HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-08-08MINUTES
REGULAR CiTY COUNCIL MEETING
THURSDAY, AUGUST 8, 1985
CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBER
• • • • • •
•
•
• • • • • • • •
i. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Snyder called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Councilman S. Roy Wilson
INVOCATION - Mayor Pro-Tempore Richard S. Kelly
IV. ROLL CALL
Present: Excused Absence:
Councilmember Jean Benson
Mayor Pro-Tem Richard Kelly
Councilmember S. Roy Wilson
Mayor Walter H. Snyder
Also Present:
Councilmember Phyllis Jackson
Bruce A. Altman, City Manager
Carlos L. Ortega, Assistant City Manger
Jeff Patterson, Deputy City Attorney
Sheila R. Gilligan, City Clerk
Richard Folkers, Director of Public Works
Paul Gibson, Accounting Supervisor
Ramon A. Diaz, Director of Environmental Services
Frank Allen, Director of Code Compliance
V. AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS, AND APPOINTMENTS
A. APPOINTMENT OF PLANNING COMMISSIONER to Fill Expired Term
of Commissioner Buford Crites.
Mayor Snyder stated that Commissioners are allowed to
serve for two four-year terms per the ordinance. He
noted that Commissioner Crites had served one term and
was willing to continue his service on the Planning
Commission.
Councilman Wilson commended Mr. Crites for the outstanding
job he has done on the Planning Commission.
Upon motion by Wilson, second by Benson, and unanimous vote of
the Councilmembers present, Mr. Buford Crites was reappointed to the
Planning Commission for a second four-year term.
VI. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. MINUTES of the Regular City Council Meeting of July 25,
1985.
Rec: Approve as presented.
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 8, 1985
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
B. CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY TREASURY - Demand Nos.
86-012, 86-016, and 86-017.
Rec: Approve as presented.
C. CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY by E.L. Yeager Construction for
Indemnification in the Amount of $1,000,000.
Rec: Deny the Claim and instruct the City Clerk to so
advise the Claimant.
D. CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY by Safeco Insurance Company on
Behalf of its Insured, Susan Geary, in the Amount of
$2,929.26 for Alleged Damages Incurred in an Accident at
Monterey Avenue and San Gorgonio.
Rec: Deny the Claim and instruct the City Clerk to so
advise the Claimant.
E. REPORT FROM RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT for the
Month of June, 1985.
Rec: Receive and file.
F. REQUEST FOR ACCEPTANCE OF WORK for Contract No. 1057 -
Palm Desert Town Center Fire Station.
Rec:
By Minute Motion, accept the work for Contract
1057 as complete and authorize the City Clerk
to file a Notice of Completion.
G. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION of Five -Year Extension of the
General Services Agreement with County of Riverside dated
March 1, 1980.
Rec:
Waive further reading and adopt Resolution No.
85-75, requesting the extension of the General
Services Agreement with the County of Riverside.
H. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL of Refund for Over -Payment of Plan
Check Fees for the Vacation Inn.
Rec:
By Minute Motion, approve the request and
authorize the refund of $17,978.62 to Vacation
Inn.
Upon motion by Kelly, second by Wilson, the Consent Calendar
was approved as presented by unanimous vote of the Councilmembers
present.
VII. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - A
None
VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION OF PER PARCEL ASSESSMENTS FOR
LOT ABATEMENT CHARGES.
Mayor Snyder declared the public hearing open and asked for
staff's report.
2
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 8, 1985
. . . . . * . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . * •
Mr. Allen reviewed the Staff Report, noting that several
of the property owners had paid the costs for abatement
prior to the public hearing. These per parcel assessments
were for lots deemed fire hazards by the Fire Marshal.
He recommended that Resolution No. 85-76 be adopted,
confirming these assessments.
Mayor Snyder invited input in FAVOR of this request, and none
was offered. He invited input in OPPOSITION to this request,
and none was offered. He declared the public hearing closed.
Councilmember Benson moved to waive further reading and adopt
Resolution No. 85-76 confirming per parcel assessments for lot abatement
charges. Motion was seconded by Kelly and carried by unanimous vote of
the Councilmembers present.
8. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION OF ENGINEER'S REPORT AND
CONFIRMATION OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 83-1.
Mayor Snyder declared the Public Hearing open and asked for
staff's report.
Mr. Altman reported that this had been discussed at
length in Study Session.
Mr. Folkers stated that Mr. Joe Kicak, Engineer for this
project, had met with citizens on three ocassions to
discuss any concerns.
Mr. Mac Brown, Special Counsel for the project, stated
that there were actually three public hearings for
consideration at this time: two related to proceeding
with the assessment district itself, while the third was
for. eminent domain proceedings. It was staff's recommen-
dation that the public hearing on eminent domain be
continued until September 12, 1985. to allow for proper
notification of those property owners who might be
affected by eminent domain. He added that all property
owners had been notified as to estimated individual
assessments and that it was recommended that all assess-
ments be reduced. He also noted that seven resolutions
had been prepared which ordered the work and confirmed
the assessments but that Council had the option at any
time to continue the public hearing.
Mr. Joe Kicak stated that maps were posted in the Chamber
showing the area of work which was subdivided into seven
different schedules, each bid as a single contrat with
all the work to be done by a single contractor. Some of
the work to be done would be: 1) construction of curbs
and gutters; 2) removal and replacement of driveways not
meeting the grade; and 3) relocation of facilities that
would interfere with the progress of the work. Bids
were opened on July 25, 1985, with the following results:
1) Massey Sand & Rock - $5,258,204.17; 2) Matich - $5.3+
million; and 3) Yeager Construction - over $6 million.
Based on the bids received and the actual bid items in
the schedules, the City's portion would be approximately
$3.92 million. Approximately $2.9 million would be
assessed to the property owners, with individual assess-
ments based on the benefit to each owner and the amount
of work involved on each piece of property. He added
that in many cases the assessments for two properties
3
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 8, 1985
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
with the same footage, side by side, could be considerably
different, primarily because of the individual work that
needs to be done. He stated that he had met over 100
property owners during the three meetings to explain the
assessments; many times he went out to their properties
with them. Most of these people ended up satisfied with
the explanations. The total percentage of protests
received in writing up to this time for the entire
project area was 4.32%; however, additional protests had
been received just prior to this meeting, which he still
needed to tabulate.
Mr. Brown stated that this would conclude the staff
report and asked anyone speaking in protest to state
their name and parcel number if they had not already
filled out a form or sent a letter.
Mayor Snyder invited input in OPPOSITION to this assessment
district, and the following spoke:
MR. MASON DURICK of Casa Larrea Motel on Larrea Street,
asked why the work was being planned to take place during
the season, when he felt either before December 15 or
after May 31 would be a better time frame.
Mayor Snyder responded that the Council was fully aware
of the problems and that meetings with the motel people
would be held to determmine the best times to do the work
in their areas.
MR. AL TIMOTHY, 74-201 Chicory Street, stated he did not
feel improvements were necessary in his area. He also
asked why 8" curbs were planned when 6" curbs would be
sufficient.
Mr. Kicak responded that staff felt uniformity should be
maintained as much as possible throughout the district,
and the cost of 8" curbs was the same as that for 6"
curbs in this contract. However, he stated he agreed
that an 8" face may impact the smaller cars depending on
the cross slope and that the slope of the pavement would
be maintained, which should alleviate this problem.
Mayor Snyder invited input in FAVOR of this project.
MS. MARY JANE BEAN„ 73-901 Shadow Lake, stated she was
definitely in favor of this project but felt that $4,700
for one house was too much to pay.
Mr. Kicak responded that he would meet with her to
explain how her assessment figure was determined.
MS. BEA STEWART, 44-476 San Rafael, spoke in favor but
asked how the payments would be handled.
Mayor Snyder responded that property owners would be
given the choice of paying the entire amount immediately
or having it put on their tax bills. He added that Mr.
Kicak would explain it in more detail further on in the
meeting.
MR. HAROLD BIRD, 47-967 Sun Corral, stated he felt the
benefits far outweighed the costs and the sooner the
curbs were in the better for everyone.
4
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 8, 1985
Mayor Snyder stated that the Council was concerned with
the costs and felt this project would enhance property
values considerably. He added that the project came
about because of petitions received by the City from
concerned citizens.
MR. DAVE STARROD, 43-620 Carmel Circle, was concerned
with many houses on his street being lower than street
level and asked if this problem would be rectified at the
same time the curbs and gutters were constructed.
Mayor Snyder responded that the engineer would be in
touch with Mr. Starrod to discuss this matter.
MS. ROSE WACHTER of Buckboard Trail, stated that the
assessment amount for her property was considerably
higher than she was originally told and asked for a
breakdown on how the figure was determined, especially
the $100 charge to move her mailbox. She also questioned
the City's payment of its portion of the district and
asked where this money was coming from.
Councilman Wilson stated that most of the City's revenues
comes from sales tax.
Ms. Wachter asked how much the reserve fund was that she
had heard about.
Mr. Mac Brown explained that the reserve fund is set at
5% of the amount of the bonds that will be issued and,
therefore, the assessments are increased by 5%. This
fund would be used to cover delinquencies in payments.
He added that if the Council proceeded with this project,
the property owners would have 30 days from this date to
pay their assessment in full, less a 7% credit. This
would reduce the amount to go to bond. If the property
owner did not want to pay the amount in full, the first
payment would appear on the December, 1986, tax roll. As
far as the charge for moving the mailbox, he stated that
property owners would be given a credit for doing some of
their own work and that Mr. Kicak would discuss this with
those owners affected.
Mayor Snyder invited anyone who needed further information
to come to the Civic Center and speak to the engineer.
MR. SANDY BAUM, 45-800 Deep Canyon, stated that he was
wholeheartedly in favor of this district and that he felt
it was high time that curbs and gutters were constructed
in these areas.
MR. DAN HOYER, 44-505 San Carlos, stated he was in favor
of the installation of curbs and gutters and asked
whether sidewalks would be added at a later date.
Mayor Snyder responded that Mr. Hoyer and his neighbors
could ask that a separate assessment district be created
for sidewalks.
MR. JONASSON, 44-695 San Benito Circle, asked what would
happen if the assessment for a particular piece of
property were put on the tax rolls and then that property
was sold.
5
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
• • • • • • •
• •
•
AUGUST 8, 1985
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Mayor Snyder responded that it would stay with the
property.
MR. EDDIE FORREST, 48-301 Birdie Way, stated he understood
that nothing could be done on the streets until the curbs
and gutters were installed and asked if plans had been
made to have the streets resurfaced.
Mayor Snyder responded that each year a priority list is
made up with those streets to be reconditioned. He added
that he knew Mr. Forrest's street was on the list and
that he could check with the City Engineer to find out
the status.
MR. TOM IVERS, Silver Moon, spoke in favor of the assess-
ment district and felt that the area at this time was
substandard and looked like a ghetto. He did not think
the construction of curbs and gutters should be postponed
any longer.
MR. DAVE MOORE, 73-252 Buckboard Trail, felt that the
project was a very good idea and asked if it was possible
for each homeowner to use his/her own contractor to do
the work.
Mr. Brown responded that there were approximately 200
parcels where certain items of work could be done by the
property owners themselves, with a reduction in the
assessment amount. He stated he would make an appointment
with Mr. Moore to discuss this with him.
MR. HAROLD BIRD, 47-967 Sun Corral, spoke as president of
the Silver Spur Ranch Homeowners Association, and stated
that the area is definitely not a ghetto, as Mr. Ivers
felt.
Mayor Snyder declared the Public Hearing closed.
Mr. Brown stated for the record that there was a total of
4.54% protest for the entire project area. He added that
if the Council wished to proceed, it should now consider
the resolutions for adoption.
Councilman Wilson moved to adopt Resolution No. 85-86, ordering
certain changes and modifications to the engineer's report in a special
assessment district. Motion was seconded by Kelly and carried by
unanimous vote of the Councilmembers present.
Councilman Kelly moved to adopt Resolution No. 85-82, over-
ruling and denying protests and making certain findings in a special
assessment district. Motion was seconded by Wilson and carried by
unanimous vote of the Councilmembers present.
Councilman Wilson moved to adopt Resolution No. 85-83, finding
and determining that the public interest, convenience, and necessity
require the improvements; that the project is feasible, and that the
lands will be able to carry the burden of the proposed assessment.
Motion was seconded by Kelly and carried by unanimous vote of the
Councilmembers present.
6
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 8, 1985
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Councilman Kelly moved to adopt Resolution No. 85-84, approving
and providing for contribution to pay certain costs and expenses in an
assessment district. Motion was seconded by Wilson and carried by
unanimous vote of the Councilmembers present.
Councilman Wilson moved to adopt Resolution No. 85-85, con-
firming the assessment, ordering the improvements made, together with the
appurtenances, and approving the engineer's report. Motion was seconded
by Kelly and carried by unanimous vote of the Councilmembers present.
Councilman Wilson moved to reopen the Public Hearing on
eminent domain proceedings and to continue said Public Hearing to the
meeting of September 12, 1985. Motion was seconded by Kelly and carried
by unanimous vote of the Councilmembers present.
MAYOR SNYDER CALLED A RECESS AT 8:05 P.M. AND RECONVENED THE MEETING AT
8:20 P.M.
C. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN, NEGATIVE
DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND PARCEL MAP WAIVER
TO CONSOLIDATE THE SITE INTO ONE LOT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION
OF AN EIGHT UNIT APARTMENT PROJECT (UTILIZING A 257,
DENSITY BONUS ALLOWED BY STATE LAW) IN THE PR-2 ZONE
LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SANTA ROSA WAY, 200 FEET
WEST OF SAN PASCUAL. (Continued from the meeting of June
13, 1985.)
Mr. Diaz reported that the applicant had requested a
continuance of this item to the meeting of September 12.
1985.
Upon motion by Wilson, second by Kelly. the item was continued
to the meeting of September 12, 1985, at the applicant's request by
unanimous vote of the Council.
D. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM PR-6 S.P.
(PLANNED RESIDENTIAL, MAXIMUM 6 DU/ACRE SCENIC PRESER-
VATION OVERLAY) TO PC (3), S.P. (PLANNED REGIONAL COMMER-
CIAL WITH A SCENIC PRESERVATION OVERLAY) FOR 15.26 ACRES
OF LAND BOUNDED BY THE PALM VALLEY STORM CHANNEL. EL
PASEO, FRED WARING DRIVE, AND HIGHWAY 111.
Mr. Altman reported that additional legal advertisement
of this public hearing was required and requested a
two -week continuance of Council's consideration.
Mayor Snyder invited public testimony, and none was offered.
Upon motion by Kelly, second by Wilson, the item was continued
to the meeting of August 22, 1985, to allow for readvertisement of legal
notice by unanimous vote of the Council.
7
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 8, 1985
• • • • • • a a a • a • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
iX. RESOLUTIONS
A. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM
DESERT, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY BOARD
OF SUPERVISORS TO LEVY A SPECIAL TAX PURSUANT TO SECTION
53978 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE FOR FiRE PROTECTION AND
PREVENTION SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1985/86.
Mr. Altman reported that this resolution was necessary to
enact the fire tax for fiscal year 1985-86 and that the
rates set forth in the document were the same as they had
been since voter approval in 1980.
Upon motion by Wilson, second by Kelly, Resolution No. 85-87 was
adopted by unanimous vote of the Council.
X. ORDINANCES
For Introduction:
A. ORDINANCE NO. 429 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 5.98,
SECTION 5.98.010 TO 5.98.130, TO THE CITY CODES PERTAINING
TO TEMPORARY DANCE AND TEMPORARY ENTERTAINMENT PERMITS.
(Continued from the meeting of July 11, 1985.)
Mr. Altman reported that the Police Advisory Committee
had not yet reviewed this ordinance in its amended form
and recommended a continuance to allow for that.
Upon motion by Kelly, second by Wilson, consideration of Ordinance
No. 429 was continued to the meeting of September 12, 1985, by unanimous
vote of the Council.
For Adoption:
None
XI. CONSENT ITEMS HELD OVER
None
XII. NEM BUSINESS
A. CONSIDERATION OF SELECTION of Underwriter for Assessment
District No. 83-1 Financing.
Mr. Altman stated that this had been discussed in Study
Session at length and that staff's recommendation, after
interviewing each firm interested in providing this
service, was to select Miller Schroder. The alternative
recommendation would be to select Miller Schroder for
the certificates of participation or tax allocation bonds
and the local firm of Prudential Bache for the assessment
bonds.
Councilman Kelly stated he felt that if at all possible, the
City should be doing business with local firms. Councilmember
Benson concurred. Councilman Wilson said that if all things
are fairly equal, he agreed with dealing with a local firm
whenever possible.
8
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 8, 1985
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Upon question by Council, Mr. Brown, Assessment District
Counsel, stated that a two -week continuance would not present
a problem but one of a month would cause a two -week loss in
the bonding process and in construction start-up.
Mr. Altman stated that it was important that the City bond for
its portion of the district which was $3.9 million which would
mean giving Miller Schroder that portion of the agreement
inasmuch as they were working now with the Redevelopment
Agency.
Councilman Wilson moved to continue the matter for two weeks and
ask a committee of the City Manager, Redevelopment Agency Director, and
Councilmembers Benson and Kelly to sit down and review the issue to come
up with the recommendation to the Council. Motion died for lack of a
second.
Upon question by Council, Deputy City Attorney Jeff Patterson
advised that the Council could authorize the Mayor to execute
any agreement that a subcommittee recommended.
Councilman Wilson moved to continue the issue to August 22, 1985,
and to form a subcommittee comprised of staff, Councilman Kelly, and
Mayor Snyder for recommendation to the City Council and in the event a
quorum was not available for the August 22nd meeting, that staff be
authorized to meet with the recommended firm to draw up the necessary
documentation by September 12, 1985. Councilman Kelly seconded the
motion; motion carried by unanimous vote of the Council.
XIII. CONTINUED BUSINESS
None
XIV. OLD BUSINESS
A. REPORT on Traffic Signs on Fred Waring Drive (followup
report from meeting of July 25, 1985.)
Mr. Folkers reported that the traffic signs were in fact
too high and that they would be lowered.
XV. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - 8
MR. SANDY BAUM, 45-800 Deep Canyon Road, Paim Desert, stated
that trees in his neighborhood were interfering with utility
lines and that he had observed sparks coming from the lines on
occasion. Mr. Folkers was directed to investigate with
Southern California Edison Company.
XVI. REPORTS AND REMARKS
A. CITY MANAGER
1. REQUEST FOR APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY
ACQUISITION.
Mr. Altman reported that $54,000 was needed for the
purpose of acquiring property for right-of-way for
Assessment District 83-1.
9
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
a a
• • •
•
•
a a • a
AUGUST 8, 1985
• • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Councilman Wilson moved to, by Minute Motion, authorize the appro-
priation of $54,000 to fund the right-of-way acquisition for Assessment
District 83-1, with the condition that this amount be refunded to the
City from the district proceeds. Councilman Kelly seconded the motion,
and the motion carried by unanimous vote.
B. CITY ATTORNEY
1. ORDINANCE RELATING TO CITY COUNCIL SALARIES
Mr. Patterson introduced an ordinance requested by
Council at a previous meeting which would increase
Council salaries from $150 per month to $300 per
month as now provided for in Section 36516 of the
Government Code. He advised that Council could
introduce it and pass it to second reading or place
it on the next agenda.
Councilman Wilson stated he would like an opportunity to
review the proposed ordinance and would prefer it be on the
September 12th agenda for consideration. The other Council -
members concurred, and the City Clerk was instructed to place
it on said agenda.
C. MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Mayor Snyder asked that everyone note the future meetings
listed on the agenda.
Councilmember Benson stated that she had read a few
letters in opposition to the Assessment District which
indicated that the writer would be placed in such a
hardship condition from the assessment that he or she
would lose his property. She asked if staff was investi-
gating these cases to see if the City could assist these
individuals.
Mr. Altman stated that the individual situations would be
investigated and the letters responded to. However, the
City could not legally financially assist any property
owner. He felt that in most cases it might just be that
the individual did not understand that the assessment
could be paid off over a 15-year period and staff would
make an extra effort to explain it to these people.
XVII. ADJOURNMENT
Councilman Wilson moved to adjourn the City Council meeting to
Closed Session in accordance with Section 54956.8 of the Government Code
for the purpose of discussing the acquisition of real property, said
Closed Session to commence immediately following adjournment of the
Redevelopment Agency Meeting. Councilmember Benson seconded the motion.
Motion carried by unanimous vote and Mayor Snyder adjourned to Closed
Session at 8:55 p.m.
10
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 8, 1985
• • • * * • • • • • • • * * • • • • • • • • • • *
Mayor Snyder reconvened the meeting at 9:30 p.m. and immediately
adjourned announcing that no action had been taken in Closed Session.
WALTER H. SNYDER,-MA R
ATTEST:
2/
�/!
SHEILA R. GIj4.IGAN, ,e TY CLERK
CITY OF PALM DESERTCALIFORNIA