HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC RES 87-008CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. 87-8
A RESOLUT I ON OF THE C I TY COUNC I L OF THE C I TY OF
PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, DENYING AN APPEAL BY
COUNTESS VON HUELLESSEM INTERNATIONAL FASHION TO
`— A DECISION OF THE ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION
DENYING A REVISED REQUEST TO PERMIT A CANVAS
AWN[NG WITH SIGNAGE AT 73-405 EL PASEO.
CASE N0: 271C
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Palm Desert d1d on the 22nd day
of January and con�inued hearing on February 12, 1987 hold public meetings to
consider an appeal by COUNTESS VON HUELLESSEM INTERNATIONAL FASHION to a
decision of the Architectural Cortmission denying a revised request to permit a
canvas awning with signage at the above noted location, and ,
WHEREAS, the Architectural Commission of the City of Palm Desert,
California, did on the 23rd day of December 1986 hold a public meeting to
consider a revised request by Countess Von Huellessem internatlonal Fashion to
permit an awning with signage at which time the request was denied for the
following reasons:
1. The awning was not installed in accordance with the approval granted
October S, 1985.
2. The awning with signage as it is presently installed was rejected by
the archftectural commisslon October 8, 1985 at which time approval
for an awning was granted subject to conditions.
3. The awning as installed is basically a canvas sign and it is not the
desire of the city to establish permanent fascla mounted canvas
awning signs.
WHEREAS, sald appllcatfon has complted with the requirements of the "City
of Palm Desert Procedures to lmplement the California Environmental Quality
Act, Resolution No. 80-89", in that the Director of Community Development has
determined that the request 1s a class 3 categorical exemption for the purposes
of CEQA.
WHEREAS, at said public meeting upon hearing and considering all testimony
said City Council did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify
the denial of the appeal:
1. The awning was not installed in accordance with the approval granted
October 8, 1985.
2. The awning with signage as it is presently installed was rejected by
the architectural commission October 8, 1985 at which time approval
for an awning was granted subject to conditions.
3. The awning as installed is basically a canvas sign and it 1s not the
desire of the clty to establlsh permanent fascla mounted canvas
awning signs.
RESOLUTION N0. 87-8
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm
Desert, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the
findings of the council in this case.
2. That the appeal is hereby denied for reasons stated above.
r
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert City
Council, held on this 12th day of February, 1987 by the following vote, to wit.
AYES: BENSON, CRITES, SNYDER, WILSON 8 KELLY �
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ATTEST: '
SHEIIA R. GIL AN, City Cle
City of Palm Desert, Califo ia
/dlg
�
v"�
RIC�iARD K� LLY, Mayor
�i