Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutC22870 CA2 Portola Avenue Bridge 647-04CITY OF PALM DESERT r PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT REQUEST: Approve Amendment No. 2 to Contract No. C22870 with Moffatt & Nichol Engineers for Additional Construction Design Support Services to Complete the Construction of the Portola Avenue Bridge over the Whitewater Channel (Project 647-04) SUBMITTED BY: John A. Garcia, P.E., Engineering Manager APPLICANT: Moffatt & Nichol Engineers 220 Commerce, Suite 250 Irvine, CA 92606 DATE: August 24, 2006 CONTENTS: Revised Fee Proposal Contract Amendment No. 2 Vicinity Map CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS APPROVED DENIED RECEIVED 0TN9R = METING DATE K014-- , ro 't „ b +- nor -MOSS F ABSTRFbt: VERIg2� -- - L�'ZBYr >l3 Staff further directed to give serious desig Recommendation: consideration for an immediate, efficient temporary barrier between the completed and By minute motion, approve: in progress portions of the bridge structure and its relation to the permanent barrier/ railin 4-0. 1. Amendment No. 2 to Contract No. C228f0 with Moffatt & Nichol Engineers in the amount of $48,500.00 for additional construction design support services to complete the construction of the Portola Avenue Bridge over the Whitewater Channel, and 2. Authorize movement of $5,595.70 from contingency to base and appropriation of $42,904.30 from unobligated funds in Account 400. Background: On October 4, 2004, City Council approved Contract No. C22870 with Moffatt & Nichol Engineers for design and construction support services in the amount of $563,467.00, plus a 10% contingency ($56,346.70) for the Portola Bridge over the Whitewater Channel. On July 14, 2005, City Council approved Amendment 1 to Contract No. C22870 in the amount of $50,751.00 for additional services to address unforeseen design requirements and approved moving this amount from contingency to base. The bridge is being constructed in two stages with one lane in each direction open to traffic throughout construction. The 447-foot-long bridge between Magnesia Falls and Quicksilver Drive will be approximately 40 feet above the channel at is highest point. The Notice to Proceed to Granite Construction was issue on August 22, 2005. Construction of the bridge is now approximately 40% complete. On July 31, 2006, the east phase was completed and traffic was moved to that portion of the bridge. Construction of the entire bridge is scheduled to be complete in May 2007. JJ 33..§§ .... P. "!�:r �• ..G..— V 3`"Si'��� :i ;�'. �..... �.: 3.: CT:JC' ✓f.{ r ^iSa:' �Lli��s *M.'I: {,�. Amendment 2 to C22870 with Moffatt & Nichol-Portola Bridge over Whitewater Page 2 of 2 August 24, 2006 Discussion: Moffatt & Nichol has expended approximately $20,000.00 in additional services analyzing the girder failure that occurred and reviewing the pile layout due to contractor's surveying error. This amount will be deducted from payment due the contractor. Staff has prepared Amendment 2 to Contract No. C22870 after negotiating with Moffatt & Nichol Engineers for additional construction design support services required to complete bridge construction. The additional services include the following tasks: • Analyzing girder failure/girder sweep corrections submitted by contractor • Preparing revised plans for change orders • Adjusting pile layout requested by contractor • Performing preconstruction survey for milk vetch plants • Responding to an unusual number of requests for information from contractor Staff has determined that the negotiated cost for the additional services is equitable and recommends that City Council, by minute motion, approve Amendment 2 to Contract C22870 with Moffatt & Nichol Engineers. The revised total contract amount of $662,718.00 is approximately 6.6% of the construction cost, which is well within the accepted range of up to 10% for design and construction support services for a project of this size and type. Therefore, staff recommends that City Council C22870 with Moffatt & Nichol Engineers in construction design support services to comp Bridge over the Whitewater Channel, and contingency to base and appropriation of $4'4 400. Submitted By: �.✓L John A. Gar a, �.E. Engineering Manager Approv Homer CLlr)rn�d AServices -�IrCaflos Orteg� City Manager JG/dhl approve Amendment No. 2 to Contract No. the amount of $48,500.00 for additional ate the construction of the Portola Avenue authorize movement of $5,595.70 from ,904.30 from unobligated funds in Account Departme Mark Greenwood, P.E. Director of Public Works z 2��,&� Paul Gibson Finance Director G:V%b WorkskStaff Reportsl200"ugust 2411 Amendment 2 to C22870 Moffatt Nichol Portola Bridge 647-041Staff Report.doc f `� 1•� k .P N CITY OF • A Lm DESERT CONTRACT AMENDMENT P.O. # 11866 Contract # C22870 Design of the Portola Avenue Bridge over Project # 647-04 Project Description: the Whitewater Channel Name Moffatt & Nichol Engineers Contractor Street Address 220 Commerce, Suite 250 Vendor # 1101 City, State, Zip Irvine, California 92606 Contract Amendment # 2 Pursuant to the terms of the original contract Agreement, you are hereby directed to make the herein described changes or do the following described work not included in the plans and specifications for this Contract. Unless otherwise stated, all work shall conform to the terms, general conditions, and special provisions of the original contract. DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE Additional construction design support services for analyzing girder failure, processing change orders, adjusting pile layout, performing milk vetch field survey, and responding to requests for information. Contingency used? es / no) I I Increase/Decrease in Amount $48,500.00 If yes, amount moved to base: $5,595.00 � � Increase/Decrease in Days Contract Amount (include past amendments) $614,218.00 Contract Date of Completion N.A Plus/Minus Current Change Order $48,500.00 Plus/Minus Current Change Order N.A. Revised Total Contract Amount $662,718.00 Revised Date of Completion N.A. 1. ORDERED BY: 2. CERTIFIED FUNDS AVAILABLE Department Head Director of Finance Date 3. APPROVED BY: 4. APPROVED BY: City Manager Date City Council Date We, the undersigned Contractor, have given careful consideration to the change proposed and hereby agree, if this proposal is approved, that we will provide all materials, perform all labor, except as may be noted above, and perform all services necessary to complete the above specified work, and hereby accept as full payment the amount shown above, which includes all direct and indirect overhead expenses fort any delays. ACCEPTED BY: Contractor/Vendor Date Page 1 of 1 Garcia, John From: Wagner, Monica [MWagner@moffattnichol.com] on behalf of Ely, Al [AEly@moffattnichol.com] Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 3:59 PM To: Garcia, John Cc: Revel, Denise; Jain, Arun Subject: Portola Avenue ReTo I Please find accompanying our proposed revised budget for the above project. The following adjustments are proposed: - Reduce Task I (R/W) from $7,720 to $5,023 = - $ 2,697 - Increase Task IF (Environ) from $54,840 to $58,640 = + $ 3,800 - Increase Task 1113 (Cons. Support) from $45,192 to $138,864 = + $93,672 - Reduce Task III (Special Services) from $54,886 to $8,611 = - $46,275 Net Budget Increase = + $48,500 The budget changes for the project can be summarized as shown in the table below: Original Budget Budget After Amend Proposed Budget #1 Design Services 448,917 499,668 500,771 Bidding Support Services 14,472 14,472 14,472 Construction Support Services 45,192 45,192 138,864 Special Services 54,886 54,886 8,611 $563,467 $614,218 $662,718 As you are aware these budget adjustments are necessary to fund the additional plant surveys performed by Bonterra and also to fund the increased construction support effort due to the unusual number of contractor RFI's, CCO's and other issues. If there are questions or if something else is needed, please call. Thanks. At The information contained in the e-Mail, including any accompanying documents or attachments, is from Moffatt & Nichol and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above, and is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, dissemination, distribution, copying or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you received this message in error, please notify us. 7/31 /2006 REV 28 JUL 06 TA$KI PROJECT ADMIN{MEETINGS,?ROGRESSREPOR'r TASK. IA— PREUMMARY I)1-31ON STUDY It.,1 Resaerch and Data Gwft eifm IA? Geve{ohart ci 1selerred u]tstnal„e IA,3 Reparr Ppepwalicm TASK 9—HYDPAUJJC REPORT TA4;KIC—BRIDGE 0"BIERAESTk1ETICSREPORT TASK ID — SURVFy td,1 Fieta SwvM 1152 PUtldrrng&OUian TA3X rE— kPGW4F-WAV TASK EP—ENWRONMENTAL D0GUMENTATIOWPIrRM1{175 TASK EG — GIEOt9�CHNICAL INVESTIGATION AND REPORTS TASK EH—1JTILJTY COMPAH1� GOt)R01NA'Q0N TASK IJ.— P23E PREPARATION LJ_1 RcwvmyP4dr% E.J_2 S+.sge-CoMtruCYoo PI*M IJ_3 CNT%)el Irnpm"Nn?re1 Pearls U_6 Y'iewd:ge Ret'OC icm Plans IJ.S LandtkWN Plan .tI.6 Rll.lihl VJUp Cetals 1J_7 Bridga Plant !J_9 Suorllernemtal Ptans IJ_9 5pecd�e� Ws IJ_ 10 Dmst.r.cli*n OoM. �70nmsle 11.1 t Ind aL M Ohgck TASK fK— DESIGN R�4'iMN'S [AMEND 11 SLOADTAL DESMN SERWCES TASK RA INDWNGPHASE SUPPORT $ERVIOE$ Vu Goarchr1:ISe Adk*MisgtAenL IL4.2 Ekd*jS IrigUi"s IV 2 S41poemeSA A I;ggstr�i%qn paea TASKIIER CWSTRUCTIQN20PPOR1`SERVICES jai Drum-tarRequesmRxInkrrmalion IEE1,2 ComazwrSubnmitals IIH.3 Cos.tiac€Ion ",flange rdurs A&Eh ihs SI7J3TOTAL CONS 1TUCT ON SE}iVFM 7ASK10 SPECIAL $4=F MES SusrcTA:_ sPLCmL SERJXC-g a FEE PROPOSAL {REMISED JULY 2006) 16 E 24 8 .4i 4D 1 a d $ y6 7$ 8 .4 4 S s � 6 T$ 2t :2 33 1B rg 32 tB 14 '62r 32 4 T2 air 52 1 2 11 11 4 4 era ':A 3d a0 Srilr 44C 2 24 1G $ t6 120 48 6 !15 64 24 1B 199 40 l 40 ?3 1D4 �24 QS8 321 I 'J3@ 599 888 lQrl 1a I 3, 4iJi I � ?4 S to 4 32 #31 18 -�S 177 :89 36 4E 46 282 15 x 40 40 _ 4 73 I i3 17 -� 7 2# 2.794 88 12,848 04 8.460 56 3_S12 52 6.3::8 A 6L�D 7.2S1J- 8 1 _$20 21703 6 1,ta0 �?,SOQ 8 I Sao 10K 12.720 ea 53 E2.�0i1 rb r. S_GV0 96 t�,f3A t,0� 12a a�+y 4$ 4:M-1 1DI3 15.104 2S$ -rjf,5;s2 ., 444 45.7$T .41554 3003 $ M.2;M # 1 M4 S2 5 :77i 74 3,;, 74 S.¢zd 90. 7.41fF ij53' 27,794 Si#. 4 B.454 373 S1.457 2Al 11.12G .,. I 3 •; k.i rt _ .fir �;"I Proposed Bridge MAGNESIA FALLS AVE I I I I I I IF 42ND AVE i D o O c� z n w O Ix 7::3 z < MAGNESI FALLS W 0 190 380 760 1,140 1,520 Feet N E S