Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOB-067RESOLUTION NO. OB - 067 A RESOLUTION OF THE OVERSIGHT BOARD OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING THE REVISED LONG-RANGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PLAN PREPARED BY THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 34191.5, DETERMING THAT APPROVAL OF THE LONG-RANGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PLAN IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, AND TAKING CERTAIN ACTIONS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH RECITALS: A. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34175(b) and the California Supreme Court's decision in California Redevelopment Association, et al. v. Ana Matosantos, et al. (53 Ca1.4th 231(2011)), on February 1, 2012, all assets, properties, contracts, leases, books and records, buildings, and equipment of the former Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency") transferred to the control of the Successor Agency to the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency (the "Successor Agency") by operation of law. B. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34191.5(b), the Successor Agency must prepare a long-range property management plan which addresses the disposition and use of the real properties and interests in real property of the former Agency, and which must be submitted to the Oversight Board of the Successor Agency (the "Oversight Board") and the Department of Finance (the "DOF") for approval no later than six months following the issuance by DOF to the Successor Agency of a finding of completion pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34179.7. C. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34179.7, DOF issued a finding of completion to the Successor Agency on May 15, 2013. D. The Successor Agency has prepared and submitted to the Oversight Board the revised long-range property management plan attached hereto as Exhibit A (the "LRPMP"), which LRPMP addresses the State Department of Finance's January 17, 2014 correspondence and disposition and use of the real properties and interests in real property of the former Agency and includes the information required pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34191.5(c). E. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34180(j), at the same time the Successor Agency submitted the LRPMP to the Oversight Board, the Successor Agency submitted the LRPMP to the County Administrative Officer, the County Auditor - Controller, and DOF. 1 RES. NO. OB - 067 F. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34181(f), the public was provided with at least ten days' notice of date of the meeting at which the Oversight Board proposes to consider approval of the LRPMP. NOW, THEREFORE, THE OVERSIGHT BOARD OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY HEREBY FINDS, DETERMINES, RESOLVES, AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are a substantive part of this Resolution. Section 2. This Resolution is adopted pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34191.5. Section 3. The Oversight Board hereby approves the LRPMP as presented by the Successor Agency and attached hereto as Exhibit A. Section 4. The staff of the Successor Agency is hereby directed to transmit to DOF this Resolution together with written notice and information regarding the action taken by this Resolution. Such notice to DOF shall be provided by electronic means and in a manner of DOF's choosing. Section 5. The staff and the Board of the Successor Agency are hereby authorized and directed, jointly and severally, to do any and all things which they may deem necessary or advisable to effectuate this Resolution and any such actions previously taken are hereby ratified. Section 6. This Resolution has been reviewed with respect to the applicability of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.) ("CEQA"). Pursuant to the State CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs 15000 et seq.)(the "Guidelines"), the Oversight Board has determined that the approval of the LRPMP is not a project pursuant to CEQA and is exempt therefrom because it is an organizational or administrative activity of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment (Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5)). Further, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that approval of the LRPMP may have a significant effect on the environment, and thus the action is exempt from CEQA (Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3)). Staff of the Successor Agency is hereby directed to prepare and post a notice of exemption pursuant to Guidelines Section 15062. -2- RES. NO. OB - 067 AYES: PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 24T'iay of FEBRUARY , 2014. BUCK, JONATHAN, LARSON, and CARVER NOES: NONE ABSENT: BRANDL and SPIEGEL ABSTAIN: KINNAMON ROY W.LLIAM CARVER, ACTING CHAIR ATTEST: R �HEU D. KLASSEN, - ETARY OVERSIGHT BOARD FOR THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY -3- RES. NO. OB - 067 EXHIBIT A Long -Range Property Management Plan -4- LONG-RANGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PLAN CHECKLIST structions: Please use this checklist as a guide to ensure you have completed all the required components your Long -Range Property Management Plan. Upon completion of your Long -Range Property Management Plan, email a PDF version of this document and your plan to: Redevelopment_Administration@dof.ca.gov The subject line should state "[Agency Name] Long -Range Property Management Plan". The Department of Finance (Finance) will contact the requesting agency for any additional information that may be necessary during our review of your Long -Range Property Management Plan. Questions related to the Long -Range Property Management Plan process should be directed to (916) 445-1546 or by email to Redevelopment Administrationa,,dof.ca.gov. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code 34191.5, within six months after receiving a Finding of Completion from Finance, the Successor Agency is required to submit for approval to the Oversight Board and Finance a Long - Range Property Management Plan that addresses the disposition and use of the real properties of the former redevelopment agency. GENERAL INFORMATION: Agency Name: Successor Agency to the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency ite Finding of Completion Received: May 15, 2014 Date Oversight Board Approved LRPMP: June 24, 2013 / February 24, 2014 Long -Range Property Management Plan Requirements For each property the plan includes the date of acquisition, value of property at time of acquisition, and an estimate of the current value. ® Yes D No For each property the plan includes the purpose for which the property was acquired. ® Yes ❑ No For each property the plan includes the parcel data, including address, lot size, and current zoning in the former agency redevelopment plan or specific, community, or general plan. • Yes ❑ No For each property the plan includes an estimate of the current value of the parcel including, if available, any appraisal information. ® Yes ❑ No Page 1 of 3 For each property the plan includes an estimate of any lease, rental, or any other revenues generated by the property, and a description of the contractual requirements for the disposition of those funds. ® Yes ❑ No For each property the plan includes the history of environmental contamination, including designation as a brownfield site, any related environmental studies, and history of any remediation efforts. ® Yes ❑ No For each property the plan includes a description of the property's potential for transit -oriented development and the advancement of the planning objectives of the successor agency. ® Yes ❑ No For each property the plan includes a brief history of previous development proposals and activity, including the rental or lease of the property. ® Yes ❑ No For each property the plan identifies the use or disposition of the property, which could include 1) the retention of the property for governmental use, 2) the retention of the property for future development, 3) the sale of the property, or 4) the use of the property to fulfill an enforceable obligation. ® Yes ❑ No The plan separately identifies and list properties dedicated to governmental use purposes and properties retained for purposes of fulfilling an enforceable obligation. ® Yes ❑ No ADDITIONAL INFORMATION • If applicable, please provide any additional pertinent information that we should be aware of during our review of your Long -Range Property Management Plan. SEE ATTACHED PROPERTY SUMMARIES/BACKGROUND/ATTACHEMENTS Page 2 of 3 Agency Contact Information Name: Title: Phone: Email: Date: Martin Alvarez Director of Economic Devel. (760) 346-0611, Ext. 467 malvarez@cityofpalmdesert.org February 24, 2014 Name: Title: Phone: Email: Date: Department of Finance Local Govemment Unit Use Only DETERMINATION ON LRPMP: ❑ APPROVED ❑ DENIED APPROVED/DENIED BY: DATE: John M. Wohlmuth City Manager (760) 346-0611, Ext. 305 iwohlmuthecitvofoalmdesert.orq February 24, 2014 APROVAL OR DENIAL LETTER PROVIDED: ❑ YES DATE AGENCY NOTIFIED: m DF-LRPMP (11/15/12) Page 3 of 3 Successor Agency to the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency Long Range Property Management Plan Property Background/Summaries INTRODUCTION On June 29, 2011, the California Governor signed Assembly Bill X1-26, which required the dissolution of all California redevelopment agencies and authorized the creation of successor agencies to manage former redevelopment agency owned assets. At its meeting of August 25, 2011, the City of Palm Desert chose to become the Successor Agency to the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency (Successor Agency). On June 27, 2012, the Governor signed State Budget Trailer Bill AB 1484, which became effective immediately. AB 1484 required successor agencies to conduct a due diligence review to determine the unobligated balances available for transfer to taxing entities in both the housing fund and all other former redevelopment agency (RDA) funds. Both the Housing Successor Agency and the Successor Agency's due diligence reviews have completed and accepted by the State Department of Finance (DOF). As part of AB 1484, those agencies who have received approval of their due diligence reviews are granted a "Finding of Completion". The Finding of Completion (FOC) allows successor agencies to submit a Long Range Property Management Plan (Management Plan), outlining the disposition strategies for all former RDA properties. The Successor Agency's property assets total 553.25 acres. On May 15, 2013, the DOF issued a Finding of Completion to the Successor Agency to the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency (see attached letter). The FOC verifies that the Successor Agency has met the DOF requirements under AB 1484, including sending all housing and non -housing funds to the State for dispersal to the taxing entities. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code 34191.4 the Successor Agency has prepared a Long Range Property Management Plan (Management Plan) that addresses the disposition and use of the real properties owned by the former redevelopment agency. The Successor Agency Board approved the Management Plan on June 13, 2013 and the Oversight Board of the Successor Agency to the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency approved the Management Plan on June 24, 2013. On January 17, 2014, the DOF provided a written response to the Successor Agency's Management Plan and indicated that the plan was not approved (see attached letter). The DOF's letter requested modifications, clarification and the addition of specific LRPMP Property Background/Summaries February 24, 2014 Page 2 of 10 language to the Management Plan to comply with requirements of AB X1-26 and AB 1484. The Successor Agency's revised Long Range Property Management Plan and map is attached to this document addressing the DOF's January 17, 2014 letter. The following sections provide background and summaries of each of the Successor Agency owned properties. The Management Plan is organized into 14 separate project sites depending on geographical location and/or if parcels were acquired together. Project sites may contain multiple parcels (i.e. Site 1(a), 1(b), 1(c), etc.). Both the Management Plan and the map use the following color codes to identify the proposed disposition strategy for each site. Parcels coded in Green = Sell the Property Parcels coded in Purple = Retain for Governmental Use PROPERTY BACKGROUND / SUMMARIES The Management Plan provides a complete listing of all Successor Agency owned properties with details as requested by the State Department of Finance Long Range Property Management Plan Checklist (see attached Checklist). Below is summary and additional background information for each property along with the Oversight Board's recommended disposition strategy. Alessandro Alley - Properties 1(a), 1(b), 1(c), 1(d), 1(e), 1(f), 1(g): Properties listed as 1(a), 1(b), 1(c), 1(d), 1(e), 1(f), 1(g) on the attached Management Plan consist of eight parcels that were acquired by the former redevelopment agency (RDA). The former RDA originally proposed to acquire 26.5 feet from each of the rear yards of these parcels to facilitate improvements to the adjacent deteriorated Alessandro Alley. Alessandro Alley is located between the residential district and the commercial core area on the north side of Highway 111 from Las Palmas Avenue to Monterey Avenue. The proposed design of the Alessandro Alley improvement project was in progress prior to the dissolution of redevelopment agencies. The preliminary design proposed to widen the alley by 26.5 feet to a total width of 46.5 feet; providing new public parking at a 90° angle on the north side of the alley. The conceptual Alessandro Alley design included 169 public parking spaces along the north side with landscaping and a new barrier wall protecting the adjoining residential properties. The properties that are listed LRPMP Property Background/Summaries February 24, 2014 Page 3 of 10 in LRPMP are these remaining parcels that were acquired by the former RDA. The details of the it iividual properties are listed in the Management Plan. The Management Plan directs that properties 1(a-g) be liquidated and sold for appraised value and that the proceeds of the sale be distributed as property tax to the affected taxing entities, in accordance with the terms of Health and Safety Code (HSC) section 34191.5(c)(2)(B). Joslyn Senior Center Expansion— Properties 2(a), 2(b): The Joslyn Senior Center sites consist of two parcels totaling 1.68 acres. The parcels are located adjacent to the City owned Joslyn Cove Communities Senior Center, which serves the region and specifically the communities of Palm Desert, Rancho Mirage and Indian Wells. The Senior Center serves over 38,000 seniors over the age of 50 on an annual basis. On June 10, 2010, the former Redevelopment Agency and the City Council held a Joint Study Session where they discussed the Joslyn Senior Center's Long Range Plan. Included in this discussion, was the Senior Center's master plan which included the expansion of the Senior Center with the use of the Successor Agency's properties (see attached City/RDA agenda notice). In addition, the Senior Center's architect provided a development program and a conceptual site design (see attached) illustrating the master plan. The attached information provides documentation supporting the intent by the former Redevelopment Agency to retain these sites for future "Governmental Use" (i.e. expansion of the City owned Senior Center). The Management Plan directs that the Successor Agency retain these parcels for governmental use. and transfer the two parcels to the City of Palm Desert to facilitate the future development/expansion of the Joslyn Senior Center. Haystack Open Space — Property 3 The Haystack property total 1.90 acres. The property was acquired to facilitate the installation of a drainage facility and retention of open space. The parcel contains an underground drainage pipe that serves residential neighborhoods in this area. Having the drainage pipe underground makes the parcel undevelopable and its' only use is for open space. The Management Plan directs that the Successor Agency retain the site for governmental use and transfer the property to the City for use as public open space. LRPMP Property Background/Summaries February 24, 2014 Page 4 of 10 Adobe Villas / Public Parking — Property No. 4 The Adobe Villas property consists of a 12-unit, vacant apartment complex on 0.53 acres. The site is adjacent to the City's commercial core business district. The former RDA acquired the site with the intent to facilitate the construction of public parking to serve the adjacent commercial district. Public parking in this area was identified in the former RDA Plan and 5-year Implementation Plan. The Management Plan directs that the Successor Agency transfer the site to the City for governmental use. The property will be used to facilitate the construction of public parking within the Core Commercial Area, a goal of the Project Area No. 1 Redevelopment Plan. College of the Desert Site (San Pablo/Fred Waring) Properties No.(s) 5(a), 5(b), 5(c), 5(d), 5(e) The subject properties consist of five contiguous parcels totaling 1.62 acres of vacant land. On February 4, 2013, the Oversight Board of the Successor Agency to the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency approved OB Resolution No.033 approving a transfer of 0.177 acres (7,705 sq ft.) from portions of: • Property No. 5(d) (.55 acres) A.P.N.'s 627-101-038; and • Property 5(e) (.26 acres) A.P.N. 627-101-039 to the City of Palm Desert to facilitate a road widening project. The City's road improvement project would add a necessary right turn pocket at the southeast corner of San Pablo Avenue and Fred Waring Drive. The request was denied by written correspondence dated April 24, 2013 (see letter attached). The proposed land transfer of 7,705 square feet (.177 acres) out of 35,283.6 square feet to the City will serve a governmental use (i.e. road improvements). The proposed project will alleviate traffic congestion and will improve air quality by reducing the number of vehicles idling at this intersection and will improve community safety. The Management Plan directs that the Successor Agency liquidate and sell 1.443 acres for appraised value and that the proceeds of the sale be distributed as property tax to the affected taxing entities. in accordance with the terms of Health and Safety Code (HSC) section 34191.5(c)(2)(B). The Management Plan also directs that 0.177 acres from A.P.N.(s) 627-101-038 and 627-101-039 be transferred to the City of Palm Desert for governmental use. facilitating roadway improvements benefiting the public. LRPMP Property Background/Summaries February 24, 2014 Page 5 of 10 Portola Ave. Roadway Widening Project - Properties No.(s) 6(a), 6(b), 6(c) The subject properties consist of three vacant individual single-family homes fronting Portola Avenue, an arterial roadway. The properties were acquired with the intent to deconstruct the homes and facilitate a roadway widening project on Portola Avenue. The project will add a free -right turn pocket at the northwest corner of Portola Avenue and Fred Waring Drive. The project will alleviate traffic congestion and achieve the street's ultimate width per the City's General Plan. The Management Plan directs that the Successor Agency retain the properties for governmental use and transfer the properties to the City of Palm Desert to facilitate roadway improvements. Larkspur Site — Property No.(s) 7(a), 7(b) The Larkspur site totals 2.10 acres and is located adjacent to the City's commercial district. The site has been approved by the City Council as a 154 room hotel project through an existing Development Agreement with a hotel developer. The Management Plan directs that these parcels be liquidated and sold to the existing developer under contract for appraised value and that the proceeds of the sale be distributed as property tax to the affected taxing entities, in accordance with the terms of Health and Safety Code (HSC) section 34191.5(c)(2)(B). Entrada Del Paseo Lot Pad — Property No. 8 The Entrada Del Paseo lot pad consists of a .68 acre parcel located within an existing 12-acre master planned commercial development. The Entrada Del Paseo master plan contains two existing restaurants, and a Museum and the Chamber of Commerce/Henderson Community Building and one vacant office professional pad. The last remaining development pad within the Entrada Del Paseo development is owned by the Successor Agency and is referred to as Property 8 on the Management Plan. The site is suitable for an office professional building or restaurant site. The Management Plan directs that this property be liquidated and sold for appraised value and that the proceeds of the sale be distributed as property tax to the affected taxing entities, in accordance with the terms of Health and Safety Code (HSC) section 34191.5(c)(2)1B). 170 Acres - Frank Sinatra Dr. / Portola Ave.— Properties 9(a) thru 9(m) (13 Parcels) The subject properties consist of 13 contiguous parcels totaling 169.55 acres located at the northeast corner of Frank Sinatra Drive and Portola Avenue. The 13 parcels were LRPMP Property Background/Summaries February 24, 2014 Page 6 of 10 acquired as one transaction in order to facilitate future economic development. The Management Plan directs that the properties be liquidated and sold for appraised value and that the proceeds of the sale be distributed as property tax to the affected taxing entities, in accordance with the terms of Health and Safety Code (HSC) section 34191.5(c)(2)(B). The estimated value of the site is ($16,995,000 / $100,000 per acre). Cal State San Bernardino University - Palm Desert Campus — Property No.(s) 10(a), 10(b) In 1993, the former RDA acquired approximately 201.64 acres for the development of a university master plan. The site was acquired with the intent to partner with California State University San Bernardino for the development of a university campus. On November 16, 1999, the former RDA entered into a Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) with the Trustees of the California State University (CSU) to facilitate the future development of the California State University San Bernardino — Palm Desert Campus. On March 22, 2001, Amendment No. 1 to the DDA was approved authorizing the transfer of approximately of 55.32 of the 201.64 acres to CSU to facilitate the construction of infrastructure and facilities for the establishment of the CSU—Palm Desert Campus. The First Amendment to the DDA also reserved approximately 125 acres for ten years for the future implementation of the remaining Palm Desert Campus Master Plan. CSU has built 5 education buildings and has a student enrollment of 1,000 students. CSU continues its efforts to expand the CSU-Palm Desert Campus and has requested approval of the transfer of approximately 123.65 acres to facilitate the future development of the CSU-Palm Desert Campus master plan. In 2002, under approval of a Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) 8.5 acres of the original 201.64 acres were transferred to the Regent of the University of California for the development of the University of California Riverside — Palm Desert Campus (UCR). The existing Palm Desert Campus improvements were completed on the 8.5 acres. As part of the DDA and subsequent Amendment an additional 11.5 acres were reserved under an Option Agreement (25 years). Recently, UCR received approval from the Oversight Board (Resolution No. 033) and from the Department of Finance (see attached approval letter) to transfer the 11.5 acre property for use as a future UCR School of Medicine. After the recent transfer to UCR, the Successor Agency controls the remaining 126.32 acres. Prior to the dissolution of the RDA, staff was working with CSU to negotiate the transfer the remaining land for the implementation of the CSU — Palm Desert Campus LRPMP Property Background/Summaries February 24, 2014 Page 7 of 10 master plan. As part of the negotiations, the Successor Agency had discussed the use/retention of 2.67 acres of remaining 126.32 for a future City of Palm Desert fire station site. The fire station site location has been identified and the conceptual design has been completed. The Management Plan directs that the Successor Agency transfer 123.65 acres to CSU for governmental purpose (university educational facilities) and transfer of 2.67 acres to the City of Palm Desert for a future governmental use (fire station). 132 Acre Site — Properties 11(a) thru 11(h) (8 Parcels) The 132 Acre Site consists of 8 contiguous parcels totaling 132.31 acres. The properties were acquired individually with the intent to assemble a larger project that would facilitate future economic development. To address current and future drainage facility needs, the Oversight Board and the Successor Agency recommends transferring 3.0 acres from parcel 11(h) (A.P.N. 694-310-005), which totals 27.73 acres. The Successor Agency staff has developed a legal description and map of the proposed drainage location. This drainage area will serve the drainage needs for the existing Riverside County Sheriff Station located adjacent to the west of the subject property and future development in this area. The Management Plan directs that 129.31 of the 132.31 acres be liquidated and sold for appraised value and that the proceeds of the sale be distributed as property tax to the affected taxing entities, in accordance with the terms of Health and Safety Code (HSC) section 34191.5(c)(2)(B). The Management Plan also directs that the Successor Agency retain 3.0 acres for governmental use and transfer to the City of Palm Desert for a future drainage facility. The estimated value of the site 129.31 acres is $12,931,000 or $100,000 per acre. Desert Willow Lot Pads- Properties 12(a), 12(b), 12(c), 12(d), 12(e), 12(f), 12(g) The Desert Willow Lot Pads consist of 25 parcels, categorized under Properties 12(a) thru 12(f) in the Management Plan. Desert Willow Golf Resort was developed by the former RDA as an economic development tool and for public recreational opportunities. As part of the master plan development several development pads were created to attract hotel and timeshare developments. These lot pads are labeled Pad A, B, C, D, E, F & G (see attached map). The Successor Agency's Management Plan directs the following for each of the Desert Willow Lot Pad: Site 12(a) — This site consists of two parcels totaling 16.86, zoned Commercial Resort. The Manaaement Plan directs that the properties be liquidated and sold for LRPMP Property Background/Summaries February 24, 2014 Page 8 of 10 appraised value and that the proceeds of the sale be distributed as property tax to the affected taxing entities, in accordance with the terms of Health and Safety Code (HSC) section 34191.5(c)(2)(B). The Plan also directs that the Successor Agency retain 3.0 acres for governmental use and transfer to the City of Palm Desert for a future drainage facility. Site 12(b) — This site consists of two parcels totaling 17.68 aces. 14.652 acres are undeveloped and 3.028 acres are developed as a public parking lot that serves the community and the City owned Desert Willow Golf Resort (see attached legal description). The Management Plan directs that 14.652 of the 17.68 acres be liquidated and sold for appraised value and that the proceeds of the sale be distributed as property tax to the affected taxing entities, in accordance with the terms of Health and Safety Code (HSC) section 34191.5(c)(2)(B). The Management Plan also directs that the Successor Agency retain 3.028 acres for governmental use and transfer to the City of Palm Desert for use as public parking. Site 12(c) - This site consists of five parcels totaling 18.845 aces. Included in this site, the Successor Agency has two miscellaneous parcels (A.P.N. 620-450-011 & 620-450- 015, totaling 0.79 acres) that were inadvertently never transferred to the City of Palm Desert and are currently used as part of the City owned Desert Willow Mountainview Golf Course (see attached map). The Management Plan directs that 18.055 of the 18.845 acres be liquidated and sold for appraised value and that the proceeds of the sale be distributed as property tax to the affected taxing entities. in accordance with the terms of Health and Safety Code (HSC) section 34191.5(c)(2)(B). The Management Plan also directs that the Successor Agency retain 0.79 acres (A.P.N. 620-450-011 & 620-450-015) for governmental use and transfer to the City of Palm Desert as part of the existing City owned recreational facility. Site 12(d) — This site consists of five parcels totaling 17.48 acres. Included in this site the Successor Agency has one miscellaneous parcel (A.P.N. 620-450-021, totaling 2.10 acres) that was inadvertently never transferred to the City of Palm Desert and is currently used as part of the City owned Desert Willow Mountainview Golf Course (see attached map). The Management Plan directs that 15.38 of the 17.48 acres be liquidated and sold for appraised value and the proceeds of the sale be distributed as property tax to the affected taxing entities. in accordance with the terms of Health and Safety Code (HSC) section 34191.5(c)(2)(B). The Management Plan also directs that the Successor Agency retain 2.10 acres (A.P.N. 620-450- LRPMP Property Background/Summaries February 24, 2014 Page 9 of 10 021) for governmental use and transfer to the City of Palm Desert as part of the existing City owned recreational facility. Site 12(e) — This site consists of eight parcels totaling 11.14 acres. The Management Plan directs that this site be liquidated and sold for appraised value and that the proceeds of the sale be distributed as property tax to the affected taxing entities, in accordance with the terms of Health and Safety Code (HSC) section 34191.5(c)(2)(B). Site 12(f) — This site consist of one parcel totaling 19.85 acres. 4.238 of the 19.85 acres are currently developed and used as a storm water retention basin (see attached legal description). The remaining 15.612 acres are undeveloped. The Management Plan directs that 15.612 out of the 19.85 acres be liquidated and sold for appraised value and that the proceeds of the sale be distributed as property tax to the affected taxing entities, in accordance with the terms of Health and Safety Code JHSC) section 34191.5(c)(2)(B). The Management Plan also directs that the Successor Agency retain 4.238 acres for governmental use and transfer to the City of Palm Desert for continue use as a drainage facility. Site 12(g) — This site consist of two parcels totaling 9.34 acres. The parcels are currently undeveloped. The Management Plan directs that the properties be liquidated and sold for appraised value and that the proceeds of the sale be distributed as property tax to the affected taxing entities, in accordance with the terms of Health and Safety Code (HSC) section 34191.5(c)(2)(B). Casev's Restaurant Site — Property No. 13 The subject property was acquired in 2005 to facilitate the redevelopment of blighted property. The site currently totals 2.924 acres, which includes a 4,943 square foot restaurant building, 500 square foot office building, parking facilities and a vacant lot. The Successor Agency's lease with Casey's Restaurant has been terminated at the request of the lessee. The Management Plan directs that 1.64 acres out of the 2.924 acres be liquidated and sold for appraised value and the proceeds of the sale be distributed as property tax to the affected taxing entities. in accordance with the terms of Health and Safety Code (HSC) section 34191.5(c)(2)(B). The Management Plan also directs that the Successor Agency transfer 1.284 acres to the Palm Desert Housing Authority for governmental use (i.e. future affordable senior housing). The affordable housing site has been designed and includes the LRPMP Property Background/Summaries February 24, 2014 Page 10 of 10 development of 72-senior affordable apartment units, combined with land currently held by the Housing Successor Agency. Hillside Open Space — Property No. 14 The subject property totals 3.80 acres and is located in the hillside open space district. The site was acquired to facilitate the preservation of open space and the expansion of hillside recreation hiking trails. The Management Plan directs that the Successor Agency transfer the site to the City of Palm Desert for governmental use (i.e. open space park land). Easements/Enforceable Obligations — Also included on the Management Plan is a list of enforceable easements, obligations and agreements that are currently assigned to the Successor Agency. The agreements include public parking easements that were established by the former RDA to facilitate and maintain public parking on economic development projects. Examples of projects that have public parking easements include the Westfield Shopping Center parking structures, the Gardens on El Paseo parking structure and the Desert Crossings shopping center. Staff recommends that these easements and agreements be transferred and assigned to the City to maintain future enforcement capabilities in the event the Successor Agency no longer is viable. The easements do not have a monetary value nor do they burden the City with any financial obligations. RES. NO. OB - 067 [THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK.] Successor Agency to the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency Long Range Property Management Plan PROPERTY 2(a), 2(b) Joslyn Senior Center Expansion Attachments RES. NO. OB - 067 [THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK.] RES. NO. OB - 067 [THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK.] • CITY Of P!Lffl DESERT 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TEL:760 346-0611 FAX: 760 340-0574 info@palm-deurt.org NOTICE OF STUDY SESSION OF THE PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL AND PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Palm Desert City Council and Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency will convene Thursday, June 10, 2010, at 2:00 p.m. in the Administrative Conference Room of the Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California 92260, for the purpose of conducting a Joint Study Session. Said Study Session will be held in order to receive a presentation by the Joslyn Center regarding its Long-range Plan. RA HELLE D. KLASSE , CITY CLEF ( CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA June 4, 2010 NO ACTIONS WILL BE TAKEN AT THE STUDY SESSION. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY SESSION IS INFORMATION ONLY. 01 MI IN PREST •VUKSIC ARC H IT E C T S JOSLYN CENTER Program 03.30.10 EDUCATION PROGRAM -16,850 SF • LIBRARY — 4,350 s.f. • Sitting Area (700 s.f.) o Lounge seating o Tables and chairs ■ Stacks (200 s.f.) • Lobby (300 s.f.) ■ Group Room (1,000 s.f.) • Computer Area (200 s.f.) • Bookstore (400 s.f.) • Copy Center (200 s.f.) • Conference Room (250 s.f.) — Next to Copy Center • AV Stations (400 s.f.) • Storage (200 s.f.) • Circulation within the space 4.500 s.f.) • Needs to be Tess isolated • Needs to be friendlier • CLASSROOMS —12,500 s.f. U Weal -Wet . s ta' D(-{ I • 12 total classrooms, 30'x30' each (10,800 square feet) • Classes to include: Computer Training, AARP Services, Writing, Braille, Language, Book Club, Nutrition, Support Groups, Tax Service and Storytelling • Circulation within the space (1,700 s.f.) ARTS/CRAFTS PROGRAM - 8,500 SF • ART STUDIO — 3,000 s.f. • 1 — Work Room (30'x70') with a partition o Needs good natural light o Good sized lockers for teachers' equipment • 2 — Storage Rooms (100 s.f. each) • 2 — Clean up Areas (100 s.f. each) • Circulation within the space (±500 s.f.) • Typically used for painting • Needs water for Clean up • CRAFTS STUDIOS — 2,500 s.f. ■ General Crafts Studio —1,200 s.f. o Work Area (750 s.f.) o Circulation within the space (200 s.f.) o Storage (150 s.f.) — able to be locked o Miscellaneous Uses (100 s.f.) o Activities to include: Painting of Ceramics and Pottery, Quilting, Knitting, Sewing, Floral Design, Cardmaking, and Hat Decorating o Needs to be located near parking lot • Wood Working Studio —1,300 s.f. o Uses range from whittling to small cabinet making o Locker for the instructor o Needs to be located near parking lot o People will bring their own supplies • LECTURE ROOM —1,500 s.f. o Ultimate capacity: 100 people o Seating (1,000 s.f.) o Stage (300 s.f.) o Circulation within the space (200 s.f.) • DISPLAY GALLERY —1,500 s.f. o Able to open to the outside 2 • - LEISURE PROGRAM - ± 27,000 SF • THEATER — 8,000 s.f. ■ Auditorium Seating: 200 people ■ Activities to include: Lectures, Forums, Movies, Plays, Demonstrations ■ Seating Area (2,000 s.f.) • Stage (750 s.f.) • Back Stage Area (750 s.f.) • Dressing Rooms (1,000 s.f.) O 2 - Private Dressing/Green Rooms (120 s.f. each) o 2 - Shared Dressing/Green Rooms (380 s.f. each) • Circulation within the space (1,500 s.f.) • Should have a Street Presence • DANCE STUDIO —1,750 s.f. • Ultimate Capacity: 50 people • Activities to include: Rehearsals, Small Classes, Exhibition Dances • Dance Area (1,000 s.f.) • Stage (350 s.f.) • Storage (200 s.f.) • Circulation within the space (200 s.f.) • Located near Piano Storage • Located away from Meeting rooms and classrooms • MUSIC ROOM — 2,000 s.f. • Ultimate Capacity: 50 people • Seating Area (750 s.f.) • Stage (200 s.f.) • 6 - Practice Rooms (100 s.f. each) • Circulation within the space (200 s.f.) • Storage (200 s.f.) — includes piano • MULTI -PURPOSE HALL — 4,000 s.f. • Ultimate capacity. 200 people • General Space (3,000 s.f.) • Activities to include: Bridge, Dance Classes, Other Large Classes, Luncheons, Fashion Shows, Etc. • Circulation within the space (500 s.f.) • Storage (500 s.f.) • Located near Kitchen, Trash and Restrooms • ACTIVITY ROOM — 800 s.f. • Ultimate Capacity 45 people • General Space (675 s.f.) • Circulation within the space (125 s.f.) • Small, multi -purpose "flex" space 3 • • • MULTI -PURPOSE INDOOR SPORT COURT — 6,000 s.f. • Activities to include: Racquetball, Volleyball, Badminton, Etc. • Located near showers and changing spaces • RECREATION ROOM — 3,000 s.f. • Large enough to fit 2 ping pong tables, 1 billiard table, 2 dartboards, 2 Wii game systems, 2 poker tables and area for TV/game watching • SOCIAL AREA — 600 s.f. • Ultimate Capacity: 30 people • Activities to include: TV, Discussions, Get-togethers, Singles Groups • General Area (450 s.f.) • Circulation within the space (±150 s.f.) • Should have its own identity, like a great room with a fireplace • Could be next to Cyber Cafe • CYBER CAFE —1,000 s.f. • Open to main circulation, not an enclosed space • Space for a small food counter • Tables & Chairs to "plug-in" 4 • - DINING PROGRAM - 8,500 SF • DINING AREA — 7,000 s.f. • Ultimate Capacity: 400 people • Activities to include: Special Lunches, Fundraisers • Seating Area (6,000 s.f.) • Circulation within the space (1,000 s.f.) • Good access to parking lot, maybe its own entry • CAFE/CASUAL DINING AREA — 500 s.f. • Should be near the Lobby • To be used for coffee & pastries in the momings • An area to read newspapers • Some tables and chairs with "plug-in" capability • KITCHENS —1,00 s.f. • MAIN KITCHEN — 600 s.f. o Typically used for staging only o Need counter space and to keep things warm or cold • THEATER KITCHEN — 400 s.f. o Must be adjacent to the Theater o Typically used for staging only o Need counter space and to keep things warm or cold • • ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT PROGRAM - t 12,000 SF • RECEPTION/LOBBY — 2,500 s.f. • Lower counter space • Central check in space/cashier • Seating area • Kiosks to display/distribute information • Area to advertise current events, sell tickets • Art display area • Gift Shop (1,000 s.f.) — with good storage • ADMINISTRATION OFFICES — 4,000 s.f. Note: Some offices may be located near their associated activities • Ultimate build -out of 20 offices • Executive Director (250 s.f.) • Program Manager — (250 s.f.) • Finance Manager — (250 s.f.) • Social Service Manager — (250 s.f.) • Theater Manager (250 s.f.) — Possibly for 2 people • Secretary (150 s.f.) • Volunteer Coordinator (150 s.f.) • Ticket Office/Cashier (150 s.f.) • Newsletter/Communication Office (150 s.f.) • Future Offices — 5 x 250 s.f. (1,250 s.f.) • Future Offices — 6 x 150 s.f. (900 s.f.) • CONFERENCE ROOM — 600 s.f. • Needs to be larger, more private • LEGAL OFFICE — 750 s.f. • Offices to eventually accommodate 10 staffers • COUNSELING OFFICES — 500 s.f. • 2 Offices — 250 square feet each • Could be adjacent to/part of Legal Offices • MARKETING OFFICES —1,250 s.f. • General Marketing Office to eventually accommodate 4 staffers (500 s.f.) • Public Relations (250 s.f.) • Advertising (250 s.f.) • Newsletter (250 s.f.) • BREAK ROOM/KITCHEN — 500 s.f. • Quiet Space • Conference Area for staff (20 people) w • STAFF WORK ROOM — 500 s.f. • Lots of work tables • Needs to accommodate 5-10 people doing a bulk mailing • Copy Area (200 s.f.) o Large Copier o Small Copier o Fax o Folding Machine o Counter Space • Needs to be near a loading area • SERVER ROOM —150 s.f. • Could include phone equipment • CIRCULATION/SUPPORT SPACE —1,200 s.f. • • FITNESS PROGRAM - 7,000 SF • CARDIO ROOM —1,200 s.f. • Ultimate Capacity: 30 people • Treadmills, Elliptical Trainers, Stationary Bikes • Ceiling Fans • Open to views • WEIGHT ROOM —1,200 s.f. • Ultimate Capacity: 30 people • Weight Machines • JAZZERCISE/AEROBIC/YOGA/PILATES STUDIO — 2,000 s.f. • Ultimate Capacity: 30 people • Workout Area (30'x40') • Stage (150 s.f.) ■ Storage (250 s.f.) • Circulation within the space (400 s.f.) • LOCKER ROOM —1,600 s.f. • Men (800 s.f.) ■ Women (800 s.f.) • Each to contain: Lockers, toilets, sinks, showers and prep areas • CIRCULATION/SUPPORT SPACE —1,000 s.f. HEALTH PROGRAM -1,000 SF • CLINIC —1,000 s.f. • Activities include: Hearing Tests, Mammograms, Nutrition Counseling • Located near Social Services Director BATHROOMS • Each approximately 900 s.f. • Familiar bathrooms in all buildings • Staff bathroom to be separate and include a shower (t 750 s.f. each) OTHER CONSIDERATIONS FOR INTERIOR SPACES • Wider and brighter hallways • Two (2) good janitorial closets with mop sinks and floor drains • More storage for tables, chairs and sports equipment • TV systems mounted in class and conference rooms • Paging and intemal sound system • Art display throughout OUTDOOR LEISURE PROGRAM • ACTIVITIES • Aquatic Area o Swimming pool u "Senior friendly" u Large enough for Aqua aerobics and leisure swimming o Warm Water Spa • BBO Area O 1 very large BBQ o Seating/dining for 50 • Garden — 3,000 s.f. o Flower Garden —Maintained by staff o FlowerNegetable Garden — for People to participate Lawn Bowling o Current area is large enough • Horse Shoes O 2-3 courts if space permits • BadmintonNolleyball o If space permits • Shuffleboard o If space permits • Basketball o Half court if space permits • Bocce Ball O 1 court if space permits • Outdoor Amphitheater o If space permits o Low priority • Walking Path o Can go around much of the outdoor activity OTHER CONSIDERATIONS FOR EXTERIOR SPACES • Well lighted • Safe • Art display opportunities MINUTES PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING FEBRUARY 8, 2007 IX. NEW BUSINESS A. REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO ACQUIRE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 75-424 WILDFLOWER LANE (APN 634-061-006) - DESERT ROSE - PALM DESERT. Member Spiegel moved to, by Minute Motion: 1) Authorize acquisition of the subject property for the purpose of retaining affordability covenants and resale, if necessary, in anticipation of the expiration of the 60-day Right -of -Refusal Period; 2) approve a Silent Second Trust Deed in an amount necessary to secure an affordable housing cost pursuant to Redevelopment Law for either a direct sale or Agency sale; 3) authorize the Executive Director to execute any documents necessary to facilitate this transaction — funds are available in the Housing Set -aside Fund. Motion was seconded by Benson and carried by a 5-0 vote. REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO MODIFY THE USE OF FUNDS APPROPRIATED FOR THE COST OF CONSTRUCTION OF A STORAGE FACILITY AT JOSLYN SENIOR CENTER FOR A PREFABRICATED STORAGE SHED, PREPARATION OF AN EXPANSION MASTER PLAN FOR THE CENTER, AND RESURFACING THE CENTER PARKING LOT. Responding to question, Mr. McCarthy stated that Council previously authorized $70,000 for replacement of a storage facility. He said the Joslyn Senior Center reconsidered the need for a permanent storage facility and was requesting a modification to use the funds for planning purposes, acquisition of interim storage, and re -surfacing of the parking area, currently in a deteriorating condition. Member Spiegel inquired if that meant the elimination of the lawn bowling. Mr. McCarthy stated the request did not imply that; the request was for alternative use of the funds. Member Finerty stated Mr. Rittenhouse's letter was requesting that remaining monies be used to resurface the parking lot, claiming it's not been done in a long time and currently contained many tripping hazards. She said if the information was accurate, why not take care of filling in the cracks to eliminate the tripping hazards first and then the parking before worrying about master planning. Secondly, she asked if the Joslyn Senior Center had a reserve set aside for taking care of the parking lot. Mr. McCarthy stated he could not comment on their reserve; however, if Council wished to caveat its motion that priority be given to the parking lot, staff would communicate that to the Joslyn Senior Center and make it a condition of Council's approval. Member Finerty stated the Agency provided the Joslyn Senior Center $70,000 for one intent, and they have changed the game plan. She thought 6 MINUTES PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING FEBRUARY 8, 2007 Council first needed to find out if the Josyln Senior Center had a reserve before allowing them to use $70,000 to master plan without addressing the parking lot. Member Spiegel stated the $70,000 was a trade; they gave the City land for the housing facility. Mr. McCarthy stated there was no urgency on this item, funds hadn't been released. He said he spoke with Mr. Rittenhouse earlier in the afternoon, who extended his regrets for not being able to attend, but that he was planning to be present at the next meeting to provide a presentation to Council. He said if Council continued this item, some of the questions can be answered at that meeting. Vice Chairman Benson stated she recalled the Joslyn Senior Center was part of the Cove Communities and funded by three cities. She said if that was the case, the City should only contribute $20,000-$25,000 for their master plan study. She wasn't aware of any other group that got paid for their master planning. Responding to comments as to why the City of Palm Desert was being asked to fund their master planning, Mr. McCarthy clarified the $70,000 was a reimbursement for destroying a storage facility that was on their property to accommodate the Agency's development. Mr. McCarthy recommended a continuance in order to address all the questions raised. Member Spiegel moved to continue the matter to the meeting of February 22, 2007. Motion was seconded by Finerty and carried by a 5-0 vote. X. CONTINUED BUSINESS A. CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR SUBSTITUTION OF SUBCONTRACTOR FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE HENDERSON COMMUNITY BUILDING PROJECT (CONTRACT NO. R22600A) (Continued from the meeting of January 25, 2007). Member Finerty stated she read all the documents and correspondence that went back and forth and believed that AB Lujan Company had ample time to obtain insurance and to get the contractor's license up-to-date. She stated that she disagreed with staff recommendation to deny the substitution. Project Coordinator Missy Wightman stated initially they recommended a denial of the substitution; however, based on documentation received from Steton Construction Group, staffs own evaluation, conversations with representatives of the California Contractor State License Board, and AB 7 MINUTES PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING FEBRUARY 22, 2007 B. CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AGAINST THE AGENCY TREASURY - Warrant Nos. 164RDA, 166RDA, 17ORDA, 167-Housing, 171-Housing, 168HA, and 172HA. Rec: Approve as presented. C. REQUEST FOR RATIFICATION of Amendment No. 2 to Contract No. R24770 — Design Services for the Civil Work and Infrastructure at Entrada del Paseo. Rec: By Minute Motion, ratify Amendment No. 2 in the amount of $9,000 to the subject contract with Stantec Consulting, Inc., Palm Desert, California, for additional design work associated with the civil improvements for La Spiga Restaurant at Entrada del Paseo — funds are available in Account No. 850-4358-433-4001. Upon motion by Benson, second by Spiegel, and 5-0 vote of the Agency Board, the Consent Calendar was approved as presented. VII. CONSENT ITEMS HELD OVER None VIII. RESOLUTIONS None IX. NEW BUSINESS None X. CONTINUED BUSINESS REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO MODIFY THE USE OF FUNDS PPROPRIATED FOR THE COST OF CONSTRUCTION OF A STORAGE ACILITY AT JOSLYN SENIOR CENTER FOR A PREFABRICATED STORAGE SHED, PREPARATION OF AN EXPANSION MASTER PLAN FOR THE CENTER, AND RESURFACING THE CENTER PARKING LOT (Continued from the meeting of February 8, 2007). Mr. Ortega noted this item was continued by Agency Board in order to clarify the funding priorities of the Joslyn Senior Center. He stated the Executive Director of the Joslyn Senior Center was present and may want to answer some of questions raised. 3 MINUTES PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING FEBRUARY 22, 2007 MR. PETER RITTENHOUSE, Excecutive Director of the Joslyn Senior Center, Palm Desert, stated the $70,000 were funds left over from the construction of a community project adjacent to the Senior Center. He said the Executive Committee, in good conscience, couldn't spend $70,000 to construct a permanent storage shed in light of current demands on the building. He explained that the building was used to its capacity, and parking was extremely limited; it didn't seem wise to add a permanent storage to the building when they weren't sure of its long-term usage. He went on to say that in order for citizens of low income to use the property, the Center operated as close to zero margin as possible. He proposed to use the $70,000 to address their three most immediate needs: 1) Hire an architectural firm to do a master plan study to look at existing properties and the adjoining property that was offered by the City— results of the study will help the committee make an educated decision on the future of the Center; 2) resurface the older portion of the parking lot; 3) purchase a prefabricated shed to replace the one that was lost and be able to relocate it to another location down the road. He said he had an opportunity to speak with the other two cities, regarding the question raised at the previous meeting, whether they would participate in the funding of the master plan and resurfacing of the parking lot. He said the City of Indian Wells was willing to entertain a maximum grant of $10,000 with no maximum amount specified by Rancho Mirage. He pointed out that at the end of their last fiscal year, the Joslyn Senior Center had less than $30,000 in operating funds and $360,000 in restricted funds. The income from the restricted funds went toward the operation of the Center, but the principal in that endowment -type fund couldn't be violated for the aforementioned needs of the Center. Member Spiegel asked if they were planning on eliminating the lawn bowling. MR. RITTENHOUSE replied the Center had a commitment to keep it for another year. He added that it was probably safe for a couple of years. Vice Chairman Benson moved to, by Minute Motion, authorize the use of the previously authorized $70,000 payment for purchase of a storage shed, master planning services, and resurfacing of the Joslyn Senior Center parking lot. Motion was seconded by Spiegel and carried by a 5-0 vote. XI. OLD BUSINESS None XII. PUBLIC HEARINGS None 4 Successor Agency to the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency Long Range Property Management Plan PROPERTY 5(a), 5(b), 5(c), 5(d) (San Pablo/Fred Waring) Attachments RECEIVEu Mt Mir i,.,ri U'Neitl ail, Rom rl ul 11u,tre•. liw fry H,nugthtu,r Vire Chali V.,, .,nt Clerk y len.• ,anther Fulton Member (;( )l .l ,l',(.l', 11, [ )1' , I:" 1 April 3, 2.013 or. nnnnle stetan Mr. Martin C. Alvarez Member Director of Economic Development City of Palm Desert Ir. Andlew Campbell73-510 Fred Waring Drive Student Trustee Palm Desert, CA 92260-2578 Or. tort i tut narnun President CITY OF PALM DESERT Economic Development RE: Transfer of Properties from the Successor Agency to the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency to College of the Desert. Assessor's Parcel Numbers: 627-101- 002, 627-101-017, 627-101-033, 627-101-038 and 627-101-039 I Located at the southeast corner of Fred Waring Drive and San Pablo Dear Mr. Alvarez: In response to your email dated March 27, 2013, College of the Desert is interested in acquiring properties referenced above from the Successor Agency to the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency for educational use. College of the Desert is proposing to use the properties for a multi -purpose educational site that enhances the Palm Desert Campus. The proximity of the properties compliments our campus and provides an opportunity for improved community and business access. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (760) 773-2500 or by email at ikinnamongtcolleaeofthedesert,edhl. Sincerely, Joel . Kinnamon, Ph.D. Su rintendent/President JLK/Ic Enclosure cc: Mr. Steve Renew, College of the Desert Mr. Wade Ellis, College of the Desert 43500 Monterey Ave., Palm Desert, CA 92260 • 760.346.8041 • collegeofthedesert.edu cN'1 U n (iiII' 1I DEPARTMENT CIF (yl,,.>,..Ntr F I N A N C E April 24, 2013 Ms. Veronica Tapia, Accountant II City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Dear Ms. Tapia: EDMUN❑ G. BROWN 11R. " GOVERNOR J 1'• 1.. STREET ■ SACRAMENTO CA f 95111 4-9717G ■ WWW.1Oi.CA.1JOv Subject: Objection to Oversight Board Action The City of Palm Desert successor agency (Agency) notified the California Department of Finance (Finance) of its February 8, 2013 Oversight Board (06) action 2013-001 on February 8, 2013. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code (HSC) section 34179 (h), Finance has completed its review of your OB action, which may have included obtaining clarification for various items. Based on our review and application of the law, the Agency's OB resolution No. 033 related to the conveyance of parcels APN 627-101-038 and APN 627-101-039 to the City of Palm Desert for the construction of the additional lanes on Monterey Avenue and the turn pocked on Fred Waring Drive is not permitted. HSC section 3.4181 states the OB shall direct the Agency to transfer ownership of those assets that were constructed and used for a governmental purpose such as roads to the appropriate public jurisdiction. Since the two parcels are currently vacant and are not yet constructed for a governmental purpose, the transfer is not allowed. As authorized by HSC section 34179 (h), Finance is retuming your OB action to the board for reconsideration. Please direct inquiries to Beliz Chappuie, Supervisor or Mindy Patterson, Lead Analyst at (916) 445-1546. Sincerely, STEVE SZALAY Program Budget Manager cc: Ms. Janet Moore, Director of Housing, City of Palm Desert Ms. Pam Elias, Chief Accounting Property Tax Division, County of Riverside Auditor Controller California State Controller's Office RESOLUTION NO. OB - 033 A RESOLUTION OF THE OVERSIGHT BOARD TO THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING THE CONVEYANCE OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY KNOW AS A.P.N. 627-101-038 AND A.P.N 627-101- 039 TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT RECITALS: WHEREAS, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34179(3), all actions taken by the Oversight Board to the Successor Agency to the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency (the "Oversight Board") shall be adopted by resolution. WHEREAS, AB X1-26 and AB X1-27 were signed by the Governor of California on June 29, 2011, making certain changes to the Community Redevelopment Law (Part 1 (commencing with Section 33000) of Division 24 of the Califomia Health and Safety Code), including adding Part 1.8 (commencing with Section 34161) and Part 1.85 (commencing with Section 34170) ("Part 1.85"). WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Palm Desert (the "City") made an election to serve as the successor agency for the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency") under Part 1.85 (the "Successor Agency"). WHEREAS, the City Council, acting as the governing board for the Successor Agency, established rules and regulations applicable to the govemance and operation of the Successor Agency, and pursuant to such resolution provided that the Successor Agency will be govemed by a Board of Directors consisting of the members of the City Council of the City. WHEREAS, in response to a letter from the Califomia State Controller ordering the City to retum to the Successor Agency real property previously conveyed by the Agency to the City after January 1, 2011 (the "Letter"), and pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34167.5, the Board desires to execute and deliver to the City that certain Grant Deed in the form attached hereto as Attachment "A" (the "Deed") and conveying that certain real property described therein. WHEREAS, on January 24, 2013, the Successor Agency and City approved the conveyance and acceptance of that certain real property described in the Deed. RESOLUTION NO. OD - 033 NOW, THEREFORE, THE OVERSIGHT BOARD HEREBY FINDS, DETERMINES, RESOLVES, AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are a substantive part of this Resolution. Section 2. The Oversight Board hereby authorizes the Successor Agency to execute and deliver the Deed to the City, and to take any such other action and to execute and deliver such other documents and instruments as may be necessary to effectuate the purpose of this Resolution, all under such circumstances and at such time as he deems appropriate upon the advice of legal counsel. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 4th day of February 2013, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Robert A. Spiegel, Chair ATTEST: Rachelle D. Klassen, Secretary Oversight Board for the Successor Agency to the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency RESOLUTION NO. 011 - 033 ATTACHMENT "A" GRANT DEED er.JUldl1 IUN Nt). UB - 033' RECORDING REQUESTED HY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL VO: CITY CLERK OFFICE CITY OF PALM DESERT 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, California 92260 Exempt from Recording Fee Pursuant to government code 6103 APN: 627-101-038, and 627-101-039 (SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE IS FOR RECORDER'S USE) GRANT DEED THE UNDERSIGNED GRANTOR DECLARES AS FOLLOWS: This transfer is exempt from Documentary Transfer Tax pursuant to Revenue & Taxation Code Section 11922, and exempt from Recording Fees pursuant to Califomia Government Code Section 6103. FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, a public body, corporate and politic, Hereby grants to the CITY OF PALM DESERT, a municipal corporation, the following described real property in the City of Palm Desert, County of Riverside, State of Califomia: LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND PLAT ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBITS "A" AND "B" RESPECTIVELY INCORPORATED HEREIN BY THIS REFERENCE. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has executed this Grant Deed as of the date set forth below. Dated: January 24, 2013 SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, A public body, corporate and politic BY Jan C. Harnik, Chairman RESOLUTION NO. OB - 033 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION RIGHT-OF-WAY APN: 627-101-038, 039 1 IN 'I'iili ('ITY OF PALM DESERT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING 2. TIIAT PORTION OF LOT I IN PALMA VILLAGE GROVES AS PER MAP FILED IN BOOK 20, 3 PAGE 51 OF MAPS IN 1'HE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, MORE 4 PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 5 6 COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; 8 THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT I NORTH 89°51'21" EAST A 9 DISTANCE OF 35.79 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; I0 1 I THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE NORTH 89°51'21" EAST A 12 DISTANCE OF 20.05 FEET; 13 14 THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHERLY LINE SOUTH 44°31'10" WEST A DISTANCE OF 32.95 15 FEET; 16 17 THENCE SOUTH 03°01'34" WEST A DISTANCE OF 196.45 FEET; 18 19 THENCE SOUTH 00°04'43" EAST A DISTANCE OF 57.78 FEET; 20 21 THENCE SOUTH 45°09'45" EAST A DISTANCE OF 18.41 FEET; 22 23 THENCE SOUTH 00°14'46" EAST A DISTANCE OF 8.53 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF 24 SAID LOT I; 25 26 THENCE SOUTH 89°49'21" WEST A DISTANCE OF 33.38 FEET TO THE MOST EASTERLY 27 CORNER OF THAT EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT PER 28 INSTRUMENT NUMBER 124083, RECORDED JUNE 22, 1983; 29 30 THENCE ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID EASEMENT NORTH 45°00'27" WEST 31 A DISTANCE OF 4.23 FEET TO THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER THEREOF, BEING ALSO ON 32 THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1; 33 Page 1 of 2 RESOLUTION NO. UB — 033 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL. DESCRIPTION RIGHT-OF-WAY APN: 627-101-038, 039 34 THENCI? ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE NORTH 00°09'46" EAST A DISTANCE OF 153.12 3s FEET TO T)W SOUTHWESTERLY CORNIER OF PARCEL "6" OF THAT EASEMENT GRANTED 36 TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT PER INSTRI IME.NT NUMBER 124086, RECORDED JLJNE 22, 37 1983; 38 39 THENCE. LEAVING SAID WESTERLY LINE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID 40 EASEMENT THE FOLLOWING FOUR COURSES; 41 42 NORTH 89°51'52" EAST A DISTANCE OF 0.47 FEET; 43 44 THENCE NORTH 03°09'52" EAST A DISTANCE OF 111.44 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A 45 32.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; 46 47 THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 46.22 FEET THROUGII A 48 CENTRAL ANGLE OF 82°45'52"; 9 0 THENCE NORTH 04°04' 16" WEST A DISTANCE OF 1.49 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF 51 SAID LOT 1 AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. 52 53 CONTAINING 7,705 SQUARE FEET OR 0.177 ACRE, MORE OR LESS. 54 55 ALL AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A 56 PART HEREOF. 12/07/2012 MICHAEL JAMES KNAPTON DATE P.L.S.8012 REV: 12/07/2012 Page 2 of 2 RESOLUTION NO. OB - 033 EXHIBIT "B" w 0 z d cf. I _l. FRED) WARING DRIVE ( STY LINE SECTION 17 DETAIL "A" SCALE: I" = 1' P.O.C. NW'LY COI?. LOT 1 N SEE DETAIL "A" �` 0E a W'LY LINE LOT 1 — T, (JDI L9 MOST EASTERLY CORNER INST. NO. __ 124083, O.R. REC. 6/22/1983 FRED WARING DRIVE 0 50 100 200 SCALE: 1" = 100' LEGEND u-AINDICATESRIGHT-OF-WAY GRANTED HEREON (7,705 SQ. FT. / 0.177 AC) P.O.C. T.P.O.B. TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING (R) INDICATES RADIAL BEARINGKIntorilom rm.!! POINT OF COMMENCEMENT MIN end Madden, Inc 90110:114 PLANNING R EIMIONENTAL OPEOLTAVIS 401 0 S1n.t. SITE SOO SAN OEOD, CA 92101 EL: WO 234-**II PREP RED 12/06/2012 MICHAEL J. KNAPTON PLS 8012 DATE L13 — L2--- —T.P.O.B. POR. LOT 1 PALMA VILLAGE GROVES M.B. 20/51 DETAIL "B" SCALE: 1" = 5' � c\) SEE DETAIL "B" 1 — 0 d L6 �L7 L8 SANTA ROSA WAY CURVE TABLE CURVE I LENGTH I RADIUS DELTA CI 46.22' i 32.00' 1 82°45'52" o z a No 80 2 1 �` 1 LINE TABLE LINE I LENGTH 1 BEARING L 1 35.79' i N89°51'21"E .12 20.05' I N89°51'21"E L3 32.95' • S44°31' 10' W L4 ,196.45' S03°01'34' W L5 57.78' SOO°04'43"E ' L6 18.41' S45°09'45"E 1.7 8.53' S00° 14'46' E L8 33.38' N89°49'21 "E L9 4.23' N45°00'27"W L 10 153.12' _ N00°09146"E L 11 0.47' N89°51 '52"E L 12 111.44' NO3°09'52"E L 13 1.49' N04°04' 16'W Successor Agency to the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency Long Range Property Management Plan PROPERTY 10(b) Cal State San Bernardino University - Palm Desert Campus Attachments OVERALL PARCEL INCLUDING rtrurl_ sini :7 R/W ., 2.67 AC EXHIBIT 'B" UNIVERSITY F RE STATION EXHIBIT MSA CONSULINC roam. ■ ems >drf ■ Lisa Sosswaye SOIX law gas Dins ■ lases Kiwis ■C► WM 'Asss?,s Min Paz OM SIMS J.N. 1936 4/24/2012 SHEET 1 OF 1 Successor Agency to the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency Long Range Property Management Plan PROPERTY 11(d)& 11(e) 132 Acres Attachments Nr- lZO tzu *l `D P48914'10T 209.961 r P.O.B. LOT 16 Ja. TRACT 30269 MB 323/ 15-16/ 38' JULE z gg-1 kifi EXHIBIT B °EPALD FORD DRIVE 29 I .3127T NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 , APN 694— 600-007 G'1 S89'54'10'W 566 03' \--GRANT DEED PER INSTRUMENT NO. 2002-357980, RECORDED 06/28/2002. CURVE DATA TABLE Cp4 RADIUS DELTA LENGTH Cl 1038.00' 11' 11'12' 202.67' C2 962.00' 11'11'12a 187.83' C3 32.00' 89'57'35' 50.24' 50.00' "NIL 1 1 UEDATA TAME tf I BEARING DISTANCE L 1 N00'03'25'W 6.02' L2 NO0'03'251W 69.98' PORTION OF SE 1/4, OF THE NE 1/4, SEC. 32, T. 4 S., R. 6 E., S.B.W. HEITEC CONSULTING SCALE 1'-100' CITY OF PALM Lei SUBJECT: LANE DEDICATION APN 694-300-006 dt 007 DATE: 00/04/13 DRAIIN BY: J.R. CHECIIFD B: 0.H. FILE: 130301X01 Www.Asltcclnc.com 42675 Weds MOO. sid P Pain Dow. Oilibais 7MSMN F.E10i/01070 EXHIBIT A THOSE CERTAIN PARCELS OF LAND LOCATED IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. STATE OF CALIFORNIA. BEING PORTIONS OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER AND THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, BOTH OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 6 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 16, TRACT 30269 AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 323, PAGES 15 AND 16 OF MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, ALSO BEING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN THE GRANT DEED TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT RECORDED JUNE 28, 2002 AS INSTRUMENT NUMBER 2002-357980 OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LAND DESCRIBED PER INSTRUMENT NO. 2002- 357980 NORTH 00°03'25" WEST A DISTANCE OF 6.02 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 00°03'25" WEST ALONG THE PROLONGATION OF SAID WEST LINE A DISTANCE OF 69.98 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°54' 10" EAST A DISTANCE OF 209.96 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1038.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 202.67 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 11°11'12" TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE. CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 962.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 187.83 FEET ALONO THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 11 ° 11' 12" TO A POINT OF CUSP. AND THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LAND DESCRIBED PER INSTRUMENT NO. 2002-357980; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE SOUTH 89°54' 10" WEST A DISTANCE OF 566.03 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 32.00 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH LINE SOUTHWESTERLY 50.24 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89°57'35" TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINS 0.36 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. EXHIBIT 'B' ATTACHED AND BY THIS REFERENCE IS HEREBY MADE A PART HEREOF. IA20131130301 urea eshibil °.doe RES. NO. OB - 067 [THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK.] Successor Agency to the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency Long Range Property Management Plan PROPERTY 11(h) 132 Acre Site Attachments EXHIBIT'A" PARCEL A LEGAL DESCRIPTION That certain real property located in the City of Palm Desert, County of Riverside, State of Califomia, described as follows: Being a portion of the north half of the north half of the west half of the east half of Section 32, Township 4 South, Range 8 East, San Bernardino Meridian, County of Riverside, State of Califomia, according to the official plat thereof, more particularly described as follows: The east 220.85 feet of the north 668.70 feet of said north half of the north half of the west half of the east half of Section 32; Excepting therefrom the north 75.00 feet. Said described land contains 3.00 acres, more or less. Subject to all covenants, rights, rights of ways and easements of record, if any. Exhibits B-1 and B-2 attached hereto and by this reference are made a part of hereof. /f 4c),C A./at...kJ-2 R. Page Gamer, L.S. City Surveyor City of Palm Desert, CA Date r 4SRrt_ W DEED TO Co. Of R/V FOR SNER/FF'S STA . SI;t:7ION 79 /VoRTN Lily, $kc7,o v GERAL D-FORD-DR N8 ? • 54 • 51 E 2 z 0. 8 6' 1.4 SECTION 32 DoC. NO. 2a08-0577535 REC. /O/30/zoo8, 0..R. R1V.Ca r /= '1 PARCEL t i T4SR6L1 API/ t �-3k• o N89'54'59"E 220.851 .b 0 '1$SR6E T4SR6E SECTION 32 SE :TON 32 N'lz� N/z) tN%z, E%z SEC.32, T.4S, R.6E., S.B.M. 1: 2.400 EXHIBIT B-2 AWE 0 3 SECTION 30 0 H - - -ilrgiAV- OJ4IOd m Cr /- ( 0 a a EXHIBIT B - Successor Agency to the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency Long Range Property Management Plan PROPERTY 12(b) Desert Willow Lot Pad B Attachments EXHIBIT "A" PARCEL "A" Legal Description That portion of Lot 8 of Tract No. 28450 in the City of Palm Desert, County of Riverside, State of California, as per map filed in Book 264, Pages 4 through 15 inclusive, of Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said County described as follows: Beginning at the westerly terminus of that certain course in the northerly line of said Lot 8 shown as "N 89° 46' 41" W 293.56' " on said map; thence along said northerly line S 89° 46" 41" E 293.56 feet to the west line of Desert Willow Drive, and to the beginning of a non -tangent curve concave to the east having a radius of 137.00 feet and to which beginning a radial line bears S 88° 57' 01" W; thence along said west line southeasterly 170.74 feet along said curve through a central angle of 71° 24' 21" to the beginning of a reverse curve concave to the southwest having a radius of 65.00 feet, a radial line through said beginning of reverse curve bears N 17° 32' 40" E; thence continuing along said west line southeasterly 51.87 feet along said curve through a central angle of 45° 43' 21" to the beginning of a compound curve concave to the southwest having a radius of 526.00 feet; thence continuing along said west line southeasterly 36.97 feet along said curve through a central angle of 4° 01' 37"; thence leaving said west line S 46° 18' 47" W 347.14 feet; , thence N 43° 41' 13" W 394.66 feet to the northerly Tine of said Lot 8; thence along said northerly line N 54° 05' 23" E 97.66 feet thence continuing along said northerly line N 0° 50' 56" E 92.68 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 3.028 acres, more or less. As shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. e G/4- 4L1 R. Page Gambr, L.S. City Surveyor City of Palm Desert, CA /o/i//i 2 Date RES. NO. OB - 067 [THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK.] Successor Agency to the Paim Desert Redevelopment Agency Long Range Property Management Plan PROPERTY 12(c) Desert Willow Lot Pad C Attachments Successor Agency to the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency Long Range Property Management Plan PROPERTY 12(d) Desert Willow Lot Pad D Attachments Successor Agency to the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency Long Range Property Management Plan PROPERTY 12(e) Desert Willow Lot Pad E Attachments PARKING AGREEMENT THIS PARKING AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is entered into as of October 25, 2007 (the "Effective Date"), and is entered into by and between the PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ("PDRDA"), a public body, corporate and politic and JW MARRIOTT RESORT & SPA ("JWMRS"). RECITALS WHEREAS, PDRDA is the fee owner of that certain real property adjacent to the Desert Springs Marketplace at the Northwest corner of Cook Avenue and Country Club Drive (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, PDRDA desires to assist JWMRS to provide for temporary overflow parking on that portion of the Property identified on the Site Plan attached hereto as Exhibit "A" (the "Premises"), on the terms and conditions described below; NOW, THEREFORE, for good and adequate consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, it is hereby mutually agreed as follows: AGREEMENT SECTION 1. Parkina Privileges. PDRDA shall allow for parking privileges for the Term and upon the covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth herein. JWMRS shall have use of the Premises for parking as hereinafter provided. SECTION 2. Term and Effective Date. Commencing on the Effective Date and continuing thereafter on a month -to -month basis until terminated by either PDRDA or JWMRS upon thirty (30) days prior written notice ("Term"), unless terminated earlier in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. SECTION 3. Use Payments. JWMRS shall pay to PDRDA on a monthly basis the amount of One Dollar ($1.00) for such parking privileges, payable on or before the first (1st) day of each month. SECTION 4. Use of the Premises. The Premises shall be used by JWMRS as an overflow parking area for the employees of JWMRS, and the Premises shall not be used for any other purpose whatsoever. Without limiting the foregoing, only passenger vehicles shall be parked on the Premises, and no construction vehicles or vehicles with more than two (2) axles shall be parked on the Premises or be given access thereto. No overnight parking shall be permitted by JWMRS. JWMRS shall not place any personal property on the Premises, or alter the Premises, without the prior written consent of PDRDA, which consent may be given or withheld in the sole and absolute discretion of PDRDA. JWMRS shall be solely responsible for providing security for the vehicles parked on the Premises and all persons accessing the Premises for parking, and P6402-000111000984v1.doc 1 G:\rda\Former Employees Files\Beth Longman\Yrigoyen\Desert Springs Resort and Spa - Parking Agmint.DOC JWMRS, at its sole cost and expense, shall hire and supervise all security personnel necessary to provide such security during all times in which vehicles are parked on the Premises. JWMRS, at its sole cost and expense, shall maintain and keep the Premises clean and free of debris. JWMRS shall be responsible for any damage to the Premises caused by JWMRS or JWMRS's invitees, and JWMRS shall promptly repair any such damage at JWMRS's sole cost and expense. JWMRS shall obtain any and all necessary permits required for parking on the Premises. JWMRS hereby assumes the risk of damage to personal or real property, or injury to persons in or on the Premises or arising from the use or occupancy thereof from any cause whatsoever, except when caused by the gross negligence or willful misconduct of PDRDA. Vehicles shall be allowed to park on the Premises only between the hours of 5:00 a.m. to 3:00 a.m. the following day. JWMRS shall provide PDRDA with a written weekly schedule of the days in each week in which vehicles will be parked on the Premises, and such schedule shall be given to PDRDA no later than the Friday preceding each such week. JWMRS shall cause all vehicles parking on the Premises to enter and exit the Premises from Desert Willow Drive. SECTION 5. Condition of the Premises. PDRDA shall have no obligation to maintain, repair or improve the Premises. SECTION 6. Possessory Interest Tax and Other Taxes. PDRDA hereby gives JWMRS notice, and JWMRS acknowledges receipt of such notice, as required pursuant to California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 107.6, that a leasehold interest may be created by this Agreement and may result in a possessory interest tax being levied against the Premises, and that in such event JWMRS shall be obligated to pay such tax. In addition, JWMRS shall be solely responsible for the payment of all other taxes attributable to JWMRS's occupancy and use of the Premises. SECTION 7. Assignment and Subletting. JWMRS shall not assign, or otherwise convey its rights under this Agreement without PDRDA's written consent, which consent may be given or withheld in the sole and absolute discretion of PDRDA. SECTION 8. Rights of Entry and Use. PDRDA shall have the right to enter and inspect the Premises at any time. PDRDA does not relinquish its right of ownership and does not convey a property interest through this Agreement and simply conveys parking rights. SECTION 9. Insurance. JWMRS, at its sole cost and expense, shall at all times during the Term keep in full force and effect the hereinafter described policies of insurance. All such policies shall be issued by companies acceptable to PDRDA, shall be issued by reputable companies authorized to do business and operating in the State of California, shall be rated A-X or better in Best's Insurance Guide, shall name PDRDA and the City of Palm Desert (the City") as additional insureds, shall not provide for a deductible in excess of $5,000.00 without the prior written consent of PDRDA (and JWMRS shall be liable for payment of any such deductible in the event of any casualty), and shall be primary to any other insurance that may be available to PDRDA or City. All insurance policies shall contain a clause stating that the insurer will not cancel or reduce P6402-0001\1000984v1.doc 2 G:\rdalFormer Employees FileslBeth Longman\Yrigoyen\Desert Springs Resort and Spa - Parking Agrmnt.DOC coverage's without first giving PDRDA thirty (30) days prior written notice. JWMRS will provide PDRDA with current evidence of such insurance, including a copy of all additional insured endorsements, on or before the Effective Date, and shall provide PDRDA evidence of renewpf such insurance at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date of such insurance, and will provide true and complete copies of such insurance policies upon PDRDA's request. JWMRS shall maintain comprehensive/commercial general liability insurance with respect to the Premises and any business operations conducted by JWMRS, its independent contractors and permitees, if any. Said insurance shall provide coverage's for bodily injury and property damage liability; personal and advertising injury liability; blanket contractual liability; independent contractors liability; and fire damage liability. PDRDA and City shall be named as an additional insured(s) under JWMRS's commercial liability insurance policy as provided under the standard insurance service office ("ISO") endorsement number CG201111 entitled, "Additional Insured —Managers of Premises." (or its equivalent). The policy or policies of insurance shall provide coverage on an "occurrence" basis (not on a "claims made" form) and shall provide limits of no Tess than the following: General Aggregate Limit: $2,000,000 Personal Injury Limit: $2,000,000 Each Occurrence Limit: $2,000,000 ire Damage Limit: $50,000 These limits of insurance may be satisfied by the use of a combination of primary and excess liability or "blanket" insurance policies. In such event, JWMRS shall not be deemed to have complied with its obligations hereunder until JWMRS shall have obtained and delivered to PDRDA a copy of each such policy together with an appropriate endorsement or certificate applicable to and evidencing full compliance with the specific requirements of this Agreement (irrespective of any claim which may be made with respect to any other property or liability covered under such policy), and until the same shall have been approved by PDRDA in writing. PDRDA may from time to time require, with due regard to prevailing prudent business practices, that these limits be increased, or that additional liability coverage's be provided, as may be reasonably adequate for PDRDA's protection. SECTION 10. Surrender. JWMRS agrees, upon the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement, to quit and surrender the Premises to PDRDA in clean condition and free of any personal property of JWMRS or its invitees (including any vehicles located on the Premises). SECTION 11. Default. In the event JWMRS shall be in default in the performance of any obligation on its part to be performed under the terms of this Agreement, and =f; ault continues for ten (10) days, following notice and demand for P6402-0001 \1000984v1.doc 3 G:\rdaTormer Employees Files\Beth Longman\Yrigoyen\Desert Springs Resort and Spa - Parking Agrmnt.DOC correction thereof to JWMRS, PDRDA may (i) immediately terminate this Agreement by written notice to JWMRS and (ii) exercise any and all remedies granted by law. SECTION 12. Indemnification. JWMRS hereby agrees to indemnify PDRDA and City against and save PDRDA and City harmless from any and all losses, costs, damages, charges, liabilities, obligations, fines, penalties, claims, demands, or judgments and any and all expenses, including without limitation reasonable attorneys fees and expenses, court costs, and costs of appeal, settlement and negotiations, arising out of or in connection with: (a) the use of the Premises by JWMRS or JWMRS's employees or invitees; (b) the conduct of JWMRS's, business or any activity, work or thing done, permitted or suffered by JWMRS in, on or about the Premises; (c) any failure to perform or observe any of the terms, covenants, conditions or provisions required to be performed or observed by JWMRS under this Agreement; and (d) any negligence by JWMRS or its employees or agents. In the event any action or proceeding is brought against PDRDA or City by reason of clauses (a) through (d) inclusive, JWMRS shall, at the request of PDRDA or City, assume the defense of the same at JWMRS's sole cost with counsel reasonably satisfactory to PDRDA or City, as appropriate. The indemnification obligations of JWMRS contained in this Section 12 shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement. SECTION 13. Waiver of Relocation Benefits. JWMRS hereby waives as against PDRDA claims for any and all relocation assistance benefits including compensation to which it may later claim to be entitled under either state or federal relocation assistance statutes and regulations due to the expiration or early termination of this Agreement for any reason whatsoever. JWMRS acknowledges that this waiver may be used as a defense by PDRDA against any claim for state or federal relocation benefits by JWMRS based on its occupancy the Premises. JWMRS further acknowledges that it has been given an adequate opportunity to seek the advise of legal counsel regarding the rights being waived hereunder. JWMRS INITIALS: SECTION 14. Partial Invalidity. If any one or more of the terms, provisions, covenants or conditions of this Agreement shall to any extent be invalid, unenforceable, void or voidable for any reason whatsoever, none of the remaining terms, provisions, covenants and conditions of this Agreement shall be affected thereby, and each provision of this Agreement shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. SECTION 15. Notices. All notices, statements, demands, consents, approvals, authorizations, offers, designations, requests or other communications hereunder by either party to the other shall be in writing and shall be sufficiently given and served upon the other party if delivered personally or if mailed by United States certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, and: P6402-000111000984v1.doc 4 G1rda'Former Employees Filesl8eth LongmantYrigoyen\Desert Springs Resort and Spa - Parking Agnnnt.DOC If to PDRDA: Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency 73510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Attention: Executive Director If to JWMRS: Desert Springs Marriot Resort and Spa 74885 Country Club Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Attention: or to such other addresses as each respective p&ty may from time to time designate by notice in writing. SECTION 16. Section Headings. All section headings contained herein are for convenience of reference only and are not intended to define or limit the scope of any provision of this Agreement. SECTION 17. Amendment. This Agreement may only be amended by a written instrument duly authorized and executed by PDRDA and Agency. SECTION 18. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all together shall constitute but one and the same agreement. SECTION 19. Binding Effect. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of PDRDA and JWMRS and their respective successors, assigns and successors in interest. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Parking Agreement to be executed on the date first written above. PDRDA: JWMRS: PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT JW MARRIOTT RESORT & SPA AGENCY, a public body, corporate and politic By: By: Name: Name: Title: Title: ATTEST: Rachelle D. Klassen, Secretary P6402-000111000984v1.dac 5 G:lyda\Former Employees Files Beth Longman Yrigoyen\Desert Springs Resort and Spa - Parking Agrmnt.DOC EXHIBIT A SITE PLAN P6402-000111000984v1.doc A-1 RES. NO. OB - 067 [THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK.] Successor Agency to the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency Long Range Property Management Plan PROPERTY 12(f) Desert Willow Lot Pad F Attachments qe1 of 1) No Receding Foss Required Pr Govsnmmml Cods Ssnaon 27961 RECORDING REQUESTED SY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF PALM DESERT 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Paton Desert, California 92260 DOC It 2009-0659531 12/211/21180 MOON Foe:NC Pees INS Recorded in Offislal Records County of Riverside Larry a. Usrd Assessor. County Clerk ti Raserdsr iu1uIuNIIIH11 S R u Pwt S4Lk UA MOW U)N U NFU CLWY NO DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX DUE M A L 465 126 PCOR NCO* SMF IT: AM: 628400-003 mu ure GRANT OF gASEMENT FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, a public body, corporate and politic, hereby grants to the CITY OF PALM DESERT, a municipal corporation, the following described real property in the City of Palm Desert, County of Riverside, State of California: 5 CTY u I An easement for drainage and water retention purposes and the maintenance thereof over, under, along and across ail that certain property described In a legal description and plat attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibtts'A' and 'B'respectively. Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency, a public body, corporate and politic, Dated: December 10, 2009 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF siveruide PALM DXSEUT 1&EDEVEWP1ENT AGENCY BY Cindy Finerty, Chairman ON December 17. 2009 before me, M. Gloria Xartita.s wen Pubic, personely appealed Cindy Fiaerty s who proved to me on the Dais of satlsh that erj to preens( wlrote k Ky subscribed to the within instrument and sick , b me Bret M1 executed Rams in rA oifr.d p���) rdeY sbnatu e(n en the the Prto*. or upon behalf of wAtidt the ached, 1 certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph Is true and corned. county and state IMAM go 1 of 11 EXHIBIT "A" That portion of Lot 3 of Tract No. 28450 In the City of Palm Desert, County of Riverside, State of California. as per map filed In Book 264. Pages 4 through 15 inclusive, of Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said County described as follows: Commencing at the southwest comer of said Lot 3; thence along the southerly line of said Lot 3 S71'37'39"E 25.32 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence continuing along said southerly line the following three courses: S71'3T39"E 173.04 feet to an angle point therein; thence N84'22'17"E 594.27 feet to an angle point therein; thence N49'35'57"E 93.28 feet; thence leaving said southerly line N47'12'02"W 309.65 feet; thence 566'49'56'W 166.02 feet; thence N87'30'47"W 91.50 feet; thence N64'19'30"W 220.48 feet; thence S27'46'57"W 211.21 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the southeast having a radius of 1727.00 feet; thence southwesterly 135.14 feet along said curve through a central angle of 4'29'01" to saki southerly line of Lot 3 and to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 188,545.3 square feet, or 4.328 acres, more or less. Ali as shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. / ?,.x7 -1 /09/09 R. Page Gamer, L.S. Date City Surveyor City of Palm Desert Page lof1 'aqa 1 of 1) a "EXHIBIT B" SCALE:1-.200' ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY TO 8E GRANTED TO THE an' OF PALM DESERT PAO INCIOATE8 PONT OF o01,11ABca®+r TPJ09 PCICATE8 TIC PONT OPT ICC411111131ANAGE V EJY BIENT AREA (MID 80pr/4.825 ACI CITY OF PALM DESERT UNE TABLE UNE LENGTH BEARING 11 173.04' 571'37'39"E L2 594.27' N84'22'17"E L3 93.28' N49'35'57`E L4 309.55' N4712'02`W L5 166.02' 566'49'56"W L6 91.50' N8710'47"W l7 220.48' N6419'30'W L8 211.21' 52746'57"W l9 25.32' S71'37'39`E 0' "A. sf CITY OF PALM DESERT DRAINAGE EASEMENT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (Fag. 1 of tj CITY Of rai IIESERT »—SIo Fier) WARING DRIVE PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 T61a 760 J46-0611 FAX: 760 340-0S74 idoibpal.t• desert."R Drainage Easement APN 620-400-003 EXHIBIT CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the interest in real property conveyed by the GRANT OF EASEMENT dated December 10, 2009, from THE PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, A PUBLIC BODY, CORPORATE AND POLITIC, to THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, is hereby accepted pursuant to its Resolution No. 77-48, adopted May 12, 1977. CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA December 17, 2009 0111•1111011100111w01 Page 1 of 2 RES. NO. OB - 067 [THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK.] z 0 04. DEPARTMENT OF May 15, 2013 Ms. Veronica Tapia, Accountant II City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 EOMUNO G. OROWN JIL • GOVERNOR .2151. :3TRRcT 6 5AC.RAMENTQ CA f 9581 4-31Ud 6 www.o0r'.CA.OoV Dear Ms. Tapia: Subject: Finding of Completion The California Department of Finance (Finance) has completed the Finding of Completion for the City of Palm Desert Successor Agency. Finance has completed its review of your documentation, which may have included reviewing supporting documentation submitted to substantiate payment or obtaining confirmation from the county auditor - controller. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code (HSC) section 34179.7, we are pleased to inform you that Finance has verified that the Agency has made full payment of the amounts determined under HSC section 34179.6, subdivisions (d) or (e) and HSC section 34183.5. This letter serves as notification that a Finding of Completion has been granted. The Agency may now the following: • Place loan agreements between the former redevelopment agency and sponsoring entity on the ROPS, as an enforceable obligation, provided the oversight board makes a finding that the loan was for legitimate redevelopment purposes per HSC section 34191.4 (b) (1). Loan repayments will be govemed by criteria in HSC section 34191.4 (a) (2). • Utilize proceeds derived from bonds issued prior to January 1, 2011 in a manner consistent with the original bond covenants per HSC section 34191.4 (c). Additionally, the Agency is required to submit a Long -Range Property Management Plan to Finance for review and approval, per HSC section 34191.5 (b), within six months from the date of this letter. Please direct inquiries to Andrea Scharffer, Staff Finance Budget Analyst, or Chris Hill, Principal Program Budget Analyst, at (916) 445-1546. Sincerely, STEVE SZALAY Local Govemment Consultant cc: Ms. Janet Moore, Director of Housing, City of Palm Desert Ms. Pam Elias, Chief Accounting Property Tax Division, County of Riverside Auditor -Controller California State Controller's Office 691 ITTEEs 'E CHAIR. GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION IURANCE DGET ALTH VENUE AND TAXATION • L'B DGET. SUBCOMMITTEE NO. 2 ON EDUCATION FINANCE April 8, 2013 Ana J. Matosantos, Director Department of Finance 915 L Strctt Sacramento, California 95814 Assembly i lifornia Itislnturr BRIAN NESTANDE ASSEMBLYMEMBER, FGRTY BECOND OISTRICT Re: Concerns Regarding the Dear Ms. Matosantos: Haf"4II 14e,e, Ikkgsm. -� Nct, rig STATE CAPITOL P.O. BOX 942649 SACRAMENTO. CA 04249-0042 (/16)319.2042 FAX (0/6) 319.2142 DISTINCT OFFICE 73-710 FREO WARI NG ONVE. SUITE 115 PALM DESERT, CA 92260 (760) 674 0164 SATELLRE OFFICE 2091 W. FLORIDA AVENUE, SUITE 125 HEME7 CA 92545 (951) 9253306 row RECEIVED APR 1 2 2013 s �/ /• CITY OF PALM DESERT Housing Deperunent Dissolution of Redevelopment n lr .4 �(Timm m rn - < worn .100 T A The purpose of this letter is to share the outcome of recent meetings with representatives of the City of Palm Desert and other Coachella Valley cities to hear their concerns regarding the state's role in the process for the dissolution of redevelopment agencies. The cities were very pleased that the transfer of land to the University of California - Riverside (UCR) was approved, and they will be working with UCR to transfer the property as soon as possible. However, many voiced their concerns regarding the manner in which the dissolution process is being managed by the State. Of broad concern to the cities is DOF's interpretation of the provisions of Health and Safety Code (HSC) § 34181 (a), related to the definition of 'governmental purpose'. Specifically, HSC 34181 (a) allows the successor agency to submit a request to its oversight board to allow a transfer of an asset due to its 'governmental purpose' to the g,Li.ptwrkiate public jurisdiction. Although this section of the HSC gives several examples of governmental purpose transfers without specific limitations, based on the feedback we are receiving from several of the cities in our districts, it appears that the DOF has narrowly interpreted the language in this section to mean only the examples given. Logic suggests that the meaning of "such as roads, school buildings, parks, police and fire stations, libraries, and local agency administrative buildings" within HSC § 34181 (a) is not limiting. Given that the DOF's current view of the matter has caused some concern among the cities that we represent, as well as many others across California, it seems that DOF may wish to seek legal guidance on this matter or, if necessary, consider supporting an amendment to the HSC to clarify the issue. From my view, either an expanded understanding of the meaning of governmental purpose via administrative interpretation or through an amendment to the HSC would assist in resolving most cities' concerns over the types of assets that should be considered a governmental purpose. With this in mind, we are enclosing an example of a more thorough defmition of the types of governmental purpose that should be allowable under HSC § 34181 (a) that would be helpful in resolving the current uncertainty. We would appreciate your feedback on how best to resolve this matter. 4 Printed on Recycled Paper Page 2 A second issue that concerns several of the cities in my district relates to the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedules (ROPS). Each successor agency must prepare and file a ROPS with DOF for each half of each fiscal year covering payments on enforceable obligations for which payment will be due from Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) revenues received by the successor agency from the applicable county auditor -controller. Based on our review of example letters issucd by the DOF for the purpose of confirming its decision as to the approved enforceable obligations on a particular ROPS, which your department posts on its website, the DOF informs each successor agency that DOF's determination is effective for only the applicable ROPS period and should not be relied upon for future ROPS periods. Further, DOF informs each successor agency that all items listed on the future ROPS are subject to a subsequent review and may be denied even if it was or was not questioned on a current or preceding ROPS. It appears that DOF considers each ROPS a "zero -based" six-month budget for redevelopment dissolution purposes. Unfortunately, this interpretation does not consider the effect that DOF's policies may have on project activities that require more than one ROPS period to complete. Imagine, for instance, the havoc that would be caused if a ROPS-approved project under construction and half way completed were to be denied on a future ROPS. DOF's policy in this regard has caused great trepidation among many cities because capital projects nearly always take longer than one six-month ROPS period to complete. Cities operate on the basis of good faith that once they have approval to move forward on their projects they can complete them. Any later DOF denial of an approved project would be disastrous. With that in mind, we bring to your attention AB 564 (Mullin), which addresses the finality of a successor agency's oversight board's actions as well as the DOF reviews. This bill will help resolve the current concern that cities have with respect to the foregoing uncertainties. We hope that DOF will consider supporting this legislation. Finally, some cities are concerned about their ability to use proceeds from bonds issued after 2010. For example, the City of La Quinta issued debt in early 2011 for affordable housing purposes; similarly, the City of Blythe issued debt to build critical infrastructure projects necessary to protect the health and safety of its residents. Both cities are now unable to use the proceeds because of the issue date conflicting with the applicable provisions of the HSC. As you undoubtedly know, tax exempt bond proceeds must be committed to projects within three years of the issuance of the bonds or the bond issue is subject to being determined taxable by the IRS, which could cause litigation by bond owners and result in both fines and increases in the interest rate applicable to the bond issue. All of those types of costs would have to be borne by the tax payers through the use of RPTTF funding. We are hopeful that you will agree that such an outcome would be a waste of public resources. Fortunately, there is legislation pending (i.e., AB 981 [Bloom]) that would authorize the successor housing entity to designate the use of, and commit, indebtedness obligations proceeds that were issued prior to June 28, 2011 (instead of January 1, 2011), and further authorize a successor agency to expend excess bond proceeds derived from bonds issued on or before June 28, 2011 (instead of January 1, 2011). We would appreciate it if DOF would be supportive of this legislation. We thank you for your consideration of these matters. In addition, we encourage DOF to work cooperatively and collaboratively with cities and their successor agencies to efficiently and Pagc 3 effectively wind down their redevelopment programs. If you have any questions, please contact Asm. Nestandc's Chief of Staff, Mr. Robert Flanigan, at (916) 319-2042. Sincerely, 4a1.4. y "4J BRIAN NESTANDE V. MANUEL PEREZ Assemblymember, 42nd District Assemblymember, 56`h District cc: Debbie Franklin, Mayor for the City of Banning Andy Takata, Banning City Manager Roger Berg, Mayor for the City of Beaumont Alan Kapanicas, Beaumont City Manager Oscar Galvan, Mayor for the City of Blythe Dave Lane, Blythe City Manager Elsa Benedict, Mayor for the City of Brawley Rosanna Bayon Moore, Brawley City Manager Maritza Hurtado, Mayor for the City of Calexico Oscar G. Rodruiguez, Calexico City Manager Eduardo Garcia, Mayor for the City of Coachella David Garcia, Coachella City Manager William Davis, Mayor for the City of Calimesa Randy Anstine, Calimesa City Manager Kathleen DeRosa, Mayor for the City of Cathedral City Andy Hall, City Manager of Cathedral City Yvonne Parks, Mayor for the City of Desert Hot Springs Rick Daniels, Desert Hot Springs City Manager Robert Youssef, Mayor for the City of Hemet Ronald Bradley, Hemet Interim City Manager Mary Roche, Mayor for the City of Indian Wells Roderick Wood, Indian Wells Interim City Manager Elaine Hohnes, Mayor for the City of Indio Dan Martinez, Indio City Manager Don Adolph, Mayor for the City of La Quinta Frank Spevacek, La Quinta City Manager Jan Harnik, Mayor for the City of Palm Desert John Wohlmuth, Palm Desert City Manager Steve Pougnet, Mayor for the City of Palm Springs David Ready, Palm Springs City Manager Scott Hines, Mayor for the City of Rancho Mirage Randal Bynder, Rancho Mirage City Manager Mark Bartel, Mayor for the City of San Jacinto Page 4 Tim Hults, San Jacinto City Manager Joel Klink, Mayor for the City of 29 Palms Richard Warne, 29 Palms City Manager Denise Hoyt, Mayor for the City of Yucaipa Raymond Cascy, Yucaipa City Manager Merl Abel, Mayor for the City of Yucca Valley Mark Nuaimi, Yucca Valley Town Manager Enclosure: Proposed draft of modifications to `governmental purpose' definition Page 5 Current wording of HSC § 34181 (a): 34181. The oversight board shall direct thc successor agency to do all of the following: (a) Dispose of all asscts and properties of the former redevelopment agency; provided, however, that the oversight board may instead dircct thc successor agency to transfer ownership of those assets that were constructed and used for a governmental purpose, such as roads, school buildings, parks, police and fire stations, libraries, and local agency administrative buildings, to the appropriate public jurisdiction pursuant to any existing agreements relating to the construction or use of such an asset. Any compensation to be provided to the successor agency for the transfer of the asset shall be governed by the agreements relating to the construction or use of that asset. Disposal shall be done expeditiously and in a manner aimed at maximizing value. Asset disposition may be accomplished by a distribution of income to taxing entities proportionate to their property tax share from one or more properties that may be transferred to a public or private agency for management pursuant to the direction of the oversight board. Proposed wording for HSC § 34181 (a): 34181. The oversight board shall direct the successor agency to do all of the following: (a) Dispose of all assets and properties of the former redevelopment agency; provided, however, that the oversight board may instead direct the successor agency to transfer ownership of those assets that were constructed, used and/or are planned or intended to be constructed and/or used for a governmental or public benefitting purpose to the appropriate public jurisdiction pursuant to an agreement relating to the transfer of an asset. Governmental or public benefitting purposes shall include, but not be limited to land, buildings, and facilities that are directly related to the functions of government, and/or will benefit a governmental use or public purpose, as exemplified by the following: i) Governmental buildings shall include, but not be limited to local agency administrative offices, city halls, county administrative buildings, post offices, chamber of commerce buildings, military facilities, and court buildings. ii) Educational facilities shall include, but not be limited to publicly funded early childhood education, K-12 schools, museums, libraries, cultural resource centers, colleges, and universities. iii) Community care and support centers shall include, but not be limited to subsidized hospitals, health care facilities and substance abuse treatment facilities, social service facilities, homeless shelters, senior centers, teen centers, subsidized childcare facilities, cemeteries, and animal shelters. iv) Housing shall include, but not be limited to single or multi -family projects that will increase, improve or preserve the community's supply of low- and moderate -income housing that is available at an affordable housing cost as defined by HSC § 50052.5. Page 6 v) Public safety shall include, but not be limited to fire facilities, police facilities, public safety training facilities, emergency response centers, jails, detention centers, and prisons. vi) Parks and rccrcation shall include, but not be limited to land preservation for a public or community purpose (dedicated for open space, protection of ecological environments or endangered species or habitat protection or restoration lands), playgrounds., parks, sports fields, public aquatic centers, community gardens, trails (hiking, biking, and walking), recreation centers and boardwalks open to the general public. vii) Infrastructure shall include, but not be limited to streets, roads (includes curbs, gutters, medians, sidewalks, and parkways), highways, interchanges, ramps, bridges, flood control channels, levees, bypasses, dams, right-of-ways, water retention, drainage, well -sites, piers, docks, and wharfs open to the general public. viii) Utilities shall include, but not be limited to including water treatment plants, watershed lands, reclaimed water facilities, interceptor pipes, facilities for the transfer and disposal of solid waste, waste disposal sites or transfer stations, waste recycling plants, transmission and distribution facilities, sub -stations, and generation plants and facilities whether publically owned or for the benefit of the public. ix) Maintenance facilities shall include, but not be limited to facilities that provide service or storage for any of the aforementioned governmental purposes. x) Parking shall include, but not be limited to facilities to provide parking for any of the aforementioned governmental purposes as well as parking provided on land owned by a public entity for the public's use inclusive of public parking easements. xi) Transportation shall include, but not be limited to airports and airfields for use by the general public, bus stations, bus shelters, train stations/terminals, and transit stations Any compensation to be provided to the successor agency for the transfer of the asset shall be governed by the agreement relating to the transfer of that asset. Disposal shall be done expeditiously and in a manner aimed at maximizing value. Asset disposition may be accomplished by a distribution of income to taxing entities e i ., v ,.. t:onate to their tax share from one or more properties that may be transferred to a public or private agency for management pursuant to the direction of the oversight board. RES. NO. OB - 067 [THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK.] RES. NO. OB - 067 [THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK.] Tm C A m m !erased ueS S241 sou'PalOmisuOOaa 1'51 aP !3 OI!uag ueS ary!O aluawal0 ues 0 sppa1V T tl� N a apn0 owoluV ueS OSBDD alm!O auoluv ueS OLBDD ary10 O!uONV ues LSBDD V1 a S S 03 V O 0 i_ w ? a f-} 6 E. N-PasFu a m" H 53 z Z 2 Zi Zi Z Z D D ➢ ➢ D D m z D D m m a a a Fa- 6 6�p O 6 o O O O O 'OD � � S 8 m g Ei. Sf adS'Is LEE'l6ugs!x3 5- X e NO11dIM3S30 A1H3dO2ld S1N3WWO0 JUl.I,tJJUK AutNGY 1 u I Ht PALM UtSEK I KEUEVLLOPMLN I AGENCY - LONG RANGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PLAN of 01. g m D o N 77 z z z D D D a "w m Nw a D q D m D is d9h' L ads 6uoix3 !s lu't ads fiugsix3 Is vse't ads 6u fS!x3 .Z1 31 A ,l1 .TI a E. ? fs S.o N 01 ti w b b u lag d g o v (6 0 0 F. o� cn �i cn 4.1 cn aaeds uad° eansAe 0 r3 NOIldlltaS30 A1a3dOdd p tD'f y O 0 dd 'aa3 -[J� oa;. a J .-u : a^ a c o cv V§ mFo. p mm o m m v 0 c E. $ z t p v N 1 vtt aN o0 e o o O m z Z Z D z z_ N T D p Z N N m � 0 grro A w Cu 7 Z L N z z o CO ; p 3 _ m a yz SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE PALM DESERT REDEVELOP < -p ^ x p P O 14 K D D 0 m K ao NVId 1VH3N39 SiN3WWOO i T. 1 o i 3 " w N m m > _ ^� �„ m n u 8 `6 m N 8 8 `W N 8 N r.r IV R a m n � N or 74 8 et if u m A � 'O 111 A y K C m z 0 m o 0 1 N m ^^D V, z 70 mr 0 C 2 m h D g srn °m m o -1 AF,W, rrn m a r5 fi Z A 0 m ti z g� 0 A rn co O q Z w m1 Gi N ff }\knm 01 \{ NOi1dINDS30 A113dONd Q !! 07. ro ) mz 69 C. // a c,,,15,.. } {7 E),! }� Rim m\ cm f z \{ \� \ �\ f f¢f auCN m }\m\ \ . ( AO31YNWS NOIlISOdS10 S1N3WWOO ENCY - LONG RANGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PLAN 1 EL LZ SOO-OLE-669 ISe3 TO co 23 }} \\ \ co §§ N01141210930 A1213d021d \ j @ f m7 tis £002 •Z \z NVId 1V213N3$ A031V211S NOLLISOdSlO S.N3WWO3 5Li ;GESSUR AGENCY TO THE PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - LONG RANGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PLAN a 1" K gaT ° n o P 0 m m gg n Of z n 0. z z V g EE 00 toy 6unped panmdw1 tot 6mNed panmdwj 4- 2 uosaa lepiawwo3 cn fg fi z z o A A 3 a 0 0 C T T Aa Q ill auoN-pue1 Iue3eA oM c grig N. On 06 Z 9Z0-006-0Z9 p. 6 N011d$ S3Q AUN3dO8d 232 n2 MO x v x" mm = n cn z O D q . m 17 a z ' 9 A a o a n c A m m z cm ew oS >y moo _ 0 0 v m < m A c o S E- n O 33 z K m s n FP , i z c nc,N z mrprn ti < 0 i m m H Z 0 21 pp m = 0.. v -7a G r O 0 <m N m r r i 0 z 0 m z m r z A931VNIS NOIIISOdS10 0 SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE PALM DESERT REDEVELOPN m z r 0 z 0 z 0 m 0 m D z D 0 m m z '-i v D z 0 BAu0 0O S;uoid • Ped L9'1, SZO-OEP-OZ9 z a F � ssm n �a 3 a L9'17 PEO-O£VrOZ9 8 z mm F m 'IN mg 11 $3 g 1F. z ° 4 -o § $ s D O w c v S D. c-) AO31V1L1S NOWSOdS10 SIN3M O3 SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - LONG RANGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PLAN m X S 0 • pasa0 wled jo Fi[0 01 u6 ssV 8 3 a D c� (D a r o_ cn c 0 O CD cn cn 0 D co m 0 CD d cn 0 0 D cn- 0 3 0 0 0 a3edg uado apfsll! IaaitS uoluNseM SSP26 b LID cn a 8 raT 0 3 3 a cg x w z D - _ a a z, a NOI1dI2I3S30 A1M3d021d 0 m w o m 'Ili = ➢O 3 H---i z A a o F 3 � � v 0 D O DC om O 3 SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE PALM DESERT REDEVELOP ENCY - LONG RANGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PLAN 1 12(f) DESERT WILLOW 12(f) _.. DESERT WILLOW 12(b) DESERT WILLOW r "L Y{LMW 12(g) DESERT WILLOW 5(a-e) COLLEGE OF THE DESERT 4 ADOBE VILLAS / PUBLIC PARKING 14 HILLSIDE OPEN SPACE 10(a-b) CAL STATE SAN BERNARDINO UNIVERSITY 12(a) DESERT WILLOW 12(c) DESERT WILLOW 12(d) DESERT WILLOW 12(c) DESERT WILLOW cc'LW -:RYCLUB1. 6(a-c) PORTOLA AVE ROADWAY, WIDENING PROJECT 2(a-b) JOSELYN SENIOR CENTER EXPANSION 13 CARLOS ORTEGA VILLAS SENIOR HOUSING SELL RETAIN FOR GOVERNMENT USE � ! .v .•r`I i • ir.i. to•F_ t ,,:1aw 4'- �•.Tr-r fsi-f, FIt A7rV . 0l{tiSl'lag )Lritt,al..., { • tw• ,e } J. 1 i ., ti ' t i. it• ,: TOil 1111 - ,.:1 •-� ° t ,4,.,qr. i. �,► 't'f I . L•LJC76a6r; ii•F+• e,.r,. .. �~ "i 1t• s 6 ( oYa-t rvetr;lr4,rrip �4 rr . t -a ism.. r r .. s 411 ,t r /ra' 7ot' +.., d p i �� .i4 ,Ill 4 r e # .AT . f. Rift .e rr +n 7 `L a"a sass y Wei a, 47►a' "` ,_, , ti ,.5' �... . - 'Gc-a (....+or ,rt•a'. ee,.reb' •tr_il CAB/ C'�' T ('.' 7R; ' ill rff .`� L-I t4 likill )pIM � Jas J a n 41110 14t, rM r r���.9a1 � ` ' is et! ?rP wi,�♦' �♦ !1'l nM ii: ,, 4 S .,: I:e 7 •. arNa, L u;r, r ,i< ,-y, 7 ..�.tiNar fIX4 .,:I'!�tt�i.'1=7,rr��r ess /�•,� .t1 ^ � �I'�1GJ sy i i 'w:uLds"tjM k _ 60i4'YYr�i�� 7r Ilik i>r ��.. r PARTIES CUISTOT RESTAURANT PORDA & Dervieux, Inc. EL PASEO COLLECTION NORTH HWY 111 & EL PASEO 2 PORDA &CRY &James Cotter & EI Paseo Collection North & RU10ne Corp (dba Palomino Restaurant) & Stanley B. Rose Co. GARDENS ON a PASEO, THE 3 PORDA & Gardens SPE II LLC A Delaware Limited Liability Company LA SPIGA RESTAURANT PORDA & C6FoodSewice,Jxs. Cuttraro Group dba La Spiga LIVING DESERT RESERVE. The - PARKING LOT SUBLEASE 5 2004-0099812 PORDA (Lessee) & The Living Desert Reserve (Lessor) EASEMENT PUBLIC PARKING EASEMENT RECORDED DOC NO. TERM 2003-097803 37150 (1.29.99) 2009-0130399 PALMS TO PINES EAST PORDA ("Grantee") & American Investment Palms to Pines East & IIWS Palm Desert & Quinto Corporation & Staples & New England Audio ("Grantor) PORTOLA AVENUE. 45-188 PORDA & Timothy R Bartlett (letter from Bartlett 2/2212008 notifying RDA of his intention to transfer property to Heather James Arts & Antiquities) SAN MARIN0 CIRCLE 74-039 PORDA & Gregory & Gregory. LLC WELL CARE CLINIC PORDA & John F. Kennedy Memorial Date 2003-097803 2004-0984004 1999-290097 2007-0445283 2002-381904 Perpetuity Perpetuity IP..dng E•emam T.m: me few of (al J yes .am do* of ong agml :Ip1 l,a data no bngeroparakd as a nnppng Canw to) but as baps. tan 16 yrs Savage E.,s.nanl Term at 4/2004 (al ,o9 o.alny o.i,.l .ab Gay ism -males El Palm, Co.ary Shutse F,ogrm Perpetuity 640-370.009 (Parking) 640-370-011 (Parking) 540-370-010 (Parking) 640-370-003 (Cuistot) 627-192-042 (City) Palm Deser Drive S (City) 627-192-036 (Cotter) 627-192-034 (Rose) 627-192-037 (El Paseo) 627-192-014(El Paseo) 627-261-006 640-370-009 (Parking) 640-370-011 (Parking) 640-370-010 (Parking) 640-370-017 (La Spiga) October 23, 2002 thru December 655-230-019 31, 2020 630-250-045 February 1, 2004 thru 55 years April 27, 2001 thru April 27, 2031: '30 yrs from completion of last improvement. Bus Stop final 4/27/2001 6 Bldg Cof0 dated 4/26/2001 Perpetuity Runs with the Land 840-170-015 (Pelnw2Pines) 1840-170-004 (HWS) 1640-170-007 (Ouinto) 1840-170-016 (Staples) 640.170.008 (New E. Audio) 625-111-033 625-082-004 627-151-006 IC ' ter 4� t44 ,..,for.„: . t } s. •r `4 ft tau. 01y h 9v 't ' a'. 4 r.. 'r-6-go* .r .0 „„ A`, • - aM'or vi t. •r, .p 4 `re 4 •e' .. :. ..1's-!• .....• fit, • .......1., ii ' 1.,.'» y , '*:, _ . k� + ` , i 114 d a e 11, w 4 rn. tiR4Rt , .^ ' '11 •o •rr •rY w. . ,. ••,, e ,....., ...4J11..a1rf yA .,.. '>� .Ina u.rw :awns s,%,4,1 iY ab Of -• ...'r Ill 11 a' 4 arta,,.ry arr '+ a :' tJ .�lkr id00, 'AA1.v u•ArV 4 - S. J....q Li. 44orfrM d1.41 wauaar" 4 a4 0' s It tot. PUBLIC PARKING Dedications, DDA's, Easements & Memorandum of Understanding 6/2013 VICINITY MAP bur -0m _ alY X ig 6 /Pm OW* - Circulation Network 1:1 City Boundary 2009 VICINITY MAP Streets o Parcels (10/2012) s ..nd_ 7 Btur Band_:z rie RES. NO. OR -- 044 Indicators Average Daily Traffic Fred Waring Drive at San Pablo Avenue - CMAQ Analysis Comparison Without Improvements With Improvements AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak 35856 35856 35856 35856 2997 3425 8.36% 9.55% Level of Service AM PM AM PM Fred Waring at San Pablo C C C C Hours of Travel saved per year 3,800 to 4,300 hrs per year Hours of Delay saved per year 3,800 to 8,700 hrs per year Without Improvements With Improvements Difference Yearly Reductions MOE's AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM Per Year Per Year Control Delay / Veh (s/v) 23 29 21 28 -2 -1 C e Delay / Veh (s/v) 0 0 0 0 0 0 T Delay / Veh (s/v) 23 29 21 28 -2 -1 7 Delay (hr) 19 28 18 27 -1 -1 -4367 -3821 Stup/ Veh 0.58 0.58 0.45 0.55 -0.13 -0.03 Stops(#) 1750 1997 1362 1885 -388 -112 -1694337 -427969 Average Speed (mph) 27 24 28 24 1 0 Total Travel Time (hr) 60 69 58 68 -2 -1 -8734 -3821 Distance Traveled (mi) 1611 1646 1611 1646 0 0 Fuel Consumed (gal) 89 99 84 97 -5 -2 -21834 -7642 Fuel Economy (mpg) 18.1 16.7 19.2 17 1.1 0.3 CO Emissions (kg) 6.23 6.9 5.87 6.78 -0.36 -0.12 -1572 -459 NOx Emissions (kg) 1.21 1.34 1.14 1.32 -0,07 -0.02 -306 -76 VOC Emissions (kg) 1.44 1.6 1.36 1.57 -0.08 -0.03 -349 -115 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 104: San Pablo & Fred Waring Drive Printed: 5/10/2013 -. C4- k4 t p't .1 Lane Configurations ' +A 1 r 'i'i + r l'i ?+ if Volume (veh/h) 38 594 128 168 734 436 151 242 257 114 105 31 Number 1 6 16 5 2 12 3 8 18 7 4 14 Initial Q, veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped..Bike Adj (A..pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parting Bus Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 Lane Assignment Cap, veh/h 96 1898 402 253 2867 811 299 448 380 256 849 344 HCM Platoon Ratio 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Prop Arrive 0n Green 0.11 0.85 0.85 0.14 0.51 0.51 0.09 0.24 0.24 0.07 0.23 0.22 Ln Grp Delay, s/veh 44.9 5.2 6.0 43.6 14.3 20.5 45.1 34.7 38.3 45.7 31.2 31.7 Ln Grp LOS D A A D BCD CDD CC Approach Vol, veh/h 844 1487 723 278 Approach. Delay, s/veh 7.4 20.0 38.5 37.9 Approach LOS A C D D Assigned Phs Case No Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s Change Period (Y+Rc), s Max Allow Headway (MAH), s Max Green (Gmax), s Max Q Clear (g_c+I1), s Green Ext Time (g_e), s Prob of Phs CaII (p_c) Prob of Max Out (pi() Assigned Mvint Mvmt Sat Flow, vehlh Assigned Mvmt Mvmt Sat Flow, veh/h Assigned Mvrnt Mvmt Sat Flow, veh/h Assigned Mvmt Lane Assignment Lanes in Grp Grp Vol (v), vehlh Grp Sat Flow (s), veh/h/In Q Serve Time (g_s), s 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 3.0 8.5 55.0 11.8 26.1 17.4 46.0 10.5 27.4 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 3.7 7.2 3.7 4.7 3.7 7.2 3.7 4.7 10.0 50.0 9.0 31.0 19.0 41.0 9.0 31.0 4.2 23.8 6.8 4.5 12.2 5.3 5.6 19.0 0.0 23.0 0.1 3.7 0.3 30.1 0.1 2.8 0.69 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.05 0.87 1.00 0.01 0.07 0.81 1.00 0.19 1 3 1774 3442 2 4 5588 3725 12 14 1581 1579 5 1774 6 4471 16 947 7 3442 1 0 3 0 5 0 7 L (Prot) L (Prot) L (Prot) L (Prot) 1 0 2 0 1 02 0 42 0 168 0 187 0 127 0 1774 0 1721 0 1774 0 1721 0 22 00 4.8 0.0 10.2 0.0 3.6 0.0 8 1863 18 1579 AM Peak without Improvements E:1Work FileslProjects2lCMAQ GrantsFred Waring - Monterey AM No Improvements.syn 2007 CMAQ Application Page 1 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 104: San Pablo & Fred Waring Drive Printed: 5/1012013 Cycle Q Clear Time (9_c), s 2.2. 0.0 4.8 0.0 10.2 0.0 3.6 0.0 Perm LT Sat Flow (s_I), vehmM 00 0 • 0 0 0 00 Shared LT Sat Flow (s_ sh), veh/h/In 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Perm LT Eff Green (g_p), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Perm LT Serve Time (g_u), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Perm LT Q Serve Time (g.._ps), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Time to First Bik (g__t), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Serve Time pre Bik (g_fs), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 Prop LT Inside Lane (P_l.) 1,00 0.00 1.00 0,00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap (c), veh/h 96 0 299 0 253 0 256 0 V/C Ratio (X) 0.44 0.00 0.56 0.00 0.74 0.00 0.50 0.00 Avail Cap (c_a), veh/h 210 0 373 0 368 0 373 0 Upstream Filter (I) 0.99 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d1), s/veh 43.8 0.0 44.4 0.0 41.7 0.0 45.1 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.2 0.0 0.6 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.6 0.0 Initial Q Delay (d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay (d), s/veh 44.9 0.0 45.1 0.0 43.6 0.0 45.7 0.0 1st -Term Q (Q1), veh/In 1.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 4.5 0.0 1.6 0.0 2nd-Term Q (Q2), veh/In 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 3rd-Term Q (Q3), veh/In 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %Ile Back of Q Factor (f_B%) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 %Ile Back of Q (50%), veh/In 1.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 4.7 0.0 1.6 0.0 %ile Storage Ratio (RQ%) 0.17 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.66 0.00 0.20 0.00 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Final (Residual) Q (Qe), veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3at Delay (ds), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Sat Q (Qs), veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3at Cap (cs), veh/h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Q Clear Time (tc), h 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Assigned Mvmt Lane Assignment Lanes in Grp Grp Vol (v), veh/h Grp Sat Flow (s), veh/h/In Q Serve Time (g_s), s Cycle Q Clear Time (g_c), s Lane Grp Cap (c), vehlh V/C Ratio (X) Avail Cap (c_a), veh/h Upstream Filter (I) Uniform Delay (d1), s/veh Incr Delay (d2), s/veh Initial Q Delay (d3). s/veh Control Delay (d), s/veh 1st -Term Q (Q1), vehlnln 2nd-Term Q (02), veh/In 3rd-Term Q (Q3), vehlIn %de Back of Q Factor (f B%) "pile Back of Q (50%), veh/In T T T T 0 3 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 816 0 117 0 548 0 269 0 1863 0 1863 0 1863 0 1863 0.0 8.4 0.0 2.5 0.0 32 0.0 13.0 0.0 8.4 0.0 2.5 0.0 3.2 0.0 13.0 0 2867 0 849 0 1582 0 448 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.60 0 2867 0 1213 0 1582 0 606 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.99 0.00 1.00 0.0 14.1 0.0 31.2 0.0 4.6 0.0 34.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 14.3 0.0 31.2 0.0 5.2 0.0 34.7 0.0 3.6 0.0 1.2 0.0 1.0 00 5.9 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 00 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.0 3.7 0.0 12 0.0 1.2 0.0 60 M Peak without Improvements 2007 CMAQ Application E:\Work_Files\Projects2\CMAQ Grants\Fred Waring - Monterey AM No Improvements.syn Page 2 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 104: San Pablo & Fred Waring Drive Printed: 511012013 %iI rage Ratio (RQ%) Initi (Qb), veh fin esidual) Q (0e), veh Sat Delay (ds), s/veh Sat Q (Qs), veh Sat Cap (cs), vehlh Initial Q Clear Time (tc), h Assigned Mvmt Lane Assignment Lanes in Grp Grp Vol (v), vehlh Grp Sat Flow (s), veh/h/In Q Serve Time (g_s), s Cycle Q Clear Time (q_c), s Prot RT Sat Flow (s_R), veh/h/In Prot RT Eff Green (g_R), s Prop RT Outside Lane (P_R) Lane Grp Cap (c), vehlh V/C Ratio (X) Avail Cap (c_a), veh/h Upstream Filter (I) Uniform Delay (d1), s/veh Incr Delay (d2), s/veh Initi Delay (d3), s/veh Co Delay (d), s/veh 1st- rm Q (Q1), veh/In 2nd-Term Q (Q2), veh/In 3rd-Term Q (Q3), veh/In %ile Back of Q Factor (f_B%) %Ile Back of Q (50%), veh/In %He Storage Ratio (RQ%) Initial Q (Qb), veh Final (Residual) Q (Qe), veh Sat Delay (ds), s/veh Sat Q (Qs), veh Sat Cap (cs), veh/h Initial Q Clear Time (tc), h HCM 2010 CM Delay HCM 2010 LOS 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.07 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 12 0 14 0 16 0 18 R R T+R R 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 484 0 34 0 254 0 286 0 1581 0 1579 0 1693 0 1579 0.0 21.8 0.0 1.7 0.0 3.3 0.0 17.0 0.0 21.8 0.0 1.7 0.0 3.3 0.0 17.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.56 0.00 1.00 0 811 0 344 0 719 0 380 0.00 0.60 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.75 0 811 0 498 0 719 0 514 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.99 0.00 1.00 0.0 17.3 0.0 31.7 0.0 4.6 0.0 35.7 0.0 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.5 0.0 31.7 0.0 6.0 0.0 38.3 0.0 7.7 0.0 0.7 0.0 1.0 0.0 6.6 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.0 8.4 0.0 0.7 0.0 1.2 0.0 6.9 0.00 1.07 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.44 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.3 C Notes AM Peak without Improvements 2007 CMAQ Application E:1Work_Files\Projects2tCMAQ Grants\Fred Waring - Monterey AM No ,mprovements.syn Page 3 Detailed Measures of Effectiveness Printed: 5/10/2013 104: San Pablo & Fred Waring Drive Jolume (vph) Control Delay / Veh (s/v) Queue Delay / Veh (sly) Total Delay / Veh (s/v) Total Delay (hr) Stops / Veh Stops (#) Average Speed (mph) Total Travel Time (hr) Distance Traveled (mi) Fuel Consumed (gal) Fuel Economy (mpg) CO Emissions (kg) NOx Emissions (kg) VOC Emissions (kg) Unserved Vehicles (#) Vehicles in dilemma zone (#) Imo 760 1338 650 250 2998 15 18 37 42 23 0 0 0 0 0 15 18 37 42 23 3 7 7 3 19 0.79 0.43 0.59 0.75 0.58 603 573 386 188 1750 26 32 20 20 27 9 32 13 6 60 224 1009 266 112 1611 16 47 18 8 89 13.8 21.6 14.6 14.0 18,1 1.13 3.26 1.28 0.56 6.23 0.22 0.63 015 0.11 1.21 0.26 0.76 0.30 0.13 1.44 0 0 0 0 0 13 31 9 4 57 1 Peak without Improvements 2007 CMAQ Application E:1Work_Files1Projects2\CMAQ Grants\Fred Waring - Monterey AM No Improvements.syn Page 4 HCM 2.010 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 104: San Pablo & Fred Waring Drive Printed: 5/10/2013 4, Lane Configurations li + t* 1 ?4 r 11 ++ I' VI ft it Volume (veh/h) 38 594 128 168 734 436 151 242 257 114 105 31 Number 1 6 16 5 2 12 3 8 18 7 4 14 initial Q, veil 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pets -Bike Adj (A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 Lanes 1 3 0 1 3 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 Lane Assignment Cap, veh/h 96 1897 402 252 2864 811 298 898 381 256 852 345 HCM Platoon Ratio 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 Prop Arrive On Green 0.11 0.85 0.85 0.14 0.51 0.51 0.09 0.24 0.24 0.07 0.23 0.22 li Ln Grp Delay, slveh 45.0 5.3 6.0 43.7 14.4 20.6 45.1 31.6 38.3 45.7 31.2 31.7 LnGrp LOS D A A DBCDCDDCC Approach Vol, veh/h 844 1487 723 278 Approach Delay, s/veh 7.5 20.1 37.4 37.9 Approach LOS A C D D Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Case No 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 3.0 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.5 55.0 11.8 26.2 17.4 46.0 10.5 27.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s .;,e, 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Allow Headway (MAH), s oL 3.7 7.2 3.7 4.7 3.7 7.2 3.7 4.7 Max Green (Gmax), s eta 10.0 50.0 9.0 31.0 19.0 41.0 9.0 31.0 Max Q Clear (g_c+11), s 4.2 23.8 6.8 4.5 12.3 5.3 5.6 19.0 Green Ext Time (g_e), s 0.0 23.0 0.1 3.8 0.2 30.1 0.1 2.9 Prob of Phs Call (p_c) 0.69 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 Prob'of Max Out (p_x) 0.05 0.87 1,00 0.01 0.07 0.81 1.00 0.18 Assigned Mvmt 1 3 5 7 Mvmt Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 3442 1774 3442 Assigned Mvmt 2 4 6 8 Mvmt Sat Flow, veh/h 5588 3725 4472 3725 Assigned Mvmt Mvmt Sat Flow, vehlh Assigned Mvmt Lane Assignment Lanes in Grp Grp Vol (v), veh/h Grp Sat Flow (s), vehlh/in Q Serve Time (g_s), s 12 14 1581 1579 16 947 1 0 3 0 5 0 7 L (Prot) L (Prot) L (Prot) L (Prot) 1 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 42 0 168 0 187 0 127 0 1774 0 1721 0 1774 0 1721 0 2.2 0.0 4.8 0.0 10.3 0.0 3.6 00 18 1579 AM Peak with Improvements E:1Work_Files\Projects21CMAQ Grants\Fred Waring - Monterey AM Proposed.syn 2007 CMAQ Application Page 1 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 104: San Pablo & Fred Waring Drive Printed: 5110/2013 'ycle Q Clear Time (g._c), s 2.2 0.0 4.8 0.0 10.3 0.0 3.6 0.0 erm LT Sat Flow (s_I), veh/hlln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 hared LT Sat Flow (s. sh), veh/h/In 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Perm LT Eff Green (g_.p), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Perm LT Serve Time (g..u), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Perm LT Q Serve Time (g..ps), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Tirne to First Blk (g_ t), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Serve Time pre Bic (g_fs), s 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Prop LT Inside Lane (P._L.) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0,00 1.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap (c), veh/h 96 0 298 0 252 0 256 0 V/C Ratio (X) 0.44 0.00 0.56 0.00 0.74 0.00 0.50 0.00 Avail Cap (c_a), veh/h 210 0 373 0 367 0 373 0 Upstream Filter (I) 0.99 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d1), siveh 43,8 0.0 44.5 0.0 41.7 0.0 45.1 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.2 0.0 0.6 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.6 0.0 Initial Q Delay (d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay (d), s/veh 45.0 0.0 45.1 0.0 43.7 0.0 45.7 0.0 1st -Term Q (Q1), veh/In 1.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 4.6 0.0 1.6 0.0 2nd-Term Q (Q2), veh/In 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 3rd-Term Q (03), veh/In 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile Back of 0 Factor (f_B%) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 %Ile Back of Q (50%), veh/In 1.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 4.7 0.0 1.6 0.0 %Ile Storage Ratio (RQ%) 0.17 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.66 0.00 0.20 0.00 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Final (Residual) Q (Qe), veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3t Delay (ds), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3t 0 (Qs), veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ,,at Cap (cs), veh/h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Q Clear Time (tc), h 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Assigned Mvmt Lane Assignment Lanes in Grp Grp Vol (v), veh/h Grp Sat Flow (s), veh/h/In Q Serve Time (g_s), s Cycle Q Clear Time (g_c), s Lane Grp Cap (c), veh/h V/C Ratio (X) Avail Cap (c_a), veh/h Upstream Filter (I) Uniform Delay (d1), s/veh Ina Delay (d2), s/veh Initial Q Delay (d3), s/veh Control Delay (d), s/veh 1st -Term Q (Q1), veh/In 2nd-Term Q (Q2), veh/In 3rd-Terri Q (03), veh/In %Ile Back of Q Factor (f B%) le Back of Q (50%), veh/In 0 2 T 0 3 0 816 0 1863 0.0 8.5 0.0 8.5 0 2864 0.00 0.28 0 2864 0.00 1.00 0.0 14.1 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.4 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.00 1.00 0.0 3.7 0 4 T 0 2 0 117 0 1863 0.0 2.5 0.0 2.5 0 852 0.00 0.14 0 1212 0.00 1.00 0.0 31.2 0.0 0.0 00 00 0.0 31.2 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 1.00 0.0 1.2 0 6 T 0 2 0 548 0 1863 0.0 3.2 0.0 3.2 0 1580 0.00 0.35 0 1580 0.00 0.99 0.0 4.7 0.0 0.6 00 0.0 0.0 5.3 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.00 1.00 0.0 1.2 0 8 T 0 2 0 269 0 1863 0.0 6.0 0.0 6.0 0 898 0.00 0.30 0 1212 0.00 1.00 0.0 31.5 0.0 0.1 00 00 0.0 31.6 0.0 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 1.00 00 2.8 1 Peak with Improvements 2007 CMAQ Application E:IWork FileslProjects2\CMAQ GrantstFred Waring - Monterey AM Proposed.syn Page 2 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 104: San Pablo & Fred Waring Drive Printed: 5/10/2013 %ile Storage Ratio (RQ%) Initial Q (Qb), veh Final (Residual) Q (Qe), veh Sat Delay (ds), slveh Sat Q (Qs), veh Sat Cap (cs), vehlh Initial Q Clear Time (tc), h Assigned Mvmt Lane Assignment Lanes in Grp Grp Vol (v), veh/h Grp Sat Flow (s), veh/h/In Q Serve Time (g_s), s Cycle Q Clear Time (p_c), s Prot RT Sat Flow (s_R), vehlhlln Prot RT Eff Green (g_R), s Prop RT Outside Lane (P_R) Lane Grp Cap (c), veh/h V/C Ratio (X) Avail Cap (c_a), veh/h Upstream Filter (I) Uniform Delay (d1), s/veh Incr Delay (d2), s/veh Initial Q Delay (d3), s/veh Control Delay (d), s/veh 1st -Term Q (01), veh/In 2nd-Term Q (Q2), veh/ln 3rd-Term Q (03), veh/In %ite Back of Q Factor (f B%) %ile Back of Q (50%), veh/In %Ile Storage Ratio (RQ%) Initial Q (Qb), veh Final (Residual) Q (Qe), veh Sat Delay (ds), s/veh Sat Q (Qs), veh Sat Cap (cs), veh/h Initial Q Clear Time (tc), h HCM 2010 CM Delay HCM 2010 LOS 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.03 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 12 0 14 0 16 0 18 R R T+R R 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 484 0 34 0 254 0 286 0 1581 0 1579 0 1694 0 1579 0.0 21.8 0.0 1,7 0.0 3.3 0.0 17.0 0.0 21.8 0.0 1.7 0.0 3.3 0.0 17.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.56 0.00 1.00 0 811 0 345 0 718 0 381 0.00 0.60 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.75 0 811 0 498 0 718 0 514 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.99 0.00 1.00 0.0 17,4 0.0 31.6 0.0 4.7 0.0 35.7 0.0 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.6 0.0 31.7 0.0 6.0 0.0 38.3 0.0 7.7 0.0 0.7 0.0 1.0 0.0 6.6 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.0 8.5 0.0 0.7 0.0 1.2 0.0 6.9 0.00 1.07 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.44 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.1 C AM Peak with improvements E:1Work Files\Projects2ICiMAQ GrantstFred Waring - Monterey AM Proposed.syn 2007 CMAQ Application Page 3 Detailed Measures of Effectiveness Printed: 5/10/2013 104: San Pablo & Fred Waring Drive 'olume (vph) %;ontrot Delay / Veh (s!v) Queue Delay / Veh (sly) Total Delay / Veh (s/v) Total Delay (hr) Stops / Veh Stops (#) Average Speed (mph) Total Travel Time (hr) Distance Traveled (mi) Fuel Consumed (gal) Fuel Economy (mpg) CO Emissions (kg) NOx Emissions (kg) VOC Emissions (kg) Unserved Vehicles (#) Vehicles in dilemma zone (#) 760 1338 650 250 2998 10 15 38 46 21 0 0 0 0 0 10 15 38 46 21 2 5 7 3 16 0.35 0.38 0.60 0.78 0.45 268 505 393 196 1362 29 33 20 19 28 8 31 14 6 58 224 1009 266 112 1611 '12 45 18 8 84 18.4 22.4 14.4 13.6 19.2 0.85 3.15 1.29 0.58 5.87 0.17 0.61 0.25 0.11 1.14 0.20 0.73 0.30 0.13 1.36 0 0 0 0 0 13 31 9 4 57 Peak with Improvements 2007 CMAQ Application E:1Work_Files\Projects2\CMAQ Grants\Fred Waring - Monterey AM Proposed.syn Page 4 Printed: 5/10/2013 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 104: San Pablo & Fred Waring Drive Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) Number Initial 0, veh Ped--Bike Adj (A_pbT) Parking Bus Adj Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In Lanes Lane Assignment Cap, veh/h HCM Platoon Ratio Prop Arrive On Green Ln Grp Delay, slveh Ln Grp LOS Approach Vol, veh/h Approach Delay, s(veh Approach LOS Assigned Phs Case No Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s Change Period (Y+Rc), s Max Allow Headway (MAH), s Max Green (Gmax), s Max Q Clear (g_c+11), s Green Ext Time (g_e), s Prob of Phs Cali (p_c) Prob of Max Out (p_x) Assigned Mind Mvmt Sat Flow, veh/h Assigned Mvmt MvmtsatFlow, veh/h Mvmt Sat Flow, veh/h 1 -4' ,I 4 4 4\ t?A is f t+ ,v ,p 54 967 186 124 836 109 260 1 6 16 5 2 12 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 1863 1 3 0 1 3 1 2 107 1879 362 197 2590 733 337 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.12 0.83 0.83 0.11 0.46 0.46 0.10 49.6 8,0 9.7 49.8 19.8 18.0 68.1 D A A D B B E 1341 1188 10.3 23.1 B C 1 2.0 9.7 5.0 3.7 10.0 5.6 0.0 0.85 0.37 1 1774 Assigned Mvmt 1 Lane Assignment L (Prot) Lanes in Grp 1 Grp Vol (v), veh/h 60 Grp Sat Flow (s), veh/h/In 1774 Q Serve Time (g_s), s 3.6 2 3.0 55.0 5.0 8.1 50.0 14.0 33.8 1.00 0.93 3 2.0 14.0 5.0 3.7 9.0 11.3 0.0 1.00 1.00 3 3442 4 3.0 33.4 5.0 4.6 31.0 4.5 3.7 1.00 0.01 5 6 2.0 4.0 15.5 49.3 5.0 5.0 3.7 8.1 19.0 41.0 10.4 10.8 0.2 28.6 0.99 1.00 0.01 0.94 5 1774 2 4 6 209 8 0 331 18 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1863 1 1 I +4' if 219 100 31 7 4 14 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1863 1863 1863 2 2 1 505 429 337 1011 415 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.27 0.27 0.10 0.27 0.26 34.3 51.9 55.4 30.7 31.2 CD E C C 889 388 52.5 46.2 D D 7 2.0 14.0 5.0 3.7 9.0 9.7 0.0 1.00 1.00 7 3442 8 3.0 33.4 5.0 4.6 31.0 26.8 1.5 1.00 1.00 8 5588 3725 4554 1863 12 1581 3 L (Prot) 0 2 0 289 0 1721 0 0 9.3 14 1580 16 877 5 0 7 L (Prot) L (Prot) 0 1 0 2 0 0 138 0 243 0 0 1774 0 1721 0 0.0 8.4 00 77 0.0 18 1580 PM Peak without Improvements A. E:1Work FilessProjects2XCMAQ Grants\Fred Waring - Monterey PM No Improvements.syn 2007 CMAQ Application Page 1 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Capacily Analysis 104: San Pablo & Fred Waring Drive Printed:511012013 Cycle Q Clear Time (g_c), s Perm LT Sat Flow (s..t), veh/hlln Shared LT Sat How (s_ sh), vehlh/In Penn LT Eff Green (g_.p), s Perm LT Serve Time (g_ u), s Penn LT Q Serve Time (g_..ps), s Time to First B1k (g._f), s Serve Time pre 81k (g_fs), s Prop LT Inside Lane (P_l. ) Lane Grp Cap (c), veh/h V/C Ratio (X) Avail Cap (c_a), veh/h Upstream Filter (I) Uniform Delay (d1), slveh Incr Delay (d2), s/veh Initial Q Delay (d3), s/veh Control Delay (d), s/veh 1st -;Term Q (Q1), veh/In 2nd-Term Q (Q2), veh/ln 3rd-Term Q (Q3), veh/In %ile Back of Q Factor (f_B%) %Ile Back of Q (50%), veh/In %Ile Storage Ratio (RQ%) Initial Q (Qb), veh Final (Residual) Q (Qe), veh at Delay (ds), slveh at Q (Qs), veh _at Cap (es), veh/h Initial Q Clear Time (tc), h Assigned Mvmt Lane Assignment Lanes in Grp Grp Vol (v), veh/h Grp Sat Flow (s), veh/h/In Q Seive Time (g_s), s Cycle Q Clear Time (g_c), s Lane Grp Cap (c), vehlh V/C Ratio (X) Avail Cap (c_ a), veh/h Upstream Filter (I) Uniform Delay (d1), s/veh Incr Delay (d2), s/veh initial 0 Delay (d3), s/veh Control Delay (d), slveh 1st -Term Q (Q1), vehlln 2nd-Term Q (Q2), veh/In 3rd-Term Q (Q3), veh/In %ile Back of Q Factor (f B%) 'e Back of Q (50%), veh/In 3.6 0.0 9.3 0.0 8.4 0.0 7.7 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 '1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 107 0 337 0 197 0 337 0 0.56 0.00 0.86 0.00 0.70 0.00 0.72 0.00 190 0 337 0 332 0 337 0 0.93 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 48.0 0.0 49,8 0.0 48.1 0,0 49.1 0.0 1.6 0.0 18,3 0.0 1.7 0.0 6.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 49.6 0.0 68.1 0.0 49.8 0.0 55.4 0.0 1.6 0.0 4.1 0.0 3.8 0.0 3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.6 0.0 4.9 0.0 3.8 0.0 3.7 0.0 0.27 0.00 0.62 0.00 0.54 0.00 0.47 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 T T T T 0 3 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 929 0 111 0 878 0 232 0 1863 0 1863 0 1863 0 1863 0.0 12.0 0.0 2.5 0.0 8.8 0.0 11.6 0.0 12.0 0.0 2.5 0.0 8.8 0.0 11.6 0 2590 0 1011 0 1537 0 505 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.57 0.00 0.46 0 2590 0 1096 0 1537 0 548 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.93 0.00 1.00 0.0 19.4 00 30.7 0.0 65 0.0 340 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.8 0.0 30.7 0.0 8.0 0.0 34.3 0.0 5.3 0.0 1.2 0.0 2.2 0.0 53 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.0 5.4 0.0 1.2 0.0 2.5 0,0 5.4 Peak without Improvements 2007 CMAQ Application E:1Work_Files\Projects2lCMAQ Grants\Fred Waring - Monterey PM No lmprovements.syn Page 2 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 104: San Pablo & Fred Waring Drive Printed: 5/10/2013 %Ile Storage Ratio (RQ%) Initial Q (Qb), veh Final (Residual) Q (Qe), veh Sat Delay (ds), s/veh Sat Q (Qs), veh Sat Cap (cs), vehlh Initial Q Clear Time (tc), h Assigned Mvmt Lane Assignment Lanes in Grp Grp Vol (v), veh/h Grp Sat Flow (s), veh/hlln Q Serve Time (g_s), s Cycle Q Clear Time (q_c), s Prot RT Sat Flow (s_R), veh/h/In Prot RT Eff Green (g_R), s Prop RT Outside Lane (P_R) Lane Grp Cap (c), veh/h V/C Ratio (X) Avail Cap (c_a), veh/h Upstream Filter (I) Uniform Delay (d1), s/veh Incr Delay (d2), slveh Initial Q Delay (d3), s/veh Control Delay (d), s/veh 1st -Term Q (Q1), veh/In 2nd-Term Q (42), veh/In 3rd-Term Q (Q3), veh/In %ile Back of Q Factor (f_B%) %ile Back of Q (50%), veh/In %Ile Storage Ratio (RQ%) Initial Q (Qb), veh Final (Residual) Q (Qe), veh Sat Delay (ds), s/veh Sat Q (Qs), veh Sat Cap (cs), veh/h Initial Q Clear Time (tc), h HCM 2010 CM Delay HCM 2010 LOS 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.06 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12 0 14 0 16 0 18 R R T+R R 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 '1 0 121 0 34 0 403 0 368 0 1581 0 1580 0 '1706 0 1580 0.0 5.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 8.8 0.0 24.8 0.0 5.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 8.8 0.0 24.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.51 0.00 1.00 0 733 0 415 0 704 0 429 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.57 0.00 0.86 0 733 0 451 0 704 0 465 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.93 0.00 1.00 0.0 17.5 0.0 31.2 0.0 6.5 0.0 38.8 0.0 0.5 0.0 0,0 0.0 3.1 0.0 13,0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.0 0.0 31,2 0.0 9.7 0.0 51.9 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.7 0.0 2.0 0.0 9.7 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.7 0.0 2.6 0.0 11.2 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.71 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.8 C PM Peak without Improvements E:IWork_Files1Projects2iCMAQ GrantsiFred Waring - Monterey PM No Improvements.syn 2007 CMAQ Application Page 3 Detailed Measures of Effectiveness 104: San Pablo & Fred Waring Drive 'olume (vph) Control Delay / Veh (s/v) Queue Delay I Veh (s/v) Total Delay / Veh (sly) Total Delay (hr) Stops / Veh Stops (#) Average Speed (mph) Total Travel Time (hr) Distance Traveled (mi) Fuel Consumed (gal) Fuel Economy (mpg) CO Emissions (kg) NOx Emissions (kg) VOC Emissions (kg) Unserved Vehicles (#) Vehicles in dilemma zone (#) 1207 1069 800 350 3426 13 21 52 55 29 0 0 0 0 0 13 21 52 55 29 4 6 12 5 28 0.50 0.54 0.66 0.81 0.58 606 581 527 283 1997 27 31 17 17 24 13 26 20 9 69 355 806 328 157 1646 22 39 25 12 99 16.2 20.6 12.9 12.7 16.7 1.54 2.73 1.78 0.86 6.90 0.30 0.53 0.35 0.17 1.34 0.36 0.63 0.41 0.20 1.60 0 0 0 0 0 25 35 8 4 72 Printed: 511012013 i Peak without improvements 2007 CMAQ Application E:'IWork_Files\Projects2\CMAQ Grants\Fred Waring - Monterey PM No Improvements.syn Page 4 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 104: San Pablo & Fred Waring Drive Printed: 5/10/2013 Lane Configurations Volume (vehlh) Number Initial Q. veh Ped-Bike Adj (A._pbT) Parking Bus Adj Adj Sat How, veh/h/In Lanes Lane Assignment Cap, veh/h HCM Platoon Ratio Prop Arrive On Green Ln Grp Delay, s/veh Ln Grp LOS Approach Vol, veh/h Approach Delay, slveh Approach LOS Assigned Phs Case No Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s Change Period (Y+Rc), s Max Allow Headway (MAH), s Max Green (Gmax), s Max Q Clear (g_c+11), s Green Ext Time (g__e), s Prob of Phs Call (p_c) Prob of Max Out (p_x) '' ttt► 'i ft+ l VI 4t .I VI ft t" 54 967 186 124 836 109 260 209 331 219 100 31 1 6 16 5 2 12 3 8 18 7 4 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1, 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1, 00 1.00 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1 3 0 1 3 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 107 1879 362 197 2589 733 337 1012 429 337 1012 415 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.12 0.82 0.82 0.11 0.46 0.46 0.10 0.27 0.27 0.10 0.27 0.26 49.6 8.0 9.7 49.8 19.8 18.0 68.1 31.8 51.8 55.5 30.7 31.2 D A A D BB ECD ECC 1341 1188 889 388 10.3 23.1 51.9 46.3 B C D D 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 3.0 9.7 55.0 14.0 33.5 15.5 49.3 14.0 33.5 5,0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 3.7 8.1 3.7 4.6 3.7 8.1 3.7 4.6 10.0 50.0 9.0 31.0 19.0 41.0 9.0 31.0 5.6 14.0 11.3 4.5 10.4 10.8 9.7 26.8 0.0 33.8 0.0 3.8 0.2 28.6 0.0 1.5 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.37 0.93 1.00 0.01 0.01 0.94 1.00 1.00 Assigned Mvmt 1 3 5 7 Mvmt Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 3442 1774 3442 Assigned Mvmt Mvmt Sat Flow, veh/h 2 4 6 8 5588 3725 4555 3725 Assigned Mvmt 14 1t 18 Mvmt Sat Flow, veh/h 1581 1580 877 1580 Assigned Mvmt 1 0 3 0 5 0 7 Lane Assignment L. (Prot) L (Prot) L (Prot) L (Prot) Lanes in Grp 1 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 Grp Vol (v), veh/h 60 0 289 0 138 0 243 0 Grp Sat Flow (s), veh/h/In 1774 0 1721 0 1774 0 1721 0 0Serve lime (g s) s 36 00 93 00 84 00 77 00 I PM Peak with Improvements E:1UVork_Files\Projects2\CMAQ Grants\Fred Waring - Monterey PM Proposed.syn 2007 CMAQ Application Page 1 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 104: San Pablo & Fred Waring Drive Printed: 5/10/2013 ;ycle Q Clear Time (g.. c), s 3.6 0.0 9.3 0.0 8.4 0.0 7.7 0.0 'erm LT Sat Flow (s_t), veh/hlln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ;hared LT Sat Flow (s_ sh), vehlhlln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Perm LT Eff Green (g_p), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Perm LT Serve Time (g__u), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Perm LT Q Serve Time (g_ps), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Time to First elk (g..f), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Serve Time pre Blk (g_1s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Prop LT Inside Lane (P_..1.) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap (c), veh/h 107 0 337 0 197 0 337 0 V/C Ratio (X) 0.56 0.00 0,86 0.00 0.70 0.00 0.72 0.00 Avail Cap (c_a), veh/h 190 0 337 0 332 0 337 0 Upstream Filter (I) 0.93 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d1), s/veh 48.0 0.0 49,8 0.0 48.1 0.0 49.1 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), slveh 1.6 0.0 18.3 0.0 1.7 0.0 6.4 0.0 Initial Q Delay (d3), slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay (d), slveh 49.6 0.0 68.1 0.0 49.8 0.0 55.5 0.0 1st -Term Q (Q1), veh/In 1.6 0.0 4.1 0.0 3.8 0.0 3.4 0.0 2nd-Term Q (Q2), veh/In 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.0 3rd-Term Q (Q3), veh/In 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile Back of Q Factor (f_B%) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 %ile Back of Q (50%), veh/In 1.6 0.0 4.9 0.0 3.8 0.0 3.7 0.0 %Ile Storage Ratio (RQ%) 0.27 0.00 0.62 0.00 0.54 0.00 0.47 0.00 Initialan''(Qb), veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Final (Residual) Q (Qe), veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 at Delay (ds), slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 at Q (Qs), veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 oat Cap (cs), veh/h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Q Clear Time (tc), h 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Assigned Mvmt Lane Assignment Lanes in Grp Grp Vol (v), veh/h Grp Sat Flow (s), vehlh/In Q Serve Time (g_s), s Cycle Q Clear Time (g_c), s Lane Grp Cap (c), veh/h V/C Ratio (X) Avail Cap (c_a), veh/h Upstream Filter (I) Uniform Delay (d1), slveh Incr Delay (d2), slveh Q Delay (d3), slveh Control Delay (d), s/veh 1st -Term Q (01), veh/In 2nd-Term Q (Q2), veh/In 3rd-Term 0 (Q3), vehlIn %ile Back of Q Factor (f B%) ile Back of Q (50%), veh/In T T T T 0 3 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 929 0 111 0 878 0 232 0 1863 0 1863 0 1863 0 1863 0.0 12.0 0.0 2.5 0.0 8.8 0.0 5.4 0.0 12.0 0.0 2.5 0.0 8.8 0.0 5.4 0 2589 0 1012 0 1537 0 1012 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.57 0.00 0.23 0 2589 0 1095 0 1537 0 1095 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.93 0.00 1.00 0.0 19.4 00 307 0.0 6.5 0.0 31.8 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 00 00 0.0 0.0 19.8 0.0 30.7 0.0 8.0 0.0 31.8 0.0 5.3 0.0 12 0.0 2.2 00 2.5 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 00 00 0.0 0.0 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.0 5.4 00 12 0.0 25 0.0 2.5 VI Peak with Improvements 2007 CMAQ Application E:iWork_Files\Projects2\CMAQ GrantsiFred Waring - Monterey PM Proposed.syn Page 2 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 104: San Pablo & Fred Waring Drive Printed: 5/1012013 %ile Storage Ratio (RQ%) Initial Q (Qb), veh Final (Residual) Q (Qe), veh Sat Delay (ds), s/veh Sat Q (Qs), veh Sat Cap (es), veh/h Initial Q Clear Time (tc), h Assigned Mutt Lane Assignment Lanes in Grp Grp Vol (v), veh/h Grp Sat Flow (s), veh/h/In Q Serve Time (g_s), s Cycle Q Clear Time (g_c), s Prot RT Sat Flow (s_R), vehlhlln Prot RT Eff Green (g_R), s Prop RT Outside Lane (P_R) Lane Grp Cap (c), veh/h V/C Ratio (X) Avail Cap (c_a), veh/h Upstream Filter (I) Uniform Delay (d1), s/veh Incr Delay (d2), s/veh Initial Q Delay (d3), s/veh Controi_Delay (d), s/veh 1st -Term Q (Q1), veh/In 2nd-Term Q (02), veh/In 3rd-Term Q (Q3), veh/In %ile Back of Q Factor (f_B%) %ile Back of Q (50%), veh/In %Ile Storage Ratio (RQ%) Initial Q (Qb), veh Final (Residual) Q (Qe), veh Sat Delay (ds), s/veh Sat Q (Qs), veh Sat Cap (cs), veh/h Initial Q Clear Time (tc), h HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay HCM 2010 LOS 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.03 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12 0 14 0 16 0 18 R R T+R R 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 121 0 34 0 403 0 368 0 1581 0 1580 0 1706 0 1580 0.0 5.0 0,0 1.8 0.0 8.8 0,0 24.8 0.0 5.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 8.8 0.0 24.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.51 0.00 1.00 0 733 0 415 0 704 0 429 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.57 0.00 0.86 0 733 0 450 0 704 0 465 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.93 0.00 1.00 0.0 17.5 0.0 31.2 0.0 6.5 0.0 38.8 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.1 0.0 13.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.0 0.0 31.2 0.0 9.7 0.0 51.8 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.7 0.0 2.0 0.0 9.7 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.7 0.0 2.6 0.0 11.2 0.00 0.25 0.00 018 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.71 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.7 C I PM Peak with Improvements E:\Work_Files\Projects2tCMAQ GrantsTred Waring - Monterey PM Proposed.syn 2007 CMAQ Application Page 3 Detailed Measures of Effectiveness 104: San Pablo & Fred Waring Drive /plume (vph) Control Delay / Veh (s/v) Queue Delay / Veh (slv) Total Delay / Veh (s/v) Total Delay (hr) Stops / Veh Stops (#) Average Speed (mph) Total Travel Time (hr) Distance Traveled (mi) Fuel Consumed (gal) Fuel Economy (mpg) CO Emissions (kg) NOx Emissions (kg) VOC Emissions (kg) Unserved Vehicles (#) Vehicles in dilemma zone (#) 1207 1069 800 350 3426 12 19 52 56 28 0 0 0 0 0 12 19 52 56 28 4 6 11 5 27 0.43 0.52 0.65 0.82 0.55 521 556 521 287 1885 28 31 17 17 24 13 26 20 9 68 355 806 328 157 1646 21 39 25 12 97 17.1 20.9 13.0 12.6 17.0 1.45 2.70 1.77 0.87 6.78 0.28 0.52 0.34 0.17 1.32 0.34 0.62 0.41 0.20 1.57 0 0 0 0 0 25 35 8 4 72 Printed: 5/10/2013 A Peak with improvements 2007 CMAQ Application E:\Work_FilestProjects2CMAQ Grants\Fred Waring - Monterey PM Proposed.syn Page 4 RES. NO. OB - 067 [THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK.] 0 2 ' 24' 2 0 s • l WA. CoNSTJUIDIG hie two= • ara. Boawnao s Lab isavnwo UMSamoaDu»•KaimM* S.GUMO 71fJNerm ON) 310443 • PAX (7W) l7S.' O L-PROP. P/1 µ/a 230' IM11. I1(24t1f/eo Site Plan Alt. 2 OM"! QP PAL 1VI DESERT PALM DESERT FIRE STATION' Date: 4/2013 Transfer 123.65 APN 694160003 PARCEL UCR Option UCR Transfer al CAL S :ATE SAN BERNARDINO PARCELA - UNIVERSITY OF CA_'FORNIA R;VERSIDE NM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY OF PALM DESER'' PALM DESERT CITY BOUNDARY drfve ..Y' .1,..4t gir,12.(c) .'620450014 ; RETAIN FOR GOVERNMENT USE RETAIN FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT L,-71 0 600Z IPdy untold o}ogd Ieuay 4 3 002 = youl T 1 IS 1U IN IVd 30 AID 6upred 399ed 1 S II.A 090r a cift 1 9§z I 7�A1 1 j[E E 2 © 7 !} $ $ ` « | | � G $ | - — -§ ! , j l8 \!(! �2 k� . ¥\ )\ ; -§ .• _§ - ® 2R ,y 2\ !! 2 7 = §/ £ r ! £ k k 3.- i } (/ (- } ` . 7 $ ƒ »i{ j i } i 1/2 \a ) 900Z'Papoulsuooaa 70 72 Xl X; $EiE%; CL 0 SIN3WWOO ! / 191 - ( k~ { } \ « , \ \ f f « § 8 \ 1 f ® laalad 6uluap!M Rempeoa any ) ] g l ® oo , K. ; , , § 7 k k • / \ \ - R s 2 / ` } } m2 ` - , , _ _ / \ ¥ 7 E - , m \ }3 = G « § 7 ; £ £ A t- 2 \ 2m . --- ` �� ` gI A if . _ c ® ` V\ )/ k7 .E ( H 2Z-E rgf k\ a\' §/ , / f § r ! ! f 0 77 / 2 ® \ 22 §2 kk( g- _- _- k( )J E » �( �/ !( (3, 0 %2) /©i /2N ([! oN 58 3.2 euoN - pue1 lueoeq ¥ .777 / A \ k / !s d9YI ads 6upslx3 is LLC l2lSS 6ugs!x3 2 -31 43 I/!=z«—Z }�{}{${ $ [ .2t / d !/ }/ !/ !! _ ,, 4 .^ 2/ \ co NVId 1V2l3N3$ A°J31VLJ1S NOIIISOdS10 8 O 0 n �N o Ti. .g. It? Ea poSaa'�elwawwo3 mR 0 v 1 h � �^ m g to m g �g 43 1�; a B a vN2a sped p l MOIIIM pas og — Im rr NVid 1V213N3O ONINOZ AO31VNLS NOWSOdSIO SiN3WWO3