Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDP 17-78 - 50 UNITS CONDOS 1980 I. RES M/L I POR SE /4 OF SEC T S R6E FOR TOTAL UE" RIPTION SEE ASSESSORS MAPS MP _ T Y R V RS D PAGE 167 _-- OWNERS NAME RECORDERS NO ZONE TRA PARCEL NO. LAND IM'RVMNTS EXEMPTIONS S NET 1 CVCWD, XX - .. x NONE ASSESS E 14250 MORRIS ARDEN 4200 9EREt_FORG 14eY_ PASADENA CALIF g1103 x 12/00/67 Y 24.00 ACRES M l I AL MOLL RAY DESCRIPTION 5ILL 71 �1 9 111 * t/00/73 YY 7.25 bFURAIPTION SrF A _ NEBEL E ALLEN 76485 RlUl - F 1 * / / 7 YY .84 S W Y L CA 11 + 9/ /66 YY 854 9 66 DESCRIPTION SEE ASSE R6E TOR TOTAL DESCRIPTION SEE ASS / / 1 2.33 - - R WS 3, Y W, N R R - x M N N. 114 Of SEC 8 7 S R6E FOR TOT L MAPS -- hFURT TON SFF ASSES On DES T , PT 4 R 1- - 13500 13500 ;101. x D CR TWE-ASSESSORS MAPS SHAPIRO YE R 4 1- 21 21 5 + — VIEJO, CA 926 xR Tom .� ESCR PTI A WINTER KATHERINE M 12818 R1 1 75041 62.1-190-048-1 2500 251XJ 1/m/75 YY 4 75 - '--� ACRES4.75 M L IN POR / Of SEC T S R6E FOR TOTAL _ LOTITO C 0 LOTITO GIOIELLA 1281q R101 75041 621-ig(1-0494 25CYJ 25MYJ 1/(Y1/75 YY 4 75 —{ 4.75 ACRES 11 1N PM NW1/4 OF SEC-8 T S R6E FOR TOTAL L TIT ORtISTOPNER N R101 75041 621-190-050-2 25(X) --___ ~ x M17 — M L N NW OF SEC T S R6E FOR TOTAL D� C - L OLNTY RIVERSIDE PAGE 168 MP OWNERS NAME - RECORDERS NO ZONE TRA PARCEL NO. LAND 1MPRV44TS EXEMPTIONS NET cA E AMT e _ _ _ R _ _ 2500 S 1 • 7 4 75 4. ACRE M N R L DI R CN ER 2500 R - • 7 7 4 M RTVIAL CA . 1/ 3/75 YY 4UK IVIAL 7 - p W1 F 9 1 • 1/ /7 YY 4 75 — li 8 ID A x 1 S R Y 7 x 7 7 TOTAL R - � 1 71 CR MIL N NW OF EC T R OR OT L qFSqORR MAPS R ?wo C L I : Ito 0 EC T S R FOR TOT L nFSCRIPTIONN SEE-AMts"'t coot R _ 2500 W - Y OF RIVERSIDEP 1 OWNERS NAME _ RECORDERS NO 20HE TRA PARCEL N0. LAND IMPRVPNFS EXEMPTIONS NET ♦ _ HER/ chic SAME(-) poll yl RI DOYL W � 3.02 ACRES M/ Rft FOR TOTAL KAWLLF45 IWILWORD M ELT ' ♦ Y -- F , l l7 YY 4 7 20000 • ♦ _PUK D — • 1/ 7 7 ASSESSORS --QT-71D:67Gm:0----7375-- a biSCRIPTION SE _ _ 4 &AQ& FOREST AVE S • �5 — DESCRIPTION SEE ASS 8 I R • L NL K R ♦ 7g -- 11 N NW R T l 12 R _ _ 235 ODl 1?7 NORTH CLARK DRIVE- AFVFQLY HILLS CALIF ♦ — N R _ _ PS MIPePAOLRR + R 15pZ�'�6 TT c� ♦ _T R101 41 621-1 6-6 23 5 2375� ♦ vy 2L9C1EC T S R6E FOR TOTALfk T ♦ 2 9 R101 75045 621-1911-077-7 2375 27nYn ACRES MOIL IN POR m /4 F SEC 5 AM FOR TOTAL DFqCRIPTIOt SFr ASSESSORS MAPS • EY 14 i R101 75041 621-190-078-8 2500 25U1 ♦ _ -4.75 AC ES MfL IN FSC 8 TSRE FOR TOTAL _ D H l R CR R 1 02 621-190-079-9 4375 4375 , L IN NH OF SEC T S R6E FOR TO7AL DE_ ION SEE ASSESSORS PAGE 171 MP 19 - ASSESSMENT ROIL CO1INTY OF RIVERSIDE OWNERS NAME RECORDERS NO !ONE TRA PARCEL NO. LAND IMPRWW7S EXEMPTIONS SA FED_ ♦ - - = ROTHFRJASMTS - 1575 HOMEY ♦ — -� A S M/l N NH P. T L • _ _ Cma CWD, A A ♦ TAX __. .— __— Wip • P X 1 .[OACH.LLA CA 92236 NON-TAX _� mum _ __ 12M PALM SPRINQ •♦ ♦ 7/OD/77 YY 6.00 lcEfiSjjSl14 OF SEC 8 T55 ROE FOR TOTAL R61E FOR R • e T V N ♦ —2�0 nn - - 127DIt1� CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNERS' LIST AFFIDAVIT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF PALM DESERT /J I, -5Ti1E hereby certify that the attached list contains the names and addresses of all persons to whom all property is assessed as they appear on the latest available assess- ment role of the County within the area described on the attached application and for a distance of three hundred (300) feet from the exterior boundaries of the property described on the attached application. I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 4e4w== (signe (date) 27 78 Mr. Allen E . Nebel T & D Investments 8665 Wilshire Boulevard 8161 Main Street Vancouver, B.C . Beverly Hills , CA 90211 CANADA VSX 3L2 Mr. Charles E. Walters Ballew/McFarland 3102 North 33rd Steve Fleshman 74-750 E1 Paseo A-7 Tacoma, WA 98407 Palm Desert , CA 92260 DP 17-78 1 of 1 Mr. Glenn S . Roberts 606 South Olive Street No. 1414 Los Angeles , CA 90014 Mr. William J. Greenwall 528 N. El Camino Real San Clemente, CA 92672 Mr. Alan C. Witnauer 3165 Knoll Way Riverside, CA 92501 Mr. William Domash 141 South Clark Drive Apt. .325 Los Angeles , CA 90048 Mr. Frank W. Swann, Jr. 1216 Roscomare Road Los Angeles , CA 90024 Mr. David L. Swann 1216 Roscomare Road Los Angeles , CA 90024 Ms . Kathleen R.H. Kellogg 4606 Forest Avenue S .E. Mercer Island, WA 98040 Ms . Sandra Lederer 222 Camino Alturas Palm Springs , CA 92292 Ms . Margaret Hovley 7473-B Magnolia Avenue Riverside, CA 92504 621- l9 TC A, 754,, 7!W N 2 SEC. 8 T. 5S. R, 6E. OR. 5 4 CCUNTRY— CLUB 71 - 14, y T t �I 47Jt,4 47o�AC 475d Ac I)J�dc I73t a- I)St4 ' 475tAC _ I+ $1.7 t<c " 1753<c 17 h `'a 73 tAr i f .� _y— \ aeGr A7534 I A.14 Ar I7Ji do 0 5 1 _ l -� �59.. '7 i�� 62 57� JB �� r- � .1 � :9' (50 5/ 5? � 5T. '� 59� 9 -�-- -- -'�---� -� ---- -+-- - - — - - - -tflNEt— n ' '7'4 `B� 66) (63. i,64 74; 01(7 I71.l l3tAc I)StA L33Ac J.01A I13t4' IJSt Ac I73,1 4 J%td I733Ac IJStAc N3tGc 173tdc o ro Q i •• 0.16t4 ,+ DATA R15 34/38 20 ASSESSOR'S MAP BK 51 Ph n,VCRSiO£ COUNTY, CALIF 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALI FORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 January 18, 1980 Wallach and Associates, Inc. 74-075 E1 Paseo, Suite A-7 Palm Desert, CA 92262 Attn: Mr. William H. Fitch Re: Request for time extension Case Nos. DP 17-78 and DP 18-78 (January 15, 1980) Dear Mr. Fitch: Please be advised that the referenced cases were approved by the Planning on December 5, 1978, and that the one year approval period has expired. The Municipal Code, Title 25 (Zoning Ordinance) provides for time exten- sions by the Planning Commission only if requests are filed prior to expiration. If you need any additional information on this matter, please contact this office. Very truly yours, PAUL A. WILLIAMS, AICP Director of Environmental Services me/pw/lr t - Ed Wallach,Jr. Bruce Stanford WALLACH AND ASSOCIATES,INC. Leonard Czarnowski PLANNERS-CIVIL ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS John E. Cavanaugh January 15 , 1980 l�i�itt OVIRosith WA �E VE" Inot Mr. Paul Williams Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert ; 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 Subject: DP 17-78 Dear Paul : We would appreciate your consideration and approval of our request for an extension .of time of one year (twelve months) for DP 17-78 , as of January 15 , 1980. Should you have any questions , please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Wallach & Associates , Inc. Wm. H. Fitch Civil Engineer WHF:klb cc : David Moss 74-075 El Paseo, Suite A-7 • Palm Desert, California 92260 • Phone (714) 568-5696 NOTICE OF DETERMINATION (Negative Declaration) To. Office of the County Clerk From: City of Palm Desert County of Riverside 45-275 Prickly Pear Lr.. 4050 Main Street Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Riverside, Ca. 92501 ( ) Secretary for Resources 1416 Ninth St. , Room 1311 " Sacramento, Ca. 958.14 SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 15083(f) of the State EIR Guidelines. Project Title/Common Name T&D Investments/Pro-Con Development State Clearinghouse Number if submitted to State Clearinghouse Contact Person Telephone Number Murrel Crump Area Code (714) 346-0611 Project Location North side of Hovely Lane, east of Monterey Avenue. Project Description Residential Development Plan to provide for 50 condominium units on approximately 10 acres. This is to advise that the City of Palm Desert has made the following determinations .regarding the above described project: 1. The project has been approved by the City; 2. The project ( ) wi11"t-'�) will not have a significant effect on the environment; 3. An Environmental Impact Report was not prepared in connection with this project; and 4. A Negative Declaration was prepared for th' oject pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. A copy of the Negative Declaration may e examined at the above City Hall address . Date Received for Filing Dated: 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION t DATE Dec , 6, 1978 APPLICANT T&D INVESTMENTS/PRO—CON DEVELOPMENT 8161 Main St . Vancouver, BC, Canada V5X 3L2 CASE NO. : DP 17-78 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of Dec . 5, 1978 CONTINUED TO DENIED XX APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 434 PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR CONCURRENCE WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION. PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR PUBLIC HEARING. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within f '\ \ (15) days of the daate' of the decision. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSSION cc: Applicant C.V.C.W.D. File Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission December 5, 1978 Page Six VI . PUBLIC HEARINGS (Cont . ) Case Nos. TT 13915 and CUP 15-78 - GEORGETOWN PARK LTD. / . GEORGE MARZICOLA, Applicant Requ st for approval of a Tentative Tract Map d Condit ' nal Use Permit to create a 40 lot In strial Planned it Development on approximately 3 .7 gross acres with ' the S . I . , S.P. (U .A. ) zone at the south- east corner Cook Street and Hovely L e extended . Mr . Crump reviewed t e staff report and he conditions of approval . Vice-Chairman Snyder decl red the P blic Hearing open and asked if the applicant wished to eak t this time. KEN KING, Civil Engineer , epresenting the applicant , noted his agreement with he conditions of approval . Vice-Chairman Snyder aske if there as anyone wishing to speak in FAVOR or in OPPOSITI to the case Being none, he de- clared the Public Hearing c sed and asked fo the pleasure of the Commission. On a motion by Co issioner Kryder , seconde by Commissioner Berkey, the Commissio approve the Conditional Use ermit by Plan- ning Commission Res ution No. 432 and by Planning Co mission Re- solution No. 433 , ecommended approval of the Tentativ Tract to the City Council ; c ried (4-0-1) AYES : Berkey, Fleshman , yder , Snyder; ABSTAI : Kelly. Co issioner Fleshman excused himself from the following three c ses, due to a conflict of interest . H. Case No . DP 17-78 - T&D INVESTi.MENTS/PRO-CON DEVELOPMENT, pp scant Request for approval of a Development Plan to allow 50 residential condominium units on approximately 10 gross acres within the PR-5 (U .A. ) zone on the north side of Hovely Lane, east of Monterey Avenue. Mr . Williams reviewed the staff report and noted the concerns of the Design Review Board . He noted that the DRB wants the shaded parking as proposed as well as apron parking . Mr . Williams noted that both the DRB and the Planning Commission will be reviewing the case again . Commissioner Berkey suggested that in Special Condition No . 2 , the word "achieve" be changed to "consider" . Chairman Kelly declared the Public Hearing open and asked if the applicant wished to speak at this time. DAVID IMOSS , representative of T&D Investments, L addressed the Commission and asked that they consider the parking as proposed and not require the additional apron parking on the project . Chairman Kelly asked if there was anyone wishing to speak in FAVOR or in OPPOSITION to the proposed project . Being none, she de- clared the Public Hearing closed and asked for the pleasure of the Commission . On a motion by Commissioner Berkey, seconded by Commissioner Kryder , the Commission approved the Development Plan with the noted change to Special Condition No. 2 by Planning Commission Resolution No . 434 ; carried (4-0-1 ) AYES: Berkey, Kelly, Kryder , Snyder ; ABSTAIN: Fleshman i 'CITY OF PALM DESERT STAFF REPORT TO: PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT ON: RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPLICANT: T & D INVESTMENTS/:PRO-CON DEVELOPMENT CASE NO: DP 17-78 DATE: DECEMBER 5, 1978 I. REQUEST: Approval of a Development Plan to allow 50 Residential condominium units on approximately 10 gross acres within the PR-5 (U.A. ) (Planned Residential ,, max. 5 du/acre, Upon Ann2xation)'.zone,. on the north side of Hovely Lane, east of Monterey Avenue. _ II. BACKGROUND: A. Environmental Assessment: The Director of Environmental Services has determined that the Subject request will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment, and a negative declaration was prepared. B. Adjacent Zoning: PR-5(U'.A.)._ (N,,E,S&W) C. Description of Design Elements : 1 . Perimeter Street - Improvement of Hovely Lane. 2. Internal Private Street/Driveway system - One access/entrance to Hovely Lane, with median island private street connecting four, unit cluster , vehicle courts. Emergency access Route to Hovely Lane along eastern property line. 3. Recreation amenities - One tennis court - Main swimming pool with cabana - Two minor recreation areas (recreation uses not specified) 4. Open Space Analysis - Required, 50% of net site - 4.66 acres - Proposed, 50.17% of net site - 4.68 acres 5. Dwelling Unit configuration - Fifty (50) dwelling units arranged in duplexes with attached garages Forty-eight (48) units max. allowed, based on gross site area 6. Parking Analysis - Required, 2 covered spaces per unit, plus 0.5 guest spaces per unit (total 125) . - Proposed, 2 covered spaces per unit, plus 58 open guest parking spaces and approximately 18 recreational vehicle storage spaces , (total , approximately 176) . III. DISCUSSION: The design of the proposed development uses a central access street with .a landscaped median to connect four dwelling unit clusters. Duplex units are arranged around vehicle parking courts which have, tree shaded, open parking stalls in the center. Recreational vehicle storage areas are provided at the ends of three courts. Precise calcualation of the gross site area reveals that the maximum number of units permitted on this site would be 48 versus the 50 proposed: A main recreation area is provided between the two northern unit clusters, Case No. DP 17-78 December 5, 1978 Page Two III . DISCUSSION: (Cont. ) at the end of the central private access street. Two other areas are designated for recreation use with a symbol , but exact improvements are not specified. At a minimum one additional pool should be included. The Design Review Board, at their November 2, 1978, meeting, viewed the !subject proposal for purposes of providing design analysis input to Staff. One major point of discussion was the provision of 20' driveway aprons, observing that only minimum apron lengths had been designed. This ;subject was also discussed relative to other Development Plans now before the Commission. The clearly consistent objective of the Board was to see open parking at each unit by providing a 20' driveway apron to each garage. In this particular proposal , it is noted that an alternative design pro vides a center open parking island directly across from units. There are modifications to this plan which would consider the Board' s position, but maintain the general scheme now illustrated. Units with projecting garage structures could provide the 20' aprons by moving the garage back the necessary distance. To add design relief and increase apron length, the middle buildings in the cluster groups could also be moved back. Perimeter treatment of the Development will need to include a project wall around the site with gate opening for emergency access, and wind/blow sand protection planting along the north and west boundaries. Ornamental land- scaping, berming, and sidewalk detail should be established for Hovely Lane to produce a pleasing street scene. One conceptual view (rendering) of the project has been provided to Jllustrate how it might appear, but the precise architectural details will have to be resolved through the Design Review process. IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The land plan presents a coordinated design which may be further enhanced by implementing the noted modifications at the Design Review stage. Therefore, based on the justification provided in the Resolution, Staff recommends: Approval of DP 17-78, by adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 434 , subject to conditions. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 434 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING =O .IISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT , CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF 48 RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM UNITS ON APPROXIMATELY 10 GROSS ACRES ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HOVELY LANE , EAST OF MONTEREY AVENUE . CASE NO . DP 17-78 l - WHEREAS , the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert , California, did hold a duly noticed Public Hearing, on December 5 , 1978 , to consider a request by T and D Investments/Pro-Con Development , to allow 50 Residential condominium units and related recreational amen- ities on approximately 10 gross acres within the PR-5 (Planned Resi- dential ,. maximum 5 du/acre) zone on the North side of Hovely Lane , east of Monterey Avenue , more particularly described -as : APN 621-190-054 APTI 621-190-055 WHEREAS , said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Environmental Quality Procedure , Resolution No . 78-32 , " in that the Director of Environmental Services has determined that this project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment and the appeal period has expired; and , WHEREAS , at said Public Hearing , upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments , if any, the Planning Commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify the approval of ( the subject Development Plan and Preliminary Design Review: 1 . The proposed development is consistent with the City ' s t adopted General Plan . 2 . The proposed use is similar to and compatible with those contemplated on nearby properties . 3 . The design or improvement of the proposed development will be consistent with the Palm Desert Zoning Ordinance . 4. The site is physically suited for both the type of devel- opment proposed and the proposed density . 5 . The design of the development and the proposed improve- ments are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or have a serious effect on the public health, safety, or general welfare . NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED by the Plarining Commission of the City of Palm Desert , California, as follows : 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and con- stitute the findings of the Planning, Commission in these cases . 2 . The Planning Commission does hereby approve Development ( Plan DP 17-78 for reasons stated, subject to conditions . PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission held on this 5th day of December , 1978 , by the following vote , to wit : AYES : Berkey, Kelly, Kryder, Snyder NOES : None ABSENT : None ABSTAIN: Fleshman GLORIA KELLY, Chairman ATTEST: \ PAUL A. WILLIPM , Secretary e h PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 434 Page Two CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. DP 17-78 Standard Conditions: 1 . The development of the property shall conform substantially with _. Exhibit A (Case No. DP 17-78 ) on file with the Department of En- vironmentl Services, as modified by the following conditions. 2 . Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any uses contemplated by this approval , the applicant shall first complete all the procedural requirements of the City which includes, but not limited to, Design Review, Subdivision process, and build- ing permit procedures. 3 . Construction of the total development may be done in phases; how- ever , each individual phase shall meet .or exceed all Municipal Code requirements to the degree that the City could consider each phase as a single project . 4. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of inal approval otherwise said approval shall become null, void and of no effect whatsoever . Further , the total project shall be completed by January 1 , 1985. After said date, this approval shall automatically expire for those remaining undeveloped portions of the subject property and the City Council may initiate rezoning procedures to revert said un- developed areas to an S (Study) Zone Designation . 5. Prior to the issuance of any City permits for the commencement of construction on said project , the applicant shall agree in writing to these Conditions of Approval . 6. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and State and Federal Statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 7. All existing electrical distribution lines, telephone, cable antenna television , and similar service wires or cables, which are adja- cent to the property being developed shall be installed underground as a part of development from the nearest existing pole not on the property being developed. 8. All requirements of the City Fire Marshal shall be met as part of the development of this project per attached letter dated November 21, 1978 . 9. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificates of occupancy shall be issued until completed . 10. Traffic control provisions shall be provided as required by the Director of Public Works. 11 . Curb, gutter , sidewalk or approved pathways, and tie-in paving shall be provided in conformance with City Standards and/or as required by the. Director of Public Works. 12. Prior to issuance of. a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval , the applicant shall first obtain per- mits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Riverside County Department of Health Palm Desert Design Review Board Process City Fire Marshal Coachella Valley County Water District Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the Dept . of Building and Safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 434 Page Three Standard Conditions: (Cont . ) 13 . No development shall occur on the subject property prior to the recordation of a tract map. l Special Conditions: 1 . Provide 20' driveway aprons for end units with projecting .garage structures, by moving garage structure back. 2 . Consider additional driveway apron length and design relief by shifting middle buildings in unit cluster back. 3 . Provide at least one additional swimming pool to area labeled "minor recreation" . 4. Provide wind/blowsand protection treatment along north and west boundaries. 5. Provide ornamental parkway landscaping along public street front- ages. 6. Provide minimum six (6) foot high masonry wall (with emergency access gate) around the site. 7 . The southerly most duplex building of the northwest dwelling unit cluster shall be deleted , resulting in a maximum of 48 dwelling units. AGREEMENT I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval , to comply with all the conditions set forth, and understand that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow oc- cupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. (Date) (Applicant ' s Signature) PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 434 Page Four P't'•_. / RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT `s�{Islu C 11 0 U'v I y IN COOPERATION WITH THE �f + • '� l - CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY 11, it VElesm! �— DAVID L. FLAKE c-- COUNTY FIRE WARDEN 210 WEST SAN JACINTO STREET ° PERRIS, CALIFORNIA 92370 TELEPHONE (714) 657-3183 November 21, 1978 Paul A. Williams Director of �nvircnmental Services City of Palm Desert 45-2'(5 Prickly Pear ane Palm Desert, CA 92260 . Re: Case No. DP 17-78 I Dear Mr. Williams: I Prior to construction of any of the proposed buildings, the following conditions must be met: j 1. Install a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow for a (2) hour duration in addition to domestic or other supply. The computation shall be j based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement, ( 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building l is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. A. Hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. B. Exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. I C. Curbs (if installed) , shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 3. prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. Upon approval, one copy will be sent to the Building Department, and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Case Number DP 17-78 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal." 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. 6. The developer shall submit plans for the entry structure, showing width and height to the Fire Marshal for approval. l 7. Alternate access for emergency vehicles shall be provided. Very truly yours, DAVID L. FLAKE re Chief £PNIROi'•i;.7ED;TAL JLl/ICES David J. Ortegel CITY OF PALM DESERT Fire Marshal vld PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO . - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COIP.IISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT , CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF 48 RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM UNITS ON APPROXIMATELY 10 GROSS ACRES ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HOVELY LANE , EAST OF MONTEREY AVENUE . CASE NO . DP 17-78 t WHEREAS , the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert , California, did hold a duly noticed Public Hearing, on December 5 , 1978 , to consider a request by T and D Investments/Pro-Con Development , to allow 50 Residential condominium units and related recreational amen- ities on approximately 10 gross acres within the PR-5 (Planned Resi- dential , maximum 5 du/acre) zone on the North side of Hovely Lane , east of Monterey Avenue , more particularly described as : APN 621-19R-054 APN 621-190-055 WHEREAS , said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Environmental Duality Procedure , Resolution No. 78-32 , " in that the Director of Environmental Services has determined that this project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment and the appeal period has expired; and, WHEREAS , at said Public Hearing , upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments , if any, the Planning, Commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify the approval of the subject Development Plan and Preliminary Design Review: 1 . The proposed development is consistent with the City' s adopted General Plan. 2 . The proposed use is similar to and compatible with those contemplated on nearby properties . 3 . The design or improvement of the proposed development will be consistent with the Palm Desert Zoning Ordinance. 4. The site is physically suited for both the type of devel- opment proposed and the proposed density. 5 . The design of the development and the proposed improve- ments are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or have a serious effect on the public health, safety, or general welfare . NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning, Commission of the City of Palm Desert , California, as follows : 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and con- stitute the findings of the Planning Commission in these cases . . 2 . The Planning Commission does hereby approve Development Plan DP 17-78 for reasons stated, subject to conditions . PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission held on this 5th day of December, 1978 , by the following vote , to wit : AYES : NOES : ABSENT : ABSTAIN: GLORIA KELLY , Chairman ATTEST: PAUL A. WILLIAMS , Secretary PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. Page Two CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. DP 17-78 Standard Conditions: 1 . The development of the property shall conform substantially with . _. Exhibit A (Case No . DP 17-78 ) on file with the Department of En- vironmentl Services, as modified by the following conditions . 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of - any uses contemplated by this approval , the applicant shall first complete all the procedural requirements of the City which includes, . but not limited to , Design Review, Subdivision process, ;and build- ing permit procedures. 3 . Construction of the total development may be done in phases; how- ever , each individual phase shall meet or exceed all Municipal Code requirements to the degree that the City could-consider each phase as a single project . 4 . Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of inal approval otherwise said approval shall become null , void and of no effect whatsoever . Further , the total project shall be completed by January 1 , 1985 . After said date, this approval shall automatically expire for those remaining undeveloped portions of the subject property and the City Council may initiate rezoning procedures to revert said un- developed areas to an S (Study) Zone Designation. 5. Prior to the issuance of any City permits for the commencement of. construction on said project , the applicant shall agree in writing to these Conditions of Approval . 6. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and State and Federal Statutes now in force, or which hereafter maybe in force. 7 . All existing electrical distribution lines, telephone, cable antenna television , and similar service wires or cables, which are adja- cent to the property being developed . shall be installed underground as a part of development from the nearest existing pole not on the property being developed. 8. All requirements of the City Fire Marshal shall be met as part of the development of this project per attached letter dated November 21, 1978 . 9. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City Fire - Marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certi£icati- of occupancy shall be issued until completed. 10. Traffic control provisions shall be provided as required by the Director of Public Works. 11 . Curb , gutter , sidewalk or approved pathways, and tie-in paving shall be provided in conformance with City Standards and/or as required by the Director of Public Works. 12. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval , the applicant shall first obtain per- mits and/or clearance from the following agencies : Riverside County Department of Health Palm Desert Design Review Board Process City Fire Marshal Coachella Valley County Water District Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the Dept . of Building and Safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. Page Three Standard Conditions : (Cont . ) 13 . No development shall occur on the subject property prior to the recordation of a tract map. t Special Conditions: 1 . Provide 20 ' driveway aprons for end units with_projecting garage structures, by moving garage structure back. 2 . Achieve additional driveway apron length and design relief by shifting middle buildings in unit cluster back. 3 . Provide at least one additional swimming pool to area labeled "minor recreation" . 4. Provide wind/blowsand protection treatment along north and west boundaries. 5. Provide ornamental parkway landscaping along public street front- ages. 6. Provide minimum six (6) foot high masonry wall (with emergency access gate.) around the site. 7 . The southerly most duplex building of the northwest dwelling unit cluster shall be deleted, resulting in a maximum of 48 dwelling units. Il AGREEMENT I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval , to comply with all the conditions set forth, and understand that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow oc- cupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. L (Date) (Applicant ' s Signature) PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. Page Four RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT IQ IN COOPERATION WITH THE ko CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY . rtn'hRslur DAVID L. FLAKE --� COUNTY FIRE WARDEN 210 WEST SAN JACINTO STREET PERRIS, CALIFORNIA 92370 TELEPHONE (714) 657-3183 Novemoer 21, 1978 I I Paul A. Williams Director of environmental Services City of Palm Deser5 45-275 PricKly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 Re: Case No. DP 17-78 Dear Mr. Williams: Prior to construction of any of the proposed buildings, the following conditions must be met: 1. Install a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow for a (2) hour duration in addition to domestic or other supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building C is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. A. Hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. B. Exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. C. Curbs (if installed) , shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original I and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. Upon approval, one copy will be sent to the Building Department, and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Case Number DP 17-78 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal." 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. 6. The developer shall submit plans for the entry structure, showing width and height to the Fire Marshal for approval. 7. Alternate access for emergency vehicles shall be provided. Very truly yours, DAVID L. FLAKE re Chief i ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES David J. Ortegel CITY OF PALM DESERT Fire Marshal vld I Minutes Palm Desert Design Review Board November 21 , 1978 Page Two III. CASES (Cont. ) i Case No. 91C (Cont. ) Carl ' s Jr. Building 1 . Change roof tile to match the other buildings. 2. Change detail above and below roof from wood to matching stucco (per original elevation drawings) . I( Carl ' s Jr. Landscaping 1 . Revise Sheet L-1 to conform to the balance of the center. 2. Indicate all trees at 24" box size. 3. Indicate shrubs numbered 2 to 4 in minimum 5 gal size. 4. Eliminate easterly most opening on the frontage road and replace with landscaping. Carried 4-0 (Jackson, Johnson, Leung, Urrutia). • Case No. 148MF - D. K. KAVANAUGH - Elevations for a 381 single-family residential complex to be located east of Cook Street and northerly of Merle Drive. Applicant not present. Staff reviewed with the Board complete elevation drawings for the proposed condominium units, noting that other than continuation of the roof line (per original Development Plan approval ) , side and rear elevations had not been detailed (continuing architectural treatment on all sides of the build- ings) . It was also observed that architecturally integrated patio covers should have been designed for at least units receiving severe sun exposure. r Discussion also included the design of the perimeter tract wall . to On a motion by Jackson, seconded by Leung, the Board approved the architec- tural elevations as submitted and approved- the perimeter wall detail subject to the following conditions: 1 . That engineering calculations be submitted for the wall design, and that pilasters be placed a maximum of 10 feet apart. Carried 4-0 (Jackson, Johnson, Leung, Urrutia) . IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS (Not on Agenda) The Board discussed the following cases for the purpose of providing de- si n input to staff: DP 17-78 - RO-CON DEVELOPMENT CO. , 50 residential condominium units on the nort�f of Hovely Lane, east of Monterey Avenue. Design Considerations: 1 . Provide 20' driveway apron for units with projecting garage structures, by moving garage structure back from private street/driveways. 2. Move the center duplex buildings back from private street to provide design relief and provide 20' driveway apron. 3. Provide one additional swimming pool in area indicated for recreation. DP 18-78 - T&D INVESTMENTS/PRO-CON DEVELOPMENT CO. , 24 residential condominium units on the south side of Hovely Lane, west of Portola Avenue. Design Considerations: 1 . Move guest parking island north, closing first driveway entry to unit groups. I INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO: Director of Environmental Services FROM: Director of Public Works SUBJECT: DP 17-78 DATE: November 21 , 1978 1 . This tract shall pay $2,500 to the signalization fund of the City of Palm Desert. 2. This tract shall be required to pay all of the park, fees as required by the City of Palm Desert ordinance. 3. The drainage of this tract shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works. 4. Safety street lighting shall be installed at the main entrance on Hovley Lane. 5. Sandblow protection shall be provided by heavy landscaping on the north and westerly sides of this development. RJECEIVED NOV 2 1978 - ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT �ouNry ESTABLISHED IN 1918 AS A PUBLIC A .Y ��sralc= COACHELLA VALLEY' COUNTY WATER DISTRICT POST OFFICE BOX 1058 COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA 92236 • TELEPHONE (714)398-2651 DIRECTORS OFFICERS RAYMOND R. RUMMONDS, PRESIDENT LOWELL O. WEEKS. GENERAL MANAGER-O"V ENGINEER TELLIS CODEKAS, VICE PRESIDENT OLE J. NORDLAND, SECRETARY C. J. FROST DENNIS M. RACKETY. AUDITOR WILLIAM D. GARDNER November 21 , 1978 REDWINE AND SHERRILL,ATTORNEYS STEVE D.RU% ON File: 0163. 11 o421 . 1 0721 . 1 Department of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert P. 0. Box 1977 Palm Desert, California 92260 Re: P.D. Case No. DP 17-78, NW4, Sec. 8, SE4, T5S, R6E Gentlemen: This area is protected from stormwater flows by the Whitewater River Stormwater Channel and may be considered safe from stormwater flows except in rare instances. The District will furnish domestic water and sanitation service to said area in accordance with the currently prevailaing regulations of this District. This area shall be annexed to Improvement District Nos. 16 and 70 of the Coachella Valley County Water District for Domestic water Service. This area shall be annexed to Improvement District Nos. 53 and 80 of the Coachella Valley County Water District for sanitation service. Very truly 4ngineer Lowell 0. WGeneral Manager-Ch RECEIVED KEH:jrf cc: Health Department NOV 22 1978 46-209 Oasis Street ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Indio, California 92201 CITY OF PALt'.1 DESERT, DESCRIPTION The land referred to in this report is situated in the County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows: PARCEL 1 : The East half of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 8 Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Meridian, in the County of Riverside, State of California, according to the official plat thereof. Except the South 33.00 feet conveyed to the County of Riverside by deed recorded January 31 , 1975 as Instrument No. 12824 of Official Records. Also except and reserving to the United States of America all coal , oil , gas and other mineral deposits, together with the right to prospect for, mine and remove the same according to the provision of the act of June 1 1938 (52 Stat. 609) as amended and as reserved in the patent from the United States of America, recorded April 12, 1966 as Instrument No. 37986 of Official Records. PARCEL 2: The West half of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 8 Township S. South Range 6 East, San Bernardino Meridian, in the County of Riverside, State of California according to the official plat thereof. Except the South 33.00 feet conveyed to the County of Riverside, by deed recorded January 31 , 1975 as Instrument No. 12824. Also except and reserving to the United States of America all coal , oil , gas and other mineral deposits, together with the right to prospect for, mine, and remove the same, according to the provision of the act of June 1 , 1978 (52 Stat. 609) as amended and as reserved in the patent from the United States of America to Emily M. Witnauer recorded November 28, 1958 as Instrument No. 86062 Of Official Records. NOTE THE FOLLOWING Note 1 : Short Term Rate Applies I ,i 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CAUFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Case No. : DP 17-78 Project: Development Plan Applicant: PRO-CON DEVELOPMENT Enclosed please find materials describing a project for which the following is being requested: Approval of a Residential Development Plan to provide for 50 condominium units on approximately 10 acres within the PR-5 zone on the north side of Hovely Lane, east of Monterey Avenue. The attached data was prepared by the applicant and is being forwarded to you for comments and recommended Conditions of Approval . The City is interested in the probable impacts on the natural environment (e.g. water and air pollution) and on public resources (e.g. demand for schools, hospitals, parks, power generation, sewage treatment, etc. ) Your comments and recommended conditions of approval must be received by this office prior to 5:00 p.m. Nov. 24 , 1978, in order to be discussed by the Land Division Committee at their meeting of Nov. 29th . The Land Division Committee (comprised of Director of Environmental Services , City Building Official , City Engineer, Fire Marshal and a representative of CVCWD) will discuss the comments and recommended conditions of approval and will forward them to the Planning Commission through the staff report. Any information received by this office after the receipt deadline will not be discussed by the Land Division Com- mittee nor will it be forwarded to the Planning Commission for consid- eration. Very truly yours, Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services PAW/ks PLEASE RETURN MAP WITH COMMENTS `DFN<ari. - J1115,7E 43-273 PRICKLY PEAR LANE 1 PALM OEfiERT,CALIFORNIA 62260 G?$ CA Ll�-''""' ' � races �— f.U.F 13iP3Wi� •r-..w TELEPHONE(TIQ 346-0611 Mr. William Domash 141 South Clark Drive r Apt. 325 RECEIVED Los Angeles , CA 90048 NOV-2�1'_.1gf p r \ - �f C ENVIRONMENTAL-SERVICES <15 t: , .CITY-,-O�PALM DESERT � } i _ r 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 ''November 17, 1978 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO PROVIDE FOR 50 CONDOMINIUM UNITS ON APPROXI- MATELY 10 ACRES WITHIN THE PR-5 ZONE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HOVELY LANE, EAST OF MONTEREY AVENUE. CASE NO. DP 17-78 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by PRO-CON DEVELOPMENT for approval of a Residential Development Plan to provide for 50 condominium units on approximately 10 acres within the PR-5 zone on the north side of Hovely Lane, east of Monterey Avenue, more particularly described as: APN 621-190-054 APN 621-190-055 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE COUNTRY O CLUB®DRIVE _ ■Y _ _�I PAI M DESERT CITY LMIT4c"y� P.C. (2) (DP 03-78) R-2 8,000 (8). � D 17 78 j l P.R.- I — HOVE LY LANE I ` SAID Public Hearing will be held on Tuesday, December 5, 1978, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall ; 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are in- vited to attend and be heard. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post November 22,. 1978 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Case No. : DP 17-78 Project: Development Plan Applicant: PRO-CON DEVELOPMENT Enclosed please find materials describing a project _for which the following is being requested: Approval of a Residential Development Plan to provide for 50 condominium units on approximately 10 acres within the PR-5 zone on the north side of Hovely Lane, east of Monterey Avenue. The attached data was prepared by the applicant and is being forwarded to you for comments and recommended Conditions of Approval . The City is interested in the probable impacts on the natural environment (e.g. water and air pollution) and on public resources (e.g. demand for schools, hospitals, parks, power generation, sewage treatment, etc. ) Your comments and recommended conditions of approval must be received by this office prior to 5:00 p.m. Nov. 24 , 1978, in order to be discussed by the Land Division Committee at their meeting of Nov. 29th , The Land Division Committee (comprised of Director of Environmental Services , City Building Official , City Engineer, Fire Marshal and a representative of CVCWD) will discuss the comments and recommended conditions of approval and will forward them to the Planning Commission through the staff report. Any information received by this office after the receipt deadline will not be discussed by the Land Division Com- mittee nor will it be forwarded to the Planning Commission for consid- eration. Very truly yours, Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services PAW/ks PLEASE RETURN MAP WITH COMMENTS CIRCULATION LIST FOR ALL CASES Circulation of Tentative Maps, Parcel Maps, CUP's, GPA' s, etc: REVIEW COMMITTEE: �( 1. Palm Desert Director of Environmental Services - Paul Williams \�1 Palm Desert Director of Building & Safety - Jim Hill Palm Desert Director of Public Works - L. Clyde Beebe '4. Palm Desert Fire Marshall - Dave Ortegel 5. Robert P. Brock Office of Road Commissioner and County Surveyor Administration Office Building, Room 313 46-209 Oasis Street Indio, California 92201 (Phone: 347-8511, ext 267) 6. �. Lowell 0. Weeks General Manager - Chief Engineer Coachella Valley County Water District (C.V.C.W.D. ) P. 0. Box 1058 Coachella, California 92236 (Phone: (714) 398-2651) 8. R. J. Lowry Project Development Services California Department of Transportation P. 0. Box 231 San Bernardino, California 92403 (Phone: (714) 383-4671 ) 9. _ Director of Planning and Building City of Indian Wells 45-300 Club Drive Indian Wells, California 92260 (Phone: 345-2831) 10. Director of Planning City of Rancho Mirage 69-825 Highway 111 Rancho Mirage, California 92270 (Phone : 328-8871) �1. Kermit Martin Southern California Edison Company P. 0. Box 203 Palm Desert, California 92260 (Phone: 346-8660) 12. Chuck Morris General Telephone Company 62-147 Desertaire Road Joshua Tree, California 92252 (Phone: 366-8389) 13. R. W. Riddell Engineering Department \/ Southern California Gas Company V(\ P. 0. Box 2200 Riverside, California 92506 (Phone: 327-8531, ask for Riverside extension 214) Circulation List for All Cases Page Two 14. Roger Harlow Director - Pupil Personnel Service Desert Sands Unified School District 83-049 Avenue 46 Indio, California 92201 (Phone: 347-4071) 15. Jim Langdon Palm Desert Disposal Services, Inc. 36-711 Cathedral Canyon Drive P. 0. Drawer LL Cathedral City, California 92234 (Phone: 328-2585 or 328-4687) 16. Stanley Sayles President, Palm Desert Community Services District 44-500 Portola Avenue Palm Desert, California 92260 (Phone: 346-6338) 17. Regional Water Quality Control Board 73-271 Highway 111 , Suite 21 Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 (Phone: ) 18. Harold Horsley Foreman/Mails U. S. Post Office Palm Desert, California 92260' (Phone: 346-3864) 19. Joe Benes Vice President & General Manager Coachella Valley Television P. 0. Box 368 Palm Desert, California 92260 (Phone: 346-8157) 20. Don McNeely President - Palm Desert Chamber of Commerce P. 0. Box 908 Palm Desert, California 92260 (Phone: 346-6111) 21. Scott McClellan, Senior Planner Riverside County Planning Commission County Administration Building, Room 304 46-209 Oasis Street Indio, California 92201 (Phone: 347-8511, ext. 277, 278, & 279) 22. James Whitehead Superintendent - District 6 - - State Parks and Recreation 1350 Front Street, Room 6054 San Diego, California 92101 (Phone: (714) 236-7411) 23. Les Pricer Redevelopment Agency 73-677 Highway Ill Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 (Phone: 346-6920 24. Robert I. Pitchford, Chairman Architectural Committee of the Palm Desert Property Owners Assoc. 73-833 El Paseo Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF A "DRAFT" NEGATIVE DECLARATION The Director of Environmental Services has determined that the follow- ing listed projects will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment and that a Negative Declaration should be adopted: CASE NO. CUP 13-78 - Request for approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow for sale of packaged beer in conjunction with an existing automobile service station within the P.C. (4) , S.P. zone at the southeast corner of High- way III and 44th Avenue. --------------------------- CASE NO. CUP 14-78 Request for approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow a Pre-School facility on approximately one-half acr`e at the northwest corner of Alessandro Drive and Cabrillo Avenue. --------------------------- CASE NO DP 17-78 Request for approval of a Residential Development Plan to provide for 50 condominium units on approximately 10 acres within the PR-5 zone on the north side of Hovely Lane, east of Monterey Avenue. --------------------------- CASE NO. DP 18-78 Request for approval of a Development Plan to allow 24 residential units on approximately 5 gross acres on the south side of Hovely Lane, west of Portola Avenue. ---------------------------- CASE NO. DP 19-78 Request for approval of a Residential Development Plan to allow 160 residential units, recreational amenities and open space on approximately 35.2 gross acres at the northeast corner of Hovely Lane (extended) and Cook Street. -2- a' CASE NO. PM 13558 & VAR 06-78 Request for approval of a Tentative Parcel Map to create a 15,170 sq. ft. parcel and a 12,634 sq. ft. parcel from a 27,804 sq. ft. parcel within the R-1 zone generally located at the northeast corner of E1 Cortez Way and Santa Ynez Avenue and related Variance for lot width. An appeal from this determination may be made to the Planning Commission within eight (8) days of the date of posting of this public notice by filing an appeal in accordance with Resolution No. 78-32, with the Dept. of Environmental Services located at 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California. If no appeal is filed within the said time, this determination shall become final . PAUL A. WILLIAMS, AIP Director of Environmental Services Date of Public Notice 3 7 Date Appeal Period Expires Af METHOD OF NOTICING: /6;1-�osting / U Mailing to owners of property within 300' Publication in newspaper /L/ 0ther mailing (agencies and other persons requesting notice) 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Case No. : DP 17-78 Project: Development Plan Applicant: PRO-CON DEVELOPMENT Enclosed please find materials describing a project for which the following is being requested: Approval of a Residential Development Plan to provide for 50 condominium units on approximately 10 acres within the PR-5 zone on the north side of Hovely Lane, east of Monterey Avenue. The attached data was prepared by the applicant and is being forwarded to you for comments and recommended Conditions of Approval . The City is interested in the probable impacts on the natural environment (e;g. water and air pollution) and on public resources (e.g. demand for schools, hospitals, parks, power generation, sewage treatment, etc. ) Your comments and recommended conditions of approval must be received by this office prior to 5:00 p.m. Nov. 24 . , 1978, in order to be discussed by the Land Division Committee at their meeting of Nov. 29th The Land Division Committee (comprised of Director of Environmental Services, City Building Official , City Engineer, Fire Marshal and a representative of CVCWD) will discuss the comments and recommended conditions of approval and will forward them to the Planning Commission through the staff report. Any information received by this office after the receipt deadline will not be discussed by the Land Division Com- mittee nor will it be forwarded to the Planning Commission for consid- eration. Very truly yours, Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services PAW/ks PLEASE RETURN MAP WITH COMMENTS - -- -- ems. - --- --- -- -- - -- -- - ---- -- - - , y a �^ v 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT CA. 92260 Jca\ZS'�L�dS�Lsr���O� �O151� **DEVELOPMENT PLAN** DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES RESIDENTIAL PLANNING DIVISION TiA INvesr,-irwn p��/$$/{Ro-�y/fM�� DFt�E�.c�?,yE�lr 7 /��J 7 •�� AR/lDlea/44L4 e7r• " '�� SZ 1• i�e7V Mailing Address - - Telephcne Loc*L. Iticoug0t , 5 .G4 C.AWADA q6x ALS City r State Zip-Code REQUEST: (Describe specific nature of approvl(al requtested) 4 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 2 L.cfs or+ ,b�vve/y 44 /d acro5 ASSESSORIS PARCEL NO. f�lon EXISTING ZONING PR' S Property Owner Authorization THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT THEY ARE THE OWNER IS)OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND HEREBY GIVE AUTHOR- IZATION FOR THE FILING F THIS AP LIGATION. l� 9 SIGNA URE DATE AGREEMENT ABSOLVING THE CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL LIABILITIES RELATIVE TO ANY DEED RESTRICTIONS. 1 DO BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT, AB OLVE THE CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL LIABILITIES REGARDING ANY DEED RES- ICTIONS THAT MAY BE APPLICABLE TO THE PROPERTY DESCR BED HEREIN. SIGN x URE - D DATE Applicants Signature SIGNA RE DATE (FOR STAFF USE ONLY) ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS ACTED B j- �e ❑ CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION CASE NO. - .DP /-7 -77 ❑ NEGATIVE DECLARATION 0 OTHER - - - REFERENOE CASE NO. CITY of PALM DESERT INITIAL STUDY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STAFF ONLY Case No. : Related Case(s) : Received By: TO ACCOMPANY APPLICATION FOR 94rf; v1t1]� rW�V�Ihn.r.i (Type 5f Permit) APPLICANT 74 D zw 1,U%e6p,,4 Please Print or Type ADDRESS 931E I AU4L) (Please Print or Type) Street Vamcoow VG Ca A, V51C 3L2 cv Bz 7c.'3d City State Zip Code Telephone I. Background Information: 1. Nature of project or activity: , No. of Units (if residential) : SQ dwelling units. Gross Floor Area (if commercial or industrial) : square 1/ squ'alre feet. 2. General Location and Size: 10 Gdf.L.S wo S1Af Jyn hTbiKN 3. Is the project a phase or a portion of a larger project? YES If so, identify the larger project: 4. Has an Initial Study or Environmental Impact Report previously been prepared that includes all or part of the project? _YES NO I If so, give date gubmitted and title of project:�, , Q� M4n ,011a,' `Oft,tLbY��N6� II. Environmental Impacts: Please answer the following questions by placing a check in the appropriate space. The applicant should be able to substantiate his response to every question. Ex- planations of all "yes/maybe" answers are required in the final section of this re- port. 1. Land (topography, soils, geology) YES or MAYBE NO (a) Does the project site involve a unique landform or biological area, such as beaches, sand dunes, marshes, etc. ? (b) Will there be construction on slopes of 25% or greater? (c) Will the project result in the removal of natural resources for commercial purposes, such as rock, sand, gravel, oil, plants, or minerals? Department of Environmental Services Form 9 _ City of Palm Desert Initial Study of Environmental Impact Page Two II. Environmental Impacts: (continued) YES or MAYBE NO (d) Will the project involve grading in excess of 300 cubic yards? (e) Is the project site located on or adjacent to a known earthquake fault or an area of soil in- stability (subsidence, landslide, or severe blowsand)? ✓ 2. Water (a) Is the project located within a flood plain, a natural drainage channel, or streambed? (b) Will the project significantly increase the rate and amount of surface water runoff? (c) Will the project result in the contamina- tion or deterioration .in quality of ground / water? 3. Flora and Fauna (a) Are there any rare or endangered species of plant life in or near the project area? (b) Will anyrAature trees be removed? (c) Is the project site adjacent to, or does it include a habitat, food source, water source, nesting place or breeding place for a rare or endangered wildlife species? (d) Is the project located inside or within / 200 feet of a wildlife refuge or reserve? v 4. Pollution (Air, Water, Noise, Land) (a) Will the project create dust, fumes, smoke, or odors? V (b) Will the project result in the generation of noise levels in excess of those currently existing in the area or in the exposure of people to noise levels above 65dBA? (c) Will the project involve potentially hazardous materials, including pesticides, herbicides, / other toxic substances, or radio-active material? I/ (d) Will the proposed project produce light or glare? (e) Does the project require variance from estab- lished environmental standards (e.g. air quality, noise, water quality)? v 5. Circulation (a) Is the project expected to cause an increase in — motor vehicle traffic patterns or volumes? (b) Will the project involve the use of off-the- / road vehicles? (/ (c) Will the project overload existing parking facilities? v City of Palm Desert Initial Study of Environmental Impact Page Three II. Environmental Impacts: (continued) YES or MAYBE NO 6. Public Services and Utility Facilities (a) Will septic tanks be utilized for sewage / disposal? J/ (b) Will the project overload any of the fol- lowing: (1) Fire Protection? (/ (2) Police Protection? v (3) Schools? low- (4) Parks or Other Recreational Facilities? v (5) Electric Power or Natural Gas (6) Communication Systems? (7) Water Supply? sI (8) Sewer System? / (9) Stormwater Drainage System? r (10) Solid Waste and Disposal? i/ (c) Will the project require the extension of / existing public utility lines? (d) Will the project employ equipment which could interfere with existing communication and/or defense systems? (e) Is the project located within the flight path or noise impact area of an airport? (f) Does the project incorporate measures for the efficient use or conservation of energy and water? 7. Land Use (a) Is the proposed project expected to result in other changes in the land use, either on or off / the project site? !� (b) Could the project serve to encourage development of presently undeveloped areas, or increase de- velopment intensity of already developed areas? (c) Is the project inconsistent with any adopted General Plan, Specific Plan, or present zoning? (� (d) Does the project involve lands currently pro- tected under the Williamson Act or an Open Space Easement? (e) Is the site for the proposed project within the Scenic Preservation Overlay District or will the project obstruct any scenic view from existing residential areas, public lands, or public roads? l� (f) Will the proposed project displace a large number or people from an established area or create a de- v mand for additional housing? City of Palm Desert Initial Study of Environmental Impact Page Four II. Environmental Impacts: (continued) YES or MAYBE NO S. Mandatory Findings of Significance (a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the / major periods of California history or pre-history? (b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term en- vironmental goals? (c) Does the project have impacts which are indi- vidually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause. substantial adverse effects on human beings, either direcly or indirectly? v III. Discussion of Impacts: Please briefly explain your answer to question 6(f) and, if you%have answered yes to any of the questions in Section II, why you believe that that aspect of the project will have no significant adverse environmental effect. TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE ABOVE INFO N T D COMPLETE. (Date) ( oject Sponsor) 660• TABULATION GROSS ACRES 10 (666x6601 � , TENNIS` NET ACRES 9.3 (660*x616 - - + + COURT - , HOVLEY LANE 29,040 sq. ft. TOTAL UNITS50 PARKING COVERED 100 -50 two car garage _ 1 , Y GUEST PARKING 58 spaces TOTAL 00 spaces GROSS DENSITY 5.0 du/ac �;_ ��•� , r � , NET DENSITY 5.3 duT ` .. . '� ■ '» / - -- - --mod� '� I` I ---- ---- _ — - ��� CABANA MINOR RECREATION �- r ! ■ -t- �r ( . 42 �77 GUEST PARKING TURE IDENTITY SIGN �. 1 -4 : n HOVLEY LANE --- -� 88' STREET z IL Wj=