Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC RES 89-024_ � RESOLUTION N0. 89-24 A RE.SOLUT [ ON OF THF C I TY COUNC 1 L OF THF C f TY pF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNEXING CERTAIN Cc�NTIGU0U5 TERR[TORY TQ SAfD CITY UNDER THE F�ROVISIONS OF THE CURTESE/KNOX LOCAL GOVERNMENT REORGAN(ZATION ACT i)F 19t�5, WHICH PROCEEUINGS ARE f1E5[t:;NATEU AS PALM DESERf ANNEXATION NU. 23. �AFCO N0. 88-22-4. WHEREAS, on February 25. 1988, the Citv Council did adopt Resolution No. 8£i-l7 initi�ting �nnexation pro�eedinqs for Annexation No. 23; and WHEREA5, the l.ocal Agency Forrnation c:ommission held a public hearing relative to Annexation No. L'3 on February ?3, 1989, and approved said annexation with the determination that the City Council of the City of Paim Desert be authorized the Conducrinq Authority; and WHEREAS, the City Co�ncil of the City of Palm Desert in its capacity as Condu�ting Authority held a noticed public hearing March 23, 1989. pursuant to C�rtese-Knox Local Government Rec�rganization Act of 1985, Section 57000; and WHEREAS, prior to and at said public hearinq there were no written protests filed and not withdrawn; and WHEREAS, the proposed annexation represents a logical extension of the City �f Palm DPsert's boundaries and will not be taxed for existing general b�nded indebtedness by the City of Palm Desert, and the regular Riverside County assessment roll shall be utilized in the future. NOW, fHEREFORE, BE 1� RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California. as follows: � F ihat the territory described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference, be and the same is hereby, by this resolution annexed to the City of Palm Desert. . That the city clerk is hereby instrur,ted and directed to transmit fifteen (15) certified r.opiPs nf this resolution to LAFCO along with anY other requirPd submittals. PASSED, APPROVED and AO(�PTFD by the City Council of fihe City of Palm Clesert on this 23rd day of Marr_h. 19Et9, by the fol�owing vote, to wit: AYES: KELLY, SNYUER, WILSON NOES: NONF ABSEN�: BENSON. CRITES aesra[N: NONE Ai'TEST: . � �/ �,y% ,. . � , �� � , / � -'�� SHEILA R. GIL.�i�N, CitY~�ler � �f - C: i ty of Pa 1 m D�sert , Ca 1 i for�a /rm ' / �" � . _...— . - --> �v-�� Y WILSON, Mayor j ' < Rl:SU[.U'Cf.�l� ''). �`)-�'+ ExIiIBIT "A" AI�1gCATi�i NO. 23 CITY OF PAII�i DESERT LAFCO NU. 88-22-4 � That portion of Section 10 TSS R6E S.H.M., being the Southeast quarter of said Section 10, more specifically described as follows: Heginning at the Southeast corner of said Section 10, thence S. 89° 46'OS"W., a distance of 2658.54' along the Southerly section line of Section 10 to the South quarterpoint of Section 10; Thence N. 0° 04'21"E., a distance of 2655.56' to the center of Section 10; Thence N. 89° 45'26"E., a distance of 2658.07' to the East quarterpoint of Section 10; Thence S. 0° 03'45"W., a distance of 2656.05' to the point of Beginnirx�. Area equals 160 acres, more or less. THIS LEG�L OESCR�PTION APPROV�i; ���"' 8� EY Rlv RSiOE COunTY SURVEYOR e Y _ .��� ,�,J� �� � a I . ._.' � I -�u.+�::���. , �r� �� ���1� �F �� • � �..� ,, � ti���, �� �r .��i � ,; �.�\ �� �..,�.,�.I'�/i�� - ,1 �/�,� / •''��-�` r Il. ��II4 � ��_ , '�,�' �i,��= �1 = __ { I , A _-� � l: � `rIP J.`3 %=.�`L=�t �.-cDVH T ctv� n�i�a ' ' L_..__ �.�:I{�T.���t7r^LY'-_.-,,o�'� ..1 O �' �,/• I� .I - � T\• � ~�yV,�/ ,� � , �-= _.� � , , . o+�'I o � '^� , r �.I.� � �., r ' h � � �� . � Hov�tr �AN� �';r �r /� �—(I— I I� J � ,_,�_ i f� r �I.,'1�� I 'I ' .�r ` 3 4' �!, � lr������ �III��II W t {�L. ' d . N07 1�0 SCALE: NowiM � � � ' PALM DEBERT CITY LIMIT �:' . .. .....�: •�!!! �:� N 89'45' 26'E 2658.0 ' COUNT' �: `° � s o � :::: �-, N • ;w P.D. � o � �, J } :•: W . 1— ':• > i U �� � : u. � ;O w :� � 'H w ' `� z � �'': o � ::. V < a w � Il .� o Z S 89°a6�U5''�^ ,�658.5a' . fHIS M1jP-APPRUVED._ �� � �- �� SY RIVERSiDE COUNTY SURVEYOR 8 Y � ro--z, �f-�c ' O F 1 ... . � Q O t RI:SOLL'TIO�I -"'' o EXIIIl3IT "3 O J wl � � � R VER9IDE NOTE: :� Thls plat was prepared Irom record data only � and doe� not represent ACRES a s�r�ey o� �ne PROP. . p�operty Shown h■��. CITY ANNEXATiON �::�: �� o :':•: � :�:: � c� 3 . Q c �o � �Point of 8eginning COUNTY OF RIV�Rs)A� �'�' '����i�irF��Ls�aYlL�li-i��ic-�iiiia�ait'i ii�t"� . � ■ INOIAN WELL9 CITY LIMIT 15 14 � ■ ' . � LAFCO N0.88-22—�4 DATE �:�'�--�---. ,� :�-.�--� � R:1��n�! A D:A7 ;0!.!�I.:.cV.� PLA PR�POSEt7 ANNEXATION NO. 23 Drnwn y: 1'O THE CITY OF PALM DE9EqT �� �'��t, rv. saru P�cao SE t/4 of BECTION 1Q T5S RdE 4 COMMUNITY DEVEL.OPMENT/PLANNINO, PA�M Dti9FF�T SCALE: 1'-800' RESOLUTION NO. 89-24 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF rj PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNEXING CERTAIN CONTIGUOUS TERRITORY TO SAID CITY UNDER THE C1 PROVISIONS OF THE CORTESE/KNOX LOCAL GOVERNMENT REORGANIZATION ACT OF 1985, WHICH PROCEEDINGS ARE DESIGNATED AS PALM DESERT ANNEXATION NO. 23. LAFCO NO. 88-22-4. WHEREAS, on February 25, 1988, the City Council did adopt Resolution No. 88-17 initiating annexation proceedings for Annexation No. 23; and WHEREAS, the Local Agency Formation Commission held a public hearing relative to Annexation No. 23 on February 23, 1989, and approved said annexation with the determination that the City Council of the City of Palm Desert be authorized the Conducting Authority; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Palm Desert in its capacity as Conducting Authority held a noticed public hearing March 23, 1989, pursuant to Cortese -Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, Section 57000; and WHEREAS, prior to and at said public hearing there were no written protests filed and not withdrawn; and WHEREAS, the proposed annexation represents a logical extension of the City of Palm Desert's boundaries and will not be taxed for existing general bonded indebtedness by the City of Palm Desert, and the regular Riverside County assessment roll shall be utilized in the future. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: That the territory described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference, be and the same is hereby, by this resolution annexed to the City of Palm Desert. 2. That the city clerk is hereby instructed and directed to transmit fifteen (15) certified copies of this resolution to LAFCO along with any other required submittals. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert on this 23rd day of March, 1989, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: KELLY, SNYDER, WILSON NOES: NONE ABSENT: BENSON, CRITES / ABSTAIN: NONE mac' % �cc.iv Ai:FI 1)(?C� .�Yj l`OiM, Mayor i ATTESTS A iTAt r,S CFRTIFIE� C f, F (� ICATE 15 TRUEAND f CORRE , rl OPYOFTHE )RI, :,^DLO, FILE AND ON l RECORD IN IVY OFFICF SHE ILA R. GI;ser��, City Cler Dated: City of Palm D Califor is /tm SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, City Clejr Gty of Palm Oeserl California %YQ- 1 Board of Supervisors Countv of Riverside M ro z ti" 3 RESOLUTION NO. 81-362 DETERMINING THE AMOUNT OF PROPERTY TAX REVENUE TO BE EXCHANGED 4 BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AND THE CITY OF PALM DESERT RELATING TO ANNEXATIONS TO 5 THE CITY OF PALM DESERT 6 BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supexvisrs of the County 7 of Riverside, State of California, in regular session assembled on 8 October 13, 1981, that: 9 1. The County of Riverside and the City of Palm Desert 10 are the agencies whose area or responsibility for service would be n affected by annexations to the City of Palm Desert. 12 2. Representatives of each of the affected agencies have 13 met and negotiated an exchange of property tax revenue to become 14 effective for tax purposes beginning July 1, 1981, for all areas. 15 annexed to the City until such time as this Resolution is rescinded 16 or superseded, as follows: 17 a. The City of Palm Desert shall assume the responsi- 3.8. bility for all general municipal services to areas annexes 19 as are required by law or presently provided throughout 20 the.City, and for such service shall receive 25% of that 21 portion of the property tax revenue generated within 22 territories annexed under the ad valorem tax rate estab- 23 lished by Article XIII A of the Constitution of the State 24 of California, that represents the County of Riverside's 25 share of such property tax revenue. 26 b. The County Auditor shall upon annexation by the 27 City'convert the above -established percentage figure into 28 actual dollar figures and thereafter allocate to the City JAMES H. ANGELL uIaRA roc. such property tax revenue in accord with the provisions WVEflSIOF CAl1FORNIA I' 1 of Sections 95 et seq., of the Revenue and Taxation Code. 2 3. The City Council of the City of Palm Desert and the 3 Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside do hereby agree to o 4 the above -recited exchange of property tax revenue. 5 4. The Clerk of this Board shall transmit a certified 6 copy of this Resolution to each affected agency and to the Executive; 7 Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission and to the County 8 Auditor pursuant to Section 99 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. 9 10 11 Roll Call resulted as follows: Ayes: Abraham, Younglove and McCandless 12 Noes: None 13 Absent: Schroeder and Ceniceros 14 15 16 17 18. . 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 PC:jf 27 10/8/81 fhe loreacina is certified to ba a lrue copy of a 28 ecolun cr i,ly 6d0p'sd by d Lcaro' :r $uper- `e DAMES H. ANG ELL - oisors c^ COUNTYCOUNSEL�+`0 3oerd LAW LIBRARY BLDG. RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA —2— a `M1 N RESOLUTION NO. 81-133 C? c'o A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE AMOUNT OF PROPERTY TAX REVENUE TO BE EXCHANGED BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AND THE CITY OF PALM DESERT RELATING TO ANNEXATIONS TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CLAIFORNIA. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert in regular session assembled on this 24th day of Sent 1981, that: 1. The County of Riverside and the City of Palm Desert are the agencies whose area or responsibility for service would be affected by annexations to the City of Palm Desert. 2. Representatives of each of the affected agencies have met and negotiated an exchange of property tax revenue as follows, to become effective for tax purposes beginning July 1, 1981, for all areas annexed to the City until such time as this resolution is rescinded or superceded. A. The City of Palm Desert shall assume responsibility for all general municipal services to areas annexed as are required by law or presently provided throughout the City, and for such service, the City shall receive 25% of that portion of the property tax revenue generated within territories annexed under the ad valorem tax rate established by Article XIII A of the Constitution of the State of California, that represents the County of Riverside's share of such property tax revenue. B. The County Auditor shall upon annexation by the City convert the above -established percentage figure into actual dollar figures and thereafter allocate to the City such property [ tax revenue in accord with the provisions of Section 95 et, seq. of the Revenue and Taxation Code. 3. The City Council of the City of Palm Desert does hereby agree to the above -recited exchange of property tax revenue. 4. The Clerk shall transmit a certified copy of this resolution to each affected agency and to the Executive Office of the Local Agency Formation Commission and to the Auditor of the County of Riverside pursuant to Section 99 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert City Council, held on this 24th day of September, 1981, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: McPherson, Newbrander, Puluqi, Snyder & Wilson NOES: None ABSENT: None f ABSTAIN: I None 00 Citv of Palm Desert. Ca EXHIBIT "A" ANNEXATION NO. 23 CITY OF PALM DESERT LAFOO N0. 88-22-4 That portion of Section 10 T5S R6E S.B.M., being the Southeast.quarter of said Section 10, more specifically described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of said Section 10, thence S. 690 46105"W., a distance of 2658.54' along the Southerly section line of Section 10 to the South quarterpoint of Section 10; Thence N. 0o 04'21"E., a distance of 2655.56' to the center of Section 10; Thence N. 890 45'26"E., a distance of 2658.07' to the East quarterpoint of Section 10; Thence S. Oc 03'45"W., a distance of 2656.05' to the point of Beginning. Area equals 160 acres, more or less. THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION APPROVLC BY RIVERSIDE COUNTY SURVEYOR ILI AlON r CLUB Do t ■ ' e DIE O MOYLEY LAME /,. W L wul KEY MAP NOT 10 SCALE: PALM DESERT CITY LIMIT X. ... N 89045' 26'E 2658.Oy'•000NT�'OF RIVERSIDE - '" NOTE: This plat was prepared from record data only Xe and does not represeni 160 ACRES a survey of the •a property shown hereon PROP. w P.D. CITY ANNEXATIONX. r .. U ;. 0%11. i I— :;:;U �:ti•: Q N�:•. Lu > to •:. J•• :X: Point of Beginning y;Z S 89°a6 U5"P" e658:54' COUNTY IF RIV€R.$JJ�F:,..ytl' _ ■ (INDIAN WELLS CITY LIMIT 15 14 M THIS P APPROVED I YIP BY RIVERSIDE COUNTY SURVEYOR ■ E BY �. fir'—•c i LAFCO NO.88-22-4 DATE E PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 23 °/1/ ;c�.,�V., TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT N. SAN PEDRO SE 1/4 of SECTION 10 T5S AGE SCALE: RAMON A. DIAZ 1'-600, COMM.DEV./PLANNING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/PLANNING, PALM DESERT I t J HO yV�-L E Y• fLLAAA-MI�B_ N 89'45' 26'E 2658.0 ¢ O O RESOLUTION o EXHIBIT "B 0 J I wl KEY MAP NOT TO SCALE: TN I .11 PALM DESERT CITY LIMIT ----� COUNT"' 'OF RIVERSIDE 0 160 ACRES N PROP. P.D. CITY ANNEXATION W (1 J m — W ¢ LL O } H O U W .. u F.a •b Z S 89046'05"H :658.54' COUNTY OF RI A Q NOTE: This plat was prepared from record date only and does not represent a survey of the property shown hoon. r Point of Beginning e� � ■ r INDIAN WELLS CITY LIMIT 15 14 THIS PP APPROVED _ j� BY RIVERSIDE COUNTY SURVEYOR ■ BY >7 LAFCO NO.88-22-4 DATE PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 23 °N n r1 TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT N. SAN PEDRO SE 11A of SECTION 10 TSS RCE SCALE: RAMON A. DIAZ 1'-800' COMM.OEV.JPLANNINO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/PLANNING, PALM oSAnAT za 69 RESOLUTI( 0. 89-24 EXHIBIT "A" ANNEXATION NO. 23 ciTy OF PALM DESERT LAFCO NO. B8-22-4 That portion of Section 10 T5S R6E S.B.M., being the Southeast quarter of said Section 10, more specifically described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of said Section 10, thence S. 890 46'05"W., a distance of 2658.54' along the Southerly section line of Section 10 to the South quarterpoint of Section 10; Thence N. 00 04'21"£., a distance of 2655.56' to the center of Section 10; Thence N. 890 45'26"E., a distance of 2658.07' to the East quarterpoint of Section 10; Thence S. 00 03'45"W., a distance of 2656.05' to the point of Beginning. Area equals 160 acres, more or less. THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION APPROM BY RIVERSIDE COUNTY SURVEYOR 1 Local Agency Formation Commission County of Riverside 2 3 RESOLUTION NO. 01-89 APPROVING THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY 4, TO CITY OF PALM DESERT LAFCO NO. 88-22-4 5 6 BE IT RESOLVED AND DETERMINED by the Local Agency Formation 7 Commission in regular session assembled on February 23, 1989, that the 8 annexation of approximately 160 acres generally located at the northwest g corner of 42nd Avenue and E1 Dorado Drive, as more particularly described in 10 Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part hereof, to the City of Palm 11 Desert, is approved. 3.21 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND FOUND that: 131 1. Commission proceedings were commenced by resolution of the City 14 i' of Palm .Desert. 15,1 2. The annexation is proposed to provide more municipal services 16'by the City of Palm Desert. 171 3. The distinctive short form designation of the proposed 18 annexation is LAFCO No. 88-22-4, Annexation No. 23 to City of Palm Desert. 1g,'i 4. An environmental assessment was made on the proposal and a 20 negative declaration filed thereon by the City of Palm Desert pursuant to the 21 California Environmental Quality Act. The negative declaration has been 22 reviewed and considered. 23 5. The boundaries of the territory as set forth in Exhibit "A", 24 attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, have been approved 25 by the County Surveyor, are contiguous to the City of Palm Desert, and are 26 approved. 27 6. The territory to be annexed is inhabited, there being more than 28 12 registered voters residing therein. RIVERSIDE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION 4030 LEMON STREET 12TH FLOOR RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501-3651 (714) 787-2786 1 7. This annexation is consistent with the sphere of influence of 2 the City of Palm Desert and all other affected local agencies. 3 8. The City of Palm Desert is designated conducting authority. 4 9. The Executive Officer is directed to transmit a certified copy 5 of this Resolution to the above -designated conducting authority, to the chief 6 petitioners, if different from the conducting authority, and to each affected 7 agency. 8 9 10 � / F.—GIUAR BOYD/JR., (/ hairman 12 � 13 I certify the above resolution was passed and adopted by the Local Agency Formation Commission of Riverside County on February 26, 1989. 14 15 �"�'�'G 16 � KENNETH M. MOHR' ' Executive Officer aN 17 120 18 9 m 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STATE BOARD OF EOLALIZA1 SCHEDULE OF PROCESSING FEES Section 54902.5, Government Code Effective July 1, 1984 1. GENERAL APPLICATION: The fees set faith in this schedule shall apply to all statements filed pursuant to Sections 54900 to 54902 of the Government Code. Statements must be filed by January 1 if they are to be reflected an the next tax roll. (See Section 3 M.) The provisions and definitions given in Sections 2 and 3 below are to help you compute the feei and serve as guidelines to insure acceptance of maps and legal descrip- tions. Fees shall accompany the statements (See Section 3 (a).) Mail statements, maps and fees to, Valuation Division, State Board of Equalization, P.O. Box 1713, Sacramento, CA 95808. 2. DESCRIPTIONS AND MAPS. After our initial processing has been completed, all filed documents are micro- filmed and then destroyed. Any document that will not produce a readable photographic image must be rejected and returned to the sender for replacement.. See Section 2 (9). , (a) Every description must be self-sufficient within itself and without the necessity of reference to any extraneous document. When a description refers to a deed of record, the deed should be used only as a second. ary reference. (b) When writing a metes and bounds description of a contiguous annexation,all details of the contiguous portions) of the boundary may be omitted. The points of departure from the existing boundary must be clearly established. (c) A z:ecific parcel description in sectionalized land (e.g., The SW % of Section 22, TIN, RIW) is permissible without a metes and bounds description of the perimeter boundary. (d) A parcel description making reference only to a subdivision or a lot within a subdivision is not acceptable, unless all dimensions needed to plot the boundaries are given on an accompanying plat. The relationship of lot lines with street right-of-ways must be clearly indicated. (a) Every map must clearly indicate all existing streets, roads and highways within and adjacent to the subject territory, together with the current names of these thoroughfares. (f) Every map shall bear a scale and a north point. If a reduced map is to be filed, the original map must have a graphic scale affixed to it before the reduction is made. (g) The point of beginning of the legal description must be shown on the map. The boundaries of the sub- ject territory must be distinctively shown on the map without obliterating any essential geographic or political features. The use of yellow lines to highlight the boundaries is urged, as this color photographs as a light grey. (h) All mops must be professionally drawn or copied. Rough sketches of maps or plats will not be accepted. 3. DEFINITIONS AND SPECIAL FEE PROVISIONS. r, (a) "Single area" means any separate geographical area regardless of ownership. A lot, a subdivision at a township could each be a "Single area". For the purpose of this schedule a geographical area which is divided into two or more parcels by a roadway, railroad right-of-way, river or stream shall be considered a "Single area". A "Single area" does not include two areas that are contiguous only at a point or two areas that are contiguous to an existing boundary or a city or district but not to each other. (b) "Zane*" include temporary zones in highway lighting districts, other zones, improvement districts, or any other sub -units of a city or parent district. (c) "Concurrent transaction" includes any combination of formations, annexations and withdrawals of o sfnale area under one resolution or ordinance. The fee shall be according to the fee Schedule (4(a) ), there is no additional costs for the number of transactions involved. If more than one resolution or ordinance, each single area must be separately computed under the fee schedule (4(a)). (d) The fees in Section 4 of this schedule are based on the concept that any given action is confined to a single county. If more than one county is involved, add $150.00 for second and each additional county involved. (e) The processing shall accompany each statement uniee or arrangement for quarterly prymenis, has been made. The use ,or quarterly payments shall be limited to those governmental entities that normally file more than 25 statements each year. Quarterly payments must be made during the month following the end of each quarter. See Section 3(h). (f) If the January 1st statutory deadline for filing statements is extended by a special validating act, the fees in Section 4 shall be doubled. If the statement is filed between December l st and the and of the annual filing poriod the fees in Section 4 shall be increased by ten percent. (g) If an annexed or detached territory comprises an entire city, district, or zone without affecting the existence of that city, district or zone, the total processing fee shall be $150.00. (h) Payment of the fee for the formation of o city or district may be deferred until that city or district receives its first revenue (Ch. 512, Stats. 1978). Each deferment shall be subject to a $25 billing charge. IMPORTANT: IF YOU HAVE AN UNUSUAL SITUATION OR ARE UNSURE, DO NOT GUESS AT THE FEE, CALL (916) 445.6950 OR (916) 322.7183 OR WRITE TAX AREA SERVICES SECTION, P.O. BOX 1713, SACRAMENTO, CA 95808, FOR HELP TO DETERMINE THE CORRECT FEE. 4. PROCESSING FEES. See Section 3 for definitions and modifications of the fees under certain circumstances. A separate fee must be computed for each ordinance or resolution. (a) .Single area transactions ACREAGE FEE $ 160.00 li — 20 $ 180.00 21 — 60 $ 250.00 61 — 100 $ 350.00 101 — 660 $ 480.00 661 — 1500 $ 700.00 1501 — 3000 $ 900.00 3001 — 6000. $1,200.00 over 6000 $1,750.00 (b) Dissolutions or consolidations, per district or zone . . . $170.00. 3i its ., CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION ' co i a Ll Pursuant to the Cortese/Knox Local Government Reorganization AInty, o 1985�5 io 57201, 57202, and 57205, this Certificate is hereby issued byExecutive 0 M Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Riverside California. �L t� 1. Short -form designation, as designated by LAFCO is 88-22-4. 2. The names of each city involved in, thi�,change of organization or reorgani- tion and the kind or type of change of organization ordered for each city are as follows: City Type of -Change of Organization - City of, Palm Desert Annexation No. 23........... ..................................................................... . 3. The above -listed city(ies) are located within the following county(ies): . County of Riverside 4. A description of the boundaries of the above -cited change of organization or reorganization are shown on the attached map and legal description, marked Exhibit "A" and by reference incorporated herein. 5. This change of organization or reorganization has been approved subject to the following terms and conditions, if any: None. 6. The date of adoption of the Resolution ordering this change of organization or reorganization (with or without election) was March 23, 1989. A certified copy of Resolution No. 89-24 is attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein. I hereby certify that as Executive Officer for the Local Agency Formation Com- mission of Riverside County, the above -listed agency has completed a change of organization or reorganization pursuant to the Cortese/Knox Local Government Act of 1985. Dated: April 17, 1989 By: A. ..�� . ..... . . . KE N T M. MOHR Executive Officer 0 t