Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDP 08-79 - AMENDMENT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT FILE 2 1980 TRANSCOPIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION DETACH AND RETAIN THIS STATEMENT RANCHO MIRAGE. CALIF. m ROT CORRECT rw SM NOTEv UeemMOMRTLM NO RECCE T09e1P o, DELUXE FORM TWC-3 V-3 DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 7/23/80 Application fee for amended development plan, Case DP08-79 and 178MF $50. 00 r.� CITY OF PALM DESERT t AU s3 r, i 0 UEPARTIMENT r� ENVIn^(l,.r4 ZNTRL ENVIkUIVIYitPI N� SERV�C_., uE;�jaflCc� CITY OF Fc?L.4 D° E)t6:1BtT A 1 5/TC KAN /NFDRM '���jT�/��jA�, 6 fl IIII_ _I/ - APON .iR..`�. fti+�. INN �l1 \•\. � � � � .rwe- .n p.�u.�e ru./��ihes,a�-5v4e• O i O l ���nTT /lU/<�/.Y6 TYPG FLOT/?/N/3 Lp RIT%To JDTAC e K v mN'i Ofl s��s�.�e. f^'.'9• ^' 711 7,7 7 7 MD �--Jall PL✓� w�L. rGV^L�OP MCNT COM/ LUNT.[.tCTOR. TRA�MCoC]�K Gr✓GLO�MGVT COt/ 60 tJ35s > Q�1a55�7iD tvJFs��s F� GS�S�OO �f �7s�lhS - M. u� mL 5-���5� 5'�{,� }� '�/� 5�5�y(�`'��@y}'ry (�3,� �/ 5�y �p(�/� _,cry/.—.`'`/cam• �TaFF.ee�N.d co-3TGR,{wq.,x. _ l5 /�`�YOYJ LI'O•✓=s 1S (SCSV save eao LS/S+>l—'J/u.u� 1�11aC�JLJC_S�N IS 9 \y6zSr`J+�LS'®1SV LlGai� crp-+u.e�`�`j. •':p V RC n w6 w F i. o = HHMAI €aaa .o 77-/47 k� FPI i � E V @s s.,fk9.c..::� g ll il�j' U� MMAA $ E E >>, F 8 H�o'cvrvc .� F U @�@ S . � a _ rqe� � a- ; - � . 4 q wa Y�I'.. -Awry 7i � �/N� NNST2R IRRR• /YiWT1.1 �Mf2 <YN/NG 9 t f �_: "l — — IA�fE�ill � ;� � � �, i ' � Ja�"r'T 25�_e - 0 0 ' - � v—° � 0 � � � - c,�,�� i Eaaa a a 6 fLQ"JR Pli1N �.,..:p.•-. /zvrnc-E p .� 6wce �6>rater rur /x��+^*. �_� '\ y r M° STAFF REPORT DP 08-79 (Amended) September 2, 1980 Page Three II. BACKGROUND: (Continued) G. PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE: Construction of this project .will be done in three (3) different stages. Projected date of commencement of project will be in the latter part of the first quarter of 1981.. Phase 1 (March, 1981) - Initial offsite and site improvements, models (2) and twenty (20) production units. Phase 2 (June, 1981) - Sixteen (16) production units. Phase 3 (Sept. , 1981) - Twenty-two (22) production units. III . DISCUSSION: The Site Plan modifications sought in this amendment are minor in nature. The significant subject before the Commission is a change in approved use, from apartments to individually-owned condominiums. The reason the change is a significant question is because the City has a general interest in increasing its rental housing stock for persons employed in the community. Geographically, the subject site appears to be a prime location for rental units. Depending on the outcome of the General Plan Update, the site may be considered for a higher density than is presently provided, further enhancing its viability .for apartment development. The applicant's desire is to proceed with the first phase of development (some twenty units) subject to obtaining the required approvals. Staff has discussed with the applicant the desire for rental housing and there appears to be an alternative development approach that he would be amenable to. The alternative would consist of approval for thirty-eight (38) condo- minium units being developed west of the .second entry driveway on Magnesia Falls (located on the east side of the central recreation area) , and the balance of the site would be left for future apartment use under the plan now presented, or preferably at a higher density subsequent to the General Plan Update adoption; in which case a revised site design would be submitted for the eastern half of the property. IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Clearly, the Commission' s options for action on the requested amendment are: 1. Deny the Amendment. In this case the approval for sixty (60) apartment units would stand and the developer could determine if he wanted to proceed with this original approval . 2. Approve the Amendment as -Requested. In this instance the project would proceed with minor site plan . refinements and be sold to individual owners. 3. Grant Modified Approval for a change of thirty-eight, (38) units to condo- minium use (or some other number of units as specified) requiring the balance of the site to .be developed as rental units. If this is the agreeable alternative, it would be the understanding that the applicant would seek a revised Development Plan approval to agree with any resulting General Plan density change for the bal.ance of the site, or that it would be built-out per the approved plans as rental units. Based on the justification contained in the draft Resolution, Staff would recommend option No. 3. Approve in Modified Form, Amendment to DP 08-79, providing for thirty-eight (38) condominium units, by adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. subject to the attached conditions. WEDGEWOOD GLEN A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Written Documents (Case Nos. DP08-79 and 178MF) STATEMENT OF PLANNING OBJECTIVE It is the objective of W.E. Development Co. , the owner; and Transcopic Development Corporation, the applicant ;of this proposed project. to identify the need of moderately priced dwelling units in the framework of the existing markets within the Coachella Valley and to fill this void quickly. While most desert developers would recognize the fact that a healthy housing market is one in which residents of Coa- chella Valley have a choice of housing opportunities and a choice necessary to achieve a stable regional economy, there exists within the Coachella Valley a serious shortage of attractive, safe, decent and affordable housing which persons and families of moderate means can afford. W.E. Development Co. ' s planning objective with regard to this development is as follows : Accompanying the growth of various commercial acti- vities come the need for housing for local residents. In today' s real estate market, the cost of homeowner- ship can be prohibitively high. This proposed pro- ject offers the perfect location for this specific sector of the market in terms of its proximity to the schools, shopping centers, hospital and medical faci- lities, commercial offices and most importantly, being in the midst of established residential areas zoned specifically for this type of development under the Master Plan of Palm Desert. After spending considerable time studying the exis- ting and potential markets , W.E. Development Co. em- phasizes priority on the property ' s location, the way the land is used, architectural design, topogra- phy, density, landscape design, view orientation, amenities package and quality of construction. G1TY OF g PALM DESERT .� . OiPAOF ENT ET4�/1RUNa1ENTAL AUG � �pnn gERdICES ENVIP,O^ E;;'ri181TA CASE NO }. �_ - -� o,we r[Arr 'lMfZKAIr10d a _ -6-i, l '� Wn emirs. r )I p/rc<.•..G I GY/(pNG rt I^K''Ym,m/we A.?u�• t _ M(M[LYfT OO:LOLY6 ryPL IpJT'!•C/N/3 av�Lv/=ey.'e L._ � R,rro ro>oriL uMo/A<A s0 yeyviTr mo..�� ,r.•�i n Mt., i. .�off_ E � O 1 1 © .II � ,. r O 1 I' � r ` � t'\ ;pa.•r,r.(-u- ..� ,. �� �....,ti. rr -I Me) _ '© o° E ]C o . . n- i t - n. l e • 'iiNZI ` 1-/ �/ r '--��C=/ �1 t• 1 1-/ it OO(_/ �r � I�Y� �.1. -wA'rucrou r AN�cvA�cr✓e<o-%.Ar ccx. rp9%(D.7mcT mw ....... )T),&M A nma-3=9 SO�iSG�ILC® zzn "s4 9 s � / \I O fRlllF ' `a i �o nxb imrti� Oa 79 447 PLQa'z PL/1N .mac`_u•-L•_ ..o . m p C S}3p}, o I � i , a z ...r. NI C—� a sddd b 'e 4 0 WHfG IOJ spR J7-�/ INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO: Director of Environmental Services FROM: Director of Public Works SUBJECT: DP 08-79 AMENDED DATE: August 15, 1980 (1 ) All conditions as previously stated for Development Plan 08-79 shall be applicable to the Development Plan 08-79 amended. (2) This development shall construct the concrete slope area adjacent to the curb on the Portola Avenue frontage. The purpose of this work is to prevent erosion into the Whitewater Wash due to flooding as approved by the Director of Public Works. �E. L. LYDIBE4EBEx .E.DIRECTOR OFC WORKS LCB/ms p1 ATEq ESTABLISHED IN 1918 AS A PUBLIC AGENCY ��STRI�j COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT POST OFFICE Box lose • COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA 92236 • TELEPHONE (7la) 398-2651 DIRECTORS OFFICERS RAYMOND R.RUMMONDS,PRESIDENT LOWELL 0.WEEKS,GENERAL MANAGER—CHIEF ENGINEER TELLIS CODEKAS,VICE PRESIDENT BERNARDINE SUTTON,SECRETARY C J.FROST DENNIS M.HACKETT,AUDITOR PAUL W.NCHOLS August 25, 1980 REDWINE AND SHERRIILL,ATTORNEYS STEVE D.BU%TON File: 0163. 11 Department of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert : i P. 0. Box 1977 Palm Desert, California 92260 Rei r Cash"VP 08-79 NWT, Sec. 16, T5S, R6E , S.B.M. Gentlemen: This area is protected from stormwater flows by Whitewater River Stormwater Channel and may be considered safe from stormwater flows except in rare instances. There may be erosion of the banks of the stormwater channel during periods of unusual rainfall and discharge; however, the degree of erosion can be minimized or eliminated by either channel landscaping or bank rip-rap. Plans for stormwater protective works shall be submitted to the Coachella Valley Water District for review. The District will furnish domestic water and sanitation service to this area in accordance with the currently prevailing regulations of this District. This area shall be annexed to Improvement District Nos. 54 and 80 of the Coachella Valley Water District for sanitation service. There may be conflicts with existing District facilities. We request the appropriate public agency to withhold the issuance of a building permit until arrangements have been made with the District for the relocation of these facilities. Very"ly yours, A �� Lowe 1 General Manag r-Chief En neer CS: ra cc: Riverside County Department of Public Health 46-209 Oasis Street Indio, California 92201 Attn: Don Park 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE September 3, 1980 APPLICANT W.E. DEVELOPMENT CO. 232 Serena Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 CASE NO: DP 08-79 (Amended) The Planning Commission .of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of September 2, 1980 CONTINUED TO - DENIED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. X APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 634 PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR PUBLIC HEARING. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. MURREL CRUMP, Acting Secretary PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION cc: Applicant C.V.C.4J D. File P, ,NING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 34 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IN MODIFIED FORM AN AMENDMENT TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF SIXTY (60) DUPLEX APARTMENTS TO ALLOW A SPECIFIED NUMBER. OF DWELLING UNITS TO BE PROVIDED AS INDIVIDUAL OWNER CONDO- MINIUMS AND CERTAIN MINOR PLAN MODIFICATIONS ON APPROXIMATELY 10.87 ACRES WITHIN THE PR-5 ZONE LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF PORTOLA AVENUE, SOUTH OF THE WHITEWATER STORM CHANNEL, NORTH OF MAGNESIA FALLS DRIVE. CASE NO. DP 08-79 (AMENDED) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 2nd day of September, 1980, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to con- sider a request by W.E. DEVELOPMENT CO. (TRANSCOPIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION) for approval of an amendment to an approved Development Plan to allow construction of sixty (60) condominiums rather than apartments, an increase in unit size and parking area coverage, a decrease in private open space, and minor modification of recreational amenities , on approximately 10.87 acres within the PR-5 (Planned Residential , maximum 5 d.u./ac. ) zone located on the east side of Portola Avenue, south of the Whitewater Storm Channel , north of Magnesia Falls Drive, more particu- larly described as : APN 621-460-022 WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedures to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89" , in that the Director of Environmental Services has deter- mined that the project has previously been assessed in connection with Case No. DP 08-79 (original application) , and no further documentation is deemed necessary. WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testi- mony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts to justify their actions, as described below: a. The proposed project, amendment in modified form, generally conforms to the intent and purpose of the PR Zone District. b. The proposed project, amendment in modified form, is ade- quately suited for the specific site and is compatible with existing and proposed development in the area. c. The proposed project, amendment in modified form, will not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and consti- stute the findings of the Commission in this case. 2. That the Planning Commission does hereby approve conceptual Development Plan No. 08-79, amendment in modified form, (Exhibit A) subject to those conditions attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 2nd day of September, 1980, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Berkey, Kryder, McLachlan, Miller NOES: None ABSENT: Richards ABSTAIN: None ATTEST: CHARLES MILLER, Chairman MURREL CRUMP, Acting Secretary PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 634 Page Two CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. DP 08-79 AMENDED Standard Conditions : 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with Exhibit A (Case No. 08-79 Amended) on file with the Department of Environmental Ser- vices, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any uses contemplated by this approval , the applicant shall first complete all the procedural requirements of the City which include, but are not limited to, Design Review, Subdivision process, and building permit procedures. 3. Construction of the total development may be done in phases ; however, each individual phase shall meet or exceed all Municipal Code requirements to the degree that the City could consider each phase as a single project. 4. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval otherwise said approval shall become null , void and of no effect whatsoever. 5. Prior to the issuance of any City permits for the commencement of construc- tion on said project, the application shall agree in writing to these Conditions of Approval . 6. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in additions to all municipal ordinances and State and Federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 7. All existing electrical distribution lines, telephone, cable antenna television, and similar service wires or cables , which are adjacent to the Il property being developed shall be installed underground as a part of development from the nearest existing pole not on the property being developed. 8. All requirements of the City Fire Marshal shall be met as part of the develop- ment of this project per attached letter dated June 6, 1979, incorporated in Planning Commission Resolution No. 505. 9. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until com- pleted. 10. Traffic control provisions shall be provided as required by the Director of Public Works. 11. Curb, gutter, sidewalk or approved pathways, and tie-in paving shall be provided in conformance with City Standards and/or as required by the Director of Public Works. 12. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contem- plated by this approval , the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies : Riverside County Department of Health Palm Desert Design Review Board Process City Fire Marshal Coachella Valley County Water District Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the Department of Building and Safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 634 Page Three Special Conditions 1. All of the requirements of Planning Commission Resolutions Nos. 505 and 622 shall be observed except as herein provided or as modified by this amendment approval . 2. Public right of way requirements shall be established in accordance with the General Plan Circulation Eleruent as they now exist, or as they may subse- quently be amended. 3. Thirty-eight (38) of the approved duplex dwelling units lying west of the second driveway entrance on Magnesia Falls Drive shall be permitted to be Il offered as individual ownership condominium units. The balance of the site shall be developed for rental units under the approved plan, or subsequent approval by the Commission. 4. Provide stormwater channel bank landscaping, or rip-rap, as approved by the City Director of Environmental Services and Coachella Valley Water District. l � q / �-✓7 / CITY OF PALM DESERT STAFF REPORT To: Planning Commission Report on: Reconsideration of Alignment of Magnesia Falls Drive Date: December 17, 1980 I. REQUEST: Reconsideration of Commission's decision of September 17, 1980, on the alignment of Magnesia Falls Drive in light of new information received by staff. II. BACKGROUND: The Magnesia Falls Drive alignment issue first arose in August of this year, in conjunction with Case Nos. DP 08-79 (amendment) and CUP 09-80. (See attached memorandum dated August 5, 1980 for description of cases) . In September 1980, staff prepared a memorandum and exhibits regarding Magnesia Falls Drive. Based on the information provided, the Commission directed staff to designate said street as a Scenic Secondary Roadway in the draft Transportation/Circulation Element of the General Plan Update. With this designation, Magnesia Falls would consist of four lanes of traffic (2 lanes in each direction) encompassing 52 feet of road sur- face and a 16 foot wide raised landscaped center median. A parkway ranging from 0-30 feet may also be required, depending on available area. The September memorandum is also attached for reference. III . DISCUSSION: Of special concern to the Commission, has been the north side of Magnesia Falls that traverses an area 250 feet west of Portola Avenue. The property owner to the north- Palm Desert Estates,i�formerly known as Marco Polo Mobile- home Park - has filed a Conditional Use Permit to expand the Mobilehome Park. (CUP 09-80) With the proposed Scenic Secondary Roadway designation, the applicant could be required to dedicate at least one half of the street (or 34 feet) , excluding any possible parkway requirements. The applicant has brought to staff's attention that a gas transformer and other utility meters are located approximately 30 feet north of the proposed alignment of Magnesia Falls, would require the relocation of the transformers and meters. Based on this new information, staff feels a reconsideration of the align- ment is in order. The safety of all potential users (motorists , pedestrians and bicyclists) remains the primary concern. Staff feels that a reduction of the raised center median from 16 feet to 12 feet wide adjacent to the property in question, could solve the problem created by the transformers and still provide for the safety of all users. IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission retains Magnesia Falls Drive as a Scenic Secondary Roadway as defined in the draft Transportation Circulation Element of the General Plan Update, but with a center median width of 12 feet adjacent to the property in question. INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PRINCIPAL PLANNER SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF ALIGNMENT OF MAGNESIA DATE: SEPTEMBER 17, 1980 FALLS DRIVE On August 5, 1980 the Planning Commission requested Staff to study the specific alignment of Magnesia Falls Drive in light of Case Nos. DP 08-79 and CUP 09-80. The purpose of this memorandum is to present Staff's findings and recommendations relating to the specific alignment of subject street between Monterey Avenue and Cook Street. To gain an understanding of the existing and potential situation along said street, Staff had completed base maps (see attachments 1 and 2) to indicate the following information: 1. Section lines (including half section and quarter corners) . 2. Existing public owned right-of-way and existing improvements in the right- of-way. 3. Existing land uses showing the location of any structures (obtained from current air photos and/or field survey inspections) . 4. Potential right-of-way dedications as shown on approved "active" Tentative Tract and Parcel Maps. 5. Proposed improvements (i .e. , bridge structure, design width and alignment). 6. Proposed improvements which are a part of approved "active" Development Plans or Conditional Use Permits (for which a Subdivision Map has not been processed). Based on the information on these base maps it seems that the appropriate roadway designation would be Scenic Secondary Roadway. The draft Transportation/Circulation Element to the General Plan Update defines this roadway as a street that collects and distributes traffic to destinations. It also serves secondary traffic generators, such as small business centers, schools, and major parks. With the scenic secondary designation, Magnesia Falls Drive would consist of four lanes of traffic (two lanes in each direction) encompassing 52 feet of road surface and a 16 foot wide raised landscaped center median. In addition, a ten foot public parkway on each side of the roadway will be designated. Finally, a scenic easement of up to 20 feet may be required, in addition to the required public parkway. This scenic easement is to provide for a pedestrian/bike path system separated from automobile traffic and/or to provide for the enhancement of City edges and scenic corridor through landscape treatment. The cross section for said roadway is graph- continued. . . Planning Commission September 17, 1980 Page Two ically shown below. los'-atw 88' R/W i 64' 10' 14 12 8 12' 14 • -W. 20' SCENIC SECONDARY ROADWAY This scenic secondary roadway designation is appropriate for the entire length of Magnesia Falls Drive. The 68 feet of road surface and raised landscaped center median (except for over the proposed San Pasqual Channel Bridge where a landscaped median is not practical ) will be consistent throughout the entire length of said street if adopted. However, the parkways and scenic easements adjacent to the road- way will vary in different areas. The following chart indicates the surface and parkway allocation for various sections of the roadway. Each section is divided by the north and south side of the road with the mid-section line serving as the road's centerline. The data provided below are a result of the information collected for the base maps. SECTION FEET OF ROAD FEET OF SURFACE PARKWAY Monterey Avenue to San Pablo Avenue 68 37 North side 34 21 South side 34 16 San Pablo Avenue to San Pasqual Bridge 68 42 North side 34 21 South side 34 21 San Pasqual Channel Bridge 68 22 North side 34 21 South side 34 21 (not landscaped San Pasqual Bridge to 1033 feet east 68 31 North side 34 21 South side 34 10 Portola Avenue to 250 feet west 68 0-20 North side 34 0-10 south side 34 10 Portola Avenue to Rutledge Way 68 30 North side 34 20' South side 34 10 continued . . . .Planning Commission September 17, 1980 Page Three SECTION FEET OF ROAD FEET OF SURFACE PARKWAY Rutledge Way to Deep Canyon 68 42 North side 34 21 South side 34 21 Deep Canyon to Cook Street 68 42 North side 34 21 South side 34 21 *Parkway may vary in actual implementation Of special concern to the Commission is the north side of Magnesia Falls Drive that traverses an area 250 feet west of Portola Avenue. This discussion is important to resolve an issue that was raised in conjunction with Case No. CUP 09-80. The imple- mentation of the planned right-of-way for Magnesia Falls, as adopted in the Collge of the Desert Specific Plan, would require the relocation of five mobile homes. The proposed scenic secondary roadway designation, with variation in the parkway requirements, would not result in the removal of subject mobile homes. This subject CUP request proposed to offer for dedication 30 feet of right-of-way south of an existing chain link fence (which is proposed to be removed) to the half section line. The scenic secondary designation requires 34 feet for road surface; obviously there is a difference of four feet between the two proposals. After careful consideration for the safety of all potential users (motorists, pedestrians and bicyclists) Staff feels that 34 feet road surface should remain. Attachment 3 illustrates the situation. The solid line represents the area 44 feet from the midsection line, which normally would be required for the road surface and parkway. As indicated, this line passes through three of the five effected mobile homes. The broken line represents the roadway without the minimum 10 foot parkway included; no mobile homes would have to be relocated. However, the mobile homes would be inconsistent with the setback provisions of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 25.22. 100). The parkway requirement and the four feet of right-of-way difference between the subject CUP proposal of 30 feet and Staff's recommendation of 34 feet remain. Before final action on the CUP request occurs, it is imperative that said differences be mitigated. Options available to the City include: 1) Require the 34 foot right-of-way and 10 foot parkway, which would result in the relocation of the five mobile homes as a condition of approval for any use permit application. 2) Require the 34 foot right-of-way, but forego the 10 foot park- way requirement, as a condition of approval for any use permit application. 3) If no further development occurs, the City could acquire the needed right-of-way and, if necessary, the effected mobile homes, prior to the development of Magnesia Falls Drive. continued . . . . Planning Commission September 17, 1980 Page Four STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission designates Magnesia Falls Drive as a Scenic Secondary Roadway as defined in the draft Transportation/Circulation Element of the General Plan Update with variation in the parkway as described in this memorandum. MURREL CRUMP Principal Planner /lr ATTfIe,,OJMg"AIT .� l MARCO POLO MOB/LE HOME w D z w ova M 0 c EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE p 8 O oZo y � rorc $3 MID SECTION LINE--�, _ sa - FALLS - DRIVE INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ACTING SECRETARY SUBJECT: CASE NOS. DP 08 7(AND CUP 09-80 COMPLIANCE DATE: AUGUST 5, 1980 WITH GENE L�LAN COD S ECT PLAN) CIRCULATION ELEMENT The College of the Desert Area Specific Plan, adopted in January of 1978, designates Magnesia Falls Drive..(43rd Avenue) as a "Major Highway". ,(110 feet right-of-way width) . Both of the referenced cases, now before the Commission, abut the Magnesia Falls Drive alignment. In lieu of discussing General Plan Circulation Element compliance individually, in a staff report for each case, it appears that this subject deserves special attention before going further into the merits of_ the project. The first staff report description page for each case with exhibits and correspondence is attached to this memorandum for reference. Case No. DP 08-79, now before the Commission for consideration of a time extension, is located on the northeast corner of Magnesia Falls Drive and Portola Avenue. The plans for development of this site include dedication and improvement of a 55 ft. half street on Magnesia Falls Drive, which at a first glance, would appear to be consistent with the Circulation Element. The COD Specific Plan Circulation Element (attached excerpt from page V-3) , speaks to a necessary shift of the roadway center- line north of the half-section line,l to enable the planned Magnesia Falls roadway to be established and allow a separate roadway/driveway entrance to the south of Magnesia Falls to be maintained to serve the Community Park Site (see illustration) . In the original Public Works/Engineering analysis of the proposed Development Plan, it was not recognized that the southern property line of this site was the half- section line, and therefore, not only did a 55 ft. half street need to be dedicated, but also the additional right-of-way necessary to shift the roadway centerline north to preserve a separate access drive to the Park. A right-of-way requirement such as this would not have affected the maximum number of dwelling units permitted by the zone, because density is based on gross site area before street dedications, but it would have. reduced the net site the units were actually to be built upon. Case No. CUP 09-80, now before the Commission for consideration of a Conditional Use Permit which would allow an existing mobile home park to expand by 17 spaces, is located on the northwest corner of Magnesia Falls Drive and Portola Avenue. The COD Specific Plan Circulation Element recognizes that implementation of the planned right-of-way for Magnesia Falls would require the relocation of 5 mobile homes. The subject CUP request proposes to offer for dedication 30 feet of right-of-way south of those existing mobile home lots to the half-section line. Together with the existing City right-of-way on the south side of the half-section line, the total width available for Magnesia Falls Drive at this point would be 74 feet, and not the planned 110 feet. IA Section is a term used in survey descriptions indicating a one square mile area, the half-section line runs through the middle of the section. ��. Page Two From a review of the adopted COD Specific Plan, it would appear that the City was committed 21-2 years ago to the acquisition and improvement of Magnesia Falls Drive as planned (as well as the other features of the COD Specific Pla n). The im ple- mentation section of the fairly orate detail , calculating costof right-of-way acquisitionanimprovement wthaprojectedbudgetdistribtion between private and public funds. Therefore, at the time of adoption, it must have been presumed that the plan was reasonable to implement and that the public agency commitment to expenditure of funds had been made by virtue of this document's approval . The complex dilemma we face today is the question of whether the planned right-of-way acquisition for Magnesia Falls Drive is reasonable in light of the public expenditures required, versus what can be expected from voluntary and/or required dedications from new development, recognizing the proposals which are now before you for action and the City's desired timing for acquisition of this right-of-way. With regard to action on these two cases, the first obvious option is to require implementation of the Circulation Element as a condition of approval . This would require new site planning for DP 08-79, and a redesign of CUP 09-80 yielding less than the desired 17 space expansion. Whether either of these developments would elect to proceed is unknown. The second option would be to recognize that we are now in the process of reevaluating and updating the General Plan Circulation Element, and through that process direct that alternatives for Magnesia Falls be studied while the subject cases are continued for evaluation in light of a potentially amended policy. A third more ambiguous approach, would be to conditionally approve the requests, requiring a redesign to conform to the resulting Circulation Element features. Particularly in the case of the mobile home park expansion, this would not ensure that it could eventually proceed as now planned. These three options are summarized by the following: 1. Approve with implementation of the adopted Circulation Element. 2. Continue consideration of these requests and study alternatives to the adopted Circulation Element in the General Plan Update process. Take action when a new policy is adopted. - 3. Conditionally approve the requests at this time, requiring conformance to any subsequently adopted Circulation Element policy, with implementation not permitted until that policy has been adopted. Some might perceive a fourth option would be to do whatever seems reasonable at this moment. The response to this is clearly that we do not have all of the necessary information to determine what is "reasonable". We have the expressed desires of the private project sponsors and there is no mistake about their position, but we have not fully explored the public interests to be served. It may very well be that an alternative to the adopted Circulation Element is more desirable from the public perspective, but this determination should only come after viewing an engineered concept design of the Magnesia Falls right-of-way alignment which defines existing City right-ment, mighty, dedications n t could reasonaly of-of and the location of the roadway centerline with respect to those constraints. Unfor- tunately, an alternative concept design for Magnesia Falls does not exist presently. The only reference or guide we have today is the existing COD Specific Plan Text and sketch of the intersection with Portola Avenue. Page Three STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is now obvious that the two proposals before the Commission are not in concurrence with the adopted Circulation Element, therefore, Staff would recommend that consider- ation be continued until the General Plan Update has been concluded (with the under- standing that the specific alignment for Magnesia Falls will be studied); or, a denial without prejudice, of the requests, finding that they are not in conformance with the General Plan (allowing the projects to be redrafted and submitted to corres- pond to the present Circulation Element requirements or to any subsequent amendment) . MURREL CRUMP /lr Attachments: COD Specific Plan Excerpt COD Circulation Plan j General Plan Street Cross-sections l Staff Reports (first page) , with exhibits and correspondence E Y Y ' 1 PRO(.. iF PUBLICATION (20101 2015. 5 CCP) PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF 60 CONDOMINIUMS OP-08-79 I am a citizen of the United CITY OP PALM'SCggsear States and a resident of the REOULLsdfT FeR APPRppVAL Oi AN ANIT TO A1�Ap Y DDEyELpPMENT PLAN 7T)4 LOW O STRU 710N Op AlI% f ) ON OMINIUM NDMINOR fI PLAN County aforesaid: I am over the MOD1FILCAAAr10cNfNpN DRpCPERRT�r pSEN RA LSLo�Dp tD NT EEAST f�pe p7f RTOL4 age of eighteen years, and hOt AVENUE!fOUTM Oi THE WNITEW6JR TORMCANNELND NORTNOFM�NISIA i L DR V a party LO Or interested in the NOTI EISH R aY GIV`4 ` NO. p 79 AMEND DI C E E H that a DubIIC Near np wl1EI hel Wr the ?Olin rt above entitled matter. I am the Planning CAmmisslon fa consider reavest by TRANSt�PIC DEELPME�T COR DORATI N '/ for an Omanr#m I to on oggroved Development Plan to a lOw cans rust an of s xH(e0)Condom n- principal clerk of the printer lums rother Thom apartments,an InereeOp In unit size ontl parking area coverage, C decrease In p�rivate a mllro Otl fl en of ree'oat1 al amenitie , on a M X mainly 1D.87 O f PALM DESERT POST, a n e w p a p e r of DDOprtreptyysie IYARINN"tyyhseee�� iyppuu-S}hh(Wla =t�e"sider�Ta{ maw Num s pQ.nu.�a�I gene�ocgrerPon�he epSr side of rtlCularly oestrlbetl N Whitewater harm frhpnrlel, l pf Mogneslo Falls Orlve, more general circulation, printed APN 621460-M and published daily in the city of Riverside, County of Riverside, and which newspaper 4 WW�tJ• � � , � has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Riverside, State of California , 7 under date of October S, 19649 Case number 83658; that the ` ' Q N 'N notice , of which the annexed is R'N • "�'*-,»r„� �.n."a� -+�=;•�.•, vn. a Printed copy, has been P.R s „1jV; '' l :, . . ' • P Published %i �v�-'•- •'•': �, !' �'j'^,' in each regular and entire issue 4 +d � 'i •t•' ' ~ g 4. of said newspaper and not in any oPOS'79 •s'` supplement thereof on the following AMENDED uW.•.•. R•T :g, t dates, to-wit' 1 D s" •R-19,000 } 08121 ,1980 SAT Public HearinC will be eld on tTtermber 2,1980.of.7:M P.M.In the Coumc'I�fhambera In the Dp4rn oesert City Hall,tS-215 PrlCkly Pear Lane,Palm Desert,(,pllfomlo.pf wh men". Dlpae all Intere5d p�rSOna are invited M p}tend and be heard. If approved ihlE Developmem Dlan AmendEmLent wUp(y,�1 allow r�tpheSecon trruction p}31sN (60I Condo unify, T Certify (or declare) under PALM pE ERT PaNNING (AMMISSION penalty of perjury that the POP6/21 foregoing is true and correct. Dated August 21 , 1980 at Riversides California -- --- - CITY OF PALM DESERT STATE OF CALIFORNIA--BUSINESS AND TRH ORTATION AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN JR.,Governor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 8, P.O.BOX 231 SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA 92403 Development Review (Date) Reference Planning Department City of Palm Desert - 45-275 Prickly Pear Ln � Palm Desert, Ca 92260 151980 EIJ'd12"'NWEN'U'l SE;'s',f'ES _ CITY OF PALM DESERT Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed 4M F1UN /Vi O F- V?Ror'eD P&Ve-1,6M -nr7- ?Z4A1 7-o Celr1r2ucr 6(V Ccvol o A-y-r t-,z ib�.��✓A�'ifR�n�?K located 691V 4��S% caw--2 ®/c Am--pL The following items marked by an "X" apply to this proposal : This proposal is considerably removed from any existing or proposed state highway. Although the traffic and drainage generated by this proposal does not appear to have a significant effect on the state highway system, consideration must be given to the cumulative effect of continued development in this area. Any measures necessary to mitigate the cumulative impact of traffic and drainage should be provided prior to or with development of the area that necessitates them. We have no specific comment on this proposal.. If additional information is desired, please call Mr. Dick Longstreet ( 714) 383-4384. J. E. PEDDY District Director By John K. Feenstra Local Assistance Coordinator Form 8-PD24 1 i+.,........o MAX (ZRA ®� TRaatn,n-n, �>;�C9I2o'¢o �9t3u d AU�21•�[ �5•�'� •�� F.i,.`)._ s. i',..... emu,:. •'•��_5 = 45.2T5 PRICKLY PEAR LANE PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA92260 0.4 ��yoS�o� It 1 V7 TELEPHONE(714) 546-0611 SEtTER t 1� n SE MAYS, DAVID etal `! Ld�i)�eABLE AS ADDRESSED 7445 Gar Av w Y LU ' \ Palm e rt, 92260 Rm W N � V 70 1 y 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 August 13, 1980 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO AN APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF SIXTY (60) CONDOMINIUMS AND MINOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATIONS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF POR- TOLA AVENUE; SOUTH OF THE WHITEWATER STORM CHANNEL AND NORTH OF MAGNE-SIA--ALLS DRIVE. CASE N0. DP 08-79 (AMENDEp) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by TRANSCOPIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION for an amendment to an approved Development Plan to allow construction of sixty (60) condominiums rather than apartments, an increase in unit size and parking area coverage, a decrease in private open space, and minor modification of recreational amenities, on approximately 10.87 acres within the PR-5 (Planned Residential , maximum 5 d.u./ac. ) zone located on the east side of Portola Avenue, south of the Whitewater Storm Channel , north of Magnesia Falls Drive, more particularly described as : APN 621-460-022 , ........... .oRvc •.c o a gg M, _ I �T C COUN fY OF PP 08-79 AMEPIPE 1 COMM.PARK R—I 9, P R-1 9,000 SAID Public Hearing will be held on September 2, 1980, at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall , 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. If approved, this Development Plan Amendment would allow the construction of sixty (60) condominium units. MURREL CRUMP , Acting Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post August 21, 1980 1-I.S.POSTAGEi- C5S4� (off 71DMP.nrm 11DMc3®ate a Au621'9;: 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE,PAW DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 IDK3k _• ' �_ TELEPHONE(714) 346-0611 _ SEA' O N P�w^SER Efi '. ENo`nO Q QPV„ E T 9ryf . 1 GoARMST 4 oTo `FHD o L 323 ONG ve.UCI C. q11 F OOS323 G y Ave.lm sert, CA 92260 A OF wggo UJitiuiCL lR i 45.275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE,PALM DESERT CALIFORNIA 62260 Cq �I TELEPHONE(714) 346-0611 ��.-�P p5,g8gRv\G�5 ITN OCCUPANT l Dr Palm e %ton CA d 92260 �RFSSRge ap9� 4, .: Koo . , " . •• ;', ;="qua•.'%:% 0 45.27E PRICKLY PEAR LANE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 fL7�pf e ,....� 7ELEPHONE(714) 546-0611 D \I F UNDELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED 1\ ��. r OCCUPANT 43942 But onwood Dr ~`� � 021980 Palm Dese Ca 92260 SEP �NVIRO M y_A� pE.SERS,S CIS.pm ®$laWr ®it ncmm Tffm lmmnmmIP'ffc .45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 A 01 . I U.893!9 i =w•,=`ltiy+. -'�,• T TELEPHONE(714) 646-0611 ! ....ti �•':•:.,..`.4 RE rUg TO PO foR6`gR�+� SE,VpfP, � FApp BROWN,jey , VER F . , etal OB4 inR�g 1e CA 92307 BRO 6'f vi q;1 j1E3NI 0£3/2Ei/£30 IiI:TURN TO SENDER NOT I:)EL..T..VE::PiFlF.3L_F. AS Fl[)I)REiS!31=:p 0 9 �ls�r`fl�O ��� UNABL.E TO FT(]R!4AF2D 9 1 5~_ �� y ppVlIEI 46.275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE,PALM DESERT,CAUFORNIA92260 , % G AL,1 U.8381.3 TELEPHONE(714) 346-0611 Dy?i o m� O ��� 1.. CAMPBELL, DIANA L. � N LSl7 Doothy #2 ngeles , CA 90049 F?C'I"Uftl�! TO SENI7L.:F: NOT I?E=L.1'.UJ .R III._17 AIS ADDRESSED UNABLE T(7 1='UF?!•!61RD • L- p`�p ..._�; ``' _i..e�e Gam=— . AUG21'Bdy ��_sa_(SI 46-273 PRICKLY PEAR LANE,PAUA DESERT,CAUFORNIA 92260 ETUgy Cq t-�F P303s1?3 TELEPHONE(710) 846-06II lSoft r zIN— KING HOMEOWNERS ASSN 116 ente Blvd. Sao G -Los Angeles, C m N � ., , f Mqpo N —s y 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 August 13, 1980 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO AN APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF SIXTY (60) CONDOMINIUMS AND MINOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATIONS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY. LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF POR- TOLA AVENUE; SOUTH OF THE WHITEWATER STORM CHANNEL AND NORTH OF MAGNESIA FALLS DRIVE. CASE NO. DP 08-79 (AMENDED) NOTICE IS HEREBY- GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by TRANSCOPIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION for an amendment to an approved Development Plan to allow construction of sixty (60) condominiums rather than apartments , an increase in unit size and parking area coverage, a decrease in private open space, and minor modification of recreational amenities, on approximately 10.87 acres within the PR-5 (Planned Residential , maximum 5 d.u./ac. ) zone located on the east side of Portola Avenue, south of the Whitewater Storm Channel , north of Magnesia Falls Drive, more particularly described as : APN 621-460-022 ,a ' � cvc•s ,.cr .wive -•c[ oe vc— ' ��� R—M R-M DP 08-79 AMENPE 1 COMM.MRK R—I 9, �3 P — R-1 9,000 e - .e SAID Public Hearing will be held on September 2, 1980, at 7 :00 P.M. in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall , 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. If approved, this Development Plan Amendment would allow the construction of sixty (60) condominium units. MURREL CRUMP, Acting Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post August 21, 1980 + I WEDGEWOOD GLEN A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Written Documents (Case Nos. DP08-79 and 178MF) PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE Construction of this project will be done in three (3) different stages. Projected date of commencement of of project will be in the latter part of the first quarter of 1981. Phase 1 (March, 1981) - Initial offsite and site im- provements, models (2) and twenty (20) production units . Phase 2 (June, 1981) - Sixteen (16) production units. Phase 3 (Sept. , 1981) - Twenty-two (22) production units. QUANTITATIVE DATA Gross area 581 , 323 S .F . Dedicated area 107 , 686 Net site area 473 , 637 S .F . Square footage - Living Area/Garage: ' Plan 1 (1, 007 ' + 465) S .F. x 34 units 50 , 048 S .F . Plan 2 (1, 130 + 457) S .F. x 26 units 41,262 Total 91, 310 S .F. Site Coverage Breakdown: Buildings 19 . 3% 91 , 310 S .F . Private streets 16 . 3 77 , 250 Driveways and Parking bays 8 . 9 42 ,164 Private patios 4 . 1 19 , 200 Sub-total 48 . 6 229 , 924 Net Open Space area 51. 4 243 , 713 Net Site Area 100 . 00 473 , 637 S .F . X 1016 TRAIVSCOPIC Sow P.O.CALIFORNIA RANCHO MIRAGE )346-5 0 92270 DEVELOPMENT 3250 3ILSHI6 /�_ 3250 WILSHIRE BLVD. CORPORATION V SUITE 604 LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA 90010 (213)380-9522 June 22 , 1980 Mr. Stan Sawa City of Palm Desert Department of Environmental Services 45-275 Prickley Pear Lane Palm Desert, California 92260 Re: Development Plan Application (Amended) Case Numbers: DP08-79 and 178MF (Wedgewood Glen) Dear Mr. Sawa: Enclosed please find the following: 1. Written Documents a. Statement of Planning Objective b. Preliminary Development Schedule c. Quantitative Data 2. Site Plan a. Six (6). full size (one of which is colored) b. Fifteen (15) reduced copies 3. Floor Plan and Building Elevations a. One (1) full size b. Fifteen (15) reduced copies 4 . A check made to the order of the City of Palm Desert in the amount of $50. 00 representing the application fee for this Amended Development Plan. Pursuant to our numerous discussions in the last month, the above mentioned submittals would complete the application in its en- tirety. Information and materials filed previously with the City of Palm Desert included the following: 1. Completed Application Form 2 . Written Documents - Legal Description/Ownership and Water District Letter 3. Property Owners' Information (Updated) and gummed mailing labels 4 . Address labels for Project Sponsors 5. General Landscape Plan and Letter from Frank Radmacher & Associates, landscape architect, outlining the subse- quent changes. 6. Preliminary Grading Plan. 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 August 13, 1980 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO AN APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF SIXTY (60) CONDOMINIUMS AND MINOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATIONS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF POR- TOLA AVENUE; SOUTH OF THE WHITEWATER STORM CHANNEL AND NORTH OF MAGNESIA FALLS DRIVE. CASE NO. DP 08-79 (AMENDED) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by TRANSCOPIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION for an amendment to an approved Development Plan to allow construction of sixty (60) condominiums rather than apartments , an increase in unit size and parking area coverage, a decrease in private open space, and minor modification of recreational amenities, on approximately .10.87 acres within the PR-5 (Planned Residential , maximum 5 d.u./ac. ) zone located on the east side of Portola Avenue, south of the Whitewater Storm Channel , north of Magnesia Falls Drive, more particularly described as : APN 621-460-022 . � cec.,iL.Ex .ov vc �v:•L oxvc Mamma ` K % __ \ ` ux4 x Ef L fLL L1 011. R-M DP OS-79 '� l - ° AMENVE P COMM.PARK R-1 9, 3 P R-19,000 .n rr1 rn SAID Public Hearing will be held on September 2, 1980, at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall , 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. If approved, this Development Plan Amendment would allow the construction of sixty (60) condominium units. MURREL CRUMP, Acting Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post August 21, 1980 �� �����a . �� . . �� ._ x - - s• • • v- � _ Y zG i • _ UA { 1 j sac t� ' Toi O 7-7 - due Ca ; _ V _ : CL z- ' 0 ID O west lL `� ul i CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF t U �~ E[slV1P 4�,� E4�'i'A�. SEf�°�9GE ul � t�AiQK1N�� � � APPROVE BY: ElC.C.RES. NO. , C ElP.C..RES.NO._ D1 ._... { � � TQFF LETTER ____..�- --- -�.. .. � D.R_R. ACTION FORM BY Date t ¢ ,� 1 0 t--- _ i CONSTRUCT,'ON SHALL COMMENCE INITHIJI I ONE YEAR OF THIS APPROVAL. ; 5 co • rr i i (P a 61 41 1 77 f.l mF , ) f _ a > v n v , - F ''moo'o a v- 3 t C - a ~ Q o �U 0 � } o = i v�'0 ID OY , .- o � a s d - C7 00 # J A; x z •. V I �1/��_ S, t/ . , .;. ,_ -: .. '.. ,., ran. � - -�•_t r LLL aV* F �x • SHEET • 4 NO 3 K i981 . _ . .: HIPP D , r i-. 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 August 13, 1980 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO AN APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF SIXTY (60) CONDOMINIUMS AND MINOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATIONS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF POR- TOLA AVENUE; SOUTH OF THE WHITEWATER STORM CHANNEL AND NORTH OF MAGNESIA FALLS DRIVE. CASE NO. DP 08-79 (AMENDED) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by TRANSCOPIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION for an amendment to an approved Development Plan to allow construction of sixty (60) condominiums rather than apartments, an increase in unit size and parking area coverage, a decrease in private open space, and minor modification of recreational amenities, on approximately 10.87 acres within the PR-5 (Planned Residential , maximum 5 d.u./ac. ) zone located on the east side of Portola Avenue, south of the Whitewater Storm Channel , north of Magnesia Falls Drive, more particularly described as: APN 621-460-022 G YC.SLYI .C4iVC °LE 04 JC yyr yyy,.�p ..: .... .. v,,.,, ouN rY OF ` DgP� 08-79 ° Ap,E1V,1 PEP COMM,PARK a R-i R-I 9,000 SAID Public Hearing will be held on September 2, 1980, at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall , 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm 'Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. If approved, this Development Plan Amendment would allow the construction of sixty (60) condominium units. MURREL CRUMP, Acting Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post August 21, 1980 c� 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE August 6, 1980 APPLICANT Transcopic Development Corp. P.O. Box 1016 Rancho Mirage , CA 92270 CASE NO: DP 08-79,Ind 178 MF The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at is meeting of August 5, 1980 CONTINUED TO DENIED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. X APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 622 PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR PUBLIC HEARING. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION cc: Applicant C.V.C.W.D File k Case No. 178 MF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 622 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNOUNCING FINDINGS AND GRANTING A ONE- YEAR TIME EXTENSION FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF A PLANNED RESIDENTIAL (APARTMENT) DEVELOPMENT AND PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF SIXTY (60) APARTMENTS AND ASSOCIATED RECREATIONAL AMENITIES ON APPROXIMATELY 10.87 ACRES WITHIN THE PR-5 (PLANNED RESIDENTIAL, MAX. 5 D.U./AC. ) ZONE LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF PORTOLA AVENUE, SOUTH OF THE WHITEWATER STORM CHANNEL. CASE NOS. DP 08-79 AND 178 MF WHEREAS, pursuant to the provision of the Palm Desert Zoning Ordinance, the Planning Commission did on August 5, 1980, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider the application of TRANSCOPIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION for approval of a time extension for a Planned Residential (Apartment) Development and Preliminary Design Review Case to allow construction of sixty (60) apartments and associated recreational amenities on approximately 10.87 acres within the PR-5 (Planned Residential max. 5 d.u./ac. ) zone located on the east side of Portola Avenue, south of the Whitewater Storm Channel ; more particularly described as: APN 621-400-022 WHEREAS, said applicant has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Environmental Quality Procedure Resolution No. 78-32" , (now super- seded by Resolution No. 80-89) in that the Director of Environmental Services has determined that the project will not have a significant adverse effect on the . environment and a Negative Declaration has been filed in connection with the ori- ginal application; and, WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and argument, if any, the Planning Commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify approval of said Development Plan and Preliminary Design Review time extensions: 1. The location of the project is in accord with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and the purpose of the district in which the site is located. 2. The location of the proposed use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. The proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. 4. The proposed use complies with the goals, objectives, and policies of the City' s General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission in these cases. 2. Approval of a one year extension of time for implementation of the Development Plan and Preliminary Design Review is granted to TRANS- COPIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION subject to the conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 505, the requirements of the Fire Marshal 's letter, attached hereto, dated July 16, 1980, and conformance to any subsequently adopted Circulation Element policy, with implementation approval granted herein not permitted until that policy has been adopted. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of Palm Desert Planning Commission held on this 5th day of August, 1980, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: BERKEY, RICHARDS, MILLER NOES: NONE ABSENT: KRYDER, MCLACHLAN ABSTAIN: NONE ATTEST: CHARLES MILLER Chairman Acting Secretary I NTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ACTING SECRETARY SUBJECT: CASE NOS. DP 08-Z9 AND CUP 09-80 COMPLIANCE DATE: AUGUST 5, 1980 WITH GENE LAN (COD S EC1 PLAN) CIRCULATION ELEMENT The College of the Desert Area Specific Plan, adopted in January of 1978, designates Magnesia Falls Drive (43rd Avenue) as a "Major Highway" (110 feet right-of-way width) . Both of the referenced cases, now before the Commission, abut the Magnesia Falls Drive alignment. In lieu of discussing General Plan Circulation Element compliance individually , in a staff report for each case, it appears that this subject deserves special attention before going further into the merits of_ the project. The first staff report description page for each case with exhibits and correspondence is attached to this memorandum for reference. Case No. DP 08-79, now before the Commission for consideration of a time extension, is located on the northeast corner of Magnesia Falls Drive and Portola Avenue. The plans for development of this site include dedication and improvement of a 55 ft. half street on Magnesia Falls Drive, which at a first glance, would appear to be consistent with the Circulation Element. The COD Specific Plan Circulation Element (attached excerpt from page V-3) , speaks to a necessary shift of the roadway center- line north of the half-section line,l to enable the planned Magnesia Falls roadway to be established and allow a separate roadway/driveway entrance to the south of Magnesia Falls to be maintained to serve the Community Park Site (see illustration) . In the original Public Works/Engineering analysis of the proposed Development Plan, it was not recognized that the southern property line of this site was the half- section line, and therefore, not only did a 55 ft. half street need to be dedicated, but also the additional right-of-way necessary to shift the roadway centerline north to preserve a separate access drive to the Park. A right-of-way requirement such as this would not have affected the maximum number of dwelling units permitted by the zone, because density is based on gross site area before street dedications, but it would have reduced the net site the units were actually to be built upon. Case No. CUP 09-80, now before the Commission for consideration of a Conditional Use Permit which would allow an existing mobile home park to expand by 17 spaces, is located on the northwest corner of Magnesia Falls Drive and Portola Avenue. The COD Specific Plan Circulation Element recognizes that implementation of the planned right-of-way for Magnesia Falls would require the relocation of 5 mobile homes. The subject CUP request proposes to offer for dedication 30 feet of right-of-way south of those existing mobile home lots to the half-section line. Together with the existing City right-of-way on the south side of the half-section line, the total width available for Magnesia Falls Drive at this point would be 74 feet, and not the planned 110 feet. 1A Section is a term used in survey descriptions indicating a one square mile area, the half-section line runs through the middle of the section. ,y Page Two From a review of the adopted COD Specific Plan, it would appear that the City was committed 22 years ago to the acquisition and improvement of Magnesia Falls Drive as planned (as well as the other features of the COD Specific Plan) . The imple- mentation section of the plan goes into fairly elaborate detail , calculating cost of right-of-way acquisition and improvement with a projected budget distribution between private and public funds. Therefore, at the time of adoption, it must have been presumed that the plan was reasonable to implement and that the public agency commitment to expenditure of funds had been made by virtue of this document's approval . The complex dilemma we face today is the question of whether the planned right-of-way acquisition for Magnesia Falls Drive is reasonable in light of the public expenditures required, versus what can be expected from voluntary and/or required dedications from new development, recognizing the proposals which are now before you for action and the City's desired timing for acquisition of this right-of-way. With regard to action on these two cases, the first obvious option is to require implementation of the Circulation Element as a condition of approval . This would require new site planning for DP 08-79, and a redesign of CUP 09-80 yielding less than the desired 17 space expansion. Whether either of these developments would elect to proceed is unknown. The second option would be to recognize that we are now in the process of reevaluating and updating the General Plan Circulation Element, and through that process direct that alternatives for Magnesia Falls be studied while the subject cases are continued for evaluation in light of a potentially amended policy. A third more ambiguous approach, would be to conditionally approve the requests, requiring a redesign to conform to the resulting Circulation Element features. Particularly in the case of the mobile home park expansion, this would not ensure that it could eventually proceed as now planned. These three options are summarized by the following: 1. Approve with implementation of the adopted Circulation Element. 2. Continue consideration of these requests and study alternatives to the adopted Circulation Element in the General Plan Update process. Take action when a new policy is adopted. 3. Conditionally approve the requests at this time, requiring conformance to any subsequently adopted Circulation Element policy, with implementation not permitted until that policy has been adopted. Some might perceive a fourth option would be to do whatever seems reasonable at this moment. The response to this is clearly that we do not have all of the necessary information to determine what is "reasonable". We have the expressed desires of the private project sponsors and there is no mistake about their position, but we have not fully explored the public interests to be served. It may very well be that an alternative to the adopted Circulation Element is more desirable from the public perspective, but this determination should only come after viewing an engineered concept design of the Magnesia Falls right-of-way alignment which defines existing City right-of-way, dedications that could reasonably be expected to come from new develop- ment, right-of-way that would have to be acquired through condemnation and purchase, and the location of the roadway centerline with respect to those constraints. Unfor- tunately, an alternative concept design for Magnesia Falls does not exist presently. The only reference or guide we have today is the existing COD Specific Plan Text and sketch of the intersection with Portola Avenue. Page Three STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is now obvious that tiie two proposals before the Commission are not in concurrence with the adopted Circulation Element, therefore, Staff would recommend that consider- ation be continued until the General Plan Update has been concluded (with the under- standing that the specific alignment for Magnesia Falls will be studied) ; or, a denial without prejudice, of the requests, finding that they are not in conformance with the General Plan (allowing the projects to be redrafted and submitted to corres- pond to the present Circulation Element requirements or to any subsequent amendment) . 141k�1t! MIJRREL CRUMP /lr Attachments: COD Specific Plan Excerpt COD Circulation Plan General Plan Street Cross-sections Staff Reports (first page), with exhibits and correspondence 1 EXCERPT FROM THE COD SPECIFIC PLAN 2. 43rd Avenue (Magnesia Falls Drive): This is the only major road contained in the Specific Plan which is not already established as a major carrier of through traffic within the College area. Its development as a through street from Mon- terey Avenue to Cook Street will make it the only other east-west arterial in the College area besides 44th Avenue. Along one route, it would connect Monterey Avenue, College of the Desert, San Pablo Avenue, the municipal golf course site, Portola Avenue, the Lincoln/Middle School complex, the Palm Desert Community Park, Deep Canyon Road, the proposed high school site, and Cook Street. Its alignment adjacent to the Whitewater River Storm Channel would make it one of the most beautiful and scenic in all the desert. This road should be shifted slightly to the north of the present half-section line so as to preserve the existing access road to the Community Park as a separate right-of-way. Construction of Ord Avenue west of Portola Avenue will require the relocation of 5 mobilehomes located in the Marco Polo Mobilehome Park. M001LEHOMt PA0.n DO d > w � V C. MOBILE FIOMa 0 - PARK p O ® _ B O g �� Q / J COMMUNITY �Pa ryK a 1 I f I 1 Jl u 1 I CY � 3Cl—1 a _ a a -- 11 ---- —_— — + II�C,7JI t I y a P T-- ttG - --- I _ r II OISER. IM5, Y I FT . .lL:m7)9T.Llti �T_ COLLEGE oDE'SERT AREA f the .y { T '1• "' ! T-t, ce_1�I rrI e 1 OEC 1 ROI.oa INC CIRCULATIONx PLAN EXIST R/W PROP R/W R/W / 'L—.Y4 l I ! 1 -I l I /�, lI f ' / /. \•� �, I �i TRAFFIC SIGNAL --- NEW Rn awe—ADDITIONAL RW.1 OPEN SPACE J . TOT LOT a PARx (PUBLIC) _ 60'-68' R/W 48' 10' 12' 12' 1 12' 12' 10' (8) (8') COLLECTOR HIGHWAY — 88' R/W 64 12' 8'-r12'--r 12'--t--12'—r I T T 8' 12' I SECONDARY HIGHWAY 100'-110' R/W 76' 10'j 8-1 12'T12'--r i—T12'+12'-t8 10' i *Variable (0 ft. to 10 ft.) MAJOR HIGHWAYS 110'-126' R/W 40 106' 10' 8' 12'T 12' 12'TT 12'—}- 8' 41 10' *Variable (0 ft. to 16 ft.) ARTERIAL HIGHWAY FIGURE 5-2 GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR HIGHWAY CROSS SECTIONS Source: Adapted from Cove Communities General Plan by Wilsey & Ham 5.P.l.b - CITY OF PALM DESERT STAFF REPORT To: Planning Commission Report on: Time extension for Development Plan and Preliminary Design Review Case for sixty unit apartment complex. Applicant: TRANSCOPIC DEVELOPMENT CORP. P.O. Box 1016 Rancho Mirage, California 92270 Case Nos : DP .8-7 and 178 MF Date: August 5, 1980 I. REQUEST: Request for approval of a twelve month time extension of an approved Develop- ment Plan and Preliminary Design Review Case to allow construction of sixty (60) apartments and associated recreational amenities on approximately 10.87 acres within the PR-5 (Planned Residential , max. density 5 d.u./ac. ) zone lo,cated on the east side of Portola Avenue, south of the Whitewater Storm Channel . LOCATIONAL MAP: L-i DP . 013 779 c �snnTounn DRIVE HHVY��ii //�9 CpMMUNITY �. PARK W .O P aIJTT nw o o II . BACKGROUND: A. ADJACENT ZONING/LAND USE: North: O.S./Whitewater Storm Channel South: P (Public)/Elementary School and Community Park East: O.S./Whitewater Storm Channel West: R.M./Mobile Home Park ' B. PREVIOUS PERTINENT CASES: The subject cases were approved July, 3, 1979, by Planning Commission Resolu- tion No. 415. - -- F J } e La O W f 0 4 }} pjL w Z _ a 00 jr W N mxl'�- f / `__` � ' ✓cc'_ 60'_J'b'G TY.✓_^ FC r P¢ilrS �,.� 'o' ✓.. _-nw n t� \\ T ° � - iie4�' mar x/ew/+e r ruu'r l��wu� .v. .,.. _ ✓„« ':�, ;; � I Ile[ m mi.mw� .P•rouxn. p✓L oueo(f.naxT I _ 5 & r EIl� C. 1 G 7M, C) 1 II J J' �� �.- III i G•.�1 - +� �� I.'' I ' i� } 1 (� 1 11G5 _11 I` 1 ry � Ge ucn 67 .—__I_� �� �_ NnT ♦rt _ N e n.�. We. OL✓LO/MLNT COHL L79 />r'J/M �TO/.`CGC u^✓e.CST-R'`A9�1'. i Cnq 1f'.'..As e2 i i I I i " ��C P.O. BOX1016 `TRAIN SCO P I `�F RANCHO MIRAGE �! CALIFORNIA 92270 „y (714)346-5506 DEVELOPMENT - - 3250 WILSHIRE BLVD. CORPORATION SUITE 604 LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA 90010 (213)380-9522 June 26, 1980 _ Department of Environmental Services City -of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickley Pear Lane Palm Desert, California 92260 Attgntion: Mr. Stan Sawa ''Su'kije$�'""!'"Extension of Case Nos. DP 08-79 and 178MF °-Dear Mr,: Sawa: �r Pu'rsuan`t1,to'. our discussion yesterday, we are hereby requesting a tweloe. (12) month extension of the approval of the above referenced cases and the check enclosed made in favor of the City of Palm Desert in the amount of $50 . 00 will represent the extension fee that is required. There are no changes as to the names of the parties involved with this project with reference to the ownership and the de- veloper. An amended application to change the nature of this project from an apartment complex to a planned unit development will be filed with your office in the near future. We will also have the list of names of the owners of the sur- rounding properties to the extent of the immediate 300 feet radius delivered to your office no later than next Wednesday (July 2, 1980) . Should you have any questions with regard to this matter, please do not hesitate to contact us. Thank you for your assistance. ery trul yours , William Lo` Pres'ident� I 5� WWL/ A� � li, � f✓ enclosure JUN < u a3c0 Li SERVICES , DEPARTMENT OF FIRE PROTECTION IN COOPERATION WITH THE UNTY CALIFORNIA DIVISION OF FORESTRY or �RIVERSIDE...,6i', DAVID L. FLAKE P.O. BOX 248 COUNTY FIRE WARDEN 210 WEST SAN JACIN TO STREET PERRIS, CALIFORNIA 92370 TELEPHONE (714) 657-3183 July 16, 1980 Carlos Ortega Acting Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert JU 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane j Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 F1Vjyonrti£N 6 j98p Reference: Case No. DP 08-79 and 178 MF qF ng<MCOS eRTFs Gentlemen : Prior to construction of any of the proposed buildings , the following conditions must be met: 1. Install a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow for a two (2) hour duration in addition to domestic or other supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways . A. Hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. B. Exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. C. Curbs (if installed) , shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. Upon approval , one copy will be sent to the Building Department, and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, and approved by the water company, with the following certification : "I certify that the design of the water system in Case Number DP 08-79 and 178 MF is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal ." DP 08-79 and 178 MF, cont. 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to-the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the. required flow. 6. Emergency access road shall be 20.feet wide minimum. 7. Parking shall be allowed on one side of interior street. 8. Cul-de-sac turning radius shall be 40 feet. Very jtr�ul Eric L. Vogt 9 Fire Marshal ELV:dt 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE(7{14) 348-0811 NZ�y �Zo SUN ING HOMEOWNERS ASSN f (j ode 11661 San Vincente Blvd. 7d o Los An eles, CA �o \6 NOT DELIVERABLE ' : AS ADDRESSED }= UNABLE TO FORAAR71 RETURN TO SENDER' �•r 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 July 18, 1980 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A 12 MONTH TIME EXTENSION OF AN APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW CASE FOR A PLANNED RESIDENTIAL APARTMENT COMPLEX LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF PORTOLA AVENUE, SOUTH OF THE WHITEWATER STORM CHANNEL. CASE, NOS. DP 08-79 and 178 MF NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by TRANSCOPIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION for approval of a 12 month time extension of an approved Development Plan and preliminary design review case to allow construction of sixty (60) duplex apart- ments and associated recreational amenities on approximately 10.87 acres within the PR-5 (Planned Residential , max. density 5 d.u./ac. ) zone Located on the east side of Portola Avenue, south of the Whitewater Storm Channel , more particularly described as: APN 621-400-022 uv L MAG /g �SANTOLINA DRIVE W 08!7/.' CAMMUNITY o' - ' te PARK W J .. SAID Public Hearing will be held on August 5, 1980, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall , 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California. Written comments prior to the hearing date may be submitted or interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. If approved, this request would allow a 12 month time extension of an approved Development Plan and Preliminary design review case. MURREL CRUMP, Acting Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post July 24, 1980 riti — ¢ esr i:. S.P0SI U �$tow O� TFmlT txn� �le"4®IIo'o-e ( R RET(�RN difllLl2`. :'yy .�` .y To pp 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE,PALM OESERT,CALIFORNIAS Ojp�»+. -1 SENDER �Att ••I:L4034!93 ,�t TELEPHONE(714) S489' - - UNDELIVERABLE AS rtLL�!?ESSE`(3� M � i -cl4 90 ` ARMSTR G, LUCILE C . 74323 G y Ave. vo`� � Palm Des t, CA 92260 -- o \ F 10 E A S.POSIAGEI: (z9fl.ail Oap xPalnxim �M 45-276 PRICKLY PEAR LANE,PALM DESERT,GILIFORNIA 92260 �?.: rt•: � �^�?m4J.� _=• i 5 TELEPHONE(7141346-0611 ( {` AL1 �U6°3�'iE._.__ -_.�• OrCUPA �' 43041 Bhttonwood Dr ✓Palm Desert, CA 92260 t � ,•:: . 48-273 PRICKLY PEAR LANE PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260, 0.£TUR ME "l < . ., TON69ttaj TELEPHONE(714) 346-0611 ; ; SENDER UNDELIVERABL AS ADDRESSED _ 774455 . , rDAVID dry Ave m De ert, CA 92260 1 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 July 18, 1980 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A 12 MONTH TIMEIEXTENSION OF AN APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW CASE FOR A PLANNED RESIDENTIAL APARTMENT COMPLEX LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF PORTOLA AVENUE; SOUTH OF THE WHITEWATER STORM CHANNEL. CASE NOS. DP 08-79 and 178 MF NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by TRANSCOPIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION for approval of a 12 month time extension of an approved Development Plan and preliminary design review case to allow construction of sixty (60) duplex apart- ments and associated recreational amenities on approximately 10.87 acres within the PR-5 (Planned Residential , max. density 5 d.u./ac. ) zone located on the east side of Portola Avenue, south of the Whitewater Storm Channel , more particularly described as: APN 621-400-022 DP �SANTOLINA DRIVE W ®8 '1 A/ � COMMUNITY - I 9/y[� - � w� SAID Public Hearing will be held on August 5, 1980, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall , 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California. Written comments prior to the hearing date may be submitted or interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. If approved, this request would allow a 12 month time extension of an approved Development Plan and Preliminary design review case. MURREL CRUMP, Acting Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post July 24, 1980 1 • r--- °_- --��•�i,;y ems—-•' i ��,40� ®jP Tp7ts.Tl rrrxi ��av4•e - y_ fcl' +,� a a "L26'E(: . ��il :� 'r I. 46-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE.PALM OESERT.CAUFORNIA92260 I U4iiJl1��•,?.•. I Cq L�F .� .&3a1?il�__.--+' TELEPHONE(714) 346-0611 S1f}tGr . I OCCUPANT �O 6 43142 Butt ,nwood Dr _ P0, Palm Desert Ca 92260 N T cT 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 July 18, 1980 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A 12 MONTH TIME EXTENSION OF AN APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW CASE FOR A PLANNED RESIDENTIAL APARTMENT COMPLEX LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF PORTOLA AVENUE, SOUTH OF THE WHITEWATER STORM CHANNEL. CASE NOS. DP 08-79 and 178 MF NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by TRANSCOPIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION for approval of a 12 month time extension of an approved Development Plan and preliminary design review case to allow construction of sixty (60) duplex apart- ments and associated recreational amenities on approximately 10.87 acres within the PR-5 (Planned Residential , max. density 5 d.u./ac. ) zone located on the east side of Portola Avenue, south of the Whitewater Storm Channel , more particularly described as: APN 621-400-022 i `\ v W VP o ®p- /p us�xiou xn on rve W Vl dH COMMUNITY � ' PARK rXY SAID Public Hearing will be held on August 5, 1980, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall , 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California. Written comments prior to the hearing date may be submitted or interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. If approved, this request would allow a 12 month time extension of an approved Development Plan and Preliminary design review case. MURREL CRUMP, Acting Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post July 24, 1980 j PROOF Of PUBLICATION (20101 2015 .5 CCP) PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF RES. APT. COMPL DP-08-79 I am a citizen of the United CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE States and a resident of the I REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A 12 MONTH TIME EXTENSION OF AN APPROVED DEVEL. I OPMENT PLAN AND PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW CASE FOR A PLANNED RESI- C oun t y aforesaid; I am over the DENTIAL APARTMENT COMPLEX LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF PORTOLA AVE- age O f eighteen earl AVE- NUE, SOUTH OF THE WHITEWATER STORM CHANNEL. g years, and not I CASE NOS. OP 08-79 and 178 MF NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Heorinoo WIII be held before the Palm Desert a party to or .interested lh the Planning Commission to consider a request byy TRANSCOPIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION for approval of a 12 month time extension of an approv Development Plan and preliminary above entitled matter . I am the donan review case to allow constructin of sixty, (d0) duplex apartments and associated recrea- t anal ameniti on a roximately 10.87«res within the PR-5(Planned Residential,max.density 5 principal clerk o f the printer �.oie )zone «ate°�on me epsf side of Portolo Avenue,south of the Whitewater Storm Channel, of PALM DESERT POST, a newpaper of more partlwlarly described as: APN 621-40"n general circulation, printed _ Z _ l L,J r and published daily in the city of Riverside , County of Riverside, and which newspaper ��` has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Riverside, State of California , DP under date of October 59 1964, ! 0S•79 avvoalrr Case number 83658; that the °Gpx dI notice, of which the annexed is 'S� a printed copy, has been published K in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on 'the following SAID Public Hearingp will be held on Augusi51980,at7:00a.m.in the Council Chambers In the dates , to—wit : Palm Desert CRY Hall,a&275 Prickly Pear Lane,Palm Desert,California.Written Comments prior to the hearinp tlate moV be submitted or interestetl persons are Invited to attend and be heard. If approved,this request would allow a 12 month time extension of an aonrovetl Development Plan and Preliminarryy design review case. 07124 , 19$0 MURREL CRUMP, Acting Secretary PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION PDP 7/24 I Certify (or declare) under penalty of 'perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated July 24, 1980 at Riverside, California CITY OF PALM DESSERT �a 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-061I August 7, 1980 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO: DP 08-79 (Amended) PROJECT: Development Plan APPLICANT: Transcopic Development Corp. Enclosed please find materials describing a project for which the following is being requested: Amendment of an approved Development Plan to allow construction of sixty (601 condominiums rather than apartments, increase in unit size and parking area, decrease in private open space, and minor modification of recreational ameni- ties on approximately 10.87 acres within the PR-5 (Planned Residential , max. 5 d.u./ac. ) .zone located on the east side of Portola Avenue, south of the Whitewater Storm Channel , north of Magnesia Falls Drive, more particularly described as : APN 621-460-022. F The attached data was prepared by the applicant and is being forwarded to you for comments and recommended Conditions of Approval . The City is interested in the probable impacts on the natural environment (e.g. water and air pollution) and on public resources (e.g. demand for schools, hospitals, parks, power gener- ation, sewage treatment, etc. ) . Your comments and recommended conditions of approval must be received by this office prior to 5:00 p.m. August 22 1980, in order to be discussed by the Land Division Committee at their meeting of . Auaust 27 , 1980. The Land Division Committee (comprised of Director of Environmental Services, City Building Official , City Engineer, Fire Marshal and a representative of CVWD) will discuss the comments and recommended conditions of approval and will forward them to the Planning Commission through the staff report. Any informa- tion received by this office after the receipt deadline will not be discussed by the Land Division Committee nor will it be forwarded to the Planning Commission for consideration. Sin MURREL CRUMP Principal Planner MC/lr PLEASE RETURN MAP WITH COMMENTS �1I�1;1�I,�'1�l�����!�4y�II"�L�II1�1�I 1I I I:l 1-,I"�III::.�I I,��1.�A�,,�-�II mI�I I�I'1...c-�I��.I�I.,x�I I��.,.�,,�t1�ZII II,I�,-f�I1,1�I,,.I"�,,"I I)I-.,l-��.1�r I-1�,7I.It-'�.1,.;-I,I�.�,,.r,I�-, r . �.. ' --_�/t,,o--,I-L�I;I/TI7�' —'I I/",- 1 ./,II-`I-",--1,".9II'II1�,It I- ,r L1:(�-1-���aI1—I�:MI-4 1-10 g/-.�1/ w i-rII;1II d.a ... _ ._, ___,'.".1I-,��4 I,�1"�1,"�,"I I-1;�,��l'.1��,,-I�I1l--1,I,.,i�,�;,I,��'-',,�I..,'-,-r,I�,,,,�I-I,�1'.L,��-,-,�.,",!1.-L.�,�--I,6,::,_,!-.�"-1,I-,,.I,;,--��;,'�,I�I.'-I,,.-�.,.I�,�1I,,.,�.��.,.-,'I,".,.�.1:,��.,..�I-1�,I,,,,---��.—,.�l",�-���.";,z�,.I�.-1,-.,.-,+II��-,%.I,It.'I,.I 1II-II1"",,�,.1-.,."-",I�.O---�I"-.'".-..,,,.:..-,1 I,_,�I�--.�-,,-1��,:1—,,1..�'-1".",,�;I!I�,�2 I-.,�,�I'�.1.-_-7''.�I.1�-,­,-:.-1 1�.�j,I''�7,�I I,�-�"�I'.,,�,-�i�,��,�I�I-���,4.'�.-�,-I.:.1...I1�,,'-,-1.1-,,,I1-.�.I-1,T,I�1'.�,,�I1'�,1I1',t.11,I-..�I"I1',,�-�,I-;-��-�--.I"l l,�I��,I-�I.�I,.�.1,,-e�1 I,�l+��,�,I�e.1I.-",lI I,--I',I�.I,-,�'II,'1,-I.�.-','I"-,t:.,�..,���I'1-I-.II,,.1�.,-�1��_'I­",-.,�-I .I I:I.,�I,I..1,.r�,'II����:.,.�I,I-I�o.*:�-'2.-I.,,�1 1-7,...,-I-.1��",-.�I-I.-,i p",1��'41I��.,.�i..�I1_�.,..�I�.,1 I I .1I"I",�,II��.II.-..i-I�I"1-I.I1:I-�I-�l-..I�I.�:�..q.,.I,I.-�I I,II�.1�,.II I II,II....1-,,1..�I,.I.I L.--�.I-.'-I."I.-I�.��I 1 I I�2''.I.�,.�"�I.'I,..,,�I�.-�.:I...I I..II...1I:I'I�I,L.'I'...I I.I1 I%1�:-.-II�I,I�-.I.,I I�I I�.��,:1--.I,+1,.�II,I,L I.I;I�I III�.�rL,l�.­l.��I I��,.-�..-I II�.1���-II,-1...-�.,,.I�-�,.1-�.�I l 1,I-,I'�.�.�,,-�?-1�"...IiI.I-��II.-Ill...L I,����I.-,I I-�,�.-­��.I�1..1 I.I1.I,.-I I.I.II I"�.1.1 I II+.I:1IL......I-.1.I.LI,�I.II.I.I.-�".I I.1.��I I�.I�I,.I.1.I-I,.I."I-1,,��I I��:I�17II-�..7��I-III.,�I-.�--�.�I I.1,��.I1.I.I 1�r I 1�.,1 I.II.1I I.I.I���,I�.I 1 1'I�I�....I11I.I�l 1�II1 l.I I�.I�I I I I I I,-I�.�I I I..I.I�L.,��,.I��III.-,I.I 1.�--.�II I..:I1--.�.�II�..�""I:I.I 1".1I v�I I1.��I r1�I II I I I I..,�,"�I ­��-1.I�III.,I,I- �1..II..�.,I..I I-I�.II I-+I I.�.I1II.I I I.�.1,.1.I1..I.�I�I...I I 1'��I.I II�I.I.I.I II.I I.I, I L�1 I.II ILI.�.I-II;�I�I�Ii,II..�I�II�.�.I II�.I.-tr",1�1I.�..��I.'L.��:�I I.I1 II�I I,,.I�I.I-�I I 1I I'I1�I��I,.II�.-I.I�I�I.,—.1 7—I'II1I LI I.pI�.I I.-,...I.�I:�....I,fI.I I,I:II.�—1I;I1I�.�1".��,�I.I I-�I II+.II..II.II I I�I II�.1 I'I�I�I�1 1..-.L.I-III II;-�I.I I�.:"I nI I.I�II:-�,I-I II.�I-:II.I�-.i-l-I..I.,,...II.I I�1.-��1�I�IIII I-.I�I I"�I�II. ��,.1 III-.���I1 II-�:.1 I�:II�.�II�..I. I,I'I....I, -II I.�I.I:1 II.I..�.I.,.1I1.�I.���-I--I.III.-���11I1-1.�I 1II r.;I,11I��I.,I,1 I,4 4 1�"�,IIIi-.Il�1I�..,a.L-,-4 1 I-I I I�I..I.)IA,�.I...1 I�1 k�tI����q1�I r�.I.1�.-�"l,1�[',�"t—\,.4 I�I`I I"I 1.I�1 I[eI, If-I�II.1, ,IL,-1IeI.,,.,..�, .1,.-A,;..I.-III.1'1.'I 1,,i�.,�,,/-II,I"r.I.'"1,r_I.,I.I�,1"I,1�I II�-I�II 1.;,iiIt"I11-,I L I.i.,I II7 11�I'I,I�I t/11,�,It<m,'),-1I-,".�1.H�1.�.,-"II�I,�-I.:9I1.1"I.�.I I 1-,�I Ii.��1 I�I;1,/'1�,II, !�.'i."I,l�.i���--�..�..I l���,I-,,I,I�,III,",/II.1.7-I,)��,I--III"t�,1II�/,1 I,�.".,�I.;./A II,.�:I I-,"-I .I/-�I"-�I",,")I�-II�-,-II,I I�,�1,",-II,-I�A�-1II.I-I,/I1-,.-,1.,-.,,.�11'4/A.I.I�I A1�I1.I�JJi Ji-ftI,�I,l 1,I4iLIiI-I:I.o�I.I 1 I I,.I�II I I.I.-,/.I 1 L..1,.1II 1II.�.,"-�I1III,-I,�,�.I-II I�,1I-I 1-1...1.1.,1-..1 I1 1-I.1 I,1�..1I.,�I 1,1,I��I1.­.1 1 1,,-i1,l Il,i..�l.�Ii 1,�l,-�l.�1l lI�,l I,II l I l�-I,l�l lI�l lI.I.I.l.,.I�l��II,lI[�i.lI-1l,,�'';..+1�-i�.,t4-4.Ii1/17�iI�--I.�.���I—_-�,.,I...�.-I�1I�I i�I:�..-�-%.-I,1-,I,,.-Z I�II-Iat;f-1 I;I.iIe��1 4�,-I�,,�IA—I.-1�I.I-I-�:�"..1II�,'.,—I,i'_.II.�I rI iI�I;-II.",I�,.�III.I-,�I("---II.-,II I 1`�I,(��I(-,I.�/I-�II--�1--�6,.-7 i-I�t--I�-I I".��—-.�.-"�I�)I I4I.I�--:�I)l.�-)I:-�.--�I I--.��-I.1- I.II I-I"--I I,.III--l AI�1.I/-..I�.--I�II/'��IflI-,.1II/�.i:�-.I-:II iiI�-.��I Z.-,.-�A�.I/I.M—.�!�/I,.III,I I-...1u��11I I�I,I.--4.II/,I�--�--I1\--,\�I Z I I�.��'I-I1 II.j.IIl�i-.I I1��+,.II.�f..I I"-1.-I I�.-,oI/.-I.�.�.��9 I I 7.-�.�..!+-1�V1i-,�I�1.,II 1��I1..1I.)f 1II i I I-,...I�I�IIIf.I.-%"I.1m".,.-11,11.I1.��I.".1 1.�.I,I�W.I 1.'(�LiII I1-'I II.-:I�.,1...I.I I�',I�I.I-�,I II,.I-F-I+��III.-I�I�""��-�,��I,.i1.,IIr-I,I/.".1 I.II..-A,�.1I If�I,*1./�1-',�II�,I/II 1-.�,�,1 I II,I.I.��II,I'1I�-�1 IoI�.-I 4-,II�-.,I l��I-I..*--�;,,�.��1I,�I'��I-.-�I/----(.'-I-�-.-,I�I�-1.I.�o--,7:I.*a,,4--I I+I�—"�.4 I_--&1.1f I�I).-I—,/I.-I.I I..I II.I..---�I.1..�.,-,-/i..-,-2-�.I`-,-I�.,�-.I.I I I-.II--�.,�ll I I��I-.I.I-,I---�1-t/,-...-�-.I1 4Ii.1 I i I-I 1i iA..I'/Ik,I/-I�.I I..I�.II-II�"I I I I'I1--I.-II�-,,� �-I-.I!.�"I"-1I I-I.�I-�iiI..I.-7;I I/I.-4 IIz�(-1-1 1-'-I I-II�I-.8.1./I.I1�,.;.-.-',I�I�,....�I 1-1.I�I-,1 I IO@I,/-��)I1�I-L..I..I11Z 7I1�I.�I I,1_.I 1--,/I��I��04'.I."-II�--1 II.,I/I,�1/I.�I-1II-.It 1 N,-I t�-:��--��, .�-.I�I.-.I II-i/-,..--�---"-/.�I�I I.\,�Il�II.r�,,I,,��1 II,I\-I--,I I I,.,I i I1I.�I�,II�I I I��I 1;���I'1��:.").��-.�1 1iiII1;-I 1�III I II,IIIi:,;!;1 �.�,I',I II.�:1�u'.-�--,.I > r.. .. r I-I�,I�-7.�I.-."�,II.�-...;!�.ii-�1-,,",--.I.,`I--&;11-"�I"�.I-1,�:�-�.�I',,,-�VI���"�,'7-".I',Z,�.-II,�I11,I,.,-�,-....- I,1��.,-I,,-1�-I�1i11e­.,1I'7�7I"-.���-1,,--1I,�.,:,I'I—.,I:-,,�'.I,-,+4�,I)-�,I-,"I�,-;;!2'111"I,.,,.-�,I,-��",1.II,...,II"I��,l��—I,,1e�',�--Y'"�I1�i T�,'I1-I1I,t-I�`I,I,1�1I�I�I--AI I,I��1*,I?"-,T�I!-J�I �,'�1I..A�1�� �I-��I;)I-III'�"�l IIg.-..'1,,I II I -7III�,�.1 I,.I-L�4�-.-,--11�(,0�,�t�,"II�Ii-.�I-,.Il-I.I��-1�.III�..;;1 �1,,0-4-",,I,"-�-l-,1..4I*.--,)-R,I I--1''�...--\.�-I if 1 4/I i!.I�i�-II-"I---�I.-,�I.�,t I/��I1/I.I I,�..—--.�-i�I�(/-�91—./�,II�I)I,1-,.I,),m-/I-I.�.I.--..ft!,I.��I I-I 2-,I"1/-.-,.,��I.1.�r—��I1�-1�0�I-�I',I.I I 4�-,+I1I I I I-/1.I!4f�II;i II�;I"iT�I,- I I�I 1II-,�j"II.I.r-..-t�I-../.,�-I I,I.I-��.-/I."-AI1.. A.I II l/iIfi! f ryI1-II?I l*-AI I�.s-.0---\I_--:,..I1 5 l.4I—.�.'. �,5I,.II�yI��I..I/"I.I�I-��II l ,� .i.I1 I.iI�I�.Il�/,/II I II�5 I...1 vI.vIa/I b2.. i--(1�I�T l././g 1I i=iiTi�.ii 2/---I�--/(I�&/._.1—,.,m--1(—,--"I-/-1 I-.'1.a-1 -,_I//tI-I,I.I/_."..I I"III-I Ir-;I Ig 1--�-,/-7-+-I-�.�I."I I-.I�y Iw-i—".V—1 �2 I I-7/4.-1-1--—-�-I�.�.-F Ip�ft I--��I;-,�i-y.*�,--,-�".,.7tII;�— ;,---fl,.,L.l-�,I-I,--��-�RI/�-�,I--—II-I.�.iI�—--�—II-II\I.,1 I I,-/--q—/-I!1 I)--�,-,��-1/(.-I_-K-I!--.--I-I-4--II----xI/4.--1)�I.5 I-/-I-,I,4--4,I=I-,I t I--,�-=��/—.,.-2 N-,1A=,21�/1r.�'I..,1--r I/�-�..-..- �---I-�/�,�—-I-4--1I1-/---;1,/-'-1�—,/-D-I,4T_-"�-1_,�,.I-7_i��)-.-D�.�.- -1..,��-,-.-I-�1)I I*�I III--.4 �II 1w,I-��I_I-1_I.I.II I5 i.;,;'�'­;lV.-.L,I 1�-o-Iff I- 'I-( I�/�/I�I,,,D Z.!,,-.­;-.-�,,II�-(I�l,I@,�7--c�-1-1 11-!I I/-..�I I)IO I�4-,.,1 5--I/p-1�.&._I---�--,I*-,I�I�",?/� ��14�iII1"I��,i� -1�,',i,�v��II�Il,,��r"��I)1,�,�f,,�1, .I1.—"4".��"��I-�":1i�1 .I�I� 8-16,gI,-.#-1.1/ ,I':,1l�I-.,d/I-!I"I�'T-I11_./--,I I(1 I::-�,-I/`!I; I M-4 4-i/--I4"171:..--�I sI1.(-1-.)-,��--I-11�I 1l I.i4 II,- -.I.I I1�—/I/I/I 7-/(,I,-"r-1 7-I-—1,-�,�I 1.1,1�I.I- 7.I t� ...I/I"-IH T�.. ��";�I,W;,Y��I 2/1� /;.r.,.-/�i-5/..-II-I.-.�I I.I,ziI.-.!-."-/44-"eI­./1II -,--3.I�Z--7,--I 0Z"�5I II1�,I-.07 .!11:;.-l'A7.1a/7/-r�]1-IA 4f-I�C,v.,-I,�II I,1 1IIiI-�ff.�:I� -N-I-IT L�S 3,11I.I4 1-;?1 I-.r\-I-11-,4-i p�,SII/j.-1-.�.-�-1-,I /:;1..1 II�0 i;1'!-;1-1-�1/�,�0�I.I1 I-7IIC,. l+I Ot,I�I I V-,�--IlI.-0%L t-0c=a-.6-I 4I�- �I0 l 1 I�-.A0a 1-I./1-.I I A/-1--O 1 I�-r.I�I I.i�� �I-,I��-;I-Ar. ,�I�oI rI.l.o.-II III4oI:;,I -4-,i-y.�I,-,!Li4.,If�I.I-1., —I1,-'I I--4'(a 0..3.,---�C,.-1-.-:81- -��1---..--.t'.-'-I,1 I--r I�4 1-wI-1�1 I-.-,-IW 1--j-f2�-/�-I-I-,.I--.jI4Il,:-A,Iw -I 4I-!-1�1 F--..-..-..$..0�!..�a.11!Iq�z-k -.�!.AI,, Ii,tII/i�:� I�II�.I-.. I-I.I�-—.II.�.III I r;7.Ir,:I1 IZIeII��..I ,>/I.. i,I"�i��I�-�li��I� l'.�I,� -II,I' �,.i,�iII1 *i1Ii�lli,�III 1',1 I l ,r I_---4.—I—;I--_ :: ',.. ,: -' ,- :the.: �.. .:.,., ♦ , .".. :,.,.: ,... .,- �r-:.M-::0-0l7,,I.4--I I I P 1F 9I 4&0 :Il LI3 xI. 2.c 140'--.7 b2 5-!M;I44I`,.rr4.d 2�-,�,I-1f.e r�4eI,-,5 r --V.V�1,7I',Ml I-— -a.I:1-.�,I,I I phIId AC7 I�2ZftI-1I -�-a-Z,'21.,l I'-1,.r I.,-0---�-I.- '�!�..I. er,�..6�.a-�I-.�-.,L-/Z.P..I.4-..�.�,.I?:.-.1.I:. �/P�C1.;-c�--4- -�!-a.A:, --��,,,.IV7?.-�.,V Q5/-�1-�II;:-I 4,1-�I�---.1� V-:.-,,7.�-l��1,;, ,- I/-I.O/-,- 1�II�,- . - :"., d.,",2.�-0.� I,;:I,I, :e,— .II II I. �"I II- 4I I�I— j.I o'1..:I -j_-I I I I"p�I(,'-'I.� 1. l-I-7 I�'.1 i�I-1,_.IE�- I�1.�"� II II I. II I1.I,.I� II .j ,. , 3-, ,. .,t , , 1. > , .-. i '�,. ..,, -: . l .., F, / , ,,, ,. w ,,I ?, »: , ". , I :. • i na '! ^1 . , ' { w I r, i,�.; - yI ,( $$-. - .1 . �, { , 1 . I i , :rI t" . i r ;, " , __ I ' p r i .I Cp, ___,{ I ----.___-.._---------- F©N/ =-I I.-I--I.=1--II1�I-.T.I+—�-=,.I,7� ,1, ft,,1-1w-:I - --I--- ,2, I _ ,dcc e-3- . ;'t 1 - er Y.a r:; _--il _ . --_ __ 1 ,+ O/G47"E.a l3 .�¢2 - , 7 104-/o c,ale. ---;II �� ��� .-�I'- /�71&5 90 A x = 2 7 2 O �,PFa d f ';"Ya rC - , I '' / N t 1i . . . yr , ;I-- ,91 707'41 //u,N� Q` //0J'e o -�t�' f , I- NlT' • 1; a �, [c = . . ,�- . Z 4/N5 02) OW,el-G/r4- 4/A//J'S W11W /e'C40 --_ ` m . y /// o, . l/Q /ca:TrQG- tom' .4X! 7 X i ,4 I x AV*2 - //30 t o 4�7 40' _ / e7 a' x � _ .f/ ea,9 ,m -- / ,�}�r'� l _ __ � , - ` tom, f ' '�e+, c0a,"�z'y e���b r._,,,_. d 14��0 TO / Ist L L .Q/ e ,`•1/��f t w . � ti I I -IA--17/-_-; +: _ ___ �/lam+. j � • � T ! o . _ YI C.. �,r , r� N1�� . n , a /`� ✓-47T `� 21;]= '� - �-�_.I �, �rlr 7/ 5/o /9 i � i f 'tit sc,.a GB _ _ _._ �t f-CJ/r�/� x = 3� UrY'� 47,Z`✓.eW.4 yes ,% ttz.4,r�i/ 4y�s ,- --- --- - --- � 7 , t _`" 1�U/LQ/ � t, `2 /?� X rl = ,rziva1� t�,aT-ia- 9 A N+r, --- T ,�' cam' } i T 473 '�T�. e7 . ib i _ =: _ c� ______- .__---------- - To,�,4 Z CoY�� Af ,� , E ii A?o I r ____ - 7' J'aG ,OI 41N , o 1r -4 ! _.� . , - .r � _ _ �- _ - I { - ----- ---- - 3 Q/L fJ I _ - __. o , /2 # �3 ! -- 3r rt�ld1� �+3GX L ,e G G,4�/ jt�rQL a _ _ . t 1 ! ' ' - ___ 1 • I i , -- T" CcWt�i�N�25 Wei t.. -C cuQ� rc� a xf , , c,e-} Q I - - �- 1 i � /iYc. _ _. I __ -rt - _ _ _ - _ _- �`'� `''--� _ t y i r _ i - _ _ �`j'M N j' ri lid Tt1`a� . �T C/ G,47�/C3� C�rQ� r ate' f•_._`- _ _— ; -- , -- �✓7 I `�... „ ,4L1 �rA0��r� wiGL ,� ,aga r-p / .r. _ _ I { , } i __ o _ i , ` � , - . '..fig - - I. e i _ 47 o jj _� _ to - �� - - I - t {{ t ► D - 4 _ _-_- , ctsc. r - f , .�.,� 3 - ____ - Q y a, i o i , . _. 3/ _ i r to, -, V � _ ,_ . } ---_______.._j w _ -� R -.-:_ - -q I - - _ - - - - -t _--- , -_-•,. . - �--- ---t _--" _ f ) ,� i o - i , ,, f • -, / , I. I ::, f f , j _ - , , 1 I I I TeF�vn� ¢/ i r . I ,1 _ , i� -I o 0 0 T L . _ _.- _ -. 1 l 11 , I 42 49 - 1 ►- 52 b 1 to �� - I 1 0 / u1 1 - �? - ------- { -- I` j _ �G •�,�_ { o i -" ; 5T �, / L F _ ( j r I O . I I � 1 r, _ O ., _� } F_ _ �� . - _ . . -. I , _ _ , fi - _ ! , , I . _ _ , - to 1 ► ,(� —— �k1A11 -- — V. { - - 11 J -- . r : �, . :: - o ,, , �' , 2 _ 1 / r t2 / , � / ( e�: 4., S/,? / - 4. , /- , ,„ -- ^--- ._._ yJ _._ - _ _ / , / - -- 2 _ -ram.; �' / .__ / / _ , ' / i _ a. ... t' .. :- / :' / .,_..-.,r•-' ,� / :" _.._ ., '/.., �' it ..' /� -f 1_'_ s _ --.- . .. ,.. ;' t - , f / / / - -- -- - , a _ _ --l�. __ / / .� _.. ____ / g / i / _ _ / s / 1 . / / /' / /// / , - , i / L / , r� �. _.. — ,i 11 :.. 2 - 1a / / / / . •-, _ / / ► !1-1 ,� '� __-.. , __-- I , Z rr.��.. _, E RT .,., ll C{TY f�F PA�.�� ®�.S _, . 0, . , FAT " CdT ,:, a o,,Cla .lI_f.IA SEhVICES ,: , ENV .. . . r,.z. .- , - ,. •: . :: .,. . . - ,. � • w. _l— C^': CURES. N0. , a . f . ;•, �, , .: .: - . , , P .' $ FF LETTER a, . ❑, -.,., . ., "' • ��. AONFORM ,.. _ ,; r _ .,.. v , -L ,. , �©V " '' T p� ^_ ATE 23 �ie.�, K� / w F r, r . _ - CONSTRilCTI ON SHALL COMMENCE WITHIN .-, , ;, 1 P•�.G > THIS APPROVAL ,: - . JL"s,�]ri C.•IL/�. ,/J2C�© ONE YEAR OF w �+ ,.. .. .:... e y f"^4 , w T ✓`' :- a.F , : _ _ - l �' ,.r►..r�X /Old _ •..; �i , J I. ;_. . . 1 h� . , —.._ _r .. �. , ::. _ -- _ ot o !� per.+^ 1 V� fi�ee,,-�-,/� p , �N ,if -'v i1,L J�'!Z-j s _ - _ - _ 4Ae,--1V /,q , - � 7 t� 4_ �.-& O 0 0 000OO 7 `� __µ _ � _ ,� Q y , , , . D D F �` .. CIT Y0 ;> : .. i • , i: PALM DESER T �,, . T , •, . DE PARTMEN . 0 i I _ N r . I I �, _. �cEs � s, I - g , . IT EX kl E 4 }.., : , - - 1 x i:. w,.. O. u 3 , EA . , C , . ro , - ,:, Il; , , , : �,_ �_ _ - tk f : „ _ . . _ , . - _ _. _ __ , _ r . �,, ..M.. .H.. ! : , : e.. ,,, + -w :wwu..,,:r,._s,..�..�.wx�.- ,mow ».w.„•:,. .+6+ a.r _ .wn :, ._ ,. ..- >. .. :� .•, ,.. v', , ,� .. h _ .. .. .. �w_ _ _ lAy a ,.r4. .... ..P .. .. .::. . - ftE.. ... : _ ___:_._..L ,£ ., d y:. 1 _ ;..d. y... a t- V I ti IS4 _ I 1 U[j ,GIcy 8 8F - 01 8I T�j �a - �•XPST//./�, GQou�v� 0 1 1 L/NE •--J /631 I 1 _ 1� //7s Q o �° 1 I� 3 q. - or • --:. _ :;..- 1 _c v,.-.. L-L ..;. .._ e. ., _,.-. --,c...:.......i+. .. _.. - ..:_.fYr. .-.... 'sden;:..Kuxs..-: -+ca •r -_ -..... __ ___ _. . _-_ -- if - L / : CITY C' PALM DEC , °7kTOF w' r L ,C SER`1 . o N�-- l� 31 Ov o_ A �..,.,.: \ FOR CO�/S'TRLJC7-/OA/ �F 38 S//vGGr- M/LY1 �oR CON ST UCT/ON\ OF ,QE �_4 L UN/TS—/v[/M a O� P// '{: L"� C.C.R_S.is Q W �• co.�/OOM/n!�/ U/V/ 'T"S C7/V/TS p`co�c/t/os Al'/V FUTU/�E 4CT/ / TO C/�a�t/C•E GE.c�E�¢A •�Ld�1 �lr':'I �•• ❑ S�C T/O d ❑ STAFF LET \ °.R-8. ACTIG.. FORM ( � J V O Qi F ti� _ a° h 5'3 a°j '�!9p•4 �--` ----._._�- �/ ��`' _ @Y II l y g CCX1T,'JC'}..K .HALL COMMENCE wRNIs } ---T"7 �d ---_� 1I 1 �� C l Q - � ♦ ONE YEAR OF THIS APPROVAL. ! 71 _ ___.,_ - 6 9 — � --- 060/CdT�0 t b..n O }5 11-7A til ( (_I \ N `F O. /% '� O./%- - ' -� - - 3TE. /.37 -- I �/ , iv 89' 4 2�'�3 E _- i3 28.o i-- _—� i� 1 `�-,•. - ,. - -• _-- ,�_- C v C�• r O F P�L -* _ P!17,• c M ESE o/2T �.4.QK/NG .4 QL-.4 -S.`�` I ` • I / �G APPPovE;) GYM ❑ c.c Q .2FC0,2.L� iV I \�,Q C/ 83 I NSiq ` � P-C.?ES:N0. I ❑ STAFF LETTER Q J 1 ( (n ER n v) \ 1� ❑ O.r:_3. AEON FOR. v , ,jQ,4 TA a ONby W�:: E�CT:0X :HALL CO'F„c3 C£ ��� °0 0 0 'O NOQT/-� �2�'SE/V T ` �QO/oOSE'O 20/V//VG = /0.2� \ 1 / I cF THIS a.31A • O Gloss ,4C,2CAGC /3.3td4C. f o' Poo' 2o0' •goo' 4oa' ,DCD/c.4 TE'O .4QEd4 = 2-.5--tAC. - NC /O. 8 zt4c. C.J 30 S/NGLE FA/NPLY Gb/V/DO. G/N/TS .�, TO TA L. NUM43Lc)2 (OF AD.U. - {22 0.42 MOl2,5 RENTAL UA//TS s 1 SFt'i<E'.2S TO -_101A/ EXPST//VG C.V.C.W.O. 2/` M,4GNES/.4 W 45 M,41m. (X I OCT — 6 1980 7"O7"-4 L LOTS /N /o,�O✓�G'T ?WO W / �. "f P.2/1/,4TE ST.2ECTS TO t3E M,tJ//VT.4/NCO Agy /'l.20/? OwA,,EgPS Assoc• UW EWIRONI�IEiVTAL SERVICES � STocZM yf/gTE,Qs To i3E .D/.e.�cTEo /NTO -a.U.JAC.E/VT yt�iy/T.EW.4TEe elY•�� CITY OF PALM DESERT 1 U /T COM/�.4/y/ES• - �=. SEWE,2 ;e Wd4TE�2 = COACHEELLA YALLFY COU/VTY �•.Y � _ _ " r: i - + M1t� vff h/rA� D�.tN 1 W� • yn � �5 SOU. C.4L/F.A G4 s C -- DU 4L/ EO S o�/ { ,ra .yONE TEL EP.�>/O/�/E G E NE.2,4 L TCL I A y , g :. � � x - { �fi I vTi�+► _ - nr c•.utx or a..t Dos~ k3 � oft,• s.ar K �, t I , Y f GL J' ►' OO D F0 co T-7— `__--�-_� Ru �.���I �---.----, � � •� Sc L OiST- DESE2T .oS t� > I �,� .�.«�.�; �,I_.:E�_' ` _q,- ;�. . .__•. - 1�t _.--_-¢� -x. _�� ._-�"` ,�.- F-- .._ -_..._��---- ..�._ --- ---- . - SA/V /V/F/EIS S�/yool O/sT. � x z�� ���, c�,a► � ,,�,- .- _,.,,,.�,•" { rLtz aM:t' •t-- LLAi�F• >� 7:' Iq \_.` - � • • 4 ///_-'' '// o �44TN } :5,..�Er•n 1 _ AY �S 1' _ lT_ A�. • I • • • ` ... ! TL-. / /Y —I S�W}PA ��, •."'ip.'3:- *f_i;Aryi6 k.ji �•-.,ry'r GCA.0A AV .FET c sue.�;IL W yy { i 64 y , CT Al T.� � D��P �C�A.f 1`. ? ••G YY9 tE l�iP1N'/lll�11 Isom atA ,.. RED+r01L?D _ - x9 ��r l !// //�//T Y M,4!� IN • n y C cowr rvpr � �dR� .SO![S E1v�IN�e�rP , x /o.4LM /JESE CdriL. - If� /r Y OF IA[A0,0&f$4f 1 r 5rA*-/ l '' ;; AO S!/.BO/v/S/ OF A 1DOR7,,10" >- O�/Ti�.� OU TN %Z O T/�lIiL�ST o w/vcle � W. �. .O.EY.ELOI�M��/T Co- M.4G/VFS/.LI F.4�L.S .O.P/YE� X-SECT/ON SFC 7'/O/�/ /6, IQ : 232 S�/ZE'N,q 0,oelYE' - - d�►� 2' Q � /oALM OE'SE/2T C4L- 92260 - -_ - _,_ ..._-. _ __ � • N L7EYELO.oE.2- SU.e.OivilJF.P � ' , �� - ENGINEERINM SERVICE CORPORATION T�.QNSCO�ic .oErc-LOPMc/vT c`o,Q/�? M!lr CpNSlJlT4NT5 IN rNR,ENGINEERtN6 S LANO PLANMNG ':� 4676 ADMIRALTY MAY.Sk{TE 9M • MARINA DEL REY•CAUEURMA90?!I I 2� TELEo1•IONE z13'872� `' � �- BATE �-•//-� M.o.2/O/—Z E• • O. I I I I�