HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC RES 79-139RESOLUTION N0. 7q-�
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM
DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNOUNCING FINDING AND DENYING AN
APPEAL OF A PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF A CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT AMENDMENT TO ALLOW AN ADDITIONAL DRIVEWAY
ACCESS FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST
CORNER OF HIGHWAY 74 AND EL PASEO.
CASE N0. CUP 09-78 (Amendment)
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California,
did on the 29th day of November, 1979, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing
to consider the request by Bank of Indio (Hughes Investments) for approval
of an appeai of a Fianning Commission Denial of an amendment of an approved
Conditional Use Permit to allow an additional driveway entrance on E1 Paseo
to facilitate access to a proposed bank building on approximately 5.4 acres
(total Hughes Investment site) within the C-1, S.P. (General Commercial,
Scenic Preservation Overlay) zone, generally located at the northeast
corner of Highway 74 and E1 Paseo, more particularly described as:
APN 627-192-036 (Previously 627-192-27)
WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements
of the "City of Palm Desert Environmental Quality Procedure Resolution
No. 78-32", �n that the Director of Environmental Services has determined
that the project has been previously assessed in connection with the
original use permit review, and that further documentation is not deemed
necessary; and
WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering
all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring
to be heard, said council did find the following facts and reasons to
exist to justify the denial of said appeal.
1. The proposed location of the conditional use amendment
access and the conditions under which it could be
operated and maintained wiil be detrimental to the pubiic
health, safety, or general welfare, or be materially
injurious to the properties or improvements in the
vicinity.
2. The proposed conditional use does not comply with the
goals, objectives, and policies of the City's adopted
General Plan.
3. The proposed conditional use does not comply with the
goals, objectives, and policies of the City's adopted
Redevelopment Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Palm Desert, California, as follows:
1.
2.
That the above recitations are true and correct and
constitute the findings of the council in this case;
That the Conditional Use Permit (CUP 09-78, Amendment) is
hereby denied.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm
Desert City Council, held on this 29th day of November, 1979, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Newbrander, Wilson, Mullins
NOES: Brush
ATTEST:
ABSENT: McPherson
ABSTAIN: None
,
�
i ^ �" / �
�-�� `�
/ J ��U i.�'�, .�'.
.� A D D. 11�LIN , Mayor
SHEILA R. GICLIGAN, C' er
City of Palm Desert, alifornia