The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDP 06-81 - 62 UNIT CONDOS 1983 PRECISE PLAN TENTATIVE TRACT I ZONE CHANGE PARCEL MAP - VARIANCE _ �2 � IJ ' r �` � .�- U . U. P. REFER TO -rT APPLICANT LOCATION 1 REQUEST EXISTING ZONE : - r' REPARATION PROGRESS DATE BY COMMENTS APPLICATION RECEIVED LEGAL PUBLICATION SENT NOTICES SENT FIELD INVESTIGATION DEPTS . NOTIFIED BUILDING ENGINEERING FIRE POLICE RECREATION & PARKS PLAIlki SCHOOL DISTRICT DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS FLOOD CONTROL PRELIMINARY MEETING STAFF REPORT FINAL PLAN APPROVAL PRECISE PLAN ( 6 ) LANDSCAPING PLAN ( 5 ) PLAN . DIRECTOR MOD. (6 ) HEARINGS & ACTIONS DATE ACTION VOTE REVIEW BOARD HEARING P. C. HEARING PUBLISHED P. C. PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT NOTIFIED C.C. PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE NO. RESOLUTION N0 , EFFECTIVE DATE RECORDED FOR DATA - BANK ZONING MAP CORRECTED MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY - APRIL 19, 1983 2:00 P.M. - CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS I. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Wood called the meeting to order at 2:00 p.m. H. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Commissioner Kryder III. ROLL CALL Members Present: Commissioner Crites Commissioner Kryder Commissioner Richards Chairman Wood Excused Absent: Commissioner Downs Staff Present: Ray Diaz Stan Sawa Phil Drell Phil Joy Linda Russell Barry McClellan i IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: April 5, 1983 Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Kryder, to approve the minutes as submitted; carried unanimously 4-0. V. SUMMARY OF COUNCIL ACTION Mr. Diaz reviewed the actions of the council for the meeting of April 14, 1983. VI. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed on the consent calendar are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless members of the planning commission or audience request specific items be removed from the consent calendar for separate discussion and action. 0A. Case No. DP 06-81 - ALEX ADAMEK - Approval of.a one year extension of time for a development plan for a 62 unit condominium project on the south side of Hovley Lane, 500 feet west of Portola Avenue. R_c: Approve as presented, Moved by Commissioner Kryder, seconded by Commissioner Richards, to approve consent calendar item; carried unanimously 4-0. VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS Continued Case No. ZOA 10-82 - INITIATED BY THE CITY OF PALM DESERT Consideration of standards for the installation of home satellite receivers (television dish antennas). Mr. Joy reviewed the staff report and stated that this was continued from a previous meeting because of concerns the commission had. Those concerns were addressed in the restrictions as part of the amendment. Mr. Joy presented some pictures of different sizes of dish antennas and introduced Mr. Dennis Stroul, to give a presentation. -1- 4 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CAUFORNIA92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: April 20, 1983 ALEX ADAMEK C/o Harry H. Schmitz & Assoc. 45-900 Paseo Coronado Indian Wells, CA 92260 f e: DP 06-81 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of April 19, 1983. APPROVED TIME EXTENSION TO JUNE 2, 1984 Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the director of environmental services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. RAMON A. DIAZ, SECRERY PLANNING COMMISSION RAD/lcr cc: File City of Palm Desert Department of Environmental Services Staff Report TO: Planning Commission DATE: April 19, 1983 CASE NO: DP 06-81 REQUEST: Approval of a one year extension of time for a development plan for a 62 unit condominium project. APPLICANT: ALEX ADAMEK c/o Harry H. Schmitz & Assoc. 45-900 Paseo Coronado Indian Wells, CA 92260 I. DISCUSSION• DP 06-81 provides for the construction of a 62 unit condominium development on 13.2 + acres in the PR-5 zone on the south side of Hovley Lane, 500 feet west of Portola Avenue. The original development plan was approved June 2, 1981, by the planning commission. A one year time extension was granted in May, 1982. The applicant is requesting a second one year extension. The accompanying tentative tract map is due to expire December 25, 1983, and can be granted a final one year extension upon request in November. II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff feels this request is acceptable and recommends: Approval of a one year time extension of DP 06-81 to June 2, 1984. III. ATTACHMENTS: A. Letter of Request B. Site Plan Prepared by Reviewed and Approved by /lr _1_ HARRY H. SCHMITZ & ASS ATES 45-900 Paseo Coronado INDIAN YELLS, CA 92260 4 _ q , 9 3---=--- ' DATE_�_. TO n(714)n346.2022 I� /BBJE,CT 1,70 1983 nU 44,P SFRVDFSPRTFS_G'�±e..��on_o� >_ __E X T EN v ,�.Qe _.�.�^^•t •.P�^^,^�.�,c•- aMm�c*.��, ,Y�.� ,o.�-�.e_� m,-e_. D C�;A_ADAMEfG- ' S16NED_ PLEASE REPLY ❑ NO REPLY NECESSARY C/ l HARRY H. SCHMITZ & ASS( SATES 45.900 Paseo Coronado INDIAN WELLS, CA 92260 ..;I. � DATE , LF _ cI 9_3 - -. TO (714) 346.2022 ��F y; fSl/B✓ECT 9 � Tfs'a- �F�2.�•f�c��__..�t. . .t1 N+� - 4. D z , PLEASE REPLY ❑ NO REPLY NECESSARY ' • � /�_ ��Il� _.ter." __- _ I - lr Mm Aw 11, REr: I • .. - � �iii•I7 _ 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: May 20, 1982 ALEX ADAMEK c/o Harry H. Schmitz do Assoc. 45-900 Paseo Coronado Indian Wells, CA 9226.0 CASE NO: DP 06-81 and TT 17794 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of May 18, 1982. APPROVED BY MINUTE MOTION Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. . a RAMON A. DIAZ, SECREtARY PLANNING COMMISSION RAD/lcr cc: File 4iI W ATEq ESTABLISHED IN 1918 AS A PUBLIC n__NCY ��STHIC� COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT POST OFFICE BOX 1058 • COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA 92236 • TELEPHONE (714) 398-2651 DIRECTORS OFFICERS RAYMOND R.RUMMONDS,PRESIDENT LOWELL O.WEEKS,GENERAL MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER TELLIS CODEKAS,VICE PRESIDENT BERNARDINE SUTTON,SECRETARY C.J.FROST DENNIS M.HACKETT,AUDITOR PAUL W.NICHOLS REDWINE AND SHERRILL,ATTORNEYS STEVE D.BU%TON June 3, 1981 :`Fi"le: 0163. 11 0421 . 1 r. 0721 .1 Department of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert P. 0. Box 1977 Palm Desert, California 92261 Gentlemen: Re: Tract 17,794, NE,' Section 8, T5S, RISE, S.B.M. This area is protected from stormwater flows by Whitewater River Storm- water Channel , and may be considered safe from stormwater flows except in rare instances. This area is designated Zone C on Federal Flood Insurance rate maps which are in effect at this time. The District will furnish domestic water and sanitation service to this area in accordance with the current regulations of this District. This area shall be annexed to Improvement District Nos. 16 and 70 of Coachella Valley Water District for domestic water service. This area shall be annexed to Improvement District Nos. 53 and 80 of Coachella Valley Water District for sanitation service. Very truly yours, Lowell 0. Weeks Ideneral Manager-Chief Engineer DBP: ih cc: Riverside County Department of Public Health 46-209 Oasis Street Indio, California 92201 Attention: Don Parks off 1y)MnZi-M 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE June 8, 1981 APPLICANTS) ALEX ADAMEK c/o Harry H. Schmitz & Assoc. 45-900 Paseo Coronado Indian Wells, CA 92260 CASE NO: DP 06-81 TT 17794 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of June 2, 1981 CONTINUED TO DENIED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. X APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 718 R. 719 X PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL June 25, 1981 , FOR PUBLIC HEARING. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environ- mental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. NOTE: PLEASE SIGN AND RETURN RAMON A. DIAZ y PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval , to comply with all the conditions set forth and understand that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. Date Applicant's Signature cc: Coachella Valley Water District File City of Palm Desert V ;Department of-Environmental Services Staff Report TO: Planning Commission DATE: May 18, 1982 CASE NO: DP 06-81 and TT 17794 REQUEST: Approval of a one year and 18 month time extension for a Development Plan and Tentative Tract Map, respectively. APPLICANT: ALEX ADAMEK c/o Harry H. Schmitz do Assoc. 45-900 Paseo Coronado Indian Wells, CA 92260 L DISCUSSION: DP 06-81 and TT 17794 provide for the construction of a 62 unit condominium development,on 13.2f acres in the PR-5 zone on the south side of Hovley Lane, 500 feet west of Portola Avenue. Original approval of the Development Plan was granted June 2, 1981, by the Planning Commission. The Tentative Tract Map was approved June 25, 1981, by the City Council. The applicant is requesting a one year and 18 month time extension for the Development Plan and Tentative Tract, respectively, as allowed by Municipal Code. The reason for this request is that the applicant has not been able to fund construction of the project, due to the economic recession. 11. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff feels this request is acceptable. Therefore, staff recommends: A. Approval of a one year extension for DP 06-81, with all previous conditions to apply; B. Approval of an 18 month extension for TT 17794 with all previous conditions to apply. 111. ATTACHMENTS: A. Letter of request B. Site Plan. Prepared by Reviewed and Approved by /lr I Nt We APR 2 i' 1982 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES H7S CITY OF PALM DESERT HARRY H. SCHMITZ & ASSOCIATES 23 April 1982 City Council F, Planning Commission City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, California 92260 Re : Tentative Tract #17994 Development Plan #06-81 (Adamek) Gentlemen: Due to the present economic recession, it has been difficult to fund construction of the above referenced project. We are therefore requesting an EXTENSION of TIME on both the tentative tract and development plan. The maximum limits permitted by law are being requested. Sincerely, Try H Schmitz cc : Alex Adamek, 72-575 Betty Ln. , Rancho Mirage URBAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING CONSULTANTS•45-900 PASEO CORONADO•INDIAN WELLS,CALIFORNIA 92260•(714)346-2022 J 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE June 8. 1981 APPLICANTS) ALEX ADAMEK c/o Harry H. Schmitz & Assoc. 45-900 Paseo Coronado Indian Wells, CA 92260 1 CASE N0: (!.O6-81The Planningion of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of June 2, 1981 CONTINUED TO DENIED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. X APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 718 &. 719 X PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL June 25, 1981 , FOR PUBLIC HEARING. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environ- mental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. C NOTE: PLEASE SIGN AND RETURN RAMON P PALM DEESERRTT PLANNING COMMISSION I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval , to comply with all the conditions set forth and understand that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. Date Applicant's Signature cc: Coachella Valley Water District - File PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO._Z18 P Oc"' i1TTn'r nr Ti._" CI nnuiTeQ rOn,WTeCT,n11 ,. ,�!r CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DE`IEI.OPMENT PLAN FOR A 62 ONTT COAIDOMTNIUM ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF HOVLEY LANE, 500 FEET WEST OF PORTOLA AVENUE. CASE NO. DP 06-81 . WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 2nd day of June, 1981 , hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a request by ALEX ADAMEK, c/o HARRY SCHMITZ and ASSOCIATES, to consider a request for approval of a Development Plan for a 62 unit condominium development on 13.2 acres, generally located on the south side of Hovley Lane, 500 feet west of Porto- la Avenue, more particularly described as: APNS 621-190-064 621-190-065 621-190-066 WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedures to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89" , in that the Director of Environmental Services has deter- mined that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment and a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact has been prepared. WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testi- mony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard,' said Planning Commission did find the following facts to justify their actions, as described below: a. The proposed project generally conforms to the intent and purpose of the PR Zone District. I b. The proposed project is adequately suited for the lspecific site and is compatible with existing and proposed development in the area. c. The proposed project will not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission in this case. 2. That the Planning Commission does hereby approve Conceptual Development Plan No. 06-81 , subject to those conditions attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED, at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 2nd day of June, 1981 , by the following vote to wit: AYES: KRYDER, MCLACHLAN, MILLER, RICHARDS NOES: NONE ABSENT: BERKEY _ . . ABSTAIN: NONE CHARLES MILLER, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary /pa PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 718 Page Two CC;, 1 T IONS OF ArPROVAL 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with Exhibit A (Case No. DP 06-81) on file with the Department of Environmental Services, as modified by the following conditions. -- 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any uses contemplated by this approval , the applicant shall first complete all the procedural requirements of the City which include, but are not limited to, Design Review, Subdivision process, and building permits procedures. 3. Construction of the total development may be done in phases; however, each individual phase shall meet or exceed all Municipal Code require- ments to the degree that the City could consider each phase as a single project. 4. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval otherwise said approval shall become null , void and of no effect whatsoever; effective date of approval to run from approval date of TT 17794. 5. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and State and Federal Statutes now in forces or which hereafter may be in force. 6. All existing electrical distribution lines, telephone, cable antenna television, and similar service wires or cables, which are adjacent to the property being developed shall be installed underground as a part of development from the nearest existing pole not on the property being developed. 7. All requirements of the City Fire Marshal shall be met as part of the development of this project per attached letter dated 8. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. 9. . Traffic control provisions shall be provided as required by the Director of Public Works. 10. Curb, gutter, sidewalk or approved pathways, and tie-in paving shall be provided in conformance with City Standards and/or as required by the Director of Public Works. 11. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval , the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Riverside County Department of Health Palm Desert Design Review Board Process City Fire Marshal Coachella Valley Water District Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the Dept. of Building and Safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 12. No development shall occur on the subject property prior to the record- ation of a tract map, except for model complex as approved by Planning Commission. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 718 Page Three 13. Redesign ertr ! se *hat stacLinn for threecers ner lane is ornvided. with turnarouna provided for rejected vehicles. and private street to the west. 15. Perimeter wall along Hovley Lane to be set back minimum of 20 feet from the curb line. 16. Applicant shall pay a one hundred dollar per unit fee at the time of issu- ance of building permit; fees to be used to provide fire suppression facilities. 17. Tennis court lighting, if used, shall be down shining black-box type with recessed light source, as approved by the Design Review Board. 18. This approval is subject to final approval of TT 17794, by the City Council . t PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 718 Page Four -- - ♦fir S ( ) IN COOPERATION WITH THE �{i1:,. � ±..1` r•.�r� ,ix �AL '�(-`?v,l nl`J15:CN CF --OcESTRY DAVID L. FLA.7:E P.O. BOX 248 COUNTY FIRE WARDEN 210 WEST SAN JACINTO STREET P ER RIS, CALIFORNIAN °'_370 TE'_4w CNE (] ICI 557-31e5 I May 29, 1931 i I Ramon A. Diaz City of Palm Desert Environmental Services Department 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, California 92260 Reference: Case No. DP-06-81 & TT 17794 Gentlemen: Prior to construction of any of the proposed buildings, the following conditions must be met: 1. Install a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow for a two (2) hour duration in addition to domestic or other supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. I 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that .no point of any building is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. I A. Hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. B. Exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall .be painted green. C. Curbs (if .installed) , shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 3. Prior to issuance of a. building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. - Upon approval , one copy will be sent of the Building Department, and the ori- ginal will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be. signed by a registered civil engineer, 'and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in. Case Number DP-06-81 & TT 17794 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal . " 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, .operating and delivering the required flow. 6. Alternative access is required. :.- 7. Entry gate must be controlled from emergency vehicles by an approved system. .Very truly yours, DAVID L. FLAKE F* Chief ERIC L. VOGT� ! Fire Marhhal cc: Jim Zimmerman 0TY CrRV-L! D: cs;;T Coachella Valley Water District CITY OF PALM DESERT STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission REPORT ON: Residential Development Plan and Tentative Tract Map APPLICANT: ALEX ADAMEK c/o Harry H. Schmitz & Assoc. 45-900 Paseo Coronado Indian Wells, CA 92260 CASE NOS: DP 06-81 and TT 17794 DATE: June 2, 1981 I. REQUEST: A request for approval of a 62 unit condominium development on approximately 13.2 acres within the PR-5 (Planned Residential , 5 d.u./acre) zone, generally located on the south side of Hovley Lane, 500 feet west of Portola Avenue. LOCATIONAL MAP: --COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE Z ifT1 177g4 DP 06-01 1 , L�Fr.�ar. _ II. BACKGROUND: A. ADJACENT ZONING/LAND USE: - North: PR-5/Condominium project under construction South: PR-5/Vacant East: PR-5/Vacant _ . .. ..__ ._ West: PR-5/Vacant B. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential 3-5 d.u./acre C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The Director of Environmental Services has determined that the proposed project will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment and a Negative Declaration has been prepared. 1 Staff Report DP 06-81 & TT 17794 June 2, 1981 Page Two D. SITE AREA/DENSITY CALCULATIONS: 1. Site 13.2 acres 2. No. of units 62 3. Density 4.7 d.u/acre E. COVERAGE CALCULATIONS: 1. Open Space 60% 2. Buildings 21% 3. Streets and Driveways 19% TOTAL 100% F. DWELLING UNIT DESCRIPTION: Single story, 2 and 3 bedroom, duplex buildings with attached two-car garages; unit sizes = 1048 sq.ft. and 1500 sq.ft. G. PARKING ANALYSIS: Required -2/d.u. or 124 covered spaces plus 31 guest spaces Provided 124 garage spaces plus 24 bay parking spaces and parking on one side of private streets. H. RECREATIONAL AMENITIES: 1. 2 swimming pools 2. 2 tennis courts (recessed) I. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP: 1. 62 lots for units 2. 1 lot for common area 3. project to be built in one phase III. DISCUSSION: A. Design: The site consists of 2 full parcels and a part of third parcel on the south side of Hovley Lane,- ,west of Portola Avenue. The area south of the westerly parcel is a vacant CVWD well site.-. An easement for access - - may have to be provided. The project is designed with a single loaded perimeter street adjacent to the exterior boundaries. One cul-de-sac is also used to allow better utilization of the site. Access to the site is through a single entry from Hovley Lane. The entry will have to be redesigned to provide a minimum single lane stacking of 3-4.cars with turnaround provisions for rejected cars. A second emergency access will also be required to Hovley Lane. Blowsand protection is required to be provided on the north and west sides of the site. Recreational facilities consist of 2 pools and 2 tennis courts. Because of the site design, staff recommends a third pool be provided in the open space area between the cul-de-sac and private street to the west. t Staff Report DP 06-81 & TT 17794 June 2, 1981 Page . Three III. DISCUSSION (cont. ) : The submitted plans show the perimeter wall on the Hovley Lane property line after dedication. Projects of this type have been required to place the perimeter wall a minimum of 20 feet back from curb. Therefore, this project, if approved, should be revised to reflect this. The submitted elevations indicate a spanish style unit with stucco, wood trim, and a tile roof. The project is currently outside the 5 minute response time as established by the City Fire Marshal . As requested during the consideration of the Sunrise Co. project staff is preparing an ordinance to require a $100 per unit fee for the provision of fire suppression facilities. In lieu of this ordinance, staff is recommending that the fee be imposed as a condition of approval (payable at the time of building permit issuance) as required for Sunrise Company. B. Tentative Tract: The proposed Tentative Tract Map would create one fee title lot for each of the 62 units and one lot for the remaining common area. Major street improvements consist of the half street dedication and improvement of Hovley Lane. Because of the possibility of design changes being required, the final map should not be recorded prior to approval of preliminary plans by the Design Review Board. The Municipal Code requires that single family attached be on a minimum 2500 sq.ft. lot. Some of the proposed lots will have to be increased in size. Specific findings and justification must be made in order to recommend approval of a Tentative Tract Map to the City Council . Those findings are as follows: 1. That the proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. 2. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the type of development. 4. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. 5. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. 6. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. 7. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. The justification for a recommendation of approval for the two Tentative Tract Maps is as follows: 1. The adopted and proposed General Plan indicate the site as 3-5 d.u./acre (low density) and the proposed project is within that range (4.7 d.u./gross acre) . Staff Report DP 06-81 and TT 17794 June 2, 1981 Page Four 2. Hovley Lane will be improved and drainage facilities will be provided in conformance with the adopted General Plan, Master Drainage Plans, and Zoning Ordinance. 3,4. The site is of sufficient size, shape and topography for the proposed type and density of development. 5,6. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or serious public health problems because it will be developed in concert' with applicable local , state and federal regulations. 7. There have been no easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. Staff feels there is sufficient grounds to justify recommending approval . of the Tentative Tract Map to the City Council . These findings and justifications can also be applied to the approval of the Development Plan for this project. IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff feels the project is conceptually acceptable. Therefore, based on the findings contained in the draft Resolution, staff recommends: A. Approval of DP 06-81 by adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, approving a Development Plan for a 62 unit condominium development on 13.2 acres, generally located on the south side of Hovley Lane, 500 feet west of Portola Avenue. B. Recommending approval to the City Council of TT 17794 by adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, recommending approval to the City Council a Tentative Tract Map to allow 62 condomin- ium units on 13.2 acres, generally located on the south side of Hovley Lane, 500 feet west of Portola Avenue. _ _ J W 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 00 Case No: TT [ I-7g4 Common Project Name (if any) {ZT SP12JhlC�S Applicant/Project Sponsor: kj,--X APA"K, 4-J o l'CZ i{ Project Description/Location: -Sim ter 2� -fir v,a;�-r c�F �-tc�l.•,a._ ..sy l Reasons project will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment: 7y*- :ray WILL 229 JD - IG"AV'7GAkJT I AAeAc:�_s 7y44--r c AtI joT ar-, inn rri4JA'tgD Mitigation measures applied to project: VYAC:�1/Ar►- 'AL. al_U.ATrdJti� t-6-6KLls - CPLdJ.1.4"t`tc'hl c "yam" c'IV�QXp INITIAL STUDY IS ATTACHED HERETO. AMON:ADIAZ DATE DIRECTOR OF ENVIRO MENTAL SERVICES /lr ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION CHECKLIST- EXPLANATION OF "YES" AND "MAYBE" ANSWERS, POSSIBLE MITIGATION MEASURES AND COMMENTS. 1 . EARTH c. The proposal will result in a change in the natural topography by virtue of grading and paving activities associated with develop- ment of the property. e. The proposal may result in temporary construction impacts related to wind erosion of soils, but City requirements for watering during grading activities should reduce any impacts to an insignificant level . Development of the site would tend to stabilize soils to eli- minate future wind erosion of blowing sand. 3. WATER b. The proposal will result in a change in absorption .rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff by virtue of development. Compliance with applicable grading ordinances at time of development will mitigate any adverse impacts. 16. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION a. The development of the site will result in new vehicular movements in and out of the project. Design of entry will be required to be designed to allow safe and easy vehicular ingress and egress with adequate stacking area for cars. e. There may be increased traffic hazards created from development of project. Hovley Lane is to be developed as secondary roadway and with bikeway to mitigate potential hazards. 23. LIGHT AND GLARE Project lighting and tennis court lighting may be provided. Lighting will be required to minimize glare onto adjacent properties and public rights- of-way. c CASE NO. ENVPRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPT. INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION CHECKLIST NOTE: The availability of data necessary to address the topics listed below shall form the basis of a decision as to whether the application is considered complete for purposes of environmental assessment. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers , possible mitigation measures and comments are provided on attached sheets). Yes Maybe No 1 . Earth. Will the proposal result in: , a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in _ _ J geologic substructures? b. Disruptions , displacements , compaction, or overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering., or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? _ 1r e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? _ c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? — — 2. Yes Maybe No 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a,..,Changes in currents, "or the course or . `. direction of water movements? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of — surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of ,� flood waters? d. Alteration of-the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? _ e. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an aquifer-by cuts or excavations? f. Reduction in the amount of water other- _..... wise available for public water supplies? — — 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in- - a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass , and crops)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of plants? — — c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? 5. Animal. Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, or — - insects)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, — rare, or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing wildlife 7 f « - r� 3. Yes Mbe No 6. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in :the rate of use of any natural resources? - r -- --- b. Depletion ofaany non-renewable natural resource? 7. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? — — b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or re- quire the-development of new sources of energy? sti — 8. .Risk of Upset-."Does the proposal involve a = risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, pesticides, oil , chemicals , or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? -- 9. Economic Loss. Will the proposal result in: -i a. A change in the value of property and - _' improvements endangered by flooding? b. A change in the value of property and improvementsrexposed to geologic hazards - — beyond accepted community risk standards? 10. - Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels toethe point at which accepted community noise and vibration levels are ` exceeded? 11. Land Use. Willethe proposal result in the a t1 eration of the present developed or planned land use of an area? _ 12. Open Space. Will the proposal lead to a decrease in theremount of designated open — — space? 13. Population. Will the proposal result in: a. Alteratien of` the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of the City? — _ — b. Change in the population distribution by age, income,-4-eligion, racial , or ethnic \ f" - - --.- group, occupational class , household type? - V 1, � ' : . •. 4. Yes Maybe No 14. Employment. Will the proposal result in additional new long-term jobs provided, or a change in the number and per cent employed, unemployed, and underemployed? _ 15. Housing. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in number and per cent of housing units by type (price or rent range, zoning category, owner-occupied and rental , etc. ) relative to demand or to number of ` families in various income classes in the City? y b. Impacts on existing housing or creation of a demand for additional housing? _ 16. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: l a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? y b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or ` demand for new parking? c. Impact upon existing transportation systems? _ ti d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? 'V e. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, ` bicyclists, or pedestrians? 17. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for, new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? 'b. Police protection? c. Schools? _ \\V d. Parks or other recreational facilities? _ y e. Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? f. Other governmental services? _ _ y. 0 5. Yes Maybe No 18. Public Fiscal Balance. Will the proposal result in a net change in government fiscal flow (revenues less operating expenditures and annualized capital expenditures)? 19. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications system? c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? 20. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? b. A change in the level of community health care provided? 21. Social Services. Will the proposal result in an increased demand for provision of general social services? 22. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in: a. Obstruction of any scenic vista or' view open to the public? b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public. view? - ... c. Lessening of the overall neighborhood (or area) attractiveness, pleasantness , and uniqueness? 23. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? � 24. Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an'alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object, or building? 6. Yes MLbe No 25. Mandatory findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment or to curtail the diversity in the environment? _ — b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future. ) — — c. Does the project have impacts which are indi- vidually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small , but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant. ) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings , either directly or indirectly? i Initial Study Prepared By: GIMP �. s�i{u'D( IQ 44 15 • • ; � � / ICE �� : ��r-,.��-. � � • ; �,; . '2x u r� ,I ' , li7n7 r k.s ��? � �' �� ■�, � / ( .mil TT Boom u k/. B RMUM � ii ,:r,�I��i � gib �°' `-o• k• ut�� n' � `" 1 � p� rl Ifs.. .-11 • �_ ;:..� { 1 LO f a 00 ❑ q aoEE zC, T.� i . , X ;z - - pad HN `e } X to �1 w ' F " o c7 r - _ C�p ofo-'dI . .__�. y � . �. O O �'l r 4 t 1-4 Wrk t I � pPoto —Ss1 r } Fj-� N I Y s L v p Ii V C/ � •L44 I I . . x 4. D y b CL iong A.c• I � El BEDRPOWRT G O a-- 144'x 13t BAa� � 2` T.T.T.. �, T ® K3T ° O ° Oo 1T5 X 15 niuir�G ;�; 0�� pO � BED ZOOM '42 13x15 O O uM I w T dAR.1Cd£ - 21X20 - - - - _ _ _ 4046 S. v "L O Q 1?� P Z .A N ius vl-A ojj N r • g V ENVIRONn�t��vi IA SCCVnr r T'r OF PAud prSc�f h LY F' t �• v x' �I T AT T,- Lr. VATION DP 0 7 r�Y k�i S�j�` i S¢, JJ ,yk�4 I,yi�i�4� $r � Q ♦;' 4 7 'h 1: Q A NY 4��(L��f��Ra^U Ir k�yh,i a� � F` 7.�H, I J�� 3 �{ •f' ` �� F . * -^F,?•fl\ 1[:{ d�1F ww of�ke4 � � ' ,f��ST r`s "�°fir{'• x+^'7'77'^'""g?'F., d c .1 T ..; Y j `y, [ ':. °�-0 i Y : f 1 3 �•fi.'� � l'1'S b i l�pd4�� Ar fhSfi r t Y1!.i1 .s+l tl Ia illy T Fl:A'1 �� ' AYE �•�• £ AQ, LE VATI ON �3 �r�y ' ` $ ,✓ ._ p. IM Fa`wt.pe r44 i; r'S" c'^,F".� a '•¢I? .? ?1 jr � � 1 I -� r �ti, � � r Qtf f.. �"1'i�'➢'Sr � �e'3�' .t �k AS,,' l e S T '�.'. -t-,, T . 't- Tr x rT' 'f. n "r T INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO: Director of Environmental Services PAbri DCS'ET'� �`S FROM: Director of Public Works SUBJECT: TT 17794 & DP 06-81 DATE: May 22, 1981 The following should be considered as conditions of approval for the above case: (1 ) Drainage and signalization fund fees as required by City ordinance shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. (2) Drainage facilities shall be provided per Ordinance No. 218 and the Master Drainage Plan to the specifications of the Public Works Director. (3) Full public improvements, including traffic safety lighting as required by ordinance and the Public Works Director, shall be installed in accordance with City standards. F (4) Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts. (5) Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the City Engineer for checking and approval before construc- tion of any improvements is commenced. The subdivider shall submit "as-built" plans prior to acceptance of the subdivision improvements by the City. '(6) All private streets shall be inspected by the engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid. (7) Additional storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer. AovtZy LAt415- (8) Landscaping maintenance on Pert-& Aurae shall be provided by the home- owners' association. (9) Hovley Lane shall be dedicated and approved to secondary roadway standards. Curb and gutter to be 32 feet from centerline. BA RR 714VC-C LE LLAN DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS BM/mS ,n� ESTA2LISHED IN 1918 AS A PU2L:C 'ICY COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT PCSTCFPICECx :Dsa - COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA 92236 • 7E_EPHCr,E ;714r298-.e51 DIRECTORS OFFICERS RAYM ONO R RUMMONDS.PRESIDENT LOWELL O.WEZKS.GENERAL MANAGER—CHIEF E'JGINEP TELLIS CCDEKAS.VICE PRESIDENT BERNARDW E SUT70N.SECRET cRY C.J FROST DENNIS M HACKETT,AUDITOR PAULA NICHOLS April 28, 1981 REDWINE AND SHEPPILL ATTORNEYS STEVE D.BBU%TON File NO: 0421 .3 State of California 0721 .3 Division of Real Estate TIT. 17799- 107 South Broadway, Room 8003 Los Angeles, California 90012 Re: Domestic Water and/or Sanitation Service For area described as Assessor's No. 621-190- 064.065. and 066 Located in Sec. 8 T_5_S , R 6 E, S.B.M. The information contained in the paragraph(s) checked below is/are applicable to the above described area. This letter does not cover financial arrangements or construction status. _X 1 . The Coachella Valley Water District , in accordance with the District's currently prevailing regulations will furnish these services to this area: r7X Water ®Sanitation X 2. The area must be annexed to these Improvement Districts to obtain services: Water I .D. No. 16 F 70 MSani tat;or, I .J. No. S3 E 80 __x_3. The current monthly sewer service charge is S 6.75 per lot. This is the prevailing charge throughout the Service Area. 4. Other I Very truly yours , - Lowell Weeks jCeManager-Chief Engineer CS : dla cc: Riverside County Planning Commission - Riverside Department of Public Health - Riverside Department of Public Health - Indio Alex Adamek - Indian Wells PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 719 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO ALLOW 62 CONDOMINIUM UNITS ON 13.2 ACRES, GEPc;; .LL`r LOCATED OFi IHE wUIH �lL; O; HO'`iLE, L4rit, 500 FEET WEST OF PORTOLA AVENUE. CASE NO. TT 17794 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 2nd day of June, 1981, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of ALEX ADAMEK for approval of a 63 lot Tentative Tract Map to allow 62 condo- minium units on 13.2 acres, generally located on the south side of Hovley Lane, 500 feet west of Portola Avenue, more particularly described as: APN 621-190-064, 621-190-065, 621-190-066 WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedures to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89", in that the Director of Environmental Services has determined that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment and a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact has been prepared. WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts and reasons justified in the staff report for TT 17794 on file in the Department of Environmental Services to exist to recommend approval of the Tentative Tract Map: (a) That the proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (b) That the design or improvement of the proposed sub- division is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. ( (c) That the site is physically suitable for the type lof development. (d) That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. (e) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. (f) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. (g) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. WHEREAS, in the review of this Tentative Tract Map the Planning Commission has considered the effect of the contemplated action on the housing needs of the region for purposes of balancing these needs against the public service needs of the residents of the City of Palm Desert and its environs, with available fiscal and environmental resources. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission in this case; 2. That it does hereby recommend conditional approval to the City Council of the City of Palm Desert of the above described Tentative Map No. 17794 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached conditions. 3. That a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact is hereby recommended for approval . PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 719 Page Two FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED that the recommended conditions of approval do include a requirement that the applicant pay In-! leu fees to ccr-1- .. '" +h. requirements of Article 26.48 of the City of Palm Desert Subdivision Ordinance. in return it is recommended that the City Council agree to use said fees for park purposes in conformance with an adopted master plan, within five (5) years of the recordation of the final map. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 2nd day of June, 1981, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: KRYDER, MCLACHLAN, MILLER, RICHARDS NOES: NONE ABSENT: BERKEY ABSTAIN: NONE CHARLES MILLER, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary /lr l. _ PLANNING COMMISSION RE° " UTION NO. 719 Page Three STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE 140. TENTATIVE TRACT 17794 1. n2 Gc'JJ{0 ,c:J J ,.. �WG(Jc'i,y deSCt"'ibed herein si.:JI ue Su Dj restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all the requirements, limitations, and restrictions of all municiDal ordinances and State and Federal statutes now in force, or which here- after may be in force. 2. Full public improvements including traffic safety lighting as required by ordinance and the Public Works Director shall be installed in accordance with City standards. 3. The approval of the final street names shall be made by the Director of Environmental Services, prior to the submittal of the final map. 4. Access rights to Hovley Lane shall be' offered to the City as a dedication on the final map. 5. The C.C. & R' s for this development shall be submitted to the.Director of Environmental Services for review, and final approval by the City Attorney prior to the issuance of any building permits. Prior to recordation of the final subdivision map, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer: a. The document to convey title. b. Covenants and restrictions to be recorded., C. Management and maintenance agreement to be entered into with the owners of the units of the project. 6. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall meet the requirements of the respective service districts. 7. Area shall be annexed to appropriate Improvement Districts having juris- diction over the subject area. [ 8. All dedicated land and/or easements required by 'this approval shall be granted to the City of Palm Desert, without cost to the City and free of all liens and encumbrances. 9. All on-site utilities, including cable TV, shall be placed underground and shall be completely concealed from view except certain appurtenances as may be approved by the Director of Environmental Services. 10. Complete plans and specifications shall be submitted as required by Ordi- nance to the City Engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The subdivider shall submit "as built" plans prior to acceptance of the subdivision improvements by the City. 11. In order to maintain reasonable fire protection during the construction period, the subdivider shall maintain passable vehicular access to all buildings. An adequate number of fire hydrants with required fire flows shall be installed as recommended by the Fire Marshal . 12. Prior to recordation of the Final Map, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. 13. All requirements of the City Fire Marshal from his letter of shall be met as a part of the development of this tract. 14. The water system shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system of Tract No. 17794 is in accor- dance with the requirements prescribed by the City Fire Marshal . " 15. All private streets shall be inspected by the Engineering Department and a Standard Inspection Fee shall be paid. 16. All requirements of the Planning Commission action on the Development Plan 06-81 shall be met as a part of the development of this tract. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 719 Page Four " 1i. The applicant shall have twelve (12) months from the date of the app'ru,-- or conditional approval of the tentative map for filing of the final map unless an extension of time of up to eighteen (18) months is granted by a Resolution of the City Council . 18. Drainage and Signalization Fund contributions as required by City Ordinance shall be made prior to recordation of the final map. 19. Development shall pay a fee in lieu thereof as a condition of the final map, for park and recreation purposes. The City shall commit the use of any such fees received within a five year period. I 20. Final map not to be recorded until design changes, if required by approval of preliminary plans by the Design Review Board are incorporated. 21. Blowsand planting to be provided along northern and western boundaries of subdivision as approved by Design Review Board. 22. Subdivision to be providedwith minimum six foot high solid masonry wall around project (except for approved openings) as approved by Design Review Board. 23. Additional storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer. 24. Landscaping maintenance on Hovley Lane shall be provided by the homeowner's association. 25. Hovley Lane shall be dedicated and approved to secondary roadway standards. Curb and gutter to be 32 feet from centerline. 26. Drainage facilities shall be provided per Ordinance No. 218 and the Master Drainage Plan to the specifications of the Public Works Director. 27. Minimum lot sizes for dwelling units to be increased to minimum 2500 sq.ft. to comply with Municipal Code requirements. L PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 719 Page Fiv(e DEPARTMENT OF FIRE PROTECTION IN COOPERATION WITH THE RIVERSIDE "~; DAVID L. FLAKE COUNTY FIRE WARDEN P.O. eox zae 210 vlE57 SAN JACIN TO STd`_ET PERRIS, CALIFORNIA 92370 TELEPHONE (7141 557-3183 May 29, 1981 Ramon A. Diaz City of Palm Desert Environmental Services Department 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, California 92260 Reference: Case No. DP-06-81 & TT 17794 Gentlemen: Prior to Construction of any of the proposed buildings, the following conditions must be met: 1. Install a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM.fire flow for a two (2) hour duration in addition to domestic or other supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular ltravel ways. A. Hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building.. B. Exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. C. Curbs (if -installed) , shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original . and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. Upon approval , one .copy will be sent of the Building Department, and the ori- ginal will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify 1 that the design of the water. system in Case Number DP-06-81 & TT 17794 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal . " 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the ,required flow. 6. Alternative access is required. 7. Entry gate must be controlled from emergency vehicles by an approved system. .Very truly yours, DAVID L. FLAKE FjrQ Chief . ERIC L. VOGT� Fire Marhsal J cc: Jim Zimmerman C:Tv OF nj Ds-, Coachella Valley Water District QT PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 718 A S0!. !1TT0'! OF } t L p;r :IT ri C a �'N r 1. !li 41 . CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A 62 UNTT CONDOMINIUM DE'VEL6rfi°Itltii ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF HOVLEY LANE, 500 FEET WEST OF PORTOLA AVENUE. CASE NO. DP 06-81 . WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 2nd day of June, 1981 , hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a request by ALEX ADAMEK, c/o HARRY SCHMITZ and ASSOCIATES, to consider a request for approval of a Development Plan for a 62 unit condominium development on 13.2 acres, generally located on the south side of Hovley Lane, 500 feet west of Porto- la Avenue, more particularly described as: APNS 621-190-064 621-190-065 621-190-066 WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedures to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89" , in that the Director of Environmental Services has deter- mined that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment and a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact has been prepared. WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testi- mony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard,' said Planning Commission did find the following facts to justify their actions , as described below: a. The proposed project generally conforms to the intent and purpose of the PR Zone District. ( b. The proposed project is adequately suited for the l specific site and is compatible with existing and proposed development in the area. c. The proposed project will not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission in this case. 2. That the Planning Commission does hereby approve Conceptual Development Plan No. 06-81 , subject to those conditions attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED, at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 2nd day of June, 1981 , by the following vote to wit: AYES: KRYDER, MCLACHLAN, MILLER, RICHARDS NOES: NONE ABSENT: BERKEY ABSTAIN: NONE CHARLES MILLER, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary /pa PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 718 Page Two CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL C. E 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with Exhibit A (Case No. DP 06-81) on file with the Department of Environmental Services, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any uses contemplated by this approval , the applicant shall first complete all the procedural requirements of the City which include, but are not limited to, Design Review, Subdivision process, and building permits procedures. 3. Construction of the total development may be done in phases; however, each individual phase shall meet or exceed all Municipal Code require- ments to the degree that the City could consider each phase as a single project. 4. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval otherwise said approval shall become null , void and of no effect whatsoever; effective date of approval to run from approval date of TT 17794. 5. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and State and Federal Statutes now in forces or which hereafter may be in force. 6. All existing electrical distribution lines, telephone, cable antenna television, and similar service wires or cables, which are adjacent to the property being developed shall be installed underground as a part of development from the nearest existing pole not on the property being developed. 7. All requirements of the City Fire Marshal shall .be met as part of the development of this project per attached letter dated 8. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. 9. . Traffic control provisions shall be provided as required by the Director of Public Works. 10. Curb, gutter, sidewalk or approved pathways, and tie-in paving shall be provided in conformance with City Standards and/or as required by the Director of Public Works. 11. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Riverside County Department of Health Palm Desert Design Review Board Process City Fire Marshal Coachella Valley Water District Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the Dept. of Building and Safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 12. No development shall occur on the subject property prior to the record- ation of a tract map, except for model complex as approved by Planning Commission. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 718 Page Three 13. Redesign entry so th?t stacking for threecars oer lane is Drnvided. tad th turnaround provided for rejected vehicles. 14. and private street to the west. 15. Perimeter wall along Hovley Lane to be set back minimum of 20 feet from the curb line. 16. Applicant shall pay a one hundred dollar per unit fee at the time of issu- ance of building permit; fees to be used to provide fire suppression facilities. 17. Tennis court lighting, if used, shall be down shining black-box type with recessed light source, as approved by the Design Review Board. 18. This approval is subject to final approval of TT 17794, by the City Council . l I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 718 Page Four VL l::R 1l "Yi IN COOPERATION WITH THE .':?.' r_%.�•.-,:,;, ":,L:=C?`+IA pNl>ION OF FOF�>TRY DAVID L. FLAKE P.O. BOX 248 COUNTY FIRE WARDEN 210 WEST SAN JACINTO STREET P ER RIj, CALIFORNIA 92370 TLLEPHGNE (7141 557-3�37 IMay 29, 1981 Ramon A. Diaz City of Palm Desert Environmental Services Department 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, California 92260 Reference: Case No. DP=06-81 & TT 17794 Gentlemen: Prior to construction of any of the proposed buildings, the following conditions must be met: 1. Install a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow for a two (2) hour duration in addition to domestic or other supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of. any building t( is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. A. Hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. B. Exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and- nozzle caps shall .be painted green. C. Curbs (if .installed) , shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 3. Prior to issuance of a. building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. Upon approval , one copy will be sent of the Building Department, and the ori- ginal will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be. signed by a registered civil engineer, and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Case Number DP-06-81 & TT 17794 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal . " 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, .operating and delivering the required flow. I6. Alternative access is required. L7. Entry gate must be controlled from emergency vehicles by an approved system. .Very truly yours, DAVID L. FLAKE F' Chief ERIC L. VOGT� ! Fire Marhsal ,cc: Jim Zimmerman c+rr D as r. D Coachella Valley Water District �i MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY - MAY 18, 1982 2:00 P.M. - CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS I. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Kryder called the meeting to order at 2:00 p.m. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Commissioner Richards III. ROLL CALL Members Present: Commissioner Crites (portion of meeting) Commissioner Miller Commissioner Richards Commissioner Wood Chairman Kryder Staff Present: Ray Diaz, Director of Environmental Services Stan Sawa, Principal Planner Steve Smith, Associate Planner Others Present: Barry McClellan, Director of Public Works Eric Vogt, Fire Marshal IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: May 4, 1982 1 Moved by Commissioner Miller, seconded by Commissioner Richards, to approve the minutes as submitted. Carried unanimously 4-0 (Crites not present). V. SUMMARY OF COUNCIL ACTION Mr. Diaz reviewed the actions of the Council for the meeting of May 13, 1982. VI. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed on the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless members of the Planning Commission or audience request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate discussion and action. A. <4 U-8 AND TT 17794 - ALEX ADAMEK - Request for approval of a one year and 18 month time extension, respectively, for a 62 unit condominium project on the south side of Hovley Lane, 500 feet west of Portola Avenue. Rec: Approve as presented. Moved by Commissioner Wood, seconded by Commissioner Richards, to approve the consent calendar items as presented by staff. Carried unanimously 4-0 (Crites not present). VIL PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Case No. C/Z 05-82 - CHORAL C. PEPPER, Applicant Request for approval of a Change of Zone from R-3 (3) (Multiple Family Residential, 1 d.u. per 3000 sq.ft. of lot area) to O.P. (Office Professional) and a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for property located at the southwest corner of Larrea Street and Lantana Avenue. Mr. Sawa reviewed the staff report and stated that this building had previously been occupied by the City's Public Works Department, but because it was a government -1- 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: May 20, 1982 ALEX ADAMEK c/o Harry H. Schmitz & Assoc. 45-900 Paseo Coronado Indian Wells, CA 92260 CASE NO DP 06-A -rid TT 17794 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of May 18, 1982. APPROVED BY MINUTE MOTION Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. d � f RAMON A. DIAZ, SECR1:3'ARY PLANNING COMMISSION RAD/lcr cc: File 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 9226O TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 .REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE June 8, 1981 APPLICANTS) ALEX ADAMEK c/o Harry H. Schmitz & Assoc. 45-900 Paseo Coronado Indian Wells, CA 92260 CASE NO: DP 06-81 , T 17794 C� The Planning ion of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of June 2, 1981 CONTINUED TO DENIED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. _X APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 718 &- 719 X 'PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL June 25, 1981 , FOR PUBLIC HEARING. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environ- mental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. ; r RAMON A. DIAZ NOTE: PLEASE SIGN AND RETURN PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval , to comply with all the conditions set forth and understand that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. Date Applicant's Signature cc: Coachella Valley Water District File NOTICE OF DETERMINATION U 2,0 19S1( (Negative Declaration) J SE<<Jlc-S EnnllRpNihEp1 f1 p6SEPT TO: (X ) Office of the County Clerk From: C-iV (f Palm Desert County of Riverside 4�-275 Prickly Pear Ln. 4050 Main Street Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Riverside, Ca. 92501 ( ) Secretary for Resources 1416 Ninth St. , Room 1311 Sacramento, Ca. 95814 SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 15083(f) of the State EIR Guidelines. Project Title/Common Name DP 06-81 and TT 17794 ADAM ADAMEK State Clearinghouse Number if submitted to State Clearinghouse Contact Person Telephone Number Area Code (714) 346-0611 STAN SAWA, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Project Location South Side of Hovley Lane, 500 feet west of Portola Avenue. Project Description 62 Unit condominium project This is to advise that the City of Palm Desert has made the following determinations regarding the above described project: 1. The project has been approved by the City; 2. The project ( ) will ( will not have a significant effect on the environment; 3. An Environmental Impact Report was not prepared in connection with this project; and 4. A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. A copy of the Negative Declaration may be examined at the above City Hall address. Date Received for Filing IIII L RIVERSIDDE COUNTY Dated: June 30, 1981 JUL - 6 1981 By DONALD D 5ULLIVAN, Clerk l C• �� D.Chri tinsen Deputy 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 July 2, 1981 Office of the County Clerk County of Riverside 4050 Main Street Riverside, CA 92501 RE: Case No DP 06-81 and TT 17794 To Whom It May Concern: Enclosed you will find two Notices of Determination for Case Nos. DP 06-81 and TT 17794. Please return one of them stamped with the filing date. Sincerely -- _. - STAN SAWA Principal Planner SS/pa enclosures NOTICE OF DETERMINATION v (Negative Declaration) to (x ) Office of the County Clerk From: City of Palm Desert County of Riverside 45-275 Prickly Pear Ln. 4050 Main Street Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Riverside, Ca. 92501 ( ) Secretary for Resources 1416 Ninth St. , Room 1311 Sacramento, Ca. 95814 SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 15083(f) of the State EIR Guidelines. Project Title/Common Name DP 06-81 and TT 17794 ADAM ADAMEK State Clearinghouse Number if submitted to State Clearinghouse Contact Person Telephone Number Area Code (714) 346-0611 STAN SAWA, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Project Location South Side of Hovley Lane, 500 feet west of Portola Avenue. Project Description 62 Unit condominium project This is to advise that the City of Palm Desert has made the following determinations regarding the above described project: 1. The project has been approved by the City; 2. The project ( ) will ( will not have a significant effect on the environment; 3. An Environmental Impact Report was not prepared in connection with this project; and 4. A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. A copy of the Negative Declaration may be examined at the above City Hall address . 8) Date Received for Filing Dated: June 30, 1981 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JUNE 2, 1981 Page Six VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS (cont. ) G. Case No. TT 17794 and 06-81 ALEXANDER ADAMEK, Applicant Request for approval of a 63 lot Tract Map and Residential Development Plan to allow construction of a 62 unit condo- minium Development on 13.2 acres generally located on the south side of Hovley Lane, 500 feet west of Portola Avenue and a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact as it pertains thereto. Mr. Sawa presented this case describing the design and location of the project. He noted that this project would be outside the five minute response time for fire protection, therefore, staff recommended a requirement of a $100 per unit fee. He reviewed the findings and justifications and recommended approval . Chairman Miller opened the Public Hearing and asked if the applicant wished to make a presentation. MR. HARRY SCHMITZ, 45-900 Paseo Coronado, Indian Wells, concurred with staff's conditions and requested approval . Chairman Miller asked if anyone wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to this case. There being none, the Public Hearing was closed. Minute motion was made by Commissioner Kryder, seconded by Commissioner McLachlan, to adopt findings as recommended by staff. Carried unanimously (4-0). Motion was made by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Kryder, to waive further reading and adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 718, a Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert approving Development Plan 06-81 and certifying a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact as it pertains thereto. Carried unanimously (4-0) . Motion was made by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Kryder, to waive further reading and adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 719, a Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert recommending to the City Council approval of Tentative Tract Map 17794. Carried unanimously (4-0). VII. CONSENT CALENDAR - NONE VIII. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ITEMS Preliminary. plan_approvals_by _the Design ReviewBoard-at_their, meeting May 26, 1981, requiring Planning Commission confirmation. Case No. 147 C - JACK WISE - Mr. Diaz reviewed this case and stated that Design Review Board approved this case. Staff recommended approval . Minute motion was made by Commissioner Kryder, seconded by Commissioner Richards, to waive further reading and adopt Resolution No. 720, a Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert approving Case No. 147 C. Carried unanimously (4-0). Appeal of Design Review Board denial of Case No. 145 C - CROCKER BANK This item was discussed and based on staff's recommendation, minute motion was made by Commissioner McLachlan, seconded by Commissioner Kryder, to refer this case back to Design Review Board for recommendation. Applicant concurred. Carried unanimously (4-0). CITY OF PALM DESERT STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission REPORT ON: Residential Development Plan and Tentative Tract Map APPLICANT: ALEX ADAMEK c/o Harry H. Schmitz & Assoc. 45-900 Paseo Coronado Indian Wells, CA 92260 CASE NOS: DP 06-81 and TT 17794 DATE: June 2, 1981 I. REQUEST: A request for approval of a 62 unit condominium development on approximately 13.2 acres within the PR-5 (Planned Residential , 5 d.u./acre) zone, generally located on the south side of Hovley Lane, 500 feet west of Portola Avenue. LOCATIONAL MAP: - !AUNTIZ Y 413 DRIVE .... 1 1 r t,. _ -IT 17794 _ OP 06-81 _- II. BACKGROUND: A. ADJACENT ZONING/LAND USE: North: PR-5/Condominium project under construction South: PR-5/Vacant East: PR-5/Vacant West: PR-5/Vacant B. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential 3-5 d.u./acre C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The Director of Environmental Services has determined that the proposed project will not have a significant adverse impact-on. the.environment and a Negative Declaration has been prepared. r. Staff Report DP 06-81 & TT 17794 June 2, 1981 Page Two D. SITE AREA/DENSITY CALCULATIONS: 1. Site 13.2 acres 2. No. of units 62 3. Density 4.7 d.u/acre . E. COVERAGE CALCULATIONS: 1. Open Space 60% 2. Buildings 21% 3. Streets and Driveways 19% TOTAL 100% F. DWELLING UNIT DESCRIPTION: Single story, 2 and 3 bedroom, duplex buildings with attached two-car garages; unit sizes = 1048 sq.ft. and 1500 sq.ft. G. PARKING ANALYSIS: Required 2/d.u. or 124 covered spaces plus 31 guest spaces Provided 124 garage spaces plus 24 bay parking spaces and parking on one side of private streets. H. RECREATIONAL AMENITIES: 1. 2 swimming pools 2. 2 tennis courts (recessed) I. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP: 1. 62 lots for units 2. 1 lot for common area 3. project to be built in one phase III. DISCUSSION: A. Design: The site consists of 2 full parcels and a part of third parcel on the south side of Hovley Lane,,:west of Portola Avenue. The area south of the westerly parcel is a vacant CVWD well site.: An easement for access may have to be provided. The project is designed with a single loaded perimeter street adjacent to the exterior boundaries. One cul-de-sac is also used to allow better utilization of the site. Access to the site is through a single entry from Hovley Lane. The entry will have to be redesigned to, provide a minimum single lane stacking of43nc44Tcars^with turnaround=_pr_o.,visions,for rej?ecaed`cars.— second emergey access will also be required to Hovley Lane. Blowsand protection is required to be provided on ther.north and west sides of the site. Recreational facilities consist of 2 pools and 2 tennis courts. Because of the site design, staff recommends a third pool be provided in the open space area between the cul-de-sac and private street to the west. Staff Report DP 06-81 & TT 17794 June 2, 1981 P_age:�,Three III. DISCUSSION (cont. ) rThe`submitted,.plans show the perimeter wall on the Hovley Lane property line after dedication. Projects of this type have been required to place the perimeter wall a minimum of 20 feet back from curb. Therefore, this project, if approved, should be revised to reflect this. The submitted elevations indicate a spanish style unit with stucco, wood trim, and a tile roof. The project is currently outside the 5 minute response time as established by the City Fire Marshal . As requested during the consideration of the Sunrise Co. project staff is preparing an ordinance to require a $100 per unit fee for the provision of fire suppression facilities. In lieu of this ordinance, staff is recommending that the fee be imposed as a condition of approval (payable at the time of building permit issuance) as required for Sunrise Company. B. Tentative Tract: The proposed Tentative Tract Map would create one fee tithe lot for each of the 62 units and one lot for the remaining -common-area. _ __ _—_ Major street improvements consist of the half street dedication and improvement of Hovley Lane. Because of the possibility of design changes being required, the final map should not be recorded prior to approval of preliminary plans by the Design Review Board. The Municipal Code requires that single family attached be on a minimum 2500 sq.ft. lot. Some of the proposed lots will have to be increased in size. ' Specific findings and justification must be made in order to recommend approval of a Tentative Tract Map to the City Council . Those findings are as follows: 1. That the proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. 2. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the type of development. 4. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. 5. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. 6. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. 7. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. The justification for a recommendation of approval for the two Tentative Tract Maps is as follows: 1. The adopted and proposed General Plan indicate the site as 3-5 d'.u./acre (low density) and the proposed project is within that range (4.7 d.u./gross acre) . Staff Report DP 06-81 and TT 17794 June 2, 1981 Page Four 2. Hovley Lane will be improved and drainage facilities will be provided in conformance with the adopted General Plan, Master Drainage Plans, and Zoning Ordinance. 3,4. The site is of sufficient size, shape and topography for the proposed type and density of development. 5,6. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial.-eovi.ronmental damage or serious public health problems because it will be developed in concerts with applicable local , state and federal regulations. 7. There have been no easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. Staff feels there is sufficient grounds to justify recommending approval . of the Tentative Tract Map to the City Council . These findings and justifications can also be applied to the approval of the Development Plan for this project. IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff feels the project is conceptually acceptable. Therefore, based on the findings contained in the draft Resolution, staff recommends: A. Approval of DP 06-81 by. adoption of Planning Commission. Resolution No. A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, approving a Development Plan for a 62 unit condominium development on 13.2 acres,: generally located on the south side of Hovley Lane, 500 feet west of Portola Avenue. B. Recommeudirig"approval to the City Council 6f TT 17794 by adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of P.alm:,Desert, California, recommending approval to the City Council a Tentative Tract Map to allow 62 condomin- ium units on 13.2 acres, generally located on the south side of Hovley Lane, 500 feet west of Portola Avenue. 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CIO 06-13 l Case No: TT l"1"7 94 Common Project Name %if any) Zr= T SPF—JN&g45 Applicant/Project Sponsor: &eg ,4,PA"K, G�D 44 14M1TZ i; Project Description/Location: <�Q.�' -6 5/per tc �}p�/j�%�! "4 5 T Reasons project will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment: 7049e:6 WILL. 2;9 ►moo -E;Pk; )J 1 1;-74,A#,JT 9-6--em t Mitigation measures applied to project: _ 5 15MV19Z14/ASNMAI_ tVALLLA.Tiot J zµy�e.-KL46-r' --g-Wt jAxIC1►.t of "y4 "AN&ybs r� INITIAL STUDY IS ATTACHED HERETO. l AMOK LA. D2I A DATE DIRECTOR OF ENVIRO MENTAL SERVICES /lr ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION CHECKLIST- EXPLANATION OF "YES" AND "MAYBE" ANSWERS, POSSIBLE MITIGATION MEASURES AND COMMENTS. 1 . EARTH c. The proposal will result in a .change in the natural topography by virtue of grading and paving activities associated with develop- ment of the property. e. The proposal may result in temporary construction impacts related to wind erosion of soils, but City requirements for watering during grading activities should reduce any impacts to an insignificant level . Development of the site would tend to stabilize soils to eli- minate future wind erosion of blowing sand. 3. WATER b. The proposal will result in a change in absorpti.on, rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff by virtue of development. Compliance with applicable grading ordinances at time of development will mitigate any adverse impacts. 16. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION a. The development of the site will result in new vehicular movements in and out of the project. Design of entry will be required to be designed to allow safe and easy vehicular ingress and egress with adequate stacking area for cars. e. There may be increased traffic hazards created from development of project. Hovley Lane is to be developed as secondary roadway and with bikeway to mitigate potential hazards. 23. LIGHT AND GLARE Project lighting and tennis court lighting may be provided. Lighting will be required to minimize glare onto adjacent properties and public rights- of-way. CASE NO. 1;NVIAONMENTAL SERVICES DEPT. INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION CHECKLIST NOTE: The availability of data necessary to address the topics listed below shall form the basis of a decision as to whether the application is considered complete for purposes of environmental assessment. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers, possible mitigation measures and comments are provided on attached sheets) . Yes Maybe No 1 . Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements , compaction, or overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering.. or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? 2 Yes Maybe No 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a,.., Changes in currents, �or the course or ` C ` direction of water movements? v b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of y surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Alteration of-the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? e. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? f. Reduction in the amount of water other- wise available for. public water supplies? — — 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass , and crops)? **N b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? 5. Animal. Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, or insects)? — — b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, — — rare, or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to \ the migration or movement of animals? _ y d. Deterioration to existing wildlife hahitat? 3. Yes Mnybe No 6. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in :.the rate of use of any natural resources? - b. Depletion ofeany non-renewable natural resource? 7. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? — — b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or re- quire the.deuelopment of new sources of energy? 8. Risk of Upset-."Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, pesticides, oil , chemicals, or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? �1 c — — 9. Economic Loss. Will the proposal result in: :i a. A change in the value of property and improvements endangered by flooding? t- — — — b. A change in the value of property and improvementsrexposed to geologic hazards beyond accepted community risk standards? 10. : Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels to,-.the point at which accepted community noise and vibration levels are ` exceeded? V 11. Land Use. Willethe proposal result in the a t�tion of the present developed or planned land use of an area? NV - 12. Open Space. Will the proposal lead to a decrease in theramount of designated open space? 13. Population. Will the proposal result in: a. Alteratien ofi the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of' the City? _ b. Change in the population distribution by r` age, income,-religion, racial , or ethnic ` group, occupational class , household type? — — — . - 4. Yes Maybe No 14. Employment. Will the proposal result in additional new long-term jobs provided, or a change in the number and per cent employed, unemployed, and underemployed? _ 15. Housing. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in number and per cent of housing units by type (price or rent range, zoning category, owner-occupied and rental , etc. ) relative to demand or to number of — — families in various income classes in the City? b. Impacts on existing housing or creation of a demand for additional housing? 16. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c. Impact upon existing transportation systems? _ _ ti d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, ` bicyclists, or pedestrians? 17. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for, new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? _ _ V d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? f. Other governmental services? _ J ` - 5. Yes Maybe No 18. Public Fiscal Balance. Will the proposal result in a net change in government fiscal flow (revenues less operating expenditures \ and annualized capital expenditures)? �r 19. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications system? c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? 20. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? b. A change in the level of community health care provided? 21. Social Services. Will the proposal result in an increased demand for provision of general social services? 22. Aesthetics . Will the proposal result in: a. Obstruction of any scenic vista or view any- scenic to the public b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? . — c: Lessening of the overall neighborhood (or area) attractiveness, pleasantness, and uniqueness? 23. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? — 24. Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object, or building? s 6. Yes MLbe No 25. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment or to curtail the diversity in the environment? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future. ) c. Does the project have impacts which are indi- vidually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small , but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant. ) _ d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings , either directly or indirectly? Initial Study Prepared By: 1 ril '. �•\-lain IM • � F �iCe-- •.J E It �I • �► _ J/ ��' •�� loll P � Tq �_ _ L a bd P I 0 o a � r � M u � r o seU — ro r ❑ ; --- rN 9 X PQ .{+ Fod CL 'w QL 1 CD a � Q _ oo �--,_ O n Fa l' El I o -- - -� . 0 M � �" rF ,• ��a�w�• �ya'A� fS '�I (�?�y J n ��f#� f� � f — __' "_ •1 �}' � '•..i;.� 1 ST ?,Z -ZT 'E LeVATTON i Q C. I.v _TJE ; r, MAY "EN lR r Y ONMENTAL StnViCES ,,CRY OF PALM-DESERT - .. .. IrMUM 3 t'' 7 � iZiY-• y�lin ��:55 I ItY:_ fl•1t��ti I J � SN...yyyrMMMN2JS..: f3�r t� � 7� ?g' 4 RV It J�taa�i%•j - r arm. _ a �lir•�a ufr-� ttf � � ,� ®�� r a Bsvggo]c«s G O a T 1;. I� 4IG I;T oT T ® o 00 1•t4 X 15 9ft X1' • � �o BEDRDOt4 42 rau L1 _ T d ARIA dE II, 21X20 — — — — — — — 4046 59.r SCALE %4�-4-0 MAY 0 51981 z:a: .. _ ENy1RONMtNINL SERVICES OF PALM DESERT / ir VATIOW a DP oL-;,-Si INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert (NAY 2 2 1981 )ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES TO: Director of Environmental Services CITY OF PALM DESERT FROM: Director of Public Works SUBJECT: TT 17794 & DP 06-81 DATE: May 22, 1981 The following should be considered as conditions of approval for the above case: (1 ) Drainage and signalization fund fees as required by City ordinance shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. (2) Drainage facilities shall be provided per Ordinance No. 218 and the Master Drainage Plan to the specifications of the Public Works Director. (3) Full public improvements, including traffic safety lighting as required by ordinance and the Public Works Director, shall be installed in accordance with City standards. (4) Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts. (5) Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the City Engineer for checking and approval before construc- tion of any improvements is commenced. The subdivider shall submit "as-built" plans prior to acceptance of the subdivision improvements by the City. (6) All private streets shall be inspected by the engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid. (7) Additional storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer. HcgLBy LAME (8) Landscaping maintenance on Pe"tr& �e shall be provided by the home- owners' association. (9) Hovley Lane shall be dedicated and approved to secondary roadway standards. Curb andd�gutter to be 32 feet from centerline. BARR`�fcC LE LLAN DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS BM/ms ' ESTABLISHED IN 1918 AS A PUBLIC ICY r. COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT POST oFFICP BOX IOSa • COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA 92236 -sEPror.:E viAl �;a-zesl DIRECTORS OFFICERS RAYMOND R R1.MMCNDS,PRESIDENT LOWELL 0.'WEEKS,GENERAL MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER. TEL LIS CCOEKAS VICE PRESIDENT BERNARDINE SUTTON.SECRETARY C.J.FROST DENNIS M.HACKETT.AUDITOR PAUL IN.NICHOLS April 28, 1981 REDWINE AND SHERRILL ATTORNEYS STEVE O.BU%TON File No: 0421 .3 State of California 0721 .3 Division of Real Estate Tit. 1779 107 South Broadway, Room 8003 Los Angeles, California 90012 Re: Domestic Water and/or Sanitation Service For area described as Assessor' s No, 621-190- 064.06S. and 066 Located in Sec. 8 T_5__S , R 6 E, S .B .M. The information contained in the paragraph(s) checked below is/are applicable to the above described area. This letter does not cover financial arrangements or construction status. X 1 . The Coachella Valley Water District , in accordance with the District's currently prevailing regulations will furnish these services to this area: DWater ®Sanitation X 2. The area must be annexed to these Improvement Districts to obtain services: Water I .D. No.- IA F 70 MSanita_ion I .I'. No. S3 & 8O ___.L_3• The current monthly sewer service charga ;s $ 6.75 per lot. This is the prevailing charge throughout the Service Area. 4. Other Veryl truly yours , GelI ti Lowell Weeks Manager-Chief Engineer CS : dla cc: Riverside County Planning Commission - Riverside Department of Public Health - Riverside Department of Public Health - Indio Alex Adamek - Indian Wells . . J 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE June 8, 1981 APPLICANTS) ALEX ADAMEK c/o Harry H. Schmitz & Assoc. 45-900 Paseo Coronado Indian Wells, CA 92260 CASE NO: DP 06-81 & T 17794 The Planning sion of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of June 2, 1981 CONTINUED TO DENIED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. X APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 718 &. 719 X PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL June 25, 1981 , FOR PUBLIC HEARING. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environ- mental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the dat-b of the decision. f NOTE: PLEASE SIGN AND RETURN RAMON A. DIAZ PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval , to comply with all the conditions set forth and understand that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. Date Applicant's Signature cc: Coachella Valley Water District File PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 718 4rc^i 'ITTn'i nF T_c ci n�v.,re;n rnre AiccrQ nc r CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A 62 UNIT CONDOMINIUM ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF HOVLEY LANE, 500 FEET WEST OF PORTOLA AVENUE. CASE NO. DP 06-81 . WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 2nd day of June, 1981 , hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a request by ALEX ADAMEK, c/o HARRY SCHMITZ and ASSOCIATES, to consider a request for approval of a Development Plan for a 62 unit condominium development on 13.2 acres, generally located on the south side of Hovley Lane, 500 feet west of Porto- la Avenue, more particularly described as: APNS 621-190-064 621-190-065 621-190-066 WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedures to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89" , in that the Director of Environmental Services has deter- mined that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment and a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact has been prepared. WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testi- mony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts to justify their actions, as described below: a. The proposed project generally conforms to the intent and purpose of the PR Zone District. b. The proposed project is adequately suited for the l specific site and is compatible with existing and proposed development in the area. c. The proposed project will not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission in this case. 2. That the Planning Commission does hereby approve Conceptual Development Plan No. 06-81 , subject to those conditions attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED, at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 2nd day of June, 1981 , by the following vote to wit: AYES: KRYDER, MCLACHLAN, MILLER, RICHARDS NOES: NONE ABSENT: BERKEY ABSTAIN: NONE ATTEST: CHARLES MILLER, Chairman RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary /pa PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 718 Page Two CO;i;;ITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with Exhibit A (Case No. DP 06-81) on file with the Department of Environmental Services, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any uses contemplated by this approval , the applicant shall first complete all the procedural requirements of the City which include, but are not ., limited to, Design Review, Subdivision process, and building permits procedures. 3. Construction of the total development may be done in phases; however, each individual phase shall meet or exceed all Municipal Code require- ments to the degree that the City could consider each phase as a single project. 4. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval otherwise said approval shall become null , void and of no effect whatsoever; effective date of approval to run from approval date of TT 17794. 5. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and State and Federal Statutes now in force$ or which hereafter may be in force. 6. All existing electrical distribution lines, telephone, cable antenna television, and similar service wires or cables, which are adjacent to the property being developed shall be installed underground as a part of development from the nearest existing pole not on the property being developed. 7. All requirements of the City Fire Marshal shall be met as part of the development of this project per attached letter dated 8. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. 9. . Traffic control provisions shall be provided as required by the Director of Public Works. 10. Curb, gutter, sidewalk or approved pathways, and tie-in paving shall be provided in conformance with City Standards and/or as required by the Director of Public Works. 11. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval , the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Riverside County Department of Health Palm Desert Design Review Board Process City Fire Marshal Coachella Valley Water District Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the Dept. of Building and Safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 12. No development shall occur on the subject property prior to the record- ation of a tract map, except for model complex as approved by Planning Commission. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 718 Page Three 13. Redesign ert-1 sr *.hat steckino for threecars oer lane is orovided, with turnarouno provided for rejected vehicles. ♦4. n.._ . �i Vil41 j.__ . . i.11 �aC,.-_ .✓ Lc r �. ...... iil vr�u ... _.. ..c_....c ..... _.. - ._ and private street to the west. 15. Perimeter wall along Hovley Lane to be set back minimum of 20 feet from the curb line. 16. Applicant shall pay a one hundred dollar per unit fee at the time of issu- ance of building permit; fees to be used to provide fire suppression I facilities. 17. Tennis court lighting, if used, shall be down shining black-box type with recessed light source, as approved by the Design Review Board. 18. This approval is subject to final approval of TT 17794, by the City Council . 1 CITY OF PALM DESERT STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission REPORT ON: Residential Development Plan and Tentative Tract Map APPLICANT: ALEX ADAMEK c/o Harry H. Schmitz & Assoc. 45-900 Paseo Coronado Indian Wells, CA 92260 CASE NOS: DP 06-81 and TT 17794 DATE: June 2, 1981 I. REQUEST: A request for approval of a 62 unit condominium development on approximately 13.2 acres within the PR-5 (Planned Residential , 5 d.u./acre) zone, generally located on the south side of Hovley Lane, 500 feet west of Portola Avenue. LOCATIONAL MAP: SI4 COUNTRY CLU13 O IVE E] _ t bS L L NE TT 177g4 R Xr� II. BACKGROUND: A. ADJACENT ZONING/LAND USE: North: PR-5/Condominium project under construction South: PR-5/Vacant East: PR-5/Vacant West: PR-5/Vacant ._. _ ... B. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential 3-5 d.u./acre C. ENVIRONME14TAL ASSESSMENT: The Director of Environmental Services has determined that the proposed project will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment ' and a Negative Declaration has been prepared. Staff Report DP 06-81 & TT 17794 June 2, 1981 Page Two D. SITE AREA/DENSITY CALCULATIONS: 1. Site 13.2 acres 2. No. of units 62 3. Density 4.7 d.u/acre ---- E. COVERAGE CALCULATIONS: 1. Open Space 60% 2. Buildings 21% 3. Streets and Driveways 19% TOTAL 100% F. DWELLING UNIT DESCRIPTION: Single story, 2 and 3 bedroom, duplex buildings with attached two-car garages; unit sizes = 1048 sq.ft. and 1500 sq.ft. G. PARKING ANALYSIS: Required 2/d.u. or 124 covered spaces plus 31 guest spaces Provided 124 garage. spaces plus 24 bay parking spaces and parking on one side of private streets. H. RECREATIONAL AMENITIES: 1. 2 swimming pools 2. 2 tennis courts (recessed) I. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP: 1. 62 lots for units 2. 1 lot for common area 3. project to be built in one phase III. DISCUSSION: A. Design: - The site consists of 2 full parcels and a part of third parcel on the south side of Hovley Lane, west of Portola Avenue. The area south of the westerly parcel is a vacant CVWD well site. An easement for access may have to be provided. The project is designed with a single loaded perimeter street adjacent to the exterior boundaries. One cul-de-sac is also used to allow better utilization of the site. Access to the site is through a single entry from Hovley Lane. The entry will have to be redesigned to provide a minimum single lane stacking of 3-4. cars with turnaround provisions for rejected cars. A second emergency access will also be required to Hovley Lane. Blowsand protection is required to be provided on the. north and west sides of the site. Recreational facilities consist of 2 pools and 2 tennis courts. Because of the site design, staff recommends a third pool be provided in the open space area between the cul-de-sac and private street to the west. Staff Report DP 06-81 & TT 17794 June 2, 1981 Page . Three III. DISCUSSION (cont. ) The'submitted plans show the perimeter wall on the Hovley Lane property line after dedication. Projects of this type have been required to place the perimeter wall a minimum of 20 feet back from curb. Therefore, this project, if approved, should be revised to reflect this. The submitted elevations indicate a spanish style unit with stucco, wood trim, and a tile roof. The project is currently outside the 5 minute response time as established by the City Fire Marshal . As requested during the consideration of the Sunrise Co. project staff is preparing an ordinance to require a $100 per unit fee for the provision of fire suppression facilities. In lieu of this ordinance, staff is recommending that the fee be imposed as a > condition of approval (payable at the time of building permit issuance) as required for Sunrise Company. B. Tentative Tract: The proposed Tentative Tract Map would create one fee title lot for each of the 62 units and one lot for the remaining common area. Major street improvements consist of the half street dedication and ,improvement of Hovley Lane. Because of the possibility of design changes being required, the final map should not be recorded prior to approval of preliminary plans by the Design Review Board. The Municipal Code requires that single family attached be on a minimum 2500 sq.ft. lot. Some of the proposed lots will have to be increased in size. Specific findings and justification must be made in order to recommend approval of a Tentative Tract Map to the City Council . Those findings are as follows: 1. That the proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. -- 2. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the type of development. 4. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. 5. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. 6. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. 7. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. The justification for a recommendation of approval for the two Tentative Tract Maps is as follows: 1. The adopted and proposed General Plan indicate the site as 3-5 d.u./acre (low density) and the proposed project is within that range (4.7 d.u./gross acre). Staff Report DP 06-81 and TT 17794 June 2, 1981 Page Four 2. Hovley Lane will be improved and drainage facilities will be provided in conformance with the adopted General Plan, Master Drainage Plans, and Zoning Ordinance. 3,4. The site is of sufficient size, shape and topography for the proposed type and density of development. 5,6. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial":environmental damage or serious public health problems because it will be developed in concert: with applicable local , state and federal regulations. 7. There have been no easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. Staff feels there is sufficient grounds to justify recommending approval , of the Tentative Tract Map to the City Council . These findings and justifications can also be applied to the approval of the Development Plan for this project. IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff feels the project is conceptually acceptable. Therefore, based on the findings contained in the draft Resolution, staff recommends: A. Approval of DP 06-81 by adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, approving a Development Plan for a 62 unit condominium development on 13.2 acres,: generally located on the south side of Hovley Lane, 500 feet west of Portola Avenue. B. Recommending approval to the City Council of TT 17794 by adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, recommending approval to the City Council a Tentative Tract Map to allow 62 condomin- ium units on 13.2 acres, generally located on the south side of Hovley Lane, 500 feet west of Portola Avenue. 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CP Dt; Case No: TT l"1"794 Common Project Name (if any) Zr=t55042 S)'P—JN6gS Applicant/Project Sponsor: X ,4,DA";C G 44 AAi—r2 Project Description/Location: 5/pz cr 44 Reasons project will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment: =_ I�p�rs -rt-Iar ,�IrJoT t� �nlTlc�a�b Mitigation measures applied to project: _ - t✓1yVf1�c1J�V1rEn1�1`AI_ . INITIAL STUDY IS ATTACHED HERETO. AMO;A. IAZ DATE DIREF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES /lr ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION CHECKLIST- EXPLANATION OF "YES" AND "MAYBE" ANSWERS, POSSIBLE MITIGATION MEASURES AND COMMENTS. 1 . EARTH c. The proposal will result in a change in the natural topography by virtue of grading and paving activities associated with develop- ment of the property. e. The proposal may result in temporary construction impacts related to wind erosion of soils, but City requirements for watering during grading activities should reduce any impacts to an insignificant level . Development of the site would tend to stabilize soils to eli- minate future wind erosion of blowing sand. 3. WATER b. The proposal will result in a change in absorption .rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff by virtue of development. Compliance with applicable grading ordinances at time of development will mitigate any adverse impacts. 16. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION a. The development of the site will result in new vehicular movements in and out of the project. Design of entry will be required to be designed to allow safe and easy vehicular ingress and egress with adequate stacking area for cars. e. There may be increased traffic hazards created from development of project. Hovley Lane is to be developed as secondary roadway and with bikeway to mitigate potential hazards. 23. LIGHT AND GLARE Project lighting and tennis court lighting may be provided. Lighting will be required to minimize glare onto adjacent properties and public rights- of-way. CASE' NO. SA $(-O7 oP ol� -S1 mTVIA0MM ;NTAL SERVICES DEPT. INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION CHECKLIST NOTE: The availability of data necessary to address the topics listed below shall form the basis of a decision as to whether the application is considered complete for purposes of environmental assessment. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers, possible mitigation measures and comments are provided on attached sheets). Yes Maybe No 1 . Earth. Will the proposal result in: \ a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in _ J geologic substructures? b. Disruptions , displacements , compaction, or _ \t - - _ overcovering of the soil? - - - c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering; or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? V b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? _ 2. Yes Maybe No 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a.. Changes in currents , 'or the course or '. direction of water movements? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of " " surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Alteration of-the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? e. Change in the quantity of ground waters, . either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? f. Reduction in the amount of water other- -.._ wise available for. public water supplies? 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass , and crops)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? 5. Animal. Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, or — - insects)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, — — rare, or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deteriorat' to existing wildlife hahitat? 3. Yes M�be No 6. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in -.the-rate of use of any natural resources? - r — -- --- b. Depletion ofeany non-renewable natural resource? 7. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? — — b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or re- quire the-development of new sources of energy? 8. Risk of UpsettiDoes the proposal involve a = risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited - to, pesticides, oil , chemicals, or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? �1 --- -. 9. Economic Loss. Will the proposal result in: :i. a. A change in the value of property and .` improvements endangered by flooding? — b. A change in the value of property and improvementsrexposed to geologic hazards beyond accepted community risk standards? 10. : Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels toethe point at which accepted community noise and vibration levels are exceeded? i a — — — 11. Land Use. Willethe proposal result in the - aTteration of the present developed or planned land use of an area? �r 12. Open Space. Will the proposal lead to a decrease in the amount of designated open space? 13. Population. Will the proposal result in: a. Alteration of the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of' the City? b. Change in the population distribution by r age, income,-E-eligion, racial , or ethnic ` group, occupational class, household type? - Y ® w i 4. Yes Maybe No 14. Employment. Will the proposal result in additional new long-term jobs provided, or a change in the number and per cent employed, unemployed, and underemployed? _ 15. Housing. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in number and per cent of housing units by type (price or rent range, zoning category, owner-occupied and rental , etc. ) relative to demand or to number of families in various income classes in the City? b. Impacts on existing housing or creation of a demand for additional housing? _ 16. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? _ c. Impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, ` bicyclists, or pedestrians? 17. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for, new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: \ a. Fire protection? -b. Police protection? c. Schools? _ _ _ \\V d. Parks or other recreational facilities7 v e. Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? f. Other governmental services? _ _ , C 5. Yes Maybe No 18. Public Fiscal Balance. Will the proposal result in a net change in government fiscal flow (revenues less operating expenditures \ and annualized capital expenditures)? 19. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications system? _ NV c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal ? — 20. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? b. A change in the level of community health " care provided? 21. Social Services. Will the proposal result in an increased demand for provision of general social services? 22. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in: a. Obstruction of any scenic vista or" view open to the public? b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? : — — c: Lessening of the overall neighborhood (or area) attractiveness , pleasantness , and uniqueness? 23. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce nesv light or glare? 24. Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration nation of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object, or building? 6. Yes nLbe No 25. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment or to curtail the diversity in the environment? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure ,.well into the future. ) — c. Does the project have impacts which are indi- vidually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small , but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant. ) _ — — d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects il on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Initial Study Prepared By: kuv" 60 idwk PZ 10 Gi ) K 1 . • ' •4t fib,, SM v� ME '� _YN • �� V� , n P , �1 • _� xu...q �7 n� �I � s e ��` ■}II y �{s�. �A' a I �{ �!II i� }#'1 lal y�i4'+ r 7�- v �'�j�1t' ��3,^•"'_++� �f2.,.,- •?� � � �i'-a ,c..<.•�, � �{ai� .c-, „�1, lk - 0 0 00 O BAIR B3 xDrzmm 41 Q QD Do a � �E27QAOM�3 I .L'll f'1 Q O� 14 x,o � vlNiMd j;� �J �v war MAIL ;!I0 . 1 OLTO TFt I LIVIMd I ,8 x22 CID I t ao xao -- - - - - -- — -- 1500 S.F: r r V v S ..cz Fes- z 0 -s . W H 4- 4. , t 1 DPo� —Ss � i' e v e+ .-.r.y, Y^ 4 r{ 1 0 9 I p�'• CI • _ ` w r �`,�y :• ��Kry�G M1Ai N4 •' EEG.. � f�� ;h• 40 R 14 . F' 1" b DIP 01, BEDQpOHNl' Cj � -- 144'x 13� . sac 'IIj� ® p O I;T p 0 0 I.I�PIN6' ® Q E2 DI87IIiss .1�L� cl AT I ' BED20014 42 . _- wu 13x15 O Q ^•{ - � I wEl - i � .. 2tx2o f - - - - - - - A048 S.r P T+ A u scgLE %4 -O tv o ENVIRONIALl'"LOF PALIA DiSE?tf _A Yl� •I aC Y• 1' \ s r VArr .1ow DP OCR-Sl ,! � V yl � 5n 4 fJ Tn FIT ZAI kit 7144 Is� i t a17, _ ' I �U -•� '� j f ' I n T 1 _ 11 Tfi T1 l ' INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO: Director of Environmental Services ci-pv or PAUc, FROM: Director of Public Works SUBJECT: TT 17794 & DP 06-81 DATE: May 22, 1981 The following should be considered as conditions of approval for the above case: (1 ) Drainage and signalization fund fees as required by City ordinance shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. (2) Drainage facilities shall be provided per Ordinance No. 218 and the Master Drainage Plan to the specifications of the Public Works Director. (3) Full public improvements, including traffic safety lighting as required by ordinance and the Public Works Director, shall be installed in accordance with City standards. (4) Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts. (5) Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the City Engineer for checking and approval before construc- tion of any improvements is commenced. The subdivider shall submit "as-built" plans prior to acceptance of the subdivision improvements by the City. (6) All private streets shall be inspected by the engineering department and a standard inspection fee shall be paid. (7) Additional storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer. HovLzy L4Ns (8) Landscaping maintenance on P&i- +aae shall be provided by the home- owners' association. (9) Hovley Lane shall be dedicated and approved to secondary roadway standards. Curb and gutter to be 32 feet from centerline. BARR cCLELLAN DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS BM/ms • • ESTABLISHED IN 1918 AS A PUBUC ICY f COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT FCST CFFICE COX COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA 92236 .71<I ;;9a-2551 DIPECTCPS OFFICERS RAYMOND R RUMMONDS.PRESIDENT LOn%ELL O.'WY KS GENERAL MANAGER-CHIC ENGiNEE� TELLIS CODENAS.VICE PRESIDENT BERNARDINE SUTTON.SECRET AR♦ C J.FROST DENNIS M NACRE".AUDITOR PAULN NICHOLS April 28, 1981 REDWINE AND SHER.RILL ATTORNEYS STEVE D.BU%TON File No: 0421 .3 State of California 0721 .3 Division of Real Estate 7R.1-779 1- 107 South Broadway, Room 8003 Los Angeles, California 90012 Re: Domestic Water and/or Sanitation Service For area described as Assessor's No, 621-190- 064.065, and 066 Located in Sec. 8 T_ _S , R 6 E, S.B.M. The information contained in the paragraph(s) checked below is/are applicable to the above described area . This letter does not cover financial arrangements or construction status. X 1 . The Coachella Valley Water District , in accordance with the District ' s currently prevailing regulations will furnish these services to this area: �� f�-} I X Water � x LSanitation X 2. The area must be annexed to these Improvement Districts to obtain services: Water I .D. No. 16 f 70 IzSanitaticn I .D. No. 53 g 80 1, The current monthly sewer service charge :s $ 6.75 per lot. This is the prevailing charge throughout the Service Area. 4. Other Very truly yours , I y i4nage ell Weeks �+s Gel g i n e e r CS :.dlo cc: Riverside County Planning Commission - Riverside Department of Public Health - Riverside Department of Public Health - Indio Alex Adamek - Indian Wells PROOF OF PUBLICATION (20101 2015.5 CCP) PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF PUBLIC HEARING TT 17794 e I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the CITYEGAL OF LM DCESERT NO age of eighteen years, and not REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A 62 LOT TRACT MAP AND RESID' PLAN TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A 62 UNIT CONDOMINIUM a party to or interested In the ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF HOVLE OF PORTOLA AVENUE AND A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF EN above entitled matter . I am the AS IT PERTAINS THERETO. CASE NOS. TT 177% AND OP 06.61 principal clerk of the printer NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be heir Planning Commission to consider a request by ALEXANDER ADAME of PALM DESERT PO$T, a hewpa per of conddoomrtlum development on aooroxlmateig 17.2 acres within the PI tl.u./oc V:one,General Iv loc�ated on the south side of Hovley Lane,SOD: general circulation , printed more Particularlyy described as: APN D21-191F069, 065. 066 - '. i l • and published daily in the I j city of Riverside, County of Riverside, and which newspaper u has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Riverside, State of California , under date of October 5, 1964, . � Case number 83658; that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed cooyp has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates , to-wit : \ ' ,:�� -` I - .. 05/21 , 1981 I Certify (or declare) under .S r will Penalty of perjury that the .SAID Public Hearing will be held on June 2, 1981•af 7:Of1P.M. in ' Palm Desert City Hall,15-275 Prickly Poor Lane Patm Desert,Califs all Interested persons are Invited to attend and be heard. foregoing is true and correct. RAMONA. OIAZ , Secretary Palm Desert Planning,Commission ., Dated May 21 , 1981 + at Riverside, California CITY OF PALM DESERT 1 DEVELOPMENT IOPMENT ON-112 t . 500 FEET WEST MENTAL IMPACT - - .• ' the Palmivmalofa 6eunit coned Residential 5 .1 of PartOla AVCI1 e ! TT 17794 : DP Ob 81 t JF `sftf J, h '_1•. Y cl ChambOrs in' i whch tlma and al, a . PDP-5/21 t �r.,-_ n:CrCL; rcr,r; _.,..c, FnL„I G :,c„I, F..H...:�..',liin9 2G5.. TELEFriUrJE (714) 316-061i CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A 63 LOT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A 62 UNIT CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT ON 13.2 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF HOVLEY LANE, 500 FEET WEST OF PORTOLA AVENUE A14D A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AS IT PERTAINS THERETO. CASE NO. TT17794 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert City Council to consider a request by AL) XANDER ADAMEK for approval of a 63`lot`Tentatiye:Tract'hlap =to allow construction of a 62 unit condominium development on approximately 13.2 acres within the PR-5(Planned Residential 5 d.u./acre) zone, generally located on the south side of Hovley Lane, 500 feet west of Portola Avenue more particularly described as: APN 621-190-064,065,066 1 I RI^ �Q a _ 1 ' t ` I y , TT 17794 SAID Public Hearing will be held on June 25,1981, at 7:00 P.M. . . in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall , 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane,; Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. SHEILA D, GILLIGAN, City Clerk City of Palm Desert , California PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post June 11, 1981 "Vo- ry` C 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 May 13, 1981 Mr. Alexander Adamek c/o Harry H. Schmitz & Associates 45-900 Paseo Coronado Indian Wells, CA 92260 Re: TT 17794 and DP 06-81 Dear Mr. Adamek: The Department of Environmental Services, Planning Division, has received materials filed on your behalf and assigned the referenced case number. Your application has been reviewed for completeness and found to be lacking in several areas. The Municipal Code, Section 26.20.030, requires that the tentative map shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer or a licensed land surveyor. In addition, you picked up a copy of the tentative subdivision map checklist at our office on May 13, 1981. The items checked in the right column must be delineated on the tentative map. When the required information is received we will be able to continue processing this application. Since�r , RAMON A. DIAZ DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONME L SERVICES RAD/lcr M I� I � I CHECK ITEMS TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP CHECK LIST NEEDED The following information shall be delineated on the tentative map except those items determined by the City Staff as not being pertinent to a par- ticular tract: / 1. Tract number, title of map, and section�descriptionjof property; i 2. name and address of owner and subdivider; I 3. name and address of person preparing map; 4. approximate acreage and over-all dimensions; 5. north point, scale and,dat� minimum scale 1" - 100' ; 6. subdivision boundary line and vicinity map; , 7. names and book and page numbers of adjoining subdivisions; C, c�. 8. names, locations and w\ i�dthslof adjacent streets; 1/ 9, identifying landmarks and existing structures, both above -`` and below .ground; / 10. names, locations and widths of proposed streets ;,' cross-section ✓ _r 11. approximate grades of proposed and existing streets; 12. streets and rights-of-way providing legal access to the property; �. 13, excavations within 200 feet of the subdivision ; 14. approximate radii of curves ; 15. widths of alleys and easements; � * r� . . 16. names of% utii-y comppaanies and location of existing and proposed public utilities ; 177. elevations of sewer at proposed main connections; u/ 18. existing culverts and drain pipes ; i 19. water courses and channels including existing and proposed facilities for control of storm waters; 20. land subject to overflow, innudation or flood hazard. � � CHECK ITEMS SUBDIVISION MAP CHECK LIST NEEDED 21. railroads and other rights-of-way; 22. lands and parks to be dedicated to public use; r/ 23. dimension of reservations; 24. proposed lot lines and approximate dimensions; l/ 25. adjoining property and lot lines; 26. setback lines from front streets and side streets (if adjustments are requested) ; 27. contours , with maximum interval as follows : Slope Interval (percent) Tin feet) C 0 - 2 2 3 - 9 5 10 plus 10 Copies of U.S.G.S. maps are not acceptable. 28. existing use of property immediately surrounding tract; 29. proposed land use of property immediately surrounding tract; 30. source of water supply; .31. method of sewage disposal ; ✓ 32. existing zoning and proposed zoning; f� 33:� name of school district and boundary if within two (2) districts; :34. names of any special districts serving the proposed subdivision and location of boundary if within area of tentative map; 35. if it is contemplated that the development will proceed by units , V the boundaries of such units shall be shown; 36. two cross sections of the property at the mid-points. Supplemental Information Reports and written statements on the following matters shall accompany the tentative map unless waived in writing: 1. Subdivision building or development plan; 2. proposed method of control of storm water; including data as to grade and dimensions ; 3. protective covenants proposed to be recorded; 4.1,'�' if private streets are proposed, the method by which their maintenance will be accomplished and financed; 5. � proposed tree planting; _�4 w � 5. a written statement from the City Health Officer stating the type of sewage disposal that will be permitted. To aid in this determination, the City Health Officer may require soil percolation tests or other pertinent information. 7. Proposed landscaping and irrigation. 8. "� Preliminary soils report and grading plan. 0 Required Materials to be Submitted 1. A completed Application Form. 2. Thirty (30) copies (folded 8z" x 13") of the Tentative Subdivision Map and an unfolded sepia. 3. Required fee. 4. Property-owners list showing all property owners within 300 feet of the property under consideration. 1 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CAUFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-06I1 REQUEST FOR COi+V'-IENTS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO: TT 17794 and DP 0641 PROJECT: Tentative Tract Map and Development Plan APPLICANT: Alexander Adamek Enclosed please find materials describing a project for which the-following is being requested: Approval of a 63 lot Tentative Tract Map and Residential Development Plan to allow construction of a 62 unit condominium development on approximately 13.2 acres within the PR-5 (Planned Residential 5 d.u./acre) zone, generally located on the south side of Hovley Lane, 500 feet west of Portola Avenue more particularly described as: b APN 021-190-06�, 065, 066 The attached data was prepared by the applicant and is being forwarded to you for comments and recommended Conditions of Approval . The City is interested in the probable impacts on the natural environment (e.g. water and air pollution) and on public resources (e.g. demand for schools, hospitals, parks, power gener- ation, sewage treatment, etc. ) . Your comments and recommended conditions of apppproval must be received by this office prior to 5:00 p.m. May 22 , 1981 , in order to be discussed by the Land Division Committee at their meeting of May 28, , 1981 . The Land Division Committee (comprised of Director of Environmental Services, City Building Official , City Engineer, Fire Marshal and a representative of CVWD) will discuss the comments and recommended conditions of approval and will forward them to the Planning Commission through the staff report. Any informa- tion received by this office after the receipt deadline will not be discussed by the Land Division Committee nor will it be forwarded to the Planning Commission for consideration. Sinc y, Ramon A. Diaz / Director of EnvironnZ Services PLEASE RETURN MAP WITH COMMENTS CIRCULATION LIST FOR ALL CASES Circulation of Tentative Maps, Parcel Maps, CUP's, GPA's, etc. : i REVIEW COMMITTEE: 1 Palm Desert Director of Environmental Services - Ramon Diaz 2. Palm Desert Director of Building & Safety - Jim Hill 3. Palm Desert Director of Public Works - Barry Mc Clellan 4. Palm Desert Fire Marshall .- Eric Vogt 5. Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency Consultant - Les Pricer 6. Robert P. Brock Office of Road Commissioner and County Surveyor . Administration Office Building, Room 313 46-209 Oasis Street Indio, Calif. 92201 (Phone: 347-8511 , ext. 267) 7. M. A. Ferguson Imperial Irrigation Dist. Power Div. P.O. Box 248 Coachella, Calif. 92236 (Phone: 398-2211 �8 Lowell U. Weeks General Manager - Chief Engineer Coachella Valley County Water District (C.V.C.W.D. ) P.O. Box 1058 Coachella, California 92236 (Phone: (714) 398-2651 ) 9. R. J. Lowry - Project Development Services California Department of Transportation P.O. Box 231 San Bernardino, Calif. 92403 (Phone: l,714- 383-4671 ) 10. Director of Planning and Building City of Indian Wells 45-300 Club Drive Indian Wells, Calif.. 92270 (Phone: 345-2831 ) 11 . Director of Planning City of Rancho .Mirage 69-825 Highway III Rancho Mirage, Calif. 92270 (Phone: 328-8871 ) 12. Kermit Martin Southern California Edison Company P.O. Box 203 Palm Desert, Calif. 92260 (Phone: 346-8660) 03. Al Doody, RC6003 General Telephone Co. P.O. Box 2920 Pomona, Calif. 91766 (Phone: ) 14. R.W. Riddell Engineering Department Southern California Gas Company P.O. Box 2200 Riverside, Calif. 92506 (Phone: 327-8531 , ask for Riverside extension 214) . 15. Roger Harlow Director - Pupil Personnel Service Desert Sands Unified School District 83-049 Avenue 46 Indio, Calif. 92201 (Phone: 347-4071 ) 16. Dick Wolford Palm Desert Disposal Services, Inc. 36-711 Cathedral Canyon Drive P.O. Urawer LL Cathedral City, Calif. 92234 (Phone: 328-2585 or 328-4687) 17. Robert Lawman President, Palm Desert Community Services District 44-500 Portola Avenue Palm Desert, Calif. 92260 (Phone: 346-6338) 18. Regional Water Quality Control Board 73-271 Highway 111 , Suite 21 Palm Desert, Calif. 92260 (Phone: ) 19. Harold Housley, Foreman/Mails U.S. Post Office Palm Desert, Calif. 92260 . (Phone: 346-3864) 20. Joe Benes Vice President & General Manager Coachella Valley Television P.O. Box 368 Palm Desert, Calif. 92260 (Phone: 346-8157) 21 . Don Mc Neilly Palm Desert Chamber of Commerce 14-004 Hwy. 111 Palm Desert, Calif. 92260 (Phone: 346-6111 ) 22. Kevin Manning Senior Planner Riverside County Planning Commission County Administration Building, Room 304 46-209 Oasis Street Indio, Calif. 92201 (Phone: 347-8511 , ext. 277, 278, and 279) 23. James Whitehead Superintendent - District 6 State Parks and Recreation 1350 Front Street, Room 6054 ban Diego, Calif. 92101 (Phone: (714) 236-7411 ) 24. Robert I . Pitchford, Chairman Architectural Committee of the Palm Desert Property Owners Assoc. 73-833 El Paseo Palm Desert, Calif. 92260 CITY OF FALM DESERT 71EASUEERI RECEF 4825 RECEIVED OF: DATE T_ L�1. AMOUNT ) FOR ® 6 "a 1 RECEIVED: CITY TRE URER\ _ ^ ACCOUNT NO. AMOUNT Y9 � CHECKS ACCEPTED SUBJECT TO BANK CLEARANCE PAYOR CITY OF PALM DESERT NEAS ERR RECEPY 4 812 RECEIVED OF: DATE `-.13-?l AMOUNT �n�'�` 0'0 FOR RE CITY THE RER BY: � ACCOUNT LAID. AMOUNT 30 d CHECKS ACCEPTED SUBJECT TO BANK CLEARANCE PAYOR �::.. ZtA E LQ CAS E'NO.MA gi-o-t Environmental Assessment Form TO THE APPLICANT: Your cooperation in completing this form and supplying\the information requested will expedite City review of your application pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. The City is required to make an environmental assessment on all projects which it exercises discretionary approval over. Applications submitted will not be considered complete until all information necessary to make the environmental assessment is complete. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1 . Name, address, and telephone number of owner, applicant or project sponsor: Alexander AA alc c/o Harry H,Schmitz & Assoo. 45900 Paseo Coronado I.W 346:2022 2. Name, address and telephone number of person to be contacted con- \ cerning the project (such as architect, engineer, or other repre- sentative) : Harry H. Schmitz 45900 Paseo Coronado Indian Wells 92260 3. Common name of project (if any) : Alex Adamek 72-575 Betty Lane R. M. Ca 92270 4. Project location (street address or general location) : South Side Hovely Lane between Monterey & Portola 5. Precise legal description of property (lot and tract number, or meets & bounds) : portion of SEJ NEE Sec_R T5SR6E, S.B B.& M ( see Policy of Title ins- ) 6. Proposed use of the site (project for which the form is filed; describe the total undertaking, not just the current application approval being sought) : Planned Residential DevellonmPnt. (62 units't) 7. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects (describe how this project relates to other activities, phases, and develop- ments planned, or now underway) : this project is a smaji on rtion of overall develonment'lih this PR-5 area 8. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, to go forward, including those required by the City, Regional , State and Federal agencies (indicate sub- sequent approval agency name, and type of approval required) : N/A EXISTING CONDITIONS: 9. Project site area: 13.2 Ac +�_,t (Size of property in sq. ft. or acreage) a 10. Present zoning: pR-5 (Proposed zoning) : PR-5 11 . General Plan land use designation: 5 units/Ac. 12. Existing use of the project site: vacant.' 13. Existing use on adjacent properties: (Example - North, Shopping Center; South, Single Family Dwellings; East, Vacant, etc. ). Vacant east & west: north is new planned residential development, south is condominium in Mont re ey C.C. 14. Site topography (describe) :_raw desert, small sand knoll 15. Are there any natural or manmade drainage channels through or adjacent to the property? NO X YES 16. Grading (estimate number of cubic yards of dirt being moved) : 50.000 au,ydsL 17. List the number, size and type of trees being removed: none 18. Describe any cultural , historic, or scenic aspects of the project site: none 19. Residential Project (if not residential do NOT answer) A. Number and type of dwelling units (Specify no. of bedrooms) : 62 units half are 3 bed.-2 bath half are 2 bed.-2 bath B. Schedule of unit sizes:_ 3 bed at 1500 sq .ft.t 2 bed at 1050 sa ft t C. Number of stories one Height 15 feet.`: D. Largest single building (sq. ft. ) 1500 } (h9t• ) 15,'ft._ + E. Type of household size expected (population projection for the project) : 2-3 persons per hoiisphold F. Describe the number and type of recreational facilities : . 2 tpnni a rnnrt.a 2 public pools G. Is there any night lighting of the project: no H. Range of sales prices or rents: $ 80.000 to $ 1 10.000 I. Percent of total project devoted to: Building . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Paving, including streets. . . . . . . . . . . . zY % Landscaping, Open, Recreation Area . . . . . % 20. Commercial , Industrial , Institutional or Other Project: A. Type of use(s) and major function(s) (if offices, specify type & number): B. Number of square feet in total building area: C. Number of stories Height feet. s D. Largest single building (Sq. Ft. ) (Hgt. ) E. Number of square feet in outdoor storage. area: F. Total number of required parking spaces , number provided G. Hours of operation: H. Maximum number of clients, patrons , shoppers, etc. , at one time: I. Maximum number of employees at one time: J. If patron seating is involved, state the number: K. Is there any night lighting of the project: Yes No L. Percent of total project devoted to: Building . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . % Paving, including streets. . . . . . . . . . % Landscaping and Open Space (Recreation) . . % Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects : Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). YES NO 21 . Change in existing features of hillsides, or substantial alteration of ground contours. X 22. Change in the dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in the project vicinity. X 23. Subject to or resulting in soil errosion by wind or flooding. X 24. Change in ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. X 25. Change in existing noise or vibration level in the vicinity. Subject to roadway or airport, noise (has the required acoustical report been submitted?) X 26. Involves the use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances , flammables or explosives. X 27. Involves the use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy. X 28. Changes the demand for municipal services (police, fire, sewage, etc. ) X 29. Changes the demand for utility services , beyond those presently available or planned in the near future. X 30. Significantly affects any unique or natural features, including mature trees. X 31 . Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public land or public roads. _X 32. Results in the dislocation of people. X YES NO 33. Generates controversy based on aesthetics or other features of the project. X _ [ ] Additional explanation of "yes" answers attached. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation, to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Harry H. Schmitz & Asso Alezander Ada mak Name Print or Type For �� 4YZ Si Mature Date INITIAL STUDY FEE: $30. 00 (Make check payable to the City of Palm Desert and sub— mit with this form. ) � ) 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT CA. 92260 **DEVELOPMENT PLAN** DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES RESIDENTIAL PLANNING DIVISION Alexander Adamek Applicant (Plense mint) c/o Harry H. Schmitz & Assoc. 346-2022 Mailing Address - TeleN.One 45-900 Paseo Coronado. Indian wells. Ca: 92260 City State Zip-Code REQUEST: (Describe specific nature of approval requested) Planned Residential Development on P R- 5 zone. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Portion of SEA of N E 4 Sec.8, T5SR6E S.B.B.& M (See attached Policy of Title h5) ASSESSOR IS PARCEL NO. -621-190-064, 065, & 066 EXISTING ZONING PR-5 Property Owner Authorization THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT THEY ARE THE OWNER($)OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND HEREBY GIVE AUTHOR- IZATION FOR THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION. SIGNATURE DATE AGRCEMENT ABSOLVING THE CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL LIABILITIES RELATIVE TO ANY DEED RESTRICTIONS.' I DO BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT, ABSOLVE THE CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL LIABILITIES REGARDING ANY DEED RES- T HAT MAY BE APPLICABLE 10 THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN. ✓ � � 3 _ 2 � . rpPl SIGNATURE DATE Applicants Signature SIGNATURE DATE (FOR STAFF USE ONLY) ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS ACCEPTED BY [I �❑ MINISTERIAL ACT E.A.No. ❑I CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION CASE C C (L lo. C1P W NEGATIVE DECLARATION CASE N L ) V7 O 0 OTHER - REFERENCE.CASE NO. TT + /^-! 9Lk Authorization to Represent I hereby authorize Harry H. Schmitz & Associates to represent me in connection with application for a Planned Residential Development and Tentative Tract map located on Hovely Lane, on file with the City of Palm Desert. By: Alex Adamek p Date: • Y� I ESTABLISHED IN 1918 AS A PUBLIC NCY COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT Pc;T OFFICE Box I0$8 • COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA 92236 TELE= .CUE nlsl 3e8"2551 DIPECTOPS OFFICERS RAYMOND R RUMMONDS.PRESIDENT LOVIELLO.l9Ec5B.GENERAL MANAGER-CHIEF Er4GINc v TELLIS CODEKAS.VICE PRESIDENT REPNAROINE SUTTON.SECRETARY PAUL 4 DENNIS VCHOLS April 28, 1981 PEDWI EAND SHEPPCLLE ATiTORNEYYS STEVE D.BUXTON File No: 0421 .3 State of California 0721 .3 Division of Real Estate T(L, 1779+ 107 South Broadway, Room 8003 Los Angeles, California 90012 Re: Domestic Water and/or Sanitation Service For area described as Assessor's No, 621-190- 064.065. and 066 Located in Sec. 8 T r_S , R 6 E, S.B.M. The information contained in the paragraph(s) checked below is/are, applicable to the above described area . This letter does not cover financial arrangements or construction status. X 1 . The Coachella Valley Water District , in accordance with the District ' s currently prevailing regulations will furnish these services to this area: MX Water QSanitation X 2. The area must be annexed to these Improvement Districts to obtain services: Water I .D. No. 1[, f 70 MSanitaticn 1 .0. No. Sj & 80 The current monthly sewer service charga ; s $ 6.75 per lot. This is the prevailing charge throughout the Service Area. 4. Other Very truly yours , Lowell a. Weeks Ge Manager-Chief Engineer CS : dla cc: Riverside County Planning Commission - Riverside Department of Public Health - Riverside Department of Public Health - Indio Alex Adamek 7 Indian Wells CASE NO. DEVELOPMENT PLAN CHECKLIST NOTE : Planning Division Staff are required to reject applications if any appli- cable exhibits are not received and checked at the time of filing. Complete: I . Completed Application Form (one (1) copy) II . Written Documents (one copy typed) - Legal Description/Ownership - Statement of Planning Objectives - Preliminary Development Schedule - Quantitative Data - Water District Letter III . Property Owners Information - Typed listing of owners, Assessor ' s Parcel Numbers (two (2) copies) - Assessor ' s Parcel Map(s) (one set ) - Gummed mailing labels (two (2) sets) IV. Address labels for project sponsors (three (3) sets) * V. Site Plan - Six (6) full size (one of which is to be colored) - Fifteen (15) reduced copies (8211xll" , or 13" ) * VI . General Landscape Plan - Three (3) copies full size, or may be incor- porated into Site Plan * VII . Preliminary Grading Plan - Three (3) copies full size, or may be incor- porated into Site Plan, where appropriate Development Plan Checklist Page Two VIII . Architectural Renderings - Three (3) copies full size (one of which is to be colored; DO NOT DISPLAY THIS COPY ON ,A BOARD) - Fifteen (15) reduced copies (8j"x1l" , or 1311) IX. Environmental Assessment Form (received by Plan- ning Division two weeks prior to formal filing of application) X. Application Filing Fee: - With Change of Zone Request , $450 + $2/du - $1000 maximum or, - No Change of Zone Request , $325 + $2/du - $1000 maximum XI . Optional plans and exhibits, as required by the Dept . of Environmental Services Aerial Photo(s) of site - Other Exhibits ( ) specify * Items V, VI , and VII may be combined. . Development Plan Exhibits Received and Checked by: Ping. Div. Staff Date i SCHEDULE A Policy No. 47689-R Date of Policy Amount of Insurance $ 105,000.00 Order No. 47689-R December 20, 1977 at 9:00 A.M. Charge S 356.00 I. Name of Insured: ALEXANDER ADAMEK and MARIA ADAMEK 2. The estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered by this policy is: A Fee 3. The estate or interest referred to herein is at Date of Policy vested in: ALEXANDER ADAMEK and MARIA ADAMEK, husband and wife, as joint tenants 4. The land referred to in this policy is situated in the County of Riverside State of California , and is described as follows: (DESCRIPTION SCHEDULE "A" CONTINUED) FORM 3235 (RI 75) This policy valid only if Schedule B is attached. Chicago Title Insurance Company No• 47689-R SCHEDULE A CONTINUED PARCEL 1 : The East one-half of the Southwest one-quarter of the Southeast one-quarter of the Northeast one-quarter of Section 8, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Meridian, according to the Official Plat thereof. EXCEPT all oil , gas and other mineral deposits as reserved by the United States of America in Patent recorded January 19, 1960 as Instrument No. 4957, Official Records. ALSO EXCEPT the North 33.00 feet as conveyed to the County of Riverside by Deed recorded January 3l , 1975 in Book 1975, page 12831 , Official Records. PARCEL 2: The West one-half of the Southeast one-quarter of the Southeast one-quarter of the Northeast one-quarter of Section 8, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Meridian, according to the Official Plat thereof. EXCEPT all oil , gas and other mineral deposits as reserved by the United States of America by Patent recorded December 5, 1961 as Instrument No. 104365, Official Records. ALSO EXCEPT the North 33.00 feet as conveyed to the County of Riverside recorded January 31 , 1975 in Book 1975, page 12831 , Official Records. Said property is also situated in the unincorporated area of Riverside County. F.m 3631 „s Chicago Title Insurance Company SCHEDULE B Policy No. 47869-R This policy does not insure against loss or damage, nor against costs, attorneys' fees or expenses, any or all of which arise by reason of the following: PART I 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies - taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements,liens or encumbrances,or claims thereof,which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct - survey would disclose,and which are not sbown by the public records. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water. 6. Any right.title, interest, estate or easement in land beyond the lines of the area specifically described or referred to in Schedule A, or in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways or waterways, but nothing in this paragraph shall modify or limit the extent to which the ordinary right of an abutting owner for access to a physically open street or highway is insured by this policy. 7. Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning ordinances) restricting or regulating or prohibiting the occupancy, use or enjoyment of the land, or regulating the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land, or prohibiting a separation in ownership or a reduction in the dimensions or area of the land, or the effect of any violation of any such law, ordinance or governmental regulation. B. Rights of eminent domain or governmental rights of police power unless notice of the exercise of such rights appears in the public records. 9. Defects, liens, encumbrances,vadverse claims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not shown by the public records and not otherwise excluded from coverage but known to the insured claimant either at Date of Policy or at the date such claimant acquired an estate or interest insured by this policy or acquired the insured mortgage and not disclosed in writing by the insured claimant to the Company prior to the date such insured claimant became an insured hereunder; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had been a purchaser or encumbrancer for value without knowledge. PART II 1. General and special County taxes for the fiscal year 1977-1978, Second Installment $251 .56 General and special County taxes for the fiscal year 1977-1978, Second Installment : $251 .56 2. An easement for the purposes shown and incidental purposes as provided in the deed recorded January 19, 1960 as Instrument No. 4957, Official Records. For . roadways and public utilities In favor of : The United States of America Affects : Parcel 1 NOTE: The following endorsements appearing after Schedule B are an integral part of this policy: / Validating snatory bb Form 3236—(R 30-73) Schedule B of this Policy consists of 2 pages. Chicago Title Insurance Company No. 47689-R SCHEDULE B CONTINUED 3. An easement for the purposes shown and incidental purposes as provided in the deed recorded December 5, 1971 as Instrument No. 104365, Official Records. For . roadways and public utilities In favor of : The United States of America Affects . Parcel 2 4. An easement for the purposes shown and incidental purposes as provided in the deed recorded June 11 , 1963 as Instrument No. 60581 , Official Records. For pipe lines In favor of Coachella Valley County Water District Affects the South 10.00 feet of the North 15.00 feet of Parcel 2 5. A deed of trust to secure an indebtedness. Amount $53,250.00 Trustor Don G. Douglas Jr. and Mary C. Douglas, husband and wife Trustee Shoshone Service Corporation, a California corporation Beneficiary Robert J. Cordes and Dolores R. Cordes, husband and wife, as joint tenants Dated May 18, 1977 Recorded June 17, 1977 in Book 1977, page 111777, Official Records F- 3631 N , ,. Chicago Title Insurance Company 621-- /9 T C 2 7527 ,09 POR N 2 SEC 8 T. 5 S. R. 6E . e;1Y CLUB OR . 5 ( a a 9 I I I I I I aop I ' \51f SS. S7% 7K GI a j 65 I ` IMPORTANT. This is not a Plat of Survey. It is fur• nished as a convenience to locate the land 'indicated II heron with rcfcrcrce to sL.eets and ctaar land. No �O 1 j� iG "'.��`�_� liability is assumed by reason of reliance hereon. CH!CAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ASSESSOR'S MAP BY 521 PG. 19 4EPr 1967 94ra a/S i"' 56 `VERSIDE COUNTY, CALIF SCHEDULE A 1. The Estate or Interest in the land described or referred to herein is: 2. Title to the Estate or Interest covered hereby at the date hereof is vested in: ALEX ADAMEK AND MARIA ADAMEK, husband and wife, as joint tenants. 3. The land referred to herein is described as follows: Said property is also situated in the unincorporated area of Riverside County. The West half of the Southwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 8, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Meridian, according to the official plat thereof; EXCEPT the Southerly 250 feet measured on the Westerly line thereof, as granted to the Coachella Valley County Water District by deed recorded May 11, 1966 as Instrument No. 49397, Official Records. ALSO EXCEPT the Northerly rectangular 33 feet thereof as granted to the County of Riverside by deed recorded January 31, 1975 in Book 1975 page 12832, Official Records. ALSO EXCEPT to the United States such oil, gas and all other mineral deposits together with the rights to prospect for, mine and remove same, as were required to be reserved to the United States by the Act of June 1, 1938 (Stat. 609) , as amended and as reserved in the Patent from the United States to Calle M. Doberenz, recorded April 16, 1959 in Book 2453 page 122, Official Records. 4. Exceptions: a. General and special County taxes for the Fiscal year 1979-80, a lien not yet due or payable. 54226-11 PAGE TWO b. General and special County taxes, including personal property taxes, if any: Fiscal year: 1978-79 Total: $209.90 First installment: $104.95 Penalty: $6.29 Second installment: $104.95 Penalty and Cost: $9.29 Code No: 75-41 Assessment No: 621-190-066-7 Exemption: None C. A lien, if any, for additional real property taxes for the fiscal year 1978-1979 which_ may be assessed or reassessed as a result of Article XIIIA of the Constitution of the State of California (Jarvis-Gann Tax Limitation Initiative - Proposition 13) or other statutes implementing any provisions thereof. d. An easement for the purposes shown and incidental purposes as provided in the deed Recorded: April 16, 1959 as Instrument No. 32321, Official Records For: roadway and public utilites In favor of: the United States of America Affects: 33 feet in width along all boundary lines e. An easement for the purposes shown and incidental purposes as provided in the deed Recorded: May 16, 1963 as Instrument No. 50883, Official Records For: underground pipeline In favor of: The Coachella Valley County Water District Affects: the South 10 feet of the North 15 feet f. An easement for the purposes shown and incidental purposes as provided in the deed Recorded: May 11, 1966 as Instrument No. 49397, Official Records For: road, pipeline and pole lines In favor of: The Coachella Valley County Water District Affects: the Westerly 10 feet g. A deed of trust to secure an indebtedness. Amount: $18,000.00 Trustor: Harry B. Chaplin and Joanne S. Chaplin, husband and wife as joint tenants Trustee: Shoshone Service Corporation, a California corporation Beneficiary: D. Irene Doyle, an unmarried woman Dated: May 8, 1978 Recorded: May 10, 1978 in Book 1978 page 92365, Official Records M/M Adamek Kent Land Co. Brimco Investments Inc. P.O.B. 1564 18902 Bardeen Way c/o D. Moss Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Irvine, Ca. 92715 740 Laverne Way Palm Springs, Ca. 92262 Winford M. Rawlins C.V.W.D. William Bone 8637 E 6th St P.O. B. 10S8 41SOO Monterey Ave. Downey, Ca. 90241 Coachella, Ca. 92236 Palm Desert, Ca.92260 M. 4 M. Cook HARRY H. SCHMITZ & ASSOC. HARRY H. SCHP3ITZ & ASSOC. 45900 PASEO CORONADO 112 Via Havre 45 0,00 PAS20 CO'ZO:•fADO INDIAN WELLS, CALIFORNIA 92ZQQ Newport Beach, Ca. 92663 INDIAN WELLS, CALIFORNIA 92260 09UGVIN',10dIIVO '91l3MNHIONI £99Z6 'VD `g3Eag laod"N MZZ6 VINH031lVO 'S113M NVIONI OOV?:0L!00 037Vd C05-94 GJAEH ETA ZIT OaVPlOUOO 03SVd 0069Y 'OOSSV '8 Zlib4H0S 'H IANOVH 100D •W $ 'W '0OSSV '8 ZlIWHOS 'H AddVH 09ZZ6'ED '3aasa0 mlud 9£ZZ6 'ED `ETTayOROD T4Z06 'ED ',CauM00 •any ,(a134LIOW OOSTV 8SOT '9 'O'd 1S 1[49 a L£98 OU09 mETITTM - 'O'M'A'D suTTMEB •W pao;uTM Z9ZZ6 -uD `s$uTadS 1111Ed XrM auaaAEI OVL SILZ6 'ED `OUlAal 09ZZ6 *VD '1109a0 w1ud SSON .0 0/0 .CUM uoapauq Z068T t9ST '9'0'd •ouI SluamjSanul oomTag -OD Pue-I 4uex xawEPv W/W I t ' �.n aa�wint►.w rw ,,.y.-. �e,w j RpfYiFOIP, l i O�t11lIDWiIA - _. 1G,`•r.t lu; ---""- 1 1— i ° 1-T{�9SIr I I WWI f A1ICR0EKt1t anEesNuts ItK. -- - —'.Y -- - �\ ` y.w. �w�u+,o+w w2.> . > �_ pAGE 1� -br MENT ASSESS ROTA COLNTr OP PIVEPf1DE / ImpR Tf ExEni ONE >("illAfSMF�FMfffT O NM.E RECORDERS LONE iPA PARCEL NO. 0 __OjtlERUStl7j -- - 'E5;500 RAwk! oca.�rnmu� seE,E� "°` ---- :__1 It q CA _S-T5�6E F --—---2111 r+r--_— — O.ESSE`jhTS tEASSfSS4Sc Wo5TS tDFfM NOA . E-1G-31 ' CR N NM I S IM f R RIP R 6 - I KENT LAND Ly. L. I 189U BARD GN AgISM/ N N 114 F T DE CRIP ION E R S R R 4.75 K 1 RD Y - R M N OE CR Pi F A R 19902 WOE& NAY IPV INE CA 92715 + 7Y i 7 I DESCRIPTION SEE ASSESSOR MAPS - - v 1 BARD WY RV N A 9 71 / R M N D R PT A R N p - - 1 1 ialINVE TM MC, R N ES G/ /7 T 4 7 PR I R R D R A R T% R. ♦ / /79 YY 4,72 - 0 CR PT A A % 1 P IT FA9 - DE A PT A R _ _- i / /79 YY A OZ .._ . . —_ -ACRE "M L IN- SSORS BAPS RAH.IN N NF RD 7FOR 4. ACR - VARW R J. VARWS K. G 5/7 /7 7Y- —- G-7._ -SWAIN FRANK W JR 1 A M N N e A G qqORS MAPS tll SWAIM DAVID L. J i4t 79 YY i 7 •,ry AEllli M Iw n�llw��MaS ��fir ., .: . . .. - ScSy ZSIlE�EN ZE- 1L7FF: .•t . _. _ .___ 1 '�•C7. r MKRCNKHE PURIISHERS,INC.. PAGE 16S M 1960-bII ASSESSMENT ROIL COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE D IMPRVFEFTS EAEFIPTI(MS A MET pA1EF$ FINE RECORDERS ZONE TPA PARCEL NO. OTNEFJA$MTS - Afff ADDRESS FMlll^)�S 1TUS lA)-$M1EU_.—...------ - F10. -DATE_._VSE_ Af�B t A21-f90-6E-3�2 NGM-TAx CVCYD. xx _ , -_L71..----_---1KNf_JA)L________ .- - - (70 Cy�Yp P 0 eox 1V5B. COACNEllA.EA�2210. ._1173 ACRES 140. ( pQ, ]}t �F SEC�IIS_1SQE_IO�I.OTM.— DESCRIVI ION 1EF ASSESSORS I'MfS 252650 OAtMjU tolitTR- 0 IN. R T$RA 8-��Zi��t7-6 `-72 B7 TiCR AM/l NPTOR SE 7T Of SEC T S R E FOR TOTAL .-----3-{2'1F-� I D�;_CP P1 ASSFSSORI ImP - R 6 - 7 LT+N1E IR r. 7/ 177 r t 75600 BERT IN N M u 11 A 4 CR FI l 1N R NY / Of SEC S R6E fOR TOTAL 72 D CR PT A R MAPS RI 6U;36 - Y1lL 1/OO/BO YY 39 St N MOAT R A11 E P D R A 9 T R R TO A P ML IM RN DESCRIP710N SE ASSESSOR MAPS R - t1500 MONTEREY AVE PALM DESERT CA 92260 11l 0/79 Tr 76 5 R A DESCRIPTION SEE ASSESSORS MAPS EYLL I YY 91 RE 41 MpN7EY AVE PAL 422 D RT A CR M N R NE f EC T R EFOR OTAL p SCR PT A S IMP2TB7T__R7TFI E WIL_1M • To / /79 Tr N REAEM LVIN PAR D ERT A 9 2 F D CR P7 ON R P - 1 In Y RNA YP 9 1470 JAMB RE RD N-YPORT BMA H. CA.92 R M f R NY Of SEC R R - - - D R PT flLA "F! f ILA.PP Y R. A Un1VERSITT PLAZA IN[• P 7TN FI I C/ fL TD Y 1S 9 ACR S M11 IN RR 9F SEC 9 T51 R6 •F R T T n _ J - 1 AN AP 141 IF CAN f F CR IN R Y t 7 SEE ASSESSOR$ F✓. JT Sl P - GIBBS CINPo_CS SiU�GF1�IBES Jllll—E 7Z 7JT II C F T 103.24 RANCHO MIRAGE. Cam' RGIBB2 UB9 9 T5ER ^f R T DE CRIP I E bbv.. P _ y V P EV R IT D V - N R CA 9 /74 r t 1 . pR 9/ 4. GI ACNE M/L PAR � 16043 GIBEBB S EIMRI GIBES JLNE7C. J 1 F • tj /74 � 7 MICROFICHE PUBLISHERS,INC. // .0 •'.gym.,.o..:.r... RIVERSIDE MFI ASSESSMEN "AGE 166 14d11-Rt T PGII CCAMTY Cf •• '••w:'��^:y:' RECORDERS ZONE IRA r •RCEL NO. LAND KFIASMIS EF[fIFTItNS ASSETS KT OWNERS FUME _ _ OTMEF/ASMI$ NG. yATE.�SE__A1 OCE 3E____ 200" 0000 ADDRESS FNII('.)-S1TVS l!)'3AME(-1 A62[K SISP 1RUtl 621�tlYUtp-: S�0(A _ - PALMER BROADCASTING COMPMI. CA ES P O BQ" t/� 79 --�•ss ._--- -_ -_ __ C/yp C4ACNELLA VALL A" 17501p 366. DNA DESERT. CA -1774 - --4164 3.15 ACRE$ MA,` {N-p�1U�197}/060 M Rt - BARBER GE4RGE Y, BARBER NELEN E. JI 9 ZQ776 Rl --- ) 71y22 ESEPI OR RAN( 1 yy �M LOT d Mb IS20lU�4I RAMC MIRAGE A/NEx _._.._— _ �:ar ilwi:�'3fGY7. "$thb7''4' - MILD 91 V'1 Y *wW) ML LNtLtl)i30- MS Avkllg.?Ww) 9 LLM _ ll l 4 Jn11 MS Sff 1C27r_Y7 '30tl3n -- •----F 3•lf 11 gtg9 ,+ 0�y71{Cl _._)• AL%00/3� 51 N )I b w]S`.av) OS[�l 0--MY -[-L39__650!?L__ _SYd__6{1(S2 - 'OM_ 1?Y wKltlr) •Y-MILMi_ WIZ NNpf N:l 1 TLn�)�Y 1 1u Yl 7 Nl iwi 6LLn20 u+ S L:M p ppa9z�¢¢n_LVIM MIVd 'OWIM MS LCC JS-'J3IN-6N VLWS 'WO[V 3e4 W371 SLS r OtYNCI S$92 5OLL _ 6-S[10-91[-129 n5[NL S1d fN7l[2 _- _ _ _ _ 'M3f ara0] '3 53Mrf twi IggqV IW 3"Ni SIMSV/l; l0 30V3Y]V 350 - 31Va- 'CMG- -T=:3MK-[nSOlti-I•s Il Vu SS3a9nv 13N IMSSY Swltl flf3Y3 S1Nu1YaAI aN1r1 •OM 13AY4 YYl 3w)Z S139Y0)31 1WN Sa1NM1) 30ISY36IY f0 j1NI1)) Il➢1 IM MSS3SSV l9-(N6I 4A ' 59l 30Vd .. ..... .,... ._. .•')Nh'SM 1N5118(ld 3H3111)M)" N )) NI IN[ G /1 NI 1 LINO I i 1` p 6 l I V) 'S3'13'.1NV SOI tl / /L a a Vd Atl 1N 6 11 I MIL 9 L9ll 9 700-91L L29 65lN1 Sad 19961 __1f NZM"IIN •A 01rM03 Nl AlIM /[h0 BM 15111 11 N 6 1 p92 Ld3S30 WlVd •OM3V WS tl hl/ / l • 1 1 G - - fa f N tld 'N00I3 M304 4 /L 1 Yll tl 1 Y 6 1tl3537 M"IYd •W3tl MS l 1 VGw I 9- 1 - 62ml S44 35 'AYtl .. /Ln a+ 1 1u al 1 u1 aNVS sli__ a tl 6[/ /Ll < l Y N Y I N ABY l 19 OSLIt 52f92 �]SL S-100-91C-129 65091 fad S11Cf2 if •I N Na 0 • I129 d Y30NI0N [ M A I NZ—a", N tlJV YVl 2 6 V) ON tld 1tld V IT tl11T ('1 M 3W)B YVl-w I Q-S1C l29 n509L • SW Hoti BN tl N N1 IN I M7 1tN0 p 2 6 ltl POW IVdVOO r30 S d 1 Ll Ja 6L/ / l s Ml NINIVO VIVA tl LL N1WAaV Ql AYO 0/3 OGSOI CC052 52151 9-n^?-f1/-LZ9 n5091 tl 29 /L 9M 1 Ill tll NO02;1 N1a3S30 N'IVd 1. 2 [.OM3aNVS �— Sl 7tl / /1 Ot l6 Y tlN Otl Yd N1 AtlSM NVWII-ll 3N)9 p - tld ZM h0/460 3d 1 1ll tl N 1N /l/1 N 1 1 tl3 3O Yf1Yd ' a WS L - y / / • 5 [ 6 tl] YW V1W5 a0 Y IYIMI 1l j Qfll 1-[10-51L-LZ9 hc091 Stld h09t1 05M OR?? 290/L6 Bu 15111 al N043a03 Nt 1NI 9ll/% M) 51 11 N0 Mlv�l9`l c2{q2 9tL 7a oL/ / L�—6uY/ aai 39N26 1N3530 Vll3 1 MaXl3a lVl3S9 yifft N 3Ni0tla39 AYa x 1MM{ 910 f1C-22 h5 9L 3677 I 1 29 /L6 W 75111 al nVlwv� m an1 YLv.2i1 M] » llMl p IMM M)Yd '919V NVS M r�OSS� tl 6[/ /lt a S1C26 tl7 N na e31 1M 1tl39tl3N IMS 35 O- :—g21f_.—_ -- 005 t OS[6 2 510 51[-L29 6$09 Sad 7 1 { !f •M tl4NYM NinOIYB N NLMOIv_B ' I /L 15111 tll NOa9A7 NI 1Nl tlll/1CU Y � -' 111{f la a 6[/ / L a 6 V ltl 0 d a n5{ �za02__ 5[56 L-110-51L-L29 65091 Sad L9f9 if 'Y At170 N35aMN _) aM19Y NA11 /16 1 1LL3 1 ll/1 M �1 1IN-fl p 1a3530 WIVd •OW3V "S tl$�[9lL ooso{ 52b0L_S(i_�S2t51[ t 9 6 49�_4ad 89f9 INTgn�+_M2�pei9e3N tl30MM S� 9M 15111 al_M_01'lI RJ6N 1p VIM LHIM N�SJA'OM a.WA tw f 14 2 7 3M1ra0 .__ _._ _._.-______---.--_—.- -)� �/�� a•�--3IS--IS�7iVLTi-1[t'SNr 83AMYtl137N JI] { O Sl2 OS[6 ---._ar.2±9-S±C-129 y�p9` _ _ - --- nl ' SS1Wf ol\vM , voov 13N 1MSSY fN0I1dM3X3 f1NMAtldNt10 OW3 'ON I37VYd 39YVul 3V7V3NOZ SV3040738 —_-T)3WS=(Y)f011S-f.11tUM W SSa3LYW 3_at SVIAIV __ f0 A1NM),_TM INIW$53SSV -L9-MM 1M \ dM ']NI Y113H511M►d 3N)131I�)1W 1 I I I •, 7 • L • t Y.. .: \ ..., a t/. i3 - [AZ . LP >• ?9_139NI 4VW 33S S,W) y)t /tlo OW C•. I*)*,_ . . r-;FVw10 03ZZA r) 'L43S3d WA,4 • AV • 9MYl 'ON l3)NYd0 Vnyl l 34PaW nn o SM '4vlllS, 1 lS is 91 O 4,l y 3.1 431 Sn _310=••)W 3W5-(•)SLTS- WtN 51NSVr43ALJ 3N)Z 5430N9Ay 13R1_1 134 IWSSV SVIIL*nl? S~I A: f A 441 39V4 30TS43AI4 _1•) _LNI)J_ll?4 _1NMS3SSV 1R�361 - 4yl ' •-:)NJ•'SHIHSIl911d IHII lUM - i r-- I _*S'9 i 430N[ 4YA 33C $ e) y0f Zan M BN S b l NI 13N $31)v 0"'7 `A'-`• T�1 1N M1ll 14 •O7 1N3WLS3ANI VLtl N t Y .. l a W 9dw 101 NI 13M S341Y hi 0NIdV 4Jyf R / v 1 A-' SUIT SIM 1 - Z9 h>Oat 54d 9a]/7 ld 70) IRMS3ANT VIVII ' 1. Mr ■30NI dVN 335 $,N) NOf 2R0/L60 9N 59.10"1 NI 13N S34)tl aL'T L/ / l O922h VJ 1NAW WI d'JAW .13S353ANI tl!tl"H I 9 MO09 %30NI AVM .N tl f /L BW l l tl N 1,J N tl 1 Z9261 tl) 'ANTNmjS ON-1 laitld ' %O9 0 6JTA-NZ ON"I 031V0 ' J O/) 071 f-aZO-OS--t29 11Ml SY ld •07 1N3u153ANI ONYI 03LV0I"NJSN7 Alt - l29 MOOR %30N IYW US W tl N N N 0' l9' U RC/OO/2l 09226 V) 1tl3S30 Wltld 3Atl A3N31NON Sl1 -L - -' CONd h9RZGL Ld •O] 1N3W1S3ANT VY l29 'a % 0Ni dtlW W 4 f 9a 101 Ni 13! S3NJtl l) L/ /2I • 2 tl] 1N3S30 Klld •3AW A3u1S3 A Of)Sil SS49 --' -" - 6%)QI SO l h942LZ B %30NT 4W 33 S,W N 1 24 /L6 BW tl) 1S9NTNASNWItldN 313tlX0 9 /i 1l L SG/ /9 • d N39NI 3"M) O/) ) ANI 9N"I 031tl0 "Y)SM7] O/) _ Nd ld .02 1N3W1S3ANi 0NY"I 03IVQl_0)S4) L29 N]O8 %30NI dVW 33 5 WJ 4 "I N NI "1/W 3Nltl 19'1 19 1 I) aL/ /S . 226 V) 1tl3S30 W"Nd 3AY A3tl31NON Mot Si I, 6-120-OSL-129 670'dl sod ,699 ld b] 1N3N153AN[ tlll"1} ' l29 M009 %30NI dtlN 33S $ N] NO1 2a0/L60 9W t1 �yy—LNON % N /N N A_3 M0922 tlM M OOS[096 £ 6 Y] 59NIN l tll-NON -_ a_ - SW 'WVIli1N_34lQ 2a0/L60 9N !Sill 41 NOI ) NI 1N3 6£1H2O NJ 9f II WI p 143S30 WIVd •OW3tl NVS `C2_. ObOSZI N hC/ / L • - N V !N N N NAVN YLn ZLI 6 -9£0-91L-t Z9 Nd J1 1r • 13NV9d VM MOO] •a NNru -)V iqo/t6o aw7SILL NL NJ 1N 6 L s7UW. • t(wn p 6 1tl35M0 W)Vd 'OW3M NVS L,Z.. . ---- tl 6 V N tldS u IVd 3AY AT 3TlWW CICK0 6 q-jjL9l -lz9 6509k CNd SW _NVTI'II1 3vO4 2R0/L60 9W 151L1 tll W 403 N3 1Ni 6t.}�1gL.W3 1£ 1i41 _ _ ---------- d MM 1U3S70 WIVd w34 NYS �1? S£006 V) •S3_i39,NV SO1 1S 13 UIVS i££\ 52L9_l - SLZ6 S_1£0 91L-129 6 9RL Sod X7�$Z- 13NTI •lV I)NIf •30nN_iM-I13M) '?3AwS :13'*t N07%A0-O71.11 1 Nl 1Nl 1S7/4ZO 43 £i t:vl _ p 09'J6 1N3S30_NIVd 'M3N NVS t�Z 09A921 . -- -- - _-- ST-OR/06T1 - — -VMA v5 -VS3W V103 -ld ~VS a�.l . 0521f OOStZ OSLE__- ,_-1-Lf0-91[_LZo hSfZ��Bgl _ 5Nd 556£Z ___ _ ____ SN '3r" W,"V3 �t�+13+ LWV 3•IYS SWSV/43N1') -99V3U)B -35A -31V0- •nN' .r=17Nvs-f•)$Ali$-1•`llv4 SS1,1, % 11" 1WSSV SWI1dW3%3 SINNANdWI 0NV"I 'ON )3)4VA VNL 3NO7 S430 0M 34Vv S•)*.,J 19l 39V4 30IS43AItl 10 A1NnO3 1104 1N3WSS3SSV 0_N6I .v ')Nl'SHINS11911d 00IMM)M , 34 6 l A L , lNS ice? •. TLC OOStT OS16 f-Zf0-91/-L29 650a "MIMNWIRM -- 0OCZ6 W3 AMSLAA'�' �- SIM SLZ6 1-10-911-L29 6SOyl SMd SIM 1�.Z S1L9t C116 L-ZKo-9tL-Lt9 6SOYl _LYd_ uvm_%rvoTFTrlRw .�1y' �yxl�L�it S4-6LILL- pqq��7��pp)iT IAT�1 �1titi2 11�3•� . ist ryVKT1 . Ir 1^I14'�tV3@I`l5,Zl �).� )Y3�1S 14 . P 6zi- zo S. R. 6E. 0� I 1 l • e V s`. 24, y.•n I ti I , ti _/ p 42 87AC v a � 9 "— — — /7 /6 {oSio i' ti ASSESSOR'S MAP SK. 62' P6. .20 ' Ri IFPS/i.S CO./N 7Y; CA[ ;F - _. r� a N 00 lC; .7+ :c 1i <v.le • of I 1 .~l. •} � 1. V -ram .. . I es QL '`r(� :• °'�• � .. . ( 1 :�. i <a __. _ �-__ _ ate '" —I_--� Y I� "1 s , O ,v Z9 �V ESLb �V ESL'v �V�SLb F �V TSLb �V�'SLb OV><SLb OVT92$I V ZC• F w It,T-SL b oV-wSL b 65 L G n b U' b C ' _79 �y S51 ♦ — - J • �;C AL1tMJ+lA . . IG;'.R4 nt6t l:y:: ,, _. _._ __ � — r lit 9 Tag m r him C 1 • I ♦ ♦ Mail K M rEl{IISNIRS,INK. I, �.\.•.\1 yNy��wyu.w.w.♦Zw'gnii.•1 _ - PAGE 162 '• r'•.I A• 4�'•<M��M1�V K. -. '-- iWil ASSESSMENT NOEL COUNIM-Gf PIVERi IDE D IWRV1NIS ExEWTICMS ASENE/yNIEEY OWNERS MAN[ RECORDERS ZONE TM PARCEL NO. -LAND 7HEA/ASEf7f—------ - 'E535O0 ADDREss �• -suussu sAnEE•> "°` �il�i a4�� r-r -- — KENNt9pjUILRCpO�g�C� •-tt 7S EIM/L�iN TOR NE•(7�bT-S€C ��" TOTAL A 7s ------ DESSP F-1 EE ASSE 109LblillR •.ZLIENRli 1471 TTJS R *FOR . �-'3.3Si�iCR L N NY / 1 n t A N NR 1/4 SE T335W l DE Cal ION R - K CA 9 71 ° t 7 1 RD N1T R R R R N M _ DE CRT E A R - 78902 BAADEEN Wl IRVINE CA 92715 1/QQ/80 rr 4 7 DESCRIPTION SEE ASSESSOR NAPS - t BARD EN WAY RV ME A 71AL t/ / rr 4 7 R N N R N A - t t BRINEORINVE IM[, R N ES N U /79 rr 4 7 P V RN Tn__._- . PALM PR R R R _ R PT A x R. R R D R PT A R / 179 rr x t P RT A 5 ME .. _ _- D R PT A R xt RAILIMS M Mf RD N --- 7 4. A A IN VARGAS R J. V RW K• 4 . / /7 rr 4 7 C SNANN IRANK N JR t ♦ R / /7 r 4 7 Co kit4 SHAM+ DAVID L. J t /7 rr 4 7 f C R 4. ACR M L N R N w.A A[wli FL0. !w n+. NL \•. �'� i�, - ie3v ESL—__._"_....- .. 1i76F: .11 .;-• ,. . ._ - _- __—'----- p. t S ' VAelAL- loon i MKROIKHI fl1tlISHIRS,INC., .��«..w�:'"•J`.�`-`.:`i'��\�..u",w. inSi•:..i _ _ ... _ PAGE 185 19IO-fi - ASSESSMENT ROLL [OI1NTr OF RIVER SIOEIA4N RECORDERS lONE TRA PARCEL NO. 0 C,,M'W ASMTS RVMMTS E%EJtPi IlMf SN.E �i C411ER$ IWE ADPRfS$ Milld�S1IV5 --��=DATE_—VSE_A0564 6F7-f90=68T-3 _ NfM'TM - CVCUO. AA a _l�Zl_ _--,NON:]AX------.---- ._ _ ve c --- 1.7 CAE OR NE 1/4 OF SES_�IS.S_BQE.10' 'm• zsiew D4Mji5E-S�C6_pKQ$R IN . P MYS DES 4z B7-��1-I0�bi3 - --------------•. �i2.87 ACT T - R N l N R SE / F [ S R E fOR TOTAL CR PT P 6 AN N ANY 9 7/ R N L N R / A OF SEC T P E�FOR TOTAL NY ' D SCR PT A - Y LL 1/00/80 rx 39 34 k 41 T R r A PALM DESERT A 9 A R M L 1N R N SEC 9 T52 P6t U XI DE CA PTI SEE ASSESSORS MAP - - al MONTEREr AVE PALM DE EAT CA 92260 a 11/ /79 Yr 76. S p L KRIMITION SEE ASSES OR MAP - ��T;6 i I-BON Y RT A 9 a / / YY 9 1 47 MONpEP M A EN PAR N T R E Op TOTAL D CRP Lb P1900 ° E WILLIAM n 7 / /79 xr iO 1e 41 CREP „ V1N PAR � ERT CA 9 R pESCR PT ON R P N RN YP 9 147 JAMBOPE tR N 4PORT BEACNo� 45.E92 - R � R D R PT N R 1AP R - - UNIVER51 r PLAT Y p77M INC- 177 Yr 128.0 / F 1 9'A R / NPOR 1/ F SEC 9 7 R6 of R T 7 J 141 N A a YT 7 t P R N R Y F C R NTOTAL i e i GI082 CINID.E S. JJV`N -�y��J; III 1 t 4 - RANCHO MIRAGE.1C 'U I / ;jEy p �fog TOTAL E R Pll R5bvmib - tD V R E VAV N R l. RR N 9 e 9/ /74 \ 4 ACRE M L 1N R FM [ y y; y ' GI JIVE J C_ - I oo BBS RL 4/ /7</ 7 t . MICROFICHE PUBLISHERS,INC. _ - u+wwn��!". SAGE 166 :,..r...u�••...w.•�L'. RIVERSIDE SMP Ass�ssnEH? Fro�L ccwi\ iF ! 1µ-,'1-.n•, RECORDERS ZONE TPA �.ACEI MO. LAND IMP AMTS EFENPT II.N2 AWETSAU ` OWNERS NAME _ _ O1MEF/ASMTS NO. �AiF-315E._ACREAOE— 20DOOD ADDRESS rAM-2-51IVS L2.3N1E( 1 Be266 sISP t6043 bat=F40-[�i61 —� - y t PALMER BROADCASTING COMPAN\. CR ,ae 4/00/19COAm }6B, PALM DEMi•A N 7 p t �-26 -f cT�lTlf-�i— �774 4164 :ti500 3.15 ACRES. - - - BA�E� pU R7REG�IWpIq BA ERN LEN J 9 zLoo/76 AT _ T 12 hB�20Ttj9IRji M _- �. EitF*bESa a 'i. . ' . '3�z. •'-?i`.;•` t. j`- 3�/t^Q_eN •S+ll tll N\MJ) NI_1NZ ld) ) 9 LIB vaQ] 3)T'YN V) '30131 111d.)NNIV!'.'H )) 4)S-119D ' OOOffI -__)y A itt J700 jl 'N AI N 0422C 00222 05ML_ V-'�40"�+L=1;9__65Lp't__.->Yd-_±{Y(SZ _L�-g Y7YllNy lnV) 3 Mr 1NT 6f1ih20 w�S N; )0 WZt6_1V35;0 NIVd '73Y NVS LLL P3 6C/fk3/21 Z0s0;;VS-'VS(N6LT vi1F(s NSOIN 3/.4 NVM ILI MN NV3f ANNO) "3 S3NVf Aiin) Of%3e{ 52f92 S0tt _ 6-57N+[-tt3 369)V 350d 3vw)1L2,•W _ __ _ _ .-2 3Nv5-(�)SO115-c.17l Yd SS]40gw 1NV 3"NS SINSV.YJNL) 1N'yN S43NM) 134 1NSSV SNVLYN3+3 SIAI 1Y 1 0NV7 '0N )3)04 "1 3N)Z S43010331 30IS43A/Y 10 •1N)?] ll)Y LN3VS53SSV L8jN6L 'ryL ••'3NI'981NS119f)d 3N31 IUN)ILV It N_ V NI LNI 6 /Y N) h 11wn V 6 V) 'S3"139NV 507 i tl / /l a V %YVd An 1N 6 1 1 L 65Q31 SYd 19961 if NI%lIN '% Otl M03 N1%1113 9 19LL 9 h00-97/-L29 L _— 1 6 h y 1N3S3o NlYd 'OLf30 NVS tl M/ / L < 1 L l ry)Dvvk 2 _ _ cy I 00'13 d P)Otld /L h Yll tll A Ntl3530 Lfl d' tl NVS N 6L/ / l 1 I 1 _ h NI 35 'AYW V07V /[ BN h hll N1 tl l 6 L11 tl NV h V 6L/ /Ll • LB V N tl N A % l OSLLh SZ£92 -U]SL S ld]-9hL l29 65091 00069LWd SV6/£2 if '7 N Nd 0M L y10% 133S S,W 9h o 3N tl533V Slh 6 V 6 V1 %tl 9 Q-.....Z9 55041 N ' I -4 M 3 13d N ) Ni Ni N] 7 11 Lo M Z 6 IN O N IVd tl ws S ll 38 611 / L e Nl NI %V tliV3 Ll NINVANBNM 0tlAV0 0/tl SL052 5215E 9-65R-ShL-l29 65081 y 01 Vqi,Z /( t#1 hShLl tll NItl3S30 N7/d - N3S NVSi L )y / /h a L6 J VN ON tld N1 AVSN%yNVi Y11M 3N)0 p _ 6SOOL SN4 It f!1 hShLl tll N 1 ll/h NJ 0 1 ltl3 30 M"1Vd 'O Z. NV$ LIE -000?5l G 6 Y7 YNV V1NV5 NO 7VlMt3 j fall h-LhO-ShL-L29 6508E SNd 60B 12B0/L60 l%Y hSYLI 81 N( l Ni 1N1 Bll/h2 N] Sh 1[Nfl p n d '01l3tl NVS £S£ l9L Jtl LL/ / L a 6 V) 53739NV 507 1S3M tl31 OS9V173B O£h 1yy18£ 52£92 _ _ _ yd N N tl A tlf1N f L SSE ZBO/L6 NN ISILL NI. NOANOJ NI 1N BLL/h NJ hh '"I p ltl 30 N794 —. NY$ r-�OSn£L 1N 6(/ /ll ^+ SLL 6 tl 1-1— tl 1'T 1N01N3�A 1968�1~ OOSLC OSL6 2-Sh0-ShG-L29 Yd h if 'N tlONtlM NiMOIV 7 1N3BN3N NIM07V�1_. L6 h hll tl N 1N LLIh N 1 1371 660hf1 p 6 V 1Ntl3530 Vd �tl NK 65f __ �______-__�2602 SL 56 L-hhO-ShL-LZ9 650BL NA 121 / L " !f 'V A1130 N3 OM)1 3 tl0R N N;j0f111v /[6 h ll tl 1N 11/h NliN-0 p Q7;Z6.3S30 N7Vd '0113N NVS .. f,OO'/fi - 6L/ L a h3-VS •3WV9NL INIm'5�15 �SNil15N 3/91 (OSOC 9 6 061_-fnd 89f922_ SM M 1N;Qi3N e34fV1 \ 280/C 60 NN I NL NOHNp)-NI TNT /h2p MJ lh s 11`m 1v — r---- Qq�61n�S30 N�Jd'ON3N MVS l9S z6..1L) ')W 01) — - — -- ------------ 3� oeS/aors s3Ar� N1W13PI OL) �f ppGGSppS55L2 OS[6 - 4314-5Y(r3;q__ p�pB` __ ed--hSiiSS9C _ -_— n1 7 gg3LNf ONNM l3N 1NSSV SNnI1dN3%3 S1NN6NdNi10 ONVI 'ON 73JtlYd 39938)V 3 01 $tl30tl033N - -(=33NVS-f V3 Solt S-f.)73VM SSN3yp 3.0IS93AIU 10 A-1NfY337708_ 1N3LYSS3SSV _l8-(16l •]HL'S>f3MSI1M�)N33)0431W I i! ,.`„si..a77off'�,^ ..it=c AA _ L/ / 54 'NYI Y-II L'a)R IS• v_\!7 Y3UNi 1V4 335 S.N) rN Z70/L'-0 S•. 101 l;? 3 AV A377L4%. r -t+ lS is ¢?f0-05L-In l70%l 51d_ OSOI?L ,- _--- 54 'Nvi tlln )N 9 IW 11VS SIsKV/13•+4) 3OV3'1]r -3Sn 31V9- ''W - -- (=)34vS-(Y)SnITS-t •)-113WSSWIV i 43411 114 INSSV Svlfl4 313 S~1d11 INVI '•ON 13TfVd V)L 3NOZ S139a013a qal 39V4 39IS13A11 10 ALwI)]_ l_l]Y IN345S355v . l9�?6l � '7NI••SM3LK1.1811d IN)IIUa IIIY „ i I 1 -_ - 130N1 4V4 3 S 4] 1.11 Tan/ e11 a l01 NI 13N S341V 0 7 l 6 Y 1N IVd A Y N l7 7 - - 6 Nf 6 / ld ''1 1N3Ni S3ANi xVIV-" C s7ns50S Y ONIS.Wj 401 / eN 99 1Jl NI l3N $3N)V h{' is NIV A N L L-1 !!Li SL/ll 7Jy[0-OSG-l29 670a1 SNd 99ZLZ id *03 1N3N1S3ANI VZVId ' 17�x/7S Y30Ni dVN 335 S N) 01 90/[60 SW 59 l0l NI 13N 53N7V � -� �I L L/ / l 6 V id '03 IN34I53ANT MY H "109 SL097-6 /- hvNt Sid l29 xT)9 Y30N: dV4 33S S,-W5a 1 R /16 V) NiadS WI r XOB 7 0 R1100AI +d N39N IHJS UIJ UJ AN ONl 0 1Y0 '-- /7 071 Oil f R7t1-OS'-lZ9 17NI SN 3L011l ld 'OJ 1N34153ANi ONtl9 0)p0e0Y3 N1W.1 4 q q N N 9' l9' U a[/ Rl 09Z26 V] 1a3S39 Nltld 3AV 63a3LN0N l7 as SRR 70-09 l29 A7091 SONS 6.2a"2 _ Ld 'J) 1N3NL52ANi VZV L29 xx B Y Ni d N Y0 Sw 101 NT 13N S3a)V L 4L/ / L a 6 V) 1N3539 WIYd 3AV A3N3Q Sl7 SS99 9 6VNL SOVd 9g2LZ Id '03 1NJN WNI VItl'N_ L29 x008 Y30Nf_J jVN 3 .NS tl 1 ZR 1,50 8N __101-ate I/N 5313V It - ?g7j6 IQ 'S9N1NdS WIVd n?e 0 7l 0 R[/ /9 » d a3JNi53 Hl5 VIJ O7 ANI 9NI 03119 0{ SO{ 0-'20-0SL l29 170R1 SNd 9lOLll ld '03 LN34153ANI 9NYI 031tl0I"1)SN)) VI 031y %3UNI dWl 33S N] N 1 N NIIL I N 53tl] 79'7 1 qro/ ZZ6 V) 1a3530 Wltld 3AY A3tl31NOM -tom Sf IOL 5f 11 6-720-OSL-l29 A70dL Sm'i °/' l.d 'O7 1N3N153ANI Vzr'1 - - l29 NOOB %30Ni dlM 335 S.IA 001 MUM) dN L7 201 ONV 27 191 421 NI I/N 53tl]V 7M1't__ YY1-NON %vL-NON p6 C 0�2Z6 V] 59NINd5 WPod 3AV A3a31M14 pOSl7 2R01[h Bt1 75711 Nl "4407 N1 1NT 64l/7 4) 911 17Nn q L43539 'IVd U NV$ (Z__ ' % OOOSZL 6 N)tl 1N n N YAVN VTn Zll -129 - Nd 1r ')I 13aVJdW xW) 'a raW v?`l �`-- - /L6 7 7L a N 1N 6 t/7 N3 5• li Vt1 I / p 6 143S30 WIVd 'ON3t1 nV5 [:Z. . . 6 tl aJN ad 41VA AV A a�LN]11 (`0517 at 5L 6 Stld 9-Si0-97L-LZ9�L$ SN 'w)IliN 3M?d ZRO/140_eN 75711 81 t~3 Ni 1NT 6.t.L173¢ W3 7i I�v1 a —OjZ 6 193S39 NIVd 34 NVS hL2 » S£006 V] 'S3l39NY SOl_1S 1,3AnVS ,ii+ OWQLL SZLR.I S[26__$_KQ-97L_lj9 6S L 5`Id 7�7j5�/l_l I7NI1 'IV I]NI1 '90nlls3J_ IL309 'I3tYa5 :A3*) Z130/L6A 'IZ�L�N N SS 91 1Nf ail%72('. N] C{ t:M) 0 09'Z6 1s3530 NIVd 'O03N WS t�Z 0009Z v] 'VS3N VISO) +v sVWVS a.aL 0"?1 0 05L _ 1- 0-9LL?9 695t S 556£zz- ON C=13Nv5-LA1S'031+1J5N-cNaAIOr�VI7 0 )tl _350 __ 1V 141+V jt SNp 0 , 1Wv 3'VS V/13N1 13N 1NSSV SNOIld1J3Y3 S1N4AadNI (INVI *ON I3)dVd YNL 3NOZ Stl30a0)38 LRI 39Vd 301Sa3AIN 10 ALNM7 II94 1N311SS3SSV LR-0R6L ')NI'SM IHSI18114 IN3I HIM III% -- zeo/mo eI% 10LL a1 N0Fld7 Ri1S5n--{-- is 051AL L Sl2 L6 f-2f0-97L-129 6SOB M OS LNIWI W11�NI$Kvk R 1 •Ml�7i ill\ ------- t �_ SjLBt S[Z6 2-LCO-97L-1L9 650V1 Sad 4W1�714-1" tK SZL9l CL26 l-LKO-Q1L-lt9 6SOal CYd 10,11v .• �ii1TL80�CiL� Qq� y P 1, x %Ali _94S1t__OSL^._�_-hZ0•?1L1Z2.-6LORl—fY�4. �� •'�� It,yi�W ' lr •Y'+\3vlpt�l�3f Tz7il "..1�11,y . tp IL P J UU 911 ' 24� . { 4l. C 0 I ` C� 190 p 42 87Ac I � 14 10 4 ) ref o ASSESSOR'S MAP 6K. 62/ P6. 12O ' Ri IIFP$i[/f CO;/N7Y, CA :F 1 - t ' oC. riZE• J.•9d.]J .of] • N-9 lo So AV, ki All i • ... OA t A r a �' (� C, ' • is t � .�, , � � a Qkz LQ I1 � le •V .. t y '1 �O I ' � i 1 . 'r T. 5S. R. ,6E . DR . 5 14 CITY ... ... l Aff` x ry 57 475f4c 4 75f4c l" - ---L ANE +- - - 4 o `Zt ` 475tAc Q.75t Ac 475iAc 4.75t Ac 4 754 Ac 4..5f Ac � 4 75f Ac � EX. ' / cif 4c 6� Of 4c