HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994-07-27 PRC Regular Meeting Agenda PacketV
AGENDA
PALM DESERT PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
WEDNESDAY, JULY 27, 1994
9:00 A.M. - COMMUNITY SERVICES CONFERENCE ROOM
73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE
*****************************************************************
I. CALL TO ORDER:
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: June 8, 1994
III. DISCUSSION ITEMS:
A. UPDATE ON INTERACTIVE FOUNTAIN
B. UPDATE ON AQUATIC CENTER
C. PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION/RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES
IV. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS:
1. Any person wishing to discuss any item not otherwise on
the agenda may address the commission at this point by
stepping to the lectern and giving his/her name and
address for the record. Remarks shall be limited to a
maximum of five minutes unless additional time is
authorized by the commission.
2. This is the time and place for any person who wishes to
comment on non -hearing agenda items. It should be noted
that at commission discretion, these comments may be
discussed. Remarks shall be limited to a maximum of five
minutes unless additional time is authorized by the
commission.
V. ADJOURNMENT
*****************************************************************
DECLARATION OF POSTING
I, Donna C. Bitter, of the City of Palm Desert Community
Development Department, do hereby declare that the foregoing agenda
for the Parks and Recreation Commission meeting of Wednesday,
July 27, 1994, was posted on the bulletin board by the outside
entry to the Council Chamber, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm
Desert, on Friday, July 22, 1994.
e July 22, 1994
e
e��
DONNA C. BITTER
Senior Office Assistant
City of Palm Desert, California
Om
r
E1 isak:>et1-i A . White
73-186 Somera Road
Palm Desert, California 92260
July 11, 1994
Er. EIVED
13 1994
Parks and Recreation Commission
"OMMWTY DEVELOPMENT DEPIRFMEN`
City of Palm Desert 'ITY OF PAEM DESERT
73-510 Fred Waring Drive
Palm Desert, California 92260
Dear Commissioners:
I would like to commend you on the installation of Ironwood
Park. When it was opened last winter, there was a tranquil aspect
to this desert sanctuary. The tot lot and small area of grass lent
an aura of just the right amount of activity to the passive park.
The pathways and bridge are attractive and useful (though some
hardpacking would be nice).
Notwithstanding the small signs recommending common decency,
it is evident that there are a number of dog owners who have chosen
to allow their animals free reign to relieve themselves in the
park, without regard to sanitation or appearance. Two possible
solutions spring to the mind: a) prohibiting domestic animals in
the park, or b) a fenced area strictly for dogs with receptacles
for sanitary disposal.
Some other concerns have been expressed by many users. The
foremost of these is the present (and longstanding) lack of a green
grassy area. For several weeks, the small grassy area has been an
ugly, dead brown. If anything, this area should be somewhat
leveled and expanded for the use of the neighborhood. The
overwhelming size of the rarely -used parking lot (which should be
primarily grass with blocks) seems rather wasteful. The use of pea
gravel rather than river rock is also messy.
On the whole, with its conforming landscaping and sweeping
vistas, the park is a pleasant, open and inviting area. If some
more large desert trees were planted, it might even approach the
ambiance of the Living Desert Reserve.
cc: City council
Sincerely,
t
"�7, K
Elisabeth A. White
Park & Recreation Commission Members, Ray Diaz, ana DicK Kelly:
I
HF some interesting information on relationship of parks to people.
LOS ANGELES TIMES � �— 5 / lw ford
National Perspec
*Group Hopes
sGreener Cities
r- Will Be Safer
A nonprofit organization
'hopes to acquire 250 parks.
Experts have long linked
recreation, crime prevention.
'a
,..,By
By MELISSA HEALY
'TIMES STAFF WRITER ,
�T 7ASHINGTON—Habitat isn't just
�/�/ for wildlife. People need some
green too.
To traditional environmental groups,
the notion of conserving land for people
might be a little strange. But to Martin
Rosen, a self -described "old warhorse'
' "from a host of environmental battles, the
idea has a kind of self-evident wisdom to
it. And a growing number of lawmakers,
prompted by the perceived link between
declining urban parkland and rising
crime, are beginning to think so too.
Rosen is president of the Trust for
Public Lands, a conservation group that
is launching a $2.5-billion effort to make
12 American cities greener and, they
hope, safer places for humans. Using
money raised through private donations
and public bond bills and working with
community activists, Rosen's group
hopes to acquire as many as 250
properties for parks in cities nationwide
over the next five years. He hopes the
group's activities will help leverage new
federal funds aimed at fighting crime
through prevention.
Sociologists and law enforcement
experts have been drawing a connection
between urban parks, recreation areas
and crime prevention for several
decades. After Watts erupted in violence
in 1965, an investigation linked urban
violence to the decay of city recreation
facilities.
More than 25 years later,
South -Central Los Angeles residents
came to the same conclusion: In the
wake of the 1992 riots, 77% told pollsters
that the absence of parks and recreation
facilities was among their top concerns.
The evidence doesn't demonstrate
clearly that deteriorating parkland and
recreation facilities cause an upturn in
crime, but the two do appear to be
inextricably linked. And if crime and the
demise of urban parks go together, then
the revitalization of urban parkland,
FRANCIS GARDI.ER / Ws Angeles Times
Frank Sutton of the Trust for Public Lands stands before a rendering of the
Uhuru Garden, a public space being planned for Watts by his nonprofit group.
Rosen and other experts reckon, will
contribute to a decline in lawlessness.
Many South -Central residents cite
compelling evidence for the idea: In the
1992 riots, buildings on Union Avenue
were torched, windows were shattered
and businesses looted. But a community
garden in the heart of Pico -Union,
cleared several years before and tended
by members of the 10th Street Mothers'
Club, stood untouched by the rampage.
"People had cleaned up those lots
themselves," said Brenda Funches, who
leads the grass -roots gardening
organization, Common Ground. "Anyone
who has a history in the neighborhood
remembers what these places looked
like before, and the truth is, everybody
knows somebody who is involved with
the garden."
Not all crime -busters see the
connection. Steve Twist, director of the
National Rifle Assn.'s Crime Strike
program, called the idea of fighting
crime with parks "hopelessly naive."
"The problem of the collapse of the
juvenile justice system is a problem of
the revolving door. There are no
significant consequences for chronic
violent offenders."
Anecdotal evidence from across the
nation abounds. In Philadelphia, police
helped neighborhood volunteers clean
up vacant lots and plant gardens, and
burglaries and thefts in the precinct
dropped from about 40 per month to
about four. In the summers of 1991 and
1993, Phoenix parks stayed open until
midnight for basketball, swimming,
volleyball and dancing, and police calls
on juvenile crime dropped up to 55%.
With Congress focusing on the causes
of crime, the link between violence and
degenerating urban parks is receiving
new scrutiny —and possibly new funds.
The crime bill, now in House -Senate
negotiations, is expected to establish a
$23-billion trust fund from which
initiatives for city parks could draw.
"Urban recreation and sports
programs are a proven, common-sense
and cost-effective means of preventing
crime and delinquency," said Rep. Bruce
F. Vento (D=Minn. ), co-sponsor of an
amendment to the crime bill that would
earmark crime prevention funds for
urban parks and recreation programs.
"Our urban crime rate would be
different if these programs had not been
neglected in the past decade."
When the Trust for Public Lands
conducted an inventory of
parkland last year, it found that parks
were concentrated in affluent
neighborhoods in two-thirds of the cities
it studied. In 16 out of 23 cities, the trust
said parkland in poor neighborhoods was
crowded and inadequate.
That kind of neglect, Rosen said,
"sends a signal to troubled communities
and youth that they're not worth the
investment." And they will almost
surely repay the nation with more
hostility and more indifference, he
added. Green areas in cities, he said,
"aren't (just) nice; they're urgent,
critical, vital areas that people require."