Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPM 7892 CAHUILLA HILLS AREA 1976 i_ M� PLANNING DEPARTMENT COUNTY .� � -_ H IVF,H S/DE ELMER M.KATZENSTEIN,Chairman,Rubidoux RUSSELL E.CAMPBELL,Blythe ® KAY S.CENICEROS,Hemet MARION V.ASHLEY,Perris JESS E. LILLIBRIDGE,Corona KAY H.OLESEN,Palm Desert HAZEL I.EVENSEN,Planning JUSTIN BACA,Banning Commission Administrative Secretary A. E. NEWCOMB — PLANNING DIRECTOR 4080 LEMON STREET,9th FLOOR, RIVERSIDE,CALIFORNIA 92501 TELEPHONE ()14) 787•8181 June 8, 1976 Indio Administrative Center 46-209 Oasis Street, Room 304 KDD:5031DO Indio, California 92201 (714) 347-8511 , Ext. 278 Mr. Paul A. Williams Secretary of Planning Commission City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, California 92260 Re: Parcel Map 7892 and your letter of June 3, 1976 Dear Mr. Williams: We are enclosing a Xerox copy of Parcel Map 5308 which was submitted in 1973 on this parcel . It shows the topography of the site and the existing struc- ture. Under the present Ordinance 460 of Riverside County, the applicant is not required to submit contour maps, improve roads, or provide percolation data. If we can be further assistance, please feel free to contact this office. Yours very truly, LAN RE C 9E 1 �I��p E ® AIVE. NewcombIDENTYPlanningGDirectoMENT JUN 9 ING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT -Keith D. Downs - Associate Planner KDD:mj Encl . cc: Riverside office 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 June 3, 1976 Roger S. Streeter Riverside County Planning Department 46-209 Oasis Street Room 304 Indio, CA 92201 Subject: Response to inquiry on Parcel Map No. 7892 Dear Mr. Streeter: At the regularly scheduled meeting of June 1, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert did review Parcel Map No. 7892 and did by Planning Commission Resolution No. // express a number of concerns relative to said Parcel Map. Basically their concern was a lack of adequate information regarding the existing condition of the land and the lack of adequate improved access to the property. In addition they are expressing a concern relative to the absence of a structure that appears to exist on the property which under the State Map Act should be shown on the Parcel Map. They do request that the Parcel Map not be acted upon until this information is provided so that the City Planning Commission can adequately evaluate the proposed parcel split. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me. i Sincerely, PAUL A. WILLIAMS f Secretary of the Planning Commission City of Palm Desert PAW/lsb ' I - GI STAFF REPORT To: Planning Commission Report On: County Referral_ of Tentative Parcel Map Case No. : PM 7892 `J Request: For Comments DISCUSSION: This property is adjacent to the, City Limits of Palm Desert, NW of Indian Springs Mobile Home Park. The staff has reviewed this parcel map request and found several serious problems 1. No contours are shown on the Map and this area does have a substantial change of elevation. 2. No indication is made as to which roads will be improved and to what extent. 3. The existing structure is not located on the map. 4. Parcels of 60,000 sq. ft. with their own private sewage systems should not be considered without an analysis of slope and soils. RECOMMENDATION: By Planning Commission Resolution No. 156 direct staff to prepare a response to the County, objecting to the approval of this map until further information can be provided by the engineer and applicant relative to slope, soils, and access. . . -�. �� -,�L th -0 3731 A S�NS I /I- Z— I L se 0 3730 I�j 42'30" - GOLF Waterrrrr 00II P IZ, T -3729 J H 4 k 3728 . Park .......... ............... /9J1J � � n II r-•lam ,II Q a' /_�..�_�._�_.� �._._._._.. ..�,,....,..,.,f1...... .I Jr NM1 � h W T�N zi T.5 S. 791 T.6 S. O 3727 INNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 5 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNOUNCING FINDINGS AND EXPRESSING CON- CERN OVER THE APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 7892 ON PRO- PERTY GENERALLY LOCATED IN THE CAHUILLA HILLS AREA. CASE NO. PM 7892. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert did I' receive a request for comment from the Riverside County Planning Office, for a Parcel Map on property located in the R-1-1 Zone, and situated in the Cahuilla Hills Area to allow for the division of 5 acres into 3 - 1.6 acre parcels; the property being more particularly described as : S 2 of the NE ', of the SE a of the NE a of Section 36 T5S, R5E, SB B & M WHEREAS, on June 1, 1976, the Planning Commission did consider this request; and, WHEREAS, at that time, upon considering the request, said commission did find that said Parcel Map 7892 should not be approved until the following informaiton is provided: 1. Contours & drainage map. 2. Schedule and type of road improvements 3. Location of existing structure 4. Slope and soil analysis relative to acceptability of conventional private sewage disposal methods. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert as follows : 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case. 2. That it does hereby request that the Planning Commission of Riverside County not act on said Parcel Map 7892 until the additional information is provided. I PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning i I I... Commission of the City of Palm Desert, held on June 1, 1976, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: BERKEY, KELLY, MILLS, VAN DE MARK, WILSON NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE f Resolution No. 156 ! 4 S. ROY WILSON, Chairman ATTEST: _ PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary f I w. .ryaX MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JUNE 1, 1976 VIII . NEW BUSINESS A. CVCWD REQUEST (continued) Mr. Williams brought Finding No.. 3 to the Commission 's attention which stated that the water district would be responsible for damages to the recently completed road improvements. Commissioner Van de Mark made a motion to approve Planning Commission Resolution No. 154, finding that the above listed projects proposed to be constructed by the CVCWD are in compliance with the adopted Palm Desert General Plan . Commissioner Kelly seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. IX. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ITEMS A. REVIEW OF ACTIONS OF DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING OF MAY 25, 1976 Steve Fleshman presented the four cases which had been approved by the above listed ORB action. He also reviewed the two cases which had been rejected and the one case which had been deferred. Commissioner Van de Mark moved to adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 155, as amended to show the change in conditions and the resolution for Case No. 21MF/SHADOW MOUNTAIN RESORT CLUB. Commissioner Kelly seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. X. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - None At this time , the Commission went back to the discussion of Case No. PM 7892-County Referral of Tentative Parcel Map. This discussion had been deferred so that the Commission could hold the Public Hearing items first. Steve Fleshman explained the County Referral and stated that staff had reviewed this parcel map request and found several serious problems . These problems are as follows: 1. No contours are shown on the Map and this area does have a substantial change of elevation . 2. No indication is made as to which roads will be improved and to what extent. 3. The existing structure is not located on the map.. 4. Parcels of 60,000 square feet with their own private sewage systems should not be considered without an analysis of slope and soils. A short discussion ensued, after which Commissioner Berkey made a motion to adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 156, announcing findings and expressing concern over the County approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 7892, on property generally located in the Cahuilla Hills Area. Com- missioner Van de Mark seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. i XI . COMMENTS A. City Staff Mr. Williams informed the Commission that at 7:00 p.m. on Thursday, June 17, 1976, there would be a meeting of all property owners in the two block area between El Paseo and Highway 111 relative to undergrounding. B. City Attorney - Not present -9- . -ANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ..,o A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNOUNCING FINDINGS AND EXPRESSING CON- CERN OVER THE APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 7892 ON PRO- PERTY GENERALLY LOCATED IN THE CAHUILLA HILLS AREA. CASE NO. PM 7892. f WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert did receive a request for comment from the Riverside County Planning Office, for a Parcel Map on property located in the R-1-1 Zone, and situated in the Cahuilla Hills Area to allow for the division of 5 acres into 3 - 1.6 acre parcels; the property being more particularly described as : S 2 of the NE ; of the SE 4 of the NE , of Section 36 T5S, R5E, SB B & M WHEREAS, on June 1,. 1976, the Planning Commission did consider this request; and, WHEREAS, at that time, upon considering the request, said commission did find that said Parcel Map 7892 should not be approved until the following informaiton is provided: 1. Contours & drainage map. 2. Schedule and type of road improvements 3. Location of existing structure 4. Slope and soil analysis relative to acceptability of conventional private sewage disposal methods. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert as follows : 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case. 2. That it does hereby request that the Planning Commission of Riverside County not act on said Parcel Map 7892 until the additional information is provided. r i PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning l_ Commission of the City of Palm Desert, held on June 1, 1976, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: BERKEY, KELLY, MILLS, VAN DE MARK, WILSON NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE "esolution No. 156 r S. ROY WILSON, Chairman ATTEST: i PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary i I t t r i t tt t E I FROM: Riverside County Planning Department A. E. Newcomb - Planning Director 46-209 Oasis Street, Room 304, Indio, California 92201 TO: Palm Desert (City Sphere of Influence) TRANSMITTAL DATE: 5/17/76 TENTATIVE TRACT NO.: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.: 7892 MAY 1 ) 1,,7E Attached hereto is -a tentative land division map. Please examine EW%SQt*1CiWALi99Rt/lPE§hiS office in time for the Land Division Committee Meeting on 6/14/7ECITY OF PALM DESERT - together with such recommendations as you deem appropriate. If additional time is needed please so state in your recommendations. Roger S. Streeter BY: X)0rA 0=X - Senior Planner I . Comments regarding tentative map II. Additional time of will be needed Submitted by: Phone No.: Title: Date: KDD:es PD-74-2 { i E- NI /'\ PFPAR.. CEL M THE 5 '122- OF THE N.E. 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 34o , T 5 5 , R 5 E , 5. 5.8. E M. s 440' 2zo' = f 1, TP47ATIVE MAP INFORMATION'- I CLEM COLLETTE A-t 5 URVEYINCs COMPANY { CA j P.O. 301A 50(0 FITCH LAOUlPiTA CA . 79 _ u ` , i MAN HATTAN BEACH, CA. f PARCEL 3 ° t 0 0 i �J .\ GR055 AREA : S ACC'ES. i 4 t 5EWAC7E 015PO-IAL BY: SEPTIC TANKS, POWER BY ' 50107HERN CALIFORNIA F-015ON GO. l I `-.R (n DOME STi GWATE2. COACHELLA VALLEY CDUN7Y WATEE 5TZ4 '. 'TELEPHONE BY: GENE12AL TELEPHONE- COMPANY. i7 ' < r iL U _ , {- ' 1,000 � PARCEL 2 ° -- PAacEL i � (- PA R CE 4 � , N \ \ ! 35 PLANNING COMMISSION i i DESERT OFFICE 70 � n ' 0 I . 10' EOSEME SO.GA D;5ON GO. � SCALE' t i � I I 'T IGHT-OF- y FOR 20A1) E RU,- RPGc 571 j 22a` y ' 22e' 220' — --• 1 EA 1 ST'G ROAD A r r -- -- -+rr I _ _-- � � • s-fltarlWh,Y III ToINL7lp To 7 00PAW1 SPxi�JGS / P20oQ PRIVATE STREET/ �! / { RI&HT•OF-WAY FOR ROAgj P.U. PURp,SES c 1 Z � WAY NO 9ULE To IDYLLWILD i TENTATIVE ' PARC' EL MAP NO. 7892 BEING lA DIVISION OF THE S 1 OF THE ME -' OF THE SE ' OF THE N. E -' y 2 4 4 4 OF SECTION 36 T 5 S R 5 E S. B. B a M. ' � OWNER AIR. IRKS CL61Y! COL L ETTE FRANK HAINERSCHLA+G R.C.E. 8630 SCALE 1 50 ' JUNE 1974 2273' AY. 25TH STREET SAN PERWal CAL 1FORN/4 90 751 FO.2X2 ,PEO`y000 STigf E UP O.2 t Re. /!26 S./S/5/ CALL %¢"'/t?> CDC'N.W. CODE'.SZ N6.4 -76C.33, t/V &_9 S9' 30 ' E ?447 98' E? s i3/Si N 890 0*9' 53" w 2647. 08' 4\ /985.3/' Gro% 77' ZONE R-/- 1 o LAND U5E L M PEN517Y RE5/0EN71AL p iN ACCE55: ALL ITE90REO PEPICAT/DNS p C0Wpz ETEO N 89 5r9' 37" W aepi s51 AREA : 5" ACRES 35.00' /8500' 220.00' /86.55' 3 5.00',- NO. OF PARCEL 5: . � 220.00' 22I.55` h 35 35' UT/L I TIE5 C Grh,IAR47/ON OF OECCAZAT/ON of —� v -� o.FDICAT/ON PEe DEPICAT/ON f�Ex �— V INST NO 7/826 INST. NO. 7/d27 h 1�YATEA COACNELLA 1/ALLEY COUNTY M OAT6 6-//-74 O� '� WA 1'Ef>' O/STf�/CT Q N OATS 6-//- 74 � � H N ELECTRIC: SOUTHERN CAL/FORN/A EO/SON 3 TELEPHONES GENERAL TELEPf/0/1/E COrI/IP�9NY 3 5EWAGE O/SPO,SAL : PRIVATE o 4 1.6" ACC-05 8AM7 /.66B ACZe5 6,M'S 1479 4C VfS 6A0.?S q 0 '0 /.2!`3 ovcES NET /.49/ 4mes NET /.06-7 ACRCS NET ti 3 W o , Z oEccA�Ar�oN o� o � ? "K /_, oE0/CA r/ON ,OCR \+ 3f A/ 4• 59' S/"�'V OATS 6-//- 7.4 N 45'O/'.14' a, !75.00' � 2 20.OD /76.35' � Q 1 i t c i 57135' � 1 � l /983..5Y,' 44.991 220.00' 220.00' 22/32' 4498' CHOLLA iNgY 66/.32' yo A/ 9-9 S'9' 20 W 2645 28,�,v 89 S9' 45 W 2G46•/4 R.S. /S15/ �D. ZX2 PE. //26s'/NG /N�'OCK f'/L E�� NOT TO StAGE0.68 SOU7A t'E� CANU/GLA 0 C'O. 34 /.P. /N LIOUND Of°ZOCk vp RpC,r vVIIV,4/L /N TOp \3 /) 3/DE PER ..S. /5f S/