Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDP 02-82 - CHURCH EAST OF MONTEREY AVENUE 1986 II PRECISE PLAN .. TENTATIVE TRACT ZONE CHANGE VARIANCE PARCEL MAC U. U. P. REFER TO : Inc; APPLICANT LOCATION : REQUEST EXISTING ZONE __ PREPARATION PROGRESS APPLICATION RECEIVED DATE BY COMMENTS _ LEGAL PUBLICATION SENT _ NOTICES SENT FIELD INVESTIGATION J DEPTS , NOTIFIED BUILDING ENGINEERING FIRE POLICE S - RECREATION & PARKS r SCHOOL DISTRICT e DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS FLOOD CONTROL PRELIMINARY MEETING S-gyp-B� p C,3 STAFF REPORT FINAL PLAN APPROVAL PRECISE PLAN (6) LANDSCAPING PLAN ( 5) PLAN . DIRECTOR MOD. (6 ) HEARINGS & ACTIONS REVIEW BOARD HEARING DATE ACTION VOTE PC. HEARING PUBLISHED PC. PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT NOTIFIED C.C. PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE NO. RESOLUTION NO. EFFECTIVE DATE RECORDED FOR DATA - BANK ZONING MAP CORRECTED 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 . November 4, 1986 Evangelical FreeChurch of Palm Desert 73-251 Hovely Lane Palm.Desert, CA 92260 Attention: John Swanson Dear Mr. Swanson: As per your letter dated October 29, 1986, regarding the temporary modular building, used one hour per week for Sunday School classes, 1 hereby waive the requirement of restroom facilities, due to the fact that the adjacent multi-purpose room has adequate restroom facilities. Should you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me. ..Sincerely, PATRICK CONLON DIRECTOR OF BUILDING a SAFETY PC:djb 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 September 12, 1986 Evangelical Free Church Reverend James A. Shilling 73-251 Hovley Lane $1 Palm Desert, CA 92260 RE: Temporary Use Permit for Mobile Trailer , 1� Dear Reverend Shilling: �4 M44U f Your request for a temporary use permit to utilize a home for a Sunday School on a 4.75 acre parcel approximately 1000 feet east of Monterey Avenue on the south side of Hovley Lane has been approved. The approval is conditioned as follows: 1. All requirements of the city fire marshal , building and safety director, and an applicable governmental agencies must be complied with. 2. Letter of clearance from the city fire marshal must be submitted to the Palm Desert Community Development Department prior to commencing use of the trailer. 3. Trailer must be skirted to prevent access or view of the underneath of the mobile home. 4. The approval is effective for one year from the date the mobile home is brought onto the site. After one year an extension of this permit may be applied for. 5. Should any grading occur on the site, proper permits must be obtained from the Palm Desert Department of Public Works. EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH SEPTEMBER 12, 1986 Please indicate that you understand and will comply with the above conditions by signing the enclosed copy of this letter and returning it to: City of Palm Desert Department of Community Development 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours, AMON A. DIAZ DIRECTOR OF COMMUN TY DEVELOPMENT/PLANNING RAD/tm I and rstand and will comply with the conditions setforth herein. L 2 HAWH 1 'iql jA )i •XAAV3 e1ANf xSi vi38M3f9+• • � iJ r � wt1 SV CrS'af, .� '� H q! '-. .y '3' ',+e ! i.: TTr+y'},• '.,hrrle i.rr 1i.f1� ..i1u ins � - ,.fi x jHt tti Etl '*.rt TrtP x r. x/fr t • r-y i.rq, V .n�. .rt1 s:nrn;, s m. t"'i" af9V9U y inuonM ' :o 7•'.'_;f 6-e xt t{ •, �,✓I tel pni7t r.ra-ti r��+. - Trx•..:�' lt. , ;"S� it r•r,�J ,. 1r17'if.4tir}x»� 'tttnv •GT x uny x.rrrl} ..•'tuOv, vtu'tI v "TY $0 iMAs� OMWOAJ' 1�T4i3M,14k)jWat7 Yf;M};'I,;i(Y1 'ji) Wir)?4)(I mi\s]AA nTe1�n rtYt4? ^r 2nQe ' iCXs,:J Jr4t r+fiN ylq.xla I rh+ tSnE,. owlal*Units r i E I 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALI FORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: July 8, 1982 DESERT EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH 73-730 Highway III Palm Desert, CA 92260 THAYER AND ADAMS 23-276 So. Pointe Drive, Suite 208 Laguna Hills, CA 92653 CASE NO: DP 02-82 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of July 6, 1982. APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 808 Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. RAMON A. DIAZ, SECRETARY PLANNING COMMISSION RAD/lcr cc: File PLAN NING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 808 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A CHURCH WITH RELATED FACILITIES IN THE PR-5 ZONE, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF HOVLEY LANE, APPROXIMATELY 1325 FEET EAST OF MONTEREY AVENUE. CASE NO. DP 02-82 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 6th day of July, 1982, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider a request by DESERT EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH for approval of a development plan and negative declaration of environmental impact to allow construction of a church with related facilities on 4.77 acres in the PR-5 zone, located on the south side of Hovley Lane approximately 1325 feet east of Monterey Avenue, more particularly described as: APN 622-020-022 WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedures to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89", in that the director of environmental services has determined that the project will not have any significant adverse impact on the environment and a negative declaration has been prepared. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts to justify their actions, as described below: - 1. The proposed project generally conforms to the intent and purpose of the PR zone district. 2. The proposed location of the use is in accord with the objectives of the zoning ordinance and the purpose of the district in which the site is located. 3. The proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it will be operated and maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare, or be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. The proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of this title, except for approved variances or adjustments. 5. The proposed use complies with the goals, objectives, and policies of the city's adopted General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case. 2. That the Planning Commission does hereby approve Conceptual Development Plan No. 02-82 subject to those conditions attached hereto. 3. That a negative declaration of environmental impact is hereby approved. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert - 1 r' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 808 Planning Commission, held on this 6th day of July, 1982, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: RICHARDS, WOOD, KRYDER NOES: NONE ABSENT: CRITES, MILLER ABSTAIN: NONE GEORGE D. KRYDER, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary /pa i I - 2 - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 808 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. DP 02-82 Department of Environmental Services: 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of environmental services, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any uses contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first complete all the procedural requirements of the city which inlcude, but are not limited to design review and building permit procedures. 3. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to allow municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 4. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null, void and of no effect whatsoever. 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Riverside County Department of Health Palm Desert Design Review Board Process City Fire Marshal Coachella Valley Water District Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to 111 the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 6. Detailed exterior lighting plan in compliance with applicable standards to be submitted to the city for approval; lights to be down shining box type to minimize glare with 20 foot high light standards; 7. Six (6) foot high (on both sides) decorative block wall shall be provided as a part of Phase I along west and south (if deemed necessary by the city) property lines, to satisfaction of city; said wall on easterly property line may be constructed with the beginning of Phase II or when development occurs to the east, whichever occurs first. • 8. Construction of the total development may be done in phases; however, each individual phase shall meet or exceed all municipal code requirements to the degree that the city could consider each phase a single project. 9. No existing trees shall be removed from the site without approval of the department of environmental services. 10. 24 foot wide driveway to Phase I parking area-to be provided along east and west side so that complete circulation from the street is provided. 11. Parking area to be screened from the street through the use of berming and/or walls and landscaping. - 3 - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 808 Department of Environmental Services (Continued) 12. Signs not approved as a part of application; signs to be reviewed and approved by Design Review Board. 13. Blowsand protection to be provided for large outdoor areas as developed. 14. All existing electrical distribution lines, telephone, cable antenna television and similar service wires or cables, which are adjacent to and provide service to the property being developed shall be installed underground as a part of development from the nearest existing pole not on the property being developed pursuant to municipal code requirements, unless determined to be unfeasible by the city. Department of Public Works: 1. Dedication of right of way to 44 feet from centerline on Hovley Lane shall be given. 2. Installation of curb and gutter at 32 feet from centerline, matching paving and sidewalk. 3. Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any. street improvements is commenced. 4. The applicant shall submit as-built plans prior to acceptance of the improvements by the city. 5. All public improvements.shall be installed in accordance with city standards. All street improvements are required in conjunction with Phase I of the project. City Fire Marshal: 1. Install a water system capable of delivering 3000 GPM fire flow for a two (2) hour duration in addition to domestic or other supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the following is measured at the time of measurement. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. A. Hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. B. Exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. C. Curbs (if installed) shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the fire marshal for review. Upon approval, one copy will be sent to the building department and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Case Number DP 02-82 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the fire marshal." 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. /pa - 4 - Pc ILL -),o Desert �- Evangelical -� Free . 1g� SEft�ICES Church rLP1c�ofE4p-M �ESERt CLYDE T. ANNANDALE, PASTOR November 17, 1983 Mr. Stan Sawa Principal Planner, City of Palm Desert Re: Development Plans #0282 Design Review Case 178-C Applicant: Desert Evangelical Free Church Dear Stan: Due to a lack of funds we were not able to commence con- struction on our church building this past year. In addition, we have been waiting for the City of Palm Desert to conduct a field survey of Hovley Lane in order to proceed with our gra- ding plans. Our plans were approved by the Planning Commission on December 21, 1982, and we are, therefore, requesting a one-year extension. Sin e�ly,, , Frank C. Zde Chairman, Building Committee FCZ/dea 73-730 HIGHWAY 111, SUITE 6 0 PALM DESERT, CA. 92260 9 (7141 346-0726 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY - DECEMBER 20, 1983 2:00 P.M. - ADMINISTRATIVE CONFERENCE ROOM 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE I. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Wood called the meeting to order at 2:05 p.m. if. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Commissioner Downs III. ROLL CALL Members Present: Commissioner Crites Commissioner Downs Commissioner Richards Chairman Wood Excused Absent: Commissioner Erwood Others Present: Ramon A. Diaz Barry McClellan Steve Smith Phil Joy Phil Drell Linda Russell IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: December 6, 1983 Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Richards, to approve the minutes as submitted. Carried unanimously 4-0. V. SUMMARY OF COUNCIL ACTION Mr. Diaz reviewed the actions of the council for the meeting of December 8, 1983. VI. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed on the consent calendar are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless members of the planning commission or audience request specific items be removed from the consent calendar for separate discussion and action. A. Case No. DP 05-81 and TT 14080 - T be D INVESTMENTS, Applicant Request for approval of a one-year extension of time for a development plan and tentative tract map to allow construction of a 47 unit condominium project in the PR-5 zone on the north side of Hovley Lane, 2600 feet east of Monterey Avenue. B. Case No. DP 02-82 and 178 C - DESERT EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH, Applicant Request for approval of a one-year extension of time for a development plan and preliminary design review case to allow construction of a church on 4.77 acres in the PR-5 zone on the south side of Hovley Lane, approximately 1325 feet east of Monterey Avenue. C. Case No. DP 08-81 - JDF FINANCIAL CORP. AND CHARLES HAVER & ASSOCIATES, Applicants Request for approval of a one-year time extension of a development plan for a 168 unit condotel on the south side of Highway 111, approximately 300 feet east of Shadow Hills Road. 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: December 22, 1983 Desert Evangelical Free Church 73-730 Highway 111, Suite 6 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Attn: Frank C. Zdenek R( : D @ P 02-8 nd 178 C The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of December 20, 1983. Approved Time Extension to December 21, 1984 Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the director of environmental services, City of Palm Dese , within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. RAMON A. DIAZ, SECRETARY PLANNING COMMISSION RAD/lcr cc: Coachella Valley Water District File City of Palm Desert Department of Environmental Services Staff Report TO: Planning Commission DATE: December 20, 1983 CASE NOS: DP 02-82 and 178 C REQUEST: Approval of a one-year extension of time for a development plan and preliminary design review case to allow construction of a church on 4.77 acres in the PR-5 zone on the south side of Hovley Lane, approximately 1325 feet east of Monterey Avenue. APPLICANT: DESERT EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH 73-730 Highway I I I, Suite 6 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Attn: Frank C. Zdenek I. BACKGROUND: This development plan was approved by the planning commission on July 6, 1983, while the design review case which determines the effective approval date was approved on December 21, 1982. The applicant indicates that they have not commenced construction due to a lack of funds and would therefore request a one-year time extension. H. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff feels this request is acceptable since conditions in the area have not changed and the proposed project is the same. Therefore, staff recommends approval of a one-year time extension to December 21, 1984. III. ATTACHMENTS: A. Letter of Request Prepared by Xb ILW Reviewed and Approved by Ar -1- Desert Evangelical Free Church CLYDE T. ANNANDALE, PASTOR November 17, 1983 � III }Ir. Stan Sawa Principal Planner, City of Palm Desert Re: Development Plans #0282 Design Review Case 178-C Applicant: Desert Rwangelical Free Church Dear Stan: Due to a lack of funds we were not able to commence con- struction on our church building this past year. In addition, we have been waiting for the City of Palm Desert to conduct a field survey of Movley Lane in order to proceed with our gra- ding plans. Our plans were approved by the Planning Commission on December 21, 1982, and we are, therefore, requesting a one-year extension. Sin !rely, 6 i Frank C. Zderl Chairman, Building Committee FCZ/dez 73-730 HIGHWAY 111, SUITE 6 0 PALM DESERT, CA. 9226O 9 (714) 346-0726 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 6, 1982 KATHLEEN TUMPANE, patient of Dr. Deluge, expressed her support. RON GREGORY, Landscape Architect, explained that the design review board denied this request, but aesthetically, in his opinion the sign is attractive. Chairman Kryder asked if anyone wished to speak in OPPOSITION to this case. There being none, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Wood asked if the sign was so important why was the concern not discussed at the time of the lease. MR. HODGES replied that the matter of the signage was discussed with Great Western and they were assured that there would be no problem. Commissioner Wood expressed his reluctance to grant a variance after working for so long on the sign ordinance and felt that the matter of the signs was not looked into properly. Commissioner Richards explained that he agreed this medical center is greatly needed and felt that many signs presently in the city are not visible. He was in favor of granting a variance only on the basis that there are unusual circumstances. Chairman Kryder agreed that it is difficult to find the medical center but felt that this matter has put the planning commission in a difficult position, and no matter how much the commissioners feel they agree with the problem it is something that should be resolved by the tenant and landlord. Chairman Kryder asked staff if a double face freestanding sign could be used as an alternative. Mr. Diaz replied they could not. After further discussion it was determined that this facility is not for emergency purposes and other alternatives could not be used unless the sign ordinance is revised. Moved by Commissioner Wood, seconded by Chairman Kryder, to waive further reading and adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 806, denying VAR 02-82. Carried 2-1 (Commissioner Richards voting Nay). A FIVE MINUTE RECESS WAS CALLED—THE MEETING RECONVENED AT 8:21 P.M. B. Case No. C/Z 06-82 (UA) - CITY OF PALM DESERT, Applicants Consideration of a negative declaration of environmental impact and a preannexation change of zone from R-1 12,000 (Riverside County) to PR-5 (UA) for 160 acres located at the northeast corner of Portola Avenue and Country Club Drive. Mr. Sawa reviewed the staff report and indicated that there were no negative responses received. Staff recommends approval. Chairman Kryder opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to this case. There being none, the public hearing was closed. Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Wood, to adopt reasons for recommending this change of zone. Carried 3-0. Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Chairman Kryder, to waive further reading and adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 807, recommending approval of C/Z 06-82 (UA). Carried 3-0. C. o. DP 02- ESERT EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH, Applicant Request for approval of a negative declaration of environmental impact and a development plan to allow construction of a church with related facilities in the PR-5 zone located on the south side of Hovley lane, approximately 1325 feet east of Monterey Avenue. Mr. Sawa reviewed the staff report and indicated staff's concerns were height of the buildings (one being 50' in height), blowsand, parking lighting. Staff is recommending -3- MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 6, -1982 a 6 ft. wall be provided on the east-west property lines to minimize impact on adjacent residential properties. Staff recommended approval. Commissioner Wood asked staff's recommendation of the building height problem. Mr. Sawa stated that there were no elevations submitted but Commission could approve the Development Plan as the phases are developed. Mr. Diaz recommended that the development plan be approved separately without the 50' high building. There was some discussion on this matter. Chairman Kryder opened the public hearing and asked if the applicant wished to make a presentation. MR. JIM THAYER, Architect, explained that the building itself does not need to be 50' in height. The reason they were asking for that height was because they would like to put a cross up next to the sign which would exceed the 30'. He also stated that the other buildings need not exceed the 30 ft. He asked that condition no. 7 be amended so that they do not have to provide a wall on the easterly property line in phase I. Mr. Diaz noted that the sign and the cross would have to be approved by Design Review Board but staff felt there should be no problem. Chairman Kryder asked if anyone wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to this case. There being none, the public hearing was closed. Moved by Commissioner Wood, seconded by Commissioner Richards, to adopt findings for Development Plan 02-82. Carried 3-0. Moved by Commissioner Wood, seconded by Commissioner Richards, to waive further reading and adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 808, approving Development Plan 02-82, with Condition No. 7 amended as follows: "Six (6) foot high (on both sides) decorative block wall shall be provided as part of Phase I along west and south (if deemed necessary by the City) property lines, to satisfaction of City; said wall on easterly property line may be constructed with the beginning of Phase II or when. development occurs to the east, whichever occurs first." Carried 3-0. D. Case No. PM 18729 - LAKESIDE PROPERTIES, INC., Applicant Request approval of a parcel map to consolidate seven industrial parcels into one lot in the S.I. zone located on the north side of Mayfair Drive at State Street. Mr. Diaz reviewed the staff report and recommended approval. Chairman Kryder opened the public hearing and asked if the applicant wished to make a presentation. The applicant was not present. Chairman Kryder asked if anyone wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to this case. There being none, the public hearing was closed. Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Wood, to adopt findings approving Parcel Map 18729. Carried 3-0. Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Chairman Kryder, to waive further reading and adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 809, approving Parcel Map 18729. Carried 3-0. VIII. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ITEMS Preliminary plan approvals by the Design Review Board at its meetings of June 8, 1982, and June 22, 1982, requiring Planning Commission confirmation. A. Case No. 238 MF - SUNRISE COMPANY - Preliminary approval of site plan -4- 1 City of Palm Desert Department of Environmental Services Staff Report TO: Planning Commission DATE: JULY 6, 1982 CASE NO: DP 02-82 REQUEST: Approval of a Development Plan and Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact to allow construction of a church with related facilities on 4.77 acres in the PR-5 zone (Planned Residential, max. 5 d.u.acre) located on the south side of Hovley Lane, approximately 1325 feet east of Monterey Ave. APPLICANTS: DESERT EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH 73-730 Highway I I I Palm Desert, CA 92260 THAYER AND ADAMS 23-276 S. Pointe Drive, Suite 208 Laguna Hills, CA 92653 I. BACKGROUND: A. DESCRIPTION OF SITE: The site is a vacant parcel with an undulating topography. Along the south property line is a 6 foot high block wall installed by Monterey Country Club. Adjacent to the north side of the wall is a row of large Tamarisk Trees which extends from Monterey Avenue to Portola Avenue. B. ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE: North: PR-5, Vacant South: PR-5, Residential East: PR-5, Vacant West: PR-5, Vacant C. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential, 3-5 d.u./acre -.. U. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A. GENERAL The project consists of seven buildings to be constructed in four phases. The structures consist of a sanctuary, classrooms, gym, youth center, offices, music rooms, and multi-purpose building. The first phase will consist of the multi-purpose building and 135 parking spaces. Access to the site will be through two driveways near the east and west property lines. The buildings are placed around a courtyard with the parking area provided in a loop around the site. B. ARCHITECTURE: A drawing showing one of the buildings indicates an early California style utilizing stucco, wood trim, and a tile roof. The application indicates that the height of the main assembly building (Phase V) will be 50 feet, which is 20 feet above the maximum height allowed. The other buildings are noted to be a maximum of 35'which is still 5 feet above the height limit. However, the height limit may be modified by the Planning Commission's approval of this development plan. C. STATISTICAL BREAKDOWN: i! II NOTICE OF DETERMINATION Negative Declaration TO: (X) Office of the County Clerk O Secretary for Resources County of Riverside 1416 Ninth St., Rm 1311 4050 Main Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Riverside, CA 92501 FROM: CITY OF PALM DESERT 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. Project Title/Common Name: Desert Evangelical Free Church, DP 02-82 Date of Project Approval: July 6, 1982 State Clearinghouse Number (if submitted): N/A Contact Person: Stan Sawa, Principal Planner Project Location: South side of Hovley Lane, approximately 1325 feet east of Monterey Avenue. Project Description: Construction of church and related facilities. This is to advise that the City of Palm Desert has made the following determinations regarding the above described project: 1. The project ( ) will, (X) will not, have a significant effect on the environment; 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared in connection with this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. X A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. A copy of the Negative Declaration may be examined at the above City Hall address. 3. Mitigation measures (X) were, ( ) were not, made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A statement of Overriding Considerations ( ) was, (X) was not, adopted for this project. Signature Title Date Received for Filing' VICINITY MAP ^ Jl'I 0,1 ,F VV.u:YaS.I_ ALL R/,fS DIRECTED �- CITY PgLng O .,` '3G _ l•i . _ I I - �-/ If PARKING `v1.204 TVPICA.L STALL HANDICAP SIZE Cl+Y j - PALMi ri`E . ,�� vouTH DEPARTBit`'�� --� -- - - 2 STORY 'CLASSROOMSI 1 CENTER / ) 6F l _��� \ PHASE II _ ENWIR6k=TAL �I �l . PHASE II l 5Fi;lfiCc. �' �• j... .. I` . SANCTUARY H • _ _ . A\\_ - - ---- R MUSIC ROOMS fl SEATING CAPACITY 764 —1 PLAYGROUND 1- MULTIPURPOSE - Y PHASE I -- w J z LAWN ¢ I w ) - PHASE V Q cl LAWN 1 <<' / -TOT'LOT 2 STORY CLASSROOMS 1 . 7. PHASE IV ¢ GYM ¢ - a a I - 25, _._. _ I-33 _..... C _ 441 • ��—_ r 11 Y PHASE 111 ; LAWN r O _I _ - \ _- II--n ��_ �, • 1 _ j✓�-0__— .I .�-_..vuarf � _ -30 �`: PARKING -4 - - - - - - I PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2010 , 2015.5 CCP) PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF LEGAL NOTICE C.P. 02-82CITY OF'PALMXDESERT ;^-• LEGAL NOTICE, y CASE NO. D. _ 02.82' I am a citizen of the United NOTICE IS HEREBY GIV�N That a public bins•will be held before the Palm Desert {{aPpplappnninI Commission to consider a request by DESERT EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH for States and a resident Of the Ichurch,school and of a recreational fucffll(l inNegative P Rl.'S zo elPla^n�ed Resldentlai,'S tl'.ul. impact ot ei`ioca�ie°d County aforesaid; I a m over the on the South side l-0aZvley Lane,�a mile east of Monterey Avenue,more particularly described as: age of eighteen years, and not _ __ a party to or interested in the � � . above entitled matter. I am the5't �. principal clerk of the printer ; of THE DESERT POST, — „ a newspaper of general circula- p Q -82 tion, printed and published weekly in the city of Riversides County of Riverside, and which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of ;'• � ,� =• I general circulation by the i _ _;,;L----- Superior Court of the County of ------=:��; -! Riverside, State of California , -- under date of October 5 , 1964 , Case number 83658; that the notice, of which the annexed is __---__ a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any ;I itl1 • ..,' supplement thereof on the following fil II li r ;;•I dates, to-wit : f3l .a (;_==cn_1 I1 I /'•`;1;' ., 4 JJ ;a 06124 , 1982 r C IA r t I i ib _ SAID public hearing will be held on July 6, 1982,at 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers in the I Certify (or declare) under Palm Desert City Hall,45.275 Prickly Peor Lone,Palm Desert,California,at which time and place all Interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. penalty of perjury that the RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary foregoing is true and correct, Palm Desert Planning Commission - ---- _ — PDPfi/24 Dated June 249 1982 at Riverside, California CITY OF PAL", DESERT Staff Report DP 02-82 July 6, 1982 1. Area do Coverage a. site 208,096 sq.ft. 100% coverage b. parking 95,900 sq.ft. 46% coverage C. buildings 37,000 sq.ft. 18% coverage d. landscaping 65,196 sq.ft. 36% coverage 2. Parking Spaces a. Phase I - 2950 sq.ft./35 sq.ft. = 84 required, 135 provided b. Phase V - 768 fixed seats/3 seats - 256 required, 256 provided. D. STAFF CONCERNS: The property is in an area subject to blowsand and as such should provide protection for the outdoor areas. Parking lot lighting will be provided and will have to meet our lighting level requirements. Additionally, the lighting will have to be designed to minimize spillover onto adjacent property. The applicant states in his application that chainlink fencing is proposed along the east and west property lines. In order to minimize noise and headlights shining onto adjacent properties, a 6 foot high masonry wall should be provided in place of a chainlink fence. III. ANALYSIS: A. FINDINGS: 1- The proposed location of the use is in accord with the objectives of the Municipal Code and the purpose of the district in which the site is located. Justification: The PR zone allows uses of this type with approval of a development plan. 2. The proposed location of the use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. Justification: The location is in an area with large lots which allow design flexibility and the fact that it will be professionally operated insure that the use will not be detrimental. 3.' The proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code except for approed variances or adjustments. Justification: The use will comply with all Muncipal Codes by design or conditions imposed by this approval. ,4. The proposed use complies with the goals, objectives, and policies of the City's General Plan. Justification: The property is designated Low Density Residential, 3-5 d.u./acre on the General Plan. The PR zone allows a church with approval of a development plan and as such, is an compliance with the General Plan. Staff feels the findings can be justified in this case. B. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: -2- Staff Report DP 02-82 July 6, 1982 The Director of Environmental Services has determined that the proposed project will not have any significant adverse impact on the environment and a Negative Declaration has been prepared. IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff feels the project is acceptable and will be compatible with surrounding properties. Therefore, staff recommends: 1. Approval of the findings; 2. Approval of Planning Commission Resolution No. , approving DP 02-82. "A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, approving a Development Plan and Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact to allow construction of a church with related facilities in the PR-5 zone, located on the south side of Hovley Lane, approximately 1325 feet east of Monterey Avenue." V. ATTACHMENTS: A. Draft Resolution B. Legal Notice C. Statement of Use D. Initial Study and Negative Declaration E. Comments from various Departments and Agencies F. Plans and Exhibits Prepared by U _ 1 Reviewed and Approved by /lr -3- June 18, 1982 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. D.P. 02-82 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by DESERT EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH for approval of a Development Plan and a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for a church, school and recreational facility in a P.R. 5 zone (Planned Residential, 5 d.u./acre) located on the south side of Hovley Lane, A mile east of Monterey Avenue, more particularly described as: A.P.N. 622-020-022 z e �Py Q a I � o HOVLEY LANE pill 0 -82 / \ >// \ \ p Q,PN// � IL Montere ✓J'1J1 �1 V �lluJlU.{' --__-_ ��___SI=R RAN _ CAMIN Ak'A'UfZ--NORTH -\ �i CAMINO--_ARR(l Y( 0 jj It=1i UU I11 Iml I� I I jl �/� Chaparral ------- ®Vitr� C-ll flb 0 za(iI��I \_ IS� _ �ii P SAID public hearing will be held on July 6, 1982, at 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall, 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post June 24, 1982 /pa April 16, 1982 Land Use Proposals for Desert Evangelical Free Church: Desert Evangelical Free Church proposes to develop and operate a church and school facility with an ultimate occupancy of 764 on 4.77 acres on the south side of Hovely road approximately z mile west of Portola. The hours of operation would be from 7 A.M. to 10 P.M. seven days per week. The main auditorium will seat 764. Parking has been provided at the rate of one space per 3 seats in the main auditorium. The site is developed as follows; 38% parking, 18% buildings, 1410 playgrounds and 30% landscaping. Layout is courtyard campus type with buildings all facing inner courtyard. The total courtyard dimensions arel80 feet long by 120 feet wide. The courtyard will be used for recreation and outdoor breaks. It also contains a 500 seat amphitheater which will be used for outdoor assemblies. Sur- rounding the courtyard are seven buildings of various size and mass as follows; 1 - Main assembly building, one story, 1 - Gymnasuim, one story, 2 - Classroom buildings, 2 story., 1 - Youth center, one story, 1 - Administration building, 1 story. To the south of the building cluster are two large playground areas. These will be depressed enough to double as a retention basis for rain water run off. They will also double as overflow parking areas. There are two drive- ways providing for two-way traffic surrounding the entire complex. Parking has been held to the perimeter to serve as a buffer between the complex and adjacent residential properties. Ultimate height of the main assembly building will be 50 feet. All other buildings will be approximately 35 feet tall. The trees will be of a tall species to be in scale with the buildings. There will be dense perimeter trees and schrubs to provide a wind break and visual separation between residential property and this complex. To provide limited access the applicant has proposed a 6 foot chain link fence around the property along the side and rear property lines. To limit headlight glare into the street the applicant has proposed a 6 foot tall earth berm along the street property line in the green area 21 feet wide between the parking lot and the street. A double face sign will also be located in this landscaped area as per drawing on site plan. Location and design of parking lot lighting is shown on the site plan. Glare will be cut at an angle to keep from shining onto adjacent property. The proposed architectural style is early California with stucco, wood trim and tile roofs. Phasing is shown on the site plan. All proposed improvements are new. There are no existing structures on the site at present. One of the futrure buildings may contain living quarters for a care-taker. lI Prepared by, Jim Thayer Agent for the Applicant 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CAUFORNIA92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 NEGATIVE DECLARATION (Pursuant to Title 14, Division 69 Article 7, Section 15083, of the California Administrative Code). Case No: DP 02-82 Applicant/Proj-- Sponsor: DESERT EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH, 73-730 Highway 111, Palm Desert, CA 92260. Project Description /Location: Construction of a church with related facilities in PR-5 zone, located on the south side of Hovley Lane, approximately 1325 feet east of Monterey Avenue. The Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, California, has found that the described project will not have a significant effect on the environment. A copy of the Initial Study has been attached to document the reasons in support of this finding. Mitigation measures, if any, included in the project to avoid potentially significant effects, may also be found attached. RAMON A. DIAZ DATE Director of Environmental Services RAD/pa DP 02-92 Environmental Evaluation Checklist Explanation of "yes" and "maybe" answers and possible mitigation measures and comments. 1. Earth: C. The proposal will result in a change in the topography and surface features by virtue of grading, construction and landscaping of the site. Mitigation Measures: Compliance with applicable grading Ordinance will be required. e. During construction there will be erosion and blowing of soils during windy periods. Additionally, because the site is in an area subject to blowsand wind and sand can be expected from the northwest. Mitigation Measures: During construction and especially grading operations, watering of the site per City requirements will be required. Because of nonresidential nature of use, blowsand planting should be provided in outdoor areas. 3. Water: b. The proposal will result in a change in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface runoff by virtue of development. Mitigation Measures: Compliance with applicable grading ordinances will be required. 10. Noise• Due to nature of use, peak noise from vehicles will occur at regular intervals and may cause some annoyances. Mitigation Measures: Provide 6 foot high block walls along south, east and west property lines. Provide landscape screening along the south, east, and west property lines for screening. 16. Transportation/Circulation: a. Development of the site will result in new vehicular movements in and out of the project. Mitigation Measures: Design and location of entry will have to be provided to allow safe and easy vehicular ingress and egress. e. There may be increased traffic hazards due to new movements. Mitigation Measures: Development of Hovley Lane as a secondary roadway with a bikeway on the north side of the street will mitigate most potential hazards. 17. Public Services: a. The property is presently outside of the 5 minute fire response established by the City Fire Marshal. Mitigation Measures: Applicant is required to pay into fire protection fund at the time of issuance of a building permit pursuant to applicable City Ordinance. 23. Light and Glare: There will be new building and parking lot lighting in conjunction with the project. Mitigation Measures: Applicant will be required to comply with existing light intensity standards. Additionally, lights will be required to be down-shining box type with poles limited to 20 feet. /lr > ESTABLISHED IN 1918 AS A PUBLIC AGENCY _� htl _ COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT POST OFFICE BOX 1058 COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA 92236 • TELEPHONE (714) 398-2651 DIRECTORS OFFICERS RAYMTELLS CDR. AS,VI NDS,VICE PRESIDENT LOWELL 0.WEEKS,GENERAL MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER TELOS.DOWELS,VICE PRESIDENT BERNARDINER S.HA ,SECRETARY JOHNP.NICHOL VICTOR RHARDT OAUDITOR NEYS PAUL W.NICHO LS RED WINE AND SHERRILL,ATTORNEYS STEVE D.BUXTON May 14, 1982 File: 0163. 11 I Ulm Department of Environmental Services M9 `L City of Palm Desert Post Office Box 1977 ENVIRONMGP p SERVICES£ Palm Desert, California 92261 CITY OF. Gentlemen: Re: Case No. DP 02-82 Portion of N�, Sec. 8, T5S, R6E, S.B.M. This area lies on the sandy area north of Palm Desert and is considered safe from stormwater flows except in rare instances. This area is designated Zone C on Federal Flood Insurance rate maps which are in effect at this time. The District will furnish domestic water and sanitation service to this area in accordance with the current regulations of this District. This area shall be annexed to Improvement District Nos. 16 and 70 of Coachella Valley Water District for domestic water service. This area shall be annexed to Improvement District Nos. 53 and 80 of Coachella Valley Water District for sanitation service. Yours very truly ,1 Lowell 0. 'Weeks General Manager-Chief Engineer CS:dlg cc: Riverside County Department of Public Health 46-209 Oasis Street Indio, California 92201 Attention: Don Park TRUE CONSERVATION USE WATER WISELY 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 DEPARTM 4T OF BUILDING & SAFETY PRELIMINARY REVII;4 OF PLANS THIS IS NOT A PLAN CHECK! DEVELOPMENT: h& &2n.Q/ i,;.,g corl=: 6 1982 MVIEMNAAENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT, BEFORE ANY FURTHER COTMENTS CAN BE MADE, ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS NEEDED FOR REVIE!d, . . LI COMPLETE ARCHTIECTURAL DRA14MGS AND SPECIFICATIONS CONff'LETE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS CUPT=, H.V.A.C. , ELECTRICAL AND PLUIBING PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS B' COMPLETE TITLE 24 ENERGY CONSERVATION DOCU�R=ON (Q COMPLETE GRADING PLANS RS OfI E PALOMINO, SR. DATE ACTING DIRECTOR OF BUILDING & SAFETY 1/ SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA gC1S COMPANY 3700 CENTRAL AVENUE RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA R. W. RIDDELL Eastern Division Melling Address: P.O. BOX 2200, RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92515 Distribution Planning Supervisor May 7, 1982 Location of Nearest Gas Main: Monterey Ave & Hovely Lane City of Palm Desert D /� 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane '�.-�� ) ,Ll Palm Desert, CA 92260 Attention: Ramon A. Diaz 2 1982 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Re: Desert Evangelical Free Church CITY OF PALM DESERT Dear Mr. Diaz: This letter is not to be interpreted as a contractual commitment to serve the proposed project; but only as an information service. Its intent is to notify you that the Southern California Gas Company has facilities in the area where the above named project is proposed. Gas service to the project could be pro- vided from an existing main without any significant impact on the environment. The service would be in accordance with the Company's policies and extension rules on file with the California Public Utilities Commission at the time con- tractual arrangements are made. The availability of natural gas service, as set forth in this letter, is based upon present conditions of gas supply and regulatory policies. As a public utility, the Southern California Gas Company is under the jurisdiction of the California Public Utilities Commission. We can also be affected by actions of federal regulatory agencies. Should these agencies take any action which affects gas supply- or the condition under which service is available, gas ser- vice will be provided in accordance with revised conditions. We have developed several programs which are available, upon request, to provide assistance in selecting the most effective applications of energy conservation techniques for a particular project. If you desire further information on any of our energy conservation programs, please contact our Area Market Services Manager, P. O. Box 6226, San Bernardino, CA 92417, phone (714) 884-9411. R. W. Riddell Distribution Planning Supervisor LC/ds 1 • RIVERSIDE COUNTY �n FIRE DEPARTMENT IN COOPERATION WITH THE �1011t O7/\`T S'; :v ` CA LIFOR NIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY a_ �? rsn Et 1?'SIDE DAVID L. FLAKE COUNTY FIRE WARDEN 210 WEST SAN JACINTO STREET •+-� May 17, 1982 PERRIS, CALIFORNIA 92370 TELEPHONE (714) 657-3163 MAY 18 1982 Ramon A. Diaz Director of Environmental Services ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane CITY OF PALM DESERT Palm Desert, CA 92260 Reference: Case No. DP 02-82 Dear Mr. Diaz: Prior to construction of any of the proposed buildings, the following conditions must be met: 1. Install a water system capable of delivering 3000 GPM fire flow for a two (2) hour duration in addition to domestic or other supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. A. Hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. B. Exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. C. Curbs (if installed) shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. Upon approval, one copy will be sent to the Building Department, and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil eingineer, and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Case Number DP 02-82 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal." 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the requited flow. Sincerely, DAVID L. FLAKE County Fire War n By Eric L. Vog to Fire Marsh cc: CVWD - J. Zimmerman INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert 2 6.1982 MA TO: Director of Environmental Services ENVIRDNMENT.AL SERVICES CITY DF PALM DESERT., FROM: Director of Public Works SUBJECT: DP 02-82 (DESERT EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH) DATE: May 26, 1982 The following should be considered as conditions of approval to this project. (1 ) Dedication of right of way to 44 feet from centerline on Hovley. (2) Installation of curb and gutter at 32 feet from centerline, matching paving and sidewalk. (3) Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the City Engineer for checking and approval before construction of any street improvements is commenced. (4) The applicant shall submit as-built plans prior to acceptance of the improvements by the City. (5) All public improvements shall be installed in accordance with City standards. All street improvements are required in conjunction with Phase I of the project. � �a BARR cCLELLAN, P.E. BDM/ms CASE v0 1;N7IRON3IENTAL SERVICES DEPT. INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION CHECKLIST NOTE: The availability of data necessary to address the topics listed below shall form the basis of a decision as to whether the application is considered complete for purposes of environmental assessment. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers , possible mitigation measures and comments are provided on attached sheets) . Yes Maybe No 1 . Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements , compaction, or overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering, or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? y r ate), 2. Yes Maybe No 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a,.. Changes. in currents, "or the course or direction of water movements? _ '` . b. Changes in--absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and- amount of surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Alteration of.the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? e. Change in the quantity of ground waters, 7 either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? f. Reduction in the amount of water other- wise available for public water supplies? 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of plants \ (including trees, shrubs, grass , and V crops)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of plants? , _ c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area , or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? S. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds , land animals including reptiles , or insects)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing wildlife habitat? 3. its No 6. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in ::the rate of use of any natural resources? - b. Depletion of:any non-renewable natural resource? \ v 7. Energv. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? — b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or re- quire the.deselopment of new sources of energy? 8. Risk of Upset:*iDoes the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, pesticides, oil , chemicals, or radiation) in the event of an Ir accident or upset conditions? 9. Economic Loss. Will the proposal result in: a. A change in the value of property and improvements endangered by flooding? V - b. A change in the value of property and improvementsrexposed to geologic hazards beyond accepted co=unity risk standards? _ 10. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels toEthe point at which accepted community noise and vibration levels are exceeded? 11. Land Use. Willathe proposal result in the a tTation of the present developed or planned land use of an area? — 12. Open Space. Will the proposal lead to a decrease in theremount of designated open space? 13. Population. Will the proposal result in: . a. Alteraticn of` the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of- the City? \V.. b. Change in the population distribution by age, income, 2-eligion, racial , or ethnic group, occupational class, household type? i i 4. Yes Maybe No 14, Employment. Will the proposal result in additional new long-term jobs provided, or a change in the number and per cent employed, unemployed, and underemployed? _ 15. Housing. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in number and per cent of housing units by type (price or rent range, zoning category, owner-occupied and rental , etc. ) relative to demand or to number of \ families in various income classes in the City? b. Impacts .on existing housing or creation of a demand for additional housing? 16. Transoortation/Circulation. Will the proposal / result in: a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c. Impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists, or pedestrians? 17. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or resu 7 in a need for, new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? f. Other governmental services? •1 Yes Maybe No 18. Public Fiscal Balance. Will the proposal result in a net change in government fiscal flow (reven ues ues less operating expenditures and annualized capital expenditures)? _ . 19. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a N Feed for new systems, or alterations to the followin g utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications system? C. Water? _ — d• Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? _ f. Solid waste and disposal? 20. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. The creation of any health hazard or Potential health hazard? b. A change in the level of community health care provided? - — ly 21. Social Services. Will the proposal result in an increased demand for provision of general social services? 22. Aesthetics . Will the proposal result in: a. Obstruction of any scenic vista or view \ open to the public? V b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view?C. Lessening of the overall neighborhood (or area) attractiveness, pleasantness, and uniqueness? 23. Li ht and Glare. Will the proposal produce new ight or glare? y 24. Archeoioaical/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object, or building? 6. Yes Maybe No 25. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment or to curtail the diversity in the environment? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental .goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future. ) V c. Does the project have impacts which are indi- vidually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small , but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant. ) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects ` on human beings , either directly or indirectly? _ Initial Study Prepared By: nn,6 k C_IPu L_ N)W to - ( � -T - - C�S�� 20 i- 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE,PALM DESERT,CAUFORNIA92260 CA LEF P.0 696195h_�::• TELEPHONE (714) 546-0611 J U C 16 1982 i�eldman, Robert ft, I ENVIRONMENTAL SERV(C O 1734 11. Verdugo Rd: C)Ty OF PALM DES ICES N Glendale,' Ca. 912.08 101 DELIVERABLE ) U4L TI L.. 3.} <>2'<:UE)IAN1. 0e'l /E3 I(��\+ I S !:ODRESSED �1'NCKFTO FORWARC CCCE RETURN TD SE:.NDE:R iET10N TO SENDER NC17 I�EI.1'.VE'FifaGl._F (1S 6dhE)FiL'SSE:h UNABLE TO 1voRWfRE) June 18, 1982 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. D.P. 02-82 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by DESERT EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH for approval of a Development Plan and a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for a church, school and recreational facility in a P.R. 5 zone (Planned Residential, 5 d.u./acre) located on the south side of Hovley Lane, X mile east of Monterey Avenue, more particularly described as: A.P.N. 622-020-022 y 2 OP y R C / I � a HOVLEY LANE D 019, W //---_L A II 11 II II g,IEk RA MADh E - 11 , CORDOBA �`V1ioI'i,nL'f°f'y '-�-__$�cp RA _MAORE=50UTI untry (Club OAMINT ppTt OYD -NORTN �� � CAMINO ARROYf I \\\ \ \ \,\ I: j/i II 0 11 11 11 q / \\ Iw\ I I II C/j _PLA, 1 II it i W 1 11 iml I I I I I I of! � g �°Il' h�.,y.il a a o11f '1 :Ii L ®1U1171try C�ll tl9 al l loll SAID public hearing will be held on July 6, 1982, at 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall, 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post June 24, 1982 /pa lU.S."vOSiA6', c a. ; . �I JUH28'82 �' _. 2 0 - -43.273 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM OESERT C4UFnqule:e»en C,4 L�F T77 81 , I� 'PFn,..n� �anr7�al� nsin7ici^� I(]87H193 -� TELEPN6N 14) 346-0611 F'E N 02 220723M. 07/07/82 Q RE7 P:F TI.A:.N Tft '0,fS NDER-D te rl -"` FETURN TG SENUEh 11 rp' N T' Uh''LIVhI?ABI!.F_#AS_yAUDF:ESSEU SEn F' Upnen.E T'G •FGR ARU — �\ �J ngobds D ocoi�Ueve!opnent Corp. �l CO2 Pe< thouPi 3$ � `� i02 Sch 1z Piz . L c \ �i Newport Beach, Ca. 92663 J U L 15 1982 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT June 18, 1982 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. D.P. 02-82 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by DESERT EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH for approval of a Development Plan and a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for a church, school and recreational facility in a P.R. 5 zone (Planned Residential, 5 d.u./acre) located on the south side of Hovley Lane, K mile east of Monterey Avenue, more particularly described as: A.P.N..622-020-022 . s V � UPS i o I � o H 0 V L E Y LANE D 0 -82 I ) 1 II I ) gIEF Rrt_MAGfi E .. -----------1 1 L-- �I�I yin v� (Club �-------- 1 `-":Z=�v'L nlr `illub I �-_--_---�` 1 �-__S Ic.4RA _NAORE=SOUT1 GAMIN ART70 Z--NORTH \ i� GAMING ARROYi I w I •li �/i Pi A, f i i 1 11 Imi� b u 11 11 l IL a� a� tl I-1 hI ii dal ��.--- ail `I✓ °P° l Dill D11 LLdIltr r SAID public hearing will be held on July 6, 1982, at 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall, 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post June 24, 1982 /pa 'I haver C(5 Adams : \ DATE TRANSMITTAL JOB NO. JU[l 1 1982 "" ATTN: Clry" PA,.,A pE ERTES �, i GENTLEMEN: ( DI We are sending you JL- f p ` 7r r ` n-, 46y qua biscKttioPhJ -PF.7 %XXT MVAeA eutA! THESE ARE TRANSMITTED: 1. As requested 2. ` For approval 3. _ For your records 4. SINCERELY, Thayer & Adams 23276 South Pointe Drive Suite 208 Laguna yi:J. . . 'alif, 92653 714 831 PNO� 5� April 16, 1982 Land. Use Proposals for Desert Evangelical Free Church: Desert Evangelical Free Church proposes to develop and operate a church and school facility with an ultimate occupancy of 764 on 4.77 acres on the south side of Hovely road approximately 2 mile west of Portola. The hours of operation would be from 7 A.M. to 10 P.M. seven days per week. The main auditorium will seat 764. Parking has been provided at the rate of one space per 3 seats in the main auditorium. The site is developed as follows; 387 parking, 18% buildings, 1410 playgrounds and 30% landscaping. Layout is. courtyard campus type with buildings all facing inner courtyard. The total courtyard dimensions arel80 feet long by 120 feet wide. The courtyard will be used for recreation and outdoor breaks. It also contains a 500 seat amphitheater which will be used for outdoor assemblies. Sur- rounding the courtyard are seven buildings of various size and mass as follows; 1 - Main assembly building, one story, 1 - Gymnasuim, one story, 2 - Classroom buildings, 2 story, 1 - Youth center, one story, 1 - Administration building, 1 story. To the south of the building cluster are two large playground areas. These will be depressed enough to double as a retention basis for rain water run off. They will also double as overflow parking areas. There are two drive- ways providing for two-way traffic surrounding the entire complex. Parking has been held to the perimeter to serve as a buffer between the complex and adjacent residential properties. Ultimate height of the main assembly building will be 50 feet. All other buildings will be approximately 35 feet tall. The trees will be of a tall species to be in scale with the buildings. There will be dense perimeter trees and schrubs to provide a wind break and visual separation between residential property and this complex. To provide limited access the applicant has proposed a 6 foot chain link fence around the property along the side and rear property lines. To limit headlight glare into the street the applicant has proposed a 6 foot tall earth berm along the street property line in the green area 21 feet wide between the parking lot and the street. A double face sign will also be located in this landscaped area as per drawing on site plan. Location and design of parking lot lighting is shown on the site plan. Glare will be cut at an angle to keep from shining onto adjacent property. The proposed architectural style is early California with stucco, wood trim and tile roofs. Phasing is shown on the site plan. All proposed improvements are new. There are no existing structures on the site at present. One of the futrure buildings may contain living quarters for a care-taker. Prrepyared by, l� Jim Tha Agent for the Applicant i 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 NEGATIVE DECLARATION (Pursuant to Title 14, Division 69 Article 7, Section 150839 of the California Administrative Code). Case No: DP 02-82 �plicant/Project Sponsor: DESERT EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH, 73-730 Highway 111, Palm Desert, CA 92260. Project Description /Location: Construction of a church with related facilities in PR-5 zone, located on the south side of Hovley Lane, approximately 1325 feet east of Monterey Avenue. The Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, California, has found that the described project will not have a significant effect on the environment. A copy of the Initial Study has been attached to document the reasons in support of this finding. Mitigation measures, if any, included in the project to avoid potentially significant effects, may also be found attached. RAMON A. DIAZ DATE Director of Environmental Services RAD/pa W ATE/t� ESTABLISHED IN 1918 AS A PUBLIC AGENCY - I � COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT POST OFFICE BOX 1058 COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA 92236 • TELEPHONE (714) 398-2651 DIRECTORS OFFICERS RAYMOND R.RUMMONDS,PRESIDENT LOW ELL O.WEEKS,GENERAL MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER TELLIS CODEKAS,VICE PRESIDENT , BERNARDINE SUTTON,SECRETARY JOHN P.POW ELL VICTOR B.HARDY,AUDITOR PAUL W.NICHOLS REDW IN E AND SHERRILL,ATTORNEYS STEVE D.BUXTON May 14, 1982 File: 0163. 11 v2p19S2 Department of Environmental Services Vim City of Palm Desert SERVICES Post Office Box 1977 ENVIRONMENTW DESERT Palm Desert, California 92261 C,TY OF. PALM Gentlemen: Re: Case No. DP 02-82 Portion of N�, Sec. 8, T5S, R6E, S.B.M. This area lies on the sandy area north of Palm Desert and is considered safe from stormwater flows except in rare instances. This area is designated Zone C on Federal Flood Insurance rate maps which are in effect at this time. The District will furnish domestic water and sanitation service to this area in accordance with the current regulations of this District. This area shall be annexed to Improvement District Nos. 16 and 70 of Coachella Valley Water District for domestic water service. This area shall be annexed to Improvement District Nos. 53 and 80 of Coachella Valley Water District for sanitation service. Yours very truly / Lowell 0.TWeeks General Manager-Chief Engineer CS:dlg cc: Riverside County Department - of Public Health 46-209 Oasis Street Indio, California 92201 Attention: Don Park TRUE CONSERVATION USE WATER WISELY QL 75 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING & SAFETY PRELE-D ARY REVIE[d OF PLANS THIS IS NOT A PLAN CHECK! DEVELOPMENT: Coll=: . . . �� . D R 1982 FNV]RnNMFrNTAL SERVICES CITY OF, PALM DESERT, BEFORE ANY FURTHER COMMENTS CAN BE MADE, ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS NEEDED FOR REV i. . . COMPLETE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS Q� COMPLETE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIO14S COMPLETE H.V.A.C. , ELECTRICAL AND PLUMBING PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS H� COMPLETE TITLE 24 ENERGY CONSERVATION DOCUMENTATION Q COMPLETE GRADING PLANS d OTHERri' If 9E PALOMINO, SR. ! V DATE O ACTING DIRECTOR OF BUILDING & SAFETY A SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAN COMPANY 3700 CENTRAL AVENUE • RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA R. W. RIDDELL Eastern Division Mailing Address: P.O. BOX 2200, RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92516 Distribution Planning Supervisor May 7, 1982 Location of Nearest Gas Main: Monterey Ave & Hovely Lane City of Palm Desert Ri �' � jT 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 <' 1982 Attention: Ramon A. Diaz ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Re: Desert Evangelical Free Church CITY OF PALM DESERT Dear Mr. Diaz: This letter is not to be interpreted as a contractual commitment to serve the proposed project; but only as an information service. Its intent is to notify you that the Southern California Gas Company has facilities in the area where the above named project is proposed. Gas service to the project could be pro- vided from an existing main without any significant impact on the environment. . The service would be in accordance with the Company's policies and extension rules on file with the California Public Utilities Commission at the time con- tractual arrangements are made. The availability of natural gas service, as set forth in this letter, is based upon present conditions of gas supply and regulatory policies. As a public utility, the Southern California Gas Company is under the jurisdiction of the California Public Utilities Commission. We can also be affected by actions of federal regulatory agencies. Should these agencies take any action which affects gas .supply or the condition under which service is available, gas ser- vice will be provided in accordance with revised conditions. We have developed several programs which are available, upon request, to provide assistance in selecting the most effective applications of energy conservation techniques for a particular project. If you desirefurther information on any of our energy conservation programs, please contact our Area Market Services Manager, P. O. Box 6226, San Bernardino, CA 92417, phone (714) 884-9411. R. W. 164 VIZG Distribution Planning Supervisor LC/ds RIVERSIDE COUNTY Y FIRE DEPARTMENT IN COOPERATION WITH THE O ONTY CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY BIVERSIDE .�.+o:;.o� DAVID L. FLAKE COUNTY FIRE WARDEN 210 WEST SAN JACINTO STREET May 17, 1982 PERRIS, CALIFORNIA 92370 y TELEPHONE (714) 657-3183 MAY 18 1982 Ramon A. Diaz Director of Environmental Services ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane CITY OF PALM DESERT Palm Desert, CA 92260 Reference: Case No. DP 02-82 Dear Mr. Diaz: Prior to construction of any.of the proposed buildings, the following conditions must be met: 1. Install a water system capable of delivering 3000 GPM fire flow for a two (2) hour duration in addition to domestic or other supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. A. Hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. B. Exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. C. Curbs (if installed) shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. Upon approval, one copy will be sent to the Building Department, and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil eingineer, and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Case Number DP 02-82 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal." 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. Sincerely, DAVID L. FLAKE County Fire WarA.n By Eric L. Vog to Fire Marsh cc: CVWD - S. Zimmerman INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert MAY 2 6 1982 TO: Director of Environmental Services ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT FROM: Director of Public Works SUBJECT: DP 02-82 (DESERT EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH) DATE: May 26, 1982 The following should be considered as conditions of approval to this project. (1 ) Dedication of right of way to 44 feet from centerline on Hovley. (2) Installation of curb and gutter at 32 feet from centerline, matching paving and sidewalk. (3) Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the City Engineer for checking and approval before construction of any street improvements is commenced. (4) The applicant shall submit as-built plans prior to acceptance of the improvements by the City. (5) All public improvements shall be installed in accordance with City standards. All street improvements are required in conjunction with Phase Iof the project. lvG2v�✓ BAR=f�1cCLELLAN, P.E. BDM/ms CASE NO. D CQ a ENCII1OM.-MENTAL SERVICES DEPT. INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION CHECKLIST NOTE: The availability of data necessary to address the topics listed below shall form the basis of a decision as to whether the application is considered complete for purposes of environmental assessment. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers, possible mitigation measures and. comments are provided on attached sheets) . Yes Maybe No 1 . Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes. in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions , displacements , compaction, or overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering., or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of -- soils, either on or off the site? `.. 2. Air. Will the proposal . result in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? �r b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? 2. Yes Maybe No 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a.., Changes. in currents, �or the course or . ` direction of water movements? '` . b. Changes in--absorption rates, drainage Patterns, or the rate and- amount of surface water runoff? . C. Alterations to the course or flow of \ flood waters? 4 d. Alteration of-the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? e. Change in the quantity of ground waters, 7 either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of, an aquifer by cuts or excavations? _ f. Reduction in the amount of water other- wise available for public water supplies? 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of plants \ (including trees, shrubs, grass , and V crops)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of plants? _ c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area , or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? 5. Animal. Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds , land animals including reptiles , or insects)? \, b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier. to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing wildlife ' habitat? 3. Yes No 6. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in :.the rate of use of any natural resources? - r _ — b. Depletion ofaany non-renewable natural resource? 7. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? _ b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or re- quire the.development of new sources of energy? 8. Risk of Upset:+.iDoes the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of : hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, pesticides, oil , chemicals, or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? 'c — — 9. Economic Loss. Will the proposal result in: a. A change in the value of property and improvements endangered by flooding? — b, A change in the value of property and improvementsrexposed to geologic hazards beyond accepted community risk standards? _ Xj 10. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels to&the point at which accepted community noise and vibration levels are exceeded? 11. Land Use. Will ethe proposal result in the as era tt tion of the present developed or planned land use of an area? — — 12. Open Space. Will the proposal lead to a decrease in theramount of designated open space? IV 13. Population. Will the proposal result in: a. Alteration of the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human ` population of- the City? �r b. Change in the population distribution by age, income,-4-eligion, racial , or ethnic h; group, occupational class , household type? — 4. Yes Maybe No 14. Employment. Will the proposal result in additional new long-term jobs provided, or a change in the number and per cent employed, unemployed, and underemployed? 15. Housing. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in number and per cent of housing units by type (price or rent range, zoning category, owner-occupied and rental , etc. ) relative to demand or to number of families in various income classes in the City? b b. Impacts .on existing housing or creation of a demand for additional housing? 16. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result is \- a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c. Impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists , or pedestrians? 17. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for, new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? _ b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? f. Other governmental services? .. 5. Yes Maybe No 18. Public Fiscal Balance. Will the proposal result in a net change in government fiscal flow (revenues less operating expenditures and annualized capital expenditures)? _ 19. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications system? c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? 20. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? NU b. A change in the level of community health care provided? _ — 21 . Social Services. Will the proposal result in an increased demand for provision of general social services? 22. Aesthetics . Will the proposal result in: a. Obstruction of any scenic vista or view \ open to the public? V b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? c. Lessening of the overall neighborhood (or area) attractiveness, pleasantness , and uniqueness? 23. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? 21. Archeoloaical/Historical . Will the proposal re , t in an aIteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object, or building? 6 Yes Maybe No 25. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment or to curtail the diversity in the environment? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future. ) c. Does the project have impacts which are indi- vidually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project-. may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small , but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant. ) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings , either directly or indirectly? _ Initial Study Prepared By: �v - ( L -�ti — SCHEDULE A The estate or intrust in the land described or referred to in this schrdulr covered by this report is: A FEE Title to said estate or interest at the date hereof is vested in: A7LtIE ADAMEN AND MARIA ADAIVIEN .: T ustees, thsir si:'>G'e.^�. sor3 or ! signog of the 1. I.ex Adamcic Vaara:ly 1079 TrVw't dated June 279 1t37i2 The land referred to in this report is situated in the State of California, County of Riverside, City of halm Dwert and is described as follows: Tav West half of the uouthsaest quarter of the Southeast quarter of the 2?orthpE t _ ?^st s.of_Scetion--Q,, Tov:> mhip 5 South, R e 5 East, Sr n Bernardino Base and dVleriair�ri; EXCEPTING that portion deeded to the County of Riverside by Document recorded January 31, 1975 as Document Fdo. 12040 of Official Records of Riverside County, Collfornia, 0:waribed as follows: Tube Northerly rect.nuhU' 33 feet of the West half of the Sauthwest quarter of the Souti,vcst cr carter of the Rorthsvest quarter of Section 0, Townstip 5 So?ith, llanp G En,:it, icui 13crnrrtdir.o Base and Meridian; ALSO EXCZrPT and rweivizig to the United States of America, all coal, oil, gas and ci?.el, rJ 7GrQl deposits, together with the right to proepeet for, mina and remove th ??n ac'3crdung to ti7c, pi'ovi."1GCs of the 1-1-et of June 1, 1933 (52 State 609) as r.ac?c,-C --id ri.,,crtied by L:e IInit d States of America by Patent rce-orded May 26; .t.JIJu n Boors 270 page `52 of PrAC-Ats, l''%ccorva of ,..lvcrstt7 f'.OiiRtya �i�3-�tf6irkl l.o s� i r yKa� 1 va ® f o o � a 0 •:-ir` - •R's�t�� �� ` . s %i � r zs�• _ 1 v- � •i�1 tl � - s >Y. L .sp�Ti K�f�� l r y� r s Az at-ILE ':I LIST OF PARTIES INVOLVED DESERT EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH 73-730 Hwy. 111, Suite 6 Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 THAYER & ADAMS 23276 South Pointe Dr. 208 Laguna Hills, Ca. 92653 v v, k t.. CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNERS' LIST AFFIDAVIT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF PALM DESERT ) I, 1; C WDA A. EBERT hereby certify that the attached list contains the names and' addressos of all persons to whom all property is assessed as they appear on the latest available assess- ment role of the County within the area described on the attached application and for a distance of three hundred (300) feet from the exterior boundaries of the property described on the attached application. I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. (signed) (date) r 1g82 __ tea. /c NAME AND ADDRESSES OF PROPERTY M4NERS FOR PUBLIC HEARING OH CASE N0. J03 i10. PARCEL NO. NA'-{E ._� ADD0ESS 622-020-011-8 Lotito Christopher N 437 Audraine Dr. Glendale$ Calif. 91202 622-020-012-9 Shapiro Raymond 2127 Amelia Ave. Sanpedro$ Calif. 90731 622-020-012-0 Dietrich Robert H 835 Seagull Lane$ Apt. C 115 Newport Beach$ Ca. 92660 622-020-021-7 Adamek Alex Tr$ Adamek Maria P.O. Box 1564 Palm Desert$ Ca. 92260 622-202-023-9 Procon Development Corp., C/O Penthouse .38 T & D California Investments$ 102 Scholz Plz; Newport Beach$ Ca. 92663 Garmar Investments Inc. TO 622-063-601-2 Bone William;, Ms. 42000 Bob Hope Dr. Rancho Mirage$ Ca. 92270 622-o65-001-8 Mrs. William Bone 41500 Monterey Ave. Palm Springs$ Ca. 92260 622-06o-031-0 Plaza Investment Co. PT 41500 Monterey Ave. Palm Desert$ Ca. 92260 622-06o-032-1 Plaza Investment Co. PT 41500 Monterey Ave$ Palm Desert$ Ca. 92260 622-063-024-3 Jamiesson Max & Phyllis 2109 Paseo Del Mar, San Pedro$ Ca. 90732 622—o63-025-4 Lanni' Rich - Grubs$ Paul C/O Jerome Grimm Grimm' Jereome - Grimm, Noel P.O. .Box 7062 Et A1$ TO Newport Beach$ Ca. 92440 t i / DIAXE AND ADDRESSES OF PROPERTY 04NE°S FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON R CASE NO. J03 No. PARCEL NO. NAME ADDRESS 622-063-026--5 Lyon Co. PT 3117 Thorn Ridge Rd. Oklahoma Cityp 0073120 -------------------- 622-063-027-6 Slade Harold N. S14 187 Las Lomas Palm Deserts Ca. 92260 622-063-028-7 Feldman Robert H. SE 1734 N. Verdugo Rd. Glendale, Ca. 91208 -----------... ',III y a 0 a 09ZZ6 0e0 °�.aasea mlea 09ZZ6 'e0 '�.aas6Q' mled 09zZ6 'eO °�aas.aQ mled 9 a;?nS III 'LnH 0£L—£L 9 a;?nS gTTI '11nH 0£L-£L 9 eq.?nS °III 'LftH O£L-£L g0sn10 aa,z,3 Ie0?Ia3ueA9 ;aasaQ gosnc10 99,7,3 Ieo?IaBueAa ;aasaQ •g0 aa.z3 Iuoil99ueAH '.aasaQ £59Z6 'e0 `sTTTH uun2ez £59Z6 'e0 °sITTH eunSeq £5 Z6 'e0 °s eunBu SOZ 'aQ a;u?od t noS 9LZ£Z SOZ 'aQ a' g�.u?od no .9 IIi.H 'I S 9LZ£Z 80Z aQ aq.utod gqnoS 9LZ£Z SKvav �? a2aVH1 SNVGV 12 HaXVHJ SKVGV 13 xaavH1 Lotitc, Christopher N Procon Development Cc:p, C/O JG-rvme CT-,,--' i 437 Audraine Dr. C/O Penthouse 38 P.O. Bcx '7062 Glendale, Ca. 91202 102 Scholz Piz. Newoo Pc cii, C4, Newport Beach, Ca: 92663 Shapiro, Raymond Bone, William Ms. Lyon Co. 2127 Amelia Ave. 42000 Bob Hope Dr. 3117 Thorn Rid_-,o 4d. Sanpedro, Calif. 90731 Rancho Mirage, Ca. 92270 Oklahoma- City, Ok.. '731"G Dietrich Robert H. Bone, William Mrs. Slade, Harold N. 835 Seagull Lane, Apt. C 115 41500 Monterey Ave. 187 Las Lomas Newport Beach, Ca. 92660 Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Adamek, Alex & Maria Plaza Investment Co. Feldman, Robert H. P.O. Box 1564 41500 Monterey Ave. 1734 N. Verde„o Rd, Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Glendale, Ca, Jamiesson, Max & Phyllis 2109 Paseo Del Mar San Pedro, Ca. 9073277, Q --- — , s Lotito, Christopher iQ 1 Procon Development Co<p. 0/0 Jerorau Crr:;nua 437 Audraine D: C/O Penthouse 38 P.O. Bcx '7062 Glendale, Ca. 91202 102 Scholz Piz. Nev7-,ort Beach 0. 92.{4J Newport Beach, Ca, 92663 Shapiro., Raymond Bone, William Ms. Lyon Co. 2127 Amelia Ave. 42000 Bob Hope Dr. 3117 Thorn Rid[r, dd. Sanpedro, Calif. 90731 Rancho Mirage, Ca. 92270 Oklahoma City, Ok. 73120 Dietrich Robert H. Bone, William Mrs. Slade, Harold N. 835 Seagull Lane, Apt. C 115 41500 Monterey Ave. 187 Las Lomas Newport Beach, Ca. 92660 Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Adamek, Alex & Maria Plaza Investment Co. Feldman, Robert H, P.O. Box 1564 41500 Monterey Ave. 1734 N. Verdugo Rd, Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Glendale,' Ca gE-OL; Jamiesson, Max & Phyllis 2109 Passe Del Mar San Pedro, Ca. 9032 I THAYER & ADAMS THAYER & ADAMS 23276 South Pointe Dr. 208 23276 South Pointe Dr. 208 Laguna Hills Ca. 92653 Laguna Hills, Ca. 92653 Desert Evangelical Free Ch. Desert Evangelical Free Church 73-730 Hwy. 111p Suite 6 73-730 Hwy. 1112 Suite 6 Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 N 0 o COACHELLA VALLEY LAND ORMATION CENTER (CVLIC) 477 SOUTH PALM CANYON DmIVE • SUITE 9 PALM SPRINGS • CALIFORNIA 92262 P.E .R .S. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: DATE RECEIVED DATE SENT OUT REPORT REQUEST CLIENT REFERENCE CODE ACCOUNTING CODE REFERENCE NUMBER REQUESTED BY: NAME Po //L z- zP Jo y TITLE PL 41t1x1//(/lr fFIS/JJ�9nlT FIRM / AGENCY (f! T� 0/— ADDRESS PR« 77�SeF7T27 TELEPHONE (71�y- ) s3 'Z,� - 06/� APPLICANT NAME DEVELOPMENT PROJECT NAME f;A4-lE-/ APPLICATION DATE T ' �2 6 -(5- LOCATION OF SITE 50yTf-1 5lP6- ROW( COLUMN 1 (FROM////CVLIC REFERENCE MAP) SIZE OF PROPERTY (APPROXIMATE ACRES) ' 7 S SEARCH RADIUS ( IN INCREMENTS OF 660 FEET) 6e1b D' PROPOSED TYPE(S) OF DEVELOPMENT (PLEASE CHECK AS MANY AS APPROPRIATE) : Q LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ❑ MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ❑ HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ❑ TRANSIENT ACCOMMODATIONS ❑ STRIP COMMERCIAL / OFFICE ❑ COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL / OFFICE ❑ REGIONAL COMMERCIAL / OFFICE ❑ WHOLESALE COMMERCIAL /WAREHOUSE / MANUFACTURING ❑ TRANSPORTATION ❑ COMMUNICATIONS / UTILITIES `GOVERNMENTAL / CULTURAL / INSTITUTIONAL ❑ RECREATION / OPEN SPACE / AGRICULTURE INVOICE AUTHORIZ /g ION THE COACHELLA VALLEY LAND INFORMATION CENTER IS HEREBY AUTHORIZED TO PROCESS A "P.E.R.S." REPORT ACCORDING TO THE INPUT INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THE ACCOM- PANYING FORM ENTITLED "P.E.R.S. REPORT REQUEST", WITH PAYMENT TO BE MADE BY (CHECK ONE) : 0 CHARGING TO C.V.L. I .C. ACCOUNT N CHECK MADE PAYABLE TO COACHELLA VALLEY LAND INFORMATION CENTER PLEASE NOTE -- COACHELLA VALLEY LAND INFORMATION CENTER'S LIABILITY FOR ANY LOSSES OR DAMAGES, WHETHER DIRECT OR INDIRECT, ARISING OUT OF THIS PROJECT SHALL NOT EXCEED THE TOTAL AMOUNT RECEIVED BY THE COACHELLA VALLEY LAND INFORMATION CENTER WITH RESPECT TO THIS PROJECT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COACHELLA VALLEY LAND INFORMATION CENTER BE LIABLE FOR SPECIAL, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES INCLUDING , WITHOUT LIMITATION, LOSS OF ANTICIPATED PROFIT. SIGNED: 2-,le (PERSON) (TITLE) (ORGANIZATION) = i!!=III._II!_=IIf.-111•=1�t•=t]f '7fF ..IE Jl;c�ii=Iil=IIL=JII_Ii1=111._ill=IIIsfIC=Ii =q - q!=1{I=tll_I�11�=111:=. jr=lit=111=IU=III=ql=q+:=.IU=,1{l,,I{1=ql,-ip. � _ -' i : ' - � I 11G_gl•_.!i�!I!.�.iil. IUpEid4a iFAEEOFI iii ! . . !+=III=.q1 Y' a III=+II.=iII: ax; _ s'- COACHEE1!1=1i! -111•=III-It?' =1! ;_; ,_ . , _.'' 1 ; i!I=f!1=111_IIIsilt 477 solL=!�!.=.I{i=!U.=11i=11L�1!L=.IiI_IU•=11! ,iil_. _ �I1=ill,=i!! s -s i.it 14�, , 1=1{I=11f-'!11;= SaFcrtl�N ;111-11(=III Ib,=1Ifs)II.t: I 1=Ill=I i I I rw cil; . - vaa6 s;4gc i o�N 1= 1-i i_di Ill=!ii-E of=!'1.=Iii.=.-! .=.Ib;=.Ih;=;I!i.=.ii!.=.Ii1:=i11.=.i!I i!1,=,Ili.=i!I=a!L-I�. 1 •i.=.i!1.=a!I=.I i.�.i'i. ; i�IU;=iiL=.ili•M,!li=.qi.=.i!!=iH.=iliaiU.�qi=l!L_. , �aIFI��I�r '-;INK"`.-•' _�.I •,iit.,F ill=' .= i� �1!r.-.q1=.i i�,!i1. ip,=lii s5 1 =II =i!i=Ili=11i=. =qi li;(iI)II.14CIil;Ili;gia�i;q�aFEGU�R? •!iCtIli 111 ;1il;q!;Ills: Ill 'Obb:�TQ8!i''t.' '2fl0>3fT►i �:'33'$�»drr5i2 3'n�'1i =� _ _ !!� !i!=1i1=ii CITY OF RANCHO ,�.�o/, V�1 n �� 2GaG.aS MIRAGE LIMITS .. . ... ... —... ... ... G6/ 79 GGr 9Y p '3aG i 1 O o C/T YN OF 4 t PAL•M1/ DESERT L IMTTS � O w b O w 3; I V U O n 0 A n / n r o � N - 1 r V W Q J n N n A zoo o n al G6L So GG/ Q9r Cc L.9� 20 I IV ��+ /Oo t•/ �Oi.pC �1 4. O _ d W � / 8"r- ryas:.�•v � � o C � w O W V Qw A a k a ��SV/ n p G'• �V1 T w -3z3 G.R NIA Oil n it I u s ti r o a i jl w I I w rso n w U O w N H y V © b s � a s ro oaz.5& .Nor.//•25.E 8R-TOtA A V& �- -------- a n •, ,A 'C/ t ��r O p $ _ A J V - d _ C � � i POR. Cl TY O PQ ERT. T R. A. /B 49 622 - 06 /o/ O2 /02 PO S. W. l/ S T S 6 E. /03 SHEET /OF 4 ro 9 /B ®AC9 39 53„7 12/ QI © 2 .77 ZG /.92 @, @ . /29 1 /30 .� I n„454 35 oo n'--L-/2Jr L 1 95 91 �a 4e•a7ii3 33...B3805s I� so Sca 5.74 - I Qs . 54s4-3 G/o,2a O 54 9 C MA c i ap2or 0 46 44 �B 7 / O3 06/ 4.69Ac 90 76 ly i 75 / 9. 6n BSBa � v, 77O Q Q R 74 n m.a � W N fg cc V) 57 s, N 45 54 5./4 Ac 20 G w200 OCM R' >z s I - 1355AC ZGO 2G9Z6 44` �_ �c-�� V c I 064 /90 CM O. PM74143 279 vo v �' 3o .3Ac � n m /8 I 5./7Ac 61 P a D LA ecn PAZ WAY z>z.zo v � o� V Y 30 � zi - 4= v' �� � Por / 2� I, I_ co• � O 739a5 24 ® `22nll ,4j° » 0 Nj 931 94 2 . I� v 6./5Ac 89 v ® S Par21 I I 2.42Ac ® 2.64Ac h I O 23 .m - y9p5 062 I z77.» _ •'sue I g y1- c .I ' CM 07 QQ 7902 7987/ G Q.� \ 3<9 1 I .O v e t, CM q 4.23 Ac r 4 Ctv v O _ h 9_ m i i/2.5✓Ac .v t I / N �. ' n 3.4At j02s L BK I,,III]IINr'' /0 c m 0.98Ac °t 4s tj CORDOBA WAY 066 V I " ti B> PM 74/93 L5t I i 6/B 4 S 3 02.05 292 20 PN Co 19V. /t%3] �c 5 `0 •, O L'4L(/ GZ <.>. 134.04, 'l� e ` /30 ` /3v BLS Q,a`0��z I 87 72 B5j ® 'tv m. .. I zac.ba zz s.rji /nca - - - - e3c 9y ® oI�Y Ii5' ro 86 p v © 52 i OCM/ 3 I O OyL 0 m O Q '0 .. 0 3.�r 4 O .94At ' "t h ® - re 1 0.teat 1 ' /.B3 At 9j� P ,- 0.65 AC U-U 2a ��jj 9L' P4 Z 3 s7.`5-/ 69 - p � e �` 1,95Ac .7 70v. 9 68 "123 s� a 94Ac lv I 1 ala \`. al 0.59t4 it {:La. O . . 5.OgAe e O ~ /3 -3l.c7 Ac p N ^ . / c G ' O CS3>„s93s /4q.79 62 I L 45Ac 32A RAN VIA a j/o '-I z•'��°- - -- -- -`- -- -- r,R,A.a'%B59�� T.RA: �/848'' : o � - �c ® CY Ali 2 /5Ac e .oN 'O.80 Ac �N o 7 4.e.js t m P D 2.25Ac /,8B O s . q C 4 G t c I 4 ' CZ 3iB. 9Q BB' - 12, 4.48A6 ' Xn 6/ ..1 .• +{ +'`. 7✓ �, - < .fi tq x 'P •, I. Ogre 54o No NEw,Mo• . -lIj i t m 1NB97%B2-/O8 TrbcJ4C/t�23rU07 /%9 45 54 o a 3 . C.M.231137.149 ro GM.24A/39=161 1 O C.M.25/ /- 19 ry.o2 I /7B.96 C.M. 29/25- 39 ASS£63OR'S MAP BK622 PG06 P.M74/43,44Porce/ Mop15,,716.C.M.29/25-39. 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CAUFORNIA92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO: DP 02-82 APPLICANT: DESERT EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH Enclosed please find materials describing a project for which the following is being requested: Approval of a Development Plan and a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for a Church, School and Recreational Facility in a P.R. 5 zone (Planned Residential, 5 d.u./acre) located on the south side of Hovley Lane, X mile east of Monterey Avenue, more particularly described as: A.P.N. 622-020-022 The attached data was prepared by the applicant and is being forwarded to you for comments and recommended Conditions of . Approval. The City is interested in the probable impacts on the natural environment (e.g. water and air pollution) and on public resources (e.g. demand for schools, hospitals, parks, power generation, sewage treatment, etc.). Your comments and recommended conditions of approval must be received by this office prior to 5:00 p.m. May 19, 1982, in order to be discussed by the Land Division Committee. The Land Division Committee (comprised of Director of Environmental Services, City Building Official, City Engineer, Fire Marshal and a representative of CVWD) will discuss the comments and recommended conditions of approval and will forward them to the Planning Commission through the staff report. Any information received by this office after the receipt deadline will not be discussed by the Land Division Committee nor will it be forwarded to the Planning Commission for consideration. Sincerely, Ra n 7�.'Diaz Director of Environntal Services /pa PLEASE RETURN MAP WITH COMMENTS r• . CASE NO. Environmental Assessment Form TO THE APPLICANT: Your cooperation in completing this form and supplying the information requested will expedite City review of your application pursuant to the California Environmental .Quality Act: The City is required to make an environmental assessment on all projects which it exercises discretionary approval over. Applications submitted will not be considered complete until all information necessary to make the environmental assessment is complete". . GENERAL INFORMATION: 1 . Name, address, and telephone number of owner, applicant or project L sponsor: 7e gwr FVAN6dr41e 'e- fj ,7.3-730 AllZifWw /// SyiT 6 pQ�rn � 92260 7'hewe .7/4 3e1160�2� 2. Name, address and telephone number of person to be contacted con- cerning the pr-jectj§pch as architect, engineer, or other repre- - sentative) : /o -rkau.r-4 A A-os,r. S ----------_—_-- ---- ------- __-----___.-- -- 2 3276 Sa ui'ti P01P1'TE L!!J(AMln. RILLf Cr, -1 U 69 3. Common name of project (if any) :. ]7ES��i 2VP ,E�I�aL G•N-4-11`GFf 4. Project location (street address or general location) : 14oV E L R D l,owrA S-t D6� f? j9e1ZPK YZ x4 ►LE Cc)C-ST• /0ol2ToLA 5. Precise legal description of property (lot and tract number, or meets & bounds) : �ic� 6. Proposed use of the site (project for which the form is filed; describe the total undertaking, not just the current application approval being sought) : GEkLiQGI, Ah4D Sc ,14 L 12_ C F cR UL.TI "Qo'TE 606- �ciT`� 42E _-7 6 L{ 7. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects (describe how this project relates to other activities, phases anddevelop- ments played, or now underway) : SZrip D r A 0gowOJ�ie � o7`CG c�P�r�c y =3oa �haa� T� �= Eoo G' ir= 76 _r_f o a ', . rl' T eLc"M 11.A T' VC— OUI- 7- TaL eeZ R UX', 4 4!5:�a �(a 8. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, to go forward, including those required by the City, Regional , State and Federal agencies (indicate sub- sequent approval agency name, and type of approval re uired) : EXISTING CONDITIONS: �7 9. Project site area: �. / (Size of property in sq. ft. or acreage) 10 Present zoning: P R _(Proposed zoning) : 11 General Plan land' use designation:_LO W a,vt A & 12. Existing use of the project site: 77 13. Existing use on adjacent properties : (Example - North, Shopping Center; South, Single .Family Dwellings; East, Vacaanntt,,'etpc. ). • , 14. Site topography (describe) : / / r v 15. . Are there.any natural or manmade drainage channels through or adjacent to the property? : NO YES 16. Grading (estimate number of cubic yards of dirt being moved) : 17. List the number, size and type of trees being removed: /2� 18. Describe any cultural , historic, or scenic aspects of the project site: *: ?p 19. Residential Project (if not residential do NOT answer) Number and type of dwelling units (Specify no. of bedrooms) : B. Schedule of unit sizes : C. Number of stories Height feet. D. Largest single building (sq. ft. ) (hgt. ) E. Type of' Rousehold' size expected (,population projection for the project) : F. Describe the number and type of recreational facilities : „ 4 ' G. Is `there any night lighting of the project: H. Range of sales prices or rents : $ to $ I . Percent of total project devoted to: Building . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . % Paving, including streets. . . . . . . . . . . % Landscaping, Open, Recreation Area . . . . . . % 20. Commercial , Industrial , Institutional or Other Project: A. Type of use(s) and major function(s) (if offices, specify type & number) : j> C �✓c552oo/fiis� OG�/GAS �. 1 . U1.B. 1 Number of square feet in total building area: C. Number of stories 2 Height R-5 feet. Largest single building (Sq. Ft. ) (9D"0a (Hgt. ) -11 7 � E. Number of square feet in outdoor storage area: p/.�e �C sal F. Total number of required king spaces Z 5# , number provided ek" �: V SSA G. Hours of operation: �e X1 q-7> i / T AI H. Maximum number of clients, patrons , shoppers, etc. , at one time: I. Maximum number of employees at one time: O J. If patron seating is involved, state the number: 7� K. Is there any night lighting of the project: Yes No Percent of total project devoted to: Building . . . . . . . . . . . . . . % Paving, including streets. . . . . . . . . % Landscaping and Open Space (Recreation). . % Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects: Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). YES NO 21 . Change in existing features of hillsides , ✓. or substantial alteration of ground contours. 22. Change in the dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in the project vicinity. 23. Subject to or resulting in soil errosion by wind or flooding. 24 Change in ground water quality or quantity, or �^ alteration of :exist.ing drainage patterns. 26 Change in existing noise or vibration level in the vicinity. Subject to roadway or airport noise (has the required acoustical report been ✓- submitted?) 26. Involves the use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives. 27. Involves the use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy. V 28. Changes the demand for municipal services (police, fire, sewage, etc. ) 29. Changes the demand for utility services, beyond those presently available or planned in the ✓� near future. 30. Significantly affects any unique or natural features, including mature trees. 31 . Change in scenic views or vistas from existing �. residential areas or public land or public roads. 32. Results in the dislocation of people. �� YES NO 33. Generates controversy based on aesthetics or ✓' .other features of the project. [ ] Additional explanation of "yes" answers attached. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation, to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. J aA A-M Name Print or Typ For 1 S i grfatureF Date --------------- INITIAL STUDY FEE: i30.00 (Make check payable to the City of Palm Desert and sub- mit with this form. ) t SCHEDULE A The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this sCCdulC covered by this report is: A FEE Title to said estate or interest at the date hereof is vested in: ALE; ADAP41EIK AND P:IARIA ADAPv1Eh dt.t,N•e .?, 'C113ir m!cca=orf3 or a i;its, of 'Clio . Ai ex Adaricic Famii.y 1070 7`rust dated June 279 1079 °,. The land referred to in this report is situated in the State of California,County of Riverside, City of Palm D' ert and is described as follows: ^i']te T.7cuE h^FP of the Southwest quarter of Clio Southeast quarter of the 2jort1lsaes1 _ r t Ce^_of_ c'cio i-8,- Tor:r_ohip 5 South, Range 6 East, Soil 13ernai°dino Base and 1'. c7lddan; :,:XC r.p7'iNG that portion dacd3d to the County of Riverside by Document recorded January 31, 1975 ao Document I-To. 12840 of Official Records of Riverside Cou,-nty, C uhfc:nia, cis criacd an foRocas: Tile Nortll ly rcetciigub2 33 feet of the Cdc::i half of the Couthwest quarter of t1te ,aouthca quarter of the quarter of Section 3, 'i'ocrnEhip 5 South, RanSc u" East; aan -Bernar(lno 13asa wid fdcrldianl ALSO EXCitPT D. 1 to the Unii:C'd Mates of Arno mica, all coal, oil, gas Intl ctlic;1, imt-Ici'al Q;pJ3i:ts, toge1j13T v/itli the plr?fit to prospet !'t for, nine and remove the sz-sac ac'cux:klgr to the pi,ovioic._,s of tho Act of June 19 1.33E (52 Stat. 600) a3 . . ^Set."•.:..4.If,':i ;,3'id L'6v�rvcd lay %4"re United aSta''tc3 of Ameeiea by patent 'reccvdod May 26, . Xtl'.3 ill Ecucic 2273 [,,age 452 cf 11 tcn'ts, Ra�.--rejj of RiVr-vck,13 C0111Siy, callftai" :—, "CLTA Pf'. _ CITY OF HALM DESERT MWURERI RECEPY 5947. RECEIVED OF: DATE 'S--6 AMOUNT��SC)t-� FOR BAt11'1 57' IM -P 140 0-I&Q F&A,P 0%f 40f° T k eG110 O6762 RECEIVED: CITY TREASURER BY: ACCOUNT AMOUNT CHECKS ACCEPTED SUBJECT TO BANK CLEARANCE PAYOR 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT CA. 92260 + l ***CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT*** DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION 2 N� ` p�s62� �y�NGELicA� �tzEE Gff�ot�.,� � �� 3 6 Applicant (please or�nU 73--7�0 /� �/� v l!1 Su ArE 7/�} 3 ��0726 Mailing Address Telephone P.4iL Ep,:r GA 9'2 '2-1c0 1 City State // Zip-Code REQUEST: (Describe specific nature of approval requested) /jCC f}"77AChl�a Ee AC C/ / DGG�R'o // 70 ai�fGLv`c.¢cf' RAY-�-� PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: &e ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 6 ZZ;--OZ0 O 22 EXISTING ZONING 5 Property Owner Authorization THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT THEY ARE THE OWNE OF T EY'P�.R E ESCRIBED HEREIN AND HEREBY GIVE AUTHOR- IZATION FOR THE FILING OF THIS APPL ATIN- V SI NATURE DATE AGREEMENT ABSOLVING THE CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL LIABILITIES RELATIVE TO ANY DEED RESTRICTIONS. I DO BY PAY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT, ABSOLVE THE CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL LIABILITIES REGARDING ANY DEED-RES- � TROTIONS THAT MAY BE APPLICABLE TO THE PROPERTY�D�ES�CCRIBED HEREIN. �v'y„ SIG Ai URE DATE Applicants Signature BIG ATURE DATE (FOR STAFF USE ONLY) ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS ACCEPTED BY ❑ MINISTERIAL ACT E.A. No. ❑ CATEGORICAL ❑ EXEMPTION NEGATIVE DECLARATION CASE No. 7f t/ ( . r ❑ OTHER - - REFERENCE CASE NO. y .. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT -- - Required Submittal Detax-i Page Two VI . APPLICATION FILING FEE. Provide check payable to the City of Palm Desert in the specified amount. - Sites containing one acre or less, $140 - Sites containing more than one acre, $250 + $10/acre (or faction thereof) t - Sites with D, S, N, SP., H, zoning overlays, plus 50% of base fee VII . Supplemental plans and exhibits which relate to the specific use requested in this application. Planning Division Staff should be contacted regarding the contemplated use, to obtain 'a list of additional plans and exhibits which will be required for that specific activity. These supplemental items will need to be reviewed with Planning Division Staff in advance of filing and submitted with the formal application. *Supplemental Appl'i"ca i-on Items: Q Residental Development Q Commercial/Industrial Activities [7 Public/Quasi Public and Private Institutional Uses Q Recreational Activities 0 Other Uses (Items .as specified for the use. ) Q Zoning Overlay District(s) "D" Drainageway, Floodplain, Watercourse Overlay "SH" Seismic Hazard Overlay "N" Natural Factors/Restricted Development Over-lay _"H" Hillside Development Overlay Variance/Adjustment *Planning Staff are to indicate which"items apply to a specific application.