HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979-12-27MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
THURSDAY, DECEMBER 27, 1979
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
'�: is :: '�: is * * * * is * is is :: '': i�: i�: *
�� is iC i�: i� is :C i�: :f S�: is :C is i�: * is is i� i �� .. ..
I. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Mullins called the Regular Meeting of the Palm Desert City
Council to order at 7:15 p.m. on Thursday, December 27, 1979, in City
Hall Council Chambers.
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Mayor Pro-Tempore James E. McPherson
III. INVOCATION - Mayor Edward D. Mullins
IV. ROLL CALL
Present:
1
Councilman Noel J. Brush
Mayor Pro-Tempore James E. McPherson
Councilman Alexis D. Newbrander
Councilman S. Roy Wilson
Mayor Edward D. Mullins
Also Present:
Martin J. Bouman, City Manager
Douglas Phillips, Deputy City Attorney
Paul A. Williams, Director of Environmental Services
Paul E. Byers, Director of Finance
V. AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS, AND APPOINTMENTS
A. RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION TO THE INDIO HIGH SCHOOL "RAJAH"
FOOTBALL TEAM FOR AN OUTSTANDING YEAR AND FOR BRINGING THE
C.I.F. DESERT/MOUNTAIN CHAMPIONSHIP TO THE COACHELLA VALLEY
FOR THE FIRST TIME.
Mayor Mullins read the Resolution Of Commendation which was
presented to Coach David Rivenes and team members David
Woods and Mark Delaney.
VI. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. MINUTES of the Regular Meeting of the Palm Desert City Council
of December 13, 1979.
Rec: Approve as presented.
B. CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY TREASURY - Demand Nos.
80-054, 80-061, and 80-062.
Rec: Approve as presented.
C. RESOLUTION NO. 79-150 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE OF
CERTAIN DEEDS FOR PROPERTY PURCHASED BY THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE C.O.D. SPECIFIC PLAN AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO
RECORD SAID DEEDS.
Rec: Waive further reading and adopt.
December 27, 1979 Page 1
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
* ;; : : ;f
* is ir;'r' irC rf irC 'rC it * J : r' irC 'f 'f i� * * if *
irC irC i; irf irf iC i; * * i� i . C C 'C i i. i. i
VI. CONSENT CALENDAR (Continued)
D. REQUEST BY MR. HAROLD HOUSLEY FOR A VARIANCE From Fire Protection
Requirements for Parcel Map No. 14163.
Rec:
Concur with the findings of the Fire Marshal
and instruct the City Manager to so advise
the applicant.
E. PETITION IN OPPOSITION TO CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY'S "TURNING
POINT" HOME FOR YOUNG GIRLS.
Rec: Refer to the City Manager for Study and Report.
F. RESOLUTION NO. 79-151 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, SETTING FORTH ITS FINDINGS
AND AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF FILES FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES THAT HAVE BEEN MICROFILMED.
Rec: Waive further reading and adopt.
G. REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO CALL FOR BIDS For Fire Station
No. 2, Located At The Intersection Of Portola Avenue And Mesa
View Drive (Extended).
Rec: Approve the request and authorize the City Clerk
to call for bids.
H. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF FINAL TRACT MAP NO. 14032-1, McLAIN
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, APPLICANT.
Rec: Waive further reading and adopt Resolution No.
79-163, approving Final Tract Map 14032-1.
Councilman Brush moved and Councilman McPherson seconded to approve
the Consent Calendar as presented. Motion carried unanimously.
VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. EASE NOS. TT 15734 AND TT 15735 SHADOW MOUNTAIN RESORT AND
RACQUET CLUB, APPLICANT: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF TWO
TENTATIVE TRACT MAPS WHICH WOULD PROVIDE FOR THE CONVERSION
OF TWO EXISTING MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO COOPERA-
TIVE OWNERSHIP, WITHIN THE PR-7 (PLANNED RESIDENTIAL, MAX.
7 d.u./ac.) ZONE LOCATED WITHIN THE SHADOW MOUNTAIN RESORT
AND RACQUET CLUB DEVELOPMENT, EAST OF SAN LUIS REY AVENUE,
AND SOUTH OF SHADOW LAKE DRIVE.
Mayor Mullins declared the Public Hearing open and asked for
Staff's report.
Mr. Williams stated that under recent State legislation,
stock cooperatives are now reviewed as part of the Tentative
Tract process. He stated that the main area of discussion
with the Planning Commission had been the covering of 33
parking spaces as required by the Municipal Code. It was
the Commission's decision to recommend approval with the
condition that the spaces ultimately be covered as part
of the Tentative Tract process, but that the applicant
be allowed to bond for those to be covered within one
year of the recordation of the Final Map. Staff concurred
and recommended approval.
Mayor Mullins invited input in FAVOR of the request.
MR. TED LENNON, Vice President of Lowe Development, addressed
Council as the applicant and stated his concurrence with both
the Planning Commission and Staff.
December 27, 1979 Page 2
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
* * * JC * * * * * * * is J: is '.: is V * is * 7': * * is * * :C * * is
VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued)
A. CASE NOS. TT 15734 AND TT 15735 (Continued):
Mayor Mullins invited input in OPPOSITION to the request, and none
was offered. He declared the Public Hearing closed. He noted that
the Planning Commission had done a very thorough job in reviewing
this case.
Councilman McPherson moved and Councilman Brush seconded to waive
further reading and adopt Resolution Nos. 79-152 and 79-153. Motion
carried on a 4-1 vote, with Councilman Newbrander voting NO. She stated
that with the size of the units starting at 485 sq. ft., it was hard to
imagine them as being homes. She also questioned the parking in the
existing development, stating that there were deadend areas there now.
B. CASE NO. TT 15630 - DUAINE K. BRICKER, APPLICANT: CONSIDERATION
OF APPROVAL OF A 17 LOT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP FOR CONDOMINIUM
PURPOSES TO ALLOW 16 DWELLING UNITS AND ONE COMMON LOT ON
APPROXIMATELY 1.3 ACRES WITHIN THE R-3 (MULTI -FAMILY DISTRICT)
ZONE, LOCATED BETWEEN SHADOW HILLS ROAD AND DEEP CANYON ROAD,
225 FEET SOUTH OF STATE HIGHWAY 111.
1
Mayor Mullins declared the Public Hearing open and called for
Staff's report.
Mr. Williams reported that this request would implement a
previously approved Conditional Use Permit and preliminary
Design Review Case which allows the construction of a 16
unit condominium development. He stated that there were a
number of revisions as a result of the Planning Commission's
approval. The Tentative Tract Map is in conformance with
the City's ordinances, and it was Staff's recommendation
to approve by Council Resolution No. 79-154, with an amend-
ment to Condition No. 19 eliminating the dedication of land
in lieu of a fee for park and recreation purposes in that
no land would be available for dedication.
Mr. Williams noted that the applicant had phoned the Clerk's
office that morning to advise of his illness. Staff, therefore,
recommended continuance of the matter if there were any ques-
tions to be directed to the applicant.
Mayor Mullins invited input in FAVOR of the request, and none
was offered. He invited input in OPPOSITION to the request, and
none was offered. He declared the Public Hearing closed.
Councilman Brush moved and Councilman McPherson seconded to waive
further reading and adopt Resolution No. 79-154, with Condition No. 19
amended as per Staff recommendation. Motion carried on a 4-1 vote, with
Councilman Newbrander voting NO due to her opposition to any building on
the south side at this time.
i
C. CONSIDERATION OF A MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN FOR THE PORTION OF
THE CITY OF PALM DESERT AND ITS SPHERE OF INFLUENCE LYING
NORTHERLY OF THE WHITEWATER RIVER CHANNEL AND GENERALLY
BETWEEN MONTEREY AVENUE AND COOK STREET.
Mayor Mullins declared the Public Hearing open and called for
Staff's report.
Mr. Williams stated that Willdan Associates had prepared
a Master Drainage Plan for the North Palm Desert Area which
summarizes the study effort associated with the development
of a Master Drainage Plan for the portion of the City's
Sphere of Influence lying northerly of the Whitewater River.
The Master Plan describes a comprehensive program for the
development of drainage facilities and presents alternative
facility plans designed to meet the needs of the community.
December 27, 1979 Page 3
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
�. il` * J` * iV iC * * * J. J * J. * * * J` V J` 1. * * * * * *
VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued)
C. CONSIDERATION OF MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN (Continued)
He reviewed a major scope of the report and indicated that
it is intended to provide the City with a means of coordinating
drainage aspects of pending developments and a mechanism for
evaluating the impact of storm water runoff within the study
area. In preparing this report, analyses were based on
storm intensities of 25 year and 100 year frequencies.
The total cost of the program recommended is estimated to
be $14,200,000. In order for the program to be implemented,
it is necessary that some mechanism for project funding be
developed. The most common financing method, which is
presently used south of the Whitewater River, would be the
imposition of off -site drainage fees (or construction of
the facilities by developers). The fees can be collected
from developers as a condition of approval of final subdivi-
sion maps. The drainage fee rate for a single basin district
would be approximately $3,400/acre. For the two district
configuration, the fee rate would be $2,800/acre for the
northerly one, and $3,700/acre for the southerly one.
Mr. Williams concluded by stating that in order for this
Plan to be implemented, an Urgency Ordinance establishing
property improvement fees for the study area would have
to be adopted, and one appeared under "Ordinances" on the
Agenda.
Councilman Wilson asked how the City could keep up with inflation,
and Mr. Williams advised that the fees should be reviewed and
updated on an annual basis.
Councilman Wilson asked how the City could work with the County
once the Master Drainage Plan was adopted to assure that they will
adhere to the Plan. Mr. Williams suggested that the Plan be
forwarded to the County Board of Supervisors with a specific
request for their adherance. He noted that the County had recently
developed drainage plans for specific areas, and it would not be
uncommon for them to approve this.
Mayor Mullins invited input either in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to
the Plan.
Mrs. Eleanor Siegle, 73-758 DeAnza Way, Palm Desert, asked
if this Plan included the area north of the Highway that is
already developed. Councilman Brush responded that it was
only the area north of the Whitewater Wash. Councilman
Wilson added that what Council was trying to do here was to
prevent what happened in Palm Desert before incorporation
by establishing a drainage program before the land was
developed.
Mr. Gene George, 44-630 Las Palmas, Palm Desert, addressed
Council and pointed out a problem of drainage on his street.
Mr. Bouman advised that the City was well aware of the
problem, and plans were being designed to correct it. Bids
should be awarded in the near future.
Mayor Mullins declared the Public Hearing closed.
Councilman Wilson moved and Councilman McPherson seconded to waive
further reading and adopt Resolution No. 79-155. Motion carried unanimously.
December 27, 1979 Page 4
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
r. .. n .. r: i*: * is r. is is r. * n * n r: * .. * n * r. '': r. * *
VIII. RESOLUTIONS
A. RESOLUTION NO. 79-156 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF
THE HOLDING OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN SAID
CITY ON TUESDAY, APRIL 8, 1980, FOR THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN
OFFICERS OF SAID CITY AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE
LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO GENERAL LAW CITIES.
Mrs. Gilligan, City Clerk reported that by State Law, the
Council was required to call and give notice of a General
Municipal Election. This resolution calls said election
for Tuesday, April 8, 1980, to elect two members of the City
Council for the full term of four years. In addition to
meeting all of the provisions of State law, it sets forth
that polls for said election shall be open at 7:00 a.m. to
7:00 p.m. of the day of said electio. Concensus of City
Clerks in the Valley was that statistically, this did
provide ample time for voters and also provided for a more
efficient counting process.
Councilman McPherson moved and Councilman Newbrander seconded to
waive further reading and adopt Resolution No. 79-156. Motion carried
unanimously
1
B. RESOLUTION NO. 79-157 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR CAN-
DIDATES FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE, PERTAINING TO MATERIALS SUBMITTED
TO THE ELECTORATE AND THE COSTS THEREOF FOR THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL
ELECTION TO BE HELD IN SAID CITY ON TUESDAY, APRIL 8, 1980.
Mrs. Gilligan, City Clerk, reported that by State Law, the
City Council is required to adopt regulations for candidates
for the Municipal Election, and this resolution provides for
such regulations. Special provisions are the limitation of
200 words on the candidate's statement and the requirement for
a $100 deposit in advance as the candidate's pro rate share of
having his or her statement of qualifications included in the
voter's pamphlet. The candidate would then be billed for any
excess cost and refunded any unused portion of the deposit.
Councilman McPherson moved and Councilman Brush seconded to waive
further reading and adopt Resolution No. 79-157. Motion carried unanimously.
C. RESOLUTION NO. 79-158 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE AMOUNT OF
PROPERTY TAX REVENUE TO BE EXCHANGED BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF
RIVERSIDE AND THE CITY OF PALM DESERT RELATING TO ANNEXATION
NUMBER 11 TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, LAFC #79-64-4.
D. RESOLUTION NO. 79-159 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE AMOUNT OF
PROPERTY TAX REVENUE TO BE EXCHANGED BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF
RIVERSIDE AND THE CITY OF PALM DESERT RELATING TO ANNEXATION
NUMBER 10 TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, LAFC #79-57-4.
E. RESOLUTION NO. 79-160 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE AMOUNT OF
PROPERTY TAX REVENUE TO BE EXCHANGED BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF
RIVERSIDE AND THE CITY OF PALM DESERT RELATING TO ANNEXATION
NUMBER 9 TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, LAFC #79-22-4.
F. RESOLUTION NO. 79-161 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE AMOUNT OF
PROPERTY TAX REVENUE TO BE EXCHANGED BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF
RIVERSIDE AND THE CITY OF PALM DESERT RELATING TO ANNEXATION
NUMBER 8 TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, LAFC #79-1-4.
Mr. Bouman stated that Items C, D, E. and F should be consided
together as they were identical, just involving different
December 27, 1979 Page 5
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
irC irC irC * irC �tC irC J. irC irC J; r. it irC r iiC _ J. itC i� i�C JC tC t. J. J JC J. J. * t. JC * JC t. *
n . i i iC . . . �� . . i. C iC �� n C i i i� n iC i� i� i� i i i i.
VIII. RESOLUTIONS (Continued)
C - D - E - F
annexations. He explained that Assembly Bill #8 provided
that the State would provide school districts with lost
money from property taxes, and those cities with property
taxes would now receive a portion of the property tax
going to counties. The Bill also provided in instances
where there were annexations of county territory by cities,
that as a part of that annexation procedure, the cities
and counties would sit down and negotiate a share of the
property tax from the county to the city. The administrative
people of the County of Riverside have worked out an agreement
whereby cities will now receive 25% of the property tax when
annexing territory. This is great for the City of Palm Desert
who now receives no property tax. The four resolutions before
you deal with annexations approved since July 1, 1980.
Councilman McPherson requested that discussion should be held
in Study Session relative to using the money received in the
area from which it is received.
Councilman Wilson moved and Councilman Brush seconded to waive
further reading and adopt Resolutions 79-158, 79-159, 79-160, and 79-161.
Motion carried unanimously.
IX. ORDINANCES
For Introduction:
A. ORDINANCE NO. 218 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING CHAPTER 26.49 AND ADDING
A NEW CHAPTER 26.49, DRAINAGE FACILITIES, ESTABLISHING A NEW
PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT FEE TO BE PAID TO THE CITY FOR THE DRAINAGE
AREA NORTH OF THE WHITEWATER CHANNEL AND A NEW PROPERTY IMPROVE-
MENT FEE TO BE PAID TO THE CITY FOR THE DRAINAGE AREA SOUTH OF
THE WHITEWATER CHANNEL FOR THE PURPOSE OF MEETING CITY-WIDE
DRAINAGE NEEDS. (URGENCY ORDINANCE)
Mr. Bouman stated that this was a complimentary ordinance to
the Master Drainage Plan. The Ordinance established those
fees as set forth in the Plan.
Councilman McPherson moved and Councilman Wilson seconded to
waive further reading and adopt Ordinance No. 218 as an Urgency Ordinance.
Motion carried unanimously.
For Adoption:
None
X. CONSENT ITEMS HELD OVER
None
XI. NEW BUSINESS
A. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF RATE INCREASE BY PALM DESERT DISPOSAL
COMPANY For Refuse Collection In The City of Palm Desert.
Mr. Bouman reported that as far back as a year ago, the Council
did receive a request from the Palm Desert Disposal Service
Company for an increase in the basic collection rates both
in residential and commercial areas. Under our interpretation
of the existing franchise, we are entitled to financial infor-
mation from them justifying the increase. However, they feel
their statements are private. This has resulted in a stalemate
for in excess of a year. They are now requesting the increase
simply based on the fact that of all the communities, Palm
i
December 27, 1979 Page 6
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
n �♦ ^ ♦ ♦ .: i�: .�: :: i� is TC * * n :: i♦ i� ♦ . is is i�
XI. NEW BUSINESS (Continued)
A. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF RATE INCREASE BY P.D. DISPOSAL (Continued):
Desert's fees are considerably lower than other cities in the area.
The Staff memo by Mr. Ortega recognizes the fact and has verified
it. On that basis, Staff does recommend approval of the 15%
increase.
Councilman Wilson stated that he didn't think that because
other cities are paying more means that we should. He
felt the Council's original request to see their operational
costs was justified. We have no assurances that they
are not making just as much money today, and he felt Council
should hold out for more information.
Mr. Gino Scopesi addressed Council as owner of the Disposal
Company stating that they did have a difference in interpre-
tation of the franchise. He felt the comparison between the
different cities did show and justify the rate increase.
Councilman Wilson noted that Coachella and Desert Hot Springs
were not listed on the comparison sheet. He stated that he
would like to study this more and see Mr. Ortega go back and
look at other cities and see the figures comparing identical
services.
Councilman Wilson moved and Councilman Newbrander seconded to
continue the matter to the meeting of January 10, 1980, asking Staff to
bring back more information. Motion carried unanimously.
XII. OLD BUSINESS
None
XIII. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
MR. GLEN RICHARDSON, 44-570 Santa Margarita, Palm Desert, addressed
Council and presented them with a study he had conducted as a student
of the University of California, Riverside (attached and made a part
of these minutes as Exhibit "A").
XIV. REPORTS AND REMARKS
A. CITY MANAGER
None
B. CITY ATTORNEY
None
C. MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Mayor Mullins asked that everyone note the future meetings
listed on the Agenda.
XV ADJOURNMENT
Councilman Wilson moved and Councilman Brush seconded to adjourn
the meeting. Motion carried unanimously. ayor llins adjourned the
meeting at 8:20 p.m.
ATTEST:
SHEILA R. G LIGAN, pyr�RK
CITY OF PALM DESERT, ALIFORNIA
/?- /,r7,)Au ,
EDWARD D. MULLINS , :MAYOR
December 27, 1979 Paze 7
A tchment "A"
C:..,-cy Council Minutes
December 27, 1979
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE
BE:RKEL£Y • DAV1, • I[i\ INE • LOS ANGELES • RIVERSIDE: • SAN DIt-GO • S.AN FR.ANCISCO
COLLEGE OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE
SANTA BARBARA • SANTA CRL'Z
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92521
I am a student at the University of California enrolled in a
course in Public Policy. Funded by a grant by the University, below
is a public opinion survey to research flood policy in the City of
Palm Desert. Your participation is voluntary, as well as anonymous.
May I ask that the survey be mailed in the enclosed, stamped en-
velope by Monday, December 3? Thank you very much for your help.
1. Whom
Glenn D. Richardson
do you believe is responsible for flood control? Check once.
Federal government
State government
County government
City government
Combination of above
2. As a registered voter, have you ever attended a public forum, such
as City Council or Redevelopment Agency meetings, to learn about
flood control efforts in your city?
, f". Y e s
No
3. Whom do you, as a registered voter, hold accountable for flood control
/ Federal government
State government
/9 County goverment
A¢. 2,5- City government
--j Combination of above
4. Considering flood control, do you feel
The city is achieving great success.
,2/ The city is doing what it can.
ZS% The city is accomplishing too little, too late.
5. Flood control for Palm Desert will cost
Less than $5 million
Between $5 and $20 million
More than 620 million
,37 Don't'know
,F7
Z)-
(over)
Page 8