HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC RES 88-092M •• M� '1�.`�: • • ;; •
A RF�OLUTI(7�I OF TE� CITY OWNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, (�E2TIFYING A NDGATIVE
DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 87-1 AS MEETING THE
RD¢JZR�VTS OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL"
�4LITY AGT OF 1970 AS AI��IDID.
Wf�tE',AS, the City of Palm Desert, California, has undertaken a project
referred to as assessment district 87-1, and
W�, said piroject is generally described as the installation of
curbs, guttexs, se�w�ex lines, and storm drain imprr�vements in the Palma Village
area, and
WE�ftF,AS, said project is generally limited by the boundaries of the Palma
Village Specific Plan and specifically identified by the map attached hereto
as �chibit "A", and
WE�RE'AS, after oca�letion of an initial study attached hereto as �hibit
"B", it was det.e.rn�ined that the project would rx�t have a significant adv�erse
impact on the erYvirorn�ent, and
WF�RF'�AS, the project w�uld have the follawing positive impacts ari tho
envirormerit :
1. The charuzeling of stoYm and nuisance waters in an efficient maruler
to planned conveyance facilities thus protecting property and
benefiting the health, safety and general welfare of the project
area.
2. A rise in the general prvpPxty values of the project area, as has
occurred in other sectians of Palm Desert when similar facilities
hav�e beesz installed.
3. A clearer delineation of street parkuzg areas by the installation of
cuz'bs ar�d gutters .
4. The facilitation of street maintenance and sweeping by the
installati� of curbs and gutters.
5. Protection of the undergro�uzd water table through the installation
of sewers.
NC7W, TF�REFORE, BE IT RESOLVID that the City of Palm Desert does certify a
negative declaratio�n of envir��erital i�act as meeting the environmental
review requirements of the California Envin�nental Quality Act of 1970 as
amerided.
0
R�T�ICN rp. 88-92
PASSED, APPR(7Vm and ADOPTID at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert
City Co�u�il, held on this 14th day of July, 1988, by the follawing vote, to
wit:
AYFS:
IV�ES :
AHSIIdT :
ABSTAIN:
CRITES; KELLY, SNYDER, WILSON, & BENSON
NONE
NONE
NONE
r,
% - / _.
JEAN M. sIIVSON, yor
ATTFST:
SHEILA R. GI�
/fr
, Ci j�f/Clerk
2
e
�4
�
�
EXHI�IT A
BOUNDARIES OF PALMA VILLAGE AREA
Pursuant to Title 14, Division 6, Article 7, Secti� 15083, of the California
Administrative C,oc3e.
��r• : � a� • •
Cv� : ��
APF�LIC�NI'/PlmJDC.T SPQ�ISOR• City of Palm Desert
PRU7F7C,T DESCRIPIZCNjLOQ�TICN: Installatian of curbs, gutte.rs, sewer lines and �
stoxm drain irt�ov�ements in Palma Village area. LL
The Directior of the Dep�.�-trnPnt of �mu�ity Develapnent, City of Palm Desert,
California, has fo�uxi that the described project will rbt have a significant
effect on the erYvi�zt. A oc�y of the Initial Study has been attactled to
do�ci.unent the reasrn,s in support of this fir�d.ir�g. Mitigati� measures, if arYy,
included in the project to avoid potentially significant effects, may also be
fotuxi attached.
, r� �
-- ----- �-- - ------ � ! �'= � -
RAN1�I�1 A. DIAZ DATE
DIRECPOR OF O�JNITY D�IEI�OPf�VT
/�
IlVITIAL S"ISa1Y
PAI�IA VTi.T.�[� �ESSNFNP DISTRICT
1. FARTH
b and c The project calls for ti�e installatio�n of curbs and gutters,
se+,,re.r liries, and stozm drain impravgnents. As part of the
rx�rmal voc�.stzuctioaz process there will be soil caY�action. In
additi�, mirx�r changes in topography may be required in order
to p�r�avide for proper drainage.
2. WATER
a ar�d b As stated under item 1 there will be changes in to�ography whtch
cause diz�ectiaz of wates movem�nts and drainage pattp.rns. This,
how�ever, will be a positive ir�act charu�eling storm waters in an
efficient manr�er and protecti� praperties.
3. EOONCNIIC L06S
a There will be a char�e in property values upward. Thi.s is based
oaz past experience of similar projects.
16. TRANSPORTATIONjCIRQJL�ATION
b � The installati� of curbs will more clearly delineate street
parkiixJ areas .
17. PUBLIC SEWF�S
e The maintenance and sweeping of streets will be facilitated by
the curbs and gutters. In additian, the prr�per channeling of
storm and nuisance water will deter street pavement
deterioratian.
� . C.�Sz YO .
�
��
..�� ��. .f`So�'' ' �� � '�`'^ � 'b...' ..�s�L"�'�
�iPZ:�ON�i�`iTa►L SEi3VICES DEPT.
IVITIAL STUDY
� . EWZAO`iylE,`iT3L EVALU�TI02i CHECKLIST
�
�
��� i
�fOTE: The availability of data necgssary ta addr�ss the tcpics listed
below shall farm the basis af a decision as to whether the
application is cansidered camplete for purposes qf env�ronmental
assessment.
E3�V IRO�iME�yTAL IMPaCTS
(Explanations af all "yes" and "maybe" answers, possible mitigat�ton
measures and coc�ents ar� provided on attached sheet5). ,
, Yes Maybe No
�
�
1. Earth. Wi.11 the prnposal rtsul.t in: .
a. Unstable earth conditions or tn thanqes in �
ge�logic su65tructurEs?
b. Oisrvptions, displacementS, campactian, or �,�.
overccvering of the soil?
c. Change in topography or ground surface relief �
features?
d. The des�ruction, cavering. ar modification
— of any unique qealoqic or physical features?
e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of
so i 1 s, ei ther on ar off the s i te?
2. Air. Will the proposal result in: �
a. Air e.►niss�ans or deteriorat�on of ambient air
quality? •
b. The cr�3tion of objectianable odors?
c. Alteration of air movement. moisture, or
temperature, or any change in climate,
e�ther locally or regionally?
. �
0
�
�
�
�-
��
.�
0
�
0
3. Wat_r. Will the praposal result tn:
a._, Changes . i n curr�nts .'or the courst cr
�'• di recti an cf watar� movement3? �
_ G .
b. Chang�s in-ahsarpt��n r`at�s, drainage
. patt�rns, or the rata and" amount a�f
surfacE watE� rvnoff?
:.
c. A1 taratzans ta �he cnurse or fl ow af
flood wat�rs?
d. A1tEratian af.the directian or rate of
fiow of ground waters?
e. Change in the quantity of grnund watars,
either through dirett additians or with-
dra�als, or thrvugh �ntErca¢tion of an
aquifer by cvtS or excavatians?
f. Reduc �� on f n the amavnt of water ottier-
wise available far public water su�pliesl
4. Plant Li�e. Will the proQa�a] result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or
numbarS of any speties of plants
(including trEes, shrubs, grass, and
craps�? • .
b. Reduc�ion of the nwr�ers of any unique� r3r�,
or endangered spec�es of plants? ,
c. Intrflduction ef ne� spec� es of p1 antS i nta
an are3. or in a barrier ta the normal
re�lenishment of exfStinq species?
,
5. Animal.l.ife. Wi11 the praposal result in:
a. Changes in th2 diversity of species. or
nurr�ers of any speci es of anima 1 s(6i rds ,
land aninals including reptiles, or
insects)?
b; Reduction �f the numbars of any�unique�
rare, ar endangered species of aninals?
c. Intrnducti on af nev+ speci es of anima I s
intc an area. or resu]t in a barrier ta
the mi9ration or movement af animals7
�� d. Oet�rioratian to existing wildliie h ab���t �
Y. ts Mayb�
.�
_
��
—
. ._
.___ __..
I
..
� _
— . —
Z�
No
—
�
—
.�
�
,�-.._
—
�
_ �
�
—
. .`�
— —
�
�
____ —
` "'..':. ,
�
�
�
� • .
s
�
(/�
�` � 1
6. Natural Resourtes. Will the proposal result in:
a. Incr�ase in�.the rate of use of any naturai
rp50UrC85? .
6. Oealetion of any nan-rene�abie natural
resourte?
7. En�. Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial amaunts of fuel ar energy7
b. Oemand upan existing sourt�s of enerqy, or re-
quire the.deQelopment of new sacsrcgs of
energy? •
8. Risk of Uoset.•�Does the proposai invclve a
risk v an explosion or the release of�
hazardous substances (including, but not limited
to, Qesticides,� oil, �chemicals, or radiatian) in
the event of an accident or upset canditions? .
� 9. E�-�nonic Loss. Wilj the proposal resuit 1n:
a. A chanqe in•fhe value of property and
improvements endangered by flooding?
b, A change irt the value of property and
improvenen�s expose� to geolagi� haz�rds
beyor.d accep�ed .CGt�r:uni �y ri sk standards?
10. Naise. Will *!�e propasal increase ex�sting
noise levels to�the point at which acceated
co:rmunity nais� and vibration levels are
exceeded?
ii. Land L'se. Will.the prvposal result in the
a tTeratian af the presert developed or
pianned tand us2 of an area? •
12. Oo�� SOdC2. Wi11 the propesal lead to a
decre�se �n the-�maunt of designated open
space?
13. Pooulatzon. Will �he proposal r2su1 � in:
a. Alt�raticn or the location, distribution.
density, ar grot•rth r�te of the humzn
pvpulation of the City?
b. Change in the population distribution by
. aye. �ncome, �eligion, ratial, or ethnic
grnup, o�cu�atianal class. househ�ld type?
Yes Mavbe
�_
—�• _..
_
_ �
. —
.
.
���� _.__
� __._
3.
�
i
�
—
�
�`JC.
—
�
�
�'' '
� �
7�.
�
i �
�
(, �
�
�
0
0
Yes
____
14. Emolovment. Will the proposal result in
add�tiana new long-term jobs provided, or a
ch�nge in the number and per cant employed,
unemployed, and underemployed?
a �
15. Hou�s�na. Wi11 the praposal rEsult in:
a. Change in number and per cent af hausing
units by type ipriCe ar rEnt ranqe,
zoning cateqory, owner-accupied �nd rEntal,
etc. ) rel ative ta demand or ta nwn�er vf � ---
families in various income classes in trie City?
�
b. Impacts cn existing housing or creatian of a " .
demand for additional housing?
___.
I6. TranSOOr'tatl0n/CirCttidtl0n. 4ii11 the proposal .
resu t tn: • -
a.� Generatian of additianal vehicular mcvement?
—
b. Effects on exist�ng paricing facil ities. ar �
demand for ne� park�ng?
c. Irr� act upon existing transpartation systems?
d. Alterations to present patterns af circulation
�r mc�rement of peopl e and/cr goods?
e. Increase in traffic hazards ta motor vehicles, •
bicyclists, or pedestrians?
I7. Public Ser•�ices. Wili the proposal have an effect
upon, or resu t in a need for, new or altered
governmental services in any of the fo1lv�Ninq
are�s:
a. Fire protection? ,
�b. Police protection?
c. Schoals? _ '
d. Parks or other recreational facilities?
.___
e. Maintenance af public faciiities. includinq
roads? '�,
, f. Other governrrental services?
.. . , �
. . ,.. ...
0
4.
Ma� Na
. �
��
__..
—
�
.___
�
.�
;�
.�
.._ _
�
�
�
�
�-
,�
�
�
__.. �
., '
0
0
0
C�
.
I8. Public Fiscal Balance. Will the propasal
resu t in a net c�anqe in gavernment fiscal
flow (revenues less operating expenditures
and annualized capital expenditures�?
.19. Utilities. Will the prcposal resuit in a
. need for new systems. or altierations to the
fallawing utflities:
-.
a. Power ar natural gas?
b. Ccrrmunications system?
t. Wdter? • �
d. Sewer cr septic tanks? �
e. Storm water drair.age?
,,
f. Solid waste and disposal? �
Z0. Human HeaTth. Will the proposal result in:
. a. The cr�ation af any health hazard or
patential health hazard?
b. A chanqe in the level of comnunity health
care provided?
21. Social Se r�ices. Will the proposal rEsult in
an increased denand for provision of general
� social.services? �
22. Aesthet;cs. Will the proposal resuit in:
a. Obstructian of any scEnic vista.or view
open to the public? .
b. The crEation of an aesthetically offensive
site oQen to public view?• -
c. Lessening of the overall neighborhood
{or area) attractiveness, pl�a=antness,
and uniqueness?
23. Lioht and Glar�. Will the proposal produce
new tgnt or g are? .
24. ArcheoToaitalt`�istorical. Wi11 the proposal
resu t in an a terac�on of a significant
archeological or historical site, structure,
_ object, or buildin9' -
� '
Yes MaYbe No
. �
_ . ._,_ _ _
r
—
.
—
—
�
�
—
—
-- __._
.
_.__ ._
X
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
`,�.
�
�
. �
. �
� �
�
0
� '. .
\ t'
25. Mandatary Findines of Siani�icanc�.
a. Ooes the praject have the potential to degrade
the quality of the enviranment or to curt3il
the di versi ty i n the envi ronmen�� .
b. Daes the project have the patential to achieve
short-term, ta the disadvantage af lang-term,
environmental.goals? (A shart-term impact on
the environment is one which occurs in a
relatively brief, definitive period of time
w�ile lonq-term impacts wi11 endure well inta
the iutur-e. ) - , -
c. Ooes the project have impacts which are indi-
vidually limited, bvt cumulatively censiderable?
(A project may impact on tivo ar more separate
resources wherE the impact on each resource
is rElatively small, but where the effect of
th e total of those impacts on the environment
is significant.) �
d. Ooes the project have environnental effects
which will cause substantial adver5e effects
on human beinqs, either directly or indirectly?
0
6.
Yes Maybe No
. 1,
X
— —
.�� �, fi
_._._ _
_ �
Ini ti al Study Pr�parEd By: -� A. �� fI z
f�g�,f. �.`fy `k5r. �,✓: rF <or�►• �h ��%,�� ���'
0
t
0
�
r ;
. �