Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
DP 01-82 - AMENDMENT #2 - MOBILE GAS/COMMERCIAL CENTER 1985
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1033 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. DP 01-82 (Amendment #0 Department of Environmental Services: 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of environmental services, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any uses contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first complete all the procedural requirements of the city which include, but are not limited to, architectural review and building permit procedures. 3. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null and void and of no effect whatsoever. 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Riverside County Department of Health Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Coachella Valley Water District Evidence of said permits or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. ****5. Major truck deliveries and trash pick-up for Market to be only between 8:00 a.m, to 9:00 p.m., Monday through Friday only, with Saturday deliveries permitted per the, following schedule: Winter Hours: 10:00 a.m. thru 6:00 p.m. - maximum of five deliveries during an eight hour period. Summer Hours: 9:00 a.m. thru 7:00 p.m. - maximum five deliveries during a ten hour period. If within six months of market opening complaints are received regarding Saturday deliveries, planning commission shall determine whether Saturday deliveries are to continue. ***6. Project to be redesigned so that outdoor noise levels do not exceed 70 dBA and indoor levels do not exceed 45 CNEL, as measured at the residential units to the south, with applicant to submit verified data by qualified noise engineer; revised plan to be reviewed by the planning commission prior to submission of final construction drawings. Lots 13 and 14 shall be provided with additional landscaping to satisfaction of property owners and applicant. If within one year of opening of super market noise maximums are exceeded and owners of lots 13 and 14 feel noise levels are unacceptable, walls shall be provided by applicant and/or market operator as recommended by Hilliard noise study dated January 16, 1985, to satisfaction of the city. 7. All architecture of future buildings to be compatible with architectural commission approval of plans. 8. Trash enclosures for each detached building to be provided; with design and location to be approved by city and local trash company. -2- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1033 **9. All public street and parking lot improvements shall be constructed as a part of the phase that includes market; service station improvements to include full loop driveway from Country Club Drive to Monterey Avenue. 10. All conditions of the architectural commission shall be met. 11. Detailed parking lot and building lighting plan shall be submitted to staff for approval, subject to applicable lighting standards; plan to be prepared by qualified lighting engineer. 12. Driving aisle south of building "D" to Sagewood Drive shall be increased to 24 feet wide with no decrease in landscape planter width along south property line. 13. Parking space and aisles shall comply with Palm Desert Design Standards for off- street parking facilities. 14. Eliminte parallel parking spaces since they are not permitted by Palm Desert Design Standards for off-street parking faciities. Z.5 ok -pe. H l2I85 slss 15. Three to 1:5 foot d __- ___ " ---" mounding shall be provided to sufficiently screen parking lot area from streets. **16. Setbacks for building "E" shall be increased to a minimum of 20 feet. 17. Aisle to south of market shall be gated for emergency access only. 18. Parking adjustment is allowed to a maximum of 10% of the required parking. 19. Market operator to submit letter indicating that he has read the conditions of approval and will abide by same; letter to be submitted prior to issuance of building permit. 20. Parking lot directional striping and safety signs to be provided; plan to be submitted with final working drawings for approval. 21. Only delivery diesel trucks built after 1974 shall be used. *22. Service station building to be setback 30 feet from Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue property lines per municipal code requirements. *23. Stone wall that extends from building shall be stepped down to three feet in height and extended to within 20 feet of each driveway. *24. Planter adjacent to parking spaces between service station building and westerly driveway on Country Club Drive shall be widened from 10 feet to 15 feet from property line. *25. Raised landscaped center median in westerly driveway on Country Club Drive shall be provided as shown on originally approved site plan on file in the department of environmental services. *26. Repair and service work in service bays shall be limited to lubrication, brakes, tires, batteries, oil change, and minor tune-ups with all work performed within building. *27. Service station signs shall comply with municipal code section 25.68.380 provided state requirements for signage shall prevail where there is a conflict. Department of Public Works: **28. Combined bikeway/sidewalks next to curb shall be installed on Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive. **29. Traffic safety striping on Monterey Avenue/Country Club Drive shall be provided to the specifications of the director of public works. A traffic control plan must be submitted to and approved by the director of public works before placing pavement markings. -3- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1033 **30. Either installation of one half of median on Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive or payment of one half estimated median costs at the option of the director of public works; medians to be installed by March 1, 1985. 31. No median breaks shall be permitted within 660 feet of the Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive intersection. 32. Grading plan shall be approved by the city engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit. 33. Signalization fund fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. 34. Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The subdivider shall submit "as built" plans prior to acceptance of the improvements by the city. 35. Landscaping maintenance on Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive shall be provided by the owner. 36. Existing utilities shall be undergrounded. 37. Sidewalks shall be installed on Sagewood Drive. 38. Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218, and the Master Drainage Plan, to the specifications of the director of public works. 39. Additional storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer. 40. Size, number, and location of driveways to public works specifications. Fire Marshal: 41. Install a water system capable of delivering 4000 GPM fire flow for a 2 hour duration in addition to domestic or other supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 42. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 150 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. A. Hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. B. Exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. C. Curbs (if installed), shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 43. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and 2 copies of the water system plan to the fire marshal for review. Upon approval, one copy will be sent to the building department, and the original will be returned to the developer. 44. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Case No. DP 01-82 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the fire marshal." 45. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating, and delivering the required flow. 46. The market building shall be fully protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system. 47. Fire lanes shall be marked as per municipal code. -4- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1033 * Condition added by Amendment #1, September 4, 1984. * Condition amended by Amendment #I, September 4, 1984. * Condition amended as minor change by Planning Commission February 19, 1985. *** Condition amended by Amendment #2, March 5, 1985. -5- MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 19, 1985 Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Downs, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1031, approving PP 85-2, subject to conditions as amended. Carried 5-0. Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Downs, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1032, approving TT 20743, subject to conditions as amended. Carried 5-0. Val. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS A. Case No. DP 01-82 (Amendment #2) - CARVER MANAGEMENT CORP., Applicant Adoption of a resolution approving an amendment to a previously approved development plan for a shopping center to permit deliveries on the west side of the market on Saturdays in addition to the Monday through Friday deliveries already approved, for property zoned PC (2) (District Commercial Center) and located at the southeast corner of Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive. Mr. Diaz explained that the resolution would enact .the action of the commission'. given at its prior meeting. Commissioner Wood asked if this would, go before the. city council. Mr. Diaz replied that this would only go to the city council if appealed. Action: Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Wood, to adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 1033, approving the amendment. Carried 5-0. IX. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS NONE X. COMMENTS Mr. Diaz discussed curb requirements in relation to line of sight. Commissioner Downs asked why the San Rios awning extends into the San Luis Rey. Mr. Diaz indicated that they had approval from the Palm Desert Homeowners Association. Mr. Sandy Baum, 45-800 Deep Canyon, stated that he had been traveling around the city and noted that there were alot of infractions. He indicated that on the property line on Country Club and that if a diagonal part not inside the property itself. He was trying to put up a fence. He stated that Mr. McClellan came to look at his corner and felt that there would be no problem. Mr. Baum indicated that other properties are not 25 feet and that he did not understand why he must change this because of the way someone is reading the code. Chairman Crites asked Mr. Baum if he had applied for a variance. Mr. Baum replied that it would take six to eight weeks. Commissioner Richards suggested that Mr. Baum apply for a variance. Commissioner Downs suggested that Mr. Baum apply for a variance to avoid being liable for traffic problems. Mr. Baum replied that this item has not been adhered to in the past. Chairman Crites asked Mr. Baum to report any places that are causing traffic hazards. XI. ADJOURNMENT Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Erwood, to adjourn the meeting. Carried 5-0. -4- City of Palm Desert ArclMS Output - Pagc 1 of 1 City of Palm Desert Ma kv �. � f• 11. •�� 19 ,. 04 Wr "4"'may http://10.20.2.35/servIeUcom.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=City0verview&ClientV... 11/9/2007 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1033 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT FOR A COMMERCE CENTER IN THE PC (2) ZONE. CASE NO.QP O1-82 ((Amendment #2) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 5th day of March, 1985, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider a request by CARVER MANAGEMENT CORP for approval of an amendment to their previously approved development plan for a shopping center to permit deliveries on the west side of the market on Saturdays in addition to the Monday through Friday deliveries already approved for property zoned PC (2) (District Commercial Center) zone located at the southeast corner of Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive, more particularly described as: Lot 104, Tract 11791 WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedures to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89", in that the director of environmental services has determined that the project has. previously been reviewed and no further documentation is deemed necessary. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify the granting of said amendment: 1. The design of the use will not substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity. 2. The use will not unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in the vicinity by the occupants thereof for lawful purposes. 3. The use will not endanger the public peace, health, safety or general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case. 2. That approval of DP 01-82 (Amendment #2) is hereby granted for reasons subject to the attached conditions. 3. That this resolution supersedes Planning Commission No. 986*. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 19th day of March, 1985, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: DOWNS, ERWOOD, RICHARDS, WOOD, AND CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE CBUFORD CRITES, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secret�p Am *-The Palm Desert Planning Commission did on the 19th day of February, 1985, approve a modification to condition #6, pertaining to noise mitigation. -1- MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 5, 1985 VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Continued Case Nos. CUP 84-8 and C/Z 85-1 - CITY OF PALM DESERT, Applicant Request for approval of a change of zone from R-1 to public and a conditional use permit to allow construction of a 15,000 square foot youth center located at the southwest corner of Rutledge Way and Magnesia Falls Drive. - Mr. Diaz explained that this request had been continued prior to the merging of the YMCA and Palm Desert Youth Center. He stated that staff was withdrawing the application with the provision that if any other type of facility for that site is proposed, discussion would be necessary with the Desert Sands Unified School District. B. Case No. DP 01-82 (Amendment 02) - CARVER MANAGEMENT CORP., Applicant Request for approval of an amendment to a previously approved development plan for a shopping center to permit deliveries on the west side of the market on Saturdays in addition to the Monday through Friday deliveries already approved, for property zoned PC (2) (District Commercial Center) and located at the southeast corner of Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive. Mr. Sawa reviewed the request and indicated that staff was recommending denial of the request of seven deliveries on Saturdays between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. He noted that two letters from residents had been received since the writing of the staff report. The letters indicated that the two residents would agree to the winter hours of 10:00 a.m. thru 6:00 p.m. with a maximum of five deliveries during an eight hour period, and the summer hours of 9:00 a.m. thru 7:00 p.m. with a maximum of five deliveries during a ten hour period. Commission and staff discussed the staff recommendation and staff agreed that if the property owners and Carver Management find the terms outlined in the submitted letter acceptable, staff recommendation could be positive and suggested a trial period. Chairman Crites opened the public testimony and asked the applicant to address the commission. MS. SANDRA YAVITZ, Carver Management, stated that she had met with the neighbors and reached an agreement. She indicated that the hours in the letter submitted were acceptable. Commissioner Erwood asked Ms. Yavitz if the other affected residents were in favor of the hours. Ms. Yavitz answered that the owner of lot 17 agreed, but that the owner of lot 16 was opposed to the commercial development. Chairman Crites asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the case. MR. BOB RITCHEY, 40349 Sugarbush Court, owner of lot 13, stated that the main concern with Saturday delivery would be noise, which had been mitigated at a previous meeting. He agreed that a trial period would be beneficial. Mr. Ritchey stated that the hours listed in his letter were acceptable. Commissioner Wood noted that in normal family neighborhoods Saturday is work day around the house. Mr. Ritchey agreed. Commissioner Wood indicated that there would be no Sunday deliveries. -2- MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 5, 1985 Commissioner Downs indicated that a trial period of one year had already been placed on the developer to mitigate noise. Chairman Crites asked if Mr. Ritchey had designated specific months for summer and winter. Mr. Ritchey had not at that time. Chairman Crites asked if anyone else wished to speak in regard to the project. `- Commissioner Richards asked that staff word the motion for Saturday deliveries. Mr. Patterson noted that refrigeration trucks have changed and noise on top of the roofs might create a problem. He felt that a condition of a one year trial period for tenants to come back would be acceptable with the protection for using the added wall height and landscaping. Chairman Crites stated that the Saturday deliveries could be stopped if there were problems. Commissioner Richards explained that is why the two issues should remain separate. Mr. Patterson then indicated that commission should specify the conditions and what they would apply to. Mr. Diaz noted that the motion should be to instruct staff to prepare a resolution for adoption approving the terms and time lines set forth in the communication received and that a six month trial period be in effect. Action: Moved by Commissioner Wood, seconded by Commissioner Erwood, instructing staff to prepare a resolution for approval at the March 19, 1985, meeting. Carried 5-0. C. CASE NOS. GPA 85-1 and C/Z 85-1 - CITY OF PALM DESERT, Applicant Request for consideration of a general plan amendment to change the land use designation from Core Area Commercial to Hillside Planned Residential and a change of zone from C-1 (General Commercial) to HPR (Hillside Planned Residential) and a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact as it pertains thereto, for 13.1 acres, located on the west side of Highway 111, 200 feet northwest of Painters Path. Mr. Sawa reviewed the background of the case and the staff report. He indicated that staff was recommending that commission adopt the findings and resolution. Commissioner Wood asked Mr. Patterson what the legal implications would be on such an approval. Mr. Patterson replied that the planning commission action would be an initial action which would require approval by the city council. He felt that the commission could deal with this item without concern about impact on the i litigation. Chairman Crites opened the public testimony and asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the case. MR. RICHARD ROMER, counsel for Mrs. Mitchell, the property owner, and Mr. McMillan, stated that this was the one year anniversary for the start of the project. Mr. Romer indicated that bound by what the city does regarding the zoning and the impact on the lawsuit determined at that time, the court ruled on the city's motion to dismiss denying that motion and affirming the fact that Mr. McMillan and Mrs. Mitchell have stated a cause j of action for a taking of this property in the event that it is determined that there is no economic use of the property. He explained that the court went on to say that even if the property were rezoned residential, if that rezoning action is not economically feasible it can be considered a taking. He felt that the citizens voting on Measure E were not in favor of any type of building and asked the commission to seriously consider whether the rezoning to residential is not just delaying the inevitable and developing further problems by not having the proper use of this property. He indicated -3- MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 19, 1985 VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS NONE VIII. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS A. Continued Case No. DP 01-82 - CARVER MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, Applicant Request for approval of a proposed measure to comply with previous condition stipulating noise maximums for property at the southeast corner of Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive. Mr. Sawa reviewed the staff report and indicated that the applicant suggested moving the aisle 20 feet back from the existing wall so that lots 38 and 39, east of the super market, would not exceed the 70 dBA limit. He explained that the homeowners to the west of the site indicated that they would prefer additional landscaping in lieu of raising the wall. Ms. Sandra Yavitz, applicant, read a letter by Hilliard, the sound engineer, which explained that moving the aisle would prevent lots 38 and 39 from exceeding the 70 dBA limit. Vice Chairman Erwood asked if any affected homeowners present wished to speak. Mr. Bob Richey, owner of lot 14, stated that he concurred with the proposal and that his neighbor agreed with him. Ms. Ven Tanner, Silktree Homeowners Association, explained that if at some future date the sound exceeded the 70 dBA, something should be done. Mr. Diaz'explained that if complaints are received, a member of the staff would go out and measure the noise levels. Commissioner Downs asked the applicant if she was willing to leave the options open if the landscaping does not work. Ms. Yavitz replied that she would be willing to work something out. Mr. Diaz explained that the options will remain open. He indicated that the city was trying to obtain the 70 dBA limit and that anything over that would be taken care of. Vice Chairman Erwood asked the homeowners of lots 13 and 14 if they understood the options. Affirmation was indicated by Mr. Richey. Ms. Yavitz noted that a time limitation of one year from the opening of the Lucky super market had been discussed. Commissioner Wood indicated that quidelines had been set and that is a nuisance is created it will be covered in the ordinance. Action: Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Wood, to approve the noise study with a minor modification providing that walls as recommended by sound engineer would be provided for lots 13 & 14 if within one year unacceptable noise levels are created. B. Consideration of findings of consistency with the city's adopted general plan for proposed secondary access to Palm Desert High School. Mr. Diaz indicated that he would like additional time to prepare a resolution. -2- PROOF OF PUBI '\TION This space Is for th ~;unty Clerk's Filing Stamp (2015.5 C.C.P.) Q � m cn GJ STATE OF CALIFORNIA, County of Riverside M r a a� < CD rn I am a citizen of the United States and a CITY OF PALMSDESER'T resident of the County aforesaid; I am over _F1 the age of eighteen years, and not a party to Proof of Publication of — „r or interested in the above-entitled matter. I lv am the principal clerk of the printer of the CASE NO . DP 01-82 (Amendment #2) DESERT POST . .................................................... ............. CITY OF PALM DESERT ... •........,.. LEGAL NOTICE .........................:....................:..... Cue No.DP01-02 a newspaper of general circulation, p Anted (IS Hedment GIVE NOTICE Ar HEREBY GIVEN that a Publro Hearing will be held before. B i-v e e k l the Palm Desert Planning Commfs and published Y, sloe to consider a leouest by CARVER MANAGEMENT CDR PORATION for approval of On in the City of ..Ra1!v..U.e.$i'.1.�............. amandment to then PrevesuSly aP pawed development plan to, a County of Riverside, and which news- shoeputg enter 10 permit a maximum Of seven(7)paavedes On paper has been adjudged a newspaper ine west alde at the marvel On Saturdays between BUD a m, and of general circulation by the .Superior T'oopm..inaddlbonlolhe Monday Court of thethrough F,iday deliveries already County of Riverside, State of aWO,ep to,property mnep PC(2) Dust,let Commercial Center) anc! CC bea1M at the swtheasl comer OI California, under the date of,111/l 19 fak, Motlerey Avenue and Country Club Drive, more so,licularly described B 3 6 5 8 t:DE,Lecl 11791 ...............: Lo Case Number . that the notice, SAID Public Hearing Yell be held on Tuesday, Mach 5. 1985. at 700 of which the annexed is a printed copy (set p In,In the Council Chamber at the in type not smaller than nonpareil) has Palm Desert Crop Center. 73510 Fred Vveung Drive..Palm Desert, been published in each regular and entire Daalornta.at which-time and Plape all interested persons are Invited Ip issue of said newspaper and not in any allend andlee heald. supplement thereof on the following dates, MMOsecrearryy to-wit: Palm Desert 2/2 2 Pli m.ing Commissam (Pub.D P_Feb.'22.1985) ...............................................s.... all in the year 19.,85 I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing Is true and correct. Dated at,,,,,,,PBl.. Desert ���LOL9 V Se�S1 California, this..�?IId.dayof.. Feb ., 19/8)5 Pv1AR 71985 Z 949 .• �"''"'"•'••' .ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES fgn ure CITY OF PALM DESERT Free copies of this Dunk form may be secured from: CALIFORNIA NEWSPAPER SERVICE BUREAU, INC. Legal Advertising Clearing House 120 west Second St., Los Angeles, Calif. 90012 Telephone: (2131625.2541 Plea o request o t:16■A L Proof of Publication when ordertne this form. i MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 19, 1985 Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Downs, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1031, approving PP 85-2, subject to conditions as amended. Carried 5-0. Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Downs, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1032, approving TT 20743, subject to conditions as amended. Carried 5-0. Vill. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS A. Case No. DP 01-82 (Amendment #2) - CARVER MANAGEMENT CORP., Applicant Adoption of a resolution approving an amendment to a previously approved development plan for a shopping center to permit deliveries on the west side of the market on Saturdays in addition to the Monday through Friday deliveries already approved, for property zoned PC (2) (District Commercial Center) and located at the southeast corner of Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive. Mr. Diaz explained that the resolution would enact .the action of the commission given at its prior meeting. Commissioner Wood asked if this would, go before .the city council. Mr. Diaz replied that this would only go to the city council if appealed. Action: Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Wood, to adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 1033, approving the amendment. Carried 5-0. IX. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS --- NONE X. COMMENTS Mr. Diaz discussed curb requirements in relation to line of sight. Commissioner Downs asked why the San Rios awning extends into the San Luis Rey. Mr. Diaz indicated that they had approval from the Palm Desert Homeowners Association. Mr. Sandy Baum, 45-800 Deep Canyon, stated that he had been traveling around the city and noted that there were alot of infractions. He indicated that on the property line on Country Club and that if a diagonal part not inside the property itself. He was trying to put up a fence. He stated that Mr. McClellan came to look at his corner and felt that there would be no problem. Mr. Baum indicated that other properties are not 25 feet and that he did not understand why he must change this because of the way someone is reading the code. Chairman Crites asked Mr. Baum if he had applied for a variance. Mr. Baum replied that it would take six to eight weeks. Commissioner Richards suggested that Mr. Baum apply for a variance. Commissioner Downs suggested that Mr. Baum apply for a variance to avoid being liable for traffic problems. Mr. Baum replied that this item has not been adhered to in the past. Chairman Crites asked Mr. Baum to report any places that are causing traffic hazards. XI. ADJOURNMENT Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Erwood, to adjourn the meeting. Carried 5-0. -4- 1 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 5, 1985 VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Continued Case Nos. CUP 84-8 and C/Z 85-1 - CITY OF PALM DESERT, Applicant Request for approval of a change of zone from R-1 to public and a conditional use permit to allow construction of a 15,000 square foot youth center located at the southwest corner of Rutledge Way and Magnesia Falls Drive. Mr. Diaz explained that this request had been continued prior to the merging of the YMCA and Palm Desert Youth Center. He stated that staff was withdrawing the application with the provision that if any other type of facility for that site is proposed, discussion would be necessary with the Desert Sands Unified School District. B. Case No. D 0 2 Amendment 02) - CARVER MANAGEMENT CORP., Applicant) Request for approval of an amendment to a previously approved development plan for a shopping center to permit deliveries on the west side of the market on Saturdays in addition to the Monday through Friday deliveries already approved, for property zoned PC (2) (District Commercial Center) and located at the southeast corner of Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive. Mr. Sawa reviewed the request and indicated that staff was recommending denial of the request of seven deliveries on Saturdays between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. He noted that two letters from residents had been received since the writing of the staff report. The letters indicated that the two residents would agree to the winter hours of 10:00 a.m. thru 6:00 p.m. with a maximum of five deliveries during an eight hour period, and the summer hours of 9:00 a.m. thru 7:00 p.m. with a maximum of five deliveries during a ten hour period. Commission and staff discussed the staff recommendation and staff agreed that if the property owners and Carver Management find the terms outlined in the submitted letter acceptable, staff recommendation could be positive and suggested a trial period. Chairman Crites opened the public testimony and asked the applicant to address the commission. MS. SANDRA YAVITZ, Carver Management, stated that she had met with the neighbors and reached an agreement. She indicated that the hours in the letter submitted were acceptable.- Commissioner Erwood asked Ms. Yavitz if the other affected residents were in favor of the hours. Ms. Yavitz answered that the owner of lot 17 agreed, but that the owner of lot 16 was opposed to the commercial development. Chairman Crites asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the case. MR. BOB RITCHEY, 40349 Sugarbush Court, owner of lot 13, stated that the main concern with Saturday delivery would be noise, which had been mitigated at a previous meeting. He agreed that a trial period would be beneficial. Mr. Ritchey stated that the hours listed in his letter were acceptable. Commissioner Wood noted that in normal family neighborhoods Saturday is work day around the house. Mr. Ritchey agreed. Commissioner Wood indicated that there would be no Sunday deliveries. -2- MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 5, 1985 Commissioner Downs indicated that a trial period of one year had already been placed on the developer to mitigate noise. Chairman Crites asked if Mr. Ritchey had designated specific months for summer and winter. Mr. Ritchey had not at that time. Chairman Crites asked if anyone else wished to speak in regard to the project. - Commissioner Richards asked that staff word the motion for Saturday deliveries. Mr. Patterson noted that refrigeration trucks have changed and noise on top of the roofs might create a problem. He felt that a condition of a one year trial period for tenants to come back would be acceptable with the protection for using the added wall height and landscaping. Chairman Crites stated that the Saturday deliveries could be stopped if there were problems. Commissioner Richards explained that is why the two issues should remain separate. Mr. Patterson then indicated that commission should specify the conditions and what they would apply to. Mr. Diaz noted that the motion should be to instruct staff to prepare a resolution for adoption approving the terms and time lines set forth in the communication received and that a six month trial period be in effect. Action: Moved by Commissioner Wood, seconded by Commissioner Erwood, instructing staff to prepare a resolution for approval at the March 19, 1985, meeting. Carried 5-0. C. CASE NOS. GPA 85-1 and C/Z 85-1 - CITY OF PALM DESERT, Applicant Request for consideration of a general plan amendment to change the land use designation from Core Area Commercial to Hillside Planned Residential and a change of zone from C-1 (General Commercial) to HPR (Hillside Planned Residential) and a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact as it pertains thereto, for 13.1 acres, located on the west side of Highway 111, 200 feet northwest of Painters Path. Mr. Sawa reviewed the background of the case and the staff report. He indicated that staff was recommending that commission adopt the findings and resolution. Commissioner Wood asked Mr. Patterson what the legal implications would be on such an approval. Mr. Patterson replied that the planning commission action would be an initial action which would require approval by the city council. He felt that the commission could deal with this item without concern about impact on the litigation. Chairman Crites opened the public testimony and asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the case. MR. RICHARD ROMER, counsel for Mrs. Mitchell, the property owner, and Mr. McMillan, stated that this was the one year anniversary for the start of the project. Mr. Romer indicated that bound by what the city does regarding the zoning and the impact on the lawsuit determined at that time, the court ruled on the city's motion to dismiss denying that motion and affirming the fact that Mr. McMillan and Mrs. Mitchell have stated a cause of action for a taking of this property in the event that it is determined that there is no economic use of the property. He explained that the court went on to say that even if the property were rezoned residential, if that rezoning action is not economically feasible it can be considered a taking. He felt that the citizens voting on Measure E were not in favor of any type of building and asked the commission to seriously consider whether the rezoning to residential is not just delaying the inevitable and developing further problems by not having the proper use of this property. He indicated -3- 1 City of Palm Desert Department of Environmental Services Staff Report TO: Planning Commission DATE: March 5, 1985 CASE NO: DP 01-82 Amendment #2) REQUEST: Approval of an amendment to a previously approved development plan for a shopping center to permit deliveries on the west side of the market on Saturdays in addition to the Monday through Friday deliveries already approved, for property zoned PC (2) (District Commercial Center) and located at the southeast corner of Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive. APPLICANT: CARVER MANAGEMENT CORP. 110 W. Las Tunas San Gabriel, CA 91776 CARVER MANAGEMENT CORP. 559 S. Palm Canyon Drive Palm Springs, CA 92262 I. BACKGROUND: A. GENERAL: The original project was approved by the planning commission on April 6, 1982. An appeal of a planning commission condition was denied by the city council at their meeting of May 20, 1982. A parcel map was approved in February, 1984, resulting in an expiration date of February 7, 1986, for the project. An amendment permitting a service station was approved by the planning commission on September 4, 1984. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE: The site is vacant and relatively flat. The curbs and tie-in paving have been installed on Country Club Drive, Monterey Avenue, and Sagewood Drive on the east. There is a six foot high block wall along the south property line. To the south is the Sagewood single-family subdivision. C. ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE: North: PR-7, S.P./Vacant South: R-2 8,000 (8)/Single Family East: P zone/Foundation for the Retarded. West: Rancho Mirage/Vacant D. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: District commercial. H. PROPOSED AMENDMENT: The existing condition that the applicants are requesting amendment to is, "Major truck deliveries and trash pick-up for market to be only between 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday through Friday only." The applicants wish to amend this condition to permit a maximum seven (7) deliveries on the west side of the market on Saturdays, between 8:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The applicants' justification is that the market operators would not be able to stock the store with fresh produce, dairy, or meat products on weekends if Saturday deliveries are not permitted. III. ANALYSIS: Staff feels a change is not warranted based on the current input. The applicant did not object to the limited deliveries in 1982 when the project was approved. i STAFF REPORT CONTINUED MARCH 5, 1985 Furthermore, the condition was imposed in order to insure that the homeowners to the south are provided with a relatively quiet environment on weekends when they are likely to be home and outside. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of this amendment. V. ATTACHMENTS: A. Legal Notice B. Letter of Request C. Planning Commission Resolution No. 986 D. Minutes of planning commission meeting of April 6, 1982. Prepared by J• S Reviewed and Approved by Am -2- February 15, 1985 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE Case No. DP 01-82 (Amendment #2) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by CARVER MANAGEMENT CORPORATION for approval of an amendment to their previously approved development plan for a shopping center to permit a maximum of seven (7) deliveries on the west side of the market on Saturdays between 8:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., in addition to the Monday through Friday deliveries already approved for property zoned PC (2) (District Commercial Center) and located at the southeast corner of Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive, more particularly described as: LOT 104, TRACT 11791 • • COU'!TT• OF RIVERSIDE dY� '.1LM DESERT CITY LIMIT t 4 P.R.-7 , S.P (DP 15-79) S� t —COUNTRY—CLUR—O RIVE�� P.C. (2) I� Oar ,E 1 R-„ 2 8.000 (8) s P R-1 ,a _ aOLn ltJry ija:nip, EE LT Q;E 1- 0 not Ct zA-Ed00 0 I A H O V L E YA SAID Public Hearing will be held on Tuesday, March 5, 1985, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission PUBLISH: Desert Post February 22, 1985 Am CARVER MANAGEMENT CORPORATION SHOPPING CENTER LEASING AND MANAGEMENT February 13, 1985 1 Mr. Ray Diaz i3 l z 1985 Planning Director Palm Desert City Hall ENVIROfAMUirAL SERVICES 73510 Fred Waring Dr. CITY OF PALM DESERT Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Re: Conditions of Approval Case No. DP-01-82 Dear Ray: Lucky Stores has requested that a public hearing be scheduled to discuss an Amendment to Conditions of Approval Case No. DP-01-82. The condition which they request to amend reads as follows: "5. Major truck deliveries and trash pick-up for Market be be only between 8: 00 am and 9:00 pm Monday through Friday only. " Ray, as you are aware Lucky Stores acquired all Smiths Food Kings within California along with this site. Lucky has informed us that they will not be able to stock this store with fresh produce, dairy or meat products unless they are granted the right to deliver on Saturday. Lucky has been very responsive as to the needs of the community and our neighbors. They have agreed to reduce the number of deliveries to 7 on Saturday and the time of delivery to between 8: 00am and 7: 00pm on Saturday. Lucky has also redesigned their store so that Saturday deliveries will only be on the West side of the Market. I would appreciate you scheduling this hearing for March 5, 1985. If you have any questions or need additional information, please don' t hesitate to contact me at (619) 325-8171. Sincerely, :%Gv."*�LLLt •i�/ '� ova-+,(/ Sandra G. Yavitz Project Manager SGY:pg cc: Bob Fellers 559 SOUTH PALM CANYON DRIVE • PALM SPRINGS. CALIFORNIA 92262 • 16191 325.5171 — - 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 986 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT TO ALLOW AN ADDITION OF A SERVICE STATION TO A COMMERCIAL CENTER IN THE PC (2) ZONE. CASE NO. DP 01-82 (Amendment #0 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 4th day of September, 1984, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider a request by CARVER MANAGEMENT CORP and MOBIL OIL CORP. for approval of an amendment to a development plan to allow the addition of a gasoline service station to a commercial shopping center on nine acres in the PC (2) (District Commercial Center) zone located at the southeast corner of Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive, more particularly described as: Lot 104, Tract 11791 WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedures to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89", in that the director of environmental services has determined that the project has previously been reviewed and no further documentation is deemed necessary. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to.justify the granting of said amendment: 1. The design of the use will not substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity. 2. The use will not unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in the vicinity by the occupants thereof for lawful purposes. 3. The use will not endanger the public peace, health, safety or general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case. 2. That approval of DP 01-82 (Amendment #1), ADJ 01-82, and 164 C is hereby granted for reasons subject to the attached conditions. 3. That this resolution supersedes Planning Commission No. 788. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 4th day of September, 1984, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: DOWNS, ERWOOD, RICHARDS, WOOD, AND CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE 7 ABSTAIN: NONE BUFORD CRITES, Chairman ATTES- : e�1- ✓ L AMON A. DIAZ, Secret ry Am *The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert did on the 19th day of February, 1985, approve a modification to condition #6, pertaining to noise mitigation. -1- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 986 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. DP 01-82 (Amendment #0 Department of Environmental Services: 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of environmental services, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any uses contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first complete all the procedural requirements of the city which include, but are not limited to, architectural review and building permit procedures. 3. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null and void and of no effect whatsoever. 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Riverside County Department of Health Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Coachella Valley Water District Evidence of said permits or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 5. Major truck deliveries and trash pick-up for Market to be only between 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday through Friday only. **' 6. Project to be redesigned so that outdoor noise levels do not exceed 70 dBA and indoor levels do not exceed 45 CNEL, as measured at the residential units to the south, with applicant to submit verified data by qualified noise engineer; revised plan to be reviewed by the planning commission prior to submission of final construction drawings. (February 19,� 1985, modification at bottom) 7. All architecture of future buildings to be compatible with architectural commission approval of plans. 8. Trash enclosures for each detached building to be provided; with design and location to be approved by city and local trash company. **9. All public street and parking lot improvements shall be constructed as a part of the phase that includes market; service station improvements to include full loop driveway from Country Club Drive to Monterey Avenue. 10. All conditions of the architectural commission shall be met. It. Detailed parking lot and building lighting plan shall be submitted to staff for approval, subject to applicable lighting standards; plan to be prepared by qualified lighting engineer. 12. Driving aisle south of building "D" to Sagewood Drive shall be increased to 24 feet wide with no decrease in landscape planter width along south property line. 13. Parking space and aisles shall comply with Palm Desert Design Standards for off- street parking facilities. Modification : Lots 13 & 14 shall be provided with additional landscaping to satisfaction of property owners and applicant. If within one year of opening of super market, noise maximums are exceeded and owners of Lots 13 & 14 feel noise levels are unacceptable, walls shall be provided by applicant and/or super market operator as recommended by Hilliard Noise Study dated January 16, 1985, to satisfaction of the city. J , f' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 986 14. Eliminte parallel parking spaces since they are not permitted by Palm Desert Design Standards for off-street parking faciities. 15. Three to 3.5 foot decorative wall and/or mounding shall be provided to sufficiently screen parking lot area from streets. **16. Setbacks for building "E" shall be increased to a minimum of 20 feet. 17. Aisle to south of market shall be gated for emergency access only. 18. Parking adjustment is allowed to a maximum of 10% of the required parking. 19. Market operator to submit letter indicating that he has read the conditions of approval and will abide by same; letter to be submitted prior to issuance of building permit. 20. Parking lot directional striping and safety signs to be provided; plan to be submitted with final working drawings for approval. 21. Only delivery diesel trucks built after 1974 shall be used. *22. Service station building to be setback 30 feet from Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue property lines per municipal code requirements. *23. Stone wall that extends from building shall be stepped down to three feet in height and extended to within 20 feet of each driveway. *24. Planter adjacent to parking spaces between service station building and westerly driveway on Country Club Drive shall be widened from 10 feet to 15 feet from property line. *25. Raised landscaped center median in westerly driveway on Country Club Drive shall be provided as shown on originally approved site plan on file in the department of environmental services. *26. Repair and service work in service bays shall be limited to lubrication, brakes, tires, batteries, oil change, and minor tune-ups with all work performed within building. *27. Service station signs shall comply with municipal code section 25.68.380 provided state requirements for signage shall prevail where there is a conflict. Department of Public Works: **28. Combined bikeway/sidewalks next to curb shall be installed on Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive. **29. Traffic safety striping on Monterey Avenue/Country Club Drive shall be provided to the specifications of the director of public works. A traffic control plan must be submitted to and approved by the director of public works before placing pavement markings. **30. Either installation of one half of median on Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive or payment of one half estimated median costs at the option of the director of public works; medians to be installed by March 1, 1985. 31. No median breaks shall be permitted within 660 feet of the Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive intersection. 32. Grading plan shall be approved by the city engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit. -3- V PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 986 33. Signalization fund fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. 34. Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The subdivider shall submit "as built" plans prior to acceptance of the improvements by the city. 35. Landscaping maintenance on Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive shall be provided by the owner. 36. Existing utilities shall be undergrounded. 37. Sidewalks shall be installed on Sagewood Drive., 38. Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218, and the Master Drainage Plan, to the specifications of the director of public works. 39. Additional storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer. 40. Size, number, and location of driveways to public works specifications. Fire Marshal: 41. Install a water system capable of delivering 4000 GPM fire flow for a 2 hour duration in addition to domestic or other supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 42. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 150 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. A. Hydrants shall,not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. B. Exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. C. Curbs (if installed), shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 43. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and 2 copies of the water system plan to the fire marshal for review. Upon approval, one copy will be sent to the building department, and the original will be returned to the developer. 44. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Case No. DP 01-82 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the fire marshal." 45. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating, and delivering the required flow. 46. The market building shall be fully protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system. 47. Fire lanes shall be marked as per municipal code. * Condition added by Amendment #1, September 4, 1984. ** Condition amended by Amendment #1, September 4, 1984. *** Condition amended as minor change by Planning Commission February 19, 1985. -4- MAR 4 1995 MaiCh 1, 1985 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT Stan Sawa Environmental Services Dept. City of Palm Desert 73510 Fred Warinq Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 REc Lucky Market and Commercial Center at Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue Dear Mr. Sawa: On February 26, 1985 I met with Carver Development Co. and Representatives of Lucky Market-to discuss acceptable delivery hours on Saturdays for the market. I met with the following project repre- sentatives:' Ms. Sandy Yavltz; Proiect Manager. Carver Development Co.: Mr.' Robert V. Feller, Project Engineer Lucky Stores Inc. 'Mr. Herbert H. Horowitz, AIg iProject'Ar-chitect L, H & A (Architects for Lucky Stoes) The following was agreed upon by myself and all parties present. SATURDAY DELIVERIES are to be: Winter Hours: 10:00 AM thru 6.00 PM maximum of 5 deliveries during an 8 hour period Summer Hours: 9:00 AM thru 7:00 PM Maximum 5 deliveries during a 10 hour period. I agree with the above stated 'delivery hours. It was also mentioned by Mr. Horowitz that the 8 foot masonry screen wall, located directly south of the (west) loading dock was to be extended and additional landscaping provided so as to increase screening of the noise to the residential lots (13 & 14) in the Saqewood development. Mr. Horowitz said the loading dock was going to be reversed (in plan) with some parking located adjacent to the ramp which will allow the loading dock to be moved further away from the residential area. I found all parties to be quite cooperative and interested in solving all the problems in the best possible manner for all parties concerned.' I enjoyed meeting with the project representatives and look forward to the project being an asset to the community. I hope this letter clarifies my position for the City with regard to the delivery hours on Saturdays. If you have any questions, please feel free to call at any time. interU. 1 0 ery O a 40349 Sudarbush Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 (619) 340-2496 (619) 340-6377 cc: Carver Lucky I--browitz MAR o 1985 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ti- CtP , > J I G d�t�_ / f / Ili City of Palm Desert Department of Environmental Services Staff Report TO: Planning Commission DATE: March 5, 1985 CASE NO: DP 01-82 (Amendment #2) REQUEST: Approval of an amendment to a previously approved development plan for a shopping center to permit deliveries on the west side of the market on Saturdays in addition to the Monday through Friday deliveries already approved, for property zoned PC (2) (District Commercial Center) and located at the southeast corner of Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive. APPLICANT: CARVER MANAGEMENT CORP. 110 W. Las Tunas San Gabriel, CA 91776 CARVER MANAGEMENT CORP. 559 S. Palm Canyon Drive Palm Springs, CA 92262 I. BACKGROUND: A. GENERAL: The original project was approved by the planning commission on April 6, 1982. An appeal of a planning commission condition was denied by the city council at their meeting of May 20, 1982. A parcel map was approved in February, 1984, resulting in an expiration date of February 7, 1986, for the project. An amendment permitting a service station was approved by the planning commission on September 4, 1984. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE: The site is vacant and relatively flat. The curbs and tie-in paving have been installed on Country Club Drive, Monterey Avenue, and Sagewood Drive on the east. There is a six foot high block wall along the south property line. To the south is the Sagewood single-family subdivision. C. ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE: North: PR-7, S.P./Vacant South: R-2 8,000 (8)/Single Family East: P zone/Foundation for the Retarded West: Rancho Mirage/Vacant D. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: District commercial. IL PROPOSED AMENDMENT: The existing condition that the applicants are requesting amendment to is, "Major truck deliveries and trash pick-up for market to be only between 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday through Friday only." The applicants wish to amend this condition to permit a maximum seven (7) deliveries on the west side of the market on Saturdays, between 8:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The applicants' justification is that the market operators would not be able to stock the store with fresh produce, dairy, or meat products on weekends if Saturday deliveries are not permitted. III. ANALYSIS: Staff feels a change is not warranted based on the current input. The applicant did not object to the limited deliveries in 1982 when the project was approved. STAFF REPORT CONTINUED MARCH 5, 1985 Furthermore, the condition was imposed in order to insure that the homeowners to the south are provided with a relatively quiet environment on weekends when they are likely to be home and outside. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of this amendment. V. ATTACHMENTS: A. Legal Notice B. Letter of Request C. Planning Commission Resolution No. 986 D. Minutes of planning commission meeting of April 6, 1982. Prepared by J• 1 Reviewed and Approved by AM -2- February 15, 1985 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE Case No. DP 01-82 (Amendment #2) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by CARVER MANAGEMENT CORPORATION for approval of an amendment to their previously approved development plan for a shopping center to permit a maximum of seven (7) deliveries on the west side of the market on Saturdays between 8:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., in addition to the Monday through Friday deliveries already approved for property zoned PC (2) (District Commercial Center) and located at the southeast corner of Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive, more particularly described as: LOT 104, TRACT 11791 I i • CO U II Tv Of RIVERSIDE Mon { �'ALM DESERT CITY !IMIT . ' r. 4 P.R.-7 , S:P ® � (DP 15-79) S� f� h —O OUNTRY—OLU 8—FORIVE--EMM P.C. (2) 55 I �E�.d Off` I. r g sic .. }DDO OR,,e qLR Ti _ R-N 2 8.000 (8) P R-I SI cCW t� oa:vpr lei NO�� a SAGS i burp 1' V �Ia T H 0 V L E Y LANE C G SAID Public Hearing will be held on Tuesday, March 5, 1985, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission PUBLISH: Desert Post February 22, 1985 AM CARVER MANAGEMENT CORPORATION SHOPPING CENTER LEASING AND MANAGEMENT February 13, 1985 Mr. Ray Diaz !: E ? 1 .z 1985 Planning Director Palm Desert City Hall ENVIRONNIL-NTAL SERVICES 73510 Fred Waring Dr. CITY, OF PALM DESERT Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Re: Conditions of Approval Case No. DP-01-82 Dear Ray: Lucky Stores has requested that a public hearing be scheduled to discuss an Amendment to Conditions of Approval Case No. DP-01-82 . The condition which they request to amend reads as follows: "5. Major truck deliveries and trash pick-up for Market be be only between 8: 00 am and 9 : 00 pm Monday through Friday only. Ray, as you are aware Lucky Stores acquired all Smiths Food Kings within California along with this site. Lucky has informed us that they will not be able to stock this store with fresh produce, dairy ,or meat products unless they are granted the right to deliver on Saturday. Lucky has been very responsive as to the needs of the community and our neighbors. They have agreed to reduce the number of deliveries to 7 ,on Saturday and .the time of delivery to between 8 : 00am and 7: 00pm on Saturday. Lucky has also redesigned their store so that Saturday deliveries will only be on the West side of the Market. I would appreciate you scheduling this hearing for March 5, 1985. If you have any questions or need additional information, please don' t hesitate to contact me at (619) 325-8171. Sincerely, A Sandra G. Yavitz 11 Project Manager VVV SGY:pg cc: Bob Fellers 559 SOUTH PALM CANYON DRIVE PALM SPRINGS. CALIFORNIA 92262 16191 325 BI11 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 986 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT TO ALLOW AN ADDITION OF A SERVICE STATION TO A COMMERCIAL CENTER IN THE PC (2) ZONE. CASE NO. DP 01-82 (Amendment #1) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 4th day of September, 1984, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider a request by CARVER MANAGEMENT CORP and MOBIL OIL CORP, for approval of an amendment to a development plan to allow the addition of a gasoline service station to a commercial shopping center on nine acres in the PC (2) (District Commercial Center) zone located at the southeast corner of Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive, more particularly described as: Lot 104, Tract 11791 WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedures to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89", in that the director of environmental services has determined that the project has previously been reviewed and no further documentation is deemed necessary. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify the granting of said amendment: 1. The design of the use will not substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity. 2. The use will not unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in the vicinity by the occupants thereof for lawful purposes. 3. The use will not endanger the public peace, health, safety or general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case. 2. That approval of DP 01-82 (Amendment #1), ADJ 01-82, and 164 C is hereby granted for reasons subject to the attached conditions. 3. That this resolution supersedes Planning Commission No. 788. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm .Desert Planning Commission, held on this 4th day of September, 1984, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: DOWNS, ERWOOD, RICHARDS, WOOD, AND CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE BUFORD CRITES, Chairman AT TES- �RAMON A. DIAZ, Secret ry Am *The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert did on the 19th day of February, 1985, approve a modification to condition #6, pertaining to noise mitigation. -1- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 986 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. DP O1-82 (Amendment #1) Department of Environmental Services: 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of environmental services, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any uses contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first complete all the procedural requirements of the city which include, but are not limited to, architectural review and building permit procedures. 3. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null and void and of no effect whatsoever. 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Riverside County Department of Health Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Coachella Valley Water District Evidence of said permits or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 5. Major truck deliveries and trash pick-up for Market to be only between 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday through Friday only. *** 6. Project to be redesigned so that outdoor noise levels do not exceed 70 dBA and indoor levels do not exceed 45 CNEL, as measured at the residential units to the south, with applicant to submit verified data by qualified noise engineer; revised plan to be reviewed by the planning commission prior to submission of final construction drawings. (February 19, 1985, modification at bottom) 7. All architecture of future buildings to be compatible with architectural commission approval of plans. 8. Trash enclosures for each detached building to be provided; with design and location to be approved by city and local trash company. **9. All public street and parking lot improvements shall be constructed as a part of the phase that includes market; service station improvements to include full loop driveway from Country Club Drive to Monterey Avenue. 10. All conditions of the architectural commission shall be met. it. Detailed parking lot and building lighting plan shall be submitted to staff for approval, subject to applicable lighting standards; plan to be prepared by qualified lighting engineer. 12. Driving aisle south of building "D" to Sagewood Drive shall be increased to 24 feet wide with no decrease in landscape planter width along south property line. 13. Parking space and aisles shall comply with Palm Desert Design Standards for off- street parking facilities. Modification : Lots 13 & 14 shall be provided with additional landscaping to satisfaction of property owners and applicant. If within one year of opening of super market, noise maximums are exceeded and owners of Lots 13 & 14 feel noise levels are unacceptable, walls shall be provided by applicant and/or super market operator as recommended by Hilliard Noise Study dated January 16, 1985, to satisfaction of the city. l - - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 986 14. Eliminte parallel parking spaces since they are not permitted by Palm Desert Design Standards for off-street parking faciities. 15. Three to 3.5 foot decorative wall and/or mounding shall be provided to sufficiently screen parking lot area from streets. **16. Setbacks for building "E" shall be increased to a minimum of 20 feet. 17. Aisle to south of market shall be gated for emergency access only. 18. Parking adjustment is allowed to a maximum of 10% of the required parking. 19. Market operator to submit letter indicating that he has read the conditions of approval and will abide by same; letter to be submitted prior to issuance of building permit. 20. Parking lot directional striping and safety signs to be provided; plan to be submitted with final working drawings for approval. 21. Only delivery diesel trucks built after 1974 shall be used. *22. Service station building to be setback 30 feet from Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue property lines per municipal code requirements. *23. Stone wall that extends from building shall be stepped down to three feet in height and extended to within 20 feet of each driveway. *24. Planter adjacent to parking spaces between service station building and westerly driveway on Country Club Drive shall be widened from 10 feet to 15 feet from property line. *25. Raised landscaped center median in westerly driveway on Country Club Drive shall be provided as shown on originally approved site plan on file in the department of environmental services. *26. Repair and service work in service bays shall be limited to lubrication, brakes, tires, batteries, oil change, and minor tune-ups with all work performed within building. *27. Service station signs shall comply with municipal code section 25.68.380 provided state requirements for signage shall prevail where there is a conflict. Department of Public Works: **28. Combined bikeway/sidewalks next to curb shall be installed on Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive. **29. Traffic safety striping on Monterey Avenue/Country Club Drive shall be provided to the specifications of the director of public works. A traffic control plan must be submitted to and approved by the director of public works before placing pavement markings. **30. Either installation of one half of median on Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive or payment of one half estimated median costs at the option of the director of public works; medians to be installed by March 1, 1985. 31. No median breaks shall be permitted within 660 feet of the Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive intersection. 32. Grading plan shall be approved by the city engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit. -3- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 986 33. Signalization fund fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. 34. Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The subdivider shall submit "as built" plans prior to acceptance of the improvements by the city. 35. Landscaping maintenance on Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive shall be provided by the owner. 36. Existing utilities shall be undergrounded. 37. Sidewalks shall be installed on Sagewood Drive.,;.;;, 38. Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218, and the Master Drainage Plan, to the specifications of the director of public works. 39. Additional storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer. 40. Size, number, and location of driveways to public works specifications. Fire Marshal: 41. Install a water system capable of delivering 4000 GPM fire flow for a 2 hour duration in addition to domestic or other supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 42. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 150 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. A. Hydrants shall;not be located closer;;than 25;feet to any building. B. Exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. C. Curbs (if installed), shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 43. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and 2 copies of the water system plan to the fire marshal for review. Upon approval, one copy will be sent to the building department, and the original will be returned to the developer. 44. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Case No. DP 01-82 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the fire marshal." 45. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating, and delivering the required flow. 46. The market building shall be fully protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system. 47. Fire lanes shall be marked as per municipal code. + Condition added by Amendment #1, September 4, 1984. ** Condition amended by Amendment #1, September 4, 1984. * Condition amended as minor change by Planning Commission February 19, 1985. -4- CARVER MANAGEMENT CORPORATION SHOPPING CENTER LEASING AND MANAGEMENT February 13, 1985 Mr. Ray Diaz F t B 1 3 1985 S Planning Director Palm Desert City Halle ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 73510 Fred Waring Dr. CITY OF PALM DESERT, Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Re: Conditions of Approval Case No. DP-01-82 Dear Ray: Lucky Stores has requested that a public hearing be scheduled to discuss an Amendment to Conditions of Approval Case No. DP-01-82. The condition which they request to amend reads as follows: "5. Major truck deliveries and trash pick-up for Market be be only between 8: 00 am and 9 : 00 pm Monday through Friday only. " Ray, as you are aware Lucky Stores acquired all Smiths Food Kings within California along with this site. Lucky has informed us that they will not be able to stock this store with fresh produce, dairy .or meat products unless they are granted the right to deliver on Saturday. Lucky has been very responsive as to the needs of the community and our neighbors. They have agreed to reduce the number of deliveries to 7 on Saturday and the time of delivery to between 8 : 00am and 7: 00pm on .Saturday. Lucky has also redesigned their store so that Saturday deliveries will only be on the West side of the Market. I would appreciate you scheduling this hearing for March 5, 1985. If you have any questions or need additional information, please don' t hesitate to contact me at (619) 325-8171. Sin rely, andra G. Yavitz� Project Manager VVVVV SGY:pg cc: Bob Fellers 559 SOUTH PALM CANYON DRIVE • PALM SPRINGS. CALIFORNIA 92262 16191 325.9171 February 15, 1985 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE Case No. DP 01-82 (Amendment #2) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by CARVER MANAGEMENT CORPORATION for approval of an amendment to their previously approved development plan for a shopping center to permit a maximum of seven (7) deliveries on the west side of the market on Saturdays between 8:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., in addition to the Monday through Friday deliveries already approved for property zoned PC (2) (District Commercial Center) and located at the southeast corner of Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive, more particularly described as: LOT 104, TRACT 11791 e COUNTY OF RVERS:DE ® o >aLM DESERT CITY !IMIi P.R.-7 , Sap ® ' (DP 15-79) p i 6 —COUNTRY CLUB—ORS!-VEE---� P.C. (2) o°Je i I "y000 OAryf cr. L P R-1 FE GO D bu^� I R:-5 W HOVLEY ',IIII l-LANE • SAID Public Hearing will be held on Tuesday, March 5, 1985, at 7:00 p.m, in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission PUBLISH: Desert Post February 22, 1985 Am 622-020-001 622-030-001 622-030-002 Foundation For Retarded Charles A. Sadova Norman B. Lubinsky Children 40361 Sagewood Dr. 1292 Acacia St. P.O. Box 1183 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Rialto, CA 92376 Palm Desert, CA 92260 622-030-003 `- 622-030-004 622-030-005 Dennis J. Parrish Rowland F. Sweet Michael J. Titone 40355 Sugarbush Court 40353 Sugarbush Court 7746 Danvers St. Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Downey, CA 90240 622-030-006 622-030-007 622-030-008 Robert S. Ritchey William G. Henderson B. Ali Farzaneh 40349 Sugarbush Court 40347 Sugarbush Court 40345 Sugarbush Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 622-030-009 622-030-010 622-030-011 Richard W. Cortese Arthur A. Wilkes OWNv 40341 Sagewood Dr. 522 Tralee Circle 40333 Sagewood Dr. Palm Desert, CA 92260 Delta BC Canada V4M 3R8 Palm Desert, CA 92260 622-030-012 , 622-030-013 622-030-014 Denver T. Johnstone James M. Calucchia iN, p'6pt;1 nlS 40329 Sagewood Dr. P.O. Box 955 40049 Sagewood Dr. Palm Desert, CA 92260 Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Palm Desert, CA 92260 `' 622-030-015 622-030-016 622-030-017 Samuel H. Hill Thomas E. Yeager Van G. Tanner 40045 Sagewood Dr. 40041 Sagewood Dr. 40033 Sagewood Dr. Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 622-030-018 622-030-019 622-030-020 Mariana P. Hutchins McBail Co. a Si ee H ers Assoc 40027 Sagewood Dr. P.O. Box 1056 -�" 3732 Dia� lvd.#309 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Alamo, CA 94507 afaye te, CAkk 049 S 622-030-021 622-031-001 622-031-002 Sagewood Associates Ross D. McMullin McBail Co. 110 W. Las Timias Dr. 40024 Sage, oN d Dr. P.O. Box 1056 San Gabriel, CA 91776 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Alarm, CA 94507 622-031-003 622-031-004 622-031-005 Mark Steinback MCBail Co. David L. Miller 40040 Sagewood Dr. P.O. Box 1056 40056 Silktree Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 Alamo, CA 94507 Palm Desert, CA 92260 622-031-009 622-031-010 622-0 -0p�p� Ronald B. Schulman McBail Co. Silktr omeowners Assoc 40088 Silktree Court P.O. Box 1056 3732 ablo Blvd.,#,309 n Palm Desert, CA 92260 Ala , CA 94507 Lafaye te, 94549 John F. Hans1J—� Terry J. Guzak 40288 Spivak 40365 Sagewood Dr. 40104 Sagewood Dr. P0288 SpivOrchak CA Court Palm Desert CA 92260 I Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 -1-_r 622-042-027 1 622-042-025 r 622-042-026 � Frank E. Cerone Edwina L. Hodges, Mitchell P. Pries 40296 Orchidtree Court 40304 Orchidtree Court Palm 2lm Desert,, C C A 92260 4sertSagewoodDr. Palm Desert CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 � 618-480-018 a 622-042-028 618-480-017 Benjamin R. Mancou I Charles Spruck Sam Anderman P.O. Box 4079 40360 Sagewood Dr. 1440 Hi.11view Cove Palm Springs, CA 92263 I Palm Desert, CA 92260 Pal[n Springs, CA 92262 620-180-014 618-02-03 + 620-180-003 Suncrest Country Club Nancy Troy I I Mayer Group 73450 Country Club Dr. c/o Cascade j c/o Alan I. Casden Palm Desert, CA 92260 835 Myrtle Ave. 9171 Wilshire Blvd.3rd F. Brookland, N.Y. 11206 I Beverly Hills, CA 90210 WA1l /.1 pF,12k11J5 622-020-002 622-031-006 P.O. 60X 15a(.v Jarms E. Kaul Isaac Newman QA p�g�r� Ga aloe 10542 Grove Oak Dr. j 40064 Silktree Court Santa Ana, CA 92705 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Abbil Oil Co. H.o. +�ssoL lam-030-01 l Attn: J.H. Huntsberry quo Y. 3655 S. Soto St. 4,o�o33 "E>rvFxa 40333 SeC+�EWoop p� f�L Uw Los Angeles, CA 90058 � 7fALrA, Ds,6F� ed �----- West Coast Mapping b P l 255 ►�• L Gl5-lo 4D -*:'LEro 4431 W. Rosecrans, Suite 500 Hawthorne, CA 90250 Cz Ac9AMAS OR- 9-701-5 Ng4x-.)tr pA94e- pLA.-J1. - -- — R . G,uillouy Pat►v. e,nZy Gd g2a67 i i 0144323 f ® STORES INC. P.O.BOX 5001.BUENA PARK,CA S n EXPLANATION -UR REFS 7 FOUR AEFLRERCCJ YOU TIFF DATE STORE GROSS A IT l DEDUCTIONS DISCOUNT 1-0586 2 7 85 50.00 i II - i i { 4 TOTALS► - TOTAL NET AMOUNT►'$50.00 CITY OF A4LM DESERT MEASURER'S RECERY 0671 RECEIVED OF: L�vp- AAA DATE-"GS-$5 AMOUNT FOR (01 MirArJbh%A % ZI RECEIVED: CITY TREASURER BY: sg IS ACCOUNT NO. AMOUNT CHECKS ACCEPTED SUBJECT TO BANK CLEARANCE PAYOR A M-eNOMZ N4T 2. Z -I - 5 N ^ �S{t� �� 5 �� �t:SS®IlD4o d 20 auc mti Q "Gl7'CJ �98a a dUG2 e� POST OFFICE SO 1977,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92261 T Cqt PBe�e'i`sa :. — pT� t� � 622-030-020_- Silktree Nonlxn piers Assoc. ' °( z f 3732 Mt. Diablo Blvd.g309 pN Ia;_ yet.f.r,, I-A 94549 P� N �= v JOT �QEL�fT�c A9LE Qyrsets� p.QCP,ESSEQg ra�nn = UNAQLE TO EQRW_;9RQ `,, �3aoLo U7 h +� - CRf is a 0 : Ol ?i.OtlNflp': rl� AUG ' i d �$�� ®�. -— -• ��'®Ilo�e 94 a 20 AU�. J� a AUG2 ' I :41�_�'��P��?�F'L' . ` POST OFFICE BOX 1977,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92261 �7Q4 •'C ^_� +` p ri(o CA l.1F P8.899193 • .. I. 622-031-0114Ti,� St:� �C'' ry ,. Si.] BsNeCiit> Assoc. ' 3732CMY.. Diablo Blvd.,",309 ; Lafayette, cA 94549 IdCT (IELIIiEr�ADLE U0��83 11111111r1(111IrIIllllll:rllllll August 16, 1984 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE Case No. DP 01-82 (Amendment #0 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by CARVER MANAGEMENT CORPORATION (MOBIL OIL CORPORATION) for approval of an amendment to a previously approved development plan to allow the construction and operation of an automotive service station' with three service bays in the PC (2) zone located at the southeast corner (service station located near intersection of Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive, more particularly described as: APN 622-030-021 P.R.-7 S.P S (DP 15-79) r � ° P R-„2 8.000 (8) R Rr 5 HOVE Y LA -jT1 SAID Hearing will be held on Tuesday, September 4, 1984, at 7:00 P.M., at the Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission PUBLISH: Desert Post August 24, 1984 Am a' ,elr-c f OO fl° �Tl Trrn� ®�3�IP o 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 November 30, 1984 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: . 164 C APPLICANT .(AND ADDRESS): SAGEWOOD PLAZA (MOBIL OIL) NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of working drawings for Mobil Oil Station. LOCATION: Southeast corner Monterey Avenue and Country Club. Upon reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the staff and by the applicant, the architectural review commission approved working drawings. Date of Action: November.27, 1984 Vote: Carried 4-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the city clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes. MINUTES PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION NOVEMBER 27, 1984 CO TINUED Mr. Steve Sullivan presented plans f r proposed apartment complex. mmissioner Martin questioned he solar protection on some windows of he buildings. Mr. S llivan suggested incr sing the solar protection on the ends units. He fee that these are t only units that might be lacking solor pro- tection. Moved by mmissi er Cook, seconded by Commissioner Leung to grant prelim ary proval subject to the following conditions: 1. Final con ruction drawings, including a final landscaping, grading, ig ting, amenities, trash storage, walkway layout, irrigat n pla s and sign program shall be submitted to the desig review oard. No final inspection or occupancy permit sha be given b the department of environmental services t this project un it the aforementioned approved plans and onstruction shall ve been completed. 2. That the design revie board reexamine the solar protection on the end units. IV. DISCUSSION ITEM: CASE NO: 164 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): SAGEWOOD PLAZA (MOBIL OIL STATION) NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of working drawings for Mobil Oil Station. LOCATION: Southeast corner Monterey Avenue and Country Club. Moved by Commissioner Martin, seconded by Commissioner Cook to approve working drawings subject to the following condition: 1. That final landscaping and signage plans be submitted for approval by ili :the commission. V. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 2:40 p.m. 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: September 4, 1984 CARVER MANAGEMENT CORP. MOBIL OIL CORP. 110 W. Las Tunas ATTN: B. R. Fox, Room 926 San Gabriel, CA 91776 612 S. Flower Street Los Angeles, CA 90017 Red DP 01-82 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of September 4, 1984. Approved by Adoption of Resolution No. 986 Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the director of environmental services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. — A 1I1I /v ` RAMON A. DIAZ, SECRETARY PLANNING COMMISSION RAD/tm cc: File(s) C.V. Water District 1 PLt%r1NING COMMISSION RESOLUTION :A0. 986 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT TO ALLOW AN ADDITION OF A SERVICE STATION TO A COMMERCIAL CENTER IN THE PC (2) ZONE. CASE NO. DP 01-82 (Amendment #0 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 4th day of September, 1984, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider a request by CARVER MANAGEMENT CORP and MOBIL OIL CORP. for approval of an amendment to a development plan to allow the addition of a gasoline service station to a commercial shopping center on nine acres in the PC (2) (District Commercial Center) zone located at the southeast corner of Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive, more particularly described as: Lot 104, Tract 11791 WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedures to Implement the California Environmental Qualit. Act, Resolution No. 80-89", in that the director of environmental services has determined that the project has previously been reviewed and no further documentation is deemed necessary. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and. arguments, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify the granting of said amendment: 1. The design of the use will not substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity. 2. The use will not unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in the vicinity by the occupants thereof for lawful purposes. 3. The use will not endanger the public peace, health, safety or general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case. 2. That approval of DP 01-82 (Amendment Ifl), ADJ 01-82, and 164 C is hereby granted for reasons subject to the attached conditions. 3. That this resolution supersedes Planning Commission No. 788. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 4th day of September, 1984, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: DOWNS, ERWOOD, RICHARDS, WOOD, AND CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE BUFORD CRITES, Chairman ATTE : AMON A. DIAZ, Secret ry Am -I- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 986 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. DP O1-82 (Amendment #I) Department of Environmental Services: 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of environmental services, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any uses contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first complete all the procedural requirements of the city which include, but are not limited to, architectural review and building permit procedures. 3. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null and void and of no effect whatsoever. 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Riverside County Department of Health Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Coachella Valley Water District Evidence of said permits or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 5. Major truck deliveries and trash pick-up for Market to be only between 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday through Friday only. 6. Project to be redesigned so that outdoor noise levels do not exceed 70 dBA and indoor levels do not exceed 45 CNEL, as measured at the residential units to the south, with applicant to submit verified data by qualified noise engineer; revised plan to be reviewed by the planning commission prior to submission of final construction drawings. 7. All architecture of future buildings to be compatible with architectural commission approval of plans. 8. Trash enclosures for each detached building to be provided; with design and location to be approved by city and local trash company. **9. All public street and parking lot improvements shall be constructed as a part of the phase that includes market; service station improvements to include full loop driveway from Country Club Drive to Monterey Avenue. 10. All conditions of the architectural commission shall be met. 11. Detailed parking lot and building lighting plan shall be submitted to staff for approval, subject to applicable lighting standards; plan to be prepared by qualified lighting engineer. 12. Driving aisle south of building "D" to Sagewood Drive shall be increased to 24 feet wide with no decrease in landscape planter width along south property line. 13. Parking space and aisles shall comply with Palm Desert Design Standards for off- street parking facilities. -2- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 986 14. Eliminte parallel parking spaces since they are not permitted by Palm Desert Design Standards for off-street parking faciities. 15. Three to 3.5 foot decorative wall and/or mounding shall be provided to sufficiently screen parking lot area from streets. **16. Setbacks for building "E" shall be increased to a minimum of 20 feet. 17. Aisle to south of market shall be gated for emergency access only. 18. Parking adjustment is allowed to a maximum of 10% of the required parking. 19. Market operator to submit letter indicating that he has read the conditions of approval and will abide by same; letter to be submitted prior to issuance of building permit. 20. Parking lot directional striping and safety signs to be provided; plan to be submitted with final working drawings for approval. 21. Only delivery diesel trucks built after 1974 shall be used. *22. Service station building to be setback 30 feet from Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue property lines per municipal code requirements. *23. Stone wall that extends from building shall be stepped down to three feet in height and extended to within 20 feet of each driveway. *24. Planter adjacent to parking spaces between service station building and westerly driveway on Country Club Drive shall be widened from 10 feet to 15 feet from property line. *25. Raised landscaped center median in westerly driveway on Country Club Drive shall be provided as shown on originally approved site plan on file in the department of environmental services. *26. Repair and service work in service bays shall be limited to lubrication, brakes, tires, batteries, oil change, and minor tune-ups with all work performed within building. *27. Service station signs shall comply with, municipal code section 25.68.380 provided state requirements for signage shall prevail where there is a conflict. Department of Public Works. **28. Combined bikeway/sidewalks next to curb shall be installed on Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive. **29. Traffic safety striping on Monterey Avenue/Country Club Drive shall be provided to the specifications of the director of public works. A traffic control plan must be submitted to and approved by the director of public works before placing pavement markings. **30. Either installation of one half of median on Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive or payment of one half estimated median costs at the option of the director of public works; medians to be installed by March 1, 1985. 31. No median breaks shall be permitted within 660 feet of the Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive intersection. 32. Grading plan shall be approved by the city engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit. -3- S PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 986 33. Signalization fund fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. 34. Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The subdivider shall submit "as built" plans prior to acceptance of the improvements by the city. 35. Landscaping maintenance on Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive shall be provided by the owner. 36. Existing utilities shall be undergrounded. 37. Sidewalks shall be installed on Sagewood Drive. 38. Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218, and the Master Drainage Plan, to the specifications of the director of public works. 39. Additional storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer. 40. Size, number, and location of driveways to public works specifications. Fire Marshal: 41. Install a water system capable of delivering 4000 GPM fire flow for a 2 hour duration in addition to domestic or other supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 42. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 150 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. A. Hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. B. Exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. C. Curbs (if installed), shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 43. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and 2 copies of the water system plan to the fire marshal for review. Upon approval, one copy will be sent to the building department, and the original will be returned to the developer. 44. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Case No. DP 01-82 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the fire marshal." 45. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating, and delivering the required flow. 46. The market building shall be fully protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system. 47. Fire lanes shall be marked as per municipal code. �* Condition amended by Amendment //1, September 4, 1984. Condition added by Amendment #1, September 4, 1984. -4- PROOF OF PUE :ATION This space Is for t ;ounty Clerk's Filing Stamp (2015.5 C.C.P.) d rT1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Y 1 County of Riverside ^` CD �? m -T1 cs1 I am a citizen of the United States and a CT TV OE PAT DFssaT C r resident of the County aforesaid; I am over , Cn the age of eighteen years, and not a party to Proof of Publication of or interested in the above-entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of the Case #DP01-82 .....................................•............. ................14,Su iT.•Po.sz. Paste Clipping ...... .............................. of Notice a newspaper of general circulation, printed SECURELY and published .....Di.-weeklx In This Space in the City of ....Palm Desert CRY OF County of Riverside, and which news- PALNOESERT paper has been adjudged a newspaper Oeselvo 0 o Eax of general circulation by the Superior (Amendment No.1) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Court of the County of Riverside, State of Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to California, under the dateof.•10 5 conalder a request by CARVER 19/• 84 r MANAGEMENT CORPORATION (MOBILE OIL CORPORATION) for approval of an-amendment to a Case Number .....Q a.5.5.Q.... that the notice, previously approved Oection and plan to ly a the approved development ant of which the annexed is a printed co (set operation of an automotive service copy station with three service bays in in type not smaller than nonpardil), has the PC (2) zone located at the been published in each regular and entire loateaa,near intersrviceection station jlocated near intersection of issue of Said newspaper and not in an Monterey Avenue and County Club Y Drive, more particularly described supplement thereof on the following dates, as: APN622aao.oz, to-wit: SAID Hearing will be had on ..p/ ........I................ Tu P.M September 4, ertC is YY •z•4.........,. Tue day, at the Palen Desert 4,at Center,73-510 Fred Waring Drive, all In the year 19..aft, Palm Desert. California, at whkh time and place all Interested I certify (or declare) under penalty of heaardd.Sere Invited to attend and be Perjury that the foregoing is true and RAMONAretary g g Secretary DIAZ, correct, Palm Desert Planning Commission (Pub.D P.Aug.24,19U) Dated at....... yz,�m„DAP.e,rt California,this„24....dayof...AD;?, 19 8 .. * . .. .. ..... Sig ture Free coppe of this blank form All be secured from! CALIFORNIA NEWSPAPER SERVICE BUREAU, INC. Legal Advertising Clearing House 120 West Second St., Los Angeles, Calif. 90012 Telephone: (213) 625-2541 Please reque)t OEN Ilk R AL Proof of PVb1Ittil l0n when orderltel this farm. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 986 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN. AMENDMENT TO ALLOW AN ADDITION OF A SERVICE STATION TO A COMMERCIAL CENTER IN THE PC (2) ZONE. CASE NO. DP 01-82 (Amendment #0 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 4th day of September, 1984, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider a request by CARVER MANAGEMENT CORP and MOBIL OIL CORP. for approval of an amendment r-+ to a development plan to allow the addition of a gasoline service station to a commercial shopping center on nine acres in the PC (2) (District Commercial Center) zone located at the southeast corner of Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive, more particularly described as: Lot 104, Tract 11791 WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedures to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89", in that the director of environmental services has determined that the project has previously been reviewed and no further documentation is deemed necessary. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify the granting of said amendment: 1. The design of the use will not substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity. 2. The use will not unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in the vicinity by the occupants thereof for lawful purposes. 3. The use will not endanger the public peace, health, safety or general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case. 2. That approval of DP 01-82 (Amendment #1), ADJ 01-82, and 164 C is hereby granted for reasons subject to the attached conditions. 3. That this resolution supersedes Planning Commission No. 788. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 4th day of September, 1984, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: DOWNS, ERWOOD, RICHARDS, WOOD, AND CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE BUFORD CRITES, Chairman ' ATTE AMON A. DIAZ, Secret ry Am *The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert did on the 19th day of February, 1985, approve a modification to condition #6, pertaining to noise mitigation. -1- C� PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 986 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. DP 01-92 (Amendment #0 Department of Environmental Services: 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of environmental services, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any uses contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first complete all the procedural requirements of the city which include, but are not limited to, architectural review and building permit procedures. 3. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null and void and of no effect whatsoever. 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Riverside County Department of Health Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Coachella Valley Water District Evidence of said permits or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building ^ permit for the use contemplated herewith. 5. Major truck deliveries and trash pick-up for Market to be only between 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday through Friday only. *** 6. Project to be redesigned so that outdoor noise levels do not exceed 70 dBA and indoor levels do not exceed 45 CNEL, as measured at the residential units to the south, with applicant to submit verified data by qualified noise engineer; revised plan to be reviewed by the planning commission prior to submission of final construction drawings. (February 19, 1985, modification at bottom) 7. All architecture of future buildings to be compatible with architectural commission approval of plans. 8. Trash enclosures for each detached building to be provided; with design and location to be approved by city and local trash company. **9. All public street and parking lot improvements shall be constructed as a part of the phase that includes market; service station improvements to include full loop driveway from Country Club Drive to Monterey Avenue. 10. All conditions of the architectural commission shall be met. 11. Detailed parking lot and building lighting plan shall be submitted to staff for approval, subject to applicable lighting standards; plan to be prepared by qualified lighting engineer. f 12. Driving aisle south of building "D" to Sagewood Drive shall be increased to 24 feet PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 986 14. Eliminte parallel parking spaces since they are not permitted by Palm Desert Design Standards for off-street parking faciities. 15. Three to 3.5 foot decorative wall and/or mounding shall be provided to sufficiently screen parking lot area from streets. ^" **16. Setbacks for building "E" shall be increased to a minimum of 20 feet. 17. Aisle to south of market shall be gated for emergency access only. 18. Parking adjustment is allowed to a maximum of 10% of the required parking. 19, Market operator to submit letter indicating that he has read the conditions of approval and will abide by same; letter to be submitted prior to issuance of building permit. 20. Parking lot directional striping and safety signs to be provided; plan to be submitted with final working drawings for approval. 21. Only delivery diesel trucks built after 1974 shall be used. *22. Service station building to be setback 30 feet from Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue property lines per municipal code requirements. *23. ,Stone wall that extends from building shall be stepped down to three feet in height and extended to within 20 feet of each driveway. *24. Planter adjacent to parking spaces between service station building and westerly driveway on Country Club Drive shall be widened from 10 feet to 15 feet from property line. .� *25. Raised landscaped center median in westerly driveway on Country Club Drive shall be provided as shown on originally approved site plan on file in the department of environmental services. *26. Repair and service work in service bays shall be limited to lubrication, brakes, tires, batteries, oil change, and minor tune-ups with all work performed within building. *27. Service station signs shall comply with municipal code section 25.68.380 provided state requirements for signage shall prevail where there is a conflict. Department of Public Works: **28. Combined bikeway/sidewalks next to curb shall be installed on Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive. **29. Traffic safety striping on Monterey Avenue/Country Club Drive shall be provided to the specifications of the director of public works. A traffic control plan must be submitted to and approved by the director of public works before placing pavement markings. **30. Either installation of one half of median on Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive or payment of one half estimated median costs at the option of the director of public works; medians to be installed by March 1, 1985. 31. No median breaks shall be permitted within 660 feet of the Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive intersection. 32. Grading plan shall be approved by the city engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit. -3- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 986 33. Signalization fund fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. 34. Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The subdivider shall submit "as built" plans prior to acceptance of the improvements by the city. 35. Landscaping maintenance on Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive shall be provided by the owner. '36. Existing utilities shall be undergrounded. 37. Sidewalks shall be installed on Sagewood DriYe.71,,,,,,,; ,,, 38. Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218, and the Master Drainage Plan, to the specifications of the director of public works. 39. Additional storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer. 40. Size, number, and location of driveways to public works specifications. Fire Marshal: 41. Install a water system capable of delivering 4000 GPM fire flow for a 2 hour duration in addition to domestic or other supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 42. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 150 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. ,A: A.: Hydrants shall not be located el9,ser1,thaq �_5;feei,,t9 apy, building.- B. Exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. C. Curbs (if installed), shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 43. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and 2 copies of the water system plan to the fire marshal for review. Upon approval, one copy will be sent to the building department, and the original will be returned to the developer. 44. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Case No. DP O1-82 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the fire marshal." 45. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating, and delivering the required flow. 46. The market building shall be fully protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system. 47. Fire lanes shall be marked as per municipal code. *, ,Condition added by, Amendment #1, September.4,.,1984. ** Condition amended by Amendment #1, September 4, 1984. *** Condition amended as minor change by Planning Commission February 19, 1985. -4- MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 4, 1984 MRS. NELLIE CARABELLA, resident of Palm Desert Greens Country Club, asked about the entrance of the project and about the signalization. Mr. McClellan replied that signalization would be put in on Portola Avenue and Country Club Drive. Chairman Crites expressed concern regarding water evaporation. Mr. McClellan indicated that more evaporation occurred on grass then bodies of water. Chairman Crites closed the public testimony. Commissioner Richards said that he felt this was a nice plan for the desert. Action: Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Wood, to approve the findings as presented by staff. Carried unanimously 5-0. Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Wood, to adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 984, recommending approval of C/Z 84-12 to the City Council. Carried unanimously 5-0. Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Wood, to adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 985, approving PP 84-32 and TT 16691, subject to conditions as amended. F. Case N..(DP 01-82 (Amendment 1) - CARVER MANAGEMENT CORP., Applicants Request for approval of an amendment to a previously approved development plan to allow the construction and operation of an automotive service station with three service bays in the PC (2) zone located at the southeast corner (service station located near intersection) of Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive). Mr. Sawa reviewed the staff report and indicated that he received a phone call from the owner of Suncrest Country Club in favor of the project. Staff felt that the project was acceptable and recommended approval. Commissioner Wood questioned the time schedule of the service bays. Commissioner Downs felt that the service bays should be open seven days a week. Commissioner Erwood suggested cutting down the hours if there was a problem. Chairman Crites opened the public testimony and asked the applicant to address the commission. MS. SANDRA YAVITZ, Carver representative, asked staff if the required three foot wall could be partially replaced with a berm. Mr. Sawa replied that that was acceptable. Ms. Yavitz indicated that the super market was planned for a later date. MR. JIM HUNTSBERRY, Mobil representative, indicated that the service station should be open on Sundays for people with car problems. Chairman Crites asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to this case. MR. WARREN PERKINS, 40049 Sagewood Drive, was very concerned.about traffic on Country Club Drive, the lack of'a buffer zone, cars being worked on, and noise. MR. BERNARD LEUNG, architect, explained that the placement of the station would direct traffic to the corner and that there would be extensive landscaping. -5- MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 4, 1984 MR. BOB RITCHEY, 40349 Sugar Brush Court, expressed concern regarding the signal lights shining in windows, noise, and wall height. Mr. McClellan replied that the lights would only be ten feet high. Mr. Diaz said that a traffic study would have to be made. Chairman Crites closed the public testimony and asked the commission for comments or questions. Commissioner Wood indicated that he felt this would be a good location and felt that the service station and super market times should coincide. Chairman Crites asked about the entrance and exit and asked if there was a guarantee of the completion of phase II. Mr. McClellan replied no. Chairman Crites asked if that could be conditioned and a surety bond posted. Ms. Yavitz indicated that a bond had been posted at the time of parcel map finaling. Mr. Diaz indicated that there is a condition that the wall be completed as part of phase I. Chairman Crites asked what would' be a reasonable completion time for the median. Mr. McClellan replied that March 1, 1985, could be the stipulated date. Action• Moved by Commissioner Wood, seconded by Commissioner Richards, to approve the. findings as presented by staff. Carried unanimously 5-0. Moved by Commissioner Wood, seconded by Commissioner Richards, to adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 986, approving DP 01-82 (Amendment 1), subject to the conditions as amended. Carried unanimously 5-0. G. Case Nos. PP 84-19 and PMW 84-13 - FRANK GOODMAN, Applicant Request to allow construction of a four unit apartment structure west of the terminus of Lantana Avenue. Mr. Joy reviewed the staff report and recommended approval. Chairman Crites opened the public testimony and asked the applicant to address the commission. MR. FRANK GOODMAN, applicant, concurred with the conditions. Chairman Crites asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to this case. Chairman Crites closed the public testimony. Action: Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Wood, to approve the findings as presented by staff. Carried unanimously 5-0. Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Wood, to adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 987, approving PP 84-19 and PMW 84-13. Carried unanimously 5-0. H. Case No. PP 84-20 - FRANK GOODMAN, Applicant Request for approval of a precise plan of design to allow construction of a three unit apartment structure in a R-3 zone located on the north side of Candlewood, 150 feet east of Portola and a development agreement pertaining to the utilization of state mandated density bonuses. -6- City of Palm Desert Department of Environmental Services Staff Report TO: Planning Commission DATE: September 4, 1984 CASE NO: DP 01-82 (Amendment #0 REQUEST: Approval of an amendment to a previously approved development plan to allow the construction and operation of an automotive service station with three service bays in the PC (2) zone located at the southeast corner (service station located near intersection) of Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive). APPLICANT: CARVER MANAGEMENT CORP. 110 W. Las Tunas San Gabriel, CA 91776 MOBIL OIL CORP. ATTN: B.R. FOX, Room 926 612 S. Flower Street Los Angeles, CA 90017 ARCHITECT:BERNARD K. K. LEUNG & ASSOCIATES 73-960 El Paseo, #4 Palm Desert, CA 92260 I. BACKGROUND: A. GENERAL: The original project was approved by the planning commission on April 6, 1982. An appeal of a planning commission condition was denied by the city council at their meeting of May 20, 1982. A parcel map was approved in February, 1984, resulting in an expiration date of February 7, 1986, for the project. The architectural commission at their meeting of July 24, 1984, approved revised elevations for the center and service station. This change is also reflected in the appearance of the proposed service station. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE: The site is vacant and relatively flat. The curbs and tie-in paving have been installed on Country Club Drive, Monterey Avenue, and Sagewood Drive on the east. There is a six foot high block wall along the south property line. To the south is the Sagewood single-family subdivision. C. ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE: North: PR-7, S.P./Vacant South: R-2 8,000 (8)/Single Family East: P zone/Foundation for the Retarded West: Rancho Mirage/Vacant D. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: District commercial. II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A. GENERAL: The applicant is proposing to replace two previously approved buildings containing 8812 square feet of floor space with an automotive service station. The station would contain 2,275 square feet of floor area and have DP O1-82 (Amendment #0 Continued three interior service bays. A covered three island gasoline area would be provided. The station is oriented towards the inside of the site. The building, as well as the service bays, would open to the inside with the gasoline islands, also away from the street. The code requires that the buildings be set back 30 feet from street property lines. The building as designed is setback slightly less than that and will need to be relocated. Staff is also recommending that the planter adjacent to Country Club Drive be widened to 15 feet. B. ACCESS AND PARKING: There will be no new access to the streets created as a result of this revision. Access will be through the interior driveway which connects Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive. A raised on-site landscaped median that controls turning movements near the Country Club Drive driveway was deleted on this plan by the applicant from the original approval. Staff recommends it be replaced and the applicant's representative has concurred with this revision. Parking requirements for the center will still be complied with. C. ARCHITECTURE: As indicated, the station will match the main shops and market architecture. The station will be contemporary and utilize a flat roof with stucco walls and fascia. Natural stone will be used on the lower half of the structure as well as on the short screen wall along the streets. Proposed signage consists of price sign monuments on each street, and building signs facing the street and shopping center. As a part of this revision, the plans indicate a shopping center identification sign at the street intersection. D. OPERATION: The requested hours of operation for self-serve gasoline pumping and service bays is 6:00 a.m. to midnight, seven days a week. In order to provide compatibility with the Sagewood subdivision, staff is recommending that pumping hours be 6:00 a.m, to 10:00 p.m. daily, with service bay hours 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., with bays closed on Sunday. According to the applicant, lubrication oil changes, batteries, tire sales and installation, brake work, and minor tune-ups will be done in the service bays. Staff is recommending work be limited to these items, with all work done within the bays only. The station will be self serve only and therefore no bells will be utilized. No mini-market or similar sales is proposed. The applicant has indicated that it is very likely that the service station will be constructed prior to the balance of the center. As such, staff is recommending that in lieu of the all public street and parking lot improvements being constructed as part of phase I, that those improvements be installed as a part of the phase that includes the market. With the station, the entire loop driveway between Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive will need to be installed. E. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The negative declaration of environmental impact was approved along with the project on April 6, 1982. There are no new impacts created that cannot be mitigated and, therefore, the original negative declaration is still applicable. III. ANALYSIS: A. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF SERVICE STATION: 1. The design of the use will not substatially depreciate property values in the vicinity. -2- DP O1-82 (Amendment #1) Continued Response: The design of the station is attractive, will blend in with the rest of the center, and will visually have a minimum negative impact on the neighborhood. Access is designed to utilize already approved driveways which will minimize impact on traffic safety and circulation. 2. The use will not unreasonably interfere with the use of or enjoyment of property in the vicinity by the occupants thereof for lawful purposes. Response: As previously noted, the station is designed to utilize access points previously approved which insure no negative traffic impacts. Staff has recommended conditions on its operation which insure that there will be compatibility between the use and surrounding residential properties. 3. The use will not endanger the public peace, health, safety, or general welfare. Response: The suggested conditions regarding operation and design of the project, along with appropriate county, state, and federal approvals insure that the public peace, health, safety, or general welfare will not be endangered. Staff feels these findings are sufficient to support approval of this request. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff feels that the project with the conditions as recommended by staff is acceptable. It should be noted that should a problem arise sometime in the future, the commission can require a review of the permit to impose further restrictions. In turn, should we find that the operation does not create any negative impacts, the applicant may, after six months or so of operation, petition the commission to liberalize the operating restrictions. Therefore, staff recommends: A. Adoption of the findings; B. Adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. , approving DP 01-82 (Amendment #1). V. ATTACHMENTS: A. Draft Resolution B. Legal Notice C. Planning Commission Resolution No. _ D. Minutes of Planning Commission meeting of April 6, 1982 E. Comments from other city departments and agencies F. Plans and Exhibits Prepared by Reviewed and Approved by Am -3- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT TO ALLOW AN ADDITION OF A SERVICE STATION TO A COMMERCIAL CENTER IN THE PC (2) ZONE. CASE NO. DP 01-82 (Amendment #1) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 4th day of September, 1984, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider a request by CARVER MANAGEMENT CORP and MOBIL OIL CORP. for approval of an amendment to a development plan to allow the addition of a gasoline service station to a commercial shopping center on nine acres in the PC (2) (District Commercial Center) zone located at the southeast corner of Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive, more particularly described as: Lot 104, Tract 11791 WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedures to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89", in that the director of environmental services has determined that the project has previously been reviewed and no further documentation is deemed necessary. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify the granting of said amendment: 1. The design of the use will not substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity. 2. The use will not unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in the vicinity by the occupants thereof for lawful purposes. 3. The use will not endanger the public peace, health, safety or general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case. 2. That approval of DP 01-82 (Amendment #1), AD7 01-82, and 164 C is hereby granted for reasons subject to the attached conditions. 3. That this resolution supersedes Planning Commission No. 788. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 4th day of September, 1984, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: BUFORD CRITES, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary Am -1- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. DP 01-82 (Amendment #I) Department of Environmental Services: 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of environmental services, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any uses contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first complete all the procedural requirements of the city which include, but are not limited to, architectural review and building permit procedures. 3. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null and void and of no effect whatsoever. 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Riverside County Department of Health Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Coachella Valley Water District Evidence of said permits or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 5. Major truck deliveries and trash pick-up for Market to be only between 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday through Friday only. 6. Project to be redesigned so that outdoor noise levels do not exceed 70 dBA and indoor levels do not exceed 45 CNEL, as measured at the residential units to the south, with applicant to submit verified data by qualified noise engineer; revised plan to be reviewed by the planning commission prior to submission of final construction drawings. 7. All architecture of future buildings to be compatible with architectural commission approval of plans. 8. Trash enclosures for each detached building to be provided; with design and location to be approved by city and local trash company. **9. All public street and parking lot improvements shall be constructed as a part of the phase that includes market; service station improvements to include full loop driveway from Country Club Drive to Monterey Avenue. 10. All conditions of the architectural commission shall be met. 11. Detailed parking lot and building lighting plan shall be submitted to staff for approval, subject to applicable lighting standards; plan to be prepared by qualified lighting engineer. 12. Driving aisle south of building "D" to Sagewood Drive shall be increased to 24 feet wide with no decrease in landscape planter width along south property line. 13. Parking space and aisles shall comply with Palm Desert Design Standards for off- street parking facilities. -2- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14. Eliminte parallel parking spaces since they are not permitted by Palm Desert Design Standards for off-street parking faciities. 15. Three to 3.5 foot decorative wall and/or mounding shall be provided to sufficiently screen parking lot area from streets. **16. Setbacks for building "E" shall be increased to a minimum of 20 feet. 17. Aisle to south of market shall be gated for emergency access only. 18. Parking adjustment is allowed to a maximum of 10% of the required parking. 19. Market operator to submit letter indicating that he has read the conditions of approval and will abide by same; letter to be submitted prior to issuance of building permit. 20. Parking lot directional striping and safety signs to be provided; plan to be submitted with final working drawings for approval. 21. Only delivery diesel trucks built after 1974 shall be used. *22. Service station building to be setback 30 feet from Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue property lines per municipal code requirements. *23. Stone wall that extends from building shall be stepped down to three feet in height and extended to within 20 feet of each driveway. *24. Planter adjacent to parking spaces between service station building and westerly driveway on Country Club Drive shall be widened from 10 feet to 15 feet from property line. *25. Raised landscaped center median in westerly driveway on Country Club Drive shall be provided as shown on originally approved site plan on file in the department of environmental services. *26. Repair and service work in service bays shall be limited to lubrication, brakes, tires, batteries, oil change, and minor tune-ups with all work performed within building. *27. Gasoline dispensing hours to be between 6:06 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. daily, with service bay hours to be between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. with bays closed on Sundays. *28. Service station signs shall comply with municipal code section 25.68.380 provided state requirements for signage shall prevail where there is a conflict. Department of Public Works: **29. Combined bikeway/sidewalks next to curb shall be installed on Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive. **30. Traffic safety striping on Monterey Avenue/Country Club Drive shall be provided to the specifications of the director of public works. A traffic control plan must be submitted to and approved by the director of public works before placing pavement markings. 31. Either installation of one half of median on Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive or payment of one half estimated median costs at the option of the director of public works. 32. No median breaks shall be permitted within 660 feet of the Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive intersection. 33. Grading plan shall be approved by the city engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit. -3- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 34. Signalization fund fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. 35. Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The subdivider shall submit "as built" plans prior to acceptance of the improvements by the city. 36. Landscaping maintenance on Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive shall be provided by the owner. 37. Existing utilities shall be undergrounded. . 38. Sidewalks shall be installed on Sagewood Drive. 39. Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218, and the Master Drainage Plan, to the specifications of the director of public works. 40. Additional storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer. 41. Size, number, and location of driveways to public works specifications. Fire Marshal: 42. Install a water system capable of delivering 4000 GPM fire flow for a 2 hour duration in addition to domestic or other supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 43. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 150 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. A. Hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. B. Exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. C. Curbs (if installed), shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 44. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and 2 copies of the water system plan to the fire marshal for review. Upon approval, one copy will be sent to the building department, and the original will be returned to the developer. 45. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Case No. DP 01-82 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the fire marshal." 46. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating, and delivering the required flow. 47. The market building shall be fully protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system. 48. Fire lanes shall be marked as per municipal code. ** Condition amended by Amendment #1, September 4, 1984. * Condition added by Amendment #1, September 4, 1984. -4- August 16, 1984 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE Case No. DP 01-82 (Amendment del) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by CARVER MANAGEMENT CORPORATION (MOBIL OIL CORPORATION) for approval of an amendment to a previously approved development plan to allow the construction and operation of an automotive service station with three service bays in the PC (2) zone located at the southeast corner (service station located near intersection of Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive, more particularly described as: APN 622-030-021 P.R.-7 , S.P I t � (DP 15-79) N E' S R-a 2 8.000 (8) F R [H -FT-1 H VLEY LA SAID Hearing will be held on Tuesday, September 4, 1984, at 7:00 P.M., at the Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission PUBLISH: Desert Post August 24, 1984 Am MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 6, 1982 A. CASE NOS P O1-8 , ADJ O1-82 and 164 C - ROY WILLIAM CARVER, Applicant Request for approval of a Development Plan, Adjustment for parking, preliminary Design Review case and Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact to allow construction of a 92,215 sq.ft. commercial shopping center in the PC (2) zone (District Commercial Center) at the southeast corner of Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive. In reviewing the staff report, Mr. Sawa stated that only Buildings A,B,C are being proposed presently and the architectural plans still need to be submitted for buildings D,E,F, and G. He .stated that Design Review Board approved these plans with some requirements. Staff felt the setbacks for the buildings adjacent to Country Club Drive should be 20 feet as required by code. One of the major concerns expressed by staff was mitigation of noise levels. The noise study submitted by the applicant indicated that the major offender would be the delivery trucks. Staff felt that if newer model trucks were used the noise could be reduced. Staff also suggested that the project be redesigned to mitigate the noise impacts, noting several methods that could be used. The following were recommended options for Commission action: (1) Approve project, with mitigation of noise as condition and have staff review revised plans; (2) Approve project, with mitigation of noise as condition, with plan reviewed by Commission at a non-public hearing; and, (3) Continue request and have applicant redesign project to mitigate noise before approval. Staff recommended option No. 2. Commissioner Richards asked how the City could regulate the age of the delivery trucks. Mr. Diaz explained that if there were any complaints they would look into this and also Condition No 19 states that the market operator agrees to abide by the conditions of approval. Mr. Diaz added that Condition No. 21 be added to read: "Only delivery diesel trucks built after 1974 shall be used." Commissioner Richards felt that this condition could not be regulated through the market operator since a lot of the trucks would be from independent vendors. Chairman Kryder opened the public hearing and asked if the applicant wished to make a presentation. MR. BERNIE LEUNG, Architect, explained that in the matter of noise impacts it should depend on what the criteria for the level of sound is. He stated that that criteria can be met. He asked if all other developments would have to meet these same noise levels. MR. CHRIS EMA, of VTN Engineering Co. for McBail, reviewed the noise study report which indicated there would only be a total of 10 impacts per week. At this point Commissioner Wood asked if the developer had agreed with all the conditions of the proposed Resolution. Mr. Leung replied affirmative. MR. MIKE GALLAGHER, of McBail Co., pointed out that this property was subdivided and zoned for commercial in 1978. He contacted four property owners fronting the back of the market and three have signed an agreement stating that they were aware that landscaping on both sides of the block wall would be provided to screen the market building and that a commercial shopping center was to be located at the site. Commissioner Crites asked what the probable reduction level would be after all the proposed changes are made. Mr. Ema replied that for every foot of height added to the block wall it reduces approximately 1 dB. Chairman Kryder asked if there was anyone present who wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to this case. MR. ALIBABA FRAZANEH, property owner adjacent to the market, stated he would not sign an agreement because he has a wife who is very ill and felt that the noise impact would be very disturbing. -2- MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 6, 1982 MR. DENVER JOHNSTONE, 40-329 Sagewood, stated that when the agreement was signed he assumed the setback from the market to the residence would be the normal required by code and not less. Mr. Diaz explained that if the setback was set at the normal 40 ft. then consequently the market would have to be moved towards Country Club Drive and the parking area to the back, which means greater noise impact would be created to the residence from the cars in the parking lot. He also stated that the building would not act as a buffer as presently proposed. Chairman Kryder closed the public hearing. Moved by Commissioner Wood, seconded by Commissioner Crites, to adopt findings as recommended by Staff. Carried unanimously 5-0. Moved by Commissioner Wood, seconded by Commissioner Crites, to waive further reading and adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 788, approving DP 01-82, ADJ 01- 82 and 164 C, subject to amended conditions. Carried unanimously 5-0. (Note: a condition included states that the project will be redesigned to mitigate the noise levels, and revised plans to be reviewed by Planning Commission prior to submission of final construction drawings). SE-N_O. CUP 03-82 - MARIO LALLI, Applicant Request for approval of a CUP to allow conversion of, a bank into a 150 seat restaurant in the C-1, S.P. (General Commercial, Scenic Preservation Overlay) located at the outheast corner of San Luis Rey Avenue and Palm Desert D\pro Mr. Diaed the staff report and recommended approval with conditions that valet parking bted and additional landscaping be added. Chairma opened the Public Hearing, and asked if the applicant wished to make a presentation. T� applicant was present and agreed to the conditions set by staff. Chairman Kryder sked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to this case. PAR. CHARLES RILEY, an of the building, felt that it would benefit the City and requested approval. Chairman Kryder closed th Public Hearing. Chairman Kryder asked why staff was recommending that valet parking be prohibited. Mr. Diaz responded that it would eliminate conflicts due to proximi of the Presidents' PLiz..t p.u.;;.id iJi ..A.:j frontage road. Moved by Commissioner Milllei seconded by Commissioner Richards, to adopt findings as recommended by staff. Carried unanimously 5-0. Moved by Commissioner Richard\y seconded by Commissioner Wood, to waive further reading and adopt Planning Commis ion Resolution No. 789, approving CUP 03-82, subject to conditions. Carried unanimously�-0. C. CASE NO. TT 18495 - DAME COSTRUCTION COMPANY, Applicant Request for approval of a three to , subdivision to allow the construction of two condominium units in the PR-5 zone located on the south side of Camin Arroyo North, west of Joya Drive; categorically exempt p eviously assessed for CEQA purposes. Mr. Diaz reviewed the staff report and recom ended approval. Chairman Kryder opened the Public Hearing a d asked if the applicant wished to make a presentation. -3- 45-M PRICXLY PEAR LANE. PAUA DESERT. CAUFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 IWAEMM?T OF 3=IM & SAFETY PRELIM A M RF7EZV 4 OF FLANS IIiI�S /IS NJT A PLAN CHECRI nFVFFzOFr>Frrr: //-,—r1Gl.1f�.e�(►y��t _. r cazt=: T,I T T JUL - 919 E, dIRUNMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT BERM ANY F URMM C31= CAN 1E MAr E, AMTITANAL II rM A= IS 15E1ED FCR FEVIFII.. . CC1'T= ARCHZM I rR.AWING5 AND SPECn7ZATI= Ca'ff'= SII1i1LTIkZAL MAWl<`IG5 AND CALCaAZT.CNIS CC—= H.V.A.C. , F LZ=CAL AND F'IIM= FLANS & SPECn=,ATI@y5 CCM = T= 24 =G'Y CMMRVATIf.A1 DOCII'MNTATIL£1 C� GLY'I t= GRADING FZANS .Q QII� IX:1 DIRECTOR OF BUILDING & SAFETY City of RANCHO MIRAGE 0yg 69-825 HIGHWAY 111 RANCHO MIRAGE CALIFORNIA 92270 TELEPHONE (619) 324-4511 July 12, 1984 J U L 1 5 1984 Mr. Stan Sawa, Senior Planner ✓1rr Nrm 73-510f FredCity oalmWaringDesertDrive ry of JAL �cESEF?7- Palm Desert, CA 92260 RE: CUP 84-6, D.P. 01-82 Amendment #1 - Sagewood Plaza Service Station (Mobile Oil Company) Dear Stan: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed automobile service station at the southeast corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey Drive. As you know, the project site lies at our City boundary line, across from Rancho Mirage property zoned for Low Density Residential development (maximum three (3) dwelling units per acre) . Therefore, our primary concern on this matter is protecting the residential area from possible disruptive impacts that could result from the service station use. We have noted in the plans you have provided that the station is designed to be "back loaded", with the pump islands and service bays on the interior of the site. An extensive landscape treatment will be provided at the corner and on the Monterey Drive frontage. However, our Staff has recognized a serious discrepancy in the proposed plan regarding Monterey Drive right-of-way and improvement width. The plan you transmitted to me indicates fifty (50) feet of right-of-way from center line, with thirty-four (34) feet improvement width. The ultimate width for Monterey Drive as a designated major arterial roadway should be fifty-five (55) feet half-width with a forty-three (43) or forty-four (44) foot improvement section. To my recollection these dimensions were indicated on Tentative Parcel Map #18764 for the overall Sagewood Shopping Center development. We would strongly encourage that the street be widened to ultimate width and right-of-way dedi- cation be secured in conjunction with this project. A street striping plan and relocation of existing traffic signal equipment will also be necessary. Our Public Works Department Staff will gladly coordinate the street plans and striping with your Staff. While we believe the project proponent is to be commended for their approach to dealing with a difficult land use project, we would offer the following additional recommendations for site improvement or conditions of approval . 1. The landscape strip along the Country Club Drive frontage should be widened to twenty-five (25) feet versus the ten (10) feet currently indicated, to match the width on Monterey Drive. Mr. Stan Sawa July 12, 1984 Page Two 2. Hours of operation should be restricted so as not to extend beyond the early evening, in consideration of the surrounding residential areas. 3. A lighting plan should be required that indicates low level lighting that is directed on the site, with a minimum of spill over. 4. Signage should be restricted to wall signs and low height monument signs. If you need any clarification regarding our comments, please call . I would appreciate a copy of the Staff Report on this project once it is prepared. Sincerely, David Abrams, AICP Director of Planning DA:dko cc: Steve Birbeck, City Manager Marty Bowman, Public Works Consultant �neso '0q!!he tlese��� I tX ''t ', F 5."e: SJ/y 1 :Mp�t`.' t r;l _ .•j'y .Y'L f ' �—�—.-. '' �. r �•'•'iP! , }�". �:� .�;Y.'�'�'v iM;tr��'��'"&`Y',x.''T 7 fat sb. r" '' '�` r S+' x �.r--.— - '- ----_—_—' S I �r . t �' <Met�� t n.' yt r�n {. t$n rfi'2't`p�'�< rY'S,y,Ii�.1� ;_���'•/ n --� � _ '� J h•�..'�_ 7� �lIU �'1'rat1G4 thvL� G F 'ij ;Y�� I r Ito to G - - - , ' F i \I I ,i S ppL� r� 1 I •tt P 'q ? ._I fy' (_ " � � ' MZ lit it �,i\ /' �,� P i 11 U t{pp'litl�;'li l!1O�TU �(��II' II Vl •� ° - ��� ,�..+ � � It jr %) .p el tP •� L1(,W(d41G\(i'I In IU� � .� , . ,. I („ •e _• /'�• ; in .� %/f'� 1 N Il A'IIItUOV� i IP 1 ti .. •I �!: 10 II V'1.I I I IA APv y •: � .� ill � j1 y�..�;lae•P_�) � .j'' ' / r 1L )h l� ��' 'o R fix: 6J _71VI11 Jl 110 �.h. r �S_�t H�''9� to � r YnPf t� ��� • '' .�,i l .j i :fix y.,• X P; tF a .! ' j ♦ I<y ea'T. t L. owl Cii " Je >a V ` F M a f 4 City of RANCHO MIRAGE 69-825 HIGHWAY Ill RANCHO MIRAGE CALIFORNIA 92270 TELEPHONE (619) 324-4511 July 12, 1984 �f JUL 1 .6 1984 Mr. Stan Sawa, Senior PlannerCity ENVIRpNMENT RVI 73-510fFredmWaringtDrive c ry o� aALM of ERTEs Palm Desert, CA 92260 RE: CUP 84-6, D.P. 01-82 Amendment #1 - Sagewood Plaza Service Station (i.iobile Oil Company) Dear Stan: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed automobile service station at the southeast corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey Drive. As you know, the project site lies at our City boundary line, across from Rancho Mirage property zoned for Low Density Residential development (maximum three (3) dwelling units per acre) . Therefore, our primary concern on this matter is protecting the residential area from possible disruptive impacts that could result from the service station use. We have noted in the plans you have provided that the station is designed to be "back loaded", with the pump islands and service bays on the interior of the site. An extensive landscape treatment will be provided at the corner and on the Monterey Drive frontage. However, our Staff has recognized a serious discrepancy in the proposed plan regarding Monterey Drive right-of-way and improvement width. The plan you transmitted to me indicates fifty (50) feet of right-of-way from center line, with thirty-four (34) feet improvement width. The ultimate width for Monterey Drive as a designated major arterial roadway should be fifty-five (55) feet half-width with a forty-three (43) or forty-four (44) foot improvement section. To my recollection these dimensions were indicated on Tentative Parcel Map #18764 for the overall Sagewood Shopping Center development. We would strongly encourage that the street be widened to ultimate width and right-of-way dedi- cation be secured in conjunction with this project. A street striping plan and relocation of existing traffic signal equipment will also be necessary. Our Public Works Department Staff will gladly coordinate the street plans and striping with your Staff. While we believe the project proponent is to be commended for their approach to dealing with a difficult land use project, we would offer the following additional recommendations for site improvement or conditions of approval . 1. The landscape strip along the Country Club Drive frontage should be widened to twenty-five (25) feet versus the ten (10) feet currently indicated, to match the width on Monterey Drive.. Mr. Stan Sawa July 12, 1984 Page Two 2. Hours of operation should be restricted so as not to extend beyond the early evening, in consideration of the surrounding residential areas. 3. A lighting plan should be required that indicates low level lighting that is directed on the site, with a minimum of spill over. 4. Signage should be restricted to wall signs and low height monument signs. If you need any clarification regarding our comments, please call . I would appreciate a copy of the Staff Report on this project once it is prepared. Sincerely, David Abrams, AICP Director of Planning DA:dko cc: Steve Birbeck, City Manager Marty Bowman, Public Works Consultant nea°�a 40-2T5 PRICXLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CAUFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 IMPARZT04T CF BUILDING & SAFETY PREi.IIM1AM RESIIEtd OF PLANS 1 .5 IS ITT A PLAN C=l DFvFznPrnarr: aA7. # E •C i31L JUL - 91984 � A96A ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1„n_ �� �,�y may.•-1./1 4ry�{9�/ .p �/^• CITY PALM DESERT. BEFORE ANY FAR Cal= CAN BE MADE, ATmMMAL MUlP= IS tli Fm I=?.. . [ (T7NP= SAL MAW= AM SPECIFICATZO E •G7 J� CMa= STRIICTMAL T)RAWINM AM CALLUAA=IS COMPL= H.V.A.C. , FtAf�}T2TCAL AND FLU-SING PLANS & SPECZ7ZATMM CC�� TITLE 24 aW= CODTSF.RVAT=l MCaMUA 1 0 CC{ F= GWING PLANS II ate JOE�PAL,(.I�R7, DIRECTOR OF BUILDING & SAFETY August 16, 1984 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE Case No. DP 01-82 (Amendment #0 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by CARVER MANAGEMENT CORPORATION (MOBIL OIL CORPORATION) for approval of an amendment to a previously approved development plan to allow the construction and operation of an automotive service station with three service bays in the PC (2) zone located at the southeast corner (service station located near intersection of Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive, more particularly described as: APN 622-030-021 P.R.-7 S.P I (DP 15-79) i R E 8,000 (8) P R �a q..r R-5 H VL Y LA L - ) ) 1 SAID Hearing will be held on Tuesday, September 4, 1984, at 7:00 P.M., at the Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission PUBLISH: Desert Post August 24, 1984 Am August 16, 1984 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE Case No. DP 01-82 (Amendment #1) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by CARVER MANAGEMENT CORPORATION (MOBIL OIL CORPORATION) for approval of an amendment to a previously approved development plan to allow the construction and operation of an automotive service station with three service bays in the PC (2) zone located at the southeast corner (service station located near intersection of Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive, more particularly described as: APN 622-030-021 s P.R.-7 , S.P ■ i aa 1S-7 (OP 9) N R-s 2`8,000 (8) F R S.Gf� bu. RR:-5 '� H V L Y L A SAID Hearing will be held on Tuesday, September 4, 1984, at 7:00 P.M., at the Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission PUBLISH: Desert Post August 24, 1984 AM INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO: Director of Environmental Services FROM: Director of Public Works SUBJECT: GH P-84-6, DP 01-82 AMENDMENT #1 - MOBIL OIL CORP. DATE:July 16, 1984 The following should be considered as conditions of approval : (1) Drainage and signalization fund fees, as required by city ordinance, shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. (2) Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218 and the Master Drainage Plan, to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. (3) Additional storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer. (4) Landscaping maintenance on Monterey Avenue/Country Club Drive shall be provided by the 6Amowners aaaewia0ka. (5) Existing utilities on Monterey Avenue/Country Club Drive shall be undergrounded. (6) Traffic safety striping on Monterey Avenue/Country Club Drive shall be provided to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. A traffic control plan must be submitted to and approved by the Director of Public Works before plac- ing pavement markings. (7) Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval prior to issuance- of any permits. (8) Installation of one-half landscaping median in Monterey Avenue/Country Club Drive or cash payment for one-half the cost of landscaped median at the option of the Director of Public Works. (9) Size, number and location of driveways to Public Works specifications. (10) Only two driveway approaches will be allowed to serve this property. Size and location to Public Works specifications. 9 -2 kC &-- VcCLELLAN, P.E. ARC:BDM/ms a`l �C-� � J u L 161984 ENVIRONNIE14TAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT ea-. RIVERSIDE COUNTY tEOF CA-L FIRE DEPARTMENT ' q. IN COOPERATION WITH THE C UNTY - CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY .�.. RIVERSIDE. ....iJ P DAVID L.FLAKE FIRE CHIEF 210 WEST SAN JACINTO AVENUE PERRIS,CALIFORNIA 92370 July 9, 1984 TELEPHONE:(714)657.3183 f, # HO MIRAGE FIRE STATION E 0.800 Highway 111 L I 1 �}Zancho Mirage, CA 92270 - 39Q�. Rmon Director ofEnvironmental Services CI7OOFnPlvI;AL ector y, SERVICES 73-510 Fred Waring Drive ALA4 DESERT Palm Desert, CA 92260 Reference: Ewft 8i-(3JDP 01-82, Amendment # 1 Applicant: Mobil Oil Corp. Dear Mr. Diaz: The following fire protection requirements are in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code and Life Safety Code standards. 1. Install a water system capable of delivering 3808 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a three (3). hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be- based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. Fire flow requirements will depend on built-in fire protection provisions of buildings. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants located: a. install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 150 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. b. exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. c. curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either directionfrom each hydrant. d, hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and three copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. Upon approval, one copy will be sent to the Building Department, and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in CUP 84-6/D.P. 01-82 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal." 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. Ramon Diaz 7/9/84 Director of Inv. Serv. Page 2. Palm Desert 6. Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when the applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval. 7. Plans must be approved prior to installation of fuel delivery system. Sincerely, DAVID L. FLAKE Fire Chief Ey Mike McConnell Fire Marshal to cc: Jim Zimmerman, CVWD II - Sea I . II II II - - - I - N II - - i I I I II � I II it Y +. r Y r G--I-SKUn —Of i T_U_V_wk z _-_ WARREN C. PERKINS 40049 SAGEWOOD DR. POST OFFICE BOX 1596 PALM DESERT.CA 92261 (019)568-1923 IPHONE) 7- 44- I- r1a 2�X_Z� e ez�) Z0 e 41 CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNERS' LIST AFFIDAVIT The attached list was taken from the latest available Riverside County Assessment roll , of all the persons to whom all property is assessed for a distance of 300 ft. from the exterior boundaries of the subject property, legally described as follows : A por. of Lot 104 Tr. 1179 I hereby certify (or declare) that the foregoing is true and, correct. i 6-15-84 Date ignat Ye 622-040-008 622-042-001 622-042-024 John F. Hansler Terry J. Guzak _'Mervyn Spivak 40365 Sagewood Dr. 40104 Sagewood Dr. 40288 Orchidtree Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 622-042-025 622-042-026 622-042-027 Frank E. Cerone Edwina L. Hodges Mitchell P. Pries 40296 Orchidtree Court 40304 Orchidtree Court 40312 Sagewood Dr. Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 622-042-028 618-480-017 618-480-018 Charles Spruck Sam Anderman Benjamin R. Manoou 40360 Sagewood Dr. 1440 Hillview Cove P.O. Box 4079 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs, CA 92263 618-02-03 620-180-003 620-180-014 Nancy Troy Mayer Group Suncrest Country Club c/o Cascade c/o Alan I. Casden 73450 Country Club Dr. 835 Myrtle Ave. 9171 Wilshire Blvd.3rd F. Palm Desert, CA 92260 Brookland, N.Y. 11206 Beverly Hills, CA 90210 622-020-002 622-031-006 WA PE12.k10-5 Jams E. Raul Isaac Newman P.O. fiOX 15,1Co Ctaal 10542 Grove Oak Dr. 40064 Silktree Court PAL►A4' '(�--SQ1 E ,Gel1 to Santa Ana, CA 92705 Palm Desert, CA 92260 5�L 1P�E ►�.o.dx�� G32 02-10-0tt 4o:>33 --eoAftk,,t,-8s_ 4o333 5 SW oco PIF— RLaU , oe,&,e -4Ic 1 Raa&o Gd rr�.60 ��p� PAP , �-6Aena,cr.1� �cvN�s p .PpX (05 ! Z55 ►.) � Glib �A #�� G� p Inns, R. Gu►Aof-y f'a nn �e1► s Ge gaab�- West Coast Mapping :Mobil Oil Co. 4431 W. Rosecrans, Suite 500 Attn: J.H. Huntsberry Hawthorne, CA 90250 3655 S. Soto St. Los Angeles, CA 90058 O *]RSHIP WITHIN 300 FT. OF THE RIBWEST OORNER OF YONTEREY & JNPRY C7TJB DRIVE, PAU4 DESERT �7z>� a T" 622-020-001 .622-030-001 622-030-002 Foundation For Retarded Charles A. Sadova Norman B. Lubinsky Children 40361 Sagewood Dr. 1292 Acacia St. P.O. Box 1183 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Rialto, CA 92376 Palm Desert, CA 92260 622-030-003 622-030-004 v 622-030-005 Dennis J. Parrish Ragland F. Sweet Michael J. Titone 40355 Sugarbush Court 40353 Sugarbush Court 7746 Danvers St. Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Downey, CA 90240 622-030-006 ` 622-030-007 622-030-008 Robert S. Ritchey William G. Henderson B. Ali Farzaneh 40349 Sugarbush Court 40347 Sugarbush Court 40345 Sugarbush Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 622-030-009 622-030-010 622-036-011_ Richard W. Cortese Arthur A. Wilkes OWNER -'� 40341 Sagewood Dr. 522 Tralee Circle 40333 Sagewood Dr. Palm Desert, CA 92260 Delta BC Canada V4M 3R8 Palm Desert, CA 92260 622-030-012 \. 622-030-013 '' 622-030-014 Denver T. Johnstone James M. Calucchia 40329 Sagewood Dr. P.O. Box 955 40049 Sagewood Dr. Palm Desert, CA 92260 Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Palm Desert, CA 92260 " 622-030-015 622-030-016 622-030-017 Samuel H. Hill Thomas E. Yeager Van G. Tanner 40045 Sagewood Dr. 40041 Sagewood Dr. 40033 Sagewood Dr. Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 622-030-018 622-030-019 622-030-020 Mariana P. Hutchins McBail Co. 1",%,Zi�32 ee H ers Assoc. 40027 Sagewood Dr. P.O. Box 1056 . Dia� lvd.#309 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Alamo, Cy. 94507 afave te, CAX�94o49 ��aas 622-030-021 622-031-001 622-031-002 Sagewood Associates Ross D. McMullin McBail Co. 110 W. Las Tumas Dr. 40024 Sagewood Dr. P.O. Box 1056 San Gabriel, CA 91776 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Alamo, CA 94507 622-031-003 622-031-004 622-031-005 Mark Steinback McBail Co. David L. Miller 40040 Sagewood Dr. P.O. Box 1056 40056 Silktree Court Palm Desert, CA 92260 Alarm, CA 9-4507 Palm Desert, CA 92260 622-031-009 622-031-010 622-0 -0 _ Ronald B. Schulman McBail Co. Si1ktr VH omeowners Assoc. 40088 Silktree Court P.O. Box 1056 3732 ablo Blvd.#309 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Alarm, CA 94507 Lafayeite,%k 94549 INVOLVED PARTIES MOBIL OIL C. U. P. SEC MONTEREY AND COUNTRY CLUB NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE POSITION J. H. Huntsberry 3655 So. Soto St. (213)683-6176 Mobil Repr. L. A. , CA 90058 B. R. Fox 612 So. Flower St. (213)683-6397 Mobil Repr. Rm. 926 L. A. , CA 90017 L. W. Hanley 612 So. Flower St. (213)683-5957 Mobil Engr. Rm. 721 L. A. , CA 90017 Roy William Carver 110 W. Las Tunas Dr. (818)285-2132 Developer San Gabriel, CA 91776 Saldra Yauitz 559 So. Palm Cyn. Dr. (619)325-8171 Developer Repr. Palm Springs, CA 92262 Stanley Morse 73-255 El Paseo (619)346-6167 Developer Engr. Suite #8 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Richard Mount 559 So. Palm Cyn. Dr. (619)320-3033 Designer Suite #Blll Palm Springs, CA 92262 Bernie K.K.Leung 73-960 El Paseo (619)346-4225 Architect Suite #4 Palm Desert, CA 92260 :mlt (0290G) 71 JUIi! 2 8 1984 EN VI. NIAL SERVICES 51 OF PALM DESLRT 3- ,10 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 I TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO(S): �,- PROJECT: SACr �WOOj� FL,az S��Vic� A S7A-r10/Nl APPLICANT: MpBIL 01L Cc-)zP Enclosed please find materials describing a project for which the following is being requested: 14PR,P ej ;AL pF A �OtiDiT/O✓AL !/fE �E2y��� v _4E,4,vME�vT TD Av /JPPA�✓Cp DC!'ELOPNE�r 4Z4,V 4,✓Ib /J f/Fc4 qTi✓E �ECL QTtigTr�. OF EV✓� �MEn/T-44 1M411XC7— TO '41'eoW �ovsT/2��y�o^/ 4,/ 0 3'EPATio v dY� ft„t/ Q dTcv.I08/L E SER✓iCE 5-T-4770/V 11V A /�/S/�i cT �O.NM ER%aL ZoNE �mli+7290 �4 r- THE SOuTf/EAST �.�,✓�.� m/= �o.✓TE,pCc� �9,✓D �ov.✓T.r� CLd7j' The attached data was prepared by the applicant and is being forwarded to you for. comments and recommended conditions of approval. The city is interested in the probable impacts on the environment (including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, noise objects of historical or aesthetic significance) and recommended conditions of approval based on your expertise and area of concern. Your comments and recommended conditions of approval must be received by this office prior to 4:30 p.m. 7-/5/-8y in order to be discussed by the land division committee. The land division committee (comprised of director of environmental services, city buildir.p official, city engineer, fire marshal and a representative of CVWD) uIH discuss the Comments and recommended conditions of approval and will forward them to the planninv corn nission through the staff report. Any information received by this o .rce after the receipt deadline will not be discussed by the land division committee. Sincerely, RAMO,ti DIRECTOR. OF RD/Ir Att?chrner,;s i Legal Description of Entire Parcel Lot 104 of Tract 11791, Book 104 , Pages 19 - 23, Riverside Co. The subject property, a portion of the above described property, is presently owned by Sagewood Assocs. and will be sold to Mobil Oil Corp. ! Mobil Oil Corp. is intending to develop on the property a two bay service station with three pump islands covered by one canopy. The use will be for the pumping of motor fuel and the light service of vehicles. No major repairs will be performed. i i i I 001 MOBIL OIL CORPORATION ? REFCK)R YOUR REFERENCE + TE I NUMBER OH ' NETAMOUNT D 99 F. FB67-006 06/01/84 RE0040567688 140,00 f CUP NEW BUSINESS MONTERE E W i o B .MLLOE NyMBEs ONEd(NUMBER• LHEp(DAiE• •M0INT OF CHECK' .TN EAON !'a 'NDMNY V0000539908 001 0474-252410 06/07/84 140,00 IF INCORRECT9 RETURN INTACT TO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE9 PO BOX 28069 OALLAS• TX 75221. C OTY _ JIB PQ L G�IA DD LS S LS R` �'c � G�f�G�l b®. a 45 275 Pvlaft0b Poor deuce, P®Omm ®es m¢, �.5�` �® 1' tD pp©►►��J_���1��� T11 _ t J�i 0-S APPLOC ATUCb FORM : deportment of anw0 'ouummeutoO 966V0C" a POeuou Ong d0v1*00n a MorsiL 01'1- Co2y. Applicant (please print) . IP I Z S, F1-ow,Ei2 g�T• ZI 3) 693-6397 Mailing Address Telephone Los 4A)6,c_Gr_5 Cp,• A-TV: 13-k- Fox RM 916 9evI7 City r State Zip-Code REQUEST* (Describe specific mature of approval requested I. APPRo✓F_ 60dST2uGTlON of A -Ttoo GA4 5ggor-e Sf.4TroAJ in)tTh# yiREE P0*0 1$�kNDS COUE�FI� 13,� oNF_ L'A-�D�)/• PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: (J PowriotiJ (_ QAacu- 7) of Ior /01/ 7;l,4cr 1179/ f /70oli' /o5Zi (l�A&rr5 19- 23 /lld�nsiDr_ Co . ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. /3aDK 6,2,2— P+&,F 03 �RCEL 2/ EXISTING ZONING Property Owner Authorization The undersigned states that they are the owner(s) of the property described herein and hereby give author- ization for the filing of this application. rnl W.f (tiavm ( .crt� Pil M, 1127/9 ignature Dar' - Agreement absolving the City of Palm Desert of all liabilities relative to any dead restrictions. 1 DO BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT, Absolve site City of Palm Desert of all liabilities regarding any deed restrictions /m/a't may be applicable to the property described herein.A VI/.A IU�Y✓1 l G� .6 , t Signature Da� Applicant's Signature -Z7-fry Signature I Date (FOR STAFF USE ONLY) Environmental Status Accepted by: J ar G+ ❑ Ministerial Act E.A.No.❑ categorical Exemption ❑ Negative Declaration CASEMJO—o ... 1 v- - I? }I D D ❑ Other Reference Case No. EWROMYENT SEWICEB/ATS B•17-e2 Leung & Bernard A.I.A. ARCHITECT 73-960 El Paseo, Suite 4 PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 oerE / 7 4 /' Boa NO. (6619)) 346.4225 ATTENTION (/� } TO 's calla 1477- STAls/ ';A i A- WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications • ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION T 1�r CL L I J THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval or your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submitcopies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS � �nD� JUL 1 ENyir? F SERV ES O CITY PAfM nccrR COPY TO SIGNED: PROWU 240P wiz,Ga ,,Mn,01471. it enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. 1� NCiNUTES ADJOURNED CITY COUNCIL MEETING MAY 20, 1982 s t • . • • a � a . z . a a a +� +r + * at a * * � � +� ■ * � * * � a MR. JAMES HARRINGTON, 73-365 Juniper Street, Palm Desert, addressed Council as the owner of the property where the energy conservation system was being installed by Mr. Downs. He expressed his frustrations with the Palm Desert Property Owners' Association. He felt the City's Building Department was all that the City needed. While the Association had once served a good purpose, it was no longer necessary. Mr. Doug Phillips responded that it would be up to the members of the Association to disband the organization. VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. CASE NOS. DP 01-82, ADJ 01=92, AND 164 C - ROY W. CARVER, APPELLANT: REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL FROM CERTAIN CONDITIONS IMPOSED BY THE CITY OF PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION IN GRANTING APPROVAL FOR DEVELOPMENT OF SAGEWOOD SHOPPING CENTER LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF MONTEREY AVENUE AND COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE. (Continued from the Meeting of May 13, 1982.) Mayor Wilson noted the Public Hearing was still Open in that this matter had been continued from the previous meeting. Mr. McClellan reviewed a site plan of the project with the Council. He noted the appellant had requested that in lieu of a left-turn in, left-turn out median be permitted there, that a modified median to where the traffic could make a left-hand turn onto Monterey be permitted. He said Staff had serious reservations about that request because firstly, as people are coming out to turn left, as they see traffic coming to that intersection, traffic is accelerating if it has been at a stop, and it is difficult to adjust speed. Secondly if a car goes out there and makes a left-hand turn and stops in the median area, it, in effect, becomes a storage area and the second car could hang out into either travel lane and block thru traffic. He stated Staff's recommendation was to deny a median opening there, that traffic can come down Monterey or Country Club, go through the protected turn there at that intersection and go down Country Club and make a right-hand turn into the shopping center. The second recommendation was that a median not be permitted on Country Club within 660 feet of the intersection. The first driveway approach shown by the appeallant is approximately 300 feet, and they are now requesting a median opening there. He noted their civil engineer had come up with a couple of design modifications that have in fact improved the interior circulation. He reviewed those modifications on the site plan. The third issue was the driveway approach to the east. Staff had concerns that that approach was located too closely to the intersection with Sagewood which is 395 feet. In reviewing this with the appellant, it seems to be indicated that Sagewood will not be extended north, thus there will not be a need for a left turn there in the future. This median, therefore, would be permissible based on those facts. However, Staff's strong feeling that it would be better if there were only one driveway opening on Country Club approximately one-half way between Monterey and Sagewood with one median opening. He concluded by stating the opening on Monterey Avenue would create many problems and as the traffic in the future increases, it will be more hazardous. Mayor Wilson invited input from the appellant. MR. STAN MORRIS, Consulting Engineering for R. W. Carver, 73-255 El Paseo, Palm Desert, reviewed their proposed changes on the site -3- � 1 MINUTES MAY 20, 1982 ADJOURNED CITY COUNCIL MEETING * � r � �r * * a � � a � �r �r a * �r a * r * + r � • a a * * a a � plan. He respectfully requested Council's approval inasmuch as they felt strongly they would need all the ingress/egress requested. Mayor Wilson stated he agreed with Staff's concern with the opening on Monterey inasmuch as it already carries a great deal of traffic with 1 only more the in the future with the new Town Center being built. Councilman Snyder said he had difficulty approving the interim driveway opening in that it was a known traffic hazard. Councilman Newbrander concurred stating also that there was already a great deal of traffic on Country Club Drive. MR. TIM JOHNSON, 43-101 Portola Avenue, spoke stating that difficulty in getting in and out of a shopping area made drivers angry. MR. BILL CARVER, appellant, spoke in support of his request and stating that in order for them to have a viable project, the needed access. Councilman McPherson stated that although the parking within the project was not an issue, he felt that the row of parking spaces which would back into the major entrance lane of the center was very dangerous. With no further input, Mayor Wilson declared the Public Hearing Closed. Councilman Newbrander moved to deny the appeal to provide a median break on Monterey Avenue and to uphold the Planning Commission recommendation. Councilman Snyder seconded the motion; carried unanimously. 11 IX. RESOLUTIONS J A. RESOLUTION NO. 82-47 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, CONCURRING WITH THE DETACHMENT OF PROPERTY IN PALM DESERT AND SUBSEQUENT ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF INDIAN WELLS. Mr. Bouman stated this was a matter the Council had considered in Study Session several times, and now official action is required. The proposed resolutions sets forth the City's concurrence that the property consisting of those three residential lots within the Vintage Club which are within the City as well as a small portion of the extension of Toro Peak be detached from the City of Palm Desert and attached to the City of Indian Wells. Upon motion by Snyder, second by Puluqi, Resolution No. 82-47 was adopted by unanimous vote of the Council. . B. RESOLUTION NO. 82-48 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE 1981-82 BUDGET TO PROVIDE FOR A PORTION OF COSTS OF REALIGNING THE PALM VALLEY CHANNEL. Mr. Bouman reported that work had been completed last summer on the Palm Valley Channel to improve it in an attempt to reduce the chances of its overflowing during a heavy rain. The City's portion of the cost is $40,000, and the C.V.W.D. has now billed us for it. Since it is not a budgeted item, the proposed resolution is neccessary to allow payment. Upon motion by Puluqi, second by Snyder, Resolution No. 82-48 was adopted by unanimous vote of the Council. C. RESOLUTION NO. 82-49 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A FEE SCHEDULE FOR AMBULANCE SERVICE. -4- MINUTES REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEE`NG MAY 13, 1982 Mayor Wilson declared the Public Hearing Open and asked for Staff's report. Mr. Diaz reported that the applicant is seeking a change of zone from R-1 to Office Professional in order to convert the existing residence to an office use. He noted the General Plan designates the site as OP. The request is, therefore, in conformance with the Land Use Element of the General Plan, and Staff recommended approval. Mayor Wilson invited input from the applicant. MR. CHARLES MILLER, applicant, indicated his concurrence with Staff's recommendation. Mayor Wilson invited public input either in FAVOR of or in OPPOSITION to the request, and none was offered. He declared the Public Hearing Closed. Upon motion by McPherson, second by Puluqi, Ordinance No. 300 was passed to second reading by unanimous.vote of the Council. H. CASE NOS. DP 01-82, ADJ 01-82, AND 164 C - ROY W. CARVER, APPELLANT: REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL. FROM CERTAIN CONDITIONS IMPOSED BY THE CITY OF PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION IN GRANTING APPROVAL FOR DEVELOPMENT OF SAGEWOOD SHOPPING CENTER LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF MONTEREY AVENUE AND COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE. Mayor Wilson declared the Public Hearing Open and asked for Staff's report. Mr. Diaz passed out a letter from the appellant, Mr. Carver. He stated that at the time of the application for the appeal, there were six conditions of approval that the applicant was appealing. As indicated in the Staff report since objections to those conditions were not raised at the Planning Commission hearing on April 6, 1982, Staff would —� recommend that the matter be referred to the Planning Commission for consideration and then back to Council for report. Since that time, however, the applicant has agreed to five of the six conditions, and the only condition he is appealing at this time is a Department of Public Works condition that the plans should be amended to provide a median break be permitted on Monterey 250 feet south of the intersection of Country Club in order to permit left-turn ingress and egress at that point into the center. The applicant is also requesting a median break on Country Club. Since these matters are 1) within the realm of the Department of Public Works and 2) directly related to the Traffic Committee, the Director of Public Works has reviewed both of these requests and presented alternatives to the applicant, basically if ingress and egress from Country Club Drive is desired, then one driveway on Country Club should be constructed and the proposed two driveways eliminated. If the applicant wished to have a left turn into the center for traffic that is heading west from Country Club Drive, Staff proposed to eliminate both of those entries and have only one entry in the center. The reason for that is the proximity of Monterey and Sagewood; to put the left turn access in at the existing driveway would place it too close to Sagewood and would result in conflicts if moved further to the west. Because it is a traffic matter, he recommended that the issue of ingress and egress from those two streets be referred to the Public Works Department for formal report and recommendation to you at the next meeting. Mayor Wilson invited input from the appellant: MR. BILL CARVER, appellant, addressed Council stating they had developed other centers in the area and had always been hurt by the -6- LV 111V U 1 LJ ' TtEGULAR CITY COUNT- MEETING MAY 13, 1982 fact that many of the properties developed don't take into account not only the traffic on the street, but also the merchants that are in business in these centers. He reviewed examples. He respectfully requested Council's favorable consideration of his appeal. Council discussion followed relative to the request. Councilman McPherson moved to continue the matter to the Adjourned Meeting of May 20, 1982, with direction to the Department of Public Works and the Department of Environmental Services to meet with the appellant in an attempt to work out a mutually acceptable solution. Councilman Newbrander seconded the motion; carried unanimously. IX. RESOLUTIONS A. RESOLUTION NO. 82-42 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENT TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPING do LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 1980-1 IN FISCAL YEAR 1982-83. Mr. McClellan reported that this item was an annual requirement stipulated by State statute, and it is a request for a Public Hearing to be held the first meeting in June to levy the annual assessment in this district which is Presidential Plaza. At the time of the hearing, there will be a staff report and an engineer's report listing the proposed assessments for the year. Upon motion by Newbrander, second by McPherson, Resolution No. 82-42 was adopted by unanimous vote of the Council. B. RESOLUTION NO. 82-43 - A R-ESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENT TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPING be LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 81-3 IN FISCAL YEAR 1982-83. Mr. McClellan stated this resolution was the same as the previous one and covered the area known as the Vineyards. Upon motion by McPherson, second by Puluqi, Resolution No. 82-43 was adopted by unanimous vote of the Council. C. RESOLUTION NO. 82-44 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENT TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 2 (LEWIS HOMES) IN FISCAL YEAR 1982-83. Mr. McClellan stated this was the same as the previous two resolutions and set a public hearing to consider the assessments for the area known as Canyon Cove on Haystack Road. Upon motion by McPherson, second by Newbrander, Resolution No. 82-44 was adopted by unanimous vote of the Council. D. RESOLUTION NO. 82-45 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS TO VACATE A PORTION OF DEEP CANYON ROAD SOUTH OF COVERED WAGON TRAIL AND TORO PEAK ROAD SOUTH OF OLD PROSPECTOR TRAIL UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF PART 3, DIVISION 9, OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE AND FIXING TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING ALL PERSONS INTERESTED IN OR OBJECTING TO PROPOSED VACATION. -7- PLANNING COMMMON RESOLUTION NO.3U A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT PLAN, ADJUSTMENT, PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW CASE, AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A COMMERCIAL CENTER IN THE PC (2) ZONE. CASE NO. DP 01-82, AD3 01-82 AND 164 C WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 6th day of April, 1992, hold a duly noticed public hearing to considerna request by ROY WILLIAM CARVER for approval of a Development Plan, Adjustment for parking, Preliminary Design Review Case and Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact to allow construction of a 92,215 sq.ft. commercial center in the PC (2) (District Commercial Center) zone located at the southeast corner of Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive, more particularly described as: Lot 104, Tract 11791 WHEREAS; said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedures to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89", in that the Director of Environmental Services has determined that the project will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment and a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact has been prepared. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts to justify their actions, as described below: 1. The proposed project generally conforms to the intent and purpose of the PC (2) zone district. 2. The proposed location of the Use is in accord with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and the purpose of the district in which the site is located. 3. The proposed location of the Use and the conditions under which it will be operated and maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare, or be.materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. The proposed Use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of this title, except for approved variances or adjustments. 5. The proposed Use complies with the goals, objectives, and policies of the City's adopted General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission in this case. 2. That the Planning Commission does hereby approve Conceptual Development Plan No. 01-820 ADJ 01-82, and 164 C subject to those conditions attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 6th day of April, 1992, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: CRITES, KRYDER, MILLER, RICHARDS,WOOD NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE ATTE ; i GEOR D. KRYD hairman AMON A. DIAZ, S retary /Ir PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 788 CONDMONS OF APPROVAL DP 01-829 ADJ 01-92 AND 164 C Department of Environmental Services: 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the Department of Environmental Services, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any uses contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first complete all the procedural requirements of the City which include,,but are not limited to, Design Review and building permit procedures. 3. Construction of a.portion of said.project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval otherwise said approval shall become null, void and of no effect whatsoever, unless a time extension is granted. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits .and/or clearance from the following agencies: Riverside County Department of Health Palm Desert Design Review Board Process City Fire Marshal Coachella Valley Water District Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the Department of Building and Safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 5. Major truck deliveries and trash pick-up for Market to be only between 8 a.m. to 9 p.m. Monday through Friday only. 6. Project to be redesigned so that outdoor noise levels do not exceed 70 dBA and indoor levels do not exceed 45 CNEL, as measured at the residential units to the south, with applicant to submit verified data by qualified noise engineer; revised plan to be reviewed by the Planning Commission prior to submission of final construction drawings. 7. All architecture of future buildings to be compatible, with Design Review Board approval of plans. 8. Trash enclosures for each detached building to be provided; with design and location to be approved by City and local trash company. 9. All public street and parking lot improvements shall be constructed as a part of Phase I. 10. All conditions of the Design Review Board shall be met. 11. Detailed parking lot and building lighting plan shall be submitted to staff for approval, subject to applicable lighting standards; plan to be prepared by qualified lighting engineer. 12. Driving aisle south of building "D" to Sagewood Drive shall be increased to 24 feet wide with no decrease in landscape planter width along south property line. 13. Parking space and aisles shall comply with Palm Desert Design Standards for off- street parking facilities. 14. Eliminate parallel parking spaces since they are not permitted by Palm Desert Design Standards for off-street parking facilities. 15. 3 to 3.5 foot decorative wall and/or mounding shall be provided to sufficiently screen parking lot area from streets. 16. Setbacks for buildings "E" and "F" shall be increased to a minimum of 20 feet. 17. Aisle to south of market shall be gated for emergency access only. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 788 18. Parking adjustment is allowed to a maximum of 10% of the required parking. 19. Market operator to submit letter indicating that he has. read the conditions of approval and will abide by same; letter to be submitted prior to issuance of building permit. 20. Parking lot directional stripping and safety signs .to, be. provided; plan to be submitted with final working drawings for approval. 21. Only delivery diesel trucks built after 1974 shall be used. Department of Public Works: 1. Combined bikeway/sidewalks shall be installed on Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive as shown on preliminary landscaping plan. 2. Traffic safety striping shall be provided to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. 3. Either installation of one half of median on Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive or payment of one-half estimated median costs at the option of the Director of Public Works. 4. No median breaks shall be permitted within 660 feet of the Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive intersection. 5. Grading plan shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit. 6. Signalization fund fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. 7. Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted as required by. Ordinance to the City Engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The subdivider shall submit "as built" plans prior to acceptance of the improvements by the City. 8. Landscaping maintenance on Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive shall be provided by the owner. 9. Existing utilities shall be undergrounded. 10. Sidewalks shall be installed on Sagewood Drive. City Fire Marshal: 1. Install a water system capable of delivering 4000 GPM fire flow for a two (2) hour duration in addition to domestic or other supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 2. Install Riverside County Super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 150 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. A. Hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. -- B. Exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. C. Curbs (if installed), shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each-hydrant. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. Upon approval, one copy will be sent to the Building Department and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, and approved r PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 788 by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Case Number DP 01-82 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal." 5: Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the buil0ing site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. 6. The market building shall be fully protected by an authomatic fire sprinkler system. 7. Fire lanes shall be marked as per municipal code. POR. N W. 114 NW//4 SEC. 8 0 T. 5 S. 6 E 622 - O 3 POR. Cl T Y OF PAL M T R. A. 184/ ..� DESERT. �' BK v 620 r — 14. 6 v v h — Ef7UA�59' - — 6 -UB s9= 37'30" E Q I� is24.9a P 7:` c/r ; o PALM ... .. ._ . .-- - .. DESERT T..• rr i/79/ h 3 c 2 e} <- ? //73 8a r lt79N da 2J a e= O ^1 M it I n d /04 7074 /00 N al (2/ n4 4/9 N a j 906Ac /�/' Lq'Bi ' b 42 h% a a yt r 4/ 189 �0 4,4• 40 w 5y p4 °4 a /C3 M 4 t, 5 . 030 of p y4 '' 43 � `4 ° � b BK �I R a 38 'It 1 3008 44 4 a O a 618 v: m m -zo u ��p a _ 2 V. h '�, 2 Q �I 0 N89^38�43"E 772. 9L /4 O 45 ° Uzi89 i.8.7. 3p.8 rasa J& 4t 7e *735 i ac/a //-F 37 $k _ O gj.83 so.a8 M r 3 0,3/ /2 / , v k o R3�,r ° v 46 O 0° o /4 Itr o b ° s Z �4 0 this y \ O c v� /6 c /9 20 M Z/ ,� °`4 9 4 7 N =477 o the ,48 0 /2 0� Fos L .�oy O �o `..j G.6l ..,zvy iaca 451c <e a�o robs S'/L SEE a V < ) a R Lpl O / 4 8, `•s O q N a 2 7 /5 `.5 cil ` e n J¢4 iq c,a N W~ s/. j3 t!iC ,.y./L._p b� �Eo9-� /02 v a v a,�, 6h / Lot A a 52 a "' I 1, O // � s v ` y�� g0.3o „>s ceos h8 `- \ V / 5/ a,yo . vAW C� Masi . o• /^ L It" `�ems. L 7/Ac a 'I O�L < 97 sz P b° /O $b q v 63 62 b 2/ ',. N 30 30 J `, 1� 50 49In 10 4. 0 0 'ry _ n m 4 pvt B4 O . a n n h30 /30 O o-d a5 Jz3-� sc3� B w c� n O BO 9a� � cos b P / � ' � � C DArE OLO NO NEW NO 55 �t1 50 Lq. J98R A 9c 89 'L B/.R6 O4 ASSESSORS MAP 8K.622 PG.03. M.6/04//9-23 Tract No. //,79/ RIVERSIDE CC TY, CAL IF. _ rn :by � Q) y H - • - CITY RANCHO (WEST SECTION L IN£ , MIRAGE L M/TS tX. _... ..._... � T CITY OF PALM DESERT LIMITS n A Lol I AIi791 •n a 90/ /z/.4z >]st/B ac a�+ i A � 7z.zc � � e ® O� OF I OF p C3 I} M cn n 4 v 0 a V OV 0o p 0 n I� ¢Z W w T n a O {9 i b'.9: 0� �.aao> g�k p1 0_2_Gb� D3s d� „as o ew OO O D 3t,74 ?Q Y A 4 b ' `• sv sz a.3933 00 0, 4 cb O n ® b a I'I}'� V y 20�zo N O b � N T: I} yvz 4/71 ® /a O/ N 7c. V tb (� we y^ O v ^ 7 , N M1 ti © w ,i /o33y N O n //7� 4? © m b w o LNe ® 11 W 6%.cb n O 8 v w y P q '° N c./g74 Ll to -h v n) O n lc.s4 u �.n a w b \ n 4 H 9I.34 rT,(b G°r6 O 4.n 38 '�_ _ o IN zy Oi V e b ro v +v IN O 16 m N � n O N p e m O Zya O 9>9 / 99 93 ° /I7 z9 Ngl'zf( Co U 1 O` q vs 54 .A es A �0; .^wp s 4f12. w ys n ky 0 V W 'cpbb c a h ' U� I.Zb 117 v '�� 'e 'a• a 9 a e� � w y ss ,gX. o` ssoz �a° a Cz .v �l o w AL o O N b n 7 ]8 9?.85 rr // 9/ A � 0 n O R O^ z o o O oQ I A y w O � A a SSll O D avv�y e � cn to r � N Lo0 ' i b Q N I � � b b b �1 V I� w (� 4 n O� n n a � v R� I n A � a O a O I a n a � n o Q 14 m v n Q v I.iseie eiez � o o Q o 2 a d M b 3 A ti � W b 2 O � ; � mN AA 1D� 3AV 1L! S30 n'7 Vd V^ sl iwi7 ilia 143Y311vOW (Q r SO'oEE Sao FF I 01'O06/ F as -79V W OH.9 VH 51/017 A1/.7 a � n Q V W 2 4 M y Z � k 2 a a n - OlNll qO ON ON V hh Ool e ` n cz h v ti a c N 3NV7 B9 .6sZ 33YI7/dn0 W Z J Co Z � O o 0 I � 0 N 0 `9 0 h ti m " 0 a w W M Z hI P N O O 4 4 J QO Q to v m r t � co. o o ti W 14J Q � I I I I i - O OIN a N to Oo � sa J .11 -.L CD N -1 y � Ana °c n y n .'. 2 v N A y y Q, ro n - C 03 a, - * _ N a M N ( W � O W 1 tit , � R m1 n', a PALM GREENS PKWY- 1 n b Xz 1 y ys a J p • y r r O - tip. n r i 8 wy V - w 1 m - I r OO r .o aF'q :b Q . y 1 DESERT GREENS OR. EAST of PO R NOL A AVE.' MUSo ANG RIDGE DR, •1(��� .. . - Pr \ p A LOT ZZ /'BAb.RR/ER STRIP - It s 184/ 622 - 02 TR.A. /e54 POR. NI/2 SEC. 8 T 5 S. R. 6 E. FOR. CITY PALM DESERT BK 620 CITY rfe73 2Y6.73 /LS 33/Zc 3.3 zb OF LG2. 53 PALM DESERT L/M/TS 6o I 03 0 o a O O 0 0 0 O © N Q h � I" 2 729 Ac 725Ac 84 9.66 Ac 9.67Ac °o /9.0/ Ac 58Ac 0 �ti I ti I a I Lki O4 v /3L5 f< 24B9L Lf88L 442.7o 4G2.G9 /3Z 5. 39 6�B 33/3G 39/3G =7/ 3S 33135 624 1 I W � J a aW to � O /2 /© l4 /5 m l6 /Q v OJr • 3.96Ac 475Ac 4.75Ac 4.75Ac ° 4.75Ac 4.75Ac 475Ac 4.75Ac Vo A.75Ac 4.75Ac 1 0 I U SD/ f/• 33/ 4/ I s3/ 3B 1 33/.38 Ifl / n./c_ - -T---- a N C ` 33/.YZ 33/,39 33r S 331.99 � 0 Lk O N © m > V ° 4.29Ac-t 4.75 Ac 4.75Ac 4.75Ac 4.75 Ac Ea' 475Ac 4.75 Ac 4.75 Ac 3.%Ac 4.75 Ac 4.75 Ac 4.75 Ac 475 Ac 475Ac 4.75 Ac ,00 ti 0.46 Ac 173Ac I) y i3I 4i _, _ d+J/.fG 23,fe J3/.43 93/ 4b 53C3.3L .fl89 48'37^E Dare ova no Ne.Ha /oleo -0 ,r.si 51831 23.26 ie DATA : ME112141 O6 07 M 8104 120 RS34138 ASSESSORS MAP BK622 PG 02 RIVERSIDE cot. -Y, CALIF R G ✓ULY'80 11, �.;: ._ ,,r�Lr.I��'`�:G-'.��__,���— .r . _ - _ - . ... , _- _ - _ - __ _ _ :. - __ . _ ___ _ _--- -- - - -- - - - - -. - - . _, t . . x . - 1 - .. +y A` of ' • ;, r „ 5, tl , r,.. �' � : ! ,! ,� 'A'' w�1' F 1ya' W `- ++I y_ g I 4 11 t �! ,'s s x i a i t � ' ,ry '� '< '4 t i f "• r• i f I� _ " ,y.} I� ' 11 F 14ip _] +> F� � � � �� �a • i - - - - - - s-- - ,* k - U `�' U lY ,... ��� CO I� CL tom•► E �' MO�a) ,I C� SIGN. ---------- - N .►�+cE sl c3�1c �, �tTf' GE s I�� LC�C�.�•I D� � ° , $� �I 1--G1Ef��'E , MC�NU/hEi SIGi`t. i I ' t Ml�l�t �}�E`( LD .t- 1�L.•�7 t�E MpN1'E ,E�' t� " , I j j.. ' - _ a� .-_.._ ___... . . . �( .. _ .. c- .. .. .. .. .. __ •- �% k ( vin I il1'3. 3' 4-b I o _o � ; s > _ 1 - - - --- r _ r - M; I dJ _ - - - - - __ � / �� ( ( ( _. boo' PH _, - Lo 11 f, 1r . 0 1 1'^UII.i�NC� D �" ¢ . tr r', _11 i , -12 " So � l01 I i v 'It-. ''� �_'__ I't I , j I . ", - . ) au _n ), I' - _____""" qo O a . §i �" I- ", I )____� F . • PN �' i ,�.-f: 1. � � c o _ � � :Z- . , a 1 �y 2�y /� . �' i 5 . =' S 5 5 o. 0 to _ _ _ 1. 1 , -- w Y�� '< �, 1N C V't 11 j �'� r � Is> Q H� :,, A /'/. . ' �. A '.' .. / 'ice A / A / . �"' " �, YP�I.J • t i�fG - - ,; / t t �► i R13av� 1 1-1 , • , �� ''A: 4' 1 , C/ `� ���D, I � � sr" �L! 1. r � t� � '�+t4N 1. 1. Cv Io 2, t� ,t ,� .; .. a sz. , I g y Ig it • 7 1N _. I.1", &• �jtp• �, '. �; , 4 "i, . p _ - :' I i I S I iI I . 1 . . _ cr_ : . • I r T ,,I« .11 , go �,� _^ _ I W t . < . ' � ft— \ - /� y� ,. �� , I di . .. A . I Mr- _.________ I . � — - \ !��, \ N .. jt A ' - * � , t r ! ,, :.: ,:;.. , �" Z�N 01 , E r =g -. , _ 4-71, 4UI L ,�� 1r Wk'61`9 s , - _, o c� - �_ t ,,: - �, PcL.Lf .L�1 •*/ S>y 4_ f,, FIB �� ► - I .^ L in IJc�'1' tJWC�'S SE 0 S.F �o f1. o-r D OO ! T 4.. ej •�•,. ,/ • •. ,. -� 21,-- a S IC N y,� - A y1�-�.i J •_.—__ �r Z a, .! q 3V ate` ; 3,, �r ,^ C+p : - 1 • • I—war+/ •n4 'a u, ,, ,� ,F,+ I.f ;#, : : t 5I. . 8 �. T N I I It w t >0 1 t'T r�: r 0 P t --_. _ y.� y - - r-id, by 1 ��/ .-__-._-._____ _! f,: .-.. I I fvN . R ♦' .� - - °µ}: - .. - . .. O e 100 F 1 1C a, •... / sr. , - —r: ,. . 1 11 ' ryr,t. .e, F,' T u - ... . ,, t,. �� =,�=_ :�t V.( , '_ . . '. I I I I . �"I' , CC 'd 0 — ._ " . -,.,4:,. ,y,.. _ *off, �" r x 's " ,,. r .R::_ : , r _ ,� �i a� . P _ _ .e.. 1't x.� t r;G { FIII. DD r0 .. 'Na V .._.,.. �7 �•. 1 U �! ' ,4 MN B1 ^♦' �tt -; L �j� Q n fir, /!�� a�; 2 T .tt,.>...., - . . ►M , . ►� i8 �iI •..i F , , h. , .. . ✓7 • .' • ,,.• .- � , e r:};t q� ., N - ' ' .. p.5 cs' l.U''ctJIiJC� s.; _ h i X: ,€ .� b t me - _ r. , c •I- 2YJ C f � II .' z L I' - 1 4. t. I I I .!'* - . . . i 1 O W a ♦ r✓ f•�1�P.S c R PIN 6 ��Z �Z N ``�. -".": - '' .� - - - \� c':' 5 ui 01 , ) -_ ,d " .uk �.w '3'1 Q - - 3 ' - 'TT2. 2 - �- 40 � - 11 - Q - - _.._ ,, t - _ .1 _ t �? t - . , 1. - , .. - _ - 14 x �7 1$ ;, �! s aJ '��g ; • 3, 1. x . 1. ,.. 0'� we I'li • t .. ,. 4 sc. ..a,. ,,,,. I .1 ,,�,,_ ,, ._. ,.. ,- . y a � / �.'�"' ;, p: t F' « .,:. ,., , 7. i�. `� vA -. ',. � ,, ! t tNlPr, I is n. �; r • p i �„ P �"'_ I, i q +i + I , , , 1 — g_' - , ICI f ! , ,, t :: It. ..',.t:,.,,. !f r.. • .v ,:, 1'. _... _ e7 ++,. �- 11 , _ _ ' { *. I 0 I r, t, + ,;,. I �!' ` ? - . , 15 " ` ' .� 5 Y♦ w qy y - — 1 / ' •., - .v a ,.: ; - r ", , ,, I Fail f. - Ill111hi r:T,�` - - -. �' a .-., ,.: ,: ,, # - 1 t ' .�,�"i r .'i �. i.. 1. }Y" .. : . . r. to� . / .. + I d {` . R i --.J L .__j ! // / < '4,*%, / c t s �,�% ., - !•I'�'.+�/�'��(���Q\+!EZ I 22L \ . � I - 1v \ I 1 - - ••.,.. h. �L. }I'llx..�` ..^fie„�.C',R�, 7. 't';. Nn v k 711 , yy� , —-.. �P �CLS -O �}� S �1 L '� / � _: •'; ''r m „,. i �� �l U �. 2 — -+V : {,t # r �\ / : �r >~ . u 4 ,� dota , x : �� -_.. �: l w , 11, \\ t ��� ,� �♦ �,. _ V �' 3 # , ' v ,,q �� .--• _-:I —... .r" .•.+-._ .v. ..,,,f -.i „ - f. +: x,v' ui♦k'tW - y:.._ `1� r. /I. . % , �"' ��� � " - . - .: o t '�� . ' _-� _' -,�i % . Ii r•E , . ,,, . I I . f!q. D I(C T Z A: " '� F _ �A_ ^v a . _ L d - Z 7 Y'»i,• " t ... !, Y�, :•, fa. F BPS ` 1.• e' ._ :, .. 3 "" „f ,ri FEBl gay • � s . r� , , l , I . _ . i a,y , .. 1 .� _ r, ,' .:,. : ..., VIRONMENTAL SEFiV1C 1$ i o � , r - OF PA ART r , ,.,;-r ,,.. 1'r y,- , A'1..t' =r . ; r w, ,. � J .., t t'. ,;fir ,c x : yy CIN ' _ '' ,.t - -. - ,•,. c . r c. w e �I _; ' ..--••+.,._..._..ate•' 1 - t M i ... , 1. d:v } yx x_ r . -_ .' y f �,r d`, !+' . F . . �' ! s R i '*+� ,� .. 3 .:. . , 4 f 11 ,.r - . y- r. .. ' . i - - t { :;/ , t4t c I I I ! I 1:1, I I. ,- "A L ". I e, Aaa T - .. •; N'e. •+�:•' .:1. r. 1 - } "' - , '�; Tic T 4 .., '/,i 11, Lry 111� �R . , yx 11 �r- :. '.� r , ,. & 1-w - I 1 4 ".: - t, As"Wim'— vh r ,. 1�1'Iqq w r . 2dl .. . 1.tid w . .. '` -•' �, - 11 , ;. '.' b C ;. i ^a- :. �• ".'" it - • it 16, d . { 1 -N-n r'" •,F ille' �rt'fi! a.. ."`s.; _'. . I) , y 6 ., .. - s'I, ,��. E As,C .ar W ,:.L' _ .s ,. T ., w y.. ,.. v ... rn .. -w.,::.. ':,.. a. - Z j W s .Fv ,`�," �. , : . v •22 - � 4 ., " . t �, '-_. s �..�.x,.�. . : c aw ,.. ,____�_ . . ...... .. ..... .. ...��n• �,, ,_ ��fi � , �. _, _ ... emu,, .-�;,_,..��..._, ,..-...�.�.�,�..,. ��.:�.L.... _,_ .___._. ' __ ._.�__ .. __'___...... __ _,._--____�.._._..__ � - --_ .____ . - __ �. . .__ _'___ -- - , __> r _: . - �r F .. i x^f C . 5 # COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE ' n . RED YUCCA ---SOFT LEAF YUCCA - --- TEXAS RANGER BLUE PALO VERDE ` j X b OCOTILLO ' I - -DWWARF OLEANDER i - _ - - — VERBENA ' + - - `� s . �• • --DWARF OLEANDER � I VERBENA • 1 P BOULDERS -- --- • -- - INDIAN HAWTHORN ' <r } MEXICAN PALO VERDE ! `a ,� --- XYLOSMA x 00 SUNBURST PEBBLES SUNBURST PEBBLES It( ,�-,' • -..._,_ ._- CALIFORNIA FAN PAL ` •� .sit r , SERVICE STATION I �x e , TEXAS RANGER �.. , : • ' - - EVERGREEN ASH ` — .` • �;_-�` - --- --- --f--- --- - MEXICAN PALO VERDE ;. • --_ `�: N HAW�i O \ � .: - ; _ - -- YELLOW GAZANIA �fi � $J •�, INDIA FORTNIGHT LIL) • \ OCOTILLO LJJ W GAZANIA v YELLOW � • j .� . s RED YUCCA y h m .., • s_. ,.., , .. .,.. . . ... _ a a ti 040 a._ .. ,.,,•,. ',Wt A DWARF OLEANDER D . ,..: LLJ 0 BOULDERS — — ;-- 1 -- --- SAGE 1 — EURYOPS • �" w BLUE PALO VERDEuj EURYOPS r LU ; NORTH --- 1 EVERGREEN ASH 2 0'-0" - -------FORTNIGHT LILY - rt r, a w FRI ICI► o� W Nw �- a n i' TMfS DRAWING AM) ALL INPONMATK)*1 THENE011 IS 1 IE ORO+'fRTY OF MOBIL Olt CORP"ATION^%0 PWJ,,.; T FOR THE Pt1P 'S �T +a� ros►Fo oA W:4f0 Exc,�P o WHICH 17 16 EXPRESSLY FURNiSHED. 11.1E DRAWING A1d€1 ANY LOPif$ THEREOF (PARTIAL OR COMPLETE) 'S.MA,Lt !F RETURNED TO THE G"fR ON DEVIAM0. LEGAL Y, TH AT° CORD AT R PARCF.I'r 0 l t CITY d!'' TN AVENUE Z� ©F RIVERSID'Ir, STA'I'X or Cxtji61 -A, N%JNJ A PQR'!�'�'OI� °t313" OF TRACT NO. 13792 A!� , IMP REC4lIOI ! TRt 1C 104 � V (Ij1 PAGES 19 THROWN 29 tI i.133110'L, 'RiICY�lC'1�13 pF SAS{# -C�T�t : 9 I3� O, o � J�, 3r }} 1 _. f : OL CERTAIN PARCEL. 891NG 099CRISED MORS PAItT-IvC'tIZiARL'Y ,AS pt>LL�tB>I r I Cou N`TftY CL-U5 Z pKi\/e BEGINNING AT 1*2 W ESTULY TLR6l mum OF'- A L M 1M T'IM 140ItT�1[ BOUNDARY OF S41D LOT 104 HAVING A ]SEARING Aft DIISTAMCE F -- - l : SINATR A DR�vE N 890 37' 30' E 1173.84 FIB'= THENCE ALC Wo -SATD I1 R � 7 BOUNDARY N 8%0 ,37' 300 1! 159.20 FEET; 1'tl`EWE ,LEAVING: S D 7 .. BOUNDARY S ©C 21' 25" L 190.00 Ip y . THENCE S 89d 3&#' 35"� M i r - Vicinity Map 185.78 FEET ` O A LIN& III THE. IMMLY r NIMRT OF SKID r 1041 Al (NOT To sc�L.e) THENCE ALONG JIRM WESTERLY 9E?(MARY IIl fl'D 1�' •d3" 'E 165.20':Fes" r P Neva 3t3 'E-: FRoPERZY t_lt lE 16'.37✓' tia t,. TO TRS BEGINI"IAG OF A TAIiGENT C-MVE, 114 SAID 8C3'GIWAO�', A m 20.1 , 30fITHEASTERLY: A" IMMG � MOMS Of 25,d4 ll`TST . t, j . 7 NORTHEASTERLY 'AIAIIG 8AI17 C�ttM" A CISl�'l L h*n'* 89 25 48 AWD All ARC k 'I't1 .QF '39'.42 I'E TR . Y : . to 000 {{ o --- -- d t i i ` L'�.y } ► CIE HEIISII A9bVE tiR9CrR BL�b Pk4R cow AT*9 0...943 AMAS 00t LA MI rya 7 zz 0 LEGEND 0TES t Y ,cA�,cY ; -�tx�• �, ZONING • PC( t cEr�,l�lCr, ��cE��fco.�;.�m,F.IJ� •f : � f � �1�--_ L=.X►STIht�3 E�" CURES WiTN '1`4"L�SIJTTG"�r / o I-X15TItvG CO"CRel fSAS 'TRAFF;VC SIC-�EL�1.:. !` / 'rRtAF�tC 454E NAL_ VAU►_ , r Q f' rJj k, G' �,y i (A�------ F_XiST IN C-�, C A'. T R 61.1V`5 T FCC 1C-� 80X RA 5 1� rg- .. s 4:: n _ i G � � '� ,. _xe r -.per �v . ,.,•. , 4 .. _. _ . _ . ,r„ s w. ''s 4� r 1'` 11, ,;, • .fir,.;.,, .; - � i , .._, -�,- �.. ,. �,. �,, �� ! t I , .1 I 3:.. 4 G {�d,'S`(�RACa rA+� {{ �`►'0 `.. I P WIT 45 C&N l.,r/4� g I�_ G�jF G1A1.i 1 4 d _ r1 22 5 J m'A�J�t•1t�R�'tr'' 'E-`'A1Pt �} C�04V©i T(�1V. •' i ki 7 ' [ 41 i �` d, p _ 5 �E W Eft t.,!N G lu 1517.E AS ilt�tC7tC A'1`Es©) I I 4, mot✓ ��- \ O ! O � VV *r WlaTE R Li Nit: Si ZE A5 iNI?JC�:? �?} t �" QEiri�. lJ►.�G, ems' ? Z 1ti�j` i r - 20 C- GAS t_;NE <S ZE AS IN x A� Ei3} Lr. SCALE AtL a fri}iy s IZ' " WA:i-E O _TF•1Nh ���/ �` / 4� �1�� ( � ..�.n41 i - --- �-� \ ,-• �;.�.sly - t L , t } - P F - - TC_ Tr, © CURf'S yy ' AL.I_ EXISTt�F, " t f I N� IJTtL_fT1ES ARn- A'a!`i? t? REC©RC7 �lvING� 1�c�GA't 1C�'#V, St ►I.)t,.D Z DATF-D APRIt4- MOKIN 0 PIT PL`� NA P"NC�lt�t1~ i 2 I r �` . ►. ti ti I so CAL_ ED)' Eag er wL 1t+iTr ' t Ll PE GZ T`�R �aGC E PC4b1.i�''✓ � 2 fZ ES !E T E1� AS ID CsN�"S OF 3'F�tE t.tN1T�p ".STATI~g FOR D1TCI-tS ►.4113 3- 3� , t5�1 26' -- �" i I i (� - - - --- - ,�NC3 CAi�A L5 A,,-ND P,1,G 'T 31 O'er TWA F�L3 _1tC , E - -- - . -- - - - -- --E / t j FI S-H PER P>K 1 12.-!- - T-0,7 4* C ut_LOCA`i",�.lf=�l. m ' �� � ry",^ �,��� ; ^� ``i - ,1? v� 'V/ti ,\ tiBASIS OF BEA � I Fp. i Ift ON T -�i�- OEAPtfrvGS HERI_4N APt BA'SEb � TF•1E + 1- -� ti j ( TA.G6'ED L,s 31B'� � CITY �3: PALL! DESERT c_C*)v1.: , R-i- GLuB URtvE eVei d ref E� '�O"� AS FLu3N AC,iGEP , ED � � � - \ A5 SECTION ?t 1 AP ^F TFZAC T t 17"11 (NA Pb 1 q J I' T C { 4 - 2-. G�y.c:-: as �. ►8-;� �Jb���CES N 0 AID APPROVED BY: ❑ c.c.REs.NO. 0 9 P.C..RfES.NO. r � I - Z ►� m" L 1 STAFF LETTER t 4 D.R_B. A— a CTIO FORM 1 ' t- ell 1 f frr, L, c�i:`lICES BY ' �,p1VIRC(�:'Ltvf.-._ .,_ ¢4 _ ate �_:K� n,.•• WITHIN a '• Cl7Y OF FHLM L �` � .Y, � , � / e {V� ��CONSTRUOTION SHALL C..,,,�i�MCE ONE YEAR OF TN S «?.JYAL. COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE - - "�/ too E ': s t o N s oATIF ev ' 1 r *T-, A� CERTIFY TO MOBIL OI2, - CORPORATION AND ITS TL. LG� �+IP�15IFfl1+l Rf� r I . ] PR ort's g ��.,►.a L s� o u-r a/18 f P4' g I + 14NY "W THIS PLAN WAS BEIM COMPILZD FROM A :SURVEY AC40J11:LY' LOS T - _ _ --- ! --- 1._ t---- T -T D E tNi 21984 , GROUND A s PER R W.( R a- i ! R rK.OWE A� k<�( --- fi- ,'_' t 1MA 9 4 x �I111tCAON THE " DESCRIPTIONS . THAT IT IS CORRaCT; ATM THAT AT THE THE F' T -T— � T ---- - - -__ _-- - T - - - _ _ _. - ---- t —I , �_ . _ SURM WAS 1�ADE, TITER$ WERE I NO EASC1�f'1"S OR ENC BOAC PM F: "c, EITHM *Ay IICRf3SS lPROPF.RTY LI4P3 SxCI ConsultingCivil Enai eer S. o. yjy ){ y{ [ j Stanley C. Morse a`AiA ! +'b y '2 fi 'S • 5+ '^ : y L • Engineering • Surveying , L,ARRY I.. XRLlIr4R '{ `r f >« �=`' Innn1� 9 4 1'v'lt� srr�llr� 7�3 4463 ;�� Ek Ferc3 -+It® E3 a r ';' �' _ # �,-, _ '* 0' <�, I ; .G-; 1 LlervWt. Calif m g, 92,260 (_E;-191 3.46-ts"4af3 s n .. • .`- f r�.t. :.f7•,i _ ` _ .v { - .d, e} r 1 T::'+'• ,lA;9e".1� Psg'.z;if�,:3?•"`t'i' 1L"' ,t ` �y ti _ r •. a - IZ„ I L ! r r -i , � C l ter,� '' . �!t`` Le ° , -. ---- j +I (✓ �_., .. 1 � 1. =---J �,.�_-----.� --- --.. _ _- -- - .'_ � � �^mil �j _ - 1 ' Q , ` �•� P�Snd,SIJLa PIS �. , ,. _ �Q T P> D I N c �O LO O �� EAo��wP� K �- A► �,._F,.. .J ._. �` �,. i � � I , �T�c.c.o � M tZG�o , G Au' k� �!i.: -�"2t�1 cc>Lc >,� To bt✓ P M. 5, 4 C4 (dvF°'zoA.� a /4 - } =As ... - „, .,,. ,• • ... :. ..:. ..___--_.___ ---__ V l:, 'ter•-1: �.rs. .� • a. ,_ --___--_—.___.__-- _._ _ -- - - - • Mi� a alk.. to ,,,� .-,,��c-- � _'�_^��r-�''�J,�-'/ ,� _ � dr � ��'�'_T' �tr-� ' �` �� _ RE_.�WN FI►�ibµ S�JGtw � _ ' �i /.�Ir `l L -` y1��� •. Je i��.±�'�7�-� L r,�- r\d•� `� 'O . F m _ ` � ` 1 't r��- J -- ♦ lr ° x7 � .O -\ - T r / Jj1 i VJ+ ,- r <. .._ is � ., :f. . ' .: I ., ...... ..... K.,,F s ,.-�,.�.{ _.'� •'?:;' � t;,:- �.�•+r �`�o:�� � � .., �_.-� �i'r; '.�./. � �. � �-, �, .ter. t o �Az--,C _ J � - �i., n e V!y 1( ,. �? ?! ...1 '.r i � ��/'-" ... -�.. .,� ` } - E..-..s�_�'-.- -� !� -,i---^i ! V ..i J: 1" S. -%�',�/ i :•-l! - I i +� J\vf- ,J- �, i r� -,_.. t1.__ ,� ^�- Y - �- 7 .,._•/-�' � .P,, �'- ..?'.�1 - _ f3 '. i - -41 �-^Q.,Z r -.`-• - \ `� ,-. 1 ,. v - f ��y�f•�-'� ti..d.�.5`�. � _.--<'..� _� i.� -_.. __.. .__..... A _. - ..V __ `•� p ��'- .-,/ ._.�%�1 (�U'-.' .'�i.�/-s-� � _�.-..e� ...��_�•.-,.1 �..: 4,.r_ �-vim'. ar_a__rwrr'_a.1.-�- �w...a -.,_._. .._,._ .- ,_ �Q -.. . 11 V. ,1�,*"�► �., r'�\l ' �``"' �a} I� L �/,�-�+ l CAI u�r�a►�,..r.rs. �7 J ' I , k�+uL.1►.r4�%r•4i .r -- r•r Yii- •� _ + r >r T o C reai 1 Price 0 Flo: �/1 • �. � � - � •�+�AL- r��:aR, d __ -. � �' , '� �. ,i ►.•�+►�C � � � I�'�►.-- h T�6 ,�r � O r V a( l+�ss 4 Gcd.for cosh . — _ �� NO R E V I S I O N S DATE BY CHKO Mobil Oil Corporation WESTERN REGION LOS ANGELES ENGINEERING CENTER Ef �EL�YATION OF FACE 6m w.•a) 4•.c Di^m, 612 SO. FLOWER ST., L.A., CA. 90017 +j �S•UG � FT.),. - � r PEGoSUS DtSG U1J L u t� j N4 LA S _ 3 Y rrs s.—e a o•�cs A"k s 54, eo r. �h Slit n ►h PL&".o ovEa 9A• of ?� �IypE L -u ri.^J �, ']+ A G l•1 - L?r�t_ y �r c T � Pi2oy�IC MONUMt.N pgiGr- 61COI M o I�,.,-LUmI N T6� ( 14.7 3 Sad . FT, D THIS DRAWING AND ALL INFORMATION THEREON IS t DRAWING NUMBER REV. 10 DRAWN.D.G.S. _.. z THE PROPERTY OF MOBIL OIL CORPORATION AND SHALL CHECKED... .. . ............. _. C•/ in NOT BE COPIED OR USED EXCEPT FOR THE PURPOSE FOR WHICH IT IS EXPRESSLY FURNISHED. THE DRAWING g AND ANY COPIES THEREOF (PARTIAL OR COMPLETE) SCALE.. ....rep..... SHEET NUMBER SHALL BE RETURNED TO THE OWNER ON DEMAND. DATE __............... ......... ....... OF c.� , t k I x - 3 fro 8 COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE RED YUCCA —S'OFT LEAF YUCCA OCOTILLO -- - -—TEXAS RANGER BLUE PALO VERDE � ' ---- DWARF OLEANDER Cf� - - --VERBENA -- -4 VERBENA - ( �; DWARF OLEANDER ---- - - - LEANDER vp, n GM 7 BOULDERS - /' , • --- INDIAN HAWTHORN i s. ,'• '.; MEXICAN PALO VERDE X Y L O S M A115 �. Pi 1 p� r .'� 1 ( CO *� — SUNBURST PEBBLES o SUNBURST PEBBLES ------- r ��y- • • - - CALIFORNIA FAN PAL n u SERVICE STATION -- - :� —TEXAS RANGER EVERGREEN ASH �-: • �,: ----- - --- -- ----- MEXICAN PALO VERDE u INDIAN HAWiO YELLOW GAZANIA � - FORTNIGHT LILI� � OCOTILLO - LU \/ c s - -- YELLOW GAZANIA 17 }. RED YUCCALLJ -- - -- ~ 1 x i me XYLOSMA ...., a_.. .» ,.... v. 7 a R O. n . F L� N D E w . w.. t;.. a ..- -_ a.. - ... ., . .z V.. a .x +t. .. 64 . ✓ .-.. , -. . is . ,. k... ,.0 - .n....lrr.. ,.- .. ..-. ... , .-, ._. a . s. :...- :... :.._ {y¢ .. . .,a a-:...... F. •. yy +a i ...., gyp' -.... .. .. s. .. -.. . +i. ♦ -... W,. -. .. a a. y . . # .... `y1 "�-': - - +� `cep s`> w. "� , � :: ,' '' r 3. z ---- -�\- f . x ♦ / Q _ r I BOULDERS ' -- SAGE "�• �,' . . �..� t GM _ - EURYOPS -� • • J-� - w BLUE PALO VERDE -• ate. / �>'��' � �:•; � " EURYOPS V Le I 1 1 /+ 1 • �T ( �J �/ �--� NORTH I IF — - EVERGREEN ASH - 20 `0 — ORTNIGHT LILY dk Lu py gr - i N N o a Eno � Ono 20# ti Q I •. � I , —---- — �, t--�— ENT L004f tI cN LD r cEr��* ume : i< act } { .., j/ F / , rt / O AMC j, y I ; � 3 ��.i`tom-+" �� � � �� �`�- ;., � � _� "._ ��` ,� � � • �� ` �,��- 1.I1 r QQ \ m ��Nn Pam " e , T . 15-7 , 4 {✓ , c,, q € x" #JI I , { I aii . . ,, 3' } 3 tip} # I y }, c 4 r ,. di CS` ' i 4 , �. - ,x SO 7_1 < w I • g Z } f + , r { e N 6 E A FMFw ' .MY L � - -. _ Q .► r ;. M .r y I ' " dfff -7 ,y na ni � r i . +. " ,X t lb q , ► +� F r'; r la✓ n. >a p �:;..•#' I " s. k ,v r.d. r... -,. ...,.4,.,. :'...��x.., sr^.�'Ykf:K3'R , , vw , i I I I X I t U ri L SERVICES jTy Of. PALM oEsF by rd Act ,6 a F I II F � r , , 6 44 ve