Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRes 05-106 Development Impact FeesCITY OF PALM DESERT FINANCE DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT REQUEST: Annual Report of Calculation of Government Code 66006, Development Impact Fees for the City of Palm Desert DATE: November 13, 2005 CONTENTS: 1. Resolution No.05-106 making certain findings pursuant to Government Code Section 66001 2. Annual Report of Calculation of Government Code 66006 3. Capital Improvement Program 2005-2006 Recommendation: By Minute Motion, that the City Council: Receive public testimony on annual report and findings; and 2. Adopt Resolution No. 05-lmaking certain findings pursuant to California Government Code Section 66001 and 66006. Background: Following the passage of Proposition 13 in 1978, many cities began charging fees on new development to fund public improvements and services such as streets, traffic signals, parks, drainage, housing, and art in public places. These fees are commonly known as development impact fees. In order to ensure that these fees were spent in a timely manner and on projects for which they were being collected, the State Legislature passed a bill known as AB 1600 (Mitigation Fee Act). This bill applies to developer fees increased or imposed on or after January 1, 1989. AB 1600 enacts Government Code Sections 66000-66008 that generally contain four requirements: A local jurisdiction must follow the process set forth in the bill and make certain determinations regarding the purpose and use of the fees, and establish a nexus or connection between a development project or class of project and the public improvement being financed with the fee. 2. The fee must be segregated from the general fund in order to avoid co -mingling of public improvement fees and the general fund. 3. If a local jurisdiction has had possession of a developer fee for five years or more and has not committed that money to a project or actually spent that money, then it must make findings describing the continuing need for that money. In addition, Staff Report Annual Report of Calculation of Government Code Section 66006 November 13, 2005 Page 2 of 3 an annual report must be made of fees collected, interest earned, projects on which fees were expended, and any transfers or loans from the fee account. This report is to be reviewed by the local agency assessing the fees. 4. If a local jurisdiction cannot make the findings required under Paragraph 3, the City must refund the fees collected. The Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee, Housing Mitigation, New Construction Tax, Drainage Facility, Fringe -toed Lizard, Park & Recreation Fee, Traffic Signalization Fee, Art in Public Places Fee, and AIPP Maintenance fees that the City collects qualify as development impact fees. Therefore, these fees must comply with the above -referenced Government Code sections. Government Code Section 66001 requires the City to make available to the public certain information regarding development impact fees for each fund within 180 days after the end of the each fiscal year. Expenditures of the fees collected must occur within a five-year period. Attached to the staff report is a copy of the annual report reflecting the require information to conform to Government Code Sections 66001 and 66006. Originally, when the fees were adopted, the ordinance and staff reports contained the necessary nexus findings to establish each of the fees. The fees are used to assist the City in handling the increased population affecting Palm Desert on our streets, traffic signals, parks, public facilities like City Hall, housing needs for low-income housing, public art, and mitigation fees to protect environmental plants and wildlife due the new development. Each fee is held in a separate fund and the report shows the fees collected and interest earned along with the expenditures paid. Lastly, the report shows the fees collected during the five years and compares it to the fund balance to verify that the fees were spent within the five years. The following are the fees that exceeded the five-year expenditures test: New Construction Tax Fee, Drainage Facility Fee, and Park and Recreation Fee. All of these fees have current capital improvement budgeted projects (copy of capital budgets attached) which would bring the fees under the five-year test and will be spent within one to two years. New Construction Tax: The New Construction Tax fund balance is $5,784,223 versus the five -years revenue collected of $4,591,945 exceeds the five-year test by $1,192,278. We currently have two major projects that have started construction which would use up all of the current five years fund balance and required the City's General Fund to loan $563,461 to cover the additional cash needed for the Corporation Yard Building Expansion ($6,000,000) and Mesa View Fire Station Renovation and expansion ($1,199,763). Drainage Facility Fee: The Drainage Facility Fee fund balance is $5,345,245 versus the five-year revenue collected of $2,219,960. This exceeds the five-year test by $3,125,285. We currently have a drainage facility master plan that indicates the various projects that the fee is being collected to build. Unfortunately, the cost of installation of these projects requires a large fund balance accumulated prior to implementing the capital budget and must also be timed with other Staff Report Annual Report of Calculation of Government Code Section 66006 November 13, 2005 Page 3 of 3 improvements happening around these capital projects. The future project schedule to draw down these funds below the five-year test is the extension of Portola Drainage for $3,700,989. Park and Recreation Fee: The Park and Recreation Fee fund balance is $3,389,396 versus the five-year revenue collected of $2,181,901. This exceeds the five-year test by $1,207,495. We currently have the Civic Center Amphitheater project ($2,482,409 Budget) that is under a revised design process that will be constructed within the next two years. This year staff is recommending that the City Council adopt a resolution to make the findings that we have complied with the five-year test under Government Code Section 66006. Attached is the resolution making the findings along with the Annual Report and a copy of the Capital Improvement Budget for FY 2005-2006. Since these findings have been made, and the City is in compliance with the Code, no refunds are required. Sub fitted by: Paul S. Gibson Director of Finance/City Treasurer PSG:nmo Attachments Approval: Carlos Ortega, City Manager Approval: Dave Erwin, City Attorney RESOLUTION NO. 05- 106 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, TO MAKE CERTAIN FINDINGS PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66001 WHEREAS, the City of Palm Desert is required to make certain findings every five years with respect to the unexpended fund balance of certain development fee funds pursuant to California Government Code Section 66001; and WHEREAS, the information to make the required findings can be found in the Annual Report Calculation, in the 2005-2006 Capital Improvement Program, the original ordinance adopting the fees file with the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, the City Council has approved a master drainage plan, a general plan for parks and approved a regional traffic signal plan that demonstrates the purpose of the fee being charged; and WHEREAS, these findings need to be made in conjunction with the public information required in Code Section 66006. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. 2. That the following findings are made as required under the Government Code Section 66006: a. That the purpose to which the developer fee is to be charged has been identified. b. That a reasonable relationship has been demonstrated between the fee and the purpose for which it is charged. c. That all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing on incomplete improvements have been identified. d. That the approximate dates on which the funding referred to above is expected to be deposited into the appropriate fund have been designated. 3. That these findings are based on information provided in the City of Palm Desert Annual Development Impact Report, Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Program 2005-2006 and master plans for improvements, which is incorporated herein by reference. Resolution No. 05- 106 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at the regular meeting of the Palm Desert City Council held on this 13t' day of November, 2005, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: RACHELLE KLASSEN, CITY CLERK BUFORD A. CRITES, MAYOR CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA Annual Report of Calculation of Government Code 66006 Development Impact Fees for the City of Palm Desert For Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2005 Government Code Section 66006 requires local agencies to submit annual and five-year compliance reports detailing the status of development impact fees. The annual report must be made available to the public and presented to the public agency (City Council) at least fifteen days after it is made available to the public. This report summarizes the following information for each of the development fee programs: 1. A brief description of the fee program. 2. Schedule of fees. 3. Beginning and ending balances of the fee program. 4. Amount of fees collected and the interest earned. 5. Disbursement information and percentage funded by fees, including operating transfers. 6. Five-year compliance testing of unexpended fees and future capital project commitments to expend the funds. The fee programs included in this report are the following: Section A — Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Section B — Housing Mitigation Fee Section C — New Construction Tax Fee Section D — Drainage Facility Fee Section E — Fringe -toed Lizard Fee Section F — Park & Recreation Fee Section G — Traffic Signalization Fee Section H — Art In Public Places Fee Section I — A.I.P.P. Maintenance Fund Page l Section A — Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (T.U.M.F.) The TUMF program is collected by the City and administered by the Coachella Valley Association of Government (CVAG). The City of Palm Desert collects the fee based on an ordinance adopted by City Council based on the type of building usage and vehicles generated by the residential or commercial activity on city streets. The City monthly remits the fee to CVAG to be disbursed on a regional basis for street -widening projects determined yearly by CVAG Capital Project Program Budget. The fee for residential is $794.31 and all commercial buildings are based on the attached formula and data sheet schedule which varies from project to project. Part 1 — Fund Balance, Revenue, Interest, Expenditures, Ending Balance Account Description Revenues & Other Sources: Developer Fee Interest Income Contributions Transfers In Total Sources Expenditures & Other Uses: Capital Projects (Paid to CVAG) Transfers Out Total Uses Total Available Beginning Fiscal Year Ending Fund Balance 2004-05 Fund Balance 1,541,516 1,541,516 1,541,516 1,541,5161 1 -0- -0- 1 -0- Part it — Compliance with Expending Funds within Five Years Five -Year Revenue Test Using First In, First Out Method Unspent Funds Represents Ending Fund Balance Revenues Collected From FY 2004-2005 Total Ending Fund Balance Result: Five-year spent test met in accordance with Government Code 66001 Capital Improvement I FY2004-2005 Projects J CVAG Payments 1 1,541,516 June 30, 2005 -0- -0- % Complete 100% % Funded with Fee 100% Page 2 Section B— Housing Mitigation Fee The Housing Mitigation Fee is used to mitigate the low-income housing impacts caused by commercial and industrial development. The fee is used to help construct or provide low-income housing assistance to the City of Palm Desert residents. A yearly and five-year Low -Income Housing Needs Report/Plan is compiled to assess the needs within the city. The fee is based on $1/sq. ft. — Commercial; $0.33/sq. ft. — Industrial; $0.40/sq. ft. — Professional; $1,000/room — Resort Hotel; $620/Room Non Resort Hotel. Part 1 — Fund Balance, Revenue, Interest, Expenditures, Ending Balance Beginning Fiscal Year Ending Account Description Fund Balance 2004-05 Fund Balance Revenues & Other Sources: Developer Fee 145,031 Interest Income 1,424 Contributions 214 Transfers In Total Sources 146,6691 Expenditures & Other Uses: Capital Projects Transfers Out to Low Income Housing 146,669 Total Uses I 1 146,6691 I 1 Total Available - 0 -1 - 0 -1 - 0 - Part II — Compliance with Expending Funds within Five Years Five -Year Revenue Test Using First In, First Out Method Unspent Funds Represents Ending Fund Balance June 30, 2005 Revenues Collected From FY 2004-2005 146,669 Total Ending Fund Balance 146,669 Result: Five-year spent test met in accordance with Government Code 66001 Capital Improvement FY2004-2005 Five -Year Projects Future Commitments Low -Income Housing 146,669 % Funded with Fee 100% Page 3 Section C - New Construction Tax Fee The New Construction Tax Fee is used for acquisition and development of public facilities such as playgrounds, public structures, and street improvements. Yearly, the City Council approves a five- year Capital Improvement Budget that reflects current projects along with future committed projects utilizing these fees. The fee for Industrial Buildings is $0.05/sq. ft.; Residential units $0.40/sq. ft.; all other development $0.40/sq. ft. Part 1 — Fund Balance, Revenue, Interest, Expenditures, Ending Balance Beginning Fiscal Year Ending Account Description Fund Balance 2004-05 Fund Balance Revenues & Other Sources: Developer Fee 570,486 Interest Income 95,628 Contributions 10,426 Transfers In from General Fund -LOAN 563,461 1 Total Sources I 1 1,240,001 Expenditures & Other Uses: Capital Projects 397,196 Transfers Out Total Uses 397,196 1 I 1 Total Available J 4,941,4181 842,8051 5,784,223 Part II — Compliance with Expending Funds within Five Years Five -Year Revenue Test Using First In, First Out Method Unspent Funds Represents Ending Fund Balance I June 30, 2005 ( Revenues Collected From FY 2000-2001 936,042 Revenues Collected From FY 2001-2002 1,277,544 Revenues Collected From FY 2002-2003 560,492 Revenues Collected From FY 2003-2004 577,866 Revenues Collected From FY 2004-2005 1,240,001 Total Ending Fund Balance 4,591,945 Result: Five-year spent test over the limit by $1,192,278, however, City has budgeted capital projects ($7,199,763) well above the excess that will be completed within 18 months from 6/30/05, which will comply with Government Code 66001. Capital improvement FY2004-2005 Five -Year I Projects Future Commitments Fire Station Renovations 1 397,196 1,199,763 Corporation Yard Expansion 174,372 6,000,000 % Funded with Fee 100% 90%, 10%-Gen.Fd. Page 4 Section D — Drainage Facility Fee The Drainage Facility Fee is used for planned local drainage created by the development and adjoining streets to the project. The City has adopted a master drainage plan that is modified as new development occurs. In addition, the five-year City Capital Improvement Budget includes both current and future projects planned for use of the fees connected to the various development projects. Fees are based on which drainage map zone they reside within: Zone 1 fee is $4,000; Zone 2 is $1,000; Zone 3 is $1,000; Zone 4 is $1,000. The map is available with the Public Works Department upon request. Part 1 — Fund Balance, Revenue, Interest, Expenditures, Ending Balance Beginning Fiscal Year Account Description Fund Balance 2004-05 Revenues & Other Sources: Developer Fee 389,685 Interest Income 95,377 Contributions 21,333 Total Sources Expenditures & Other Uses: Capital Projects Total Uses Total Available 506,395 130,597 130,597 4,969,447 1 375,798 Part II — Compliance with Expending Funds within Five Years Five -Year Revenue Test Using First In, First Out Method Unspent Funds Represents Ending Fund Balance Revenues Collected From FY 2000-2001 Revenues Collected From FY 2001-2002 Revenues Collected From FY 2002-2003 Revenues Collected From FY 2003-2004 Revenues Collected From FY 2004-2005 Total Ending Fund Balance Result: Five-year spent test over the limit by $3,125,285, however, City has budgeted capital projects ($3,700,989) well above the excess that will be completed within 18 months from 6/30105, which will comply with Government Code 66001. Capital Improvement Projects Portola Ave. Drainage June 30, 2005 700,561 413,626 426,474 289,614 389,685 2,219,960 FY2004-2005 Five -Year Future Commitments 130,597 3,700,989 Ending Fund Balance 5,345,245 % Funded with Fee 100% Page 5 Section E — Fringe -toed Lizard Fee/Wildlife Mitigation This fee is collected in connection with environmental endangered plants & wildlife agreements with State and Federal environmental agencies. The fee is collected and placed into trust and remitted monthly to the Center for Natural Lands Management, and is used to acquire open space land to be utilized for various plant and wildlife preserves. The current fee is $600 per acre. In Fiscal Year 2005-2006, the fee will be changed to reflect the new multi -species mitigation agreement. Part 1 — Fund Balance, Revenue, Interest, Expenditures, Ending Balance Account Description Revenues & Other Sources: Developer Fee Interest Income Contributions Transfers In Total Sources Expenditures & Other Uses: Capital Projects Transfers In Total Uses Total Available Beginning I Fiscal Year Fund Balance 2004-05 -0 - Part II — Compliance with Expending Funds within Five Years Five -Year Revenue Test Using First In, First Out Method Unspent Funds Represents Ending Fund Balance I June 30, 2005 Revenues Collected From FY 2001-2002 - 0— Revenues Collected From FY 2002-2003 - 0 — Revenues Collected From FY 2003-2004 - 0— Revenues Collected From FY 2004-2005 - 0 - Total Ending Fund Balance - 0 - Result: Five-year spent test met in accordance with Government Code 66001 112,776 112,7761 112,776 112,776 Ending Fund Balance .0. 1 -0 Capital Improvement I FY2004-2005 I Five -Year I % Funded with Fee Projects Future Commitments Payment to Center 112,776 100% for Natural Land Mgt I I I Page 6 Section F — Park & Recreation Fee The fee is used to acquire land, construct parks and recreational areas, open space, and other public facilities for the city residents. Yearly, the City Council adopts a five-year Capital Improvement Plan detailing the current and future projects necessary for use of the fee. The fee is only charged to residential properties based on the following formula: Number of units x 2.292(people per household) x 5 acres =1000 population x land market value per acre. Part 1 — Fund Balance, Revenue, Interest, Expenditures, Ending Balance Beginning Fiscal Year Ending Account Description Fund Balance 2004-05 Fund Balance Revenues & Other Sources: Developer Fee 1,071,648 Interest Income 55,218 Contributions 6,156 Transfers In j Total Sources 1,133,022 Expenditures & Other Uses: Capital Projects 7,125 Transfers In Total Uses 7,125 Total Available 2,263,4991 1,125,897 3,389,396 Part 11— Compliance with Expending Funds within Five Years Five -Year Revenue Test Using First In, First Out Method Unspent Funds Represents Ending Fund Balance June 30, 2005 Revenues Collected From FY 2000-2001 448,809 Revenues Collected From FY 2001-2002 234,546 Revenues Collected From FY 2002-2003 249,427 Revenues Collected From FY 2003-2004 116,097 Revenues Collected From FY 2004-2005 1,133,022 Total Ending Fund Balance 2,181,901 Result: Five-year spent test over the limit by $1,207,495, however, City has budgeted capital projects ($2,482,409) well above the excess that will be completed within 18 months from 6/30/05, which will comply with Government Code 66001. Capital Improvement Projects FY2004-2005 Five -Year % Funded Future with Fee Commitments 'Civic Center Amphitheater & Park Improvements 1 7,125 2,482,409 100% Page 7 Section G - Traffic Signalization Fee The fee is used for acquisition and development of the regional traffic signals within the city to facilitate increased traffic load added by the development. Yearly, the City Council adopts a five- year Capital Improvement Plan detailing the current and future projects necessary for use of the fee. The fee is charged based on the type of building constructed, which is: Residential $ 50 per unit; Commercial $500 per 1,000 sq. ft.; Industrial $500 per acre. Part 1 — Fund Balance, Revenue, Interest, Expenditures, Ending Balance Beginning Fiscal Year Ending Account Description Fund Balance 2004-05 Fund Balance Revenues & Other Sources: Developer Fee 162,437 Interest Income 15,053 Contributions 5,201 Transfers In Total Sources I I 182,691 Expenditures & Other Uses: Capital Projects 27,000 Transfers Out Total Uses I 27,000 Total Available 812,3161 155,691 968,007 Part II — Compliance with Expending Funds within Five Years Five -Year Revenue Test Using First In, First Out Method Unspent Funds Represents Ending Fund Balance Revenues Collected From FY 2000-2001 Revenues Collected From FY 2001-2002 Revenues Collected From FY 2002-2003 Revenues Collected From FY 2003-2004 Revenues Collected From FY 2004-2005 Total Ending Fund Balance Result: Five-year spent test met in accordance with Government Code 66001 June 30, 2005 337,098 194,073 143,162 165,744 182,691 1,022,768 Capital Improvement FY2004-2005 Five -Year Projects Future Commitments Kansas & Hovley 27,000 1,061,966 % Funded with Fee 100% Page 8 Section H — Art In Public Places Fee The fee is used to acquire, develop, install and maintain artwork to be displayed in the city, the administration of the program, and community public art education programs. The City has an Art in Public Places Committee that meets monthly to decide both location and type of art that will be placed throughout the city. Developers may choose to place and develop art within their project site without paying a fee to the City. Yearly, the City Council adopts a five-year Capital Improvement Plan and administration plan detailing the current and future projects necessary for use of the fee. Part 1 - Fund Balance, Revenue, Interest, Expenditures, Ending Balance Beginning Fiscal Year Ending Account Description Fund Balance 2004-05 Fund Balance Revenues & Other Sources: Developer Fee 425,460 Interest Income 32,652 Contributions 7,130 Total Sources 465,242 Expenditures & Other Uses: f Capital Projects I 453,548 Total Uses 453,548 Total Available 1 1,688,5771 11,6941 1,700,271 Part II - Compliance with Expending Funds within Five Years Five -Year Revenue Test Using First In, First Out Method Unspent Funds Represents Ending Fund Balance Revenues Collected From FY 2000-2001 Revenues Collected From FY 2001-2002 Revenues Collected From FY 2002-2003 Revenues Collected From FY 2003-2004 Revenues Collected From FY 2004-2005 Total Ending Fund Balance Result: Five-year spent test met in accordance with Government Code 66001 Capital Improvement FY2004-2005 Administration 108,028 Prof. Architecture/Eng 13,278 Art Work -El Paseo 52,992. Aspiration 21,000 Baja Palapa 50,000 Chaftan II 31,500 El Paseo Entrance Sign 49,750 Fat Happy 32,000 Lily Pad 10,000 PD Comm Room Mural 35,000 Road Runner 50,000 June 30, 2005 366,421 441,840 341,536 361,027 289,794 1,800,618 Future Commitments % Funded with Fee Page 9 Section I — A.I.P.P. Maintenance Fund A portion of the Art in Public Places fee is used to cover the yearly maintenance of all the art placed within the city in public places. The City of Palm Desert placed $300,000 from General Fund cash within the AIPP Maintenance fund to be used as a loan to ensure sufficient funds to adequately maintain the artwork until sufficient funds are collected to cover the yearly costs. Part 1 — Fund Balance, Revenue, Interest, Expenditures, Ending Balance Account Description Revenues & Other Sources: Developer Fee Interest Income Contributions Transfers In Total Sources Expenditures & Other Uses: Maintenance of Art Work Transfers Out Total Uses Total Available Beginning Fiscal Year Ending Fund Balance 2004-05 Fund Balance 4,413 12,518 16,931 67,026 50,095 264,139 (50,095) 214,044 Part II — Compliance with Expending Funds within Five Years Five -Year Revenue Test Using First In, First Out Method Unspent Funds Represents Ending Fund Balance Loan From General Fund — Transfer In Revenues Collected From FY 2001-2002 Revenues Collected From FY 2002-2003 Revenues Collected From FY 2003-2004 Revenues Collected From FY 2004-2005 Total Ending Fund Balance June 30, 2005 300,000 Loan from General Fund 300,000 Result: Five-year spent test met in accordance with Government Code 66001 Capital Improvement FY2004-2005 Five -Year Projects Future Commitments Maintenance of Art 67,026 % Funded with Fee 100% Page 10 PROPOSED PROJECT LIST BY FUND MEASURE A FUND *Portola Interchange Q 1-10 ROW Design 'Cook Street from Fred Waring to Frank Sinatra *Fred Waring ® Monterey Ave NB Right-Tum Pocket 'Monterey Ave/Freeway Loop 'Hwy 111 @ Desert Crossing/Toy "R" Us 'Portola Ave ® Whitewater Bridge (Design) 'Portola Street / Dinah Shore Expansion *Monterey Median Imp ( Hovley & Country Club)+B23 'Monterey Ave & Avenue 35 *Dinah Shore Imp (Miriam to Key Largo Ave) 'Cook Street from Fred Waring to Frank Sinatra • San Pablo Avenue - COD Driveway to Magnesia Falls • San Pablo NB ® Fred Waring- Right-tum pocket 'Fred Waring WB ® Hwy 111 Right -Turn Pocket • San Pablo NB @ Fred Waring- Right-tum pocket • Monterey Avenue Widening Portola Interchange ® 1-10 ROW Design CONSTRUCTION TAX FUND CITY OF PALM DESERT PROPOSED FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SUMMARY FUNDING SOURCES Measure A Fund 213 Measure A Fund 213 Measure A Fund 213 Measure A Fund 213 Measure A Fund 213 Measure A Fund 213 Measure A Fund 213 Measure A Fund 213 Measure A Fund 213 Measure A Fund 213 Measure A Fund 213 Measure A Fund 213 Measure A Fund 213 Measure A Fund 213 Measure A Fund 213 Measure A Fund 213 Measure A Fund 213 'Corporation Yard Improvements Construction Tax Fund 231 *Civic Center Park Storage Construction Tax Fund 231 *Fire Station Improvements (Town Center/Portola Stations) Construction Tax Fund 231 *Fire Station Expansion (Mesa View Station No. 67) Construction Tax Fund 231 DRAINAGE FUND *Portola Ave/Dinah Shore Extension *Portola Strom Drain - Cook and Country Club PARK & RECREATION FUND *Legends Field Colums 'Trail Signage *City Park Improvements *Civic Center Amphitheater TRAFFIC SIGNAL FUND "Dinah Shore & Portola Avenue *Portola & Gerald Ford 'Portola Ave & Frank Sinatra Drive 'Country Club Drive ®Via Scene 'Frank Sinatra Drive & Gerald Ford Drive Drainage Fund 232 Drainage Fund 232 Park Fund 233 Park Fund 233 Park Fund 233 Park Fund 233 Traffic Signal Fund 234 Traffic Signal Fund 234 Traffic Signal Fund 234 Traffic Signal Fund 234 Traffic Signal Fund 234 Budget Year 1 Carryover of Budget 1 1 1 Carryover of Budget 1 Carryover of Budget Carryover of Budget Carryover of Budget Canyoverof Budget Carryover of Budget Carryover of Budget 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 Total Fund Carryover of Budget Carryover of Budget Carryover of Budget Carryover of Budget Multi -Year Funding 1,769,000 763,832 2,000,000 396,172 500,000 275.439 Total Fund Carryover of Budget Carryover of Budget Total Fund 1 1 1 Carryover of Budget Total Fund Carryover of Budget Carryover of Budget Carryover of Budget 2 2 Budgeted Funded 2,532,832 Yes 1.000,000 Note 1 500,000 Yes 2,396.172 Yes 775,439 Yes - Yes 250,000 Yes 60,230 Yes 505,000 Yes 315,000 Yes 8,000,000 Note 1 405,000 Yes 100,000 Yes 200,000 Yes 405,000 Yes 500,000 Yes 3,220,000 Yes S 21,164,673 2,658,217 Yes 100,000 Yes 84.000 Yes 1,534,294 Yes 309,821 Yes 3,391,168 Yes 7,500 Yes 50.000 Yes 150,000 Yes 2,274,909 Yes $ 2,482,409 Fund Total $ 215,000 Yes 208,466 Yes 208,5W Yes 215,000 Yes 215,000 Yes CITY OF PALM DESERT PROPOSED FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SUMMARY FUNDING Budget Mufti -Year PROPOSED PROJECT LIST BY FUND SOURCES Year Funding Budgeted Funded RECYCLING FUND 'Recycling Program Recycling Fund 236 1 100,o00 Yes *Household Hazardous Waste Recycling Fund 236 1 100,000 Yes 'Recycling program Recycling Fund 236 Carryover of Budget 73,075 Yes Fund Total $ 273,075 CAPITAL PROJECT RESERVE FUND •Portola Ave ® Whitewater Bridge Year 2010 Fund 400 1 4.000,000 Carryover of Budget 66.092 4.066,092 Note 1 • Major street landscaping Year 2010 Fund 400 1 1,450.000 Yes • Major street sidewalk program Year 2010 Fund 400 1 770,000 Yes • Fred Waring Drive Widening - Califomia to Washington Street Year 2010 Fund 400 1 2,010,000 Carryover of Budget 5,082,296 7,092.296 Yes *Calla De Los Campesinos Year 2010 Fund 400 1 125,000 Yes *City Hall Facilities Year 2010 Fund 400 1 325,000 Yes 'Bus Shelters Year 2010 Fund 400 1 100,0W Yes 'Community Gardens Year 2010 Fund 400 1 125,000 Yes *Energy Program Year 2010 Fund 400 1 225,000 Yes 'Council Chamber Sound System Year 2010 Fund 400 1 25,000 Yes • Facade Program Year 2010 Fund 400 1 500,000 Yes *Washington Street Medians Study Year 2010 Fund 400 Carryover of Budget 40,000 Yes *Shadow Mountain Drive/Hwy 74 Traffic Signal Year 2010 Fund 400 Carryover of Budget 225,000 Yes *Bus Stop Relocation Year 2010 Fund 4W Carryover of Budget 40,300 Yes *Redesign & Renovate LLBD Year 2010 Fund 400 Carryover of Budget 333,866 Yes 'Fugitive Dust Control Measures Year 2010 Fund 400 Carryover of Budget 338,370 Yes 'Monterey Ave - Hovley W. to Country Club Dr. Year 2010 Fund 400 Carryover of Budget 45,000 Yes 'Fred Waring at San Pasquel Year 2010 Fund 400 Carryover of Budget 92,155 Yes 'Sewer Laterals installations Year 2010 Fund 400 Carryover of Budget 23.723 Yes *Civic Center Well Site Year 2010 Fund 400 Carryover of Budget 944,026 Yes *Visitor Center Equlpment/Fumiture Year 2010 Fund 400 Carryover of Budget 259,07e Yes •Portola Ave ® Whitewater Bridge Year 2010 Fund 400 2 4.000.000 Yes • Major street sidewalk Year 2010 Fund 400 2 250,000 Yes • Major street landscaping Year 2010 Fund 400 2 250,000 Yes • Facada Program Year 2010 Fund 400 2 500,000 Yes • Major street sidewalk program Year 2010 Fund 400 3 250,000 Yes • Major street landscaping Year 2010 Fund 400 3 250,000 Yes • Facade Program Year 2010 Fund 400 3 500,000 Yes • Major street sidewalk program Year 2010 Fund 400 4 250,000 Yes • Major street landscaping Year 2010 Fund 400 4 250.000 Yes • Facada Program Year 2010 Fund 400 4 500,000 Yes • Major street sidewalk program Year 2010 Fund 400 5 250,000 Yes • Major street landscaping Year 2010 Fund 400 5 250,000 Yes • Facada Program Year 2010 Fund 400 5 5W,000 Yes Total Fund $ 25,144,904 DRAINAGE FUND • Nuisance water inlet/drywell program Drainage Fund 420 1 300,000 Yes *Monterey Avenue - Fred Waring to Whitewater Channel Drainage Fund 420 3 2,137.052 Yes Total Fund $ 2,437,052 CITY OF PALM DESERT PROPOSED FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SUMMARY FUNDING Budget Muld-Year PROPOSED PROJECT LIST BY FUND SOURCES year Funding Budgeted Funded CP - PARK & RECREATION FUND 'CC Bonce Ball/Crts/Picnic Parts Fund 430 Carryover of Budget 77.000 Yes 'CC Handball Courts Park Fund 430 Carryover of Budget 51.000 Yes 'Hiking Trail Park Fund 430 Carryover of Budget 246,038 Yes 'Teen Center Park Fund 430 Carryover of Budget 895,000 Yes 'CC Restrooms Park Fund 430 Carryover of Budget 125,000 Yes 'Amphitheater Park Fund 430 Carryover of Budget 64,574 Yes 'Legends Field Colums Park Fund 430 2 7,500 Yes 'City Park Improvements Park Fund 430 2 50.000 Yes 'Legends Field Colums Park Fund 430 3 7,500 Yes 'City Park Improvements Park Fund 430 3 50,000 Yes 'Legends Field Colums Park Fund 430 4 7,500 Yes 'City Park Improvements Park Fund 430 4 50,000 Yes 'Legends Field Colums Park Fund 430 5 7,500 Yes 'City Park Improvements Park Fund 430 5 50,000 Yes Total Fund $ 1,688,612 ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND *Fat Happy AIPP Fund 436 1 32,000 Yes 'Freedom Park AIPP Fund 436 1 120.000 Yes 'AIPP Projects AIPP Fund 436 Carryover of Budget 343,000 Yes Total Fund $ 495,000 CP - SIGNALIZATION FUND 'Traffic Signal Coordination Carryover of Budget 188,152 Yes Total Fund $ 188,152 TRUST FUND 'Homme/Adams Park Trust Fund 880 Carryover of Budget 324,553 Yes Total Fund i 324,553 CAPITAL - RDA PROJECT AREA #1 FUND 'Portola Ave & Whitewater Bridge RDA PJ#1 Fund 850 1 4.000,000 Yes 'Neighborhood Undergrounding RDA PJ#1 Fund 850 1 2,000,000 Yes 'Living Desert Parking Lot RDA PJ#1 Fund 850 1 250,000 Yes 'El Paseo Courtesy Carts RDA PJ#1 Fund 850 1 125,000 Yes 'San Marino Parking Lot Improvements RDA PJ#1 Fund 850 Carryover of Budget 8,000 Yes 'Entrada El Paseo-12 Acre RDA PJ#1 Fund 850 Carryover of Budget 2,071,282 Yes 'Fred Waring Street Improvement RDA PJ#1 Fund 850 Carryover of Budget 782,993 Yes 'Palms to Pines East Glasser RDA PJ#1 Fund 850 Carryover of Budget 1,425.000 Yes 'Palms to Pines - Central RDA PJ#1 Fund 850 Carryover of Budget 800,000 Yes 'Perimeter Landscaping RDA PJ#1 Fund 850 Carryover of Budget 89,364 Yes 'Catalina Rec Facility RDA PJ#1 Fund 850 Carryover of Budget 100,000 Yes 'COD Pool RDA PJ#1 Fund 850 Carryover of Budget 461,062 Yes 'Neighborhood Undergrounding RDA PJ#1 Fund 850 2 2.000,000 Yes 'Living Desert Parking Lot RDA PJ#1 Fund 850 2 250,000 Yes 'EI Paseo Courtesy Carts RDA PJ#1 Fund 850 2 125,000 Yes 'Neighborhood Undergrounding RDA PJ#1 Fund 850 3 2,000,000 Yes "Living Desert Parking Lot RDA PJ#1 Fund 850 3 250,000 Yes 'EI Paseo Courtesy Carts RDA PJ#1 Fund 850 3 125,000 Yes 'Neighborhood Undergrounding RDA PJ#1 Fund 850 4 2.000,000 Yes 'EI Paseo Courtesy Carts RDA PJ#1 Fund 850 4 125,000 Yes 'EI Paseo Courtesy Carts RDA PJ#1 Fund 850 5 125,000 Yes Total Fund $ 19,112,701 PROPOSED PROJECT LIST BY FUND CAPITAL - RDA PROJECT AREA 02 FUND 'Desert Willow Pad Stabilization 'DW Parking - For Condition of Approval/Lakes 'Perimeter Landscaping 'CVWD Well Site Development -Desert Willow 'Desert Willow Pad Stabilization ' New Fire Station 'Desert Willow Pad Stabilization *Desert Willow Pad Stabilization 'Desert Willow Pad Stabilization CAPITAL - RDA PROJECT AREA 93 FUND *Perimeter Landscaping *Corp Yard CAPITAL - RDA PROJECT AREA #4 FUND CITY OF PALM DESERT PROPOSED FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SUMMARY FUNDING Budget Multi -Year SOURCES Year Funding Budgeted Funded RDA PJ#2 Fund 851 1 75,000 Carryover of Budget 25,000 100,000 Yes RDA PJ#2 Fund 851 Carryover of Budget 686,486 Yes RDA PJ#2 Fund 851 Carryover of Budget 241,845 Yes RDA 1302 Fund 851 Carryover of Budget 1,324.750 Yes RDA PJ#2 Fund 851 2 75,000 Yes Yes RDA PJ#2 Fund 851 3 4,000,000 Yes RDA PJ#2 Fund 851 3 80,000 Yes RDA PJ#2 Fund 851 4 80,000 Yes RDA PJ#2 Fund 851 5 80,000 Yes Total Fund $ 6,sa8,081 RDA PJ#3 Fund 853 Carryover of Budget 12,429 Yes RDA PJ#3 Fund 853 Carryover of Budget 75,000 Yes Total Fund i 87,429 'Undergrounding Neighborhood RDA PJ#4 Fund 854 'Fred Waring Street Improvement RDA PJ#4 Fund 854 'Warner Trail Storm Drains RDA PJ#4 Fund 854 *Regional Park RDA 1304 Fund 854 HOUSING FUND 'Home Impr Prg Comp 1 to 6 •Acq/Rehab/Resale HIP 'Desert Rose Project *Property Acquisition *Multi -Family Improvement 'Rental Assistance *20 Acre Development *20 Acre Site Development 'Mortgage Assistance 'Home Buyer Assistance 'New Acquisition Rehabilitation *New Acquisition Rehabilitation *Laguna Palms Rehabilitation 'Self Help Housing *Palm Village Apartments *Country Club Estates 'Property Acquisition *Home Impr Prg Comp 1 to 6 •Acq/Rehab/Resale-HIP 'Desert Rose Project *Rental Assistance •20 Acre Development 'Mortgage Assistance *Home Buyer Assistance 'Self Help Housing 'Multi -Family Acquisition/Rehab (Country Club Estates) Carryover of Budget 2,500,000 Yes Carryover of Budget 2,000,000 Yes Carryover of Budget 250.000 Yes Carryover of Budget 8,021,228 Yes Total Fund S 12,771,228 Housing Fund 870 1 300,000 Yes Housing Fund 870 1 500,000 Yes Housing Fund $70 1 250,000 Yes Housing Fund 870 1 1.000,000 Yes Housing Fund 870 1 100,000 Yes Housing Fund 870 1 110,000 Yes Housing Fund 870 1 9,000,000 Carryover of Budget 3,388,000 12.386,000 Yes Housing Fund 870 1 100,000 Yes Housing Fund 870 1 50,000 Yes Housing Fund 870 1 300,000 Yes Housing Fund $70 1 1,500.000 Yes Housing Fund 870 1 2,500,000 Yes Housing Fund 870 1 2,000,000 Yes Housing Fund 870 1 100,000 Yes Housing Fund 870 Carryover of Budget 6,579,727 Yes Housing Fund 870 Carryover of Budget 3,070,000 Yes Housing Fund 870 Carryover of Budget 11.312,569 Yes Housing Fund 870 2 300.000 Yes Housing Fund 870 2 275,000 Yes Housing Fund 870 2 50,000 Yes Housing Fund 870 2 165,000 Yes Housing Fund 870 2 10,000,000 Yes Housing Fund 870 2 101,D00 Yes Housing Fund 870 2 325,000 Yes Housing Fund 870 2 800,000 Yes Housing Fund 870 2 250,000 Yes PROPOSED PROJECT LIST BY FUND HOUSING FUND (Continues) *Laguna Palms Rehabilitation *New Construction Subsidies *Home Impr Prg Comp 1 to 6 'Acg/Rehab/Resale-H IP 'Desert Rose Project 'Property Acquisition 'Multi -Family Improvement *Rental Assistance '20 Acre Development '20 Acre Site Development 'Mortgage Assistance *Home Buyer Assistance 'Self Help Housing 'New Construction Subsidies *Home Impr Prg Comp 1 to 6 'Acq/Rehab/Resale-HIP 'Desert Rose Project 'Property Acquisition •Multi -Family Improvement *Rental Assistance '20 Acre Site Development 'Mortgage Assistance 'Home Buyer Assistance *New Construction Subsidies 'Home Impr Prg Comp 1 to 6 'Acq/Re hab/Resa le-H I P 'Desert Rose Project 'Property Acquisition 'Multi -Family Improvement *Rental Assistance '20 Acre Site Development 'Mortgage Assistance *Home Buyer Assistance 'PDHA Property Subsidies 'New Construction Subsidies PALM DESERT HOUSING AUTHORITY FUND *One Quail Place Carports/Signage CITY OF PALM DESERT PROPOSED FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SUMMARY FUNDING Budget Muhl -Year SOURCES Year Funding Housing Fund 870 2 Housing Fund 870 2 Housing Fund 870 3 Housing Fund 870 3 Housing Fund 870 3 Housing Fund 870 3 Housing Fund 870 3 Housing Fund 870 3 Housing Fund 870 3 Housing Fund 870 3 Housing Fund 870 3 Housing Fund 870 3 Housing Fund 870 3 Housing Fund 870 3 Housing Fund 870 4 Housing Fund 870 4 Housing Fund 870 4 Housing Fund 870 4 Housing Fund 870 4 Housing Fund 870 4 Housing Fund 870 4 Housing Fund 870 4 Housing Fund 870 4 Housing Fund 870 4 Housing Fund 870 5 Housing Fund 870 5 Housing Fund 870 5 Housing Fund 870 5 Housing Fund 870 5 Housing Fund 870 5 Housing Fund 870 5 Housing Fund 870 5 Housing Fund 870 5 Housing Fund 870 5 Housing Fund 870 5 Housing Auftrhy Fund 871 1 Total Fund Total Fund TOTAL FIVE YEAR PROPOSED BUDGET Note 1: Project would be UNFUNDED if RDA and CVAG don't participate in funding the project. Budgeted Funded 250,000 24,000 300,000 275,000 95,000 3,000,000 25,000 220,000 6,000.000 800,000 103,020 300.000 500,000 32,000 300,000 280,500 110.000 2,000,000 200.000 275,000 700,000 155,080 300,000 40.000 300.000 286,110 125,000 1,000,000 25,000 330,000 600,000 50.000 300,000 1,894,720 48,000 $ 75,667,726 500,000 $ 500,000 $178,145,061 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes N i 3 4' U �6 I r m N u > a Y'c ys, r 9 y BOG cr w e p. 6 a 0 0 c�'' Is'}s g o a9y OQ$$ a OUa $�N� N u U t14 3, U a � � u dp 4 N T A N it B A G U Ica � at rs W 0co CITY OF PALM DESERT RELATIVE TO ANNUAL REPORT OF DEVELOPER IMPACT FEE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert City Council to consider filing a report and resolution on developer impact fees as of June 30, 2005. SAID PUBLIC HEARING will be held on Thursda '�,'iA p.m. in the Council Chamber of the Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert. All citizens are invited to present oral or written comments relative to the proposed impact fee report. Any citizen unable to attend may submit written comments to the City Clerk prior to the Public Hearing. Copies of the report may be reviewed at the Civic Center, Monday through Friday between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Date: October 12, 2005 ELLE D. KLASSEN, CITY CLERK CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA Legal Notice - Public Hearing 11/10/05 Developer Impact Fee Page 1 of 1 Martinez, Gloria From: Moeller, Charlene [CMOELLER@palmspri.gannett.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 3:25 PM To: Martinez, Gloria Subject: RE: Legal Notice - Public Hearing 11/10/05 Developer Impact Fee Received ad and will publish on dates requested. O Charlene Woel%r Classified Public Notices Dept. Desert Sun lq al, @thedesertsun.com eT,, Desert (Post Wee dp)yl�als@thedesertsun.com (760) 778-4578, Fax (760) 778-4731 My hours are Mon -Fri 8:00-5:00 pm. -----Original Message ----- From: gmartinez@ci.palm-desert.ca.us [mailto:gmartinez@ci.palm-desert.ca.us] Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 3:13 PM To: charlene.moeller@desertsun.com Cc: pgibson@ci.palm-desert.ca.us Subject: Legal Notice - Public Hearing 11/10/05 Developer Impact Fee PLEASE PUBLISH THE FOLLOWING: PUBLIC HEARING Public Hearing Relative to Annual Report of Developer Impact Fee TWO TIMES IN THE DESERT SUN Thursday, October 27, 2005 and Thursday, November 3, 2005 <<PH 111005 - Developer Impact Fee.doc>> Thank you, Charlenellll 91f. gfona 91fartinez 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, California 92260 (760) 346-061 1 Ext. 354 gmariinez@ci.palm-desert.co. us 10/13/2005