HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979-11-29MINUTES
PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 29, 1979
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
I. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Mullins called the Meeting of the Redevelopment Agency
to order at 8:32 p.m. on Thursday, November 29, 1979, in City Hall
Council Chambers.
II. ROLL CALL
Members Present: Members Absent:
Member Noel J. Brush
Member Alexis D. Newbrander
Member S. Roy Wilson
Chairman Edward D. Mullins
Also Present:
Member James E. McPherson
(Excused Absence)
Martin J. Bouman, Executive Director
Les Pricer, Agency Consultant
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. MINUTES Of The Meeting of the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agenc:
of November 8, 1979.
Rec: Approve as presented
B. CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AGAINST THE AGENCY TREASURY - Demand
No. 11-1.
Rec: Approve as presented
Member Newbrander moved and Member Wilson seconded to
approve the Consent Calendar as presented Motion carried unanimously
with the members present.
IV. RESOLUTIONS
A. RESOLUTION NO. 104 - A RESOLUTION OF THE PALM DESERT
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DECLARING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY NECESSAR`.
FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION THEREOF.
Mr. Bouman stated the City has acquired property adjacent to
the Union Station which has been occupied by Mr. Roger Senior
for garage purposes. He said Mr. Senior has not been willing
to vacate the property so that the City can demolish the
buildings and go ahead and utilize the property which has beet
acquired for a public parking lot. Therefore, the City has
chosen to go into Eminent Domain proceedings which gives
Mr. Senior or his attorney the right to appear before the
Redevelopment Agency and be heard. Mr. Bouman requested the
Board's adoption of Resolution No. 104, which would result in
the City's occupancy of this property.
Chairman Mullins invited input from the audience.
MR. ROGER SENIOR, 72-710 Penny Lane, Rancho Mirage, California
stated that he would speak for himself as his attorney was not
present. He said this has been his place of business for the
past 16 years and this action would cause him private injury 1
taking away his business. He further stated he did not know
whether a parking lot was in the best interest or not.
November 29, 1979 Page 1
MINUTES
PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * is * * * * * * '.: .. :c
IV. RESOLUTIONS (Continued)
Member Brush noted a letter had been filed by the attorne::
and questioned why he could not be present.
Chairman Mullins stated the purpose of this hearing was t:
hear any input Mr. Senior might have. He asked for furthe
comments.
Mr. Pricer stated he wanted to report that this project
will do the most public good with the least private injur:
as there is only one business which will be affected by 7..
project. The property is needed for adequate access. The
benefit would be a parking lot accommodating 80 or more
businesses, with 2-way ingress and egress.
Member Newbrander commented that anyone turning off San
would realize how important it is to remove the building.
Member Brush stated he felt the improvement necessary for
people going into business there. He questioned if Mr. Se
would like the hearing delayed until his attorney could =_
present.
Mr. Pricer responded that the attorney's absence does no:
any way impair the rights of Mr. Senior. He stated this s
..,would pave the way to eventual demolition of the structure
that the hearing was to specifically provide Mr. Senior t..
a chance to speak to the issue.
Member Brush suggested if the attorney wanted to file any
written comments they would be accepted.
Member Brush moved and Member Newbrander seconded to adopt
Resolution No. 104. Motion carried unanimously with the members
present.
V. NEW BUSINESS
None
VI. OLD BUSINESS
None
VII. CONSENT ITEMS HELD OVER
None
VIII. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
MR. RICHARD NICHOLS, 73-460 Highway 111, Palm Desert, addre_se
the Board with three questions: 1) He stated he was watching
Frontage Road with concern. He questioned why private parking
spaces were required to be double striped and public not.
Mr. Williams responded that the Design Review Board has jus:
recently been applying this standard and it was a matter of
timing. 2) Mr. Nichols then noted that the islands on
Frontage Road are the main objection with everyone. He
questioned why there were no islands on Monterey, San Marcos
and Cabrillo, and yet one on El Paseo. Mr. Pricer responded a
the divider was extended on El Paseo due to the traffic general
by the 4 lane divided street. 3) Mr. Nichols commented or. am
article in the Desert Sun which indicated that Save Our Businiel
organization had held up the Frontage Road progress. He wa
it on record that this case went to court twice and they los:
hearings, therefore, they felt they were in no way respcn:`
for the delay.
November 29, 1979 Page
MINUTES
PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
IX. REPORTS AND REMARKS
A. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Frontage Road Conversion Change Order - Mr. Bouman
requested the Board's approval of an expenditure in
the amount of $9,786.00 which resulted from additional
work not in the original plans for the Frontage Road
Project. He stated this work was required by the
California Department of Transportation for drainage
purposes, and recommended approval by minute motion.
Member Wilson moved to approve the expenditure of $9,786
as an addition to the contract with Massey Sand and Rock Company,
known as Contract No. 1. Member Newbrander seconded. Motion carried
on a 3-1-1 vote, with Member Brush voting NO.
Member Brush stated he voted no reluctantly, as he had
voted on this project initially and did not want to pass
any blame. He said he had reservations about the con-
version and felt the Board should take a strong look to
see if it was damaging people in business on Frontage Road
He stated he was not sure whether it was necessary to
approve this expense in case there are other changes to be
made.
Chairman Mullins responded that the work has already been
done.
Mr. Bouman explained this work as extras approved by the
field engineer, but still requiring approval by the
Board for payment.
Member Brush voted yes, approving the expenditure on a vote
of 4-0-1.
B. AGENCY COUNSEL
None
C. CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE AGENCY
None
X. ADJOURNMENT
Chairman Mullins adjourned the meeting at 8:55 p.m.
4-EtR23, LD `D .V 'INS, Chairman
ATTEST:
EL CLAUSSEN, Assistant Secretary
to the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency
/d
November 29, 1979
Page 3