HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC RES 88-113RESOLliTION NO. 88-113
:� RESOLliTIOti OF THE CIT1�' COLtiCIL OF THE CITI' OF
PALi�i DESERT, C.�LIFOR�I.-�. DE1��'I�G .-�\ .�YPE.-�L TO THE
DECISION OF TtiE PL��'�ItiG C01�t�14ISSI0\ �`HICH D�:tiIED
THE PROPOSED I.OT SPLIT. �'.�RIAtiCE TO THE ZO\I�;G
ORDI\.-�'�CE TO .-�LLO�� 'I'HE LOT SPLIT .�tiU THE
St"FiSEQL-E�T CO�;STRLiCTIO� OF :� SItiGLE F.-�1�IIL��
RESIDE�CE ,�'�D GL �.ST riOI;SE O'� PROPERT�� I\ 1'HE
HILLSIDE PL:\�tiF:D RESIDE�TI�L "LO\E.
CASE N0. PM 23711, VAR 88-1, PP 88-8
k'tiERE.-�S. the Cit�� Council of the Cit�� of Yalm Desert, California. did on the llth da�-
of A�igust, 1988 hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the appeal b�- CH.�RLES
H.-��'ER 8. ASSOCI:�TES on behalf of SLS.�ti CL SE on the above noted cases.
WHERE.-�S, the Planning Commission of the City� of Palm Desert, California. did on the
5th da�' of Julti-. 1988 hold a dul�- noticed public heac�ing �c�hich uas continued to Jul,v 19,
1988 to consider the request b�� Sf:S.-�� CCSE CHARLES H:\�'ER & aSSOCI�TES for
appro�-al of a variance to the zoning oi�dinance, a parcel map and a hillside de�-elopment
plan to allou- construction of a single famil�� home on -�.5 acres within the Hillside Planned
Residential zone generall�� located .�-est of the Palm �'alle�� Storm Channel, more
particularl�- described as ��P� 6?8- 130-00,-.
�t�HERE_-�S, the applicant made application for a rariance. �:ase '�o. ��.-�R R8-1, to
facilitate and make possible the appro��al of the requeste�j parcel map.
��HERE.aS. the planning commission denied Case \o. �'.�R 88-1 because the applicant
z.c�as unable to affirm the necessar�� findings.
V�'HERE:�S, the applicant has not submitted information to the cit�� council �chich u��uld
demonstrate that the proposed par��el map complies �ith the pro��isiuns of oprion 3 of the
h�llside or�dinanc•e.
u�HF..RE.-�S, the applicant has not pro�-ided informatic�n to thE� cit�� council u-hi��h :�ould
affirm the findings nece5sar�� r�� „rant a� ariance (section ?�-�.; �3.0� 0.�, B. C or p of the
zc>ning ordinance).
�O�', THERErORF.. B�: IT RESOL',�EU b� Ihe �'1t� Co�_1n��il of the �,ii� of Falm (>esF�rt.
California, as f�:�ilo-.cs:
That the abo��e recitati�ns are true and corrPcr a:^,d c,�n5t �ture � he findin�s r�f the
coun�;il in this case.
3. That the cit�� council does herebs� den� this appeal for the reasons sperified
abn��E;.
RESOLUTION �10. 88-113
P:�SSED, APPROVED and :�DOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert City
Council, held on this 8th day of September, 1988 by the following vote. to wit:
.��'ES: CRITES, IiELLic'. StiFDER, BE�SON
\OES: WILSO\
�BSE�T: �ONE
�BST�IN: tiOtiE
JE�IIv M. BENSO!�, MaYOR
�TTEST: �l � f�
SHEILA R. GIL"I.IGAI�. Q:a/f_ Clerk
City of Palm Desert, ifornia
dlg
J
�