Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC RES 06-031RESOLUTION NO. 06- 31 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT APPROVING THE SALE BY THE PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 0.53 ACRES ON A PARCEL LOCATED BETWEEN PAINTER'S PATH, HIGHWAY 111, THE PALM VALLEY STORM CHANNEL AND WEST EL PASEO PURSUANT TO A DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND C V FOOD SERVICE, INC. (D.B.A. LA SPIGA) The City Council of the City of Palm Desert hereby finds, determines, resolves and orders as follows: Section 1. On March 9, 2006, the City Council of the City of Palm Desert (the "City") and the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency") held a duly noticed joint public hearing on the approval of the Agency's proposed sale of certain real property consisting of approximately 0.53 acres located in the Agency's Project Area No. 1 (the "Property"), as described in that certain Disposition and Development Agreement (the "Agreement") by and between C V Food Service, Inc., a California corporation, d.b.a. La Spiga (the "Developer") and the Agency, at which time all persons desiring to comment on or ask questions concerning the Agreement and the lease of the Property to the Developer were given the opportunity to do so. On or before February 23, 2006, information concerning the Agency's proposed sale of the Property to Developer, a copy of the Agreement, and the Summary Report prepared pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 33433 were made available for public inspection and copying in the offices of the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency at 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California 92260 between the hours of 8 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday. Notice of the public hearing was published in the Desert Sun on Thursday, February 23, 2006 and Thursday, March 2, 2006. Section 2. Pursuant to the Agreement, the Developer covenants to construct certain improvements on the property within a certain time period as therein described, including but not limited to, an approximately 4,500 square foot restaurant facility plus an approximately 1,000 square foot exterior patio, walled gardens and certain public improvements. Section 3. The City Council reviewed and considered all written and oral comments, questions and concerns regarding the Agency's proposed sale of the Property to Developer received prior to and at the public hearing on March 9, 2006. Section 4. The Property contains approximately 0.53 acres, and pursuant to the Agreement will be sold to the Developer for a purchase price of $750,000. Agency staff obtained a report prepared by a real estate analysis services company, which evaluated the fair market value of the Property at its highest and best use, and determined that the probable fair market value of this property at its highest and best use is approximately $32.50 per square foot. A Summary Report prepared pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 33433 is attached hereto as Exhibit A. RESOLUTION NO. 06- 31 Section 5. Project Area No. 1 is an area which has been previously identified in the Redevelopment Plan for Project Area No. 1, originally approved and adopted by the City Council of the City pursuant to Ordinance No. 80 on July 16, 1975, as may be amended from time to time, as a blighted area. The area has previously been determined to create a social and economic burden on the community, which cannot reasonably be expected to be reversed or alleviated by private enterprise or governmental action, or both, without redevelopment. In addition, Project Area No. 1 contains vacant and underutilized properties, and properties that suffer from economic dislocation, deterioration or disuse including depreciated or stagnant property values and impaired investments. Project Area No. 1 is characterized by the existence of inadequate public improvements, public facilities and open spaces, which cannot be remedied by private or governmental action without redevelopment. Section 6. The City Council hereby finds that the sale of the property pursuant to the Agreement will assist in the elimination of blight, providing for Developer's construction of certain improvements, and use described in the Agreement on previously vacant underutilized land which will remedy the lack of adequate public improvements, assist in the revitalization of Project Area No. 1, encourage private sector investment, and create job opportunities all for the health, safety and welfare of the residents and taxpayers of the City. Section 7. The City Council hereby finds that the proposed sale of the property is consistent with the Agency's Implementation Plan adopted pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 33490. Section 8. The City Council hereby finds that the consideration to be paid by Developer pursuant to the Agreement is not Tess than the fair market value of the property at its highest and best use in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan for the Agency's Project Area No. 1. Section 9. In 1989, an Environmental Impact Report was prepared and approved for the Ahmanson Commercial Development Plan, which was proposed for the same approximately twelve (12) acre site of which the Property is a part (the "Master Site"). Pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Agency staff and the Director of Community Development have found that (a) the proposed project (sale of the property for construction of a restaurant facility) is a project within the scope of the EIR prepared for the Master Site, (b) the proposed project constitutes a less intense use than the proposed development of the Master Site contemplated by the EIR, and (c) pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 21090 and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15180, further environmental review of the project is not required. The Agency staff found and the City Council finds in exercise of its independent judgment that none of the factors in State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 or 15163 apply, and therefore no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required. Specifically, substantial changes have not occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that require major revisions to the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. In addition, new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence, is not present in this matter and does not arise due to the proposed Agreement. Based on all the information in the record of this matter, and on the grounds, including but not limited to those specified above, the City Council hereby finds the project exempt from CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15180. The City Council further finds that the project will have a diminimus impact on wildlife resources. The City G:\RDA1Maria Hunt\WPDATAIAYLAIAN112acre\La Spiga\ccreso.doc 2 RESOLUTION NO. 06-31 Council directs staff to file a Notice of Exemption and any of the required environmental filings with the County Clerk's office. Section 10. The City Council hereby approves the Agreement and the Agency's sale of the property to Developer in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Agreement pursuant to the requirements of California Health and Safety Code Section 33433 (b) and authorizes the Agency's Executive Director and/or any other authorized officers of the Agency to take such actions, perform such deeds, and execute, acknowledge and deliver such instruments and documents as the Agency deems necessary in connection therewith. The City Council hereby authorizes the Agency's Executive Director, and/or any other authorized officers of the Agency, to enter into the Agreement in substantially the form now on file with the City Clerk with such changes therein as may be necessary and as the Executive Director may approve in his discretion as being in the best interest of the City. Such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery thereof in order to effectuate the development and operation of the Property by the Developer, and to take such actions, perform such deeds, and execute, acknowledge, and deliver such instruments and documents as it deems necessary in connection therewith. to wit: PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9t day of March 2006 by the following vote AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: NONE ATTEST: BENSON, CRITES, BELLY, SPIEGEL, and FERGUSON NONE NONE Ra e e D. Klassen, Cii Clerk G:IRDA\Maria Hunt1WPDATA'AYLAIAN112acrelLa Spiga\ccreso.doc 3 RESOLUTION NO. 06- 31 EXHIBIT A G:\RDA\Maria Hunt\WPDATA1AYLAIAN\12acre1La Spiga\ccreso.cloc 4 REASCO I REAL ESTATE ANALYSIS SERVICES CO. POST OFFICE BOX 2809, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92261 TEL: (760) 340-1429; FAX: (760) 340-2041 EMAIL: LRWREASCO@AOL.COM February 23, 2006 Ms Lauri Aylaian Development Manager PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY OF PALM DESERT 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, California 92260 Copies to: Mr. Justin McCarthy Mr. David Yrigoyen REFERENCE: Proposed Sale Of Agency Property To CV Food Service, Inc., dba La Soiaa SUBJECT: Report Pursuant To Section 33433 Of The California Health And Safety Code NOTE 1: This report is based on the terms and conditions of the Disposition and Development Agreement ("Agreement") Dated Nardi 9 , 2006 between the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") and CV Food Service, Inc. dba La Spiga ("Developer"). Dear Ms. Aylaian, Section 33433 of the California Health and Safety Code stipulates that before any property of the Agency, acquired directly or indirectly with tax increment funds, is sold or leased (or otherwise conveyed) for development purposes pursuant to the redevelopment plan, the conveyance shall first be approved by the legislative body by resolution after public hearing. The property the Agency proposes to sell to the Developer falls into the category covered by Section 33433. MY 33433 REPORTS/"33433 FOR LA SPIGA (1)" . 28-Feb-06 11:27 AM REAL ESTATE ANALYSIS SERVICES COMPANY -PAGE2- February 23, 2006 LETTER TO: Ms Lauri Avlaian SUBJECT: Report Pursuant To Section 33433 Of The California Health And Safety Code We have prepared a comprehensive report, beginning on page three of this letter, which is required in order to comply with Section 33433. Pursuant to the report, we have concluded that the following findings can be included in the resolution approving the Agreement: FINDING #1: The Sale of the Property will assist in the elimination of blight in the Project Area. FINDING #2: The Sale of the Property is consistent with the implementation plan adopted pursuant to Section 33490 of the California Health and Safety Code. FINDING #3: The consideration is not less that the Fair Market Value at its highest and best use in accordance with the plan. The rationale for these findings can be found in the report which begins on page 3 of this letter. Sincerely, Leonard R. Wolk Leonard R. Wolk, President Real Estate Analysis Services Company (REASCO) MY 33433 REPORTSP'33433 FOR LA SPIGA (1)" 28-Feb-06 11:27 AM REAL ESTATE ANALYSIS SERVICES COMPANY - PAGE 3- Following are the detailed Sections of the report: SECTION 1 - A summary of the major business points of the Agreement between the Agency and the Developer concerning the proposed sale of the Subject Property, owned by the Agency, to the Developer. Reference is made to the Ageement for full particulars of any provision described herein. In the event of any inconsistency between the provisions herein and the Agreement, the Agreement shall control. A. The Subject Property: 1. The Agency owns fee title to certain unimproved real property (the "Property") in the City of Palm Desert (the "City"). The Property is located on the north side of Painter's Path, west of El Paseo, within the 12 acre Master Site known as Entrada del Paseo. 2. The Property is legally described in Exhibit A of the Agreement and its size is approximately 0.53 acres, or 23,077 square feet. B. Purchase and Sale of the Property: 1. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Agreement, the Agency agrees to sell to the Developer, and the Developer agrees to purchase from the Agency, fee simple title to the Property at an agreed to price of $750,000, or $32.50 per square foot. Agency and Developer agree that the purchase price is the fair market value of the Property. * Refer to Article 2 of the Agreement for further details about the Purchase and Sale of the Property. C. Development of the Improvements: 1. Developer shall develop, or cause to be developed, the improvements on the Property in accordance with the Schedule of Performance and the Scope of Development (Exhibits B and C of the Agreement, respectively). The cost for developing and constructing the improvements shall be bome solely by Developer. -� Refer to Article 3 of the Agreement for further details about Development of the Improvements. MY 33433 REPORTSP33433 FOR LA SPIGA (1)" 28-Feb-06 11:27 AM REAL ESTATE ANALYSIS SERVICES COMPANY - PAGE 4- D. Agency's Obligations: 1. The Agency shall deliver the Property to Developer at close of escrow with a finished (over -excavated, backfilled, rough graded, compacted and certified) building pad, and with available temporary power, fire protection and water service. 2. The Agency shall complete the construction of a community use building (the "Henderson Community Building") on Parcel 12 and the landscaped gardens (the "Gardens/Open Space") on Parcels 2 and 12, as designated on the Parcel Map Number 30226, all in accordance with the Master Site Plan, within the time frame described in Exhibit B of the Agreement. 3. The Agency shall construct, or cause to be constructed and completed prior to a date which is nine months after close of escrow, the 18 parking spaces and all utilities described in Exhibit C of the Agreement as "Public Improvements". Both Parties acknowledge that 205 public parking spaces have already been constructed, and that 18 more spaces will be constructed by the Agency under the terms of the Agreement. They further acknowledge that this number of spaces will be sufficient to serve the improvements currently constructed on the Master Site plus the planned Henderson Community Building and the Improvements to be constructed by the Developer. If the Agency constructs (or permits construction of) additional building(s) on Parcel 1 of the Master Site, Agency agrees to construct additional parking spaces in the full quantity required for such additional building(s) by local ordinance, without reducing such number by the number of parking spaces which are subject to shared use agreements between the Agency and the users of the Master Site. Refer to Article 3 of the Agreement for further details about Agency's Obligations. E. Limitations on Transfers and Security interests: 1. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Completion for the improvements, Developer shall not sell, assign, transfer, mortgage, hypothecate or convey (collectively a "Transfer") the Property or any part thereof, or any of Developer's rights or obligations pursuant to the Agreement, without the Agency's prior written consent, subject to certain exceptions described in Section 4.1.1 of the Agreement. MY 33433 REPORTS/"33433 FOR LA SPIGA (1)" 28-Feb-06 11:27 AM REAL ESTATE ANALYSIS SERVICES COMPANY -PAGE5- E. Limitations on Transfers and Security Interests (continued): 2. Developer acknowledges that the identity of Developer is of particular concern to the Agency, and it is because of Developer's identity that the Agency has entered into the Agreement with Developer. * Refer to Article 4 of the Agreement for further details about Limitations on Transfers and Security Interests F. Use of the Property: 1. For a period of twenty years after the close of escrow, (the "Term of Use"), Developer and its lessees, successors and assigns shall use the Property and the improvements only for the operation of a fine dining restaurant and ancillary uses, and any other uses expressly permitted by the Agency. 2. So long as the Agreement is in effect and Developer is operating a fine restaurant on the Property featuring Italian cuisine, Agency shall not permit any other property within the Master Site to be used for the operation of a restaurant which features Italian -inspired cuisine. 3. During the Term of Use, Developer shall maintain the Property and the improvements thereon in good condition and repair and in a manner substantially comparable to the highest level of maintenance provided by owners of developments in the Coachella Valley substantially similar to and of similar age as the improvements. 4. The common area maintenance costs as described in Exhibit H of the Agreement and including landscape water consumption of the Parking Lot Site described in the Easement Agreement (Exhibit E of the Agreement) shall be included within the common area expenses shared by all owners and occupants of the Property included within the Master Site. Developer shall be responsible for the monthly payments to the Agency of its pro rata share of the common area expenses required to maintain the Parking Lot Site. Developer's pro rata share of such common area expenses shall be based on the ratio of the number of parking spaces required for the improvements, which is acknowledged by the parties to the Agreement to be 60, to the total number .of parking spaces available within the Master Site. Refer to Article 5 of the Agreement for further details about Use of the Property. MY 33433 REPORTS/"33433 FOR LA SPIGA (1)" 28-Feb-06 11:27 AM REAL ESTATE ANALYSIS SERVICES COMPANY PAGE 6 - G. Events of Default. Remedies and Termination: 1. Subject to the provisions of Articles 2 and 6 of the Agreement regarding Developer's appeal rights, the occurances which constitute a Default are described in Article 6.1. of the Agreement. 2. In the event of a Default by any Party to the Agreement prior to the Close of Escrow, the non -defaulting Party may pursue any and all of the remedies provided in Article 2 of the Agreement. 3. In the event of a Default by any Party to the Agreement after the Close of Escrow, the non -defaulting Party shall be entitled to the remedies described in Article 6.2.2 of the Agreement. -0. Refer to Article 6 of the Agreement for further details about Default, Remedies and Termination. SECTION 2 - Cost of the Agreement to the Agency: The cost of the Agreement to the Agency is comprised of the following three components: (1). the land acquisition cost; (2). the cost of any improvements to be provided by the Agency; and (3). the projected interest on the source of funds used to finance the land acquisition cost and the improvement cost. A. The Agency's land acquisition cost: NOTE: The Agency's purchase was funded by a loan from the City. 1. The Agency purchased the Master Site on 11/1/1998 at a purchase price of $3,347,917. Therefore. the acauisition cost for the Master Site can be expressed as follows: ACRES SQ. FT. a. Amount of land 11.97 521,413 b. Cost per acre; per sq. ft. $279,692 $6.42 c. Total cost $3,347,917 $3,347,917 MY 33433 REPORTS/"33433 FOR LA SPIGA (1)" 28-Feb-06 11:27AM REAL ESTATE ANALYSIS SERVICES COMPANY -PAGE7- A. The Agency's land acquisition cost (continued): 2. Calculation of the oro rata land acquisition cost for the Property: NOTE: The Property area includes the gross restaurant area plus the amount of land for which Developer has a non-exclusive easement for 60 parking spaces. a. Gross restaurant area b. Plus parking rights area c. Total area d. Times cost per acre; per sq. ft. e. Total cost (pro rata) ACRES 0.5298 0.4132 0.9430 $279,692 $263,749 SQ. FT. 23,077 18,000 41,077 $6.42 $263,749 PERCENT OF MASTER SITE n/a n/a 7.88% n/a 7.88% B. Calculation of the Auencv's protected finance cost for the land purchase: The land acquisition cost was funded by an interest -only loan from the City, whereby the interest payments were at the appropriate LAIF rate. The following table describes the Aaencv's annual interest payments to the City: YEAR 1998 1999-2005 2006* 1. Loan balance 2. Times average interest rate 3. Interest payments to the City 4. Total payments through escrow close date = —/► $80,047 $263,749 $263,749 $263,749 5.43% - 3.966% $2,388.25 $67,198.81 $10,459.64 * LAIF rates for February, 2006 through November, 2006 are not yet available, so estimates were used. MY 33433 REPORTS/"33433 FOR LA SPIGA (1)" 28-Feb-06 11:27 AM REAL ESTATE ANALYSIS SERVICES COMPANY -PAGE8- C. Cost and timing of the improvements to be provided by the Agency: NOTE: Projected escrow close date is 11/30/2006 Pursuant to the Agreement, the Agency will provide the following improvements: ESTIMATED IMPROVEMENTS COST DUE DATE 1. The finished (over -excavated, backfilled, rough graded, compacted and certified) pad, and available with temporary power, fire protection and water service. $9,480 10/31/2006 2. Bringing utilities to the pad. $65,000 5/1/2007 3. Sewer work $40,100 5/1/2007 4. Water lines and detector check for fire sprinkler system $8,053 5/1/2007 5. Fire hydrant $10,000 5/1/2007 6. TUMPF and lizard fees $10,357 5/1/2007 7. Constucting 18 parking spaces. 5760 $8.04 $46,316 5/1/2007 8. Agency's total Improvement cost $189,306 D. Agency's method of payment for the improvements: 1. The building pad will be paid for with tax increment funds. 2. Funds available to Agency when escrow closes 3. Less payoff of City's land loan 4. Funds remaining to pay for Agency's remaining obligation 5. Less cost of Agency's remaining obligation 6. Funds remaining to reimburse tax increment fund $750,000 ($263,749) $486,251 ($179,826) $306,425 E. Agency's net cost of the Agreement: 1. Interest payment to the City for land loan ($80,047) 2. The Agency will lose one year of investment income that could have been earned on the tax increment funds to pay for the building pad, because in the following year, the funds would be used to fund another project. At a projected LAIF rate of 3% per year, the Agency will lose ($284) 3. Net funds remaining to reimburse the tax increment fund $306,425 4. Less cost of building pad ($9,480) 5. Net cost of the Agreement to Agency (actually a net gain) $216,614 MY 33433 REPORTS/"33433 FOR LA SPIGA (1)" 28-Feb-06 11:27 AM REAL ESTATE ANALYSIS SERVICES COMPANY -PAGE9- SECTION 3 - The estimated value of the interest to be conveyed (the unimproved Property) determined at the highest and best uses permitted under the Redevelopment Plan (the "Fair Market Value"). A. Highest and best use for the interest to be convened: 1. Pursuant to its current zoning and a recent appraisal, the highest and best use for the interest to be conveyed is for development of a retail/restaurant building. B. Estimated value at the highest and best use of the interest to be conveyed: 1. Pursuant to the recent appraisal, the current estimated value at the highest and best use of the interest to be conveyed is $32.50 per sauare foot. Section 4 - The estimated value of the interest to be conveyed (the unimproved Property) determined at the use and with the conditions, covenents and development costs required by the sale (the "Reuse Value"): 1. Pursuant to the appraisal, the purchase price ($32.50 per square foot) represents the Reuse Value of the Property at the use, and with the conditions, covenants and development costs authorized by the Agreement. Section 5 - Findings to be included in the resolution approving the transaction: FINDING #1: The sale of the Property will assist in the elimination of blight in the Project Area. FINDING #2: The sale of the Property is consistent with the implementation plan adopted pursuant to Section 33490 of the California Health and Safety Code. FINDING #3: The consideration is not less that the Fair Market Value at its highest and best use in accordance with the plan. MY 33433 REPORTS/"33433 FOR LA SPIGA (1)" 28-Feb-06 11:27 AM