundary line of the City of Palm Desert. 6. Thence continuing along the boundary line of the City of Palm Desert the following courses and distances. Thence south 89046' 32" west, a distance of 3,981.26 feet. 7. Thence south 00`07 ' 20" west, a distance of 1,325.52 feet. 8. Thence south 89*48'00" west, a distance of 1,327.45 feet. 9. Thence south 00601' 50" west, a distance of 1,592.03 feet. 10. Thence north 76032' 56" west, a distance of 3,166.84 feet. 11. Thence north 00609' 12" east, a distance of 2,168.56 feet. 12. Thence north 99*45' 08" east, a distance of 3,052.69 feet. 13. Thence north 00'06' 40" east, a distance of 660.00 feet. 621--20 B T 5S.R6E. p O . © p t J � � S 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 April 26 , 1978 Ted Weiner Oil Properties P. O. Box 12819 Forth Worth, TX 76116 Dear Mr. Weiner : With regards to your request for annexation, upon approval of the proposed development plan for your property, it is my opinion that any subsequent possible moratorium action on the part of the City would exempt your project . Very truly yours , Paul A. Williams, A. I .P. Director of Environmental Services paw/ks ANNEXATION NO. 5 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS • 'E'Je��l7/einev�iL7�' 010.9�12019 �ozL�lJor1/�, �Jixna7('11B February 20, 1978 PETITION TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939, as amended, Government Code Sections 35,300-35,326, we respectfully repre- sent as follows: 1 . We are the owners of Assessor's Parcels Numbers 621350023-2, 621350018-81621350017-7, 621200020-5, 621350016-6> 621200033-7', and 621200032-6, which have an assessed value as shown on the Equalized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside. 2. We request that such land be annexed to the City of Palm Desert, subject to the condition that the City of Palm Desert zone the property in conformance with the Palm Desert Land Use Plan showing a residential classification with a density of not less than five (5) units per acre or more than seven (7) units per acre. If such conditions do not occur, this petition is withdrawn and shall no longer be effective. 3. There are less than twelve (12) registered voters living within such land. Date: 1978. Ted Weiner d Katheryn of aw, Trustee Ted Weiner Oil Properties Trust L Case No . and/or Related Case No . C INITIAL STUDY FOR ANNEXATION NO . 5 CITY OF PALM DESERT C APRIL 1978 Prepared by: DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALL' DESERT 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane P. 0. Box 1977 Palm Desert , Ca. 92260 ( 714 ) 346-0611 TA"_',LE OF CONTENTS C Section. Pave No . I INTRODUCTION Project Description . . . . . . . . . . Project Location . . . . Project Proponent and/or Lead Agency . II ENVIRCNMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS Existing Setting . . . . . . . . . . . Natural environment . . . . . . . Man-made environment. . . . . . . Proposed_ro o..ed Setting Natural environment . . . . . . . Man-made environment, . . . . . . III ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Significant Environmental Effects. . . CAdverse . . . . . . . . . . . Beneficial . . . . . . . . . . . . Mitigation. Measures . . . . . . . . . . IV FINDINGS Negative Declaration. . . . . . Environmental Impact Report . . . . . . V COMMENTS AND APPEALS Public Review . . Responsible Qency Review . Appeals to Initial Study Determination. VI APPB;TDICr,S A. Informal consultation materials and comments B. Notice of Negative Declaration LIS^ CF %XrfI I''S C Exhibit Title Pare P'o . 1 Project Regional Location 2 Project Vicinity Location 3 Photos of Project Site 4 Topographic Map 5 Transportation Facility Map 6 Existing Public Services 7 Existing Public Utilities 8 Proposed Zoning Map 9 Summary Table of Proposed Zoning Acreages and Dwelling Unit and Population Densities 10 General Land Use Plan II"2RODi'C^TON C This report shall serve as the basis for ccmnliance with the California Environmental Quality act of 1970 and Resolution No. 78-32 of the City of Palm Desert.' It is intended herein to provide the reader %-iith factual envir- onmental information reEardin; the subject project and therein substantiate the need for the preparation' . ` an. E'nvironmental Impact Deport (EIR) or Negative Declaration (ND) . Project Description : (Eriefly describe the project and the action proposed. ) The project to be considered herein is , and shall herein- after be referred to as, "Annexation No . 511 . The proposed project would annex approximately 1050 acres of undeveloped land lying north of and adjacent to the existing Palm Desert City Limits. C Project Location: (Describe the regional and vicinity location of the project and show on Exhibits 1 and 2 Also include legal description of property or properties invloved in the project. ) The project site is situated in Southern California in the upper Coachella Valley near the center of Riverside County as shown on Exhibit 1 . The specific site to be considered in this initial study, as shown on Exhibit 2 , is legally described as follows : Beginning at a point in the northerly boundary line of the City of Palm Desert, County of Riverside, State of California, said point being the common J Section corner of Section 7 and 8, Township 5 south, Range 6 east , San Bernardino base and meridian . Said point also being in the boundary line of the City of Rancho Mirage of said Riverside County. Thence northerly along the aforementioned common Section line of Sections 7 and 8 and along the easterly boundary line of the City of Rancho Mirage, a distance of 2 , 652 . 82 feet to the common section corner of Sections 7 and 8 and Sections 5 and 6. Thence north 89 33 ' 48" east along the northerly line of the aforementioned Section 8 , a distance of 2 , 629. 98 feet to a point . \., Thence north 89 42 ' 08" east , along the northerly line of the aforementioned Section 8, a distance of 2 ,670. 86 feet to the north- easterly corner of said Section 8 said point being the common corner of Sections 8 and 9, said point also being the centerline intersection of Portola Avenue and Country Club Drive. EXHIEIT / Project Regional Location NiT �� iL A/ PALM m < \ S,9 '-SPRING. . S RANCHO ` MIRAG T 1 _ ® ESERB� . � ,.INC31A. 1 ..\,�^' 1-10 \ WELLS COACHELL \� ti �THE�3MAL i 86 ?!� 74 J sy,� C C _ f T 9 19S ` w =T F ram_ n EXHIPIT Project Vicinity Location CO NTRr CLUB Dawc 1 lm D. 1 . � Ll I —� 1 2 4 �L I fI '[jG{THRTSSRttt-=AORO-'^^`--- 1 � M II i� 1 a-..:-� }, -1.•�.. mac.:>_t;� �� 1 / 1 Project Location : (Continued CThence continuing north 89 42 ' 00" east along the northerly line of said Section 9, a distance of 5 , 307. 00 feet to a point . Said point being the northeasterly corner of said Section 9, said point alos being the centerline intersection of Cook Street and said Country Club Drive. Thence south 00 06 ' 00" west along the easterly line of the aforementioned Section 9, a distance of 3, 979. 72 feet to a point . Said point also being the most northeasterly corner in the boundary line of the City of Palm Desert. Thence continuing along the boundary line of the City of Palm Desert the following courses and distances. Thence south 89 46132" west , a distance of 3 ,981 . 26 feet . Thence south 00 07' 20" west , a distance of 1 , 325. 52 feet . Thence south 89 48 ' 00" west , a distance of 1 , 327. 45 feet . Thence south 00 Ol ' 50" west , a distance of 1 ,592. 03 feet . Thence north 76 32 ' 56" west , a distance of 3 ,166. 84 feet . Thence north 00 09 ' 12" east , a distance of 2 , 168 . 56 feet . C Thence north 89 45' 08" east , a distance of 3 , 052. 69 feet . Thence north 00 06 ' 40" east , a distance of 660. 00 feet . Thence south 89 45 ' 08" west , a distance of 1 , 325 . 00 feet . Thence north 00 06 ' 40" east , a distance of 664. 68 feet . Thence south 89 44 ' 27" west a distance of 3 , 977.43 feet to the point of beginning. This parcel of land contains 1 , 046. 67 acres more or less. The project site may generally be described as lying north of and adjancet to the existing City limits bounded on the north by Country Club Drive , on the east by Cook Street , on the south by the existing City limits , and on the west by Monterey Avenue. Project Proponent and/or Lead Agency : The proposed project has been initiated by the City of Palm Desert, also the Lead Agency for the project , at the request of property owners within the annexation area. EXHIBIT Transportation Facility Map l rv�ERsrnru io .�. Awl",� < ,moo\ i o� rnwesrvnTRs `\�0�.� t✓ \�1s, is oo i COUNTRY IMM \ •• • A. I/ 1 '�' S` ..... •r ...s...� iTND 1VE. .• • 1 FIGURE 5.1 HIGHWAY NETWORK . _- •• _ 'Emma Freeway <...._ ._�....__..,...— -. -----Arterial Highway Major Highway Q� t _____Secondary Highway ^�� -- -- on---indicates [.fisting Road i�' �Indica fc• Pr„pused Road Existing Interchange ;• - Q Proposed lrn? change +F}f+}R�ilroad - .. ti ewater Flood Control Channel Bridge 1 i r NORTH 0 1 2 Miles 3 ti G1 WILSEY & l1A,V1 JJ -'XHII IT Existing. Public Services 01INTRY CLUB DRIVF I T-4 pm ._ fly Lam, � � _ __ I i•� I � V L c 7� S . Q � I 1 i m LL k- 1 I'-t— { _� {1 ll (�AYSTACR-RO{tD�^--�- __• I ' I + L aye ' ,/ S/ I J � V EXHIBIT Existing Public Utilities - fOt NTR r q RIVE f� II_ a k ri K x x rc c R of 6, I r-- O �1 1 -;,"J .. r l��I r---j j _ �lr 1 fira— r_ .. ,!( I - .'-/��-GfiapfVECl£�a+S ---5[--.. . ; I .1 I _J � :j �. I Ii ♦ �+.ano I Ili �)/ 1„• 4 l; /—�-H•41'STA CK—ltOpD--^--- � of _ Proposed Setting: In the following sections describe the proposed changes to the subject site if the project is ap- proved. Relate the changes to the existing setting and to other projects, both public and private, for the purpose of examining cumulative effects. Natural environment : No change in the natural environment is anticipated as a result of the annexation; however , development may occur as effected by such action . Such development will be considered in the following sections . It should be noted that while much of the land surrounding the project site is still in its natural state a mobile home park has developed adjacent to the northern boundary of the annexation area. Proposed Setting: (Continued) CPear.-made environment: The proposed land use for the subject site can best be explained in terms of the completed pre-zoning study. Attached as Exhibit 8 is a copy of the proposed zoning for the subject annexation. The approximate�.acreages and number of units which may be provided are'•.set forth in Exhibit 9. It can be noted from a comparison of this table and the General Land Use Plan attached as Exhibit 10, that the pre-zoning is compatible with this City' s adopted General Plan . Further comparisons of the Land Use Plan with the proposed zoning indicates that the overall density of the area will be reduced if the proposed zoning is approved. Con- sequently it may be concluded that the adverse significant effects associated with growth inducement would be dimineshed. C _s �O E ➢ E E _ E E nt E E P p = Cg c i n ¢ ¢ v w N.Y c E a -° n„ W 2 WE c0 $ ss o ^�- ¢ w6 ¢ w > o a u - f � W J J J 2 F J H N < a r 2 J - ^- � O O � �+ W O O N a a ¢ a f ¢ u o z rc a a a a w - m `o c E O F p f f o o J o a o f } 3 x w i W oo `o - E Z 2 2 Z i d W Q W 2 o o a i_ ¢ 2 i % V 2 V y J Q _U a O V 2 2 J O 2 3 ¢ Ol 2 a0 w 0 Q� a ¢ LO �]MS93AFV 10 AJN 3 ann V 11/t O W C� i Z W a \� i Z o w = (n c e Q I Z LL O o m zd e� N O C P A M C WO U m N W L N H C U O d .1 n O \ \ W z n m a C H y y O N d aQG N Y V +i 6 C DP A P m m \ \ w ❑ z vi m N c z m M C7 m +1 Y cK F a~i c U rr gg N . 4 m q q Y O Q C rZi AbO C C N O O F m•.i ..a H O a -+ a Z �`'� m O. tD Z m m •.a b C7 a O Y C1 ri N m C ap❑a ca a° m a C W O 6 Y a F r+ H m �a o� b ma • F z W H H U N EH a a a N O O d a z a Q m Y N O m O++ H O H c m s o a a o N [N N N W W Y o 0 n d E N � ri td Y Y H U N .y ti C O Gd .a N N a a o d W N U N V U 9 r •ti rn .i .N U +� N � Y •CJ U U C C G G a C U U Y V N H+i W d N N m N W U a au m m x a m o x m w m O C ti C 0 0 o a o •o O o a O G N m r-1 .-1 fq Y VJ I O E. W a o r ¢ - _ q COMMON SECTION OF RIVERSIDE - - CORNER 4 3 ?OSED PALM DESERT CITY l MI C I TR C N RIVE K r Y x � SECTION 9. 3 44 1h AVENUE i T 5 S R-6-E S. B.M. � '` ..: � _ I 141rHWAV 71ll h Iui PROPOSED BALM DESERT CITY•LIMIT LOCATION - mAP Nor. Ir SCALEIr a + i y r 1 V • twit iv. ..s y. -f-- PALM DESERT CITY LIMITIle .' _ ♦ .v Y .. ' f _ t: ap - 1 tKCOUNT`/-y-�F RIVERS`IDE +. ��' .'� :T Z ! �f1�' "' w.r.+i' �f R ,�'I�,3-•yr � .� ..d>s'.++ a.-�yF ,� ':�d �M } � �mac+ .:�� t- � .yJ R:.'y t~+ a - 44� 7..yk".���y-• - y. - -! DATE. 2 - 14 -7 PROPOSEQANNF., A (�?(11 � �' f tN SECTION .9IL r' YS�'' fix � i I�►e , ENBfNEf r r sEK�INEI: �_ '. mom- EL NOTICE OF EXEMPTION/LEAD AGENCY SITUATION PROJECT TITLE: LAFCO 78-34-4 JUL 1 81978 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Annexation #5 by City of Environmental Palm Desert Assessment No. 9193 PROJECT LOCATION: South of Country Club between APPROVING AGENCY: Monterey and Cook County of Riverside Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street PROJECT SPONSOR: CITY OF PALM DESERT Riverside, California 92501 54-275 PIRCKLY PEAR LANE PALM DESERT, CA 92260 0 Board of❑ Planning Commissions ❑ East Area Planning Council The Planning Department has reviewed the above referenced project and found that: The project is exempt from the provisions of CEQA CThe project is exempt from CEQA as it has previously complied with the provisions of CEQA, and there has been no substantial change in either the project as originally reviewed or the circumstances under which the project is to be undertaken. a. Negative Declaration was filed in connection with > EA No. , on b. An Environmental Impact Report was filed in connection with , EA No. , on ,EIR No. , considered by the Board of Supervisors on - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ® A "Lead Agency" situation exists in that the County officer or body involved in approving or supporting the project is not the lead agency and that the lead agency has complied with CEQA and all appropriate State Guidelines. LAFCO - Rules to Implement CEQA - Section 4.03 B (2) A.&-A@W699Ib-- P. Nemeth, AIP Planning Director By: Joseph A. Richards �& Title: Senior Planner R1ECEEIt( � b White - Applicant JUL 19 1978 Canary - Case File Pink - Clerk of Board ENvIR0N:E'NT1L SERVICES Goldenrod - EA File PD 77-22 Goldenrod JLW/pmP County Use Only -�sv'",M—•'••�:_fit � Q ,'i-'"• COMMON SECTION . _ d COMMON SEC CORNER - COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE . . `.�c CORNER . 6 5 COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE 4. r. jf 49°42�08"E 281b`.86 NB9° s Oar y ij !� .. RT. C �- - fa _ SECTION- 8 1 c a _ T, S ;- -6-�E- S. B.B. _ - - r • r d. o . , a a 94 i67' ACRE O 3 89^44'27"W 3977. 3r. uSECTION CORNER 21, ' o c b ( tt PARCEL MAP 9378 - z 5 e9 -s5 oe w BOOK .36' PAGES 83-85 PALM DESERT CITY: LIMIT "y'e ..-_. . 'N 88°45''08"E _ . - 3042:69-' r � z ` PALM DESERT CITY LIMIT CoOMMON SE Q PRE. ' IB - 7 --- . 1 17 EPALM SECTION 17oT-5-S; R-6-E' S.B.B:MN bHITEy/A7 R RI R r+ z r �2e• 2. vi x45 PALM DESERT CITY LIMIT Ft C.V 3(st to k $ r C ': r I � +'�. •,r ` .:F ]°' I+ts _"F+ �' "3'ra .+ _ b. `y�..r. .�•f Proposed Setting: (Continued) CMan-made environment : (Continued) It should be noted that this analysis will not include environmental information previously addressed in the EIR for the General Plan. Open space has been preserved on the site in accordance with the General Plan ., The site containing the sand dunes described previously is designated on the prezoning map as O.S . The public utilities and services were contacted concern- ing this annexation. The correspondence received regard- ing the annexation is located in Appendix A. The only critical concern raised as a result of this survey was the need for an additional fire station to service the area; however, it can be noted that such a fire station is proposed in the General Plan. ENVIRCNMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS A significant effect on the environment will occur, as defined by CEQA guidelines , if a "substantial , or potentially substantial, adverse change in any of the physical conditions within the area are affected by the activity, including: land ; air; water; minerals ; flora; fauna; ambient noise ; and, objects of historic or aesthetic significance. " Accordingly, the purpose of this section is to analyze the foregoing information to determine what, if any, changes to the environment will occur and then to determine if the said changes may be con- sidered significant. Significant Environmental Effects : List below the adverse and beneficial impacts occurring as a result of the propcsed project. Adverse : While minor environmental effects may occur as a result of the proposed action , as noted in the previous sections of this initial study, none are considered substantial enough to warrant the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report . In addition mitigation measure can be provided to reduce or eliminate the minor effects . CAdditional environmental documentation will be required as development occurs within the project area. Penef.icial : Annexation will provide control over timeliness of development and coordination and management for the provision of municipal services. c C Mitigation Yeasures : (Discuss ways in which any adverse environmental impacts may be reduced or eliminated. ) Mitigation measures, as listed on environmental check list attached as Appendix A, and plans for municipal services appear to eliminate two environmental concerns considered in initial study. C.. TFiI:DI'<GJ The purpose of this section .is to provide a written statement settir,� forth the justification for finding that an Environmental Impact ?-_port or Negative Declaration shall be prepared for the subject project. An 3IR means a detailed statement presenting the envirormental effects and consider- ations pertaining, to a project. A ND is a statement describing the reasons why a proposed project will not have ' a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, does not reauire the preparation of an 3IR.. Accordingly, this initial study may be used as the basis for the preparation of a more de- tailed environmental document or the written justification for the preparation of a ^;D. Negative Declaration : (Briefly describe the justification for the preparation of a Based on the findings of this initial study there will be no substantial significant environmental effects occur- ring as a result of the action proposed by the subject project . See copy of Negative Declaration in Appendix B. Environmental Impact Re;:ort : (1`tplain why an BIR must be prepared and list the si-3-ificant effects of the proposed project which are to be considered .in more detail in the BT_R. ) i'.ote ; If on the basis of the, initial study it is determined tha: an t;IR 1�_ re^.Uired `he fore,.'•;ning information-may be Used and eypanded to fll1f111 the statl:atory ren�.lirements for further ervi-onmental documentation. . The addition of sections on : I„reversible Envl.ronl' e- 'al Imr.actsi Unavoidable impacts ; Grcwt+ _induc-in-, Impacts ; and, Project Alternatives , to this StUd;f . Uemwj it cas-_. relre_*S .: c CO I-'IEN`"S A";D APPEALS C 5ollo, ing determination of the reed for the nreparation of an Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration pursuant to the California Environmertal Quality Act of 1970 and Resolution No. 78-32 of the City of Palm Desert, pro- cedures require either the notice of preparation of an EIR or a public review period for the ND prior to project approval . An appeal period is also provided by law followinE the completion of any environmental documentation including an initial study determination . This section , therefore , has been reserved for comments received during the presecribed review periods and for the consideration of appeals . Public Review: (Eriefly describe comments received and responses and place correspondence in Appendix. ) CResponsible Agency Review: (Describe comments received and responses and place correspondence in Appendix . ) Appeals : (Describe and refer to Appendix. ) C_ APPENDIX A I -� 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 March 22, 1978 Dear Sir: This is to advise you that the City of Palm Desert is conducting an initial study to determine potential environmental effects of a pro- po�annexation of approximately 1 ,050 acres of land located generally adjacent to and north of the existing City limits. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and Resolution No. 77-7 of the City of Palm Desert, the City, as the Lead Agency for this project, herewith requests your comments and recommenda- tions prior to determining whether a negative declaration or environmental impact report will be prepared. Enclosed for your review of the proposed project are: a project location map; a proposed zoning map; and, a copy of the City's initial study check- list. Since it is intended herein only to provide for informal consultation with responsible agencies , as prescribed by CEQA, regarding the proposed annexation, we would appreciate receiving any comments or recommendations you may have by April 1 , 1978. We trust the enclosed information will be satisfactory for your review. Should you have any questions regarding this matter or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Ronald R. Knippel of our staff at (714) 346-0611 ext. 53. Very truly yours , Paul A. Williams, A. I .P. Director of Environmental Services rk/pw/ks Enc. Mailed to : Lt . Froemming, Sheriff ' s Dept . , Indio C D. M. Pinkstaff , GTE , Indio Stanley Sayles, P. D. Comm. Svcs. P .D. Kermit Martin , SO. CALIF. Edison , P.D. R. W. Riddel , So. Calif. Gas, Riverside Lowell Weeks, C .V.C.W.D. , Coachella - LAFCO, Riverside, CA 92501 County of Riverside Planning Commission, Indio Riverside County Planning Dept . , Riverside 1 . t ur c PROJECT LOCATION MAP "q"'VrR✓ CiVB OR fu I W ,I 4 i \ s y \ �-I .�b•.0 - i Y�rc..r�.N \U oti=a.aL- Fu o.aTir � �� _.��� �j�.�•}L ;,.°ram��� �;1I�a��f ,�,�ff� pp era � •''�_L�uII�L_'r��LJ-'��'�.�•,,1\�1\ �I:/ C . ' =1� b J "''- 1t4 . c _ Egg = - E E - - _ E E s - - EO - - _ Q �O - a a a a z ¢ u u Q z ¢ m Y n ¢ - J 2 2 2 Z t W C W N W W a W J W > N 4 N VI N N 0 z W Ln S ¢ S ¢ ¢ n V ¢ O N 6 < i 30 3 o 0 v\ w U) I Zw i Z o Q cc O J .F_. 0 cr LOL a = I I � w IL i a� Vi Ir CL - - - , / I p l _ • I Southern California Edison Company 36-%00 CATHEDRAL CANYON DRIVE CATHEDRAL CITY, CALIFORNIA 92234 March 28 , 1978 Mr. Ronald R. Knippel City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, Calif. 92260 Dear Mr . Knippel: Your proposed annexation of the 1 ,050 acres north of your city limits has been reviewed by the Edison Company as far as distribution facilities are concerned. Statement 6 (c) of the Initial Environmental Impact Study states that the annexation of that property will not require an extension of existing public utility lines. However, if this property is developed, electrical line extensions will more than likely be re- quired to serve new loads. This would be done in accordance with the tariff rules set forth by the Public Utilities Commission. Street improvements might possibly conflict with our existing facilities if relocations are necessary. A copy of your initial study has been forwarded to our Trans- mission Department for their review since they have facilities on the property in question. If I can be of any further assistance to you, please feel free to contact me at 328-5741, Ext. 33 . Yours truly, Roger W. Maraist Plan^ Palm Springs District Southern California Edison Company C- RWM:sg DEPARTMENT OF FIRE PROTECTION IN COOPERATION WITH THE \ COUNTY -� C 1 _ CALIFORNIA DIVISION OF FORESTRY RIVERSIDE...,..,�.;, DAVID L. FLAKE COUNTY FIRE WARDEN P.O. BOX 248 210 WEST SAN JACIN TO STREET PERRIS. CALIFORNIA 92370 TELEPHONE (714) 657-3163 Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Dear Paul , After reviewing the information provided by your office with regards to pro- posed annexation number five, we find that the annexation will have no immediate effect on the Fire Department. However, as the area developer , we will have concerns about the fire protection in the area. Some of our concerns are: 1 . The existing Palm Desert Fire Station is already running over the maximum amount of calls it can adequately handle. 2. During the rainy season, our access to the area is Beverly hampered by the C flooding of Monterey Avenue and Cook Street. During these times , fire engines from Bermuda Dunes and Rancho Mirage respond to the area. 3. Any development which occurs in the area of Country Club and Cook Street will be subject to long response times due to the distance from the nearest station. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this annexation proposal , and should you desire any clarification, please let me know. David L. Flake County Fire Warden Bud Engel Fire Marshal BE:dt . . . ' . ..- "�•=- ." .--';'ems ac:�:sa:,9?- 'sic:::^_sr. -...ti`?a1'^x '-r fan„-.aa•r,.�.,.ns.�..�.,.n�-» _ _; . T,rt_' < <.r���:"A; �:.. '.<a*x• +•-, ...... .:,a r . :`2.:':vr�".c.-+.-v..^ 7�s 1..._s.r.-_".Fi...ac _ka�A . OP P P of I PG'^ _. O TAP inn � d`PSN F'�P _ - ASP^sl`^•On ly, i�,an G�. a o sis °o 2�oP o i6'e4' ';6> Ps t 6 + a.' P� P°ari e . / � �� P �j 6�d 09 09 °A •p. F n.0 6 6P a o' %9 a�%O�p 000 0 a rh o-> o P PS AG6 dG " 60 p .a a9P^F 6P p�P hoG ;st a a a c 6 aoG soPa �a P d P^y el t o' !Pn h �P � c s �h d d ?1 Lo 0 CP dGa li G S q, c ,9P O F n I C�%IYPP'F PF s F 9; Pn C�l�„PO ' .?� `•+,PTAs O,c'=ir, G ` FyroF,r ,. � ..y-^psi--�l-c?a-y'✓i.$"7f�u�s ;fi,i'd"Y '*?�$a'c�.s,'- r..;.v �Xr.�!'.._..�Kr�ct ._ 'tfi:ai.�.�.wv$'M+�.ntn•I..gsce'1X*,�Zt-. 'y .we::tr'p...,-:.:..N.aa ...a.a.--.;.'��a:..R.�. ..YdceniWl"tom=,. .... . ..a .. '. _v� _. q. . •�.. ., Mainiero, Smith and Associates, Inc. Civil&Environmental Engineering Professional Plaza •Suite 3 222S East Tahquitz-McCallum Way,Palm Springs,California 92262 Telephone (714) 327-8544 March 31, 1978 Mr. Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, California 92260 Dear Mr. Williams : We have reviewed the proposed Annexation No . 5 as it C relates to the Palm Desert Community Services District . Since the District does not serve the area to be annexed there does not appear to be any direct impact on their water supply and distribution system. However , the development of the area would ultimately result in an increase in the rate at which the groundwater basin is being depleted. If you have any questions in regard to the above , please contact us . Very truly or s , MAINIERO, ITH AND ASSOCIATES , INC . RJM/cam CC : Mr. Stanley Sayles ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT C MEMO TO ' DATE PREPARED C` e�� 90.1-2 NEW 1/73 (FREV. EO 6B' ` ` 31. April 14, 1978 Mr. R. W. Maraist Planning Manager Palm Springs District Reference is made to your memo of March 30, 1978 regarding Transmission facilities in the area of the proposed annexation by the City of Palm Desert. The attached map is marked in red showing the location of existing Transmission facilities. Since part of these existing facilities are now within the city limits, it appears that further annexation would not require an Environ- mental Impact Study. However, other interested departments C of the Company should be contacted before a final decision is made. J. A. Eckl Supervising Estimator Eastern Transmission JAE:jw Attachment •)I ldarch 28, 1978 Mr. Ronald R. Rnippel City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, Calif. 92260 Dear Mr. Rhippel: Your proposed annexation of the 1,050 City limits has been reviewed by the e Edison acres north s your distribution facilities are c he Edison oncerned. Company as far as Statement 6 (c) of the -Initial. C that the annexation of tial Environmental Of existin that property will Impact Study states develo ed g Public utility lines. if this an extension P electrical line extensions will mere than likely quire to serve new this property is the tZ=riff loads. This would be done in c be with rules set forth by the Public accordance with Street improvements might Utilities Commissicn. facilities if relocations Might Possibly conflict with th °Ur. existitg A copy Of Your initial study has been f°raarded to our Trans- mission Department for their review since the property in question. eY have facilities on If I can be of any further assistance to you, to contact me at 328-5741, Ext. 33, Please f eel free Yours truly, Roger w. M.araist Planning Manager Palm Springs District ( Southern California Edison Company t.wt�t:sq n - E E _ - _ E? _ z ... E - W a - _ W z wE cg 3 N W ¢ c 6 q W _ _ c • j J • 3 O _ o;C• a p {j _ C _�- c a - E _ N F Y• 4 F Y U a S a O W O O U f Y• J LL• 2 W W C q O N O J a a a 6 f g Y '_^ W c p a e W i J W Z W a W N W W a WV. J W ¢ > W W W U O O O O J ¢ Z W 2 Y J Q Y a C Y F - ..O - 6 N N N Q2 W W O J W J 4 W a OI M1 Y 6 O N p 6 N O p N 2 S QI o g q ¢ ¢ ¢ 6 Y LL O N 6 � ^ C • • • O s E Z 4uu, �L l o N F- i a. O I j X ILJ Lul � I p J M C = U < 0 C.L g j - 0 I U a W a I i u) w t O:. CNT CL 3' 0 � — — • " APPENDIX B C C I EIR FORM #1 CITY OF PALM DESERT NEGATIVE DECLARATION Case No. : ANNEXATION NO. 5 Applicant : City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane , P. 0. Box 1977 Palm Desert , CA 92260 Description of Project: The proposed project would annex approximately 1050 Cacres of undeveloped land lying north of and adjacent to the existing Palm Desert City limits . Finding: The project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment and no further environmental documentation will be required. Justification: The project is compatible with the General Plan for the City of Palm. Desert . Based on the findings of the initial study, which study is on file at the Palm Desert City Hall , no substantial signficiant environmental effects will occur as a result of the action proposed by the subject project . C Any interested citizen may appeal this determination to the Planning Commission within eight (8) days of the date of the posting of public notice by filing an appeal in accordance with Resolution No. 77_7 with the Department of Environmental Services located at 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California. If no appeal is filed within said time-this determination shall be. final. Date Filed with County Cler k (within five days) Mav 1 . 197R Date Public Notice Is Posted: May 4 , 1978 - - - -- -County Clerk ..U spires: ' ' File May 12 , 1978 Bulletin Board PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 5 TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT ANNEXATION DESCRIPTION! Beginning at a point in the northerly boundary line of the City of Palm Desert, County of Riverside, State of California, said point being the common a Section corner of Section 7 and 3, Township 5 south, Range 6 east, San Bernardino base and meridian. Said point also being in the boundary line of the City of Rancho Mirage of said Riverside County. 1. Thence northerly along the aforementioned common Section line of Sections 7 and 8 and along the easterly boundary line of the City of Rancho "Mirage, a distance of 2,652.82 feet to the common section corner of Sections 7 and 8 and Sections 5 and 6. 2. Thence north 89033' 48" east along the northerly line of the aforementioned Section 8, a distance of 2,629.98 feet to a point. 3. Thence north 89*42'08" east, along the northerly line of the aforementioned Section 8, a distance of 2,670.96 feet to the northeasterly corner of said Section 8 said point heing the common corner of Sections 8 and 9, said point also being the centerline intersection of Portola Avenue and Country Club Drive. - 4. Thence continuing north 89*42'00" east along the northerly line of said Section 9, a distance of 5,307.00 feet to a point. Said point being the northeasterly corner of said Section 9, said point also being the center- line intersection of Cook Street and said Country Club Drive. 5. Thence south 00*06'00" west-along the easterly line of the aforementioned Section 9, a distance of 3,979.72 feet to a point. Said point also being the most northeasterly corner in the boundary line of the City of Palm Desert. 6. Thence continuing along the boundary line of the Citv of Palm Desert the following courses and distances. Thence south 89`46' 32" west, a distance of 3,931.26 feet. 7. Thence south 00*07 '20" west, a distance of 1 ,325.52 feet. 8. Thence south 89*48'00" best, a distance of 1 ,327.45 feet. 9. Thence south 00.01 '50" west, a distance of 1,592.03 feet. 10. Thence north 76*32'56" west, a distance of 3,166.84 feet. 11. Thence north 00009' 12" east, a distance of 2,168.56 feet. 12. Thence north 89045' 08" east, a distance of 3,052.69 feet. 13. Thence north 00006'40" east, a distance of 660.00 feet. 14. Thence south 39�45'08" west, ,a distance of 1 ,325.00 feet. 15. 'Thence north 00�06'40" east, a distance of 664.68 feet. 16. Thence south 89�44'27" west a distance of 3,977.43 feet to the point of beginning. This parcel of land contains 1,046.67 acres more or less. 1 3 S3. .So > 76r �- S3 -70 1 i v. y ✓ /3 S'v� g� 6 (a�oov 7 / /� 7ro �. 8y 3000 "�z o 9, GC oo '414, �, 96 zi7S � 7r zro a 7j— ys� �r 7- 0 '7j 7� 7— .2Sov 3 . 96 y0en0 7 r'. 2 3 73' lf, 7S'' zSa 0 Y 3 7,:, �f. 7,r zrno y`, 77� z 3'7J 7f J," T 7- z 3 74 y 7s� v3 74 'f. 7J1-- �3 711 v3 �,r 7J/" y 3 7J' ;2 373� �37) 330 79r. CD ao , o o 1 370 3�, 34/- 37a /9, ).- 4Z, �'y yl ko7 4G, Zo 1 7 -7-7 3 y, 34 i 7S'� AG 76,o-i `�YJYro so y s� .moo <70 9 3Zo, /9-�' I� • RESOLUTION NO. 78-81 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, MAKING APPLICATION TO THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION FOR A CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION KNOWN AS, "PALM DESERT ANNEXATION NO. 5, " PURSUANT TO SECTION 35140 OF THE STATE GOVERNMENT CODE . WHEREAS, over twenty-five percent of the pronerty owners have requested, by petition , within the area hereafter known as , "Palm Desert Annexation No . 5, " and more particularly described in the attached map and legal description; and, WHEREAS , the California Environmental Quality Act has been com- plied with, pursuant to City Council Resolution No . 78-32 , in that all responsible agencies have been contacted and an expanded initial study has been completed by the City Staff ; and, WHEREAS , the City Council has determined that the proposed change of organization is appropriate for the following reasons : 1. The request is a logical expansion of the City boundaries. 2. Expanding the boundaries of the proposed annexation to in- clude all property south of Country Club Drive is considered consistent with the Municipal Organization Act of 1977 which encourages limiting the number of annexations processed and expanding City boundaries to include logical growth area. 3. The proposed annexation is considered of sufficient size to mitigate the two major environmental concerns related to the area: which are provisions for blowsand protection and pre- servation of unique land forms and animal habitat in the area. 4 . The proposed area to be annexed has been determined to be of satisfactory size to provide municipal services without ad- versely affecting the rest of the Community . NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert , California, as follows : 1 . The above recitations are hereby determined to be true and correct and represent the findings of the Countil in this matter. 2 . The City Clerk is hereby- instructed to file an official appli- cation with the Local Agency Formation Commission for Palm Desert Annexa- tion No. 5 pursuant to the Municipal Organization Act of 1977 for unin- habited territory since less than twelve registered voters reside in the area. 3. In addition to any required application , the clerk is hereby instructed to forward the attached Plan for Services to LAFCO as required by Section 35140 of the State Government Code . PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert City Council , held this 22nd day of June 1978 , by the following vote , to wit : AYES: Brush, McPherson , Newbrander, Wilson & Mullins NOES : None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None L1 'ARD D AMU LINS, Mayor i ATTEST : SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, C ' - Clerk City of Palm Desert , California CITY OF PALM DESERT TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council SUBJECT: Plan for Services for Palm Desert Annexation No. 5 I . INTRODUCTION: Pursuant to Section 35102 of the State Government Code, the City is required to file with any new Annexations effective January 1, 1978, a plan outlining the method by which services will be provided in the area to be annexed. This report represents the required plan for services for Proposed Annexation No. 5. The City of Palm Desert, being a contract City, must rely on many other agencies to provide for services both in the community and areas sub- sequently annexed. In addition, many services provided such as water and sewer, electricity, gas, are provided without regard to city limit lines. Therefore, the area proposed to be annexed is presently served or has the capability of being served by many of these agencies. The fact is substantial by the letters received from responsible agencies as a part of the review births responsible agencies during the Environmental Review process. The major emphasis of this report is to address those services provided directly by the City either through City Staff or direct contract with the City by other agencies. In addition, wherever possible, this report will address the methods by which other service agencies would provide needed facilities in the area. II . DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES: The utilities which would be extended into the area proposed to be annexed would be as part of actual development and they would consist of the services of the Coachella Valley County Water District in the area of water and sewer, Southern California Edison Company in the area of electricity, Southern California Gas Company in the area of gas, and Able Cable in the area of cable television. The services provided by this City directly would be in planning and building, public works, parks, administration and code enforcement services. By contract the City would also provide for trash disposal , police and fire services. Public transportation would be provided by the. Sunline Agency. The major road improvements would include the widening of Monterey Avenue, Country Club Drive, Hovely Lane and Cook Street. Road extensions would include Portola Avenue from the Whitewater Storm Channel to Country Club Drive; Hovely Lane from Portola Avenue extended to Cook Street; and the extension of a new road from Hovely Lane northerly to Country Club Drive approximately midway between Monterey Avenue and Portola Avenue (extended) . The creation of any local streets would be on the basis of specific projects and would be the responsibility of the developer. A majority of the public parks needs in the area to be annexed will be met by the propsed Sand Dune Park which totals approximately 120 acres of which approximately 60 acres is included in the area proposed to the annexed. Approximately 17 acres of said parks area would be given to the City as a part of development under the City's subdivision ordinance. The remainder would be aquired by the City with revenues generated from the City' s new construction tax. At ultimate development there will be a need for bridges at the Cook Street crossing of the Whitewater Storm Channel and possibly to the Portola Avenue Whitewater Channel . Said facilities would be constructed with a combination of federal grants and local participation very similar to existing bridges in the valley. If Monterey Avenue ultimately becomes an extension of State High- way 74, a bridge would also be required at its crossing of the Whitewater Channel , which is not in the area to be annexed but would serve said area. The funding for said facility would be the same as the other proposed bridges. Page Two Transmittal Letter III . LEVEL AND RANGE OF SERVICES: The level and range of services provided would include sufficient sized water and sewer, gas, and electrical facilities to service development proposed for the area. Planning and building, public works, and code enforce- ment services as provided by the City directly, would be on the basis of need. Police and fire services capability exist to meet the need of the area at its present stage of development and are proposed to be expanded to meet the needs of subsequent development in the area. Public transportation would be provided by the expansion of the existing system to serve the area. Subsequent development will result in the need for the City to add an addi- tional police vehicle and the need for an additional fire station in the vicinty of Country Club Drive. Since fire services are provided on a volunteer basis in conjuntion with the County of Riverside and State Department of Forestry, the City would be required to provide for a facility in the area which would be manned by these agencies. A fire station has been planned for in the City's General Plan in this area and will be provided at the time it is needed. In addition said area will be served by a proposed fire station at 44th Avenue and San Pablo (Civic Center Complex) , which is tentatively proposed for construction in 1980/91 budget year. In the meantime, the area would be served by the existing Palm Desert Station at E1 Paseo and Highway 74 with backup being provided by the Rancho Mirage, Thousand Palms and Bermuda Dunes stations. The basic administration services of Planning, Building, Public Works, and Code enforcement would be provided by existing City Staff. I IV. TIMING FOR SERVICE EXTENSIONS: Basic utility services would occur as a part of development. The City has on file letters from the various utilities assuring us that these services would be available. The City services would be available immediately in the area of planning, building and code enforcement, public works , and police and fire. Road improvements would occur as a part of new development. The construction of the new fire station near Country Club Drive would result from the City' s new construction tax which would be accrued from the new development in the area, which would be 20� per square foot of new construc- tion. Parks would be developed in the area under the City' s Subdivision Ordinance which provides for the dedication of land for community facilities and would provide for sites for the fire station and parks. A majority of the proposed residential development contemplated for the area is planned residential which would include a majority of necessary recreational facilities to serve .the ultimately residents of the area. V. REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT AND FINANCING• New development would be required to extend roads throughout the area and to provide for needed sites for fire, parks and other related municipal facilities provided r vi through o P the City's Subdivision Ordinance. The new Construction Tax of 20� per square feet would provide for construction and additional acquisition of these facilities. The provision of planning and building services would be provided through the fees generated from new development. On-going maintenance of roads, created in the area , would be provided through State Gas Taxes generated as a result of population within the area. Police services and parks maintenance would be provided on the basis of Sales Tax generated from commercial facilities in the area. In summary it is felt that development of this area would result in a balance between needed services and the revenues to provide said services. i ANNEXATION NO. 5 OFFICIAL PETITIONERS • l R E C E I V E D MAR 3 1978 PALM DESERT CITY HALL PETITION CITY CLERK'S OFFICE TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939 , as amended, Government Code Sections 35 , 300-35 , 326 , I/we respectfully represent as follows : 1 . I/We are the ownerSs) of Assessor ' s Parcel Number 6 ZI- 110 -0&f which has an assessed value as shown on the Ecualized Assessment Roll of the Cccnty of Riverside. 2. I/We reauest that such land be annexed to the Citv of Palm Desert , subiect to the condition that the Cit.,7 of Palm Desert zone 'the Property in conformance with the Palm Desert Land Use P'_an showinc a res4dential class-"_cation wit'- a density of not less than five (5) units per acre or more than seven ( 7) units . Per acre . If such conditions do not occur, ta'_s Pe_ition is withdrawn and shall no loncer be effective. 3 . There are less than twelve (12) rec_ istered voters livinc within such land . Date : (, ! 1 uiLt� ( 19_� � 't�( �� •1� L PETITION TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitate3 Territory Act of 1939 , as amended, Government Code Sections 35, 300-35 , 326 , I/we respectfully represent as follows : 1 . I/We are the owner (s) of Assessor ' s Parcel Number 621-190-068-9 which has an assessed value as shown on the Equalized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside. 2 . I/We request that such land be annexed to the City of Palm Desert , subject to the condition that the Citv of Palm Desert zone the property in conformance with the Palm Desert Land Use Plan showina a residential classification with a density of not' less than five (5) units per acre . or more t1l, -1 seven (7) units per acre. If such conditions do not occur, this petition is withdrawn and shall no longer be effective. 3 . There are less than twelve (1-2) registcred voters living within such land . Date : 19 Glenn A. Thomas Berna Dean Thomas R R E C E 1 V E �\ MAR 31978 PETITION PALM DESERT CITY HALL CITY CLERK'S OFFICE TO : THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939 , as amended , Government Code Sections 35 , 300-35 , 226 , I/we _esoectful_y reoresent as -follows : 1. I/we are the owner (s) of Assessor ' s Parcel - Number (21 jfc-074 wh.ich has an assessed value as shown on the Eaualized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside. 2 . I/we request that such land be annexed to the City of Palm Desert , subject to the condition that the City of Palm Desert zone 'the property :.n conformance with t'le Palm Desert Land Use P'_an show_nc a residential c_assif:_cation with a density of no'. less than five (5) units oer acre or more than seven (7) units oer acre. If such conditions do not occur, t_v s petition is withdrawn and shall no 'longer be effective. 3. There are less than. twelve (12) registered voters living within such land. Date : t ago 107,e . ^^2( ' L4�J�.L-r�•( RE C E I V E D MAR 3 1978 PALM DESERT CITY HALL PETITION CITY CLERK'S OFFICE TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CA'- IFORN:A In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939 , as amended, Government Code Sections 35 , 303-35 , 326 , '/we respectfully represent as follows : 1 . I/hie are the owner 's! of Assessor ' s Parcel Number 6 '1I- iIC -L which has an assessed value as shown on the Ecualized Assessment Roll of the CcUnty of R4vers4de. 2 . I/We request that such '--and be annexed to the City of Pa'_m Desert , subiect to the condition that the Citv of Palm Desert zone 'the property in conformance with t',e Palm Desert Land Use Plan showing a re.>zdential classification with a density of not less than five ( 5) units per acre or more than seven (7) units oer acre. If such conditions do not occur, th'_s pe=ition is withdrawn and shall no longer be effective. 3 . There are lets than twelve (12) rec_ istered voters livinc w41h4 n such land . Date : 11 I lr1 v RE C E I V E D MAR 3 1978 PALM DESERT CITY HALL PETITION CITY CLERK'S OFFICE TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939 as amended , Government Code Sections 35 , 300-35 , 326 , I/we res_oect`ully represent as follows : 1 1 . I/We are the owners) of Assessor ' s Parcel Number(i-).f f yo-c &4' which has an assessed value as shown on the Equalized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside . 2 . I/We request that such land be annexed to the City of Palm Desert , subject to the condition that the City of Palm Desert zone 'the prooerty in conformance with the Palm Desert Land Use Plan snowing a residential classification with a density of no-- less than five (5) units per acre or more than seven (7) units per acre . If such conditions do not occur, to-4 s pet`_`_ion is withdrawn and shall no loncer be effective. 3. There are less than twelve (12) rec_ istered voters . livinc w- +n such land . Date : PETITION TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939 , as amended, Government Code Sections 35 , 300-35 , 326 , I/we respectfully represent as follows : 1 . I/We are the owner (s) of Assessor' s Parcel Number 621-190-002-9 which has an assessed value as shown on the Equalized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside. 2 . I/we request that such land be annexed to the City of Palm Desert, subject to the condition that the City of Palm Desert zone the property in conformance with the plans submitted by the McBail Company and prepared by V.T.N. Consolidated, Inc . , tentative tract number 11791 . If such condition does not occur, this petition is withdrawn and shall no longer be effective. 3 . There are less than twelve (12) registered voters living within such land. �-� -� Date :- -., 19��.. Desert Land Investment Co. , No . 2 0. Michael Homme, General Partner PETITION TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939 , as amended , Government Code Sections 35, 300-35 , 326 , I/we respectfully represent as follows : 1. I/We are the owner (s) of Assessor ' s Parcel Number 621-190-045-8 which has an assessed value as shown on the Equalized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside. 2 . I/We request that such land be annexed to the City of Palm Desert, subject to the condition that the City of Palm Desert zone the property in conformance with the plans submitted by the McBail Company and prepared by V.T.N. Consolidated, Inc. , tentative tract number 11791. If such condition does not occur, this petition is withdrawn and shall no longer be effective. 3. There are less than twelve (12) registered voters living within such land. Date : 19 ( ,�' -xS� Iy�n���� Desert Lands InvestmLt Co. , a Limited Partnership Woodpecker Development Co. , General Partner 0. Michael Homme , President Tf. .ap .'° -Or o. °s •ce ppC lb 1� �q �� ds •e. � Uti` e'd : e s SO•d.� `S:1c_"`l.�_��Y d` �� `�eS`'C f1 �e`-��20 d � 'S _ S• Le .� .Cy ti r� •.•� `.7,� c� � �,S: 'tip' '� .O he `S�.'d ,�0</'���•a J�O.'Se �C`.'?C'\ `LL�.<Sh` S `�S• �SSe s•Sey'`.� �s e Ee,.` °tA d` :< d sol`oe `° I I cJ �1�e �. .�0. 2• d �S II Wd1 to r J 4er PETITION TO : THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT , CAL T_TORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Unin.habi`_ated Territory Act of 1 Q O as ,. o Sections 35 , 200-35r326 , T/•::•e respectfully represent as follows : 1 . I/We are the owner(s) Of Assessor ' s Parcel Number 621-190-005-2 which has an assessed value as shown on the Ecualized Assessment Roll of the County of Rivers-de. 2 . I/We recuest that such land be annexed to the C_tv of Palm Desert , subject to the condition that the (___=-y' Of .aim Desert zone the property in ccnforr.ance with the Pa'__^i Desert land Use Kan showing a residential classification with a density of not l- eSs than five ( 5` units per acre or ,horn than seven(7) U.P.its per acre. If such ccnditlons do not occur , t is petition =5 w1 _hC"l :^ and shall no loncer be effective. _ . There are less than :we' ve (12) registered voters _iv'_- a within such land . Date : . i \ 1 '1 Ka heri e R. p7cP ie 10 r William mcPhie '; Branna Sisenwein Irv -Slsenwein J PETITION TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated .Territory Act of 1939 as anendnr , Covgrnmont Sections 35 , 30^-35 , 325 , '_/we respectfully represent as follows : - • I/Tne are the owner !s? of Assessor ' s Parcel Number 621-190-006-3 which has an assessed value as shown on the Eaualized Assessment R011 of _ ._ County of Riverside . 2 . I/We request that such land be annexed to the City of Pain Desert , sub-ec_ to the condition that the / _v o- Parr'. Desert zone the aroper -y in conformance with the ?aim Desert land Use Plan showing a residential class_-_cat%7 with a density of not 'less than five ` units per acre or more _."cn seven '?; units per acre . if such condi=ions do not occur, this 0c'_ition is ..ithd,r_wn ar.�: shall n0 -Once_ r be offac t_ve. _ ? , _'^_nre are less than twelve ! 1"21 _" registered voters living within such land . Katherine R. McPhie Date : William McPhie Branna Sisc"nwein Irvin 1SZsenwein PETITION TO: THE 110:00R_M . .__ CDUVCIV 0? M CITY 07 PAW D330T, CALI ORTI9 In accordance :r'.th the annexation of Uninha:itated Territory act of 1939, as a-ended , Government Code 3ect'ons 35,300-35, 326, I/ue reanectfall; represent as follows: 1. IA.Te are the odner(s) of Assessor' s Farce_ is oer 621-00-0. 7-0 which has an assessed value as shown on the Equalized A=sesmnent Paoli of the County of Riverside. 2. I/'.de request that such land be annexed to the City of Pad_:' Desert, subject to the condition that the City of Pain Desert zone the yroperty in ccnfor-:aAce .with the Part. Desert Land Use Plan sowing a residential classification :with a density of not lens than five (5) unit; per acre or sore than Bevan (7) units per acre. If such conditions do not occur, this petition is withdrawn and nhall no longer Je effect'_ve. 3. There are loss than twelve (12) registered voters lien, :within ouch land. Date: �� Faye (Shapiro) +.'zLl PETITION TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of :;nin_habitated Terrltory Act of 1939 , as amended, Government Code Sections 35 , 30?-35 , 326 , I/we resn_ ec'_F'',jjy represent as follows : 1 . _T/We are the cwner (s) of Assessor ' s Parcel Number 621-190-051-3 which has an assessed value as shown On the Ennalized Assessment Roll of the County of ?-vers_de. 2. Q e request that such '_and be annexed to the C_tv of P017 Desert, Stb'ect to the condition _han the __ty of n&1TM Desert zone the property _n conformance with oa_T Desert Land - se Kan showing a res_iential classi"_cc-=:_on w __:- a tensity_ of not 'less than f:_ve 5; unLns 7er acre or wre than seven "! un_lTs vnr anre. If such conditions do not Occ"_.. , _. :. . POtition is _ _` .. �.a_ _.dr .. and shall no '_c ne" be n -fe,_� ' ._ !- ve. 3 . There are joss than. twelve ( 12r _ - � 'ed' s -l` ed vo=e=s -_v'_nc wi=___n such land . Date : RayWond Shapiro PET TT-ON TO : THE HONORABLE CITY CO:JNCT_L OF THE CITY OF PA' M DESERT, CALIFORNIA in accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939 , as ameneed, , Governme-t_.._ Code Sections 35 , 300-35 , 326 , I/.ate resoec*F,___y reoresent as Lo1_owS : T we are the owners) of Assessor ' s Parcel_ Number 621-190-054-6 which '-as an assessed value as slo:an on E= 1_zed assessmen= Roll of the County of Riverside . 2 . T/We rec:_est _''ate such land be annexed to the amity o`_ Palm Desert, sub-iec-- `O _ :e condition that the "Ltv of .. E. m Desert zone the proOe—v in con-o" ance w_t Desert larnC'. Dse Plan s.'rC::1 Q d reS:Ge^t_3l C_asslfication wi ___ d C.-_nsi-_v c'. not less than five ' 5) un-ts ver acre or :^ore t:ia- seven !7) un_ts ^er acre. ?` such cone. _ions do not occ•.l'_ , ontltlon is %v; thcra,rn anC. shall no :.onr1e- '7" ef'ective . 3 . There are '_ess t an twelve ( '-2) reaisterec voerssuch land . Date : William McPhie en McPhie Ile Fe us Homme Martha G. Hordrhe _ETI=O\ TO : TEE HONORABLE CITY COL'N= OF TEE CITY OF PALM DESERT , CATT _FORNIrl in accordance with the annexation of "r_inhabitated Terr-=or_ Act ^F 1939 , as ,..ended, Government Coce Sect_ons 35 _300-35 _ F. ,_ _ , 25 =/ espect_1__'_y represent as FO�1C:V5 : T_/We are --o ownerrS ' of Assessor ' s Parce'_ Number 621-190-055-7 wh_c- has an assessed VaICC as }:-le cua'_ized .Assessm,an: Ro_1 of t. e . ounty ,F Riverside . 2 _ ?/-+'e -ec•.:est that such land be annexed to C-' -v o= 'a='I 2esert , sub ec_ =o the c or,d_`_-or _ha : the C _:v 0_ PZ-r+ Desert zone the pro.nerty -n con`or*lance .dith t'ae Palm Desert _ '.e 'Dian showinc a re�ident'_al class ifJcaticn w_�_'= a O?.ns-' t-y 0- not less than Live , S i „7-- is her acre or mo.-c than seven '7% nits ver acre. If � co t . _ suc:. r.d= �ons do not pct; Lion is „_ _ ._.-.-e:_. and shall n0 -Once- 'mac• ^_`eCt_Ve . � . -herc are '_nqs _^an `we, Ve ( 12) _^c_ '_$te_led VO z'_'rS . `_v:_nc w_=.. _-. Such land. will A ePhie 'Date : \'. e e n Phi Fer s Homme Martha C . itamme PETITION TO : THE HONORABLE CITY COrrtiCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CA _FO?N-A in accordance with tie annexation of Unin'-abitated Terr- _Ory Act of __939 , as amcnc�ed, Govern .e-t Code Sec=lons 3J , 3n`_�-j J , =• 6 , I/We respectfully recre.sent as _ 1 . I/rnre are owner 's? of Assessor ' s Parcel Number 621-190-057-9 whic_. "as, an assesseC Va_'_e as shown On the =coal=zed Assess-e-,n_ RO_1 of --C COLI--V ofvers_Ce. 2 . T/We recuest `_'at S"c.^: ' and by inns Xed to the CZ-v of P<'m Desert , sub=ect :o _he cond'_t_on ".at the C_tv of Palm Desert zone _..e nrocer in conformance .,_th Palm D..- -- _ -- j ^._- ;'se �.'_an s.howina a resice- t; , C_ __on W_t__ a densi tV Of not less than _1'Jn un-ts Je;: acre Or more ,::an seCln ' 7', `1n =S per acre . Tf s',lC.� COP.C�1-, ons CO -.0t 0cc,: , •.^ O^ •_`_ion is Withdrawn and 512 ' 1 .c e__ective. 3 . '^'^ere ar- less than. '_we_ve (12) recisterec voters __v�_nc w___hin such land . Da Walter Jit I PETTT'ON TO : THE HONORABLE CITY CO'_"vC=_ OF THE CITY OF PAT M DESERT, CAT_T=ON-A in accordance the t4 f Uninhabitated Territory Act of 193° , as a-nended., _overnment Code _ Sect-ons. 35 , 3C9 35 , : G , =/we respec_`nl__y represent as follows : T 'We are 'he ow-er (sN of Assessor t S Parcel Nu:r,,'De-- 621-190-059-1 wiic`': has a- e.ssessed va'ne as. s'-Own on `_fie Ecca_ized Assess^.en- Ro-1 2 . :/We re1-1-eSt that s'Ic-: 'land be annexed to _ce C_t c` 2al_. . ^es.er- ac^ ect to cone'_t-o- _'?a_ _ne ty °t 2a_T Desert zone _ne orozil___y _._ Cor'_�::'.ance �v` t'n ^e _lay_.. Desert �,anr 'Ilse . _a'l^F',0'n_nu a '_'esiCGential < C_a SS__f___at'on td_ _.? a :.6nS_ _V C.: not ' eSS !?an __ 1 ; 7 _ -._ __ per acre or n.Cfe seven !-, ' uni -S _C,- ac,-c!. I 5,,,z!l ccrditions do not ' -' _t_Oa iS .._ _.__._'c'.W^. and ha ._ •in r..-�.e l'Dc n -gi_p�,,_ . � _ _ zve. "ere are _•'SS t^a^ i'% ,, ve (12) -er-- --e-er voters w , -:nd . Date : Walter Jit PETITION TO : THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM OL'SE=T CAL--FO'N-A in accordance with the annexation of Unin^abitated Terr-torn i.,ct 0= _939 , as an^ende=, Government COCe Sections 3ti , ?.02-'S , ?T5 , -T/ e resn_ ect`n1=y _eoresent as `ollows : I/We are t' - owner (s� of Assessor ' s Farce! Number 621-190-060-1 w_—''- ^.as an assessed va-•_._ as shown on the Ecua'-_zed Assessment ROB . 0c +'ten f'py r++V of D' VerS_ae. 2 • !Ale request t_nat such 'land be annexed to the C_ -v o- 'zz.-:I T-!ae2rt , sub-ect to cc-d-' -on _ -one C- _V o_` ?a:.T 'Oeser'- zone the D`"^7cr._y _. . •_C^."`Or^aP.Ce wit_'- DaIT Desert �anr'. Use 9' , showi--c a i __ _s' -e�t-a- class_f-ce.t'_on tcitn~e density of -�ot 'less tnan five ( 5� units ner acre or , 'fan seven /i) ,1^,_-s per acr(? . if s'_'c.n. Ccndltions do .npt ccc'-'- + , -,.<_,t_tion is it.. ._. : n and sna'.. no _0.=er o_ e `ect-ve. �. There are less +'nan `welvd " 2) reo-s`-ered voters =iv_nc w_t_�_n ;cch land .. Date : Walter Ji er PE'TIT_ON TO: THE HONORABLE CITY CC'..'NCIL OF mHE C_TY OF PALM DESERT, CAL'FORN:A In accordance with the annexation of Uninhab-fated Terr_tory Act of _9'9 , as amended, Government Cede Secticns 35 , 3+0'�-1� , ,,2 11 , 6 , =/'.:e respect_Ful_ ` y represent as ro'__ows : _ . I/We are +^- Owner /9� Of ASSeSSOr ' S Parcel Nu-nbe- 621-190-061-2 whic.". has an assesses va'__e as shown or. the Eaua_ized Assessment Po-' of _ e Countv of ?ivers'_se. 2 . I/We recuest that such. land be annexed to the C_tv Of na_'.m DeSP-t , sub'lec- t0 the ccna__t_on that the C_ _v of az , m -Desert zone __n 'onfo-_lance fie '72 .._. Desert *.- Ise se ? _..n s,cwina _L-es 'resident -al C_aSS_f �_O^ w -^ a denSitV 0- not lr-gs an =_VQ un_=s per acre or more =_ .-n seven (7: un-ts ?e- a.re. If s•_:ch consz:'_ons shall ne 'oncer ef.'_ective. 3 m ere are 'less t.^.an a-.1ve ( '_2) r@C' St'd-^d vc-�--S land. Hate : � Walter Jitn r PETIT'_ON TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCI_' OF TI?E CITY OF PALM DESERT, CA:1TT.7OR'N'A In accordance With the annexation Of Uninhab_tated Territory Act of -939 , as amended, Government Code Sections 33 , 3.6n-35 , 326 , ve res-ectful_'-v reorese_nt as f0ll0Ws : _lWe are the oWner (s; of Assessor ' s Parcel Number 621-190-062--3 w_­ c'n has an assessed i value as shown on the ECuali Zed P.ssessment Poll Of .: e County of 3iverside. 2 . '/We _equest that such land `ile. an-exed to e C_ty of Palm Desert , subject to the con_d-' tion that t'ne __-v Palm Desert zone _ne oroo-=rty _n confc-1,ance with __-- 'aL- Dese-- Lan_ Use ?_.__ s^ehinc a resident" '.' c_assif_r a`i_ on :. _ _.. a censit_v of not les=. 'than -_d^_ ,S) n---s per acre or more -_?an seven (7` un_ts _oer acre. If such conc_='_ons do not nc+C.-r, tnls oet_tion is wit' d _- _-,awr ana spa_`_ no _once= be effective . 3 . There are less t'_^:a_n. twelve 11 2) _stereC. vcte-s '_a.nc. " Date : 4]alter Jit e PET TTTON TO : THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA in accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of '_93? , as amended , Government Code Sections 33 , 300-3_ , 3 )6 , 1/1,,�e respectfully represent as 1 . I/We are the owner (s) of Assessor ' s Parcel Number 621-190-071-1 which has an assessed value as 'hewn on the Equalized Assessment Roll o= the Coun`_v of Riverside. 2. I/'We request t:^at such '_and be annexed to the City of ?alm desert , subject to the condition that _' 2 Ci_v of ?alm. Desert zone the property -n conformance with the �a'm: Desert anG ''Sn P' an S_lo'.+'inc a res--en tial classif' cation wit', a density of not less t:lan f _:e r5; •, per acre or more tha n seven (7; units aer acre . 1f such conditions do not occur , +^'_; oetition is w4_t';drawn and shall no _once;- be e�_ective. 3 . -here are 'ess than twelve e ) ( 2 rea s ered voters __v'_ac w_t.._n such land . - tec W Ite Jitne aesomm e_ Martha G. HgOmme PETITION TO: THE HONORABLE CITY =_'NCT_L OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA in accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Terrltory AC` cf 1039 , as aT.enC^_, Government Code Sections 35 , 307-35 , 326 , IlSae _^_soectfu ly re_Dresfnt as f0,10ws : '_ • T_/We are the owne" �s) Of Assessor ' s Parcel Number 621-190-078-8 w;^:_ch '-as an assessed value as shown on the Equalized Assessment Boll of the County of Riverside . 2 . I/We re_.-cest that such land be ar._.exec to the C- l_y c= ?am.. Desert, ..ub�ect to .he c0nd_4t_O_ ='1a'_ '='fin . - C_ Da_m Deser= zone the ?ro er=y -__. con-0-mance with +; Dalm Deser= Land' '_'Sc Plan .showInc a resir dental c_ass_fication w_`._ a c.ensity of not less un:`_- ^er acre or more t_lan seven ( / ) units -jerac-(, . Tc SL`Cn CCnC:idons CC nct occ_Y, t^__ __t-ior. _,^ w_=: drawn una shall no '_oncer be _ . T:,ere are less t lc.n t'a'n_tj L? / ' 2 ' •-�-c- St P_reC voters --� :_nn wi ^:' n sxh land . Cate • � Walter Jitner nFm�mTON TO : THE HONORABLE CITY CO"NCTL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CAL1=02NIA in accordance with the annexat_on of Oninhabitated Territory Act of 1039 a- enc.�r__, Government Code Sect_°ns 35 , 3CC-35 , 326 , _/c,e respectfully represent as follows : '_ . =/we are the owner 's; of Assessor ' s Parce_ Number 621-190-080-9 wh; ch :.as an assessed valuo as shown on. the _'cr,_,ali Zed Asscssme"1t Ro of -ne County of R--vers'_de. 2 . I/Sde request that such 'and be annexed to t.e C_ty of ?a_ Desert , subiect to the condlt_on i-L.e +_ - _ o_ lelm Desert zone the property -r con-`°'_mance with the Palm Desert_ Care_ Cse -'an showing a c_assr_t-_ x - _=°n •,,` -h a f_o-.sit_v o' no: less than five : 5� ur-,-.s per acre or i^:ere t:nan seven ! / ) '_nits per a--re . if such ccnd_ _-°n5 do not occ_.- , t-..'_S pe_' _=on is wit'-.drawn a.nr_ shall no _orce- effec '_ve . 3 . '^here are less t--an twe've 112' re voters _ivinq w`-t':^.in .;uch lanC . Ll"ate : alt Ji rr 19 _ -mac• F gus Homme Martha G. Ho e • •, �rl�LciirevUrl�i���rlicv �Q.ern/28/9 February 20, 1978 PETITION TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF. PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA In accordance with the annexation of Uninhabitated Territory Act of 1939, as amended, Government Code Sections 35.300-35,326, we respectfully repre- sent as follows: 1 . We are the owners of Assessor's Parcels Numbers 621350023-2, 621350018-8,621350017-7, 621200020-5, 621350016-6, 621200033-7, and 621200032-6, which have an assessed value as shown on the Equalized Assessment Roll of the County of Riverside. 2. We request that such land be annexed to the City of Palm Desert, subject to the condition that the City of Palm Desert zone the property in conformance with the Palm Desert Land Use Plan showing a residential classification with a density of not less than five (5) units per acre or more than seven (7) units per acre. If such conditions do not occur, this petition is withdrawn and shall no longer be effective. 3. There are less than twelve (12) registered voters living within such land. Date: 1978. Ted Weiner tl t. . , ' Clcc Katheryn Vo .taw,-Trustee Ted Weiner Oil Properties Trust 621-20 f "CA. 111, SEC 8 T SS.lrsE. ScC...I. FR SEC llA'a 22 y .' oe _.'mac] O 1 .. • CvC O- `~_.�-• ��� •,L/ �0.�. Oaf. ./f 1N ✓ /)/ /,I{/'J /1• _... _ �I! [ r f H } Environmental Assessment form Riverside County Local Agency Formation Commission r LAfC No. To accompany application for Palm Desert Annexation No. 5 Location address Applicant City of Palm Desert, P. 0. Box 1977, Palm Desert, CA 92260 714/346-0611 name address zip telephone no. Background Information: 1 . Briefly describe the nature of the proposal : The Environmental Analysis on this annexation Cas been done by the City. Please note the attached Initial Study. The County Planning/Environmental Staff was contacted as a responsible agency. Since a Negative Declaration has been issued 2. General Location on the project, no further Environmental Analysis is required. 3. Describe the area, including distinguishing natural and manmade characteristics. 4. Is the proposal a phase or a portion of a larger project? If so, identify the larger project. 5. Does this proposal include property on which a previous zone change application, conditional use permit, public use permit, subdivision, or parcel map has been denied by the County Planning Commission?_ Please explain 6. Does this proposal include property on which a previous environmental assessment or environmental impact report has been submitted to the Riverside County Planning Department? If questions 5 and/or 6 were answered yes, fill out Part B of this application. To the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. Si ned City of Palm Desert �\ project sponsor Title Director of Environmental Services Use additional sheets , if necessary ''II. Assessment of Environmental Impact: B Please answer the following questions by placing a check in the appropriate space. (The applicant should be able to explain or substantiate his response to every question. ) A. Characteristics of the Natural Environment. Yes No County Use 1 . Land (Topography, Soils , Geology) a. Does the project site involve a unique landform or biological area, such as beaches, sand dunes, marshes, etc. ? b. Will the project involve construction on slopes of 25' or greater? c. Is the project to be located in an area of soil instability (subsidence, landslide or severe erosion)? d. Is the project site located on, or adjacent to a known earthquake fault? 2. Water a. Is the project located within a flood plain? b. Does the project involve a natural drainage channel or stream bed? 3. Flora and Fauna a. Are there any rare or endangered species of plant life in the project area? b. Will any mature trees be removed or relocated? c. Is the project site adjacent to, or does it include, a habitat, flood source, water source, nesting place or breeding place for a rare or endangered wildlife species? d. Could the project affect fish , wildlife, reptiles , or plant life? e. Is the project located inside or within 200 feet of a fish or wildlife refuge or reserve? _ 4. Potential Alteration to Natural Features a. Will the project result in the removal of natural resources for commercial purposes ( including rock, sand, gravel , oil , trees, or minerals)? b. Will the project involve grading in excess of 300 cu. yds .? -2- s6. Potential Direct Impact of Project. Yes No County Use 1 . Impact on Existing physical surroundings. a. Pollution (Air, water, noise, land) (IT Will the project create dust, fumes , smoke or odors? (2) Will the project involve the burning of any material , including, brush, trees or construction materials? (3) Is the project expected to result in the generation of noise levels in excess of those currently existing in the area? (4) Will the project involve the application, use, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials , including pesticides, herbicides , other toxic substances or radioactive material? _ b. A licable Pollution Controls and Standards. 1 Will the project require a permit or other approval from any of the following agencies? State or Regional Water Resources Control Board County Health Officer Air Pollution Control District City or County Planning Commission _ U. S. Environmental Protection Agency County Airport Land Use Commission (2) Does the project require variance from established environmental standards (e.g. , air quality, noise, water quality)? 2. . Impact on existing facilities and services. a. Circulation. (1 ) Is the project expected to cause noticeable increase in pedestiran traffic or a change in pedestrian patterns? (2) Will the project result in noticeable changes in vehicular traffic patterns or volumes (including bicycles)? — — (3) Will the project involve the use of off-the-road vehicles of any kind (such as trail bikes)? b. Water Supply and Sewage Disposal . (1 ) Will the project entail the acquisition of water from wells or surface sources for commercial and/or non-domestic use? -3- Yes No County Use c. Demand for Service from Special Districts and/or Municipalities or County. (1 ) Will the project require the extension of exiting public utility lines? (2) Will the project require public services, from an agency, district or public utility which is currently operating at or near capacity? _ 3. Miscellaneous a. Will the project employ equipment which could interfere with existing communication and/or defense systems? b. Is the project located within the flight path or noise impact area of an airport? C. Potential Indirect Impact of Project. 1 . Land Use a. Is the proposed project expected to result in other changes in land use either on or off the project site? b. Could the project serve to encourage development of presently undeveloped areas, or increase in development intensity of already developed areas (examples include the introduction of new or expanded public utilities , new industry, commercial facilities or recreation activities)? c. Is the project adjacent to or within 500 ft. of an existing public facility or site for same? _ d. Is the project inconsistent with any adopted general plan, specific plan or present zoning? e. Does the project involve lands currently protected under the Williamson Act or an Open Space Easement? 2. Visual Impact a. Is the site for the proposed project adjacent to a designated Scenic Highway or within a Scenic Corridor? _ b. Will the project obstruct any scenic view from existing residential areas, public lands, or public roads? _ — 3. Social/Cultural Impact a. Will the project require the relocation of housing or business in order to clear the project site? b. Does the project site include or affect a known historical or archeological site? -4- III. Statement as to Significant Environmental Effect. If'you have answered yes to one or more of the questions in Section II , but believe the project will have no significant adverse environmental effect, indicate your reasons below. To the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. Date: Signed Project sponsor By Title U1, wj qI I, > In 4vb 14 Qg LO W Ul ------------ ui 1q. 14. JI tu mo 14. Irk LU 14, IN uj 1z V qcN 4, 'C (�27 10 104 'CC'-1 F ' L7 Ir A Li 1� rk .... .. e,.a ct -3Z AL co lu zi Tx I PROJECT LOCATION MAP corrN77PY cove O.G ]I e W 6 1 I Uuuvl p � f, w< Y _ ee T.1 �` ✓ � enin �.of 0 \ .I...,`•, I ' <C EZA Ilnp A s "��' ��w I-D a .Li �����® '•i ply �p3 tl� i1JOYr+ �I�aQ�lOa � ��� _ • . rl� •,�� 1, �� � i�; N `L HDAl - ---w------/ A 1••• 1 �Li..ru..� i I � •i. al? i S iORN y_s r EIR FORM #1 CITY OF PALM DESERT NEGATIVE DECLARATION Case No. : ANNEXATION NO. 5 Applicant : City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, P. 0. Box 1977 Palm Desert , CA 92260 Description of Project: The proposed project would annex approximately 1050 acres of undeveloped land lying north of and adjacent to the existing Palm Desert City limits . Finding: The project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment and no further environmental documentation will be required. Justification: The project is compatible with the General Plan for the City of Palm Desert . Based on the findings of the initial study, which study is on file at the Palm Desert City Hall , no substantial signficiant environmental effects will occur as a result of the action proposed by the subject project . Any interested citizen may appeal this determination to the Planning Commission within eight (8) days of the date of the posting of public notice by filing an appeal in accordance with Resolution No. 77-7 with the Department of Environmental Services located at 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California. If no appeal is filed within said.time, this determination shall be final. Date Filed with County Cler k (within five days) May 1 , 1978 Date Public Notice Is Posted: May 4, 1978 cc: Applicant Date Appeal Period Expires: County Clerk File May 12 1978 Bulletin Board Mainiero, Smith and Associates, Inc. Civil&Environmental Engineering Professional Plaza•Suite 3 2225 East Tahquitz-McCallum Way,Palm Springs,California 92262 Telephone (714) 327-8544 March 31, 1978 Mr. Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, California 92260 Dear Mr. Williams : We have reviewed the proposed Annexation No . 5 as it relates to the Palm Desert Community Services District. Since the District does not serve the area to be annexed there does not appear to be any direct impact on their water supply and distribution system. However , the development of the area would ultimately result in an increase in the rate at which the groundwater basin is being depleted. If you have any questions in regard to the above , please contact us . Very �truly:/ITH 7 0 s , , MAINIERO, AND ASSOCIATES , INC . RJM/cam Cc : Mr. Stanley Sayles RECEIVE © kp 0 >' 1J u ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT i Southern California Edison Company 36-100 CATHEDRAL CANYON DRIVE CATHEDRAL CITY, CALIFORNIA 92234 March 28 , 1978 Mr. Ronald R. Knippel City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, Calif. 92260 Dear Mr. Knippel : Your proposed annexation of the 1 ,050 acres north of your city limits has been reviewed by the Edison Company as far as distribution facilities are concerned. Statement 6 (c) of the Initial Environmental. Impact Study states that the annexation of that property will not require an extension of existing public utility lines. However, if this property is developed, electrical line extensions will more than likely be re- quired to serve new loads. This would be done in accordance with the tariff rules set forth by the Public Utilities Commission. Street improvements might possibly conflict with our existing facilities if relocations are necessary. A copy of your initial study has been forwarded to our Trans- mission Department for their review since they have facilities on the property in question. If I can be of any further assistance to you, please feel free to contact me at 328-5741, Ext. 33 . Yours truly, Roger W. Maraist Planning Manager Palm Springs District Southern California Edison Company RWM: sg O Z p. . =Q W a` e MOAT VV.L46d Ix e31Ww t L/••t• r 4.�w 41 w -�101Stl3T1t! i0 ASNIO3. v a, ,LL'ALBc M 00 30,00 S - pt e0 � A 02 C . o ► ,Z �. 00 o rf AT U) Z H OD O J ~ r W = J m g U i Ky. } N � V Z ~ W O w U (wA N V O 3 W N O r 0: O ' m R' w z _ ac I Y A N U N W O V 0 m 4. w z i O Q Q,. y O J '4l o ( o zs 9zci w,,oL,ca,00s� u, . .j 1hsj w r N zl. 2 � z W O W 0r Q U 4 o Q O U U 3tM3AV Q. or, 00.099 N , I90o00 A ,so-a 91 M.09,10,00S 0 Alpy O � p 3 o m OU W'. m O + n N A _ W J m _II 3,os,9o,00 N w _ f=1 t A In O d• Q Uh, m w W n 3 � U V O e� o � O O w n n m O m U) M 0: � Z ,99'B91Z � 3„Z1,60 o00 N .! W O . > 1 — N m r U N J W 0 Y N F r • U K n J F p WW� I w a) 00 J H O I N N t o w Ir- it V O U W It z a a _> It w u • a s c~i `° w w wn W N y U y O 4: o I w di e O a a m A Q 0! OT ,Z9,2993 36090o00N me- 3 OVo A3tl UNM 11WI1 A113 39VMV4 OHONVN IF 3NV1 I,0NV10 Wm � 1 a . .A - I a a ten + 4-Z-- tt 3nN3nv tl'10l110d x o Q o d 2 - S.. a t U z W O Q ui Y� 6 A:IY3IWON t � w irk 4 oM r'3O1SN3AM A0 AiM03 v - ,ZL'6L9C .ZW IA., 00,90000 $ OI ID _ti. '�� .+0+ 2 x ' as LLJcsIL www , ' t „ A\ f O C ,.. a.• _� a_ C m 0 .. Ou N � � Y a w ~ Ul w N O Z ¢ ^ W O 0 P _ J 0) ¢ Iwn W d 1 > 111 w 0 pO I J z a � u W ¢ b o a VS �X w V . J W L) a 2 a 2 Q o O UU 3nN3Ao. IC` , OC'099 OS m 90a00 co ,1C O'tiSl M,,,04,IO o00$ o x- w NO 3 P U e ' O o N O V b N O A r ' b D n e } b N o c n ,89'f99 ' ¢ N 3 � w - - 1 N jl ,or,9o>oo N J _ W U Y a o q U Z 3 P / 0 / Vim, mot .: w u {• m _ W Iw W 3 / V Ci v n ' O f a a o O W D p I ^ L P � b ^ � CO V1 cr l O: 2 —� ,9$'89IZ 3 21,SOo00 N .} W O ..11l 3333 v > f F N � f 1!) W J w ( O } 0 K O Z I N C Iw J f O ' n w IO w F V U O a Q V j ~ Ir Z N ¢ O G a H �' W f W O V e a 3 W J M OK a (WA a O N N y 43 it .� 2 rz n y a V ¢ ti p J Ow , o a a m ` v a z 0. a - J 3 a uu : a e m a N O a T h ,28'2592 3„60,90 o00 N m It 3 OtlOtl — A3Y31NOW `O ^ 11N11 A113 39V8N OH:)NV8 3Nni 43NVIO ^ m t `4 • O F. 4 3nN3nv V101tlW It -W C15 W { � W r + 1. �• 1 �" M° b 30isaanla 40 4NOGo ,, o n ; a' O � v O q ' . ,ZL'6L62 - M , 00,10,00 9 .. Of to F , *. 30, 11 XU. A { ( d; W p CBF ►- CO o f O a po $_ W o m F Z d c� _ D z' '1 2F Z W T o: 1 H W m w w N I U � N ; w O ( w. z _ o: I - T. r W N O N o. o J ^- r � . �� W z � J > W � O 1 W f. O %� J o u t ,ZS"GZtI M„02,LOe00Y . . + ' p r fN Z w40 _ . W W u s Q Z U 0. 0: 4 O U U .'t NAY , OC'099 Ot Y101tl0/ ` 1;z�s .+.•wr:3 ry n _A. I m t� .ni��' B9'e9 94 3oN,� oVy3„gtKWOTFfJ,9 0.00N W p hO O n m ZO UO I111f F^ NZ WmN� 3.Of,40o00 N fr ,3OS�,'I Ope_oUV 0r U 30 U S fI t A-, W0 ,t0"2i51 QZ_ WJ : p I o O O p I Il WOD o N _ � ..CL I t w ,9S'8912 �� 3-Z1 ,60 oO0 N J _> / N (X U N J W C T N H H 'w m m J I T O i « N IO w F ¢ c) U t� O a �• w V w 4 3 V t0 w I W W w J n N O Nzzzzz W ry N U y OLU 4 z m 0. Q m o m G 3 0 W ,20'249Z 3„60,90.OON OVOtl tr ARM31NOW m llWll Ally 39VMfW ONDNV2! 3Ntll /,ONOl0 1' m t17� i.• :t `F Y,..t W sY. . , � ZQ afIN3NV VglYOd /L •. i ID t � � w of 0 Y! .< K - W• �ul AiNnoo. � � � v.. saws�..= - ,ZrC•6L6£ M 06,90 000 S A tD r rri�+.i J V IW 0 F d F. c6 c � O j W f w I Y r z z d m U ,O q, Z W J J g r U J N 0WIN > p W W N 1 U N _ 3 W Cl) 6 0: 0 n ^ W W O o J E N N e l G W H m 0 m � O U � ml �' E N g N r a N W W > r Q 0 q 1 J O - z W t,Z9,Sul M„o2,100009'�' O tj w z w z WI $O$$W f 0. Olx Q rwI7.1t O fW3At! '� 0, lD ,OC'099 Q4,90000N 0'2i£i M,OS,IOo00SC T r f O O N I O n O V Y O A e V N IN A A Q ~ N m z W J N - Q m ,/I 304,90.00 N ; r W U r r ( O 3 f m U Z r O O ur_. 3 1 UV IV IN m W N ~ O m O d o O e A J W n W W 00 = 2' p - (0 Z ,95991Z � 3„Z1 ,60 o00 N w 0 > K F U 0 J W _H O > N ~ m g I w 0 m J Y C I H w 0 U W V < O a a U Z or N g O g a ~ N w O u d U J M O j p « N U Y W itCC 0 g p W 0= r0 N Q \ 4 O g I Q Q Z ^' 0.0. w a co W a uL) a n 0 a I ; 0. m1 3 N I ,29'2492 3„60 SOo OON AaY31NON '° llWll kLO 39VSM OHONVlJ aNvi �Nav r' m^ 4L a F. art u O � •t Np0 W' '`" m �C ' Qul J O j 80N3Atl tll0i1HW O . 0 F r x a Q o d5 u H G z at N it 21f A243l wa d u* o uJ 3alsa3nla d0 A1Nn0 o ui '°"* - z� A,4 4 o. q ' .f ,ZC 6462 N, 00.10 e00 s x U. h W zar o a � � m J N W 1 W W O o' r > r m x .N 2 a: '1 Off„ ap o^ r LL a- 2 = ' o_ J O W W r m t = z Q- M I N Z J m g ~ O Z W} N � r W W w iL °D O r 0: o N Z N O W � 0. J W r N IWA W J 1W a R O r w 0 � i _ z I — W zs"OL Ml M„0z,10,0as� N r N a m bS z u 31 f �w a z as U O Q (� o 30N3Atl fviolmo a ,0C'099 t •, 4 ` r 'I .,qY,90e009 to � ,L4'zf Sl M OS,10 o009 r NIt I P O U 0 _ n o O ry a T I r ' b O Mf P N C N 1 . � m U o ^ ,89'049 e xrJ m ; W 3.00,90e00 N J o Q W V r a Y e q U z 3 F. a ro r I O �_ V Z b_ Q W ( r Z V W 3 U U m r b N I J I a O a W a _ w 4 W m K z —� , 9S'991z � 3„z1 ,60000 N .1 W O U Y) J W LLo r w r 1- - o J -f. N a• � ( r N to W Q V U 0 V W r z 2 ^ O a r W O W J # r W W W J M m O N ry p V y A W P Q o d e m I a a w 0,40 o V = x - O = N ,z6'Z99z 3„60,90 o00N I a m - 3 OtlOtl - A3tl31N0Y1 1D 1' llWll A110 39tl6'tW ONONVH _ 3Nvi ONVID r- m I 1 I $N p � Y'W III M ,. CIV 0 NN r N � 1 1a. o,T P a �, (11w •H v v _,A a U) w r-1 x v ro ar4x r1 U -P RS N •ri l4 r1a p 1v (U a In 11. w a1 x° o L o >1N F=i +1 1 -1 W " "1N " £ Ud W ry C � O G u Co I O U U o d o h � W 0 'c o m U c VI n oouNrr ESTABLISHED IN 1918 AS A PUBLIC AvDNCY L �75TRIGT COACHELLA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT POST OFFICE BOX 1058 • COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA 92236 • TELEPHONE (714)398-2651 DIRECTORS OFFICERS RAYMOND R. RUMMONDS, PRESIDENT LOWELL O. WEEKS, GENERAL MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER TELLIS COOEKAS,VICE PRESIDENT OLE J. NORDLAND, SECRETARY C. J. FROST WALTER R. WRIGHT, AUDITOR WILLIAM B. GARDNER March 31 , 1973 REDWINE AND SHERRILL, ATTORNEY$ STEVE D.BUXTON Filet 0421 ..2 0721 ..2 Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, California 92280 Re: Proposed Annexation No. 5 Dear Mr. WO liams:: The property wi'thi,n the proposed annexation should be annexed into Improvement District Nos. 16, 53, 70 and 80 to obtain domestic water and sanitation service. In addition, a condition should be placed on the property within the proposed annexation requi.ri:ng that water for domes,tic service and fire protection be obtained from a public agency and that a private fire protection water system will not be acceptable. Very truly yours i _ I Low 11 0. Weeks General Manager-Chief E gineer TL:db RRCEWED APT' 0 3 1978 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF FIRE PROTECTION IN COOPERATION WITH THE )g COUNTY CALIFORNIA DIVISION OF FORESTRY or �— RIVERSIDE...,1.,7 DAVID L. FLAKE P.O. 9OX 248 COUNTY FIRE WARDEN 210 WEST SAN JACINTO STREET PERRIS, CALIFORNIA 92370 TELEPHONE (714) 657-3183 Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Dear Paul , After reviewing the information provided by your office with regards to pro- posed annexation number five, we find that the annexation will have no immediate effect on the Fire Department. However, as the area developes, we will have concerns about the fire protection in the area. Some of our concerns are: I . The existing Palm Desert Fire Station is already running over the maximum amount of calls it can adequately handle. 2. During the rainy season, our access to the area is Beverly hampered by the flooding of Monterey Avenue and Cook Street. During these times , fire engines from Bermuda Dunes and Rancho Mirage respond to the area. 3. Any development which occurs in the area of Country Club and Cook Street will be subject to long response times due to the distance from the nearest station. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this annexation proposal , and should you desire any clarification, please let me know. David L. Flake ;.County Fire Warden Bud Engel Fire Marshal BE:dt MAIR Q E 1# W Dor MEMO TO L� DATE PREPARED SCE SD-1-2 NEW 1/75 (VREV. EO 66) FR 4 31. April 14, 1978 Mr. R. W. Maraist Planning Manager Palm Springs District Reference is made to your memo of March 30, 1978 regarding Transmission facilities in the area of the proposed annexation by the City of Palm Desert. The attached map is marked in red showing the location of existing Transmission facilities. Since part of these existing facilities are now within the city limits, it appears that further annexation would not require an Environ- mental Impact Study. However, other interested departments of the Company should be contacted before a final decision is made. �/ J. A. Eckl Supervising Estimator Eastern Transmission JAE:jw Attachment 1 March 28, 1978 I Mr. Ronald R. Knippel City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, Calif, 92260 Dear Mr. KhIPPel: � Your mits Propoas been sed annexation of the 1,050 acres north of you, city istributionhfacilitiesvareeconcernedEdison company as far as Statement 6 (c) of the Initial Environmental Impact Stud that the annexation of that property will not re J of existing Public utility lines. However Y states developed, electrical line , if thiisrP an extension thequi td to serve new loads, extensions will more thanplikelyybesre- the thriff mules This would be done in accordance with set forth by the Public Utilities Commission. Street improvements might g Possibly facilities if relocations are necessary, conflict with our exist.�n A copy of your initial study has been forwarded ,T mission Department F tment for their review since arded to our Trans- the property in -question. they have facilities on to If I canmeeatf3 5 any further assistance to Ext. 33. YOu, Please feel free Yours truly, Roger W. Maraist Planning Manager Palm Springs District Southern California Edison Company i RWMssg 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 March 22, 1978 Kermit Martin Southern California Edison Co. P. 0. Box 203 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Dear Sir: This is to advise you that the City of Palm Desert is conducting an initial study to determine potential environmental effects of a pro- poseF—annexation of approximately 1 ,050 acres of land located generally adjacent to and north of the existing City limits. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and Resolution No. 77-7 of the City of Palm Desert, the City, as the Lead Agency for this project, herewith requests your comments and recommenda- tions prior to determining whether a negative declaration or environmental impact report will be prepared. Enclosed for your review of the proposed project are: a project location map; a proposed zoning map; and, a copy of the City's initial study check- list. Since it is intended herein only to provide for informal consultation with responsible agencies , as prescribed by CEQA, regarding the proposed annexation, we would appreciate receiving any comments or recommendations you may have by April 1 , 1978. We twist the enclosed information will be satisfactory for your review. Should you have any questions regarding this matter or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Ronald R. Knippel of our staff at (714) 346-0611 ext. 53. Very truly yours , Paul A. Williams, A. I .P. Director of Environmental Services rk/pw/ks Enc. PROJECT LOCATION MAP cpUNrRY «UB OR i i i i W �I S 1 W �1 1 i N .JL:JL'( p i i , �v, • D��O� Inn 1 zZa LUZZ o � Mu.�� 7 o -ff. 4� :: << ....-.. .Y u 4 -'1 510M" l �ti E •, s E E - E v E v - E _ - h V ¢ ^ v ¢ v E _ ¢ E = ¢ E ¢ o O w i WE c$ S N W ¢ E Q ¢ w I Q E o - 4 W J Q Q Q J J U 4 2 J fg J 2 h Y Z Q ¢ Q U 2 U f ¢ W O O 41 ¢ Q J J W ¢ U U V I ¢ h ¢ G Q w C c 0 c E O hhhF W hOOJ O4 p2 ) W 4w4 oO '-O , e J W W W W 2 ¢ 2 O W N p 2 U J zO J ¢ N ~ O N 6 N N N N m Q 2 6 W ¢ Q m p W z a U W W W W O J W J 4 W J 0 I- > 2 W R "� U m Q ¢ ¢ a a z 4 u 4 p N 4 4 N O Q ¢ - - a � aa aoa 0000a oNoa F 0 3 � � � 0 I z I n. - �Lo a- i smsa an�a .o u�ncs z WU g � _ W - Q ' y C O Q LL- . � .. - _CL' 7 O O • a l p U W LLJ a i CL z Y a _ _ Q� O \ vn•+ I 71- N -- -...- v � � .. n;_ r y I � . , CITY OF PALM DESERT INITIAL STUDY OF ENVIRON! ILNTAL I)TACT A. PROJECT REFERENCE 1 . Case No. Annexation No. 5 2. Project Sponsor City of Palm Desert 3. Project Description ( In Brief) Proposed annexation of approximately 1 ,050 acres of land located generally adjacent to and north of the existing City limits. B. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are provided on attached sheets. ) 1. Land (topography, soils, geology) YES or MAYBE NO (a) Does the project site involve a unique landform or biological area, such as beaches, sand dunes, marshes, etc. ? X (b) Will there be construction on slopes - of 25% or greater? X, (c) Will the project result in the removal of natural resources for commercial purposes, such as rock, sand, gravel, oil, plants, or minerals? X (d) Will the project involve grading in excess of 300 cubic yards? X (e) Is the project site located on or adjacent to a known earthquake fault or an area of soil in- stability (subsidence, landslide, or severe blowsand)? X 2. Water - (a) Is the project located within a flood plain, - a natural drainage channel, or streambed? X (b) Will the project significantly increase the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X (c) Will the project result in the contamina- tion or deterioration in quality of ground water? X 3. Flora and Fauna (a) Are there any rare or endangered species of plant life in or near the project area? X (b) Will any nature trees be removed? X (c) Is the project site adjacent to, or does it include a habitat, food source, water source, nesting place or breeding place for a rare or endangered wildlife species? X (d) Is the project located inside or within 200 feet of a wildlife __. ,2, or reserve? X City of Palm Desert Initial Study of Env inQnmrnr:tl impact 1'n ` TWO YES or `LAYBE NO 4. Pollution (Air, Water, Noise, Land) (a) Will the project create dust, fumes, smoke, or odors? X (b) Will the project result in the generation of noise levels in excess of those currently existing in the area or in the exposure of people to noise levels above 65dBA? X (c) Will the project involve potentially hazardous materials, including pesticides, herbicides, other toxic substances, or radio-active material? X (d) Will the proposed project produce light or glare? X (e) Does the project require variance from estab- lished environmental standards (e.g. air quality, noise, water quality)? X 5. Circulation (a) Is the project expected to cause an increase in _ motor vehicle traffic patterns or volumes? X (b) Will the project involve the use of off-the- road vehicles? X (c) Will the project overload existing parking facilities? X 6. Public Services and Utility Facilities (a) Will septic tanks be utilized for sewage disposal? X (b) Will the project overload any of the fol- lowing: (1) Fire Protection? X (2) Police Protection? -X - (8) Schools? _ (4) Parks or Other Recreational Facilities? �- (5) Electric Power or Natural Gas �- (6) Communication Systems? �- (7) Water Supply? -X - (8) , Sewer System? -x- (9) Stormwater Drainage System? (10) Solid Waste and Disposal? -x— (c�;< Will the project require the extension of existing public utility lines? X (d) Will the project employ equipment which could interfere with existing communication and/or defense systems? (e) Is the project located within the flight path or noise impact area of an airport? X (f) Does the project incorporate measures for the efficient use or conservation of energy and water? X City of Pala Desert Initial Study of Environmental Impact Page Three YES or >'_41'BE NO 7. Land Use (a) Is the proposed project expected to result in other changes in the land use, either on or off the project site? X (b) Could the project serve to encourage development of .presently undeveloped areas, or increase de- velopment intensity of already developed areas? X (c) Is the project inconsistent with any adopted General Plan, Specific Plan, or present zoning? X (d) Does the project involve lands currently pro- tected under the Williamson Act or an Open Space Easement? X (e) Is the site for the proposed project within the Scenic Preservation Overlay District or will the project obstruct any scenic view from existing residential areas, public lands, or public roads? X (f) Will the proposed project displace a large number or people from an established area or create a de- mand for additional housing? X 8. Mandatory Findings of Significance (a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially ---- reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or pre-history? X (b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term en- vironmental goals? X (c) Does the project have impacts which are indi- vidually limited, but cumulatively considerable? X (d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either direcly or indirectly? X City of Palm Desert Initial Study of Environmental Impact Page Four C. Dlscu:;:;ion a( Imp:;ctG: Please briefly explain your answer to question 6(f) and, if you have answered yes to any of the questions in Section II, why you believe that that aspect of the project will have no significant adverse environmental effect. Proposed 0 S zoning would protect unique land forms contained within the project area. 1 (e) - Mitigation measures would be required to minimize effects of blow sand within project boundary. 3 (c) - Proposed 0 S zoning would preserve the habitat of the fringe-toed lizard located in the project area. 7a&b) - Land proposed to be annexed is presently undeveloped although a development plan has been submitted for a 40-acre parcel located in the northwest corner of the project area. Proposed zoning of site would encourage further development of the area however, individual pro- jects would be subject to further review by the City when submitted. The area pr posed to be annexed lies within the City's sphere of influence and is compatible with the City's General Plan for which an EIR wasprepared. .. The zoning as proposed would reduce the overall density of the project area from that originally proposed by the General Plan. TO THE BEST OF MY MOWLEDGE, TH ABOVE I F MATION IS TRUE AND CMILETE. (Date) (Project Sponsor) I n?D 3 O xx �o H o�D n no T o , mom , 0 F a a `Duo ra r "q row �a tines �C .10 L7y y4 � N � rjf� # o1C�J a, �► j�i�� 1 ?f` r f j ! 4 { , I ' l AIM �O 1 1 � � a o z r 1]➢Y1C I1WJ 9L f.!.<�. i0� OQ 3 1 -.E Z- N1O/.f a101YOd 2 n S,�f:.!J O i F F Q 0 W•! RS W V ; m p LL cr V) 2 Z¢ A tl31MP Ow i ow a Z N n j W W o W 3UIStl3Altl !0 A1N00] o ^ - Z�{D p 133tl15 _ O >' O P `w�y ;LL LBG -` -- - � --�M-CJ➢Oe00 S q Ip La ��'1 • Y r U W o H W 41 is '} f W 3' LQ N w w P O O O W J W V 2 F ¢ Sv` 0 T h a 2 W d ¢ F f V Z O O J 6 i u O N Q¢ Q O d Z2 U 6 �¢ Q O r-f VU ti 30Y]nv 10 _,pG499 - OICLYO! - ¢ h 0 J Illy Q If W I ``tir In 2 � N ' O G I O W 6 4 w O O m F31 I f 7 ¢ n W h - a a V I W h pW h O 3 i➢ W I W W r► ¢ O I-. J a ¢ V CC) G Wu a (L m o m CL a q tS92 360 SOe00• � m'1- - 1 - E E c ^s E E E ^ p Eo n co v EQ o V i N - n ..E 0 '- m - u ° y w w a Q �o 27 ! ai eo p n U a J'l J C W W W 6 6 0 m Y u E e — y f Z 7 NQ J J J J W Q U O W O � Q W S W d 1 u •O fN ._ ° o J Z 2 Z 2 S W Q W % W W J O U_ J O _ u W U O O O O J Z W 2 Z12 > 2 J 0 2_ % 2 ~ S _p _p ^ op ^ O G (tl W W W W O j W J d W Q m O W Q % ~ u_W _" $ r _ ¢ `c 1 O' 6 O % J J F 1 K W Q _ U O — p S % Q `uC m o m � ° �00 Z 3°i5ll3utl 10 11 O3 °j^ ,fin. .oet C) av X W W Cn - - a p J F MIz LL d LL z O LL W U 1 o aW N a d `.a.d_ ?' j TC'j - OD - 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CAU FORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 April 24, 1978 LEGAL NOTICE CITY OF PALM DESERT REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A PLANNING COMMISSION INITIATED CHANGE OF ZONE FOR PRE-ZONING APPROXIMATELY 1 ,047 ACRES FROM 'S' STUDY TO P.C. (2) (U.A. ) , R-2 8,000 (8) (U.A. ) , R-1 12,000 (U.A. ) , PR-5 (U.A. ) , PR-4 (U.A. ) , O.S. (U.A. ) , PR-3 (U.A. ) , PR-10(U.A. ) OR ANY OTHER ZONE DEEMED APPRO- PRIATE ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND THE WHITEWATER CHANNEL AND BETWEEN MONTEREY ROAD AND COOK STREET. CASE NO. C/Z 01-78 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a Planning Commission initiated Change of Zone for Pre-Zoning approximately 1 ,047 acres from 'S' Study to P.C. (2)(U.A. ) (Plan- ned Commercial , District, Upon Annexation) , R-2 8,000(8)(U.A. ) (Single-family Residential , 8,000 sq. ft. min. lot area, min. 8,000 sq. ft./du, Upon Annexation) , R-1 12,000 (U.A. ) (Single-family Residential , 12,000 sq. ft. min. lot area, Upon Annexation) , PR-5(U.A. )_ (Planned Residential , max. 5 du/acre,. Upon Annexation) , PR-4(U.A. ) (Planned Residential , max. 4 du/acre, Upon Annexation) , O.S. (U.A. ) (Open Space, Upon Annexation) , PR-3(U.A. ) (Planned Residential , max. 3 du/acre, Upon Annexation) , PR-10(U.A. ) (Planned Residential , max. 10 du/acre, Upon Annexa- tion) or any other zone deemed appropriate on property generally located between Country Club Drive and the Whitewater Channel and between Monterey Road and Cook Street, more particularly described as : Beginning at a point in the northerly boundary line of the City of Palm Desert, County of Riverside, State of California, said point being the common , Section, corner of Section 7 and 8, Township 5 south, Range 6 each, San Bernardino base and meridian. Said point also being in the boundary line of the City of Rancho Mirage of said Riverside County. THENCE northerly along the aforementioned common Section line of Sections 7 and 8 and along the easterly boundary line of the City of Rancho Mirage, a distance of 2,652.82 feet to the common section corner of Sections 7 and 8 and Sections 5 and 6. THENCE north 89' 33' 48" east along the northerly line of the aforementioned Section 8, a distance of 2,629.98 feet to a point. 89' 8 east, along the northerly line of the THENCE north 42 0 ea g y aforementioned Section 8, a distance of 2,670.86 feet to the northeasterly corner of said Section 8 said point being the common corner of Sections 8 and 9, said point also being the centerline intersection of Portola Avenue and Country Club Drive. THENCE continuing north 89' 42' 00" east along the northerly line of said Section 9, a distance of 5,307.00 feet to a point. Said point being the northeasterly corner of said Section 9, said point also being the centerline intersection of Cook Street and said Country Club Drive. THENCE south 00' 06' 00" west along the easterly line of the afore- mentioned Section 9, a distance of 3,979.72 feet to a point. Said point also being the most northeasterly corner in the boundary line of the City of Palm Desert. THENCE continuing along the boundary line of the City of Palm Desert the following courses and distances. Thence south of 89' 46' 32" west, a distance of 3,981 .26 feet. � a THENCE south 00' 07' 20" west, a distance of 1 ,325.52 feet. THENCE south 89' 48' 00" west, a distance of 1 ,327.45 feet THENCE south 00' 01 ' 50" west, a distance of 1 ,592.03 feet. THENCE north 76. 32' 56" west, a distance of 3,166.84 feet. THENCE north 00' 09' 12" east, a distance of 2,168.56 feet. THENCE north 89' 45' 08" east, a distance of 3,052.69 feet. THENCE north 00' 06' 40" east, a distance of 660.00 feet. THENCE south 89. 45' 08" west, a distance of 1 ,325.00 feet. THENCE north 00' 06' 40" east, a distance of 664.68 feet. THENCE south 89' 44' 27" west, a distance of 3,977.43 feet to the point of beginning. $-10—__ __ � __- . .� - •-.�,., .n.r e.wov° ...e resrn cnr ..n � ,..o i$10, F ,.,PC(21 S to - �jPcd) S to R-1 12,000 S to N.AI ;R-2 8,000 MIA) PR.- I' (8)(UA) W.A.) seer ax I I �� e 10 S to APR.-5 1 tu.A,1 P.R.-3 .t . So. sr .cr+ IU.AJ 1, M,M. ,.',._, ,,.„, � E • , ., . • �_ ^� ell CITY LIMIT to to r ..,.°nclrr <I„LIMIT r O.S. J-; f l S to (u.a) P,R.-4 N.A.) } IT ,., ,.... _ M ouch cm { SAID Public Hearing will be held on Wednesday, May 17, 1978, at 1 :00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Palm Desert City Hall , 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place, all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post April 27, 1978 I COUNTRY CLUB D R I VE I i i t ya , .{ 0 • T 21207 • + ' 1777fi • + 14750 • + ly 29500 • + --v ) J i 14750 - + I 15250 • + 15250 - + j 1 4 7 5 0 • + COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE - - -- PALM DESERT CITY LIMIT _ Z 244933 • T W >I r�.n- � cc - � cr P.R. - 5 ..0 f P.R.- 5 Y COUNTY F 0 RIVE L Y LANE w-_ ;>�;` .� :�:�, �...� � >� ,�= -----CITY OF PALM DESERT 0 N Y -- '-. -------------- _. _—. ---- .�..�:-;Y�: ..,:..,., _. .. ..._ ,.. .... ._. ��- t «_�- K'� �..=ice �;� f s�- v#�._ _ RIVERSIDE I ■■ ■■ �� = ESERT CITY LIMIT f'ALM DESERT CITY LIMIT COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE I n i �, ■ • I O.S. S. I., S.PIV RMMEN- P A I M: .I .�ESERT CITY LIMIT.�� G r - PALM DESERT CITY LIMIT - R-M job.H. N N E = R-M _ P M OESFR L M !II W _ u�L-i Ll uu i s� > - it O. S. cr I - W �. i Sak w N > N a - N E Fa�M RANCHO MIRAGE CITY LIMIT Q DES PALM GESFRT CITY LIMIT O R-M O.S. o 0. - �► P. R. - 7 , S.P. P P R-I 90000 - _ BASE DISTRICTS OVERLAY DISTRICTS OTHER ADDITIVE SYMBOLS DENSITY DESIGNATION R-2 a R-3 ZONES ZONING MAP MOBILEHOME - WHERE NO SUFFIX ARE SHOWN AFTER THE BALE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT(A,R-E,R-I,R-2 B R-3) THE MINIMUM 0 F THE NORTH A AGRICULTURAL R-M SERVICE DRAINAGEWAY FLOOD PLAINS DESIGNATION MINIMUM SITE AREA PER PARK S'I' INDUSTRIAL D WATERCOURSE ' STANDARDS IN THE ZONING ORDINANCE SHALL APPLY. ON MAP DWELLING UNIT(in S0.FT.) PLANNED - THE NUMERICAL SUFFIX AFTER THE BASE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (A, R-E, R-I, R-2 8 R-3) INDICATES THE 3000 PLANNED RESEARCH MINIMUM LOT SIZE PERMITED, ie.,R-E- 40,000 RESIDENTIAL ESTATE 40,000 SO.FT, MINIMUM 3 SCALE I"=600 R-E RESIDENTIAL ESTATE P. R . RESIDENTIAL P' I' INDUSTRIAL PARK S.H. SEISMIC HAZARD LOT SIZE. 4 4000 CITY OF PALM DESERT SHEET NUMBER R-1 RESIDENTIAL C- I GENERAL PUBLIC NATURAL FACTORS - THE NUMERICAL SUFFIX IN BRACKETS WHEN AFFIXED TO THE R-?2 AND R-3 DISTRICTS INDICATES THE MINI- 5 5000 SINGLE FAMILY COMMERCIAL P INSTITUTION N RESTRICTED DEVELOPMENT MUM SITE AREA PER DWELLING UNIT, i.e., R-3-12,000 (4) MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 12,000 SO. 6 6000 FT. MINIMUM LOT SIZE , 4,000 S0.FT. OF LAND AREA PER DWELLING UNIT. 7 7000 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES—PLANNING MRESIDENTIAL - THE NUMERICAL SUFFIX AFTER THE P.R. SYMBOL INDICATES THE DENSITY PER ACRE, i.e., P.R.-7 R-2 S STUDY H HILLSIDE PLANNED RESIDENTIAL, SEVEN UNITS PER GROSS ACRE. j 9 soDo ADOPTED BY CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. B 6000 .91NGLE FAMILY 1 3 3 t ATE R-3 RE3iDtNTIAL P C PLANNED 0.S. OPEN SPACE S.P. SCENIC PRESERVATION (2)DISTRICTRICA3)REGIONAL BRACKETSL SUFFIX IN 4)RESORT OF PLANNED COMMERAL THE P.C. SYMBO NDICATES THE TYPE 11)SPECIALTY ,' JANUARY ,1977 ;� MULTIPLE FAMILY � COMMERCIAL t DATED JANUARY 13, 1977 SECTION 25. 46-6 ORIGINAL t c sp u F' ., v , ` i +�,iilKfr+.w'TVn>+s+.xir+nwaauk �,wai�»vM•....x.a.. ....e....._.-�_ n.......-.. .,v._.r.-.._ ......._.-.,_.� ...... ..... ... _._. w _-. w. =t.1. . -. •.ra.isw'iYiirra �SHrKrw+.r,...>� .wc++.iw..ai�ot+e�+wtr.— - ..s. .,,,.,....e .....__...«. ...-..�..�.__.-_.«w.e.»_�.....e..•. ........ra...,._w:r..........e _........_ r......w. ar.r+w.,—..wrrw.._-..a+_.w...,,�w..r�,_r..�...__ _—...«m r+r.+.�»Yurwi,.� I : { i ,-: ��/. ...i-..er ..ri • ,. _.. :,,:. n ,_. :...._ b,..Y .� ,'.n: „ ,-: ><:,'.i.. z f _a._ _w4[ -.. u. -�`-`Tx.4. �.r,�.a,�:,u, „,�,s..s.,,�.... •r � .:_ '. �''� _. r � ,'€ s-�,t.. ._ -- .,. - _ ... ��.� �rz;'''rv"�s^,"�`.ta`�- '��xz�n'".7`«-{4 'r � { _ .,.x ♦. .... re k, I f i l I 11d COUNTRY- CLUB --DRIVE 1. PC 2 I t _-e _ SS 14c, Pg. �' per' R cl Li 60 - . i ! 3 � i 1 t I I I ,.. ,,... ...... .. . ., .. ... ..._. .. ,....., ._-� _ _ems-.-.._..-_.:. - ...,�.'- ,.. .,.........:.t `Z • _ I , i • I ,�ti} I r , � ' e i lRcglTMxs,a ' I J CLANCY i.ANE' £. 1 rh, C�•'?3. 9.t,� B,P. r� 33 , 4a I c I r- j� I I { i ( I � j # r,. i _ t y P I I • t ryry. x4 t y k .. COUNTRY Co LU R� )vC ., x dirk c '" '4+,y.. �,.t.,,.£ ,.-•:�"` r�;:, ,,,,a'a x� s ,-.,,� - • f f '._' : _ .. =ya,a±o,.rwar �► , ...r:A.:.;`k , Y �`��I1�� �, .:,, a. .pr.: ,. ... ':!Q �x� . ,K �, .r„ - .,.. i9;hh,r�'�.p�� ,�;w,�..: ., ✓ ..s�',•+. # f.. t g , , x , u ! , -row" 0 IN smomm ZA it :.: vP{:= .•�""'1 4" ���� _.'!"';` „t4-a..�:'.,•A,�" Ti x` r,Y E�}':; a -' �;; a, 1=4 e, a • , y✓;!':t,. -F i - � ,r '.. jY e,.'. �`". �� �Nr'' rf4nl.''<id ,.�:��5...1 ��-,v R 14- p r _ GLUM s ar , a �w �y , y . a"- '-..,:, �"'r -„ .A;'t,s,y,+' r" ,.x," .M.*=.• ,f:�'.i;_4k.4k'� Y{ ..'7: / ;£:, yw x ury;:.. s e� ,.. � `d`k�i✓ w3�'"`rx k,',� v:i,V - � � 1t. y -. s : i y.. , t - ' s r , : - Roo ;CL IdaL Al 12, Ol 18 ;40LE 4OLF: C,01)RSF. ttl _ PA Y 40Ui. Y 5 H � U5 PAS .; � .�.__ �..__.� .__.a.. x • „z 3:. „� '. >� ,,a,;�s.t w�Lt<�"""... '" i r< ,. _:.-, .<, ,,;.'. a ,-..•:-•.,\-•" � '�= :4i. 7 !(Aj.fAJ 7 , i ,.;�'=..e..sm�SY„ir ,afu•,i "'� , ..?-;»,>.,:. .. '"_;, ;L�a;'E"4 g s ?,"i+� +x.. 3. a.,. .� .:�,.. ..... � _ .'r..,..� h= •� ;_„v_:;: rY" ' � m :s, ,� .`,.,,ay`5w'3L'v 6..�entw""n'"'..'. _ ti. �_,.. f V 4 o Of 266 , . , e, r ,`S• T., + t �t,c ,h'. s f 14 3 4 } N \\ HG�./' ,�. r`�Y'['r�, u'.'' +7'� r'x k' l,!'°•' k,j. ,�{, ... .I � 16 420 +i. a� r. �5 w Nt 1 3 e �+ b *��',.,,.._...,.,,. '. i +, -i"•" ," ^fix. 4. �� 0 k ss P .. V'UPO ON k, 4 , �r ,. a. Si-, .,.: .. ,. ,.�a'„y+.:. .,^mot... ,- :...'., „-... .,.✓... ,` :...: ,. -,. ::m-,. :..Y.' � ^' ems" "' - -.�.��.,. a �;� rw<s. _,. -,a, t%C:i °"x -a5 ,,,t F�C,•_.: ::.� �MI1Bpx � i' —. Ono W.�...:r, ,..v .Jaz',•..- ':' a ...'.wr;,+w:e.,.:.n ,�...... -...F s:. A.'. .. ,;'-.. '4y # `5k�. "h .: .a Will ,. - y { ..I., rd e„ r ,. .akx-Oi �a•rWYI b.4k F •e :<.. .:..:.1.� .. :.. ..,. y^��„�:. .. � _.. r:,.o. .K4 r,'nrj.-• Li aw"^'7'— ... - ��6 �� I .� .:. .. A; _ - - .,xar w- 1 a.� _ r . BALLEWMcFARLAND, ` '�Jr42 • r .�� c� LAN NE fi S ARC�� � ���� —, i TECT us r -� �C40LF COURSF. • v:� i:.<7p ,yam. a 7r z^� .... ..,.., � 1 ., __ •,. _ ;r. a� n r. n f sibs. r. C► � n t] o p � 1 ._.1 � � Tj t1 L� CI t t C7 rm � C C7 D 0 13 Q =1 II C 00 NOW do 13 f 11 I Q • ,O N. d a . 0 C� � Q x,A,Y ly (yam c� Q ,fj L� fl " n d 13 ❑ Otip Q q JI 01 L7 C B HD - I » AD y Ta µ , 1 r II • I . - • _7 i S _ L f D- Ej rl • r' O r1{. tr a Q i r L7 J II 4 4 . 4 a rT IT 01 tz-7 . PRACTICE RANGE x �,. _ `/cam•^r'J` �g� � i•e, +- .. v e s <. .. :c3 ♦ a i. A_. .. A{.. .. t3. ..,.i#' .. K.. ... .- ., gyp, ,. zf , ra- . i. a w } PA L M OSSERTA CALMFORNIA ,aOLF CARD hole yds per hole yds per 1 285 4 10 340 4 t - 2 150 3 11 180 ThE D WEINER THEODORE Go P E34N DN 3 280 4 12 145 3 owner golf course arc iteact , land planner 4 165 3 1 295 4 5 300 4 14 160 1 ' 6 270: 4 - 15 320 4 7 275 4 16 130 3 8 320 4 17 220 3 9 165- 3 18 290 4 out 2210 33 in 2080 31 Lf out 2210 33 —total 4290 64 - March 78 I ( CLUB DRI VE . , I I �i COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE PALM DESERT CITY LIMIT !/ z w 1/70 up CI P.R.- 5 P.R.- 5 A _ _ . ,,.,. _ - . zr � COUNTY OF RIV SI DE NE CITY OF PALM DESERT, 0 N�� L I LIMIT A A - I ALM DESLNT CITY LIMIT COUNTY OF RiVERSiUt Lk 1 � • O.S. S. I., S.P I S T RM C n _t _ - - ■� ■� T!! w PALM ( E R SE ` __,1 Y �Im,T E � R-M ,P `M DES - M z W u Q _ O S_ w p W _ \ ! Z 'x _ S ~ - > IV H A Now Q N RANCHO MIRAGE CITY LIMIT Q P. R. — 5 l N _ J y ^' MAGNESIA FALLS DRIVE ■■ ?� PALM L�SLR _"r �IMI1 .�R—M O -'` OS cr tPi i P. R. - 7 , S.P. P a P R-I 9,000 BASE DISTRICTS OVERLAY DISTRICTS OTHER ADDITIVE SYMBOLS DENSITY DESIGNATION R-2 a R-3 ZONES ZONING MAP .� - WHERE NO SUFFIX ARE SHOWN AFTER THE BASE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT(A,R-E, R-I, R-2 9 R-3) THE MINIMUM 0 THE NORTH MOBILEHOME SERVICE DRAINAGEWAY, FLOOD PLAINS, STANDARDS IN THE ZONING ORDINANCE SHALL APPLY. DESIGNATION MINIMUM SITE AREA PER AGRICULTURAL R-M S.I. � ON MAP PARK INDUSTRIAL WATERCOURSE DWELLING UNIT (in so.FT.) THE NUMERICAL SUFFIX AFTER THE BASE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (A, R E R-I, R 2 6 R-3) INDICATES THE 3000 SCALE 1"=600 F F PLANNED PLANNED RESEARCH MINIMUM LOT SIZE PERMITED, ia.,R E^ 40,000 RESIDENTIAL ESTATE 40,000 SO FT MINIMUM 3 4000 CITY 0 F PALM DESERT R-E RESIDENTIAL ESTATE P. R . P. I. S.H. SEISMIC HAZARD RESIDENTIAL INDUSTRIAL PARK Lor slzE. 4 RESIDENTIAL GENERAL PUBLIC NATURAL FACTORS - THE NUMERICAL SUFFIX IN BRACKETS WHEN AFFIXED TO THE R-2 AND R-3 DISTRICTS INDICATES THE MINI- 5 5poo SHEET NUMBER R-I SINGLE FAMILY C- I COMMERCIAL P INSTITUTION N RESTRICTED DEVELOPMENT MUM SITE AREA PER DWELLING UNIT, i.e., R-3-12,000 (4) MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 12,000 SD. 6 s000 FT. MINIMUM LOT SIZE, 4,000 SO FT. OF LAND AREA PFR DWELLING UNIT. 7 7000 DEPARTMENT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES—PLANNING RESIDENTIAL STUDY B e000 R-2 HILLSIDE - THE NUMERICAL SUFFIX AFTER THE P.R. SYMBOL INDICATES THE DENSITY PER ACRE, i.e., P.R -7 SINGLE FAMILY PLANNED RESIDENTIAL, SEVEN UNITS PER GROSS ACRE 9 9000 ADOPTED BY CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 1 3 3 DATE I - THE NUMERICAL SUFFIX IN BRACKETS AFTER THE PC. SYMBOL INDICATES THE TYPE (')SPECIALTY }� 3 ;;RESIbENTIAL p C PLANNED O.S. OPEN SPACE S.P. SCENIC PRESERVATION (2)DISTRICT (3)REGIONAL (4)RESORT OF PLANNED COMMERCIAL JANUARY ,1977 "MULTIPLE FAMILY � COMMERCIAL DATED JANUARY 13, 1977 SECTION 25.46-6 I ORIGINAL a, �� f _ �. :. ., ;:: :. ,,, k'� � ._ - v r. _ t �� I "- 400' 'IV .r' 4 \� I I 4 •JRt ItSf 24,; 241E ktS 1 � • IP ,17 f 1D 2I cst, . 4', // I / I /8 ID, J zt z3 (O zs LiBIc _ O -' v u �>�' � � �Q8 , �> '� '! `77 ,V � O Sq Soo lop � � K 2fs 3S � J O i� �/ ' �, 39 a.. �`-•i,< O + 0 OQ 1 'h � � w � � `fit — � --- tt ; _ 80l - — 1 tiff __ ,zit 1 • 4'� - ...4,_ � �� 00, - •+z ti c yr t G V 90 4 d r. c. A. 7526 lh 2 SEC. 9 T. 5S. R. 6 E. y ' COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE t ssol o _ m t _ -- — — /36315 /0/72 - f O N ��,v AG 1 - 79. tJ t AC. O •. � 24 m �T 77 5f AC O 0( B. 93tA . 3 DOTE. OLD NO. NEW NO. 27 " CLANCY LANE 51 A f24-cc C nc - ---- ------ °'.---------------- C2� SEE MAP s ° I � � ale 3/ 26 s �.r*AC. 51 AC a /¢ T. C. A. 7526 S 2 SEC. 9T5S. R.6E. r MAP L2 92t.49 SEE n , ./ - lope i n 4 ` ' * O+0 I 621 35. rc. A." ' r527 ' 7 r. \� 22 I 20 m 3 i DATA _ n' 40 •.8 13 LS.ISI21324.4Z YNr 4bli 3 3.621Ac. e , ,• be 7.3t Al.t V. j4bp.l`ry - J6% a I 6t x m : gg PA - — --- 8 4f PALM '�». ..- <a �.�r 9 7. % �` `(�•�f 4 DESERT • 1.. ti �` � i oisNo. No. 1�%41 '•�.. I4252AaY �I i », I I � , y N • y' eef on, n2 '. \ a .. � 4. lAs.'- '�•.. ')ILL" .C"`Y/ •. 2/>/ oir : orS, 0/6 -- .... plus. u ' cz �TFC�ry�.,�• 4 46.20Ac. r also ko A 40342,4171 p7.57Ac. t jv ti It i3u.e razr..es I OATH R/S 90138 54161 • 29 /5B °36 37/7 �.. l: _ ASSESSOR'S MAP BK. 621 AG 35 RIVERS/DE COUNTY, CALIF. ' SEPtN6i ' am - A5S€SSOR'S -MAP BR 62/ P6 P3 RIVERS/DE COUNTY, CALIF_ ASSESSOR'S MAP 8K.62/ FIG. 24 RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIF_ t •