HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC RES 00-135RESOLUTION NO.
00-135
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA,
ESTABLISHING A PILOT PROGRAM FOR THE CITY OF PALM DESERT TO
PROVIDE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR NEIGHBORHOOD ASSESSMENT
DISTRICTS. A POLICY IN CONNECTION WITH THE INITIATION OF SPECIAL
ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS BY PETITION OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS FOR
THE PURPOSE OF FINANCING THE CONVERSION OF OVERHEAD UTILITY
FACILITIES TO UNDERGROUND LOCATIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT HEREBY FINDS,
DETERMINES, RESOLVES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The legislature of the State of California has found and declared that, in many
areas of the State, landowners, cities, public agencies and public utilities desire to convert
existing overhead electric and communication facilities to underground locations by means of
special assessment proceedings, that a public purpose will be served by providing a procedure to
accomplish this conversion, and that it is in the public interest to provide for the conversion by
special assessment proceedings.
Section 2. Homeowners in various locations in the City of Palm Desert have expressed a
desire for the City Council of the City of Palm Desert to undertake special assessment
proceedings for the purpose of financing the conversion of overhead utility facilities to
underground locations.
Section 3. To assist homeowners in the cost of the underground conversion of overhead
utilities the City Council of the City of Palm Desert hereby establishes a pilot program to provide
financial assistance to neighborhoods which form undergrounding assessment districts. The City
of Palm Desert undergrounding assistance program shall be initially funded in the amount of not
to exceed $3 million, available to pay for certain eligible undergrounding assessment district
costs. The following six (6) conditions shall apply:
1. The City undergrounding assistance program shall be available to neighborhood
underground assessment districts on a first -come -first -serve basis. To qualify,
neighborhoods must initiate the assessment district proceedings by the submission
of the petition described below, certification of the petition and adoption of the
resolution of assessment district formation by the City Council of the City of Palm
Desert.
2. Only certain assessment district costs are eligible for funding by the City of Palm
Desert undergrounding assistance program they include, but not limited to, the
following: 1) Engineering fees; 2) administration and supervision costs; 3) sale of
bonds which finance the district; 4) work within the public right-of-way to include
trenching, backfill, and tie-in paving.
G \C tyMgr\Monica O'Reilly\wpdocs\Pat Conlon\AssmntResItn wpd
RESOLUTION NO.
00-135
3. Assessment district costs which are not eligible for funding by the City of Palm Desert
undergrounding assistance program include, but not limited to, the following: 1) Work
and equipment on private property; 2) conduit, conductors, and equipment owned by the
private electrical, telephone, and cable television companies.
4. The total amount of eligible costs funded by the City of Palm Desert undergrounding
assistance program shall not exceed 50 percent of the overall cost of the underground
assessment district.
5. Neighborhood districts which are eligible for the City of Palm Desert undergrounding
assistance program are shown on Exhibit A of this resolution. Smaller contiguous
neighborhood districts may be combined into one larger district, but in no case can the
districts shown on Exhibit A be subdivided into smaller districts.
6. Neighborhood undergrounding assessment districts have a one-time eligibility for the
City of Palm Desert undergrounding assistance program. If a neighborhood underground
assessment district fails to form, and funds are expended on engineering and/or legal
and/or administration activities, that district will be precluded from future participation in
the City undergrounding assistance program.
Section 4. Pursuant to the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 (Streets and Highways
Code Section 10000, et semc .) (thc "1913Act"), proceeding for a conversion must be initiated by
either a petition of property owners or by a determination of the City Council that the City or a
public utility has voluntarily agreed to pay over 50 percent of all costs of conversion, excluding
costs of users' connections to underground electric or communication facilities. The 1913 Act
provides that a petition for proceedings for conversion must be signed by not less than five
owners of assessable land in the proposed assessment district, as shown on the last equalized roll
used by the City, owning lands constituting more than one-half of all assessable lands within the
proposed assessment district.
Section 5. Once proceedings have been initiated by a petition of property owners, the
City Council may undertake to complete proceedings to form an assessment district and to levy
and collect assessments against properties in such assessment district to pay for the costs of
undergrounding overhead utility facilities. However, pursuant to Article XIIID of the California
Constitution, the formation of the assessment district must be abandoned in the event of a
majority protest. A majority protest will exist if more ballots are received from property owners
who oppose the assessment than from those who support it. In determining the existence of a
majority protest, ballots must be weighted in proportion to the assessment against the property
for which the ballot is cast.
G \C tyMgr\M 0111 ca U'Reilly`,wpdocs\Pat Conlon\AssmntReslln wpd
Page 2
RESOLUTION NO.
00-135
Section 6. The City Council desires to accommodate the desires of property owners who
request the City to form an assessment district for the purpose of financing the cost of
undergrounding overhead utility facilities. However, the City Council recognizes that substantial
costs are involved in undertaking such assessment proceedings, including engineering cost, City
administrative costs, legal costs and noticing costs. While such costs may be reimbursed to the
City from assessments and/or bond proceeds in the event an assessment district is formed, such
costs would not be reimbursed to the City in the event of a majority protest.
Section 7. The City Council also recognizes that signing a petition indicating a property
owner's initial support of an assessment district does not preclude that property owner from
casting an assessment ballot in opposition to the proposed assessment. Therefore, in order to
reduce those instances where an assessment district is defeated by a majority protest and the City
becomes liable for the unreimbursed costs of undertaking assessment proceedings, the City
Council has determined to undertake assessment proceedings only where there is initially an
extraordinarily high level of property owner support. Such support must be shown by
submission to the City Clerk of a petition signed by not less than five owners of assessable land
in the proposed assessment district, as shown on the last equalized roll used by the City, owning
lands constituting more than 70 percent of all assessable lands within the proposed assessment
district. In addition, where a petition is signed by an owner of 40 percent or more in area of the
property proposed to be assessed, the petition must also be signed by owners of not less 30
percent in area of the property proposed to be assessed which is not owned by the owner of such
40 percent or more.
G \GtyMyr\Monica O'Reilly\wpdocs\Pat Conlon\AssmntResltn wpd
Page 3
RESOLUTION NO. 00-135
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Palm Desert held on this 14th day of December , 2000, by the following
vote, to wit:
AYES: Benson, Crites, Kelly, Spiegel, Ferguson
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
ATTEST:
SHEILA R. GIL GAN, C TY CLERK
CITY OF PALM DES , CALIFORNIA
(i \CmMgt\Monica O'Reilly\wpdtxs\J'at Conlon\AssmntResltn wpd
Page 4
Resolution No. UU-135
NJ))14
1a, �1 1 .a,.ru■ av • 0!
■ a, .■
OP
t� 1i1ui1iu1i1uhi1ui1ii 11a' lid �� �� �at�_a+.-
11111111,
�IanQ/.� �/1/.uy�f a,■ Ivy � :mrir.wu- �_.�■ L.d_'lllll� li�l
�.nuu■ WiW111..1U ■1� uao �IIIIIIpOIIO Nimmo irn 11■1o1-------`-'
ink ynos
�1!1111! II!.
�l1�il�Jy�r.Tll
71�111� �IIIII IIIIIG III•uiII P ..
�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII� :154
!%fit
41117
•
.,...111U, n'::11 Alig 1 fS�S1.SPC
��l1�`%1ay*
�._•�.•1 il
l•••:ft b. if -
II.SS••/ Suuuium_
UNIMIN
dp •1\IIatin Si
ilk-
1 iiii■iuuuu.i i.=%
MINIMINIMM■■III I ii•Agi
new
/IIIIIIIIIIIII
/IIIIIIIIIIIui_
hiu ii`; r1 1i
I obi _ VT ..w i w MOM .il
. •
bill11 . ii 4;,,--,,,ii
iron VS 2
�,I 14 1r:i . : lNrr rr S•
til-
Nal
vi
ai
./4nOIIhOO!*IIIIr. I
2000 Feet
..3, aimia■':
Hr. .7fito■.a1111.1111111.
..
UNDERGROUNDING
ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS
EXHIBIT A
RESOLUTION NO. 00-135
DISTRICTS 3-18:
TOTAL: 3,916 PARCELS
3 - 192 PARCELS
4 - 355 PARCELS
5 - 195 PARCELS
6 - 135 PARCELS
7 - 358 PARCELS
8 - 362 PARCELS
9 - 226 PARCELS
10 - 174 PARCELS
1 1 - 280 PARCELS
12 - 218 PARCELS
13 - 245 PARCELS
14 - 240 PARCELS
15 - 309 PARCELS
16 - 131 PARCELS
17 - 230 PARCELS
18 - 266 PARCELS