Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDP 09-81 - 10 UNIT CONDOS 1984 PRECISE PLAN . TENTATIVE TPACTo ZONE CIiANGE I PARCEL MAP - VARIANCE U. U. P. REFER TO : 7"r iBUa 7 _ t� ` A � r70LPl-f, tl S�J.a� � - LOCATION : �/� fo� ve,e Pfr,e rd moo✓ .� r� /E v ��'ni 1 ls� REQUEST : : PP�a �� c aF i0 Pa ✓ Dcs ,; ; EXISTING ZONE r'� PREPARATION PROGRESS DATE BY COMMENTS APPLICATION RECEIVED LEGAL PUBLICATION SENT pJ NOTICES SENT FIELD INVESTIGATION DEPTS . NOTIFIED BUILDING i4� , f ENGINEEr21NG FIRE POLICE RECREATION & PARKS SCHOOL DISTRICT DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS FLOOD CONTROL i _ _ c, PRELIMINARY MEETING STAFF REPORT FINAL PLAN APPROVAL PRECISE PLAN ( 6) LANDSCAPING PLAN ( 5 ) PLAN . DIRECTOR MOD. (6 ) HEARINGS & ACTIONS DATE ACTION REVIEW BOARD HEARING VOTE PC. HEARING PUBLISHED PC. PUBLIC HEARING )' APPLICANT NOTIFIED C.C. PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE N0. RESOLUTION NO, [RECORDED FFECTIVE DATE FOR DA BANK ONING MAP CORRECTED f. MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY - OCTOBER 30, 1984 6:00 P.M. - CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBER 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE A STUDY SESSION WAS HELD PRIOR TO THE MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBER CONFERENCE ROOM, AT 6:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. if. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Downs lead in the pledge of allegiance. III. ROLL CALL Commissioners Present: Commissioner Downs Commissioner Erwood Commissioner Richards Commissioner Wood Chairman Crites Commissioners Absent: None Staff Members Present: Ray Diaz Stan Sawa Phil Drell Phil Joy Doug Phillips Barry McClellan Tonya Monroe IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Approval of the minutes of the meeting of October 16, 1984. Action: Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Wood, approving the October 16, 1984, minutes as submitted. Carried 4-0-1 (Commissioner Erwood abstained.) V. SUMMARY OF COUNCIL ACTION Mr. Diaz summarized the actions of the city council at its meeting of October 25, 1984. VI. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Case N DP 09-81 TT 18027, and 229 MF - ROBERT WARD, Applicant Request for approval of a one-year time extension of a development plan, design review case, and a tentative tract map to allow the construction of ten condominium units in the PR-7 zone located at the southeast corner of Fairhaven Drive (future) and Park View Drive. Action: Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Wood, approving a one-year extension for DP 09-81, TT 18027, and 229 MF, with previous conditions. Carried 5-0. '.L City of Palm Desert Department of Environmental Services Staff Report TO: Planning Commission DATE: October 30, 1984 CASE NO: DP 09-8 , TT 18027, and 229 MF REQUEST: Approval of a one year extension of a development plan, design review case, and a tentative tract map to allow the construction of ten condominium units in the PR-7 zone located at the southeast corner of Fairhaven Drive (future) and Park View Drive. APPLICANT: MR. ROBERT WARD 60-5602 West Hastings Street Vancouver, BC V6B 1P2 ARCHITECT: MR. CHARLES MARTIN 73-725 El Paseo #24 C Palm Desert, CA 92260 I. DISCUSSION: The development plan, tentative tract map, and design review case provide for a ten unit condominium project on the subject property. The tentative tract map also provides for five duplex lots. Original approval date of these cases is May 13, 1982. An'extension was granted in May, 1983, by the planning commission. The applicant is requesting a one-year extension for the development plan, design review case, and the tentative tract, as allowed by municipal code. This would be the last extension for the tentative tract map permitted. The city council recently denied a rezoning and precise plan request by the applicant for a 48 unit affordable high density project on this site. The applicant is also in the process of requesting approval for a new project utilizing a 25% density bonus. If that project is approved, this approval will be null and void. II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff feels this request is acceptable and recommends: 1. Approval of a one-year extension for DP 09-81, TT 18027, and 229 MF with all previous conditions to apply; III. ATTACHMENTS: A. Letter of Request B. Site Plan Prepared by Reviewed and Approved by,, Am October 11, 1984 Mr. Ramon Diaz Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert Palm Desert, CA 92260 Re: Tentative Tract Map 18027 Dear Mr. Diaz: Please extend the above referenced map an additional year. We have experienced difficulties in developing this lot due to the recession and attempts to redesign the plot plan to a higher density. Thank you for your consideration. lobe r Y i � ,N =HE O/IYo/ /♦•LM�GSFRT CAa/�-. - oL of of TENTATIVE �A,eKV/Gd.(/ .. n,...W�. t . T.2AC7- MAP NO /B027 ^.•.••.. W • x•n a Scbd:v/. n /vE a r• a, -=j F" t ...... R ac,e7.ae,e➢e914. SmI M, 15,aE56Td�J . � I,P I1 i : J s _- - � __Y' • t rI1••Yi e•n A//j e//cF,Sc%i. Scc.ro, � r � NFl•M'I♦ J/n Fa/H' � ..a.I I11 ♦I ., •Hse' .Nr4i '11,.I • '1p�-- •`�`�Yw• �'` 'r< ,.. .I,r.. a,af l� L /.•:... I` or /. 1 -1,� y • 00. O G..•. h .. � Yid" - _ ...r � . ./ow 1 J" a r} l ' .; N1 1 �[�-.' N•fMn /Wn./nt.MeeN.! S CA f1=c<J.{ ! Ir,", d ` / ♦ / _` )cF //e Road,f6r/m Sp<ing r F fOR DOAJ/N/UM P09E5 ( : a l •-s r • F.,•I« JJJ��� ,Q / J_or a o... YJ e..d/..J ON J %r• r,.o.o s!/ sr '// .v�pere.rd By 6 f �� •,-/1� i'fi .•Ja ar/ PCYa I�u/nnglon?Alfeo !n)Jea-es)i • (,/a=J a.I I , I � � IM.; Y/Y a.J•fr /a 9f N.Po//n CbnS/On 0/ �° •ec .`�!� 91L( 0 wex. c✓..ram i / / i /J ,yv _ i •i `i F=sI. ElcrYl.<//y SauMrrn e•L/Cdwn cc ��`-� . � ' V— � ' /• 1,L •• � I � •� M \ / ( Gaa--nulA<!Lb/,I GFa G. ,:. ! / d/ ♦ Te/epbone-G<xre///ewux Co . • d°-qrr- ,L' • •. /y <uJr- ✓eronY vlopo+ed R<F.w.rY.{/ fy tl .{I n.yrl a / / i•� ••• 4 I Alse IJF.,In/a FJ lA,ve)/MwaJ/.LO/lel.Mlf� / �n( y a e,•y�� f/ �faf� •i aa�'\ '�• � \�t� .0 •f i�♦! / m...nq/oimg4�.or.+a ald=nLs/ Y 1 � (• In a• J' :\'L ,�° �° \ Lo/5/ -J :mc// - / E, Lo/ 7 7�/✓ewe • • �.f•r PR7 1 ,,,.•f� _N,N A!� i , M �r �, COndo/K/n/um P✓�cs . Ir a 111,0 \ (Jotle J) of p "`. - i�' ,P, •P' /. /^. Pa r \ \ et J J rb•<I g �✓ N 'I yr,./ems AMENDED NO. I i? p�e.�f . . /-e. ✓..✓. _. � � Amended /vo✓.•^J,/➢e/dn - -- - s✓omd/ed June EO✓ge/ .. o /o /or) Tent mdp t9311 _ I , NOTICE OF DETERMINATION Negative Declaration TO: W Office of the County Clerk ( ) Secretary for Resources County of Riverside 1416 Ninth St., Rm 1311 4050 Main Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Riverside, CA 92501 FROM: CITY OF PALM DESERT 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 15083(f) of the State EIR Guidelines. Project Title/Common Name: DP 09-81, OSC ENTERPRISES, INC. Date of Project Approval: March 2, 1982 State Clearinghouse Number (if submitted): N.A. Contact Person: Stan Sawa, Principal Planner Project Location: Southeast corner of Parkview Drive and Fairhaven. Project Description: Construction of 10 unit condominium project. This is to advise that the City of Palm Desert has made the following determinations regarding the above described project: 1. The project has been approved by the City; 2. The project ( ) will W will not have a significant effect on the environment; 3. An Environmental Impact Report was not prepared in connection with this project; and, 4. A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. A copy of the Negative Declaration may be examined at the above City Hall address. —7— —�2 Date 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CAUFORNIA92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: May 6, 1983 HOFFMAN BUILDERS, INC. c/o Billington, Feiro and Fivash, Inc. 1445 N. Sunrise Way Palm Springs, CA 92262 Re: Time Extensi n`D-P'09- -1- TT 18027 and 229 MF The Planning Com n of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of May 3, 1983. Approved Time Extension for DP 09-91 & 229 MF to May 13, 1984 Approved Time Extension for TT 18027 to November 13, 1984 Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the director of environmental services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. RAMON A. DIAZ, SECRETARY PLANNING COMMISSION RAD/lcr cc: File MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY - MAY 3, 1983 7:00 P.M. - CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS I. CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Commissioner Kryder III. ROLL CALL Members Present: Commissioner Crites Commissioner Kryder Commissioner Downs Vice Chairman Richards Excused Absent: Chairman Wood Staff Present: Ray Diaz Stan Sawa Phil Joy Barry McClellan IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: April 19, 1983 Moved by Commissioner Kryder, seconded by Commissioner Crites, to approve the minutes as submitted; carried unanimously 3-0-1 (with Downs abstaining). V. SUMMARY OF COUNCIL ACTION Mr. Diaz reviewed the actions of the council for the meeting of April 28, 1983. VI. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed on the consent calendar are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless members of the planning commission or audience request specific items be removed from the consent calendar for separate discussion and action. A. Case N DP 09-81 TT 18027, and 229 MF - HOFFMAN BUILDERS, INC., c/o BILL . , FEII2O, AND FIVASH, INC., Applicants Approval of time extensions for a development plan, tentative tract map and design review case to allow the construction of 10 condominium units in the PR-7 zone located at the southeast corner of Fairhaven Drive (future) and Parkview Drive. Rec: Approve as presented. Action: Moved by Commissioner Kryder, seconded by Commissioner Crites, to approve the consent calendar item; carried unanimously 4-0. VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Continued Case Nos. VAR O1-83 and PP 05-83 - EGS METRO AND C.G. DUNHAM CO., Applicants Request for approval of a precise plan of design, variance for off-street parking and Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact to allow the addition of three 5640 square foot commercial buildings to an existing shopping center in the C-1, S.P. zone located at the northwest corner of El Paseo and Larkspur Lane. Mr. Diaz reviewed the staff report and explained the changes submitted by the -1- City of Palm Desert Department of Environmental Services Staff Report TO: Planning Commission DATE: May 3, 1983 CASE NO: DP 09-81, T 18027 and 229 MF REQUEST: Approval of a one year extension of a development plan and design review case and 18 month extension of a tentative tract map to allow the construction of 10 condominium units in the PR-7 zone located at the southeast corner of Fairhaven Drive (future) and Parkview Drive. APPLICANT: HOFFMAN BUILDERS, INC. ry c/o Billington, Feiro, and Fivash, Inc. 1445 N. Sunrise Way Palm Springs, CA 92262 I. DISCUSSION• The development plan, tentative tract map, and design review case provide for a 10 unit condominium project on the subject property. The tentative tract map also provides for five duplex lots. Original approval date of these cases is May 13, 1982. The applicant is requesting a one year extension for the development plan and design review case and 18 month time extension for the tentative tract, as allowed by municipal code. II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff feels this request is acceptable and recommends: 1. Approval of a one year extension for DP 09-81 and 229 MF with all previous conditions to apply; 2. Approval of an 18 month extension for TT 18027 with all previous conditions to apply. III. ATTACHMENTS: A. Letter of Request B. Site Plan Prepared by Reviewed and Approved by /Ir I Yz BILLINGTON , FEIRO & FIVASH , INC. n; Planning, Engineering, Surveying . TELEPHONES (714) 323-4573 1445 NORTH SUNRISE WAY (714) 346-8015 PALM SPRINGS. CA. 92262 -71 April 13, 1923 Planning Department City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane -- Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Attention: Stan Sawa Reference: Tentative Tract No. 13027 Gentlemen: We hereby apply for an extension of time for the above referenced tract and associated Design Review and Development Plan. Sincerely, Billington, Feiro & Fivash, Inc. Pete ngton, iPresident PB/nb cc: Robt. Ward ai I I i 77. r17--- LN IS If, L `r I � ^'• -' ,.. r2 is u ` m is 2 II o•e.w..<— 01 � 'o a v n i;y#, � C}•" �.� p�ov i I 00 II �? < 0 �.�� I •U nW q°.Q nQ ° -'t 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CAUFORNIA92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: March 4, 1982 MOE HOFFMAN HOFFMAN BUILDERS, INC. 766 Vella Road Palm Springs, CA 92262 CASE NO DP 09-81, T 18027 (Amendment) and 229 MF The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of March 2, 1982. Approved Request by Resolution Nos. 785 & 786 Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. RAMON A. DIAZ, SECRdRY PLANNING COMMISSION RAD/Icr cc: CVWD File PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 786 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN, PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW CASE AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF 10 RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM UNITS IN THE PR-7 ZONE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF PARKVIEW DRIVE AND FAIRHAVEN DRIVE. CASE NO. DP 09-81 and 229 MF 4 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 2nd day of March, 1982, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider a request by HOFFMAN BUILDERS, INC. for approval of a Development Plan, Preliminary Design Review Case and Negative Declaration of Environmmental Impact to allow development of 10 residential condominium units in the PR-7 zone located at the southeast corner of Fairhaven Drive and Parkview Drive, more particularly described as: Lot 6 TT 18027 WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedures to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-8911, in that the Director of Environmental Services has determined that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment and a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact has been prepared. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts to justify their actions, as described below: a. The proposed project generally conforms to the intent and purpose of the PR Zone District. b. The proposed project is adequately suited for the specific site i and is compatible swith existing and proposed development in the area. C. The proposed project will not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of he community. WHEREAS, THE Design Review Board did on February 23, 1982, approve preliminary plans for said project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission in this case. 2. That the Planning Commission does hereby approve Development Plan No. 09-81 and Design Review Case No. 229 MF subject to the same conditions imposed on the approval of TT 18027 (Amendment) and as attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 2nd day of March, 1982, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: CRITES, MILLER, RICHARDS, WOOD, KRYDER f B ? NOES: NONE �- ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE GEORGE D. KRYDER, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary /pa PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 786 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Case No. DP 09-81 and 229 MF Department of Environmental Services: 1. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all the requirements, limitations, and restrictions of all municipal ordinances and State and Federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 2. Full public improvements including traffic safety lighting as required by ordinance and the City Engineer shall be installed in accordance with City standards. 3. Prior to submittal of the Final Map, the applicant shall provide the Department of Environmental Services with a list of proposed street names with at least three alternatives. The approval of the final street name shall be made by the Director of Environmental Services. 4. The CC&R's for this development shall be submitted to the Director of Environmental Services for review, and final approval by the City Attorney prior to the issuance of any building permits. Prior to recordation of the final subdivision map, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer: a. The document to convey title. b. Covenants and restrictions to be recorded. C. Management and maintenance agreement to be entered into with the owners of the units of the project. 5. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall meet the requirements of the respective service districts. 6. Area shall be annexed to appropriate Improvement Districts having jurisdiction over the subject area. 7. All dedicated land and/or easements required by this approval shall be granted to the City of Palm Desert, without cost to the City and free of all liens and encumbrances. 8. All on-site utilities, including cable TV, shall be placed underground and shall be completely concealed from view except certain appurtenances as may be approved by the Director of Environmental Services. 9. Complete plans and specifications shall be submitted as required by Ordinance to the City Engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The Subdivider shall submit "as-built" plans prior to acceptance of the subdivision improvements by the City. 10. In order to maintain reasonable fire protection during the construction period, the subdivider shall maintain passable vehicular access to all buildings. An adequate number of fire hydrants with required fire flows shall be installed as recommended by the Fire Marshal. 11. Prior to recordation of the Final Map, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. 12. The water system shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system of Tract No. 18027 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the City Fire Marshall' 13. All private streets shall be inspected by the Engineering Department and a Standard Inspection Fee shall be paid. 14. The applicant shall have twelve (12) months from the date of the approval of the tentative map for filing of the final map unless an extension of time of up to eighteen (18) months is granted by a Resolution of the City Council. 15. Drainage and Signalization Fund contributions as required by City Ordinance shall be made prior to recordation of the final map. 16. Development shall pay a fee in lieu thereof as a condition of the final map for park PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 786 and recreation purposes, based upon the densities developed on lot 6. 17. Final map not to be recorded until design changes, if required by approval of preliminary plans by the Design Review Board are incorporated. 18. Subdivision to be provided with minimum six foot high solid masonry wall around project (except for approved openings) as approved by Design Review Board. 19. Additional storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer. 20. Drainage facilities shall be provided per Ordinance No. 218 and the Master Drainage Plan to the specifications of the Public Works Director. 21. Waiver of access to Fairway Drive and Parkview Drive shall be offered on the final map except at one authorized location on Fairway Drive. 22. The emergency access gate on Fairhaven Drive shall be located south of the proposed curb return. 23. A turnaround facility shall be provided within the development. 24. The applicant's civil engineer shall submit a boundary survey map. 25. The installation of curb and gutter on Fairhaven Drive at 20 feet from centerline, sidewalk and matching paving. 26. The private drive shall be shown as lot 7 on the Final Map. 27. The installation of curb and gutter on Parkview Drive at 32 ft. from centerline, sidewalk and matching paving. 28. All existing electrical distribution lines, telephone, cable antenna television, and r. similar service wires or cables, which are adjacent to the property being developed shall be installed underground as a part of development from the nearest existing %''" pole not on the property being developed. Fire Marshal 29. Install a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a two hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 30. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants located at each street intersection (a) but not greater than 500 feet apart in any direction. a. Exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. b. Curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 31. Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. 32. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Tract No. 18027 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal." Upon approval, the original plan will be returned to the J developer. 33. Prior to the delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. 34. Fire lane required as per municipal code. 35. Cul-de-sac required as per municipal code. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 785 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Case No. TT 18027 (Amendment) Department of Environmental Services: 1. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all the requirements, limitations, and restrictions of all municipal ordinances and State and Federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 2. Full public improvements including traffic safety lighting as required by ordinance and the City Engineer shall be installed in accordance with City standards. 3. Prior to submittal of the Final Map, the applicant shall provide the Department of Environmental Services with a list of proposed street names with at least three alternatives. The approval of the final street name shall be made by the Director of Environmental Services. 4. The CC&R's for this development shall be submitted to the Director of Environmental Services for review, and final approval by the City Attorney prior to the issuance of any building permits. Prior to recordation of the final subdivision map, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer: a. The document to convey title. b. Covenants and restrictions to be recorded. C. Management and maintenance agreement to be entered into with the owners of the units of the project. 5. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall meet the requirements of the respective service districts. 6. Area shall be annexed to appropriate Improvement Districts having jurisdiction over the subject area. 7. All dedicated land and/or easements required by this approval shall be granted to the City of Palm Desert, without cost to the City and free of all liens and encumbrances. 8. All on-site utilities, including cable TV, shall be placed underground and shall be completely concealed from view except certain appurtenances as may be approved by the Director of Environmental Services. 9. Complete plans and specifications shall be submitted as required by Ordinance to the City Engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The Subdivider shall submit "as-built" plans prior to acceptance of the subdivision improvements by the City. 10. In order to maintain reasonable fire protection during the construction period, the subdivider shall maintain passable vehicular access to all buildings. An adequate number of fire hydrants with required fire flows shall be installed as recommended by the Fire Marshal. 11. Prior to recordation of the Final Map, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. 12. The water system shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the f water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system of Tract No. 18027 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the City Fire Marshal." 13. All private streets shall be inspected by the Engineering Department and a Standard Inspection Fee shall be paid. 14. The applicant shall have twelve (12) months from the date of the approval of the tentative map for filing of the final map unless an extension of time of up to eighteen (18) months is granted by a Resolution of the City Council. 15. Drainage and Signalization Fund contributions as required by City Ordinance shall be made prior to recordation of the final map. 16. Development shall pay a fee in lieu thereof as a condition of the final map for park PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 785 and recreation purposes, based upon the densities developed on lot 6. 17. Final map not to be recorded until design changes, if required by approval of preliminary plans by the Design Review Board are incorporated. 18. Subdivision to be provided with minimum six foot high solid masonry wall around project (except for approved openings) as approved by Design Review Board. 19. Additional storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer. ^1 20. Drainage facilities shall be provided per Ordinance No. 218 and the Master Ji Drainage Plan to the specifications of the Public Works Director. 21. Waiver of access to Fairway Drive and Parkview Drive shall be offered on the final map except at one authorized location on Fairway Drive. 22. The emergency access gate on Fairhaven Drive shall be located south of the proposed curb return. 23. A turnaround facility shall be provided within the development. 24. The applicant's civil engineer shall submit a boundary survey map. 25. The installation of curb and gutter on Fairhaven Drive at 20 feet from centerline, sidewalk and matching paving. 26. The private drive shall be shown as lot 7 on the Final Map. 27. The installation of curb and gutter on Parkview Drive at 32 ft. from centerline, sidewalk and matching paving. 28. All existing electrical distribution lines, telephone, cable antenna television, and similar service wires or cables, which are adjacent to the property being developed shall be installed underground as a part of development from the nearest existing pole not on the property being developed. Fire Marshal 29. Install a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a two hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 30. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants located at each street intersection (a) but not greater than 500 feet apart in any direction. a. Exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. b. Curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 31. Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. 32. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the I water system in Tract No. 18027 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal." Upon approval, the original plan will be returned to the developer. 33. Prior to the delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. 34. Fire lane required as per municipal code. 35. Cul-de-sac required as per municipal code. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 785 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP AMENDMENT TO PERMIT RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUMS AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF 10 RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM UNITS IN THE PR-7 ZONE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF FAIRHAVEN DRIVE AND PARVIEW DRIVE. CASE NO. TT 18027 (Amendment) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 2nd day of March, 1982, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of HOFFMAN BUILDERS, INC. for approval of Tentative Tract 18027 (Amendment) and Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact to allow development of 10 residential condominium units in the PR-7 zone located at the southeast corner of Fairhave Drive and Parkview Drive, more particularly described as: Lot 6, TT 18027 WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedures to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-8911, in that the Director of Environmental Services has determined that the project will not have any significant adverse impact on the environment and a Negative Declaration has been prepared. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts and reasons as justified in the staff report for Planning Commission dated March 2, 1982, on file in the Department of Environmental Services, to exist to recommend approval of the Tentative Tract Map (Amendment): (a) That the proposed map is 'consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (b) That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (c) That the site is physically suitable for the type of development. (d) That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. (e) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. (f) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. (g) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. WHEREAS, in the review of this Tentative Tract Map the Planning Commission has considered the effect of the contemplated action on the housing needs of the region for purposes of balancing these needs against the public service needs of the residents of the City of Palm Desert and its environs, with available fiscal and environmental resources. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission in this case; 2. That it does hereby recommend approval to the City Council of the City of Palm Desert of the above described Tentative Map No. 18027 (Amendment) for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached conditions. FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED that the recommended conditions of approval do include a requirement that the applicant pay in lieu fees to comply with the requirements of Article 26.48 of the City of Palm Desert Subdivision Ordinance. In return, it is recommended that the City Council agree to use said fees for park purposes in conformance with an adopted master plan, within five (5) years of the recordation of the final map. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTEd-at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 785 Planning Commission, held on this 2nd day of March, 1982, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: CRITES, MILLER, RICHARDS, WOOD, KRYDER NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE GEORGE D. KRYDER, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary /Ir ,..J J MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 2, 1982 Commissioner Richards concurred with Commissioner Wood's concern but added stores having a larger area would not have congestion, so it should be left up to the descretion of market owners to determine the number of machines to be used within the limits of the proposed Ordinance. Moved by Commissioner Crites, seconded by Commissioner Miller, to adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 784, recommending approval to the City Council of ZOA 02-82, as presented by staff, defining arcades as 5 or more electronic and mechanical machines with a Conditional Use Permit. Carried 3-0-2 (with Commissioner Wood abstaining; and, Commissioner Richards abstaining because of lack of any real feeling on the issue). B. Case No. DP 09-81, TT 18027 (Amendment) and 229 MF - HOFFMAN BUILDERS, INC., Applicant Request for approval of a Development Plan, an amended Tentative Tract Map for condominium purposes and preliminary 10 condominium units in the PR-7, S.P. zone (Planned Residential, 7 d.u./acre, Scenic Preservation Overlay) located at the southeast corner of Parkview Drive and future extension of Fairhaven Drive. Mr. Smith presented the staff report for this request stating that the main concern was the height of 30 ft. The Municipal Code limits height in the PR-7 to 30 ft. or two stories, therefore, the proposed project would conform if the garages were lowered 4 feet below grade to conform to the definition of "basement". Staff recommended approval. Commissioner Richards asked if the actual 30 ft. limit is from normal grade or could they build pads up and then dig down.. Mr. Diaz replied that height is measured from finished grade but the review process precludes artifical pad construction. Commissioner Wood asked for clarification of the height. limit because of misunderstandings with the project on Ryway Place. Mr. Diaz explained that the Ordinances written in 1975 state that a basement is not to be included as a story and the height of the basement above grade is not to be included in the height limit. In the case, of Ryway Place and this project, staff did include the area above grade in measuring total height. Chairman Kryder opened the public hearing and asked if the applicant wished to make a presentation. MR. CHARLES MARTIN, 73-160 El Paseo, stated he was present to answer any questions the Commission might have. In response to a question relating to garage drainage, Mr. Martin explained that the Civil Engineer would resolve this problem. Mr. Martin then stated that they were now looking into the correct definition of a story to exclude a mezzanine with a bathroom. Mr. Diaz clarified to Mr. Martin that the definition in the Municipal Code would have to be followed, and any determination by ICBO would not impact the code. Chairman Kryder closed the public hearing and asked for further comments from the Commission. Commissioner Richards wanted the applicant to understand that in no way would the height of the building exceed 30 ft. Mr. Martin reviewed the conditions briefly and stated he concurred. Moved by Commissioner Crites, seconded by Commissioner Richards, to adopt findings as recommended by Staff. Carried unanimously 5-0. Moved by Commissioner Wood, seconded by Commissioner Richards, to waive further reading and adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 785, recommending approval of TT 18027 (Amendment) to City Council, and Planning Commission Resolution No. 786, approving DP 09-81 and. 229 MF and Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact. Carried unanimously 5-0. -2- City of Palm Desert Department,of. Environmental-Services, Staff Report TO: Planning Commission REPORT ON: Development Plan, Amendment to Tentative Tract Map do Preliminary Design Review Board action. APPLICANT: MOE HOFFMAN HOFFMAN BUILDERS, INC. 766 Vella Road Palm Springs, CA 92262 CASE NOS: DP 09-81, TT 18027 (Amendment) and 229 MF DATE: March 2, 1982 I. REQUEST• Approval of a Development Plan, an amended Tentative Tract Map for condominium purposes and preliminary Design Review Case to allow construction of 10 condominium units in the PR-7, S.P. zone (Planned Residential, 7 d.u./acre, Scenic Preservation Overlay) located at the southeast corner of Parkview Drive and future extension of Fairhaven Drive. II. BACKGROUND: A. HISTORY: In September, 1981, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract 18027, a seven lot subdivision. The present applications involves the development of 10 condominium units on lot 6 of TT 18027. B. ADJACENT ZONING/LAND USE: North: PR-7 S.P./Condominium South: R-1 12,000/Single Family Residential East: R-1 12,000/Single Family Residential West: PR-7 S.P./Vacant C. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential 4-7 d.u./acre D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The Director of Environmental Services has determined that the proposed project will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment and a Negative Declaration has been prepared. III. DISCUSSION: TT 18027 was approved in September 1981. The map provided 5 lots for the construction of a duplex on each, a private street and a remaining parcel on which to construct 10 residential units. The present applications involve the development of the 10 residential units. Development Plan approval is required for all developments in the PR zone and a tract map is required because the units are to be condominiums. The building plans have been reviewed by the Design Review Board and obtained preliminary approval. Affirmation of the DRB action is required. The applicant proposes 10 condominium units in 3 structures. Two structures will contain 3 units and the third building will have 4 units. -1- i Staff Report DP 09-81, TT 18027, 229 MF March 2, 1982 The property in question is zoned PR-7, which permits a maximum height of two stories or 30 feet. The buildings in question conform to the 30 foot limit. The structures are two (2) story units over the garage area. In order to comply with the code provisions relating to stories, the garage level must be submerged to qualify as a *basement, so that no more than four feet of the garage extends above adjacent existing grade. If more than four (4) feet extends out of the ground, then this level is considered a story and the project would not be in compliance with the height limit. (i.e., the maximum 2 story limit). The grading plan submitted indicates that the garages will exceed the permitted limit. The grading will need to be revised in order to comply. Each unit will be provided with a private yard in the rear. Recreational Amenities: 1 swimming pool 1 jacuzzi Parking: Required 20 covered spaces 5 uncovered spaces Provided 20 covered spaces 5 uncovered spaces Unit Sizes: Units Plan Sq.ft. Plan Treatment 7 A 1231 3 bedrm., 2Y2 bath 3 B 1272 2 bedrm., 2Yz bath Lot Size/Density/Building Coverage: Size: 61,923 Density: 1 dwlg. unit per 6192 sq.ft. (ie 7 units per acre) Coverage: 9527 sq.ft. -- 15% Landscaping: 29,266 sq.ft. -- 47% Perimeter Treatment: A block wall will be provided along the north and west property line and around the swimming pool. The block wall has been reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board. IV. CONSIDERATIONS: A. TENTATIVE TRACT: Specific findings and justifications must be made in order to approve a Tentative Tract Amendment to permit condominiums. Those findings are as follows: 1. That the proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. 2. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. *Basement means that portion of building between floor and ceiling which is partly or wholly underground. A basement shall be counted as a story for purposes of height measurement where more than one-half of its height is above the average level of the adjoining ground. -2- Staff Report DP 09-81, TT 18027, 229 MF March 2, 1982 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. 4. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. 5. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. 6. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. 7. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. The justification for recommending approval of the Tentative Tract Amendment to permit condominium is as follows: 1. The density allowed by this map is consistent with General Plan and College of the Desert Specific Plan. 2. Fairhaven Drive will be dedicated, improved and drainage facilities will be provided in conformance with adopted General Plans, Master Drainage Plans and Zoning Ordinances. 3 & 4. The site is of sufficient size, shape and topography for the proposed type and density of development. 5 & 6. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or serious public health problems because it will be developed in concert with applicable local, state and federal regulations. 7. There have been no easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. Staff feels there are sufficient grounds to justify recommending approval of the Tentative Tract amendment to permit condominiums. B. DEVELOPMENT PLAN: Staff feels that plans submitted are adequate for approval of the development plan subject to lowering of the garages as required by Municipal Code. C. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD: The Design Review Board reviewed the plans and granted preliminary approval at its February 23, 1982, meeting. V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on justifications contained in this report and the attached draft Resolutions, staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the findings for the Tentative Tract Map as noted above, and adopt Resolution Nos. , approving DP 09-81 and 229 MF, and recommending approval to the City Council of TT 18027. "A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of -3- Staff Report DP 09-81, TT 18027, 229 MF March 2, 1982 Palm Desert recommending approval of a Tentative Tract Map (Amendment to permit residential condominiums) and Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact to allow construction of 10 residential condominium units in the PR-7 zone located at the south east corner of Parkview and Fairhaven Drives." A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert approving a Development Plan, preli- minary Design Review Case and Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact to allow development of 10 residential condominium units in the PR-7 zone located at the south east corner of Parkview and Fairhaven Drives." VI. ATTACHMENTS: A. Draft Resolutions B. Initial Study and Draft Negative Declaration C. Plans and Exhibits D. Comments of various agencies Prepared by Reviewed and Approved by�� - 7� /lr -4- •1 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ### A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP AMENDMENT TO PERMIT RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUMS AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF 10 RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM UNITS IN THE PR-7 ZONE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF FAIRHAVEN DRIVE AND PARVIEW DRIVE. CASE NO. TT 18027 (Amendment) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 2nd day of March, 1982, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of HOFFMAN BUILDERS, INC. for approval of Tentative Tract 18027 (Amendment) and Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact to allow development of 10 residential condominium units in the PR-7 zone located at the southeast corner of Fairhave Drive and Parkview Drive, more particularly described as: Lot 6, TT 18027 WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedures to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-8911, in that the Director of Environmental Services has determined that the project will not have any significant adverse impact on the environment and a Negative Declaration has been prepared. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts and reasons as justified in the staff report for Planning Commission dated March 2, 1982, on file in the Department of Environmental Services, to exist to recommend approval of the Tentative Tract Map (Amendment): (a) That the proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (b) That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (c) That the site is physically suitable for the type of development. (d) That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. (e) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. (f) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. (g) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. WHEREAS, in the review of this Tentative Tract Map the Planning Commission has considered the effect of the contemplated action on the housing needs of the region for purposes of balancing these needs against the public service needs of the residents of the City of Palm Desert and its environs, with available fiscal and environmental resources. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission in this case; 2. That it does hereby recommend approval to the City Council of the City of Palm Desert of the above described Tentative Map No. 18027 (Amendment) for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached conditions. FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED that the recommended conditions of approval do include a requirement that the applicant pay in lieu fees to comply with the requirements of Article 26.48 of the City of Palm Desert Subdivision Ordinance. In return, it is recommended that the City Council agree to use said fees for park purposes in conformance with an adopted master plan, within five (5) years of the recordation of the final map. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. Planning Commission, held on this 2nd day of March, 1982, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: GEORGE D. KRYDER, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ Secretary /lr -2- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Case No. TT 18027 (Amendment) Department of Environmental Services: 1. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all the requirements, limitations, and restrictions of all municipal ordinances and State and Federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 2. Full public improvements including traffic safety lighting as required by ordinance and the City Engineer shall be installed in accordance with City standards. 3. Prior to submittal of the Final Map, the applicant shall provide the Department of Environmental Services with a list of proposed street names with at least three alternatives. The approval of the final street name shall be made by the Director of Environmental Services. 4. The CC&R's for this development shall be submitted to the Director of Environmental Services for review, and final approval by the City Attorney prior to the issuance of any building permits. Prior to recordation of the final subdivision map, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer: a. The document to convey title. b. Covenants and restrictions to be recorded. C. Management and maintenance agreement to be entered into with the owners of the units of the project. 5. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall meet the requirements of the respective service districts. 6. Area shall be annexed to appropriate Improvement Districts having jurisdiction over the subject area. 7. All dedicated land and/or easements required by this approval shall be granted to the City of Palm Desert, without cost to the City and free of all liens and encumbrances. 8. All on-site utilities, including cable TV, shall be placed underground and shall be completely concealed from view except certain appurtenances as may be approved by the Director of Environmental Services. 9. Complete plans and specifications shall be submitted as required by Ordinance to the City Engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The Subdivider shall submit "as-built" plans prior to acceptance of the subdivision improvements by the City. 10. In order to maintain reasonable fire protection during the construction period, the subdivider shall maintain passable vehicular access to all buildings. An adequate number of fire hydrants with required fire flows shall be installed as recommended by the Fire Marshal. 11. Prior to recordation of the Final Map, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. 12. The water system shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system of Tract No. 18027 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the City Fire Marshall' 13. All private streets shall be inspected by the Engineering Department and a Standard Inspection Fee shall be paid. 14. The applicant shall have twelve (12) months from the date of the approval of the tentative map for filing of the final map unless an extension of time of up to eighteen (18) months is granted by a Resolution of the City Council. 15. Drainage and Signalization Fund contributions as required by City Ordinance shall be made prior to recordation of the final map. 16. Development shall pay a fee in lieu thereof as a condition of the final map for park 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. and recreation purposes, based upon the densities developed on lot 6. 17. Final map not to be recorded until design changes, if required by approval of preliminary plans by the Design Review Board are incorporated. 18. Subdivision to be provided with minimum six foot high solid masonry wall around project (except for approved openings) as approved by Design Review Board. 19. Additional storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer. 20. Drainage facilities shall be provided per Ordinance No. 218 and the Master Drainage Plan to the specifications of the Public Works Director. 21. Waiver of access to Fairway Drive and Parkview Drive shall be offered on the final map except at one authorized location on Fairway Drive. 22. The emergency access gate on Fairhaven Drive shall be located south of the proposed curb return. 23. A turnaround facility shall be provided within the development. 24. The applicant's civil engineer shall submit a boundary survey map. 25. The installation of curb and gutter on Fairhaven Drive at 20 feet from centerline, sidewalk and matching paving. 26. The private drive shall be shown as lot 7 on the Final Map. 27. The installation of curb and gutter on Parkview Drive at 32 ft. from centerline, sidewalk and matching paving. 28. All existing electrical distribution lines, telephone, cable antenna television, and similar service wires or cables, which are adjacent to the property being developed shall be installed underground as a part of development from the nearest existing pole not on the property being developed. Fire Marshal 29. Install a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a two hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 30. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants located at each street intersection (a) but not greater than 500 feet apart in any direction. a. Exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. b. Curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 31. Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. 32. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Tract No. 18027 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal." Upon approval, the original plan will be returned to the developer. 33. Prior to the delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. 34. Fire lane required as per municipal code. 35. Cul-de-sac required as per municipal code. -4- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ### A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN, PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW CASE AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF 10 RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM UNITS IN THE PR-7 ZONE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF PARKVIEW DRIVE AND FAIRHAVEN DRIVE. CASE NO. DP 09-81 and 229 MF WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 2nd day of March, 1982, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider a request by HOFFMAN BUILDERS, INC. for approval of a Development Plan, Preliminary Design Review Case and Negative Declaration of Environmmental Impact to allow development of 10 residential condominium units in the PR-7 zone located at the southeast corner of Fairhaven Drive and Parkview Drive, more particularly described as: Lot 6 TT 18027 WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedures to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89", in that the Director of Environmental Services has determined that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment and a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact has been prepared. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts to justify their actions, as described below: a. The proposed project generally conforms to the intent and purpose of the PR Zone District. b. The proposed project is adequately suited for the specific site and is compatible swith existing and proposed development in the area. C. The proposed project will not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of he community. WHEREAS, THE Design Review Board did on February 23, 1982, approve preliminary plans for said project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission in this case. 2. That the Planning Commission does hereby approve Development Plan No. 09-81 and Design Review Case No. 229 MF subject to the same conditions imposed on the approval of TT 18027 (Amendment) and as attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 2nd day of March, 1982, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: GEORGE D. KRYDER, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ; Secretary /pa ,. „ -1- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Case No. DP 09-81 and 229 MF Department of Environmental Services: 1. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all the requirements, limitations, and restrictions of all municipal ordinances and State and Federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 2. Full public improvements including traffic safety lighting as required by ordinance and the City Engineer shall be installed in accordance with City standards. 3. Prior to submittal of the Final Map, the applicant shall provide the Department of Environmental Services with a list of proposed street names with at least three alternatives. The approval of the final street name shall be made by the Director of Environmental Services. 4. The CC&R's for this development shall be submitted to the Director of Environmental Services for review, and final approval by the City Attorney prior to the issuance of any building permits. Prior to recordation of the final subdivision map, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer: a. The document to convey title. b. Covenants and restrictions to be recorded. C. Management and maintenance agreement to be entered into with the owners of the units of the project. 5. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall meet the requirements of the respective service districts. 6. Area shall be annexed to appropriate Improvement Districts having jurisdiction over the subject area. 7. All dedicated land and/or easements required by this approval shall be granted to the City of Palm Desert, without cost to the City and free of all liens and encumbrances. 8. All on-site utilities, including cable TV, shall be placed underground and shall be completely concealed from view except certain appurtenances as may be approved by the Director of Environmental Services. 9. Complete plans and specifications shall be submitted as required by Ordinance to the City Engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The Subdivider shall submit "as-built" plans prior to acceptance of the subdivision improvements by the City. 10. In order to maintain reasonable fire protection during the construction period, the subdivider shall maintain passable vehicular access to all buildings. An adequate number of fire hydrants with required fire flows shall be installed as recommended by the Fire Marshal. 11. Prior to recordation of the Final Map, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. 12. The water system shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system of Tract No. 18027 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the City Fire Marshal." 13. All private streets shall be inspected by the Engineering Department and a Standard Inspection Fee shall be paid. 14. The applicant shall have twelve (12) months from the date of the approval of the tentative mzp for filing of the final map unless an extension of time of up to eighteen (18) months is granted by a Resolution of the City Council. 15. Drainage and Signalization Fund contributions as required by City Ordinance shall be made prior to recordation of the final map. 16. Development shall pay a fee in lieu thereof as a condition of the final map for park - - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. and recreation purposes, based upon the densities developed on lot 6. 17. Final map not to be recorded until design changes, if required by approval of preliminary plans by the Design Review Board are incorporated. 18. Subdivision to be provided with minimum six foot high solid masonry wall around project (except for approved openings) as approved by Design Review Board. 19. Additional storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer. 20. Drainage facilities shall be provided per Ordinance No. 218 and the Master Drainage Plan to the specifications of the Public Works Director. 21. Waiver of access to Fairway Drive and Parkview Drive shall be offered on the final map except at one authorized location on Fairway Drive. 22. The emergency access gate on Fairhaven Drive shall be located south of the proposed curb return. 23. A turnaround facility shall be provided within the development. 24. The applicant's civil engineer shall submit a boundary survey map. 25. The installation of curb and gutter on Fairhaven Drive at 20 feet from centerline, sidewalk and matching paving. 26. The private drive shall be shown as lot 7 on the Final Map. 27. The installation of curb and gutter on Parkview Drive at 32 ft. from centerline, sidewalk and matching paving. 28. All existing electrical distribution lines, telephone, cable antenna television, and similar service wires or cables, which are adjacent to the property being developed shall be installed underground as a part of development from the nearest existing pole not on the property being developed. Fire Marshal 29. Install a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a two hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 30. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants located at each street intersection (a) but not greater than 500 feet apart in any direction. a. Exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. b. Curbs shall be painted red 1.5 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 31. Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. 32. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Tract No. 18027 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal." Upon approval, the original plan will be returned to the developer. 33. Prior to the delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. 34. Fire lane required as per municipal code. 35. Cul-de-sac required as per municipal code. -3- �y CASE No pP 09-3i 7113027 (Amend 229 iMF oil 1�Ilm= ENVIAON'^dENTAL SERVICES DEPT. INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION CHECKLIST NOTE: The availability of data necessary to address the topics listed below shall form the basis of a decision as to whether the application is considered complete for purposes of environmental assessment. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers, possible mitigation measures and comments are provided on attached sheets) . Yes Maybe No 1 . Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in . geologic substructures? b. Disruptions , displacements , compaction, or overcovering of the soil ? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief / features? d. The destruction, covering, or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? V _ 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? !/ c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or �- temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? 2. Yes Maybe No 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a.. Changes in currents , "or the course or direction of water movements? l/ b. Changes in absorpti'6n`rates , -drainage Patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? ✓ c. Alterations to the course or flo w of / flood waters? V d. Alteration of-the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? (/ e. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an (/ aquifer by cuts or excavations? _ f. Reduction in the amount of water other- wise available for public water supplies? 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of plants (including trees , shrubs , grass , and crops)? (/ b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of plants? , c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? 5. Animal. Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds , land animals including reptiles , or insects)? - v' b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of animals? _ (% c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? _ _ v d. Deterioration to existing wildlife habitat?. iY 3. Yes No 6. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in .the rate of use of any natural / resources? - v r — — b. Depletion of:any non-renewable natural % resource? V/ 7. End. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? _ V b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or re- quire the.development of new sources of energy? V - 8. Risk of Upsett?iDoes the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, pesticides , oil , chemicals , or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? 9. Economic Loss. Will the proposal result in: a. A change in the value of property and / improvements endangered by flooding? t — — b. A change in the value of property and improvementsrexposed to geologic hazards beyond accepted community risk standards? — — 10. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels toE:the point at which accepted community noise and vibration levels are / / exceeded? i V - 11. Land Use. Willethe proposal result in the a tTeration of the present developed or planned land use of an area? 12. Open Space. Will the proposal lead to a decrease in the ;emount of designated open space? 13. Population. Will the proposal result in: a. Alteraticn of the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of the Citv? b. Change in the population distribution by age, income, religion, racial , or ethnic / h group, occupational class , household type? — — — 4. Yes Maybe No 14. Emoloyment. Will the proposal result in additional new long-term jobs provided, or a change in the number and per cent employed, ✓' unemployed, and underemployed? 15. Housing. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in number and per cent of housing units by type (price or rent range, zoning category, owner-occupied and rental , etc. ) relative to demand or to number of v/ families in various income classes in the City? b. Impacts on existing housing or creation of a demand for additional housing? 16. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? LIZ b. Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand for new parking? c. Impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? (/ e. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , L bicyclists, or pedestrians? 17. Public Services . Will the proposal have an effect upon , or result in a need for, new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c% c. Schools? v d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? f. Other governmental services? I Yes Maybe No 18. Public Fiscal Balance. Will the proposal result in a net change in government fiscal flow (revenues less operating expenditures / and annualized capital expenditures)? V 19. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a ` need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: / a. Power or natural gas? v b. Communications system? c. Water? / d. Sewer or septic tanks? ✓v e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? 20. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? b. A change in the level of community .health care provided? V% 21 . Social Services. Will the proposal result in an increased denand for provision of general social services? 22. Aesthetics . Will the proposal result in: a. Obstruction of any scenic vista or view / open to the public? b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive / site open to public view? v c. Lessening of the overall neighborhood (or area ) attractiveness , pleasantness , and uniqueness? 23. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce — — ne�q light or glare? 24. Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal resuit in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, % object, or building? V ( � I 6. Yes M�be No 25. Mandatory findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment or to curtail the diversity in the environment? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into v' the future. ) c. Does the project have impacts which are indi- vidually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small , but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant. ) _ d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings , either directly or indirectly? Initial Study Prepared By: �hJ ENvIRONMENTAL EVALUATION CHECKLIST- EXPLANATION OF "YES" AND "MAYBE" ANSWERS, POSSIBLE MITIGATION MEASURES AND COMMENTS. 1 . EARTH c. The proposal will result in a change in the natural topography by virtue of grading and paving activities associated with develop- ment of the property. e. The proposal may result in temporary construction impacts related to wind erosion of soils, but .City requirements for watering during grading activities should reduce any impacts to an insignificant level . Development of the site would tend to stabilize soils to eli- minate future wind erosion of blowing sand. 3. WATER b. The proposal will result in a change in absorption rates , drainage patterns , and the rate and amount of surface water runoff by virtue of development. Compliance with applicable grading ordinances at time of development will mitigate any adverse impacts. 16. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION a. The development of the site will result in new vehicular movements in and out of the project. Design of entry will be required to be designed to allow safe and easy vehicular ingress and egress with adequate stacking area for cars. ¢ni q 1 Cu:ft:�hzr OOTl_Trs'rr ��l� o 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 NEGATIVE DECLARATION (Pursuant to Title 14, Division 6, Article 7, Section 15083, of the California Administrative Code) Common Project Case No: DP 09-81,718027(Amend) 229 MF Name (if any) Applicant/Project Sponsor: HOFFMAN BUILDERS, INC. , 766 Vella Road, Palm Springs , CA 92262. Project Description/Location: Ten residential condominium units on a to located at the Southeast corner of Fairhaven and Parkview Drive The Director of the Department of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, California, has found that the described project will not have a significant effect on the environment. A copy of the Initial Study has been attached to document the reasons in support of this finding. Mitigation measures , if any, included in the project to avoid potentially significant effects, may also be found attached. Mar h 2 1982 RAMON A. DIAZ DATE Director of Environmental Services `s y V L\ M1P YCC n\ ryW Y ` � �q\ 1�1�'8 8� 0 •M1n.gE 41�1 � 1�c�` Q 4F \ \C� `( �P`.n S� �••.`a y1y�V4 ♦n�q IC\a Yca. /` �w > ` f� C � � \ CF 1 uV• [S�; NnVO yo..a.[w.ry W 47 Aj QL ` I Y c 2 " 03 �ii'� M1M1 1 � { Y k i � �/•�� / ti: a '� '� i i a t VZ 6E L� - � �Ot YY '• \ n �n.r 1.%+ rs✓ "' I. 10 rQ t ESTABLISHED IN 1918 AS A PUBLIC AGENCY COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT . POST OFFICE BOX 7058 • COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA 92236 • TELEPHONE (714) 398-2651 DIRECTORS RAYMOND R.RUMMONDS.PRESIDENT OFFICERS TELLISCODEKAS.VICE PRESIDENT LOWELL O.WEEKS.GENERAL MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER JOHN P.POWELL December 14 1981 BERNARDINE SUTTON.SECRETARY PAUL W.NICHOLS VICTOR B.HARDY.AUDITOR STEVE D.BU%TON REDWINE AND SHERRILL.ATTORNEYS File: 0163. 11 r- r. 0421. 1 0721.1 Department of Environmental Services nFC 17 198� City of Palm Desert Post Office Box 1977 Palm Desert, California 92261 �;10 Gentlemen: Subject: Tract 18,027 (Amendment) SEZ, Sec. 18, T5S, R6E,S.B.M. This area is protected from stormwater flows by a system of channels and dikes, and may be considered safe from stormwater flows except in rare instances. This area is designated Zone B, on Federal Flood Insurance rate maps which are in effect at this time. The District will furnish domestic water and sanitation service to this area in accordance with the current regulations of this District. This area shall be annexed to Improvement District No. 54 & 80 of Coachella Valley Water District for sanitation service. Yours very truly, Lowell 0. Weeks General Manager-Chief Engineer CSF: cc: Riverside County Department of Public Health 46-209 Oasis Street Indio, California 92201 Attention: Don Park TRUE CONSERVATION USE WATER WISELY Coi F!EE DL?AR7;"cNr \ ... E CJ.:PEF-TION W'. December 10, 1981 70-800 Highway 111 Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Ramon A. Diaz ��o„++ .` Director of Environmental Servicesk 1 19�1 City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 �J Reference: Tentative Tract No. 18027 (Amendment) Dear Ray: Fire protection requirements for this tentative tract were established by a letter from my office date August 14, 1981 and still apply in this case. Thank you. Sincerely yours, DAVID L. FLAKE County Fire Depar ment By �tc ERIC L. VOGT Fire Marshal gf e. 'S MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY - FEBRUARY 2, 1982 7:00 P.M. - CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS I. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Kryder called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. H. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Commissioner Crites III. ROLL CALL Members Present: Commissioner Crites Commissioner Miller Commissioner Richards Commissioner Wood Chairman Kryder Staff Present: Ramon Diaz, Director of Environmental Services Stan Sawa, Principal Planner Steve Smith, Associate Planner Phil Joy, Assistant Planner Linda Russell, Planning Secretary Others Present: Barry McClellan, Director of Environmental Services Eric Vogt, Fire Marshal IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: January 19, 1982 Chairman Kryder noted two corrections: Page 2, paragraph 10, "previous" should read "previously"; page 4, under COMMENTS, Section D, should read " Chairman Kryder stated that amenities proposed for the Hahn Shopping Center on the initial plans are now being changed (i.e., ice rink, outside areas)." Motion was made by Commissioner Miller, seconded by Commissioner Richards, to approve the minutes as amended. Carried unanimously 5-0. V. SUMMARY OF COUNCIL ACTION 1982. Mr. Diaz reviewed the actions of the Council from the meeting of January 28, VI. CONSENT CALENDAR A. DP 09-79 (Amended) and 188 MF - PACIFIC COAST BUILDERS INC. - Request for approval of a one year extension of time for a residential development plan and preliminary design review case to allow the construction of an 1111 unit condominium project and golf course on 404 acres in the PR-3 S.P. zone located at the northeast corner of Cook Street and Country Club Drive. Motion made by Commissioner Wood, seconded by Commissioner Richards to approve a one year time extension. Carried unanimously 5-0. V11. PUBLIC HEARINGS Case No. DP 09-81 - HOFFMAN BUILDERS, INC., Applicant Request for approval of a Development Plan for 10 condominium units and an Amendment to an approved Tentative Tract Map in the PR-7 S.P. zone (Planned Residential, 7 d.u./acre, Scenic Preservation Overlay) located at the southeast corner of Parkview Drive and the future extension of Fairhaven Drive. -1- MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 2, 1982 Mr. Diaz stated that staff concurs with applicant's request to continue this request to March 2, 1982. Chairman Kryder opened the public hearing and invited input in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to this request. There was none. Motion made by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Wood, to continue this request to March 2, 1982. Carried unanimously 5-0. B. Case No. C/Z 01-82, CITY OF PALM DESERT, Applicant Request for approval of a Change of Zone from R-3, 18,000 (3) S.P. (Multiple Family Residential, 18,000 sq.ft. minimum lot size, 1 d.u. per 3,000 square feet of land area, Scenic Preservation Overlay) to C-1 S.P. (General Commercial, Scenic Preservation) for property located on the east side of Highway 74, approximately 120 ft. south of El Paseo. Mr. Sawa reviewed the staff report stating that the reason for the request is to bring the property in compliance with the General Plan. Staff is recommending that the Scenic Overlay be retained with the Change of Zone approval. Chairman Kryder opened the public hearing and invited input in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to this request. MRS. JEAN DAILY, 38B Sandpiper, asked if a Conditional Use Permit would be required to expand existing buildings (i.e. Adobe). Mr. Sawa replied affirmative. Mr. Sawa noted that a letter was received by Mr. Chester Brabyns, 4515 Fairfield Dr., Corona Del Mar, also Sandpiper property owner, opposing the Change of Zone. MR. TOM TAYLER, 37C Sandpiper, was concerned for any future developments in that area that might be objectional to the neighboring property owners. Mr. Sawa explained that he would be notified of any development plans. Chairman Kryder closed the public hearing. Moved by Commissioner Miller, seconded by Commissioner Richards, to waive further reading and adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 777, recommending approval of C/Z 01-82. Carried unanimously 5-0. C. Case No. CUP 15-80 (Renewal) - FRANZ TIRRE, Applicants Request for approval to renew a CUP to allow construction of a 10 unit residential condominium project on a 25,200 sq.ft. site, within the R-3 zone located at the southeast corner of Las Palmas Avenue and San Gorgonio Way. Mr. Sawa reviewed the staff report and stated the applicant is requesting Condition No. 5, undergrounding the utility poles, be waived because the poles would also service adjacent properties. Staff recommends that if the undergrounding is waived, a requirement or condition be added to relocate the poles if found necessary by staff and a future undergrounding agreement be signed by the applicant. Commission concurred, Condition No. 5 was amended to read: "Applicant shall record agreement guaranteeing property will voluntarily be a part of any undergrounding district which is subsequently established; however, utility poles are to be relocated at expense of applicant if determined necessary by City.' Commissioner Crites asked staff what size area was included in the Land Use Element to justify density conformity. Mr. Sawa replied within 2 to 3 blocks of this project. -2- 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: February 2, 1982 HOFFMAN BUILDERS, INC. 766 Vella Road Palm Springs, CA 92262 CASE NO: DP 09-RI The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of February 2, 1982. CONTINUED TO MARCH 2, 1982 Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. lid J�. RAMON A. DIAZ, SECRETARY PLANNING COMMISSION RAD/lcr cc: CVWD File PROOF OF PUBLICATION (20101 2015.5 CCP) PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF LEGAL NOTICE DP09-81 I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the - — CITY OF PALM DESERT County aforesaid; I am over the LEGAL NOTICE. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR CONDOMINIUM P.R. S.PT ZONE age Of eighteen years, and not (P AMENDMENT TO AN TIAL,7 OVED.UJACRTENTATIVE SCENIC MAP ION OVERLAY) : CAT- (PLANNED RESIDENTIAL 7 D.U./ACRE, SCENIC PRESERVATION OVERLAY) I O OF a party to Or interested in the EDRHAV THE,SOUTHEAST CORNER OF PARKVIEWIAND THE FUTURE EXTENSION<OF above entitled matter. I am the FAIRHAVEN. CASE NO.D.P. 00.81 and TTIW27 w7p•- principal clerk of the printer J of THE DESERT POSTn a newspaper of general circula- L t tion, printed and published weekly p in the city of Riversides County I 1 of Riverside$ and which newspaper > � TT 80Z7 has been adjudged a newspaper of �JI' .1, general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Riverside, State of Californian under date of October 5n 19649 Case number 83658; that the notice• of which the annexed is 44th AVENUE a printed copy, has been published Nf,� in each regular and entire .issue of said newspaper and not in any NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearl"s wlll'be held before the Palm Desert supplement thereof On the f O11 Owing Plonnln0 Commission to consider a reauest by HOFFMAN BUILDERS, INC. for approval of 10 condominium units and an amendment to an approved Tentat ve Tract Mop. In the P.R. 7, S:P, da tes s to-wit : zone (Planned Residential, 7 d.u./ogre• Scenic Preservation,Overlay) located at the southileosf eorner.of Parkvlew and the future extension of Fairhaven,'more parrtticulorly described as% C APN'S 6183ee301-9 .► �,+, 01121 s 1982 Palm DesertlCity Hall dS-275Prickly`Poor Lane?PalmZ Desert'itollforniIn a Catt whit'01me and ln the Place all Interested parsons are Invited to attend and be heard. RAMON A. D AZ, Secretary Palm Desert Plonnina.Commisslon I Certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct, Dated January 21s 1982 at Riverside, California CITY OF PALM DESERT RAtiT�A ESTABLISHED IN 1918 AS A PUBLIC AGENCY �$TSR.1.Cj COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT POST OFFICE BOX 1058 COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA 92236 • TELEPHONE (714) 398-2651 DIRECTORS OFFICERS RAYMOND R.RUMMONDS,PRESIDENT LOW ELL O.WEEKS,GENERAL MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER TELLIS CODEKAS,VICE PRESIDENT BERNARDIN E SUTTON,SECRETARY JOHN P.POWELL VICTOR B.HARDY,AUDITOR PAUL W.NICHOLS December 18 1 REDWINE AND SHERRILL,ATTORNEYS STEVE D.BUXTON 981 File: 0163.11 A, Department of Environmental Services zfvv/RpN„City of �98� Post OfficemBoxsert 1977 4,ty OF/ ��.I sFRVjC£ Palm Desert, California 92261 PSsRT R Gentlemen: Subject: Case No. DP 09-81, Change of Zone SE14, Sec. 18, T5S, R6E, S.B.M. This area is protected from stormwater flows by a system of channels and dikes, and may be considered safe from stormwater flows except in rare instances. This area is designated Zone B on Federal Flood Insurance rate maps which are in effect at this time. The District will furnish domestic water and sanitation service to this area in accordance with the current regulations of this District. This area shall be annexed to Improvement District No. 54 & 80 of Coachella Valley Water District for sanitation service. Yours erryy trul Lowe 0. W General Manager-Chief ngineer CSF:fc cc: Riverside County Department of Public Health 46-209 Oasis Street Indio, California 92201 Attention: Don Park TRUE CONSERVATION USE WATER WISELY ,_ y4 e RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT - IN COOPERATION WITH THE C. � ` - COUNTY Y CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY °-R/VF,RSIDF, ,.� ..3aa,- DAVID L. FLAKE ENVIRyO�NNIiLNTAL SERVICES COUNTY FIRE WARDEN CITO W'ESTYSgWljA.,j5ROTSTREET December 22, 1981 PERRIS, CALIFORNIA 92370 TELEPHONE (714) 657-3183 70-800 Highway 111 Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Ramon Diaz Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 Reference: DP 09-81 Dear Mr. Diaz: Prior to construction of any of the proposed buildings, the following conditions must be met: 1 . Install a water system capable of delivering 2500 G.P.M. fire flow for a two (2) hour duration in addition to domestic or other supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. A. Hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. B. Exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. C. Curbs (if installed) , shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. Upon approval , one copy will be sent to the Building Department, and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Case Number DP 09-81 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal ." 5• Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. Ramon A. Diaz 12/22/81 Palm Desert, CA Page 2 6. A 20 feet fire alternative access is required. 7. Electronic gate control waives 40 feet cul-de-sac radius requirement. Sincerely, DAVID L. FbAKE Co lky Fire arden "'7/ h � vcz _V, By ERIC L. YOGI Fire Marshal gf cc: Jim Zimmerman C.V.W.D. INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert ENVIRONMENTAL SEkVICES TO: DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT FROM: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT 18027 (amend) & DP-09-81 DATE: December 23, 1981 We have no changes ^/two/our original recommendations. BA cCLELLAL�LL N DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS ATTACHMENT BDM/lo JMj abed Z£T-18 'ON NOI1n1OS3a RESOLUTION NO. 81-132 Page Three STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. TENTATIVE TRACT 18027 1. , The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all the requirements, limitations, and restrictions, of all municipal ordinances and State and Federal statutes now in .force, or which here- after may be in force. <w 2. _ Full public improvements including traffic safety lighting as required by ordinance and the City En_ g�irieer shall be installed in accordance with , City standards. 3. Prior to submittal of the Final Map, the applicant shall provide the Department of Environmental Services with a list of proposed street names with at least three alternatives. The approval of the final street name shall be made by the Director of Environmental Services. 4. The CC&R's for this development shall be submitted to the Director of Environmental Services for review, and final approval by the City Attorney prior to the issuance of any building permits. Prior to recordation of the final subdivision map, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer: a. The document to convey title. b. Covenants and restrictions to be recorded. C. Management and maintenance agreement to be entered into with the owners of the units of the project. 5. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall meet the requirements of the respective service districts. 6. Area shall be annexed to appropriate Improvement Districts having juris- diction over the subject area. [ 7. All dedicated land and/or easements required by this approval shall be granted to the City of Palm Desert, without cost to the City and free of all liens and encumbrances. 8. All on-.site utilities, including cable TV, shall be placed underground and shall be completely concealed from view except certain appurtenances as may be approved by the Director of Envirenmental . Services. 9. Complete plans and specifications shall be submitted as required by Ordi- nance to the City Engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The subdivider shall submit "as built plans prior to acceptance of the subdivision improvements by the City. . 10. In order to maintain reasonable fire protection during the construction period, the subdivider shall maintain passable vehicular access to all buildings. An adequate number of fire hydrants with required fire flows shall be installed as recommended by the Fire Marshal . 11. Prior to recordation of the Final Map, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. 12. All requirements of the City Fire Marshal from his letter of August 14, 1981, shall be met as a part of the development of this tract. 13. The water system shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system of Tract No. 18027 is in accor- dance with the requirements prescribed by the City. Fire Marshal . " , 14. All priraw >na4 , uc mbpecl.eu uy Lim ulyineermq uepartment and a Standard Inspection Fee shall be paid. 15. The applicant shall have twelve (12) months from the date of the approval of the tentative map for filing of the final. map unless an extension of time of up to eighteen (18) months -is granted by a Resolution of the City Council . 16. Drainage and Signalization Fund contributions as required by City Ordinance shall be made prior to recordation of the final map. 17. Development shall pay a fee in lieu thereof as a condition of the final rup for park and recreation purposes, based upon the densities developed on lot 6. 18. Final map not to be recorded until design changes, if required by approval of preliminary plans by the Design Review Board are incorporated. 19. Subdivision to be provided with minimum six foot high solid masonry wall around project (except for approved openings) as approved by Design Review Board. 20. Additional storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer. 21. Drainage facilities shall be provided per Ordinance No. 218 and the Master Drainage Plan to the specifications of the Public Works Director. 22. Waiver of access to Fairway Drive and Parkview Drive shall be offered on the final map except at one authorized location on Fairway Drive. 23. The emergency access gate on Fairhaven Drive shall be located south of the proposed curb return. 2.4. A turnaround .facility shall be provided within the development. 25. The applicant's civil: engineer shall submit a boundary survey map. 26. The installation of curb and gutter on Fairhaven Drive at 20 feet from center- line, sidewalk and matching paving. 27. The private drive shall be shown as lot 7 on the Final Map. Z$ , Cutz 4 Ciu-r7=y+- .4ANj rNb O� —�rQ2/CdfffW RL c4U12C5'J. h Off s nS= - 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 9226O TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL DEC i 2981 tiUILDlNS & SAFETY DEPARTME;;T CASE f10: DP 09-81 CITY 4F PALm DE'ERT PROJECT: D01 PHIPLS011ARE APPLICANT:HOFFMAN BUILDERS. INC. Enclosed please find materials describing a project for which the-following is being requested: Approval of a Development Plan for 10 condominium units at the southeast corner of Parkview and Fairhaven. APN'S 618-344-001-9 ZONE: R-2 (7) S.P. The attached data was prepared by the applicant and is being forwarded to you for comments and recommended Conditions of Approval . The City is interested in the probable impacts on the natural environment (e.g. water and air pollution) and on public resources (e.g. demand for schools, hospitals, parks, power gener- ation, sewage treatment, etc. ). Your comments and recommended conditions of approval must be received by this office prior to 5:00 p.m. DarPmt� I 1981, in order to be discussed by the Land Division Committee. - The Land Division Committee (comprised of Director of Environmental Services, City Building Official , City Engineer, Fire Marshal and a representative of CVWD) will discuss the comments and recommended conditions of approval and will forward them to the Planning Commission through the staff report. Any informa- tion received by this office after the receipt deadline will not be discussed by the Land Division Committee nor will it be forwarded to the Planning Commission for consideration. , Sinc y, 3. Ramon A. iaz Director of Environmer Services PLEASE ETURid MAP WITH COMME14TS I I I gi: - 1•1 -r �j I 7- 1 yl M I ! lip. 1 i CITY 0} „ I PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT £N SERV CES ExHisit CS o _n CASE N0. O 7$7� 111�.+�3 Pf�M .CL' T Z46-40�10' .�15 J61- J _l E ° s � i ,q �I Ci i'�` I'DIF �V A PtlB_M DESERT 8j m° �s ,sel4 a DEPARTMENT OF F 0 ENvirosarGrlL'SAL EI= E3S SIT CASE e. J�p-....... ING. 7G� VII-�L� �D, o\Lri S��INGS 323—Zr 5 ��GW^.RLE`; M•ORTW�•AQLFII,T,E�T 73]t�� HWY III m3 PP:�M- �ES��T 846=polo'- HI�`l��_: _ CIRCULATION LIST FOR ALL CASES Circulation of Tentative Maps, Parcel Maps, CUP'S , GPA' s, etc. : REVIEW COMMITTEE: jl� Palm Desert Director of Environmental Services - Ramon Diaz t! 2. 1 Palm Desert Director of Building & Safety - Jim Hill h3. ! Palm Desert Director of Public Works - Barry Mc Clellan Palm Desert Fire Marshall - Eric Vogt 5. Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency Consultant - Les Pricer 6. Robert P. Brock Office of Road Commissioner and County Surveyor Administration Office Building, Room 313 46-209 Oasis Street Indio, Calif. 92[O1 (Phone: 347-8511 , ext. 267) 7. M. A. Ferguson Imperial irrigation Dist. Power Div. P.O. Box 248 Coachella, Calif. 92236 (Phone: 398-2211 ✓j 8.} Lowell U. Weeks General Manager - Chief Engineer Coachella Valley County Water District (C.V.C.W.D. ) P.O. Box 1058 Coachella, California 92236 (Phone: (714) 398-2651 ) 9. R. J. Lowry Project Development Services California Department of Transportation P.O. Box 231 San Bernardino, .Calif. 92403 (Phone: (714- 383-4671 ) 10. Director of Planning and Building City of Indian Wells . 45-300 Club Drive Indian Wells, Calif. 922/0 (Phone: 345-.2831 ) 11 . Director of Planning City of Rancho Mirage 69-825 Highway III 1� Rancho Mirage, Calif. 92270 (Phone: 328-8871 ) 121 Kermit Martin Southern California Edison Company P.O. Box 203 ��� Palm Desert, Calif. 92260 (Phone: 346-8660) � 13. \ Al Doody, RC6003 JI General Telephone Co. P.O. Box 'L920 Pomona, Calif. 91766 (Phone: ) 1j 14 1 R.W. Riddell Engineering Department Southern California Gas Company P.O. Box 2200 Riverside, Calif. 92506 (Phone: 327-8531 , ask for Riverside extension 214) . 15. Roger Harlow Uirector - Pupil Personnel Service Desert Sands Unified School District 83-049 Avenue 46 Indio, Calif. 92201 (Phone: 34/-4071 ) 16. Dick Wolford Palm Desert Disposal Services, Inc. 36-711 Cathedral Canyon Drive P.O. Urawer LL Cathedral City, Calif. 92C34 (Phone: 328-2585 or 328-4687) 17. Robert Lawman President, Palm Desert Community Services District 44-500 Portola Avenue Palm Desert, Calif. 92260 (Phone: 346-6338) 18. Regional Water Quality Control Board 73-271 Highway 111 , Suite 21 Palm Desert, Calif. 92260 (Phone: ) 19. Harold Housley Foreman/Mails U.S. Post Office Palm Desert, Calif. 92260 (Phone: 346-3864) 20. Joe Benes Vice President & General Manager Coachella Valley Television P.O. Box 368 Palm Desert, Calif. 92260 (Phone: 346-8157) 21 . Don Mc Neilly Palm Desert Chamber of Commerce 74-004 Hwy. 111 Palm Desert, Calif. 92260 (Phone: 346-6111 ) G2. Kevin Manning Senior Planner Riverside County Planning Commission County Administration Building, Room 304 46-209 Oasis Street Indio, Calif. 92201 (Phone: 347-8511 , ext. 277, 278, and 279) 23. James Whitehead Superintendent - District 6. State Parks and Necreation 1350 Front Street, Room 6U54 San Diego, Calif. 92101 (Phone: (714) 236-7411 ) 24. Robert I . Pitchford, Chairman Architectural Committee of the Palm Desert Property Owners Assoc. 73-833 El Paseo Palm Desert, Calif. 92260 - 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REQUEST FOR COM1,IENTS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO: pp Og-81 PROJECT: not P_HInI .soVARE APPLICANT: HOFFMAN BUILDERS. INC. Enclosed please find materials describing a project for which the-following is being requested: Approval of a .Development Plan for 10 condominium units at the southeas';t corner of Parkview and Fairhaven. APN'S 618-344-001-9 ZONE: R-2 (7) S.P. The attached data was prepared by the applicant and is being forwarded to you for comments and recommended Conditions of Approval . The City is interested in the probable impacts on the natural environment (e.g. water and air pollution) and on public resources (e.g. demand for schools, hospitals, parks, power gener- ation, sewage treatment, etc. ) . Your comments and recommended conditions of approval must be received by this office prior to 5:00 p.m. _Dp�p bQr 24f" 1981. in order to be discussed by the Land Division Committee . - =A, The Land Division Committee (comprised of Director of"Environmental Services , City Building Official , City Engineer, Fire Marshal and a representative of CVWD) will discuss the comments and recommended conditions of approval and will forward them to the Planning Commission through the staff report. Any informa- tion received by this office after the receipt deadline will not be discussed by the Land Division Committee nor will it be forwarded to the Planning Commission for consideration. Sinc y, ,[ r C Ramon A. biaz Director of Environmer .� Services PLEASE RETURN MAP WITH COMMENTS CITY OF MLM DESERT . REASU RERI RECOPY - 5454 RECEIVED OF: 4f'C /��•vTE�2PfZ�1�1�7' DATE 4) -C7-91 AMOUNTO / 17L5- °0 4D FOR RECEIVED: CITY TREASURER BY: //!'�tx 6 ACCOUNT N6. AMOUNT CHECKS ACCEPTED SUBJECT TO BANK CLEARANCE PAYOR CITY OF FALM DESERT REASU RERI RECEN 5453 RECEIVED OF: DATE 42--e— AMOUNTO/30, 00 FOR RECEIV/ED: CITY TREASURER BY: N� ACCOUNT Nof AMOUNT 130 051 CHECKS ACCEPTED SUBJECT TO BANK CLEARANCE PAYOR CASE NO. CU:5 ll Oo ff IFE�� Environmental Assessment Form TO THE APPLICANT: Your cooperation in completing. this form. and supplying the information requested will'expedite City review of your application •pursuantIto the California Environmental Quality, Act.. The City .is required to make an environmental isse' smen't on 'al I projects' which it `exe"rc.ises, ; discretionary approval over. Applications submitted will net be considered complete until all information necessary to make the environmental assessment i`s complete. , ; GENERAL INFORMATION: 1 . Name, addres , a d telephone number,of owner, ap licant or project sponsor: O MM1 RIJI'i C� IAY �(o.(o VaS=6 2c_Ab 9"W* ros Ca921b2 5M. ZG63 2. Name, address and telephone number of person .to be contacted con- . . cerning the r�oject (such as 'archi'tect, engineer, or other repre- sentative) :d( P1�:Z C (Y10ZN,� '137� 1 ljJ 3 Foam CA 4(2qn 3. Common name of. project ,(if, any) : tY�l (�qb►1 S(�>t� �s 4. Project location (street address or general location) : 5. Precise legal description of property (lot and tract number, or meets & bounds) : ner 18 TC 5 Q(06 156 +. 6. Proposed use of the site (project for which the form is filed; describe the total undert king, not just the current application approval being -sought) : `1 Vf k laili�� 6o 7. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects (describe how this project relates to other activities, phases, and develop- ments planned, or now underway): tp 4946 kYo 8. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, to go forward, including those required by the City, Regional , State and Federal agencies (indicate sub- sequent approval agency name, and type of approval required): SJeyUL4en1 SQOP-4;> -'LYE Po4<9uP DEC W6'kgVN-W . un� CFO _ _ EXISTING CONDITIONS: 9. Project site area: 3sF = 1.+ZZ (Size of property in sq. ft. or acreage) 10. Present zoning: FOZ —7 (Proposed zoning) : 11 . General Plan land use designation: 12. Existing ruse of,the project site: VACA4.r 13. Existing use on adjacent. properties : (Example ; North; Shopping_Center; South, Single Family Dwellings; East,' Vacant, 'etc. ). ' 14. Site topography'(describe): tyr r jgrnkjrs�-rA*L.4 WJWVN K.Ao Pout LAt.•m R LeS or- s ajw 15. Are there any natural or manmade drainage channels through or adjacent to thq property? NO t-D YES . 16. Grading (estimate number of cubic yards of dirt being moved) : r—c ?9 17. List the number„size' and type of trees being 'removed: MI!44yt = ' ' 18. Describe any cultural , historic, or scenic aspects of the project site: :Q2L�dNAt,; `aIZEr dF A6A9 OJT AM KU CexziAO& t-Y� Ek.YLOR`1 �o t�O S'Z25°C� i { 19. Residential Project (if not residential do KOT',answer) A. Number and type of dwelling units (Specify no. of bedrooms) : t0 t�uCPS 2 i� 5 5GYu�� t sF�,'t� w l�s B. Schedule of unit sizes : 0 B)e&r4aWq 1 Z81 . 3 2 fin.. t2c� 8 SF C. Number of stories OG O Height Z6-^{�� feet. D. Largest single building (sq. ft. ) -4E3e9L:> (hgt. ) 20-01 E. Type of household size expected (p ulation projection for the project) :,M613 WnVI.43 l�D / /N�UldCyQ2C*L� , ma�K3 Mow/ wayopowon�►s F. Describe tMe number and type of 4ecreational facilities : / LAB A DUAotp G. Is there any night lighting of the project: M1M1A%4L-§AM% H. Range of sales prices or rents: $ to $ I. Percent of total project devoted to: Building . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . f,�j' % Paving, including streets. . . . . . . . . . . . % Landscaping, Open, Recreation Area . . . . . . . . % 20. Commercial , Industrial , Institutional or Other Project: A. Type of use(s) and major function(s) (if offices, specify type & number) :- . . ,. B. Number of square feet in total building arer8� C. Number of stories Height feet. D. Largest single' buil'ding (Sq. Ft. ) . (Hgt. ) E. Number,of square feet in'outdoor storage area: F. Total number of required parking spaces > number ,proyidedt J ,T G. Hours of operation: � . H. Maximum number of clients, patrons , shoppers, etc. , at one time: I . Maximum number of employees at one time: J. If_ patron +seating is involved, state the number: -rye K. Is there any night lighting of the project: Yes No L. Percent of total project devoted to: Building . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . % Paving, including streets. . . . . . . . . % Landscaping and Open Space (Recreation). % Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects: Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). YES NO 21 . Change. in existing features of hillsides,, or substantial alteration,.of ._groum( c9n. tours. 22. Change in the dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in the project vicinity. 23. Subject to or resulting in soil errosion by wind or flooding. 24. Change in ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. 25. Change in existing noise or vibration level in , the vicinity. Subject to roadway or airport noise (has the required acoustical report been submitted?) , ` 26. Involves the use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances , flammables or explosives. 27. Involves the use of .substantial amounts of fuel or energy. x 28. Changes the demand for municipal services (police, fire, sewage, etc. ) 29. Changes the demand for utility services, beyond those presently available or planned in the near future. 30. Significantly affects any unique or natural features, including mature trees. 31 . Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public land or public roads. 32. Results in the dislocation of people. YES NO 33. Generates controversy based on aesthetics or other3features of the project./' (Tt*oe6 wiu, 1.o e 1T) [ ] . Additional explanation of "yes" answers attached. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation, to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. C -1i i P_n� L M�z1� �rmA1J BU c�S NamePrint�o'r' Type For C6��LS 9l e� Dateignature Date - INITIAL STUDY FEE: $30. 00 (Make check payable to the City of Palm Desert and sub- mit with this form. ) F yi 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT CA. 92260 L52��LS ���LSrStS �lU� �0� **DEVELOPMENT PLAN** DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES RESIDENTIAL PLANNING DIVISION &EEMAGIN $UI�.�S , INC. QppflCpnl Dlease A^� EL.L�4 �i 3Z 3��7 •JJ////i))I(/�gJAtldress Tol^^hone i LJVI SP+elA 6-s C4 ZZ40164a City State Zip-Code REQUEST: (Describe specific nature of approval requested) PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: LOT qo OF DELL EsT,gT19s z1/6ep SF, /4 : 5Sxz.- . IS . 7_92>. R64F-: 'S ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. EXISTING ZONING Property Owner Authorization THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT THEY A E THE NER(S)OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND HEREBY GIVE AUTHOR- IZATION FOR TM (LING OF THIS APP TION SI A DATE AGREEMENT ABSOLVING THE CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL LIABILITIES RELATIVE TO NY DEED RESTRICTIONS. I DO BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGEWEMENT, ABSO E CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL LIABILITIES REGARDING ANY DEED RES- TR ION HAT MAY BE APPLICABLE TO THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN. S1041ATU JF DATE Applicants Signature RE DATE (FOR STAFF USE ONLY) ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS ACCEPTED BY ' ❑ MINISTERIAL ACT E.A.No. ❑ CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION❑ CASE No. NEGATIVE DECLARATION ❑ OTHER REFERENCE CASE NO.� : _ x r � 1�-;.nay. ilk , i a F, .n { t k � 1�01 a`x/st .�✓rnf `�09—`_s4�� PA R&O' VIEW fy • �q 1 N c99 ° / 5'E 6 I 23/. �8' s A. !� t: 73d S.'v 0'4� fib'1 .vs2• v 1 I ,Q= 2 E 5.14 95 ! 6 \ i q,b Al" -- 4 °1b h g`� a 0 IV ' e : t K b •� QIV .p h b \ 'a /' t' / s , 4 wt 2v a �� 4�/ 41b �h'I ` CO—, iPC,7t fa 19 141 IL r. v £ ... e. M �. .. _., ,.,.. :« kj..... .. .:...... w t i ,- .. is m.- F•... .v,. t n - _. _.- err } 4 ei _', x,t ,e , • > 9 $ p 1 �. ✓n Lo wer' � I G• J x.. te �/ o „ a,,<,.0 4 �. K �= ,��, 9�• __ _-_-� , '' co'7 I a � �`�- \a I B . - - . . 4 _:fir - —A' � V ,—Y vJ D' ;(s ►: (' S ° .. 1 , 3 , °P i 5 _ � r 3 - • 6 t P 96 q /9� 9 q , `qb + �/K tea - f f /9 J/ { k 9 IL r t o !J/N/ I , ♦ - 1 •, , C„ ., l > ,,, �:.�.. V '-t_' _ ICI f/O e'e s " ' c ` I OF t� CITY OF A PADESERTEN�'!s '...._.,. ..,. u d 4 `% I DEPARTMENT APPR 'C. � c.C. Rc.. NO. z SERVICES ❑ P.C. >z._ B. t t {{ 4 a ENVIRO��Bti, f�";A_ APPROVED BY: y STAFF �E�r�R ❑ C.C. RES. NO. KD.R.B. ACTION FORM ;,. - =- =-- o D" :•� � � ® P P.C. RES. N0.la Ste.[• >.. -�--� O INFP /96.9 , ' a .» o`� : - L7 STAFF LETTER By .......... PST • FF °t r - C] D.R.B. ACTION F RM /914 7 _ i,(� !Yftl1tN CJONSTRJCT;OPd SMALL GOM'!4ENCS �9 C7 /9 7 N O 3 _ ✓ .; Od fi0 i 1 V BY ........... ONE YEAR OF THIS APPROVAL.^ _ / C. ATE -.0 (I CONSTRUCT 04 S.iA-L COt'm-"CE WITHIN ONE YLLR Of THIS APPMv j 74 . 2 .k yj rA.uqj ' h CE 1AAS PZAIV 0 p i��'�� I "°'`'t_ - - _ � e 97 •1 i 1 J � t -, � � CvO. ----------- LOTS t� S ------------ fd 7'0 G � �60 n 5 ° . - �G. 74 � S BOIL�J, ,R wdL- _ , I 4Y n S e ur e n I O 61 Al. m�a Cw yob 02 G 2 t k4 �7/4) 2.3 4 .3 /9C90 wo V/7