The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDP 07-77 - SHADOW MOUNTAIN RESORT CONDO 1977 �4 o - -E a o r. : l J U L 1 1982 ' 1 ' I\ I LC�^JC7 - EZ ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES G]EEO_ r CITY OF PALM DESERTf t��'r=F �'Lilsonov June 24, 1982 Mr. Ramon Diaz RESORT City of Palm Desert AND,RACQUET 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane CLUB Palm Desert, California 92260 45750 San Luis Rey Palm Desert, California 92260 Re; Case #DP07-77 & 77MF Telephone (714) 346-6123 Palm Desert Venture r Dear Mr. Diaz: Please be advised that the chain link fence has been installed as per your letter of May 27, 1982. Thank you for your cooperation. S• rely, nce M, Robb Claiborne RC:me i •1 Destination Resort Management, Inc. Other Resorts:The Gent—Aspen, Colorado The Ranch —Steamboat Springs 1 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-06H May 27, 1982 Shadow Mountain Resort 45-750 San Luis Rey Ave Palm Desert,CA 92260 AM: Ted Lennon Re: Perimeter fencing required by Case No.DP 07-77 and 77 MF Dear Ted: It has come to our attention that Condition No. 16 of Planning Commission Resolution No. 249(Case No. DP 07-77) requiring 6 foot high chain link fencing, has not been fulfilled. The fence is required along the south property line of your development between the Shadow Mountain Golf Course clubhouse and course maintenance building. You indicated in a letter dated October 21, 1977 (see attached), that the fence would be installed in conjunction with development of the adjacent area. Development has since occurred without the fence being installed. 1 Please take steps to install the required fencing and inform us of when the work will be done. Should you need any clarification please feel free to contact this office. Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours, 4AMON A. OIAZ DIRECTOR OF ENVIR NMENTAL SERVICES RAD/lcr Enclosure .a October 21, 1977 1l • \ d \ RESORT AND RACQUET CLUB Mr. Paul A. Williams 73-80 Fairway on.e Secretary, Faun open c.nrom'a 9ZVW Palm Desert Planning Commission - reiprmne pu�m.66tm City of Palm Desert Palm D sert,l^�a2�(,ane Palm Desert�Ca. 922 RE: Case Flo. 77MF -iPalm Desert Venture, Ltd. Dear Paul• - In answer to the staff recommendation dated October 11, 1977 Palm Desert Venture would like to make clear the following: 1. Undergrounding on San Luis Rey will be done in conjunction with the construction of units on San Luis Rey. 2. Timers on tennis court lights were installed three months ago. 0Chain link fence on south property line between golf clubhouse and maintenance shed will be done in conjunction with the development of that portion of the property. Grading and a retaining wall is required prior to the fence con- struction. 4. Twenty five additional parking spaces are being bonded as an imporvement plan with the city as a requirement of obtaining the final tract map. 5. The trash enclosure redesign will be subject to recommendation of Palm �� mpanallon RporlMppemptlnc. '`>J OMe,flpOlp:Taa elnt—.40p,CGIafaCa�COp,EY LIC—ldke TaaOO,aOvaEa J Page Two October 21, 1977 Mr. Paul A. Williams, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission Re: Case No. 77 MF 5. (continued) Desert Disposal for that area. We hope to have their input prior to the Design Review Board meeting. 6. Completion of Club Circle Drive, please refer to item 4. Club Circle Dr_ is being banded as Part of the improvement plan in order to obtain a final tract map. Club Circle Dr. will be built in conjunction with any of the phases in 77MF. 7. Landscaping plans are now in Your possession. S. Fire access review has been completed and approved by Fire Marshal Engle. 9. Perimeter wall on Club Circle Dr. will be built as soon as Possible along with landscap- ing prior to receiving building Permit for any new phases. The Perimeter wall at Fairway Cottages and golf course will be completed prior to permit request for 12 unit pahse in 77MF. See attached re approval of wall. This letter may be attached as an agreement by Palm Desert venture, Ltd. to perform the above. Sincerely, Ted A: Lennon ----- vice President. f RESOLUTION NO. 151; CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 7,,DLJ Q - / 7 CASE NO. CUP 03-73 Q7 1. The development of this project shall conform substantially to all development plans submitted in behalf of this case (Exhibit A) , and as revised according to Planning Commission action. Any minor changes require approval by the Director of Environmental Services. Any sub- stantial change requires approval by the Planning Commission. 2. All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of the State„ City, and other applicable government entity shall be complied with as part of the development process. ' 3. This approval is applicable, subject to the development of this project commencing within one year from approval date and being promptly completed. 4. A landscaping plan (with irrigation system) shall be provided as approved 1 by the Design Review Board Process for installation prior to final inspec- tion and receiving certificate of occupancy. 5. Curb, gutter, curb cuts, and tie-in paving shall be provided for by means of installation, along San Luis Rey. Construction shall conform to City i of Palm Desert Standards. Jfl. 6. Sewer hookup shall be made if mains exist within 200 feet of property. 7. A 6 foot decorative masonry wall shall be installed along the easterly and northerly property line. 8. Heavy landscape treatment shall be installed along said wall in a manner acceptable to the Design Review Board Process. 9. Existing tennis court lights shall be modified in a manner acceptable to the Design Review Board Process. 10. The existing free standing sign shall be removed before any building permits are issued. 11. The entry at Juniper Street shall be improved with the first phase of development. 12. Utility lines along San Luis Rey shall be placed underground. -- 13. Proposed parking spaces along the easterly property line of the project shall be improved. 14. The grading along the north and east property line shall match the grades of the adjacent R-1 lots along Shadow Lake Drive. 15. All existing and proposed tennis court lighting shall be placed on automatic timers. 16. The two most northerly buildings shall be re-designed to provide for a single-story limitation. 17. Parking areas shall be lighted in a manner acceptable to the Design Review Board Process. Zar o agree to the above listed conditions. w— .-4 TFo or, ) (Applicant Signature ate PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 249 ,A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNOUNCING FINDINGS AND GRANTING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO AN EXISTING. DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF 22 CONDOMINIUM UNITS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF SAN LUIS REY AND JUNIPER BY AMEND- ING PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 151. CASE NO. DP 07-77 WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Palm Desert Zoning Code, the Planning Commission did on May 31, 1977 hold a duly-noticed Public Hearing, and on June 14, 1977 a continued Public Hearing to .consider the application of PALM DESERT VENTURE, LTD. , for approval of an Amendment to an existing Development Plan to allow construction of 22 condominium units on property located in the PR-7 Zone and situated east of San Luis Rey and Juniper and more particularly described as: A Portion of SE '„ Section 20, T5S, R6E, S.B.B. & M. and M Tract 4545 (CM 015/171 175) WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Environmental Quality Procedure- Resolution Number 77-7 in that the Director of Environmental Services has determined on May 10, 1977, that the project would not have a significant impact on the environment and the appeal period did expire on May 31, 1977; and WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Com- mission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify the granting of said approval : 1. The proposed development is consistent with the City's adopted General Plan. 2. The proposed use is similar to and compatible with those existing on adjacent and nearby properties. 3. The design or improvement of the proposed development as modified by the recommended conditions will be consistent with the Palm Desert Zoning Ordinance. am 4. The site is physically suited for both the type of development pro- posed and the proposed density, as modified by the recommended condi- tions. 5. The design of the development as amended by the recommended conditions and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial en- vironmental damage or have a serious effect on the public health, safety, and general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission in this case; Case No. DP 07-77 Planning Cununission Resolution No. 249 2. The approval of the Amendment to the Development Plan is granted to Palm Desert Venture, Ltd. , for reasons by the Amendment of Planning Commission Resolution No. 151 as follows: Modify Existing Conditions Action New Wording 1 Revise The development of this project shall cor form substantially to all development plr submitted in behalf of this case, Case Nc DP 07-77, Exhibits A-I , I-1-; and H-4, an( as revised according to Planning Commis- sion action. Any minor changes require approval by the Director of Environmental Services. Any substantial change require approval by the Planning Commission. 7 Delete 13 Delete 8-12 Re-number to 7-11 14-17 Re-number to 13-15 Add the following new conditions: 16. A six (6) foot chain link fence shall be constructed along the property line between Shadow. Mountain Resort and Racquet Club and Shadow Mountain Golf Course. The subject fence shall extend from the existing golf club house westerly toward that point in the vicinity of the golf course maintenance building where the fence will connect with the wall proposed for Case No. DP 06-77 phase of the project. 17. A minimum of twenty-five (25) additional parking spaces shall be provided east of the existing forty (40) studio units and west of Club Circle to accommodate anticipated increase in restaurant patrons and employees. 18. No building permits shall be issued by the Department of Building and Safety until a six (6) foot masonry wall and related landscaping is totally constructed along the east and north property lines parallel to Club Circle. 19. A masonry wall and a mesh/wrought iron fence shall be constructed between the proposed units on the southeastern portion of the project and Fairview Cottages. The location, design, materials, and point of transition from masonry to wrought iron shall be approved by the Design Review Board. Said wall/fence shall be in- stalled' prior to issuance of building permits for the adjacent new units. 20. Any and all proposed tennis court lighting shall be submitted to the Design Review Board for approval . 21. The applicant shall comply with all of the requirements of the City Fire Marshall per the attached letter. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Plan- ning Commission, held on this 14th day of June, 1977, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: KELLY, READING, BERKEY NOES: KRYDER ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: SNYDER GEORGE BERKEY, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: PAUL A. WILLIAMS .SECRETARY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION _ DEPARTMENT OF FIRE PROTECTION f# •Ct^i -pF,w IN COOPERATION WITH THE a CO(7NTY �T{-- ( CALIFORNIA DIVISION OF FORESTRY \:ICY'.• —* o. TYY':'_o ' n- R11'ERSIDE !.111-, DAVID L. FLAKE COUNTY FIRE WARDEN P.O. BOX 248 210 WEST SAN JACINTO-S.TRE ET PERRIS, CALIFORNIA 9237( TELEPHONE (7741 657-3183 May 17, 1977 Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Re: Case No. DP 06-77 & DP 07-77 Gentlemen: Prior to construction of any of the proposed buildings, the follow- ing conditions must be met: 1 . Install a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow _ for a two (2) hour duration in addition to domestic or other supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the ! flow is measured at the time of measurement. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. A. Hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. B. Exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. C. Curbs (if installed) shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall fur- nish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. Upon approval , one copy will be sent to the Building Department, and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engi- neer and approved by the water company, with the following certif- ication: "I certify that the design of the water system in Case No. DP 06-77 & DP 07-77 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal ." h -- ------- -_-----------, , -2- 5. The proposed buildings on the west end of Fairway would pose some real problems for the Fire Department because of the limited access. The buildings should be located so an emer- gency vehicle can drive within 100 feet of all points of the building. Also with only ten feet between the rear of the proposed building and a fence it would hamper our efforts to fight a fire from the rear of the building. We would recom- mend that this building be relocated to a point where there is clear access for fire equipment in the front and twenty feet in the rear. Bud Engel Fire Marshal BE/ks I j I. i I. MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY - JUNE 14, 1977 7:00 PM - CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS I. CALL TO ORDER The regularly scheduled meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission was called to order by Chairman Berkey at 7:00 p.m. in the. Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall . II. PLEDGE - Commissioner KRYDER III. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioner KELLY Commissioner KRYDER Commissioner READING Commissioner SNYDER Chairman BERKEY Also Present: Paul A. Williams - Director of Environmental Services Hunter Cook - City Engineer Ralph Cipriani - Associate Planner Sam Freed - Assistant Planner Marcie Johnson - Planning Secretary IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. MINUTES of the Planning Commission meeting of May 31, 1977. - Commissioner Kelly requested that the following deletion be made: Page 10, 1st paragraph, 4th line, delete - "and up. ". A motion of Commissioner Reading, seconded by Commissioner Kelly, to approve the minutes of the May 31, 1977 meeting, with the above-mentioned deletion, was unanimously carried. V. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS Mr. Williams noted that the only written communications were those dealing with the cases on tonight's agenda and would be discussed at the appropriate times. VI . PUBLIC HEARINGS Chairman Berkey explained the Public Hearing procedures to those present. A. CONTINUED CASE NO. DP 07-77, PALM DESERT VENTURE, LTD. , APPLICANT Request for approval of a Development Plan Amendment to allow construction of 23 condominium units as a part of the Shadow Mountain Resort and Racquet Club, located east of San Luis Rey and south of Shadow Lake Drive. (Continued from the Planning Commission meeting of May 31, 1977.) Mr. Williams explained that this case had been continued from the last meeting to allow for some discussion to occur between the adjacent pro- perty owners and the applicant with regards to the fencing and perimeter walls. Further, revised plans had been submitted which were the 4th re- vision to the 13 units off of Fairway Drive and the 10 units on the northerly boundary. Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission June 14, 1977 Page Two Since the last meeting, the 13 units have been reduced to 12 units and additional covered parking spaces have been deleted. Mr. Williams showed the revised site plan to the Commissioners. He also explained the applicant's new proposal which includes the two-story units being approximately 22 foot in height, wrought iron fencing, 44 parking spaces (24 covered) , unlighted tennis courts , and a small maintenance building. Mr. Williams stated that staff was still suggesting that the tennis courts be re-located or modified to allow for 25 additional parking - spaces; however, the parking did comply with the zoning requirements. Mr. Williams stated that it appears that the applicant has resolved the concerns of the Fairview Cottages to staff's satisfaction. Finally, he stated that staff was recommending that the Planning Commission approve Resolution No. 249 (Amendment of Planning. Commission Resolution No. 151) with the following changes to the existing Conditions of Approval No. 1: 1 The development of this project shall conform substantially 11 Y to all development plans submitted in behalf of this case, Case No. DP 07-77, Exhibits A-I , I-1, and H-4, and as revised according to Planning Commission action. Any minor changes require approval by the Director of Environmental Services. Any substantial change requires approval by the Planning Com- mission. Mr. Williams also reviewed the Conditions of Approval with the Commis- sioners and suggested that the Commissioners may want to consider an amendment to the condition regarding fencing in the southerly area. Further, he stated that since the last meeting, the Commission had received an additional letter from a property owner to the north, Mr. Philip Jefferson - listing his concerns with regards to the tennis courts and lights and the two-story building that was being contem- plated in front of his property. Chairman Berkey asked if the Commissioners had any questions at this time. There were none. Mr. Williams passed out copies of Planning Commission Resolution No. 151 to the Commissioners stating that they had been inadvertently left out of their packets. Chairman Berkey stated that before calling on the applicant to speak and opening the Public Hearing, he would like to note for the record that the Planning Commission had met in a Study Session prior to tonight's meeting for the purpose of clarifying staff reports. Fur- ther, he stated that no decisions were made at the session. Chairman Berkey declared the Public Hearing open on Case No. .DP 07-77 and asked if the applicant was present. SKIP BEHRHORST, Vice-President of Destination Resort Corporation, Aspen, Colorado, spoke to the Commissioners and informed them that since the last meeting, he and Mr. Bizzell (President of Fairview Cottages) had reached a workable agreement regarding the re-design of the 13 units. Further, the one-story element next to Fairview Cottages satisfied the concerns that the Fairview Cottage Associa- tion had. Also, an extension of the masonry wall to the southeast would provide additional security and protection: Mr. Behrhorst then stated that he had discussed the new Condition of Approval No. 18 with staff regarding the concept of issuing building permits prior to installing a masonry wall and he was requesting that build- ing permits be changed to read certificate of occupancy. Chairman Berkey asked if there was anyone present wishing to speak in FAVOR of the project. Being no one, he then asked if there was anyone wishing to speak in OPPOSITION to the project. Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission June 14, 1977 Page Three MR: PHILIP B. JEFFERSON, Del Mar, California, spoke to the Com- mission regarding the importance of the proposed wall . He also stated that he felt the tennis courts should be unlighted. Fur- ther, he was happy to see the re-design of the. one-story building. HELEN HUNTINGTON, 73-820 Shadow Lake Drive, spoke to the Commis- sion and stated that she felt the wording should not be changed on Condition No. 18 regarding the issuance of building permits prior to the installation of the masonry wall . Further, she stated that originally it was agreed that the only two-story units were to be located around the pool area and she would like it to remain that way. She also stated that she was strongly against the tennis courts on the perimeter. 'Ms. Huntington also questioned the location of the air conditioning units on the roof. MARY JANE BEAN, 73-901 Shadow Lake Drive, spoke to the Commission and questioned the location of the maintenance building. Mr. Williams pointed out the location of the proposed maintenance building on the map. Ms. Bean then asked if there was to be any lighting on the tennis courts. Mr. Williams answered there would be no lighting. Ms. Bean questioned when the road improvements were going to be made around the perimeter. Mr. Williams stated that these improvements would have to go in at the j same time as the wall construction. Chairman Berkey asked if there was anyone else wishing to speak in OPPOSITION to the project. Being no one, he asked the applicant if he cared to make a brief rebuttal . Mr. Behrhorst stated that they would be building the wall during the time that the additional 67 units would be under construction. . With regards to the tennis courts, they had been reduced from 3 to 2 in the area around the 10 units and from 4 courts to 3 courts north of the "Y" building. Mr. Williams pointed out these areas on the map. Mr. Behrhorst also stated that the road would be improved from a construction standpoint as soon as possible at the commencement of construction of the 12 units. He also spoke regarding their financial obligation for the undergrounding of the utility lines and the cost burden involved. Chairman Berkey asked the Commissioners if they had. any questions of the applicant. Commissioner Reading asked if the units that Ms. Huntington had referred j I to on top of buildings were indeed air conditioning units. Mr. Behrhorst stated that they were air conditioning units, that they were properly screened and that they had been approved by the Design Review Board. Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission June 14, 1977 Page Four Commissioner Kryder asked about the timing for the construction of the wall . Mr. Behrhorst stated that the wall should be completed by October of this year. Commissioner Reading was concerned about golf ball .protection for the northerly units. Mr. Behrhorst stated they would physically look at the area to see if it needed additional screening. Commissioner Reading then stated that he felt it would be best for the applicant to install the wall prior to construction to protect the construction workers from being hit by golf balls. Mr. Behrhorst stated that it would be difficult to get the equipment in if the wall was installed first and that there were other ways to protect the construction workers. There was a short discussion pertaining to wrought iron/mesh fencing. Commissioner Reading asked staff when the wrought iron fence was going in and if it would have to be approved through the Design Review Board process. Mr. Williams stated that this matter would be addressed as a part of the Design Review Board process. Commissioner Reading asked where the additional 25 parking spaces would be located. Mr. Behrhorst stated they would be to the northeast of the "Y" building along Circle Drive and that the tennis courts had been re-designed to accommodate the additional parking. Commissioner Reading and Mr. Behrhorst then discussed the James Franciscus Tennis Tournament and the impact it would have on the parking situation. Mr. Ted Lennon stated that there was the possibility that the Club would be purchasing a "shuttle bus" for the property and that this bus would be used during the Tournament. Further, this was a once-a-year charity event and that possibly an agreement could be worked out with the merchants/banks along El Paseo to use their parking facilities for this event. Chairman Berkey asked if there were any further questions. Commissioner Kelly felt that the wrought iron fence could pose an access problem if it were installed prior to construction. Chairman Berkey closed the Public Hearing on Case No. DP 07-77 and asked for the pleasure of the Commission. Commissioner Reading stated that he realized that it would provide a financial burden; however, he felt that the wall provisions should be as written in Conditions No. 18 and No. 19. Mr. Williams suggested a re-wording for Condition No. 19 as follows: 1. J 1x- 49vw,:-A•masonry wall and a mesh/wrought iron fence shall be con- structed between the proposed units on the southeastern portion of the project and Fairview Cottages. The location, design, materials, and point of transition from masonry to wrought iron shall be approved by the Design Review Board. Said wall/fence shall be installed prior to issuance of building permits for the adjacent new units. Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commissi-on June 14, 1977 Page Five Commissioner Kelly stated that she agreed with the condition as suggested .' by staff. Further, she commended the developer for working with the. resi- dents and staff to resolve the problems that had been encountered. Commissioner Kryder felt that the building permits should not be held up as this would pose a financial burden .un the applicant. Commissioner Snyder stated that he would abstain from the matter. Chairman Berkey asked if there were any additional questions. There were none. Commissioner Kelly moved that the Planning Commission approve Resolution No. 249, amending Planning Commission Resolution No. 151, with the amendments as suggested by staff pertaining to Condition No. 1 and Condition No. 19. Com- missioner Reading seconded the motion. The motion carried 3-1 with the following vote: AYES: KELLY, READING, BERKEY NOES: KRYDER ABSTAIN: SNYDER Chairman Berkey again commended the applicant for his cooperation during the hearing process. B. CONTINUED CASE NO. CUP -05-76, JOHNSON & BARBATTI, APPLICANTS Request for an Extension of Time for a Conditional Use Permit to operate a parking lot in an R-3(4) zone and a Variance for setback requirements. (Continued from the Planning Commission meeting of May 31, 1977. ) Mr. Williams explained that this case had been continued to allow staff time to look at a revised site plan for a proposed office building to be located westerly of Portola Avenue and Highway 111. Mr. Williams showed the revised site plan for the two-story, 3,800 square foot office building. He added that this site plan had not been through the Design Review Board process as yet. The applicant had submitted the plans to show what she intends to do with the property, showing the proposed off- site parking which would be located approximately 300 .feet away from the proposed building. Finally, he stated that staff was recommending ap- proval of Planning Commission Resolution No. 250 for an extension of time of one year. Chairman Berkey asked if there were any questions of staff at this time. Being none, he opened the Public Hearing on Case No. CUP 05-76 and asked if the applicant was present. SHIRLEY JOHNSON, 73-960 Highway 111, spoke to the Commission and stated that she had just wanted to show the Commissioners her pro- posed P posed plans for the property. Chairman Berkey asked if the Commissioners had any questions. Being none, he asked if there was anyone present wishing to speak either in FAVOR of or OPPOSED to the request. Being no one, he closed the Public Hearing and asked for the pleasure of the Commission. .I Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission June 14, 1977 Page Six Commissioner Snyder moved that the Planning Commission approve Reso- lution No. 250, granting the extension of time for one year and the Variance for the setback requirements for said property. Commissioner Kelly seconded the motion; motion unanimously carried (5-0) . Mrs. Johnson asked if the extension would be for one year from today's date. Mr. Williams answered yes. VII. OLD BUSINESS None VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. DISCUSSION OF COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT EIR OF THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE •CITY OF INDIO GENERAL PLAN. Mr. Williams stated that the City of Indio is .presently revising their general plan which was adopted in 1965. The document received by the City of Palm Desert is the draft EIR for the new Land Use Element. Further, the draft EIR provides a summary of the general. land use im- pacts that would result from adoption of the new element, which is broken down into a short-range and a long-range plan. The staff's only comment regarding the EIR is that there is some confusion re- garding the goals and the impact of the land use plan. Therefore, staff was recommending that the Planning Commission, by Minute Motion, direct staff to forward its comments to the City of Indio for inclusion in the final EIR. Said draft letter containing the comments was in- cluded in the Commissioner' s packets for this meeting. Commissioner Snyder commented that the draft letter was very well done: Commissioner Reading moved that the Commission direct staff to forward their comments to the City of Indio. Commissioner Kryder seconded the motion; motion unanimously carried (5-0) . B. COUNTY CASE NO. EIR-64 Consideration of Staff Comments on County Referral - Palm Isles Draft EIR Mr. Williams gave a brief background on this project. He explained that the City had been requested to comment on the draft EIR for a Change of Zone request to build a 960-unit residential condominium project which would be located in the blowsand area north of Palm Desert Greens. Fur- ther, staff felt that the EIR is technically deficient in many areas such as air quality degradation, protection of endangered wildlife, energy con- servation, access, and the impacts of blowsand mitigation measures. Mr. Williams then asked the Commission to direct staff, by Minute Motion, to forward the comments as contained in the staff report to the County. Commissioner Kelly was concerned about the only access being the extension of Frank Sinatra Drive. Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission June 14, 1977 Page Seven There was a short discussion pertaining to endangered species of wild- ' life. Chairman Berkey asked that the following sentence be deleted from the staff comments: "#11, page 55 - An example of this phenomenon can be seen at Del Safari where Cook Street was constructed along the west side of the project in a manner similar to that being proposed for Palm Isles. " His reason for asking for the deletion was that it was an inaccurate statement in that Cook Street is not adjacent to Del Safari and that Cook Street was there long before the Del Safari pro- ject came into existence. Staff agreed with the deletion. Commissioner Reading moved that the Planning Commission, by Minute Motion, direct staff to forward their comments to the Riverside County Planning Commis- sion. Commissioner Snyder seconded the motion. Commissioner Kryder asked if he could abstain from the matter due to a possible conflict of interest. Chair- man Berkey stated that this would have to be Commissioner Kryder's own_ personal decision. The motion carried 4-0 with the following vote: AYES: KELLY, READING, SNYDER, BERKEY NOES: NONE ABSTAIN: KRYDER C. COUNTY CASE NO. C/Z 2208 Consideration of County Referred Change of Zone from R-1-1 (Single- Family-One Acre Lot Minimum) to R-T on property located approximately 1,300 feet northerly of the intersection of Monterey Road and Country Club Drive. Mr. Williams presented a brief background pertaining to the request to the Commission. He then stated that staff was recommending that the Planning Commission direct staff to notify the Riverside County Planning Commission that the Change of Zone request is in conflict with the Palm Desert General Plan and that the proposed use may not be appropriate for the subject pro- perty. Staff's justification is based on the following: 1. Said site is within an area designated Open Space-County Park on the Palm Desert General Plan. 2. No specific park sites have been designated on the Cove Com- munities General Plan, while new development in this area is rapidly eliminating the most logical sites. Commissioner Reading moved that the Planning Commission, by Minute Motion , direct staff to notify the County that the change of zone request is in conflict with the Palm Desert General Plan. Commissioner Kelly seconded the motion; motion unanimously carried (5-0). IX. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ITEMS A. Review of Cases Acted on by the Design Review Board at their meeting of June 7, 1977. Chairman Berkey asked staff if these items should be set back to the end of the Agenda or discussed at this time. Mr. Williams replied that due to the number of interested parties in the audience, it would be appropriate to discuss these items at this time. Further, due to the unique situation with regards to item No. 8 on the DRB agenda (Case No. 76MF) , this case should be discussed separately and there was a separate resolution drafted for said case. Mr. Williams then asked Mr. Cipriani to review the Design Review Board cases with the Commissioners. Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission June 14, 1977 Page Eight The first case Mr. Cipriani presented to the Commission was Case No. 58SA - Sign for a Commercial Structure for ROY WILLIAM CARVER. Mr. Cipriani gave a background of the request and explained that the ORB had upheld their previous decision to approve the sign program as modified at their meeting of May 24, 1977. BERNARD LEUNG, 73-960 E1 Paseo, Architect for the project, spoke to the Commission regarding the .modification of the approved sign program by reducing the length of the facia signs from 12 feet to 8 feet. There was a discussion between the Commissioners, staff, and Mr. Leung concerning the proposed reduction in the length of the facia, the original ORB approval , and conformance to the City's Sign Ordinance. It was de- cided to delete Condition No. 4 from the Conditions for this case. (Condition No. 4 reads as follows: "Each business shall be permitted one (1) four (4) square foot hanging tenant sign. Such signs may be two- sided."). CASE NO. 75MF - Preliminary Site, Floor, and Elevation Plans for a 217-Unit Condominium Project for SILVER SPUR ASSOCIATES. Mr. Cipriani explained that this was the continuing development of Ironwood Country Club and contained the same layout and design as the previous phases. Mr. Williams informed the Commission that they would be seeing this project as a Tentative Tract at their next meeting scheduled for July 5, 1977. CASE NO. 23SA - Sign Program for Palms to Pines for ROY WILLIAM CARVER Mr. Cipriani reviewed the applicant's proposal and the Design Review Board's decision regarding this case. He also explained that the existing signs would be removed. Further, the new signs would read "Palms to Pines East and "Palms to Pines West". Finally, the project would end up with 6 directory signs and 4 welcome signs. Mr. Williams explained that these would be map-type signs and they would not be visible from passing vehicles. CASE NO. 53C - New Elevations and Revised Site Plan for an Existing Restaurant for CARL COX Mr. Cipriani explained that this was a remodel of an existing structure formerly known as the Tortilla Flats Restaurant. There were no major changes to the structure itself, just changes to the exterior. Mr. Cipriani showed pictures of the structure to the Commissioners. Finally, he explained that a six (6) foot masonry wall would be installed at the rear of the property adjacent to Garden Square. Commissioner Reading moved that the Planning Commission approve Resolution No. 251, with the deletion of Condition No. 4 for Case No. 58SA. Commissioner Snyder seconded the motion; motion unanimously carried (5-0) . CASE NO. 76MF - Preliminary and Final Site, Floor, and Elevation Plans for a 193-Unit Condominium Project for BIDDLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. Mr. Williams explained that there was a unique situation with regards to this case which required the preparation of a separate resolution. He explained that the Design Review Board abstained from any decision on this case and referred the matter to the Planning Commission. Further, the ORB had sympathized with the applicant and felt that it would prove a hardship to require the applicant to provide for single-story units along Highway 74 at this stage of the process. Also, the Planning Commission had already ap- proved the two-story units. Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission June 14, 1977 Page Nine Mr. Williams then stated that staff felt the Planning Commission would be within their rights to place a single-story limitation for the ] .units pro- posed along Highway 74 and that the draft Resolution No. 252 indicated same. At this time, Mr. Cipriani addressed the Commission and informed them that the applicant had, just prior to tonight' s meeting, submitted new plans eliminating all two-story units to be located within 150 feet of Highway 74 and that the applicant had been extremely cooperative and helpful . Mr. Cipriani then gave a brief background of the project including size, loca- tion, number of units, square footage, etc. Chairman Berkey asked if the plans had been reviewed by the Design Review Board. Mr. Cipriani answered yes and that the DRB was agreeable. He then showed the color/material sample boards for all the units. MARSHALL FANT, Executive Vice President of BIDDLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, spoke to the Commission regarding the feasibility of solar heating for the pools. He stated that they had previously received a report on this matter and hoped to work it out. He also stated that the easement situation had been resolved. Mr. Cipriani then informed the Commission that ORB member Eric Johnson, landscape architect, had not had an opportunity to review the landscaping plan for this project and that #3 on page 1 of Resolution No. 252 allowed for this review. Commissioner Snyder moved that the Planning Commission approve Resolution No. 252 as presented by staff. Commissioner Reading seconded the motion; motion - unanimously carried (5-0) . THERE WAS A BRIEF RECESS AT 8:50 P.M. THE MEETING WAS RECONVENED AT 9:00 P.M. X. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Discussion of Mandatory State Guidelines for Preparation of the Housing Element for General Plans. Mr. Williams told the Commission that this item had been presented for informational purposes and that it was the third draft of the State Housing Element Guidelines. Further, this housing element must be up- dated at least once every five years. The housing element in the adopted Palm Desert General Plan appears to be in conformance to the new guide- lines in terms of housing goals and objectives. Chairman Berkey asked if we would have to revise our Housing Element entirely. Mr. Williams answered that if these proposed guidelines were adopted, there would be some minor revisions to our housing element. There was a brief discussion pertaining to the above between the Com- missioners and staff. Commissioner Kryder commented that staff's pre- . sentation was very clear and concise. Commissioner Kelly agreed with Commissioner Kryder. Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission June 14, 1977 Page Ten B. DISCUSSION OF THE DRAFT REGIONAL HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN PREPARED BY THE COACHELLA VALLEY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS. A discussion period ensued and the consensus of the Commission seemed to be that this document really doesn 't apply to Palm Desert. The Com- mission did have the following comments with regards to said document: 1. The proposed document should be condensed. 2. Said document should emphasize reducing "red-tape" to allow for development of additional housing units. 3. Said document should emphasize greater citizen involvement at the neighborhood level . C. REVIEW OF PRELIMINARY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1977/78 Mr. Williams explained that this discussion item had been reviewed by the City Manager during the Study Session prior to tonight's meeting. He also stated that staff was recommending approval of Planning Commis- sion Resolution No. 253, which recommends approval of said Budget to the City Council . A brief discussion period ensued between the Commissioners , staff, and the City Entineer. They discussed the cleanup of previous projects and the sprinkler system at the Community Park. Commissioner Kelly moved, by Minute Motion, that the Planning Commission believes that the City Council should consider developing a program to get the Community Park on a watering system that would allow for watering during off hours of usage and that the Council should give this matter high priority. Com- missioner Snyder seconded the motion; motion unanimously carried (5-0) . Commissioner Kelly moved that the Planning Commission approve Resolution No. 253. Commissioner Kryder seconded the motion; motion unanimously carried (5-0) . D. REVIEW OF THE MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN FOR THE CITY OF PALM DESERT Mr. Williams explained that this item was really presented as an informal item because once the City Council is satisfied with it, the Planning Commission will be reviewing it as a possible amendment to the General Plan. City Engineer Cook told the Commissioners that additional copies of the Master Drainage Plan would be available within the next year, printed ' in color with meaningful exhibits. I i The Commission decided to table the matter until the additional copies were made available. 1 Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission ' June 14, 1977 Page Eleven E. DISCUSSION OF THE PRELIMINARY DRAFT OF THE COLLEGE OF THE DESERT SPECIFIC PLAN AREA. Mr. Williams explained that this item was passed out at the last Plan- ning Commission meeting on May 31, 1977; however, there was not sufficient time to discuss the matter. He asked the Commission to consider a special meeting in July to finalize the discussion due to the fact that there was additional work needed regarding the Circulation Element. Mr. Williams told the Commissioners that at the time that the Planning Schedule was passed out at the July 5th meeting, staff would ask the Commission to establish a special meeting for either the second or third week in July for the final discussion on this matter. Further, staff would try to get everything finalized regarding the "S" (Study) zones and initiate neetings with the public for their input. Mr. Williams stated that Mr. Meisterlin and Mr. Arnold had submitted their proposal for Parcel A, which is zoned "S" at this time. Further, this area has been discussed on a number of occasions. CARL MEISTERLIN, 73-261 Highway 111, spoke to the Commission and . told them that the street system which had been recommended by staff was agreeable to him. He then showed the proposed plans for the parcel . There was a brief discussion pertaining to the unique characteristics of the entire area, i .e. historical sites, etc. ; improvements needed in the entire area; the three "S" zones; the proposed golf course; and whether or not the staff had been in contact with the property owners in the area. Mr. Williams told the Commissioners that staff would get together with Mr. Meisterlin and Mr. Arnold to resolve their differences between now and the meeting of July 5th. It was decided that Public Hearing procedures should be initiated at the next meeting for the three "S" zoned parcels. XI. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None XII. COMMENTS A. City Staff Mr. Williams informed the Commission that staff had discussed with the City Council at their last study session the matter of changing the meeting times for the Planning Commission meetings. The Council had agreed that Wednesday afternoon at 1:00 p.m. would be an appro- priate time for the "study session" meeting of the Planning Commission and that this matter would be on the next scheduled Council meeting of June 23, 1977. Further, if adopted by the Council , the new meeting time and day would become effective the second Planning Commission meeting in July. Mr. Williams then told the Commission that the City Council had established a new Undergrounding Utility District No. 4 for the area between El Paseo and Highway 111, east of Portola Avenue. Further, that the City Council would go 50/50 on the cost for the existing buildings. Also, the owners would be responsible for any overhead service lines to be undergrounded. Finally, according to Rule 20B, the three participants in the cost would be the property owners, the City, and the utility companies. Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission June 14, 1977 Page Twelve Mr: Williams also informed the Commission that Mr. Carver had withdrawn his appeal regarding the signage for E1 Paseo Square. B. City Attorney None C. Planning Commissioners None XIII . ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Snyder moved to adjourn the meeting. Commissioner Reading seconded the motion and the meeting was adjourned at :9:55 p.m. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY ATTEST: GEORGE BERKEY, CHAIRMAN PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION I I i l �x CITY of PALM DESERT STAFF REPORT To: Planning Commission Report On: Amendment to an Existing Development Plan to Construct 23 Condominium Units Applicant: PALM DESERT VENTURE LTD. Case No. : DP 07-77 I. REQUEST: Request for .jp val_ of a Development Plan Amendment to allow construction of 23 condominium units and maintenance building as a part of the Shadow Mountain Resort and Racquet Club, located east of San Luis Rey and south of Shadow Lake Drive. II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve a modified Amendment by Planning Commission Resolution No. subject to compliance with the Conditions of Approval. Justification is based upon the following: 1. The proposed development is consistent with the City's adopted General Plan. 2. The proposed use is similar to and compatible with those existing on adjacent and nearby properties. 3. The design or improvement o•f the proposed development as modified by the recommended conditions will be consistent.w,i_th the Palm Desert-, Zoning Ordinance. 4. The site is physically suited for both the type of development proposed and the proposed density as modified by the recommended conditions. 5. The design of the development as amended by the recommended conditions and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial. en- vironmental damage or have a serious effect on the public health, safety, and general welfare. III. BACKGROUND: A. Description: The subject property is located east of San Luis Rey and Juniper, and is more particularly described as the SE �4, Section 20, TSS, R6E, SBB & M and M:-Tract 4545 (CM 015/171/175) . B. Location: The subject property is located on the east side of San Luis Rey Avenue, slightly more than one quarter mile 'south of Highway 1117' C. Size: Approximately 3.8 acres in this phase. D. Total Number of Units: 23 units in this phase and 97 units overall. E. Density: 6.3 units per acre in this phase and 5. 1 units per acre overall. F. Coverage: Approximately 47.5% of the gross area will be covered by structure or paving. Approximately 54% of the area will be in open space or recreational space. G. EIR Finding: An environmental impact report was filed on the overall project in June of 1973. The current proposal is sub- stantially in conformance with original development plan and no further environmental documentation is required Planning Commission Staff Report Case No. DP 07-77 May 31, 1977 Page Two III. BACKGROUND: G. EIR Finding: (continued) by law. A Negative Declaration was filed on May, 10, 1977, and the appeal period has expired. H. Existing Zoning: PR-7 I. Adjacent Zoning: North - R-1-12,000 South - O.S. East - PR-7 West - R-1-16,000 and R-1-20,000 J. General Plan Commitment: Low Density, 3-5 dwelling units per acre. K. Utilities: Water and Sewer - Coachella Valley County Water District Power - Southern California Edison Company Gas - Southern California Gas Company Telephone - General Telephone Company L. Type of Units: The project will consist of two and three bedroom condominium units ranging in size from 1,078 to 1,459 square feet. M. Parking: Each unit has two covered spaces. There are:.a total of 47 covered spaces and 50 uncovered spaces. N. Previous Action: The Conditional Use Permit approved for this case in 1974 provided for 108 units in the overall Development Plan. The following is a summary of the various amend- ments that have occurred on this project: (see page 3) The present Development Plan Amendment proposal involves the re-design of the ten units on the northerly-most portion of the project to conform to the single-story limitation applied by Planning Commission Resolution No. 151; re-configuration of the 13 approved units off Fairway; and the of a proposed maintenanceobuilding. IV. DISCUSSION OF ISSUES: A. INTRODUCTION: The total project received its original approval by the County in 1973. Since then, the project has been revised three times and this request represents the fourth revision which to some degree is in response to the requirement by the Planning Commission (CUP 03-73 Amend, Resolution No. 151) of a single-story limitation for any building along the northerly boundary .of the project. Further, the applicant is pro= posing to revise the design of thirteen units which were previously ap- proved off of Fairway Drive. Finally, the applicant is proposing to re-locate a maintenance building to the northerly boundary of the project which has resulted in the elimination of 17 over-flow parking spaces on the perimeter drive. Planning Commission Staff Report Page Three ' Case No. DP 07-77 May 31, 1977 SHADOW MOUNTAIN RESORT & RACQUET CLUB DEVELOPMENT HISTORI PROJECT AREA CUP 03-73 CUP 03-73 AMEND DP 06-77 DP 07-77 February, 1974 August, 1976 April, 1977 May, 1977 A 21 One-Story 3-plex condos Shown as "Future Units" 10 One-Story Condos Not Shown (East of San Luis Rey and 21 Covered and 34 Open Spaces 5 Two-Story Condos North of Juniper Cir.) 30 Covered and 2 Open Spaces B 33 One-Story 3-plex condos Shown as. "Future Units" 25 One-Story Condos Not Shown (East of San Luis Rey and 33 Covered and 49 Open Spaces 6 Two-Story Condos south of Juniper Circle) 62 Covered & 25 Open Spaces C 12 One-Story 3-plex condos 10 One-Story, 5-plex condos Not Shown 6 One-Story 3-plex (East of Club Circle and 21 Covered & 24 Open Spaces 18 Covered & 29 Open Spaces condos South of Shadow Lake) 4 Two-Story 4-plex condos 20 Covered & 10 Open Spaces D 30 Two-Story 6-plex condos 12 Two-Story 6-plex units Not Shown Not Shown (Central area west of 30 Covered & 31 Open Spaces 16 Two-Story 8-plex units the pool) 55 Covered & 15 Open Spaces E 6 Two-Story 6-plex condos 12 Two-Story 6-plex units Not Shown 12 Two-Story 6-plex (South of Tract 4545 6 One-Story 3-plex condos 1 One-Story condo unit units off Fairway) existing - 4 condos existing now 12 hotel units 1 One-Story condo 16 Covered & 23 Open Spaces 27 Covered & 20 Open Spaces existing - 12 hotel units TOTALS 108 Condo Units 97 Condo Units 97 Condo Units 97 Condo Units (23 6 Ft. wall indicated (51 shown & 46 Future) (46 Shown & 51 Implied) shown and 74 Impllied) on north and south No perimeter wall shown on No perimeter wall shown No perimeter wall shown property line site plan. 100 Covered & bn site plan, on site plan. 64 Open Spaces Planning Commission Staff Report Case No. DP 07-77 May 31, 1977 Page Four IV� DISCUSSION OF ISSUES A. INTRODUCTION (continued) Because of the complexity of the previous history of this project, and since this request if built will complete. the project, the staff is pro- posing to discuss all the issues related to the request individually. The ruling previous approval on the matter before the Commission is Plan- ning Commission Resolution No. 151 which will be referenced wherever ap- propriate. Said resolution is the last action on the total project except the 46 condominiums (DP 07-77) adjacent to San Luis Rey. In response to the letters received on this Amendment, the applicant has submitted a revised plan for the thirteen unit portion of the project off Fairway. Please note Exhibit H=2 and the letter from the applicant dated May 26,_f,, 1977. B. PERIMETER WALLS: Staff's principal concerns with regard to this case have centered .:around_ seeking ways to mitigate the potential adverse impacts the proposed pro- ject might have on adjacent property owners. Correspondence received from adjacent property owners indicates a desire by the owners to have masonry walls constructed in various locations in order to separate the proposed project from their respective developments. In addition to mitigating possible adverse impacts relative to circulation, traffic and noise, the walls may be viewed by adjacent property owners as a means to preserve the individuality and identity of their own developments. Staff is requiring masonry walls along the south property lines in order to achieve such a separation between the proposed project and Shadow Moun- tain Golf Club. An additional masonry wall is being required; in order to achieve separation between the proposed project and Fairview Cottages. Com- plete construction of the masonry wall which was reuqired as a condition of approval for the 1974 Conditional Use Permit is not being required prior to the issuance of any building permits as the wall has never been constructed. These three masonry walls should address the concerns of adjacent property owners with regard to separation. The applicant would like to discuss al- ternatives to. this requirement with the Planning Commission during the meeting. C. PROPOSED THIRTEEN UNITS OFF FAIRWAY (AREA E) : The thirteen units that the applicant proposes off of Fairway, if built as now proposed, would appear to be acceptable in terms of setbacks and effects on adjacent development. The original design appeared to be :better�suited even though two-story in design. However, a close analysis of the original approval and the latest, indicates that this area is much smaller than pre- viously shown. Further, the applicant has elected to split the 12 two-story units into two buildings which has pushed all the proposed units to within fifteen feet of the southern perimeter property line and twenty feet of the easterly property line, and reduced the distance between buildings to less than the required twenty feet. The result is that this portion of the pro- ject does not now appear to adversely affect adjacent development, as pointed out by the letters from adjacent property owners and the City Fire Marshall. Planning Commission Staff Report Case No. DP 07-77 May 31, 1977 Page Five IV.J DISCUSSION OF ISSUES C. PROPOSED THIRTEEN UNITS OFF FAIRWAY (AREA E) : (continued) 'The staff wrestled.with -the request of the adjacent property owners to reduce'these urilts to single-story and to maintain a minimum of twenty feet from adjacent property. The revised plan which shows a twenty foot setback from the easterly boundary and a fifteen foot setback for three points of the two buildings adjacent to said property line appears to be _ a satisfactory `approach�to mitigating the concerns of the adjacent property owners. The adjacent property owners concern for two-story in this area merits considerationronithe basis of the Planning Commission action on the northerly boundary of the total complex. Initially, the staff sup- ported the idea of limiting at least building number 2 to single-story. However, with the revised design of this portion of the project which has resulted in pushing a majority of the two-story units back even more than twenty feet from the adjacent property; and because a two-story building already exists in this area, staff is of the opinion that no benefit in terms of line-of-sight would;be gained by limiting building nunber_2 to single-story: D. TEN UNITS PROPOSED FOR THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY: As a part of Resolution No. 151, the Planning Commission as a part of review of CUP 03-73 Amend, required that the units on the northerly boundary be limited to single story. In partial. compliance with that requirement, the applicant.now proposes six single-story units on the northerly boundary of the project with a new four-unit building in the central core of the project. This has been accomplished by the deletion of a proposed tennis court. It would appear to staff that the applicant has met the intent of the Planning Commission's desire to limit building height on the northerly boundary. E. PARKING• The proposed Amendment and all previous approvals..on this project have not really addressed the total issue of parking in that the applicant has always provided a minimum of 2.5 spaces per unit. However, at this time, it is clear to staff that once this project is fully constructed, there will be a need of over-flow and/or employee parking. Previous plans did show 17 spaces on the perimeter road. Said spaces. as a part of this Amendment have been eliminated. Because this project does have restaurants, a number of employees, and does have special events which require additional parking, staff is recommending that the proposed three tennis courts near the easterly boundary of the pro- ject be eliminated and/or modified to provide for a minimum of 25 additional parking spaces. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNOUNCING FINDINGS AND GRANTING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO AN EXISTING DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO ALLOW CON- STRUCTION OFi 3)CONDOMINIUM UNITS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF SAN LUIS REY AND JUNIPER BY AMENDING PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 151. CASE NO. DP 07-77 WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Palm Desert, Zoning Code, the Planning Commission did on May 31, 1977, hold a duly-noticed Public Hearing to con- sider the application of PALM DESERT VENTURE LTD. for approval of an Amendment to an existing Development Plan to allow the construction of 23 condominium units on property located in the PR-7 Zone and situated east of San Luis Rey and Juniper and more particularly described as : A Portion of SE I;, Section 20, TSS, R6E, S.B.B. & M. and M Tract 4545 CM 015/171 175) WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Environemtnal Quality Procedure Resolution Number 77-7", in that the Director of Environmental Services has determined on May 10, 1977 that the project would not have a significant impact on the environment and the appeal period 'did expire on May 31, 1977; and WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested<:persons desiring to be heard, said Com- mission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify the granting of said approval: 1. The proposed development is consistent with the City's adopted General Plan. 2. The proposed use is similar to and compatible with those existing on adjacent and nearbyproperties. 3. The design or(Cmprov_ emeno of the proposed development as modified by the recommended conditions will be consistent with the Palm Desert Zoning Ordinance. 4. The site is physically suited for both the type of development proposed and the proposed density, as modified by the recommended conditions. 5. The design of the development as amended by the recommended conditions and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial en- vironmental damage or have a serious effect on the public health, safety, and general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission in this case; Case No. DP 07-77 Planning Commission Resolution No._ 2. The approval of the Amendment to the Development Plan is granted to PALM DESERT VENTURE LTD. , for reasons by the Amendment of Planning Commission Resolution No. 151 as follows: . ' Modify.Existing Conditions Action New Wording 1 Revise The development of this project shall con- form substantially to all development - - - plans submitted in behalf of _this case Case No. DP 07-77, Exhibits A-I and H-2;-, Sand as revised according to Planning Com1� mission action, Any minor changes require approval by the Director of Environmental— _Services. Any substantial change- requires approval by the Planning Commission` 7 Delete 13 Delete 8-12 Re-number to 7-11 14-17 Re-number to 13-15 Add the following new Conditions: 16. A six (6) foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the property line between Shadow Mountain Resort and Racquet Club and Shadow Mountain Golf Course. The subject wall shall extend from the existing golf club house westerly (toward ;' that point in the vicinity of the golf course maintenance building where the subject wall will connect with the wall proposed for DP 06-77 phase of the overall project. 17. A minimum of twnety-five (25) additional parking spaces shall be provided east of the existing 40 studio units and west of Club Circle to accommodate antici- pated increase inrestaurant patrons and employees. 18. Construction in the vicinity of the loth Fairway of Shadow Mountain Golf Course shall have a ten (10) foot minimum setback between adjacent buildings. 19. No building permits shall be issued by the Department of Building and Safety until a six (6) foot masonry wall is totally constructed along the east and north property lines parallel to Club Circle. 20. A six (6) foot masonry wall shall be constructed in order to separate proposed units from Fairview Cottages. The wall shall extend from Fairway Drive westerly along the property line to a point directly south of the southwest corner of the proposed .two (2) story structure east of the existing conference facility. The wall shall be constructed so as to preserve existing trees and shrubs and ' avoid encroaching on the steps and walk of Cottage No. 13 of Fairview Cottages. In addition, golf ball protection measures shall be taken to ensure the safety of those residents residing in the proposed units adjacent to the 10th Fairway of Shadow Mountain Golf Course. Case No. DP 07-77 Planning Commission Resolution No. 21. The applicant shall comply with all of the requirements of the City Fire Marshall per the attached letter. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 31st day of May, 1977, by the following vote, to wit: AYES. NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ,CHAIRMAN ATTEST: PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION J , I �. DEPARTMENT OF FIRE PROTECTION ..,�.x."w,�� IN COOPERATION WITH THE C7J UNTY r'<,:3gj CALIFORNIA DIVISION OF FORESTRY " RIVE11St!)F' .Ja,:,, DAVID L. FLAKE COUNTY FIRE WARDEN P.O. BOX 248 5--- 210 WEST SAN JACINTO STREET" PERRIS, CALIFORNIA 92370 TELEPHONE (714) 657-3183 i May 17, 1977 Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Re: Case No. DP 06-77 & DP 07-77 Gentlemen : Prior to construction of any of the proposed buildings, the follow- ing conditions must be met: 1 . Install a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow for a two (2) hour duration in addition to domestic or other supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. A. Hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet, to any building. B. Exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. C. Curbs (if installed) shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall fur- nish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. Upon approval , one copy will be sent to the Building Department, and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engi- neer and approved by the water company, with the following certif- ication: "I certify that the design of the water system in Case No. DP 06-77 & DP 07-77 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal . " i _2_ 5. The proposed buildings on the west end of Fairway would pose some real problems for the Fire Department because of the limited access. The buildings should be located so an emer- gency vehicle can drive within 100 feet of all points of the building. Also with only ten feet between the rear of the proposed building and a fence it would hamper our efforts to fight a fire from the rear of the building. We would recom- mend that this building be relocated to a point where there is clear access for fire equipment in the front and twenty feet in the rear. Bud Engel Fire Marshal BE/ks i tf� � � a a 47 i I r t r' a) R '. ..iri� rc•v -utiaw J May 26, 1977 r3 I Q k rw N . RESORT Mr. Paul Williams, Secretary AND RACQUETCLUB Palm Desert Planning Commission 73-850 Fairway Drive Palm Desert,California 92260 Dear Mr Williams: Telephone(714) 346-6123 Herewith Palm Desert Venture is submitting a revised site plan in response to neighborhood concerns over our planned construction near the loth Fairway at Shadow Mountain Resort and Racquet Club. Specifically we have redesigned the plans to: A. Allow a 20 foot set back from the Fairway cottage property lines to accomplish additional open space between the prop- erty and allow fire department access to the front of the units. B. Increased the set-back from the loth Fairway property line to the new building structures from 10 feet to a minimum of 15 feet. One-third of the structures now have a set-back of 15 to 20 feet, the remaining frontage two-thirds is over 20 feet. C. Eliminated one excess parking structure to allow for more landscaping. D. Rearranged the units to provide better protection from 10th tee duffers. As the planning commission knows we are merely amending the approved plan of August 1976 to design a more aesthetically pleasing building by breaking the structure from one long one to two structures. We have every intent to satisfy our neighbors requests within reason. As to Destination Resort Management, Inc. Other Resorts:The Gant—Aspen,Colorado • Coeur du Lac—Lake Tahoe,Nevada t 2 4 t i i r " I Paul Williams 5/26/77 Page 2 requests for a density reduction this is not economically practical . We are well within our projects density limits. In addition, the units will in no way have a high density feeling as they all are oriented towards the golf course and it's magnificent vistas.• As to the two story versus one story, we would lose a great deal of open space and indeed have cramped unit design. The existing two story building presently facing the golf course would now be pleasantly hidden behind these new structures. Vistas in the northern direction would not be restricted from the golf course. Respectfully submitted, Ted R. Lennon Vice President Destination Resort Corporation is j i S i I i a t i { i ry � P. 0. BOX 667 PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 9226e May 20, 1977 City Council and City Planning Commission Palm Desert, California 92260 To the Attention of Paul Williams: The purpose of this letter is to inform you of the opposition of the Shadow Mountain Golf Club to the development proposed by the Shadow Mountain Resort and Racquet Club. The board of directors of the Golf Club has adopted a resolution to inform you of the Golf Club's opposition to the proposed development of the Shadow Mountain Resort and Racquet Club which is based upon the following among other reasons : (1 ). We propose that the developer be required to install a six foot retaining wall separating the Golf Club's parking lot and the new level of construction be three feet below the Golf Club's level . (2) . That the developer be required to install a crash "fire gate" in the newly constructed fifty foot road to the Club's parking lot. (3). That a chain link six foot fence or similar fence be installed on the east joint property line from the Golf Club 's tenth tee to the end of the joint property line eastward. (4). That a twenty foot set back be required on the proposed buildings to be constructed along the tenth fairway and that. the height of these units be reduced to single story to conform with all perimeter buildings in the balance of the project. (5). That the developer give consideration to guest parking requirements if a public restaurant is to be operated. (6). That the developer offer a plan of maintaining security and control beyond what has been proposed to this date. These requests have been discussed at the first proposed presentation to the Planning Commission. The Golf Club had agreed to an acceptance with the developer on this basis. Now with an entirely new management of the Shadow Mountain Resort and Racquet Club, we find ourselves completely at odds with its latest proposal . We urgently request your favorable consideration and concurrence in the above. Very truly yours , Shadow Mountain Golf Club v JES/mp ff7 " - 00 d7 X-) Helen Faull Huntington 0 0 P.O. Box 701 • Palm Desert, California 92260 Planning Commission CO C Palm Desert , California P O - Gentlemen : I wish to go on record as opposing " the Palm Desert Venture Ltd . application. /' _ I believe it is an increase in density. Found{;. } it typical that they announce the building 0 0 of eilIrht (8) less buildings only to add twenty C' three (23) at a later. date. That is the well C 0 0 0 known ONE STEP FORWARD and TWO STEPS BACK. 0 G The traffic on narrow Shadow Lake Drive is already way beyond its capacity. Cut downs, 0 motorcycles and sports cars race through the :, J �� C) street with no regard to the home-ownft rs and particularly those with small children. ', , f- O C1� I strongly oppose any tennis courts on the perimeter of the property. E� C And last but not least NO MORE TWO STORY ' BUILDTHGS should be allowed . We started with r. C' two story buildings ONLY AROUND THE POOL and Ct now they are scattered throughout the complex. C- Ci« V It would seem that your commission has a C G C � deep hatred for open space as you are doing 0 your best to eliminate and semblance of such. C Sincerely, 0 tJ Helen Huntington ' . MAY 2 51977 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 01. C7 CITY OP PALM DESERT `` 0 c: c cC" � c � c ° c " 0 o r i 4 F Faitview loollaye,4 AJOCc lion 46-007PORTOLA AVENUE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 May 18, 1977 IC EN Planning Commission MAY 191977 City of Palm Desert GsFkr, cas Palm Desert, California RI:HIRAM&. PAAS rial �t�: OF. hrst�£ G Attentions Mrs Paul Williams, Planning Director Gentlemen: On May 16, 1977 four officers and directors of Fairview Cottages Association reviewed the plans for the proposed additions to the Shadow Mountain Resort & Racquet Club. The four included Bill Bizzell, President, Margaret Morgan, First Vice President, John Eidam, Treasurer and Don Ellsworth, Secretary, On the basis of that review they request the following modifications in those plans. 1, Reduce the height of all buildings in the proposed group to be built adjacent to and just west of the Fairview Cottages to a single story, and the number of units in the group from thirteen to not more than ten. This will then conform to an earlier plan which was approved in January 1974 calling for ten units in this area. 2. Reducing the number of new units will permit the number of supporting parking spaces to be reduced' and we request the proposed plan be modified accordingly, with the land made available by the reduction in parking spaces landscaped. 3. As a part of its proposed construction program we request the Shadow Mountain Resort & Racquet Club be required to build a six foot wall on its property between the proposed new buildings and Fairview Cottages, the wall to be located so as to leave existing trees and shrubs and avoid encroaching on the steps and walk of Cottage No. 13. This is in accordance with a commitment made in a letter from A. Jerry Luebbers dated October 7, 1974- A copy of that letter is attached. I j I ; I% i Planning Commission, page 2 !� . we also request that a substantial wall or fence. be constructed along the south side of the Shadow Mountain Resort & Racquet Club property between the proposed new units and Shadow Mountain Golf Club so there will be a clear separation between the two and guests of the Racquet Club will be prevented from trespassing on the properties of Fairview Cottages and Shadow Mountain Golf Club, Thank you for your consideration, A copy of an authorization signed by fourteen of the nineteen owners of Fairview Cottages appointing the persons named in the first paragraph of this letter to act for them is attached and by reference made a part hereof. Respectfully yours , Fairview Cottages Association A 4" lillla Zell President i Destination Resort Cor oration October 7, 1974 jo88oWilshire]3oulcs,ard,Suite1114 Los Angeles,Califixuia 90024 Mrs. Margaret Morgan TClcphonc (2,13)474-1551 46047 Portola Avenue Cottage 11 Palm Desert, CA 90260 Dear Mrs. Morgan: Confirming our conversation of October 1, 1974, this is to advise you that we are aware that Mrs. Chamberlain's porch and steps encroach upon our property. This encroachment was inadvertent and apparently happened at the time her unit was originally built. To the best of our knowledge, this encroachment will cause us no difficulty, and it is our current intention to modify our peripheral wall in the vicinity of her home so that she may continue to use her porch and steps without modification. At the time we actually stake for construc- tion of the wall, we will consult with you as to the best mutually satisfactory manner in which to handle this problem. We see no reason that this encroachment should pose a problem for either of us, and we welcome your further inquiry at any time. Sincerely, Q, A. Je ry u bbers Vice Presi ent AJL:dg vv Rocky Mountain Regional Office:Aspen,Colorado i § is • r FAIRVILM COTTAGES ASSOCIATION PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA THE 110MLOWNERS OF FAIRVIEU COTTAGES ASSOCIATION HEREBY APPOINTS ANY ONE OF THE PERSONS NAMED IILRON TO REPREShNT THIS ASSOCIATION AT ANY HEARINGS I?EFOR15 ANY COMMISSION, BOARD, OR AT ANY OTHER HEARINGS OR MEETINGS ON MATTERS PERTAINING TO DEVELOPMENT, ZONING, VARIANCES, ECOLOGY, POLLUTION OR ERVIRWRIENT IN THE PALM DESERT AREA OR ANY O'fIIER ,AREA IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. NAME U14IT ADDRESS/ TELEPHONE TIL- r Cyr rz,,,?L 1 // - /6 G 1/7 �✓�E17�• J -�4��AY9l•C .� t C�- ,. .�;o' • �T C� . 't'l.P r ��i v F°_��. .� �"�- ��{'� ,C�� i r. h I) 1 Lr.„ -17 ",k' E:J'Z�- } ��r 1 u #� 2— V&eV l 3 — it 14 .3 L' FAIRVILI7 QOT'TAGES ASSOCIATION 46007 PORTOLA AVE., ALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 MAY, 1977 4 2 3 • a i i t SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA C9' Gs . COMPANY R.W. RIDDELL 3700 CENTRAL AVENUE • RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA Esslem Dlvls ion Distribution Planning Supervisor Mailing AMm. P. O. BOX 22DD, RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92506 May 10, 1977 Location of dearest Gas Main: Fairway Dr. and Mountain View Dr. City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, California 92260 Re: Case No. DP-07-77 This letter is not to be interpreted as a contractual commitment to serve the proposed project; but only as an information service. Its intent is to notify you that the Southern California Gas Company has facilities in the area where the above named project is proposed. Gas service to the project could be provided from an existing main without , any significant impact on the environment. The service would be in accordance with the Company's policies and extension rules on file with the California Public Utilities Commission at the time contractual arrangements are made. The availability of natural gas service, as set forth in this letter, is based upon present conditions of gas supply and regulatory policies. As a Public utility, the Southern California Gas Company is under the jurisdiction of the California Public Utilities Commission. We can also be affected by actions of federal regulatory agencies. Should these agencies take any action which affects gas supply or the condition under which service is available, gas service will be provided in accordance with revised conditions. We have developed several programs which are available, upon request, to provide assistance in selecting the most effective applications of energy conservation techniques for a particular project. If you desire further information on any of our energy conservation programs , please contact this office for assistance. � Cir. I � f 1 � 1977 . "AnoNMcNTAL SLkv10ES Crrr OF PALM DESERT I : i ] 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 i i TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE June 21, 1977 APPLICANT Palm Desert Venture, Ltd. 73-850 Fairway Drive Palm Desert, CA. 92260 CASE NO. : DP 07-77 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of June 14, 1977 CONTINUED TO DENIED XXX APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 249 PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR CONCURRENCE WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION. PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR PUBLIC HEARING. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. I I I PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSSION cc: Applicant C.V.C.W.D. File CITY of PALM DESERT STAFF REPORT To: Planning Commission Report On: Amendment to an Existing Development Plan to Construct 22 Condominium Units. (Continued from the meeting of May 31, 1977. ) Applicant: PALM DESERT VENTURE, LTD. Case No. : DP 07-77 I. REQUEST: Request for approval . of a Development Plan Amendment to allow construction of 22 condominium units and maintenance building as a part of the Shadow Mountain Resort and Racquet Club, located east of San Luis Rey and south of Shadow Lake Drive. II . STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve a modified-Amendment by Planning Commission Resolution No.,w, subject to compliance with .the Conditions of Approval . Justification is based upon the following: 1. The proposed development is consistent with the City's adopted General Plan. 2. The proposed use is similar to and compatible with those existing on adjacent and nearby properties. 3. The design or improvement of the proposed development as modified by the recommended conditions will be consistent with the Palm Desert Zoning Ordinance. 4. The site ii's._physica11 ;suited ;;for both the type of-development propps_ed and the proposed density as modified by the recommended condition's. 5. The design of the development, as amended by the recommended conditions, and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial en- vironmental damage or have a serious effect on the public health, safety, or general welfare. III. BACKGROUND: A. Description: The subject property is located east of San Luis Rey and Juniper, and is more particularly ldes.cri.be d as the SE ;, Section 20, T5S, R6E, SBB & M and M Tract 4545 (CM 015/171 175) . B. Location: The subject property is located on the east side. of San Luis Rey Avenue, slightly more than one quarter mile south of Highway 111. C. Size: Approximately 3.8 acres in this phase. D. Total Number of Units: 22 units in this phase and 96 units overall . E. Density: 6.3 units per acre in this phase and 5. 1 units per acre overall . F. Coverage: Approximately 47.5% of the gross area will be covered by struc- ture or paving. Approximately 54% of the area will be in open space or recreational space. June 14, 1977 Page One I Planning Commission Staff Report Case No. DP 07-77 June 14, 1977 Page Two III. BACKGROUND (continued) G. EIR Finding: An environmental impact report was filed on the overall project in June of 1973. The current proposal is sub- stantially in conformance with original development plan and no further environmental documentation is required . by law. A Negative Declaration was filed on May 10, 1977, and the appeal period has expired. H. Existing Zoning: PR-7 I. Adjacent Zoning: North - R-1-12,000 South - O.S. East - PR-7 West - R-1-16,000 and R-1-20,000 J. General Plan Commitment: Low Density, 3-5 dwelling units per acre. K. Utilities: Water and Sewer - Coachella Valley County Water District Power - Southern California Edison Company Gas - Southern---California Gas Company Telephone - General Telephone Company L. Type of Units: The project will consist of two and three-bedroom con- dominium units ranging in size from 1,078 to 1,459 square feet. M. Parking: Each unit has two .covered spaces. There are a total of 47 covered spaces and 50 uncovered spaces. N. Previous Action: The Conditional Use Permit approved for this case in 1974 provided for 108 units in the overall Development Plan. The following is a summary of the various amendments that have occurred on this project (see page 3) . The present Development Plan Amendment proposal involves the re-design of the ten units on the northerly-most portion of the project to conform to the single- story limitation applied by Planning Commission Resolution No. 151. Regarding the 13 approved units off Fairway; 12 have been re-designed and re-located and one unit has been eliminated. Additionally, a proposed maintenance building has been re-located. IV. DISCUSSION OF ISSUES: A. Introduction: The total project received its original approval by the County in 1973. Since then, the project has been revised 4 times and this request represents the fifth revision which to some degree is in response to the requirement by Planning Commission Resolution (CUP 03-73 Amend) of a single-story limi- tation for any building along the northerly boundary of the project and dis- cussion at the Planning Commission meeting of May 31, 1977 regarding the units off Fairway. The applicant is proposing to revise the design of 12 units which were previously approved off of Fairway Drive. Finally, the applicant is proposing to re-locate a maintenance building to the northerly boundary of the project which has resulted in the elimination of 17 over-flow parking spaces on the perimeter drive. Planning Commission Staff Report Page Three Case No. DP 07-77 iJune 1 SHADOW MOUNTAIN RESORT & RACQUET CLUB DEVELOPMENT HISTORY PROJECT AREA - ---- t CUP 03-73 —- - CUP 03-73 AMEND' -- DP 06-77 DP 07-77 . i February, 1974 .--,August, 1976 = 1 April, 1977 may, 1977 A 21 One-Story 37plex condos Shown as "Future Units" 10 One-Story Condos Not Shown (East of San Luis Rey and 21 Covered and 34 Open Spaces 5 Two-Story Condos rth of Juniper Cir.) 30 Covered and 2 Open Spaces B 33 One-Story 3-plex condos Shown as "Future Units" 25 One-Story Condos Not Shown (East of San Luis Rey and 33 Covered and 49 Open Spaces 6 Two-Story Condos south of Juniper Circle) 62 Covered & 25 Open Spaces C 12 One-Story 3-plex condos 10 One-Story, 5-plex condos Not Shown 6 One-Story 3-plex !_ J (East of Club Circle and 21 Covered & 24 Open Spaces 18 Covered & 29 Open Spaces condos _ South of Shadow Lake) 4 Two-Story-4-pl 20 Covered & 10 Open Spaces D 30 Two-Story 6-plex condos 12 Two-Story 6-plex units Not Shown Not Shown ,Central area west of 30 Covered & 31 Open Spaces 16 Two-Story 8-plex units the pool) 55 Covered & 15 Open Spaces E 6 Two-Story 6-plex condos 12 Two-Story 6-plex units Not Shown 12 Two-Story 6-plex (South of Tract 4545 6 One-Story 3-plex condos 1 One-Story condo unit; units off Fairway) existing - 4 condos existing now 12 hotel units 1 One-Story condo 16 Covered & 23 Open Spaces 27 Covered & 20 Open Spaces existing - 12 hotel units TOTALS 108 Condo Units 97 Condo Units 97 Condo Units 97 Condo Units (23 6 Ft. wall indicated (51 shown & 46 Future) (46 Shown & 51 Implied) shown and 74 Implied) on north and south No perimeter wall shown on No perimeter wall shown No perimeter wall shown property line site plan. 100 Covered & on site plan, on site plan. 64 Open Spaces Planning Commission Staff Report Case No. : DP 07-77 June 14, 1977 Page Four IV. DISCUSSION OF ISSUES (continued) B. Amendment Submitted Subsequent to the Planning Commission meeting of May 31, 1977: The Planning Commission declined to act on Case No. DP 07-77 at their May 31, 1977 meeting as they felt additional discussions were needed be'-. tween the applicant and adjacent property owners in order to attempt to resolve areas of conflict regarding the project. Since the last Planning Commission meeting, the applicant has informed staff that the controversial element of their previous proposals have been re-designed and compromises with adjacent property owners achieved. The latest revisions submitted -to staff by the applicant indicate a re- duction in the number of units proposed off of Fairway from 13 units to 12 units. This part of the project has been re-designed so that four _ single-story units are now located adjacent to Fairview Cottages in order, to mitigate any possible adverse impacts to the residents of the Cottages. Further, the covered parking space closest to the Fairview- Cottages has- been eliminated and re-located further west in the project. A single, two-story structure containing eight units lies west of the single-story units where it will have little adverse impacts on line-of-sight to adja- cent property owners. The latest revision still. indicates a 20 foot set- back between proposed units and the east property line adjacent to the Fairview-_Cottages and._a, 15 foot- setback between the units and -the-south) property line: -- - - The applicant has informed staff that compromises with adjacent property owners have been reached regarding fencing and..perimeter walls. The ap- plicant has stated that the Shadow Mountain Golf Club is agreeable to the notion of a chain-link fence between the proposed project and the area west of the Golf Club House where an oleander hedge presently exists. Further, the applicant has come to an agreement with Fairview Cottages with regard to fencing; the proposal now being to construct a masonry wall from Fair- way southerly and at some agreed upon point, change to wrought iron in order to preserve the view from residents of Fairview Cottages and the proposed development. Staff is still requiring the applicant to construct a six (6) foot masonry wall along the east and north property lines parallel to Club Circle before any additional building permits are issued to the applicant by the Department of Building and Safety. Since the May 31, 1977 Planning Commission meeting, staff has received a letter from Mr. Philip Jefferson regarding the proposed project. Mr. Jefferson's concerns regarding the two-story buildings are unfounded as there will be no two-story structures directly in front of his residence. Mr. Jefferson is also concerned with the proposed tennis courts. Any pos- sible adverse impacts from the tennis courts should be mitigated during the Design Review Board process. With regard to the parking problem Mr. . Jefferson refers to, staff believes this problem should be resolved as a result of additional spaces required in the Conditions of Approval . PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 249 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNOUNCING FINDINGS AND GRANTING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO AN EXISTING. DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF 22 CONDOMINIUM UNITS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF SAN LUIS REY AND JUNIPER BY AMEND- ING PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 151. CASE NO. OP 07-77 a WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Palm Desert Zoning Code, the Planning Commission did on May 31, 1977 hold a duly-noticed Public Hearing, and on June 14, 1977 a continued Public Hearing to..consider the application of PALM DESERT VENTURE, LTD. , for approval of an Amendment to an existing Development Plan to allow construction of 22 condominium units on property located in the PR-7 Zone and situated east of San Luis Rey and Juniper and more particularly described as: A Portion of SE '„ Section 20, T5S, R6E, S.B.B. & M. and M Tract 4545 (CM 015/171 175) WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert.Environmental Quality Procedure. Resolution Number 77-7" , in that the Director of Environmental Services has determined on May 10, 1977, that the project would not have a significant impact on the environment and the appeal period did expire on May 31, 1977; and WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Com- mission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify the granting of said approval : 1. The proposed development is consistent with the City's adopted General Plan. 2. The proposed use is similar to and compatible with those existing on adjacent and nearby properties. 3. The design or improvement of the proposed development as modified by the recommended conditions will be consistent with the Palm Desert Zoning Ordinance. 4. The site is physically suited for both the type of development pro- posed and the proposed density, as modified by the recommended condi- tions. . 5. The design of the development as amended by the recommended conditions and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial en- vironmental damage or have a serious effect on the public health, safety, and general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission in this case; II Case No. DP 07-77 Planning Lvomnission Resolution No. 249 i 2. The approval of the Amendment to the Development Plan is granted to Palm Desert Venture, Ltd. , for reasons by the Amendment of Planning Commission Resolution No. 151 as follows: Modify Existing Conditions j Action New Wording 1 i Revise The development of this project shall con form substantially to all development plat submitted in behalf of this case, Case No DP 07-77, Exhibits A-I , I-1, and H-4, and as revised according to Planning Commis- sion action. Any minor changes require approval by the Director of Environmental i Services. Any substantial change require approval by the Planning Commission. 7 I Delete 13 IDelete 8-12 IRe-number to 17-11 14-17 lRe-number to I13-15 Add the following new conditions: 16. A six (6) foot chain link fence shall be constructed along the property line between Shadow Mountain Resort and Racquet Club and Shadow Mountain Golf Course. The subject fence shall extend from the existing golf club house westerly toward that point in the vicinitylof the golf course maintenance building where the fence will connect with the, wall proposed for Case No. DP 06-77 phase of the project. 17. A minimum of twenty-five (25) additional parking spaces shall be provided east of the existing forty (40) studio units and west of Club Circle to accommodate anticipated increase in restaurant patrons and employees. 18. No building permits shall be issued by the Department of Building and Safety until a six (6) foot masonry wall and related landscaping is totally constructed along the east and north property lines parallel to Club Circle. 19. A masonry wall and a mesh/wrought iron fence shall be constr, - 11—le.tween—the proposed units on the southeastern.portion of the project a' " airview es. The location, design, materials , and point of transition fr -_to wrou ht iron shall be approved by the Design Review Board. Said wall/fencers a" — stalled prior to issuance of building permits for the adjacent new units. j 20. Any and all proposed tennisicourt lighting shall be submitted to the Design Review Board for approval . 21. The applicant shall comply with all of the requirements of the City Fire Marshall per the attached leltter. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Plan- ning Commission, held on this 14th day of June, 1977, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: KELLY,. READING, BIRKEY NOES: KRYDER ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: SNYDER 1 GEORGE BERKEY, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION � I - 1 i t DEPARTMENT OF FIRE PROTECTION 'r IN COOPERATION WITH THE COUNTYMCA LIFORNIA DIVISION OF FORESTRY � - "RIVERSID ::;:d DAVID L" FLAKE COUNTY FIRE WARDEN P.O. BOX 248 210 WEST SAN JJACINTO STREET PERRIS, CALIFORNIA 92370 TELEPHONE (714) 667-3183 May 17, 1977 li Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, Ca. 92260�1 Re: Cale No. DP 06-77 & DP 07-77 4' Gentlemen: Prior to construction If any of the proposed buildings, the follow- ing conditions must be met: I . Install a water syl,tem capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow for a two (2) hour 'duration in addition to domestic or other supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi I residual operating1pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. II 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. A. Hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. I B. Exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. C. Curbs (if installed) shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall fur- nish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. Upon approval , one copy will be sent to the Building Department, and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engi- neer and approved by, the water company, with the following certif- ication: "I certifyi that the design of the water system in Case No. DP 06-77 & DP 07-77 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal . " I I I -2- 5. The proposed buildings on the west end of Fairway would pose some real problems for the Fire Department because of the limited access. The buildings should be located so an emer- gency vehicle can drive within 100 feet of all points of the building. Also with only ten feet between the rear of the proposed building and a fence it would hamper our efforts to fight a fire from the rear of the building. We would recom- mend that this building be relocated to a point where there is clear access for fire equipment in the front and twenty feet in the rear. Bud Engel Fire Marshal BE/ks I 1 I i PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 151 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNOUNCING FINDINGS AND GRANT- ING AN AMENDMENT TO A PORTION OF THE PREVIOUSLY-APPROVED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE SHADOW MOUNTAIN RESORT AND RACQUET CLUB ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF SAN LUIS REY AND SOUTH OF SHADOW LAKE DRIVE. CASE NO . CUP-03-73. WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.26 of the Palm - Desert Zoning Code, the Planning.Commission did on June 1, 1976, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application of DESTINATION RESORT CORP. for an amendment to Conditional Use Permit-03-73 to allow a relocation and redesign of buildings ,for a portion of the Shadow Mountain Resort and Racquet Club on property located in the PR-7 Zone and situated east of San Luis Rey i and south of Shadow Lake Drive, and more particularly described as: a portion of the south k southeast ;, Section 20 T.5S., R.6E., SBB & M WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Environmental Quality Procedure Resolution Number 74-14", � in that the Director of Environmental Services has determined on May 17, 1976, ! that the project would not have a significant impact on the environment and the appeal period did expire on May 25, 1976, and; WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all - testimony and argument, the Planning Commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify the granting of said Amendment: - 1. That the location of the project is in accord with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and the purpose of the district in which the site is located. 2. That the location of the proposed use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public I health, safety, or welfare, or be materially injurious to properties or improve- me nts in the vicinity. Y 3: That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable - provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. 4. That the proposed use complies with the goals, objectives, and I policies of the City's General Plan. Resolution No. 151 ' i • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert as follows: ! 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute i the findings of the commission in this case. 2. The Conditional Use Permit amendment, case no. CUP-03-73, is i granted to DESTINATION RESORT CORP. subject to the attached conditions. PASSED,'APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of IPalm Desert Commission held on June 1, 1976, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: BERKEY, KELLY MILLS, VAN DE MARK, WILSON NOES: NONE ABSENT: 'NONE ABSTAIN: NONE ILSOt�/, Chairman '/ v ATTEST: I i I .I PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary I I RESOLUTION NO. 151 - CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. CUP 03-73 1. The development of thfs project shall conform substantially to all development plans submitted in behalf of this case (Exhibit A), and as revised according to Planning Commission action. Any minor changes ' 'require approval by the Director of Environmental Services. Any sub- stantial change requires approval by the Planning Commission. i I 2. All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of the State, City, ' and other applicable government entity shall be complied with as part of the development process. 3. This approval is applicable, subject to the development of this project commencing within one year from approval date and being promptly completed. 4. A landscaping plan (with irrigation system) shall be provided as approved by the Design Review Board Process for installation prior to final inspec- tion and receiving certificate of occupancy. 5. Curb, gutter, curb cuts, and tie-in paving shall be provided for by means of installation, along San Luis Rey. Construction shall conform to City of Palm Desert Standards. 6. Sewer hookup shall-be made if mains exist within 200 feet of property. 7. A 6 foot decorative masonry wall shall be installed along the easterly and northerly property line. 8. Heavy landscape treatment shall be installed along said wall in a manner 7. acceptable to the Design Review Board Process. 9. Existing tennis court lights shall be modified in a manner acceptable to the Design Review Board Process. 10. The existing free standing sign shall be removed before any building permits are issued. 11. The entry at Juniper Street shall be improved with the first phase of development. 12. Utility lines along San Luis Rey shall be placed underground. 13. Proposed parking spaces along the easterly property line of the project shall be improved. 14. The grading along the north and east property line shall match the grades of the adjacent R-1 lots along Shadow Lake Drive. 15. All existing and proposed tennis court lighting shall be placed on automatic timers. 16. The two most northerly buildings shall be re-designed to provide for - a single-story limitation. 17. Parking areas shall be lighted 4n a manner acceptable to the Design Review Board Process. i I have read and do agree to the above. listed conditions. (Applicant Signature Date ' I Helen Faull Huntington P.O. Box 701 • Palm Desert, California 92260 Planning Commission. Palm Desert, Califbrnia' Gentlemen: I wish to go on record as opposin the Palm Desert Venture Ltd.. application. I believe it is an increase in density. Found it typical that they announce the building of eirht (8) less buildings only to add twenty three (23) at a later date. That is the well known ONE STEP FORWARD and TWO STEPS BACK. The traffic on narrow Shadow Lake Drive is already way beyond its capacity. Cut downs, motorcycles and sports cars race through the street with no regard to the home-own¢7ers and particularly those with small children. I strongly oppose any tennis courts on the perimeter of the property. And last but not least NO MORE TWO STORY BUILDINGS should be allowed . We started with two story buildings ONLY AROUND THE POOL and now they are scattered throughout the complex. It would seem that ,your commission has a deep hatred for open space as ,you are doing ,your best to eliminate and semblance of such. Sincerely,; RECEIVE Helen- Huntington MAY 2 51977 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT nn nn t'aitview l�attayei Ajvciatiovt 46-007PORTOLA AVENUE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 May 18, 1977 RECEIVED Planning Commission MAY 191977 City of Palm Desert EMN114ME TAL 6fiWi @8 Palm Desert, California M Attention: Mr. Paul Williams, Planning Director Gentlemen: On May 16, 1977 four officers and directors of Fairview Cottages Association reviewed the plans for the proposed additions to the Shadow Mountain Resort & Racquet Club. The four included Bill Bizzell, President, Margaret Morgan, First Vice President, John Eidam, Treasurer and Don Ellsworth, Secretary. On the basis of that review they request the following modifications in those plans. 1. Reduce the height of all buildings in the proposed group to be built adjacent to and just west of the Fairview Cottages to a single story, and the number of units in the group from thirteen to not more than ten. This will then conform to an earlier plan which was approved in January 1974 calling for ten units in this area. 2. Reducing the number of new units will permit the number of supporting parking spaces to be reduced and we request the proposed plan be modified accordingly, with the land made available by the reduction in parking spaces landscaped. 3. As a part of its proposed construction program we request the Shadow Mountain Resort & Racquet Club be required to build a six foot wall on its property between the proposed new buildings and Fairview Cottages, the wall to be located so as to leave existing trees and shrubs and avoid encroaching on the steps and walk of Cottage No. 13. This is in accordance with a commitment made in a letter from A. Jerry Luebbers dated October 7, 1974• A copy of that letter is attached. Planning Commission, page 2 4. We also request that a substantial wall or fence, be constructed along the south side of the Shadow Mountain Resort & Racquet Club property between the proposed new units and Shadow Mountain Golf Club so there will be a clear separation between the two and guests of the Racquet Club will be prevented from trespassing on the properties of Fairview Cottages and Shadow Mountain Golf Club. Thank you for your consideration. A copy of an authorization signed by fourteen of the nineteen owners of Fairview Cottages appointing the persons named in the first paragraph of this letter to act for them is attached and by reference made a part hereof. Respectfully yours, Fairview Cottages Association e illia z 11 President Destination Rcsort Corporation October7, 1974 ro880 Wilshire Boulevard,Suite rrr4 Los Angcics,California 90024 Mrs. Margaret Morgan Telephone (zr;)474-1551• • ' 46047 Portola Avenue Cottage 11 { Palm Desert, CA 90260 Dear Mrs. Morgan: Confirming our conversation of October 1, 1974, this is to advise you that we are aware that Mrs. Chamberlain's porch and steps encroach upon our property. This encroachment was inadvertent and apparently happened at the time her unit was originally built. To the best of our knowledge, this encroachment will cause us no difficulty, and it is our current intention to modify our peripheral wall in the vicinity of her home so that she may continue to use her porch and steps without modification. At the time we actually stake for construe- tion of the wall, we will consult with you as to the best mutually satisfactory manner in which to handle this problem. We see no reason that this encroachment should pose a problem for either of us, and we welcome your further inquiry at any time. Sincerely, A. J ry bers vice Presr ent AJL:dg i Rocky Mouniain Regional Office:Aspen,Colorado -� 1, FAIRVIEW COTTAGES ASSOCIATION PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA THE HOMEOWNERS OF FAIRVIEW COTTAGES ASSOCIATION HEREBY APPOINTS ANY ONE OF THE PERSONS NAMED HERON TO REPRESENT THIS ASSOCIATION AT ANY HEARINGS BEFORE ANY COMMISSION, BOARD, OR AT ANY OTHER HEARINGS OR MEETINGS ON MATTERS PERTAINING TO DEVELOPMENT, ZONING, VARIANCES, ECOLOGY, POLLUTION OR ENVIRONMENT IN THE PALM DESERT AREA OR ANY OTHER AREA IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. NAME UNIT ADDRESS TELEPHONE !601// 74 o c a �Y1• I YL E 61 I i 'NZljJ ,l Ll RJCIJtN- l VCx1Qf° � ClloA'C'� -34f6-3 3 L� �e •v # >— °i Coo q 3 - it d-2 3 FAIRVIEW OTTAGES ASSOCIATION l,6007 PORTOLA AVE., ALAI DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 MAY, 1977 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAN COMPANY R.W. RIDDELL \ 3700 CENTRAL AVENUE • RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA Eastern Division .Distribution Planning Supervisor Mailing Address P. O. BOX 2200, RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92506 r May 10, 1977 Location of dearest Gas Main: Fairway Dr. and Mountain View Dr. City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, California 92260 Re: Case iNo. DP-07-77 This letter -is not to be interpreted as a contractual commitment to serve the proposed project; but only as an information service. Its intent is to notify you that the Southern California Gas Company has Facilities in the area where the above named project is proposed. Gas service to the project could be provided from an existing main without any significant impact on the environment. The service would be in accordance with the Company's policies and extension rules on file with the California Public Utilities Commission at the time contractual arrangements are made. The availability of natural gas service, as set forth in this letter, is based upon present conditions of gas supply and regulatory policies. As a public utility, the Southern California Gas Company is under the jurisdiction of the California Public Utilities Commission. We can also be affected by actions of federal regulatory agencies. Should these agencies take any action which affects gas supply or tine condition under which service is available, gas service will be provided in accordance with revised conditions. We have developed several programs which are available, upon request, to provide assistance in sal�-cti7g the most effective applications of energy conservation techniques for a particular project. If you desire further information on any of our energy conservation programs , please contact this office for assistance. D 2 1977 ENVIRONIvi SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT KilipV V. Jegerson DEL MAR. CALIFORNIA 6/2/77 Paul Williams, Planning Director RECEIVED City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane JUN 7 1977 Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Dear Paul: CITY OF PALM DESERT It was good to see you the other day on-our visit_to Palm_ Desert. I came expressly to protest case #DP 07-77, Palm Desert Venture, Ltd. , but upon entering the meeting, found the protestors had already spoken, secondly, the meeting had been postponed another two weeks. Please advise me in advance so that I can make plans to be at the meeting. My protest is, that they are contemplating a two story building which would be directly in front of my view, which prop- erty Mrs. Jefferson and I own, being parcel 7 and 8 on Shadow Lake Drive. These two parcels are the entirety of lot 33. Also they are contemplating more tennis courts of which the noise and lighting both would be detrimental to my property, being parcel 2, lot 35, parcel 5, being lot 38, and parcel 6, being lot 39, as well as our residence, parcel 12, lot 29. The view at all locations are that of the mountains and I need not state that any two story build- ing would be detrimental. The tennis courts, although we have one continue'd r 3 1 diP C5 J erson DEL MAR, CALIFORNIA -2- in Del Mar, are irritating if you are too close with the constant pounding of noise. I would also like to mention the problem that the Fairway Cottages are having with this new development and the parking problem it has created to the Cottage owner's. I happened to go by during one of their tennis tournaments, and one car could barely pass through the street as there were so many parked vehicles. I'm wondering why the fire marshall has not looked into this and should be aware of such hazards for the safety of Fairway Cott- ages and Shadow Mountain Tennis Club as well. I would also like to protest the fact that the dining areas, which would be one and a half stories, cannot be lowered to one story. I noted that George Kryder and Charles Redding, Planning Commissioner's, both brought this subject up to the Palm Desert i Venture Representative, i I will appreciate you presenting this letter to the Planning Department and as you know our interests in this particular area is very substantial. continue'd i Philip V, Jegerson DEL MAR. CALIFORNIA -3- Sincerely`; ON ' PBJ/dw cc: Margaret Morgan i i I �P b-7-T) MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY - JUNE 14, 1977 7:00 PM - CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS I. CALL TO ORDER The regularly scheduled meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission. was called to order by Chairman Berkey at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall . i II. PLEDGE - Commissioner KRYDER III. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioner KELLY Commissioner KRYDER Commissioner READING . Commissioner SNYDER Chairman BERKEY Also Present: Paul A. Williams - Director of Environmental Services Hunter Cook City Engineer Ralph Cipriani - Associate Planner Sam Freed - Assistant Planner Marcie Johnson - Planning Secretary IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES i A. MINUTES of the Planning Commission meeting of May 31, 1977. Commissioner Kelly requested that the following deletion be made: Page 10, 1st paragraph, 4th line, delete - "and up.". A motion of Commissioner Reading, seconded by Commissioner Kelly, to approve the minutes of the May 31, 1977 meeting, with the above-mentioned deletion, was unanimously carried. V. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS Mr. Williams noted that the only written communications were those dealing with the cases on tonight's agenda and would be discussed at the appropriate times. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS Chairman Berkey explained the Public Hearing procedures to those present. A. CONTINUED CASE NO. DP 07-77, PALM DESERT VENTURE, LTD. , APPLICANT - Request for approval of a Development Plan Amendment to allow construction of 23 condominium units as a part of the Shadow Mountain Resort and Racquet Club, located east of San Luis Rey and south of Shadow Lake Drive. (Continued from the Planning Commission meeting of .May 31, 1977. ) Mr. Williams explained that this case had been continued from the last meeting to allow for some discussion to occur between the adjacent pro- perty owners and the applicant with regards to the fencing and perimeter walls. Further, revised plans had been submitted which were the 4th re- vision to the 13 units off of Fairway Drive and the 10 units on the northerly boundary. Minutes Palm Desert Planning. Commission June 14, 1977 Page Two Since the last meeting, the 13 units have been reduced to 12 units and additional covered parking spaces have been deleted. Mr. Williams showed the revised site plan to the Commissioners. He also explained the applicant' s new proposal which includes the two-story units being approximately 22 foot in height, wrought iron fencing, 44 parking spaces (24 covered) , unlighted tennis courts, and a small maintenance building. Mr. Williams stated that staff was still suggesting that .the tennis courts be re-located or modified to allow for 25 additional parking spaces; however, the parking did comply with the zoning requirements. Mr. Williams stated that it appears that the applicant has resolved the concerns of the Fairview Cottages to staff's satisfaction. Finally, he stated that staff was recommending that the Planning Commission approve Resolution No. 249 (Amendment of Planning Commission Resolution No. 151) with the following changes to the existing Conditions of Approval No. 1: 1. The development of this project shall conform substantially to all development plans submitted in behalf of this case, Case No. DP 07-77, Exhibits A-I , I-1, and H-4, and as revised according to Planning Commission action. Any minor changes require approval by the Director of Environmental Services. Any substantial change requires approval by the Planning Com- mission. Mr. Williams also reviewed the Conditions of Approval with the Commis- sioners and suggested that the Commissioners may want to consider an amendment to the condition regarding fencing in the southerly area. Further, he stated that since the last meeting, the .Commission had received an additional letter from. a property owner to the north, Mr. Philip Jefferson - listing his concerns with regards to the tennis courts and lights and the two-story building that was being contem- plated in front of his property. Chairman Berkey asked if the Commissioners had any questions at this time. There were none. Mr. Williams passed out copies of Planning Commission Resolution No. 151 to the Commissioners stating that they had been inadvertently left out of their packets. Chairman Berkey stated that before calling on the applicant to speak and opening the Public Hearing, he would like to note for the record that the Planning Commission had met in a Study Session prior to tonight's meeting for the purpose of clarifying staff reports. Fur- ther, he stated that no decisions were made at the session. Chairman Berkey declared the Public Hearing open on Case No. DP 07-77 and asked if the applicant was present. SKIP BEHRHORST, Vice-President of Destination Resort Corporation, Aspen, Colorado, spoke to the Commissioners and informed them that since the last meeting, he and Mr. Bizzell (President of Fairview Cottages) had reached a workable agreement regarding the re-design of the 13 units. Further, the one-story element next to Fairview Cottages satisfied the concerns that the Fairview Cottage Associa- tion had. Also, an extension of the masonry wall to the southeast would provide additional security and protection: Mr. Behrhorst then stated that he had discussed the new Condition of Approval No. 18 with staff regarding the concept of issuing building permits prior to installing a masonry wall and he was requesting that build- ing permits be changed to read certificate of occupancy. Chairman Berkey asked if there was anyone present wishing to speak in FAVOR of the project. Being no one, he then asked if there was anyone wishing to speak in OPPOSITION to the project. Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission June 14, 1977 Page Three MR. PHILIP B. JEFFERSON, Del Mar, California, spoke to the Com- mission regarding the importance of the proposed wall . Re also stated that he felt the tennis courts should be unlighted. Fur- ther, he was happy to see the re-design of the one-story building. HELEN HUNTINGTON, 73-820 Shadow Lake Drive, spoke to the Commis- sion and stated that she .felt the wording should not be changed on Condition No. 18 regarding the issuance of building permits prior to the installation of the masonry wall . Further, she stated that originally it was agreed that the only two-story units were to be located around the pool area and she would like it to remain that way. She also stated that she was strongly against the tennis courts on the perimeter. Ms. Huntington also questioned the .location of the air conditioning units on the roof. MARY JANE BEAN, 73-901 Shadow Lake Drive, spoke to the Commission and questioned the location of the maintenance building. Mr. Williams pointed out the location of the proposed maintenance building on the map. Ms. Bean then asked if there was to be any lighting on the tennis courts'. Mr. Williams answered there would be no lighting. Ms. Bean questioned when the road improvements were going to be made around the perimeter. Mr. Williams stated that these improvements would have to go in at the same time as the wall construction. Chairman Berkey asked if there was anyone else wishing to speak in OPPOSITION to the project. Being no one, he asked the applicant if he cared to make a brief rebuttal . Mr. Behrhorst stated that they would be building the wall during the time that the additional 67 units would be under construction. With regards to the tennis courts, they had been reduced from 3 to 2 in the area around the 10 units and from 4 courts to 3 courts north of the "Y" building. Mr. Williams pointed out these areas on the map. Mr. Behrhorst also stated that the road would be improved from a construction standpoint as soon as possible at the commencement of construction of the 12 units. He also spoke regarding their financial obligation for the undergrounding of the utility lines and the cost burden involved. Chairman Berkey asked the Commissioners if they had any questions of the applicant. Commissioner Reading asked if the units that Ms. Huntington had referred to on top of buildings were indeed air conditioning units. Mr. Behrhorst stated that they were air conditioning units, that they were properly screened and that they had been approved by the Design Review Board. Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission June 14, 1977 Page Four Commissioner Kryder asked about the timing for the construction of the wall . Mr. Behrhorst stated that the wall should be completed by October of this year. Commissioner Reading was concerned about golf ball protection for the northerly units. Mr. Behrhorst stated they would physically look at the area to see if it needed additional screening. Commissioner Reading then stated that he felt it would be best for the applicant to install the wall prior to construction to protect the construction workers from being hit by golf balls. Mr. Behrhorst stated that it would be difficult to get the equipment in if the wall was installed first and that there were other ways to protect the construction workers. There was a short discussion pertaining to wrought iron/mesh fencing. Commissioner Reading asked staff when the wrought iron fence was going in and if it would have to be approved through the Design Review Board process. Mr: Williams stated that this matter would be addressed as a part of the Design Review Board process. Commissioner Reading asked where the additional 25 parking .spaces would be located. Mr. Behrhorst stated they would be to the northeast of the "Y" building along Circle Drive and that the tennis courts had been re-designed to accommodate the additional parking. Commissioner Reading and Mr. Behrhorst then discussed the James Franciscus Tennis Tournament and the impact it would. have on the parking situation. Mr. Ted Lennon stated that there was the possibility that the Club would be purchasing a "shuttle bus" for the property and that this bus would be used during the Tournament. Further, this was a once-a-year charity event and that possibly an agreement could be worked out with the merchants/banks along E1 Paseo to use their parking facilities for this event. k�04O Chairman Berkey asked if there were any further questions: �!?`��':, i problemi�feitKelly felt that the were installed priorrtoght const�uctone could pose an access Chairman Berkey closed the Public Hearing on Case No. DP 07-77 and asked for the pleasure of the Commission. Commissioner Reading stated that he realized that it would provide a financial burden; however, he felt that the wall provisions should be l{ as written in Conditions No. 18 and No. 19. Mr. Williams suggested a re-wording for. Condition No. 19 as follows: 19. A masonry wall and a mesh/wrought iron fence shall be con- structed between the proposed units on the southeastern portion of the project and Fairview Cottages. The location, design, materials, and point of transition from masonry to wrought iron shall be approved by the Design Review Board. Said wall/fence shall be installed prior to issuance of building permits for the adjacent new units. Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission June 14, 1977 Page Five Commissioner Kelly stated that she agreed with the condition as suggested by staff. Further, she commended the developer for working with the resi dents and staff to resolve the problems that had been encountered. Commissioner Kryder felt that the building permits should not be held up as this would pose a financial burden on the applicant. Commissioner Snyder stated that he would abstain from the matter. Chairman Berkey asked if there were any additional questions. There were none. Commissioner Kelly moved that the Planning Commission approve Resolution No. 249, amending Planning Commission Resolution No. 151, with the amendments as suggested by staff pertaining to Condition No. 1 and Condition No. 19. Com- missioner Reading seconded the motion. The motion carried 3-1 with the following . vote: AYES: KELLY, READING, BERKEY NOES: KRYDER ABSTAIN: SNYDER Chairman Berkey again commended the applicant for his cooperation during the hearing process. B. CONTINUED CASE NO. CUP 05-76, JOHNSON & BARBATTI , APPLICANTS Request for an Extension of Time for a Conditional Use Permit to operate a parking lot in an R-3(4) zone and a Variance for setback requirements. (Continued from the Planning Commission meeting of May 31, 1977. ) Mr: Williams explained that this case had been continued to allow staff time to look at a revised site plan for a proposed office building to be located westerly of Portola Avenue and Highway 111. Mr. Williams showed the revised site plan for the two-story, 3,800 square foot office building. He added .that this site plan had not been through the Design Review Board process as yet. The applicant had submitted the plans to . show what she intends to do with the property, showing the proposed off- site parking which would be located approximately 300 feet away from the proposed building. Finally, he stated that staff was recommending ap- proval of Planning Commission Resolution No. 250 for an extension of time of one year. Chairman Berkey asked if there were any questions of staff at this time. Being none, he opened the Public Hearing on Case No. CUP 05-76 and asked if the applicant was present. SHIRLEY JOHNSON, 73-960 Highway 111, spoke to the Commission and stated that she had just wanted to show the Commissioners her pro- posed plans for the property. Chairman Berkey asked if the Commissioners had any questions. Being none, he asked if there was anyone present wishing to speak either in FAVOR of or OPPOSED to. the request. Being no one, he closed. the Public Hearing and asked for the pleasure of the Commission. i Minutes i Palm Desert Planning Commission May 31, 1977 Page Two VI . APPROVAL OF MINUTES (continued) B. MINUTES of the Planning Commission meeting of May 17, 1977. Mr: Williams stated that these minutes should reflect the excused . absence of Commissioner Charles Reading. ' Commissioner Snyder moved and Commissioner Reading seconded to approve the May 17, 1977 minutes as amended. .Motion carried unanimously. VII . WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS A. Mr. Williams reported that there were written communications; however, they dealt with the items on the Agenda and would be addressed as a part of the presentation of those agenda items with the exception of an excerpt from the Los Angeles Times dated May 20, 1977, which had been forwarded for information. VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS Chairman Berkey announced that prior to this meeting, the Commission had met in a Study Session for the purpose of clarifying the staff recommen- dations. No decisions were reached. Chairman Berkey then explained the Public Hearing procedures to those present. A. CASE NO. DP 07-77, PALM DESERT VENTURE, LTD. , APPLICANT +, Request for approval of a Development Plan Amendment to allow construc- tion of 23 condominium units as a part of the Shadow Mountain Resort and Racquet Club, located east of San Luis Rey and south of Shadow Lake Drive. Commissioner Snyder left the meeting for this hearing inasmuch as he was an officer of the property adjacent to this project and did not feel it would be fair to participate in the hearing or vote on the issue. Mr. Williams reviewed this case pointing out that it was a request for an Amendment to the Development Plan to allow construction of 23 condominium units and maintenance building as a part of the Shadow Mountain Resort and Racquet Club. This request represents the fourth revision to the project that dates back to County approval in 1972. Mr. Williams reviewed the various revisions that had occurred since approval by the County. The original approval by the City was for 108 units, and after three revisions, it has been reduced to 97 units. The Amendment being considered covers 13 units proposed off Fairway Drive and 10 units proposed along the nor- therly boundary of the project. The hearing tonight is in regard to the single-story limitation for any building along the northerly boundary and further, the applicant is proposing to revise the design of the thirteen units which were previously approved off of Fairway Drive. Finally, the applicant is proposing to re-locate a maintenance building to the northerly boundary of the project which has resulted in the elimination of 17 over-flow parking spaces on the perimeter drive. The applicant is proposing to allow a 20-foot setback from the Fairway Cottage property lines to accomplish additional open space between the property and allow the Fire Department access to the front of the units; to increase the setback from the loth Fairway property line to the new building structures from 10 feet to a minimum of 15 feet. One-third of the structures now have a setback of 15 to 20 feet, the remaining frontage two-thirds is over 20 feet; eliminate one excess parking structure to allow for more landscaping; and finally, re- arrange the units to provide better protection from loth tee duffers. Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission i May. 31, 1977 Page Three Mr. Williams reviewed a letter from the Fire Marshall wherein conditions were. set forth prior to any construction being permitted. He also re- viewed a letter from Shadow Mountain Golf Club setting forth conditions they would like considered; a letter from Helen Faull Huntington opposing the development by Palm Desert Venture Ltd. due to increase in density in that area, traffic problems, and two-story buildings; a letter from the Fairview Cottages Association requesting modifications to the plans ; a petition from the homeowners in Fairview Cottages Association in opposition to the project; and finally, a letter from Southern California Gas Company indicating their ability to service the project. Staff recommended approval of the modified Amendment subject to compliance with the Conditions of Approval . Mr. Williams stated that in response to this correspondence and staff's analysis of these proposed amendments, the wall should be required as originally required by the County and that is masonry walls on the nor- therly, southerly, and easterly boundaries of the project. With regards to the 13 units off Fairway, staff feels that the proposed setback of 15 feet from the southerly boundary of the project and 20 feet from the easterly boundary is sufficient to adequately mitigate any adverse effects to the adjacent development. With regards to the two-story existing build- ings in this area, there is a two-story-12 unit building existing there now, and staff feels that limiting the proposed buildings to single-story would have little effect in terms of line-of-sight. If the Commission chose to accept the recommendation of the. staff, that could be accomplished by amending Resolution No. 151 by adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 244. Mr. Williams pointed out that with regards to the 13 units along Fairway, to which most of the correspondence is directed, the applicant does have approval of preliminary design review of that portion of the project and it is previously shown-as two-story. y� Commissioner. Kelly asked for a brief review of the proposed resolution. Mr. Williams responded that it would tie the project, with the exception of the planning discussed at the last meeting, to the maps submitted at this meeting. It would delete a requirement for the wall on the northerly boundary. The new condition requires that to be installed under a new condition #16 and #20. Condition #13 speaks to the parking spaces originally proposed, the 17 spaces along the easterly boundary, and staff is requiring this to be increased to 25 spaces. Additional new conditions speak to walls, parking, and fire marshall requirements. Chairman Berkey declared the Public Hearing open and asked the applicant to address the Commission. MR. SKIP BERHORST, Aspen, Colorado, Vice-Chairman and Principal of . ,.. Destination Resort Corporation and General Partner of Palm Desert Venture Ltd spoke to the Commission and addressed the following: He had had lengthy discussions with the Board and members of the Shadow Mountain Golf Club. He thought they had arrived at what they both felt were good solutions. They have a mutual agreement as to the various points they raised. These are the people who will be most affected by our development, and we feel we have worked with them for reasonable solutions like the wall and their privacy. Mr. Berhorst reviewed the points of the letter. He pointed out that what their development and the Shadow Mountain -Golf Club had agreed to was different that what staff was recom- _mending, and he was, therefore, in disagreement with staff. He `proposed that instead of a wall between the two parking lots, it Would be beneficial to have chain-link fence that would be hidden by oleanders. In addition, they would agree to provide a decorative -fire gate across the fire access road into their parking lot. They have .agreed to this and feel that it is a good solution. The set- back _and re-design of the 13 units has been well- described by staff. ;He. felt alternative methods of security should be considered along the 13 units. A wrought-iron fence, 6 feet high along the property line facing south would be an acceptable solution to both of us, and then carrying the fence along the property line southwest and northeasterly to about midpoint and then starting a masonry wall that would then connect with the existing- entrance sign. The heavy f. Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission May 31, 1977 Page Four growth of trees along that property line creates a nice buffer between the two Fairway Cottage homes next to the property. Both those houses orient to the golf. course and not to our development. The buffer should be more than adequate not only for our units but for the Fairway Cottages and that a wall about mid-point out is the best way to solve the privacy problem and also allow the house that tv is farthest out to have views across the southwest. Mr. Berhorst reiterated that the people most affected by their development had agreed to the compromises he had covered, and this solution seemed the best. He requested the Commission 's consideration of amending Condition No. 16 and No. 20 to incor- porate the concepts written in their letter to Walt Snyder. He asked regarding Condition No. 19 for clarification. Mr. Williams explained that no permit would be issued as this condition' was written until that wall was constructed. Mr. Berhorst requested that this condition be amended to prohibit construction of only the 10 units without the wall . He also stated that they would agree to pave Club Circle Drive as a prior condi= tion to the construction of the 10 units. tie concurred with all the other conditions. Chairman Berkey asked for input in OPPOSITION to the project: MR. BILL BIZZEL, 46-087 Portola, addressed the Commission representing the Fairview Cottage Association.. He specifically noted paragraph 4 of his Board of Directors ' letter which addressed the requirement they desired on the proposed buildings to be constructed along Fairway; F' specifically that the height of these units be reduced to single- _ - story to conform to all perimeter buildings in the balance of the project. He pointed out that his group had met with the people from Palm Desert Venture, Ltd. , and that they had leaned over backwards to reach agreements. However, he stated their continued disagreement _.. with density.and height of buildings was -still in effect. He further objected to the location of the carports that run in front of their Unit #13. He concluded by opposing Fairway Drive being used as the main entrance to the Shadow Mountain Resort and Racquet Club indicating a severe traffic problem for them. He also expressed concern over the security of their property; . if it is not .sufficient now, what will it be like when the project is completed. MR. DON SLAUGHTER, Attorney with Schlecht & McCullough, Palm .Springs, addressed. the. Commission stating that he had just purchased a lot on Shadow Lane and wondered if the proposed tennis courts were to be lit. Mr. -.Williams stated that it was his understanding that the courts were to be unlit, but if the Commission so desired, they could make it a condition of approval . It has not been a condition up to now. Mr. Berhorst presented rebuttal stating that one of the problems they have is that their development is not yet totally completed and the ultimate design is not yet there. At present, the entrance to the development is off Fairway Drive; yet, the ultimate plan shows the main entrance off San Luis Rey. The traffic will then be minimized on Fairway Drive. With regard to the carport being as close to Unit #13-as stated, Mr. Berhorst presented pictures showing trees that would act as a buffer there. He did clarify that the tennis courts would be unlit. He concluded by saying that they were not normal developers. They- had a management company that would stay on the project after completion; they would be a part of the community, and thus concerned with community problems, adjacent properties, etc. Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission May 31, 1977 Page Five Commissioner Reading asked why in the rest of the project, on the perimeter all the way around with the exception of the 13 units, they were proposing to put in here now, they are all one-story. He stated that this doesn 't seem to conform to the rest of the pro- ject. The applicant responded that the plan. that was approved last May had a two-story building in that. particular area. The principal reason for. that was the existing twelve-unit building which was a two-story building and the conference building next door which was more than a one-story building. From a design standpoint, they felt that was good and what they have done with this amended plan is to improve the design over what was there before; to keep that density and drop to a one-story is like creating a "ghetto". Commissioner Reading asked if the applicant would .be willing to compromise with 112 of those being one-story and the other half two-story. to satisfy the Fairview Cottage Association. He asked if they would be willing to re-design it. The. applicant stated that they had attempted to satisfy the desires of the one-story adjacent homeowners by having a one-story building with a 20 foot setback which is more than required and pulling that building in, solves the problem. Commissioner Reading asked about the people on the other side of the golf course. The applicant responded that there is an existing two-story building and changing to a one-story would not have that great an effect. Commissioner Reading stated that he would. like to see additional parking, the one-story buildings, some re-design to conform to the rest of the project which in turn will make the neighbors to the east, north, and south much happier. He suggested a continuation. Commissioner Kelly stated that at this time the new conditions to this Amendment would satisfy parking and walls. She felt that the wall should remain masonry as stated in the conditions. She also felt that Condition No. 21 should be included, that the tennis .courst should be unlit as Condition No. 22, and also one-story buildings on the perimeter. Commissioner Kryder stated that he too felt that the one-story would be an advantage, but these people have been working on the premise that they have had approval for two-story buildings, and it seems somewhat unfair at this stage of the game that it has to revert to a one-story situation. He stated that he would agree that perhaps there could be a re-design or some type of a compromise to please both parties to some extent. He stated that he felt that the real disadvantage appeared to be to one Fairview Cottage than to the rest of them. He indicated his preference for seeing the project re-designed to ,incorporate some of the ideas presented at this hearing. Chairman Berkey stated that it was evident that there had been some good cooperation on the part of the developer, and he thought that from the comments from the other Commissioners, it would be well to continue the hearing to the next meeting. i i f 3 • Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission May 31 , 1977 Page Six Commissioner Reading suggested that, as well as he has gotten along with the Golf Club, to work with the Fairview Cottages and the other residents .that we had correspondence from to come to a conclusion that will be satisfactory to everybody. =t' Commissioner Reading moved to continue the hearing to the meeting of June 14, 1977. Commissioner Kelly seconded the motion; motion carried by the following vote: AYES: KELLY, KRYDER, READING, BERKEY NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: SNYDER The applicant addressed the Commission again indicating they obviously had time schedules to meet and certain financial commitments to their lender. He asked for resolution of the problems tonight. Chairman Berkey indicated that the disagreements were far too great to be resolved without further staff consultation with the applicant. The applicant agreed to comply with the recommendation to work with adjacent property owners to resolve all problems. B. CASE NO. CUP .05-77, RICK SEIDNER, APPLICANT Request for a Conditional Use Permit to operate a 1,240 square foot restaurant in the Harmon Building and a Variance on the parking re- quirement from. 19 spaces to 8 spaces on a parcel located at the north- west corner of Portola Avenue and El Paseo. Mr. Williams presented the staff report stating that the proposed use is com- patible with adjacent..development. The primary concern was that of parking. The intention of the applicant is to provide 8 parking spaces when 19 are required. Though the reduction in spaces is considerable, staff believes that the applicant's request for a Variance deserves strong consideration due to the exceptional circumstances applicable to the subject property. The proposed restaurant lies within the Core Area Commercial District of the City where a growing number of businesses and professional offices are located. As these activities increase, the number of pedestrian traffic will increase, thus reducing the necessity for the additional parking spaces. In addition, strict interpretation of the parking requirement would deprive the applicant of the opportunity to operate a restaurant as the possibility of creating additional parking in the vicinity does not exist. Staff be- lieves a need for the proposed use exists and that the use should be permitted and the parking variance granted as long as the applicant is able to meet any minimum requirements other governmental departments specify. Mr. Williams point ed ed out, however, that the proposed restaurant may not be feasible unless a second exit is provided as required by the Uniform Building Code. Chairman Berkey declared the Hearing open and asked the applicant for input. RICK SEIDNER, 74-160 Velardo Road, addressed the Commission stating that he had nothing further to add unless the Commissioners had any questions. Chairman Berkey requested input in OPPOSITION to the project and none was offered. Discussion followed among the Commission as to how many parking spaces were available in the surrounding area. j. MR. JULIUS HARMON, 38-900 Island Drive, Rancho Mirage, addressed the Commission indicating that there were 65 "spaces and that he was the owner of the property in question. CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA TREA&AER'S RECEIPT N° 274 x m Received of— Date m Date �S '�'— 77 = u For J Account No. Amount o L111 T VV W M 50 W Received : CITY TREASURER W by 4=:� f/ Total �� a I o0 lFaD nu , 1!DcD=(:E)nP'a 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 June 16, 1977. NOTE FOR CASE NO. DP 07-77 1. In order to accept any application for Design Review on any future building, including the maintenance building, the 45- unit condominium complex unit adjacent to San Luis Rey, the 12 units off of Fairway, or the 10 units on the north boundary of the project; the applicant will have to had installed fencing on the north boundary line and the chain-link fence between the Golf Club and the Resort. - 2. In addition; in order to obtain building permits for the 12 units proposed off of Fairway, the applicant will have to install the required wall/or mesh fence along the area off of Fairway as required and of a design acceptable to the Design Review Board. 3. In order to logically determine when the circular road should be instal.led, .the applicant should be required to install this road as a part of either of the following situations : the 10 unit facility on the north boundary line, the 12-unit facility off of Fairway, or the north half of the 45 units off of San Luis Rey. 4. None of these conditions should affect the remaining 14 units in the center court area which has been through Design Review and is in plan check at this time. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION PAW/mj e .i RR =- i� OO :ff I1ma 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE June 9, 1977 i APPLICANT Palm Desert Venture Ltd. 73-850 Fairway Drive Palm Desert, California 92260 CASE NO. : DP 07-77 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of May 31, 1977 XXX CONTINUED TO June 14, 1977 DENIED I APPROVED BY.PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ' FOR CONCURRENCE WITH THE PLANNING j COMMISSION DECISION. PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR PUBLIC HEARING. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSSION cc: Applicant C.V.C.W.D. File PROOF OF PUBLIa.7 TION This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp (2015.5 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIAl ss. County of Riverside I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above Proof of Publication of entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer I, of PALM DESERT POST, a newspaper of general circu- p lation, published weekly, in Palm Desert, County of _ -_ -. Cihy of Palm m Desert-_ �t Riverside, and which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Riverside, State of California, C�g�' LiD_ nP_"""02r"Z7_"-"`-""-""-"-"""_"--"--""-""" under date of October 5, 1964, Case Number 83658; that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy, LEGAL NOTICE has been published in each regular and entire issue of CITY OF PALM DESERT '?< REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF 23 said an newspaper and not in supplement thereof on CONDOMINIUM UNITS ASA PART OF THE SHADOW y su PP 1 MOUNTAIN RESORT AND RACQUET CLUB CASE NO.DP 07-77 the following dates to-wit: No is hereby wen mar O Public Hearing will be held be-4 fore the Palm DESERT V fanning Commission to consider a request by PALM DESERT VENTURE,LTD.far approval of O develop- ment Plan Amendment to allow construction of 23 condominlum` units Os apart of the Shadow Mountain Resort and Racquet Club, .I000ted east of San Luls Rey and south of Shadow Lake Drive,' more particularly described Os: y SE 1/4,Section 20,T5S,R6E Sea&M Troct 4545(CM 015/17{175) ----------- ------------------—----------------------- _ 1 L / 1 OP 07.77 I certify (or declare) under penalty or perjury that the T E ET foregoing is true and correct. �t l —J ✓�L .__ 7 D Public Hearing will be held on Tuesday.May 31, 1977,Ei P.M. in the Council Chorn rs of the Palm ar Desert.CI I1all,45-275 Prickly Pe Lane.Palm Desert,California,of which Signature lime and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be' card. Ilated:May 9,1977 PAULA.WILLIAMS,Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission " i� POP-5/12f1- Date------------------May---12---------- —— -- - 1 197-- at Palm Desert, California P. 0. BOX 667 PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 May 20, 1977 City Council and City Planning Commission Palm Desert, California 92260 To the Attention of Paul Williams : The purpose of this letter is to inform you of the opposition of the Shadow Mountain Golf Club to the development proposed by the Shadow Mountain Resort and Racquet Club. The board of directors of the Golf Club has adopted a resolution to inform you of the Golf Club's opposition to the proposed development of the Shadow Mountain Resort and Racquet Club which is based upon the following among other reasons: (1 ). We propose that the developer be required to install a six foot retaining wall separating the Golf Club's parking lot and the new level of construction be three feet below the Golf Club's level . (2). That the developer be required to install a crash "fire gate" in the newly constructed fifty foot road to the Club's parking lot. (3) . That a chain link six foot fence or similar fence be installed on the east joint property line from the Golf Club 's tenth tee to the end of the joint property line eastward. (4). That a twenty foot set back be required on the proposed buildings to be constructed along the tenth fairway and that the height of these units be reduced to single story to conform with all perimeter buildings in the balance of the project. (5) . That the developer give consideration to guest parking requirements if a public restaurant is to be operated. (6) . That the developer offer a plan of maintaining security and control beyond what has been proposed to this date. These requests have been discussed at the first proposed presentation to the Planning Commission. The Golf Club had agreed to an acceptance with the developer on this basis. Now with an 'entirely new management of the Shadow Mountain Resort and Racquet Club, we find ourselves completely at odds with its latest proposal . We urgently request your favorable consideration and concurrence in the above. Very truly yours , Shadow Mountain Golf Club JES/mp 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 Date: May 9, 1 77 LEGAL NOTICE CITY OF PALM DESERT REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF 23 CONDOMINIUM UNITS AS A PART OF THE SHADOW MOUNTAIN RESORT AND RACQUET CLUB CASE NO. DP 07-77 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by PALM DESERT VENTURE, LTD. for approval of a development Plan Amendment to allow construction of 23 condominium units as a part of the Shadow Mountain Resort and Racquet Club, located east of San Luis Rey and south of Shadow Lake Drive, more particularly described as : gE ',, Section-26 T5S, -R6E, :SBB & M Tract 4545 (CM 015/171 175) D R I V E m J R E E T SHADOW L K CHIC 31 n DP 07.77 - < J T R E E T a (�F T R E E T SAID Public Hearing will be held on Tuesday, May 31 , 1977, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Palm Desert City Hall , 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place, all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post May 12, 1977 EIR FORM #1 RFIVED _. . N.: MAY 3 1. 1977 CITY OF PALM DESERT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT NEGATIVE DECLARATION Case No. : DP-07-77 Applicant : PALM DESERT VENTURE, LTD. 73-850 Fairway Drive Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Description of Project: Amendment to existing.Development Plan to allow construction of 23 condominium dwelling units as a part of the Shadow Mountain Resort & Racquet Club located east of San Luis Rey and South of Shadow Lake Drive. Finding: EIR was prepared for the original project in June, 1973. Amendment would not substantially change impact of project. State law requires no further environmental documentation. Justification: No increase in density will take place. Units are being revised architecturally and several of the buildings near Shadow Lake Drive are being reduced from 2-story to 1-story. Any interested citizen may appeal this determination to the Planning. Commission %Iflf?H(i)(XYaviX�EXQ�XYdfX 144&X��€XSXdSi( ( �iX�fX �XXji(iYc by filing an appeal in accordance with Resolution No. 77-7 with the Department of Environmental Services located at 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California. If no appeal is filed within said time, this determination shall be final. Said determination does not, indicate whether the .project ,will_ be approved or denied', but merely indicates conformance to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. Date Filed with County Clerk (within five days) May 10, 1977 Date Public Notice Is Posted: May 10, 1977 cc: Applicant Date Appeal Period Expires: County Clerk File May 31 , 1977 _ B,Ilctin &qrd -ry 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 Date: May 9, 1977 LEGAL NOTICE CITY OF PALM DESERT REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF 23 CONDOMINIUM UNITS AS A PART OF THE SHADOW MOUNTAIN RESORT AND RACQUET CLUB CASE NO. DP 07-77 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by PALM DESERT VENTURE, LTD. for approval of a development Plan Amendment to allow construction of 23 condominium units as a part of the Shadow Mountain Resort and Racquet Club, located east of San Luis Rey and south of Shadow Lake Drive, more particularly described as : SE ;, Section 20 T5S, R6E, SBB & M Tract 4545 (CM 015/171 175) D R I V E A ..I R E E T SHADOW L.'(E < ' CHIC m DP 07.77� - < T R E ET 7-7-771 a FF TREET l I I SAID Public Hearing will be held on Tuesday, May 31 , 1977, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Palm Desert City Hall , 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place, all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post May 12, 1977 W-f it 75 PRICKLY PEAR LANE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 RFrU/ /, • i R'V � pp77 MF 'i �• TELEPHONE(714) 346-0611 QryQF� Se0 c`O QL_� Dy9 I�q��F As A�Q sFQ A. .S. .Hoyt Jr. Barbara C. Hoyt 11252 Binini Dr. Santa Ana, Ca. 92705 B - EIR FORM Nl O MAY 16 1977 ENVIRONMtNTAL SERVICES - - CfTY OF. PALM DESERT, CITY OF PALM DESERT NEGATIVE DECLARATION Case No. : DP-07-77 Applicant : PALM DESERT VENTURE, LTD. 73-850 Fairway Drive Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Description of Project: Amendment to existing Development Plan to allow construction of 23 condominium dwelling units as a part of the Shadow Mountain Resort & Racquet Club located east of San Luis Rey and south of Shadow Lake Drive. Finding: EIR was prepared for the original project in June, 1973. Amendment would not substantially change impact of project. State law requires no further environmental documentation. Justification: No increase in density will take place. Units are being revised architecturally and several of the buildings near Shadow Lake Drive are being reduced from 2-story to 1-story. Any interested citizen may appeal this determination to the Planning. Commission ) E$t?tl(i)fi( X�tXQ�XX�XdtX€P4�X��E�X�S1( (�Xad(�fXi¢�XXtXi by filing an appeal in accordance with Resolution No. 77-7 with the Department of Environmental Services located at 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California. If no appeal is filed within said time, this determination shall be final. Said determination does .not indicate whether the project will_ be' approved or denied, but merely indicates conformance to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. Date Filed with County Clerk (within five days) May 10, 1977 Date Public Notice Is Posted: May 10, 1977 cc: Applicant Date Appeal Period Expires: County Clerk File May 31 1977 Bulletin $rogra \ F 1 12L � ~� 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (TI4) 346-0611 Date: May 9, 1977 LEGAL NOTICE CITY OF.PALM DESERT REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF 23 CONDOMINIUM UNITS AS A PART OF THE SHADOW MOUNTAIN RESORT AND RACQUET CLUB CASE NO. DP 07-77 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by PALM DESERT VENTURE, LTD. for approval of a development Plan Amendment to allow construction of 23 condominium units as a part of the Shadow Mountain Resort and Racquet Club, located east of San Luis Rey and south of Shadow Lake Drive, more particularly described as: SE , Section"20 TSS, R6E, SBB & M Tract 4545 (CM 015/171 175) D R I V E `C J J B E E T sNaDDW L'-:ce i CXIC < N DP 07-77� - < J , T R E E T � , 6 F SAID Public Hearing will be held on Tuesday, May 31 , 1977, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Palm Desert City Hall , 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place, all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post May 12, 1977 L_ r (Q�� MAY (Kpt-ate �� 21083.'n rrrtn �®7 7'j71143-273 PRICKLY PEAR LANE,.PACM DESERT,CALIFORNIA92260L`� ❑❑ n• •a � � �� L8.838183 < TELEPHONE(714) 346-0611 °F. G�y9�yr� 2°`NOF W. Wenck 683 Vista Bonita 'Newport Beach, Ca. 92660 (fRAY 1)3-7745-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260L'.93P!an « TELEPHONE(714) 348-0611 110 ' % S �S Shadow Mountain Park Inc.0 F0� WWenckS83 Vista Bonita Newport Beach, Ca. 92660 EIR FORM #1 RECEIVE ®. MAY 171977 CITY OF PALM DESERT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT - -- NEGATIVE DECLARATION Case No. : DP-07-77 Applicant : PALM DESERT VENTURE, LTD. 73-850 Fairway Drive Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Description of Project: Amendment to existing Development Plan to allow construction of 23 condominium dwelling units as a part of the Shadow Mountain Resort & . Racquet Club located east of San Luis Rey and. south of Shadow Lake Drive. Finding: EIR was prepared for the original project in June, 1973. Amendment would not substantially change impact of project. State law requires no further environmental documentation. Justification: No increase in density will take place. Units are being revised architecturally and several of the buildings near Shadow Lake Drive are being reduced from 2-story to 1-story. Any interested citizen may appeal this determination to the Planning. Commission X3EXE¢i67f)( X�EXQ(8(XXPaXYdfl(I1fiAX�&fe�Xdll( ( tyi (IE�fXz�p� 7XjtXie(by filing an appeal in accordance with Resolution No. 77-7:_with the Department of Environmental .Services located at 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California. If no appeal is filed within said time, this determination shall be final. Said determination does .not indicate whether the project .will_ be_ approved or denied-, but merely indicates conformance to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. Date Filed with County Cler k (within five days) May 10, 1977 Date Public Notice Is Posted: May 10, 1977 cc: Applicant Date Appeal Period Expires: County Clerk File May 31 1977 Bullef in &qrd i G:End off =DffM=n1 ~� 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 i Dater May 9, 1977 LEGAL NOTICE CITY OF PALM DESERT REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT. PLAN AMENDMENT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF 23 CONDOMINIUM UNITS AS A PART OF THE SHADOW MOUNTAIN RESORT AND RACQUET CLUB CASE NO. DP 07-77 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by PALM DESERT VENTURE, LTD. for approval of a development Plan Amendment to allow construction of 23 condominium units as a part of the Shadow Mountain Resort and Racquet Club, located east of San Luis Rey and south of Shadow Lake Drive, more particularly described as : SE ;, Section 20 T5S, R6E, SBB & M Tract 4545 (CM 015/171 175) 0 R 1 V E _m J B E E T SRa00w La(E i ' CHIC z w DP 07-77� - T R E ET - ` - q\vd• n x�y" pF T R E ET . •r I,e LLL - SAID Public Hearing will be held on Tuesday, May 31 , 1977, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Palm Desert City Hall , 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert; California, at which time and place, all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post May 12, 1977 � 0. MAYI777 r�'~ 11 I• 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 i« Cq L,� PB.599193 _�« TELEPHONE(714) 346-0611 RE'G R '(1 ljli4�F�9a Jon W. Fay Inger W. Fay Carl L. Hershiner 20401 Ravenwood Ln. ; r ' Huntington Beach, Ca. 92646 t [fi f �`�``. `;YE '• t18�881 e7•.an•tt r-1 �� . ,.a . _ i I. !(!Z° � t6lYtifdj�ltl .e ` Irt •T(�r.• s•. r -it :�' - at CL'.hICE 1E3l11 1E a •• ! .Y •Ry n1 . .t• i/ r:•. a rp EEL Ell N,r mm J IIIY.l i111 i�P" 01•el•77 13lMIM-ML Ott t$ YW 71.71 uiM.ER) .IV. V.S.P. 11{I•'T �•• Ate[. AYpIEa31 OE3C411t1tT TV 10 NItEL r0 LA Sit III PEAS Nq E[EMTIC% YE"t' +SPOKE. _ 001[ it Iti• N Y81 a}7.111.010.1 yr(,(jtIA MT/ ar fi�[tiy t 1 TOU 471111 $6172 RR3t1 A LOT M aU►11a an/M0 OALK DMI IKK LAT 1 tax N 1%. 7aa TKE�aatATp ink it Nl:881 p7J11.113.1 OIT To, If[ Am OUM N/n ny r 7 Uri 13 BAJA 0 111 Ill/IN PRO MIT ItU�tlKy t�QUt O A '•.�� •K wvum 7C018•NI a27•SII.ONd I.rt ro��i/IE� !MM --1100 SipA[ al"133 11/73 C 9 1LAI 1MIA 1 au r A Ul/M PUN MEAT U1 3 RA 13 A R R� Ca 1 f10E7 TC el=•001 07-311-01" KaOE�aatMt CU"If 7�7aT 10 /O. Not 51 MOTTam mw N/Y u7rI�LAT�Ry LetS ILA P A Nt1M1 MR OEIERY P4M O AT t�t �� it 018.081 R7.711.015-7 ic[a STSNa I6171 K Lot M RA r A an/M ow IOWA! RAm r A A it t1i:E81 aE7.311-017-t Icy (.1^1211 UK LU C41i eM33au 2I/fl-M U7 S to n RA r A I21/051 N' DESE11 urt-CSm 0su 11.11-77 ASSESSREri-ROLL FCP ARE tEA1 77-79 (PRPPO2707 DI-j- 50143 11-41-7.1 ACT TC7 MIKE. A( MBN DE ulollo3 OY 19l3{u7-311•RII-S PAQCEL r0 Wr $74 7IY PEAS ORP 1E•=TIGO IV TCT R� R IrE YO al TAKE 067171 N/71 tC Q,8.80 K�� LATTT M RA 0 A NI/w:AK KKII "A ZSS RDRTt 011:8]Ae27.311.019•t C.rAru weu ou» � UI 39 Illr r A I21/w SALK DESE11 Ut a.ovum I �} it 01l:880 627.311.020.0 SaU NIIDa Nq1 UT M 4 r A auw Nu a1E1t 1 UK it 018:816 I27.3I1.021.1 Lot 7 A uwm I GiMtYtE fISN NI)► YN� i LAIN rut A r A M/N1 MW KKNI u[ au. It 111•I/I /21.31t•on•e Ut a.1111W 1 RRM1 to f NA r A On/1N rftll mat NM it of`•01 W-311•631.1 toa A mom I 111111 N/7/ . EM N Iltt r»0/01`0RA 111111 MOM 1 e, r.. , ill U•.qi in 7 'C' 11 R• a rA O,UCbO •A';• Esto! ( d K i �QE� •• tLf fIE•fEi /l:dll•A)y C• 7 •. . �i-1ii 't0TTE1�117fN T. i6 .AE[�:E tl lllCC/tUC;E 1AT.a1 Will • ;�w` ' COT 11 ALA 0 At 61110ta 111. 1 E41 ZES S •r u.•i'•.. at • K ; 11/i1•A• rn�.tAnr cA j bun 61.01.77 ASrfagelroCEl toll 1HE Ttlt 71.71 VtlAAi707 'AY mt.. ilrol /';CU A<,• •C ef{i�[[. WJICMA OpCt11110Y ty TN II KCI!0 Ur ft1 rr'I FEAR ab ETEwlCa tP.• ••• iNCT `t� 0 It Bir-jil 177.711.ONro r . �10 t on"7tA pq A METAIIE twoNm +� UT la fUt 1 is MIrIN MlA putt PAR IOU �ix f• Ol=•101 U7a11-oh•a AN '� tC -N y�t- t!r 11 N��7�oy Art • IitN1 Mtn AR LIT M40 h/n/1N M.11=al lIN I. TC OId.010001 i27.111-In-i tt t,7Af1 A R bt 10 1 ILn11 111n Ut N Iu r Ti MI/Ia1 MlO p1fC1T IM • y1=tTrt 1 T1s TC 01�_al i27.711•BM-0 C�7�� k • ;11�C@AIryRis NN b7i101t1 i 1W�/NI Ayw":3tt n i 22 W1 t 16 R/1 7p1p�p��up /1ma�y11 IC Blt-011 N7.771ro]i-T tar 'CiirEaLa 127tl6 01176 BBB I �'12 Lill 1 M MIrN7 i�C� boo TC 01!_G01 627-312-0016 pur1iv p toa toil {tytf}gg�{ pp�2T5�� Ea7ATEf 1 Q Vo ,at 01N13 0a176 tm 9 KA C a I23/150 alp woo -rEro7~ er.EroD.rr MR om all-01-7/ ASMOR 1T-COl1 TO THE TEAR 77.71 taTH!A2767 PAX WAS Nro1- rim Or Im BN(fE� ApOrl. DEMIPTIOA AT 111 OiBCEI N LAND T76 IN PEAS ABV ETEWTIcim vu TC7 A� 1• B C{I•[t TC 01�-toll 627•312.002.7 [Ot1f6T112 -00 Nn2t Nl7i ART! IBM o a MIR"Ma DESM 42 r1�1�y1" 1 1• TM /22N TC 116_Sgl 627•312.003.1 KnrI&I tR �t 1• MCTIr! IYBIM N17- OR it 11 Ili•is MtrIN MCA pua1T I• 1�N TC 01�_I01 Q7.112•N1.1 Emu slit •cf'IR"Pt iNf11 11r76 1100 1n n Iu I tr mrM1 Mu oatlT A wimv 4 .1M1N tC 111:111627.312•001-6 701tI�A11 1MIN Nn6 ABANDON,MININVO /OLAI 4/1 to Ki•tl p1ry11 MR IMI/T WFDLNU Amitaiv OIf MINiC 11`•�I N7•flhNl•f UM IKfMrr {N 1 Y�tN 1p/M1 Iili M�I7 1� i�i/}[/ff�Muft}1� alr/u trx+ •c•.nulu nn • 1t „ i7fipp�[[�8� Rl;�li 1• .0 11'.NI N7.7.1•iN•t At [1J[ �1 CYltt1{C[ fr011 �[ ;.C• » �t 01i7'(g tt a I111/il 1400 PeAtm&W T It II1.0I N7•341.1N•0 /•t• NomntKt a latr rl �•l iI7g 1� 1111 1[171 dj4fL 1 Palms maw nFXT41t NM ka&Can tttr.t>•tt 771T tiwO/r.r ut[ ilia 61•/1.77 4rt111W-IE[t ra Tit nil 71.71 /rMW2707 Mx MW 01-a i'2711 M[' tEt tlIWI[. m a1/71a n Ta Pam It LCC III Tl7 ilml PW t4011CO (ICI am ^ CYItA �t1{t It /•/1 ITAI N7-341.111-4 em p C1�r�C q a /1NN N11t N W aMii l7i C, I INTO 1 Nlnu"M Minim .N j11 �[R +• n+-N1 NJ-MI•C I:d f1�f am It ,JLIWM r lQ7l of farm mm mama Pam • owr0 W82911ilEVOISM 7[gait f / } pCE10 1 amm sulm Morris PM q1 i it /1t•N7 6i7-34I.111-7 IM It A #7176 hN Ota 1 nutty arbor mum%wE -11 EVE � a TC IIj-Nt ir7-Mlilt•t '� " W n 7�-f/1�Nit -/l IitmL} 1}1� ItRi!Nlli WTi76 1 Ia/Ia saga ftwit1 Ma 1 to US K!! i owl4Mr AN 111N Il-fl•77 p/[1gn_tT-W. fEi Tn[T[N 77.71 04 2741 tiY N1M 62-/1- t7ilf t*w 1UMM OZML Daalfli0i 71 ill ➢ilC[C PC LIDO tTl TI•(att5 POW [IEM71M W TEi +® SMA:0 rc ad�1 N7-ta•oc1-f /�,1� r[at 171771 N17/ [/{ W 1}M/Nt Imm MINT1It NM U7 1 is g7w MANI�• tC oil-NI N7-Mt•11t•i ••if11 tair/aur It/n rum wm iWLY WWr1It Pam f• 1C 11t�1 NhWN1•t am /Nu jwwm OWN wuwow ►n6rw It /1t#1 1n•W 1N 1 • e LI 6I•L I.77 /ptmg 41.11OlL tot tot IUI 77•TI 00"I"tl s1Y. frill .t ISO ME,E, s>,71EM. Metelplin t7 III slittL to ton III 117 stag rws C./n•t&M V"" 1?1KITWA f n=•ui fi7•IM•IUH { +. !jam na a 1MI41 Il176 fag TeMt MKIISTIn ter 12 A tc Il I pl•wIHItH �nII�T�n M 93M tafa� CPnE1WM IMM e7171 OO�I 14 a a•aU a If UUMe MLR tat to a1 it at'�1 p7•w1Hp-7 Mm n n n Ir n OF Ut�6 u r a pine IWf Mint tv N a cl1�° ffiM Ut a IU a s mill psu Mager In an �,V e• Tc fijl fi7•3.I40-9 1r/�7In a f7lN aaF . 7llfet ag17a tat 7 ILA a of innu My Cl wWcEr Ut M% ------------ Mx f►wt a1H1-77 /MMUM-Opt rag THE TEI9 77.7I (Mn)I7f) qz Him al-e wnm IV III pdFl• etL'IMl1. EMNIs11M rY III sIKEI ae LAIC fn TPI snf Mcs ErEWU 6 Wt TtT It! T it I1=:81 fir- o-osq WS n oftaw offer ag1rl Ur a alias parts/P"Mo. Ur 17 1 t o MOM t2/71 tt 11:-NI f77•AtHM•i tt�a tam -w • IsIla 1 L/7!aU a•Marne MLR mnt UT M•1 mg flk Tc II= 1 fir->,t•wr-: �Vvrlla= -Twow uln 99 1 I OR I 1rfllf H I�aMrel/SO=TAWAIN Me4 Up M s/ O� Aft M� S. Tc 411.sl1 N7-HC-01.7 LK CMIUfKt IMH 4EE u7MwI 11 M IMr/b fa100a Re{laTfta IIag 1 Tc e11•4I 627g41•09•1 p M pHptagt7 + TAM Ii17i "1*so M1a1 a1Mt1n Ism ao MMeIIN �� fI1M•IINe � �J �% iP;j`�,3�F1�;1tPa a t, aal.�Ea /r•.:.a.ut•• ��. �.. , ��4t f Its»'albt to itif at ``ee Al t tlT 'n t+17Si t'&A'111% �1� n 'Sir k, 1� i/ t+YttDII )NtNM1 t: tI'. 1 �t7=111•atl•f Mo �tT �1{ �1O.tilWtt II l•IULt/U:rt .,T P711 1 M,411 16.%ft.%TAI% NM 1,411 VAM ttt;Ktttt twi-1Nrr Six tthl 1141•77 autHO a114%, to of RN 77•11 /Nt!t171r PAX "So 1141 Mrs tan ttt +lltom NSAM awl"160 At too pum N Nq So 117 b Pw t4ep"Sm W. TCT sm tt uroINr•tt1•tuaOnlim,as /n7n N•71 7 sour macan Nat t Let ssn e. •s• Tc t1M11 N7-WKNi t it�tat+lwttl fir tun NMN S "it t\NAM 1101111m M✓♦fln NN . tw4sa �{aRNttR NOW AN�t +t N1,Nt+r1r aStnn uar s.a �• -N t[ N/L7 titI a77.7l7-Nt•2 �N p� tN'` NG A ilMIMIR NRN � 4 1!t 77+.17tN swim I", to NN Il latrssa 1`S tNtEbtE MIIM N,N T ' "flow"tNtipl NuaNrtn Am, ' r +s�V 3 . . MJ�F. ttt_-t}tw MN MR ttntt am 11�1-7J ttOctN 4MI tN THE TEAR rr•n ctt.KISN7 vex NARt Nit- •. "M R71 tiff 4111cm t. t/NIN. OWIFTIN tt TN t1Kcc ab UG ST, tat AM DW ER"ttrs %v Tel si t. tc tis:�t ttt-,Mt m t r e �LNIGtMKt M14 ie "41 SWIM saw OWAIN ttN ! taN uaT 7 itT. ,� T; u` 1 6t7•Nt NI.7 an= MO F - to N 1119■N ab,Nt pup ma �� tc url Nr.NI Nt-t � y1 1/1 M w i•O��1tyN�Ma tow it tint A17.111H11•9 11rf1 itM1.w �, 1M M W I•IM/IM Nlat 111Mt ff*�I+� ,� �, 1 K /1�1 Y7•M1•INy k //M „ ,,., � ��w ��i�c �K�4u; e.. cl�,��t e7;aeldta•e t 'r s e� � "i`” . MM r V��Y 11'lp�� • �L4t�'11 of cp��' gtral scw:nlws cacao: e1.7a t ��t1itl'10111011 SWU a11491N WK 'y G14 df!e1 J't°�Y7't Y�G�l wD HT 119 TC GI�K01 111•NI•Ilr•f S i�yi?,iD uu fEo'�'�1I.i E6rrcil.te 00GG + 1 ► ��'t�1111lI1111 nllltOP SA %I%PIM 1 ° UlitT 12 L+of T t�shh ,{� D Ilt�l Y7•NI.OtM1 N M0 Ml a urn OtlliO i Nm�wav WA111%MMI cl �1 II' t atT•NIIi7•I NY K' O7fa N116 �It alnN aWa mmat%as tttalll.• 1H� 11 N It: -. B t PPP -INPPP :,�. k Ut SAri5 11i1-77 IIIWNNT-II.L 101 iN VISA 77-71 (gPtlr70) P= an NEi wi I11d1t44211101S.amlma IN in AIM N0 IIC Sil IM Pill PW EIt7"= NEi TIT M%mu TC flimi ar7-NI.11th5 `t- NmI M � r. is" 111711 In ln,l IaT SA N�NNM11111NN Imm"wa mkaR ISO i[ •1= 1 0r7-8 ,-�1.01 AUfr"".r,.- im 1�,�I1IQ �1 Ns 1Tar�ic ,: • � 01a1IP�� tiePTT'}�t�rt 4 tlaOl 6Tats �MrY 1 no"aNOa Ka11U PM •Iini�� iI !Met Simi U7-151.0r1.5Im1 I, . ?., "it am"som!0 MAIN NSA •i OI SU TI DIMS 07-351.0n•6 1Aa 0A{Ai�� 1" Suisse,mm MWAIN PAW . 76 1 1yp�ii��K K.7 L$a �I riiMP PPe%Kfm '" K.M,11 I14I.77 1NCMNINT•IOtI Min Via 77.71 IPIPtrr7P) WY via py1-71 1 M' -Ki 00t AKVOM SXN^ ONLIIPifa rY ?Is PIIDtI SA LAND Nil T:V Pt"40 m mme %ti T0i �. it tl7-NI.ON 7 ti " e � A�➢l1'ANr MM Nrn M�JL�f""N1"m MWA N Poi Im . . r IN77t+ANr TI /ll�1 Y7•N1NN•1 � '1■!, � iNN • ' �� ttsttl H w e! '� • ;Pd•N;r ktteleF� Fnite Fax. r'a:vvil •IF. �,. . 41tNFI yFr•i'y ,�7 it1.F11 Ft7•t11•{lI•► i . �s� Y'{i61YfKKF It1.1 tt ff 1I�F �?FNe� i`t (S 61F16 F1FsFU 1►JOs•3JYt1IY Kw ,yl/ 4 vi .T R Ftl it nj.�f Itr•fIi•Frra �i71rif1 Fir y 1� 1 FAR. IITFTO i {lf.lft MwDDY lIW1TF1r MFR �7 (�s sf 11�ry{� NWHtMF U.r•FI... nit iFril pYl•77 FIIteK.I•Im tfe UP! tf« 77411 I.MtIZTit n7. "IN Fi47 I':w Q• to >•+OFE. Ifs AWI►tim R' I" FFIIFC IF IK. ITF Ire Fi«MV i1'U*IpW rc-V ewlel +� �g}F iC Fit Mf Lif•1F1•It2.7 tilt fCIRTLot it m IF/7F F-N s� Orw�:B 1 MIAp fsL4or fwFrtFlf Ma GA krT .�1�� ICti1 fiT•itd7hFI f r, m Q t11r{ F/F� nri«i r R'M;�III/«/wFlws ow"Im"a 1 �rttlw n u�i an•sf-oa-I LCLwiF F�t13,01 sum nrn ■FF7II 1 Frel1l twlew tt*WIN fe« ■ wn7+�w W • ` S. TC HFMI R7-11-fif-1 y tl711 HI 1«feF fern F1F fF FF�/III"to 1tp/fFn Wf p7nd �I7F.I p« tt Ftj-MI F17.111-427-1 A�F Tf1 ol�f� -K A t FIRF �l t plHfe Wlp tF%MiFtr Kilt S,. tS.Sn.. .a • 5YA'JE/ . 41.1\ `t " q it( t;E (((; Alf-;tf.(I1• n • Wr lit ft26f �R %W;c 11,E 35T370PSi�tP3 rCi 1C'A•, I 5"coa 6"Y��O}LIr 1uy\ eI0•l26.6ft.. W .1 e�`:011E[5E11LC�it�E1 122er USE��tt�oDE (T .ON1tlA\:tE O�IDOAIPOIN A14 IYLLt0E51tIts`I•e G+NM7 1441 'mat w IV: • I us Q, 0wtc 11100 iC 011.441 [u•uf•fll•1 �ES NtN G O4 t�ICQC7![iD'L IN Lots It A 13 PS M17016 1 ...@.pn, i /-ir�:2a1 =1r- 5Mf5 01.01-77 ASSESS!E\'i•iCLL roe W. IEAi 77.78 (r.ar.t7L) ate- 5{:2; 7 nat sip r\CP71CL< \T: TC. ASSMEE. ANNES`S. OESCRtD11ON TV 744 PARM NC LAC $T, 7r;Ms iC; E.r.P•g\S NE+ •• �E�A}:{oEJ•EET[AL It 4 4IE.001 [34•It4.41:•7 rNEu AD M l N�LE1'it 4 ni Ia.L tN A I911 Lu AD }z[p USE COEppEESD /LiT�C pa YAAENLE p T5[0077t7�1�0y176 Wf ifOP iiT 7701AL,DESCGIVII�Y bEE�SSESS0i55 POWAIN n `i Nill ACES 1T N pprAT�AkLE%A:EfCtC2[0) 5y 7C 011_001 [70•Itl-0I3-i tlE A!di i0'4AlNDES',A1011ON gEES1OSOi3 0 00 WN MI D. N TC 011_40 674.171-MI-1 L11 pESM[ T N 4 C0 M CODE RI /ETAiCE 112105 07176 LOTAt1 11t 02I07 SUDOI NCUYTAIN;.CLr kR�7�E{TSLpi1� O u 7C OIS:f01 6]4.171.00t•2 .DESCfbN 4 O0 t1�O tCtttOD1Fp It COWETANLE 113025 08n6 ESTITES I 021007 SMDM 14UNIAIV nCLr CA 92243',('n`j1 S6 TN• TL 41g:g01 [30.171.OD1 , LL1 O6OE )00)0�Eg S� COIYETINCE 124212 01173 44 HT1JL 1042/007 S44DN /O'JNtAIN :OLE m:•LNAt piM.f2N3 n2 l9fM 01•0I.77 ASSES DO—ROLL f04 1Y•: TEAI 77.73 ixR>t4C01 DALE SM21 'IT AM AN tic"TIM NEt .C. AWSSSM ADDIESS. DESCRIPTION Tv IRA PAICEL N0 LAC S1I TIT DEIS DIED EL?wDICVS NET •• • 7C 4Id.88, {./0-1a1.006.6 1%" "2 ZOa 11030 T1N[E 11Ylf toga R{ LO}Ati{l W[Oi21007 DOY KCUIMII IOIf �1 UTC '. 1C OI'.�I p0.177.0o3•S ` 1 /1[MIETT P 1 1661111f/12 i •� 'S'a' t7inC .C' If •+ (a..tM tar• >+^ •,/�' 144\r4 4 CUS t � 0/2:0.Efr�1:€ LL 01C:4t1 n.f•I It•t1:•4 LOT II •1 c"IM IRA:. 7177 0 T 1 E%tt Dry 4L 0: (! U4.1IC•0U•J j� � M jl ft "A O i7 a IT At M B I At USE 4JC "�!C It, CGAVCTIN:E OSMJ E6/J4 tots + t S 11 c441f67 TRACT 2377 :U+*�90xOr4 o j IC Y 011:00I 675.120.02.2 736ppOR I�1CA ,22V 60 4tCt At" pRASgqE �CE00! L 6b (WIETW1E 007/03 01161, CESCafe�ISa SEiE�!lE3504lN+ATIq E04 T0,1L `� i1:R PEb[iTL 1RETU9 1N: f2260 ,. 1:9'1 630-120•CO3.9 EE6COCDE9C CCE-Y- OrIEMCE tg p ff ' 9fE 4f04liCTILIJEIsi(1i�\!�S��E55[433 M: ...AURA. IV^. . .a2a3 ai S060 01-01.77 ASSE59CENI-iCLI. Too T41 Ir14 77-7/ Mci -27t1 a-s. St:p t7 ' .rt a_9S a9„ro r,n:T1P5 V'ET 1,, MIME, nUESS• DESUIP:ICV P7 194 P14CEL NO UW ST4 TP; aE45 P2Ca E47 a;ICL_ Vc iN1�N�X77pgpryr7y�eAIN CI agCLUE INE OII:O01 6J0-I2G-GN-4 .I USE COCoxD q7 IETAKE 922" •` 0 1: [9� &p p 1 p 9 t� ��O5 PE0&gOlil OElC9lolfq;/lEEr453 30955! ppI CGJ[ 1c y L4 T6KE TC 01f ttl 6J0-I20-006-2 I MM11Pjic9 FEE 6!!El10951Y.FD5 112 TOTAL 0. 0 Y (( Al F 11i1A/T 1 L7 At%L 4E�112 INC TC 011:OL1 630-120.007.3 ., pISEE K0001E�yT(�CO2 ETTAANCt 92260 b0 4400 1 OCEUIP7I'ACE 955E1S093ti E09 7Cty. M17 PT 5L1a iINNN�fCC7 E11:001 630.120.COO-4 1rl D±Li DCM4ILL,L I4E4 92260 TC CC Gott Ak'' )U51 CCODE CT CONIEWICE !. 1N40pigp,•TT419 PLC ESCQ TES71!9 042/007 5M 4�``T00 LC� AINUiSC,9PYLUB INC yzz6p 4IS:4C1 67t-120-411.6 } USE ME P.OC4' rCOA-/EYME 47190 04,69 4f 4! dit'T'_S 1IL IN LOTS 12 t 13!S C611015 4y 7Dbt qq { 11P4PSJi7 0SIE 1MSS 47N1.77 ASSESSrUT-RCLL FOR TK TE11 77.71 (""92707 K;,E N670 I Ir!KY PMP {ROM* WT lot A11E116Yr IppM K GERM mcitollow P7 l9A P110EL LAU 1T1 ?IV PE6 EL?•et WO (OVS NS7 7Ct EMI:`y6LS 1C 111631•IM•012.7 x144 1 i.- - r MW� i�; f-.•:•; _ �`1 Y 11#ByIIMM��iTMIllyq{ ACV t I1E.,T ,�Y7MM•I •IM/Y wEMos !' 4•` ''. `ter l'�.:'1. C4 v .. _ - M[ .. ,• •la iryy 01•ib 77 ITEt"'W- lL IN -0 Tt11 77.7E TPAnrt•T, .�. :. ••t` • + ••••✓aq �.• ••+ 611ttl3tt. AO!@w. 'n31rt ICV to 1*1 nKtl IO LIp AT$ Tu are, 'A•• ....✓; 11 �}��t ` •.��11 7: 11�•uI 171•JX•ON•I I f1 �Wf1�AEC[ IfHll N•7E 11{ANp A�t�NIni1 was"MAIN NIl1 o ltft0[ 111 t 7IVTAKE TOM hall It w=•1!7 Wf71•Nh! ®W 1E TII q no TOTAL:tlGtnl.v HI M�11�IWI rOL tic fflE�SEN1 TL 17=�1{T7.22h117-f APKAA� 1A'CEpAAfm}muyE 1lfilt NIN OtlOAi1TiP11f.[JIM 11AFA"O TOTAL ARM IK II TC "1 627.335-0411•f CO MAKt I}!IfllN t NIN OE1LRifTIOY f[[A�tl MM a TOTAL V ARsT rttN IC flt-IOi 627-33A-INi �TconEnRtE 049023 04175 2 1C[}1 S% TO MAL OEECRn710f rtFr•grer ..rrK3.+. 011'or2ry3 FAZ SAM II.01-77 ASSESSM T•wll Eta THE TEAT 77.7E (P" 70) 'FIX HIM Sol In PEM PAOP E;TWTICI6 ■EI tat AKEIEEE. Imo. MCRIPIIOR to IRA PARCEL 10 LAID SIR in PM FROG EL*FPTIC>S SET TC rt L� TC Olt•E11 f27.3>f-61M Uf f1107 0-N R n TM I39IH ATM IO 5 M TIE% FOR TOTAL OtRCAt"10R Illii �5k;3yM6VTMU MpEO�TII�fD TC OI1•101 R7-N1-N1-{ ORftNf -00 003306 07174 IOIS 3. 2. 3 A t IU Y FJ 4211050 FUR �3 L��q{3/�7A7R N It 01E.001 /27.3t1.0R1-7 f WI'tCTAKU 00 LOT A MAN A 18 0211050 PALP D.SEIT KTWO LI IC 0I1.n1 627.341-003.S PIT = 771 N TITO 1K ROOC TI TAIKE LOT A ALF P RA 02110w FALP MEAT 11/T�j{fjj�fA� E• PCAiA1R OR TC f! f0 olE_gg1 A:7au-wta UK C00[�L7MTAItE II1f02 O3/T AM 7 ALA S PA 6211010$ALF MEAT i IM"AIFM AM2.1Mt AN/I11TI3 MK IHIT I!M•Tl AlIM1Atr1.IM11M TIR 1q1 iT•T1 EIrAlA717 N11 NN2 i IM Yg ,L�[ •ifr+'..t�'1Erit'J half! q :e lCt t -P Ch•0.1 PAl• ME41 W 7 y�• P1! Yy,i N11 t•�` r:• 'Al t E1T�r0Y C�,cI�YLE 1ias ie„i 1 " NI IP/ 00 PAV Ct W UTII 3 Pi Pill-14 LG7 ..:.I,.,. .... 7... j ete•r0'U ng ItHt il•01.77 A51t114At•10U t01 it TUI 77.71 f110r2107 Pi:, ACIAt i PINS Nc- tw"IlCU TEl tC7 ASttum ADMM matall0i TY too PRUL it LAC; Ut IN atq PIC* ta" ICM V.• ••• TC I11111 {Pi•SPt•112•t An • �UPiyIL ll pp��f11 TASCt IWI,MU � �' lIIII•it 1�!'1"Nu Dtstst MI 3 A t �i ;w1a. to" tt {t7•17NM1.7 IFA7q 1 onlits ti1005 r"All PAN "{ �� TC 111-it7 ft1•A5•Itt-1 1 11��PP��.�.� A��TTii1I i7205 -15 A�} �7It _CAMTIIKS "I 715 4172 &Ws 1 pills SIIAODi ftwatl VAR 1♦ •P¢�"� t/5�ia[l� TC 111:11 A27-315-NS-f ATE 1�[ 1051��11 COYitTASU IETAssC I�moll Swim mW11i PAN `4f iMOPP0 • 7L 011111 47.sa-M-/ il -FAi'/ftAUCE CIU4102171 7t{ta gj It mills SOD"IM MAti PAN tiT trrE-Oler. P.rt-ifr.. /AAZM/ ME Nits 11-01.77 ASSMENT-10U FOR TSE tEN 77-71 (Pprr2») MiE SAM 1 tl7I'm Pp OiL11AIM SET ICT ASSEMM ADDI£55. DEICAMIR rT TIA Vatm SO LAIC 511 TIT PM ARM EIFWTIM W7]V T[ 111.111627.333.O15-1 MVI 6 on" Infll eun 69AM A Inials&am OOIIYIAti PANph» ATE 027-3»-10i-2 1 T AAtE 1»7T! III» ..pp TC 011-C17 M M WN rot tOUnL MCA IPIM � gMp JiC Tc N1•8I 27• S -N7•3 LK .tdMTAAI 12"t 03151 P PyKAj&;MPa TOTAL MAN tit IC 111111 N7.33540•t m •aavAAU IRM all" /51 f.5[2 Or Stt�flra i0tu ItRll►EWi Rl 17 5,I TC I11111 pia21-Nf•1 `�IAnTAKi Motl//» 0 OWN rr mw Imllptt" 'I ]91EI1v.' I a F• VI¢FY4 1 17AE % DP7EUY(C 177f 11 1117E i LOT ! ALP as PI 6N1001 DIY :Este: JUt 7 :1;re RS`CY CCCL1 11141 s. 11 EI 16l7.17Y•EOY•7 T111OR�11Sf)'COY/CTI\'(E ES106/ 01177 1,CA d•jd {CAaIL.LJOIRPLI"jYlf"a ur 1 0LE ]E. L211001 li f1 It IL 1C Old:ddl 627.11.•006.1 p r 40" gi 1A`1 `t�1G11ACE ddtill 01716 21!11•~tolloo •ALP DESERT UNIT 1 ME OCP!4701 P87 KH] 01-01-n 4OE5IEENI-ROLL FOR IRE TEAR 77.71 (P1M2:0) PAW 6E15A SW :IY P{Q] ARCO tlT..r:m NET 101 ASSESSEEVC.E ADDITM DESCRIPTION N IRA PARCEL NO LAC Sig 1/7 O£LS Pata EV"TICV7 +F: 7„ 1/ AVERp4E�• AYE p�1g TO 61d_�1 627.77A-006.1 TT� CONYETRRCE dull{WITS PAR/11•ees ddd/IK PALM DESERT WIT 7 M OO Z C. CA 92260 1C Old_C001 677.7N-007.0 ��bCOYYETAnt A tLOOTRT7T�A pAS 026/AOLN PAL/DESERT WIT 7 SARMi ff E1 6 1C 01 d_001 627-]N-00R•1 CT MF(L A� 00 .) IAE 2Vnd1 WT�ItU dV0 . OA/76 LOT 7 ID 0251046 PALM DESERT WIT 7 M/1 PIpp(To pp66ll1 /C 011:Od1 627.75Y-001-2 LEIEEMI VANCE $1409 6 11/75 C 44 UI 1 MR 02510%PALM DESERT WIT 7 NE M/t LLMM..ttIKOa(DCAAY, to z26p 1( Old:ddl 627.77Y-010.2 LIU P(RDE TT p1'COP2TAMCE 111fil 07176 LOT S RD 0251046 PALM DESERT WIT 7 RA F}� CA 6�7 TC 011381 627•]]4•011•3 ME DOE fTl�r"EpkltlAMtE INS O4176 I PAR F RS O1/1I00 PALE DESERT MIT 7 0D 21g1-H lL4411 WD•Os... (920wre) PA! K104 01-01-77 ASSESSMENT-ROLL FOR 14E VEIR 77-71 KRM7?E) PATE 50IO 1T1 IN am ARCO EIEPFTICVS NET 101 RSSEM ADDRESS. DESCRIPTION FV IRA PARCEL NO LAY.'+ SYR I"PERS PNDP ENEPPIICY] NE1 tCT TE 1IR AVE d753I6 0]176 Tt 011:001 677.7N•01!•Y 2A11d•n 0/1/I00 PALM DESERT WIT S MD C 4C �1/ 1 ILAATT v 1C 011:111 627.175.001.7 M/i Ang ROOa 4 04 1 ii TAYEE CODAS 09171 TU E17 IMAY Aj 121/111 Sam amA1MfA'IU-- h ICOId:H7 617.576.002.1PAK9 "JAM N111 �1� 1 m/111 IIA1001*MAI%Alp / INi... IF/r.. - NfNIN/r•. TubgNOLfPNUFFNaF.INi/N+ N.Wuau.. /FNU gHp1'APN- NN1 iAlitiMUYua fIIIN{UItNNUN61NNf1iNN{MNI FIFf.F F a r. r .InouuNFNOIN.NwHNNMNF ., fNtuntnula u... 41-c1•r: ss sJPEr•R4_L ICA 14 IPA 77.72 �~ ASSESSES. 4-IttS, 31:4."1CY 144 P1R;E1. L: , R1LOA !NR`A 41t-Ctl 07.732.047.0 b, Llscipa.E CNAOEN 4 a6 1x1�1 a[pt�Q CA 92260 •. 7T"TE �c N iY� aTCowtYAN•t ` LOT 3 SARI ES 02110SO PALO 018147 V tw.A, ;I 1'`R ,OE. 1C Cl�.ggl 171.]]2.44f-1 FFt, y` i'E"�SyE'''ytt4��i • U6,6xtli0t III cwtYANCt 079120 07171 ' �.pottx4 xLA R P7 oil On PICK DESERT �./ TIMfaA N 2ND IC 011:8S1 127.332.605.2 •,pIF xn PfY 1 4 40 .; r �ptt3S1tM` � Fr 113e ,. 'C:t- ui7xt00E (Tiff dMrAKE 01" t LOT 1 AU x N1 021/050 PALx MEAT .4. IXA/[ RCWC C '! rA1� OUSH Will It 016:�1 {27-]72-001-7 r 4tE LOT 1 SILK 03 Al 0211031 PICA OEbtRt WIT 3 AM L 011:91 627.332-007-4 I pPEyIE�� y2;p 0 00 7. CODE�f• CONIEYAKE 41494 07/74 1C LOT 2 rA.A 03 KS C211081 PALx DESERT UNIT 3 LLI M7E ETNSK. TC 0i8:881 627.332.001•9 i{ N Ev,lf12[OVrtgNCE 013233 02/67 LOT 3 SLA 03 Ps 0211CS1 PALP DESERT U911 3 v PA;:. 54PI JI.01.7; ASSESSS_Vi-ROLL FOR lif Y-IR 77-11 WRPPFi747 PA{ HI50 e M,. 2 P +', ASSESSEE. ADDRESS. DESCRIPTION fY TRI PARCEL NO UL9 Stp ilY PE25 PRE' P .r PEb >L REI1'i iCNS A_ lCt C MMCNS t TC1 +�LT1REKE S. TC 16E c `"i1fCR C0v1EaA;E 1046A2 03,72 ` LOT t ILK 03 AS 0211031 PALx DESERT WIT 3 �(C, IRE A. i / � 7JPTOV 51 it OIt:881 627.33:•010-/ x1T pa I(K15[4 CI`iF 94109 LINE TV (0N'RETAKE �LOT 55R�KA 03 RD 4211421 PALA DESERT WIT 3 1 ' xlt LPpp Y 7f7�� oo0077yy Tt 01001 627.333.001.1 tAW CODE CONYETANCE Oi041f 05176 40 LOT 10 fU W KS 0211031 PAL". DESERT WIT 3 L CLLC(NN O L {TE 015:815 627.333.002.2 ARfE�1YENJE 10712 TC P /2TC�p [OVRfAKE III410 Of 11a i LOT 11 47 03 AS 02t10t1 PALx DESERT UVIT 3 IN 1 NLM. tC 018:88t 127•]73-00]-3 co tl IEYAKE 037659 03171 CY LOT 0 0 4n1ON PALx DESERT UNIT 7 a A TC 011:881 621.333•004-f �O{��, T CDEE—,t pIYLTAKE LSl S As 121/111 PALR DE1tat UNIT 7 m&-foot" ".49tN Fill) ASK 11142 IH1.71 intllll[ 4kl PN 111E KW 77.71 tfNNP77l) "X MIS? qv NU• )..YI:S• :.S'L:.•i•\ (. '(( r1( E: \C .1\. 1• n:. .: . ''-a+ Cr. tl (CCQTICLI 4rIM0 CA•r3 '�1� r , LCI 3 %Lv. C +s 0 1 04 6AL1 CEOEIT T ky, It 01'•"1 41.117.ONQ 21 owtIaInE 10917 4071 Lot S ALA A+M 021140 OALe awl i PAN r T TC 11t 47.113.117.1 tin L r 1 � in" coTA1tt l41fp 07076 LO711ftf�14 11 111 41/N1►0LR p[fCIT j� , 41 UEM�qq TC 11':�1 47•)1=•IOt•{ Lr t w 111t n COITETAAtt "'1' LET 1 AR 1 q 41141 MLR OC1E1T RI p fllt AWO'} t[ 11l1 47.7I7-O/f•1 tR{u O CA 1324 C"TYdCt 0132M 12/7h LOT f Ali 111 411M MLR OEfEII ' x ' 1C 01!_881 4;-71]-OIO.1 Le 7 ALAOATE w TT 'tTAIEE nI11I 12173 ° 44 LET 10 ILA 111 UloM MLA'J,EIEAT tni-1?m tn'r1bTT ae U132 01.01.n A95EyPINT-ULL tOR T1E TM 77.78 (DIM210) 997 5II47 IS- Eb':U6 IET TGi AtN'aEF. A�mA. RSGIO110r FY TU PARCEL AO LAC fTO Tn OEp NW EL'ryRICSS GT tCTAm III IC /1l•001 4T-017.011-t ,A��3Rt 1 000 71�]n73� MCE U TAI[E 010132 01172 LC, 11 All 111 M/M IALO Ct M LIT A NA �� C.01Y[Tf1[E TC Ot�-�147•]I]•01i•f Vow It 41231 4/7% B LOT At AIL 1 A 41/0M MLR CUM �1 LOT s u �yley SA11I1 1. w /224 TC Ott-ttl 4T-71r01r0 L1[W[��7711uCDMTAr[E 074f2/{17{ sow IN LOT 13 SEA 111 MAW PALM NAtl1T T( 11�.A0I {27•SISMf1.1 6>Iffi RAW ... IIAIn 4/73 011 MLII IM LOT O M{/am LOT{ILK 1 NO 0211N0 CO[t� yy Rat n Jp12 MCA I A VANCE II7173 Ot/h 011 fiT 1 tU 17 1211001/NO fILM fEIEIT T it Ol�•BBI R7.721.41•, L�f 1A rAAr[ It413 O11T{ p71�i LH 1 NA L M 021/41 PALM OEICIT AMN•/7OIA I+f+M/f11 MY N311 M•01'11 1NtWW-MLL f60 TRt Tt11 77•7I (140/0171) oft 4A4 a' tlrTf011 11[i/H ass" low" ot1ti1M101 it to PAIM of LAIC It1 WE om AM moollp1 1RT NT AM fi 1"1I11•Nt•Nhl �i 111rN pN1 AM 141�1 • 411 t ;.•.t• •t '. tit N3 •At • Ii •A S Al1.. .lil•:7 15KWW-40AL r01 T4L TEN 17•71 MINIM) uY. 1313 4i$% tl 1101104 IV TO rNCEL AL LAB: $4 in Kb par EA-.)r.7Cr4 wi •: �' 1t 1 u trc ' tE u131 427.3»wt•f q 1y�(�1 �1111 �� t�SAW }� 1� ►M 7�74ff171C�1(1r�t11i A 111I11011 `1 MM1�1RK lK tG •1i•MI It7•I1i•MYt CI rwlrt Itg11 n/p •N �� 111y�1 q 1�1 111 �tr 111 tc 11MA mr-3711-400-1 � »/» i�1RPT;4}L'CIq:tIhL`A4�q }p Moll Re NN Tc ti= r ftla74•407.7 r I u 1p93 WityM, t r01 1 IUfFp[f}11/» 71 tM tRLL '1l�J.tf Or'X@`.ffl10C!"° r'1 wI Lr em�Ipp11 r 1VMyl3A-0404I •0V Arcs TOM 11173 I.Y 1C10 NO tr AFT I M N11011 u i rrrliM• r••I-7.••r .0a Nut H-11-77 ASSESSIrrt-ROLL 001 13E TEN 77-78 (MM"70) PAX %I» r EAarT3/� 10 TOt ANEMEE, 4MUMS, Dwirfi0M IV 7N PAICEL%0 UG SU IN Op6 R4i ELT-MTIM W. TOT 0 IC 418181 427-311.003.3 r A/ 9' .%' m6.,VA%CE In" r' �tom'' 41543102176 su LET 3 0 0»"TI TUCT 1N3 ■ { TO 10. Lo Tt 01E381 N7-no-0o•-t mgpp1. t2260 •O0 COrR& OM37 12113 Let r 10 I721470 TUCI AAri ..� A 1 tG 011:88, 627.340.005.1 ■ � yp11 In" r =40& 477846 06176 �! L01 0 M 4721#76 tOACt 4111 13'Tl iC Q8•881 p7•310.000.7 M AfY p Into A3CE "A"N170 3M 0 1r m/471 tMtt on goI, it 411:881 W-30-03.0 tt A1r Y .� 1 IWCE 431131 Wn a YJ11Jt7 w to 7 ON tr ( M WW cmau "M1 un1 1C 41l:p1 Ml•3N 1111 �t �s 1 . 'A leA:•:2)U PAF 0C1hI 01•H•77 ISKN'Exi•ICII KI IxE Tilf 77.71 IAisn 2;C, i• AN; S•0 PERI :RCO iAr.:•1".5 It ICI pr.1llI ASStlItt. AMISS. M11.1I6ti6Y AY 141 r117E1 to L/Y AIR I/, X u6 1 �•�C2WE tC 11t.�1 in•Slo•11!•3 , t1 R tf MIME CINNS ON73 Ut it M 0/0/001 MIT 173E 7 �.� MY AOTCtl7•NOHIh6 1vt50YYETAKE IOSOfI 07176 - Lot ISO mini MCI ZT32 1t /1: 1627.1N-Ilf-7 t� AA,nt Y plif tOMYEaYCE 1.724S W70 ` . Lai aii�It Y3 OHIOy6"TIACt 2732 r 40 1 ilf�COI'/EfAKE 0{I20f 0{/ff Tc It1 l 6i7.1N•013.1 { i1 LOT 13 M 65I/003 TRACT 2732 IE S. TC Ut 1627-361-616-f r G3EL�3 SEACM RC NEW fffyyy 2A4 If If COYYEVAKE I06447 67176 LOT 16 fs 050/001 TRACT 273E {l. 77-71 (A".270 PA{ N162 01-01-77 ASSFSSftYtiOLI POR IRE VE14 77-73 (RIPF17f) i Ulf. ETA TIT DERS POP EEEx>TIM Kt ICT MESSEE, ADDRESS, OE11CIIPT100 PY 1RA PARCEL K LAIC 57 in om PAP UT"D �L�Y 22YfEp \� 0Y�23Y L RI IY CONVEYANCE ISSftI 12173 Tc Olt-NI i27-SNil7.6 66ULAO3OTTLL17 RD O301003 TRACT 2732 f-N SAOL94h,91CICAMUNCE NN TC 011NI f27.3N-113.1 IAY/ SLY nwo -107f3I 07l76 •`/' LO1 t3 A0 03//0o3 TRACT 2732 NE . E AL 01/:9 1 UT-30-019-2 10 A 1 u)ot TC i Af2iCe"EVAKE 042191 03/70 LOT 19 fA OSO/003 TRACT 2732 ,I R627.7°" 'IQ fil2f0 IC ol�V 360.M-1 11 MauvcE 110A2h 02,70 LOT 20 11 030/Oo3 TRACT 2732 r 10��C1AA,,u IC II�•�1 "1.3ww11.3 S YI Tf.}L"�lSV LR066/01I a["[d E f2m COW(YAYCE C37179 /1/73 I. 1.10 ACM nn IN Lot it Rf own06 144CT A6M•iNu 2T37 1 _ _ . ` i T N A sA}0 t• 1 !SL°CC[9EAf 9t2 COVIEt,t:E i707,f i7,:1 tot 1.. 11LD[ 0000 IiuT 1722 14 Il i 01-MO.942.6 N I=76cwtvant Cant/Cliff NG_ Ln 11"1N1001 TRACT 1732 ��t�� Tc nt.�i Itr•sw•w3.7 [ 1 OWETAN[C Will 101*14 Lot 33 M OHIO"TRACT 1132 � C� f1010 1C EI:.101 127•]w•K.q . i °4 �jf�j'A VIE" ,,R im tdM/Altt[ 111M/Efl7l Lot /III 0501002 TRACT 37I1 it tlt.ttl 627.364-06 f on" f9[� V{IEE IETRNCC Cum: 01170 ut t NR o5llw/ TRACT 2732 ...E•o9PT. ,.57-A lPwstTff CAz "Iw 01-01.77 ASSESSPEW-ROLL EC7 THE TEAR 71-71 (0111"I Tf) h. UC in Try PENS WDO EKE"21,ON3 NET III ASSESSE[. ADDRESS, DESCRIPTION AV IRA PARCEL AD LAC 5TR In PEGS PW EZE+i .1. X M n�{Ep kL!EP il CO+IY[1ARCE OS.uS C.n3 Tc °I=-REP u7.3w-wFC LOT i PIT OSOIM TRACT 2732 •0 00, MANwAR I pm LAL. yCE. 1C nt-a1 A2)•SiO./07•) ' UI[ RI°niOCOWETANCE 1579w 12173 LOT 7HI�IIp(OSOIw/TRACT 27M ll Sim ° `• ,E 01Up, u7.7w-R0l•2 T11/It�TANCE 0159t. 021A! CO VVUA3)[? I III C55001µ0L0D2 TRACT 2732 �TN DOPOiNfCR ,C 011.011 i2)•]i0-°19.3 '•�', y�!�p[pOpEt A AVE /3 C 00 i USE CODE °tl"72NCOWETAHCE 0"N19 06175 T h SSLAAAC 9 I10��RLEEE[OpSNO/v0,p0I1 TRACT 2732 IRT P1IT App1OLLIAA)Alp E ,NC V x 201 91 t( 011 °I1 A27-3i1.O11•] t 364 5NER 7D? ETANCE 113021 Of 175 0 OC LOT�1,0 KSpp050/003 TRACT 2732 iP"`°p�7p�PpS"I e2E7Ay"Ep tC (THI 627.36 •011-1 1 --- CAPE 1 CWIEIAVCE 020193 47171 LOT It "OSOICOS TRACT 2732 4`r PPr7.49m I'. I 77.1/ (1MTInn PAX Salil 01.01.77 43SESSIERT•Rou TOR TNC TEAR 71•TR (POMit) � w OU 1/1$W NW EVM SM NEEI 101 0I� 1 ANCUEE, ADDRESS, DESCRIPTION 9V M PARCEL ND Lilt 57t If Pp{aw t71+t i�l�j� 'pA�� 1C Olt.=tl ilT-3N•112•i EVANCE 414455 Will Lot TR NI"Still TRACT 27u 1c ut.a1 ur•7N•11l•i 1D Inh�tN 1 Tun Mail film to It M Iwtl" twt Ito r ... n�L'!•q CJhSh n 66 ' .S'J •, j •A^ 01.0147 ASSESS+CK'T•ACLL rCI t)E IM 77.11 414R11270 AAg. M.I:1 i1•GI-:: 1.• ' ASSCSlCE• AOCIM, CESC41011C\' rY IRA OARM NO LAN' Sit irf 'm 14" E '. :CKS K/i -.C• ASSSEyyS]tAELLE• • 1r iN/t 11Y,CY1 C to1 RMIT U. AK DO t 011.001 121-5l7.OEI.7 KTRAIN 1 S 00 OOCC ly LaaEtB;!tt DKYCTAYCE 021112 07113 i 10�A10 .O 071/011 SKACCY RtJK1A1F OAiI 1p( YI ' j p {/(IT ZI CR MIT d [L `� iC t'8451 i27•]5:-04t•1 R1{ 1 ' f [p 04 11 I C01YtrAKCE 051507 WIT LO{AJ6/1 0711411 MINOR!"WAIN MIA 'i 1 7pY t TO E1 l 627-773.401•5 C�A'Ip [R TT COYfETIKtE 75t)1 09,76 LOfmfA1Cii-v Or MITLLTb)7 q Of11O11 SOON MIRIAM PAIR HA IT 1 ` E r^ C. • ��. R• OU:OC1 62]•I57-001.6 0t M1 P/7 - � 1C 0 40 l S[ 51 IIIYrt C (Ayy �S]3 Rg n tmEnr,E o1Em ant to It OfATEa 1 Mott SHADOW R0 ,I, PAR, L0111 23 U YK/E e 1n/m 71 SRX OI pT,1627-]53-005.7 IAUJ�U�Y now ^I�iO xptty�SE[q,I�I17 AL[T S MELLET�pp7}p�pp iC 8-00 °Irs�"c5 t�� USED OMKES• HyOOOOr,71.17111/ 10175 UNFf '9 TIV414,MIT U1106"I 0211012 vomy ROOKTAIY PACK iTT7NR R 4I!_C4I 627-153-006-1 >. ♦ fS.lpTy p4Y to 1A gyp ti IMP USE CODE T.Y 7u-000007)72• 0�0 3 I2174 LA;S{S[S Ob/011 SX1DpnT1KEFtMA76R SPARK 0�-af000 EE ED I u0;:-7<011 SOTS? 01.01 77 ASSESSSEKT-CCLL !Ct ]HE YEAR 77;S (PM.-270 Darr SOI11 01-41-77 CET Sp tS3F33SEEC. AODIESS. DESCRIPTION DY IRA PARCEL KG UV 57C ir!aERS P. _c_• IC\5 KT^] iGi ASSE9EE. � �TEb ITiA 71T]17 4i 16i]-]SS-E07-9 �1p�LE TT� T �`. TO Y TA ITA ppppp oG6pp{p TO INS, R71 LTcE AWE to I�TA1'T �TARCE 165502 12/74 PEE t o piAi� 1 021/01/SHADOW"MAM PARK 7iRr 73 qq 1wn ip JB T 25W4 p,' A�YH. iC O7l.00I 627-]60-401-7 T1 � CUMI G0 EE44 Ri 1 LOT 1 a 0010" Tit TA2732 0703ff 0]/JI ] in USE IAA TAY[E af12{DAMiC OIL.001 62]•760.002.6 ITT 25 O 0" �„W E G44 73/t1SM� IOT 2 A 140/001 TRACT 7732 IC__ 1 s f 1'!�Y$Yt7�{ Ay[ TC OII.001 62 •364.007-7 R �1 U q [MYASJJC 147051 10176 4 44GG UNj]' 1mn tv IT is 000/001 MOT 2732 P11110 R/I Ij * 7C OII.00I 627.160.001•S RM 4 00t TA9E U/t" Of111 u1 �q 14T 4■/14/104 TAUT 211" 1111;74 CR MN OI�a81 {27•S{E•Oa•9 11 yI[�n n2iE it 40 {p villtE I7{107 06116 uT 6 A WI M 14ACT 1Ju VIM MA A74f111 n1C•Unt 1 T ens: ol•ol•:T 4sstssNENLRnL roR INE c,a ::•7/ Lavruw PAz xl:z <I-tl•:: ASSESSEE, ADDRESS, OESCRIPIICV PY 194 MUL VE UN: STa PERS let, rrr:-1CN) V?1 '0 USEJJE4 to n�:b01 627asz•a,.J r r s. NIT V V 71 S 570t6 TC 4 Rr c�� sV� {kTEwUSEt Err JJppLLp�i1 DSMIDUEE 01715 46I7SeOIOS LN107AJ011lo71rou sxlacY !cu\ulu NIRIL 11 CCC72{ fFN1yp�Ty�NFATFJ 1 .W0I71i1ri m/l VR )� COYYErEV[F I51710 11173 it Cl1-04I 62:•75Z-f G5•> r F to ` r 0211018 SN+DOY XGUxIRIN PARK N6AOSvii �TA��INi ,�,• �E [SF ` yyzz zz U tl '. YFi1n11pOEEOANEYENCE 02�005 07161 � 016_p�l 627.752-006-5 �1, 1t/ U. ON,f !! Fl1\J2 IN'N0221011 JM1IDDY NODUTAik PARR 44 N 753 r� FE ltb P454405 PAI.P. -< XETTODYN yyEERNA p 01 -COI 627-]5R•007-6 USE CODE 41 XIf 22N7.0 NAG14 CIRCLE TE 8.0t ! TY TV CALIFCC mso� an 19 c.oN/l Lam r1 [OWErAYKE OnL6 02171 f9 0751#16 L0TES7 Xb 0211013 SNAOOY XOUNIAIN PARK gEilRl EUk OEJEE TES ( yyyy}5 ' pp � T X/T of .bMAX OR 77I S TC 011:441 6Z7•)52-44E-7 Nl61E CCR t UU Y. COEYETANCE 0 + 0 03111 0 UUT 20 or,"Sit ! LLppT SJEA 1�02/1011 JXAwi Y.00ViA7Y vIRK 9 475n16 ESTATES 1 l��jMJ. 9z66Q 7C tIE_g�l 627-352-464•3 t P TTAIN�Y'C AN[E 476519 03166 10TA55 02/1015 1i14O0'i NCUNIAIN PARK .:-Slue ES 1E5 ur:-IO••• 64I5/ OI-Ol-T7 ASSESSNEE9-RCLL TCR 1NE YEAR 77-70 /ai=•.r2:G) P4n•7 56177 01-01 77 MET 141 LN OJEEgNWEEESSSS1EL2E,, ADDRESS, DESCRIPTION P'/ IRA PARCEL VC LAN: Si; 1'V -M .RP EVTPt;CNS VE1 iQ ASKMEE. WE'COJE Rll A CA OYIYEIAVCE 020912 DSI;] II OIS:C01 627-757-001.7 Etta�TSMir� 4D7AM XA 0211010 SNIOO!NC'1Y11IY DIRK U OG ' �1� wlE7 AS ES 1EJ I UUNIT 11 9/OSn 4`2As 1` fl!-G01 627-05:-LC2•. A 07S/0% pC� WIF! 6 6 Il FTAVKE 0/110/ 09167 C1lp(L T2 D W1p} p 02//01//MIDDY NOVMTAIY PARK N/T I�X rlTA�� 1 RR•�%flf ii A ( 01 16L 45)•OW5 MLXI �r 1t7{ u kOYId 11 f}os. to �-�� vlE n rA1a TV CACdMnNCE ISSIII 01176 uN)r }}�r CCNN MSn IAlA62 17 /011 SXAOOY XOUKIA IM PARK A RAl/fa Ell 02r! N. TC t1g:881 6Z7.75S-001-6 Maw [t C a uE tl Auto OIO972 06/72 5 [raE it bll�S Ilr fulfil fNIDOY MAINTAIN PAER PIT 2]p 6pn N1UY a Nuur Tc �88M ATM1 t�}y�y0 m7671•¢211N Iona NUR 161#6 I Miffs flow 1O11NAIN►JAK Na 173/Na I CI-C1.71 ISS1SYEN1-ULL rCA 101 YEAR 77.71 Cl2Pa270 'AJ ISSESSEE, A;CRESS, OE5•41111tN ri IRA s1R•EL NC Uq $1.4 -1. Itts Pic, W.4"ILy W• 1_ AWS1 ,E 6,d.S81 621.351.07A•i r (d��r11 Y ROLL ' A NIA 1 61IappEENrO1qp°i�[ris,}"2q�0£Y LAIC� COtO6 4 1I11 CyOpWEllVAAlKiiEyy rB 119610 01171 '+!0„?,f;j'R �wOWRMOWiA1N".IOx E11Af£5 1 121,011 lyt'�C�Q` 1 m1or,,01 MAN 11!p/1 1" 1t P�U 'ICIYAtE Kr nc0 �7 p, tc 611•881 u7-ssl•OSs•0 CEyE�y�L1 p0} ASRJ R T2�y1pI!)A-000003331-01/00 �R�n0iAl L U,,22ia1`S��EC6C% I/L0 EE3O1��M[VANCE 097950 07/76 rIUiU� MOIINTA�M PRIM I$IAiE! 0281010 SRADW A!A T 1 Tr1EI xcOS1N(pv1[lA RE I111 H9 R 0 1 TC 01104, 627-352-001.0 611 µpp0 031" in LAITA117 Ab 6U1011 SRADOY MM414 PARK fP�NL3D� La�►�r3 f� £b SEµSSpp!j� OR7 l262 WOIEP5660C R7 CDOE t1' "„ E1r'ACEE 0zIJ02 02176 TO OIt:00i 62]•352.002-1Is IYIT 3/0 C LLpp 1� 4 00 6A at% 1 M/011 SNAWY PUAI MW PARR A�pApPti� ppE�S Am C1� 6I r. ii t5�5�(��(n b.D;Vr�"�AC�ou OR z62 TO o18.00g1 u7-3s2-003-z Lon i IL6V 0 I>1E CAOF TV t9*Yt YA"CE 11IJOJ 02176 751 fi t874ILMI 0211019 SNADON FOWAIN PARR uP9-I1.IP ...1-1C..P MY 10117 01-41-77 A3SE53+ENS•RCLL FCR 14E YEAR 77-773 IPR>rr2:4I >t;�- 54172 0141- MR NET let 7E "BUSSEEE. ADDRr5s. DESCRIPTION FY IRA PARCEL NO LAN. SW In PERS >Rt-^ WY PIICK Irl 101 Amm 111ii 0 ' y7y7c 57006 1C olt.00, 627.352-00,-3 ./lAIQ} X. mkR 7�",14 N EY/EVNCE 071715 06115 4 4G •R 4 1D1A50 9 021f/o11 SNWgt IWNTAIN PAPA CV (�7 P�P[p609CtyAI17yE5 1 !s TA70C 0 IIpM r�Y DANCE 1811t0 11/73 'C Ole o01 627•J52.005-i in"n"1r E6TA�� t IN1011 SUDW NWRIAIN PAP" 4 AArE C ��- tY�EdN[YAIIEE ��4085 P3/63 iC RiS:00i 627-]52-L06-S �:73! 4 40 f p51 ILtAQ 1f 0211011 SKADON M MAIN PARR E57 1PV[}11�OLyE p yy AC PNNRLCE LEE 1113T6 02l11 1C 011 4Gi 627.35?•001-60[ WAR!M9 bb/016 SIq,00Y MAINTAIN PARR 0 7Q�CJSQ 1 + a 2b it 011 627-J52.000.7 YAK(�E�WIYEYA"LE 07)T1ro 03l)1 0 04.10i 1113xii i'7� 0 11'E6M i�on/ois WDW NOLWAIN PARK TC Ri1.G[I 627.352•AA3.1 i •� ' 9�911 0 YAkCC �261Ie 03166 0 40 �•': ' _ �r1A1 3 e0)1/136 IIMDIY F"Alk PAIR ¢ii9=libr �T 1000•I0AA 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Case No. : DP-07-77 Project: 23 Residential Condominium Units Applicant: Palm Desert Venture Enclosed please find materials describing a project for which the following is being requested: A development plan amendment to allow for the construction of 23 condominium units as a part of the Shadow Mountain Resort and Racquet Club, located east of San Luis Rey and south of Shadow Lake Drive. The attached data was prepared by the applicant and is being forwarded to you for comments and recommended Conditions of Approval . The City is interested in the probable impacts on the natural environment (e.g. water and air pollution) and on public resources (e.g. demand for schools, hospitals, parks, power generation, sewage treatment, etc. ) Your comments and recommended conditions of approval must be received by this office prior to 5:00 p.m. May 23rd , 1177, in order to be discussed by the Land Division Committee at their meeting of May 25th The Land Division Committee (comprised of Director of Environmental Services, City Building Official , City Engineer, Fire Marshal and a representative of CVCWD) will discuss the comments and recommended conditions of approval and will forward them to the Planning Commission through the staff report. Any information received by this office after the receipt deadline will not be discussed 'by the Land Division Com- mittee nor will it be forwarded to the Planning Commission for consid- eration. Very truly yours, �, ,Dicey Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services PAW/ks PLEASE RETURN MAP WITH COMMENTS 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Case No. : 77 Project: .23pp Applicant: Enclosed please find materials describing a project for which the following is being requested: (11)4�7/L!/-CLLCM, cb c�� CiJ'lJ�'J NZL[fil l7 L/�r�L(O («, 4. fJ6.�s L A,-,f L The attached data was prepared by the applicant and is being forwarded to you for comments and recommended Conditions of Approval . The City is interested in the probable impacts on the natural environment (e.g. water and air pollution) and on public resources (e.g. demand for schools, hospitals, parks, power generation, sewage treatment, etc. ) Your comments and recommended conditions of approval must be received by this office prior to 5:00 p.m. )))aw 023 , 1977, in order to be discussed by the Land Division Odmmitte@ at their meeting of /) , a . The Land Division Committee (comprised of Director of Environmental Services, City Building Official , City Engineer, Fire Marshal and a representative of CVCWD) will discuss the comments and recommended conditions of approval and will forward them to the Planning Commission through the staff report. Any information received by this office after the receipt deadline will not be discussed by the Land Division Com- mittee nor will it be forwarded to the Planning Commission for consid- eration. Very truly yours, Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services PAW/ks CIRCULATION LIST FOR ALL CASES Circulation of Tentative Maps, Parcel Maps, CUP's, GPA's, etc: REVIEW COMMITTEE: 1. Palm Desert Director of Environmental Services Paul Williams 2. Palm Desert Director of Building & Safety - Jim Hill 3O. Palm Desert City Engineer - Hunter Cook _ Palm Desert Fire Marshall - Bud Engel 5. Robert P. Brock Office of Road Commissioner and County Surveyor Administration Office Building, Room 313 46-209 Oasis Street Indio, California 92201 (Phone: 347-8511, ext 267) 6: Lloyd Rogers Supervisor - Riverside County Health Department County Administration Building, Room 107 46-209 Oasis Street Indio, California 92201 (Phone: 347-8511, ext 287) 70 Lowell 0. Weeks General Manager - Chief Engineer Coachella Valley County Water District (C.V.C.W.D. ) P. 0. Box 1058 Coachella, California 92236 (Phone: (714) 398-2651) 8. R. E. Deffebach Director - District 8 California Department of Transportation P. 0. Box 231 San Bernardino, California 92403 (Phone: (714) 383-4578) 9. Harry Schmitz Director of Planning and Building City of Indian Wells 45-300 Club Drive Indian Wells, California 92260 (Phone: 345-2831) 10. Gerald Dupree Director of Planning City of Rancho Mirage 69-825 Highway 111 Rancho Mirage, California 92270 (Phone: 328-8871) 11. Kermit Martin Southern California Edison Company P. 0. Box 203 Palm Desert, California 92260 (Phone: 346-8660) 12. D. M. Pinkstaff Area Construction Supervisor General Telephone Company 83-793 Avenue 47 Indio, California 92201 (Phone: 347-2711) 13. R. W. Riddell Engineering Department Southern California Gas Company P. 0. Box 2200 Riverside, California 92506 (Phone: 327-8531, ask for Riverside extension 214) r Circulation List for All Cases Page Two 14. Roger Harlow Director - Pupil Personnel Service Desert Sands Unified School District 83-049 Avenue 46 Indio, California 92201 (Phone: 347-4071) 15. Jim Langdon Palm Desert Disposal Services, Inc. 36-711 Cathedral Canyon Drive P. 0. Drawer LL Cathedral City, California 92234 (Phone: 328-2585 or 328-4687) 16. Stanley Sayles President, Palm Desert Community Services District 44-500 Portola Avenue Palm Desert, California 92260 (Phone: 346-6338) 17. Moe Kazem Regional Water Quality Control Board Colorado River Basin Region P. 0. Drawer I Indio, California 92201 (Phone: 347-4011) 18. Harold Horsley Foreman/Mai 1 s U. S. Post Office Palm Desert, California 92260 (Phone: 346-3864) 19. Joe Benes Vice President & General Manager Coachella Valley Television P. 0. Box 368 Palm Desert, California 92260 (Phone:- 346-8157) 20. Don McNeely President — Palm Desert Chamber of Commerce P. 0. Box 908 Palm Desert, California 92260 (Phone: 346-6111) 21. Roger Streeter Senior Planner Riverside County Planning Commission County Administration Building, Room 304 46-209 Oasis Street Indio, California 92201 (Phone: . 347-8511, ext. 277, 278, & 279) 22. James Whitehead Superintendent - District 6 State Parks and Recreation 1350 Front Street, Room 6054 San Diego, California 92101 (Phone: (714) 236-7411) 23. General Telephone Company C. N. VAUGHN, Area Engineer-Outside Plant RC6761E 83-793 Avenue 47 Indio, California 92201 (Phone: (714) 347-6352) Mk W,oec.Te-e �ivY� — PieC.S/,0G1"'T . ,45'- 700 S&N Luis 2EY 90 T�,q�m J E3 E2 7' CA . Z z v v CITY Or PALM DESERT : 43-273 PRICKLY PEAR I, PALM DESERT CA.92260(714)34e-0e11 APR. NO. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DATE REC. PLANNING DIVISION (DD Nor WR/rE/NrH/SSPACEI APPLICANT (Please prin4 ) PALM DESERT VENTURE, LTD. (NAIA E) - 73-850 Fairway Drive 714-346-6123 (Mailing address) (Telephone) Palm Desert, CA .92260 (City) State (Zip-Code) Request:(describe specific nature of approval requested) Amendment Approval to an existing C.U.P. Development Plan. for 13 Condominium Units Property Description: SE 1/4, Sec. 20, T.5S, R.GE., S.B.B. and M Tract 4545 .(CM 015/171 175) Assessors Parcel No. - Existing Zoning PR 7 627-42 ) Existing Gen. Plan Designation (041 iss a a common lot) Low Density 3.5 DV/ac. Property Owner Authorization: The undersigned states that they are the owner(s) of the property desc r i bed herein and hereby give aui ation for th filing of this plica,. n. May 2, 1977 Signature Date Agreement Absolving the City of Palm Desert of all liabilities relative To any Deed Restrictions. ' DO BY MY SIGNATU N THIS GREEMENT, absolve the City of Palm Desert of all liabilities regarding any deed estric ns taT ma be applicable to the property described herein. � , May 2, 1977 Signature Date Applicant's Signature Z02 - May 2. 1977 Signature - Date (for staff use only) ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS Accepted by: ❑ MINISTERIAL ACT E.A. No. ❑ CATEGORICA EXEMPTION -p ❑ NEGATIVE DECLARATION 17 OTHER CASE No. 07-77- NOTE: APPLICANT MUST ALSO COMPLETE RELATED SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION. Reference Case No. ORIGINAL FILE COPY l Supporting Data! Shadow Mountain Resort and Amendment to the C. U. P. ( 10 Units - 2 Tennis Courts - Maintenance Building) 1 . A) To allow the development of a proposed amendment to an existing C. U. P. Development Plan (C. U, P. -03-73PD) Such amendment will meet the intent of the zoning ordinance and the overall PR-7 zone. The proposed amendment will provide for 10 condominium units which were approved for density for this area of the plan. The amendment is to satisfy the Planning Commission's request to modify the two-story buildings directly adjacent to the R- 1 single family lots to one-story buildings in the C. U. P. -03-73PD plan approved June 2, 1976. The proposed amended plan includes two one- story buildings (6 condominium units) and one two-story building (4 condominium units) directly east of the existing two-story 18 unit building. B) To ammend the existing C. U. P. Development Plan to relocate the proposed maintenance building from the south side of the property originally shown on the approved C. U. P. Plan to the north side of the property to allow for more efficient and centralized circulation of the maintenance services for the total Shadow Mountain Development 2. It is the intent of the Developer to modify the existing C. U. P. development plan to satisfy the Planning Commission's concern of the two- story buildings directly adjacent to the R- 1 single family lots. The arch- itectural features and design character is similar to the approved 28 condo- minium units presently under construction in the center of the property. The proposed development will consist of two-single story buildings and one two- story building with units ranging in area from 1075 to 1460 square feet with a mix of two basic units (a) two bedroom; two bath and (b) three bedroom; three bath. The proposed amendment will allow for the architecture to flow together both with open space and buildings. All streets are intended to be private and will be maintained by the Owner's Association which will be established. 3. All common areas within the amended development area will be maintained by an Owner's Association set up as a normal necessity to a condominium project. It is anticipated that some units will become part of the Club's optional management program which will offer rental services to owners who participate. Supporting Datai Shadow Mountain Resort and Amendment to the C. U. P. (10 Units - 2 Tennis Courts - Maintenance Building) 1 A) To allow the development of a proposed amendment to an existing C. U. P. Development Plan (C. U. P. -03-73PD) Such amendment will meet the intent of the zoning ordinance and the overall PR-7 zone. The proposed amendment will provide for 10 condominium units which were approved for density for this area of the plan. The amendment is to satisfy the Planning Commission's request to modify the two-story buildings directly adjacent to the R- 1 single family lots to one-story buildings in the C. U. P. -03-73PD . plan approved June .2, 1976. The proposed amended plan includes two one- story buildings (6 condominium units) and one two-story building (4 condominium units) directly east of the existing two-story 18 unit building. B) To ammend the existing C. U. P. Development Plan to relocate the proposed maintenance building from the south side of the property originally shown on the approved C. U. P. Plan to the north side of the property to allow for more efficient and centralized circulation of the maintenance services for the total Shadow Mountain Development 2. It is the intent of the Developer to modify the existing C. U. P. development plan to satisfy the Planning Commission's concern of the two- story buildings directly adjacent to the R-1 single family lots. The arch- itectural features and design character is similar to the approved 28 condo- minium units presently under construction in the center of the property. The proposed development will consist of two-single story buildings and one two-' story building with units ranging in area from 1075 to 1460 square feet with a mix of two basic units (a) two bedroom; two bath and (b) three bedroom; three bath. The proposed amendment will allow for the architecture to flow together both with open space and buildings. All streets are intended to be private and will be maintained by the Owner's Association which will be established. 3. All common areas within the amended development area will be maintained by an Owner's Association set up as a normal necessity to a condominium project. It is anticipated that some units will become part of the Club's optional management program which will offer rental services to owners who participate. I CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNERS' LIST AFFIDAVIT STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF PALM DESERT ) I, David G. Behrhorst hereby certify that the attached list contains the names and addresses of all persons to whom all property is assessed as they appear on the latest available assessment roll of the County within the area described on the attached application and for a distance of three hundred (300) feet from the exterior boundaries of the property described on the attached application. I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. (signed)_ Aa,�: (date)_ May 2, 1977 , 1 000); AND ADDRR;;SI:S O]' ])l(O"ER7'Y 01Y"* tS yOlt )'UI1L1C III-XIONG ON CASE 110 . JOB NO. PARCEL NO. NAME ADDRESS 77900 Avenue of the States , 627-311-013 . Goodman, Frank Palm Desf-r} California 73675 Shadow Mountain Drive { Palm Desertf California 20401 Ravenwood Lane 627-311-014. 1 Fay Jon W Etal Huntington Beach California 73-704 Joshua Tree '.Street f . — Palm Desert California 4058 Braeburn Way 627-311-015 0 Walker Georgia L Los An eles California 73-754 Joshua Tree Street Palm Desert , California 73-640 Joshua Tree Street 627-311-0161 Zastupnevich Paul Palm Deserf-, California 77900 Avenue of the States , 627-311-034 0. Goodman Frank R Palm Desert California 73665 Shadow Mountain Drive Palm Desert, California 47120 W. W1 Dorado Drive 627-313-007 I In lehart, John G. & Margaret B Indian Wells , 11501 Orum Road 627-313-008:f Shi stad Eddie H Etal Los An eles California P.O. Box 512 627-313-009_J. McDougall Ann D Palm Desert , California 3640 Juniper Street Palm Desert , California 73751 Joshua Tree Street. 627-313-014-1 Lehman Whewell O etal Palm Desert , California 73641 Juniper Street 627-332-004' r Twaroski Stanley E etal Palm Desert California P .O. Box Cove , 627-3.32-005 / York Robert H Etal Ze h r Cove Nevada 9 73-675 Juniper Street Palm Desert California 73620 Pinyon Street- 627-332-009. / Horne Arthur R Etal Palm Desert , California 2190 Washington Street 627-332-010 Johnson Oscar F Etal San ranciscQ . C:ajifornia 941-09 6922 Via Angelina 627-334-005.1 Wilson Sally W Etal Huntin ton Beach Ca. 92647 George Woodley Et Al 926 Palo Verde Avenue 627-334-006 Arnold Vera S Long Beach, California 90815 i NA611i AND ADU 117:3SES 01" 1)"O"""J'Y 011'Jdl;itS Toll PUBLIC )JENR1PG ON CASE NO . JOB NO. PlsRCEL N0. NAME, ADDRESS 6922 Via Angelina 627-334-011 ArnnM Vera Huntington Beach California 92647 926 Palo Verde Avenue 627-334-012 Arnold Long Beach California 96815 3170 W. Olympic Blvd. 627-335-001 • Montgomery Los Angeles California 9o006 45850 San Luis Rey Avenue Palm Desert , . CalifQrniA P .O. Box 652 . 627-335-002 Moore Joseph A Etal - Palm De 45860 San Luis Rey Avenue Palm Desert Calif ia' 45868 San Luis Rey Avenue 627=335-003' � Clark Van B Etal Palm Desert, California P .O. Box 1054 627-335-004 Sima . Josephine E Palm Desert, California San Luis Rey Avenue Palm Desert, California P.O. Box 1066 627-335-005 i Pearson E F Etal 45880 San Luis Re Avenue Palm Deser 45896 San Luis Rey Avenue 627-335-006.-.# Brace Ellis J Palm Desert California P.O. Box 451 627-335-007 Roberts Construction .Company Palm Desert, California Shadow Mountain Manor Inc:' P .O. Box 451 627-335-008 44* Shadow Mountain Manor Inc.. Palm Desert California 73700 Ironwood Street 627-335-009'• Abbott Earl V Palm Desert Califnrnia RT. 5 Box 502 627-335-010 4I Scribner James G Etal jDalton, Georgia 30720 73720 Ironwood Street Palm Desert, California 1A281 Yorba Street 627-341-001 j Gala Villa Motel ( Tustin, California 92680 73721 Shadow Mountain Drive Wymer H Donaldson Palm Desert, California 73793 Shadow Mountain Drive 627-341-002 Hetland Don L Etal Palm Desert, California 73793 Shadow Mountain Drive 627-3417003 ■ Hetland Don E Etal Palm Desert, California I NAMI AND ADDRE:;SP.S 01' 311'O"ER7'y O14NISRS yOlt PUIlL1C lllin'IU.t;G ON CASE 110 . JOD NO. _ PARCEL, NO. NAME ADDRESS 73837 Shadow Mountain Drive 627-341-004 Ernst Clyde L Etal Palm Desert, California S a ow Mountain Drive 627-341-005f Ernst Clyde L Etal Palm Desert, California 1614 a axy Drive 627-341-006 Marthen Reinhard Newport Beach, Califor-nia 92660 73855 Shadow Mountain Drive Palm Desert California 683 Vista Bonita 627-341-007` , Shadow Mountain Park Inc Newport Beach, California 92660 J M Wenck P.O.Drawer J . 627-341-008" 1 Jefferson Phillip B Etal Del Mar California 92014 123 W Main Street 627-341-009 • " Barnard Earl C Etal Emmett , Id . 83617 73752 Shadow Lake Drive Palm Desert , 'California_ 1502 S Palm Canyon Drive 627-341-010 - Richey Lenore Etal Palm Springs , California P.O. Box 701 627-341-011 Huntington Helen F ( Palm Desert, " California 73820 Shadow Lake Drive. Palm Desert, California P.O. Drawer J 627-341-0120 Jefferson Philip B Etal Del Mar California 92014 73822 Shadow Lake Drive Palm Desert , California 1502 S . Palm Canyon Drive 62.7-341-013 • Press & Press, Inc . Palm Springs, California 502 S. Palm CanyonDrive- 627 341 014 y Press & Press Inc . Palm Springs- California 73745 Shadow Lake .Drive 627 342 0019 Bothell Dewey E Etal I Palm Desert California P .O. Drawer J 627-342-002P I Jefferson Philip B Etal I Del Mar , California 92014 861 N Seward Street 627-342-003'. Lantz Walter Etal Hollywo i od California 90038 - 11252 Bimni Drive 627-342-0041 Hoyt R S Etal Santa Ana; California P.O: Drawer J 627-342-0050 Jefferson Philip B Etal Del Mar , California 92014 . rawer 627-342-006 .1 Jefferson Philip B Etal Del Mar , California 92014 NA1,11' AND AU1)R1":)SFS 01' 1'1(0111'' R')'Y 011'1v)S1i;i ),'Oil pill.tL1C 111iAMING ON CASE 110 . JO)3 NO. PARcr1., ND. NAh113 ADDRESS 77035 Desi Drive ��P-- Dean Gertrude Indian Wel s , Sal ; fern; a 77035 Desi Drive Dean Gertrude Indian Walls Calif—niz P.O. Box 187 ,3 Vee Nisley Interiors Inc ' P.O. Box 18 { 04 Vee Nisley Interiors Inc. Rancho Mirage , California 73951 Shadow Mountain Drive. Thorp Stanley B Etal Palm Desert California P.O. Box 44 ¢2 — ,�ju Stemen Evelyn M Palm Desert , California Menara Circ e lm Desert, California 3s , Holloway Bert W Etal Pa 927 Emerald Bay Clark Robert S Etal Laguna Beach California 92651 1125 Singing Wood Drive Lynch Camilla J - Arcadia California P.O . Box 361 Waggener Frances A Palm Desertf California 45731 Portola .Avenue Huntoon Edith H Palm Desert California 1002 Northwestern Sinclair Robert S Etal Claremont California 91711 45775. Portola . Avenue Palm Desert, California 45807 Portola- Avenue Sinclair Robert S Etal Palm Desert , California 777 E Valley Blvd. Apt. 119 Isabella Jane C Alhambra California 160 Trescony Street Tibbetts Sheri Santa Cruz California 95060 1048 Whitney Road 2 _ _ W.T. Meehan & Selma C Meehan Anchorage , Alaska 99501 72-615 Pitahaya 627-351-018� Donovan_-M Bi flow&JuanitaBigeloc Palm Desert , California 777 E Valley Blvd. Apt. 119 627-351-019 Isabella Jane C Alhambra California 627-351-0201 Donald J. Pennin roth and 6282 Marcella Drive Evelyn E. Penningroth Huntington Beach, California 92647 P .O. Box 336 , Palm Desert, CA. 627-351-021 _ Wood Laurence Q Etal 45790 Mountain View Ave . Palm j i I PAM)' AND AD))111;RSliS Ol' P)101')ilt'1'Y 011'N)iRS T011 11UI.11,1C I11iA'RI NG ON CASE 110 , JOB NO. _ PARCEL N0. NAME ADDRESS 45760 Mountain View Avenue -022 Keedy Robert D Etal. . Palm Desert California 14371 Pinewood Road Casale Frank J Tustin California 92680 1945 N Curson Morton James E Etal Hollywood California 90046 45656 Mountain View Avenue Palm Desert,California Roosevelt Way David K. Ellison &TurnerE.Taylor San Francisco , California 94114 P.O. Box 639 6'27 Alliguie Marius M Etal Palm Daselt- , California 45630 Mountain View Avenue Palm Desert California 1502 S . Palm Canyon 1-02 Harris Ester B ATTN :Bob Press Palm Springs , califnrnia 73950 Mountain View Avenue Naasz Darrel D Etal Palm Desert , California_ 9 William F. Frost&Naych L.Frost c o Bryan Ind Box_ 3547 Hoyt R S Etal - -.Anaheim, California 92803 73920 Mountain View Avenue [MEntain View627-351-032 Flann r rt California 146 E .Orangethorpe Avenue. 627-351-033 Hoyt R -S Etal Anaheim, California . 627-351-03'4 Frank Verrell&Virginia Verrell 2491 Madison Way 627-351-035 W:T. .Meehan & Selma Meehan An 1731 Port Westbourne 627-352-001-II Stockholm Edward S Etal - I Newport Beach California 1502 S . Palm Canyon 6 27 352 0024 Press & Press Inc ( Palm Springs ( aliforn; a 1502 S. Palm Canyon 627-352-0034 Press & Press Inc I Palm Springs California P.O. Box 77 627-352-00.4I State Theatre Company' Brookings SD 57006 45675 Mountain .View Avenue Palm Desert,. Californi 45641 Mountain View Avenue 627-352-005) Powers Gary L I Palm Desert California __ • , i 1'.AifE ANU / UUIih;;Si?S 01' 1'1101'ER7'Y 01YNT;115 T'011 ),UI.1L1C 11)iA'1111tG ON CASE NO . JOD NO. _ PARCT;T., N0. NAME ADDRESS 6421 Mira Vista Lane 627-352-006 Breitwieser George F , Etal San D; eg9 aalifornia 92120 22647-B Nadine Circle 62 -3 - x Verna Torrance California _90505 10105 Castletown Drive 627-352-008* De Long Rupert C El Paseo Texas 79925 1731 Port Westbourne 627-35 2-009 � Stockholm Edward S Etal n a 2660 73901 Shadow Lake Drive 627-3 Palm Desert ,...California 73905 Shadow Lake Drive 627-353-0020 Rumble Lester Etal Palm Desert , California 1902 Grandview Street 627-353-003A Tucker James W Etal Oceanside, California92054 73911 Shadow Lake Drive 627-353-004p Jensen R Gordon - Etal Palm Desert California c o Hirschi Healey & Healey 627-353-0050 Tibbetts Sheri P.O. Drawer 1703 Palm Desert, CA. 683 Vista Bonita 627-353-006"i Wenck J M Newport Beach , 660 683 Vista Bonita ' 627-353-007j Wenck J M Newport Beach, California 92660 46087 Portola Avenue . 627-360-001.'f Bi_zzell William H Etal. Palm Desert California 46083 Portola Avenue. 62-7-360-0022 Newton Loma A' Palm Desert California 13226-G Fiji .Way 627-360-0030 Van Bergen Robert Etal Marina Del Rey , California 90291.-° 46079 Portola Avenue P 1 P.O. Box 6454 627-360-004' Gannon James E Burbank California 91510 46075 Portola Avenue Palm Desert , California 46083 Portola Avenue -. 627 360 005bi Newton Loma A Palm Desert California .46071 Portola Avenue Palm Desert California 46067 Portola Avenue 627-360-006• OMalley Anna M Palm Desert , California 46063 Portola Avenue 627-360-007 . Harris Clarence C Etal Palm Desert, California P .O. Box 197 627-360-008.1 Dickinson Malcolm G Etal Blue Jay California 92317 i - -- 46059 Portola Avenue — Palm Desert, California I ' 1 NA1d1i AND ADl)l1E!;Sl7S OF P11011EIYI`Y 01YNP;1tS )'Olt 1'U1.1L1C 1JEA'R1NG ON CASL 110. J013 NO. r PARCEJ.. NO. NAME ADDRESS 46055 Portola Avenue unit #9 627-360-00 1( Ell wor p�� " n + California 5807 Topanga Cyn. Blvd. H2O1 627-360 0108 Samuels Leonard - Avenue. rnia - 46051 Portola Avenue. Palm Desert Oal � fornia 46047 Portola Avenue ! 627-360-01.1• Morgan Margaret, Palm Desert California 46043 Portola Avenue 627-360-0120 Eidam John L Etal 22480 Liberty Bell Road 627-360-01'30 Joseph J. An risani & Marie 1364 Angrisani 2470 Dexier Avenue N 627-360-014-o Hevly Robert B Etil Seattle WA 28109 46035 Portola Avenue Palm Desert ,- California 46031 Portola Avenue 627-360-0151' Maury Reuben Etal 627-360-01'66 Ross Werner & Marjorie Werner 46023 Portola Avenue 627-36D-01;7• Milroy Lois M Etal Palm Desert California 46019- Portola .Avenue. 627-360-018' Saul C J Etal Palm Desert , California _ P .O. Box 56 627-360-01790 Bridge -Robert T Norf l 46015 Portola Avenue Palm .Desert California 46011 Portola Avenue 627-360-02*90 Angle Thomas G Palm Desert, California 46007 Portola Avenue 627-360-0210 Jackson Paul 0 Etal Palm Deser California Fairview Cottage Assn ( 46011 Portola Avenue Palm Desert California .45-700 San Luis Rey 627-370-0021 Shadow Mountain Golf Club Inc .l Palm Desert , California - 45 700 - San Luis Rey 627-370-0031 Shadow Mountain Golf Club Inc . 10880 Wilshire .Ste 1114 627-370-006 Palm Desert Venture Ltd Los Angeles , California 4 c/o Destination Resort Corp. I A l,fld AND ADD111;SS17S 01' ]'1101'JiR'1'Y 011'14P:11S )-OR P1.1131,1C 111SA'RING ON CASE 110 . JOD NO. _ PARCEL NO. NAME ADDRESS 10880 Wilshire Ste 1114 627-370-0071f Palm - rna Annel Ca l ' f r o 24 c/o Destination Resort Corp: 10880 Wilshire Ste 1114 627-370-008I Palm Deser Los Angeles ralifhrnia 90024 c/o Destination Resort Corp.. P.O . Box 1023 630=120-0020 Fulmer Howard J Palm Desert California 73650 Ironwood Street Palm Desert , California 45 700 San Luis Rey 630-120-0034 Shadow Mountain Palm Desert California 45-700 San Luis Rey Shadow Mountain 'Golf cliih TnL Palm Desert California 73660 Golf Course Lane -1'�30 Filmer Jeanne W Palm Desert, California 45 700 San Luis Rey 630-120-0081 Shadow Mt. Golf Inc. Palm Desert , California L.W. Seannell, .Walter Bourcie , Ernest E. 'Bromley & Bradford H. Hebgen - " 73-655 18th -Fairway Lane D. L.W. Scannell Palm D r 73655 18th Fairway Lane_-#D Shadow Mt. Fairway C 1c. Palm Desert California LLL j I i r y- a • k. r. , >. 8 X�OII�Ic011-5w W/�✓�'cl�t� f1NI5F1 — a b . ., , , revised from sheet a10. 1 FRONT ELEVATIO,N 1 /8 - 1 - WIN v , r i x �• ' .. _..... -�-�r,..� -:r a� rr_a..___. .. 3.!`a--:e:w.b�S.3�'x+'vfr•:::5:�1 ..,e .. 1 - _ _. -. -.. — _ _ � R j' i • ..' � .sue _.. :. .. .: :- :. r;� ryK ..:"'��rn�fA� - _ '�.3:; - . I _ y... , '••, i �I� ��I r ,, ;r', ..�.� Elul 11II -. ,.. ---------. _ ' d JII ii Illl fill l I', IIII Ili A' t i;.I I IIII l JI1J �a.))y 1i I I' ul ll� f f lull III I) li! ;il 1 !�IJI 1+1J I,I I SPACE ADDITION 111 1►I,, I,lll ,, IIII'II 1a; _•,,;��'•�••� .. - Il� I)II) 111 III) �►,11 ► � ,In -- _ • �. • , ' � i _ . 1,,l lI II I fI�Il III)II.I..)II I. .IIi1 I1tI 1I1J�I I III1 I,I 1)IlIiI1I I I)1 I IIIIIlI II I 1III!III I 1I III!1ll I l ilIlI lltl�)l,II I!II IIII.�II,1I I'I,I II ►y hI11III 1,l,1lII�II I�1I} ;hI I►I i�.:,I i lti�).l•�=�IiI(u.1:,I;:J�I.1l.�_I:1:'-j.11t.J.�,I1u:IIII.I1II1i III.I1PIiIII►l.II.i I II.I 11I1II1(I+II1 I.�Il.I I(;Jl I1�►j Ill I1�lI�I lIII.�,1liI.I�'iff�lLii.I IIl iI.l:.I�I I I It.l.lu..lI_�l;'\i.\I .;l•.,i.i.•I.Ic.aI},.'II—�.;i�i..1...I,.I1,I�Gc�• .. ►-.Il:Ii-, ,}h.".I,.�I.,I ;I�..II�. I-l',hI�,{1`I•I i ,�.- ,�I�%�;�', � •.'•.':�:-.'�!�t: I`�II • �I•I I({iII�I IIIi';!,I �IIIiI• ��_�•• • �• dt�r _ , C .`J,..RPORT #- N J111 ..... ell c._5 II( I 0111 <it cl .. OF PALPA — E—.s RT —= jErt BEN ^ OEaA EN — ES NVIRON TA�. ��VI��,� aRV100"E ETT SIT v E® �• s� b.R0Y10N FORM TA L,-- n UEC1 � �1�97e 9 D� MMENCE piTNl111CONSTRUTON SMALL CO ONE YEAR OF TNIS APPROVAL. revised from sheet a1 .7 . PLAN VIEW . WEXLER/U'RRUTIA, A.I.A -o1i8 1 ASSOCIATES - 199 S.CIVIC DRIVE/SUITE 10 PALM SPRINGS,CALIFORNIA 92262 (714) 327-1388 73-350 EL PASEO/SUITE 201 PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 (714) 346-0593 ,- ; F, I ,. ( 4 C1W OF PALM E - . MAR. E T y E VIRWIMENTA . S&AMT APPROY ® �y: r---` coRatauaTwa aIIALL c mmax wrMIN "a YEAR OF THIS'AKROVAL.I i.Ly ,�—outline of previously / I \ \ • approved location i UNITS #il's & 616 UNI #�15 & 615 t• j I % , SHADOW MOUNTAIN RESORT & RACOUET CLUB Tj _J U 4GAR,G #9 1 A �► I COURTYARD (LEAS CITY RELOCATE UNIT #514 _ Y OF ... ' — >P�LR� .DESERT s airs up _ REVISION y. DPA TPHASE Ii EN :4:NOCA D ��- - BUILDING 8s 2 R GAR IG - EX4181T _ �. t • s }w A ION:��, i VMLER/URRUTIA A.I.A. - & ASSOCIATES F99S.CIVIC lMwt SUITE 10 JJ ''II ALAI SPRINGS,CALI ORNIA 92262lE(p714)327-13SE /AIM OFSERT,CAUFO3-350 EL?AS (714j UITTED201 cjRCC� 593 SITE PLAN revise sheet a1.8 1/16":1'-O' , JAIL `7 j980 ' • RELOCATED UNIT #514 -� — -- — In _ - - I p -c _ I - • RELOCATED 2-GAR GARAGE ELEVATION revised #3 from sheet a6:9.1 SIDE ELEVATION FROM JUNIPER CIRCLE - 16":1 '-0 _: 11/19/79 7.i S E - CwGn�o 13FIGF� TAPE 15 Oft Al. r g Est.9P/��$ U'E -l� ► _ - - _ 7-'' 24 4 d7�� A ► E ', � 1 ► m �) Ap • YIN At J � F � • rclo $^ r ^s lU -T { o0 _ Z . anoldde _ eaoi P , _ CL Aald-loLLI a 1P _ Pam`• m - , A - .. 1 �v O :` fi= g g6a LJr Lam- , D 6 - jc "- .s or PR 6orA.IG _ J g►.�6s g. is Oz b E m �,gyn`TI� O i r-".'S.uNS BY U ' � L<;GEN +,��`'� .9-sc-�' � Nate � �.• 4 I PIP1% - - - lob jlO it _ r �=s 1 - • 3- '� - ��Pro-'�% -- ,� � � - - �� • - ` ` �.`' � '� �` oNrq� UNIT s ? _ _ -�" F� 5N �,�NET, FotzM�` �FoP,1Mf _ en1,{s IIN1T• aT�R - NIT 5V4''� ., - �a>T�5�.^ : - '. � � � 1 s�,•,a o .. •_ er+of��= _ _ d , �'nP - i. g �_ -r UARcoi +P+ — l.- co v 8_0 - - coIN ��o yo g 6y y �' j LL 0 f _ r _ 15 oti � J - _ ey�6e•g, 5- t t -odeVut (OWN" u - . 9GB O t n 'SF_ �_ 4 �•_ I - 1 f rx- 2 4 'V �4 7vr : _ F�d'-'�i !-'(��- D� • . F j�'•�t-'TI~ -�H tom! r'?� or•� (r,-r' •. I �. Pt- TA,'.. Ca �5 �y t METLv H PI K f-j — <y s�+ f�i4V10 1 G 3 w':, -- G p ! -- D T� 1,�VA IOI _ NOTE t Cv I T a t L. I`{ Y i -�. s - � GtP.. �. PPE•�q-° x (sty} �, ^ I f -A+ -t ate- C. - -O • G t•.? j p .a.r-r i r+, A. r �..c 4't G• �.. I if ir - u � <sJ � 2 oUl✓ 4 � At x• + ! t _! it { y-,� �' 41, Q If 2411,11, 4 _ EPS7 ELE,&h,I, W `yTID r 1 - f'- o ifot:7 _ e 17 x I t+ _ ••Z ___-._...__, -- �;�, tx�LJ�' , � � ,+ �, � -- .. �, ., �Tilc.c-,O �/�� Got- �j�., , Q 1_ 41'�,p,G,Guy W/ co IL.. vt�c�vEGr� T SIT F ` 0 rl HuTor4�. *I- te16-17L -a '!! MLtt' X-_-k 1,AL Ott 72 14,0 .,, fi �! j'RUt7Tt�L- t EzG.7 OC ta4a' -Q LUMl71P� FI�TU{�=S c } 0 c eea BITE PLAW _ i 4 i ce_ .� ► { Got-+7F•'T w% ' 4 0 _ ,� ,:C3t-i^' f; , __ _.�. -f -� �•�i01`jT �{ �, _•IS o� t*Mp►f bt,rFz �2�ip - , T � - ..� _.___ _ - - �; ,,.! �' � I ;, .� �, y � � 'a.L•L c�� wtt�taavi �c�,�t`--t�s ,. .� ` sE �trca ( �DLI TH L E U�.TI oN �� I_ f' !I . f t� tl� t _ o v per, t✓ ii I t� �`°! !./.ram•. tiT\45 - - - - - ,. _ _ � •i-",v �-' r��Cf'``i'Yte"':.:i c�%�'f�✓I:r7 .1.AK�(r"-�� woo—. �:., /'-; t�i`"t,b. tom,. i_oa.".;,,,-JI"., - �"f'c�.r.rc^;••••: �O� �` 2Lo �9PG r,.. `` � ---- ! Gs��'ll`IG l' k g � 24n O. G. Tod of t-�„•1"'E.T �!�' L-IFST L1 r) �4 : - -b c,a�° coriT. r i : t: __ I��tr-�P��4-, gyp. t� �� -,►� ,..,��t��. ,;- �+� —� � � i O i �� i � i�-TEA7E- 11L — .,•,. A tC �xt.. i.""J ."�--t �i � � I t-i F'.,1Z ' F - J--. �. I /' � � � �' , R'' --.`.~— .._-`-.._.- ,� ,. ,. f u 10" . o , •• a 90 t ✓G f 0(IST TeN IS -� , GOLI RT ;✓E kJGIr \� \ t ;b•.TE �, G. Pam✓► I.,IG, J �� \'.�Np�1C.1� �\ �. P�- r10 K. �C 1 G� %f VA FZ �. cam « I - - +� ` _fir!►. , �\ �,' w/ 4-tom'. gt-ott o.� rw�.�:, ol-� � � c, BRA.--�;� - 1�1�t� t�IE;Ca� 4L ��q , tJ}�DE�,P,dCaLll�.lD Gf� 611ILT uP 9.,4vF w t v ,lgtt I G., FT. M IN♦ , `N\ _ ` 1 I I �wt f t CITY OF j PALM DESERT sheet number • r , DEFARTMENT a OF ENVIR014MENTAL SERVICES _ EXHIG, NO.— „t, CASE N� of x• x a .+-s',+.:ut.n.n._..:ridw,k..A,«.a:xM�u.uf"•pE4�'.:. " , • r' t " b t f � 1 t 1 i t� V M 4 w✓ C • JJ ')A IL b/H EOE R TVENTU ILIrE:D* U-4p D)E u 1, HA 0 i ; r ri. � ,� o is 20 40 coo V ` — �— Lem Ito ASKEE.T �' `\ i►i —r-- . --� i -o, HI&H Gorc,, VLk. wAL , 10 1!-Zw5T ► ► e, MtK4 15T i 1--� Ext DTI ►�G / HOUSE Hodte NONE Herr- 4 / L...- �,y - ,11101 x v • a I IIIdlt .il 'aa'�yN..anr•cbw+gNyp, wdM' -. .. �..;. >,.,..rev:-.« ..n .zs�.s .x..mrv.. W,.. .. --�-- xv zu+r .. F + ,v.. / - ol . .. ,s t i +ate_._ w..R+ ar.. x.eaae+a.. •* aeMe ',•.. .'R. a. t .. .: . •> - ,.. u}.. Y�r fie., PRn n1YOPFi1 .r J dft O cx c 0 0 CL !et number k 1 A Z r ! � 3 � 1 r , ,r lqD IRA jfl R "A IL bl ))Et, E R T 0 VENTUD TP ILIr E:D 510 Y . a RD >! O - Y ti kr f � Coo y, tad ---- a 1 I v I a I f- — --- / A . - 1 1 ili "I", � -- / ,, - I r x N o g g V ,;:•^+„d��!':ro' - ".. .- .�. --- — 2 3 4 5 6 E"D IR T D "T ID 24, R - I 12, 000 pY di O OWNE RO R:1A IL M 3E 5 E R1 T V " GLU5 CIRCLE VE N T U RE'L..49 LT�Do MorosEG 2 CQU&TS � '�' �,� c c Mr - AA ah" •�-1 b j YO W% c.0 y O , $h.h ' v %4 PR0190SED . O , I DI ... -. t: Qo RIE SOR:RT (c (a R1 RIO) F 1 O 20 . Nor�L . s / EX15Tl N TENN j T7 l 8 HI NG CANES b v R—I 121000 "her,-91-. EX15T1111G TENNIS CLll1SN0 x a W y r { 1 " M W J , C.U.P. —03 —73PD) v V� s 2g GoNpoM - vCT100 �: T , POOL i. iIS r.• ^, r. Y 9 1 � + ! t *. r Z s P G EJZENGE FAC-IL17 IMF COVEREDcy A S n F' N S f} ''}1f 00 X15TING 12. HOTEL UNITS r' 1 V u 77 lop E � FAIRWAY. DR/V� �� 0. ^ All BVIL'DIN ' ± - .,. .7 " $ • ail • � � �� ` mm I R-3 (4) Af ---- CITY 4F E F"U_; r-T sheet number EN AL CCh�ii ov • i f ^ - - NAT O .� x• y of %F] N H /.- . fl I I I v I R J- - I F I .- --_-__ _. .:._ ..,w,,r..._�.... ,n._ ."._�4_. ..,,.•y.�v.Tt..r•m.�.�A.,�..,�,.��K.,....�,� ,��.,,t�...�.., ,� R,..v, a s ` F IL 9 A 6 � b v N v b 0 a u d N C O Q c N_ 0 a V p C C1 C V V 4! rA- Z O Q v � N sheet number of n BE .: '... d .,, a t , :. o. ', ,: ax. ». , .. i w ..: ., '., . ._ • . „, -. ......i .. '. f . r,.. ..f., .. fr..:.v..d.,n•.. -- _- __ , ., , ' ISM i, , : a .. :, - y ' � ; t . • .: „�: ,- , _, , ,, a,•,nx . - - , .a ty,., e,v i r, r r x .• " ,' '.+p. : .. �•' ¥ , . r , . -... t. , . • ,. , ., I fl . r � .,«: .K::' Y i ',, : .5: '. a a r i , .. f" r i h a �r.a " ' ', --- i : n' , a +'. .,. u a � e , } - r .x. ,'. v s :t ,: ,l V : .. .. .. ,.. ♦ - .. : is?;r ,. , .. : . -.. t. ` ,r i :. ,, i , r I�r. .. , r t ., ,. i. f•; Y a Y .. h r. t l r. ri. t w .,r /t .}1,. { "a , { ',.. tr •.. .. „. �t r �• v. ' a ,M /: V ♦ - :. �. ;r , , , .,.. 'I. ',r .I • ': r.. r.. #! ,... Y4 � Yr 1 / ,e 'we, 6 - r r' � ; • «• r , e t rn f .. , ,A ., ., >r r . • •9 •,t. , u` � «. r .. r , x'r ,, :�r s' >. r _. r::,, :'k _: k ,. ,. ,• ,y .' 4,-- � : , r .,. - ;. a ,.r :. , - . ': : e , .: `.: ,.: :., , , ... ..v , �. ,: : r° .. . •. Y,; ..• Y f w r' H. .2 `. ,:... .,: to ..... .. 4, ., .:, ., • ,Y, .. : ,. ,, 5 x. ,. y:. r,,. t -., a r ,x.. . . ;. � V I .. B :q x.. M. r .r r n I r. .. r r « i .. ... .:, y .. r. :. . .: ' e.. -n.r• •+: a.. . -i!. r ..,: ! A : _" ,. 4 Y T' '9I r � i tl J d kt: «.; :#.r 'N 5 n .a. �... .••. ., } _ , 5'. « .. -:. 11 A ¢ "� �� t e ,. ,.. �. . � n '� Pn a --- I _A I 1I 1I 1 2 3 4 5 I - 6 — , p. I , 11, �; ''° az I, i I �� 15 I 11� E T lff-R .;-�-,,, %�,, '.I . �,;..j4"f,,� ,J4 / I T Rb D tn D D F I `51 , " ., x .. �sIDqDM7 qD J1 "�. 4�"It "�� !�, t k'x oa`:b ", �1111 L a , `�,-�,, - v ,�'".' 4v 1�-� 1�1,1�, �� ,A I�,a1� � , � , '--V,` f 3"�'! 11 D i I I.A R A �,"I�t`�� l IN D R lA 1 2 D iflirT ifll) + - �� ,�: ';1 :,,��-I, p-1�1I ^vI, ,�, -0 ,",I � ' V .. `�,,��;;r��- I, 1 ,.,I". "� ,1,,�, "''", !�,,, 1, I ,-,��;,�11,;� 1; z, 'I le, 11� ,�'-'- � u-, o,,�;,4�'� ,;,,�'�.� ; , .,� I ,�,,it�', . I I I I., ,; '�, 11' I , -, 11, it,�-�"1'11' I �- I 11- I � -15f -� 4',�a,�71'1,t ., r TiRi ... "" - ` 111A X, 11 � �,'-�, .. ,2�,�`5`r�, , - -.. �.1I`�,IiI.i4��1l �,,k I '.'��1,...�'I,WI', , :' - a L O--.--t,,1I,,,-n-'W,W.�1-.�- "�' "' 1,' ,, 'I"-� ii L — EII r� RR� }� , % a Q ,. 1 / .�I 1 � .,�,,��I�:,,;L�, *: ,'aI;,I�`I'�',,,,,,,--��I�.`-�'jtI�I1,-�'��'"l,1-'-,-;,-`-,l !i-,,7.1.,�,t-,,-,�I` t ,�,.'',1..,"�,,, ,"I"I�"'" ,I"��,i1, �`-�If,-I�-;;;.,",1"..::2'',,"","1 S-�V ;'"--',.-',,�,�- �:f� ��', !-.. �� J�, ',,',�,',I �-- .' ,Ikff I-tt.II. '�' I,.��nI',I -,) - ��! �:"-1 "�M1�.�,-� ",1 � �14 "I ,4�i�'-,-I -'t,'-"R��I 1 ,,''( !� -�,��--,�- �,i1 ,� �1�' .1,i- I 1,�, � �� --�It , , ,-tI, .,`�!,�-I �-I- k�, �L- ., . . *."11 NIII"-1I1"�1,1. I,-`-�'"--`k-I �I�'�,I`i111-'i1,"1LI-,�iI I :r'11��,��1'1,, ,1It1I,�!- ;�"Z,--,�R, "1T1l-;""l-,� l'1,"�I�.�:�11 -�"-,,1�. 'l�t'-k" 1-I,,,1--t1 �'- I,,�I�,-t�"' �-�I�"-1�:I11-, ' -',,-,, ),�,,,4,'�'I��,I,1I�Z, -'"I1:--',,�"6I111 -:' ,,1:'. 1 "-1 �- I;,t�D, ,,�i� ]I )--,V, -',,, I�,' '�, �'-,- �'�,'.V2,1,,-'�. ��-�-��,`,�1��1-,"`;"-----�,.��-1`I ' �1', 11- r,,�� ,--,- "��, ,��,.-,`,�-'I S,"-`l�-,,�,t��,i', t��-1 "� l- �,I,l�,1' �,1,- 1 ,,,,,"l'�-'`,1,"x,�,��'1,�:-�, , 1r, ,-�l, '� ": , I� I",:, ., �� 1, �I 1 II ,i �'I -, ,W� 11 ��I1"I) , �,,I-'.. � 11� , I 1�1�� 1', t I�` ,�1�, ',"� ,I, .,1 ,I ,I, , , 1r,� ,.� � `1 ., 1F", 1,1�" ,- ,-�,�' ',' �%1, !, �� -: ZcIE 7, W11NHIZ- W'EU ,) A IsI PN 3 PbSURI - - - T� R�. I)T-L- N)P�LPATA--P4-( Ac --41'1,* "� .I (' DTIT( LlDjr:� "7R IOiDa �` tt } „., r'" a ��' " k -:1 �, , � � , o p ' i� .:4 f „ fit, �'I� R f t `�, L J F,0.i i r 2, `..I 7 B ` �F x �, 74 + t.,#i♦Y:"";mod xi I • . ' .. � " , 4 ".r"' � " 1 _. ��: 9� v� �' 1 % II .II',"4-,.,�1l ,,�,:1 11 II , � . . I I . I I - 11 I - � I I I �I � ,I , I,I� I �I , I 11 :1`1., �-, 1II��,:",-��j�;I )'��,.I,-,,,�,,,��-�-',:,`,,-"'-"�,'-1��'""��"�,.,,,,�,"`�---,,��-"i--t,�"��'`-1`,�,'"I.tp-.�,�,,,l,1".01I�-�,4" "�,`,I""11'11�`4,,�,,,,","IW��,.,,,,,,�.�,�,,�- ,,:6,��X,-,'"1,�,"-,";,,�i'-, ��,�,",��",, ,1,',�NI �`g-�,,I1i�-,,,,'-�,�-'1.,�,�,l�,?.,""",1�,�.`,,,w1�'�*'�,,11,��,�1g7--,',-1,,.�;-&,9-I,11,---,"," ,k-I-�I,-,,-'5,-I�e 1'n-Ig,,IA"I-I,,, .,�;�Z'l,�,r,',,`,-40,A"�4-,"k�1,-.,-`�-�.,".p11-�,�,�1,11, ,�1,I",,l-,,,,. ,1 ," . . f s b+ -'��, �1 ,, 1 , . ,�,� -�1,, �I :- �, ''II'll I I � ,�m,1,�,I'`11,,it"�N11,,,114R1-,11�-1M�-,-,��-!"' I;,,,�",, r1 '�II�!i� ' III /I ,,�,,,wI,V��W',,, , ,,, _ • ,I - b %�-4 II�-I I• , I! � - 11�", - . .1. — I I -�-- . —-----.-— - - t, -- , I- I I -I y,: ,. ... �. ..:, f +. i z } i y ig.M-`r'"' «a....+-M"..yy * 'r :. w _ I1�l ,� �' �. rt rh, y .+ i ' ,I -- -- - - ��;Ii --- _, : -- - -- I I . . — ---- - . ,.,. ------ -- ,, , 4$I - 4 >E. t ,; x f `,'�" 1 :'�. rt v 2 : f. F •gym, -?Fv; I' 1 * 111� d u w ' iw,� ,}, t ItI'' II !I * , I � A i I 0 • 0", , `► ,r ��s - d. i o I " - c tr • a e u v t "r ! " ; t t - ! , iu I & . - W _— w ro V a fA O c • M. w ro 11 0 ro g - { ' O L o C r a - c u x ro b 'v O C. -0 .a O v a V) 1, � I ,. , -- I . ,�� — - . 1I, '", 1 . ,I ". �fi Y 0.}in .'k I ` - n �\ , 11 `^ 1. 4 ` y ,, I j t I - 1! --,�,,,,'- ,-, - �"', � I , I - , � k , , { . "I --:,�*�` IC - �, I "' , � ,;.1, PnTr`LE"`N��D�111 ,a� I �P� v "", "I � I , *` I'll, ,-T, .1- , �Z, , - I 1-11 I I . LAN��S ,�, 11 �11 ,- -�� 1-It I 11 ' - c; .,. 11-1 I I I i � ; ;. _ _.P .. - I ( I } / t" �- �2, I," I � I ", , 1�,..,,psi:, r, , �, --- , I I 11 r -', nslt ,,, 11 Alt- 1 . 4 1 ...,w. ---• .. s - - 'f i S.. , , ', ,e,.- , v, k ..., r„ E'. - + 1-111 1�Y { •,= �r - �^ f�. I bs +ems,+,, ,. k. _ • \ Y'':`(9 * ,'4t 4,+` y 4 ,aa" .rc I �. , ! .. \ :� �,r 4' • V �� ERGR � ��.�� F..l R� SHRUBS :, w,. _ q �.: _ ,.' CONIFER-S. . - Y.. -• . •. . - utifolta,'Italian Stone Pine Mexican Fan alm Grevillea - Jacaranda Ac _, �' ti r r a - , �� str t n' r , ._ .; . : / n> n rt, Atle F'ir Gha #rp. .,.,.%_._-Ww .,., .,, ,� ,, ,,,, _ Srach chiton P l eu ,.�.' pQ rnmps `Palms Ju tpe ^, �• �:. - LL ,.. l 1 r C`htr Dine flag Palms Euon us .�,,:, • : i I 8razillian Peps Ym a' —+i+A er f - - - lambao. ..., i a t / Carob Tree ly } ,,. r,.. , , _ _ i Yi k��S�Ven 'MT xas P ive t ,. , R ND COVER VINES f, Silk Oak GROUND e r} i .,,7 \ S t ,,.-X I \ \� - \\\ �. - � x. ' , , - - \ \ \ \\\\ „ 1. \\\ \\\ thorn ALartdcr n \\\ \ \\ _ _ f rnta i'e r Grass tre :..; - : P r I. ;., _ _ � :.,<3 ;.. �, r m C,dzantt�. o-ran �a _ t-+��*1� sum -_, - �' ..., . �;�;,;..... ,_,; -'-; . wa.; is Claw Tobira Q. ✓ ,. - m. a ,, >, •--_ , bush Ca <, :; �:� ;� _ _ . -- ' a - Plum_,, ; - -� G , - i 'tZ3ntc"1 yelt4w �. - i - .a-�r� _ :�� ' ,� .,Y tat �; ,max w, -. t , +:: .. kJISSf 1 toFCe S t 101�1/gyr 1j3: - ^. - •" . ,. p;, :€� - _ • a c` n fishI I- _ , {'! , :` sIr ,. ., ,.., i, ;, r, - - • , _ - \\ P. - - \ ; ; -�-- L} - \\ . -, }�,,;. r , I ;;; 11 I LM\\\\\\ - - �y ! I,,, QI'll r. r, ♦ Pf , ; ... e r ; ,. i . ,, ,. t. ' , ep� tt ,i ,. 4 - , - -04 p. l r,x a,w 14 , I t I , r r • .. .. - , :rv- i _ . '.'♦ifF I O }�pP•kv; 1. r 1. . q4 1�1 7 /£ i /� • R cRy , V^ O J \ ?. i j� . q I3 \ y. r v \\ ;: fir. . / • .I _ _, 4 .... m- r,., w �" /y .. _ ; :,wr' :. J - N'r -.'G! , .1. ,✓.':. -Is' '.' b ... i� "^,^�,: aaf.-' ,'r,,. • �s ,H L. , . _ .' x r., F. . ,• n. , �, I ; _ {. / ,, i t :...,.,.,. . , . . P .. , , {jam) y'•1+ PI,rL.....: .. • - n '.t ,. , - , \ �., .. dd{s�'„ ..,.ate 1� �! i .. _':,,,,.,,. FJ /I f 1. ,.. t ,. r,/..' r ! .v„ .ti' ,. .. _ :: / .: !>F ,•` i . --,`� I r F1; . , , ;Y' ;:= ,.arc _: , .,,,, „,. J k .. �' r :. %:,. s p ,n , , hs' .�, . ., J ` •,. , ,, „ y • •r, is sM _ I a • {` e ' .�: r (// A> j"z'' %;', . , rrn • .._ , c-� { ;a �`• f �• °5^Ca >r..yi ;... .« , : e ,. T v P j P •" .,i... ', : /I /� , ,: , ;.. . •t:^,_„ *'. �7 - - <,J, !t sew, �. h, . ..a,} , , j,,/ /, r ,'pin r ,J ay., e J ;�� Iq _. v . �-,� ; \\�� ' f� h< '. r . , tf ,.p , I - ' f \i �! ., - ' ,p , 1P. 1. , ➢. ,>; A 33.� _ �;,r, :". \ �; \ \ \ I 0 I . � 4 :, I F . I.- ." , \ Qh I - �✓ � � r � �, I , ; ; 4 P ' , * • �`'ti 4 f , x., !� o , P , , ,, , •_ 5, r 1• , :. t ,. -, {•I _. , � _ ,. �� `` 4 1 .1 • 1 r`, r c "� ��\` �I , II ,Y - , R 'r J .t r o I d 7 �, . - r `7. . a,- 6 h' 11' r 4i _ i�'` 'r/ r-.,, �, II \\LI N,\1 �, . a " r 1 6t\� \\ !_ Y //J , r ,y .. t p . \ �\ VVVGGi 1 . <,, 4 \\\\\\\\\\ 4 CJ I , . :. :i . , . ,, le , ♦ ,,r ,ffi '�r Six % .i�f,.•" f %. ` ,r '. !,*I' h`11 roI ,., ye J/ ' . 5 d'r t7" w tic `, ` Y i I I, I pp % y � "� I f , F., w 'rrtr • Pt `J) AJi ,"a' fi ! } jf d l d>< f > I a:,,.v ,+ ---.11 -w`"'c. "' - H `.�„ 11 - p, „' a ;} 11 ', 'Y .9 . - RI *z 0�`A }- ' -- 4. I ," 11 � r "� SA ,� NnblI >X..,1 - ' i;; i 11 l �I ...", ,,�; ?.. , e - 11I'll 5 * I, }♦ ,� ''j t ,s;.' Y 55 t. . t ,I $ gg„ h , h A, . A g tea +•' o . ,g`: ;; .t", .. - i . .; 'r.' vq• � a I y8v' .��',�, . . ,.I.�� i1"�� I' CITY OF r 4, - PALM DESERT �I A�II �: ^ r€ " I ',k - DE�At�`fMENT , y; " - "t! OFn �.I I , ' .,, ENVI�tONMENTAI. 1.""I 9 ICI SERVICES ',"� I , �- . CHI@IT / >;,.t: l NO. CASE N ' y - ,,; - - . ` a k - ,'' - ` „°' " _ .. n _ ..„_ A u - of - .d: '`-'fir ' _ �: , ,,, e _ 1,., _ ,�' I *:: .. + :, . t .Ih.. ,: .:: 2. ... . ,p, .,. ..Vr.. .. _. ,: .:, S . .,. s ,. , .. ... C .v .: .. ,. ,., o v, , w.M .tr s ., .::: ., ..:. .. .. A , .. .,.., ,. ,:. a-..: ,. am. - .n . � .:. , .:,:. .... _. _„ ... -_;:` i;' •_. «. ,- ,.., .,. �.. ;,. ....,.... ., sk .m• as � ,�.ly:. ,. w. ... vY 1,. a.. �.. .. _-_- v+wi'k d'.a -- ,,:.: ::' ,, ..,: ,:,:. ,, n ... ,,. :.. P'iF♦,',+'-�- ... !", , ..r ,.. .... . , _ "sYrrrr ' _ __- _ -.__- 'gym c . •. nr,: „ a.;. -. ..,,.. ., -Y ,, ,. .. -„ ,�..., m.ww,.rx w'a. .r-:ra x+{*'. _. '. , : "r.. :,:. 3,. ... :. w, ...e.. a tee: .. .'' _„ '•-� r. r.