HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-07-25MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
THURSDAY, JULY 25, 1985
CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBER
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
I. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Snyder called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Mayor Walter H. Snyder
III. INVOCATION - Mayor Pro-Tempore Richard S. Kelly
IV. ROLL CALL
Present: Excused Absence:
Councilmember Jean M. Benson
Mayor Pro-Tempore Richard S. Kelly
Councilman 5. Roy Wilson
Mayor Walter H. Snyder
Also Present:
Councilmember Phyllis Jackson
Bruce A. Altman, City Manager
Carlos L. Ortega, Assistant City Manager
Doug Phillips, Deputy City Attorney
Mary P. Frazier, Deputy City Clerk
Ramon A. Diaz, Director of Environmental Services
Richard Folkers, Director of Public Works
Kirby Warner, Finance Director
V. AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS, AND APPOINTMENTS
None
VI. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS OF JUNE 26
AND JULY 11, 1985.
Rec: Approve as presented.
B. CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY TREASURY - DEMAND
NOS. 85-125, 85-126, AND 86-011.
Rec: Approve as presented.
C. CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY BY ANGIE LYONS ERICKSON IN THE
AMOUNT OF $500,000 FOR ALLEGED DAMAGES SUSTAINED IN AN
ACCIDENT NEAR 44-409 SORRENTO, PALM DESERT.
Rec: Deny the claim and instruct the City Clerk to so advise the
claimant.
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING JULY 25, 1985
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
D. CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY BY KIRK ROLAND AND DIANA ROLAND
FOR ALLEGED DAMAGES IN THE APPROXIMATE AMOUNT OF
$150,000.00 FOR ALLEGED INJURIES SUSTAINED IN AN ACCIDENT
AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAN LUIS REY AND HIGHWAY
111.
Rec: Deny the claim and instruct the City Clerk to so advise the
claimant.
E. REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO ADVERTISE AND CALL FOR
BIDS FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS AT EL PASEO AND
HIGHWAY 111.
Rec: By Minute Motion, authorize the City clerk to advertise and
call for bids for traffic signal modifications at the
intersection of State Highway 111 and El Paseo adjacent to
the Town Center.
F. REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO ADVERTISE AND CALL FOR
BIDS FOR THE TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT EL PASEO/SAN PABLO
AVENUE AND EL PASEO/SAN LUIS REY AVENUE (CONTRACT 1094).
Rec: By Minute Motion, authorize the City Clerk to advertise and
call for bids for Contract No. 1094.
Upon motion by Benson, second by Kelly,the Consent Calendar was approved
as presented by unanimous vote of the Councilmembers present.
VII. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - A
MR. GEORGE BERKEY, 73-625 Joshua Tree, addressed the Council
relative to sidewalks in industrial parks. He stated that he was
connected with a new industrial park on Cook Street and that at least
one of the buyers who submitted a development plan to the Planning
Commission had been advised that sidewalks would have to be installed
in the interior of the park. It was his feeling that people go to
industrial parks to meet and carry on business; they do not go to stroll.
He added that he hoped this matter could be cleared up so that
sidewalks would not be required in industrial parks.
Councilman Wilson stated he felt this was something that should be
looked into.
Mayor Snyder noted that Environmental Services staff would be
directed to investigate this matter of sidewalks in industrial areas and
report to the Council with the findings at its meeting of August 8, 1985.
VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS
N one
IX. RESOLUTIONS
None
X. ORDINANCES
For Introduction:
N one
For Adoption:
N one
XI. CONSENT ITEMS HELD OVER
None
-2-
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING JULY 25, 1985
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
XII. NEW BUSINESS
A. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FOR AN APPROPRIATION OF
$3,800 TO THE CHRISTMAS DECORATION ACCOUNT.
Mr. Altman reported that the Council was briefed on this at Study
Session. At the end of the 1984/85 fiscal year, there was $3,800
remaining in the Christmas Decoration Account which was put back
into the General Fund. This was money that the Christmas Committee
had planned for the 1985 Christmas season, and it just needed to be
reappropriated to this year's budget.
Councilman Wilson moved to reappropriate $3,800 to the 1985 Christmas
Decoration Account. Motion was seconded by Kelly and carried by unanimous vote of the
Councilmembers present.
B. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION OF INCREASE IN REFUSE RATES
FOR PALM DESERT DISPOSAL COMPANY.
Mr. Altman reported that this was discussed in Study Session and
recommended it be continued to the meeting of August 22, 1985, as Mr.
Ortega is continuing in his discussions with Palm Desert Disposal
Company.
Upon motion by Benson, second by Wilson, this matter was continued to the
meeting of August 22, 1985, by unanimous vote of the Councilmembers present.
XIII. CONTINUED BUSINESS
A. CONSIDERATION OF THE CALLING AND ORDERING OF A SPECIAL
ELECTION FOR THE PURPOSE OF PLACING A MEASURE RELATING
TO A DIRECTLY ELECTED MAYOR ON THE NOVEMBER 5, 1985,
BALLOT.
Mr. Altman reported that this item was on the Agenda per Council
direction and that resolutions had been prepared for the Council to
consider.
Mayor Snyder stated that if the Council desired to put this issue on the
ballot for November 5, 1985, and consolidate with the UDEL election, it
would need to adopt Resolution No. 85-74.
Councilman Kelly noted that inasmuch as Councilmember Jackson was
expected to enter the meeting shortly and she had strong feelings about
this issue, he felt this matter should be continued until further in the
meeting so that she would have an opportunity to state her feelings.
Upon motion by Kelly, second by Wilson, this matter was continued to later in
the meeting by unanimous vote of the Councilmembers present.
XIV. OLD BUSINESS
A. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF FORMATION OF NORTH SPHERE
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 84-1.
Mr. Altman reported that this was discussed in Study Session and that
Mr. Warren Diven of MacKenzie Brown's office was available to answer
any questions.
Mr. Warren Diven addressed Council and stated that both the County of
Riverside and the City of Rancho Mirage had passed resolutions
granting consent to the formation of this assessment district. He
submitted copies of both resolutions for the record (on file and of
record in the City Clerk's Office). He also noted that Section 4 of
Resolution No. 85-77 had been amended to provide that the bonds shall
not exceed fourteen (14) years from the 2nd day of September next
succeeding twelve (12) months from the date. This amendment was a
result of urgency legislation which was now effective, modifying the
-3-
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING JULY 25, 1985
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
maturity date for bonds from the previously authorized July 2nd next
succeeding ten (10) months from their date.
Councilman Kelly moved to waive further reading and adopt the following
resolutions pertaining to the formation of the North Sphere Assessment District: 1)
Resolution No. 85-77, establishing jurisdiction and declaring the intent to construct the
improvements; .2)-1-solution No. 85-78, passing on the engineer's report and setting the
public hearing for the district; 3) Resolution No. 85-79, referencing the prevailing wage
scale and calling for construction bids; 4) Resolution No. 85-80, authorizing the sale of
bonds for the district; 5) Resolution No. 85-81, setting the public hearing for eminent
domain proceedings for the district. Motion was seconded by Benson and carried by
unanimous vote of the Councilmembers present.
B. REQUEST FOR AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY
ACQUISITION SERVICES FOR THE NORTH SPHERE ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT.
Mr. Altman referred the Council to a memo in the packets from the
Public Works Director relative to this matter and offered to answer any
questions.
Councilman Kelly moved to: 1) By Minute Motion, award a contract for right-
of-way acquisition services (Contract No. 00-053) for the subject assessment district to
Quan & Associates in an amount not to exceed $17,000 and authorize a ten percent
contingency reserve for the contract in the amount of $1,700; and 2) By Minute Motion,
authorize the appropriation of $18,700 to fund the cost of the right-of-way acquisition
services, with the condition that this amount be refunded to the City from assessment
district proceeds when formation of the district takes place. Motion was seconded by
Wilson and carried by unanimous vote of the Councilmembers present.
COUNCILMEMBER JACKSON ENTERED THE MEETING AT 7:15 p.m.
C. CONSIDERATION OF A SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION ON CONTRIBUTIONS TO OUTSIDE AGENCIES.
Mr. Altman reported that the Council had been briefed on this matter
in Study Session and that Mr. Warner had been working with Mr. Phillips
to mitigate concerns brought up by the Council during the Study
Session.
Mr. Warner reported that Item No. 4 of the Agreement required that
the agency requesting contributions submit a monthly report listing its
actual revenues and expenditures. Council had asked if quarterly
reports could be required instead, and Mr. Phillips indicated that he had
no problem with that change; he was just concerned that the City
continue to monitor the public benefits of the programs. Another
concern of the Council was that a nondiscriminatory clause be included
in the agreement to assure that agencies receiving funds would make
the programs available to all citizens. The following clause was
proposed by Mr. Phillips to mitigate this concern: "These programs are
available to all eligible participants, without regard to race, sex,
political persuasion, religion, national origin, or age."
Councilmember Benson moved to, by Minute Motion, appropriate $60,000 from
the Unobligated General Fund balance to be placed in account titled "Contributions to
Outside Agencies" and allocate $20,000 to the Cove Communities Seniors' Association,
$20,000 to the Palm Desert Chamber of Commerce, and $5,000 to the Family
YMCA/Youth Center, and authorize the Mayor to execute contracts for these amounts in
a format to be provided by the City Attorney, said contracts to include the
nondiscriminatory clause and the amendment requiring quarterly instead of monthly
reports. Motion was seconded by Kelly and carried by unanimous vote of the Council.
-4-
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING JULY 25, 1985
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
XIII. CONTINUED BUSINESS
A. CONSIDERATION OF THE CALLING AND ORDERING OF A SPECIAL
ELECTION FOR THE PURPOSE OF PLACING A MEASURE RELATING
TO A DIRECTLY ELECTED MAYOR ON THE NOVEMBER 5, 1985,
BALLOT.
Mayor Snyder noted that this had been brought up earlier in the meeting
and had been held over until this time so that Councilmember Jackson
would be present for the discussions.
Councilmember Jackson stated that she had expressed her feelings on
this matter in a memo to the Councilmembers. This came up before
the Council for consideration several months earlier, and a study had
been done which showed the pros and cons of directly electing a mayor.
One of her concerns was that of the many cities in California (441), less
than 25% have a directly elected mayor, and most of those are either
very large cities or are those with a ward or burrough system. She felt
that there were many more reasons against directly electing a mayor
than for it. She stated that she had an opportunity to discuss this
matter with several other cities in California. One of the concerns
expressed was that it is a movement toward bringing bipartisan
elections into local government, and she felt that city government
should be kept nonpartisan. She also believed that everyone elected to
a council seat enters the job on an equal basis and must answer to the
people who elected them. She felt that the current system of selecting
the mayor from among the councilmembers was working so well that it
should not be disrupted by putting the issue on the ballot. She also
stated that she would far rather be selected by her peers than elected
by the electorate.
Mayor Snyder stated that he had never had really strong feelings one
way or the other. He agreed with many of the things stated by
Councilmember Jackson but felt that Palm Desert is no longer a little
village. He did not feel that the job of Mayor was just an honorary
position as that person must be willing to do the job that a good
administrator would, and he did not see any change in the position
whether elected by the citizens or selected within the council. He felt
Palm Desert has a very intelligent level of citizens who should be
allowed to make the decision of whether or not to directly elect the
mayor.
Councilman Kelly stated he also did not have any strong feelings about
this issue; however, he felt that in considering the pros and cons, the
cons outweighed the pros in having a directly elected mayor. He could
see two good people running for mayor - one would be elected, and the
one who was not elected would not even be serving on the council. He
could also see a councilmember in the middle of a term running for
mayor - if that councilmember was elected there would be an open seat
on the council. There would then be the additional expense of electing
a new councilmember. He felt that when the council elects a mayor
from among itself, it establishes a good relationship and they can work
together. He also stated that he had not seen or heard a great deal
from the citizens about directly electing a mayor and had heard only
good things about the way the mayor is selected currently.
Councilmember Benson stated that she had originally voted for putting
this issue on the ballot. However, she had given it a lot of thought, and
her concern was that prior knowledge means a great deal in solving
some of the problems that the council encounters. A directly elected
mayor may not have the advantage of knowing what has gone on
previously.
Councilmember Wilson stated that when this was originally brought up,
he felt it should be given a try. He agreed with Councilman Kelly in
that he had not heard a lot from any citizens as to whether or not to
put this on the ballot. He stated that after listening to comments made
by the other Councilmembers, he would probably change his mind and
- 5-
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING JULY 25, 1985
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
vote against the resolution. He felt that the Council should let the
people decide whether or not they want to put this issue on the ballot.
Mayor Snyder invited input from the audience.
MR. RALPH WOOD, 72-920 Roy Emerson Drive, stated that he did not
agree with Councilmen Wilson and Kelly about no interest being shown
by the community. He stated that at a luncheon he attended the
previous Tuesday, this issue was the topic of discussion for the entire
meeting. He stated that he had noticed in the Planning Commission
meetings and City Council meetings a tendency for the people to only
attend the meetings if they were opposed to something. If they were in
favor of a matter, they tend to stay home and assume it will go
through. He felt the issue should be put on the ballot and that the
Councilmembers should not be the ones to decide against doing so.
Councilman Wilson stated that this was a Council initiated action for
consideration. If the people really wanted it on the ballot, they should
come to the Council and request it be put on.
MR. GEORGE BERKEY, 73-640 El Paseo, stated that as he saw it the
question was whether or not to let the people decide in November
whether or not to elect the mayor. He added that he would be happy to
see the Council vote against the resolution. However, if the resolution
was adopted and the matter put on the ballot, he would be willing to
work with a committee against having a directly elected mayor.
Councilmember Jackson moved to DENY without prejudice Resolution No. 85-
74 calling and ordering a special election and requesting the Board of Supervisors of
Riverside County to approve consolidation with the UDEL election to be held on
November 5, 1985. Motion was seconded by Kelly and carried by a 4-1 vote, with Mayor
Snyder voting NO.
Mr. Phillips stated that by not passing Resolution No. 85-74, the
Council would be denying it without prejudice, and anyone could come
back and request that it be put on the ballot. He also stated that with
Resolution No. 85-74 denied, the optional resolutions, No. 85-75 and 85-
76, were moot and no action was necessary.
XV. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - B
MR. SANDY BAUM, 45-800 Deep Canyon, addressed the Council
relative to signs at the ends of the median strips on Fred Waring and on
Monterey to Parkview. He did not know of any other place in the City
where you would be able to find directional signs like these and
wondered why they were installed in just these few places. He felt they
were placed a little too high for automobile lights to illuminate them
and that they were more a distraction than a help.
Mr. Folkers responded that directional signs have been around for a long
time and that the new ones being installed are the symbolic type signs.
The signs are for safety and to assure that motorists do not run into the
islands. As far as being placed too high, he stated he would look into
this and report back to the Council.
XVI. REPORTS AND REMARKS
A. CITY MANAGER
1. COACHELLA VALLEY TELEVISION
Mr. Altman reported that at Study Session he was asked to
remind the Council to direct the Mayor and City Manager to go
to C.V.A.G. with the issue of C.V.T.V. on Tuesday and ask them
to take up the charge of looking into the cities' rights and
privileges regarding cable television regulations.
-6-
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING JULY 25, 1985
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Upon motion by Wilson, second by Kelly, the Mayor and City Manager
were directed to discuss with C.V.A.G. the cities' rights and privileges relative to
Coachella Valley Television and regulations. Motion carried by unanimous vote of the
Council.
B. CITY ATTORNEY
None
C. MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
1. SB 75
Councilmember Jackson stated that a city in Orange County had
produced a tape on SB75 which is very well done and has been
well received by various organizations. She felt the citizens
should be made aware of the unconscionable judgments against
cities, and this might be something that could be shown to local
service organizations to urge citizens to write to the Assembly
Judiciary Committee. She also felt the City might be able to
get the cooperation of the cable company in running this movie
in the Coachella Valley.
Mayor Snyder agreed with Councilmember Jackson that this is a
very serious situation which needs to be addressed immediately.
Councilman Wilson moved to, by Minute Motion, approve the purchase
of the videotape on SB75. Motion was seconded by Kelly and carried by unanimous vote of
the Council.
2. Councilmember Jackson thanked the Council for delaying the
directly elected mayor issue until she could be present for the
discussions. She stated that she was late because she had been
at the Bob Hope Cultural Center's introduction of its new
theater manager to the press.
3. Mayor Snyder asked that everyone note the future meetings
listed on the Agenda.
XVII. ADJOURNMENT
Upon motion by Kelly, second by Benson, Mayor Snyder adjourned the City
Council meeting at 8:00 p.m. to Closed Session in accordance with Section 54956.8 of the
Government Code for the purpose of discussing real property negotiation and transactions,
said Closed Session to be held immediately following the adjournment of the
Redevelopment Agency meeting. Motion carried by unanimous vote of the
Councilmembers.
Mayor Snyder reconvened the City Council meeting at 8:50 p.tn. and
immediately adjourned with no action taken or announced.
4GE.�
WA TER H. SNYDER, MAYOR
ATTEST:
MARY P. FRAZIgR, DEPUTY TY CL,ERK
CITY OF PALM DESERT, C FORNIA'
-7-