The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutFeasibility of Florida Avenue Sidewalk ProjectCITY OF PALM DESERT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT REQUEST: Informational Item — Response to Residents Speaking at Council Meeting 01-13-05 Regarding Fred Waring Widening and Florida Avenue Sidewalk Projects SUBMITTED BY: Public Works Department DATE: February 10, 2005 CONTENTS: Transportation Engineer Report Mail List for Public Meeting 03-31-04 Recommendation: • Receive and file informational report. • Initiate discussion regarding feasibility of Florida Avenue Sidewalk Project. Discussion: At the City Council meeting on January 13, 2005 concerns were raised by residents Richard Lee (it is believed this resident also goes by the name Rick Coster), Anthony Fantacone, and Gina Sandoval. The following information is provided per City Council's request. In addition, this report addresses concerns posed by resident Andrew Bader, who has contacted the Public Works Department on multiple occasions since January 14, 2005. In the following text we will bullet -point each concern and offer our response: • The City is acting without informing the public and giving the public due process. A public meeting was held in City of Palm Desert Council Chambers on March 31, 2004. Invitation notices were sent out to affected residents (mailing list attached). A public meeting was held in the City of Indian Wells Council Chambers on May 6, 2004. Invitation notices were sent out to affected residents of Indian Wells and Palm Desert, and included the addresses on Florida Ave. G:1PubWorks\Staff Reports120051February 10llnformational Item Fred Waring Widening Project.doc Staff Report February 10, 2005 Page 2 of 4 Both cities have retained the services of WEC Corporation for project management, which includes a designated Community Liaison. The Liaison has on two occasions gone door-to-door to distribute letters from Michael Errante, and to date has personally met with 54 of the 69 residents on Florida Avenue. Our records indicate that Florida Avenue residents Lee (Coster), Fantacone, and Sandoval purchased their properties after the time of the public meeting, which becomes a disclosure issue between the buyer and the seller. Mr. Bader did attend the meeting on March 31, as is evidenced by his name on the sign -in sheet. At the meeting on March 31, display boards which were made specifically for the meeting indicated the proposed alignment of the sound wall and roadway on Fred Waring. These displays indicate the planned relocation of the existing Fred Waring roadside curbing to approximately 7-14 feet northward, which is within the existing rig ht-of-way. • The City is imposing easements which reduce the size of back yards. The project plans conform to the display boards presented at the March 31 public meeting. These displays clearly indicate the new sound wall will be placed exactly at the existing wall location in most cases. In the cases where the wall location will change, the resident will gain back yard square footage. In no case will any resident lose back yard space, even though an easement does exist which would allow the City to do so. • Private pools, spas, landscaping and other property will be damaged during the new sound wall installation, with no recompense to the owners. Photographs are being taken of existing affected back yards. Private property which is damaged as a result of the project will be repaired at the City's expense. No pools will be removed even though several are located within the public right-of-way. • The Fred Waring widening will increase noise levels by cars and trucks. The proposed sound wall will provide a noise barrier to help mitigate noise issues. Additionally, the City's practice of using gap -graded rubberized asphalt will help reduce the noise levels experienced by the residents. Fred Waring Drive is a designated truck route and a regional arterial roadway over which the City of Palm Desert does not have exclusive jurisdiction. The City Transportation Engineer has prepared a report (included) addressing the restriction of truck traffic along Fred Waring Drive. It is the conclusion of the staff that Fred Waring Drive should remain a designated truck route in the City of Palm Desert. As proven by our many successful roadway widening projects, noise levels will actually be lower after completion of the project. G:1PubWorks\Staff Reports120051February ? 011nformational Item Fred Waring Widening Project.doc Staff Report February 10, 2005 Page 3 of 4 • The closer proximity of the road to the sound wall creates unsafe conditions. It is the professional opinion of civil engineers involved in this project that the proposed retaining wall will provide greater protection against vehicles leaving the road than do the existing wooden fences and block garden walls. The double -wall construction (one retaining wall, one sound wall) proposed for some areas of this project would afford still greater protection. Closer proximity of the wall to the road could result in quicker deflection of an errant vehicle. • Speed will increase along Fred Waring Drive, creating unsafe conditions. Speed limits are established according to the California Vehicle Code. Referring again to the Transportation Engineer's report (included), the rules must be fair and reasonable in order for responsible drivers to comply. In effect, it is the drivers who decide the appropriate speed limit when they drive. It should be noted that other portions of Fred Waring have been improved to six lanes with no increase in speeds. • Property values will decrease. As a result of the new sound wall the back side of properties will have an improved, uniform appearance with an architectural treatment. Residents whose back yards are increased may also experience an increase in property value as a result of this increase. Other portions of Fred Waring have been improved to six lanes and there has been no reduction in property value. Completing the ultimate widening at this time may actually increase property values by removing any speculation regarding potential future improvements. • Florida Avenue Sidewalk Project will destroy private property and result in Toss of land. The public right-of-way extends to ten feet behind the curb. The proposed sidewalk would be six feet wide; therefore, no private property will be damaged. Residents who have installed private property within the public right-of-way (mailboxes, decorative items) would be given the opportunity to move these items prior to the beginning of construction. However, due to the opposition to this project by the residents, staff has reconsidered the various alternatives regarding the sidewalk on Florida Avenue: 1. The original plan was to build out toward the street; more current data has shown there may be insufficient street width to consider this and it may conflict with existing utilities. 2. Build the sidewalk behind the curb, which would result in disrupting the residents and existing landscaping. 3. In lieu of building the sidewalk, sign the route so that bicyclists and pedestrians can use the surface street on Florida Avenue. G:IPub Works1Staff Reports120051February 101/nformational Item Fred Waring Widening Project.doc Staff Report February 10, 2005 Page 4 of 4 Widening Fred Waring Drive will have no impact on pedestrian and bicycle volumes on Florida Avenue. Pedestrians and bicyclists have traveled on the roadway on Florida Avenue for 40 years without incident. Given the above conditions, the expense of engineering and constructing the sidewalk on Florida Avenue may not be justified against the benefits. The cost is estimated at $300,000, while there has been no proven demand or benefit to proceeding with the project. Staff requests that Council initiate discussion on the alternatives for the sidewalk, and is seeking direction so that a recommendation can be brought forth for action at the next Council meeting. Submitted :v: Department - ead: Mark Gre nwood, P.E. Michael Er ante, P.E. City Engineer Director of Public Works Approval: c Homer Croy ACM for Development Services Paul Gibson Finance Director Carlos Orteg City Manager /dhl G:IPubWorks\Starf Reports120051February 101lnformational Item Fred Waring Widening Project.doc CITY OF PALM DESERT PUBLIC WORKS INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM To: Mike Errante, Director of Public Works From: Mark Diercks, Transportation Engineer Date: January 26, 2005 Subject: Fred Waring Drive As requested, I have research the current standards and regulations regarding posting of speed limits and restrictions of truck traffic as they relate to Fred Waring Drive. Posted Speed Limits Procedures and regulations for establishing appropriate speed limits are specified in the California Vehicle Code (CVC). Specific sections of the CVC that pertain to the establishment of speed limits by local jurisdictions are summarized below: ➢ CVC Section 22349 establishes a maximum speed limit of 55 and 65 miles -per - hour (MPH) on two lane and multi -lane highways, respectively. ➢ CVC Section 22350 establishes the "Basic Speed Law", which requires motorists to drive at a reasonable and prudent speed. ➢ CVC Section 22352 establishes "Prima Facie" speed limits of 25 MPH in "business and residence districts", in school zones and in areas near senior centers. Fifteen MPH speed limits are established at "blind" railroad crossings and intersections. "Business Districts" are defined in CVC Sections 235 and 240. "Residence Districts" are defined in CVC Sections 240 and 515. ➢ CVC Section 22357 allows local jurisdictions to raise a prima facie speed limit above 25 MPH (except in schools and senior areas) upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. ➢ CVC Section 22358 allows local jurisdictions to reduce a prima facie speed limit from the 55 or 65 MPH maximum upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. "Engineering and traffic survey" is defined in CVC Section 627 as conforming to methods established by the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) for use by state and local authorities. Section 2B.116, "Speed Limits and Zones", of the MUTCD 2003 California Supplement specifies the procedures and requirements for an engineering and traffic survey. There are no provisions in the CVC which would authorize any local jurisdiction to establish a speed limit by any method other than as prescribed in the CVC. The result of posting speed limits which are not in compliance with the CVC, is that when a speeding citation is contested, which many are, the court is left with little choice but to dismiss the citation. This effectively prevents enforcement of speeding except for exceeding the maximum speed limit of 55 or 65 MPH. This situation would certainly not be favored by the majority of the drivers or residents. It appears to be the intent of the regulations to protect citizens from unreasonable regulations in the course of their daily activities. The regulations provide procedures to balance the concerns of a vocal minority with the unspoken, yet demonstrated, will of the people. All traffic rules and regulations are based on the concept of "voluntary compliance". These rules must be fair and reasonable for responsible drivers, who are a large majority, to choose to comply. This knowledge is based on many studies by organizations including the Federal Highway Administration, State Department of Transportation, universities, professional organizations and the insurance industry. These studies invariably find the drivers comply with those rules with which they agree, and ignore those which they find unreasonable. In effect, drivers are deciding the appropriate speed limit each time that they drive. These types of studies also continuously report that the speed at which a street is posted, has very little effect on the typical speed of traffic on that street. Posting a lower, or higher, speed limit may result in an overall change in speeds of 2 MPH. Although the posting of speed limits frequently generates concerns and interest from citizens, especially nearby residents, it is necessary to comply with the legal requirements in order provide the safest streets possible. It should be noted that enforcement efforts frequently result in the residents of the area being cited for speeding. Providing reasonable speed limits, which the majority of drivers will try to obey, is the best compromise between the concerns for safety which are stated by citizens in their homes versus the actions of those citizens when they are in their vehicles. Truck Restrictions The California Vehicle Code (CVC) allows cities and counties to restrict, by ordinance, commercial vehicles subject to the specific conditions. CVC Section 35701 allows cities, by ordinance, to prohibit the use of a street by any commercial vehicle or by any vehicle exceeding a maximum gross weight. However, specific conditions which may preclude restricting commercial traffic on Fred Waring Drive include CVC Section 35702 which requires exclusive jurisdiction of the highway by the local authority enacting the ordinance and CVC Section 35705 which excludes highways on which money from State Transportation Funds has been or is used for construction or maintenance. Given the above, restricting commercial traffic on Fred Waring Drive may not be as simple as enacting an ordinance. Consultation with legal council and/or engaging the services of a qualified professional should be considered prior to enacting such an ordinance. From my perspective, Fred Waring Drive is a regional arterial roadway providing a vital east -west Zink between Palm Desert and Indio. Fred Waring Drive is currently designated as a Truck Route in Palm Desert, as shown on the attached map, and should remain as such. Ib(ark S. Diercks, P.E. Transportation Engineer /MSD CC: Mark Greenwood, P.E., City Engineer G:1PubWorks\Mark Diercks\word data\Memos\Interoffice\IOM - ME - Fred Waring Restrictions.doc DINAH SHORE DR MONTEREY A i'.GERALOFORD DR FRANKSINATRADR COUNTRY CLUE IOR HOVLEY LN cc MAGNESIA \1. - 0 3 0 0 HOVLEY LN E FALLS I ELEASEO_ GRAPEVINE ST /HAYSTA—CK RD /MESA VIEW DR 11 0 0 0 0 HOVLEY City Of Palm Desert Truck Routes LN E ta to) cc Cc CALIFO FRED WARING DR 4 6. co) FAIRWAY DR +.1 S TATE HW Y 111 WASHINGTON ST Truck Routes w 404, 0 0 5 1 2 a R f / 0 Alt. Address t ® t t t t / 0 0 0 0 0 0 � / EEEEE /To CIS 0_ 0_ 0_ a Alt. Phone Address 0 ƒ \ k% 3 E k 75-051 La Sierra Dr. E 0 I 760/346-9091 / \ 0 Sotomayor, Byron 760/674-8800 (Office) 75-083 La Sierra 06/17/04 760/341-3410 75-115 La Sierra 07/06/04 760/773-2182 75-147 La Sierra Dr 06/17/04 760/674-4623 75-179 La Sierra Dr 06/19/04 760/779-5977 La Sierra Dr. / 06/17/04 760/340-5120 (Home) 760/574-7436 (Cell) 06/17/04 760/773-9742 / / 07/02/04 760/341-2073 06/17/04 760/346-8826 760/776-4892 Palm Desert 75-387 La Sierra 07/06/04 760/340-9936 Palm Desert 75-419 La Sierra D (0(0cc) � / 0 0 00 EE 0_f 75-451 La Sierra Dr. 06/30/04 760/836-3647 75-483 La Sierra Dr. 07/02/04 760/346-7114 0 ƒ \ cn C E a - o 0 3 ƒ G c c 0 / R 0 ±\ k= c >_ 53 -/ 0 // G 3 E T O 2 2 ka 55 00ƒ0\2 /) �_ 2 k $± CO 2= a CDƒ 0\ /k 6 o - /27 / ok �� ' � a a c E < � § E - / / / / § / CO co [ 2. c % \ / -0 0 20>00 //k$ /$/�/ o2 Uneffected/concerned residents: t t t= t t t t 00000000 EEEEEEEE afCLƒ�� CLa 75-226 La Cresta 760/773-4041 760/340-2801 760/341-8647 75-419 La Cresta 760/568-3855 75-432 L Cresta 760/568-1754 75-307 La Cresta 760/779-0031 75-211 La Cresta 760/341-8647 75-130 La Sierra Dr 760/341-3247 Wall Color - Navajo White (DunnEdwards) Primary Phone # 0 N U 0 X LL 0 (0 0) 0) 44-079 Elba Court Palm Desert 760/674-2256 760/861-7675 Kent, Deirdre E. a) rn E a 0 0 U ca w 0) 00 O �Lc) Ln c0 T I� 4 co T 0) 0) d' '- O 0) N O co O d O) 44-099 Elba Court Palm Desert 760/799-1872 (hers) 760/773-2895 Stark, Mirko & Milenka O Nco co N N co N N N N 0) a) 6) O 0) d) 0) 0) 0) N CO 760/439-1339 760/776-6804 949/387-3447 44-119 Elba Court Palm Desert 949/547-0699 760/773-5993 a) c otf 4) m o co U E ots o L u c i _a 0 O w Y fb it a.. L a) U) a) 0 E d 0 U 0 CS) O rn 00 N O CO ti O O M co M ti ti O co N- 760/341-5541 Romero, J. T. (Jackie) 44-079 Oran Court Palm Desert 760/568-6922 760/341-9525 Sandifer, Ronald/Miriam 909/792-7481 44-089 Oran Court Palm Desert 909/633-6747 Fangary, Heba 44-099 Oran Court Palm Desert 760/346-0894 Anderson, Charlotte A. 44-109 Oran Court Palm Desert 760/776-4958 44-119 Oran Court Palm Desert 760/340-4595 44-129 Oran Court Palm Desert 760/773-2848 Billingsly, Margaret CO CO CO m CO C. 0 N N N N N N N N 0) 0) 0) O) Q) Q) O) O) Middle School 760/880-8420 760/836-3208 Adams, Theresa 44-069 Vigo Court Palm Desert 760/413-1172 760/340-6186 Babcock, Phil & Anne 44-079 Vigo Court Palm Desert 760/773-6553 Fumito, Takahiro & Mariko 44-089 Vigo Court Palm Desert 760/641-3585 760/340-5314 E Lf') =O co'? co O N CD C co Heinrich, Bob & Ardith 760/340-4924 760/568-1655 818/848-0576 Robone, Lawrence J. CO m N N 0) O 760/346-3647 760/578-1654 Burton, Tammie L. 615/597-2828 0 / k : 0 \ 0 E k 0 E CD q t 0 0 E 0 / 0 0 5 k \ CO / E 0 0 \ 3 0 0 0 0 0 /0) 0)�0 0 0 0 0 0• 00 000 E E E E E ƒ0_ //ƒ cu 00 >> n £ 858/713-3403 141 W. Twelve Stones Crossing // /q 0\ 3\ EE To To 3 0 0 o CO 0 0 �.- 0 \ 3 0 e o R R O 0 o e (13 a. >5/ /0 IN- & c ' // / / 00 // E § \ Palm Desert 92260 24 Via Cielo Azul 760/773-3774 Desert Resort Mgmt COCO0oOcOCaO LO LO LC) LO LO LC) 000000 ✓ r r r r r F-XXXXXX �000000 Jmmmmmm Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 2aaa.aaa OWNER FRST OWNER MID MAIL2NAME 76565 CALIFORNIA DR _ Z >- � � o❑ ❑__I 0 • Q "- CO N • 01 CIO ADELINE ORTEGA P O BOX 4127 -� -� Q Q 0 Q w W z 0 zQ J E TAHQUITZ CANYON 73941 HIGHWAY 111 CIO RALPHS SEWING & VACUUM 76971 FLORIDA AVE z - W >W �C 0 0 O w<pv = zto=mo W - 00 Q JLLJJ❑ ❑ W U ��Z�}Q> QZUZwOpwp I0 ISQ Z❑-F-00 Do_a_z Qaz3Qja(aao(i�Q~0 0000z0ww Cno dZC� �C7❑22QJI-md�W I-�F-„IY§-) f!)Jce _..1 U Z w _ W Q~ W N Q z U M Z COwW �_ QZ zQ= 0z JI 0 �Z�(nZZ- W W J �_> 0 � J>M N2Z CL ❑❑ I- CC ZWZQWQZ ZZ-�W QcnW W�(1)F--� SOY Q Z LLI W ❑❑❑❑w NwY Y=>-z0 OQOdN QZ❑W2w >-W❑zW W OQQ 0»0000i=-�~J1w1F-z�❑zQO°D-LQOw W11Z Q2azC�QuO>hWCI Q�wQzQc�w� ¢ O O DUUUUUQ 0U)=C 1 Z= Ym0 0cc❑fAZ Ja =0zzwcnLL�c0 >mmJJ Ln I� O co O c- f - CO LO - M N r O O CO N C0 LO N d' M r CO O C ) co f� CO LC) d' M N r O c CO o CO:): '� M N ✓ 0 N N M M r r r r r r r r 0 0 0 O O O O O O r N �- r r r r r r 0 r r 0 0 0 O O O O O 0 0 0 0 CD 0 0 r 0 r r 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M r r r r r Ln Lfl Ln to L(i to Ln Ln L() LO LO LO LO Ln LO LC) lf) Ln M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M 1� N M co.,— O CO N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M M `',:r") M M M M M M M Z P2 ti CV h ti ti ti RI RI ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti P. ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti h �- ti ti ff a M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M Q CO Cfl CO CO CO CO CO C0 CO CO C0 CO C0 CO CO C0 C0 O (0 O O O O O C0 C0 CO C0 CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO C0 CO CO O C0 CO CO 444 S PLYMOUTH BLV 31562 VIA SAN CARLOS Z co__I Z N 0 05. 0 'i co 0 W LS;m N 0 O tia0 4808 COURAGEOUS LN 39817 DESERT SUN DR w O Q Q Q z ZZ, O 0 0 O W W 0 0 0 - J U 1S m m CO o O 000� `ti° CI_ aa.� m w Z z z w W 0 J z Z_ �J�U J W >Q-wi �U Qm td o a-<CU` Mfarx w J J Z zrw 1- Q O_i Q CC-J Q W Y 0 0 2 2 mw0Cow00Z=pmeQi00 w UWZ WmJQcoct0to022 W I- = W„, oZWZW rA0ZQ�D ZRwE=Q wI--0c�cw 00<Q`�c=>>- of Q>=w W 0 Z Z 0 CL 0 J Q - [� = m 0 Z U W O Z F- W ZwZ OZ ZU ZC]D>c�000Qw owz 000 W Ww Qi-Wlo W?ji1-QW COh-O>JQJC'1>F-000 J Q Z UJ - W a 1 U J U Z ecrY— 0 U J Z 0 Z ccO c Q 0 W w 0 1- 00> W }JQWcca_QOaOcnWQw=><>aaaa Q << ZUQJ222W=u_Ycob000M>o--)50WWWu-0000 a 0 d 0 e- N CO ' I" 0 CO 1,- N CO O O r' N I,- A- CO 1.0 d' r' N M 0 0 N. CO Oo O N M dr �- r N N O co t- O co O O coO O O O co �- 0 CD 0 r O CD 0 CD 00000 O O O O O �- d d' O d' d' A' O O C O O M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M dO d d0 d0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 co 0 0 0 0 CO dd- N N N N N N N N C.0 N N N N N N N N I,- N N N N I,- I,- N N N N I-- N N N N d' CS) Cr) M M M M M M co M co COCO CO CO CO CO M CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO Ch CO M CO I,- I, - CO M I -- I, - CO CO CO CO 0 CO CO CO CO CO 0 CO CO 0 CO CO 0 CO CO 0 CO 0 CO CO CO 0 CO 0 CO 0 CO CO 0 CO CO CO CO CO CO U) 0 2 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r c- r O r r r 0 e- r r r r r 0 — r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r t r... r r r r r r_.r r N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N CV N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0) W O O O U STREET SUFFIX CITY I-- Ct CC W W CC CC fICL W IX CeCYW W W IY CY CC X W W W W: a C CC CC CCCC CC W W W LI W W W W W WWW LU W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WW W U) U) U) U) U) U) V) U) U) U) U) U) U) In U) U) U) U) f/) V) U) U) U) U) U) U) U) U) U) U) U) U) U) W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J • J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J anQ.aaaQ.daaaaaCLCLaaaaaa0 QQ.aa aaaa aaaaaaa wwwwwwWWWWwwWWWWWWWWWWw wwww wwwwwww aa<<<<<<aa'Qaaaa¢aaa<<<< aQQ¢ <<<<<<a F- QQQQQQQQQQQQ<<<<< Q.QQ< <<<< <<<<<Q< LU 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ct O • 00• 00• 000000000000000000 0000 0000000 J __I _I J J __I J -I _I J __I J _I -I J J J J __I _I __I __I -I 0000 J J __IJ J J J J J J V1 LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL Li_ LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL o O 0 0 0 0 0 to I,- M I` 0) e- In 0) r In T's O) •c- LO 0) I.- N- o') a) In ,.O co LA �,;0) O r M Cf) I-. r 0 d C0 • O O r N ch CC) CO I� a) r Q) O N N M lA coo) coin O N d' CO W r N CO 0 N- Z CCOO CO CEO (SO CCOO COO COOCOO COCO(00 CO COO COO CCOO CO CO CCOO CCOO CEO CO COCOCEO coO(OO (0 co CO COO CO CO 0 ttOO 0) W N- Lam- I,- I` ti N- ti N. ti N. ti ti ti ti N. ti N. ti N. N. N- N- N N. f� N- N- N M M CO CO CO CD 0 0 ▪ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 0 O CD 0ti O O O O N O O O O 0 0 0'Cr c- N N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 000 N N CEO N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M N N N N N J 0) 0) 0) a) 0) 0) O) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) O a) 0) 0) 0)) 0) Q QQQQQ 0 00 U 0 0 Q QQQQQ J J J J J J J J J J J J w W W w w W U 2 = 2 = 2 = N 0 0 0 0 0 0 <000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 PALM DESERT CA Q Q Q O 0 0 0) CO O 0 0 222 aaa U Q 0 0 J Q 0 J w 0 PALM DESERT CA 0 Q Q U Ow LLI 0 < 0 Z Z� 2 PALM SPRINGS CA PALM DESERT CA PALM DESERT CA T r r r r T r r T r r ..... 0 T T ....... r r r' r 0 0 0 0 0 T 0 r T r r T r r I T r r T T r r T r r T r r T {- .... T r N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N CD r 0 M M 0 0 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M W M M M M W M 0 N I- I- I- I - -I- I - -I- I- I- I--I--I- I- I - I - I- I-I-F-I-1-1-1-1-F--1-1-1-1- W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ c ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0000000000000 J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J »» > >»» »» >»»»» QQQaQQQQaQQQ<<<< QQQaQaQQQaQQQ PALM DESERT PALM DESERT I- I- w QQ<QQQQQQ<QQCQCQ <QQQ<<<<w‹<QQ z X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Z X X X X Z 0000000000000000 00000000ZUJ 0000 J a LL LL LL U- LL w LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL w LL LL w LL w I— LL UL LL LL LA LC) LC) LC) LC) LC) LO LO LC) LC) LC) LC) LO LO LO LC) 0 LO LO LO LSD LI) LO LO Lf) LO LO LC) LC) CO 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 M c} 0 0 t` CO 0 O r N d 0 CO N N- Cb O 0 r N M et co Ni- CD 0 0 M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r r T N-- r T 0 T T T N N N N N N O N N M M 0 � Cfl ti I,- I-- I� ti ti ti L-- ti ti ti ti ti ti co ti ti I` r-- I-- r- ti ti r- r- ti N. I,- L- � I,- I, r- I` - ice- I� � N. ti Nt ti L- ti ti co) co �t d' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O 0 N N N- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W CD CD r 0 0 O N- CO M M M T 0 0N) 0Nj M 0Nj N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOS ANGELES CA TEMECULA CA CARLSBAD CA RANCHO MIRAGE CA Q Q I-• QQVUU� w J J w W W W W W ❑ _ _ _ ❑ 20002 J Q Q Q J < O O O < Ilainfiliiiiiiiiiiiiiklie 111111EareimillIMMUMI a • 111111111111101111111111111111 a unnuiszatammunimi