HomeMy WebLinkAboutPurchase - Skid Steer LoaderREQUEST:
SUBMITTED BY:
VENDOR:
DATE:
ATTACHMENT:
CITY OF PALM DESERT
PUBLIC WORKS
STAFF REPORT
Award of Bid for the purchase of a Skid Steer Loader and Hammer
Breaker Bar Attachment
Carlos Hernandez, Streets Maintenance Supervisor
Johnson Machinery
800 La Cadena Drive
Riverside, CA 92502
February 10, 2005
Staff Equipment Evaluation
Cat 246 skid steer loader / UB hammer breaker
Comparison Specifications
Recommendation:
By Minute Motion:
1) Reject bids from Scott Equipment and RDO Equipment Co. as non-
responsive.
2) Award the purchase of a skid steer loader and hammer breaker bar
attachment to Johnson Machinery, Riverside, in the total of
$34,209.55.
Discussion:
On January 14, 2005, sealed bids were opened for the purchase of a skid steer loader
and a hammer breaker attachment. The following proposals were received:
Scott Equipment, Fontana, Mustang 2066 / Husky HH 500
$30,196.94
RDO Equipment Co., Riverside, John Deere 320 / Husky HH 500 $30,248.20
Johnson Machinery, Riverside, Cat 246 / UB 303
$34,209.55
D3 Equipment, Fontana, CASE 70XT / UB 302
$34,905.62
$42,201.10
Claremont Equipment, Indio, Kumatsu SK 1020-5 / Husky HH 500
Staff Report
Award of Bid for the purchase of a Skid Steer Loader and Hammer Breaker Bar
Page 2 of 2
February 10, 2005
All bidders were required to provide an on site demonstration of the equipment. A
hands on evaluation was conducted and the results attached. The bid specifications
were for a CASE 70XT (or equivalent) skid steer loader plus additional features and an
attachment to break up to 12-inch thick concrete.
The following bid proposals were not fully responsive:
Scott Equipment, Mustang 2066: Did not include all specified features in
proposal.
RDO Equipment, John Deere 320: The equipment proposed is below minimum
specifications in many areas. This unit also has a vertical lift system as opposed
tote radial lift of the specified unit and with this feature Tong -term durability may
be compromised for the intended equipment use.
The equipment proposed by Johnson Machinery meets all specifications and has many
additional features not on other equipment such as, hand and foot engine throttle
controls, anti -stall system and a hydraulic quick coupler for engagement and
disengagement of work attachments.
Public Works staff recommends the award of purchase to Johnson Machinery. This
equipment was included in the 2004/2005 budget and funds are available in account
110-4310-433-4045.
Submitted By:
nance Supervisor
Approval:
ACM for Devel - ent Services
City Manage
Department Head:
Michael Errante
Director of Public Works
Finance Director
Staff Demonstration Evaluation
As part of the bidding process, each bidder was required to provide equipment for
hands on demonstration testing with city staff.
The mechanic, equipment operators and street supervisor evaluated the equipment.
Following are the results of the evaluation.
Mustang
2066
John Deere
320
Caterpillar
246B
Case
70XT
Komatsu
SK 1020-5
Service and Maintenance
1
3
4
3
4
Controls
2
3
4
2
4
Safety
3
4
3
3
3
Operation
2
3
3
3
4
Overall Performance
2
3
3
3
4
1 = poor
2 = fair 3 = good 4 = excellent
Asa
IRIS
rite It
.'/ 1
/
fart`. Y !U!Q
iJiiiii
+Uaaaaaal
iIaaaaaar°°:.
111aaaa'
closed;:bracket _;desi`gn
werfu.l breaker for maximum productivi
itrogen gas assisted deliver faster blow
operating and and maintenance costs
Excellent strength and durability
Extremely competitive price
IPACT ,ENERGY':'CLJ
P.ERATING *0:, :HT
PERAT.ING; RRES_SU
E:Q.IJIR,EQ OIL'FLOVG
HISEL: piAMETER
UMB,EROF BLOW
Randy May
Compact Equipment
Sales
Johnson Machinery
800 E. La Cadena Drive
P.O. Box 351
Riverside, CA 92502
951.830.1144 mobile
951.686.4560 tel
951.774.3270 fax
may_randy@johnson-machinery.com
mvw.johnson-machinery.com
J - 1,35t
.5 - 3.5
ex..t cal '.:urai O:t.sal b.ri
epla.Ceable' tool ;bus
ietd,::se.rviceable'` `_ G.':.
asy to` rebuilt.
Distributed By:
2300-,.
225'.
50 -I 950
6.0 - 9:0
Compare Specification Display
320 skidsteer
Compare
MANUFACTURER
MODEL
DATE OF SPECIFICATION
ENGINE
Manufacturer
Net Horsepower (kw)
Fuel Capacity, gal (L)
HYDRAULIC SYSTEM
Standard Pump Flow, gpm
(L/min.)
Optional High Flow, gpm
(L/min.)
Hydraulic power,
calculated, hp (kw)
PERFORMANCE
SAE Rated Oper Cap
(ROC), Ib (kg)
SAE ROC with opt
Counterweight, Ib (kg)
Tipping Load, standard, Ib
(kg)
Boom, Ib(kn)
Bucket, Ib(kn)
DRIVE TRAIN
Maximum Grnd
Speed,stand,mph (kph)
Two Speed Trans Grnd
Speed,mph(kph)
DIMENSIONS
Length Without Bucket,in
(mm)
Width Without Bucket, in
(mm)
Dump Height, in (mm)
Dump Reach, in (mm)
Ground Clearance, in (mm)
OPERATING WEIGHT,
STANDARD LB (kg)
John Deere
320
Oct-04
John Deere
62 (46)
16 (61)
19 (72)
31 (117)
38.2 (28.5)
1,950 (885)
2,300 (1043)
3,900 (1769)
3,100 (13.7)
5,500 (24.4)
6.8 (10.9)
Not applicable
102"(2590)
69.8" (1770)
90.2" (2290)
28.1" (710)
9.6" (1074)
6,435 (2919)
Specifications subject to change. Please contact your local dealer for more detailed informationDur local dealer for more deta
Case
70XT
Apr-04
Case
79 (59)
22 (83)
21.0 (79)
31.9 (121)
36.7 (27.4)
Caterpillar Mustang
246B 2066
Dec-03 Aug-04
Cat Cummins
78 (58) Not published
24 (90) 19 (72)
22 (83) 21.5 (81)
Not applicable Not published
42.8 (31.9) 37.6 (28.0)
2,000 (907) 2,000 (907) 2,000 (907)
Not published 2,100 (953) 2,300 (1043)
4,000 (1814) 4,000 (1814) 4,000 (1814)
4,664 (20.7) 4,657 (20.6) 6,692 (29.6)
5,885 (26.1) 5,484 (24.3) 5,820 (25.8)
7.0 (11.3) 7.7 (12.4) 7.7 (12.4)
Not applicable 11.8 (19.0) 11.2 (18.0)
01/19/2005
103.9"(2640) 110"(2790) 93"(2360)
64" (1630) 66" (1680) 67.3" (1710)
96.6" (2450) 94" (2390) 95" (2410)
21.3" (540) 21" (530) 28" (710)
9" (1095) 9.3" (1143) 7.9" (1092)
6,906 (3133) 7,142 (3240) 7,480 (3393)
http://www.deere.com/specsapp/servlet/com.deere.u90785.specscompare.view.servlets.Spere.u90785.specscompare.