HomeMy WebLinkAboutC22870 CA2 Portola Avenue Bridge 647-04CITY OF PALM DESERT
r
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
REQUEST: Approve Amendment No. 2 to Contract No. C22870 with Moffatt &
Nichol Engineers for Additional Construction Design Support Services
to Complete the Construction of the Portola Avenue Bridge over the
Whitewater Channel (Project 647-04)
SUBMITTED BY: John A. Garcia, P.E., Engineering Manager
APPLICANT: Moffatt & Nichol Engineers
220 Commerce, Suite 250
Irvine, CA 92606
DATE:
August 24, 2006
CONTENTS: Revised Fee Proposal
Contract Amendment No. 2
Vicinity Map
CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS
APPROVED DENIED
RECEIVED 0TN9R =
METING DATE K014-- , ro 't „ b +-
nor
-MOSS F
ABSTRFbt: VERIg2� -- -
L�'ZBYr >l3
Staff further directed to give serious desig
Recommendation: consideration for an immediate, efficient
temporary barrier between the completed and
By minute motion, approve: in progress portions of the bridge structure
and its relation to the permanent barrier/
railin 4-0.
1. Amendment No. 2 to Contract No. C228f0 with Moffatt & Nichol
Engineers in the amount of $48,500.00 for additional construction
design support services to complete the construction of the Portola
Avenue Bridge over the Whitewater Channel, and
2. Authorize movement of $5,595.70 from contingency to base and
appropriation of $42,904.30 from unobligated funds in Account 400.
Background:
On October 4, 2004, City Council approved Contract No. C22870 with Moffatt & Nichol
Engineers for design and construction support services in the amount of $563,467.00, plus
a 10% contingency ($56,346.70) for the Portola Bridge over the Whitewater Channel. On
July 14, 2005, City Council approved Amendment 1 to Contract No. C22870 in the amount
of $50,751.00 for additional services to address unforeseen design requirements and
approved moving this amount from contingency to base.
The bridge is being constructed in two stages with one lane in each direction open to traffic
throughout construction. The 447-foot-long bridge between Magnesia Falls and Quicksilver
Drive will be approximately 40 feet above the channel at is highest point. The Notice to
Proceed to Granite Construction was issue on August 22, 2005. Construction of the bridge
is now approximately 40% complete. On July 31, 2006, the east phase was completed and
traffic was moved to that portion of the bridge. Construction of the entire bridge is
scheduled to be complete in May 2007.
JJ 33..§§ .... P. "!�:r �•
..G..— V 3`"Si'��� :i ;�'. �..... �.: 3.: CT:JC' ✓f.{ r ^iSa:' �Lli��s *M.'I: {,�.
Amendment 2 to C22870 with Moffatt & Nichol-Portola Bridge over Whitewater
Page 2 of 2
August 24, 2006
Discussion:
Moffatt & Nichol has expended approximately $20,000.00 in additional services analyzing
the girder failure that occurred and reviewing the pile layout due to contractor's surveying
error. This amount will be deducted from payment due the contractor.
Staff has prepared Amendment 2 to Contract No. C22870 after negotiating with Moffatt &
Nichol Engineers for additional construction design support services required to complete
bridge construction. The additional services include the following tasks:
• Analyzing girder failure/girder sweep corrections submitted by contractor
• Preparing revised plans for change orders
• Adjusting pile layout requested by contractor
• Performing preconstruction survey for milk vetch plants
• Responding to an unusual number of requests for information from contractor
Staff has determined that the negotiated cost for the additional services is equitable and
recommends that City Council, by minute motion, approve Amendment 2 to Contract
C22870 with Moffatt & Nichol Engineers. The revised total contract amount of $662,718.00
is approximately 6.6% of the construction cost, which is well within the accepted range of up
to 10% for design and construction support services for a project of this size and type.
Therefore, staff recommends that City Council
C22870 with Moffatt & Nichol Engineers in
construction design support services to comp
Bridge over the Whitewater Channel, and
contingency to base and appropriation of $4'4
400.
Submitted By:
�.✓L
John A. Gar a, �.E.
Engineering Manager
Approv
Homer CLlr)rn�d
AServices
-�IrCaflos Orteg�
City Manager
JG/dhl
approve Amendment No. 2 to Contract No.
the amount of $48,500.00 for additional
ate the construction of the Portola Avenue
authorize movement of $5,595.70 from
,904.30 from unobligated funds in Account
Departme
Mark Greenwood, P.E.
Director of Public Works
z 2��,&�
Paul Gibson
Finance Director
G:V%b WorkskStaff Reportsl200"ugust 2411 Amendment 2 to C22870 Moffatt Nichol Portola Bridge 647-041Staff Report.doc
f `� 1•�
k .P N
CITY OF • A
Lm DESERT
CONTRACT AMENDMENT
P.O. # 11866
Contract # C22870
Design of the Portola Avenue Bridge over Project # 647-04
Project Description: the Whitewater Channel
Name Moffatt & Nichol Engineers Contractor
Street Address 220 Commerce, Suite 250 Vendor # 1101
City, State, Zip Irvine, California 92606
Contract Amendment # 2
Pursuant to the terms of the original contract Agreement, you are hereby directed to make the herein described
changes or do the following described work not included in the plans and specifications for this Contract. Unless
otherwise stated, all work shall conform to the terms, general conditions, and special provisions of the original contract.
DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE
Additional construction design support services for analyzing girder failure, processing change orders,
adjusting pile layout, performing milk vetch field survey, and responding to requests for information.
Contingency used? es / no) I I Increase/Decrease in Amount $48,500.00
If yes, amount moved to base: $5,595.00 � � Increase/Decrease in Days
Contract Amount (include past amendments) $614,218.00 Contract Date of Completion N.A
Plus/Minus Current Change Order $48,500.00 Plus/Minus Current Change Order N.A.
Revised Total Contract Amount $662,718.00 Revised Date of Completion N.A.
1. ORDERED BY: 2. CERTIFIED FUNDS AVAILABLE
Department Head Director of Finance Date
3. APPROVED BY: 4. APPROVED BY:
City Manager Date City Council Date
We, the undersigned Contractor, have given careful consideration to the change proposed and hereby agree, if this proposal is approved, that we
will provide all materials, perform all labor, except as may be noted above, and perform all services necessary to complete the above specified
work, and hereby accept as full payment the amount shown above, which includes all direct and indirect overhead expenses fort any delays.
ACCEPTED BY:
Contractor/Vendor Date
Page 1 of 1
Garcia, John
From: Wagner, Monica [MWagner@moffattnichol.com] on behalf of Ely, Al [AEly@moffattnichol.com]
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 3:59 PM
To: Garcia, John
Cc: Revel, Denise; Jain, Arun
Subject: Portola Avenue
ReTo I
Please find accompanying our proposed revised budget for the above project. The following adjustments are
proposed:
- Reduce Task I (R/W) from $7,720 to $5,023 = - $ 2,697
- Increase Task IF (Environ) from $54,840 to $58,640 = + $ 3,800
- Increase Task 1113 (Cons. Support) from $45,192 to $138,864 = + $93,672
- Reduce Task III (Special Services) from $54,886 to $8,611 = - $46,275
Net Budget Increase = + $48,500
The budget changes for the project can be summarized as shown in the table below:
Original Budget Budget After Amend Proposed Budget
#1
Design Services 448,917 499,668 500,771
Bidding Support Services 14,472 14,472 14,472
Construction Support Services 45,192 45,192 138,864
Special Services 54,886 54,886 8,611
$563,467 $614,218 $662,718
As you are aware these budget adjustments are necessary to fund the additional plant surveys performed by
Bonterra and also to fund the increased construction support effort due to the unusual number of contractor RFI's,
CCO's and other issues.
If there are questions or if something else is needed, please call.
Thanks.
At
The information contained in the e-Mail, including any accompanying documents or attachments, is
from Moffatt & Nichol and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above, and is
privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure,
dissemination, distribution, copying or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you
received this message in error, please notify us.
7/31 /2006
REV 28 JUL 06
TA$KI PROJECT ADMIN{MEETINGS,?ROGRESSREPOR'r
TASK. IA— PREUMMARY I)1-31ON STUDY
It.,1 Resaerch and Data Gwft eifm
IA? Geve{ohart ci 1selerred u]tstnal„e
IA,3 Reparr Ppepwalicm
TASK 9—HYDPAUJJC REPORT
TA4;KIC—BRIDGE 0"BIERAESTk1ETICSREPORT
TASK ID — SURVFy
td,1 Fieta SwvM
1152 PUtldrrng&OUian
TA3X rE— kPGW4F-WAV
TASK EP—ENWRONMENTAL D0GUMENTATIOWPIrRM1{175
TASK EG — GIEOt9�CHNICAL INVESTIGATION AND REPORTS
TASK EH—1JTILJTY COMPAH1� GOt)R01NA'Q0N
TASK IJ.— P23E PREPARATION
LJ_1 RcwvmyP4dr%
E.J_2 S+.sge-CoMtruCYoo PI*M
IJ_3 CNT%)el Irnpm"Nn?re1 Pearls
U_6 Y'iewd:ge Ret'OC icm Plans
IJ.S LandtkWN Plan
.tI.6 Rll.lihl VJUp Cetals
1J_7 Bridga Plant
!J_9 Suorllernemtal Ptans
IJ_9 5pecd�e� Ws
IJ_ 10 Dmst.r.cli*n OoM. �70nmsle
11.1 t Ind aL M Ohgck
TASK fK— DESIGN R�4'iMN'S [AMEND 11
SLOADTAL DESMN SERWCES
TASK RA INDWNGPHASE SUPPORT $ERVIOE$
Vu Goarchr1:ISe Adk*MisgtAenL
IL4.2 Ekd*jS IrigUi"s
IV 2 S41poemeSA A I;ggstr�i%qn paea
TASKIIER CWSTRUCTIQN20PPOR1`SERVICES
jai Drum-tarRequesmRxInkrrmalion
IEE1,2 ComazwrSubnmitals
IIH.3 Cos.tiac€Ion ",flange rdurs
A&Eh ihs
SI7J3TOTAL CONS 1TUCT ON SE}iVFM
7ASK10 SPECIAL $4=F MES
SusrcTA:_ sPLCmL SERJXC-g
a
FEE PROPOSAL {REMISED JULY 2006)
16
E
24
8
.4i
4D 1
a
d
$
y6
7$
8
.4
4
S
s
�
6
T$
2t
:2
33
1B
rg
32
tB
14
'62r
32
4
T2
air
52
1
2
11
11
4
4
era
':A
3d
a0
Srilr
44C
2
24
1G
$
t6
120
48
6
!15
64
24
1B
199
40
l
40
?3
1D4
�24
QS8
321 I
'J3@
599
888
lQrl
1a I
3,
4iJi
I
�
?4
S
to
4
32
#31
18
-�S
177
:89
36
4E
46
282
15
x
40
40
_
4
73 I
i3
17
-� 7
2#
2.794
88
12,848
04
8.460
56
3_S12
52
6.3::8
A
6L�D
7.2S1J-
8
1 _$20
21703
6
1,ta0
�?,SOQ
8
I Sao
10K
12.720
ea
53
E2.�0i1
rb
r.
S_GV0
96
t�,f3A
t,0�
12a a�+y
4$
4:M-1
1DI3
15.104
2S$
-rjf,5;s2
.,
444
45.7$T
.41554
3003
$ M.2;M
# 1 M4 S2 5 :77i
74
3,;,
74
S.¢zd
90.
7.41fF
ij53'
27,794
Si#.
4 B.454
373
S1.457
2Al
11.12G
.,.
I 3 •; k.i
rt _ .fir �;"I
Proposed Bridge
MAGNESIA FALLS AVE
I I I I I I IF
42ND AVE i
D o
O
c� z
n w O Ix
7::3
z < MAGNESI FALLS
W
0 190 380 760 1,140 1,520
Feet
N
E
S