Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976-01-06MINUTES PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY JANUARY 6, 1976 CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS I. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Clark called the meeting of the Redevelopment Agency to order at 7:00 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Members Present: Chuck Aston Jean Benson Noel Brush Jim McPherson Chairman Henry Clark Also Present: Harvey L. Hurlburt, Executive Director Paul A. Williams, Associate Planner III. MINUTES Member Benson moved and Member Aston seconded that the minutes of the December 18, 1975, meeting be approved as presented. Motion carried unanimously. IV. OLD BUSINESS A. CONTRACT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF LANDSCAPING, PAVING, AND LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS ON EL PASEO BETWEEN PORTOLA AND SAN LUIS REY. Mr. Hurlburt stated that the bids had come in higher than anticipated and that only one bid, in fact, had been received for $34,560. This was was from the Little Grass Shack. He continued explaining that through some reductions which Staff thought logical and acceptable, a project cost of $20,260 was being recommended. Mr. Hurlburt pointed out that $18,500 had been budgeted for this particular project and that we were a little less than $2,000 short. Chairman Clark asked why the bid had come in 90% higher than what was estimated. Mr. Hurlburt stated that the original project was esti- mated at $18,500 but that as a final consideration at a Study Session, Council had decided to include one cross- walk. Mr. Buccino's original estimate for the crosswalk was $5,000-$10,000, but because of the requirement for stamped textured concrete, the bid had been $13,000. Mr. Hurlburt asked Mr. Williams to outline the alternates suggested to reduce the cost which Mr. Williams did. Redevelopment Agency January 6, 1976 Page 1 Member Brush requested that Mr. Buccino outline the proposal presented. Mr. Buccino pointed out that originally the estimated project was $18,500 not including the pedestrian crosswalk. He pointed out that what the Agency should be concerned with is the $18,500 for the irrigation, planting, and lighting. of the median strip. Discussion followed as to what type of trees would be planted, what type of irrigation system would be in- stalled, etc. Member Brush questionned the bid from the Little Grass Shack asking why no other contractors had submitted bids. Mr. Hurlburt pointed out that the bid had been advertised in the Desert Sun and the Palm Desert Post. He stated that Mike Buccino had personally telephoned 5 contractors about the bidding but felt they had been reluctant to bid because of the concrete work. Member Brush asked if the bids might have been different if the concrete work had not been included and Mr. Buccino responded that they probably would have been and that more contractors would have bid the job. Mr. Hurlburt pointed out that 8 contractors had taken plans out which indicated that the bidding received good coverage but that only one had submitted a bid. Member Clark stated that he felt that the time element had had an effect on the bidding and that the inclusion of the concrete work had definitely affected it. He suggested that the two bids might be split. Member Aston moved and Member McPherson seconded to refuse the bid from the Little Grass Shack. Motion carried unanimously. Member Aston moved to break the contract into two parts and remove the time restrictions and state "as soon as feasible". Member Benson seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. V. ADJOURNMENT Member Aston moved and Member Benson seconded that the meeting be adjourned. Carried unanimously. Chairman Clark declared the meeting adjourned at 8:10 p.m. H NRY B . CL !t hairman ATTEST: HARVEY L. RLBUR xecutive Director Redevelopment Agency Meeting January 6, 1976 Page 2