Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016-09-22MINUTES REGULAR PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL MEETING THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBER 73510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CA 92260 I. CALL TO ORDER - 3:00 P.M. Mayor Pro Tem Harnik convened the meeting at 3:00 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Present: Mayor Pro Tem Jan C. Harnik Councilman Sabby Jonathan Councilman Van G. Tanner Councilmember Susan Marie Weber Absent: Mayor Robert A. Spiegel Also Present: Justin McCarthy, Interim City Manager Robert W. Hargreaves, City Attorney William L. Strausz, Successor Agency Counsel Rudy P. Acosta, Assistant City Manager Rachelle D. Klassen, City Clerk Russell Grance, Director of Building & Safety Ryan Stendell, Director of Community Development Martin Alvarez, Director of Economic Development Janet M. Moore, Director of Finance/City Treasurer Lori Carney, Director of Human Resources Mark Greenwood, Director of Public Works Frankie Riddle, Director of Special Programs Bo Chen, City Engineer Stephen Y. Aryan, Risk Manager Dan Talbot, Division Chief, Palm Desert Fire/Riverside Co. Fire Dept./Cal Fire Eric Cadden, ESC, County of Riverside Emergency Management Department David W. Teets, Chief, Palm Desert Police/Riverside Co. Sheriffs Department Anthony Baur, Asst. Chief, Palm Desert Police/Riverside Co. Sheriffs Department Grace L. Mendoza, Deputy City Clerk MINUTES REGULAR PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 III. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - A (CLOSED SESSION ITEMS) None IV. ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION Request for Closed Session: A. Conference with Real Property Negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8: 1) Property: APN 627-071-065 (San Antonio Circle) - Alessandro West Corridor Negotiating Parties: Agency: Justin McCarthy/Rudy P. Acosta/Martin Alvarez/ City of Palm Desert Property Owner: Michael Castelli Under Negotiation: x Price x Terms of Payment B. Conference with Legal Counsel regarding significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Govemment Code Section 54956.9(d)(2): 1) LIABILITY CLAIMS: a) Claim Against the City (#772) by Anne L. Salerno. b) Claim Against the City (#776A) by Steven Marks. c) Claim Against the City (#776B) by Laura Vento. With City Council concurrence, Mayor Pro Tem Hamik adjourned the meeting to Closed Session of the City Council at 3:01 p.m. He reconvened the meeting at 4:00 p.m. V. RECONVENE REGULAR MEETING - 4:00 P.M. A. REPORT ON ACTION FROM CLOSED SESSION. None VI. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - Palm Desert Youth Committee Vice Chair Tacie Johnson VII. INVOCATION - Councilman Sabby Jonathan 2 MINUTES REGULAR PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 VIII. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - B MS. STACEY GRABBE, President of the Palm Desert Charter Middle School Parent Teacher Organization, thanked the Council forthe grant they received last year, stating they are the only middle school in the City, so receiving it was not taken lightly. They worked with Maureen from Coachella Valley Water District to put together a field trip where the students went all over the Valley and had an incredible experience, which they couldn't have afforded without the grant. She went on to say that at the direction of the administration, they sought a Palm Desert location to hold their upcoming fund-raising gala, and she is happy to announce that it will be held at Desert Willow Golf Resort on November 5, 2016. Additionally, the District's Teacher of Year Band Director Willard Lacro from PDCMS will be honored that evening. She thanked the Council forthe grant and everything they do forthe school. Councilman Jonathan commented the Council will once again be splitting their evening on Saturday, November 5 between the Palm Desert Charter Middle School event and the YMCA 29th Annual Hoedown, which is always held the first Saturday in November. Mayor Pro Tem Harnik announced that there will be a Candidate's Forum on October 13, 2016, for the people that will represent education in the City. She encouraged everyone to attend, stating it was important to know who the candidates are that will be helping the City and youth in education, adding that more information was to follow. IX. AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS, AND APPOINTMENTS A. PRESENTATION OF PROCLAMATION DECLARING THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 2016, AS "DEPUTY CHRIS TRUEBLOOD DAY" IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT. On behalf of the entire City Council, Mayor Pro Tem Harnik presented the proclamation to Deputy Chris Trueblood who assisted a family that was in a dire situation, and he was able to help this family return home safely with a positive experience. Deputy Trueblood stated he didn't feel he did anything different from what thousands of law enforcement officers across the Country did every day. He said it was an honor to work in Palm Desert, because it was a great City, and he expressed his appreciation for the recognition. Mayor Pro Tem Harnik said Deputy Trueblood's words were wonderful, but his actions spoke loudly. 3 MINUTES REGULAR PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 Councilman Jonathan stated that in his invocation he mentioned Palm Desert was a community and a wonderful City, and Deputy Trueblood was representative of what he was talking about. B. PRESENTATION OF PROCLAMATION DECLARING SEPTEMBER 2016 AS "NATIONAL PREPAREDNESS MONTH" IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT. On behalf of the entire City Council, Mayor Pro Tem Hamik presented the proclamation to Emergency Services Coordinator Eric Cadden, representing the County of Riverside Emergency Management Department. Mr. Cadden said it was an honor to work and serve the City of Palm Desert. He expressed the importance of being prepared for a disaster, stating fire, law, and EMS personnel will be in the mist, but time and time again, as seen through Hurricane Katrina and the Northridge Earthquake, first responders are overwhelmed almost immediately and resources are tied up. He said it was important for residents to have enough food and water for at least a week, adding that the City of Palm Desert offered a free CERT (Community Emergency Response Team) training class. In fact, one was starting on Monday, and there are several throughout the County. The class teaches residents how to be prepared for a disaster and how to do search and rescue in a building, and concluding the training with a disaster scenario. C. PRESENTATION OF PROCLAMATION DECLARING OCTOBER 9-15, 2016, AS "FIRE PREVENTION WEEK" IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT. On behalf of the entire City Council, Mayor Pro Tem Harnik presented the proclamation to Division Chief Dan Talbot with Riverside County Fire Department/Cal Fire. Chief Talbot stated that without a doubt, detectors saved lives. He said smoke detectors need to be changed every ten years and batteries to be checked twice a year. The fire environment in structures has changed dramatically in the last 30 years, stating fires have gotten larger and faster due to significant amounts of synthetic materials, which has changed how house fires burn. Therefore, having working smoke detectors gives a family a chance to get out of the house. Additionally, designate an area where family members come together and wait there for first responders to show up, and if there's no one else to help, don't go back in a burning house. 4 MINUTES REGULAR PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 D. PRESENTATION OF PROCLAMATION DECLARING OCTOBER 2016 AS "FIRE PREVENTION AND MINI -MUSTER MONTH" IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT. On behalf of the entire City Council, Mayor Pro Tem Harnik presented the proclamation to Division Chief Dan Talbot with Riverside County Fire Department/Cal Fire. Chief Talbot said he loved the Mini -Muster because it was an opportunity to go to every elementary school in the City and reach every 3rd grader. Every year they instruct 700 students on multiple methods in fire prevention, exit drills in the home, and allow them to have fun. He said they couldn't do it without the support of the City and the District, and the Historical Society, which actually started the program. As noted in the proclamation, Mini Muster is in its 24th year of holding this event, and he invited the Council to come out to the schools and observe the interaction with the kids. Ms. Jan Holmlund stated the Program has trained more than 14,000 children in safety and how to work and live in this community. She thanked the Council for the wonderful invocation, because a lot of people, public and private, have made the Program work, including Station 33, Jean Benson, Ed Mullins, Ed Foote, and a number of other people that have contributed to its success. She said 14,000 children know what to do with their families in an emergency, stating they are called Ambassadors of Safety. The Historical Society took this on as a community project and it's been adopted by the City of Palm Desert, who also provides awards to school children about the Art Program. She said Mini -Muster was basically a small adaption of what the firefighters do to learn their training, and the children do it in a field exercise, and they just love it. The children receive a certificate for their effort, and when that's over, 90% of them agree to be Ambassadors of Safety to their neighborhood. She thanked the Council for their participation in the Mini - Muster and the Art Program. E. PRESENTATION BY TACIE JOHNSON TO PROVIDE AN UPDATE OF PALM DESERT YOUTH COMMITTEE ACTIVITIES. Ms. Johnson stated the Youth Committee is a great part of the City of Palm Desert, because it gives youth an opportunity to contribute to making the City better for everyone. She reported the Committee restarted their meetings for the school year on September 12, and the next one is on October 10. Membership is 15, but they currently only have 12 seats filled. The Committee will be participating in the following three upcoming events: Relay for Life - October 1, from 6:00 to 8:00 a.m.; Y Be Fit Challenge - October 2; and Golf Cart Parade - October 30. 5 MINUTES REGULAR PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 X. CONSENT CALENDAR A. MINUTES of the Regular City Council Meeting of September 8, 2016. Rec: Approve as presented. B. CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY TREASURY - Warrants Dated 8/26/2016, 8/31/2016, and 9/9/2016. Rec: Approve as presented. C. CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY/HOUSING TREASURIES - Warrants Dated 8/26/2016 and 9/2/2016 (Joint Consideration with the Palm Desert Housing Authority). Rec: Approve as presented. D. CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY (#7721 by Anne L. Salerno in the Amount of $67,500. Rec: By Minute Motion, reject the Claim and direct City Clerk to so notify the Claimant. E. CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY (#776A) by Steven Marks in an Unspecified Amount. Rec: By Minute Motion, reject the Claim and direct City Clerk to so notify the Claimant. F. CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY (#776B1 by Laura Vento in an Unspecified Amount. Rec: By Minute Motion, reject the Claim and direct City Clerk to so notify the Claimant. G. APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE by Paint Sip and Inspire, 73280 El Paseo, Suite 5, Palm Desert. Rec: Receive and file. H. CITIZENS' SUSTAINABILITY COMMITTEE MINUTES for the Meeting of May 23, 2016. Rec: Receive and file. 6 MINUTES REGULAR PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 I. RESOLUTION NO. 2016-75 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, Setting Forth Its Findings and Authorizing the Destruction of Paper Records that Have Been Digitally Imaged from the Office of the City Clerk to Rely On the Electronic Record as the Official Record — Various Record Center Documents as Specified in Section 3 (Exhibit A). Rec: Waive further reading and adopt. J. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL of the Selection of Desert Urgent Care as the Primary Occupational Health Clinic for the City of Palm Desert. Rec: By Minute Motion, approve selection of Desert Urgent Care as the primary Occupational Health Clinic for the City of Palm Desert. K. REQUEST FOR ACCEPTANCE of the California Governor's Office of Emergency Services' 2016 Emergency Management Performance Grant Award in the Amount of $12,822. Rec: By Minute Motion: 1) Accept the FY 2016 Emergency Management Performance Grant (EMPG) through the California Governor's Office of Emergency Services (OES) in the amount of $12,822; 2) authorize City Manager to execute all required grant documentation. L. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL of Actions Supporting the City's FY 2016 State Homeland Security Program Grant Application. Rec: 1) Waive further reading and adopt Resolution No. 2016 - 76, supporting the City's FY 2016 State Homeland Security Program (SHSP) Grant Application and authorizing the City Manager to execute all grant documents; 2) By Minute Motion: a) authorize City Manager to execute any required grant documentation; b) appropriate $7,741 from the Unobligated General Fund to Account No. 1104130- 4309000 - City Manager Professional Technical/Other. M. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL of Agreement with Otocast, LLC, to Produce a Mobile Audio Guide App in the Amount of $2,250 for the 2017/2018 El Paseo Exhibition (Contract No. C35700). Rec: By Minute Motion: 1) Approve an agreement with Otocast, LLC, in the amount of $2,250 for creation of a mobile audio guide for the 2017/2018 El Paseo Exhibition — funds are available in Account No. 4364650-4309202; 2) authorize staff to finalize negotiation of the subject contract with Otocast, LLC, and Mayor to execute same, subject to satisfaction of the City Attorney. 7 MINUTES REGULAR PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 N. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL of Amendment No. 2 to Contract with Melissa Morgan Fine Art and Artist Steve Tobin to Extend Loan Period for the Temporary Exhibition of Steve Tobin's Sculpture Large Steel Root (Contract No. C32401). Rec: By Minute Motion: 1) Approve Amendment No. 2 to the subject contract with Melissa Morgan Fine Art and Artist Steve Tobin to extend the temporary exhibition of Large Steel Root currently installed in Civic Center, and authorize Mayor to execute same; 2) authorize staff to finalize negotiation of subject contract with Melissa Morgan Fine Art and Steve Tobin and Mayor to execute same, subject to satisfaction of the City Attorney — there is no additional financial obligation as a result of this amendment. Approved 3-0-1 (AYES: Jonathan, Tanner, and Weber; NOES: None; ABSTAINING: Harnik; ABSENT: Spiegel) O. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL of the 2016 Holiday Celebration at The Gardens On El Paseo. Removed for separate consideration under Section XI, Consent Items Held Over. Please see that portion of the Minutes for Council discussion and action. P. REQUEST FOR ACCEPTANCE OF WORK for Contract No. C34940 — Firecliff Golf Course Bunker Renovation Project at Desert Willow Golf Resort (Earth Sculptures, Inc., Indio, CA). Rec: By Minute Motion, accept the work as complete and authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion for the subject project. Q. REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION to Release Maintenance Security for the Portola Duplex, 45855 Portola Avenue (Toma Stoianovici, Applicant). Rec: By Minute Motion, authorize the City Clerk to release Maintenance Security on file for the Portola Duplex Project. R. REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION to Release Maintenance Security for the Presage Project, 73811 El Paseo (Justin Baldwin, Applicant). Rec: By Minute Motion, authorize the City Clerk to release Maintenance Security on file for the Presage Project. Approved 3-0-1 (AYES: Jonathan, Tanner, and Weber; NOES: None; ABSTAINING: Harnik; ABSENT: Spiegel). 8 MINUTES REGULAR PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 S. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL of Out -of -State Travel for Director of Public Works to Attend the National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices Annual Meeting - Arlington, Virginia - January 4-6, 2017. Rec: By Minute Motion, authorize out-of-state travel for the Director of Public Works to attend the National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices Annual Meeting in Arlington, Virginia — January 4-6, 2017 — funds are available in Account No. 1104300-4312000 - Administration Conference/Seminars/Workshops. T. INFORMATIONAL REPORT on Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control Grant Funding for Minor Decoy and Shoulder Tap Programs. Rec: Receive and file. Mayor Pro Tem Harnik stated she would be abstaining on Items N and R, and Councilman Tanner requested Item 0 be removed for separate action under Section XI, Consents Items Held Over. Upon a motion by Tanner, second by Weber, and 4-0 vote of the City Council, the remainder of the Consent Calendar was approved as presented (AYES: Jonathan, Tanner, Weber, and Harnik; NOES: None; ABSENT: Spiegel). XI. CONSENT ITEMS HELD OVER O. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL of the 2016 Holiday Celebration at The Gardens On El Paseo. Councilman Tanner stated the only reason he decided to pull this item was to announce that the Holiday Celebration at The Gardens is something that is part of the City's Strategic Plan. It's an excellent way to celebrate with residents and tourists for a small amount of money, adding that if you haven't been to the downtown El Paseo celebration, you needed to see it because this year was going to be even better. Councilman Tanner moved to, by Minute Motion: 1) Approve 2016 Holiday Celebration at The Gardens On El Paseo on Friday, December 2; 2) approve contract with Scot Bruce in the amount of $1,550 for live entertainment during the event (Contract No. C35710A); 3) authorize Mayor to execute Scot Bruce contract; 4) authorize City Manager to sign Promotional Agreement with The Gardens On El Paseo (Contract No. C35710B); 5) authorize expenditures in an amount not to exceed $9,500 payable to various vendors from Account No. 1104416-4306101 - City -Produced Events. Motion was seconded by Weber and carried by a 4-0 vote (AYES: Jonathan, Tanner, Weber, and Harnik; NOES: None; ABSENT: Spiegel). 9 MINUTES REGULAR PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 XII. RESOLUTIONS A. RESOLUTION NO. 2016 - 77 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN OFFERS OF DEDICATION WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION MAP OF PALMA VILLAGE UNIT NOS. 7 AND 11, M.B. 21/16 & 96, RESPECTIVELY, RIVERSIDE COUNTY RECORDER, UNDER PROVISIONS OF TITLE 7, DIVISION 2, CHAPTER 4, ARTICLE 3, SECTION 66477.2 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Mr. Greenwood stated that acceptance of this right-of-way is to facilitate the Alessandro Alley Project. These maps were offered by the developer to the County back in 1946. The County at the time, required the developer to offer the dedications, then they specifically declined the offer, leaving the City in limbo. The laws have changed significantly since then, and in order to proceed, the City needs to officially accept the dedications. Councilman Jonathan moved to waive further reading and adopt Resolution No. 2016-77. Motion was seconded by Tanner and carried by a 4-0 vote (AYES: Jonathan, Tanner, Weber, and Hamik; NOES: None; ABSENT: Spiegel). XIII. ORDINANCES A. For Introduction: 1. ORDINANCE NO. 1308 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, REVISING SECTION 2.52.510 OF THE PALM DESERT MUNICIPAL CODE — POLICY AGAINST HARASSMENT, DISCRIMINATION, AND RETALIATION. Ms. Carney stated the proposed Ordinance is a revision of the City's policy against Harassment, Discrimination, and Retaliation. The City's personnel regulations were last comprehensively reviewed and revised in 2004. Therefore, over the course of the next year she will bring forth to the Council several of these revisions and updates, stating she will go through the policy's one at a time. In the last ten years there have been many changes with regards to harassment and discrimination, and a few key highlights of the changes in this policy provide a much broader and detail listing of protected classifications. As an example, current law requires a specific protection on the basis of being transgender, gender expression, breast feeding, and veteran status. This policy is based on a model policy received from Liebert, Cassidy and Whitmore, which is the City's employment law firm. The proposed Ordinance includes best practices such as plain language, 10 MINUTES REGULAR PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 improved structure of the policy, and reference to the City's new hotline as a complaint method. The complaint procedure in the new policy is more detailed and specific in order to comply with laws which were passed in April 2016. Councilman Tanner said he was happy to hear the revisions will now be included in the employment manual, and it will go a long way to giving people that work with the City a good feeling. Councilman Tanner moved to waive further reading and pass Ordinance No. 1308 to second reading. Councilman Jonathan added that Ms. Carney has had her hands full with various things the last few months, and she's done a great job, which is very much appreciated. He said this was an example of taking a situation and ending up the better City for it. Councilman Jonathan seconded the motion and it carried by a 4-0 vote (AYES: Jonathan, Tanner, Weber, and Harnik; NOES: None; ABSENT: Spiegel). B. For Adoption: None XIV. NEW BUSINESS A. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) BETWEEN THE CITY OF INDIAN WELLS AND THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE FOR PURCHASE OF A MOBILE EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER VEHICLE (MEOC) (CONTRACT NO. C35720). Mr. Aryan noted this item is related to the City's Strategic Plan under Priority 3 of the Public Safety and Emergency Services section, which is to help the community become more prepared for disasters and public safety emergencies. Back in March 2016, the Cities of Indian Wells and Palm Desert entered into an agreement to share the cost of one full-time equivalent Emergency Services Coordinator whom the Council met earlier this evening Eric Cadden. Under this contract, the Cities agreed to provide the Coordinator with a vehicle outfitted for emergency response. This MEOC is an invaluable resource for Eric. At the last major event, which was at Palm Desert Country Club back in August 2015, such a vehicle would have been invaluable to staff that was out there for many days. As part of this agreement, the Cities have agreed to donate the vehicle to the County of Riverside for the duration of the contract. The County will be responsible for maintenance, insurance, and repair of the vehicle. 11 MINUTES REGULAR PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 Councilmember Weber moved to, by Minute Motion: 1) Approve acquisition of a new 3/4-ton truck and necessary outfitting as a Mobile Emergency Operations Center (MEOC) in an amount not to exceed $35,000; 2) authorize and direct City Manager to enter into an MOU with the City of Indian Wells and County of Riverside to equally share costs associated with the outfitting of an MEOC vehicle with the City of Indian Wells; 3) authorize donation of vehicle to the County of Riverside to operate and maintain it on behalf of the Cities of Palm Desert and Indian Wells; 4) appropriate $35,000 from the Unobligated General Fund for this purpose. Motion was seconded by Tanner. Mayor Pro Tem Hamik asked where the vehicle will be parked. Mr. Aryan responded that Mr. Cadden takes it home every night because he may have to respond at anytime of the day. He said it was part of the decision to donate the vehicle to the County, because the City's fleet policy does not allow employees to take vehicles home. Mayor Pro Tem Harnik called for the vote and the motion carried by a 4-0 vote (AYES: Jonathan, Tanner, Weber, and Hamik; NOES: None; ABSENT: Spiegel). B. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF THE PURCHASE OF SEVEN (7) STRYKER POWER -PRO XT GURNEYS IN THE AMOUNT OF $125,607. Mr. Aryan stated that as part of the 2016-2017 budget, the City Council and Public Safety Commission approved staffs request to lease these units directly from Stryker. However, staff recently learned that this program required a lengthy credit application and insurance requirements. Therefore, it's in the City's best interest to purchase them directly from Stryker in lieu of the financing. He said Stryker is not the only company that manufacturers a power -assisted gumey, so they are not sole source, but the Fire Department recommends purchasing them from Stryker because it is the Riverside County Fire Department's standard in all its medic units. A different gumey brand would require the retrofitting of all the City's ambulances with new mounting brackets, as well as training for all the firefighters. He's proud to note that since the City had these gumeys in 2008, not one Palm Desert firefighter has suffered a back injury from transporting patients. Staff recommended approval of the purchase and continued use. Councilman Tanner stated the staff report mentions the life of the gumey is seven years, questioning if they really lasted that long. Mr. Aryan answered yes, adding that in the future they plan to phase in the replacements to avoid having to replace them all at one time. Further responding, he said staff anticipates replacing the gumeys toward the end 12 MINUTES REGULAR PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 of the seven-year cycle, but not all at once. It will be through some type of replacement plan the Fire Department comes up with. Councilman Jonathan stated the Stryker units are power assisted, it's mechanical, and sometimes devices can be completely refurbished rather than discarded. He asked if staff had looked at that altemative. Mr. Aryan replied that the current gurneys were out of compliance, which is the reason for ordering new ones. Chief Talbot explained that a gumey is a medical device regulated by the Federal Department of Health, and it has a seven-year life span. The other concem, for agencies that transport, is there are two major areas for litigation. One is to properly treat and the other is falls and spills from gurneys, and if the gumey is out of compliance, the Fire Department owns the liability. Further responding, he said each gurney has an end date life span and it's financially onerous to refurbish, adding that those same regulations apply to many hospitals and their patient transport devices within the hospital. Councilman Jonathan pointed out that the request is to purchase seven gurneys, three of which are reserve units. He questioned if the reserve units were needed, and of the existing ones, do they get used. Mr. Aryan replied the gurneys get used quite a bit, especially during the busier months. He said ambulances can get tied up on calls, and they might be at the hospitals with patients and have to wait there, which is when a reserve unit would come into play. Chief Talbot stated reserve units are also available when the primary unit, not only the ambulance, but the gumey itself has a mechanical issue. Mr. Aryan pointed out that the purchase amount includes seven years of maintenance. Councilman Tanner moved to by Minute Motion: 1) Approve the purchase of seven (7) Stryker Power -Pro XT Gurneys in the amount of $125,607; 2) appropriate $125,607 to the Equipment Replacement Fund, Account No. 5304220-4404000; 3) designate the City's existing Stryker Gumeys as surplus for trade-in value toward purchase of the new Stryker Gurneys. Motion was seconded by Weber. Councilmember Weber stated the Public Safety Commission had also brought up the question about the warranty and maintenance, which staff pointed out was part of the recommendation. 13 MINUTES REGULAR PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 Mayor Pro Tem Harnik called for the vote and the motion carried by a 4-0 vote (AYES: Jonathan, Tanner, Weber, and Harnik; NOES: None; ABSENT: Spiegel). C. REQUEST FOR AWARD OF CONTRACT TO WURM'S JANITORIAL SERVICES, INC., FOR MONTHLY JANITORIAL SERVICES IN THE AMOUNT OF $67,514.40 FOR THE PALM DESERT POLICE SUBSTATION AT 73520 FRED WARING DRIVE (CONTRACT NO. C35600). Mr. Aryan noted the Palm Desert Police Substation at City Hall is leased to the County of Riverside, stating they utilize the facility as a substation which houses two critical components, the 911 Communications Dispatch Center and the Sheriffs Investigation Bureau. One of the responsibilities under the lease agreement is to provide janitorial services. Since 2011, Wurm's Janitorial has been providing services without any complaints received from staff. The Council recently approved a three-month extension, so the contract is good through October 1. Staff went out to bid and received three bids, and out of those three bids, Wurm's still came in as the lowest bidder. Another thing to consider is that Wurm's has gone through all the necessary Sheriffs background investigation of their staff in that facility. Councilman Tanner stated he would move to approve because staff was happy with the service and they were the lowest bidder. Councilman Tanner moved to, by Minute Motion, award subject contract to Wurm's Janitorial Services, Inc., Corona, California, for monthly Janitorial Services at the Palm Desert Police Substation, 73520 Fred Waring Drive, in the amount of $67,514.40, and authorize the Mayor to execute same — funds are available in Account No. 5104195-4369500. Motion was seconded by Weber and carried by a 4-0 vote (AYES: Jonathan, Tanner, Weber, and Harnik; NOES: None; ABSENT: Spiegel). D. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF MARKETING PLAN AND RELATED MEDIA PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017. Tourism & Marketing Manager Thomas Soule said this item was the proposed Palm Desert Marketing and Media Plan for fiscal year 2016-2017. He called attention to the revised flow chart that was provided to Council, which should replace the spreadsheet provided in the agenda packet. The Plan continues the forward momentum of the City's marketing program with the goal of increasing the number of visitors to Palm Desert and enticing them to extend their stays and deepen their engagement with the City. The Marketing Plan and Media Plan were both unanimously approved by the Marketing Committee at their Tuesday meeting. He offered to answer questions. 14 MINUTES REGULAR PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 Councilman Jonathan stated the Plans looked great, and Council trusts and has confidence in staff to do a great job. He asked if there was a way to track measurable results as staff moved through implementation of the Plans, and whether staff will know what to do more or less of in the future. Mr. Soule answered yes, stating staff measures on a continuous basis, especially the digital portion. In the last fiscal year, staff noticed which pieces worked better and which ones drew people to the website. Staff also tracked how many people signed up for the Visitor's Guide or asked to be placed on the email mailing list. He added that staff placed more money toward the things that were effective and took it away from the things that didn't seem to work as much. Further responding, he confirmed the proposed marketing plans reflected those changes, including a few other things staff wanted to try this year. Mayor Pro Tem Harnik said she attended that Marketing Committee meeting and she was impressed with the analytics, adding that Council would have appreciated the differences in the social media engagement, which were very obvious. She added that the analytics supported the proposed Plans. Councilman Jonathan moved to, by Minute Motion: 1) Approve the Marketing Plan for FY 2016-2017; 2) approve the Media Plan for FY 2016-2017; 3) authorize creation of a Purchase Order in an amount not to exceed $403,000 for Media Buy expenditures related to H & L Partners (Contract No. C34641) executing said Media Plan — funds are available in the FY 2016-2017 Marketing Budget for this purpose. Motion was seconded byTannerand carried bya 4-0 vote (AYES: Jonathan, Tanner, Weber, and Harnik; NOES: None; ABSENT: Spiegel). E. REQUEST FOR AWARD OF CONTRACT TO FG CREATIVE, INC., FOR EVENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES RELATED TO THE CITY'S SWING 'N HOPS STREET PARTY TO BE HELD ON EL PASEO ON SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 4, 2017 (CONTRACT NO. C35510A). Management Analyst Deborah S. Glickman noted this will be the second year of the Swing 'N Hops Event. It's a featured event of the City's First Weekend Event series. Last year this event was well received and it was planned with FG Creative. This year staff went out for a Request for Proposals and received one proposal, which was from FG Creative. Therefore, recommended approval of award of contract with FG Creative, Inc. Mayor Pro Tem Harnik agreed it was a great event last year and believed it will be even better this year. 15 MINUTES REGULAR PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 Councilmember Weber moved to, by Minute Motion: 1) Award subject contract to FG Creative, Inc., Palm Desert, Califomia, for Event Management for the Swing `N Hops Street Party to be held on El Paseo, Saturday, February 4, 2017 — funds are available in Account No. 1104416-4306101; 2) authorize staff to finalize negotiation of the subject contract with FG Creative, Inc., and Mayor to execute same, subject to satisfaction of the City Attorney. Motion was seconded by Tanner and carried by a 4-0 vote (AYES: Jonathan, Tanner, Weber, and Hamik; NOES: None; ABSENT: Spiegel). F. REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO ADVERTISE AND SOLICIT A REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS/PROPOSALS FOR THE MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS OF THE DESERT WILLOW GOLF RESORT (CONTRACT NO. C35730). Mr. Acosta recalled for the Council that at the meeting of December 10, 2015, in the context of the discussion on whether to authorize the option for an extension on Kemper Sports Management contract, issues and concerns were raised, one being the last time the City performed a market analysis. The estimate given at that time was about nine or ten years previously, so the direction from Council was for City staff to work with Kemper staff to perform a market analysis. The analysis was completed and presented to Council at a study session in May 2016. Additionally, Council was concerned about the last time the City had gone out for an actual Request for Qualifications/Request for Proposals (RFQ/RFP) for operators at Desert Willow, because the City has only exercised one operator for twenty years for the entire existence of Desert Willow. The comment was made to the broader responsibility the City had to the community when it has these Tong -term contracts in place. Questions were raised on whether the City was getting a fair and reasonable price for the services offered, was it getting the best services, and is there other companies that might be able to perform as good or better. He said Interim City Manager Justin McCarthy asked if Council's action included a direction to move forward with the RFQ/RFP, because he was under the mistaken impression that it was going to be predicated upon the market analysis presentation that was given in May. However, a review of the actual minutes indicated that Council did indeed direct staff to move forward with the development of a RFQ/RFP that would allow staff to go through the evaluation and review process, make a recommendation, and have a new recommendation in place for the 2017-2018 year. He said the current extension with Kemper is valid up to June 30, 2017, and per the current agreement, the City is required to notify the operator six months in advance of any potential change to the contract date. Therefore, he scrambled to put a RFQ/RFP together, which is attached to the staff report. He noted the document is watermarked as draft, because there are programmatic requirements that might be important elements that Council may want to employ, which was entirely up to the Council. He noted Finance staff was available to answer questions on any specifics as well. 16 MINUTES REGULAR PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 Additionally, he had previously stated the process could take anywhere from six to eight months, so Council may be wondering why this RFQ/RFP was truncated to four months. In this particular instance, as opposed to the original process staff took 21 years ago, he was not suggesting to employ the site visitation of the individual competitors' properties, which took 31/2 to four months to visit properties regionally in San Diego County, Orange County, LA County, Las Vegas, and Arizona. Staff also traveled to Chicago, Illinois, to review the top two short-list competitors. In this instance, staff is proposing an aggressive schedule, but keep in mind, this was a RFQ/RFP process where the most important elements are the specific qualifications of the firm that the City wants to do business with, and if the operator has a full understanding of what the project is, what the services are, and how will they implement the City's vision. He said the City has set the bar very high at Desert Willow, which has always been an overriding part of the decision making of how it critiques, reviews, and analyzes, and ultimately whether it will stay with the current operator or go forward with changes. As having half his career in the private consulting business, the marketing and organizational material of the teams it will employ to perform a particular service to a potential client, those are in order. However, other elements such as how you maintain a golf course, how you operate food & beverage, and the operations aspect, are elements that are typical exercises of any operator in the golf industry. What is unique to Desert Willow, is again, the higher standards and its location. Desert Willow is a south west location, so a company that has all of their eggs in the north east basket, has no experience in the south west with the desert climate conditions, desert bugs, plant material, etc., which would be a concern to him if that operator and team didn't have that understanding. He said the City couldn't afford to hire someone that doesn't have some familiarity with Desert Willow's style of course. In the staff report he included a timeline for a RFQ/RFP process, which was doable, and it includes a little bit of slippage time should this Council be concerned about the tightness of that timeline. He noted Council had other options available should it wishes to go another direction as well. He pointed out that with the current operator, the City has utilized the practice of a 20-mile radius restriction. It was installed as a device to maintain the focus of that operator on Desert Willow solely. He said there might be an advantage to removing that restriction; however, it has served the City well, which is the best argument he could provide for maintaining it. He didn't want to speak for Kemper Sport, but because of that restriction, they have passed up a number of opportunities that have come up in the golf industry in our region. The other two items the City has utilized are the cash reserve of $500,000, which is a unique aspect of the contract, and the other is the learning center/academy. Another consideration is that the City entered into an agreement with an adjacent developer that has those new homeowners/HOA tied into the golf academy. Also, any corporate cost borne by the operator, stays with the operator. He said the City is only paying for 17 MINUTES REGULAR PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 the staff assigned to operate Desert Willow, site specific. For example, say personnel from Chicago or northern Califomia properties comes down, they are not reimbursed by the City. Councilmember Weber asked if Request for Qualifications was conducted separately before moving forward with Request for Proposals, because sometimes you can check to see if people are qualified without actually having them do a proposal. Mr. Acosta responded that Councilmember Weber was probably referring to a pre -qualification process, and the City has done that in the past. However, he wouldn't recommend doing so in this instance, because he didn't think the City could legally exclude firms that didn't participate in the pre -qualification process and ultimately they submit qualifications anyway, and that portion could be compressed in this process. MR. TOM WALTON, Yucca Court, Palm Desert, asked for Mr. Acosta to articulate the benefit for a 20-mile radius non -compete clause, because he was having a difficult time trying to quantify it. He added that he had reviewed competitive contracts and compared them to the City's and saw a tremendous amount money being spent in order to have this particular non -compete clause. Mr. Acosta replied that it drives the operator under contract to focus solely on the City's property. MR. CORY STEPANEK, Salt Cedar, Palm Desert, thanked Councilmember Weber for setting up a staff meeting prior to this meeting. He said the staff report dated June 9, 2016, shows that from 2010 to 2011 the cost per round was $68.71, and as of 2015, the average cost per round is $108.34, which is a 60% increase. Secondly, on that same staff report, it states "additional consideration to justify the increase of the Palm Desert Resident Rate is that artificially keeping the resident rate far below the cost of golf rounds impacts the private golf club's ability to attract new members, especially with residents." He said he didn't realize Palm Desert was in the business of protecting private clubs as a City, and it should instead be fiscally responsible to the City and residents. MR. SCOTT SHERMAN, Newcastle Drive, Palm Desert, stated that Desert Willow as a golf course itself is a wonderful place, and the staff there is phenomenal. He and his wife moved to the desert and leased at The Lakes while they looked for a place to buy, and they purchased a home in Palm Desert mainly because of the staff at Desert Willow. He didn't know how the City could make the staff and quality of the entire package any better, stating he hoped it would remain that way. 18 MINUTES REGULAR PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 MR. STAN SPERLING, Country Club Drive, Palm Desert, shared he was a resident of Palm Desert for eight years, a member at large of the Audit, Investment & Finance Committee of the City of Palm Desert, he's lived in this Valley for more than 30 years, and 22 of them at the Vintage Club in Indian Wells where he held a club membership and a seat on the Board as House Chairman and Vice President. His career in business has been in the motion picture and casino hotel operations in Tahoe. He's played golf at almost every golf facility and golf club in the Valley, and he enjoyed their food and service. And since moving to Palm Desert, he's taken advantage of Desert Willow's many fine amenities, golf, dining, special events, buffets, brunches, and the quality and service of the Kemper Sports operation is second to none, and truly makes Desert Willow a landmark in the Valley. He said Desert Willow was more competitive against all the similar resorts in the desert, and the current management knows what their doing; their reputation and financial numbers show it. He said the lowest bid is not always the best bid MR. BRIAN WHITE, Van Gogh Drive, Palm Desert, stated he was in the golf business and is fortunate to do what he does. In response to Mr. Acosta's comment about operators being familiar with the desert climate and things of that nature, he assured the Council there are other companies that can provide very good service. He said it was a shame the Council had to be stuck and/or be lead by the City Managers or whoever is involved, in terms of this contract. He pointed out that on a previous item on the agenda, Council considered a contract where it had three bids, adding that the residents of Palm Desert are entitled to have an open bid on such a huge area of the City. Another thing, he's played at Desert Willow pretty much throughout the summer and the course is not as good as it should be, stating the putting greens have not been maintained to what he has seen in the past. Councilman Jonathan stated Desert Willow is an important asset, resource, and revenue generator for the City. He said this evening speakers mentioned Desert Willow is amazing, Kemper's operation is second to none, and that it was important to address qualifications and not just the lowest price. He also heard concerns about the open bid process, which is why this evening Council was moving forward, not just with an open bid, but with Request for Qualifications and Request for Proposals. If there is any concern about the quality of this golf course, the facility, and resort resource for the residents and visitors, or questions about the continuing quality, he would say that Kemper has set a very high bar. He said the primary objective was to not allow that bar to be lowered one iota. If anything, the City was prepared to raise it, stating the City owed it to the residents to see if it can get a better job, and if that was possible, perhaps at a lower price, and this evening Council was considering moving that process forward. He 19 MINUTES REGULAR PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 noted he read through the staff report in great detail and appreciated all the hard work that went into it. However, the following are his concerns: a) he agreed the timeline was tight, so he suggested staff work with Kemper on the proper notification. He understood Kemper couldn't just drop everything and would need a six-month notification, so perhaps the notification period can be extended to March 31, 2017. If the City notifies Kemper that their contract is not being extended, they should get six months to wind down their operation. He agreed the timeline was aggressive, but he didn't want to rush the job and sacrifice the quality of the process; b) Kemper provides a $500,000 operating reserve, which meant the City was not out for it; however, there are pros and cons to this requirement. He didn't want to prejudge that element, so in going through the RFQ/RFP, the City should not designate it as a mandatory requirement. Instead, the City should find out what other companies have to say about it, stating it can be thrown in if they felt it was valid. Proposers can also say no and give their reasons, and the Evaluation Committee should then evaluate their responses; c) The 20-mile geographic restriction also has pros and cons, so he felt bidders should provide a response as to why it was good or not good for the City and have them convince the Committee why or why not it would be a benefit to the City. Therefore, he suggested not having this restriction as part of the RFQ/RFP, but have the bidders address it, so that the City didn't have its hands tied; d) the make up of the Evaluation Committee is very important, stating he liked, for various reason, having the Palm Desert Recreational Facility Corporation Board represented. However, he personally didn't see the need to have a member from the Hotel and Signature Events Committee on it, because Desert Willow was neither a hotel nor signature event. The Committee includes two Council representatives and he felt his background lends itself to this type of task, which he would be happy to do. He also thought Councilman Tanner would be a good choice, because he has served for two years on the President's Committee and has the background on the Parks and Recreation Commission, additionally, Mayor Pro Tem Harnik also has expertise, particularly in the operational and maintenance, including being knowledgeable on conservation water issues, etc., stating he hoped she would be available as well. Councilman Tanner said he appreciated Councilman Jonathan comments, but he disagreed with eliminating certain elements from the RFQ/RFP. He also didn't believe that by leaving the restrictions in, it would reduce the number of proposals it could receive, because if a company is qualified, they will come in. With regard to the 20-mile radius restriction, he didn't want to eliminate it, because by doing so, it will invite management companies that could potentially take play away from Palm Desert to put play at a club they are managing that is not doing financially well. Additionally, the $500,000 reserve has served the City very well for the past 21 years, because the City has never had to worry about going into the General Fund to fund Kemper, 20 MINUTES REGULAR PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 which is the purpose of the reserve. There have not been many problems dealing between the City of Palm Desert and Kemper's work at Desert Willow, so he was not willing to vote in favor of eliminating the $500,000 reserve or the 20-mile radius restriction. However, he was in favor of the notification extension, because it would give everybody an opportunity to plan. He said he would move to approve staffs recommendation with the amendment to provide Kemper an extension to March 31, 2017, providing a wind -down period in the event the City decides to go a different direction. Councilman Tanner moved to, by Minute Motion, approve the recommendations, as amended: 1) Provide Kemper Sports Management an extension of the December 31, 2016, notification deadline to March 31, 2017, and allowing them a six-month wind -down period in the event their contract is not renewed or extended; 2) advertise and solicit a Request for Qualifications/Proposals (RFQ/RFP) from qualified golf course management companies for the Maintenance and Operations of the City's Desert Willow Golf Resort; 3) establish formation of an Evaluation Committee for the purpose of conducting the interview and evaluation process of the proposals submitted by qualified golf course operation firms. Motion died for lack of a second. Responding to question by staff, Councilman Jonathan clarified that his suggested was to work with Kemper Sports to where they still get six months to wind down, instead of having until December 31, 2016, to notify them of a change in the contract for non -renewal of the extension or give the City until March 31, 2017 to notify them. For example, if the City notifies Kemper Sport on March 31, they have until September 30 versus June 30 to wind down their operations. Councilmember Weber agreed, adding that in the staff report it states, "Current Desert Willow operations agreement has evolved over the years to adapt to various changes in the resort..." She said the City has been pouring money into Desert Willow, and she didn't want to say it was a band -aid, because that would imply it was broken and it wasn't. However, Desert Willow has kept changing to go with the changing times without stopping. Therefore, she agreed everything had to be reviewed. For example, when discussing the 20-mile radius, she would like to know what today's world would support or justify that recommendation, because she didn't think a business would put its reputation at stake just to send a few golfers to their other little places to play golf. Clearly, in 1997, it was a different world, and it seems to her, staff should fall back, regroup, and re-evaluate what is the City's intention for Desert Willow and the food and beverage operations. She said everything has changed, so extending the notification period gives the City an opportunity to regroup. She added this was not about Kemper, because Council was in awe of their work and they have raised the bar tremendously. She said this was about re-evaluating, and while the Council had to agree to go out for a RFQ/RFP, it first had to define what it was 21 MINUTES REGULAR PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 looking for, because it was not clearly defined yet. Therefore, she would not second the motion, because she wants to figure out a way to quickly determined what is the definition of Desert Willow and where does the City want to see it in the next 20 years, so that someone coming in with an RFQ/RFP would have an idea of what it had in mind. Councilman Jonathan said he believed there was a way to accomplish it. However, he felt Councilman Tanner seemed to have a predisposition in favor of the $500,000 reserve, which he may or may not disagree, but he didn't want to tie Council's hand. He wants the bidders to tell the Council why it is or isn't important to have it, and the same would apply to the 20-mile radius restriction. He believed the RFQ/RFP can be worded in such a way it states that these are features the City has had, enjoyed and valued, and let the bidders respond to it. And to Councilmember Weber's point, they may enlighten and say it was an evolving situation and those restrictions may not be needed or actually matter. Also, if the management company is managing Indio Municipal, not to pick on them, is there really a conflict when they are two different products. His point is that by the City not binding itself, it leaves options open, allowing the City to learn and evolve as it moves forward through the process. Councilman Tanner explained his reasoning is that this was a bid process or qualifying process with an Evaluating Committee, which he hoped to be a part of at Council's request. He believed that if the current elements that were designed 21 years ago are left in, it would not restrict competition, because a company can provide a quote proposing 10-mile radius or a 5-mile radius, and the Evaluation Committee will determine if it's a qualified bidder. He preferred to leave the contract as is with the qualifying elements as currently structured and accept all qualified companies. He said bidders respond to an RFQ/RFP to what that company wants to perform for Desert Willow, and if it doesn't fit what the City is looking for, they can be disqualified. However, it didn't mean the proposal won't be accepted if they had good qualifications other than that 20-mile restriction. Councilman Jonathan replied he didn't think the City would get those bids, because certain companies would say, oh my God, there's a 20-mile geographical limitation or that it would have to pony up $500,000, stating the City would lose that proposal and he wants to see them, not necessarily accept them. One example is that by not making them mandatory, but stating in the specifications that these features have been enjoyed and valued in the past, and then let the bidders respond to include it or not. And if Kemper is the only one that comes back with a proposal that is willing to continue with the two elements and no other bidder does, then that might say Kemper is the choice. However, he didn't want just one bid coming back, based on the two restrictions. He said Council saw that happen with FG Creative Inc., 22 MINUTES REGULAR PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 where the City went out to bid and it got one response, adding that it would be an injustice. He rather open it up and have the bidders come back with whatever they have to offer, so that the City has the control to make that decision. He wasn't disagreeing with Councilman Tanner, and frankly, he didn't know where he stood when it came to these two elements, but he wants to have the opportunity to evaluate them based on what is submitted. Councilman Tanner said he may agree to pull the 20-mile restriction, but he refused to eliminate or negotiate on the $$500,000 reserve, because it was meant to keep the Council from taking money from the General Fund in the bad times, stating fiscal responsibility was something the Council needed to think about. Councilman Jonathan explained he had run the numbers, and in his mind, there is a possibility that it may be financially beneficial to not have the $500,000 requirement. In that even if the City was to continue with Kemper Sport, it may not want to mandate the $500,000 reserve because it's financially beneficial to look at other alternatives, and he wants to have the ability to evaluate it. Responding to Mayor Pro Tem Harnik's question on the language for the RFQ/RFP, he said the communication needs to let bidders know, particularly with regards to the $500,000 reserve and the 20-mile restriction, that these are features that in the past have been important and perceived beneficial to the City. Further, it should ask bidders that if the features are not included in their proposal, to explain why that is not detrimental to the City. He would put the burden on the bidder that if they were not going to include the two elements, they should tell the City why their company should even be considered. He's not saying the Council should decide on whether or not to have the two elements, he's just interested in hearing what bidders have to say. Councilman Tanner stated he could bet that those cities that are currently dipping into their general funds, wished they had demanded a reserve just like Palm Desert did 21 years ago, because it would ensure there would not be a cash flow issued during the bad times. Again, financially, he didn't know how the City would benefit by eliminating the reserve requirement, but he was willing to listen. If the 20-mile radius is eliminated, he would still want it suggested in the RFQ/RFP, because right now it doesn't worry about how the courses look. He's willing to amend his motion to pull the 20-mile radius, but he's not willing to take out the $500,000 reserve, because it would be fiscally irresponsible. Councilmember Weber asked for clarification on the $500,000 reserve, because she thought it was a receivable to the City of Palm Desert from Desert Willow. 23 MINUTES REGULAR PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 Ms. Moore explained that it was on Desert Willow's books as cash available. There was an additional loan made to Desert Willow at one point when the City shut the course down Councilmember Weber stated she didn't see that the loan was paid off and therefore Desert Willow owes the City. Ms. Moore answered yes. Councilmember Weber stated that by having the $500,000 restriction when somebody owes the money, is really not a restriction, which was a moot point to bring that element as a factor. At this point and time, the City has come up with Vision Palm Desert, bringing about new ideas for the City, and to restrict a proposal based on something that took place 21 years ago seemed last century. She believed the Council needs to come into this century, go out for proposals, and ask bidders to show Palm Desert exciting things. She believed it was time for a change, and perhaps Kemper is excited to do so as well, but were constrained. She reiterated the City needed to fall back, regroup, and define what it wants for Desert Willow. Councilman Jonathan pointed out he was prepared to offer an alternative motion should the current one fail. However, he wants to be clear that the $500,000 reserve is a cash flow issue, stating the City was still responsible for any operational deficit or loss should one occur, but it hasn't been the case. This element was just a cash flow management issue, but when he looked at the numbers, including the point Councilmember Weber raised, it doesn't seem to be a particularly advantageous or profitable arrangement, and by excluding it, the City may gain benefits elsewhere. He hadn't made up his mind, but he wants to keep all options open and develop a new vision for Desert Willow based on as many qualified bid operators it can get. Mayor Pro Tem Harnik noted that Councilman Jonathan wanted to remove the representative from the Hotel and Signature Events Committee from the Evaluation Committee and wondered if he had someone else in mind. Also, she didn't see the number of people that would be on the Evaluation Committee, asking if it was specified in the staff report. Mr. Acosta replied it wasn't, but the current President's Committee consists of the City Manager, Assistant City Manager, Director of Economic Development, Director of Finance, Director of Public Works, and Senior Financial Analyst. Additionally, two Councilmembers, a member of the PDFRC. Also in mind is Phil Smith, who was a member from the original Desert Willow Steering Committee with more than 30 years of experience with the Sunrise Company, and is an upstanding citizen in the Valley. The reason he suggested a member of the Hotel and Signature Events 24 MINUTES REGULAR PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 Committee is because there is an individual that manages The Westin property who might be relevant. It is important to the resort sites that we continue to bear the high standard it has employed at Desert Willow over the years, because they use it as a marketing tool for why their properties are special. And in Tight of the fact that the City has ongoing negotiations with the resort developer on the other 70 acres, they also use that tool to elevate the bar on their own respective property. He was open to adding another member, but all in all, staff is looking at 8 to 10 members on the Evaluation Committee. Councilman Jonathan said he was not adamant on that point, and he sees the sense of what Mr. Acosta was saying, adding that if it was the desire of the Council he had no problem with it. Mayor Pro Tem Hamik said Desert Willow labors under a specific tax designation, and she wants to make sure it's included in the RFQ/RFP, because bidders need to be familiar with the nuances of that aspect. She noticed that these discussions have mostly addressed the financials, which is important to cover because Desert Willow is an economic tool, but Council doesn't want this to drag on Palm Desert's community members backs. However, when looking at the golf course, it wasn't just about the books, the cost, or how much money is generated, but also the fact that recycled water is used on the course. Using recycled water was another facet to consider, because of how it affects the course and how the greens grow, including the microclimates within the course and fairways. She agreed Mr. Smith certainly has a great deal of understanding of golf, but wondered if the Evaluation Committee included someone who understood golf course maintenance. She said the City couldn't afford to select someone who had a great marketing plan and saved the City a lot of money, yet the course didn't warrant the high green fee. Mr. Acosta agreed, stating it was an excellent point. He suggested inviting a representative from the Hi-Lo Desert Golf Course Superintendents' Association, stating all the golf course superintendents in the Coachella Valley are part of that organization, which is how they stay updated regionally and nationally with all of the trends. He said they share information with each other on what bugs are affecting their property, etc. Councilman Jonathan said he was fine with the expansion of the Committee. In fact, someone currently serving on the Sustainability Committee would qualify for what staff just described because it's his profession at the Hi-Lo Desert Golf Course Superintendents' Association. However, he just didn't know at what committee it will stop at, because there are other aspects that are just as important. 25 MINUTES REGULAR PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 Mayor Pro Tem Harnik said she wasn't a believer in that a larger Committee was necessarily better, but she just didn't see anyone on the Committee representing golf course maintenance. In the end, if the City saves money but ends up with a lousy golf course, the City would be in trouble. Councilman Tanner moved to, by Minute Motion, approve the recommendations, as amended: 1) Work with Kemper Sports Management to negotiate extension of the December 31, 2016, notification deadline to March 31, 2017, and allowing them a six-month wind -down period in the event their contract is not renewed or extended; 2) include the $500,000 reserve in the RFQ/RFP; 3) eliminate the 20-mile restriction requirement as mandatory from the RFQ/RFP. Motion died for lack of a second. Councilman Jonathan moved to, by Minute Motion, approve the recommendations as amended: 1) Provide proper notification to Kemper Sports Management of the City's intent to release a "Request for Qualifications/Proposals for the Maintenance and Operations of the Desert Willow Golf Resort," and work with them to negotiate extension of the December 31, 2016, notification deadline to March 31, 2017, allowing them a six-month wind -down period in the event their contract is not renewed or extended; 2) advertise and solicit a Request for Qualifications/Proposals (RFQ/RFP) from qualified golf course management companies for the Maintenance and Operations of the City's Desert Willow Golf Resort with the following conditions: a) strike the mandatory requirement for a $500,000 reserve from the RFQ/RFP; b) strike the 20-mile restriction requirement as mandatory from the RFQ/RFP, with the understanding on items a and b that it is clear to proposers in submission documents that these are two features that the City has enjoyed and valued for the past 20 years in its current relationship, and if those features are not contained within the bidders' proposals to explain why that is to the benefit of the City; c) operator -proposer to demonstrate that they have familiarity with operating a municipal golf course that has been financed with tax-exempt financing; 3) establish formation of an Evaluation Committee for the purpose of conducting the interview and evaluation process of the proposals submitted by qualified golf course operation firms and add a representative from the Hi-Lo Desert Golf Course Superintendents' Association to be part of the Evaluation Committee. Motion was seconded by Weber and carried by a 3-1 vote (AYES: Jonathan, Weber, and Hamik; NOES: Tanner; ABSENT: Spiegel). Councilman Jonathan moved to, appoint Councilman Sabby Jonathan and Councilman Van Tanner to serve on the Evaluation Committee for the qualified golf course management companies for the Maintenance and Operations of the City's Desert Willow Golf Resort. Motion was seconded by Tanner and the motion carried by a 4-0 vote. (AYES: Jonathan, Tanner, Weber, and Hamik; NOES: None; ABSENT: Spiegel). Mayor Pro Tem Hamik stated she agreed with Councilmember Weber that the City has had tremendous success with Kemper Sports Management, adding that Desert Willow is a beautiful golf course that is well -maintained and well -ran. However, Council was doing its due diligence to the tax payers and the people who flip the bill, which is the reason for going out to bid. In 26 MINUTES REGULAR PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 her mind, it has nothing to do with the dissatisfaction with the job that has been performed by Kemper Sports, stating everyone she knew is always sharing what a great golf experience they have had at Desert Willow. G. REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO INITIATE A ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT, PROHIBITING COMMERCIAL ANIMAL BREEDING WITHIN THE CITY. Mr. Stendell stated that based on ongoing discussions with a local advocacy group that addressed the Council at the July 28 City Council meeting, the proposed Ordinance Amendment was before the Council. Of the two items proposed to staff by this advocacy group, one of them seemed worthy of bringing forward to the Council for further review. Staff believes that in looking at the impacts of animal breeding in the City, it might be a worthwhile exercise to prohibit commercial animal breeding within the City. Other local jurisdictions have been successfully lobbied, most recently the City of Coachella who is being asked to make findings such that animal breeding does add to the local stray population and also can be shown to be somewhat incompatible zoning due to smell and noise issues. The ultimate discretion of whether to move forward or not is solely with the City Council. Staff viewed this as a good opportunity to bring an issue to the Council that furthers the City's long-standing commitment to animal welfare issues. He said the City didn't have a current problem, nor active Code complaints of active breeding, or a licensed breeder in town. Again, this would be a preemptive effort if the Council so desired. In this case, staff wanted to bring this concept to the Council's attention and review. Councilman Tanner asked if there was any indication that Palm Desert has backyard illegal breeders. Mr. Stendell replied he wasn't sure, stating that under today's ordinance, it doesn't speak to whether or not you can breed. If the proposed Ordinance was in place, it would give Code Compliance the tools necessary if they found one down the road. Responding to question, he said there might be a breeder in town, but he didn't know for sure if one existed. Councilmember Weber inquired as to any complaints with regard to breeding or smells. Mr. Stendell said there were none. Councilman Jonathan noted there were already ordinances that would prohibit animal breeding in someone's backyard, because that would be operating a business without a license. Mr. Stendell agreed, stating this issue could be dealt with a couple of different ways. However, some cities, including Palm Desert, for many years 27 MINUTES REGULAR PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 have said that by not being listed as approved, it's inherently denied, and it can be challenged. Approval of the Ordinance Amendment would be taking it a step further if the City felt there was a risk. Councilman Jonathan pointed out that the proposed Ordinance was not limited to backyards, because it was for Commercial Breeding. Mr. Stendell agreed, which is considered, in his mind an agricultural use, and Palm Desert doesn't have much opportunity in town for agricultural uses. Mayor Pro Tem Hamik asked if the City had an Ordinance limiting the number of animals a person could have. Mr. Stendell said it was four. Councilman Tanner said that the definition of "Commercial" was breeding and selling from a home, which he believed was a commercial enterprise. Whether or not the owner had a license, it would still be considered commercial. Mayor Pro Tem Harnik said she had three rescue animals herself, so she understood the importance of what the Council was doing, but with current Ordinances in place, what would be achieved by implementing the proposed Amendment. If the City was saving an animal from any kind of harm, it's important, but the City has a significant Ordinance in place already. Mr. Stendell explained it would provide further backing and clarity if there are issues in the future. However, there are things staff can lean on today. MS. LISA BLODGETT, La Quinta, California, stated she was before the Council to speak about the Palm Desert Puppy Store. She said pets sold in retail puppy stores are likely to be inhumanely treated, claiming there is abuse that went along with selling pets for profit. Also, mothers are destroyed once they are no longer able to breed and the gruesome list went on and on. She said Palm Desert is the only City in the Valley that does not have a ban against the sale of retail of puppies and cats, and the only City that has a puppy store, adding that if the City was not interested in such a ban, it might be interested in whether it had law-abiding business owners. She said Animal Control has inspected the Palm Desert Puppy Store at her request, but they should have been doing it for three years, because it's required every six months. On May 5, 2016, Animal Control did an unannounced visit to the Puppy Store and found the owner noncompliant, stating there was no consumer rights information for customers, breeder information was only being provided to actual buyers not perspective buyers, and there was no sprinklers or fire alarm system in the building. She said this owner had live animals living in the building 24/7 for three years, and she couldn't understand the lack of attention to that fact. She went on to say that 28 MINUTES REGULAR PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 if no one cared that he had animals there, did anyone care about the endangering of citizens, buildings, and the whole street of San Pablo. Animal Control chose not to cite the owner for those violations, but "worked" with the owner and brought him into compliance. However, the owner did not stay in compliance and Animal Control was advised, so they made another visit on July 14 and found him out of compliance on two issues. Animal Control's report stated, "They conducted an unannounced inspection of the Pet Store, and the owner was not present. However, he did have a volunteer and one employee working. Officer noticed one of the animal enclosures did not have proper posting on it, and when asked, the two workers could not provide the records of the dogs pursuant to Health and Safety Codes, stating that they did not know where the owner kept the information. They were advised of the infractions and were informed that Animal Control Services would return to the store to address these issues with the store owner," which they did on July 20, and the owner was cited. She said everyone has their own definition of humane and how one would not hurt an animal, but she knew that having a puppy store in Palm Desert is hurting thousands of animals. Mayor Pro Tem Hamik asked staff to keep a paper trail of any citations. MS. VALERIE MASI, Indio, California, suggested a compromise, because she knew Council didn't want to shut down a business, which she understood. However, they know this is a bad business that is doing bad things, stating Bianca Rae has a stack of complaints of the kinds of things this owner is doing. One of her suggestions is to pass a ban on the retail sale of animals, but mainly puppies and kittens, and grandfather this owner only at the current location. Otherwise, Palm Desert is wide open for this owner to expand or others to come in, exposing citizens to badly bred animals. She noted that prior to the meeting, information on puppy mills was delivered to the Council. It was important to know that backyard breeders are small puppy mills where they don't vaccinate nor take care of the puppies and mother. They are not doing what a responsible business owner should be doing with a product. She said this store owner has a breeder in Palm Desert, so obviously he's acting illegal. She went on to say that real breeders find homes for their animal, and they do not send puppies out to stores to be bought, stating they don't need a puppy broker. She said why would one sell their puppy for $500 to this owner and he tums around and makes $3,500. She said if a breeder is going to be doing all the work, paying the vet bills, taking the proper responsibility when you take care of a mother dog and her puppies, then that breeder is going to want the full amount, because when it's done right, it's a very expensive endeavor. When a breeder does it wrong, it's very cheap, but if affects the community, the shelter, and public safety. In the past 15 years, dog bites have multiplied by four times, which happened at the same time puppy mills exploded. 29 MINUTES REGULAR PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 MS. SUSAN COYLE, Pinyon Pines, Califomia, shared she has been a volunteer for a rescue animal group since the 1970's. Her property is licensed to foster dogs until she can get them adopted. She's very familiar with the big multimillion dollar dog breeding farms located in Califomia and mostly back East. She said many of those farms can house as many as 6,000 dogs, and they are also called puppy mills. Those dogs live and breed in cages, and they die in cages. The owner of The Puppy Store is purchasing those types of puppies. Many of them come into the store, if they make the long trip or are dead on arrival. She said this owner is selling them out the door, and he can get up to $6,000 for one puppy. She believes this owner is aware that some of them are ill or harboring illnesses. Last year there was a family that paid $2,000 to purchase a puppy from The Puppy Store, and a day or two later, the puppy had acute diarrhea. After spending $2,000 at a vet's office and still no resolution, they were able to sell the puppy to a friend who thought their vet could fix him up. However, after dumping another $1,000 they decided they couldn't handle it anymore. She adopts dogs out of local pet stores, and the daughter of this puppy came in and asked her to take the ill puppy, because they couldn't handle the problem or the cost. She took the puppy, but after reviewing the paperwork, she realized she had a puppy mill dog. A quick trip to the vet and a few tests determined he had severe gastritis, and after changing his diet and putting him on probiotics, he later became normal. At the end of the month, she was able to place him into a wonderful home, stating that was a successful story, but there are dozens of failures in cases like this, including death. The Puppy Store is a pipeline for puppy mills, and these puppies arrive sick with diseases, infirmities, etc., and fees can come into the thousands. She urged the Council to make a resolution to put this owner out of business or have this owner adopt puppies from the shelters. She noted she had sent the City Council information on puppy mills. Mayor Pro Tem Harnik acknowledged receiving and reading the information. Councilman Jonathan said he appreciated getting input from residents of La Quinta, Indio, and Pinyon Pines, as it was nice to have them in Palm Desert and the Council welcomed them. With regard to the City of Palm Desert, there is one store on San Pablo. In his opinion, it would not only be irresponsible but actionable to shut down a business that is regulated, inspected, and not found to be doing anything illegal. He understood people may have their opinions about what is going on there, but he would encourage them to work with the appropriate regulators, and if there are violations, like any business, restaurants, etc., they will be shut down. The staff report states, "There has not been any evidence produced for the City by Riverside County Animal Control that the puppies being sold at Palm Desert Puppy are from puppy mills." In his mind, there is no action that the 30 MINUTES REGULAR PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 Council can or should take there. With regard to animal breeding, the last time he checked, commercial animal breeding, when in compliance with relevant regulations, is a legal activity. To prohibit a legal activity from taking place in Palm Desert, inhibits capitalism and a free economy, which for him was not a good thing. He believed customers create demand and supply, and if there are people that don't patronize certain stores, including the one on San Pablo, then the results will speak for themselves. But obviously, there are customers that come to a different conclusion, and they should be free to avail themselves of products that are legal. He didn't want to prohibit something that doesn't exist, stating he felt it was stirring the pot when it wasn't necessary. Councilmember Weber concurred, stating she would not be in favor of taking action at this time. She said she felt the speakers were very sincere and have a passion for this cause, but in Palm Desert, it tries to educate everyone. She would like to meet with the speakers one more time to figure out a platform to educate the shopper so they won't want to buy, but instead adopt. She said the City currently pays for spaying, adoptions, etc., so it was already educating people to adopt animals as opposed to shopping forthem. Councilman Tanner noted staff was recommending a prohibition of commercial breeding, however, according to staff, there are no commercial breeders in Palm Desert. Unfortunately, he agreed with Councilman Jonathan that the Council would be interrupting sales, unless there are continued problems. Councilman Tanner moved to, by Minute Motion, direct staff to initiate a Zoning Ordinance Amendment, prohibiting commercial breeding within the City of Palm Desert. Motion died for lack of a second. Councilman Jonathan clarified he did not agree with staffs recommendation in that there was no need for the proposed Ordinance since the City didn't have commercial breeders. Mayor Pro Tem Harnik asked if Code had come across any backyard breeders in Palm Desert. Code Compliance Supervisor Pedro Rodriguez said it had not. He will follow up with Ms. Masi on her concern or her comments about knowing of a Palm Desert breeder. However, Code has not received any complaints, but if there was a large operation, Palm Desert citizens are very active, they will notify Code. Councilman Jonathan stated that if there is animal breeding in a backyard and Code is not aware of it, it meant they haven't pulled a business license 31 MINUTES REGULAR PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 and therefore operating illegally, so potentially there is an opportunity to shut them down. Mr. Rodriguez replied it was something the City wouldn't license or issue a permit, because Palm Desert didn't have the zoning for it. He added that Code receives complaints from time to time where someone claims their neighbor has eight puppies. However, puppies and cats under the ages of four months are permitted, because the amount of the litter cannot be controlled when they are born. So when Code investigates those complaints, they are advised that by the time they tum the age of four months, they can only have a culmination of four. It could be two cats and two dogs or whatever culmination as long as it didn't exceed four animals. Councilman Jonathan said he wanted everyone to understand that if there is commercial animal breeding in a backyard, which is operating a business in a residence, it's already prohibited. In other words, the City already has a mechanism that prohibits backyard animal breeding. Mr. Rodriguez agreed, stating it falls under the Home Occupation Permit, which would be something Code would know about. Mayor Pro Tem Harnik said she would appreciate staff following up with Ms. Masi and finding out where this issue may exist. However, she couldn't support staffs recommendation, because there are responsible breeders, stating that not everybody is irresponsible or creating the dysplasia and the sick animals. If Palm Desert has a responsible breeder that obtains a permit for a business and is caring for the animals, she couldn't say the City wouldn't allow it. As mentioned, people buy pets that are flown across the country to get a healthy beautiful animal. She went on to say that Palm Desert won't allow people operating businesses irresponsibly. Councilman Tanner said he's gotten German Shepherds from people that bred them out of their house, but one gets the proper paperwork. He asked if there were any breeders in Palm Desert that had a license. Mayor Pro Tem Harnik said staff has already said there wasn't. Further responding, she said if someone chooses to be responsible, caring, and compassionate toward animals, and breeds them appropriately and correctly, and it's their business, she didn't think it was something Council should object to. She understood the puppy mill issue, and it's something the City had to monitor. Therefore, she asked that staff and Animal Control create a paper trail in order to be able to do something about it. 32 MINUTES REGULAR PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 Councilman Tanner stated he believed one could have a puppy mill in the backyard, and the owners can say they are reselling animals out of their home and not have a license. Mayor Pro Tem Harnik said that is considered a resale and it's a business. Councilman Jonathan moved to, by Minute Motion, directed staff not to take any action at this time, but for Code to be vigilant and keep a paper trail as warranted. Motion was seconded by Weber and carried by a 3-1 vote (AYES: Jonathan, Weber, and Harnik; NOES: Tanner; ABSENT: Spiegel). XV. CONTINUED BUSINESS None XVI. OLD BUSINESS A. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF THE PURCHASE OF GAS AND DIESEL FUEL FOR THE CITY'S FLEET AND EQUIPMENT, AND FOR DESERT WILLOW'S MAINTENANCE VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT FROM BECK OIL, INC., FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017 IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $245,000. Mr. Greenwood noted this item was the routine fuel purchase for the year. Councilman Tanner moved to, by Minute Motion, approve Purchase of Gas and Diesel Fuel from Beck Oil, Inc., Coachella, California, for FY 2016-2017 for: 1) City's fleet and equipment in an amount not to exceed $145,000; 2) Desert Willow Maintenance Facility in an amount not to exceed $100,000 — funds are available in General Fund Account No. 1104331-4217000 - Auto Fleet -Supply Automotive Gas and Account No. 5204195-4803100 - Desert Willow Maintenance Facility. Motion was seconded by Weber and carried by a 4-0 vote (AYES: Jonathan, Tanner, Weber, and Hamik; NOES: None; ABSENT: Spiegel). B. ORDINANCE NO. 1305A - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 9.50 - MOBILE HOME PARK RENT REVIEW - SECTION 9.50.040 OF THE PALM DESERT MUNICIPAL CODE TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF MEMBERS OF THE RENT REVIEW BOARD FROM FIVE (5) TO THREE (3). Ms. Riddle stated that in an effort to continue communications with the park residents, staff held a second community meeting. One of the main concerns expressed by the residents was on the Hearing Officer review process. As an alternative, it was proposed that the City reduce the existing rent review board from five members to three members. By doing so, it will allow the 33 MINUTES REGULAR PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 City to continue to handle rent control matters that might come up, because currently, if all three members were to be available, there would be a quorum. However, in contacting the Rent Review Commissioners, Mr. Adams indicated he may be resigning for health issues. If that were to occur, staff would not be able to conduct rent control matters, so by reducing the membership, it addresses the residents' concem about having a City Manager Hearing Officer review process. Therefore, in order to address both issues by both parties, the alternate was proposed. MR. JAMES KIRWAN, Highway 74, Palm Desert, thanked Ms. Riddle and Mr. Hargreaves for the work they have done in this matter, because the group felt heard. He said staff took their concerns and consideration and came up with a solution that addressed the administrative aspect of continuing the Rent Review Board, and the residents quality of life. It's the very reason for having five members on the Council, because things that affect the quality of life, should not be left up to one person. They also discussed the possibility of recruiting new members for the Board, not only through the general newspaper, but also targeting service organizations such as the Rotary Club or Elks Club. He thanked the Council, stating he was very pleased with the results of this effort on everyone's part. MS. MARI SCHMIDT, Highway74, Palm Desert, expressed her appreciation to the Council for reconsidering the demise of the Rent Review Commission. She said Mr. Hargreaves and staff provided her with a copy of the staff report, and she likes the framework and is very much in favor of it. She added that Indian Springs has a Committee that is strong and very vocal when necessary. One of the members is Jim Kirwan who reviews things relating to rent control and how it affects them. She has one important concern relating to the quorum, in that a quorum of two was tantamount to having a City Manager, because if one person approves and the other doesn't, they're toast. She believed there should be a quorum of three; therefore, consideration should be given to having alternates, and they will help find them. In a City of 75,000 residents, she couldn't believe that three people couldn't be found. However, she liked the idea of convening and keeping the existing Commission as long as the members can do it, but she didn't like giving up on looking for altemates for the existing structure. Additionally, she questioned if the existing Ordinance that governs rent review was still intact, because she has several documents that have been blue -lined, which she believes has not been approved. Mr. Hargreaves confirmed there have been no changes to the Rent Review Ordinance for more than 20 years. MS. SCHMIDT said she was pleased to hear that for now, because it gave them some protection while they dealt with the changes and upgrades to the 34 MINUTES REGULAR PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 Ordinance. Also, the Ordinance that governs them now is over 12 pages, and in April they received a revised version that was also blue -lined throughout the entire document, and the proposals before the Council today was only two pages, so it's confusing. She didn't know if other parks were as organized as they are, and they will not stop. She said she understood the Ordinance had to be upgraded, but she wants it to be done right, and not encourage the park owners to come asking for hardship per capital improvements. Lastly, to say the Commission hasn't done anything for ten years is just not true, because they were hit with a $330 a month rent increase, adding Council may recall that the park owner decided the residents should pay for the new sewers and streets, etc., and the City was behind them on that one, and for that they are grateful. Councilmember Weber asked for clarification on the issue raised about the quorum. Mr. Hargreaves replied that typically when there is a board, if there is a majority, it's a quorum. Councilman Jonathan added that when the Rent Review Commission meets it is to consider a hardship rent increase request, and to grant the increase, it would require a vote of at least two members of the commission whether two or three are present. Mr. Hargreaves concurred. Councilman Tanner moved to waive further reading and pass Ordinance No.1305A to second reading. Motion was seconded by Weber and carried by a 4-0 vote (AYES: Jonathan, Tanner, Weber, and Hamik; NOES: None; ABSENT: Spiegel). XVII. PUBLIC HEARINGS None XVIII. REPORTS AND REMARKS A. CITY MANAGER 1. City Manager's Meeting Summaries Report for the Period of August 29 - September 9, 2016. With City Council concurrence, the City Manager Meeting Summaries were received and filed. B. CITY ATTORNEY None 35 MINUTES REGULAR PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 C. CITY CLERK None D. PUBLIC SAFETY 1. Fire Department None 2. Police Department Assistant Chief Anthony Baur introduced the newest commander Palm Deserts Chief of Police David W. Teets. Chief Teets said he was taking over the helm from Captain Sue Trevino who recently retired. He shared he was on his 20' year with the Sheriffs Department, and although he didn't live in the Coachella Valley, he and his wife spend a lot of time here in the desert. In 2011, he was promoted to Lieutenant and sent to the Palm Desert Station where he ran the Patrol Division and Investigations Bureau, and he was the liaison to the City of Rancho Mirage as well. He eventually was sent to Sheriffs Administration where he over saw the Media Bureau, then promoted to Captain to oversee the Indio and Blythe jails, including the state of the art east county detention center that is being built in the City of Indio. He's now in Palm Desert where his top priority is to keep the City safe while providing the best law enforcement possible. E. MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL 1. Councilmember Susan Marie Weber's Meeting Summaries Report for the Period of August 28 - September 11, 2016. With City Council concurrence, the Meeting Summaries were received and filed. 2. Council Requests for Action/Committee Reports/Comments: a) Councilman Van G. Tanner Reports/Comments: - Cal State University, San Bernardino - Palm Desert Graduation - He said he's attended their past graduations, but last night was special, because they introduced 150 new freshman students into their 36 MINUTES REGULAR PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 program, and even more impressive is that many of them are from the Coachella Valley. Mayor Pro Tem Hamik added it was also their 30`h Anniversary in the Coachella Valley b) Councilmember Susan Marie Weber Request for Action: - Aaenda Item Placement - She was wondering if there was a way to rearrange the agenda, because Council is aware of the issues that will bring the public out to these meetings, especially when it knows it will have a crowd. This evening some people had to stay until 6:00 p.m. and sit through all the business items. Mr. McCarthy stated the City Council always has the discretion to move an item up earlier into the agenda. Ms. Klassen agreed, however, there does have to be some semblance of order. For instance, "New Business," does indeed require being new business, and "Old Business" is for items that have been continued to a date uncertain or something that has been considered previously and now is back for more consideration. She said with Council concurrence, an item can be taken out of order. Councilmember Weber responded she understood, but the last time she asked this question she was told it couldn't be done, because people judge their timing based on the fact that it's appearing at the end as opposed to the beginning, so it would have been nice to have controversial items appear as A and B on the agenda instead of at the end. Ms. Klassen said she realizes that this evening there was quite a crowd that might have been sitting through some of the other items, but sometimes it's just the luck of the draw. Some nights the City doesn't have much business and would have gotten to it by 4:30 p.m., but tonight was a larger agenda. c) Councilman Sabbv Jonathan Reports/Comments: - CVAG Homelessness Committee - He said the Committee broke up into three working groups once it defined its mission and developed an action plan. What the Committee comes up with will affect the City, and at some point it will be before the Council. He took the opportunity to thanked Director of Special Programs Frankie Riddle, 37 MINUTES REGULAR PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 Assistant Chief Anthony Baur, and Sgt. Zamora, stating they have all been diligently attending all the meetings. Mayor Pro Tem Harnik inquired about the Coffee with a Cop, and Assistant Chief Baur responded the next event will be held on Tuesday, September 27, from 8:00 to 10:00 a.m., on Hovley and Washington Street. The event is posted on Facebook and the Palm Desert Police web page. d) Mayor Pro Tem Jan C. Harnik Reports/Comments: - Coachella Valley Economic Partnership - The Workforce Excellence component is ready to move onto their own entity. This is the group that has worked with FAFSA (Free Application for Federal Student Aid) and helping students with career pathways within the schools and academies toward their education. The Workforce Excellence has been incubated by CVEP, and they have done a lot of good and their success is greatly appreciated. She went on to say CVEP has seen a tremendous increase in banks and cities referring businesses for advice and development, and they are helping out. Additionally, the Conventions and Visitors Bureau had a great August, stating Marriott had the best attendance ever. 3. Council Consideration of Travel Requests and Reports: None XIX. ADJOURNMENT With City Council concurrence, Mayor Pro Tem Hamik adjoumed the meeting at 6:41 p.m. ATTEST: RA ELLt D. KLASSENT ITY CL ' K CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA JAN C. HARNIK, MAYOR PRO TEM 38