HomeMy WebLinkAboutRes OB-069 (2)RESOLUTION NO. OB - 069
A RESOLUTION OF THE OVERSIGHT BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,
RECEIVING AND FILING MINUTES OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE
PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETINGS OF JANUARY 23,
FEBRUARY 13, FEBRUARY 27, MARCH 13, AND MARCH 27, 2014
RECITALS:
A. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34179(3), all actions taken by the
Oversight Board of the Successor Agency to the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency (the
"Oversight Board") shall be adopted by resolution.
B. There has been presented to this Oversight Board for approval, receiving and filing of
Minutes of the Successor Agency to the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency Meetings of
January 23, February 13, February 27, March 13, and March 27, 2014.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE OVERSIGHT BOARD OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE
PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY HEREBY FINDS, DETERMINES, RESOLVES, AND
ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are a substantive part of this
Resolution.
Section 2. The Oversight Board hereby approves receiving and filing Minutes of the
Successor Agency to the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency Meetings of January 23, February 13,
February 27, March 13, and March 27, 2014, which are made a part hereof and attached hereto as
"Exhibit `A'."
Section 3. The staff of the Successor Agency is hereby directed to provide the State
Department of Finance ("DOF") written notice and information regarding the action taken by the
Oversight Board in Section 2 of this Resolution. Such notice and information shall be provided by
electronic means and in a manner of DOF's choosing.
Section 4. The officers of the Oversight Board and staff of the Successor Agency are
hereby authorized and directed, jointly and severally, to do any and all things that they may deem
necessary or advisable to effectuate this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 5th day of May, 2014.
AYES: BRANDL, BUCK, CARVER, and SPIEGEL
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: JONATHAN, KINNAMON, and LARSON
ABSTAIN: NONE
ATTEST:
RACHELLE D. KLASSEN, SECRETARY
OVERSIGHT BOARD OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY
TO THE PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
ROBERT A. SPIEGEI CHAIR
(4-0. nor ,llmwmen,Lartr,
QHo✓-1- BY OVERSIGHT BOARD 17)
ON 5 --2c
VERIFIED BY��
i
Original on file with City Clerk's Office
RESOLUTION NO. OB - 069
EXHIBIT A
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
MEETING MINUTES
January 23, 2014
February 13, 2014
February 27, 2014
March 13, 2014
March 27, 2014
2
RES. NO. OB - 069
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY
TO THE PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
THURSDAY, JANUARY 23, 2014
CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBER
73510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CA 92260
I. CALL TO ORDER - 3:00 P.M.
Chair Tanner convened the meeting at 3:00 p.m.
II. ROLL CALL
Present:
Director Jean M. Benson
Director Jan C. Harnik
Director Robert A. Spiegel
Vice Chair Susan Marie Weber
Chair Van G. Tanner
Also Present:
John M. Wohlmuth, Executive Director
David J. Erwin, City Attorney
Robert W. Hargreaves, Assistant City Attorney
Rachelle D. Klassen, Secretary
Russell Grance, Director of Building & Safety
Lauri Aylaian, Director of Community Development
Martin Alvarez, Director of Economic Development
Paul S. Gibson, Director of Finance/City Treasurer
Janet M. Moore, Director of Housing
Frankie Riddle, Director of Special Programs
Bo Chen, City Engineer
Stephen Y. Aryan, Risk Manager
Casey Hartman, Battalion Chief, Palm Desert Fire/Riverside Co. Fire/Cal Fire
Bill Sullivan, Asst. Chief, Palm Desert Police/Riverside Co. Sheriffs Department
Grace L. Mendoza, Deputy City Clerk
III. ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION
Reauest for Closed Session:
None
RES. NO. OB - 069
MINUTES
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE
PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
JANUARY 23, 2014
With Successor Agency Board concurrence, Chair Tanner adjourned the meeting to
Closed Session of the City Council at 3:04 p.m. He reconvened the meeting at 4:00 p.m.
IV. RECONVENE REGULAR MEETING - 4:00 P.M.
A. REPORT ON ACTION FROM CLOSED SESSION.
None
V. AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS, AND APPOINTMENTS
None
VI. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. MINUTES of the January 9, 2014, Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the
Successor Agency to the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency.
Rec: Approve as presented.
B. CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AGAINST SUCCESSOR AGENCY TREASURY -
Warrant Nos. 138SA, 143SA, and 148SA.
Rec: Approve as presented.
C. REPORT Pursuant to Section 33080.1 of the California Health and Safety Code
(Joint Consideration with the Palm Desert City Council and the Palm Desert
Housing Authority).
Rec: Receive and file.
Upon a motion by Spiegel, second by Weber, and 5-0 vote of the Successor Agency
Board (AYES: Benson, Harnik, Spiegel, Weber, and Tanner; NOES: None), the Consent
Calendar was approved as presented.
VII. CONSENT ITEMS HELD OVER
None
VIII. RESOLUTIONS
None
2
RES. NO. OB - 069
MINUTES
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE
PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
IX. NEW BUSINESS
JANUARY 23, 2014
A. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF EXPANSION OF THE FREEDOM PARK DOG
PARK AND A PROJECT BOND PROCEEDS FUNDING AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE PALM DESERT
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND THE CITY OF PALM DESERT FOR THIS
PURPOSE (JOINT CONSIDERATION WITH THE PALM DESERT
CITY COUNCIL).
Senior Management Analyst Ryan Stendell reported that the subject request will
offer a good compromise in helping the City's Dog Parks network in the North
Sphere by providing a regional solution at Freedom Park, which has ample parking
and can help take some of the Toad off the other neighborhood parks in the vicinity.
He said Dog Park patrons that he's talked to seemed very supportive of this
concept; many of them indicate that they come from this side of town and would
be more than happy to use this facility if it were bigger. Therefore, staff believes
this is a very good recreation solution for the dogs.
Councilmember/Director Benson asked if there was a way to see that it's only
Palm Desert residents who are using the facility.
Councilman/Director Spiegel noted that in recently speaking with a Rancho Mirage
Councilmember about their park enlargement project upon asking if it would
include a dog park, the answer was that they'll let them use Palm Desert's.
Councilmember/Director Benson responded she was aware that this was
happening, and everyone believes Palm Desert will do it for the whole Coachella
Valley. Further, all the complaints received by the City are from non-residents.
Councilman/Director Spiegel observed that the problem stems from the University
Dog Park facility, because of the bicycle lanes, etc., and it's overcrowded. The
subject proposal will help take away that problem. He added that the Parks &
Recreation Commission voted unanimously to approve this expansion.
Councilmember/Director Benson restated her concern that there should be a
sticker on the car of dog park users that signifies Palm Desert residency in order
to keep the City from getting the reputation of doing this for the whole Valley. She
reiterated that if the complaints didn't come from those outside the City, she
wouldn't care; but they do, and non-residents are the reason for the overcrowding.
She felt it was simple for people to have a small decal on their car to note Palm
Desert residency.
Mr. Stendell responded that this notion has certainly come up at past Parks &
Recreation Commission Meetings. However, the program would require
management that would be difficult — staff would have to ensure an ample supply
3
RES. NO. OB - 069
MINUTES
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE
PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
JANUARY 23, 2014
of decals being available, a staff member being at the facility — and it would
become similar to the Skate Park situation where a person is stationed. He said
every time this idea has been discussed, it becomes cost prohibitive, especially
with the City's four dog parks. Although, he said the good news here was that
while some cities are saying no, some are saying yes, like Cathedral City's recent
news about building its first dog park; and La Quinta has also stepped up in the
last several years. He felt dog parks were catching on and even starting to make
the national conferences and trade journals that he receives — becoming much
more popular and a trend that he felt some of the cities will go toward in the future.
Councilman/Director Spiegel moved to: 1) By Minute Motion, authorize expansion of area
of the Freedom Park Dog Park, as proposed in the accompanying staff report's Conceptual
Design; 2) by Minute Motion, authorize staff to solicit bids for all project components (Contract
No. C33250A); 3) by Minute Motion, appropriate $100,000 from Unobligated 233 Park Funds
to Account No. 233-4670-454-4001 and estimate a reimbursement from the former Palm Desert
Redevelopment Agency Project Area No. 4 Funding; 4) waive further reading and adopt
Resolution Nos. 2014 - 04 and SA -RDA 023, approving the execution of a Freedom Park Dog
Park Project Bond Proceeds Funding Agreement between the Successor Agency to the Palm
Desert Redevelopment Agency and the City of Palm Desert, and taking certain related actions
(Contract No. C33250B); 5) by Minute Motion, approve of and authorize the Mayor/Chair to
execute said Project Funding Agreement. Motion was seconded by Harnik and carried by 5-0
vote (AYES: Benson, Harnik, Spiegel, Weber, and Tanner; NOES: None).
X. CONTINUED BUSINESS
None
XI. OLD BUSINESS
None
XII. PUBLIC HEARINGS
None
XIII. REPORTS, REMARKS, SUCCESSOR AGENCY BOARD ITEMS REQUIRING ACTION
A. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
None
4
RES. NO. OB - 069
MINUTES
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE
PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
B. SUCCESSOR AGENCY COUNSEL
None
C. CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY
None
XIV. ADJOURNMENT
JANUARY 23, 2014
Upon a motion by Spiegel, second by Weber, and unanimous consent of the Successor
Agency Board, Chair Tanner adjourned the meeting at 5:24 p.m.
ATTEST:
VAN G. TANNER, CHAIR
RAC1-IELLE D. KLASSEN, S¢CRETARY
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE
PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
5
RESOLUTION NO. OB - 069
[ THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK. ]
RES. NO. OB - 069
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY
TO THE PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 13, 2014
CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBER
73510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CA 92260
I. CALL TO ORDER - 3:00 P.M.
Chair Tanner convened the meeting at 3:00 p.m.
II. ROLL CALL
Present:
Director Jean M. Benson
Director Jan C. Harnik
Director Robert A. Spiegel
Vice Chair Susan Marie Weber
Chair Van G. Tanner
Also Present:
John M. Wohlmuth, Executive Director
David J. Erwin, City Attorney
Robert W. Hargreaves, Assistant City Attorney
Rachelle D. Klassen, Secretary
Russell Grance, Director of Building & Safety
Lauri Aylaian, Director of Community Development
Martin Alvarez, Director of Economic Development
Paul S. Gibson, Director of Finance/City Treasurer
Janet M. Moore, Director of Housing
Mark Greenwood, Director of Public Works
Frankie Riddle, Director of Special Programs
Stephen Y. Aryan, Risk Manager
Larry Sherman, Admin. Sgt., Palm Desert Police/Riverside Co. Sheriff's Dept.
Grace L. Mendoza, Deputy City Clerk
III. ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION
Request for Closed Session:
None
RES. NO. OB - 069
MINUTES
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE
PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
FEBRUARY 13, 2014
With Successor Agency Board concurrence, Chair Tanner adjourned the meeting to
Closed Session of the City Council at 3:01 p.m. He reconvened the meeting at
4:01 p.m.
IV. RECONVENE REGULAR MEETING - 4:00 P.M.
A. REPORT ON ACTION FROM CLOSED SESSION.
None
V. AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS, AND APPOINTMENTS
None
VI. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. MINUTES of the January 23, 2014, Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors
of the Successor Agency to the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency.
Rec: Approve as presented.
B. CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AGAINST SUCCESSOR AGENCY TREASURY -
Warrant No. 152SA.
Rec: Approve as presented.
Upon a motion by Spiegel, second by Benson, and 5-0 vote of the Successor Agency
Board (AYES: Benson, Harnik, Spiegel, Weber, and Tanner; NOES: None), the Consent
Calendar was approved as presented.
VII. CONSENT ITEMS HELD OVER
None
VIII. RESOLUTIONS
None
2
RES. NO. OB - 069
MINUTES
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE
PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
IX. NEW BUSINESS
FEBRUARY 13, 2014
A. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF THE EXECUTION OF AN ALESSANDRO
ALLEY PROJECT BOND PROCEEDS FUNDING AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY AND THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, AND TAKING CERTAIN
RELATED ACTIONS (JOINT CONSIDERATION WITH THE PALM DESERT
CITY COUNCIL).
Councilman/Director Spiegel said he and Councilmember/Director Benson had
waited a very long time for this project to get to this point.
Councilmember/Director Harnik requested that as the City moves forward in
undertaking this project, hopefully prior to commencement, it would receive a
different name than "Alessandro Alley," as she didn't think "Alley" was befitting
of Palm Desert's image. She added that whatever the choice of a name is, it
should be chosen and applied right away.
Councilmember/Director Benson moved to: 1) Waive further reading and adopt
Resolution Nos. 2014 - 09 and SA -RDA 024, approving the execution of an Alessandro Alley
Project Bond Proceeds Funding Agreement between the Successor Agency to the Palm
Desert Redevelopment Agency and the City of Palm Desert, and taking certain related
actions; 2) by Minute Motion, estimate revenue of $250,000 to the Capital Project Fund; 3) by
Minute Motion, approve of and authorize the Executive Director and Mayor/Chair to execute
the Alessandro Alley Project Bond Proceeds Funding Agreement (Contract No. C33330).
Motion was seconded by Spiegel.
Councilmember/Director Benson noted she felt the project was long overdue.
She uses the road very frequently, every time she does so finding another
bump there, and hoped that undertaking this project will save a lot of car
repairs.
Mayor/Chair Tanner called for the vote on the motion to approve the Bond Proceeds
Funding Agreement for the Alessandro Alley Project, and it carried 5-0 (AYES: Benson,
Harnik, Spiegel, Weber, and Tanner; NOES: None).
X. CONTINUED BUSINESS
None
XI. OLD BUSINESS
None
3
RES. NO. OB - 069
MINUTES
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE
PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
FEBRUARY 13, 2014
XII. PUBLIC HEARINGS
None
XIII. REPORTS, REMARKS, SUCCESSOR AGENCY BOARD ITEMS REQUIRING ACTION
A. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
None
B. SUCCESSOR AGENCY COUNSEL
None
C. CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY
None
XIV. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - C
None
XV. ADJOURNMENT
On a motion by Spiegel, second by Weber, and 5-0 vote of the Successor Agency Board
(AYES: Benson, Harnik, Spiegel, Weber, and Tanner; NOES: None), Chair Tanner adjourned
the meeting at 5:12 p.m.
ATTEST:
L l'� I )��
VAN G. TANNER, CHAIR
RAHELLE D. K ENJSECRETARY
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE
PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
4
RES. NO. OB - 069
l
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY
TO THE PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 2014
CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBER
73510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CA 92260
1. CALL TO ORDER - 3:00 P.M.
Chair Tanner convened the meeting at 3:00 p.m.
II. ROLL CALL
Present:
Director Jean M. Benson
Director Jan C. Harnik
Director Robert A. Spiegel
Vice Chair Susan Marie Weber
Chair Van G. Tanner
Also Present:
John M. Wohlmuth, Executive Director
David J. Erwin, City Attorney
Robert W. Hargreaves, Assistant City Attorney
Rachelle D. Klassen, Secretary
Russell Grance, Director of Building & Safety
Lauri Aylaian, Director of Community Development
Martin Alvarez, Director of Economic Development
Paul S. Gibson, Director of Finance/City Treasurer
Janet M. Moore, Director of Housing
Mark Greenwood, Director of Public Works
Frankie Riddle, Director of Special Programs
Stephen Y. Aryan, Risk Manager
Casey Hartman, Battalion Chief, Palm Desert Fire/Riverside Co. Fire/Cal Fire
Bill Sullivan, Asst. Chief, Palm Desert Police/Riverside Co. Sheriff's Department
Grace L. Mendoza, Deputy City Clerk
III. ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION
Reauest for Closed Session:
None
RES. NO. OB - 069
MINUTES
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE
PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
FEBRUARY 27, 2014
With Successor Agency Board concurrence, Chair Tanner adjourned the meeting to
Closed Session of the City Council at 3:01 p.m. He reconvened the meeting at 4:00 p.m.
IV. RECONVENE REGULAR MEETING - 4:00 P.M.
A. REPORT ON ACTION FROM CLOSED SESSION.
None
V. AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS, AND APPOINTMENTS
None
VI. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. MINUTES of the February 13, 2014, Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of
the Successor Agency to the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency.
Rec: Approve as presented.
B. CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AGAINST SUCCESSOR AGENCY TREASURY -
Warrant Nos. 157SA, 160SA, and 164SA.
Rec: Approve as presented.
Upon a motion by Spiegel, second by Weber, and 5-0 vote of the Successor Agency
Board (AYES: Benson, Harnik, Spiegel, Weber, and Tanner; NOES: None), the Consent
Calendar was approved as presented.
VII. CONSENT ITEMS HELD OVER
None
VIII. RESOLUTIONS
A. RESOLUTION NO. SA -RDA 026 - A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE PALM DESERT
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, APPROVING A PROPOSED ADMINISTRATIVE
BUDGET FOR THE SIX-MONTH FISCAL PERIOD FROM JULY 1, 2014,
THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2014, PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY
CODE SECTION 34177(j) AND TAKING CERTAIN RELATED ACTIONS.
Management Analyst II Veronica Tapia stated that the Successor Agency must
submit its Administrative Budget for the next six-month period, July - December
2
RES. NO. OB - 069
MINUTES
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE
PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
FEBRUARY 27, 2014
2014. She said this item went before the Oversight Board on Monday this week
and was approved unanimously. She offered to answer any questions.
Director Spiegel moved to waive further reading and adopt Resolution No. SA -RDA 026.
Motion was seconded by Weber and carried by 5-0 vote (AYES: Benson, Harnik, Spiegel,
Weber, and Tanner; NOES: None).
B. RESOLUTION NO. SA -RDA 027 - A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE PALM DESERT
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, APPROVING A RECOGNIZED OBLIGATION
PAYMENT SCHEDULE FOR THE SIX-MONTH FISCAL PERIOD FROM JULY 1,
2014, THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2014, PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY
CODE SECTION 34177 AND TAKING CERTAIN RELATED ACTIONS.
Ms. Tapia said in addition to the Administrative Budget considered under Item A,
above, the companion item is the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule
(ROPS) for the six-month period of July - December 2014 (ROPS 14-15A). She
said there were no substantial changes to ROPS 14-15A from the prior one, with
the exception of Palm Desert now being permitted to add the SERAF
(Supplemental Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund) payment that's included
here. She added that this item was also unanimously approved by the Oversight
Board on Monday.
Director Spiegel moved to waive further reading and adopt Resolution No. SA -RDA 027.
Motion was seconded by Harnik and carried by 5-0 vote (AYES: Benson, Harnik, Spiegel,
Weber, and Tanner; NOES: None).
IX. NEW BUSINESS
A. REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO INITIATE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
PROCEEDINGS AND TAKE RELATED ACTIONS, INCLUDING A PROJECT
BOND PROCEEDS FUNDING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE SUCCESSOR
AGENCY TO THE PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND THE CITY
OF PALM DESERT, FOR UNDERGROUNDING OF UTILITIES AT
PALM DESERT TAMARISK AND ADJACENT PROPERTIES (DISTRICT 12)
(JOINT CONSIDERATION WITH THE PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL).
Management Analyst David Hermann reported that the subject request
represented the next step in a very long process initiated by residents
Merilee Colton and Lesley Miller and their neighbors almost a year ago. Staff
recommended that City Council allow it to proceed to the next step so that the
neighborhood residents will know how much the assessments would be on their
properties if, indeed, an assessment district is approved. As an update to
information in the printed staff report, he said it indicated that final design could be
completed in 10 months; however, Southern California Edison (Edison) has since
3
RES. NO. OB - 069
MINUTES
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE
PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
FEBRUARY 27, 2014
informed the City that their final design process usually takes up to 12 months,
with the other utilities (Time Warner, Verizon) taking an additional 3 - 6 months.
Therefore, it would be more like 15 - 18 months instead of 10 for final design.
Further, as also noted in the staff report, the City has received a separate petition
from a smaller group of residents on Heliotrope; they are also interested in
undergrounding their utility lines. The City intends to ask the engineers to study
both projects, see if they make more financial sense to go forward together or
separately, then present that information to the residents. He called attention to
the fact that the item is being jointly considered with the Successor Agency to the
Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency, reason being that money to pay for the
engineering will initially come from the City and then be reimbursed from
Redevelopment Bond Proceeds. He added that there were some residents
present today who also wanted to address the City Council on the item. Upon
inquiry about the reasoning behind Verizon and Time Warner not beginning their
engineering process until after Edison's is done, he said that those utilities require
the final design from Edison in order to base theirs on afterward because of having
to first know where the trenches will be located, etc.
MS. MERILEE COLTON, Salt Cedar Street, Palm Desert, urged City Council to
approve the project, and she especially wanted to thank staff for all its hard work.
She said the report being discussed takes a lot of time and effort, and it was only
the beginning of a long process where they'll continue to be very involved. She
offered to answer any questions that may be raised.
Mayor/Chair Tanner noted that Ms. Colton's tenacity has brought the project
forward to this point today and commended her efforts for the prospective
District 12.
MR. LLOYD MACFADYEN, Salt Cedar Street, Palm Desert, expressed his
objections to the whole process and indicated that last May he and his wife sent
a letter to the City Council to this effect. He was very bothered by the expenditure
of $400,000 for 83 parcels, saying if the City wished to give him that money
instead - slightly under $5,000 per parcel - he'd be happy to have it. He referred
to the previous item on today's City Council agenda that requested spending
money for Desert Willow Golf Course. While not a golfer, he said that Desert
Willow was something for the entire City of Palm Desert. His objection centered
around the City spending $400,000 that it will never receive back, even if it comes
from "Redevelopment," it doesn't come out of the air magically - somebody gave
it somewhere. Therefore, he felt that the City's money would be better spent on
other projects. As far as his neighborhood was concerned, the request was simply
cosmetic and wouldn't increase his property value. When he purchased the
property some 20 years ago, he didn't first look to see if there was a utility pole in
the backyard, and he didn't think anybody else really cares that much either. He
and his wife felt it was simply an expenditure that the City Council need not make.
4
RES. NO. OB - 069
MINUTES
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE
PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
FEBRUARY 27, 2014
Mr. Hermann clarified; first, he said the $400,000 amount is a maximum threshold.
Based on its understanding, staff believes the cost of the engineering will come in
at roughly 10% of the total project cost, which is just over $2.7 million. So it would
probably be closer to the range of $270,000 - $300,000, and staff also wanted to
include money for the Assessment Engineer in this initial request. Secondly, he
clarified that utility undergrounding was one of the items identified as a project and
an appropriate expenditure when the bonds were issued. In answer to specific
question about the step after the design is completed by all the utilities, he
confirmed that the cost of the project will then go to the residents for their vote.
Further responding, Mr. Wohlmuth said for the Tamarisk - District 12 Project, the
City would be responsible for portions of the improvements that cross its property,
with a handful of such instances. For example, he said on the Heliotrope portion,
which may/may not be included in District 12, the first 100 feet of the proposed
undergrounding project would come through Smoke Tree Park, and the City would
be responsible for that cost. Unlike the Palm Desert Country Club proposed
undergrounding project in which a percentage would have been paid for by the
City, it can no longer do that in the future due to the limited amount of funds. He
went on to explain that the funds proposed to be used for the subject District
initiation were bond funds, resulting from bonds sold 10-15 years ago. Those
bond documents identified projects that were intended for completion with the
funds; if the City doesn't spend the funds on projects it anticipated completing
when the bonds were sold, the proceeds cannot be used. He added that the
bonds could be defeased, but doing so wouldn't benefit the City, because the
money would go back to the State and the Riverside County Auditor -Controller to
disburse. Therefore, it was the City's intent to utilize bond proceeds on projects
that previous Councils committed to when they sold the bonds — undergrounding
in this area of the City being one. He affirmed that Edison engineers, Verizon and
Time Warner engineers will hopefully use the same trench in order to keep costs
down, and then the Assessment Engineer comes up with a calculation of how to
disperse the funds based on linear footage and other relevant assumptions.
Based on the Assessment Engineer's formula, the total projected cost of the
undergrounding project is divided amongst the parcels in the proposed
assessment district; each parcel gets to vote for or against participation, with 51 %
required to pass. If over 51 %, the cost is spread to the parcels, and then the City
has to decide whether or not it sells additional bonds, with the amount assigned
to the parcel either being paid in full by the property owner up front or going on the
property tax roll if another bond is sold to pay for the $3 million project. The
returns come back to the bondholders once the property taxes are paid over
approximately 20 years. Upon further inquiry about how much money the City is
out if the Assessment District doesn't pass if property owners decide the amount
is too high, he said at that point, the City would be out a maximum of $400,000 of
Redevelopment Bond funds.
5
RES. NO. OB - 069
MINUTES
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE
PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
FEBRUARY 27, 2014
Councilman/Director Spiegel moved to: 1) Waive further reading and adopt Resolution
No. 2014 - 11, initiating proceedings for the undergrounding of overhead electric and
communication utility facilities to underground facilities pursuant to the provisions of Chapter
12.12 of the Code of the City of Palm Desert, California, and the Municipal Improvement Act of
1913; 2) waive further reading and adopt Resolution Nos. 2014 -12 and SA -RDA 025, approving
the execution of a District 12 (Tamarisk) Utility Undergrounding Project Bond Proceeds Funding
Agreement between the Successor Agency to the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency and the
City of Palm Desert, and taking certain related actions; 3) by Minute.Motion, approve of and
authorize the Executive Director and Mayor/Chair to execute the District 12 (Tamarisk) Utility
Undergrounding Project Funding Agreement; 4) by Minute Motion, appropriate $400,000 from
Account No. 400-4256-464-4001 to pay for engineering fees that will allow project design to
proceed. Motion was seconded by Weber.
In answer to question about whether or not the cost for the Heliotrope addresses
is included in the $400,000 expenditure, Mr. Hermann said it was the City's
intention to have both Edison and the Assessment Engineer do two scenarios -
one including Heliotrope, one that doesn't - and that information will be presented
to the residents. The residents will be able to determine whether it's in their
interest to go forward together or separately. He further affirmed that Verizon and
Time Warner were also being included in the process here.
Mayor/Chair Tanner called for the vote on the motion to approve actions for initiation of
proceedings for the Palm Desert Tamarisk (District 12) Utility Undergrouding Assessment
District, and it carried 5-0 (AYES: Benson, Harnik, Spiegel, Weber, and Tanner; NOES: None).
Councilmember/Director Harnik personally commended Ms. Colton and Ms. Miller
for all their hard work in taking forward the proposal in a very positive fashion,
further emphasizing that the process moving forward now represented democracy
at its finest. She wished the proponents all the best.
X. CONTINUED BUSINESS
None
XI. OLD BUSINESS
None
XII. PUBLIC HEARINGS
None
6
RES. NO. OB - 069
MINUTES
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE
PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
FEBRUARY 27, 2014
XIII. REPORTS, REMARKS, SUCCESSOR AGENCY BOARD ITEMS REQUIRING ACTION
A. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
None
B. SUCCESSOR AGENCY COUNSEL
None
C. CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY
None
XIV. ADJOURNMENT
On a motion by Spiegel, second by Weber, and unanimous Successor Agency Board
consent, Chair Tanner adjourned the meeting at 6:03 p.m.
ATTEST:
<y
VAN G. TANNER, CHAIR
R A HEL E D. LASSEN, ECRETARY
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE
PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
7
RESOLUTION NO. OB - 069
[ THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK. ]
RES. NO. OB - 069
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY
TO THE PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
THURSDAY, MARCH 13, 2014
CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBER
73510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CA 92260
I. CALL TO ORDER - 3:00 P.M.
Chair Tanner convened the meeting at 3:00 p.m.
II. ROLL CALL
Present:
Director Jean M. Benson
Director Jan C. Harnik arrived at 3:05 p.m.
Director Robert A. Spiegel arrived at 3:13 p.m.
Vice Chair Susan Marie Weber
Chair Van G. Tanner
Also Present:
John M. Wohlmuth, Executive Director
David J. Erwin, City Attorney
Rachelle D. Klassen, Secretary
Russell Grance, Director of Building & Safety
Lauri Aylaian, Director of Community Development
Martin Alvarez, Director of Economic Development
Paul S. Gibson, Director of Finance/City Treasurer
Janet M. Moore, Director of Housing
Mark Greenwood, Director of Public Works
Frankie Riddle, Director of Special Programs
Larry Sherman, Admin. Sgt., Palm Desert Police/Riverside Co. Sheriff's Department
Grace L. Mendoza, Deputy City Clerk
III. ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION
Request for Closed Session:
None
RES. NO. OB - 069
MINUTES
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE
PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
MARCH 13, 2014
Upon a motion by Benson, second by Weber, and 3-0 vote of the Successor Agency
Board (AYES: Benson, Weber, and Tanner; NOES: None; ABSENT: Harnik and Spiegel),
Chair Tanner adjourned the meeting to Closed Session of the City Council at 3:01 p.m. He
reconvened the meeting at 4:00 p.m.
IV. RECONVENE REGULAR MEETING - 4:00 P.M.
A. REPORT ON ACTION FROM CLOSED SESSION.
None
V. AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS, AND APPOINTMENTS
None
VI. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. MINUTES of the February 27, 2014, Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of
the Successor Agency to the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency.
Rec: Approve as presented.
B. CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AGAINST SUCCESSOR AGENCY TREASURY -
Warrant Nos. 176SA and 181SA.
Rec: Approve as presented.
C. COMPLIANCE ANALYSIS AND INVESTMENT REPORTS for November 2013
and December 2013 (Joint Consideration with the Palm Desert City Council).
Rec: Receive and file.
Upon a motion by Spiegel, second by Weber, and 5-0 vote of the Successor Agency
Board (AYES: Benson, Harnik, Spiegel, Weber, and Tanner; NOES: None), the Consent
Calendar was approved as presented.
VII. CONSENT ITEMS HELD OVER
None
2
RES. NO. OB - 069
MINUTES
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE
PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
VIII. RESOLUTIONS
None
IX. NEW BUSINESS
None
X. CONTINUED BUSINESS
None
XI. OLD BUSINESS
None
XII. PUBLIC HEARINGS
None
MARCH 13, 2014
XIII. REPORTS, REMARKS, SUCCESSOR AGENCY BOARD ITEMS REQUIRING ACTION
A. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
None
B. SUCCESSOR AGENCY COUNSEL
None
C. CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY
None
3
RES. NO. OB - 069
MINUTES
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE
PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
XIV. ADJOURNMENT
MARCH 13, 2014
r.
On a motion by Spiegel, second by Weber, and unanimous consent of the Successor
Agency Board, Chair Tanner adjourned the meeting at 4:59 p.m.
ATTEST:
VAN G. TANNER, CHAIR
R HELLE D. KLASSE d, SECRETARY
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE
PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
4
RES. NO. OB - 069
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY
TO THE PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
THURSDAY, MARCH 27, 2014
CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBER
73510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CA 92260
I. CALL TO ORDER - 3:00 P.M.
Chair Tanner convened the meeting at 3:00 p.m.
II. ROLL CALL
Present:
Director Jean M. Benson
Director Jan C. Harnik
Director Robert A. Spiegel
Vice Chair Susan Marie Weber
Chair Van G. Tanner
Also Present:
John M. Wohlmuth, Executive Director
David J. Erwin, City Attorney
Robert W. Hargreaves, Assistant City Attorney
Rachelle D. Klassen, Secretary
Russell Grance, Director of Building & Safety
Lauri Aylaian, Director of Community Development
Martin Alvarez, Director of Economic Development
Paul S. Gibson, Director of Finance/City Treasurer
Frankie Riddle, Director of Special Programs
Bo Chen, City Engineer
Jessica Gonzales, Housing Department Management Analyst
Casey Hartman, Battalion Chief, Palm Desert Fire/Riverside Co. Fire Dept./Cal Fire
Bill Sullivan, Asst. Chief, Palm Desert Police/Riverside Co. Sheriff's Department
Grace L. Mendoza, Deputy City Clerk
III. ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION
Reauest for Closed Session:
None
RES. NO. OB - 069
MINUTES
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE
PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
MARCH 27, 2014
With Successor Agency Board concurrence, Chair Tanner adjourned the meeting to
Closed Session of the City Council at 3:01 p.m. He reconvened the meeting at 4:00 p.m.
IV. RECONVENE REGULAR MEETING - 4:00 P.M.
A. REPORT ON ACTION FROM CLOSED SESSION.
None
V. AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS, AND APPOINTMENTS
None
VI. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. MINUTES of the March 13, 2014, Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the
Successor Agency to the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency.
Rec: Approve as presented.
B. CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AGAINST SUCCESSOR AGENCY TREASURY -
Warrant Nos. 185SA and 191 SA.
Rec: Approve as presented.
C. COMPLIANCE ANALYSIS AND INVESTMENT REPORTS for the Month of
January 2014 (Joint Consideration with the Palm Desert City Council).
Rec: Receive and file.
Upon a motion by Spiegel, second by Weber, and 5-0 vote of the Successor Agency
Board (AYES: Benson, Harnik, Spiegel, Weber, and Tanner; NOES: None), the Consent
Calendar was approved as presented.
VII. CONSENT ITEMS HELD OVER
None
VIII. RESOLUTIONS
None
IX. NEW BUSINESS
None
X. CONTINUED BUSINESS
None
XI. OLD BUSINESS
None
2
RES. NO. OB - 069
MINUTES
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE
PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
MARCH 27, 2014
XII. PUBLIC HEARINGS
None
XIII. REPORTS, REMARKS, SUCCESSOR AGENCY BOARD ITEMS REQUIRING ACTION
A. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
None
B. SUCCESSOR AGENCY COUNSEL
None
C. CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY
None
XIV. ADJOURNMENT
On a motion by Spiegel, second by Weber, and 5-0 vote of the Successor Agency Board
(AYES: Benson, Harnik, Spiegel, Weber, and Tanner; NOES: None), Chair Tanner adjourned
the meeting at 4:41 p.m.
ATTEST:
h 7 1,2tih
VAN G. TANNER, CHAIR
RACELL "b ILA EN, SECRETARY
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE
PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
3
RESOLUTION NO. OB - 069
[ THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK. ]