Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutHPC 06-01 Palm Desert Lodge 4/27/2006CITY OF PALM DESERT BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT REQUEST: Consideration of recommendation by the Historic Preservation Committee relative to identifying a potential historic site classification, Palm Desert Lodge, 74527 Highway 111, Palm Desert, California. SUBMITTED BY: Amir Hamidzadeh, Director of Building and Safety APPELLANT: Palm Desert Lodge, LLC, Michael Noto, George Demos, as trustee of the Demos Trust and Daniel Brush as trustee of the Peter Demos Living Trust CASE NOS: HPC 06-01 DATE: April 27, 2006 CONTENTS: 1. Historic Preservation Committee, February 27, 2006 meeting minutes 2. Ordinance No. 401 3. Exhibit I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Palm Desert Lodge project was originally brought to the attention of the Historic Preservation Committee after the City of Palm Desert received a call from a developer who was interested in the demolition of the existing Palm Desert Lodge building and replacing it with a Walgreen's Drug Store. Upon receiving this notice, the information was referred to the Historic Preservation Committee for further review and their recommendation to the City Council. The Historic Preservation Committee has conducted hours of research and has held two public meetings and one public hearing in regards to this property in order to make a sound recommendation to City Council and avoid making a decision that would negatively impact the community. It is Staff's recommendation to approve Case No. HPC 06-01 of the Historic Preservation Committee's recommendation of Class 5 designation for the Palm Desert Lodge building that states: "Sites qualified for City designation only. An archive may be maintained. No stay of demolition or landmark eligibility. Usage may be restricted by City Council. Eligible for review at any regular scheduled meeting of the board." Staff Report Consideration of Recommendation — Palm Desert Lodge Page 2 of 3 April 27, 2006 II. SITE DESCRIPTION: The Palm Desert Lodge is located at 74-527 Highway 111 on the southeast corner of Highway 111 and Deep Canyon Road. To the north of this property, across Highway 111, is an Albertson's. On the south, this project backs up to a residential neighborhood. Immediately to the east, there is vacant commercial zoned property also owned by Mr. Noto, and to the west across from Deep Canyon Road is a gas station and a shopping center. The parking for this project is located on the north and northwest part of the property. The Palm Desert Lodge is comprised of two separate types of buildings. The original building is a single story wood framed building in the back of the property containing rooms with porches facing the pool area. The second building is a two-story masonry structure facing Highway 111 that was added at a later date. According to the documents gathered, the Palm Desert Lodge has been in operation in that location for over 40 years. III. ANALYSIS: CHARACTERISTICS: The City of Palm Desert's Ordinance No. 401 was adopted on November 1984 with the purpose of preserving areas of community and specific buildings reflecting important historic value. Per section 29.05.020 of this ordinance, the definition of a historic site reads, "An historic site is any real property such as a building, structure, including but not limited to archways, an archeological excavation or object that is unique or significant because of its location, design, setting, materials, workmanship or aesthetic effect and..." it continues with seven (7) categories. The seven categories include such buildings that have association with a historic event; famous person; particular period; distinctive characteristics; or a well-known designer, artist, or architect. When deciding on the recommendation of the class designation for this property, the Historic Preservation Committee unanimously agreed that this building meets the definition of the "Historic Site" as it appears in the ordinance and that this site reflects a particular period in local history. Even though the date of construction is uncertain, but from the research conducted, it appears that the Palm Desert Lodge single story building was originally built in mid 1950s. With porches facing the central pool and play area surrounded by a large open green space and trees are descriptive of an older, yet friendly and inviting lodge environment. In the late Staff Report Consideration of Recommendation — Palm Desert Lodge Page 3 of 4 April 27, 2006 1960s the second building was added to this project to provide more accommodations and act as a buffer to Highway 111. Palm Desert Lodge represents a sense of place and time that is much more approachable and comfortable than can be found in many exotic upscale hotels in the community in recent years. This would be that of lodging as a tourist destination in the newly formed area of Palm Desert. This site also represents a distinctive type of construction of the vernacular roadside architecture of the motor lodge. Palm Desert Lodge is one of the last buildings of its type built on Highway 111. CLASSIFICATION: After numerous hours of research, gathering information and several public meetings, on February 27, 2006, Historic Preservation Committee in a public hearing unanimously voted 7-0 in favor of Palm Desert Lodge being recommended to City Council to be recognized under the Class 5 designation. Classifications 1 through 7: • Class 1 and 2 are for sites that are either not qualified for any designation or they are to be reviewed in future. In a discussion with the property owner, and his representatives on January 30, 2006, they indicated that keeping or upgrading of the property is not making any economical sense for the owner because of its extensive and expensive cost (estimated around $600,000 with $150,000 for the sewer hook up alone). However, they mentioned that they have people interested that would lease or purchase it as vacant land. This classification is not appropriate for this site as all seven of the Historic Preservation Committee members unanimously agreed that this site has unique features and meets the historic site definition. On the other hand if we class this project as Class 1 or 2, it would mean that, the owner is subject to wait for further review, which would result on continued financial burden or restriction on a property owner. • Class 3 and 4 are for sites that are located within an officially designated historic district. This property does not fall in these classifications as it does not fall in any designated historic district. • Class 5 is for sites qualified for City designation only. An archive may be maintained. No stay of demolition or landmark eligibility. Usage may be restricted by City Council and is eligible for review at any regular scheduled meeting of the Committee. This classification is best suited for the subject property. It gives the building a City designation, and we can gather all the necessary information, documents, and photographs. We can keep, archive, and maintain this information at the City of Palm Desert for future reference. Staff Report Consideration of Recommendation — Palm Desert Lodge Page 4 of 4 April 27, 2006 Additionally, the property owner will be able to demolish the building and lease or sell his property as a vacant land as so desired. • Class 6 and 7 are for sites that qualify for city, county, state, and federal level designation and are limited in use, modifications, and demolition. They also need to meet the State and Federal guidelines one of which is for the structure to be of at least 50 years of age. It also needs to meet the historic site definition as in a more significant way. The front building facing Highway 111 does not meet the 50 years criteria and the age for the older original single story buildings is unknown, hence it does not qualify this building for this classification. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Per the current Ordinance 401, Section 29.05.125, staff recommends the approval of Case No. HPC 06-01 of the Historic Preservation Committee's recommendation of Class 5 designation for the Palm Desert Lodge building subject to an archive and maintenance of all appropriate information and photographic documentations. Prepared by: Amamidzfiffeh Director of Building and Safety Approval: Carlos Ortega ity Manager Revie and Co ur: Homer Cr y ACM for D lopment Services G:\BldgSfty\Amir HamidzadeMStaff Reports\Staff Report.PD Lodge.recomn=C.doc Chapter 29.05 HISTORIC PRESERVATION Pagel of E Palm Desert Municipal Code ^ Up << Previous » Next * Main Title 29 HISTORIC PRESERVATION - Collapse ? Search # Print Chapter 29.05 HISTORIC PRESERVATION 29.05.010 Purpose and_authority. This chapter is adopted pursuant to the authority of Government Code Section 37361 for the purpose of preserving areas and specific buildings and areas of the city which reflect elements of its cultural, social, economic, political, architectural and archaeological history. This chapter is intended to stabilize and improve buildings, structures or areas which are considered to be of historical, architectural or ecological value, to foster civic beauty, to strengthen the local economy and to promote the use of specific buildings for the education and welfare of the citizens. (Ord. 401 § 1 (part), 1984) 29.05.020 Definitions. A. "Historic district" means any area of the city of Palm Desert containing a number of structures, natural features or sites having historic, architectural, archaeological, cultural or aesthetic significance and designated as an historic district under the provisions of this chapter. B. Historic Site. An "historic site" is any real property such as: a building; a structure, including but not limited to archways; an archaeological excavation or object that is unique or significant because of its location, design, setting, materials, workmanship or aesthetic effect; and: 1. That is associated with events that have made a meaningful contribution to the nation, state or community; or 2. That is associated with lives of persons who made a meaningful contribution to the national, state or local history; or 3. That reflects or exemplifies a particular period of the national, state or local history; or 4. That embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period or method of construction; or 5. That presents the work of a master builder, designer, artist, or architect whose individual genius influenced his age; or that possesses high artistic value; or 6. That represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or 7. That has yielded or may be likely to yield information important to national, state or local history or prehistory. (Ord. 401 § 1 (part), 1984) ARTICLE I. HISTORIC SITE PRESERVATION BOARD. 29.05.030 Creation of historic site preservation board. There is created by the city of Palm Desert, the Palm Desert historic site preservation board, consisting of seven members who shall be appointed by the Palm Desert city council. Nominations shall be submitted to the council from the Palm Desert historical society's board of directors but are not required to accept such nominations. (Ord. 401 § 1 (part), 1984) 29.05.040 Qualification of members. To be eligible for appointment to the Palm Desert historic site preservation board, an individual must have http://gcode.us/codes/palmdesert/view.php?topic=29-29 05&showAll=1 EXHIBIT 2 2/17/2006 Chapter 29.05 HISTORIC PRESERVATION Page 2 of 8 demonstrated knowledge and interest in the cultural, social, economic, political, architectural or archaeological history of the area, either through experience, training, education or occupation. (Ord. 401 § 1 (part), 1984) 29.05.050 Term of office. The term of office for each member is four years. The members first appointed shall qualify themselves by lot so that two members serve two years, two members serve three years, and three members serve four years. Each member serves until his successor is appointed and qualifies. (Ord. 401 § 1 (part), 1984) 29.05.060 Removal or vacancy. A member may be removed by a majority vote of the city council. A vacancy is filled in the same manner as the original appointment. A person appointed to fill a vacancy serves for the remainder of the unexpired term. (Ord. 401 § 1 (part), 1984) 29.05.070 Vacancy caused byabsence from meetings; _._ . If a member is absent from three successive regular board meetings the office becomes vacant automatically. The chairman of the board shall immediately notify the city council of the vacancy. (Ord. 401 § 1 (part), 1984) 29.05.080 Time and place of regular meetings -.,,- A regular meeting time shall be fixed; provided, however, that meetings shall not be less than once every three months. (Ord. 401 § 1 (part), 1984) 29.05.090 Appointment of officers. A chairman and a vice-chairman shall be selected by the members. The chairman and vice-chairman serve a term of one year or until a successor is selected. (Ord. 401 § 1 (part), 1984) 29.05,100 Adoption „of rules --quorum. The board shall adopt rules for the transaction of its business with four members constituting a quorum for the transaction of business. (Ord. 401 § 1 (part), 1984) 29.05.110 Board records. The board shall keep a public record of its resolutions, transactions, findings and determinations. (Ord. 401 § 1 (part), 1984) 29.05.120 Duties of officers. A. Chairman: Shall preside over meetings of the board; shall appoint necessary committees and shall perform the duties necessary or incidental to his office. B. Vice-chairman: Sits as chairman in the absence of the chairman. C. Secretary: Shall keep minutes of each meeting and shall record the official actions taken and shall perform such other duties as the board assigns. http://gcode.us/codes/pahndesert/view.php?topic=29-29_05&showAll=1 ?./t 70nnr, Chapter 29.05 HISTORIC PRESERVATION Page 3 of 8 D. The Palm Desert director of building and safety and his staff shall serve as secretary and staff to the Palm Desert historical site preservation board. (Ord. 401 § 1 (part), 1984) ARTICLE II. PROCEDURE FOR DESIGNATION OF HISTORIC SITES OR HISTORIC DISTRICTS. 29.05.125 Created by council. The city council may designate one or more historic sites or districts by following the procedures specified in this chapter. Designations will be made by categorizing nominated sites and districts into one of the following classifications and such other categories as may be designated by resolution: Class 1 Site not qualified for designations. Not eligible for review for two years from date of initial review. Class 2 Site not qualified for designations. Not eligible for review for six months from date of initial review. Class 3 Site is located within an officially designated historic district and is not a contributing factor to the historic character of the district. No archive will be maintained. Eligible for review at any regularly scheduled meeting of the board. Class 4 Site is located within an officially designated historic district and is a contributing factor to the historic character of the district. An archive will be maintained. Usage may be limited by the city council. Eligible for review at any regularly scheduled meeting of the board. Class 5 Site qualified for city designation only. An archive may be maintained. No stay of demolition or landmark eligibility. Usage may be restricted by the city council. Eligible for review at any regularly scheduled meeting of the board. Class 6 Site qualified for designation at the federal, state, county and city level. An archive will be maintained. Site is eligible for a six month stay of demolition. Site is eligible for plaquing. Usage may be limited by the city council. Eligible for review at any regularly scheduled meeting of the board. Class 7 Site qualified for designation at the federal, state, county and city level. An archive will be maintained. Site may not be modified nor object removed without the approval of the city council. Site will be plaqued. Usage may be limited by the city council. Eligible for review at any regularly scheduled,meeting of the board. (Ord. 401 § 1 (part), 1984) 29.05.130 Initiation of proceedings —National Register. A. The Palm Desert historic site preservation board may initiate proceedings for designation of an historic site or district or the recommendation of a property for nomination to the National Register by motion, and shall then hold at least one public hearing prior to making a recommendation to the city council. B. The city council may initiate proceedings for designation of an historic site or district or the recommendation of a property for nomination to the National Register by motion, and shall then refer the matter to the historic site preservation board for public hearing and recommendation. C. Upon final action by the city council recommending a property for nomination to the National Register, the recommendation will be forwarded by the city clerk to the appropriate Riverside County agency for historical preservation. The transmittal shall request that the county join in the recommendation and forward it to the appropriate state of California agency for historical preservation with a request that the state join in the recommendation and forward it to the Department of the Interior in Washington, D.C., for designation. (Ord. 401 § 1 (part), 1984) 29.05.135 Investigation and study. http://gcode.us/codes/palmdesert/view.php?topic=29-29_05&showAll=1 2/17/2006 Chapter 29.05 HISTORIC PRESERVATION Page 4 of 8 The historic site preservation board shall conduct or cause to be conducted such preliminary surveys, studies or investigations as it deems necessary to adequately inform the historic site preservation board and city council prior to the public hearing, and shall make available to any interested person the results of any such survey, study or investigation. (Ord. 401 § 1 (part), 1984) 29.05.140 Notice of public hearing. A. Mailed notice of the public hearing shall be provided at least ten days prior to the hearing to the owners of all property lying within the area proposed to be designated as an historic site or district and within three hundred feet of the outer boundaries of the area proposed to be designated as an historic site or district, and in addition to such mailed notice, notice of such hearing shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the city at least ten days prior to such hearing. Notice shall also be given by placing a display advertisement in a newspaper of general circulation in the city, and by posting such notice in at least three conspicuous places within the proposed boundaries of such site. B. Notice May Be Combined. Notice of public hearing before the city council may be combined with the notice of public hearing before the historic site preservation board, provided that the date set for public hearing before the city council shall be not more than sixty days later than the date set for public hearing by the historic site preservation board. For good cause, the public hearing before the city council may be continued from time to time, without further published notice, by announcing that fact at the time and place set for the public hearing before the city council. (Ord. 401 § 1 (part), 1984) 29.05.145 Findings and recommendation to the city council. Following such public hearing, the Palm Desert historic site preservation board shall make findings upon which it shall base its recommendation to the city council con ceming the designation of such proposed historic site or district. Within thirty days after the conclusion of the public hearing, the historic site preservation board shall file its recommendation with the city council, together with a report of findings, hearings, and other supporting data. (Ord. 401 § 1 (part), 1984) 29.05.150 Public hearing by city council. The city council shall hold a public hearing upon notice given in the same manner and to the same persons as required for the public hearing before the historic site preservation board, which notices may be combined as stated elsewhere in this chapter. (Ord. 401 § 1 (part), 1984) 29.05.155 Conduct of hearing. At the public hearing the city council shall receive all evidence and hear all interested persons, and the matter shall then be submitted to the city council for decision. (Ord. 401 § 1 (part), 1984) 29.05.160 Findings and decisions —Resolution. If the city council shall find that the purposes of this chapter are furthered by designation of property as an historic site or district, such findings shall be stated in a resolution designating such property within such historic site or district. From and after the adoption of such resolution, all property within such historic site or district shall be subject to the rules and regulations governing the demolition, preservation, rehabilitation or alteration of historic sites. (Ord. 401 § 1 (part), 1984) http://gcode.us/codes/palmdesert/view.php?topic=29-29 05&showAll=1 2/17/2006 Chapter 29.05 HISTORIC PRESERVATION Page 5 of 8 29.05.165 Markers for designated historic sites. A. Upon designation of an historic site by the city council, the historic site preservation board may determine which historic sites shall be marked with uniform and distinctive markers. The markers shall be of a design approved by the city council. B. As a courtesy, notice may be given to the Riverside County Historical Commission and the California Department of Parks and Recreation (Office of Historic Preservation) regarding the proposed location of markers prior to installation to permit recommendations by those agencies. (Ord. 401 § 1 (part), 1984) ARTICLE III. RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR HISTORIC SITES AND HISTORIC DISTRICTS 29.05.170 Stay of demolition. At any time after the initiation of proceedings for designation of an historic site or district, the historic site preservation board may, upon its own motion or upon the application of any interested person, issue an order staying any proposed or threatened demolition or alteration of the exterior of any structure within or upon such proposed site. Such stay order shall be effective for no longer than one hundred twenty days, and is intended to afford time for necessary studies, hearings and determination whether such site should be designated as an historic site. Such stay order may be extended once for a period not to exceed sixty days. (Ord. 401 § 1 (part), 1984) 29.05.175 Effect of stay order —Exceptions. Upon the issuance of a stay order, no permit shall be given for the demolition or exterior alteration of any structure or the interior arrangement of a public building described in such stay order, and any such permit previously issued shall forthwith be revoked; provided, however, that a stay order shall not prevent the performance of any repairs, demolition or removal necessary for the protection of public health, or safety, and ordered by the director of building and safety to be performed by the owner or occupier of such structure. (Ord. 401 § 1 (part), 1984) 29.05.180 Approval,reguired._-__- No person may undertake any of the following within or upon an historic site or district without a certificate of approval from the historic site preservation board: A. Construction of a new structure; B. The moving, demolition or alteration of an existing structure in any manner which affects the exterior appearance of the structure; C. A change in land use which affects the exterior appearance of a structure or the interior arrangement of public buildings; D. The erection, remodeling or replacing of a sign which affects the exterior appearance of a structure. (Ord. 401 § 1 (part), 1984) 29.05.185 Application for permit to construct or alter structures. A person who desires to construct (including new construction), alter, move or demolish a structure within or upon an historic site or district shall file an application upon a form prescribed by the city. The application shall include all necessary information required by the rules of the board. When the application is filed, it shall be referred to the board for review. (Ord. 401 § 1 (part), 1984) http://qcode.us/codes/palmdesert/view.php?topic=29-29_05&showAll=1 2/17/2006 Chapter 29.05 HISTORIC PRESERVATION Page 6 of 8 29.05.190 Factors to be considered upon application. In reviewing and acting upon each application the board shall consider: A. The historic value and significance, or the architectural value and significance or both, of the structure and its relation to the historic value of the surrounding area; B. The relationship of the exterior architectural features of the structure to the rest of the structure itself and to the surrounding area; C. The general compatibility of exterior design, arrangement, texture and material which is proposed by the applicant; D. Archaeological or ecological significance of the area. (Ord. 401 § 1 (part), 1984) 29.05.195 Board action restricted to exterior features, --Exception. The board shall consider and pass upon only the exterior features of a structure and may not consider the interior arrangement of the structure, except in the case of public buildings. The board may not disapprove applications except in regard to the considerations set forth herein. It is also the purpose and intent of this chapter that the board be strict in its judgment of plans for structures considered to have historic or architectural value according to its judgment after detailed studies of the historic and architectural history of the city. It is also the purpose of this chapter and the intent of the city council that the board be lenient in its judgment of plans for structures which have little or no historic value or plans for new construction except for plans which seriously impair the historic or architectural value of surrounding structures or the archaeological or ecological value of surrounding area. In adopting this chapter the city council does not intend to limit new construction, alteration or repairs to any particular period or architectural style. (Ord. 401 § 1 (part), 1984) 29.05.200 Procedure _upon application. A. Upon the filing of an application, the board secretary shall set the matter for hearing and shall give notice in accordance with the rules of the board. The public hearing shall be held and a decision made by the board within forty- five days from the date of application. If the board fails to act within forty-five days, the application is considered approved unless the applicant and the board agree to an extension of time. B. At the conclusion of the hearing, the board shall make its decision and shall file a certificate of approval or certificate of rejection with the building official of the city. No person may do any work upon a structure which is a subject of an application until the board has filed its certificate of approval. If the board files a certificate of rejection, the building official may not issue a building permit for such work. (Ord. 401 § 1 (part), 1985) 29.05.210 Special considerations, A. If an application affects the exterior appearance of a structure or proposes to remove or demolish a structure in a manner which the board considers to be detrimental to Palm Desert, the board shall attempt, in cooperation with the owner, to arrive at an economically feasible plan for the preservation of the structure. B. If the board is satisfied that the proposed construction or alteration will not materially impair the historic or architectural value of the structure, it shall approve the application. C. If the board finds that the retention of the structure constitutes a hazard to public safety and the hazard cannot be eliminated by economic means available to the owner, the board may approve the application. http://gcode.us/codes/palmdesert/view.php?topic=29-29 05&showAll=1 2/17/2006 Chapter 29.05 HISTORIC PRESERVATION Page 7 of 8 D. If the board considers the structure valuable for the period of architecture it represents and important to the neighborhood in which it exists, the board may nevertheless approve the application if any of the following circumstances exist: 1. The structure is a deterrent to a major improvement program which substantially benefits the city; 2. Retention of the structure causes an undue hard ship to the owner; or 3. Retention of the structure is not in the interest of the majority of the inhabitants of the city. E. The board may approve the moving of a structure of historical architectural value as an alternative to demolition. (Ord. 401 § 1 (part), 1984) 29.05.215 Limit on applications. No application for the same or similar work may be filed within one year after the board has rejected it. (Ord. 401 § 1 (part), 1984) 29.05.220 Exceptions. The regulations contained in this chapter for approval by the historic site preservation board do not apply to routine maintenance or repair to restore a structure as near as possible to its original condition after decay, injury, dilapidation or partial destruction of a structure within an historic district or upon an historic site, provided such maintenance or repair does not exceed three thousand dollars in value. (Ord. 401 § 1 (part), 1984) 29.05.225 Preexisting building permits. This chapter does not apply to construction, alteration, moving or demolition of a structure started under a building permit issued before the effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter. (Ord. 401 § 1 (part), 1984) 29.05.230_AMp 1. A. A person aggrieved by a board action may appeal the decision to the city council by filing a notice of appeal within ten days of the date upon which such decision is made. B. Such notice of appeal shall be in writing, filed with the secretary and in addition to the name and address of the appellant, shall contain the following: 1. A statement of the specific action appealed from; 2. A listing of the specific grounds of the appeal; 3. A statement of the facts supporting the grounds of appeal; 4. A specification of the relief or the action sought from the city council; and 5. A declaration under penalty of perjury that all factual statements in the notice of appeal are true to the knowledge of the signer except as to matters which he has stated expressly are only upon his information and belief and that as to those matters he believes them to be true. C. The city council shall hear such appeal within forty days after the filing of notice of appeal. D. The city council shall render a decision within fifteen days after the hearing, which decision shall be deemed final. E. The appellant shall be notified in writing of the council's decision at the address shown on the notice of appeal. (Ord. 401 § 1 (part), 1984) http://gcode.us/codes/palmdesert/view.php?topic=29-29_05&showAll=1 2./170.00F Chapter 29.05 HISTORIC PRESERVATION Page 8 of 8 C.. 29.05.235 Penalty for violation. --_ Any person who violates a provision of this chapter is guilty of an infraction and shall be punished upon first conviction by a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars for such offense. Any person who violates a provision of this chapter within five years of a prior conviction on the same grounds under this chapter shall be guilty of a misde meanor and shall be punished by a fine not to exceed five hundred dollars, or by imprisonment in the city jail or in Riverside County Jail for a period of not more than six months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. (Ord. 401 § 1 (part), 1984) 29.05.240 injunctive relief. The board may seek relief from the appropriate court to restrain or enjoin any violation of this chapter and of the orders and decisions of the board, or to compel the reconstruction of any building, structure or object which is destroyed in violation of this chapter or the orders and decisions of the board. (Ord. 401 § 1 (part), 1984) 29.05.245 Compliance with other laws. The provisions of this chapter are separate from and additional to all other requirements of law, including but not limited to compliance with other ordinances and codes of the city, conditions of approval of land use permits and architectural review and approval. Neither a certificate of approval nor any other provision of this chapter shall be deemed to relieve the owner or applicant from full compliance with any such laws, ordinances, codes or conditions. (Ord. 401 § 1 (part), 1984) http://gcode.us/codes/palmdesert/view.php?topic=29-29_05&showAll=1 2/17/2006 CITY OF PALM DESERT HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE MINUTES FEBRUARY 27, 2006 Council Chambers I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Kent Routh called the meeting of the Historic Preservation Committee to order at 10:02 a.m. II. ROLL CALL Present: Absent: Bonnie Bowie Gale Broeker Jan Holmlund Kim Housken Bob Pitchford Kent Routh Jim West Vera Handley (alternate) Also Present: Amir Hamidzadeh, Director of Building and Safety Hal Rover, President Historical Society Mary Clark, Recording Secretary Ill. SWEARING IN OF NEW MEMBER — Rachelle Klassen, City Clerk, swore in Gale Broeker, a new member to the Historic Preservation Committee. IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Committee Member Jan Holmlund moved to accept the minutes of the January 30, 2006 meeting with the corrections noted on Pages 2, 4, and 6. Committee Member Bonnie Bowie seconded the motion and it was unanimously approved 7-0. V. CONTINUED ITEMS A. Palm Desert Lodge, Case No. HP 06-01 —Voting on recommendation to City Council for historic classification/designation. Chair Kent Routh indicated that a motion was needed to approve the Staff Report. Motion #1: Committee Member Jan Holmlund moved that the property located 74527 Highway 111, Palm Desert, California --Palm Desert Lodge be recognized under Paraaraph 29.05.020 Definitions as #7 of historic interest to the City. Ms. Holmlund quoted that definition "it has yielded or G:\BldgSfty\Mary Clark\Word data\Historic Preservation CommitteeWinutesWinutes 22706.doc HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE Minutes FEBRUARY 27, 2006 may be likely to yield information important to national, state or local history or prehistory." In addition, that it also fits under Paragraph 29.05.125 Created by Council. on Page 3 of the Historic Preservation Ordinance as Class 6. "Site qualified for designation at the federal, state, county and city level. An archive will be maintained. Site is eligible for a six month stay of demolition. Site is eligible for plaquing. Usage may be limited by the City Council. Eligible for review at any regularly scheduled meeting of the Board." Committee Member Bob Pitchford seconded the motion. Discussion: Committee Member Jan Holmlund said that she would like to explain the motion. She said that her first thought was to list it as a Class 5 as more was learned about the structure and about what was happening along Hwy. 111, which is very limited information. Ms. Holmlund indicated that she became concerned that the Committee did not have the kind of information that might create an irreversible decision since this is the only structure of its kind left on Hwy. 111, which offers a glimpse of history into the City that is not available elsewhere on Hwy. 111. Ms. Holmlund's concern is that the destruction and the results of destruction are irreversible and social policy should err on the side of refraining from such activity. Committee Member Jim West said that as a talking point on Palm Desert Lodge, 74527 Highway 111. "It is moved that the property located at 74527 Highway 111 does meet the requirements for historic site as defined in Section 29.05.020 in City Ordinance No. 401. Specifically this site reflects a particular period in local history. This would be that of lodging as a tourist destination in the newly formed area of Palm Desert. This site also represents a distinctive type of construction. This would be that of the vernacular roadside architecture of the motor motel. It is further moved that this site be designated as a Class 5 as defined by Section 29.05.125 in City Ordinance No. 401. In presenting this recommendation to City Council this Committee suggests that a complete professional photographic documentation be made of this property with both exterior and interior views represented. This should be added to measured site drawings and maintained in a City archive. It is also recommended that in the event that the owner should ever decide to cease the operation of this facility that every reasonable effort is made for adaptive reuse of this property and/or select features (such as the neon street sign, light fixtures)." Mr. West indicated that this is a slightly different proposal and understands that it is not on the floor because a motion has been submitted and seconded, but is entering it for discussion. Vote: Chair Kent Routh asked for a vote on the motion to designate as a Class 6. Motion #1 failed with 5 NO votes and 2 YES votes. Motion #2: Committee Member Jim West presented the following motion. "It is moved that the property located at 74527 Highway 111 does meet the requirements for historic site as defined in Section 29.05.020 in City Ordinance No. 401. Specifically this site reflects a particular period in local history. This GABldgSfty\Mary Clark\Ward data\Historic Preservation CommitteelMinutesWinutes 22706.doc HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE Minutes FEBRUARY 27, 2006 would be that of lodging as a tourist destination in the newly formed area of Palm Desert. This site also represents a distinctive type of construction. This would be that of the vernacular roadside architecture of the motor motel. It is further moved that this site be designated as a Class 5 as defined by Section 29.05.125 in City Ordinance No. 401. In presenting this recommendation to City Council this Committee suggests that a complete professional photographic documentation be made of this property with both exterior and interior views represented. This should be added to measured site drawings and maintained in a City archive. It is also recommended that in the event that the owner should ever decide to cease the operation of this facility that every reasonable effort is made for adaptive reuse of this property and/or select features (such as the neon street sign, light fixtures)." Vote: Committee Member Kim Housken seconded the motion. Motion #2 received a unanimous vote 7-0 in favor. Discussion: Committee Member Jan Holmlund said that she would like to amend the motion. She felt it would be very helpful if this item went to the scenic design group of the City for scenic preservation overlay review. To make sure when and where possible this particular property is treated with environmental respect. At the present time there are grass and trees there, which are very beneficial to the entire look of Highway 111, and she would second the importance of the photographic file, etc but would like to add to that to amend the motion that this go to the scenic preservation overlay ordinance and that the Commission that overlooks that for preservation of scenic vistas, setbacks, landscaping, building height, and signs. Ms. Holmlund indicated as part of the package that would be forwarded to City Council, she would also like information attached from that Commission to give some guidance for that property for future use. Committee Member Jim West asked if Ms. Holmlund was submitting this as a separate motion? Ms. Holmlund indicated that she wanted it as an addendum. Amir Hamidzadeh, Director of Building and Safety, pointed out that there is a process already in place in the City should there be any other use of the property, new buildings, and/or new construction. Motion #3: Committee Member Jan Holmlund moved "that the recommendation that this Committee makes to the City Council carry comments from the Scenic Preservation Commission vis-a-vis the preservation of scenic vistas, setbacks, landscaping, building heights, signs, and the mitigation of its excessive noise impacts along with our recommendation." Discussion: John Criste of Terra Nova Planning, representing the owner, commented that the City General Plan provides for a process for the review of any proposed change in land use. The City General Plan has a community design element that the Architectural Review Committee, Planning Commission, and the City Council are GABIdgSfty\Mary Clark\Word data\Historic Preservation CommitteelMinutesWinutes 22706.doc HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE Minutes FEBRUARY 27, 2006 to take into consideration when they review any kind of change including setbacks, landscaping, aesthetic issues, and others come into play. Committee Member Jan Holmlund said that under Section 29.05.020 Definitions. A and B, Historic District. `Any area of the City of Palm Desert containing a number of structures, natural features or sites having historic architectural, archaeological, cultural or aesthetic significance and designated as an historic district under the provisions of this chapter "And an Historic Site: An historic site is any real property such as: a building, a structure, including not limited to archways; an archeological excavation or object that is unique or significant because of its location, design, setting, materials, workmanship or aesthetic effect and:...". Ms. Holmlund indicated that the Committee does have an interest and an obligation to look at the environment that is being changed, and it is important that the City Council recognize that with this recommendation to Class 5 that the Committee is not considering adaptive reuse. The Committee is considering destruction of the site, and the City Council needs to know that includes not only the structures on the site but the environment of the site. Ms. Holmlund indicated that she would like to have a page attached that says that someone who looks at the scenic environment of the City has looked at this property and is allowed to make their comments on it. Tom Slovak, Attorney representing the owner, commented that the new motion on the floor would place restrictions on the property that would prevent the owner from going forward and demolishing the property and using it as it was hoped. Mr. Slovak indicated that since the last meeting another sale was lost. The property is unmarketable, and he felt the amendment would keep it unmarketable. Mr. Slovak pointed out that the City has a detailed process in place to address future use of the property and asked that this item go forward without the amendment. Joan Swanson, resident on Deep Canyon for 30 years, indicated she would like the environmental and noise impact issues addressed because Deep Canyon in South Palm Desert already experiences heavy traffic and noise. She indicated that any future use of the property should be compatible with the neighborhood. Committee Member Kim Housken suggested that wording be added recognizing that the property is located within the scenic preservation overlay. Committee Member Jan Holmlund indicated that would be fine but wanted it to be certain that City Council received that information in a way that is really obvious to them and that the environment of that site is being changed should a certificate of demolition be given. Committee Member Jim West commented that in the motion that passed the wording interior and exterior documentation could include the entire site of what was would include the environment, and could include videotaping. Amir Hamidzadeh, Director of Building and Safety, pointed out that when a new project goes through the City, noise and traffic studies are conducted. However, if G:\BldgSfty\Mary Clark\Word data\Historic Preservation Committee\MinutesWinutes 22706.doc 4 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE Minutes FEBRUARY 27, 2006 the Historic Preservation Committee wants to recommend to City Council additional items that is their prerogative. Vote: Motion #3 failed 6 NO votes and 1 YES vote. Committee Member Bonnie Bowie indicated she voted NO because the additional motion was redundant. The City already has processes in place. B. Joint Venture with Palm Desert Historical Society and Historic Preservation Committee regarding recognition for historic remodeling. Chair Kent Routh said that he received information from the City of Sonoma. He indicated that what is being proposed is some sort of recognition for persons or entities that have gone into remodeling or restoration that is in keeping with the Committee's view on historic preservation. The purpose is to create public interest. Committee Member Jim West noted for the record that annually the organization PS Modcom awards exactly that kind of award to both residential and commercial structures, so they basically recognize business owners who maintain 'properties and residences. One of the awards presented last year was in Palm Desert, which was the addition to the church on Highway 74. Mr. West suggested that the Committee talk to them about the nomination process. Chair Kent Routh suggested that publicity could be done on the City of Palm Desert web site, newsletter, and local newspapers. Committee Member Gale Broeker asked if the City of Ventura model could be looked at as well as any other California models. Chair Kent Routh asked that this item be placed on the March agenda. Committee Member Kim Housken suggested that City staff could assimilate programs from other cities. Amir Hamidzadeh, Director of Building and Safety, said yes. VI. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS A. CHAIR REPORT — Kent Routh 1. Chair Kent Routh said that he had hoped that they could discuss adoption of the Mills Act to the City Council but it was not included on this agenda. Amir Hamidzadeh, Director of Building and Safety, indicated that he plans to put this item on a future City Council agenda. Committee Member Jan Holmlund said that the Historic Preservation Committee need to be on record as voting positively that this be presented to City Council. This item will be placed on the March agenda. 2. Chair Kent Routh complimented Committee Members Jim West and Kim Housken for their participation and influence in the film shown at the Palm Springs Museum, Desert Utopia. Committee Member Kim Housken said that the film might be shown again in a month because it was sold out. Committee Member Jim West indicated that there was discussion that the film might be expanded and a possible multi -part presentation on PBS. GA]31dgSfty\Mary ClarkMord datalHistoric Preservation CommitteeWinutesWinutes 22706.doc HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE Minutes FEBRUARY 27, 2006 Committee Member Jan Holmlund said she spoke with the film Director and asked if it could be shown down valley, and he indicated he thought it would be possible. 3. Hal Rover, President Historical Society, said that on behalf of the Historical Society they are thrilled with all of the work that has been done by the Committee and wanted to commend each member. B. SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT 1. Committee Member Jim West discussed the City's tour book that is going to be published, which will include public art pieces and a sampling of architecture in the City of Palm Desert. Richard Twedt, Public Arts Manager, asked Mr. West to mention that that process is firming up, and Mr. West is reviewing a map of the architecture sites. 2. Ordinance Subcommittee "Draft of Ordinance Interest List" -- Committee Member Jan Holmlund asked the Committee if there were any additions or changes to the draft list. Committee Member Kim Housken said that the list was very inclusive. She indicated that at this time the Committee is advisory and she wondered if there were plans to change that. Ms. Holmlund indicated it is a recommendation that the Committee needs to make if they want it changed, and a point that should be added when it goes out to the consultant. C. INDIVIDUAL COMMITTEE MEMBER REPORTS 1. Committee Bob Pitchford discussed old photographs of the early years of the City. They were circulated for the Committee members to view. VII. OLD BUSINESS A. Report on Request for Consultant — Amir Hamidzadeh, Director of Building and Safety, indicated that a couple of the consultants that are being considered are on the City's new consultant list. He said that he has contacted them and the next step would be determining a time for them to begin. Chair Kent Routh asked that this item be placed on the March agenda for update. B. College of the Desert Campus Changes — Committee Member Kim Housken provided a visual presentation of the C.O.D. proposed new buildings and buildings that are going to be demolished. Ms. Housken indicated that they are going to eliminate two of the original buildings; one is the Registration Building and the other is an outer building, originally a technology building. She said that she wrote a response to the EIR with four comments one being the Velma Dawson house not being identified on the 1981 list, and received a comment back. The EIR is being changed to read: The Historical Society of Palm Desert identifies the Velma Dawson house constructed in GAB1dgSfty\Mary ClarklWord data\Historic Preservation Committee\MinutesWinutes 22706.doc HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE Minutes FEBRUARY 27, 2006 1948 and previously known as the Odell Ranch House as a historical site and the 1981 Riverside County Historical Commission identifies the house as a recorded historical site. Ms. Housken said that her letter was written as a concerned citizen, and she is looking for direction on how to proceed. The architects for the Registration Building, Building #5 (formerly student center) was Frey and Chambers. The architect for the smaller outer building, which was originally the technology building, was Wexler and Harrison. Committee Member Jim West indicated that there are original plans of the campus that are maintained in the Building and Maintenance Department of C.O.D. and suggested that the City of Palm Desert should have copies of the plans as a resource. Chair Kent Routh asked Committee Member Kim Housken to be the official representative of the Historic Preservation Committee at the next C.O.D. meeting on March 21, 2006, and that this item appears again on the Committee's March agenda. VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. Committee Member Jan Holmlund provided a copy of a dated list titled Heloina Hands. which lists organizations as resources for historic preservation to each Committee Member. B. Committee Member Jim West said that an item that came up at their workshop was that when realtors sell a property they are referring to them as historic, and one in particular on Hedgehog referred to Walter White and how important the building was. He indicated this means that the Committee is getting the knowledge out to the right people and he felt that is a positive sign. C. Committee Member Kim Housken commented that when the Committee receives letters from people concerned about things going on with the Committee and begin referring to the designation of historic properties as a taking of property, she found it offensive. For the record, she did research and historically the courts have sided with historic preservation, and they do not consider it a taking of property. D. There was discussion and the Committee decided to hold monthly workshop meetings the third Friday of each month at 10:00 a.m. and asked that Staff find a meeting room they can use on a monthly basis. The next workshop meeting will be Friday, March 17, 2006. IX. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA None X. CONFIRM NEXT MEETING DATE AND ADJOURN The Historic Preservation Committee's next meeting is Monday, March 27, 2006, 10:00 a.m., Administrative Conference Room. Chair Kent Routh adjourned the meeting at 11:35 a.m. G:\BldgSfty\Mary Clark\Word data\Historic Preservation Committee\Minutes\Minutes 22706.doc City of Palm Desert ArcIMS Map Output Page 1 of 1 Palm Desert Lodge 74527 HWY 111 tt` As A EXHIBIT 3 http://lO.20.2.35/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=CitvOverview&ClientV thedesertsun.com Iconic motel's future murky ..yr .,. :� r� .�F^� "+': o. •i�"` .&F�".T—•i HAW �'�^,. Return to article I Return to Growth & Iconic motel®s future murky �1=sEq,. Developer eyes site of Palm Desert Lodge Q� o K Kaufmann The Desert Sun v November 3, 2005 Ask almost anyone at the corner of Deep Canyon Road and A'1'INWI 11 which they prefer - the funky '50s pink hotel or a new Walgreens - and the answer is unequivocal. "I wouldn't want a Walgreens," said Ryan Taylor, a lifelong resident of Palm Desert who has been staying at the Palm Desert Lodge for two weeks while looking for a condo. The hotel's "been here forever," he said. "It's known all over the valley, and it's got the best prices." The fate of the hotel at 74-527 Highway 111 will be discussed at a special meeting of the Palm Desert Historical Preservation Committee at Friday at City Hall. Evergreen Deveo, a commercial development firm with offices in Phoenix and Glendale, has asked the committee for a preliminary evaluation of the site and whether the city could classify the hotel as an historic building. The company may be planning a Walgreens for the site, said Amir Hamidzadeh, director of Building and Safety for Palm Desert. Tyler Carlson, project manager for Evergreen, declined to comment on the company's plans, but said he would be attending the meeting Friday. Michael Noto, the hotel's general manager and a co-owner, was not available for comment. Built in the 1950s, the hotel is a concrete pink box that Jim West, a member of the historical preservation committee, described as "very declarative (and) very visible to people who came through the city" Page 1 of 2 ,t Josh Omar Ornelas, The Desert 5 n The Palm Desert Lodge on Highway 111 s TALK OF THE DAY Is the Palm Desert Lodge worth saving? C A commercial development fir has shown interest in changin the site where the Palm Deser Lodge sits. PRO: There needs to be s cooperation with builders and m' sure the property gets its best u and that their needs are met. a CON: The building is an exampi. older roadside motels rare to firjt these days and carries the nostalgia of an era gone by. IF YOU GO WHAT: Palm Desert Historical Preservation Committee WHEN: 10 a.m. Friday WHERE: City Hall He also noted that pictures of the hotel and its trademark neon sign had been included in "Palm Springs Weekend," a popular coffee table book on area architecture. Mary Vartanian, another Palm Desert resident, said losing the hotel would be like "losing a little bit of your culture." "It's like old Palm Springs," she said. "It's the good old days that brought us to where we are now." Making any determination on the hotel's historic value may be complicated by the current state of Palm Desert's histd1rk-,•:.:': preservation ordinance though. Committee members are in the process of updating the ordinance, which is vague on details of what constitutes a historic site and how it should be evaluated. The committee is allowed to make "surveys, studies or investigations as it deems necessary," according to the law. Peter Moruzzi, who heads up the Palm Springs Modern Committee, a historical preservation nonprofit, said no action should be taken until the hotel is evaluated by a qualified architectural historian, as is required in Palm Springs. E http://`,,vvwv.thedesertsun.comlappslpbcs. dlllarticle?Hate=20051103&Category=NEWS05 &ArtNo... 11 /3/2005 thedesertsun.com y Iconic motel's future murky Page 2 of 2 "Those types of roadside accommodation, which were very common 40 years ago, are very rare today," he said. "It should require a review prior to a decision being made." Moruzzi pointed out similar hotels in Palm Springs, such as the Oasis and the Orchid Tree Inn, that had been evaluated by the city. Jan Holmlund, who is heading up the Palm Desert committee's efforts to update the ordinance, said, 'This committee is attempting to meet all the modern challenges of historic preservation and retain the variety and vitality of the cultures that brought Palm Desert into being so we end up with a visually exciting community." And she noted that if a decision is made Friday, it will be reported to the city's Building Department, the Planning Commission and the City Council. The council will make the final determination on the hotel's historic status. Kent Routh, chair of the Historic Preservation Committee, said the group might be open to the kind of official evaluation Moruzzi recommends. "I think we're going to try to move it a long as expeditiously as we can," Routh said of the Evergreen proposal. "But we're not going to cashier that place without some real thought about it." Robert Pitchford, a member of the historical preservation committee, said there's a certain amount of sentimentality about older buildings that tugs at one. But other considerations exist. "That's an important corner, and I don't know whether it's getting its best use. But what is its best use?" he said. Customer service About this site Contact us F.A.Q. Subscribe Now! Advertise CLASSIFIED PARTNERS: Jobs: CareerBuilder.com I Cars: Cars.com I Apartments: Apartments.com I Shopping: Shopt-ocal.com Copyright © 2005 The Desert Sun Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, updated June 7, 2005 ,w�1V` GANNE17 �7MtC1t roMrtrfM4 _�_.nu;,�w.,.a<�%%" .. .li r[.:'�.:,.x.,.:'L:.:.:. dv...;.,. -✓+. ......i....,..__.61 ..,...._ .,s�^as•.,,. :<:"•:.o., su� i i ex�.w ......;.. { .v-.<. Ka•..!lSar.e w••''.a �.r.....rv; ...-...m. i? a �t http://www.thedesertsun.corn/appslpbcs.dlllarticle?Date=20051103 &Category--NEWS05 &ArtNo... 11/3/2005 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. HPC 06-01 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert City Council to consider the classification designation of the Palm Desert Lodge Building located at 74527 Highway 111, Palm Desert, California. SAID public hearing will be held on Thtjrsda April 27, 2006 .at 400 p.m. in the Council Chambers at the Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. Written comments concerning all items covered by this public hearing notice shall be accepted up to the date of the hearing. Information concerning the proposed designation is available for review in the Building and Safety Department at 73510 Fred Waring Drive between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. If you challenge the proposed actions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Palm Desert City Council, or prior to, the public hearing. DATE: March 31, 2006 Amir Hamidzadeh, Director of Building and Safety Secretary to the Palm Desert Historic Preservation Committee PUBLISH: 4/13 & 4120/06 Legal Notice - Public Hearing 4/27/06 HPC 06-01 PD Lodge Page 1 of 1 Martinez, Gloria From: Moeller, Charlene [CMOELLER@paimspri.gannett.com] Sent: 'Friday, March 31, 2006 11:23 AM To: Martinez, Gloria Subject: RE: Legal Notice - Public Hearing 4/27/06 HPC 06-01 PD Lodge Have a nice weekend! Ad recieved and will publish on date(s) requested. Charlene 912oeder ,pu6Cu Notice CustomerSerowe 9p. (760) 778-4578, Fax (760) 778-4731 My hours are Mon -Fri 8:00-5:00 pm. (Desert Sun 1e1�ais@thedeserts"un.com cZ Desert c'ostWeek(ydvwiegals@thedesertsun.com The Valley's #1 Source in News & Advertising! -----Original Message ---- From: gmartinez@ci.palm-desert.ca.us [mailto:gmartinez@ci.palm-desert.ca.us] Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 11:18 AM To: charlene.moeller@desertsun.com Cc: mclark@ci.palm-desert.ca.us; ahamidzadeh@ci.palm-desert.ca.us Subject: Legal Notice - Public Hearing 4/27/06 HPC 06-01 PD Lodge PLEASE PUBLISH THE FOLLOWING: PUBLIC HEARING Public Hearing Case No. HPC 06-01 Palm Desert Lodge Building Located at 74-527 Highway 111, Palm Desert TWO TIMES IN THE DESERT SUN Thursday, April 13, 2006 and Thursday, April 20, 2006 <<PH 042706 - HPC 06-01 PD Lodge.doc>> Thank you, Charlene!11 Have a GREAT weekend. W. 9kria 9Kartinez 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, California 92260 (760) 346-0611 Ext. 354 _9martinez@ci.pa1m-desert.ca.us 3/31 /2006