Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDP 09-78 - 116 UNIT CONDOS 1978 DRAFT Environmental Impact Report ON THE PROPOSED Chacahuala Project BY Chacahuala, Limited CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA HOUSLEY/WILLDAN ASSOCIATES A Joint Venture of 1.Harold HousleV,Consulting Engineers and Willdan Associates DRAFTI ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ON THE CHACAHUALA PROJECT IN THEI CITY OF PALM DESERT i I I April, 197E I i HOUSLEY/WILWAN i i 73-700 Highway 111 , Suite 8 Palm Desert, California 92260 (714) 346-3,868 1026 South Anaheim Boulevard, Suite 300 Anaheim, California 92805 (714) 774-5740 I 1 I HOUSLEY / WILLDAN ASSOCIATES A Joint Venture of I. Harold Housley, Consulting Engineers and Willdon Associates April 14, 1978 City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, California 92260 Attention: Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services Subject: Draft Environmental Impact Report on the Proposed Chacal la Project in the City of Palm Desert Dear Mr. Williams: This letter serves to transmit our draft environmental impact report on the subject project. The report has been written in conformance with the provisions of the Cali- fornia Environmental Quality Act, the State Guidelines, and particularly in accordance with the procedures established by the City of Palm Desert. The report summarizes our investigation of the effects of the proposed project on the environment. Assessment was made of both the adverse and beneficial effects of the proposed development. 73-700 Highway 111, Suite 8, Palm Desert, California 92260 (714) 346-7080 Thank you for the opportunity to be of service. If you have any questions regarding any aspect of this report, please do not hesitate to call. Respectfully submitted, I . HAROLD HOUSLEY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS I . Harold Housley WILL N ASSO T(S . Gene B. Scothorn/ Vice President / i �I E-291 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1 .0 SUMMARY 1 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 5 2.01 Project Proponent 5 2.02 Project Location 5 2.03 Project Objectives 5 2.04 Project Characteristics 9 2. 05 Zoning and General Plan 11 3.0 EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, ENVIRON- MENTAL IMPACT, AND MITIGATION MEASURES 13 3.01 Hydrology and Drainage 13 3.02 Existing Land Use and Land Use Compatibility 23 3.03 Traffic and Circulation 26 3.04 Public Services and Utilities 30 3.05 Schools 33 1 3.06 Scenic Quality 35 3.07 Energy Consumption and Conservation 39 3.08 Geology and Seismicity 42 3.09 Geomorphology 43 3. 10 Climate and Air Quality 44 3. 11 Biology 45 3. 12 Noise 46 4.0 TOPICAL ISSUES 47 4.01 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts 47 4.02 Alternatives to the Proposed Project 47 4.03 Growth-Inducing Impact of the Project 50 5.0 REFERENCES 52 5.01 Persons and Organizations Consulted 52 5.02 Bibliography 53 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) SECTION PAGE APPENDIX A. Letter from the Southern California Edison Company B. Letter from the Southern California Gas Company C. Letter from the Fire Department D. Climate and Air Quality excerpt from the Palm Desert General Plan E. Letter from the Desert Sands Unified School District j LIST OF FIGURES i FIGURE PAGE 1 Regional Location 6 2 Vicinity Map 7 3 Aerial Photograph of the Project Site 6 -? 4 Proposed Development Plan 10 i 5 Zoning Map 12 6 Aerial View of Flood Damage 15 7 Views of the Project Site and Vicinity 36 8 Views of the Project Site and Vicinity 37 LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE 1 Project Area Schools 34 2 Project Energy Consumption 40 { SECTION 1 . 0 SUMMARY This environmental impact report has been prepared to accompany the i •. i request for zone change and development plans fora 38t acre parcel of land located east of Alamo Drive and south of Homestead Road, extended. The pro- posed project will develop the land into a planned residential development consisting of 14 single-family detached units and 117 attached units, primarily duplex in nature. The project also includes such amenities as tennis courts, bike trails, swimming pools, recreation buildings, and landscaped greenbelts. The impacts associated with the project are briefly summarized below. A more detailed discussion of the impacts is included in the main text of the report. Hydrology and Drainage The project site is situated directly in the path of a natural storm channel , which has in the past been the source of major damaging floods in the project vicinity as well as much of the City of Palm Desert. On-site protection from flooding will be provided by the project by raised pad areas and a more defined drainage channel; however, additional off-site and regional facilities are needed to provide adjacent properties and downstream areas with adequate flood pro- tection. Land Use and Land Use Compatibility The project conforms to the land use designation for the property and should be compatible with surrounding residential land uses. Traffic and Circulation The proposed project will improve portions of Alamo Drive and Arrow Trail in conjunction with project implementation. The proposed project, upon completion, is projected to generate approximately 1 ,572 trips per day. Bike trails will be present to accommodate non-automobile modes of transportation. Public Services and Utilities No impacts are anticipated in providing water, sewer, gas, or electric service to the proposed project. Concerns have been raised by the Fire Marshall concerning the inadequacy of fire protection services to this region of the City. i Schools The project is projected to generate approximately 20 students in grades K-12. No major impacts on School District facilities are anticipated to result from the proposed project. 2 Scenic Quality The project will transform the visual character of the site from that of a vacant parcel of land to that of a planned residential community. It should be noted, however, that the proposed use of the site (planned residential) offers the City much more stringent control over visual appearance of the project than would a standard R-1 type development. Short-term adverse impacts may result from the construction phase of this project. In the long-term, the cumulative impact of urban light on the views of the nighttime sky will be incrementally increased as a result of this project. Energy Consumption and Conservation The project is estimated to have an annual energy consumption (gasoline, natural gas, and electricity) roughly equivalent to 14,600 barrels of oil. Pro- posed measures for reducing energy consumption include the use of solar energy for pool heating and the use of supplemental insulation. Additional suggested measures include the reduction in gasoline consumption through the use of car pools, bicycles, and public transportation. Geology Seismicity Geomorphology Climate and Air Quality No significant adverse impacts are anticipated. 3 Biology The existing biotic community will be essentially eliminated from the site, but will be replaced by landscape varieties and native animal species which are compatible with and tolerant of human inhabitation. Landscaping of the drainage swale will be accomplished in a "desert' fashion, utilizing native desert species, large boulders, etc. Noise Other than short-term impacts related to construction activities, no sig- nificant adverse impacts are anticipated. 4 SECTION 2. 0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2. 01 Project Proponent The project proponent is the Chacahuala, Limited, 10677 West Pico Boule- vard, Los Angeles, California 90064. 2. 02 Project Location The approximately 38-acre project site is located in the south-central portion of the City of Palm Desert, approximately 1 . 5 miles south of State Highway 111 . More specifically, the project site is situated to the east of Alamo Drive, to the south of Little Bend Trail (an unimproved dirt road) , and westerly of Chia Drive (extended) also known as Arrow Trail immediately adia- cent to the project site. The project site's regionil location is shown in Figure 1 , and on a USGS a topographic map and aerial photograph in Figures 2 and 3, respectively. 2.03 Project Objectives The objectives of the project proponent are to implement a change of zone on the project site and then to develop a feasible and marketable planned resi- dential project which is compatible with and complementary to adjacent develop- ments in Palm Desert. 5 G'TT <F S,q ti , 9%s PALM L y'GG gCS9T SPRI G 9 S ti 111\ RANC 0 MIRAG� \ PALMM DESERT, INDIA IN �p Leo J WELLS \• (Project Site r COACHELL THE MAR 86 I � 74 S� \ CC< ti� ,9 195 O� REGIONAL LOCATION Figure No. i ire �1"\�� � e • . . p '•O n 14 ..°RIVE ❑ .: � J lij 1 Palm Desert ��-- 'BM ys 36 e� o�D t� —�so ��� , v I 29� �< Water am •Water I � 592 �- � \ •�Wa r � ��' vv � � ��� ����� PYolect Site to SIv Water , :% \ \_ ��� .— 11 reek _ ________ _____ `--___ i \ F VICINITY MAP USGS Topographic Map Figure No. Rancho Mirage Quadrangle, 1959 2 vat SFfW'-1 t . . ry •'r, n J y,� I .�••• r. ;n %' , • i- ,L.iiat"`7t�r.�♦ram rrx%:, wa'tr+ne.:.:.r .._. �.�..M��:i.� 51. i•r t� J:r r,i .:•. a r� ,l' 1 ':.! :� ^ ,.f,•-. ,i�. 'mot ,� ,.% •� ,�J•.�zs 1,•-,'/`•• ..fir �C+ ;L,�.S� M�; SwF./y/'�'•:�5�'�ji .. . :%lf. : • •�`� O� .r••• !:I`'.•'tii•,._�,N•'•^• y�y� •r f5n i•• �•i•�r.. • 1• Jov 7�•-�(Cs /t ` . ^r „�..., '!b' NORTHI'i •� Y Tam.• t..•.Tr. ..,.�.�.�.>.��+••'!•.'�I.� vW AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH OF THE PROJECT SITE Figure No. 3 2.04 Project Characteristics The proposed project is the development of 131 units on approximately 38 acres of land, yielding a density of approximately 3.4 dwelling units per gross acre. Access to the project from the northwest will be from a proposed entrance on Alamo Drive. A second entrance is proposed near the northeast corner of the project site and will connect with an extension of Little Bend Trail. A third access point for emergency egress only, is proposed along the eastern boundary onto Arrow Trail. Certain portions of the project site will require grading to establish building pads, and to install utilities underground. Figure 4 illustrates the proposed development plan for the project site. The layout of the plan proposes 12 detached units facing Arrow Trail along the easterly boundary. These units will be spaced a minimum of 20 feet apart and will thus provide a visual buffer and transition between the proposed project and the existing single-family development to the east. The remainder of the units (except for two additional detached units in the north-central and south-central portion of the site) will be attached, consisting primarily of clusters of two units situated on a zero lot line. Lots vary from 4,000 to 5,500 square feet. Building coverage on the lots will range from 1,500 to 2,000 square feet, plus garages. Homes in this develop- ment will be single-story structures with a majority having two and three bedrooms. 9 lo �- � � V/�� �� III• '� -- � A\\"`"`��������f �I ��/y , r II I i q NORTH Scale 1" = 240' PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN (Preliminary) Figure No. 4 The internal circulation of the project is by way of primary collector streets, cul-de-sacs, a small triangular loop in the southeast portion of the site, and a bike trail along the greenbelt areas of the project. Further details of the circulation system are discussed in Section 3.03 of this report. Other features of the proposed project include a landscaped storm drain- age swale running approximately from the southwest corner to the northeast corner of the site and recreational facilities such as tennis courts, swimming pools, a recreation building, and landscaped greenbelts. 2. 05 Zoning and General Plan The existing zoning for the project site is single-family residential, R-1-20,000. The proposed zoning for the project is PR-4 which designates a planned residential development at a maximum density of four dwelling units per acre. This is roughly equivalent to the density of a standard R-1-10,000 development. Figure 5 shows the existing zoning in the project area. The Palm Desert General Plan land use designation for the project site and land immediately to the east, west, and north is Low Density residential (3 to 5 dwelling units per acre) . The land immediately to the south of the pro- ject site has a land use designation of Medium Density residential (5 to 7 dwell- ing units per acre) . 11 P. R-3 n tiYGT��K ) f t �-T-T 00 R-1 13,000 R-I �00 R-1 I3,000 3'560 RA I �� R 1 13,00 a L 10,000it ` �uYtd `_Yosrn-iaau_ R-I - 10 ,000 7 000 i 40 ao ---- - - - -- -� R-I 10,000 R-1 10,000 tpp/�/ R-1 10,000 R-1 20,000 — D aca =a-AUVE!-- ��/ --LAUL - (C.U.P. 1367) Project Site R-I 20,000 /Z/ R-1 10,000 P.R.-7 (C.U.P.-1382) / / AvENUE -J PR.-7 ( C.U.P.-1382) a i Scale •yam\ , " ='r- ~ Ql 1 inch = 600 feet NORTH C / ZONING MAP Figure No. City of Palm Desert 5 SECTION 3.0 EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT, AND MITIGATION MEASURES The first seven items discussed in the following section are those topics which the City of Palm Desert has determined to be the most significant with respect to the current project. These are the topics which have received the "focus" of the analysis and assessment in this report. The items following the first seven, were determined by the City as not being significant with respect to this project and, thus, have been given only a cursory discussion in this report. 3. 01 Hydrology and Drainage 3.01 . 1 Existing Environmental Conditions The project site, like all of the City of Palm Desert, is situated on the alluvial fan deposited by drainage from Dead Indian Creek and Deep Canyon watersheds of the Santa Rosa Mountains. The area is characterized as an arid inland desert region and has annual precipitation on the order of three inches per year. The greatest 24-hour and 1-hour rainfall recorded at established rainfall stations in the general vicinity is 2. 90 inches and 1 .24 inches respec- tively. Virtually no precipitation is experienced during the non-winter season except for thunderstorms which generally occur during the period between August and November. 13 Thunderstorms are typically of short duration; however, their intensity can be very high. Consequently, the potential for excessive runoff rates and flood damage is quite acute for this type of storm. Historically, two generally distinct flood control problems have existed in the Coachella Valley. The first involves runoff from storms occurring in the adjacent mountain ranges. Heavy rainfall in these mountainous areas combined with spring snow melt has contributed to major floods in 1916, 1929, 1938, 1960, and, most recently, in September, 1976. The most recent of these damaging floods resulted from tropical storm Kathleen. This storm caused intense rainfall to occur in the mountainous water- shed to the south of the City. Sometime after noon, on September 10, 1976, a diversion dike at the mouth of Dead Indian Canyon failed. A wall of water esti- mated to be several feet high began flowing northerly toward Dead Indian Canyon diversion dike, just south of Portola Avenue and east of Highway 74. The water struck and breeched Dead Indian Canyon dike at two locations several hundred feet easterly of Highway 74. A wave of water several feet in height and hundreds of feet in width con- tinued northeasterly toward the urbanized area of Palm Desert, and portions of the flood passed through the site of the proposed project. Figure 6 shows an aerial view of the flood area and illustrates the relationship of the project site to the broken dike and flood path. 14 4 # A na� r tt w IN Project Site e� o-• ? AERIAL VIEW OF FLOOD DAMAGE Master Drainage Plan Figure No. for the City of Palm Desert 6 As Figure 6 clearly illustrates, any repetition of a flood such as the one caused by the tropical storm Kathleen could, unless protective measures are taken, result in substantial damage to the proposed project as well as to adja- cent properties. L� There are two recent documents which can further contribute to an under- standing of the flood control problems in the Palm Desert area. These are: (1) "Engineering Report on Preliminary Design and Cost Estimate for Flood Control Works for Palm Desert, Rancho Mirage, and Indian Wells," prepared by Bechtel, Inc. , San Francisco, dated August, 1977. (2) "Master Drainage Plan for the City of Palm Desert," I . Harold Housley Consulting Engineers in association with Willdan Asso- ciates, Palm Desert, dated June, 1976. The Bechtel report was commissioned by the Coachella Valley County Water District on September 15, 1976. This study was an outgrowth of the serious damage incurred as a result of the major flooding from tropical storm Kathleen. The second document had been essentially completed at the time of the storm, but its publication was delayed until January, 1977 in order to consider the factors involved in the flood damage. The reader is encouraged to review these docu- ments for additional background on the hydrologic and drainage conditions which exist in the area. 16 3. 01 .2 Environmental Impacts The drainage-related impact of the proposed project can be considered from two perspectives. The first is its effect on existing environmental condi- tions. The second is the impact of existing environmental conditions (i .e. , drainage problems) on the project itself. The second of these is not, in the strictest sense, an environmental impact but rather the question of the suita- bility of the site for development. This latter question is, however, a matter of substantial local concern, particularly in light of the recent flood damage. The drainage-related impacts of the project on the existing environment will be limited to an increase in the amount of storm water runoff generated on the project site. The project, as currently proposed, would increase site- generated storm flow by approximately 60 percent. This increase is due to the construction of impervious surfaces, such as building roofs, street pavement, walks, driveways, patios, and recreation amenities such as swimming pools and tennis courts. Most of this runoff would be directed into the major drainage swale (improved) which transects the site. This increase in runoff amounts to approximately 10 percent of projected runoff in the City's tributary basin # 3 in which the project site lies. The estimated 60 percent increase in site runoff for the proposed project compares with a 70 percent increase that would occur with the development of a typical 10,000 square foot single-family residential develop- ment. That portion of Alamo Drive which is proposed to be improved would result in incremental increases in runoff flowing northward along Alamo Drive. 17 A drainage study was conducted to assess the effect of a catastrophic flood (such as the one resulting from tropical storm Kathleen) on the proposed project and the project's potential effect in diverting flood waters onto adjacent properties. While no conclusive statement can be made as to the effect of another dike failure on the project as proposed, it is reasonable to assume that unless certain precautionary measures are incorporated in the design of the project, damage could occur. The exact nature and extent of such damage is a matter of specula- tion. 3. 01 .3 ' Mitigation Measures Three levels.of mitigation measures are appropriate to providing for the solution to existing and potential drainage problems associated with the proposed project. These are: (1) Properly designed, on-site grading and drainage facilities. (2) Implementation of the City's Master Drainage Plan. (3) Construction of adequate upstream regional flood control facilities. The latter of these is by far the most important from the standpoint of protecting this and adjacent properties from the "catastrophic" flood. There are no alternatives available to either the project proponent or the City of Palm Desert that could be realistically substituted for an adequate upstream regional 18 flood control facility. The project engineer has reported that the City of Palm Desert and the City of Indian Wells may be close to an agreement on the "split" of the storm flows from the canyons to the south of the Cities, and that the con- struction of a permanent protection dike could begin .in approximately the next two years. However, in light of the fact that there is no immediate improvement planned for the dike system, it is essential that a modicum of protection be pro- vided for any future development below the dikes. The project plan includes certain features intended to offer a degree of flood protection for the subject project in the event of another dike failure resulting in a flood wave of compar- able magnitude. The project proponent proposes to grade the site in such a manner as to reduce the possibility of damage to structures from a flood wave. To accomplish this, the project plan proposes the construction of a depressed greenbelt area of sufficient size to carry the estimated volume of storm flow with- out damage to residential structures. This depressed swale has been incorpor- ated into the greenbelt amenities proposed in the project plan. Additionally, grading would raise the southerly end of the project site in such a manner as to direct any resulting flood wave into the greenbelt swale and away from adjacent properties. r The conceptual design for flood control included in the project proposal would offer minimum flood protection to the subject project in the event of a dike failure similar to that experienced in September, 1976. If this concept is limited only to on-site implementation, however, it would protect the Chacahuala Project 19 but would offer little protection for adjacent downstream properties. Extension of the plan to provide protection for those properties is, however, possible•- but would require acquisition of additional land and extension of the construction activity beyond the limits of the proposed project. The implementation of this concept would require the extension of the greenbelt swale to the northeast, through the vacant properties located between Homestead Road and Haystack Road. The water could then be collected in a drainage channel or storm drain along Haystack Road, carrying the water easterly along Portola Avenue and into the existing CVCWD stormwater channel . Numerous alternatives to this basic concept were also considered. These depend, in large measure, on the availability of vacant land and the availability of the financial resources necessary for the City to develop the lands as combina- tion flood control and park properties. One of these concepts would be to acquire the vacant properties between Homestead Road and Haystack Road for park pur- poses and develop the area in such a manner as to create a series of retention basins which could be used to retard the peak flood flow. A further extension of this concept would be for the City to acquire the area immediately southerly of the project site for park purposes, thus extending the park greenbelt for nearly a mile from Portola Avenue near Alamo Drive, northerly and easterly to a point near the intersection of Portola Avenue and Haystack Road. Protection could be added for the land west of the project site by constructing Portola Avenue on fill along the southerly boundaries of the project site to essentially create a second- 20 ary dike that would divert flood waters toward the depressed greenbelt. The roadway could be depressed to allow flood water to pass into the low area without significant damage to structures or danger to life. The project plan as presented incorporates the features of this conceptual flood protection program within the limits of the subject project. It should result in a reasonable level of protection from the possibility of another dike failure for those structures located on the project site. The extension of this conceptual design to afford similar protection to adjacent properties will require the involve- ment, cooperation, and financial contributions of other landowners and the City of Palm Desert. Some of these resources may be derived from the City's drainage fees which are assessed at $1 ,500 per acre. In the case of the proposed project, this would amount to almost $57,000. With respect to mitigation of impacts on local drainage (i .e. , storm flow resulting from rainfall originating within the dike system of the CVCWD) , the project has incorporated in its design, facilities comparable to those recommended in the City's Master Drainage Plan. The overall effectiveness of these drainage facilities will depend on the implementation of other elements of the Master Drain- age Plan. These elements will either be constructed by the City or by the owners of adjacent undeveloped property at the time of their development. In addition, the City could require, as a condition of approval, that the widening and improvements to Alamo Drive be extended northerly of the project boundary. This would provide protection (from storm runoff originating on Alamo 21 Drive) to the property located to the northeast of the intersection of Alamo Drive and Homestead Road. The project proponents have included, in their proposed project design, reasonable mitigation measures for existing and potential future drainage prob- lems. Care should be exercised, however, to assure that the final project design effectively achieves the intent of the conceptual drainage design program. This can be achieved through a number of means, including construction of open or closed conveyance structures, greenbelt swales, and judicious grading of the project site. 22 3. 02 Existing Land Use and Land Use Compatibility 3. 02. 1 Existing Environmental Conditions The project site is currently vacant and undeveloped except for the extreme northwest corner of the site on which a single residence exists. An electrical power line located approximately 250 feet south of the northern prop- erty Iine crosses the project site from west to east. An underground waterline owned by the Coachella Valley County Water District crosses the site approxi- mately 400 feet north of the southern property line. The Water District also operates a water reservoir and pump station adjacent to the southwest corner of the project site. Surrounding land uses include single-family residences to the east which have been developed in conformance with R-1-20,000and R-1-10,000 zoning classifications. These classifications yield a dwelling unit density of approxi- mately two to four units per gross acre. Property to the north of the project site, although currently developed only along the frontage of Alamo Drive, is slated for a planned residential development for retired teachers. Property to the south of the project site is currently vacant but is planned for the extension of the Iron- wood planned residential development which may result in a density of approxi- mately seven dwelling units per acre. Immediately to the west of the project site is an existing planned residential development conforming to a PR-5 zone which allows for up to five units per acre. The existing land uses of the area are illustrated in the aerial photograph in Figure 3 and the existing zoning in the area in Figure 5. 23 3. 02.2 Environmental Impacts The proposed project will extend the residential use of this area of Palm Desert. It is anticipated that the proposed homes will be compatible with sur- rounding residential developments and will be of a quality comparable to others in the area. The project appears to conform to the land use and density designated for the property in the Palm Desert General Plan but will require a zone change to be in conformance with the zoning. It should be noted, that the density proposed for the current project is less than or equal to the existing and future densities for all of the surrounding adjacent properties with the exception of the R-1-20,000 zoned land to the east of the southern portion of the site. The potential land use conflict with the development to the west, resulting from the light and glare of the proposed project's tennis court lighting, has been virtually eliminated by placing most of the project's tennis courts located along Alamo Drive, immediately opposite those of the development to the west. The remainder of the courts proposed for this project are located somewhat more internally rather than adjacent to the project's boundary. It should be noted, that even if the illumination is such that no light shines directly on sensitive residential uses adjacent to the project, the view of the night sky will be some- what diminished due to the increase in ambient urban light. The effect of this impact is qualitative and subjective and is not easily quantified. 24 3. 02. 3 Mitigation Measures Since no major land use impacts are anticipated as a result of the pro- posed project, no specific mitigation measures are proposed. It should be noted, however, that in response to suggestions by the City and adjacent property- owners, the project has been designed with single-family detached units along the eastern boundary to provide a visual transition and complimentary interface with the existing single-family development to the east. 25 3.03 Traffic and Circulation The project site is bordered on the west by Alamo Drive which has been improved to half-width in conjunction with the residential development to the west. The northern portion of the eastern boundary of the project is bounded by Arrow Trail, which will connect with Chia Drive when it is extended. Several unimproved dirt roads transect the project site. Access to the Coachella Valley County Water District reservoir site is also provided by unimproved dirt service roads which cross the southwest corner of the project site. Other significant streets and roadways in the local vicinity include State Highway 74, approximately one-half mile west of the site, and Portola Avenue, immediately to the southeast of the project site. Portola Avenue, designated as a Major Highway in the Palm Desert General Plan, presently terminates approximately 600 feet south of the eastern boundary of the project but is planned to be extended to the southwest to Highway 74 by way of Portola Avenue (formerly Carriage Trail) . No traffic counts are currently available for Portola Avenue. Highway 74, designated as an Arterial Highway in the Palm Desert General Plan, currently experiences approximately 8,500 two-way trips per day. 3. 03.2 Environmental Impact Access to the proposed project will be provided on the west,by way of an intersection with Alamo Drive and another along the northerly boundary with the proposed westerly extension of Little Bend Trail. Emergency access is also proposed along the easterly boundary from Arrow Trail. 26 Internal circulation is proposed by way of two main collector streets, Iguana Road and Chacahuala Road, four cul-de-sacs, and a small loop system in the southeastern portion of the site. Street widths range from 30 feet to 40 feet measured from curb to curb. Access points at Alamo Drive and Little Bend Trail will be somewhat wider and will be provided with triangular median islands. Projections of the traffic generated by the proposed project can be made based upon the assumption that the development will have year-round occupancy and that each dwelling unit will generate approximately 12 trip ends per day. This trip generation factor is used in the City of Palm Springs and is widely used throughout Southern California for single-family residential developments. Considering these assumptions, the project will generate approximately 1 , 572 trips per day. It is anticipated that a majority of these trips will be directed northerly toward the downtown area of Palm Desert and the surround- ing communities. The most likely route for this traffic will be north on Alamo Drive, west on Homestead Road, then north on Highway 74. Traffic may also continue north on Alamo Drive to Haystack Road and then travel west or east to Highway 74 or Portola Avenue, respectively. An alternate route for northbound traffic will be provided upon completion of the extension of Chia Drive (Arrow Trail) to Haystack Road. Until that time, traffic from the eastern portion of the site will likely travel easterly on Little Bend Trail to Portola Avenue. Traffic traveling in a southerly direction from the project site will likely travel westerly on Homestead Road to Highway 74 or easterly on Little Bend Trail 27 to Portola Avenue. The City's Circulation Element indicates that the easterly portion of Portola Avenue will trend in a southwesterly direction and will join with the westerly reach of Portola Avenue (formerly Carriage Trail) . The precise alignment of the extension of Portola Avenue has not, as yet, been determined; and it should be noted, that informal proposals for connecting Portola Avenue to or parallel with Mesa View Drive have been suggested by private concerns. Due to the lack of specific detail associated with the Portola Avenue extension, it is not known at this time what design or alignment, if any, the project's circulation pattern will have with respect to Portola Avenue. In addition to the automobile circulation described above, a bikeway loop system is proposed to coincide with various greenbelts throughout the project. It is conceivable that this system may some day become part of the regional bike- way system, although it should be noted that no bicycle trail is shown in the immediate project vicinity with respect to the Non-Automotive Circulation Net- work of the Palm Desert General Plan. 3. 03. 3 Mitigation Measures Alamo Drive and Little Bend Trail, adjacent to the site, will be improved in association with the implementation of the proposed project. As noted in the Mitigation Measures of Hydrology and Drainage (Section 3. 01 .3) , the City could require the improvement of Alamo Drive north of the project for drainage reasons. Such improvement would have an important secondary effect of providing addi- tional traffic capacity on Alamo Drive. It must be noted, however, that since no i 28 current traffic counts exist for Alamo Drive, any inferences of capacity problems { for the street are somewhat speculative and may not exist or be directly attributable to the proposed project. Off-street parking will be provided in conformance with applicable City standards. t 29 3. 04 Public Services and Utilities 3.04. 1 Existing Environmental Conditions Electricity -- The project site is in the service area of the Southern California Edison Company. Power lines exist along the western boundary of the site as well as in an east-west direction across the northern half of the site. A letter from the Edison Company is reproduced in the Appendix. Gas -- The project site is in the service area of the Southern California Gas Company which has facilities in the immediate project vicinity. A letter from the Gas Company is reproduced in the Appendix. Fire -- Fire protection service is provided to the project vicinity by the Riverside County Fire Department under contract with the California Division of Forestry. The project site is 2.8 miles from the closest fire station located at 72-861 El Paseo. A letter from the Fire Department is included in the Appendix. Water and Sewer -- Water and sewer services are provided to the project area by the Coachella Valley County Water District. Facilities for both services are located within the immediate vicinity of the project site. 3.04.2 Environmental Impact Electricity -- According to the Edison Company, the electric loads of the proposed project are within the parameters of projected load growth in the area, and no impacts in providing service to the project are anticipated. Gas -- The Southern California Gas Company has indicated that the project could be provided with gas service from an existing main without any significant impact on the environment. 30 / Fire -- The Fire Department has indicated a response time to the project site of no less than five minutes due to the long, steep grade of Highway 74, the main access road, and.the distance of the nearest station from the site. The Fire ' I Department also indicated that due to rapid growth in the City, the fire station is rapidly reaching a point of saturation; and that fire protection in the project vicinity is inadequate and will be until such a time that a new station is constructed in the area. Water and Sewer -- Conversations with personnel at CVCWD indicated that no impacts in providing water service or sewer service to the site were anticipated. Water supply was deemed more than adequate and would come from 1 existing mains fed by the 2:5 million gallon reservoir located at the southwest corner of the site. 1 Sewer service will be provided by connection with existing mains follow- ing the project's annexation to the appropriate improvement district. The exist- ing treatment plant has sufficient capacity to adequately handle the incremental i addition of sewage generated by the proposed project. 3. 04.3 Mitigation Measures Since no major impacts are anticipated with respect to electrical, gas, water, and sewer service, no specific mitigation measures are proposed. The City, however, has suggested the use of solar energy, where feasible, to mini- mize the consumption of non-renewable natural resources. The project proponent has indicated that solar energy will be used to heat swimming pools and possibly 31 household water. For additional energy-saving measures, the reader is referred to Section 3.07, Energy Consumption and Conservation. Existing overhead facili- ties on the project site and future utility lines will be placed underground. With respect fo fire protection services, the Fire Department has indicated that a new fire station is planned to be located in the project area; however, at this time, no date has been set for the start of construction. I_ I 32 3. 05 Schools 3.05. 1 Existing Environmental Conditions The project site is within the boundaries of the Desert Sands Unified School District. A letter from the District regarding the impact of the proposed I project on the District's facilities is included in the Appendix. The schools serving the project, their enrollments, and capacities, are shown in Table 1 . 3.05.2 Environmental Impact According to the School District, the project is projected to generate no i more than 20 children from kindergarten through twelfth grade. This projec- tion is based on the ratio of 0. 14 students per dwelling unit, which is the aver- age for all of Palm Desert located south of Highway 111 . In summary, the District indicated that the proposed project will have only a minor effect on pupil enroll- ment of the District. 3. 05. 3 Mitigation Measures No specific mitigation measures are proposed. i 33 TAB LE 1 PROJECT AREA SCHOOLS School Address Grades Enrollment Capacity w r Washington School 45-768 Portola, Palm Desert K-2 492 540 Lincoln School 74-100 Rutledge, Palm Desert 3-5 462 570 Palm Desert Middle School 74-200 Rutledge, Palm Desert 6-8 504 600 Indio High School 81-750 Avenue 46, Indio 9-12 2,556 2,655 3. 06 Scenic Quality 3. 06. 1 Existing Environmental Conditions The existing visual quality of the project site is characterized and influ- enced by an alluvial channel, sparse vegetation with few trees, an overhead power line, a large steel water reservoir, and the existing residential develop- ments to the west, east, and southeast. Aside from those factors just mentioned, views from the project site include virtually unobstructed views of the moun- tains and canyons to the south, east, and west, and a view of the Coachella Valley to the north. Views of and from the project site are shown in the photo- graphs in Figure 7 and Figure 8. 3.06.2 Environmental Impact The proposed project will result in a visual transformation from that of a vacant, undeveloped parcel of land to that of a planned residential development. The project will also result in the elimination of the overhead power lines and the sparse native vegetation. The dwellings proposed for the project will consist of single-story struc- tures. The single-story nature of the project should not interfere with the sky- line views from the surrounding developments. The proposed project, by increasing the population density in this area of the City, will incrementally add to the effect of City lighting on views of the nighttime sky. As mentioned in Section 3. 02, Land Use Compatibility, this impact on the view of the night sky is subjective and is not easily quantified. 35 ............. _ View Southeasterly Toward Ironwood Development w i mil;w_ ' z'..;..:5 _ °1 .`Y,�T f= X _^_ ems , • , . ,? CVCWD Water Reservoir 1,7 Development to the West of the Project Site — Y VIEWS OF THE PROJECT SITE AND VICINITY Figure No. 7 `�- y ea��--I�T�.•`6�Y�.a1f.K�4.�. • h� a31.21� � t.�l+ r Northerly View Aj /', "�' �I = _mil �� �� �..._. ��5�'^'I•� ` L �. Southerly View VIEWS OF THE PROJECT SITE AND VICINITY Figure No. 8 In general, the proposed project is not expected to result in any major adverse impacts on the scenic character of the region nor in specific adverse visual impacts on the immediate project vicinity. 3.06.3 Mitigation Measures The planned residential character of the proposed project provides numerous opportunities for both the City and the developer to not only mini- mize the potential for adverse impacts on the scenic quality but, in many cases, to actually enhance the visual character of the project site. Typical measures which are planned to be used to enhance the project include: (1) Extensive use of landscaping throughout the project including the major drainage swale running diagonally across the site. (2) Use of single-family, detached units along the eastern project boundary to provide a visual transformation with existing single-family development to the east. (3) Use of curvilinear streets for visual variety. (4) Use of screen trees along tennis courts front- ing on Alamo Drive. (5) The undergrounding of existing and future utility lines on or immediately adjacent to the project site. 38 3 07 Energy Consumption and Conservation 3.07. 1 Existing Environmental Conditions The project site, in its current undeveloped state, neither consumes nor conserves energy. The surrounding area, being primarily residential, con- sumes energy in the forms of natural gas, electricity, and automotive fuels such as gasoline. 3. 07.2 Environmental Impact The project will consume energy resources in two distinct phases. The first, is the construction phase during which construction machinery will con- sume petroleum fuels such as diesel oil and gasoline. The second phase is. i during the normal operation periods for the life of the project. Natural gas will be used for heating and air conditioning. Electricity will be used for light- i ing, electric blowers on air conditioning units, and miscellaneous power require- ments. Petroleum fuels will also be used by project residents in their private vehicles. Estimates of project energy consumption during the operational phase of the project are shown in Table 2. It should be noted that this table does not include estimates for recreational lighting since it is not known, at this time, i what type of equipment will be used. i 3. 07.3 Mitigation Measures Several measures have been proposed for incorporation into the current project to minimize energy consumption and to further energy conservation. 39 TAB LE 2 PROJECT ENERGY CONSUMPTION Annual Total Annual In Equivalent Energy Type Base Factor Rate Annual Total Total in BTUs Barrels of Oil (6) Vehicular Gasoline 5.7 x 106 13.7 mpg(2) 4.2 x 105 gal. 5.6 x 1010 1 . 00 x 104 VMT/yr. (1) Natural Gas 131 du 1 ,095 Therms/ 1 .4 x 105 1 .4 x 1010 0.25 x 104 du/yr. (3) F Electricity 131 du 9,490 KWH/ 1 .2 x 106 1 .2 x 1010 (5) 0.21 x 104 du/yr. (4)) 8.2x1070 1 .46x104 (1) Assumes 12 trips per du per day x 10 miles per trip x 365 days per year. (2) Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (3) Source: SCAQMD, 1977. (4) Source: SCAQMD, 1977. (5) Assumes that 10,387 BTUs generate 1 KWH. Source: SCAQMD, 1977. 6 (6) Assumes 5.6 x 10 BTU/barrel. Source: U.S. Bureau of Mines. These include the use of additional insulation materials in excess of those re- quired by applicable building codes. The project proponent has also indicated that solar energy will be utilized for the heating of swimming pools and that dwelling units will be constructed so as to allow, where feasible, for the conver- sion to the use of solar energy for water and space heating. Measures to reduce the consumption of gasoline in automobiles would have the greatest single effect on project-related energy consumption. Such measures might include the use of public transportation, the formation of car pools, and the use of non-automotive forms of transportation such as the bicycle. I 41 3. 08 Geology and Seismicity 3.08. 1 Existing Environmental Conditions The project site as well as the rest of the City of Palm Desert is situated on alluvial sediments derived primarily from Dead Indian Creek. According to the Palm Desert Seismic Safety Element, no landslides, faults, or other seismic hazards are located on or near the project site. 3. 08.2 Environmental Impact Since no geologic or seismic hazards are specifically or generally asso- ciated with the project site, no adverse impacts of this nature are anticipated. 3.08.3 Mitigation Measures Other than applicable building codes, no specific mitigation measures are proposed or warranted. 42 3. 09 Geomorphology 3. 09. 1 Existing Environmental Conditions The project site currently slopes downward to the north with elevations on the site ranging from approximately 570 feet above sea level in the south to approximately 500 feet at the north. The major topographic feature on the site is a natural drainage channel traversing the site from the southwest to the north- east, and man-made containment dike along the easterly bank of the channel. 3.09.2 Environmental Impact Other than minor amounts of grading necessary to create building pads and roadways, and to slightly modify the shape of the drainage channel , no sig- nificant impacts to the site's topography are expected to result from the proposed project. 3. 09.3 Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures are proposed. 43 3. 10 Climate and Air Quality 3. 10. 1 Existing Environmental Conditions For a discussion of the existing climate and air quality in the region of the project site, the reader is referred to the existing environmental setting section (page E.4 and E. 5) of the environmental impact report accompanying the Palm Desert General Plan. For convenience, these pages have been repro- duced in the Appendix of this report. 3. 10.2 Environmental Impact The proposed project will incremental) contribute to the air pollutant T p p P 1 Y levels in the Palm Desert locale as a result of vehicular emissions and the com- bustion of natural gas for heating and cooking. It is estimated that the project- related emissions will account for less than three-tenths of one percent of the total emissions for Palm Desert and its sphere of influence. Other than causing a slight increase in local humidity levels as a result of landscaping irrigation and swimming pools the project is not expected to result in significant impacts on the local or regional climate. 3. 10.3 Mitigation Measures Since no significant adverse impacts are anticipated, no mitigation measures are proposed. 44 3. 11 Biology 3. 11 .1 Existing Environmental Conditions The biology of the project site is now and has in the past been influenced by the surrounding human encroachment and periodic flash flooding. Plant life is typified by plants common to the creosote bush scrub plant community. Animals and birds noted on the site include jackrabbits and California quail. No rare or endangered species of plants or animals, as designated by State and Federal authorities, are known to exist on the project site. 3. 11 .2 Environmental Impact As a result of grading operations associated with the proposed project, existing vegetation will be systematically removed. Similarly, the grading operations will result in the immediate displacement of essentially all resident animal species. Upon termination of the proposed grading operations, the replanting and reseeding associated with project landscaping and individual lot landscaping will provide for a plant community which is compatible with residential land use. A number of bird and animal species may be expected to rehabit those areas within the project site which provide sufficient vegetation for food and cover. The major drainage swale crossing the project site will be landscaped in a fashion compatible with the desert environment utilizing such features as native plant species and large decorative boulders. 3. 11 .3 Mitigation Measures Other than project landscaping, no mitigation measures are proposed. 45 3. 12 Noise 3. 12. 1 Existing Environmental Conditions The project site, in its current vacant condition, does not serve as a source of noise on the surrounding properties. Noise experienced on the site is the result of residential and recreational activities of the developments to the east and west, and vehicular traffic on Alamo Drive. In neither case, are the noise levels considered adverse. Maintenance and pumping operations at the CVCWD reservoir site also serve as intermittent sources of noise. 3. 12.2 Environmental Impact Construction activities associated with the proposed project will result in short-term increases in ambient noise levels. In the long-term, the proposed project will generate those noises normally associated with a residential area. A residential area is usually quiet; however, it may create noises that are dis- turbing. Among these are landscaping power equipment, motorcycles, musical equipment, power tools, and air conditioning units. 3. 12. 3 Mitigation Measures Construction activities will be limited to the daytime weekday working hours, to minimize construction noise impacts. Adequate noise insulation will be provided in the common walls of the duplex units to effectively attenuate noise from one dwelling unit to the next. No other mitigation measures are proposed. 46 SECTION 4. 0 TOPICAL ISSUES 4.01 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts Unavoidable impacts which will result from the implementation of the proposed project include: (1) There will be a loss of approximately 38 acres of natural open space. (2) The emission of primary air pollutants and traffic on the streets in the area will increase incrementally. (3) The demand for public services and utilities will increase incrementally. (4) Energy consumption in the area will increase. (5) Construction-related activities will produce short- term impacts from construction noise, traffic, and dust. 4.02 Alternatives to the 'Proposed Project 4. 02. 1 No Project The "no project' alternative would leave the project site in its present condition. Remedial action in terms of landscaping and erosion control would be required to maintain or develop the site into usable open space. 47 4.02.2 Higher Density Residential In conformance with the existing land use designation of the project site, up to five dwelling units per acre could be developed on the site (as compared to the density of 3. 4 dwelling units per acre proposed in the current project) . Higher densities than this would require a General Plan Amendment and could serve to increase many of the impacts (schools, air quality, traffic, scenic quality, etc.) which are at insignificant levels with the current project. 4. 02.3 Standard Single-Family Residential A standard R-i development with an average lot size of 12,000 square feet was considered as an alternative design to the currently proposed project. This type of development would result in roughly 100 units and a density of about 2. 6 units per acre, assuming an allowance of approximately five acres for a pri- mary drainage Swale transecting the project site as shown in the proposed project. Disadvantages of and possible reasons for rejecting the standard R-1 type development for this site include the following: (1) The lack of a satisfactory way to maintain the drain- age swale unless it is dedicated to the City as com- pared to the uniform maintenance of the drainage swale and common areas insured by the homeowners' association of a planned residential development. (2) Greater storm runoff from R-1 development than from a planned residential development (see Section 3.01 , Hydrology and Drainage) . 48 1 (3) An R-1 development provides less of an opportunity for the City to exercise strict control and review over aesthetic considerations and design standards such as the choice of exterior building materials, type, and quantity of landscape vegetation. (4) Although a single-family development, such as R-1-12,000, might result in a lower density develop- ment, this would merely serve to increase the disparity with the density of the existing PR-5 development to the west and future higher density projects planned to the north and south of the project site. In other words, the primarily duplex nature of the proposed project would serve as a better transitional use, with respect to density, between the existing R-1 develop- ment to the east and the existing and future planned residential developments to the north, west, and south. The reduction of dwelling units associated with a standard R-1 would, however, further reduce the nearly insignificant effects of traffic, air quality, and student generation. 49 4.02. 4 Very Low Density Residential A lower density project, such as estate-size lots, would probably de- crease or eliminate some of the impacts of the current project relative to the effects on traffic, schools, etc. This alternative was rejected because estate-size lots and homes would have to sell for considerably more than the homes in the currently proposed project, and the project proponent has questioned the marketability of such a product. 4.03 Growth-Inducing Impact of the Project Growth inducements will be felt by the servicing public utilities. Exten- sion of water, sewer, telephone, gas, and electric power facilities into the project site are required. This, however, should be considered a local induce- ment of growth since the construction of 131 homesites cannot, in itself, be con- sidered as necessitating construction of new major supply facilities. Future projects to the north and south of the proposed project, will also require extensions of these utilities, and should also be considered as local inducements of growth. The cost of police, fire, and rubbish collection services is generally off- set by fees or tax revenues generated by the proposed development. In the specific case of the proposed project, the critical necessity for a new fire station in the area will be accentuated. 50 The development of the project site will also have an incremental growth- inducing impact on the area's economy. On a short-term basis, the construction of 131 homes will provide additional employment in the construction-related industries. On a longer-term basis, the relocation of families to the project site should result in an increase in mercantile trade and consumer-related ser- vices throughout the Palm Desert area. This increase in commercial activity will have secondary effects in stimulating additional job opportunities in the vicinity. I 51 SECTION 5.0 REFERENCES This report was prepared by Envista, Inc. , in cooperation with Housley/ Willdan Associates. The principal author was Mr. Clarence E. Aschbrenner. Prior to printing and distribution, this report was reviewed by both the City of Palm Desert and the project proponent. 5.01 Persons and Organizations Consulted Department of Fire Protection, County of Riverside Bud Engle - Fire Marshall Southern California Gas Company R. W. Riddell - Eastern Division Distribution Planning Supervisor Southern California Edison Company Glenn Buchanan - Customer Service Planner Desert Sand Unified School District Roger M. Harlow - Coordinator of Child Welfare and Attendance Coachella Valley County Water District Robert Hague - Domestic Water Engineer City of Palm Desert Paul Williams - Director of Environmental Services Samuel G. Freed - Planning Department Hunter Cook - City Engineer (former) Martin Bouman - City Manager Alfred T. Wilkes - Project Architect Housley/Willdan Associates I . Harold Housley - Project Engineer 52 5. 02 Bibliography "Palm Desert General Plan," Wilsey and Ham, January, 1975. "Environmental Impact Report, City of Palm Desert General Plan," Wilsey and Ham, January, 1975. "Master Drainage Plan for the City of Palm Desert," Housley/Willdan Associates, June, 1976. "Engineering Report on Preliminary Design and Cost Estimate for Flood Control for Flood Control Works for Palm Desert, Rancho Mirage and Indian Wells," Bechtel, Inc. , August, 1977. "Air Quality Handbook for Environmental Impact Reports," South Coast Air Quality Management District, February, 1977. 53 APPENDIX 46. 10 Southern California Edison Company 36100 Cathedral Canyon Drive Cathedral City, California 92234 kECEiVED 0l_, 7UI k; TO; Envista, Inc. 125 S. Claudina Street Anaheim, California 92805 SUBJECT: Proposed 140-Unit Residential Development, City of Palm Desert Environmental Impact Report (per your letter $ map of October 11, 1977) Gentlemen: This is to advise that the subject property is located within the service territory of the Southern California Edison Company, and that the electric loads of the project are within parameters of projected load growth which Edison is planning to meet in this area. Unless the demand for electrical generating capacity exceeds our estimates, and providing that there are no unexpected outages to major sources of electrical supply, we expect to meet our electrical load require- ments for the next several years. Our total system demand is expected to continue to increase annually; and, if our plans to proceed with future construction of new gener- ating facilities are delayed, our ability to serve all customer loads during peak demand periods could become marginal by 1981 . In addition, the major fuel used in Edison's generating facilities is low sulfur fuel oil. We now believe that our low sulfur fuel oil inventory, together with our contractual commitments for delivery and our customers' conservation efforts, will permit us to meet the forecasted demand for electricity during 1977. It is our intention to continue to do everything that can reasonably be accomplished to provide our customers with a continuous and sufficient supply of electricity. eery truly urs` �LAWL-- Glenn Buchanan Customer Service Planner GB:im A-1 (Rev. 1 /77) j; E. CEIVED EiJ\IISTA. INC. `,t�Il14i4:'Ft" ALiFORNiP 'gas c()kM1/ik-wjwv 3700 CENTRAL AVENUE • RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA R.W.RIDDELL Eastern Division Meiling Address P.O. BOX 2200, RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92516 Distribution Planning Supervisor October 14, 1977 Location of Nearest Gas Main: Homestead Rd. & Alamo Dr. Envista 125 South Claudina Street Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: EIR - Proposed 140-Unit Residential Development - City of Palm Desert This letter is not to be interpreted as a contractual commitment to serve the proposed project; but only as an information service. Its intent is to notify you t;rat the Southern California Gas Company has facilities in the area where the above named project is proposed. Gas service to the project could be provided from an existing main without any significant impact on the environment. Tile service would be in accordance with the Company's policies and extension rules on file with the California Public Utilities Commission at the time contractual arrangements are made. The availability of natural gas service, as setforth in this letter, is based upon present conditions of gas supply and regulatory policies. As a oublic utility, the .Southern California Gas Company is under the jurisdiction of the California PuLlic Utilities Commission. We can also be affected by actions of federal regulatory agencies. Should these agencies take any action which affects gas supply or the condition im%iPr ,yhiCh corVj r.P is ?\rai7able, gels Service will he Provided In accordance with,• revised conditions. We have developed several programs which are available, upon request, to provide assistance in selecting the most effective applications of energy conservation techniques. for a particular project. If you desire further information on any of our energy conservation programs , please contact this office for assistance. B-1 DEPARTMENTOF FIRE PROTECTION :N COC)PF_FZATION '41TH 7HE C4L. FORNIA FORFSIR'� DAVID L . FLAKE COUNT'! FIRE WARDEN ' K1:1,1 ;AN PFRRIS. Al 1 i'Y�R H;A 1 70 If-1 F111W111 /iIII I,, / "". Clarence E. Aschbrenner Tri-Cities Fire Marshal Envista Planning & Environmental Services 70-800 Highway Ill 125 So. Claudina Street Rancho Mirage, Ca. 92270 Anaheim, Ca. 92805 October 20, 1977 RECEIVED Ref: Environmental Impact Report Greenwill Development Company City of Palm Desert Dear Mr. Aschbrenner, In answer to your inquiry concerning fire protection for the above named project to be located near Alamo and Homestead in the City of Palm Desert: Fire protection is provided by the Riverside County Fire Department under contract with the California Department of Forestry. The fire station is located at 72-861 El Paseo (cross street is Highway 74) . The main access road to the area is Highway 74, which poses a long steep grade for the fire engines to pull . The proposed site is located 2.8 miles from the fire station, with a response time of no less than five (5) minutes. The Palm Desert station is staffed with one paid man, supported by a twelve man volunteer company. The station equipment consists of two fire engines and a rescue unit. Due to the rapid growth in the City, the fire station is rapidly reaching a point of saturation. In the outlying areas of the City, especially in the area of your proposed building site, the fire protection is now inadequate due to long response time encountered by our units. I have some real concerns for public safety in the site area, and will certainly oppose this project until a fire station is located in that area. The City Council of Palm Desert is well aware of long response times to this area, and are taking the necessary action to correct it by construction of a new fire station to be located near the site area. However, at this time, no date for con- struction has been set. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this environmental impact pact report. If you have any questions , please contact me at the Rancho Mirage Fire Station, 70-800 Highway 111 , Rancho Mirage. Very truly yours , David L. Flake County Fire Warden By: Bud Fngel Battalion Chief Fire Marshal C-1 BE:dt d III . EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING A. Natural Environment The primary features of the physical environment are described in various sections throughout the General Plan document. In Section 6, Environmental Elements, the various physical char- acteristics of the planning area's natural environment are detailed. Included is a discussion of the following: topography and geography geology and soils seismic and non-seismic geologic hazards flooding vegetation and wildlife Those features of the physical environment not specifically dealt with by the General Plan are described in more detail below: 1 . Climate The Coachella Valley has an arid desert climate. Water laden marine storms deposit most of their precipitation in the San Jacinto, San Gorgonio and Santa Rosa Mountains, Frequently the annual rainfall in the mountains exceeds 40 inches while on the Valley floor less than 5 inches is normal . Most rain falls as a result of infrequent and short winter storms. On rare occasions there are high intensity summer storms which can create runoff problems in the form of flash flooding. Street flooding is also common under these conditions. The climatic attractions of the Coachella Valley are its normally clear skies and pleasant winter temperatures. The area within the Palm Desert City Limits and that por- tion of the Sphere of Influence south of the City experi- ences temperatures similar to those at Palm Springs. In Palm Springs the annual average maximum is 880 F. and the annual average minimum is 560 F. Summer highs commonly exceed 1000 F. and occasionally exceed 1200 F. Winter lows are in the 40's but sometimes dip. below 200 F. At higher elevations, in the northern portion of the planning area, the temperatures are lower and precipitation greater. The daytime temperature difference between the 950-foot level and the 2,750-foot level averages 9.8 degrees. D-1 2. Air Quality The air quality of the Coachella Valley has been steadily deteriorating during the past few years. The problem is two-fold: dust and oxidants. The dust problem is most acute in the lower Valley and results from human activity; . e.g. , burning dumps, vehicle movement on unpaved roads, sand and gravel operations, and agricultural burns. Figure 9-1 summarizes air quality in the Southeast Desert Air Basin. The high oxidant levels are believed to be the result of pollutants from the Los Angeles Basin which have been carried through the San Gorgonio Pass. Local automobile sources undoubtedly contribute to the problem, but to what degree is unknown. Findings by the Riverside County Air Pollution Control District indicate that local vehicular emissions are not of sufficient amounts to explain the existing high levels of Valley pollutants. The pollution problem is accentuated by the Valley physiography. With mountains to the north, south, and west, air commonly becomes trapped and moves up and down the long narrow depression of the Valley. In addition, stable air masses often confine pollutants closer to ground elevation than usual. 3. Hydrology A groundwater level of between 80 to 200 or more feet below the surface is the normal condition for the City and Valley flioor. The water level in this 'region of the Coachella Valley is dropping 2 to 3 feet per year. How- ever, the CVCWD (Coachella Valley County Water District) is currently involved in a program to recharge the ground- water basin. Using water from the Colorado River the CVCWD expects to raise the groundwater to its 1945 level by the year 2000. The quality of groundwater in the Valley is considered to be quite good and is used for domestic as well as agri- cultural purposes. Total dissolved solids average 175 ppm although this figure varies greatly. In, the southern portion of the planning area the water is rather hard while in the northern area it is very soft. Well water is generally not used directly from. individual wells, but is piped to holding tanks in the northern portion of the City. This creates a blending of water from various areas having a wide range of dissolved solids. The following table summarizes the water quality of the planning area. D-2 \f LED S y r Desert Sands Unified School District a BERMUDA DUNES r INDIAN WELLS m - 83449 AVENUE 46 INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201 • (714) 347.8631 �. PALM DESERT .+ LAOUINTA �a INDIO October 31 , 1977 f.JD y� Envista Planning and Environmental Sciences RECEIVED 125 S. Claudina Street Anaheim, California 92805 DEC 19 1977 Attention: Clarence E.Aschbrenner E N VISTA, INC. Dear Mr. Aschbrenner: The following comments are presented in response to your October 11 letter requesting information regarding your 140 unit residential development. The Desert Sands Unified School District began a Comprehensive Master Plan Study during the 1976-77 School year. The study in its first phase defined 115 study areas each containing, as far as possible, comparable zoning, economic and geographic cir- cumstances for the purpose of comparative analysis and development of projection formulas for pupil enrollment, housing capacities and other related factors. At the end of school , June 9, 1977, we had developed a pupils per dwelling unit average for each of the study areas in the populated areas of the district. The first survey has given us very valuable information which will be the basis for answering your concern regarding estimated student population in the project. Your third and fourth concerns are also addressed by our data, but I must state that the periodic update of our information will make future answers more valid than those presented here. I therefore will respond to your numbered concerns specifically as follows: 1 . No more than 20 children grades K-12 will reside in the project. The size of the homes, the relatively limited number of bedrooms per dwelling unit and the probable cost of the units all give strong indication that the pupil population will be small . The study area in which the project is contained showed a .05 pupils per dwelling unit average on June 9, 1977. The estimate above is based on a .14 pupils per dwelling unit average for all of the City of Palm Desert located south of Highway 111 . 2. Pupils in the project will attend the following schools: Washington School 45-768 Portola, Palm Desert K-2 Lincoln School 74-100 Rutledge, Palm Desert 3-5 Palm Desert Middle School 74-200 Rutledge, Palm Desert 6-8 Indio High School 81-750 Avenue 46, Indio 9-12 3. Enrollments and capacities are: Washington School 492 540 Lincoln School 462 570 Palm Desert Middle School 504 600 Indio High School 2556 2655 4. From evidence previously mentioned, it appears to me that the proposed 140 unit project will have a minor effect on pupil enrollment in the Desert Sands Unified School District. E-1 Envista Planning and Environmental Sciences Page 2 October 31 , 1977 I feel compelled to state for the record, that even though Indio High School enrollment appears dangerously close to capacity and there is a site owned by the district for a future High School . in Palm Desert, it is expected that present pupils in our school system projected ahead to grades 9-12 will , over the next 5 to 6 years, show a fairly stabilized high school enrollment with an anticipated decline for the period from 1980 .to 1984. Thank you for the opportunity to provide these comments. Sincerely, HAROLD SCHOENFELD Superi endent � J By: Rre . Harlow, Coordinator elfare and Attendance RMH/br E-2 HOUSLEY/WILLDAN ASSOCIATES A Joint Venture of 1.Harold Housley,Consulting Engineers and W Ildan Associates 73-700 Highway 111, Suite 8, Palm Desert, California 92260 (714) 346-3868 1020 South Anaheim Blvd.,Anaheim, California 92805 (714) 774-5740 (213) 924-1631 631-19 r c A /aoo Por. E112 of NW. 114 of SEC. 32, US,R 6E. Q ` x.S.WT f11 p9 C� 58 JOT 67 14. 56 1 55 t. V � V/ i 21 `R/ATA TRAIL c me i� fa wpYri't._ /7/ / x, Jt� �Jm Jt r [OT O y /.9 BAf / 60 of V ten ✓4 J A A 9 p` 5 00 00p , 62 ,+ 6 O " JE O _ to55 5\� 25 Aeo 6/ h / MB 33/3-Silver Spur Ranch unit no.2. - p ( ow..G.L.O. R5 59139 ' t ASSESSOR'S MAP BK.63/ P6./9 RIVERS/DE COUNTY CALIF. APR. 1967 F r . J{ rwrft_I k �'•%9 07.01.77 A<;rgREKT-OCLL ICE IT VERO 77.01 CPRPRE2167 FAZE 53113 07-01-7' 1 KiA It A"E.ISEE. ACSRESS. CE5CUPTIOC A. TPA ASIXT AO LIKJ 514 T]V PEPS In' EX5"I:CVS K'r 10 ASSESSES. AWR 6251 nitTpNO F€i L RRED L. � i1: OIO:OL'1 631-193-010.1 2175 14250 N][ 1:54 1A675 SACX EPK2ST A. q�RMq C '.E41 ppCttA f2260 4 04 INOCR EPICPpp [[[[[[. 6p U1C[AJE4I ACLNIEYAt,Ert9-Ai 'P 'fi2 CCr. LOT 53 RD 033102 51LVE4 SPUO 111rh IJKIT 2 70R LOT 51 RR 417103t 9750 P.RN44�C �E(IT. 7700 01 -006 UI•If0-C 01-I 2725 I1200 FSL 1749 IS1;5 OOTLE M[L FF tleb /! 773210 RINAIA fP ` °* X/1 65pS1 K K1LCA% AYE PALR AE11 122AO tC 00 ¢ C�IFG P1EP�LfIIpnCA 111 .E E RI COvayaN:E 016if502/75 ji I Ual pf 1fp 0311002 p1L1;R 6PIW RAKA MIT 2 USE CO2C PI CONr7 I l M2/[fSp _ �1� L07 51 RF N71039 IRA ! RUA 1ILK T Will 11260 14f00 011_ROO 631-190-CO2.2 2725 1{500 V� 21225 2COOJ pE OF/105OI1 RAYRCL) K. 7S2f0 R161:iTG CCaVEYANCE 47r757 05/76 1 Li400EEUT 9226Tp CWE USE CC]E 11 641 LOT pt R1 0371f02 SILrt9 5DU0 RAK(N UCIt 2 7 LCT 53 OR O47/031 IRA h-Eo ONIS!.' 1��100 OI�.0010 6J1•If0.00J4 2725 25100 NCY 1750 26775 YC•1 SNI2LCT R. .RLEO AND M. 0 73 W RIATA 12121 1 S KOA%ILE1 A. PALM OESUA f21W IIA�Aq�ySLRgVL A. I aSCC USE CWC 11 CRNgYAIf.E Of5611 011 T6 YILCOCALV tT eft tt32 .LO:b1.1'A.431NOf�31t1ER 1VCN UC1: 2 _.� LL�OES�/e,,,7•,,,fffC.LU CA e y F' USF�CAY'Ell 922 C0�SE 1.17 AM fAEiT p000 Ott-col col 631-If0.004-4 2C00 Rn paEYlEapLOFBN`L i:1 ,0 I2 AC �-it 2CC0 LOT pz RB OA7/O3f T41 f USE COOC TT !E'fIFLE C6 7J6 06r;1 ((} 195C ALONI[mR36`J3/C{2 SILVER SPJa PIK(r,lryll 2 1,�. jl'1�K Rtt�LCRR/1 1 . IpX,UIY 2OO Iry �JCO OIL_06^,OJI-IfO.00s-5 1125 1375 pEtE �Ay;f12zf1 � -Pt B�tW.TVNiLl3�E"ICE �N4'J6 0617, 4 OC CAGE WYVE Lot 55 RJ 0331OC2 SILVER SP_1 AAV; UCn 2 POO LOT N /D 0471039 12ErE _ nrl•ISm IA2f 07.01.7: ISSESSRENIT-FOIL Y00 !W TEAT 77-71 1rprg70/ cI• .E 53411 07.01.7: It" 1C ASS--"EE. Aq7 M CESCRIPIIC'C rr TER Ism K^, lair, UC !t0 117 PCOS I:T ECER9t1Oe5 L?A TO CLSOp�A0S1SfESSEF. A.0.-OE5 AKCO {0taaHp'['3L[YEa=a!!R tt fi�DC1 011_N0 6J1-If0-006.6 2175 11025 NCI 1T50 IhSC P.pGM Al NC1. L7C CNE t, f22f0�TYA CE 126119 1f r7: 1�1In61�*E�L f22N FUSE CG:.E al LOti.2r LOT N I!J 13310:2 SILVER SF1P tlpN LICIT; LOT Al RO 117f031 TUC PAR/ [/i 7\LaLRlti .-1LIN OIIw9 llt-IfNMI-: 2525 �-y. Zy5 C FM R�U{App`X.r 7I2900 A�EA[ CI ff2D� / \., `Ik00EfERiFfi7N t!C COOC TT C8ErtY1R[E I7TI32 11176 ttC CWC RI COtM1Tr LIT N I!1331N2 31'.R/WE RuM Wit 2 Let Al 0 4471639 TNC'. ''t "-N0 f]T01 11 6t1-113-63R-a 2175 21FA 23425 L. �1R1R(E(/g321�yy�1((pI�1 TF vmw 111u__WPj1 57 fNN 1 e�� w1 u UT �apt��y0 0f4 Iw inilw SJllfa EARN wa MY 2 7 �} 27 Let At"I N7f32p trc� �u KTf7 OARMIu3-IrOYfli n23 3b _J_------ `�2H_ `� • C CI ;: 195E05XL11-NOl!"I 'AT YEAR 77-71 (FCvrr AS'<'?SrE• A:CPrgS, CES:P7Pt IGV AV IPA IS'S1 N. IAQ SIR 11V JANS Pi A tkrPPt i^YS Sp 'E - .11.1 a NAC;rT i, 107:0 811.'CO 631-196.006.6 2175 1602S Aix 1T55 1315, C.-S" u-%, E'.T�[O MICPT A. t C 6 C.!,s 1 ±.r ir$A1[[pa1 via AT,4 IP ` Ag} IA ACC `t44 0166 }�%EEESe A�E9L 1�I CMETAYC( 126IU 0l:7: SSr .L�t PI LOT 5% i0 0331092 EILVER 507P PA ACN UVIT 2 I.CT Af MP CA„I Ypg\12 UApp.; ^100 CI 0 t71•I!0-Cf7-7 2525 F 0%1104 P. 714 PARL ITi' �F g•SS 2539 9112p nR-tE aA C NERPOSA BEACH C/ 10151 01l`. DEOT 9t: f CpOC rY CV4Y ANCE IIf/S52 II176 L'SF CODE 11 LIT0E PP 0331002 51lVER SPUR RAVC4"It 2 LOT AN PP OA7'C RECOE4 M1,A�LrV �700 0110.00p00 631.190-006d .2173 2115E 23425 PILE,`AA1CIl¢E• MIT 4116 VALERIO S1 LE YAV M1r5 CA 9NOO X/t �6LN 1 7AIS E ERITITA 92 WAR OIRWE NA I67S" �NCMWC[AR1121 COANEYANCE 093737 01/75 LYE = 'l 6LOOTTT 66613p 033/002 SILVER SPUR RIVER UNIT 2 "1 41 10 0 66 7C/A1� II g4il0iE LIRErC2CA 70291 TWO 011.000E 671•I11-009-9 2725 27515 ]025f. �ST ICMIW;C v I`I N 237pSESILYER pA111 IN C 0 55150M FALLL1OSS 3C40C 35CPCOM'NCI9t1'(CVYETAVCE IA353 NAM 11, ABCACROCE 41 LOT CC6y3EPO 00X331002 SILVEa SOu CAVCN UNIT 2 LOT 13 90 047/0 2500E [ 39 91p�yECIMIL i1Tp' 71800 011-0000 631•120-010-9 2725 ISM N0% 1156 16200 p Is Kiy1NTY NJO4 5RI SI 16E 000C�4.9 &VEYANCE 063109 05173 44 l /I $$ IT LA 9224 NI WI 67)AN 0331002 SILVER SOAR RARCN WII i t MM5 N1CC - LOT It PM 047/6. N C pHy(S/E�411AT}M��j�p �ES00 OIE_000 631-Ito-011.6 2725 IAA14 ROT 17S4 15375 10CE 01f CC\IEVA\CE 102917 08174 f 4p 9944 C01,it M9 0771407 S7LLiN SPUR RIXCN UNIT 2 �.•'`- �_ Ax 5313E 07-01.7/ ASSESSP2NT•291.1.FOR THE YEAR 71-78 (ORPAA77C) PATE 53N5 47.01-77 710V5 V[T tC ` /SSSq[ISOSIEEE,, AAO09ESS, OESCRIPTIRS TV 1P1 ISPNt VO LAW S'2 IIV AM P-CP EM YTICNS WO TO ASSE5OEE. ISits iili rtiP70.A0R; 1�1�YE �2260 gh:E1�.0005 671•I90.011•1 155E 9ASO M1NSNff;� CA` „IEkSrYE CtC\TE SE1lt I1172 0 11./11 'MLAR 6PU4 NAMCNERS AM 200 61 •000 631-19i-013-2 SO "` tN- Mli 0 WM 10, CA )226C TC -00 SC l0T 15 No 0 1103 p0X OlCN aC CODE Yr COVYTU" 011734 02177 12" I n RCRC5 M/L AR A0R LCT E INS LO1 0 AM NILN N6 I,9Ap O• 9O,��.SIHC[O3 7IlYCN SP{IP RAAtN N'II 2 X�h'NN itT C C IT�11AlCR M•10�111' X. iC92t 011- 8 b7i•20I-HI-A 100 4430 A730 P�M^"CMMI;I' J0 Ptt 0 0 pppp[N1[53[[1�15 G INH OA RD TR f22i9 P01 LOT O0 K M' HA6 ANNE I CC1AMTAVCE 06372E 06/7A LC. 6 N 033/6112 SILVER SPA IAAVCC4 MIT 2 A�1 ET.r0.1nw t on AN AA'L6[El3IiIt 54 ATn�i1YRN-Im 1[�H i11_Ne,VI.211-Ht-5 1\TS t.75 UCWIT A \KF1111h. [i LY1 �H7 / 00 Rp Lot 66 ANN N' ueE CLCGSS�ORRC r1 CdAMEtANtE IBM&67n1 Cy C075 LOT N R 033/01=SILVER SILO AANCN UNIT 2 _ VAR 0 7i I TgH'03=-01R TIRim IT 631.211i43-4 1475 P�]ELN� III CA C -H 00 L5t 66 1Ar N; ,NIL 1 n C�i"]CE MAR MU 36011 LET 1•O337H7.NILVEN NIU ViKK UNIT 2 11 k E INN 6 KY IK TC!"N1!- 631.201•CH-7 1475 IL75 II/ ft�t 61 1!E n •!PO ft7it ems - 1� LOT 3 K OU(itl 67LVE1"MKS Np1 2 ERR tv RAN NN Ni 25-9-11 631-06 T. C. A. /805 E.112 of NE. 114 ofNE. 114 of SEC. 3/, T.5S.,R.6E. 30 /T 29I32_ /l�AA40 _ H. /•BL' va_ „/ LOT "B" LOT \ � O f� 3 m : n ama oa a ; ,o; o ,o: 3 q. � t.m a m r"'w N[ati^ I sO a� ^ q . �. m ,., m `•rma arq. m a a + � v a + • °• i • a a a u O Oa °0 �a .00 O' •O ®j ,� .®v �' �6 •� ®+ a© ® a ]J/ Q try N u 1=J OaO ®a°o OL'u ®aan S a. + < a a a , •® � � � n.Bn yin inV RAI a s a a ®a a Sou]' w1 B] Tw BT OPTE OI.G ve NEW B NO/•lG' a'µ! /.fJa,Br' MB 73151-54 Tract No. 4487 i - • DON.- G L.O. ASSESSOR'S MAP BK 631 P6.06. RIVERSIDE COUNTY CAL1 • APR. 1967 : rf i 1 ,a'V Y� .l:a 6f_Gr f t' -• 155E35•C\bPE;l r,. t9 TE12 77"l tD:Prs7tO1 PAt 57717 67•CI.77 prsnc,q, A,[:,}x, :EtLpl0l IFS TV •0A AS.eT NC LA\C 572 t.: PE:! RRCO rlW-11N3 \?• •• Al5ES5=E, AiaE]5, ;S}CD;A':'\ 631-057-611a ISCO e115 }A:5 LAL1 CWRt imi}C a • Lt Sep ' �G e•E: IVtS etuiA• 1. CAL• t CA }72A". 'iN1;MEyyA1V.t . an 21I 12a [( [ a (cN.EYAN;E 061e2 45,73 IA`I^ iEGi !22N tbE [C C m LL't.-10V"r u:278 1 LC* 5 PS CM'IRA TRACT C2761 l0T 6i�t731057 Ttla aD' t 1\' 74 ki.1 Ali iii L. g0t0 /12_'00 W-4153-011-4 I570 MO YLL 1754 777C CO%I'A4 S a 3i5 4Al1lE .p G vALM DE AS 1 75 LL41 'MAIN }12" DLXRQiCi YA [. USE CODE RI GEc+/PALE 101f 7a N172 ert i 0 AOt NIEp LCT t ry 4MIMI IM! 427" aQ70 II'm CA 93611 qq�� PALM OCURT 922" COERI[LO L1[�Eap1.' �SEIN 01D.,`0 t]I-05]•020•a ISCO 7215 MCL 1150 6165 1DE COOEp/1 CCWEYAKE 1513I7 1 �0L C NASIAiiOCSiCi 1I}2ti0 .2YAKE t0aa7i IIlt7 t4 pCOC�A l`IF,q�AA1SRL/NI TRACT Hl7 t IY• lv LOT 700E OM 064 iRAtl 02768 P'A`�"SE.i„'it[�1IYIL Lus 0OW11; RIOT E. a7100 011•000 6]L/53-021.5 1500 9275 RON IISO 1P2i M/1 WELL 1 aAD`1RN17G L W. TC 0-N N/T LpIC REGEIG 1C20i V6[MCMEIRRlf2 iroNVEYAXS 0)DN3 07/76 MAo.� p[5mER1 }ll 22N IA]E JOE 11 WIEIMCC 151232 1 LOT E N2 I4910P TRACI 627" p Lp 5{10i 0!]IR31 TRACT aM1 t i4t Ep WAR PlIffilt 1;% 14M0 Ole_00000 631-053-412.6 I500 10120 M)C I75O 187C CROANL.MNOY AR�ERAT, i iS•CLUR IPL1'C000 2t41 CPMY44CE 139756 12171 0 4CMUPt!MY10NCEREtE,LAL tv }Mo 0 We" TRACT 421N _ _ - -- PKIRDIAME1O p2}pilJi�AOu0MA7LS. ^p E [jN COMtppAA yCIj CO IMMCC 27H0 01 -O(�5 57I-<6I.011-2 2]75 -.NI4 S;DS 72}1lTpp(L(LAO EIT, LA }INa E710�4X.' YTcX140 Ill.. 51E 1 90505 ]C E-00 CARENCOOE DR111�iiCCC/CYAYCE 151AS 1 12g17) �t4p 69 1MENC�112777777t/ YAMCE 112]N M75 AhE2371051 TRACT arS7 D itt IV Lp 1 Rt 4731051CTTRAACCT i487 0 IV I4 CC"CS , " { 4 I - I 1 � j � ' - � � •A t - - a� � r Ea mm= 1 ,1 A r1111M - 5!]/3 OY-LV77--^- - AS'a55L•-Yl-,POSL FCA l4E YEFR 77-75 02PNF270 'A;,' WS 07.01-77 S N.7 1C ASSE55EE, ADDRESS, DESCq P11ON TV IRA ASNNT NO .AND 57R "177"PER.1 PROP EYENPTICN• NCI TO ASSEBSCE, ADI 1000 LAEEIIDESERT 10 U. E UAL 49340 /IC_0J05 631.061402-3 1250 10210 :24C FALM C•5ERT TENNIS MIT AL 0 TRAUB PIALLIO A. fOMNAN 9E`` 11 [[ RAUgg CAR ONS111MA4:A9Vt"V. it RAF MIT SOU [ ENY TNEF M/T 76 CYP ES[y YAY SOUTH BEND, IN ROLLIN;NI``L5 ESTATES, CA '1077, -ELMS ECLAY fl 7Rl75 HONESTEAp RD USE"COOEERRI9226Col USE"CODEERRI 2 6CONMEYANCE 015502 0717, LOT N MS 0731051 1 200 p CDNY.ON AREAS A EA! M8 O1J105I TRAIT ,V7 L TNT IN COY.M.OK 117 pL11ER5 ASS4 Nli P 0 BDN ER1 PALM OESEAI 1ENNIS CI JB ,)S,c 01ee-00: 631-061.003s 2250 1021C 12460 OALN DESERT CI BIAA,S HILL TAN J. i. G-00 USE C RACOUEt LG RAINS N at J USE CODE 9 Cd M/T IILLIAM J SIAM 3.03 ACRES 14 LOT f M1i IEMMAI STRM BEAU, CA f0266 t 1N1 IN CUA'JN AR SO PE, 025 ALAMO LM LE7•A7 f22N USE [0, RI 'ON12YANCF [t00%! Ot'll ALLEN JAMES C. LOT 3 MA O'3165' TRACT „A7 A INT IN cc-cC ALIEN BIABAAA A. M/ i OCEAN iPd WAS L YA DEL REY, PALM DESERT 92260 PALM Om"t l WIS CLUB 52140 OIR-605 63I-OFFO;A3 2375 16b60 15035 USE CODE Al Cd MI1 T900 4V,STBENI L 400 Nli 2715�ICFVEL! IT L01 tl MB 073/O5t ' CA MA. CA 12041 COMMON AREAS 6n0 48035 AESLEAIY 4R PUSE"CppE NAi3r�COMMIT 151275 11173 PALM DESERT TENNIS LOT , 41 073/L51 1RACT „17 1 INT IN CCNNC4 most AU1 N"DJ AREAS M/T ALLAN J HURST 1 N11 3+00 ETftv'ERRI PA``N ppEEySERT TLHAI).CLUB 52M M-013 631-061-005.6� 2375 10660 13035 72f10bp�@ II LAIL1J,tGp�XITE LYNAN'0. JN 7: o-oc i'SEMtOUEy`B pR Mt26co H25 n1/T If 7"CM. A i iCOS CIO lAta9SrT1'e E<«MRu ARt�1s/051 nn Nl�l� 1 JE44, CA 91b,E �%WS AAyLEA 1"LOX RRI ""counYANCE mot, /3/75 RO S MB 473 651 TRACT 4487 6 iNl :N CC"CN M•Ob,A � Y ,r,A-10'rr . i .:-11-77 Att3°•c4T-OOu FOR T-E T-AR :i-it (P:'"%1 6, PA;E 53399 Oi-Pi-'7 RI M-T 1/ A `, ADCREBS, DESCRIPTION! FV TR4 ISMm :.ANC SIR 1/ 0-25 AREA EV-01ICK NET 10 ASBESSYE, AO 1754 KllRpppf[BP� It1ENNIS CLUB M43 BIT S L31•KI-NF: 23'i I9iN I3035 O,i` O[B��CtYCCl 1 IpC..S M' v N LL% r 112 B NAB/TL9M`;pEERS`IAt;�R�_B2LMiIB31 21 CON9[•A4EE MITI,♦t1:7 UIE 000E RIOR CO WAS WALat i11'1/3/KI IBAt1.AH71 INt�Hy'Y�pc LOT i71f1�3fMl CM"Jw ABE 14M lOMTS MIN SIIN 111-145 631-06I-E27-1 23S IBif1 I3635 Y lLlI al RY. iCC UT t 1tS rlufM2�Ch 1#274 - _. _ -_ - -- — - __- - - ___.�. -- Kt - Y.1 ,eG 1 atm <li e �+I4: C d j:a b]i•Cil ((• 6 2JJ' .:r '; o • are 6f i474] `a :73 tll 1"",,-' 443' 4 IA• :N Cfrrti' --- :, gxx6. C;-at•7i Aslss"Eki-Oat Fc0 i+E rE.4 77-;e5]]99 ,- •::�. ! to A"tSSEE, ADDRESS. CESCRIPIICN PN 104 AsXNl NO Lit: STD in PER5 Pr•R E7E1,11Cw 1: % l iSC CANyESE41 iEAA15 ClC3 CIO OIE-Cp5 6l1.061.006.7 2]J5 IObw 1]:JS 3AL £11 L. ii I X/ a T `scl*tr Xn kli i' �L C r tAu'7p CR r./t 4l%A 6p 06� ` CA S 2t2 4 4 115?MC 0C 491f i766vL4ANCE 021St5 12177 PCL 1Ci [[ LSE 166P5 q@S Ms 0731061 T441 44/: t IVI 1w CCNXDNLei PALX DESCRY I[wviI C`.VB 52140 sit- pS i71.061•PO1-R • . IObw IM35 ` 4 / N1MSCOM OCNALO Y. - TC 0.0f Pit WN! CM N. HAS XI1 Y1LLINMLu,�CAk 70274 "; 1` 11�tiy M� MCx 175C 5C06 IPbiMOE 041 220MIETANCE 416773 02175 LLpp1 7 "0731051 TRACY 4467 C 10 ik CO"44 AREAS PALM DESERT TENNIS Tit qt.o Ott-a185 6]1-061•CO6-2 2250 10705 1113t NOIDION WIE£g0..�.A G �IN 750 Y%t 3 B�E11Yn11tEA 0£O4.ALot t6p CCRDMMAgpDEL XA . CA 32625 OAL%3CC'JU[41 i22w 1C1�, LSE C00E 61 CONVEYANCE 611060 06174 IAI LAl 3 RD 073w51 1£wT 017 i IVY IN CD`:.Gw A Cc0.1 3125C PAX�G'.^_'f�N15 CLUB L0 i15.0 5 Ui•061.009.1 2250 1035 Iw35 PAI ^, 0-4� R IEL.A S- MAI E22ii99�36jj.3 1SSAANRC'CrANINX'0D 91331 IRE 0[SE 0j022M�7A'2YR:E ISII5i Il/l][ Es lC P r.3 is/osI Y:rr 4417 6 TNT Iv cc." 44Asd144r ruB•104,4 PA7E 6]Stl 47.CI-77 x55E55XE4',•RCCL fGR :fi YEFi 77-76 VOCF2T PAZ J400 I PIOP etFXPTi0w5 Ali ASSEsm. AC:•RESS. CESCRIAt;CN EV 119 AShl AY: LAND Sit In IRS NRCP m"lic" A?T 1C 16 IwA PILP DCERI TENNIS ILLS Wit ii1•f05 631-061.0I6.4 2375 3375 I72S0 PA NARI w ERTJ4E 0.1// A4 Si .,VW PA]1AY ID i[v A. MI• SXCllli NkF;kyM 61 S:1L1NAw LIFE R41 CCCW"ALCS IS7177 U176 I 1 =1 18 P. /O51 TRACT 443: 0 IV, ik Lg NOT 1Jl6 4613 RR Cd ►ALA CEN", ^. 75 CLST 15221-0 C10 1Q5 UI.161y1i•, 2375 II660 INN. DI wu V ,4IALOT LTC i LIZ i LINK37"IT Oia AC-N (]co N 72M CLAY C1 WAY M u CE4E 41 Im"Am 0I083 w/75 L,ry 67S Itt Cl M7731461 EDICT��027 a ivi it ���u tsltliE t1N 61C15 631-06I.112.2 mi IIiU 1 730]6 r I�1�3J{3 CRY ED 1 1A��E N�[�OR31[I OIAp t3i7! CIN �SL70�iStiI NOV 44 16 ENT IN } 7 tie OtmiOi S PNES ICow 4DIV U1y/1-OIS-3 2m tao I}116 O '1 i A--_.ne a__,,... :.ftP•eN r, •AA AS•'. _ 114E S•R -• rl•a "'na• `(vk:5 P..i ••'=:II CS 671dH•C IE•; 2R5 f1:5 :2� [ ' rarr NAt GYNICR A. r AL r�9::i T i ��1 Ti IA [ r A SL1li'!N '2971 '�n A .._: C:Le2-- R l7266 > RI CCVtE]AYCf 117771 iN7i I`CT 10 n 0.31#51 iRAGI .%it 1 INT IN . .. .41a cCRRXN 14£A•_ •A!R1E�y ERl IL..15 CLUB 52151 01=_01005 631.061-011-1 2373 10N0 1111 4�0Rr=ALRv LID 1C B/1 32N CNCR.1 aAE R UN7"'k. CA WAY f dMR CLAY cl ! 4K C7:SE01 f22N USr CO9E RI CONVEYANCE OAIfi' 04115 L !-6 t II h ARE1731051 IRACT 44/7 L SAY IN C Crr{{�Il B2.[�OISTRUT'i'k CO IRE 521a0 411105 631-411-412-2 2250 10715 13135 R/1 6la�K[I1uQRNE Kf SIE 1 90505 iC 60 f 72fN CLAr C+ R USE OESERt fi1N B USE CODE RI Cp.YEYANCE 1:2341 I1/75 7 1109 C.LDI IT BR�77'DSI IRA'.1 N/7 A INi IN ` 'Am Ini tLR.�fURT TENNIS CLUB - - • _ AM* OI 005 671.061.013.3 ROSA 10210 t2A/d C F Sri OFee�6'y,Uy,�1,LNLNECME� ENOS A``T IW CO CID IRECERIU [ RRES iC �-40 175 I��rI7C4CR1h122NA1E fi]IS I SSs 000GEEEE 1 USI CC RI CNNEYARTE 1I17N Of!]2 1 1 LLppt 13�Rgg 0731051 IRAC1 4411 [ 1" in � CCRNON AM_A7 AI 1 P ` i nA[•Gbo i aaaC-IOeu fADC 53316 0:•11.77 ISSESSrRNT-CCU 7C2 iNE YEAR 77.73 (llfrr270] OADC 53A01 AS P" EIE"IICk5 YCI •C ASSESSES. An,:55, OESClV11ON r1 IRA ASIYT NO LAND Sit T/v /EA'J ARC• E3ENRTIC" NEI IC vEY 175C ANS TAU yy10RRlA^.:.tE1:el5 CLLi ``2110 I10./05 631./61.01A•A 2375 U160 15535 WILLIAMS NICKEtt1 O. iC 0.0 MitLIM•t 11W31Ril IA!!A LCDI 02CAEVIES 1 lCr A 12614 ' AS tLLAC A EI�N__. L CO1i EYAL:E 0132" hR6 1L1 NCI 17" Sill LEI It!1�47710S1 TOACI ../7 A TNT 19 1 / �"1111,1np1CSA[9�Ew 1C7 TER CKKA,,gilyI�EW S%tM 52144!It Q05 631-N1-6:5-5 2375 IOW 1303a RI EN 4"tLL1A J. Et it /- _ A 401 Uld SAM R/I C1 R 6 I tEcJ R[ITEC RLN54OWp6[COW CIA 9726. ` 1��GEOC' LIIIf COMMIT 491524 I:rla {JJT 1�6731051 TRACT 4427 1 Ski Ik RRI 17N 11Y. ClJ60t[�. �• tEA':1 CUS 521Af It -IRS 631.06t-116-6 2375 IRA" R'",1 I]51 t12" R/T TUN S. r I.ong N 1 y146 f27N Nor IW %" IAIE(.ME ��ll C/Rf4Q 15121111117 L►1 11 go OTUNI twt W 7[IRS 11 '#2CIN 631.161•I17-7 2775 IIW (3030 IIA R�_jI INC -0{ '1u"1 /Nfl 167%32 I27T3 "I•0731tu TnLI W7 A or SR _-_ naFihaA ii r ' 12.- rI,LL. ��' . N;o y )i25. a:A, eA:,"a aS LLc v t 5A.7 )2760 , I^L le'i 11 ,%V1:,AN3 0152A 0),1i LOT 15 N0 731051 1RAC1 ,.IT 1 I41 IN r.NrCN A E05 rAtN LEVU TEA.:5 CLLTI 52140 011.105 631.0614164 2375 10614 f. 1TY. WAR t, v. rEXOLTq;jAis,CA R 1[ 0-10 AA`r Al3ES I CA D f2260 Y '6NA ISOACOM"Al1 Li�COYIEYANU 151201 11173 LOOT rt O'3f051 TRACI AAA; / INT IN AALX VAA 011LIEN'%IS ELI" SCHO 010 0 5 63:-161.015•7 237S 10610 I7135 YCAWI.I 0 C..113MC1•1NC n 1125 "I CIO VINCI.Q >R��J,15 INC X•1r1p3E1,1 �EyN CA 1 ILLDppEO 1000EXrpp i= [�YYEYAV� I17132 12R3 HljI 1RE0731051 WAIT AA17 C ]NI IN ...^.-q.n v.O.10... AA,:- b3317 F 01-01-77 %SSESSXENI-ROLL)fR 1 7NE YEAR 7 71 AoR0n2763 PAX 531L2 [M OWN Ev"TIONS NET 10 Y ASSESSEE, ADDRESS. VSC41PII N 7Y IRA ASSN7 NO LAND 1T1 1IT NO PROP E%E"IIC%S NET 10 1125 CXPALpFNpPMS�NW1EATTENN75 IIOEl N C1. oto I9810 Olt-003 611-161-019-1 2150 10211 121f0 'S,O``,11``f ROYery ELCIAt / y OSEX� IP"CCOWEYANCE 1073" 01171 1175 UCdIN011&AS73I051 TRACT 4427 1 TNT IN II PALM 1DAEESpSNAERT TEW15 CLUB Af210 610 005 131.061-OH-) 2250 10214 1240 A T IO7 ANAS E%MCI TC ItA �pEyMTfI"KAC CA A f0313 111E CODE 11 [ANVEYAPCC O25t37 03115 C7]1051 TRACT NO A INT IN j (�0p1.EX�py1pNARCAS AAM AfpLS[EERN 1. '�0110 010-005 63t-161-02C•f 2375 10660 ' 3631 AALN tl 1EWIt CLUB Y 1314 n/I ONE NEN01 KACANN,�. cA f26f1 72f15 NOKSTEAO RO ' A'1l`X OCbE01 )2260 IAE U]Eq 11 UWEIANCE 15111i 11173 R - •• LOTCOM p�01ES6E1E�16/017I.SRAC IAIi�S..INLII 1125 VILMCIAT VVI INISCOLus 140 0T 1 5 631.16;-Ot1-1 2375 106/1 13676 lill•• P0""`A T31( b X7 935 MA , 91 A01 IbE 11 CONVEYANCE 125012 69111, 01 i Ib 731461 TRACT 4417 6 IVI IN ArAE-l/An ARL ...E-1a.. 1) "K Am 6r-61.77 RSSESSXLNI.IDLL AOR IRE YEAR 77•71 OAtA!.2767 RAZE &WAR ma MV EI"IIMl NEI If M aKt. R3ME96 WARIMION r7 tit ISX47 NO LAND CIA IfY Ads A101 tr."TIBYI ART T1 Not 1754 /f51 A NCN6 611 6 171•l61•022.1 2254 lull1 11117%"172 ti w a mt731114 Two W7 1 m CN u Alto _ TWA AU.W iL-� If s IPA* _AYIA ___ 101f 1711 t7 AY•AAYIT_lrrlf er__ _ --- - - - 1Ol Y a a e � !Y 1 H H f H '100P0600 6 y Oi-01.7T ASSESS♦ENI•R:11 TCR IN' TEAR 77-71 'P5-!F2707 PA-", b'.:; . rtr aa\ n `` ASSESSEE, A:AE-•3, '.E3C01t11DN TV 144 OS-VT n LW SIR 1,. Mf5 Pf-P EIEn*IC\: \F' IIaA^, 10''� FA[A ILIP IEWIS itC11 A10 005 631.061.O61.5 2315 till 17I54 PIT 11111 IJ 72925 p7ECyUEr %D, IN 46617 „CfJE I11j13nHCW.EYAVE 155765 121'4 LO 60 P[0 31051 iRACt IASI 1. NT IN P)DT c own" AASSIR J C700 6111l,631-C61.664-9 2A745 70[10 13a2 PRA lfI26: CA 122" O k.40E0LG2NCODE S+ CONVEYANCE 1112,7 W76 1 013lIAINECO�AVO0406 FITOp1151 70ACT AAA7 I, OLLL[M[3361AIWA A 'OLIO 41 0-005 631-062-001.5 2375 IRIS NCI VY IOSCC NIRAT OakllRERMI 10-M I6nl 7n75 uA55 ET PALM DESERT Info Was + Lot 1 ��CODE yy 61 COATI"A t 697335 /N7a ., WPIMMgpI'E6RE073/01 fAgi aAL/ L 1\I IS R,1RA.7 1LL�LL0A TEMM'S CLC9 J. 15100 0:1 1605 631-062-0/2-6 2250 Ia50 !7:06 WMI rilm 0. E- Wit ]A�LELHNN,6ILIER610E 2I to REIW1�AY, !S "7M Ix31 VILntC:c f'22H 180eE .C.C:C U cO6nyWE 625333,3I:5 E"SSZE0131051 79AIT 44117 l 1N1 IN AS u M•IOna ' oeA•17ru 27/R PAl 533" ' V-51.77 ASSUSPEIT-RCIC RC6 TM_! YEAR 7:--76 EKPrf2:07 K;( DWI PELy PROP ELt`v+tOM! NET 'Cl ASSFSSa2. AC:f35. :3CRiPi ICN EP i.;A A5/Rt K: ;A\; S+0 SIL K0{PRDP E1CPP-ICH WET 1C I334, I lALM R1 i(( C. Cum Nit?ltt:00s[31•/it-/CS-7 tn: }Ut 1770E 5 , RMIT i Cias F LiLLf -A,LER 3 is 5 yA6lA �c11CCCLELtEA, vt�ts, I Y62:2 PALM SESEil 122" tIAACE CODE RI mitt' u 63:N1 /3175 f u MSC WEST TRACT 411+R IN! 1% 31s M�A11 T[y[I�CL!9 '#21H Il0.I5 al•Iu-ILA•1 73n If 1303e % Alrt L' AS„C6 1g13 NP6RL6M1 tl EpIK�'1JQ 67M1 72R3 wOYw11l[IfM N a "T" 111145 aM•6 aim to r>I , t�m-.0 OtIN 6tr 6314"405-1 »n Ild" IS[i a. ! t , MI6 IEiw 1 c !0.6uE61Amm" OnTA 60!ls /• /' -.cCp l r("" GIC:y`�UI•:37�CC3'T 72"_[ }.�• . t I y t L AI -c AL L,e.t. ri- 9C>Y Cif,, nR a RI ClN.L•1V•.. f3NM 01'5 IV . NIc?. d •AL E([�LRp1,}(ET IS CY'0 71r0 01e•005 G]I•let•IOr•! 2575 I066f Iv' �AC�IC .!0_'EbilA. IC 0-GO .Ee NIMi[ :R 1 nrt 214 Am Av. {I LOW.J�EACN. CA. 901I3 If*35 YSAND E�[C111. R1 776C { ONVVRK1- 16Trr+ I2/13 COY S j7!1091 tRACT HI? t INT IN 0AL0 CESLLI MPVI3 'UN tH0 Ot -005 6JI-CU•OLS-9 2775 fO6H ISLJS LCOSE YISE IA A. 0 5. t[ -LG 0p t 11Y vL1! 5i1 3100C CA I �p�VSM ustR 260 V``tE 9I60r It COYYEr14CE 035775 03175 Ho1 ((33 Al f7J/051 TRACT /H7 3 1N1 IN _ ISf79 PALM a0l 1 "15 CLUB, �•� W-0 01110 631.0U•006.0 2375 10660 ` 'SL•5 NASN Yii C-005 0 I iwIq Fi1LN`Ejj[`�iESMLvCP P LVppSEAC 1pOOEee p1 0s`(ErAVLEJ791- -U I&AS77 121 81 AOEAS31051 'RACT ml L INT IN vr8-I DAu ur1•t f n. 0A;1 53400 /47-01.77 ASSESSEEN'f-POLL CC; THE YEAR 77-71 �f0R21F270) n;{ 53135 !RS 02CP ELEVPI1Ckt VET 1C ASSSESSEE. AOORr-LS. OESUTATION FY IRA ISEYi NO LAN. SIR UPFERS FRCP -LE"0170V3 N!.T 1; 1275G 0C�11[1 NCC'1AM IEo7[SN CPC7EOtiE7 LID S)111D Oto-015 67i•OU•007.1 Z]TS 10660 vT I3035 N17 2IC2r1ixA1YPCRW CO C 44 ®VY1 E/r t aSAGC zz SOLO Fl�OIA% C1976-100/037J5-0001 I re5 AUPPOO O�Ln CEVEGt 2260 WE COLL R1 CONVEYANCE 193215 1217E LOT VL6!/0S((1 TRACT 4111 t INI IN 13033 W110.ANSr(O TE21S Cta/ iC AO 011.0065 631-0U-OCS-2. 2250 1:2t1 12160 VRED Ip75 ILAW OR 1. P4V OESEAT 92260 115E COOL RI CONVEYANCE 063r59 01177 LCDW.nW AARREi5310s1 tRI[T 4481 a IA; IN i WE3g�E��ppp1 t>!RME0105*rEllll iil�' etg.11 671-BU-6O9-3 2250 !VO � II700 IJOb g1RRA3 ECPE'til Y. Ctt AL DALI�p(yERI 1[A'w"S 41f9 P/t RgERi C TIA NIT 000 00ppI16Elf IA nAtlnil W RCA'N, CA 9L266 7me PIMA VIP D3 WECODE � Rt R3 �lCIANM 16550 16176 � 1 u 19}2Ery 1051 TRACT r107 G IV IV 171K I O;x AC 7 tTCOOG ut_COS Gn•ou•e0-3 2375 9R75 12250 It IP'i'/^O IIT tA'I �9LIr IK t 5:9P :rsA1R 0 0 P7}A9L174 1YpI0EL�11p�E1R.T�E2Y2{CPO�I 9i`a1 t�E COIC R1 CdOf[tikCC 1ST\22 .2/7 ` Ut 90 M 613ml RLC1 41E7 3 141 IY CL_VIDN—AELOS mc-lf00I IIIC•I1N0 1 Paz 53461 _ 171I.77 F7166ECIAT•MLl 9N f1[ 1EAt:7-71 (/VIfITi) 0414 S3410 aJ't rc�':,el A aa6!' CI.J:[jo 631-W, •G7-1 M, o• :i. C: ii 'IY•i 0 aN+AI,.6 PSA•N. vq. Ir'R• N22{0 IE f�.r_ OI tT�E11h;,E 161,5H t0l7{ Lr, ,,Y2�17Jrt51 iSA[1 ut7 1 IN1 iN IPEA7f[[ { P�LNtM-✓� fI Al EI✓J. A(HIroF t SNIP O.PAIS CVIif000 011:145 631-{62•OIO•] 237D 0115 0.11 In/N[y1N{`'Y{[LLV(POLY L 0 00 IA 7 i'I. A vf%% 9n:aa I$ ': L it OMSEI/PE 167422 12/73 CQv I10 %173/C51 'RACI 4427 C INI IN •CI Pa;f 53a01 OI.OI iL__.---- +lSESSPENi•RCLI r07 iNE YEAR 7 31--_.� (72Rr1276) rer SNIO rER3 PRCR rftr ums ME1 It ASSE75EE. A07RESS. DESCRIPIECN IN IPA /{5•hi NO LIND STR�-^177 CERS PROP CIEMTID" KS• *- I55]5 5YA"RR E"JOHN TENNIS CLUB 4f000 011:81, 631-062.011-4 2.75 )/75 �S IMA A. ),L KEMN Sq )i-6 EA 0 )RD,f tt 0117E N RI CC:NEYANCE 003652 01174 fLOCQMNQE ARCAj/051 TRACT NAST t IN1 14 ` PALN QE5ERl lt"15 CLUB af100 Cis:Its 631-062-012-5 2250 )450 1170: 1]03D RLE N NAEI E. TC GEA 6"JJZEEECN[N'B AS7pOVV CR112AO tYIEW O CAOELICIAS 90277 USE CODE 11 'AWEYPNCE 096497 01/75 LOC "rt8 O5]/051 TRACT 1117 1 FIT 1N LY�ARL PALMRiI ERI TEM ib CLUB .U,O 011:00005 631-OR-013-6 2250 10210 i 124" N;N I770 11235 57EVAll KARIN 0 N/1 EULLER10NT.wCA"04 f2633 I MENE000E i1470 ) WYAEYAAtE 070132 0617a PpI CONJgN A¢E07]1451 T21CI %Atl 1 III IN �1 PALM DEK47 I MNIS CLUB tt j-0 01 -005 631-062.0H-7 2375 106.10 I 13035 IISMwN1a{D1E6w}6DAA6M2Y WTI. y 11 Nwl a. ORMAY II``�1 p[7AA EiI JM 91720 Ro tb[ tOCE RI COWEtaNt, 1674IS I.1's 7 LOB P9 O731051 TRACT Aa7: 6 191 IN ANM , r 276/ Pty- w12 0741.77 As5E3SCMT-R.-L ACR INE YCRC 7.-71 CPRDer27D7...iii� PAIL "All w rm PLOP MNSITM ME, It AS tsml Ap IPM MIMP110M FY ICA ASAWT OO CI K' Slt V, AT POOP EXCNfltor SKY I0 IN" M Witc!CE0 k5ii of IIA:/,5 651.662.115•1 2373 IIfM h lM!{ L RP1Y y // tR IA�Jc! fea: ` 61 CtlMEVWE 032W 63176 uT fi 1�173/Ofl TYCI N07 t 197 It 1„M tM/N III [t'!IT" IM pill1t�1f fll-K2.616•f 7773 iNM INS M I T 117M y�� LLII1T A°" , '.'{•e� .. _;;Rq[A NJ 1U Al,VI AC Jt, !'R rrn c�o r t t.'",A.• •.� r :A '•?R� rtNq! ::a 2140 Q0.115 F31•IP•67+•1 2315 IN61 IY•`i �f ' •AgA'j AM RY:FAY 1. �. A iAr- t Y NAkm T if,l AAh RCNS R "� � • ' j ,j,•QCO,'„tF- cm`..V:f f01t7 RA'.•. C£2"_°4i fil60 f1}f_a s lSE Cf2F RI ECNYE1ANCi 437I65 03176 oa_r L"I 15 C"Xm 1073101 TOALt 4411 A INT IN EAS 1 F,C' LCT 1 5 M.P1f ON �,E(A1 TENIAL(NCI rJi CRIB 01IrC OIS i0! 631-/62-01i-! 2375 10664 3F35 1 "it ,t0a AVCg GENE II`rCC" A114 1!0 J(IR�",A4 iF ?PIT R oo N./1 y011 ISiN1 CAVt 614 1I356 'tl' C-07Cf LN R1LN DElE 1 92260 1`1 ALM ME CODE 01 CONVEYANCE 01103 Cl/71 L01 f6 1161573/O51 TRACT 147 I f1`,Ip 5 :1C35 C('``910N A1i_C_.__._�� M/T tow ND9 vstON1JOIfE W. CLUB 50140 011 101 631-062.017-G 2375 10660EIRI I[35 Ac cox MORTE,1Mp1SpM, 4EB1qRRnp [J. .63 0- C/1 71x,N7VLISiA10EELOnAR YEN G ,N3I R*LRI CCl11N 72037 1 BARS ISEE4t�TE III ti(ONVEYANCE 167435 12173 KT I.OT f7 'BE173/Osl r0AC1 „e7 A IV7 IN N/�I i IJ035 C044CN C ! SpLyfA1M� eBpp�NM�7 J7lS(i 4. ,L�g 9140 011 044 631-062.011-1 2251 IO21C I2,N LffC 1.05E IIli07 c vgqII(C5(11LLi riV 12037 tL 9- x6.47 6[I V SX0Wlf27100NVE1'ANCE 167425 12-73 ! f0� { LO f1 10C173105C1 TRACT NW l 147 IN neC•Ifry y COMJW R ruE•II`+• rA:E !)403 1 01.01.77 ASSESSfE117.00L1. FOR T4E YEAR 71-71 friR.r271 S PACE 53411 0T EM11045 NET 1C I ASSESSES. AOORESS. DESCRIPTION fY TN ism NO LAN) 5TR 117 145 FRCP EYEPPIICN5 W..1 TO All I2460 I PA . O,NoQ6A 15 CLUB 11710 011 /05 63L062.011-2 2251 IO2I0 i 17,N �� (/ Am 0 JR 4• / B/�� 0O,� 0 d[4L0(AOELICi A9 90217 0��1lsF't[OOE AI 2NCOVIEYAVCE 010962 PUT, .' to MB 073/05I TRACI 4487 6 1NT IN % 4t I Fa 12,60 � A� BBBlllllli!! PALF.DESERT TEWRIS CLUB 1C 140 010.015 631-I62.020.2 2J15 1066E I3035 Mlt /•M11 NANLO g F PAC A. / AI/i {{I PIT p BB PrNIp ! SNP MIT R VE A146 VEAV II OR [A 10274 / rAUNVVAyIRCyS�REAA55p UE C�R. SEE C.00E 111 CONVEYANCE 167114 12173 _ H.N w LpT � N6 Np Pool t{[ CSIN�IIN0 A71]/OSI TRACT 6 IV? IV _ _ BAq 13636 - -- , - - . NIO fILN OCSER;�QT.N'C5 fLUO C 01t_015 63t-ou-021J 2375 fti! 12ri6 =/I �S7A�y1�7�pSRAE1NfL1{�RI�[WRTER�I AYE M/ A�F�COOE RI b1YElIlCF 2260 ISIR4 11173 N B(1 lOT{I SEW TRACT Nf7 E 10 IN �1 I.0m I [dIMY ItA! 1 t Ia O�tS4 4L/N 61!'+03 Nl•062.122.4 2251 045 117N R t C/ f lC / fx66i y • 1 dw",a 113M 11/711 0u Siri"I IMCT 44n It Ivy IN 4ur•Iur aN•11444 ' 25-9 r C.A. /600, re/0 , /B05 S 112 of NE. 114 of SEC. 5/, r.5S,R.6E. 03 04 05 06 / :200, O O O OB O x m O VI 5 E 6 � N V ^ O \ � V wr 0 2 45 Ind 655/ • •� J '�'1 5 86,SB •" ' S 89'Ib l0 E. l6 OBBD 4r ( v ao9/C ,P •/� t o9m: c L.O. ' — ASSESSOR'S MAP RK.63/ AC. RNERS/0£ C0lNTY/CA4/F. APR /967Milli _ I' -- Ae rVIR "�s �\ 5" f11 a:� L!1•IIC�:L•e 121 ' r ,•tiN. .A.•e'.e-�Z•. x-, � + E j Ci AT S) 3 t1 CR 1E'AL �. I ....•11... •.—Sa..2 JI 0:•4 L77 ASSESS?RI.11—U sp idr 'CAR 7:41 (/Rir1271) 11 aU. : .. •. 5< �:• ASSESSEE. AAI;I:RESS, 7]ESCRIOtIS Ft IPA As"t WC A. SIR To; ALAS 92t, ttj'i�SIERyLA ICAWERISAE'SSIE 1 ppp T2506 01t.CC0 L11-110-007-f L25 LZa IS RCR�,CyU((£SA?tts'S .-ovoAt12-CIS.55 02111 OESCRIf1ICV]EEEISSCSILMPCSRCCC16 f0R tC7Al IS SCIt IEIIFll ENTER/RISES INC Root Olt_'C0 67I-170-001-0 6250 HSC i'Af Ili I IBC GG i AKE CA 95050 Spp OA TADS 1175-000044273-0000 USE CCOE IT CONVEYANCE 121224 O9/72°f TICI1EFE S C4TOOAL OLSCI001 SEASSSCRS • I _ � b S1POC SfCq'CUIRCELLLEEt 1317 AW ENTERPRISES IRE o SC( 0 OIt_CCO 671.1Ib01f-1 L250 VSE II:C' J5E All ASCOT' IITKArCOY'.EY4LE 0 ` If000 t0E1/E,L C°SCA IDIIIIOC SEE ASSESSORS A&" SILVER SPA IS0000 01i:005 651-II0-010-1 Si5Cf }'SC! RlOACCA5TE AALI DESERT, CA 92260 l RISE CC2E IT pCCNr, AKE JET 157999 11172 l' 20dol 10 AS CESCRIDijON SEEF AY^RSSYA'S - - ITLO ``-- CCLL - _- Yity,ICI.O�OFSERt,AIIlE5 fUiO SL000 611.Cg5 651-110-075-4 I2500 125CC USE CCCE TV EFWIEYAW:E 153119 11172 t 6 4 IIACO iC14 IN I0'I CCISEE ASSESS^A55v PSE nr(-Cau m--Ilrn -25--9-9- 629-62 630-23 T c A. 1801, /806 por of S.112 of S. 112 of SEC. 29, T.SS.,R.6E. ' - 2z / 1 — =BF'SZC _ SILVER MOON - — car c TRAIL •E /9 _ _ » O. •.t'e zi © e°O.m :„>z<v e/ ` • `°M1 ' Ba.M �`; 0iO134�.PD 25 27 28 29 30 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 0a 66 65 9 B 231 4 4 47 4 45 44 43 42 e 4/ 39 64 r /2 4ocar • P / LIT BEND TRAIL ' 9/G7 57 58 SG B° / 32 s � 234 6z a E 52 53 54 55 56 59 60 _ rb14JER 25 0.4 At. Is,I, y0 � i Pee 15 °so 3>st ss ne *8p,"Z, 63/ °°r ;°° •=rE»_ MB, 30152,53,54-Silver Spur Ranch unit no./ fL1/7 i_:rM s is rL iz M B 36183,84 - Silver Spur Ranch unit na 5 L O./C. 0L0 r i _ _ { ASSESSOR'S MAP BK 630 PG. 23 R/vERSIO£ COUNTY, CALIF. 2 VI C11•f!1 i7LQ2t•IIA•a IIM OIP' 1 L'.r i �:Ii l9e}Ngh.pN{ 1 rT I. r'1 t}' C52 SIL.EO 0=x Rik- NIT 1 rTM91li VItK U.CYN., 1�70! CIl.lOt 630-222.O15-5 1325 IS'' r 66`((1`�31 S'•.VNCRE 51 ee `` EE rl 1 :SC CC::I v N' CONVE'ANC{ ii i17 1217! LCT 13 Al 630.012 SILV{t SW1 RAN'CI rNit 1 mayy' V7116 IA%DRAVA S1LL1LC{I INC 2C 01 •001 671-7M-NI-S 51 51 � It nli yyII`pVESCR\SR"gt AVC'AS ASSOC IA: IC -00 ".;I •ALP CESP1t CALIF fzzM :c• ! LSE ELL:{ IV CMEYAVCE LOT rt 0311152 SILYEI fp1 RAVEN LCIT I � _ �2. f jrii ASDI IAWyM 1SC iit IAMKRS ASSL%4r% 7 � A :CT 6 R[[F.1E1 MlE 6.'3 Et LOT E "S 1707052 SIIVEf 50.1 iA>'[4_ql 1.• - Y./t i�b'T AMAE[``P � ]57611P.P1I fiN-271-N1-0 1625 1160 \ 1925 ��IC U+Fb �IlabS �t21 CCVIEVLV.E 133193 1e:75 1C 1 _CT 9 LOT M YS 0301052 SILAR MR RA%:N JVTI I rE{ e7T I L> 1 ueV-35u• n;f, sIn3 17-01-77 ASSE35rEN •RC: FC7 '+E `EAR 77.75 IRi2ra7tl O.E 53211 h;T It ASSES SEE, A„TRESS. CE UMICR - - fY'-'itA AS!'V7`Ru "---vi;. S72 ACM MP {LEVITICVS III 1' 2t3ct STALE MORrS L. ' 7t 9C0 01 •0OOI W-2]I- -1 Ion `7100 9725 RWA ell 10110 1ELVIN A.E C 0 k4wh WolKRIpp^tF CA 91324 FIi 1 ipp•�SEIfiR92'lY4 TR ` \. 57071 VSEfCME RI CONVEYANCE 12N67 10115 ;` N I LOT 26 NO 0301052 SILVER SFL,R AW4:'SIT 1 LET t U.15 VARKY REMIT N. 15.C- 0121601 12:-MI-Ci3-2 ISM 1275 .CL 1150 t]SS Y.RNEr ET.1rN A. P•66 ert 734M LVERY-0LN 12 IALN DESERT CA MAR V 135My ILVER ecbe 7R nl+, . IIICOVEYANCE 115162 07174 AE LOT 27 All 0311052 SILVER SR:^+ RAVEN NIT I - LOT 1' 143M SAM YIY ERNE E. - = - -- Poe 01•i-M 630.231-004-3 1]M I3M 01Cy�I SNRIN3tfR2�2AN S. ., •00 ell F KRNOM. IL 9210 47M2 USE COOS " CMI YAKE UK G LOT 71 Pit$30102 SILY{R PM RIVER WIT 1 LOT 7 Ia1M I734&3V& 9PRIOR 10 TC7 1 If1 III 630-231-005-4 1125 .35t MCI 110 4426 USE CODE IT CV.'VEVINCE IISS40 02161 !L((O,,t 29 MT $34,0S2 SILVER SN.1 RAVEN IX;1 I Wi] YE4- IYOa 1. I i6 111_i�l iS0.271.0<6.5 IIM iJ".1 NCL 1:50 tJTS .IK tl7 ea C^�uej+T 576 e yYT C� 9226E 73W L f f.1bi Ii ICA I'M IM0t {.lE I '.C%M.. - Llt M a 43110162 SI.v"SItlR.4r. ',Rl' I S 119 S n+ rr• rR4•INRr r rry 9 r I" .. •2•• 1 M"•xJ:'12-1 fIb sit- 6M T7af IX .A T.._52 ix nrt ;•.rr or 1.I6... r14 S12<y R-^I.77 Ps.!f!fT-t[_ r•i •i=, 'y ""^i (Itnt2P} r2[{ 53322C 17-0I 'n lots W. rC 4xri7, AaCri. =21,11C. rs tN At R7 fin,_ 5'0 r., T[N cr7 E,rrr.VIS by IC Ann t67b, tILYErwI AM t i�ir t 5:.3 •. :Sri CtOT[rB YF1 1 rt i�1W4 SSilpl.:[v[r:: Y f 11 i. �•i. Ul'' t``7766"22p(p���(to lf.0 COG' T. Cpn;IkKE 1475l: Iii7 1E cCOE i LIFI ! b1 03 U1 II N HSTflt SillEt VF pLb(+. .,b:t 1 I�Tt ➢{fJ(111••'i iS9-2JI-tI+-: Y.ri :2lt 92h ilFwt it rtEMtK stE .t! "r dry YEb, bi • 1012 "i' 2�1 "' 1 TS/ i7rn IA["t�x;,f [OwxnttC -.. ��� LOT 31 11 63IlOS2 511.2E1 Sr1IF *'VC CbiT 1 �..• '�^- - .._.. _ IDl »M!: 4 y M I1;L[f r tt ICC 9-43 ell 636-231-I15-3 t!» 7.C2 rt, 170 ri.5 1ri1j C00[ tl 7S2CrMpCYrCe IIN12/2+if C 1 1lJri t/t SI M Ib+q2 SAtit S"p2KY xit 1 LrT2w111 WIWI t"Im W. 'AU 1 IIi n 631.231!ii-. It» •475 It. :79 IN ""i 1Z M1�(1 1?-ATIrlllq`}(I E[SEm: It . 7�,IH�S7C1 1aE(OR r�if�[t/CrttIKE SfCM: Tf:1i �C�`R1 LOT M M 151i152 SR':"SIA trbC",MIT 1 Lot 1 M IL Ii10 ,1p1[ l SfO� 5I.t112 Y C. H •) 1•t� 7 !J:-2J1•ICd Uri 1C tf» iiT�O SSY l W IY1t / / RfJY Y,r„„l2{ 12ST1Eµ��[ SA![t2 VATTa lK 1� C00[T tl �Uh-ETr4'x 471p1 �`• . LST Mf M pI14W sn.:tt!2.I ptbE" blt I LOT r w ill .rrhH+lr ur5•Ipu f 11a Mot .-L TE2x "--1 42im27:e $97 l721t ! /741- •im wi 1/' �01[F. UCOJS7. .'fYt`r•;-Y 'I�' __�rt t." .tQ"-1.2 +.. I:pt :t? EFS•t•:^M SET 10 NKM IS1S MTU ).tt: C:E _I IQ'•A[-':Ii 1115 "7 1'N lrlE E.M[ t( WPM ww�_',Is�sitxe ru rs, i�:T'�` f!� tp :1tt 1 �1 LY•Al• IT : tin 7s7 4" 17H TW " 1�}- No tM tam p fill T- 1 ma fowl N'T f -M♦f,A MAU SIE2M Tom OWN wit 1 Otto NSN/I OF271-@WF IYS I!i am O IMMo U17b LNy/1 LIFT MS w 1fIAR"SRY wo WIn7 wT S '_" "It.t01 • i 6320 ilt•Cal 656-23I•t254 I!a EAi75 HSei LSr t a ,1 C21754 E2175 W1 22 r,F 01ld4 j ,.Cl al nj UC/f�i 51L+EQ 55;R RAKCe \hit 1 0 VILL11"S P, f, 1N'P CC``f7�M1 R. •: !V CK EILpA:I c,. Ic7Ce 010 t0i bw-1)I-0264 1)!5 I7a ♦NN00a 461.0 P. l 7S7N NA1IT 9 R' ii VILI RLCFICCY Q] V` M 1 fRb( L'i'zOQ lI SC CI YIY171 LOT CODE 01 1 USE C.7C rt (OV;7:n\:E 0511:7 Cv77 LpT xl N1 bn/a< LOT AO NF p.•,/052 S7ttiLR SPLR LAYEN Wfi 1 LGREI51&� NIRtLO L. T 5yEf00 0Il-001 6]O-2]1-027-1 rLW,f ".0t N. 519 L�fCO R. i 0-t0 2025 107R0 X:V ITS^ IC175 �n,fT YXAY *�'K t- 9I1670,1 CORRAL :0 dItLR pCq(ET 221Y P N.^IV 72260 S:D fOQ " 5 I LEE CO.E RI CO VEVC-E 020,91 02r:5 USE COOL RI C 'w'1 39 NS 0301052 SILVER SPA :AVCH Oft: 1 / LOT 20 N/e7,71010 -l5fr• nr0•Ibin 53261 - 07-iETT7— .T= -,._ .ISStS .wr-tOK-tAi IVE TEAR Sun - 07•01-77 Kp 10 yypppp ASSESSEE, ADDRESS, DESCRIRTICV- TV 11A A5PRT t0 Lyn 5.9 TIY PEN :tJ% EYer;T ION VLi 10 ASSESS[[, A, 19475 , 1L3it* MAP N.�6EE 1c500 O1g:001 630.232•01•5 2025 8350 a NOY 1150 Rba Ulm Air •� FILL.i//X9pL(�LITE1END TR 0 G t 1..11 715KX t'/Y 1N�O 60 us COOL at COVYEYAS'CE 0%2515 C5167 7E``7X GCSE to 226b LOT 62 NS 0301052 SILVER SPA QIVER OBIT 1 l '1ASE COO[ NI G (jCKV PYtlLSC[J 15400 61 •oOi QO-1)1-001•A l0a 952E 6% 1750 26" LOT 19 41 077/6%0 17T67 1 Xp j341 [al & T rANtE O7T/t1 Ot175 1[ 0-10 ppN�ICCAAO1CC aa 51[AKI[1TNER7K LOT 55 N6 0301052 SILVER SRO RIVEN MIT 1 Nli �0} fOY IAL 1 I N%f �A'1tKApT�('OAQNSCTCAVApA 1c5w 011-001 6)1432-80]-7 202 975411,175 LOT O X1 0771N1 7A7�3A4L29 i1�C If1fm0 t0 C 12• 0 ' UQXC R41f CONVETAKE 01)7u Otn7 MyY x1 A(, B. t0' {N77,pOp�LL0 0301052 SILVER SPA OWN CNll 1 Z /L 111fJE� GEORRAE II X rULLI''ANLCE Oi t�RYRf7NR��CI 91780 7 01 CI�:Y01 670-2]Si0\•6 875 Ii75 6560 IpACTERlIRYIVRn/1N tuMlOtlf'f11Jl1E H tQ "S3' ISI" �-� 11 CCVYEVANL' WIRN'N t2� LOT 66 NS 6JapwflLYEQ SPA RL•SN MIT : 0 �µ,A tAt 16 a 0771N6 NA110M Q y1f2Q0 C1a:i0: =79•I7PIf5-T 2Ca ISa NLY I7w IRE �y 71 LIT A#FRfI.„•ccamhact 441522 0\!7: LOT 56 Al 030.'051 SILVER S9J0 QAVN MIT ! / [D LOT 16 X6 077100 `]bRn nRE9NRa 1aN 17-81-n SR_-E55F_KI-RBI fU 7dE rtIR ^•T/ -,WN 2781 RATE 53U4 07.01.77 rT 4 &ssemem, Ai1As. KKKnT1OR fT TOO &SPAT t0 LAC 519 IN AM RICO LE"P.100 WET 10 A16nalL 66 aft met �Are c�n 6:1�1 671 m-166-1 ma ;52+ f5w,cf6161 /mma 17I163 97/71 LIT It w 1nto%l L09 67 16 MAW 6tL101 3OW SAM VITT I [ 2513 1. - Om elml&WM-w7a 21a 75» SfN +pL � FM Ask 630-/9 630-30 rRA /soi /e/a, /s20 POR.SW//4, SW.//4,SEC. 29 T.5 S R. 6 E. /9 I o D O ® a O © ( a V " ^ • i n N 10 9 B 0 - 7 6 3OY, 5 4 /• /00, 'V GOT BPO L_s' " h /5 /6 /7 /B N O M IL. /rzsr " 30 \ 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 2/ a N LOT C M111.714 3 N /.I100 .p NB9'32'L )J/r+E" I` 2, 32 0 " r4rr OLONO ti e 0 O ir, 38 37 36 o ,4 BEE—�zm=P/ram LOT 0 n"', MJ9•dr'E Ids 9B' �- M.B 74179-80 TroU No. 4704 ASSESSOIK7 MAP 6K630P630 DEC 1972 RIVERSIDE CDUNJY,CALIF LA is 4 :r^ as:.»w,...v. • 1 ., nl. •) •1 i..•wt•a. -t-: ear� �•.,1. . 1e...-.. 1. ..�. :'•tt".•1:\ t qa Mit' C ./. a"1 ) . n» rt ..),r• • t P•.Re. at /a::. .Y• '-G T. � r i ,,.:T. tart .J T A .. t'• 1 TMY• N'i• a - rl f t, T •1 .', no .-•• r.0 •—[ AI 41 WJ:)-01) • trig 4= • N i A' t. aaq f•YI •FY 131 +`.'li�n i� ..• c 1-M �tr.i. 1449l.ei wu �xa tt ir.! ..51 vr. ST q N 1N an 'o T N-I• 1.fT 7 N r-•,'1 1c!!.^•. r• ;1: '1 11 -IY iro, . -.'T nl tae iF_-. lY'rtw'4 K•+) 3•it N.{S. u17r 1• Kr 4�[ to r 'N ia:I "te[!t 1112V NJ •t ISO It t VN 1 To N i••.cu !W w•JMT e, • .• Ntt11t iCa . •.• !`I •_Ta ,ce)a ): � a C .• �I to F l m i f 3••{ a.ps i -�G lie. f:y. r"+•1 .p f\N 1-•ll•'T .••.w• Oi_ '9 .. • Y ^• 1 rG>"•7"" raa r.'f Ir-Ct-« / r,. �lAiI3` :-r-to r. •M pK ,h 4.1 • hr- h - :•ai•,-•. I . -. [103fii,. t1 • Is. to �i'yw J ��•' { ar. Lgt'H Z 7!l IN f iail�(1a1, r 1 1N,b1 TOW 1.4p IDT 71 w 17e1Ip en1 tam te-nt-x a. .H r* - cr Iv 1»[ an r,r k� ! P 1` rrr4.0 U•r 1 ('-.I-:' ISSESSrs ]•t:^: FGC TYF TEll 4•]t !`Ss57?C, l::�3`., :�AEs;r•:Cp !: it, 1741 C lW 3't i[t5 aE i':r.•;7• L:• •• ISSEl3?E• AC:-q, :+ I, } Oti s" ',} a $too a�(I1 e°:•xbe:e-L ib: :zx rLt:En Y l to n•in i. . k 3"7M IMA L•act f AA s+. dd n ::,Ys TN'> :�21a7 et.71 '!Iw i'v� A C' 30 4 .:. oD •PAF• C.-C. ` �JOCr(LDI- ti 1$71[CY:C-A.-[ CA. G jj5ce OII:OSc UC-X3- 01-2 il3 12" T i. Ifa". }"1lY CC1 M A 01.,Ow TOCT CK !j}1 III[13 `L iiCC .i{"i��1. COWzor •7015 M"�iAllc�1l 11"T S7zw r.1 IK Yu LIDO YO?:. ME :CC[ OI COAYCTlu(C IK07C IS']S 1w/lKi/y"1�py IEALA. 1 ii Ia r III Si7w [' 71 rS oHi0l7 WA❑ O.:p :lu CODE Sl CGWETAKi AJi" T GGE[p�O�A 70N ell1-f•3 W--3C3•IR4 75E :SC "1 w A OWN 110:T 016 1IICa a. T( 1•11 r . GA 1' 7LL7L((tw{A Cm.1 W tl 1SE [OOE 1T COW.Tq;C 0/1K1 ^.S/1L pq A' r,T i IF If pp CT SS rl 0].1073 '11:' /.:E. 7l nOio•,,�C{ °(i i1i oOOC1EEi fa. �.t b C•LCmWl to St a Ol�011 130.3e}M-7•. i8! 123T DOE 1. tt MNEYAWLE IILWI11TO0 NI �t M?E1, r! If006 i" 01 " LGl 70 M OH+OSO TOt:' CN 'M LAN TT :AaN1...a A 1371 4..71 ICT 33 Ill G4109 TOAp CaA SIrAm C"Iftel 1. SIMIPI ,.,A S 17fI ita YlY�I rt TIC t �it kA S::t Et •sa LSc-3e3-00.-3 Si! 7Ct „IRYrILHyy] I,M CA i u ����1T �•.. irEi: SN7 let :bIFIETlL.0 IL-.S cl ILI ]1 if t].,056 Tl1;i TV ..{ (C 34 A 01..073 14A•• O.T!. y1r11 yyVY 7t-::S f>"•"3••O•L Il'a MC'. y r:COC M L[Y�yr. T ` rl Alt L`OS,,(73CLE1 SOLE tllC .•OO..CCAA��gS�CC:E•q'P CAli! a :M tl ':Y:VaLCE 1/ •►C:. " ••r• r::. CCT Tt w V. :aC ta,'• ON nr. y rr :: i •�-: ;34' liC-IUI t3]-r7-1::-r Itn uu 1 1 .. :..i:. fl " ..1,1.GF IS1111 l,.n o♦ � .�j�, .i SS L\Ilu.[,r • 11f 11C_MI IN•N7-/11-i Iin tn. Ira, ,.._ ;c•,, u rw SJSA .av oil n . • , c y rc w _ iaf/ nE• 11 b!r `.:1.E 11 a..'.rrC[ Itf.0 IT 1, .;%1)•IIY sC .cLe • rC '/ MITMWV.-w ❑T.E•IwC v. .•S.O 11 -f/1 fN•S7./17-/ 113 1/010 I P t!f ..\Ar.T '. .ESS�tt77,eS1��.NSyl1.CiC3\ f. It 5-/1 ./ NI 'Amp �22it ' • +CST1 >T Q:d 11 .0.1111K1 Man it 06 WA will 1Q• ;t1 7)16/pq1/ TNCJ W0 I CIO ',,OS /11.1/1 1S?-M7-Ib•/ Ills 17f1- 1'5 I1 a, '1T fl wR w MO u 1 /-0an r7 Llr Ii0 i til CJY 11 aA.111wt 111116 I/ '. U, 77 A OJb11/ tOtT 0.104 VJ.1 w 1 r\1l� f AC s .LT 62 •M m•-;uu v-Il•n n-1^ IN 14 J \ ! I M ••, N11]1C1. \C:L'A. "SC41011 A II ql As"I 11: 016 111 . ..,jy +::.1 'woq^'TV .r. tuCC' M ..�' S1u1/i7 Ilt_//1 f71•M7•Ii.•I 117 11107 C, I'Y 1Ia71CT 1 IG[ 107[ at rtY.n\n,t IcatiJ of 'S COT F A 17110" II\CJ ,.N. Ct N A Allw.OfI,it 1�07/ t11-111 .1 1 l fN•N7-OIS-7 Ins 11Y. t V1 CF-0E Il CCIYM" �:w /..n -t1 .!}f." wL• 01 LOT 7f r. 07110�. TRACT 100. 41 7�7yf 'O1 1. A u[ 1C1y7�T'CD1(1C14Y 11711t Itr,f t� III W.tt7•.1f-1 17V 17% wn 7�I1TWI,CA 1 C 1 lit a r ffu/f/ MCI ..7N i4.� '�tt w N4\. SON 111 11 fN-10b01 • 17N pX .LIT Y A wI N I.fOCwO Int r -NN IK Ifl I1TIT• �EMKI\{j IW h tJ +1T Tl LOT 7J A/761/11 IN1, M 1. 717" Cou M11 E L1p11 S TV t Tipp w-MSyf1-S am RAM ry Ly11lT Y• ■II 1 gC11 r�i31 f.e y1p{{1C FC 1K 1n CQ.[IRZ LiN�I r 1 LAY! as A C74,/7/ M., N7•, •!.fir 11((����11,� n n To1N 111.111 "N X241" am list of LT�N11 I1lLT1.Y1 IK 1-11 67 o VV1I [[1 ���77RAf1, LOT tT A M CU."Mou Il7f„ N if UIT s A 117,111171 TRACT .IN r.M•II.N '=TMr 629-59 E r c. A. /eo% /606 630- /9 Poi of S. 112 of SW. //4 of SEC. 29, T-5S., R.6E. /B •I n 764t Ac. i _ " O I1 `r lrJ O/4A 111s1 "1 T,L 1' \ 1r.fy 4 ti 9r.1 9r1 V�M 1rr f/.fJ 9r lY 9111 9r IJ 1fiY 1P19 1° 2 24 ;25 ), 24 27 26 29 .30 " 3/ 32 1 .. 39 40 : 4/ 4?p� � 2f 3 4 5 o �OJ 3/fl ?©9 L ti ® Ji.e IS SB/YI /6 5.ltl SOUK A//KN ' O.I)Ac1 UMr 10. 3 { BK. 30 °05 22 I 628 k104 ' N o. e / d 8 f� . _ 23 /2 Y 9 >c,2 2. 704c. P,B 30 Bu4]9 vqS car B or s;; . y. BonrA .on a/ esl.fo � n f tc n c _s.� 3/I v9!]B ✓m sz vo ¢ 6>d64 ,bi RS 54/29 TRACT NO. 4980-/ MS 77/40-4/ _ TRACT NO. 4980 M.B. �0143-45 Oalo:G.L.O.; M.B.30153,54; 50054-66-4/274 j R/S 54/29 T�ro!/r�ir.-iz' 630 ir>. ./9 Y w!1,�21_v/4" ...... ✓UC7 $67 1 f Vf" •;%.CIA 17: G[--t--I 1T7 I1•'0 - l i 'MQ3 CI <,': � t . ' p�:eR n�:€36 us•Ife•earx 16:5 12s5o f 1r•evkk- : .. r ✓ (i,� r��sn r .CE %1• .C6:E"\U III043 t:r76 •S' LCt 3 0% CMCSC tint 4a7C-1 LET or;-IArn Ot109 07-01.77 155.9 SSrEN1.90LL ECO iNE YEAR 77-71 1D19r7270/ rl l 53191 Yr` 'r, ASSE55CE, AGGRESS. CES( MION EY IAA ISENT NO LI%D SIR It.PECS ARC; EYEMICNS NET in + ,L',C 2CS75 SNNTCRND :O5ERN D. 75100 011.006 630-196-022-3 1625 11,325 KIN! ITS, 1720t COOK 11 RCLYN C. T( 0-00 CIOCK N NIYSTACA RO ALr OISERRI CA 92260 1 31 T5 MMICK b�j 736 LSE CODE Rl CCN/EYAYCE 00166) O]/7f 11ALr._ LOT 1 M 0771040 TRACT 47SO.1 M LOT J7JOSWNMl7I T.im r. 6E660 011:ON6 630.190-023-1 1625 13775 Net' I'm 13650 N111 A52S DAL1 IOESEOTf R60N K. tt IWITE ME CODE RI CONYETANCE 431161 03176 0 LOT 5 S0 07710AO MCI 41E0-1 34 0 1:RD As R 77 P. I�Ito 016.0R6 aO•uo-ozl-s 1625 12000 WOW 17so 12775 Loll 1 306I0 `; T NK lit 1. T 000 i 4A N.ATSIA02 AN, SLT IESEet 22U 60 E USE .ODE RI CONYEYANT:E 076151 06/75 MIT U T0 LOT 6 KS 077/040 IRACI 410.1 _ 0 _ - _ USE G NiTtl6I11L1VEY pSpRT1IepLD�oECIO%fREEY9N 111300 011 06 6]C-IfB•025.6 J107f5 3707-A LOT 1 Net 1110 MIR, KIT A AN.ODESCRY.AIAYE in" C 0 ygiLLt UE CODE n t,Cy0.SYr�EppJAkCC lStill 11172 PIT E4 [t3 FORRTTOTAL�E!(R1 P240M SEE AUEU0»55 - . - 733546 IF MOppCr OOONOOOAAAAAART L. 10100 01 :066 630-190-627.1 2500 2500 f375 NlttCi PRMM6RPERE111r.NILL R C E-01 gITR07 CA f0.20 NO1lO0, USE ° TY tOAVEYAI;E I14932 69g5 rqY� LOT 21 M OSO/03 TRA:T 0Et USE C1 C1p D37p-.6S�AA LLCp LCT 2- SSNppILLT 1��it7Sp00R6Tf6LripA 511A 7 i60i 01t:®Oc 630.00.021-9 I500 rc: U6EC:000 IiiES CU:2viNEE3r30•149 0 tr.;5 C0 O4 LOT 22 M 010II3 UICT 1130 t!6 vr:-ILu m:•pry J 04Y 53144 67-61-77 ASSESSrEV-CCEL YC9 INE YEAR 77.71 (*W 270 OA;E 53119 RON EREM11M Ip 10 e ASSESSEE, ACCRES5. DUCRIDTICR TV TRA ism US LAVZ STR 11'2 PEAS 9R(9 ELt Y01ICN! HT T .9t 17N 263% Cp'Ltp7 1M I4 Ir 7 760N 111406 63/-196-622.0 ISOv ISOC Y Li04 15E (OOE6TAXES �✓c�NfIN3i-10117 // 1d .07 23 91 03,1/443 TRACT q10 MLO WON 17N Iff2S SKIT 1�06p1�_LT�,�^, 11CM IIC:1;WIJO-N1i flt/ Iftf fiE�++ 4�[ TA RRVCACBNYETUKL3,u•121076 NI.1 `0 LAI 24 A 0N/443 IEICT AJN M6 l R/[ ITN 26W f Nyll3 ��0N3l33-00N IN11 flt• i 6H•I9I•I3I-1 1540 ly°C r�OCiRI[L 1211N 08M / 1�C0 UI 2s me 001043 1,ACT MN 6N1 �U. 2 ((�6 3f-NN i[ IS=•0N 671-M-632.2 15% IR01 KJ 1.'N 21130 IIN �V111[ w M14 Nr% -N ULP2tR WJM7.R61Q NI/ C 11J;f 17 I40 ;"• It N Cf1...J !aA;• I .,1 Ry+RN+� t ' :1y1f rs.'gt uaar.•et:•. flsz4 .. or J•41 .�SNi1�' E�.•". ( -- 1!E ...Z n {5\.i1N:E �G6JlJ if N Q12i r•if+� P'i 1v 1-2 1a t7.L .Est110.16!Y_ ag'-!--t9 •< 5!I11 ti•4I.77 Rs`ESSPECi-Ct:1 Ito Ifi TERt 77"72 AWIC275. :1:: 551/6 • .. /•:';'\•< L:• •. ASSEsSEE. IrrCtss. :ES11IYt ICN Ya T:4 +Sr\: \S LA\L S': I,-" W7 '1_•1•I"h NT,' C I:53 CNARL S^IC •1R 2. 2752 11 -/"1 670.186 405.7 618 N1 C9k WIIX EELIILARITN ., TC -Ot it I7 �\CEJE t,^tAfi #))60 tI1bLCyE1 Et.E YY yy LEWET1S52E EE tat25S 11177 CEStrMiWC5EEE*5 %C .2ff64 YC!TCiRL 19125 OE 1 CANT T[[Mri CLCO C1M05 AM 4121400 ^1{{ 0 650•It6•469•1 775C1 47151 IC515C a06/y /0 RAtSEI AESNR TC i•La6 YERI MCA 42 18E 11C66Cd:tETAN¢ InN1 44/74 6S1 ACK5 NET IN LC7 4 7b 673102 It .551 CA 10155 L 2 CN 11150 L 5 C• 14155 L 1.5 i}CSC N/ AMI 6 [tpp 12JC0 41 IN 67C-If1-/OF! 270.5 2N9 "IT Lpp7Jyy I6Z UNNIIY�INVO ! "`0 t: -f0 USE CCCpE[�11 L =EYISNCC CS6 1062 07119 �6a 6 p0 TV LiaEStAI TIC%5CE SSES CATS 201aS - RAY MAX 1. f1224 Olt-4H 6N•Uh051-2 77t0 1251f 125C Ntt IDC t54aL RAY N.1:ARET M. Tt 1•N + PIT 720 DEP31].EOD A. 022" USE a CCM<EYAN:E 48 017 1517: MC76 nCC�M IN 11 1 2S 0"102! 101 SY 114 , rM�I1j-25 r sit CiXEyy4"L71 7u:N!'2s 1<sN 5 s!C 1110.0 6I1.60I 634•I90.012.4 2:751 Ar-UU EALIY 1C0 7 I 0 44 I2.25 —CC— ESTV CCN;EYAN;E 4:J�21 12;71 1( II1 C10 fW 1CIAL C!SC17o{j Cy1SES`A 03-10155 f ffM•IJf1f frfN•14f ff 1) PACE 5710 U•!I.77 17SE55PtN1-aiL TC: T-H YEAR 7::1 11:1.7270 d;E $7197 'E1S MOA' UM+t C! NET TC RSSESSEE. Att4M. CE5tRl011dN Ya ItA lYLT NC LIr S'1 i4 'ER7 MCI CLt"TICYS ACT IC N61 \7t"ALYIS a SCC1 AI -411 6J1-If1-117.5 125t 1250 PIT C/0[A7Iias It,,1IqrNIN EF tt6622 7C 3-N ME C�555Y/YL�CIN000p YYNA\SE pr 11263% 12211:2 0K 1•f00 y[ �i/L NtS[5/ ON IMU�KMTIRNMAM SE1EC5Sc7 51SEE 1S Ss 700f/11j ef 6N-110.415.7 N pit �= I i WT %KUkR �NQ 1 � M 7N Nil[1MK0111�MI S[[ `N[IOOq . 4ta IMMI 55IN 21=344 04-I/6.411-1 12M UTS Ntt Ti. T T C A. I80/, 7822, 628- /9 1,906 por of S //2 of SE. //4 of SEC. 30, T.5S.,R.6E. e se'vv"w Po.H //Z 74 //Z 71 p,y[ O A 9 /O l/ /2 1 /3 /4 /5 /6 V1 /7 /B SANTA GERTRUD/S DR J a PO o) — _ 90 0 630 /B 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 2/ 20 O O O 192 O / o> r o U l PPF N /0e /d0 B>ea r 125 o I ✓ ' h l/ /2 /3 /4 /5 /6 /7 /B j /9 J 20 2/ h // /9 h t./ HOMESTEAD R0. - mr e 1'69'S8'ol'N r ZZ59 BK 63/ ----- - -i�,F»; M.S. 26193,94 -Pines to Po/ms Esloles unit no. / MB. 4216/- Tract 2259 - oo/d G L o --- -- - - ASSESSOR'S MAP Gh' 628 PG, /9 RrVF/?S/0£ COUN'7), CALIF, i cs 4 � � 6 ' , ••L:7 ASSESVEN' 4C11. FC4 THE YEAR 77.71 (DD ots27(1 DA•t- 52115 i I Iy_rl::a A.N_M DESC41 of IS r9 IDA As N*. NO LAND Sip 11'J It" 14CD EI•_rpi1 V% 5?T 'C `•'1 ;7jC �Ml '• ! 01 611-t91-COSQ Z625 l00 01 - 0 f750 f_atc: +, l7 /L3 iC + L0))) 5-J I4 4I 4 C IAC 2•f1 iC +CrY 1754 I0G13 ••t Mf I .r• eps `%C r 64I,7CtOTN AN1E 'DµL At A C f'x I Y'10040 RATJ ilppCioi lf2zea L2E CCX CI .'.\VE11N:E CA7506 pl171 LOT 11 SS 0261013 VVEA TO lAL1:5 E5TAtEi PC4 UT! , LN'71 1 AND ilN it 2 -I 3f!! MO CM l ILLEP DEAN N. i0 100 OI - 001 2C25nILLD40CARL L. C 2C25 04 1E5" r,PIT Pap' It V PALn �S6 CALIF f2260 7271. W-F-,. U5E CORE IT (ON,'EYA\EE 05 11 01161 PAV DE!'4T -e N T!B 02f lOf] DINE! To ofLM3 El MI U T f>SSE ML R EB PO4 LCT� 1. MIT 1 �ARI [E 795E O2 CCi LAQjEPTTEyVILIRFE Y. rcf00 011.001 621-1f1-007-6 2625 14525 41 ITSC 15AC1 NA41ON N., S. 21" DAbEnQC00E RRiIl2Tb00WETfN� 123643 09,73 4 1 1 VAlAm LOT 15 MI 02610f3 Pik" TC PAM ESTATES 72T1C ' dT WIT i _ _ _ - - _ _ PALM cL2,N '- — t6E CCS£ 4 NICE 1RnA M. /100 OIU_00: 621.191.001-7 202! 2C25 POP LOTS I. n/T 5CNS TR 21-S-M-7-0 TRUlt D E Lx G0 NIT D 0 SDx 60102 TESn AVNEX pp66 i•61 IC 00 AND "if . 1 USC LOSER YXIES'[0'YETA\EC CA 7l06 Os'11 �. ]1!] MA/f6. LO7 If XD 0261013 DINES '0 CAM ESTIfEE 4 -ILLy5A'.LT WIT I n/i OALISn 72732 J:s,s 'ME CC=. R: :CRAM 11iNEp 1Na R. I40 01e•001 521-BI.00f-3 2025 Q TC25 Wy LOT! 7. M/i 7J)I6 50,EMf AD t0 8-4G 2!^^ D1LN OCS+pi, [1 97}I60 ANO -_NIT 1 U5E CODE 1i CON2E'T ANEE 096131 13177 T3 M] C", LOTi17 IS 0261093 Pp,E5 /0 PAL-5 ESTATES li M.rX C6e r, NN ! — f - / I, 1 V Mll 07.01 i7 ASSESSlEN7-ROLL TCZ IRE TEA; 77-71 (DC4v:2L107 DAf 57ffi6' /741- MESSEE. ADCDESS, DESCRIPTION FY IRA ISMNt NO LANK STR i('. Ep5 DRCD EEE+DT76Li NET IC ASSESS 1:V 1.475 CRpf XAiNEtlNE R. 510000 611.0801 621.91-010-1 2506 10000 4OY 1754 10:54 CA"_SN J^eN r Pit BOX 2 1 1 4 UPCY IZ:R114 i+ILn 0E5C01 G /7160 _Ai �y�l L[ USE7Z IEL AIR RJ / nll 4hi Ll1 7 UE RI CpvETfYt[ Rflf71 BS 172 S TIfASFEEL LnTt 1f 03$261013 DINES TO 74Lr ^'ATES j L1*7� P A[ ry j•1 LASITO E S4NC [QNSt t CEY i4C HO 01e-0%1 621-I11-011•9 2f 25 f'ii �Nlt 3 c 7I!y PIT J54M ySypDpOp G�OV SIE C t0 6.00 - ]Sa] vj fffffff {OLD 1OOpp t1YF3 �f7f•f000R3135 P01a pUySEE LJ9 1'Y pMMEYANEE I39177 G1176 nllcm w PILP�EITAi��lytt �]'45 02i101] DINES tC 'ITCI�(�7 [Y �. I.N22-�'� ^^T'pA 11C0 YXCR X4 77" 01 -641 621.1f1.112.0 U25 p2! u!L c A SR ASfpfLN PO35!NRE CDT 542 TC 0•00 11 Lot ar"C 2r E,fVMYET6N2 1O"GA 12176 // AW Ui1 pa LLC��O}0}[ b53 Am,PM O Af[5 UY{�y 26/MS PM f0 DALM! 7C2 NilIN" 7 { 170071 Ib1 K. T`IN ill-off 621•I!2-NI-] :625 12150 Ncx 1750 t]fri „1 j{a Iwl 1w1f1 LNu �E I1 UlE}G1 PI CCMYEfWCT 6319117 f314 }� WIT 1412L/M!VAI 10 P" EOIATES No Lott�r i Ito 11AI 12•a if25 ICY 1 " 15706 X1RIAtN 'CIA, X LLN �{SE�yEI�n��1h ' ��I a-�1 An-112.17 f]x ` il[CC! 11 A2MfNCE 06711 044i C�7' , t7Ap t a. . ^ I I` • ..,i. �' - '}.'1 VI•[P2-P`.3 .' :A.S Ir SI - I I . • 3 :'6 CR. +In S •' 'a IS EAAISS It•-11 3. +�+Ar OUIY"r, }.110 II -Ifl 6N•Ift 4*6.1 175 fill Y e,-: 1:�:f'1�7•L:c Hf•7-191:� 1i�:CURi,} .n f:R " 1:+ R: sic ••+ t tt :;Y.'.•IY t f3}Iti a 76 Its f ulrt, a Ut HJ +:ns vAL^! LlIA:ES . ."39141 CA& •1L[[ •, Flim 2So0 alljol 621.112.017-f 2501 los•! - I:S' II VS LE9:1 Wit L O'ILE LCO41 _ 1 - tf,1E,M1I.::..Y't�l EA Mal •2�)f,B,15}1 C C_ tl LCY'.`PArt %I t27•'S 1261g3 PIPES l7 all^! LSIVES rill AI} .. f +.. }—+••,1 I 47.01 ASSMFUT-lim!^J lk� SEA; 77-71 l»vrrT01 ar;E swo C7-ti •:'K V• ASSESSEE. AC.RESS. 7ESCRIP•!35 It 124 RS-%t NC LAY; SCR I. PETS Ply EIVI' :Y5 W •' ASSESS 1100AS AL{{1[[Y41 E. food fi •0C1 621.192•CCI-0 WS 143'5 •D, 110f Is.60 A rR lTRE% StLf53 1E[CLLL A19 17 #: E-OC 17JL---; SA.�T.{((�1R :A[•COJE R1Ift7 CMEY19LE 16t6P2 06114 fALMMlIrUCB.IS[at 1:-A10[11111JEEfINE GUMS PINES tJ O/,FS ESTATES PON `oEsCI'y R lt'$ ALiMLA Ti301 011 061 Rf-Ift-10}-I 2540 IiAtS :t I:at 1.•!:5 LN ELIZAr) 7 N 1[L Ait 0• 4- n* 1614 LA n r COT RT )ttAO 7�� CACC RI [MYCTAv( tl111f7 011ia �A1�L 0:1 2l AS 02i/N3 PINES 10 PALES E514TES NRNR• RI po UT f. +IE: !Mt P. 100 ilt 001 621-192-011.1 2t25 2EJ6 3963 am A 666l 4 1 Fli Cp([BSyM[ TEA` } LO 0.10 ypLpP1 r All' 1f70 OOM/13336 IOiO L� USC 7T CCA:CTAN,[ 409111 11'74 NYCA011 7 LOT 1f 1NIOf7 r iK5 t0 P11r3 ESu1E5 .,L(��i1 All 1 R4FCOOE zw �I tr UK at CCCppWpa Rl[ A, It 11 -011 RI-If2.O11.2 7750 I2oH s 1'X law J«U1s k 771A4 IKK iEM r3 iC E-OP Imo Witt} 7 A, OIL" XM4 1226 JIM NJ 1161 LSE C07E p[:CT.N[E 4121n3 M'74 LCT it Pa./ INI TOI:I '25f 1OIE or T 210E `` FIT I jN ar� Li. #s0O 011a01 422-112412-1 17M 113:L YC• IJ: 13.7! `Cr a U II SiLF-.E•AYCE 1113.4 03 76 Lot 12 9 0211�1 iRIF Ns) S/S7 4 SSSMMM 21LC 1 1 I 0'J 6211. 07-15.77 A3S'SSKY7-Y:i;,a fi[ YEAR 77.71 MfNr2701 .47 5" 47y1•11 •:LF) V.• 'L MANKE. AM M CWIPI1CN 1• 111 &SKI M air sit t , rLJf q7P WAI.ICNt 1LT it of-yalI Put Nlf+. Vast oil-oil 671- f2.1J-Y 17A 12-64 , 1274 R b I 11 M au 111M1 N173 -01 t(7lrr 17syNytIMI 704C' all" �0T( r101f, idE it C. 4,46"01=�1 6N-If2•ru-1 tM SITS sea Iv. 1416 f MtIOM IMP j , I A NO 67.01-77 _ . -- IS5ESS-F GW➢ ;, FD41+y lTAR 77.71=__ (c:cr02761 cAF 52330 01-0I-77 ASSESSEEr ADDOESSfCE5t01c7;Ok :7 1RA 1SYST 0 LAND 512 il7`Y'.-"grFRCY E3!r112L'5 %?l iC ASSESSiE, A..aC RiFAULT ins 011_{2Y 621.112-012-/ 7S/ 5154 �` {ifi w.Clli[ ON NTVVY r i4 f \ I'itG'iC Lk YI°ikA I!1 iibp wif LL 1;Y °/1 X 1 M r•C7i OTC4 ddd Tr2q�., { fec.f r 44a GA if. a dALP rp :e`Pf2 64 diLLr. 0 gt 1 n2v 'li. C[1C 11 CM*t .'7E 116110 12,76 'BE C4 RI FEkYEI VT 9 R1 M2,061 TRAC' 2259 ,OR L013 6, 26 A 51 CE Aka Uhl' 3 CA 02/ :2 TAYT ALJCf F.xC p af53res� 7A Q[/Ef� 022i0 #tt10 /10.101 fY1•If2-:!<-4 Ii25 IS225 'T•xl 1750 I51co • `A Mi �YifSOTo•20.� V!E COBE 11 [DN'Ct/VCE 161Nf Iil7f 0 12ifa°WRSER1,.,h V LOT 26 n 042/461 TRACT 225) j dot. O ER 922W /-fi ( USE CODE RI FCWlEY . i` ° F• two it/-0Q sZl-U2-411•I mo 1217J / Ir625 R0R Wi` {, 26 t S M9 /I )f0 xpkFdlGO RO tC 4 00 f/ °kkND LOTI ° C2 p0b 12 L11 SENT, CA 22266 7fS] ON ONIOf1 d 1I7N�iEAD q TWICE 1 [fN.r.At:.E IS!2Q IU1i LOT 21 AL 121061 TR41 2m �` �tA 2WAY" I H,'� 2ARi0OfF CAORiE R. "A'i 41 •OOL 621.241.662-1 I%4 AA 7 USER 112i0 RI7 30 R 03HEA1 AVE ;;-` S-{6 ) 51X RI CONVEY d2.Lpd Ar.CLES, CA )bon 1q 7 W[UOCyOCE °At 2p{pCMMONICE ��0"119 °tni bff]UYM�CN10fi02+01zf 3153 3410 At0Y�g1 2,012 1A1i74fC[."tv loot IMi //((r,,LpLfOOCQ 4 f. HrtL „X�i{t{0 ^°i KMMLc M YA NEW T,•,n ?)xR 415-0�621-Y.i-"5-z I3" .A57 Wh F! Rj NA wav �762�L7R3p10�Ef1�11�EEt ) I3137 -0 �ryp�pR LOT R726pj0 6rtEyt if ,6Y10lpRE LACLpOE 4fy1 2p6T02CLx.,tTgk'C{C{ 143293 @ 5 ]ff3Uii0f ]ff7U° R4CCSf '112 ik� IBC-^N itt;?J) r rublloe 17ii-77 I5r5^ST-:_-;•FCS Tx YCA2 1A:1 L6PFw q q•27 ,E 5n3: {:- Oi97 fIM.12E. A=+iE73, Crstat•'['r FT Tat +srr• R: LaYZ SYR ?rr s2:3 of;; C=Ic of W. 15 k54tw . Amm {"' R U11t1K:. SS]Cl fllii L21-20t-CN-) 17i1 kr37 r,�{n p�• A�11111yfl�1lYy�i{,f{ �•LL /-t f( YEYYfOff�Ry�1}3 �r��lf 1°O*1) J Cx M2:012MIP1 ill C4aalp,LMC7 2R3 1�MVfY A11�E IC_ UTO 0 ma NOW, fRf fixf ) R1 ix•xl-{a-) Iw )N/ k[f. 17f1 Mn � .. aE cbot a tonn I6II RllEE 7f urn ) 6 FW ' —�_-- 63/-25 T C.A. Ieo5 Poc of NW.114 of SEC 32, T.5S.,R..6E. /9 4 J�a 5ips !'-zoo' 1' ae I / 46 � I� I 4 I 2 a 2 N 2 i f e I P 9 /J.YJAe.i > /3 ""• s SEE _ MAP 44 I _ _.._Jeso lf� OC3 LOB/LO/ 11 L93 ze+/.LS Od2Ip1 5a 2_ /2_ b7w YG 27 MB 79122-24 Tract No 5053 4 --: Oo10 G.L.O.;PIS 25/40;2-C-59 ns 59/39 ASSESSOR'S MAP BK. 63/ PG.25 RIVERSIDE! COUNTY CALF. - cp 1 APR. 1967 �. ' n . . :•. :I Y Td C:6 n1 to "tf:.ISI".7^. 9 Cfe A.YN ACC /1 `0 i+1.14C•091•! 225 pY, �AC7a2eg• +A N1r\IE ESE : N 1 IT ?2J P�'.5nlCI Nll if'aJ.' .• [CvfCN\:pP SSF44FI4 C4.74 it, it N3 E31rf9 Ci ACit iC:Ai\ N.CEM D�1C N 0SE[F�SItSSRPS TA ! IL+£ p-Le�A� LvA CA YCN TYD4'.:, : LET 9 13 0M1 • .•I7n• nlr.,4nr 1£ 334a 07.01.77 ASSESS✓.ENT-ROLL FOR 1K TEAR 77-7A� fOR>NY 53N3 0 \ 27c) DIaE 07.01-77 ASSESSEE• ADOCESS• DESCRIPTION TV IRA ASNNi NO UNJ Stt ilY DERS POCe ETEFD-1C4' All iC ,DL AwE6SEE. 23w 1 51 R03� 1�35OC IMES 116000 011A C :005 631-25C•001-6 29600 29C00 G 7 m;may F.1 1.+\ USE [ROE OiV R �CONYETANTE F31IF3 OSIIS PP G040 0 721�',+V�lla�% � <a„ 'f JI ACRE N/L 7N Pr AY 114 pr yr(32 -Se ROM IMS _ F609 Sp1Al PESCOIDi 104 bEC RSSESSCP. - LR [S rO LET !41 311LH I030 SILVER AS IA iC752 Olt_R0 P O V, E kQ �alN I LITE Ca DY1 ISF _TG9WINZ5 Y IFf II172 6L1A '. LEE C= 3.I5 A[RC I2 IN SEC 32 15S V6E FOR IF 10 AL OSESgCpR:fP,�I IN SEE ASSE35M NAPS LOT TO NO 637/JH Xis E0ILiYEO bpgIDpOLLA 1SSOCIAIE9 iR204 OIF:OFS 6J1-250-007-i 2050 2t� R "Val 1 2525 MlT pYCLlN7{GDElE1tR1,,CAAYE 92260 0 ME UnE IT 1 USE AM YT CONVEYANCE !Ii22[ CRp V� p 32 n LOT i£ PJ q7/MI RAyA FW i0f6iN0Eb[RIP SEESAM 550RS Y.EAOr 6GO�CX NAR• 1 917 �0!D[ 129 L q pL LA C'JINTA CI N11 Il.,OESE07 A AVLS f226C IiC000 011_FFS 631.2S0-OII-S IL170 r0500 �CC� f12M 1750 IS:aO L 0 ! 17X[ROE n •COYIEYANCE Lqp 1 pr�F LOT 71 Nb 437101 FFLCS FO�RpIOTIS)ALL�yCOESY CrIPIIOR2SE,1SSESSO%! RALAIMN YILLtAN at A 91 HK 14)S NI 1AV1 OE Ct'. U93 lm f2255pp II6400 OII_FF! bJI45J-OIJ= 26600 2KA0 1 J7E IF 'CH USC CODE YY 'CONVEYANCE 0541f3 /5115 9 13 33 ACRES I. U& I4 SCR w 114 OF SEC 32 15S R Y+L 7:R 0 _ FOR 1G1AL ES IPLICN SEE ASSESSORS N/T 1 VfLE ^.. T I7SEDCCQEAi`Iia. j LOT 72 A 037101; PnF-ISnf u4F•IN44 l3"s 51a47 07.41.77 ASSESSTEN'1.4OLL FOR TK TEAR 7741 (PPPNr270) PATE 53464 07.01.77 RS_NS NE1 :r' ASSFSSEE. AD IM DSSCRI;llcN FT 194 ASTN1 SO LAN' 579 Tit fEP! PROP EVE"T!M K1 TO ASSEM. I 1[9t0 1IilL'RwLLNMY+lSCf4 6 2260 16010 011_015 6Jl•26G•042.1 I500 I500 M(NSAj7�3,ORyL f`1;(RO�A��R Y UK CM TT COMAKE IU919 11172 C 0 05 { (1``1cA3lRb Ip N[ 1 S[( S2 15S {[ USf GG 4T OgyC.(IyC 14 aT 6L27CR3%FCi TCIAL [�00 LOT N PN On.Y10 Si3 MLR . tFWE f22M T• 0)F�i ul-iw•110-! 1454 1454 pall 0 . fi0'IJ1{K C0c0�[ 1fL Orpfp�'ETOKt AVT \ IRSL. FO0 TS7�YOpalrlfFd Fu� 1 L 0 Iwn Lot Y3 onWrIIf /00T0UEi9[ :w I1S•M!631.2w-611.6 Am AM 13414 tat 7100MUT 4 MU I 10 tIn►M 4_1L00I!s-1/f-P_SU.331M — r c 9-9 T. c :• /BOO, IB05 co3/` ' -18 por of NE //4 of NW. //4 of SEC. 32, T.5S,R.6E. /I / eK 630 SBE. 151-33-39-2 �Po6. )ePo ➢pas rogl ,pro p'v p YO.M ➢OM AI.CO ➢a.a0 yb qr S.S. A.J. Oo /5 /4 /3 4 /2 ° // , /0 9 8 7 /° (D 3.40AD.= BUCKBOARD TRAIL _ � cos e �"� o!f➢ DO Cd SYl oo K.Oa a.00 Sbro mpo m(b Pom vOro .Mao 18 /9 ° 2 2/ 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 O a / off. 2) C (D d 20 a ✓� ,/ 9a 9. Ya 00 900 D Ya 00 ➢a /OC.00 e-1� /M.pO /aa�0a /B2 roPo /g9.LN /qJ<y IpJOa /N'J.pC 3 ' 1 m � Q o 43 /42 4/ 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 as.L• »aL 1 !> /a uo 1- / BROKEN ARROW TRAIL p/L>B N9➢SJ6 J LOI C DD/f /Mao /aOsb /Oa.M /rom /o0oa /aO.M /00-W IW.00 //J J9 0 44 J 45 ° 46 a 47 48 49 50 5/ 52 53 O<r( O(O Np N[P'A0. C >H /4JW AAp. kV RJ /W.M /lb. /O M>s• 51V - Y;a — M.8 33/3- Si/ver Spur Ranch unit no. 2 - --- oam:c.L.o. 1 I ASSESSOR'S MAP SK. 63/ P6./B i RIVERS/OE COUNTY C41./F- 1, —� APR. /967 i I CIMC". 611.1K, '3 2 60tC 16.C: 1'. %9 n,. )\ ::2 Irr 1:• cr Sr: S� }tbs 7-C !"V +:+r 2L4fulot l4e lCE' Ij^C!"__r >;,;1.1 rIqe f,::d0 nr; Ac}CE IA'ti,3 r 7 M I pOtA`^�R`0�f;AC6cL i77 {{ T7710 Olt its 63t-16/•/OA•b ti6 1T C_ U,� rr LnC CCtL fin` Grp\:OA\YC tlttt! I1172 LCT If n orm f6.LiC 1•Rt5 •. Il M ♦[ 114 ppr rt N , t11» iC4 IC:II CES_RIB{ICV SE[ 3;sC C 1 «I n�-�•n� �c " AMA I \y M/I Syf1�YA a� P ` RICwAR 51 OO6 11 00 67t•I i1.00t•! 7b7E6 SS40 U5C CC" rr G M! 6AN 1 1 It t•tC 7f:tC rlt 10I S Soma CqC 6P RO6 LCT 02 M7 C33 1�M 5Soma }tTf2 Irli 7 L>•� c:.E S01 f0\'M 00ExA\YE MA%n tit 10111�ESCSIsi jCV`SEEr1 CC '5 55 7... r..;-Vr.r 147t 07-01.77 ,f - - %m!ERT4CLT.KOP­iaE-vw_;.7=7 (SOrrr270) fix 53,35 07-91-77 V T 'C 45SESSEE. ACCIESS, MSCRIOIICV TV 114 ASW MC LAMC 51Q_-,Try sERS A,' MT "TIQM5 VE' IC At 13•35 ARt EARL M.0. fMEO OIta00 b7i-IU•OOI-3 20M i6» ' N;A 175E t}S/ DTrrA 6 €L J `IMI rELBA M. iC 0 ;�a F TN yp• 141I• 121" �� Rµ1 C 11R}22 01 1 CCS1TR it xARE /26000 02176 IbE: RI CC 1 UT 16 o 433/eU SILVER SM RAMCN MIT 2 � LOT {S rs C33/CC2 BSA1LLCCON i 7M« MLOMIY vI�Nli M? �t:R4 altttR 631•I61.442-« »4 7I44 S}E4 M DEl✓(� RTRES Nil 00 SILO1RtRAINE BLV 6314S 7 LOSfUAC%6a175'Tts 90005 RAMI:lID OILOS V I240t k IVASEt COCE RI CW.EYAVCE 112450 I0171 tOtlP[AMC'Ilz t LOTS IMS AR 033/002 SILVER SOUL RANCN MIT 2 BLROT`` K 7 00�N3y3/E002 �1• NM7LLLIMAM mn F.RTWE I�E. It100 Oit_t010 671•1e1-407-5 20M 5000 NCti 1790 bi» BR117AIN ELRpVj. `� ffiE R111226000 YAVCE _.�--.- -.t-.a�- l` 73Ttt5tt l} f'N G/WENIA[�hr, LOT IA N6$331002 SILVER SOW RRA'CN MIT 2 R O r`61 ANi 117C0 m 11 CC Ota LEROY L. 43200 OI 33/0C2 A JARS C. lC t-00 10100 MIT 0 60V SIGNS OCOR2 R 7pyL�M6IDxlllll [A }My [ % L% CO•.E 6R7} Cd1TTAVCC 40405 O.R7 M/tfQ •7 IRc T So LOT 13«f 4331002 SILVER SOUR PAAYN MIT 2 M�SM R f2260 V3E [ .E AI CO LOT SS AO 033/0C2 7 S'SS CCIVL ILD E. itt46 O1tat0 67I-Iti-6t5.7 2CM 7675 dC7 1750 »50 LN p6[y[NATC1 It R'�F 4^7Nx E. LOE MCA 673cn O6n3 (�j�L}yL�byI �iN(�NIR pplpCyy UT 12 W0331W SILVER SCJO RAVCN"It 2 1A[M ¢j„}226`p LLCC[T 6LLCC}''MR t331OC2 11..r u.4-120.. Jot /HI-77 ASSESSM r-1LLL OCR IRE TELL 17-71 C01Or27n 02X 63436 a7•S3•T7 NEE tC ASSESKE. ACYESS. ChCA1rr10M rx 11A Aim PO LAL'C SIR IIV.Ef3 POOR M1011CM5 LIT IC A •sEs}ct, A,^I if Xn Q C ' 6 IMe6 a1t•600 UI.167•/u•6 2oM u60 MfV 1750 1.» L[CPE 7A .C: CyOI I{{i.�Cj,,,' ' 1 1C -N LRE 6Srf,,�A11¢�NCO SI mA6a atom a2/6} UKJ�xWE6S. L01 13 0 fWOU SILMD WO SAVII CIr1T 2 Let To mg f3Mff3 11 1PH 11t 0/ fvat Ina r.ri 7ff1 To n:ao t Ara tlfYf not Am, LOT If N 133/10 S3LVE6 MUf Or01 mi 2 WJt{p313SD_J. __4m"ns•aR1.13t.16t.6r.6_—wa-._07fa_ __ _ - -_ __......_ __. _ r a j{5.0 11 -f K3 a71-Il1•!"1•. TV 01.' • . 1 i Y;,y 1• A l,nr c, n t %. Yna lone i:.6: '.CI 1 •0 1!3 02 SIL'.ER 1� R tort-AU 2 NILCV NNty A. 2V: Woo 0 Q110.i0100 631.181.610.1 2025 BUR 1C9h AI`Gk AAiN1fN\. IF .SSri 1 tyC t0Y P[Afp !` 5�� SA Vv([[ Rp 1 l!'1. LC.LCR,1/2260Cr.RA%LE Let 7 FS 033002 SILYER Sa R QAKN CNIT 2 T••i-IIT.. _ T.Tl•12.r. 1+Ci, 53T22 07-01-77 15SESSAENI-ROLL FOP I.Ft YEAR 77.71 (11RAF270) P1;E MAST '-EC +0-r771"_N7 NET 7E ASSESSEE, ADDRESS. OESCQIP710V FY IRA SSW NO LAND VQ I/V PEN PROP EYECPIICN NET TC I3035 MIT P 0 AMA RANCHERS ASSN {p IC200 011:100 631-191-011-2 50 50 I of cc . DESERT,YIN C VIEE7&WEE g 0ie73. 02177 4 C 1 �.[IACCEO J/001 INLYCR SOUP q L E AN CFE 0EpLYN INCH UNI1� _- - M15 pAIF OESEGI. [1 12260 10000 011:000 631.112-001-E 2175 10075 NOY 1750 IOSN 7D27t AUtKrkRD TO uC CODE QI CONVEYANCE j 13035 ACT 1118�S 0331002 SILVER SWR RANCH MIT 2 ; / /iECVCrOON CLI IAY E. 10300 OIE_04 631.1/2-002.7 2025 7300 ` NY)Y 1750 7575 FA P 0 JEO 716 4 1 PALM DESERT, CA 922" 7]n T USE C COETANC Li I1 HIS 033/002 SILVER SNP RAVEN N:li 2 L 13036 1 OI006 1AIMI N Too 01`-000 631d12-003-1 2025 9600 1 ItBS F FIT .TIT LDS FS 12ASLVJ 10027 T` 0-00 I ' LOS ANCELE CC 73301 OUCK WARD TR 7 CALM DESERT 12260 li USE CODE RI CONVEYANCE 037622 03176 ` LOT 20 FA 033,002 511 AER SPAR RANCN UNIT 2 j UNIT SIERRA.NEVADA In 42300 01E_000 631.182-004-1 2025 8550 le5'S P11 VAZ) 6EA d AVE tC 0 CG 1 12.66 77y21AACGNOe ANAw v6z1C3 RAEM R 92260R -r IfSc CIA Cw/ETAV[C 1+0107 61/76 � tl I LOT 71 AS 033/002 SILVER SPUR RANCH UNIT 2 .a L PAIL SS%23 07-01-77 ASSE55AENI-41.1. FOR THE YEAR 77-71 (111K271) PPE 53TN PW E%EMT:C% NET IC ASOC�SLSLLCE.CCEE#DOOM, DESCOIPIICN TV 724 ASANI NO LAND 510 TIV PEN NCP tnOlID13 MET TC 111N Owl 1C1/0 410.,100 631-1/2-NS-1 2025 fast Arc, 17N f12a 01f SAS 2PCTTO k. awl 6MAtlCE 47f491 *SIT? x LOT 22 TO 033/02 SILVER SM IRKN Wt7 2 N U FI lA 1 idlE-. 6356F Q1'_0iQ 631.102•IN-1 2125 11366 I= ITN teals � 91 SSE ! IC 1/L ACWPE11FlCE 101 tf� Le O 111 031/W fiL1ER"am"UNIT 2 IM�lar[Tmam�y O6 01f��A,aT J. T N N1•Itl•Nl•2 "It77N 11lH 6T1 U[ fY "[ayR7NQ N177 C NN '1,' ,_ ; ,`., .. �--,:' tlC•t F" ANP16n <C/-} >C2J IIYi^.. A:It svilkv COW: 77 _ `¢ . r � `� •Ct �+ .:W'i:2 lIL:`:"c.A eA%'I cP 9 f •A.'P. ;FPA 9, yttc 0TH, 6]I•ISz-U9-A ILA 025 ,: Lc I[ ! x .fs. 11 [esREuNC[ I30I5 NrU i iM LTl 2L 'S VN37C:2 SILVEV 5T1'R RANCH'.1'It 2 N1 •go fill-112-010-. 2C is IRbSC {: l?b' IVfii r_Si J� 307 AgAIP" 10 �- PA`M HkRP`12ho tK [ t 01 WGEYWCE I0731 PI1L! LOT 27 MD 031002 SlUtP So-R RANCN'NL' 2 .re\•IIAA. ♦nE-ltn. cAb. S147. 07-01.77 ASSESS'EAT-ROLL POP TRt TEAR 77•:S (PR;1127c) PAf SN3! ° wNE l C\S N-7 TO ASSCSSEE. AD6RESS, MCNIPTION TV 104 AS'" NO LAN: SIP TA PEN ARE' EY['OTICNS A'E' ,C me UE XCCL`LE�pTgERGVE!ljC,iELOTL,EELiCtAL 10700 010.00R fill-1Dt•Ol I.S IA75 IA75 fU%EtH D t2 1•h�11�Riq�JAANIE AOMEY 2N7 G 0 USE I Pit tL�N USE ME IV COWCYAN'CE OIIOOA 0t176 lOT M M 0331002 SILVER SPA RANCH L•Nl7 2-- - — KDWI MIT IMARD EL6T0RD SWOO 01 •000 631-112.012-6 tI TS I0A00 N6Y 17s0 ICS25 7SOM TSiLARDPONENLAP. TR iC 0-00 PALM USE I PALM OESERT 1226A UBE COOS N1 -OWEYAL'CE LOT it LOT AS NO 0131002 SILVER SOUR RAVEN UNIT 2 1 5)0 y�SLt0MR0X LLpp r C 070TO •000 63I-112-013.7 2175 3675 G li ' �N DCfST �ITq T 71)/T x LOT O122 WE CONVEYANCE 053737 06/10 LOT 42 MD 0331007 SILVER SPUR RAN;N AINIt 2 -r 073m1 1NC t � . - ,� - vtlE t LONWWELLON*AMC. L72co 611-000 631-162-016-0 2175 3625 NCA 1750 Kim LOT I LOM6EILLOW VALERRpIyE TO 0-00 �1A120 E .ASIIiC�RVANCE 048392 04173 .R(p LOT 33 RD 0331002 SILVER SPUR RANCH WIT 2 K`C06 UCxI IR0 4AryA ANIA J. L900 OID:000 131-I12-017-I 2175 I3750 NCV I:SC I417S N33YA1 1 0 L01 I im R R7260N TP USE RI 2 SILVER$ 137723 II 76 ALA LOT 31 Mi 033/002 SILVER sW'R OANCN UNI7 2 N' xl LOT I ...L-111n ...E-1in• 1 PAX 53125 07.01-77 ASSESS'SA14CLL r]P lIE YEAR 77.70 CPAO[T270 PA7E S3A46 I U EltW, 16A1t DET 10 ASSESa[3EE y„ES t. ADDOL-S. CA10110N TN 104 ASMAT At LANC Sig 11V PEN ONES tY6fIICNS NE1 it V 2111 iLy1 p CEPRNPO.N It�500 010.001 e7I-U2•/11-I II75 $01 NEW I7N ]62y 1 122" TN P M 11 LCXIEYAN(E INSt/ //fN E ACT 33377 At sm/1102 510"sm RIKR ONIt 2 LOT 1 i7i1 jilt 111 IN L•TlT/l1Y NIlII 46171 TNII II= /0i 431-182•019.3 2175 1125 NOTITN fm Im /A0y 1 LIST i0 M I141/M8 SILV[!/NIR ipKN UNIT 2 am f. - SNM Stir S51-Ii2-$M-i 217! IMN Will LISS t fat I t ikw wfu 1t MI C 12111 TMN_ 1/___ __.. —.—. ____- -____ -- _ .ENAw N I pe1, C•C I.71 g5E55•E31-OC11 Fti !N[ 1E0i 77•a p:PrrTGI iAi gm,% �� V ' ASSE53CE, AI-RE!N. 8!t*iP7ICC 7V IRA ISNVi %: LAN' Sit PC" ICri A- .- 09t3 P, !T0500 01y.881 671•112.011.2 2175 12W cl 17M I'm .,n 1a Y. t ]Kg-t 73390 M N ARQP it CIt1 PAIN BLSER� s2z6 t5E C CE 91 CCN$YALTF /i6J11 16/6f '° LET 377 KS 031002 SILVER Ml 9AV'CN MIT 2 IF, Pm L`Ll}A SIN ['1(1LTN L. i(o00 010-000 631-182.019-3 2175 1125 SLY 17M M1, '_ANT O�LIidt5E97N5#tow22" TO 4 60 USE :E RI CONTEYAKE 061511 16171 TN61 LOT 36 AS 6331002 SILVER SPUD RAL'CN Unit 2 '1!E µ LCT RoomMYLE t:ENEYI CPCVE C. Vig1o0 0110 a;0 631•182.020.3 2175 1:30 IN25 NIT NENCY 6 GENEVIEVE NOYLE EFIJ Mc "I P 0"1 FiT tI 14LS 0 l? CA 922" fl 7] 2tO - 7 A9ROM IETAI�LE UC IOo21I IIl7! PAV LOT 35 NS 0331002 SILVER SPQR TIMM UNIT 2 jv LOT DEE P LT1OX INVESTMENT Co T7300 410 400 631-I92-421.4 1125 I KIT1673 GAMERVILLE CA 411I0 CET' USE CO2E YY FOWEYMCE 1oo/11 06177 C11 eIT LOT 34-01510C221LVEA-S9g1A1CH-oAJ 2 777; pEt1�1Y[iLt I A! 9. 45200 0 631 t A I 1.00} R0/tp1pp A0 f540 LIALLT 7CCC CChIEYAKE 011121 05173 f ]ACRES IN POO LOT 10 N6 0331003 SILVER Pit dtbuR RANCH WIT 2 NIT 73r PALI USE LOT 1 I 1 m•-i.... uA0-I2A11 DA s 51126 1 07-01.71 A35E55CEN74CLL FOR L.E N,AC 7i-73 CPRriPi%0> PI.3. SNAI f $[Er2T('N5 N?1 TE ASSESSEE. AOORES5. CE5CRIPTIOV FY 124 ASRW NO LAN; $1: 7 i PEAS PROP E1111%0 1 AFT TC 5625 ILEEM CpApRjAS Jut i.,71 513CO Oil 100 631.192.023-1 2175 10650 ex 17M I103 MNNLL LN [RI J226 1R -0 *,IT U3SC5 CCCC�NN3EEEES RI ppQCONVEYAVCE 100524 OSI%J I 77.1 iPZ10ARAA,NllgI 210741 N9 0S]IOCJ 51iYER� R — _ __ _ _ LLET 962S NCNTM:NARiAfEI 0. SIN C.0B-000 631•183.001-9 2175 11150 N:x ITS•. Q275 RAq Nt]I1NN IN E. C 4• 0 NIT )376f NAM TR PALM P fn" 7374 USE CC]! 01 CMEYAKE 437066 C3176 LIE LOT 64 MR f"1002 SILVER SPM RANC4 Wit 2 (LOOT CC4C0 j7Wj]�T23LLIAM DANIIEL 0. S7140 01 ;04 UL113.002.0 2175 12146 _x Or I2523 t���nyLL}690f1 W C RRIf % VAMEE Inn! 10173 Na(, LOT 65 IS 0331447 SILVER S►UI RAVOn WIT 2 LOT! I 7 1pMLL 1. 1TR J0n0 Oli_006 6)1•i/3-013.1 2175 7625 MCI :w irM .R( fTM 0KK 1 // USA f15 Cp7!VICU 092%2115M R�)rRt6( LOT 56 N f31/162 SILVER SPA IRVEi WIT 2 I 1f410.t00 631-123-m•2 2179 MCI NCI 17M 1370 UTIZS MIPS f22M �7CC"�W 2TAw,S I)S7Ei u1u IIrT LCl 67■13310021tLVER SPU1 I"WII 2 �I Ul �1 •7 fits Ic c'i ._. p ri fJJ tfJ 5i,•ii ,,l ^- V1,. SH': C7-/1-77 ASSESSEa7.OtLL tta 14 TJR 77.71 1P2:•,70 a.. SSgI ._• :A •:•;_4+ [?+ 1, A55ESSEE, ADCIESS. DESCRIPIIC% TV IRA Am, NO L1%. S+a Ili PE45 Pat- r,%rya•;•Nl N— LEONE '- SBl LEONE CHIQNI JP. ySC)00 Olt_,000 t]1442-02S-i 21'5 ICASC T± 17R 11C^v 133 E 0A RONEN AFRNE Ta 0 PAL!! SCORT 2260 USE CCCCE 41 CCWfETAMCE IOOY24 Ot/73 ,SS4ACA\ N7NwOCa2LOT .I IB OJS/04] Sia7t 5625 PCY.M.MACDA4ET 0. S610 011-000 631-183.001.5 2175 11154 is Illy1223 PCMTVM JOHN E. iC -CO 73261 ORVtN ARM la PALM DES CRT 92260 USE CODE 41 CONVEYANCE 6379" 03,76 LOT 4%n 0331002 SILVER SPUR RANCH INI1 2 WILLIAM DANIEL R. 5710 411.000 631-113-602-0 2175 12100 xC% I:SC In25 ICOfO PIT P 80%502 1C -00 7327710 CA AOOOY t0 12201 V W.PAL' �f2264 W. a 41 eDN•rtrANCE Inuf 10173 LOT ',i MS 633/002 SILVER SDR RA%C4 LNI1 2 16 1 "E BaDONAXEN DP:0Y11R 31200 018.400 631.113-003-1 2175 7625 I S7SC 7 3297PALM DESERT 92260 121E CODE 41 CONVEYANCE 02421 05177 LCT µ yKSSpyy0331002 SILVER SPUR RANCH IINII 2 MfENIV aEOpBA CAp1. 42C00 011-ICO 631-113-O0A-2 2175 13325 / Nt% 17M 1J79^, 125 PIT PACM pE5EPt1((AI iC }i26C 0 t / 131iif rOKEN ARCOY TO ID_ CC • 01 CLN;ETE A5571A 06'60 :f LOT 17 KB 0351OC2 SilP SF:,a aAN:X T'I7 2 Ir ...N•u•.. ...v-tz... 1 F2707 P17. 53W OP51.77 AUUS-C\T-t=t;t 14E Tt Aa 77.71 IPtPPr2707 PATE 53AA2 PENS PROP EtTn11CVS Nr• TO ASSUME. AC-QUS. :ESCR1PIIOV P; IRA AS,%I MD LAX- -12 1;. PEts ARCO E%E"P71LAts %E., TC 6n "CARE VICTOR WCC Claa-009 631-113-DOS-3 2175 13C37 152f! PCCARD -AAI iC 1•C0 MIi JIC CWYY%PLL401``0 CAN •AE2;t It P 6f22 LIS 01 CONVEYANCE 6433" 63i7: LC/ Al PO 033/102 51LYEC S-S fAGx CHIT 2 i2i1 TP3]6 ARCN61L+,1 tt iC500 OIE µ4 63 i•113.606•A 1175 131 C PTt3t1LL t o1wLM•W E6!2O U[P tl CON.LYAKE 17126515177 Ali! At MI 633/002 S1LK0 SPA RANCH MI 2 411" } q et10 411:=SO 431-143-667-S 2175 13a y met 170 134M OR, o2!tt{p6W 1t Itoo [AMPPOU 418O93 62,13 tv �M{pa2R"aim 4 GIILVER W MAKM WIl 2 631.113-m-6 112% IM.- V T H LL 17, l r ' / I i ' I / I I _1 - �v L f t WIL OPMENT NY 13 December 1978 Lloyd T. Morgan Planning Technician City of Palm Desert 45275 Prickly Pear Lane DEC 1. 1978 Palm Desert, California ENQ&PE 1 spU 92260 PERU Dear Mr. Morgans A s you requested during our talk yesterday, would you please reserve the following street names for our Chacahuala projects - Chacahuala Road - Whiptail Loop - Iguana Road - Gecko Path - Racer Trail - Chameleon Road As you will notice, I have not listed any second choices, only because I will have to go back to my biology expert if I need to come up with an alternate name of a lizard. If any of the above names are already reserved, please notify me and I will supply you with an alternate as soon as possible. Thank you for your interest. Sincerely, Chacahuala, �ZLt Leonard Greenberg, / General Partner LG,slw BUILDERS AND MANAGERS OF UNIQUE TAX SHELTERED REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS 10677 W.PICO BLVD.,LOS ANGELES 90064 I213I 474-7979 475-5550 I i 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 . September 14, 1978 Title Insurance & Trust Co. 3490 Tenth St. Riverside, CA 92502 Attn: Larry W. Violassi Re: DP 09-77 Dear Mr. Violassi : In response to your request of August 31 , 1978, we are enclos- ing a copy of the Negative Declaration for DP 09-77, we also state herewith that all off-site is existing and no bonds were required. Regarding a final flood hazard letter, you must obtain this information by writing to the Coachella Valley Water District, Coachella, California. If there is any further information required, please contact ._the Staff- of the Department of Environmental Services. C Ver truly yours, Paul A. Williams, A.I .P. Director of Environmental Services lm/pw/ks Enc. AUGUST 31, 1978 TITLE INSURANCE AND TRUST CITY OF PALM DESERT 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE PALM D>FSERT, CA 92260 ATTN: CITY PeINEER RE . TRACT NO. 11207 ' GENTLEMEN: i REGARDING THE ABOVE METIONED TRACT, KINDLY FURNISH OUR OFFICE WITH THE FOLLOWING: 1. A COPY OF THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION MADE JULY 27, 1977, CASE NO. DP:09-77; 2. FINAL FLOOD HAZARD LETTER; 3. COPIES OF ANY BONDS OR AGREEMENTS THAT MAY HAVE BEEN FURNISHED BY THE SUBDIVIDER OR A STATEMENT THAT ALL OFF-SITE IS EXIS3JNG AND NO BONDS WERE REQUIRED. ALL OF THE ABOVE ARE REQUIRED FOR SUBMISSION TO THE DEPARTMENT OF REAL - ESTATE IN ASSOCIATION WITH AN APPLICATION FOR A FINAL PUBLIC REPORT. VERY TRULY YOURS: C/� LARRY . VIOLASSI SUBDIVISION TITLE OFFICER LWV/BRH P 5 1978 Title Insurance and Trust Company 3490 Tenth Street P.O. Box 707 Riverside,California 92502 714 686 4180 ATICOR COMPANY - f • i J } ' 1 January 20, 1978 + I, Harold Housley Consulting Engineers J 73-700 Highway 111, Ste. 8 Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Re: our Project No. 7734-G Chacahuala Development Dear Mr. Ho ley: As you know, we are planning to develop a 140 unit single family' project on the 40 acre parcel located on the south- 1 east corner of Alamo and Homestead. You are hereby authorized to act as my agent in connection with the planning, processing and development of our pro- , posed project. This authorization includes the signing and processing of documents in connection with the environmental h application, Conditional Use Permit, Tentative Tract Map, y zoning and related matters. s 1f Very truly yours, Leonard Greenberg General Partner RECEIVED LG>:lsp CC: Paul Williams, City of Palm Desert JAN 25 ?JIj • ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY OF PALM DESERT STAFF REPORT ' To: Planning Commission Report On: Development Plan Applicant: CHACAHUALA, LTD. Case Nos: DP 09-78 and 126MF Date: August 1; 1978 I . REQUEST: Request for approval of a Revised Development Plan and Preliminary Design Review for a .116.-unit condominium project on approximately 39',acres located south of Little Bend Trail and north of Mesa View extended between Alamo and Arrow Trail . The applicant has filed a slightly revised .Plan which will be addressed in this report. II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION : Approve the Development Plan and Preliminary Design Review by Planning Commission Resolution No. 388 . Justification: 1. Proposed development will conform to the intent and purpose of the PR Zone District. 2. Proposed development willJconform to the adopted General Plan. 3. The site is physically suited for the type of Development proposed. III. BACKGROUND: A. Location: South of Little Bend Trail and north of Mesa View extended between Alamo and Arrow Trail . B. Size: Approximately .39.05',,acres C. Requested Zoning: PR-4 D. Adjacent _Zoning North - R-1 10,000 -1 South - PR-7 East - R-1 10,000 and R-1 20,000 West - PR-5 E. Type of Units: ;58. duplexes =- each un,i-t 1 ,639 sq.,- ft = F. Density: Approximately 3.25)du/acre G. Proposed Recreational Amenities: 1-1,000 sq. ft. recreation structure 7 tennis courts 8 swimming pools IV. DISCUSSION: The applicant has filed a revised development plan which provides for a total of 116; units. The proposed structures include 58' duplexes (1 and 2 bedroom) Only one recreation bui'l.ding is proposed where two were pro- ...posed previously. The number of swimming pools has been reduced from 9 to' 8 and the number of tennis courts reduced from 9 to 7. ._ The _-two major- changes in the revised Development Plan include the provisions of a larger L Page two CASE NOS: DP 09-78 and 126MF setback between those units on the east side of this project and existing development at Silver Spur south of Broken Arrow and the reduction in the number of proposed units thereby resulting in a reduction in the over- all density to approximately 3.25 d.u./acre. The Special Conditions of Approval still require the improvement of Alamo Drive on the easterly side, a masonry wall along Mesa View Drive and street width modifications. In addition, Special Condition No. 11 requires that the proposed emergency access road onto Mesa View Drive shall be deleted. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 388 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CONMISSION OF THE CITY OF PAL1.1 DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNOUNCING FINDINGS AND APPROVING A DEVELOP- MENT PLAN AND PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW TO ALLOW CON- STRUCTION OF A 117 UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT ON APPROX- IMATELY 39 ACRES SOUTH OF LITTLE BEND TRAIL AND NORTH OF MESA VIEW EXTENDED BETWEEN ALAMO AND ARROW TRAIL . CASE NOS . DP 09-78 and 126MF WHEREAS , the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert , California, did on the 1st day of August , 1978, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider an application from CHACAHUALA, LTD. re- questing approval of a Development Plan and Preliminary Design Review for 117 condominium units, a recreation building and common open space on approximately 39 acres within the PR- 3 (Planned Residential , max- imum 3 d.u. /acre) zone , generally located south of Little Bend Trail and north of Mesa View extended between Alamo and Arrow Trail , more particularly described as : APN 631-170,-001 APN 631-170-006 APN 631-170-002 APN 631-170-007 APN 631-170-003 APN 631-170-008 APN 631-170-004 APN 631-170-009 APN 631-170-005 WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Environmental Quality Procedure Resolution No. 78-32" , in that a draft Environmental Impact Report has been completed in accordance with the requirements of CEQA; and, WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, the Planning Commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify the approval of the subject Development Plan : 1. Proposed development will conform to the intent and purpose of the PR Zone District. 2 . Proposed development will conform to the adopted General Plan. 3. The site is physically suited for the type of Development proposed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert as follows : 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and consti- tute the findings of the Commission in this case ; 2. The Planning Commission does hereby approve a Development Plan DP 09-78 and Preliminary Design Review of 126MF for reasons stated, subject to the attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission , held on this 1st day of August , 1978, by the following vote, to wit : AYES : BERKEY, KRYDER, SNYDER, FLESHMAN NOES : NONE ABSENT : KELLY ABSTAIN: NONE GEORGE BERKEY, Chairman ATTEST : PAUL A . WILLIAMS, Secretary /tb PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 388 Page Two CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NOS . DP 09-78 & 126 MF Standard Conditions : !( 1. The development of this project shall conform substantially to all plans submitted in behalf of this case , particularly Exhibit A (Revised) , and as revised according to the Design Review Board process and/or Planning Commission action . Any minor changes require approval by the Director of Environmental Services . Any substantial change requires approval by the Planning Commission . 2. All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of the State, City, and any other applicable government entity shall be complied with as part of the development process . 3. This approval is applicable, subject to the development of this project , commencing within one year from approval date and being promptly completed. 4. Any roof mounted, exhaust or air conditioning equipment shall be fully concealed from view from any public rights-of-way and ad- joining properties by architecturally integrated means . 5 . Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building permits . All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. 6. All utility service and distribution lines on or abutting the sub- ject property, shall be placed underground prior to occupancy clearance. 7. Traffic control provisions shall be provided as required by the Director of Public Works . 8. Curb, gutter , sidewalk or approved pathways, and tie-in paving shall be provided in conformance with City Standards and/or as required by the Director of Public Works . 9. The Fire Protection Requirements as specified in the Fire Marshal ' s memo May 10 , 1978, attached hereto, shall apply . 10. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval , the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies : Riverside County Department of Health Palm Desert Design Review Board Process City Fire Marshal Coachella Valley County Water District Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the Department of Building and Safety at the time ( of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 388 Page Three Special Conditions : 1. Traffic safety lighting shall be provided at the entrance of Alamo Drive and at Mesa View Drive . 2 . All existing overhead utility and distribution lines shall be undergrounded pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code . 3. Swimming pool equipment shall be indicated on the final working drawings in every instance where a swimming pool is proposed. Said equipment shall be located within a building or placed underground. 4. Tennis courts shall be recessed a minimum of three feet and a ten foot landscaped setback provided between the courts and Alamo . 5 . Areas adjacent to the existing water tank west of the subject site shall be intensively landscaped. 6. Alamo Drive shall be fully improved on the easterly side between Homestead and the first cross street northerly thereof . 7. Proposed street widths shall be modified to provide a minimum of 32 ' wide streets for all interior streets. 8 . The proposed wall along Mesa View Drive shall be setback a minimum of ten feet from the property line and said area shall be landscaped. 9 . The number of proposed pools ;should be reconsidered. Specifically at least six of the proposed pools could be replaced with three larger pools which would serve the ultimate occupants of the development . 10. Proposed emergency access road onto Mesa View Drive shall be deleted. 11 . Unit 117 shall be relocated to the interior . PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 388 Page Four Design Review Conditions : 1. Final construction drawings, including a final landscaping , grading, lighting, trash storage, walkway layout , and irrigation plan in addition to a proposed sign program and tennis court lighting proposal or any other ammenities proposed shall be sub- mitted to the Design Review Board. No final inspection or occupancy permit shall be given by the Department of Environmental Services to this project until the aforementioned approved plans and con- struction shall have been completed. 2. Resubmit a revised plot plan to the Board prior to completion of working drawings . AGREEMENT I accept and agree , prior to use of this permit or approval , to comply with all the conditions set forth, and understand that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occu- pancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been re- ceived by the Department of Environmental Services. (Date) (Applicant ' s Signature) PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 388 Page Five DEPARTMENT OF FIRE PROTECTION } IN COOPERATION WITH THE \_ .. COUNTY , C� CALIFORNIA DIVISION OF FORESTRY R7VERS/DE .. ;.d DAVID L. FLAKE COUNTY FIRE WARDEN P.D. BOX 248 210 WEST SAN JACINTO STREET PERRIS, CALIFORNIA 92370 - TELEPHONE (714) 657-3183 Tri-Cities Fire Marshal 70-800 .Highway 111 May 10, 1978 Rancho Mirage, Ca. 92270 Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 I Case No. DP-09-78 & 126 MF Due to the long response times encountered by our fire units to this area, I oppose any construction in this area until a southside fire station is constructed. However, should the Commission decide to approve this project, the following fire protection shall be provided: 1 . Install-or show exists a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow for a two (2) hour duration in addition to domestic or other supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured along approved vehicular travel ways. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any build- ing is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways . A. Hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. B. Exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. C. Curbs (if installed) shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. Upon approval , one copy will be sent to the Building Department, and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Case Number DP-09-78 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal . " Very truly yours , - — - David J. 2/egal jklAY I Fire Marshal ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DJO:dt CITY OF PALM .DESERT CITY OF PALM DESERT STAFF REPORT To: Planning Commission Report On: Development Plan Applicant: CHACAHUALA, LTD. Case Nos: DP 09-78 and 126MF Date: May 30, 1978 I . REQUEST: Request for approval of a Development Plan and Preliminary Design Review for a 132-unit condominium project on approximately 38 acres located south of Little Bend Trail and north of Mesa View extended between Alamo and Arrow Trail . II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Development Plan and preliminary Design Review by Planning Commission Resolution No. Justification: 1 . Proposed development will conform to the intent and purpose of the PR Zone District. 2. Proposed development will conform to. the adopted General Plan. 3. The site is physically suited for the type of Development proposed. III . BACKGROUND: A. Location: South of Little Bend Trail and north of Mesa View extended between Alamo and Arrow Trail . B. Size: Approximately 37.8 acres C. Zoning: PR-4 D. Adjacent Zoning: North - R-1 10,000 South - PR-7 East - R-1 10,000 and R-1 20,000 West - PR-5 E. Type of Units: 15 single-family units - each over 2,000 sq. ft. 51 duplexes - each unit 1 ,639 sq. ft. 1 triplex - each unit 1 ,593 sq. ft. 3 quadraplexes - each unit 1 ,639 sq. ft. F. Density: Approximately 3.38 du/acre G. Proposed Recreational Amenities : 2-1 ,000 sq. ft. recreation structures 9 tennis courts 9 swimming pools Case Nos. DP 09-78 and 126MF May 30, 1978 Page Two IV. DISCUSSION: The Special Conditions of Approval require a number of modifications. to the proposed Development Plan that may necessitate a revised plan. An Ordinance requirement which requires)a 20' minimum perimeter setback . between any proposed units and the .property lines may require some ad- justing of the site plan. Further adjustments will have to be made to accomodate Special Condi.tion No. 9 which requires a 44' dedication along the southern boundary of the project in order to provide adequate fire protection access. Traffic safety Tighting' in addition to undergrounding of existing overhead utility distribution lines are being required. Other Conditions of Approval require the improvement of Alamo Drive, a 5' sidewalk along Alamo and. intensive landscaping on that portion of the property- that is adjacent..to the existing water tank. A revised plan shall also include the modified street widths as required by Special Condition No. 10. Special Condition No. 11 requires an additional mod- ification to the proposed plan by requiring the deletion of the following units: the unit proposed at the southeast .corner of Iguana Road and Alamo Drive; the 2 most westerly structures proposed for the south side of Whiptail Loop. PLANNING OBJECTIVES 1 . Both a development based on individual lots and a develop- ment based on a planned condominium development were studied. The latter was chosed for these reasons : a. The drainage of the site in relation to flooding from above requires a very definite wide drainage Swale diag- onally thru the property. It was almost impossible to lay out a tract of individual lots which allowed for the drainage requirements and produced enough lots to be economically feasible. b. In our previous project, we have prided ourselves on exceeding the minimum criteria set up by the planners of the city in which we worked. A planned development was the only way we could control the development of this entire project. The construction of individual houses on lots delineated by rigid property lines was too restrictive to accomplish a project of the quality we had in mind. C. As shown by the E. I . R. , the impact of an ordinary tract of individual houses was greater on the site and the drainage than a planned development would be. In addi- tion our control (and the City' s ) control over the design was far greater with a planned development. 2 . The final plan submitted to the City is the result of a great number of preliminaries, many of which were presented inform- ally to authorities in the planning and other departments of the City as well- as to the members of the architectural com- mittee of the adjacent tract to the east (Silver Spur) . The end result was governed by these major factors: a. The views both up and down the hill, and the orientation to the sun. The buildings are oriented along axes which are set to take the best advantage of the view to the mountains to the southwest and the view to the desert to the northeast. b. By setting the buildings at an angle to the streets and to each other rather than parallel , each home has a view which is unobstructed and looks past its nearest neighbor to the major distant views and also into the greenbelts it backs up to. This should be compared to a standard arrangement which sets buildings 10, apart, facing each other across property lines set square to the streets. C. The concept of a planned development also permits control of the entire project, including landscaping and has the advantage of continuous maintenance of all the open land not occupied by the buildings themselves. page 2 d. In conjunction with the.:overall environment for the project, it is our intention to produce a desert-like landscape which is enhanced by the careful choice of plants and materials which are indigenous to the re- gion but concentrated and artistically placed to pro- duce the maximum impact with appropriate species and natural features . Summation: The plan presented represents our efforts to produce an architecturally sound project which takes maximum advan- tage of the views, considers the problems of the sun and heat, insures the optimum privacy for the occupants, and provides for efficient maintenance. In addition, several charges and modifications have been made to conform to the desires of the homeowners to the north and east with whom we: have conferred as the planning progressed. PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE PHASE NO. CONSTRUCTION BEGINS NO. OF UNITS CONSTRUCTION ENDS 1 01/78 39 01/79 2 01/79 52 01/80 3 01/80 40 01/81 2153 North lEuc.0 Upll..J' Calilor.ia 91786 23 May 1978 Palm Desert Planning Commission City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, California 92260 Re: Case Nos. DP 09-78 and 126MF Notice re Public Hearing Tuesday, May 30, 1978 Attention: Mr. Paul A. Williams, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission Gentlemen: We urge that you deny the request for approval of the crostruction of a 132-unit condominium project as described in your legal notice dated May 8th. This area is in the path where the disastrous flooding occurred in September, 1976. Another factor to consider is the unappealing effect of high density construction. . . too many beautiful communities have been destroyed in this manner. As a property owner in Palm Desert, I trust you will note this past history of flooding and consider the aesthetics involved in responding to the referenced request, and deny this request. Thank you. Very /truly yo yours, Leland Scheu LS:dh 48-255 Racquet Lane Palm Desert, California t MAY 2 1S73 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO: Director of Environmental Services FROM: Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Development Plan 09-78, 126MF DATE: May 10th, 1978 1. This tract shall make. a contribution in the amount of $10,000...00, $5,000.00 should be allocated to Haystack Road and Highway 74;y intersection, and $5,000.00 to Haystack Road and Portola Avenue intersection. 2. This tract shall pay the required drainage and park fees as required by City of Palm Desert ordinances therefore. 3. This tract shall provide traffic safety lighting at the entrance of Alamo Drive and at Little Bend Trail . MAY I 1 I373 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT; t.. TO: Mr. Paul A. Williams, Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert FROM: Mike Murray, R.S. , Supervising Sanitarian Riverside County" Health Department - Desert District { DATE: May 9, 1978 SUBJECT: DP-09-78 Since we have information from you that this project will be connected to Coachella Valley County Water District sewage disposal system and domestic water, we have no comments at this time. 'r a i MM:js i i i t i i i i ` W F, a. MAY 15 - ENC�Ty SERVICES OF PALM DESERT i SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA gC1S COMPANY 3700 CENTRAL AVENUE RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA R.W.RIDDELL Eastern Division Distribution Planning Supervisor Mailing Address P.O. BOX 2200, RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92516 May 9, 1978 Location of Nearest Gas Main: Gas in Homestead Trail City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 Attention: Paul A; Williams Re: Case No. DP 09-78 and 126MF . This letter is not to be interpreted as a contractual commitment to serve the proposed project; but only as an information service. Its intent is to notify you that the Southern California Gas Company has facilities in the area where the above named project is proposed. Gas service to the project could be provided from an existing main without any significant impact on the environment. The service would be in accordance with the Company's policies and extension rules on file with the California Public Utilities Commission at the time contractual arrangements are made. The availability of natural gas service, as set forth in this letter, is based upon present conditions of gas supply and regulatory policies. As a public utility, the Southern California Gas Company is under the Jurisdiction of the California Public Utilities Commission. We can also be affected by actions of federal regulatory agencies. Should these agencies take any action which affects gas supply or the condition Under which service is available, gas service will be provided in accordance with revised conditions. We have developed several programs which are available, upon request, to provide assistance in selecting the most effective applications of energy conservation techniques for a .particular project. If you desire further information on any of our energy conservation programs, please contact this office for assistance. RWR:blc . Mp,Y 1 11 IST) ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITE' OF PALM (DESERT 46.10 Southern California Edison Company 36-100 CATHEDRAL CANYON DRIVE CATHEDRAL CITY, CALIFORNIA 92234 May 11, 1978 TO: City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Project: DP 09-78 and 126MF - Development Plan for 132-Unit Condo Project Environmental Impact Report Gentlemen: This is to advise that the subject property is located within the service territory of the Southern California Edison Company, and that the electric loads of the project are within parameters of projected load growth which Edison is planning to meet in this area. Unless the demand for electrical generating capacity exceeds our estimates, and provided that there are no unexpected outages to major sources of electrical supply, we expect to meet our electrical load requirements for the next several years. Our total system demand is expected to continue to increase annually; and, if our plans to proceed with future construction of new generat- ing facilities are delayed, our ability to serve all customer loads during peak demand periods could become marginal by 1981. In addition, the major fuel used in Edison's generating facilities is low sulfur fuel oil. Ile now believe our low sulfur fuel oil inventory, together .with our contractual commitments for delivery, and our customers' conservation efforts, will permit us to meet the forecasted demand for electricity during 1978. It .is our intention to continue to do everything that can reasonably be accomplished to provide our customers with a continuous and sufficient supply of electricity. Very truly yours, ,.. Glenn Buchanan L + Customer Service Planner GB:im MAY 1 5 J ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (Rev. 11/77) CITY Qf PALM DESERT, �ouNrr ESTABLISHED IN 1918 AS A PUBLIC As_..CY �TSTRI�S COACHELLA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT POST OFFICE BOX 1058 • COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA 92236 - TELEPHONE (714)398-2651 DIRECTORS OFFICERS RAYMOND R. RUMMONDS, PRESIDENT LOWELL O. WEEKS, GENERAL MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER TELLIS CODEKAS, VICE PRESIDENT OLE J. NORDLAND, SECRETARY C. 1, FROST WALTER R. WRIGHT, AUDITOR WILLIAM B. GARDNER May 19, 1978 REDWINE AND SHERRILL, ATTORNEYS STEVE D.BUXTON File: 0163. 11 o421 . 1 0721 .1 Department of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert Post Office Box 1977 Palm Desert, California 92260 Re: P.D. Case No. DP 09-78 MF No. 126 NW-'— Sec. 32, T5S, R6E Gentlemen: This area is protected from stormwater flows by a system of channels and dikes. This area may be considered safe from stormwater flows except in rare instances. The District will furnish domestic water and sanitation service to said area in accordance with the currently prevailing regulations of this District. This area shall be annexed to Improvement District Nos. 54 and 80 of the Coachella Valley County Water District for sanitation service. There may be conflicts with existing District facilities. We request the appropriate public agency to withhold the issuance of a building permit until arrangements have been made with the District for the relocation of these facilities. Very truly yours, Lowe 0. Weeks General Manager-Chief Engineer KH:dlb A "1i� rim ram+ MAY2e137 ENCITOOF PALM DESERTS J. Ask V G�.K3�] ��:JCS�] e e � � LSii�:IV��:Ji9Lyy ii L70C5V May 19, 1978 P.O. Box 680,Palm Desert, California 92260 City of Palm Desert 45275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert , CA 92260 Attentions Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services Gentlemen: This is a reply to the environmental impact report known as "Chacahuala" . The Board of Directors of the Silver Spur Ranch disagree with the environmental impact report of the Chacahuala development. We feel that this development would have a serious adverse impact on the development itself, as well as the adjacent properties , and all of Palm Desert. The area of the development is one of the finest view properties on the desert. Few areas of this nature are undeveloped. The view and the area are condusive to large elegant homes equal to the finest on the desert. To develop this area with less is to waste a potential that could bring more income to the city and increase the prestige of all of Palm Desert. The EIR has statements in it that are based on supposition. As an example, "The development will be compatible to the surrounding residential land use . " Not true. The surrounding area to the east is developed with single family homes. To the north along Haystack Road, and to the northwest along Alamo are also single family homes. A large development of single family homes has also been approved for the north side of Haystack Road. The EIR admits that there will be an increase of 60% in the runoff draining to the northeast corner of the development. At this time there is no definite way of disposing of the runoff water at this point. The city of Palm Desert has a master drainage plan that will take water under Haystack Road , etc . , but until this program has been funded no developers should be permitted to dump water on adjacent property owners. v- City of Palm Desert 5-19-78 p.2 We object to a zone change from R1 - 20,000 ft. to PR-4. If there is to be a change, it should be to R1-4 with 3.6 dwellings per acre. This would allow for lots of 12,000 square feet, with some as low as 10 ,000 square feet. This would be compatible with Ironwood' s development of single family homes , and also with the Lewis homes north of Haystack Road. All the new homes in Silver Spur Ranch are on lots of 12,000 square feet, or more , with a maximum height of 14 feet or less. This height will allow for a pitched roof of either tile or white rock. The developers propose a second entrance on the northeast corner connecting with Little Bend Trail. The residents of Silver Spur Ranch do not want this additional traffic coming into the area. The above reasons, plus too many more to mention in this letter, should be sufficient to explain our reasons for objecting to this development in its present form. Sincerely, SILVER SPUR RANC}IERS6�SSOCIATION Fred W. Griggs , Jr. President FWGslw In ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 01Ty OF PALM DESERT r , r Flugualt 12 1978 Ma. Pawt (U.i.I.L i cw i Department of £nvtiaownentab Setvicea 45275 Niek4_Peat .Vane Pa6x beaett, a1.,.i g. 92260 Pe: Chacal" Noje_ TWA Mt, Witt icM : 9U health ptevw U my petaonal. appec✓carxce tonight ao 9 w.i& appaeciate it i you wV2 o"eja may u ewa on -the above captioned *atte2. 9 am ied with .the d&vity gactot of thi4 aoject. 9 do app,teciate .that V744 deuelopnsent ha4 p&eaented Elie gamt ftoodpconttot in out a .ea. 9 know .this, w4eeN gactoa would rw-t be poaaibtie if .the aitea waa devoted .to tough gami y teu�. 9 do not have to temind you that fitanw i.1. the °ttoubte° atteet to owa city and it ahovU be heU .to a ainimm of t-taf$.ic at aLb mist". 9 am in �avot of Meaa Uetde beiju the eaat-wea.t attet got aU f ie between diahway 74 and PottoCa. 9 caiuwt wu6bdtand how Si tuet Spu2 Raaocia;--A can rx?,A rat ,thii Clow of tAgf is of fait to dhc-te .thei& butt of it. Cetitaiax.G,j they do rwt .contribute mote than othe2 -taxpaget4 in Palm Jeaert. 6 tluou4l dticeet ¢tom Idiahwaq 79 to Pottota i4 e4desaL to& R4e and odice totection arzd cwz ea-t4 to be anawe . hi,6 dev p- ment oho have i to -in"ed4 and e 4e." ftom Mesa of aLG putpoaea.. Ueicy txwly youta, &A. fltLtdw-a 9. Pobet& 72965 Sei qi& Road Dabs heaeAt, Calif. 92260 IV F. AUG - 11978 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT STAFF REPORT To: Planning Commission Report On: Development Plan Applicant: CHACAHUA A, LTD. Case Nos : DP 09-78 and 126MF Date: August 1, 1978 I . REQUEST: Request for approval of a Revised Development Plan and Preliminary Design Review for a 127-unit condominium project on approximately 38 acres located south of Little Bend Trail and north of Mesa View extended between Alamo and Arrow Trail . The applicant has filed a slightly revised Plan which will be addressed in this report. 1 II . STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Development Plan and Preliminary Design Review by Planning Commission Resolution No. Justification: 1. Proposed development will conform to the intent and purpose of the PR Zone District. 2. Proposed development will conform to the adopted General Plan. 3. The site is physically suited for the type of Development proposed. III . BACKGROUND: A. Location: South of Little Bend Trail and north of Mesa View extended between Alamo and Arrow Trail . B. Size: Approximately 38.84 acres C. Requested Zoning: PR-4 D. Adjacent Zoning: North - R-1 10,000 South - PR-7 East - R-1 10,000 and R-1 20,000 West - PR-5 E. Type of Units : 3 single-family units - each over 2,000 sq. ft. 62 duplexes - each unit 1,639 sq. ft. F. Density: Approximately 3.27 du/acre G. Proposed Recreational Amenities : 1-1,000 sq. ft. recreation structure 7 tennis courts 8 swimming pools IV. DISCUSSION: The applicant has filed a revised development plan which provides for a total of 127 units. The proposed structures include 62 duplexes (1 and 2 bedroom) and 3 single units (3 bedrooms) . Only one recreation building is proposed where two were proposed previously. The number of swimming pools has been reduced from 9 to 8 and the number of tennis courts reduced from Page Two Case Nos: DP 09-78 and 126MF 9 to 7. The two major changes in the revised Development Plan include the provisions of a larger setback between those units on the east side of this project and existing development at Silver Spur south of Broken Arrow and the reduction in the number of proposed units thereby resulting in a reduction in the overall density to approximately 3.27 d.u./acre. The Special Conditions of Approval still require the im- provement of Alamo Drive on the easterly side, a masonry wall along Mesa View Drive and street width modifications. In addition', Special Condition No. 11 requires that the proposed emergency access road onto Mesa View Drive shall be deleted. PLANNING C014MISSI0N RESOLUTION NO . A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING C0MMISSI0N OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA , ANNOUNCING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF A DEVELOP- MENT PLAN AND PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW TO ALLOW CON- STRUCTION OF A 127 UNIT C0NDOMINIUM PROJECT ON APPROX- IMATELY 38 ACRES SOUTH OF LITTLE BEND TRAIL AND NORTH OF MESA VIEW E<`iTENDED BETWEEN ALAMO AND ARROW TRAIL . CASE NOS . DP 09-78 and 126MF iWHEREAS , the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert , California, did on the 1st day of August , 1978 , hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider an application from CHACAHUALA , LTD. re- questing approval. of a Development Plan and Preliminary Design Review for 127 condominium units . a recreation building and common open space on approximately 38 acres within the PR-4 (Planned Residential , max- imum 4 d . u . /acre) zone , generally located south of Little Bend Trail and north of Mesa View extended between Alamo and Arrow Trail , more particularly described as : APN 631-170-001 APN 631-170-006 APN 631-170-002 APN 631-170-007 APN 631-170-003 APN 631-170-008 APN 631-170-004 APN 631-170-009 APN 631-170-005 WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Environmental Quality Procedure Resolution No ., 78-32" , in that a draft Environmental Impact Report has been completed in accordance with the requirements of CEQA; and, WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, the Planning Commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify the approval of the j subject Development Plan : 1. Proposed development will conform to the intent and purpose of the PR Zone District. 2 . Proposed development will conform to the adopted General Plan. 3 . The site is physically suited for the type of Development proposed. NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert as follows : 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and consti- tute the findings of the Commission in this case : 2. The Planning Commission does hereby recommend approval to the City Council of a Development Plan DP 09-78 and Preliminary Design Review of 126MF for reasons stated, subject to the attached conditions . PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a special meeting of ,the Palm Desert Planning Commission , held on this lst day of August , 1978, by the following vote , to wit : AYES : NOES : ABSENT : ABSTAIN; GEORGE BERKEY ,Chairman ATTEST : PAUL A . WILLIAMS, Secretary /tb PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. Page Two CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NOS . DP 09-78 & 126 ME Standard Conditions : 1 . The development of this project shall conform substantially to all ( plans submitted in behalf of this case , particularly Exhibit A ( (Revised) , and as revised according to the Design Review Board ` process and/or Planning Commission action . Any minor changes require approval by the Director of Environmental Services . Any substantial change requires approval by the Planning Commission . 2 . All requirements of any law. ordinance , or regulation of the State, City, and any other applicable government entity shall be complied with as part of the development process . 3. This approval is applicable, subject to the development of this project , commencing within one year from approval date and being promptly completed. 4. Any roof mounted, exhaust or air conditioning equipment shall be fully concealed from view from any public rights-of-way and ad- joining properties by architecturally integrated means . 5 . Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building permits . All conditions shall be made a part_.of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. 6 . All utility service and distribution lines on or abutting the sub- ject property , shall be placed underground prior to occupancy clearance . 7. Traffic control provisions shall be provided as required by the Director of Public Works . 8. Curb , gutter , sidewalk or approved pathways , and tie-in paving shall be provided in conformance with City Standards and/or as required by the Director of Public Works . 9 . The Fire Protection Requirements as specified in the Fire "larshal ' s memo May 10, 1978 , attached hereto, shall apply . 10. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval , the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies : Riverside County Department of Health Palm Desert Design Review Board Process City Fire Marshal Coachella Valley County Water District Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the Department of Building and Safety at the time (I of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. Page Three Special Conditions : 1 . Traffic safety lighting shall be provided at the entrance of Alamo Drive and at Mesa. View Drive . 2 . All existing overhead utility and distribution lines shall be undergrounded pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code. 3 . Swimming pool equipment shall be indicated on the final working drawings in every instance where a swimming pool is proposed. Said equipment shall be located within a building or placed underground. 4 . Tennis courts shall be recessed a minimum of three feet and a ten foot landscaped setback provided between the courts and Alamo . 5 . Areas adjacent to the existing water tank west of the subject site shall be intensively landscaped . 6. Alamo Drive shall be fully improved on the easterly side between Homestead and the first cross street northerly thereof . 7. Proposed street widths shall be modified to provide 32 ' wide streets for all interior streets . 8 . The proposed wall along Mesa View Drive shall be setback a minimum of ten feet from the property line and said area shall be landscaped . 9. The number of proposed pools shall be reconsidered . Specifically at least the size of the proposed pools could be replaced with three larger pools which would serve the ultimate occupants of the development . 10. Proposed emergency access road onto Mesa View Drive shall be deleted. PLANNING COMISSION RESOLUTION NO. Page Four Design Review Conditions : 1 . Final construction drawings , including a final landscaping , grading, lighting, trash storage , walkway layout , and irrigation plan in addition to a proposed sign program and tennis court lighting proposal or any other ammenities proposed shall be sub- mitted to the Design Review Board . No final inspection or occupancy permit shall be given by the Department of Environmental Services to this project until the aforementioned approved plans and con- struction shall have been completed. 2 . Resubmit a revised plot plan to the Board prior to completion of working drawings . AGREEMENT I accept and agree , prior to use of this permit or approval , to comply with all the conditions set forth, and understand that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occu- pancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been re- ceived by the Department of Environmental Services. (Date) (Applicant ' s Signature) PLANNING CO!:i:.iISSiON RESOLUTION NO. Page Five i—� -DEPARTMENT OF F;R'E PROTECTION IN OOOPERATION WIT;; THE CINi Y'1`} CALIFORNIA DIVISION OP FORESTRY �" � RrvFRs>DE J`- DAVID L. FLAKE ^TELEPHONE i7t4). 657-3183 Tri-Cities Fire Marshal 70-800 Highway Ill May 10, 1978 Rancho Mirage , Ca. 92270 Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Case No. DP-09-78 & 126 MF Due to the long response times encountered by our fire units to this area, I oppose any construction in this area until a southside fire station is constructed. However, should the Commission decide to approve this project, the following fire protection shall be provided: i 1 . Install or show exists a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow for a two (2) hour duration in addition to domestic or other supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured along approved vehicular travel ways. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any build- ing is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. A. Hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. B. Exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. C. Curbs (if installed) shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. Upon approval , one Copy will be sent to the Building Department , and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and j approved by the water company, with the following certification : "I certify that the design of the water system in Case Number DP-09-78 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal . " RE Very truly yours , David J. Or/C/egal l �.�,V I Fire Marshal ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DJO:dt CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY OF PALM DESERT STAFF REPORT To: Planning Commission Report On: Development Plan Applicant: CHACAHUALA, LTD. Case Nos : DP 09-78 and 126MF Date: May 30, 1978 I . REQUEST: Request for approval of a Development Plan and Preliminary Design Review for a 132-unit condominium project on approximately 38 acres located south of Little Bend Trail and north of Mesa View extended between Alamo and Arrow Trail . II . STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Development Plan and preliminary Design Review by Planning Commission Resolution No. Justification: 1 . Proposed development will conform to the intent and purpose of the PR Zone District. 2. Proposed development will conform to. the adopted General Plan. 3. The site is physically suited for the type of Development proposed. III . BACKGROUND: A. Location : South of Little Bend Trail and north of Mesa View extended between Alamo and Arrow Trail . B. , Size: Approximately 37.8 acres C. Zoning: PR-4 D. Adjacent Zoning: North - R-1 10,000 South - PR-7 East - R-1 10,000 and R-1 20,000 West - PR-5 E. Type of Units : 15 single-family units - each over 2,000 sq. ft. 51 duplexes - each unit 1 ,639 sq. ft. 1 triplex - each unit 1 ,593 sq. ft. 3 quadraplexes - each unit 1 ,639 sq. ft. F. Density: Approximately 3. 38 du/acre G. Proposed Recreational Amenities : 2-1 ,000 sq. ft. recreation structures 9 tennis courts 9 swimming pools Case Nos. DP 09-78 and 126MF May 30, 1978 Page Two IV. DISCUSSION: The Special Conditions of Approval require a number of modifications to the proposed Development Plan that may necessitate a revised plan. An Ordinance requirement which requires a 20' minimum perimeter setback between any proposed units and the property lines may require some ad- justing of the site plan. Further adjustments will have to be made to accomodate Special Condition No. 9 which requires a 44' dedication along the southern boundary of the project in order to provide adequate fire protection access. Traffic safety lighting in addition to undergrounding of existing overhead utility distribution lines are being required. Other Conditions of Approval require the improvement of Alamo Drive, a 5' sidewalk along Alamo and intensive landscaping on that portion of the property that is adjacent to the existing water tank. A revised plan shall also include the modified street widths as required by Special Condition No. 10. Special Condition .No. 11 requires an additional mod- ification to the proposed plan by requiring the deletion of the following units: the unit proposed at the southeast corner of Iguana Road and Alamo, Drive; the 2 most westerly structures proposed for the south side of Whiptail Loop. PLANNING OBJECTIVES 1 . Both a development based on individual lots and a develop- ment based on a planned condominium development were studied. The latter was chosed for these reasons : a . The drainage of the site in relation to flooding from above requires a very definite wide drainage Swale diag- onally thru the property. It was almost impossible to lay out a tract of individual lots which allowed for the drainage requirements and produced enough lots to be economically feasible. b. In our previous project, we have prided ourselves on exceeding the minimum criteria set up by the planners of the city in which we worked. A planned development was the only way we could control the development of this entire project. - The construction of individual houses on lots delineated by rigid property lines was too restrictive to accomplish a project of the quality we had in mind . C. As shown by the E. I . R. , the impact of an ordinary tract of individual houses was greater on the site and the drainage than a planned development would be. In addi- tion our control (and the City' s ) control over the design was =ar greater with a planned development. 2 . The final plan submitted to the City is the result of a great number of preliminaries, many of which were presented inform- ally to authorities in the planning and other departments of the City as well as to the members of the architectural com- mittee of the adjacent tract to the east (Silver Spur) . The end result was governed by these major factors : a. The views both up and down the hill, and the orientation to the sun. The buildings are oriented along axes which are set to take the best advantage of the view to the mountains to the southwest and the view to the desert to the northeast. b. By setting the buildings at an angle to the streets and to each other rather than parallel , each home has a view which is unobstructed and looks past its nearest neighbor to the major distant views and also into the greenbelts it backs up to. This should be compared to a standard arranaement which sets buildings 10' apart, facing each other across property lines set square to the streets. C. The concept of a planned development also permits control of the entire project, including landscaping and has the advantage of continuous maintenance of all the open land not occupied by the buildings themselves. page 2 d. In conjunction with the overall environment for the project, it is our intention to produce a desert-like landscape which is enhanced by the careful choice of plants and materials which are indigenous to the re- gion but concentrated and artistically placed to pro- duce the maximum impact with appropriate species and natural features . Summation: The plan presented represents our efforts to produce an architecturally sound project which takes maximum advan- tage of the views , considers the problems of the sun and heat, insures the optimum privacy for the occupants, and provides for efficient maintenance. In addition, several changes and modifications have been made to conform to the desires of the homeowners to the north and east with whom we have conferred as the planning progressed . PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE PHASE NO. CONSTRUCTION BEGINS NO. OF UNITS CONSTRUCTION ENDS 1 01/78 39 01/79 2 01/79 52 01/80 3 01/80 40 01/81 1LeiaziJ Saheu 216 3 North F-Uvli� California 91786 23 May 1978 Palm Desert Planning Commission City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, California 92260 Re: Case Nos_ DP 09-78 and 126MF Notice re Public Hearing Tuesday, May 30, 1978 Attention: Mr. Paul A. Williams, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission Gentlemen: We urge that you deny the request for approval of the crostruction- of a 132-unit condominium project as described in your legal notice dated May 8th. This area is in the path where the disastrous flooding occurred in September, 1976. Another factor to consider is the unappealing effect of high density construction. . . too many beautiful communities have been destroyed in this manner. As a property owner in Palm Desert, I trust you will note this past history of flooding and consider the aesthetics involved in responding to the referenced request, and deny this request. Thank you. Very truly yours, Leland Scheu LS:dh 48-255 Racquet Lane Palm Desert, California f- p. MAY 2 %: 197' ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT 3 r� M 'I INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO: Director of Environmental Services FROM: Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Development Plan 09-78, 126MF DATE: May 10th, 1978 1. This tract shall make a contribution in the amount of $10,000.00. $5,000.00 should be allocated to Haystack Road and Highway 74 intersection, and $5,000.00 to Haystack Road and Portola Avenue intersection. 2. This tract shall pay the required drainage and park fees as required by City of Palm Desert ordinances therefore. 3. This tract shall provide traffic safety lighting at the entrance of Alamo Drive and at Little Bend Trail . 14 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY Of PALM DESERT, TO: Mr. Paul A. Williams, Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert FROM: Mike Murray, R.S. , Supervising Sanitarian Riverside County' Health Department - Desert District DATE: May 9, 1978 SUBJECT: DP-09-78 Since we have information from you that this project will be connected to Coachella Valley County Water District sewage disposal system and domestic water, we have no comments at this time. MM:js EfJITY OOM N UAL PALM DESERT SERVICES CITY 3700 CENTRAL AVENUE RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA R.W.RIDDELL Eastern Division Distribution Planning Supervisor Mailing Address P.O. BOX 2200, RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92516 May 9, 1978 Location of Nearest Gas Main: Gas in Homestead Trail City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 Attention: Paul A; Williams Re: Case No. DP 09-78 and 126MF This letter is not to be interpreted as a contractual commitment to . serve the proposed project; but only as an information service. Its intent is to notif�.r you that the Southern California Gas Company has facilities in the area where the above named project is proposed. Gas service to the project could be provided from an existing main without any significant impact on the environment. The service Mould be in accordance with the Company's policies and extension rules on file with the California Public Utilities Commission at the time contractual arrangements are made. The availability of natural gas service, as set forth in this letter, is based upon present conditions of gas supply and regulatory policies. As a public utility, the Southern California Gas Company is under the Jurisdiction of the California Public Utilities Commission. We can also be affected by actions of federal regulatory agencies. Should these agencies tai;e any action which affects gas supply or the condition under which service is available, gas service will be provided in accordance with revised conditions. We have developed several programs which are available, upon request, to provide assistance in selecting the.most effective applications of energy conservation techniques for a particular project. If you desire further information on any of our energy conservation programs , please contact this office for assistance. RWR:b1c - % 'k1 ; . ss ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT 4 6.l(i Southern California Edison Company 36-IOC CATHEDRAL CANYON DRIVE CATHEDRAL CITY, CALIFORNIA 9223E May 11, 1978 TO: City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Project: DP 09-78 and 126MF - Development Plan for 132-Unit Condo Project Environmental Impact Report Gentlemen: This is to advise that the subject property is located within the service territory of the Southern California Edison Company, and that the electric loads of the project are within parameters of projected load growth which Edison is planning to meet in this area. Unless the demand for electrical generating capacity exceeds our estimates, and provided that there are no unexpected outages to major sources of electrical supply, we expect to meet our electrical load requirements for the next several years. Our total system demand is expected to continue to increase annually; and, if our plans to proceed with future construction of new generat- ing facilities are delayed, our ability to serve all customer loads during peak demand periods could become marginal by 1981. In addition, the major fuel used in Edison's generating facilities is low sulfur fuel oil. We now believe our low sulfur fuel oil inventor , together with our contractual commitments for delivery, and our customers' conservation efforts, will permit us to meet the forecasted demand for electricity during 1978. It is our intention to continue to do everything that can reasonably be accomplished to provide our customers with a continuous and sufficient supply of electricity. Very truly yours, r- - - Glenn Buchanan Customer Service Planner GB:im ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (Rev. 11/77) CITY GE PALM DESERT . c�uwry ESTABLISHED IN 1918 AS A PUBLIC AGENCY ��STA1�T COACRELLA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT POST OFFICE BOX 1058 COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA 92236 TELEPHONE (714) 398-2651 DIRECTORS OFFICERS RAVLIOND I, ""ONES, FRESIEKNT LONELL O. WEEKS, GENERAL EAANAGER-CM? DE ENGIN,Ea TE LL6 CODEKAS, VICk GRESm[Ni OLE J. HORDLAND SECRETARY C. J. FROS 'W ILUAM 8 GARDNER May 19, 1978 R EDWI WELTER R.NE AND SHLRILL RRILLWRIG A npprtOR , AticEN EVE SS EVE D.6UXTON File: o163. 11 0421 . 1 0721 .1 Department of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert Post Office Box 1977 Palm Desert, California 92260 Re: P.D. Case No. DP 09-78 MF No. 126 NW,'— Sec. 32, T5S, R6E Gentlemen: This area is protected from stormwater flows by a system of channels and dikes. This area may be considered safe from stormwater flows except in rare instances. The District will furnish domestic water and sanitation service to said area in accordance with the currently prevailing regulations of this District. This area shall be annexed to Improvement District Nos. 54 and 80 of the Coachella Valley County Water District for sanitation service. There may be conflicts with existing District facilities. We request the appropriate public agency to withhold the issuance of a building permit until arrangements have been made with the District for the relocation of these facilities. Very truly yours , Lowell. O. Weeks General Manager-Chief Engineer KH:dlb MPAY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY Of PALM DESERT F f' { May 19, 1978 P.O. Box 680,Palm Desert, California 92260 City of Palm Desert 45275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert , CA 92260 Attention: Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services Gentlemen : This is a reply to the environmental impact report known as "Chacahuala" . The Board of Directors of the Silver Spur Ranch disagree with the environmental impact report of the Chacahuala development. We feel that this development would have a serious adverse impact on the development itself, as well as the adjacent properties , and all of Palm Desert. The area of the development is one of the finest view properties on the desert. Few areas of this nature are undeveloped. The view and the area are condusive to large elegant homes equal to the finest on the desert. To develop this area with less is to waste a potential that could bring more income to the city and increase the prestige of all of Palm Desert. The EIR has statements in it that are based on supposition. As an example , "The development will be compatible to the surrounding residential land use . " Not true . The surrounding area to the east is developed with single family homes. To the north along Haystack Road , and to the northwest along Alamo are also single family homes . A large development of single family homes has also been approved for the north side of Haystack Road . The EIR admits that there will be an increase of 60% in the runoff draining to the northeast corner of the development. At this time there is no definite way of disposing of the runoff water at this point. The city of Palm Desert has a master drainage plan that will take water under Haystack Road , etc . , but until this program has been funded no developers should be permitted to dump water on adjacent property owners . City of Palm Desert 5-19-78 p. 2 We object to a zone change from R1 - 20 ,000 ft. to PR-4. If there is to be a change, it should be to R1-4 with 3 .6 dwellings per acre . This would allow for lots of 12,000 square feet , with some as low as 10,000 square feet. This would be compatible with Ironwood's development of single family homes , and also with the Lewis homes north of Haystack Road. All the new homes in Silver Spur Ranch are on lots of 12 ,000 square feet , or more , with a maximum height of 14 feet . or less. This height will allow for a pitched roof of either tile or white rock. The developers propose a second entrance on the northeast corner connecting with Little Bend Trail . The residents of Silver Spur Ranch do not want this additional traffic coming into the area. The above reasons , plus too many more to mention in this letter, should be sufficient to explain .our reasons for objecting to this development in its present form. Sincerely, / SILVER SPUR RAN ERS�-ASSOCIATIOv Fred W. Griggs , Jr. President FWGI1w ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission August 1 , 1978 Page Four VI . PUBLIC HEARINGS (Cont . ) A. Case Nos . C/Z 05-78, C/Z 05-78 EIR, DP 10-78 & 133MF (Cont. ) Mr . Wright noted that the lower corner of the site is being reserved for flood control purposes. Also, he noted that the units are like 4 bedroom homes not like pods . HAROLD HOUSLEY, Project Engineer, reviewed the flood control issue, noting that the City has a Master Plan for flood control and that the pro- ject has planned for flood control by having high pads and low streets . He also noted that projects will pay for flood control before the City can get bonds passed to do the same . Vice-Chairman Snyder declared the _ublic Hearing closed and asked for the pleasure of the Commission . i,.1, 11 Commissioner Kryder noted that the project would be atLaet. L`S, to the Community but the proposed Change of Zone . He was also con- corned with the property if it was sold, what would the project then become. Further, the current zoning should be respected or the Zoning Ordinance and General Plan should be revised. This is a good project but in a wrong location . Commissioner Fleshman noted his concerns were the visual im- pact as far as the character of the neighborhood is concerned; the traffic issue ; is it the best use for the area and the community; & would flood control as proposed by the. City be sufficient . Vice-Chairman Snyder stated that the zoning is the issue and that the project should be placed in an area that is zoned to pro- perly handle it . Also the proposal does notmeet zoning requirements. On a motion by Commissioner Kryder , seconded by Commissioner Fleshman, the Commission denied the Change of Zone request and ap- proved and certified the Final Environmental Impact Report as com- plete by Planning Commission Resolution No . 386 ; carried unanimously ( 3-0) . On a motion by Commissioner Fleshman, seconded by Commissioner Kryder , the Commission denied the request for approval of a proposed Development Plan by Planning Commission Resolution No . 387 ; carried unanimously ( 3-0) . THERE WAS A BRIEF RECESS AT 8:30 P.M. THE MEETING WAS RECONVENED AT 8:40 P.M. B. Continued Case No DP 09-78 nd 126MF, CHACAHUALA , LTD. , Applicant , Request for approval of a Revised Development Plan and Preliminary Design Review for a 116-unit condo- 1 minium project on approximately 39 acres located L south of Little Bend Trail and north of Mesa View extended between Alamo and Arrow Trail . Mr . Williams reviewed the Case noting that the applicant had submitted a slightly revised Plan and also stated that the City Council had approved the Planning Commission ' s recommendation of PR-3. The applicant ' s revised Development Plan reflects this zoning. Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission August 1 , 1978 Page Five VI . PUBLIC HEARINGS (Cont . ) B. Case Nos. DP 09-78 and 126MV (Cont . ) Mr. Williams noted that Alamo would be exit only and that Mesa View is entrance/exit . The number of units is reduced to 116 from 133 ; 2 bedroom and 3 bedroom; 58 duplexes , no more triplexes ; 8 swimming pools not 9; and, 7 tennis - courts instead of 9 . With regard to the flood issue , there will be catch basins on the entry streets. The fence along Mesa View will be wrought iron and brick. Mr. Williams stated that Staff recommends approval of the proposed plan and he reviewed the conditions of approval . Commissioner Fleshman asked if the wrought iron wall design would be all around the project . A. T. Wilkes, representing the applicant noted that public streets would have the open wall , with a solid wall adjacent to private areas . Commissioner Fleshman asked about the driveways for the units off of Homestead and if there would be sufficient emergency vehicle access. Mr . Williams noted that if the area were grassed this would be sufficient for the Fire Marshal . Chairman Berkey declared the Public Hearing open and asked if the applicant wished to speak at this time . ((( HAROLD HOUSLEY, Project Engineer , reviewed a revised 1 site plan and noted that 117 is the correct figure {t for 3 units per acre , not 116 as Staff has stated. With regard to the Conditions of Approval , he noted that Condition No. 10 has been complied with ; Condi- tion No . 6 - traffic will not be as heavy with exit only on Alamo and requested that the condition be deleted; Condition No. 7 - asked if the roads could be wider. He also noted that Mesa View and Alamo would have an open fence , Silver Spur would have a solid wall and other private sectors would have a solid wall . A. T. WILKES, Architect , stated that the pools had been reduced to six 201x40 ' pools and that the loop streets had been replaced with long driveways. Chairman Berkey asked about the Broken Arrow exit if it would be emergency access/exit only like Alamo . Mr . Wilkes noted it would be . Mr. Wilkes also noted that some of the units would be rotated for a better view. Commissioner Fleshman asked about the location of the 117th unit . Some discussion followed regarding the location of this unit . I•�:,fEpir�i' �; TiF�Mr. Wilkes noted that it would be moved off of Silver Spur. Chairman Berkey asked if there was anyone wishing to speak in FAVOR of the project . BOB WEINSTEIN, 73-065 Skyward, noted his approval . MARGARET KAY, 73-082 Homestead, noted her approval of the project as it will provide flood protection. She asked if Silver Spur streets were dedicated, and if they are, why can' t traffic flow there also . .f Minutes Palm Desert Planning- Commission August 1 , 1978 Page Six VI . PUBLIC HEARINGS (Cont . ) B. Case Nos. DP 09-78 and 126MF '(Cont . ) Chairman Berkey asked if there was anyone wishing to speak in OPPOSITION. I- JANE WOOLLEY, 73-010 Somera, asked why Silver Spur is a "sacred cow" and why Chia was not being opened up . She also asked how an exit only would be controlled on Alamo . She would rather have entrance than exit on Alamo and she also noted that the project is super , but better traffic control is needed on Alamo. TOM O' SULLIVAN, 72-990 Homestead, asked how the exit only will be enforced. Mr . Williams noted that it would be a spike system with a key to release for emergency access. Mr . Sullivan then noted that 2/3 of the residents would still use Alamo if it is an exit as proposed. He noted that there is a need for a secondary entrance/exit on the north side . Chairman Berkey asked if the applicant would like to give any REBUTTAL at this time . Mr. Housley noted that He felt that the issue was traffic and that the right-of-way on Chia is the question. Further , he noted that the Homeowners ' Association may not want more than one entrance/exit for security reasons , but 1 he would like the option to do either . C KAY CRAIG, stated that Silver Spur and Mesa View should be used with signs on Highway 74 directing traffic to use these routes . Chairman Berkey declared the Public Hearing closed and asked for the pleasure of the Commission . Chairman Berkey asked if the Staff has considered other alternatives for traffic flow than those proposed and why not a single entrance/exit . Mr. Beebe noted that Condition No. 6 should be retained as it will help channel traffic better . He also stated that he hadn ' t had time to study the exit only proposal . Mr . Beebe also noted that the Silver Spur streets were accepted by the City but that the City will not maintain them for 5 years. Commissioner Fleshman asked if one entrance would effect the applicant ' s marketing. Mr. Greenberg that yes , that this Y-mG a more favorable flow plan. Commissioner Snyder stated that--the-completion of Mesa View to Portola will help the traffic flow and that the problems noted previously have all been addressed reasonably . Commissioner Fleshman asked for the addition of Special ' L Condition No . 11 stating that Unit 117 would be relocated to the interior . He also asked when the flood control fees are paid. Air. Williams noted that they are paid when the Final Map is filed. Mr . Housley asked if the Commissions decision was final or if it still had to go before the City Council . Mr . Williams noted that this decision is final unless the applicant appeals. Minutes Palm Desert Planning .Commission August 1 , 1978 Page Seven VI . PUBLIC HEARINGS (Cont . ) B. Case Nos . DP 09-78 and 126MF (Cont . ) On a motion by Commissioner Snyder, seconded by Commissioner Kryder, the Commission approved the Development Plan and Preliminary Design Review by Planning Commission Resolution No. 388 with the noted changes to the Conditions and the addition of Condition No . 11 ; carried unanimously (4-0) . Commissioner Fleshman was excused for the remainder of the meeting at 9 : 30 p.m. C. Case Nos . _ C/Z 07-78, TT 13236, CUP 08-78, CLIFFORD SWANSON, App ant Request for approval of a Change of Zone from ' S ' Study to S. I . (U.A. ) on approximately 29 acres located on the east side of Cook Street northerly of the Whitewater Channel and related 40-lot in- dustrial subdivision and a related request for ap- proval of a Conditional Use Permit and Preliminary Design Review to allow an Industrial Park Develop- ment on the site. M Williams reviewed the Change of Zone and noted that it is comp ible with the adjacent zoning. rr Ch irman Berkey noted that this request does not conform to the Minut Motion that was sent to CVAG regarding the right-of-way on Avenue 2 . Mr. illiams stated that the thought was to separate the com- mercial fro the residential . Mr. B ebe noted that northerly of Avenue 42 the County states that they wil not go much further but if they do it will be an 88 foot right-of way. Chairma Berkey stated that the City' s position on Avenue 42 should be firm d up before any action is taken. Mr. Williams stated that the Tentative Tract and the Conditional Use Permit could be continued in light of the question on Avenue 42. He also noted a etter of concern received from the City of Indian Wells stating tha they were concerned with the intrusion of industrial upon commercial . Commissione asked that the Tentative Tract be continued and allow the Staff tim to pursue the issue ,of Avenue 42 . Chairman Ber y declared the Public Hearing open and. asked if the applicant wished to speak at this time . �_ED-WALLICK Project Engineer, asked if the applicant have to improve Avenue 42, noting that he would rather not . Chairman Berkey asked if there was anyone wishing to speak in FAVOR or in OPPOSITI N to the proposals . ALEXIS NEWBRA DER, 46-260 Cottage Lane, asked if the Commissio had read the letter from the City of Indian Wells stating there concerns . Chairman Berkey not d that the Commission had. �Z vr 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CAU ORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE August 2, 1978 APPLICANT Chacahuala, Ltd. I. Harold Housley 73-700 Highway 111 , Ste. 8 lm Desert CA 92260 CASE NoC.: DP9-78 and 126MF The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of August 1 , 1978 CONTINUED TO DENIED XX APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 388 PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR CONCURRENCE WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION. PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR PUBLIC HEARING. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSSION cc: Applicant C.V,C.W.D. File 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE July 6, 1978 APPLICANT Chacahuala. Ltd. I . Harold Housley 73-700 Highway 111 , Ste. 8 Palm Desert, CA 92260 CASE NO. : DP 09-78 a d 126MF The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of ljly 5 1978 XX CONTINUED TO August 1 , 1978 DENIED APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR CONCURRENCE WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION. PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR PUBLIC HEARING. - Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY ` PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSSION cc: Applicant C.V.C.W.D. File 1 Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission July 5, 1978 Page Six VI . PUBLIC HEARINGS (Cont . ) B. Case Nos . C/Z 02-78 and related Draft EIR (Cont . ) TOM O' SULLIVAN, stated that he opposed the project due to the traffic problems and the access to the property. Chairman Berkey stated that the present R-1 would create more access to Alamo and that this proposal allows for control . At this time Chairman Berkey declared the Public Hearing closed and asked for the pleasure of the Commission . Commissioner Fleshman stated that the easiest access for most of the residents of the project would be to use the Alamo entrance/exit ; PR is preferred to R-1 ; all questions and concerns noted at this hearing should be better clarified; and, no more than 20% of the traffic should be directed to Alamo . Commissioner Flesh- man proposed a PR-3 zone. Commissioner Kelly stated that she like Commissioner Flesh- man's proposal ; against the higher density ; planned residential is only workable zoning for the parcle. Commissioner Snyder noted that the presentation and the EIR were both very complete but he is concerned with the flood control and the obligation of the City . The work that needs to be done in the City is beyond the scope of the applicant . Planned residential is good for the area. Commissioner Kryder stated that he concurred with Commissioner r Snyder and that the EIR is so complete that it defeats itself in a !Il sense . He noted his continued concern for projects being approved prior to the completion of flood control in the City. Chairman Berkey stated that he liked Commissioner Fleshman ' s approach and that he was concerned with the zone change and the in- crease in density. The PR-3 is a good solution . l On a motion by Commissioner Fleshman to recommend to the City Council a Change of Zone of PR-3 and to certify the EIR as complete by Planning Commission Resolution No. 374, seconded by Commissioner Kelly; carried (4-1) (AYES : Berkey, Fleshman , Kelly , Kryder ; NOES : Snyder) . THERE WAS A BRIEF RECESS AT 9:40 P.M. THE MEETING WAS RECONVENED AT 9:50 P.M. C. Continued Case NosODP09-7 ' and 126MF - CHACAHUALA LTD. , Applicant Request for approval of a revised Development Plan and Preliminary Design Review for a 131-unit condo- minium project on approximately 38 acres located south of Little Bend Trail and north of Mesa View extended between Alamo and Arrow Trail . Chairman Berkey asked the applicant if they would like to continue this case due to the action on the Change of Zone . Mr. Williams noted that to consider the project is meaningless as it does not form to the approved zoning. He also noted that the issue of the Development Plan goes into limbo until the zoning is acted on by the City Council on July 27, 1978. Mr . Williams recommended that the Cases be continued to the August 1 , 1978, meeting. Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission July 5, 1978 Page Seven VI . PUBLIC HEARINGS (Cont . ) C. Case Nos. DP 09-78 and 126MF (Cont . ) Commissioner Fleshman noted the following items that would be needed prior to the cases being discussed or acted on : Detail of road crossing the channel ; detail of all exterior walls and how they relate to adjacent property; specifics on channel and how it will carry the water ; the units on Arrow Trail are not appropriate ; need 40 ft . setbacks along Silver Spur area; no more than 2 units joined together ; minimum 1 ,600 to 2 , 100 sq. ft . units are appropriate as proposed; and, circulation , no more than 200 of the units should exit on Alamo . On a motion by Commissioner Snyder, seconded by Commissioner Fleshman , the cases were continued to the meeting of August 1 , 1978 ; carried unanimously (5-0) . D. Case Nos . C/Z 05-78 , C/Z 05-78(EIR) , DP 10-78 , and 133MF, BUREAU OF TEACHER AID AND RETIREMENT SERVICES , Applicant . Mr. Williams noted that a written request for a continuance had been received and Staff recommended that the cases be continued to the August 1st meeting. On a motion by Commissioner Snyder , seconded by Commissioner Fleshman, the cases were continued to August 1 , 1978; carried unani- mously (5-0) . L Commissioner Fleshman left the room due to a conflict of interest . E. Case No . TT 12784, SILVER SPUR ASSOCIATES , Applicant Request for approval of a Tentative Map which would create a 2-lot subdivision to provide for 100 air- space condominiums and recreational amenities on approximately 10 acres within the PR-7 zone located north of Irontree Drive, west of Mariposa Drive and south of Foxtail Lane. Mr . Williams reviewed the case and noted points of the proposed Development Plan . He pointed out the memorandum received from the Fire Marshal and letters freceived regarding concerns with the density and traffic . Mr . Williams noted Staff ' s recommendation of approval and reviewed the various conditions of approval . Chairman Berkey asked if density was part of the approval sought . Mr . Williams noted that it was . Chairman Berkey declared the Public Hearing open and asked if the applicant wished to speak at this time . LARRY SPICER, representing Ironwood Country Club, stated that this project was not proposed as a downgrade to the present area. Chairman Berkey asked if there was anyone wishing to speak in FAVOR of the proposal . Being none , he asked if anyone wished to speak in OPPOSITION to the project . MIKE BAGNAL, President of Homeowners Association #2 , stated that he was concerned with the parking on Foxtail , as it is already a problem; the density would be 30% than the present zoning ; would like more open space and amenities; and, the number of tennis courts would not be sufficient for the number of total units . 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE May 31 , 1978 APPLICANT CHACAHUALA LTD. I. Harold Housley 73-700 Highway 111 , Suite #8 Palm Desert, CA 92260 CASE NO. : C/Z 02-78, DP 09-78, 126MF and Related Draft EIR The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of May 30, 1978 XX CONTINUED TO July 5, 1978 DENIED APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PLACED ON THE AGE14DA OF THE CITY COU14CIL OF FOR CONCURRENCE WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION. PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR PUBLIC HEARING. appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSSION cc: Applicant C.V.C.W.D. File ,i Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission May 30, 1978 Page Four VI . PUBLIC HEARINGS (Cont . ) A. Case Nos . C/Z 02-78 and Related Draft EIR (Cont . ) Commissioner Kryder asked if there was an outlet from the project onto Mesa View. Mr . Williams stated no . r Temporary Presiding Officer Snyder declared the Public Hear- ing closed and asked for the pleasure of the Commission . Commissioner Kryder stated that it is a well thought out development and that the project is a good one for the area. He then noted that the drainage and flood control is his main concern arL�,�that he wants more time to study the draft EIR. ]):Commissioner Kell stated that the increase in density, drain- a�` a�g.e and fire protection are her concerns and she would like more Temporary Presiding Officer Snyder regrested that Staff make certain determinations with regard to the land down stream and the traffic problem. Commissioner Kelly asked for further study to be done on the traffic situation. On a motion by Commissioner Kryder, seconded by Commissioner Kelly, the cases were continued to July 5, 1978 for further study; carried unanimously ( 3-0) . Mr. Housley asked what was to be done now. Mr . Williams stated that Staff is to address the City ' s responsibilities with regard to drainage and also Staff will provide more information on traffic and access. Temporary Presiding Officer Snyder noted that the Planning Commission needs additional input from Staff , the applicant gave a fine presentation . B. Case No DP 09-78 and 126MF - CHACAHUALA, LTD. , Applicant Mr. Williams e that the se se cases had been reviewed with the related Case No . C/Z 02-78 and that they should be continued to the meeting of July 5, 1978. On a motion by Commissioner Kryder seconded by Commissioner Kelly the cases were continued; carried unanimously (3-0) . C. Case Nos. DP 05-78 and 117MF - TERRA INDUSTRIES , Applicant Request for approval of a Development Plan and Pre- liminary Design Review for a 200-unit condominium project to be located on approximately 33 acres at the northwest corner of Fairhaven Drive and 44th Avenue . Mr. Williams reviewed the cases and passed out pictures of similar projects already developed in other areas . He then noted the concerns of the Design Review Board and letters from the City of Rancho Mirage and Mr. Balch. Mr. Williams noted the applicants letter presented earlier in the day addressing the concerns of the Design Review Board. One of the main concerns with the project is that the parking areas are too tight . Mr. Williams stated that Staff is recommending denial of the project. �- ..ram-..,„ l:_-- _ i::✓=I oe-Pa� t; -o��_w MAY-87E 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE,PALM OESERf,CALIFORN1A92260 �5�1 �'-• 0 �. �. C.4LtF' P�,B° JIc6 is TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 > W W W yo n� C J $ F3anDiego, ental ' Q a American Drop, o0 tuaI Escro;a Co. th Avenue ;u', D'U'+ERnGLE Ca. 92101IU I`S n0 RESSEG a INABLE 10 FORWARD v VI_ > i TETURN -TO WRITER 0J7tp`� �— ` NAY��i m MST-$"7 ' ' .2&'...: _ (w:«...m• 4$-27$PRICKLY PEAR LANE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 62260 •�^' ❑,������� TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 W p� n W W W - WE w 00 SENDER. �--t It ~Palm Desert Tennis Club f W j�NDELIVERABLEA,5 22410 ttawthorne Blvd . I � � oo ADDRESSED Torrance, Ca . 90505 Z DIVABLE TO FORWARD i 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CAUFORNIA92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 May 8, 1978 LEGAL NOTICE CITY OF PALM DESERT REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PRELIMI- NARY DESIGN REVIEW FOR A 132-UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT ON APPROXIMATELY 38 ACRES LOCATED SOUTH OF LITTLE BEND "'RAIL AND NORTH OF MESA VIEW EXTENDED BETWEEN ALAMO AND ARROW TRAIL. CASE NOS. DP 09-78 and 126MF NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will beheld before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by CHACAHUALA, LTD. , for approval of a Development Plan and Preliminary Design Review for 132 condo- minium units, a recreation building and common open space on approximately . 38 acres within the PR-4 (Planned Residential , maximum 4 du/acre) zone, generally located south of Little Bend Trail and north of Mesa View extended between Alamo and Arrow Trail , more particularly described as: APN 631-170-001 APN 631-170-006 APN 631-170-002 APN 631-170-007 APN 631-170-003 APN 631-170-008 APN 631-170-004 APN 631-170-009 APN 631-170-005 -- - oL � F--_=rs" A--.- I�42iL3916BEL AIR < L m J ' HOMESTEAD AD TI A 7R BUCKBOARD TRAI DAVIS RD LL LLL `�— iz6 � F - QJS. 4 ITG e� J 177 �\ > O J u a WHITE DR. gy1 Y AVENUE10 SAID Public Hearing will be held on Tuesday, May 30, 1978, at 7:00 p.m. in the Cpuncil Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall , 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place, all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission PUBLICH: Palm Desert Post May 11 , 1978 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 May 8, 1978 LEGAL NOTICE CITY OF PALM DESERT REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM R-1 20,000 TO PR-4 ON A 37.8 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED SOUTH OF LITTLE BEND AND NORTH OF MESA VIEW EXTENDED BETWEEN ALAMO AND ARROW TRAIL. CASE NO. C/Z 02-78 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by CHACAHUALA, LTD. , for approval of a Change of Zone from R-1 20,000 (Single-family residential , min. 20,000 sq. ft. lot size) zone to PR-4 (Planned Residential , max. 4 du/acre) zone on a 37.8 acre parcel located south of Little Bend and north of Mesa View extended between Alamo and Arrow Trail , more particularly described as : APN 631-170-001 APN 631-170-006 APN 631-170-002 APN 631-170-007 APN 631-170-003 APN 631-170-008 APN 631-170-004 APN 631-170-009 APN 631-170-005 a I � I 0 T BEL AIR <� 0am sW i � LLUIL1L' !—_- J C rsa ON U I 1�L_j HOMESTEAD OAD W LLLZI___ _ = _ B 4CKB04Rb TRAIL DAVIS RD.' cJz oz-zs _ pqq u 4 IT4 � O I '7 Q� AB 112W J ¢ / _ ¢ L W ¢ W rWHITE DR.MESA VIEW DI Y AVENUE SAID Public Hearing will be held on Tuesday, May 30, 1978, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall , 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place, all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post May 11 , 1978 L` I. HAROLD HOUSLEY CONSULTING ENGINEERS 73-700 HIGHWAY 111,SUITE 8 PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 May 16th, 1978 Paul Williams Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert P. O. Box 1977 Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Subject: Project No. 7734-G Chacahuala Development Dear Mr. Williams: The purpose-5of this letter is to correct the proposed con- struction schedule as indicated in our Development Plan sub- mittal for Mr. Greenberg' s property, southeasterly of Home- stead and Alamo. The construction estimate is as follows, rather than what is shown on the application: ESTIMATED SCHEDULE TO BEGIN CONSTRUCTION PHASE BEGIN DATE _ I 01-01-79 II 01-01-80 III 01-01-81 If there are any questions regarding the above matter, please give me a call. Sincerely C ftAy I 1,97(i _ ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES I. Harold usleya P• E• CITY OF PALM DESERT IHH:lsp I 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CAUFORNIA92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 May 30, 1978 Mr. Fred W. Griggs, Jr. President Silver Spur Ranchers Association P. O. Box 680 Palm Desert , CA 92260 Dear Mr. Griggs : This is to acknowledge receipt of your letter of May 19 , 1978, regarding the draft environmental impact report on the "Chaca- huala" project . While we appreciate the time you and your Association have taken in the review of this document , we note in general , that your letter does not appear to address specific environmental issues for consideration or further analysis prior to action, but rather registers the Association' s objection to the overall development . You should be aware that the purpose of the EIR is to provide the decision-making body with adverse and beneficial environmental impact information regarding a proposed project . The City has taken the position that the environmental issues associated with the "Chacahuala" project have been fully addressed in the draft EIR. If the Association is opposed to this project , such objections should be raised at the public hearing. Please be assured, however , that a copy of your letter has been included in the final EIR as well as presented to the Planning Commission for their conside- ration at the public hearing. In general we would agree with the concept expressed in your let- ter regarding environmental impacts associated with the develop- ment of any vacant land. Such impacts , however, were considered when the City adopted its General Plan . Accordingly, development of the property is not an issue , but rather the type of development to occur . With this in mind we would again refer to the intent of an EIR which is not to justify the type of development , but to pro- vide information and address potential impacts of a proposed develop- -2- We trust the foregoing information will be helpful to you and we appreciate receiving your comments. Should you have any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact us. y truly yours, Paul A. Williams, A. I .P. Director of Environmental Services rk/pw/ks PROOF OF PUBLILATION This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp (2015.5 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIAI ss. County of Riverside I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above Proof of Publication of entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of PALM DESERT POST, a newspaper of general circu- CITY OF PALM DESERT lation, published weekly, in Palm Desert, County of ---------------------------------------------------------- --- Riverside, and which newspaper has been adjudged CASE MPS? DP 09-78 and 126 MP a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Riverside, State of � . - z f E?ov'cEddd /! ♦ 1 I.- I I II under date of October 5, 1964, Case Nu m[ $EEEL_ IV n� N \ Izthat the notice, of which the annexed is a pr gsa€=1- _. f� \ -" w IIhas been published in each regular and entl ;$=,Eat aaaa � r� I I`1✓I J a 11 ma -f-6t—i said newspaper and not in any supplement; °>NSomo aaaa m I 1 \` 1 o�gcu� the following dates to-wit: jo rcE€ CI i r of May 11 , IL978 ---- -------- c� 8 � IT P \ 'c------------------ ----------- _- o� 2zzzzILL aO "€€oEF=CCaaaaaaa //1���� ago �a O1900 Atlb3b tl•0 O a I certify (or declare) under penalty or peril. zr,-oo - $� 5do$ aZ Z� of foregoing is true and correct. a Jg -8 N a>6_` H� o 28 �UtC Waf,W O aOxz3 LL o roa on ri• No on•�T�—`- f oo c1------------ SLLO W W - E — F E Signature �w3:XC0 a - — o=O o_« e>wawo aa'E WW.QWW5<1­0Jw COU. 13noovu r Uc VW KZ~Z 4= t'to of LLzOLLh $-o 'J- O L-1 Dt[�o ZJOOvox azc Date------May--1_1_'.--197§------------ a°aWW,X; O>a - � a V'LL>OO7Qw x1Vt ib e tl n38 =6. at Palm Desert, California Joo>-M2-J Z�€ a 3 ►aa oaa �m� �azEwLuF oWE c - - «� a-)FW Vo:� 6 pJz�LLO =o i r .vbd ; Iua= LLW�JOC w« w 0 yaOWHa .Uoo w°zua° _ J 01-7--t QZOQ ZT' j] 1 1� Q-GaN{1 • .ce - V. - a . .• •�:• . .�. . rpNL d.� ���i •i• a I•i•�i. �p II M a. T 7 ! ' 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 I PRE 00 071 215N 1 RETURN To,.SENDER-7. N �a TELEPHONE(714) 546-0611 I U F N0T DELIVERABLE AS ADDRE JED�:) 'o poi UNABLE TO FOR WARD,30 �n m o a Yatm—Desert:lnv. co. fu: c/o Frederick Prescott Montanas Este c�V Irvine.,_ Ca.._ 9.2715 -- - W NN01i GELIVERA 3LE AS ADORESSEO.- -P1 UVOLE TO FORWARD MAri2 r IR E T I M TO SENDER 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CAUFORNIA92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 May 8, 1978 LEGAL NOTICE CITY OF PALM DESERT REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PRELIMI- NARY DESIGN REVIEW FOR A 132-UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT ON APPROXIMATELY 38 ACRES LOCATED SOUTH OF LITTLE BEND TRAIL AND NORTH OF MESA VIEW EXTENDED BETWEEN ALAMO AND ARROW TRAIL. CASE NOS. DP 09-78 and 126MF NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will beheld before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by CHACAHUALA, LTD. , for approval of a Development Plan and Preliminary Design Review for 132 condo- minium units, a recreation building and common open space on approximately 38 acres within the PR-4 (Planned Residential , maximum 4 du/acre) zone, generally located south of Little Bend Trail and north of Mesa View extended between Alamo and Arrow Trail , more particularly described as: APN 631-170-001 APN 631-170-006 APN 631-170-002 APN 631-170-007 APN 631-170-003 APN 631-170-008 APN 631-170-004 APN 631-170-009 APN 631-170-005 WAY 1[775�II --F= f Q m W 0 E L AIR a¢ 1 m J HOMESTEAD I / �� - �Z.L_1_AR PA 7j�gE� �BI U IICIIKB'IIIOAIROI TRAIL DAVIS RD.� j DI O / _ • �I L_LL L I�Jj � k°�//t� r zC M F - QL AhTQ.W A ITG l _F �M�F.R p GA R WHITE DR. �{ a L4. g� _AV E UE SAID Public Hearing will be held on Tuesday, May 30, 1978, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall , 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place, all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission PUBLICH: Palm Desert Post May 11 , 1978 y _ 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 May 8, 1978 LEGAL NOTICE CITY OF PALM DESERT REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM R-1 20,000 TO PR-4 ON A 37.8 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED SOUTH OF LITTLE BEND AND NORTH OF MESA VIEW EXTENDED BETWEEN ALAMO AND ARROW TRAIL. CASE NO. C/Z 02-78 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by CHACAHUALA, LTD. , for approval of a Change of Zone from R-1 20,000 (Single-family residential , min. 20,000 sq. ft. lot size) zone to PR-4 (Planned Residential , max. 4 du/acre) zone on a 37.8 acre parcel located south of Little Bend and north of Mesa View extended between Alamo and Arrow Trail , more particularly described as: APN 631-170-001 APN 631-170-006 APN 631-170-002 APN 631-170-007 APN 631-170-003 APN 631-170-008 APN 631-170-004 APN 631-170-009 APN 631-170-005 TT-n El I L 1T�'11�I o > .��.J z w HOMESTEAD ROAD ILL —— D - \ w LI z L I BUCKBOARD TRAIL J A VIS RD. w I c/z 02-78 _LLL IIL A .TAa�ox As92W J 1 ¢ w 1.. p /� F �N R a > / E w DR w - _1 ' .L T WHITE DR. �} 1 MESA.. VIEW Y AVENUE SAID Public Hearing will be held on Tuesday, May 30, 1978, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall , 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place, all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post May 11 , 1978 <OPAYO�6 :� 11 WL45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE,PALM DESERT.CALIFORNIA9226O TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 - A, LLLTTT u r,h 5, Y co j /+- 01 yy W W Rf f49 = Rhona d J. rioyle "'& Fr^^a�n�I�c���ti���� r W 2, 4F1� w v c, B. SiAtons Q z o RTFRr! 73�-351 \Broken Arrow Tr. o0' rb Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 � !F� VL�R L ,I 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 May 8, 1978 LEGAL NOTICE CITY OF PALM DESERT REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PRELIMI- NARY DESIGN REVIEW FOR A 132-11NIT� CONOOMI.N?UM PROJECT ON. APPROXIMATELY 38 ACRES LOCATED SOUTH OF LITTLE BEND TRAIL AND NORTH OF MESA VIEW EXTENDED BETWEEN ALAMO AND ARROW TRAIL. CASE NOS. DP 09-78 and 126MF NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by CHACAHUALA, LTD. , for. approval of a Development Plan and Preliminary Design Review for 132 condo- minium units, a recreation building and common open space on approximately 38 acres within the PR-4 (Planned Residential , maximum 4 du/acre) zone, generally located south of Little Bend Trail and north of Mesa View extended between Alamo and Arrow Trail , more particularly described as: APN 631-170-001 APN 631 -170-006 APN 631-170-002 APN 631-170-007 APN 631-170-003 APN 631 -170-008 APN 631-170-004 APN 631-170-009 APN 631-1}700--0{05 L-- F o w - [5� fl ' m W BEL AIR a ¢a 1 HOMESTEAD AD / L-LI_1T . BUCKBOARD TRAIL --� a DP 09 78 �— e irn n�T WHITE DR. (i a �gr AVENUE: SAID Public Hearing will be held on Tuesday, May 30, 1978, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall , 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place, all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission PUBLICH: Palm Desert Post May 11 , 1978 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-06I1 May 8, 1978 LEGAL NOTICE CITY OF PALM DESERT REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM R-1 20,000 TO PR-4 ON A 37.8 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED SOUTH OF LITTLE BEND AND NORTH OF MESA VIEW EXTENDED BETWEEN ALAMO AND ARROW TRAIL. CASE NO. C/Z 02-78 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by CHACAHUALA, LTD. , for approval of a Change of .Zone from R-1 20,000 (Single-family residential , min. 20,000 sq. ft. lot size) zone to PR-4 (Planned Residential , max. 4 du/acre) zone on a 37.8 acre parcel located south of Little Bend and north of Mesa View extended between Alamo and Arrow Trail , more particularly described as : APN 631-170-001 APN 631-170-006 APN 631-170-002 APN 631-170-007 APN 631-170-003 APN 631-170-008 APN 631-170-004 APN 631-170-009 APN 631-170-005 - d�ltl_ Y J o LJ ¢ I ¢ a m W C5� B 4.L+ LR - BEl AIR ¢z I a mJ 1 HOMESTEAD OADi LZZ BOARD TRAIL -- �L L LLLL G IT„ � 02 � �� _�La W J ¢ o WHITE DR. / L AVENUE SAID Public Hearing will be held on Tuesday, May 30, 1978, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall , 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place, all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post May 11 , 1978 i i AY-37E " GOSIAGEIr 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE,PAL RT,CALIFORNIA 92260 0. _i=y+ ;� �. 13 TELEPHONE(714) 346-0611 sF O tib c; K w r- S z:, �� CN o Joyle r Genevieve G. WZ`� Do 189 � � 2 W o 0 �. Palm De ert, -Ca. 922G0 � L r y a= O 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CAUFORNIA92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 May 8, 1978 LEGAL NOTICE CITY OF PALM DESERT REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PRELIMI- NARY DESIGN REVIEW FOR A 132-UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT ON APPROXIMATELY 38 ACRES LOCATED SOUTH OF LITTLE BEND TRAIL AND NORTH OF MESA VIEW EXTENDED BETWEEN ALAMO AND ARROW TRAIL. CASE OS. DP 09-78 and 126MF NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by CHACAHUALA, LTD. , for approval of a Development Plan and Preliminary Design Review for 132 condo- minium units, a recreation building and common open space on approximately 38 acres within the PR-4 (Planned Residential , maximum 4 du/acre) zone, generally located south of Little Bend Trail and north of. Mesa View extended between Alamo and Arrow Trail , more particularly described as: APN 631-170-001 APN 631 -170-006 APN 631-170-002 APN 631-170-007 APN 631-170-003 APN 631-170-008 APN 631-170-004 APN 631-170-009 APN 631-170-005 O� Y K w [.S iLy.);g 4N �I9916 mw f�L AIR a a J I HOMESTEAD BUUCKCK BOARD TRAIL _ \ D AVIS RD.w r / LLLLU � � _ 4NITA .IZ6. M F - � 0 AUB WHITE DR. y� 9� AVEN UE SAID Public Hearing will be held on Tuesday, May 30, 1978, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall , 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place, all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission PUBLICH: Palm Desert Post May 11 , 1978 I s , 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 May 8, 1978 LEGAL NOTICE CITY OF PALM DESERT REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM R-1 20,000 TO PR-4 ON A 37.8 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED SOUTH OF LITTLE BEND AND NORTH OF MESA VIEW EXTENDED BETWEEN ALAMO AND ARROW TRAIL. CASE NO. C/Z 02-78 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by CHACAHUALA, LTD. , for approval of a Change of Zone from R-1 20,000 (Single-family residential , min. 20,000 sq. ft. lot size) zone to PR-4 (Planned Residential , max. 4 du/acre) zone on a 37.8 acre parcel located south of Little Bend and north of Mesa View extended between Alamo and Arrow Trail , more particularly described as : APN 631-170-001 APN 631-170-006 APN 631-170-002 APN 631-170-007 APN 631-170-003 APN 631-170-008 APN 631-170-004 APN 631-170-009 APN 631-170-005 ,fL! TTTTT yGryT r O T I! � 2 ITTIL.T{j �.�JI� 1L e ,TL=a W BE a 0 W CS!� H BEl AIR KUADez 1 as HOMESTEAD OAD W _ yl W m BUCKBOARD—TRAIL _ DAVIS RD. ���pp yygpp TI� 'lypyy L 4 ITAJZ1/ / DTI J C 11 1 W q�/ 1'{ WHITE DR. �{ c rt a \ >/Y YY 6P/ / Y AVENUE SAID Public Hearing will be held on Tuesday, May 30, 1978, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall , 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place, all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post May 11 , 1978 e. ti r 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM OESERT,CAUFORNIA92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 May 8, 1978 LEGAL NOTICE CITY OF PALM DESERT REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PRELIMI- NARY DESIGN REVIEW FOR A 132-UNIT CONDOMI_N.IUM PROJECT ON APPROXIMATELY 38 ACRES LOCATED SOUTH OF LITTLE BEND TRAIL AND NORTH OF MESA VIEW EXTENDED BETWEEN ALAMO AND ARROW TRAIL. CASE NOS. DP 09-78 and 126MF NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by CHACAHUALA, LTD. , for. approval of a Development Plan and Preliminary Design Review for 132 condo- minium units, .a recreation building and common open space on approximately 38 acres within the PR-4 (Planned Residential , maximum 4 du/acre) zone, generally located south of Little Bend Trail and north of Mesa View extended between Alamo and Arrow Trail , more particularly described as: APN 631-170-001 APN 631-170=006 APN 631-170-002 APN 631-170407 APN 631-170-003 APN 631-170-008 APN 631-170-004 APN 631-170-009 I APN 631-170-005 - - _S 11 Q W 1J.e L 1 , J 0 W I Jyl—ItyV1l' Q Q 2 BEL AIR amp L HOMESTEAD AD /� �LZIJ_._ L 11 ((�� H -SITU CIK 8I0ARD TRAIL \ DAVIS RD.a LI Q LI �. L�u���P�// \ DP 09. 78 L I 1Z6. MF - AR UM 4 T1 IEEE rc / ` — W w ��.L .11.. . 1 WHITE DR. y� .A V E—N U E' SAID Public Hearing will be held on Tuesday, May 30, 1978, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall , 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place, all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission PUBLICH: Palm Desert Post May 11 , 1978 /o 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Case No. : DP 09-78 and 126MF Project: Development Plan for 132-unit Condominium Project Applicant: Chacahuala, Ltd. Enclosed please find materials describing a project for which the following is being requested: Approval of a Development Plan and Preliminary Design Review for a 132-unit condominium project on approximately 38 acres located south of Little Bend Trail and north of Mesa View extended between Alamo and Arrow Trail . The attached data was prepared by the applicant and is being forwarded to you for comments and recommended Conditions of Approval . The City is interested in the probable impacts on the natural environment (e.g. water and air pollution) and on public resources (e.g. demand for schools, hospitals, parks, power generation, sewage treatment, etc. ) Your comments and recommended conditions of approval must be received by this office prior to 5:00 p.m. May 19 , 1978, in order to be discussed by the Land Division Committee at their meeting of May 24th The Land Division Committee (comprised of Director of Environmental Services , City Building Official , City Engineer, Fire Marshal and a representative of CVCWD) will discuss the comments and recommended conditions of approval and will forward them to the Planning Commission • through the staff report. Any information received by this office after the receipt deadline will not be discussed by the Land Division Com- mittee nor will it be forwarded to the Planning Commission for consid- eration. Very truly yours, Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services PAW/ks PLEASE RETURN MAP WITH COMMENTS CIRCULATION LIST FOR ALL CASES Circulation of Tentative Maps, Parcel Maps, CUP's, GPA's, etc: REVIEW COMMITTEE: 1. Palm Desert Director of Environmental Services - Paul Williams Palm Desert. Director of Building & Safety - Jim Hill Palm Desert Director of Public Works - L. Clyde Beebe Palm Desert Fire Marshall - Bud Engel 5. Robert P. Brock Office of Road Commissioner and County Surveyor Administration Office Building, Room 313 46-209 Oasis Street Indio, California 92201 (Phone: 347-8511, ext 267) 6. Lloyd Rogers Supervisor - Riverside County Health Department / County Administration Building„Room am' V 46-209 Oasis Street Indio, California 92201 (Phone: 347-8511, ext 287) 7. Lowell 0. Weeks �eneral Manager - Chief Engineer Coachella Valley County Water District (C.V.C.W.D. ) P. 0. Box 1058 Coachella, California 92236 (Phone: (714) 398-2651) 8. R. J. Lowry Project Development Services California Department of Transportation P. 0. Box 231 San Bernardino, California 92403 (Phone: (714) 383-4671 ) 9. - Director of Planning and Building City of Indian Wells 45-300 Club Drive Indian Wells, California 92260 (Phone: 345-2831) 10. Director of Planning City of Rancho Mirage 69-825 Highway 111 Rancho Mirage, California 92270 (Phone: 328-8871) 11. Kermit Martin / Southern California Edison Company / P. 0. Box 203 v Palm Desert, California 92260 (Phone: 346-8660) 12• Chuck Morris General Telephone Company 62-147 Desertaire Road Joshua Tree, California 92252 (Phone: 366-8389) 13. R. W. Riddell Engineering Department Southern California Gas Company P. 0. Box 2200 Riverside, California 92506 (Phone: 327-8531, ask for Riverside extension 214) �i Circulation List for All Cases Page Two 14. Roger Harlow erector - Pupil Personnel Service Desert Sands Unified School District 83-049 Avenue 46 Indio, California 92201 (Phone: 347-4071) 15. Jim Langdon Palm Desert Disposal Services, Inc. 36-711 Cathedral Canyon Drive P. O. Drawer LL Cathedral City, California 92234 (Phone: 328-2585 or 328-4687) 16. Stanley Sayles President, Palm Desert Community Services District 44-500 Portola Avenue Palm Desert, California 92260 (Phone: 346-6338) 17. Regional Water Quality Control Board 73-271 Highway 111 , Suite 21 Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 (Phone: ) 18. Harold Horsley Foreman/Mails U. S. Post Office Palm Desert, California 92260 (Phone: 346-3864) 19. Joe Benes Vice President & General Manager Coachella Valley Television P. 0. Box 368 Palm Desert, California 92260 (Phone: 346-8157) 20. Don McNeely President - Palm Desert Chamber of Commerce P. 0. Box 908 Palm Desert, California 92260 (Phone: 346-6111) 21. Scott McClellan, Senior Planner Riverside County Planning Commission County Administration Building, Room 304 46-209 Oasis Street Indio, California 92201 (Phone: 347-8511, ext. 277, 278, & 279) 22. James Whitehead Superintendent - District 6 State Parks and Recreation 1350 Front Street, Room 6054 San Diego, California 92101 (Phone: (714) 236-7411) 23. Les Pricer Redevelopment Agency 73-677 Highway 111 Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 (Phone: 346-6920 24. Robert I. Pitchford, Chairman Architectural Committee of the Palm Desert Property Owners Assoc. 73-833 E1 Paseo Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 i CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 1431 TREASURER'S RECEIPT ' / Y � Received of: m � Date $� S-/-�k w , on For �� " Account No. Amount a , P 7 r A jzr Q 7t` ` ^°v Received : ITY TREASURER a pp b Total a Y N Y w lr I. HAROLD HOUSLF LIEU4, -10F 'TRUSEMR& Consulting Engineers 73-700 Highway 111 Suite 8 PALM DESERT, CA 92260 DATE EMay 1 , 1978 JOe ` 734-G (714) 346.3868 ATTENT1ON Planning Department TO City of PaDl Desert RE Chacahuala Development P. O. Box 1977 Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 GENTLEMEN: WE ARE SENDING YOU 3p Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 24 4-78 Plot Plan 4 4-78 Floor PIa—pl 4 4-78 Elevations Plan 1 5-78 List of Property Owners withing 300 Feet 1 5-1-78 Change of Zone Application 1 5-1-78 Develdpment Plan-Residential-Application 1 5-1-78 Design Review Board Application 1 4-27-78 Check No. 138 in he amount of $1, 604. 00 THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: © For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submitcopies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS Please place the enclosed items on the next Planning Commission agenda. COPY TO , /I SIGNED: (X/ ronle24o-3 AvOubievom rovmeene.Mem.016e If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT CA. 92260 /���ZS'�ZS����OD �S�J Z4 OZSItiJaau� **DEVELOPMENT PLAN** DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES RESIDENTIAL PLANNING DIVISION Chacahuala , Ltd. . 475-5550 Applicant (Plme vi t) 474-7979 10677 W. Pico Blvd. _� - 476-3845 Mailing Address Los Angeles, Ca , 90064 City State -Zip-Code REQUEST: (Describe specific nature of approval requested) Approval of Development Plan of proposed Tproiect on site described below: PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: NW a of Sec. 32 , T5S, R6E FO - See Attached Legal ASSESSOR IS PARCEL NO. - 631-170-001-9 EXISTING ZONING R-1, 20, 000 Property Owner Authorization THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT ARE OW R OF PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND HEREBY GIVE AUTHOR- ATION FOR THE FILING OF T PLIC N. / SIGNATURE GATE AGREEMENT ABSOLVING THE CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL LIABILITIES T Y DEED RESTRICTIONS. I DO BY MY SIGNA E N THIS AG EMEN ,fA9SOL„ y 11 CITY OF M SERT OF ALL LIABI (TIES REGARDING ANY DEED RES- . TI SF THAT M APPLIC 8 TO THE PROPE TY DESCRIBED HEREIN./ SIGNATURE DATE Applicants Signature • / GN ATURE� n DATE (F TAFF USE ONLY) ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS ACCEPTED By ❑ MINISTERIAL ACT E.A.No. 7/`�� ! o ❑ CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION CASE No. ) a9=78 ❑ NEGATIVE DECLARATION Q ❑ OTHER ceveoevne ryep y0 Q��� 4 � . _� L6 �/ 4 P17:7" 7- Ia t_`r= City of P.vla L'esert, Cortncy of Ri:•orside. State of California, . -]escri'�-d as follows: ^;�e ?;ort.,,est quarter of the :;ort,'.,w-st quarter OF Section 32, Township 5 Synth, Ranae 6 East, S"tIn 3rrnar.•iino Base and "eridian; S_CCPDZtiC ::here..frou that ,portion descrit�d as `ollovs: Cn!LY'?;CZ.7G at t::e ?:'orthwest corner of said Section 32; South 1" 24' 30" East, along the :test line of said Section 32, feet to a Point i:7 the West 11ne of said Section 32, this point I-elnn also t.:o '!�-'GE.POZ.'!T OF ^.'?E:;CE Eas'_ rle: anti at rin'7t ar:gl_s to ti2c West line of ^aid Section 32, Tort_°: 33" 35' 30" i:ast, 100 fcr,t; - _..S::C3 SouCnerly and r7zra21oZ to the rest Iine of said Section 32, South 1' _ " 3•.^." cast, 100 f,s.c; f%esterla South S::" 35' 30" ;best, 100 f et, to e. Point in the :Nest :ine o.` -- id "'.-Ction 32• IIrI--CE t!ort::erl!7 and along the '%AsterIy lin•� of said Section 32, 190 :rare or leas, to t^<' :'RC.T. POP.i_ OF PCCZh:1Z.'IG; A_SO Erc2PTr: tl:erefron7 that portion c'_scrihed as follows- at t`e southwest corner of said ;!orth:-'est quarter of the _ q?IAZter; ..ESCE _'ortiz 0" 03' 00" :Jest, along 00 test lire thereof, a distance of 3,;9.05 feet to fee South line of that certain 100 foot square parcel a belonging to the Coachella Valley County Rater District locally referred to as the "twin reservoir" site; _r-:;CE ?.orth 39" 52' 00" Fast, along t':e month line of said parcel, a cistance of 100.00 feet to the southeast corner thereof; _=:7C2 i;Ort:] 0" OS' 00" f✓est, along the r'a.st line of said parcel, a distance o' 100.00 feet to the Northeast tuner thereof; _':'c:;�E .;ort:: -90 52' 00" Fast, a Astanca of 100.00 feet; ,1iC;%CE So2:t'7 0" 03' 00" East, a distance of 469.65 feet to tho South '.ine-. of Iort;n�est nizazY.er of the ;!nrthr:lest .T.'azt0r; South 39" 52' 00" ast, alonr, saic: :1out17 tin^ a distance of _'00.00 faeL to to Point OF :7egi Wing. Cen�reI `::7 SPr:cial 'n;rack: tars for thn :i.scal year 1976-77, as set Or.zt January 20, 1978 1. Harold Housley Consulting Engineers 73-700 Highway 111, Ste. 8 Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Re: Your Project No. 7734-G Chacahuala Development .14 Dear Mr. Housley: As you know, we are planning to develop a 140 unit single family project on the 40 acre parcel located on the south- east corner of Alamo and Homestead. E' You are hereby authorized to act as my agent in connection with the planning, processing and development of our pro- posed project. This authorization includes the signing and i processing of documents in connection with the environmental application, Conditional Use Permit, Tentative Tract Map, } zoning and related matters. Very truly yours, Leonard Greenberg �� 1 General Partner LG:lsp cc: Paul Williams, City of Palm Desert ' 1 CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA TREASURER'S RECEIPT o Received of: r� m /�27 Date 9< w �.00 '� I For p��e..e. 3.Z, Account No. Amount a ` Ia ✓ v, P 7 / -o d ' Received ; ITY TREASURER by Total a 8 N u 8/i�. llCt 35-. W , U�i Ld ,Uhl 31 000 ,3-400 it% � . W I � J p� 0 rz .—� J TIP Tlyr. Aoyloft -- Ie .. .r+:.,, rvey.�H-.►aw+i � •wnr�_ r__ _ ..�-�.r r �-� ... J A ri a( y .1T ; e ��.1'', \ ', y'• ' \ "mot lr '`'+"1(�L'�''jj�'M'��; 7► / - `•S:. .. F S y �%• � � " ;,r�""�/�ii�re,,' "�'�.�',,r�yo1j{ �w�►.."'".�,.�.',+�,)I1�"�w�y�r�I` "S+ '\►/"' �'+"' �•..,MG7'�"' � �` � /` :. 1 ,` iS•r / ,i � -'rO (.�L! �, �� "�",./'r,/I •���„a► V,.."' l./'���' "�1 �t � '� -• ram- �]6.r..,��r '� .. lot IT CfD Z7 cs.r`+A�''" p°,r per,.,! .✓ . . Lij Ats"I foil 0 7"y ���1-07 40 CP z C � ✓ � 1 J �c. V - �+�✓ fp"' wppy,� � C� \� ` fit• � ;;• V - /� •�2-Y�'',''Y9C' I�`I!✓ �' � � "^"�' ' .''t./'J'*�`r� �'�,*._-...-,., %j'+�.,�; �Q�iiw."�I t r•t DATE PRINTED REVISION JOB NO aa�9OjG' GQ'`,T"�✓ c�"�a.►r...a°° ✓ '� - --1-- _ `_ -_ CITY F Q PALM D sERr _ DEFADAir ENWIq®N cE�r'4 4 • � �ERv� L , EXHlSrr ,1 A noo. 6 7f 7 10A 000 I/76 DIMMIC"40" CLUI""" now r' , , t 77 s • REVISIONS ; BY ,I , i • I ..F _ F QT��OCT �i mow ® of z► .. +.r O Iv 33' t 6p' a C7 $C Y tR, t S of R S o � z CD 'i x ' 0 o, 30 29� s CAU. (M4 �D/54' ( -5� 3) � IQ - --- U a liol 31 1 1 czato t2 f -4 7' QhL�R O F t2,$SS r AND t 1 CQ�ifJUl ANti CbtAb%)lT ! { ,,rama Y 0 1 M COA1Du17 Q i ` \ n I! Ln tn r 29.9 91FSB ,' ...., - �,,• aR.� -4- z ,, w� _ _ w ,.. ,- a". _.. .f -,.. ... ,.- ..,...... ... • 1'+r ...F.'.. '"P. t :"KMi. ,.. .. ,. .. <.. -. _.. a .r i:.t 4. :: : .. IfJ.7Yr I J .:, )... a : .:,. ..J.: + i /(! s ss _ .� 1 Q i f F 3�. W61T � Cb,ru � r c xMs , 4 a; i t 3I j(cd CQE OrJ r\1 Ga z �`.�.5 �►t�'P� tv�QaC t�S 411 1--j- _ #4- �wel�tng C,� O Ro w ATCIL Pt PE t.a N r' pESE�xuot R� i , t I _ ter"`► - I SIT � - THE D15TAMC-F-5.. l�l b MINKI M 6 S tUOWki �`sR� T NE , t : C ' 1rFIyA`fiSA,1. Lj T'FIE tv1D.j� RLID :E MA AST AJAIL_AF�LZ FT-O:M RE.COr�Ian T'14r— EQ`.�� L1hsD VU�ST t �U !t` I tE W E FZE E5►A15L f c-AA E,, :k AY M D EL T i I�ib 7 H E \ME :�i I. t`l pM Utsar WD Tut t/its, -TM UAJF- vows rc nat�r~ e►MQ WATUL X P1PELthit I' U)NOM t ; P, b b isi _ I SDUT�t '/teQ�N 1�l ME1VS1Lth1S . t�.S R;�.Ct�,� �Z.�`� Z5/At3 , 1Z'T't�E2LY TD EACf� L'�OU�.1Dty.�'Y ,1 �+ \ ` 1 TH E: `_ " i Y _ LSSi�ty T� E trto LIME A5 A. At►.1D Ct�t�A�:� � �t~`.lfs TUE L�.A�C�Lt. �1 l Z . � j �' �ET\AJfiC:Kl T� MORT4iLY SECTi©I LIME 61+,1D TuF. /jt.TN UJ\JE A-5 70UE AP?EAK 0a M5 D3/3 TuE ' o CA L G.} _ C_.JI 4 W E K1 fC_l- 4EZ L { LI KIE �{(YIIJ�S i� I.LUL A 1 , TAE, LI 1A67I1 WAS TAKEM 01Q? -LTLY VROM Nb N i TNREE hL3 deltSA�1 ES E5-17 A6USMED T"T- FEOi2TU DATE c-at -a) --r s by I M� J EIZSi hIG , TWE, 0FP5E.t SCALE 9 i AM, T ��il�:_t�I f�` �! f�'1 L Al S1 b N S ARE FfZDM Tu E / W - I 1".0 L g''> T`i-�t�T L2C.11 LTa -rWEM cRAwr, > _ e FVEM S8 t tAE 1,✓E� 1 _� SHM GS AIVD 1�Iti1E*l5 Ot�1S Sut1W1� f : F _i �C 1 A ' A, ' ?l��.f 4V1 A.�i A N A IRS: St1 P'Pw U E r--D' ' _ USES KU nui( NEB LESS STk't lSrFMT DEb2EES b .: . A,CLUtZA S SETS DATh-INT STOCMD{RAFTING FOAM NO 101-54 - -