HomeMy WebLinkAboutRes 06-153 Development Impact Fees and Capital Improvement Program 2006-07CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
REQUEST: Annual Report of calculation of Government Code 66006, Development
Impact Fees for the City of Palm Desert
Date: October 26, 2006
CONTENTS: 1. Resolution making certain findings pursuant to Government Code
section 66001.
2. Annual Report of Calculation of Government Code 66006
3. Capital Improvement Program 2006-2007
Recommendation:
1. Receive public testimony on annual report and findings.
06-153
2. Adopt Resolution No. _ making certain findings pursuant to California Government
Code Section 66001 and 66006.
Background:
Following the passage of Proposition 13 in 1978, many cities began charging fees on new
development to fund public improvements and services such as streets, traffic signals, parks,
drainage, housing and art in public places. These fees are commonly known as development
impact fees. In order to ensure that these fees were spent in a timely manner and on projects
for which they were being collected, the State Legislature passed a bill known as AB 1600
(Mitigation Fee Act). This bill applies to developer fees, increased or imposed on or after
January 1, 1989. AB 1600 enacts Government Code Sections 66000-66008 that generally
contain four requirements:
1. A local jurisdiction must follow the process set forth in the bill and make certain
determinations regarding the purpose and use of the fees, and establish a
"nexus" or connection between a development project or class of project and the
public improvement being financed with the fee.
2. The fee must be segregated from the general fund in order to avoid commingling
of public improvement fees and the general fund.
3. If a local jurisdiction has had possession of a developer fee for five years or more
and has not committed that money to a project or actually spent that money, then
it must make findings describing the continuing need for that money. In addition,
an annual report must be made of fees collected, interest earned, projects on
which fees were expended, and any transfers or loans from the fee account.
This report is to be reviewed by the local agency assessing the fees.
4. If a local jurisdiction cannot make the findings required under paragraph 3, the
city must refund the fees collected.
Development Impact Fees. Page 2 of 3
The Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee, Housing Mitigation, New Construction Tax,
Drainage Facility, Fringe Toed Lizard, Park & Recreation Fee, Traffic Signalization Fee, Art in
Public Places Fee, AIPP Maintenance, Child Care Facility and Fire Facility Fund fees that the
City collects, qualify as development impact fees. Therefore, these fees must comply with the
above referenced Government Code Sections. Government Code Section 66001 requires the
City to make available to the public certain information regarding development impact fees for
each fund within 180 days after the end of the each fiscal year. Expenditures of the fees
collected must occur within a five-year period.
Attached to the staff report is a copy of the annual report reflecting the require information to
conform to Government code sections 66001 and 66006. Originally when the fees were
adopted the Ordinance/staff reports contained the necessary Nexus findings to establish each
of the fees. The fees are used to assist the City in handling the increased population affecting
Palm Desert on our streets, traffic signals, parks, public facilities like City hall, housing needs for
low income housing, public art and mitigation fees to protect environmental plants and wildlife
due the new development. Each fee is held in a separate fund and the report shows the fees
collected and interest earned along with the expenditures paid. Lastly, the report shows the
fees collected up to the five years and compares it to the fund balance to verify that the fees
were spent within the five years.
The following are the fees that exceeded the five-year expenditures test: Art in Public
Places, Drainage Facility Fee and Park, Traffic Signal and Recreation Fee. All of these
fees have current capital improvement budgeted projects (copy of capital budgets attached)
which would bring the fees under the five year test and will be spent within a year to two years.
Art in Public Places:
The Art in Public Places fund balance is $2,188,825 versus the five -years revenue collected of
$2,231,815 exceeds the five-year test by $42,990. We currently have $812,000 budgeted to do
additional art work
Drainage Facility Fee:
The Drainage Facility Fee fund balance is $5,652,409 versus the five -years revenue collected of
$2,053,831 exceeds the five-year test by $3,598,578. We currently have a drainage facility
master plan that indicates the various projects that the fee is being collected to build.
Unfortunately, the cost of installation of these projects requires large fund balance accumulated
prior to implementing the capital budget and must also be timed with other improvements
happening around these capital projects. The future project schedule to draw down these funds
below the 5 years test is the extension of Portola Drainage, Country Club Drive, and Fred
Waring Drive for $4,242,413.
Traffic Signal Fund:
The Traffic Signal fund balance is $1,161,423 versus the five -years revenue collected of
$889,111 exceeds the five-year test by $272,312. The future project schedule to draw down
these funds below the 5 years test is the Traffic Signals on Portola at various locations for
$745,382.
Development Impact Fees, Page 3 of 3
Park and Recreation Fee:
The Park and Recreation Fee fund balance is $5,824,409 versus the five-year revenue collected
of $4,168,105 exceeds the five- year test by $1,656,304. We currently have the Civic Center
Amphitheater project ($2,306,477 Budget) that is under a revised design process that will be
constructed within the next two years. In addition, we have the hiking trail and civic center park
improvements project budgets of $224,000.
This year staff is recommending that we adopt a resolution by City Council to make the findings
that we have complied with the five-year test under Government Code section 66006. Attached
is the resolution making the findings along with the Annual Report and a copy of the Capital
Improvement Budget for FY 2006-2007.
Since these findings have been made, and the City is in compliance with the Code no refunds
are required.
Submitted By:
r p5C
Paul S. Gibsbn
Approval:
Carlos OrtegaCity,nager
Approval:
Dave Erwin, City Attorney
ance/City Treasurer
ZITY COUNCIL,,.ACTION:
APPROVED "- DENIED
RECEVED OTHER('
S _ N0 ao-l'-; r
YESI D� , _
Aata YES• esLe__wn
NOES:
ABSENT: I(i
ABSTAIN: mt4
VERIFIED BY: y%1C3 ' 1
Original on File with City Clerk's Office
RESOLUTION NO. 06-153
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, TO MAKE CERTAIN
FINDINGS PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66001
WHEREAS, the City of Palm Desert is required to make certain findings
every five years with respect to the unexpended fund balance of certain
development fee funds pursuant to California Government Code Section 66001;
and
WHEREAS, the information to make the required findings can be found in
the Annual Report Calculation, in the 2006-2007 Capital Improvement Program,
the original ordinance adopting the fees file with the City Clerk; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has approved a master drainage plan, a
general plan for parks and approved a regional traffic signal plan that
demonstrates the purpose of the fee being charged; and
WHEREAS, these findings need to be made in conjunction with the public
information required in Code Section 66006.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Palm Desert, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the following findings are made as required under the
Government Code Section 66006:
a. That the purpose to which the developer fee is to be put has
been identified.
b. That a reasonable relationship has been demonstrated between
the fee and the purpose for which it is charged.
c. That all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete
financing on incomplete improvements have been identified.
d. That the approximate dates on which the funding referred to
above is expected to be deposited into the appropriate fund
have been designated.
3. That these findings are based on information provided in the City of
Palm Desert Annual Development Impact Report, Operating Budget
and Capital Improvement Program 2006-2007 and master plans for
improvements, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Page 2 of 2 of Resolution No. 06-153
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at the regular meeting of the Palm
Desert City Council held on this day of - 006, by the following
vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
RACHELLE KLASSEN, CITY CLERK JIM FERGUSON, MAYOR
CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA
Annual Report
of Calculation
of Government Code 66006
Development Impact Fees
For the City of Palm Desert
For Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2006
Government Code Section 66006 requires local agencies to submit annual and five-year
compliance reports detailing the status of development impact fees. The annual report must be
made available to the public and presented to the public agency (City Council) at least fifteen days
after it is made available to the public.
This report summarizes the following information for each of the development fee programs:
1. A brief description of the fee program.
2. Schedule of fees.
3. Beginning and ending balances of the fee program.
4. Amount of fees collected and the interest earned.
5. Disbursement information and percentage funded by fees, including operating transfers.
6. Five year compliance testing of unexpended fees and future capital project commitments to
expend the funds.
The fee programs included in this report are the following:
Section A—Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee
Section B — Housing Mitigation Fee
Section C — New Construction Tax Fee
Section D — Drainage Facility Fee
Section E — Fringe Toed Lizard Fee
Section F — Park & Recreation Fee
Section G —Traffic Signalization Fee
Section H —Art In Public Places Fee
Section I —A.I.P.P. Maintenance Fund
Section J — Child Care Facility Fund
Section K — Fire Facility Fund Page 1
Section A — Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (T.U.M.F.)
The TUMF program is collected by the City and administer by the Coachella Valley Association of
Government (CVAG). The City of Palm Desert collects the fee based on a Ordinance adopted by
City Council based on type of building usage and vehicles generated by the residential or
commercial activity on City streets. The City monthly remits the fee to C.V.A.G. to be disbursed
on a regional basis for street widening projects determine yearly by CVAG Capital Project
Program Budget. Fee for residential is $794.31 and all commercial buildings are based on
attached formula and data sheet schedule which varies from project to project.
Part 1 — Fund Balance, Revenue, Interest, Expenditures, Ending Balance
Beginning Fiscal Year Ending
Account Descri tion Fund Balance 2005-06 Fund Balance
Revenues � Other Sources:
Developer Fee 1,297,268
Interest Income
Contributions
Transfers In
Total Sources 1,297,268
Expenditures 8� Other Uses:
Capital Projects (Paid to CVAG) 1,297,268
Transfers Out
Total Uses 1,297,268
Total Available - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Part II — Compliance with Expending funds within 5 Years
Five Year Revenue Test
Using First In First Out Method
Unspent Funds Represents Ending Fund Balance June 30, 2006
Revenues Collected From FY 2005-2006 - 0 -
Total Ending Fund Balance - 0 -
Result: Five year spent test met in accordance
With Government Code 66001
Capital Improvement FY2005-2006 °/a Complete % Funded with Fee
Pro'ects
CVAG Pa ments 1,297,268 100% 100%
Page 2
Section B— Housing Mitigation Fee
The Housing Mitigation Fee is used to mitigate the low-income housing impacts caused by
commercial and industrial development. Used to help construct or provide low-income housing
assistance with the City of Palm Desert residence. A yearly and five year Low Income Housing
Needs Report/Plan is compile to access the needs within the City. Fee is based on $1/sq. ft. —
Commercial; $0.33/sq. ft. — Industrial; $0.40/sq. ft. — Professional; $1,000/room — Resort Hotel;
$620/Room Non Resort.
Part 1 — Fund Balance, Revenue, Interest, Expenditures, Ending Balance
Beginning Fiscal Year Ending
Account Descri tion Fund Balance 2005-06 Fund Balance
Revenues & Other Sources:
Developer Fee 1,033,888
Interest Income 30,222
Contributions
Transfers In
Total Sources 1,064,110
Expenditures & Other Uses:
Capital Projects
Transfers Out to Low Income Housing - 0 -
Total Uses - 0 -
Total Available - 0 - - 0 - 1,064,110
Part II — Compliance with Expending funds within 5 Years
Five Year Revenue Test
Using First In First Out Method
Unspent Funds Represents Ending Fund Balance June 30, 2006
Revenues Collected From FY 2005-2006 1,064,110
Total Ending Fund Balance �,064,110
Result: Five year spent test met in accordance
With Government Code 66001 1 Year Balance
Capital Improvement FY2005-2006 Five Year % Funded with Fee
Pro'ects Future Commitments
Low Income Housin - 0 - 100%
Page 3
Section C — New Construction Tax Fee
The New Construction Tax Fee is used for acquisition and development of public facilities like
playgrounds, public structures, and street improvements. Yearly the City Council approves a five
year Capital Improvement Budget that reflects current projects along with future committed
projects utilizing these fees. The fee is for Industrial Buildings $0.05/sq. ft.; Residential units
$0.40/sq. ft.; all other development $0.40/sq. ft.
Part 1 — Fund Balance, Revenue, Interest, Expenditures, Ending Balance
Beginning Fiscal Year Ending
Account Descri tion Fund Balance 2005-06 Fund Balance
Revenues & Other Sources:
Developer Fee 950,016
Interest Income 151,850
Contributions
Transfers In from General Fund-LOAN
Total Sources 1,101,866
Expenditures & Other Uses:
Capital Projects 5,812,312
Transfers Out
Total Uses 5,812,312
Total Available 5,784,223 4,710,446 1,073,777
Part II — Compliance with Expending funds within 5 Years
Five Year Revenue Test
Using First In First Out Method
Unspent Funds Represents Ending Fund Balance June 30, 2006
Revenues Collected From FY 2001-2002 1,277,544
Revenues Collected From FY 2002-2003 560,492
Revenues Collected From FY 2003-2004 577,866
Revenues Collected From FY 2004-2005 1,240,001
Revenues Collected From FY 2005-2006 1,101,866
Total Ending Fund Balance 4,757,769
Result: Five year spent test met in accordance
With Government Code 66001. 1 Year Balance
Capital Improvement FY2005-2006 Five Year % Funded with Fee
Projects Future Commitments
Fire Station Renovations 1,034,056 282,695 100%
Corporation Yard Expansion 4,778,256 879,954 90%, 10%-Gen.Fd.
Page 4
Section D — Drainage Facility Fee
The Drainage Facility Fee is used for planned local drainage created by the development and
adjoining streets to the project. The City has adopted a master drainage plan which gets modify
as new development occurs. In addition, the five-year City Capitat Improvement Budget includes
both current and future projects planned for use of the fees connected to the various development
projects. Fees are based on which drainage map zone they reside within: Zone 1 fee is $4,000;
Zone 2 is $1,000; Zone 3 is $1,000; Zone 4 is $1,000. The map is available with the public works
department upon request.
Part 1 — Fund Balance, Revenue, Interest, Expenditures, Ending Balance
Beginning Fiscal Year Ending
Account Descri tion Fund Balance 2005-06 Fund Balance
Revenues & Other Sources:
Developer Fee 322,430
Interest Income 212,002
Contributions
Total Sources 534,432
Exuenditures & Other Uses:
Capital Projects 227,268
Total Uses 227,268
Total Available 5,345,245 307,164 5,652,409
Part II — Compliance with Expending funds within 5 Years
Five Year Revenue Test
Using First In First Out Method
Unspent Funds Represents Ending Fund Balance June 30, 2006
Revenues Collected From FY 2001-2002 413,626
Revenues Collected From FY 2002-2003 426,474
Revenues Collected From FY 2003-2004 289,614
Revenues Collected From FY 2004-2005 389,685
Revenues Collected From FY 2005-2006 534,432
Total Ending Fund Balance 2,053,831
Result: Five year spent test over the limit by
$3,598,578 however, City has Budgeted capital
projects ($4,242,413) well above the excess that
will be completed within 24 months from 6/30/06
which will com 1 with Government Code 66001.
Capital Improvement FY2005-2006 Five Year % Funded with Fee
Pro'ects Future Commitments
Portola Ave Drainage 309,432 100%
North Sphere Study 136,960 208,678 100%
Country Club Drive 67,508 3,475,103 100%
Fred Warin 22,800 249,200 100%
Page 5
Section E — Fringe Toed Lizard Fee / Wildlife Mitigation
This fee is collected in connection with environmental endanger plants & wildlife agreements with
State and Federal environmental agencies. The fee is collected and placed into trust and remitted
monthly to Center for Natural Lands Management to be used to acquire open space land to
preserve for various plants and wildlife preserves. The current fee is $600 per acre. In fiscal year
2005-2006 the fee will be changed to reflect the new multi-species mitigation agreement.
Part 1 — Fund Balance, Revenue, Interest, Expenditures, Ending Balance
Beginning Fiscal Year Ending
Account Descri tion Fund Balance 2005-06 Fund Balance
Revenues 8� Other Sources:
Developer Fee 194,844
Interest Income
Contributions
Transfers In
Total Sources 194,844
Expenditures & Other Uses:
Capital Projects 194,844
Transfers In
Total Uses 194,844
Total Available - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Part II — Compliance with Expending funds within 5 Years
Five Year Revenue Test
Using First In First Out Method
Unspent Funds Represents Ending Fund Balance June 30, 2006
Revenues Collected From FY 2001-2002 - 0 —
Revenues Collected From FY 2002-2003 - 0 —
Revenues Collected From FY 2003-2004 - 0 —
Revenues Collected From FY 2004-2005 - 0 -
Total Ending Fund Balance - 0 -
Result: Five year spent test met in accordance
With Government Code 66001
Capital Improvement FY2005-2006 Five Year % Funded with Fee
Pro'ects Future Commitments
Payment to Center 194,844 100%
for Natural Land M t
Page 6
Section F — Park & Recreation Fee
The fee is used to acquire land, construct parks and recreational areas, open space, and other
public facilities for the city residents. Yearly the City Council adopts a five year Capital
Improvement Plan detailing the current and future projects necessary for use of the fee. The fee
is only charged to residential properties based on the following formula: Number of units x
2.292(people per househoid) x 5 acres divided by 1000 population x land market value per acre.
Part 1 — Fund Balance, Revenue, Interest, Expenditures, Ending Balance
Beginning Fiscal Year Ending
Account Descri tion Fund Balance 2005-06 Fund Balance
Revenues & Other Sources:
Developer Fee 2,290,439
Interest Income 160,696
Contributions
Transfers In
Total Sources 2,451,135
Expenditures & Other Uses:
Capital Projects 16,122
Transfers In
Total Uses 16,122
Total Available 3,389,396 2,435,013 5,824,409
Part II — Compliance with Expending funds within 5 Years
Five Year Revenue Test
Using First In First Out Method
Unspent Funds Represents Ending Fund Balance June 30, 2006
Revenues Collected From FY 2001-2002 234,546
Revenues Collected From FY 2002-2003 249,427
Revenues Collected From FY 2003-2004 116,097
Revenues Collected From FY 2004-2005 1,133,022
Revenues Collected From FY 2005-2006 2,435,013
Total Ending Fund Balance 4,168,105
Result: Five year spent test over the limit by
$1,656,304 however, City has Budgeted capital
projects ($2,525,995) well above the excess that
will be completed within 24 months from 6/30/06
which will com I with Government Code 66001.
Capital Improvement Projects FY2005-2006 Five Year % Funded
Future with Fee
Commitments
'Civic Center Amphitheater 8 Park Improvements 2,306,477 100%
Hiking Trail 16,122 33,878 50%
Civic Center Park Improvements 114,360 185,640 100%
Page 7
Section G — Traffic Signalization Fee
The fee is used for acquisition and development of the regional traffic signals within the City
created by increase traffic load added by the development. Yearly the City Council adopts a five
year Capital Improvement Plan detailing the current and future projects necessary for use of the
fee. The fee is charged based on the type of building constructed, which is: Residential $ 50 per
unit; Commercial $500 per 1,000 sq. ft.; Industrial $500 per acre.
Part 1 — Fund Balance, Revenue, Interest, Expenditures, Ending Balance
Beginning Fiscal Year Ending
Account Descri tion Fund Balance 2005-06 Fund Balance
Revenues & Other Sources:
Developer Fee 159,983
Interest Income 43,458
Contributions
Transfers In
Total Sources 203,441
Expenditures & Other Uses:
Capital Projects 10,025
Transfers Out
Total Uses 10,025
Total Available 968,007 193,416 1,161,423
Part II — Compliance with Expending funds within 5 Years
Five Year Revenue Test
Using First In First Out Method
Unspent Funds Represents Ending Fund Balance June 30, 2006
Revenues Collected From FY 2001-2002 194,073
Revenues Collected From FY 2002-2003 143,162
Revenues Collected From FY 2003-2004 165,744
Revenues Collected From FY 2004-2005 182,691
Revenues Collected From FY 2005-2006 203,441
Total Ending Fund Balance 889,111
Result: Five year spent test over the limit by
$272,312 however, City has Budgeted capital
projects ($745,382) well above the excess that
will be completed within 24 months from 6/30/06
which will com I with Government Code 66001.
Capital Improvement FY2005-2006 Five Year % Funded with Fee
Projects Future Commitments
Traffic Si nals 10,025 745,382 100%
Page 8
Section H — Art In Public Places Fee
The fee is used to acquire, develop, install and maintain artwork to be displayed in the city (City
owned land), the administration of the program and community public art education programs.
The City has an Art in Public Places committee that meets monthly to decide both location and
type of art that will be placed throughout the City. Developers may choose to place and develop
art within their project site without paying a fee to the City. Yearly the City Council adopts a five-
year Capital Improvement Plan and administration plan detailing the current and future projects
necessary for use of the fee.
Part 1 — Fund Balance, Revenue, Interest, Expenditures, Ending Balance
Beginning Fiscal Year Ending
Account Descri tion Fund Balance 2005-06 Fund Balance
Revenues & Other Sources:
Developer Fee 825,318
Interest Income 81,258
Refunds to Due to Private Placement 108,958
Total Sources 797,618
Expenditures & Other Uses:
Ca ital Pro'ects 309,064
Total Uses 309,064
Total Available 1,700,271 488,554 2,188,825
Part II — Compliance with Expending funds within 5 Years
Five Year Revenue Test
Using First In First Out Method
Unspent Funds Represents Ending Fund Balance June 30, 2006
Revenues Collected From FY 2001-2002 441,840
Revenues Collected From FY 2002-2003 341,536
Revenues Collected From FY 2003-2004 361,027
Revenues Collected From FY 2004-2005 289,794
Revenues Collected From FY 2005-2006 797,618
Total Ending Fund Balance 2,231,815
Result: Five year spent test over the limit by
$42,990 however, City has Budgeted capital
projects ($812,000) well above the excess that
will be completed within 24 months from 6/30/06
which will com I with Government Code 66001.
Capital Improvement FY2005-2006 Future Commitments % Funded with Fee
Administration 207,263 60%
Prof. Architecture/Eng 34,697 100%
Art Work—EI Paseo 15,999 100%
Art/PlacemenUPurchase 51,105 812,000 100%
Page 9
Section I — A.I.P.P. Maintenance Fund
A portion of the Art in Public Places fee is used to cover the yearly maintenance of all the art
placed within the City on public places. The City of Palm Desert placed General Fund cash within
the fund of a sum of $300,000 to be used as a loan to have sufficient funds to adequately maintain
the Artwork until sufficient funds are collected to cover the yearly costs.
Part 1 — Fund Balance, Revenue, Interest, Expenditures, Ending Balance
Beginning Fiscal Year Ending
Account Descri tion Fund Balance 2005-06 Fund Balance
Revenues 8� Other Sources:
Developer Fee
Interest Income 6,991
Contributions
Transfers In
Total Sources 6,991
Expenditures & Other Uses:
Maintenance of Art Work 72,464
Transfers Out
Total Uses 72,464
Total Available 214,044 65,473 148,571
Part II — Compliance with Expending funds within 5 Years
Five Year Revenue Test
Using First In First Out Method
Unspent Funds Represents Ending Fund Balance June 30, 2006
Loan From General Fund —Transfer In 300,000 Loan from General Fund
Revenues Collected From FY 2001-2002
Revenues Collected From FY 2002-2003
Revenues Collected From FY 2003-2004
Revenues Collected From FY 2004-2005
Total Ending Fund Balance 300,000
Result: Five year spent test met in accordance
With Government Code 66001
Capital Improvement FY2005-2006 Five Year % Funded with Fee
Pro'ects Future Commitments
Maintenance of Art 72,464 100%
H:\��'P51\COIiVCIL\Annual Report-Devebpment Impact Fee 2005-06.doc
Page 10
Section J — Child Care Facility Fund
The City of Palm Desert is interested in providing funding, through impact fees for new child care
homes and centers, in order to meet some of the child care demand generated by employees and
commercial uses in the City. A Nexus Study was prepared and approved by City Council in
August 2005. Yearly, the City will adopt a budget to use these funds to create new facilities and
equipment.
Part 1 — Fund Balance, Revenue, Interest, Expenditures, Ending Balance
Beginning Fiscal Year Ending
Account Descri tion Fund Balance 2005-06 Fund Balance
Revenues & Other Sources:
Developer Fee 247,624
Interest Income 5,759
Contributions
Transfers In
Total Sources 253,383
Expenditures & Other Uses:
Design, Construction & Equipment 82,000
Transfers Out
Total Uses 82,000
Total Available - 0 - 171,383 171,383
Part II — Compliance with Expending funds within 5 Years
Five Year Revenue Test
Using First In First Out Method
Unspent Funds Represents Ending Fund Balance June 30, 2006
Loan From General Fund —Transfer In
Revenues Collected From FY 2005-2006 253,383
Total Ending Fund Balance
Result: Five year spent test met in accordance
With Government Code 66001
Capital Improvement FY2005-2006 Five Year % Funded with Fee
Pro'ects Future Commitments
Grants to Non-Profits 82,000 100%
H:���'P51\COL VCII.\Annual Report-Development Impact Fee 2005-06.doc
Page 11
Section K — Fire Facility Fund
The City of Palm Desert is interested in providing funding, through impact fees for new Fire
Station and equipment, in order to meet some of the new commercial and residential development
in the northern half of the City. A Nexus Study was prepared and approved by City Council in
June 2006. Commercial development rate is $0.22 per sqUare foot, industrial/office rate is $0.20
per square foot, and residential development would be based on a $2,262 per acre depending on
density of units built. Yearly, the City will adopt a budget to use these funds to create new
facilities and equipment.
Part 1 — Fund Balance, Revenue, Interest, Expenditures, Ending Balance
Beginning Fiscal Year Ending
Account Descri tion Fund Balance 2005-06 Fund Balance
Revenues & Other Sources:
Developer Fee 129,330
Interest Income 2,179
Contributions
Transfers In
Total Sources 131,509
Expenditures & Other Uses:
Design, Construction & Equipment - 0 -
Transfers Out
Total Uses - 0 -
Total Available - 0 - 131,509 131,509
Part II — Compliance with Expending funds within 5 Years
Five Year Revenue Test
Using First In First Out Method
Unspent Funds Represents Ending Fund Balance June 30, 2006
Loan From General Fund —Transfer In
Revenues Collected From FY 2005-2006 131,509
Total Ending Fund Balance 131,509
Result: Five year spent test met in accordance
With Government Code 66001 1 Year Balance
Capital Improvement FY2005-2006 Five Year % Funded with Fee
Projects Future Commitments
New Fire Station - 0 - 4,000,000 50%
Land Purchase 2,000,000 100%
Page 12
LEGAL NOTICE
CITY OF PALM DESERT
PUBLIC HEARING RELATIVE TO
ANNUAL REPORT OF
DEVELOPER IMPACT FEE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm
Desert City Council to consider filing a report and resolution on developer impact fees
as of June 30, 2006.
SAID PUBLIC HEARING will be held on Thursday, November 16, 2006 at 4:00
p.m. in the Council Chamber of the Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-51Q Fred Waring
Drive, Palm Desert. All citizens are invited to present oral or written comments relative
to the proposed impact fee report. Any citizen unable to attend may submit written
comments to the City Clerk prior to the Public Hearing.
Copies of the report may be reviewed at the Civic Center, Monday through Friday
between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.
RACHELLE D. KLASSEN, CITY CLERK
CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA
October 19, 2006
PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS and
EX/STING PROGRAMS
The Capital Improvement Program is a listing of proposed and existing projects
for the acquisition and construction of generai government resources and
intergovernmental grants and reimbursements. These programs are outlined in
the proposed five-year capital budget and the existing capital projects. The final
approval of each project by Council/Board is based on recommendations by staff
after the project has been through a thorough review and approval process by the
appropriate committees andlor commission to ensurs that conce�ns of all parties,
'�` including the public, affected by the project have been addressed. This process
�� inciudes a checklist submitted with the staff report to Council/Board of the
;`%;:� required review, approvai and status of the project.
�
�;. This section includes:
* Listing of the First t�the Fifth Year/Fiscal Year 2006-2007 to 2011-2012
of the Proposed Five-Year Capital Improvement Program
* Listing of Existing Projec#s in Fiscat Year 2005-06 and Continuing
Appropriations to Fiscal Year 2006-07.
Continuing appropriations are amounts which have been
ii� appropriated in Fiscal Year 2005-06 and are not expected to be
� expended by June 30; 2006. This applies primarily for capital
improvement program budgets and specific programs that overlap
fiscal years. When authorized, continuing appropriation totals are
� added to the new fiscal year budget totats in order to track all
�� approved spending.
- The exact amount of appropriations for carryovers for each program
�--;
`�` will be determined at the end of the fiscal year during the preparation
of the financial statements. Totafs will include appropriations for
1) purchase orders and contracts encumbered totals and
2) unencumbered balances as of June 30, 2Q06.
Page 6-]
. .. . . . .. .. .. _ . ... �... �f%' � �:.�J� �t.i� . ._. . . � � . � `��.:5? U:.S Lc!� r ,. . .
�7
�-+
�
�M
F-LI
�
�
�
�
z
0
H
`Z N
W `�
H �
z �
�
h
w
w
a
, �
; �
I w
c�
Q
0.
�
�
�
c-,
i
� � �+�` �M`� CITY OF PALM D�SERT
'J�.:.: ..., Sfh
CAPITAL iMPROVEMENT PROGRAM _
`: � ' STREET,TRAFFIC SIGNAL,AND DRAINAGE PROJECTS
- '�. �� . 5-YEAR SCHEDUIE
�'�•�`s 2007-E011
r
' .�-:;:.,—�.:,-:�.:�--,.:.-- .�.
~4�'L:F`;:�:{iN,! , I
:'Si!Y._.\'_
" (_' _
" ea:on S!3.uu+c FriK.•c' 7
,-- '� L..------.. _ _. . . �
,\ �- � r,-;.,-�---�---n-----_-- -:i
�' 1 . '.r`a•:x s �r � i
, :s�G;�t,l WJf�f.++M�f�R� � _/ I . � !
. ke<..Tac�r.fFa:..�'p _. `���j. � - L Or'.Se6Z..1o6fffy�N !l n .,V
.r=x.KKSl LY.OGf.A+: .- --� T� � /
� ' y �, tiNC>)26�+.Y4 i,-�.tO.Z.�W
� Eu Ccti Z!�:dl_' F(.:Yk'iSM Y�. / J
, __ _._' _._ . / sr�,pf<..\� / .....�..._ ._ ___ '__.. ....
v.<rao;vnnJ� ltrr•ca'�.xs� �wo„vxx-� + � 4�„� � .r �as�c-rF•c�.::.as�m .4ws.r•rocr.c.�_��,
YbKEiS/'lENILJAUHSNhHEOk 1.�� '�� 1 . CJ 1.��.�EwOi�MI�iSM'�[0!�EATl�4t���
- �� �tt'at t 59AW' s '..JJ4.XCs' � � � L_ :Q('irA.N.r —�__�
�
. . ts�LN]YZM'� F'?S.^�.'P.2 , ��•
% ,'_—_"___---._='--'"_'__' ',� � i.n.ViKS'iNKfW�`�CtiUC,s!9WIV.�.^,9�itioCAT"!.�A�E�
'.S0.F.["�'+A:f,nMXRFR£�iiu'F.MICt�!'tS:�I ��� � ^a�. �� /wKNn4'i1�CRR•CJhY!•�Li�.E �
' .W_W:Enc��+L'uOn:t�f_2):� F1� ofrta:o�Olro�lt CU:WIN�
IC.NW��_+J .. �__.�_�-.�._..�._��..��._
1.__"__—�__ ��—...�— ` ' '� /
�=��� : Yn��. . � �.�_
�� 'a� I'aN�r�MSw�C�R4.'CT�R.vYtiWfRAAlH�:O'1x'+/G/t..Y
� _ �_. �4�, '� sP�Nc{ryu1�1TRThiXf.o.V.9W4C�
Z„7 Y �9� £R:M.7]UA�9.'.Y�}lOF1tT
iM:'i�gGM(i$O�'l'SLG�MfR"fX1:(r�NNC�u3.£�1 �x p �xe,
�M.Ar 4�B M R1R YJ.SCCr1�
�,, � r.r.r«sf�s,cx ry aps::a----J � . � _ . ��/ J''Rs�
�'s ___'__ ._. �\ ..�w.�swa�Raa� � r�..n�num�,
R`f . _.. '.'MMSF1nG.RtT•:CCIIRtNSL:wrRR1C'.NLN:YaW.�,uE
d� FF9M�if1WJEC:w10MfNL1'WMYK
� W'.'SVtrtO�CAYlCi ,� �.� � PIM3tdM16G[VFW
�_.•.� \ G!Lor..4do007D.�tY%Ail'PC'
t ' " 'LStAltf. Y.KC6.YF. '� �� � -�--''
.C'�.. --•—•--- i /
� � / ���
GYfEF�/V.�1fC2YGM�fAA'�ML✓L{.'NUG � : �"�"� j .
. Gi�QYY1IINilVGM:MLN'ClL9 `\` �`r� I�xMw���bQ. � VM�rttJeDl�
E'tLa+t S$'JYY :9Y.:Y7�.:.! � I ,f �' �
.Enc �a7uo3. ��� w�vcn.ww ',� / �cc g
�� � < .�9
�z � � � � �
:lVlfT.11[ 9
�a�w�+a)�i^.:wx.irF�rwr.oa�e.ace d :3
9HlAOADYGtlkYDWWt'NA[9fAPVd+,:..NE�� . � "` ' €
F Oi�r3i.�A1St F+��'J'dV'A � �^'��!{�
. . : I �r4E'"IM•�if:�P4:JSM+�.L'P'i�:lr�,.�
r1 r [a�GfWACktC\:ii'+n�..'�>' I
'1idCTRqAIk'LT'�V:N809_4 WJ�6]4(5��[MI } � rCM�>•:.�
..+GafcvE�sYfaM+6i�ts�4:C�a "" �--'rl • { I
..,Y � '1 Fs:Cb'Si•AoOpU Fr}JD<bE^ �
__�:Cail195A�` �riolw�oet ;:e v�_Iw,�0+1 Gg j`
� vto
� a-r,��a�cc.n�raa�+wan�raro:+o-ta _ �3 � •
VM+1L1M�Ki0ffniYJCu`cs-1F -�� �e' Miwoo�
E�ttw�t���{'RQ��rh�JC) �, d ���
� .,�at eos .�ph"'"^ .. B . �
'FJ�:at � �f�YA� M . 'MEEYMCS:.1G'Ptai4'xSrw.:�
� . .7 ' , �� �t�tawnw.0?^ra.w.vnw:.c.:,sj
� cr�+r�.w�o t
'--- -�.___... �� . .
'i7f�i3O�' Ft:4M:tlllaJOG iti Pte.TM+
. � ,� . V � � � .�
���!{��� F � �:� �� �--------_... .
. kt1E� U�On:=J_f1FE3%^5'� , Y� 7 � n r�RWI�("�_(G �,\ �� i
J a�s.��c'v�rvw�s �.� �6 y�.x��r i.. �.��r f�.mtvK.�,Mc[aurr�v,ntePa.a...—I
:� ,{ A'.Y�b.�x.cAtixaax.ecfa��,w :t+.•...
`J. � \ . , . �M �'.\ COM;R+w�y
\ ►itCoeif'JQtoM.�lr2Na�
�� �� � � • '�' \ ' . .M C �Y \ ��_`\\ ______. .._._y
I-�. ��� •> -�� �� "AtLPJK�#f �RtC..��+F uz f
, .�'71�;.._ �-',r,i '`�� \ �`A+�wcmcwuxw�r.e*.!�vt�»ii.ow,Y>.t � fla'n�C.^�w�wwua��n�r�a�F,c�
-��1;: br�s..rc..aa ,dnrn_ NkH:t�MCrM�':� —1
::� S ur-:•:.�e�ew n raa.mm
_ d . tsa+:cauo-.n ,.,:+n.Tu
�i
..Y.... .�....-.� _E. ._'."; �
s �" � �
-_._... _ 1�' .,,.... ;;` � � �
�. __ `•., o ,
L— 1__.._._ ___._ ,
Miles
CITY-W/DF PROJECTS IMPROVEMENT FISCAL YEAR
-M,u�mF.Fr �?— Mnroa s�T +vwsax�wnr� ��� TYPE COLOR fNDEX
.-..__. . � LANDSCAPE PROGRA4i ,/NLET/ORVWELL PROCaRAAI �y,.s:;a� ,.__----,._.............
SIDEWALKS PROQRAAI �
_ _ , _...,._ � .... ..._ .._...._._ ._., � ._._. ,.._._..._....., — �CONi1MUIhIG ;
�PY:2006-204T 57.6if,000� I �FY:2008-2007-S25D 000; . FY Z00!4607-f300�000; enri:4 vµ:t i.._ ---s
; s—�_.___ �.., ,:.�........�.._..:...d fV:2006-2007;
'FY:T007-?fW8-f2SD.060' :�Q7-20�!-i250A�� i i FY:2D0710�•:51��8�� •�F •���.:�
� . ; ---^
�- . wa: c« FY:38071008;
,
fY:20�-�o0s-,�60sC46; i�Y:2DOD�'20o4•t'�Aoo i � .FY:400iR-ZCDl►-�o0a' .•��••,• '
---,�r.iy»��.+,o.�,�-e-���. 1,.�. r-..�-�-rt-•`-�•-----....�y . _... . _. . i F1' � ..� OU9,
•`�sRp!^sv7..oP�, ..,, f ���,"'�.`��i .... ._......_..... wwai ,...... �y��a�
� , � l�
4'�..... .�. . 1 ...._._ i3��•._. ':ms,e:re .• .. � _ ,..
L_� — �-
Yage 6-3
CITY OF PALM LIESERT
PROPOSEO FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMEIJT PROGRAM
SUMMARY
FtlND/NG Budge! Multl-Veer
PRQPOSED PROJECT UST BY FUND SOURCES veai funding Budgeted Funded
MEASURE A FUND
'Cock Stro�t Imprcvemenfs fr�m F�ed Waring io F�ank S�eatr3 AAeaswe A F,nd 2t3 7 �3.(YN),,;On
Carrycwer-�t 6Wqet 53%265 8.597.r.55 Note i
'Fred Wanng Tum p��rkOt Measura A Fund 7t3 1 ipp,(N'A
Ca�r,�cvr,r o1 BWget SUO.004 6Ct.LY.0 Yes
'Menterey Ave Remp Motl�licat�on Measure A Fund 2�3 t S.a05.000
Cam�m.Pr of 9,�dget 2,370,324 7,'75.424 No(1)
'Portota'I-10 Irterchange ROW;Des�g� Measure A Fuxf 213 Carrypver ol8udge� t.?15.993 Ves
'Portota Sfreet i Din;ih Shore Exfension Measure A Rnd 213 Cairyove�of Budget 2+3.&t9 Yes
'Monterey Med�an!mp(Hovley&Country Club) tuleasu/e A Fund 2�3 Carrywe�d Budget 5s.3oJ Yes
'Monterey Ave UtiliT�RelOCation �,leasure A Fux1 219 Carrywer of Butlpet Sf.q.tx10 Y?s �
'Dmah Shore Imp(Miriem to Key Largo AveJ Mea9we A Fe�xf 2i3 Carrywer of Budge! :Ot 535 Vas
:`,',;
'Monterey Avenue From fred Waring to Geratd Ford Measve A Funtl 2�3 2 5oo.0oU No(3)
'Portola Interchange A I-10 Measwe A Fund2t3 2 B.WG.COo No(2) ��
'Fred W aring R�ghFTurn Pocket Measwe A Fund 273 2 NM..� Yes �h
'Portola Inte�c�ange� I-10 Measue a Fux1 2t3 3 2.Oq0.00o No(2) �
'Fred WA�I�g Tum PoCket Messue A Fund 2t3 3 BOU.pop ves f�:�,
'Monterey Avenue From Fred Waring io Gerald Ford Aleasure A Fund 2t3 3 3.Ooo.ocC� No(3)
'Monteroy Averue From Fred Waring to Gerald Ford t�easure.4 Funo 2t3 4 3.ax�.rY�o Mo(3)
i"
Totd Fund 5 37,365,�69
� (
CONSTRUCTION TAX FUND
'Corporation Yard Improvements Const�uctbn Tax Fu�d 231 Carrywer ot Budyet � Yes
'Givic Centei Park Storage Co�structbn r�Fund 23� Cairywer W BuAger �GO,uoc ves `'
'Fire Statlon Improvements�TOwn Center�`PCrtola Statipns} ConsnucDon Taa Furx123i Carrywer of BuAget ?9,377 Yes �
'Fire Stat�on E■pans�on(Mesa V�ew Station No.67) Constructan rax Fund 23i Carrywer ol Bueget Yes
�
Total Fund S 179,377
DIiAlNAGE FUNO
'Cook and Country Club Dramage Drairvage FuW 232 t 6Op.p0p "�%
Carryover of B�dget 3.393,871 3,993,871 Yes �'�
�t,�>
'Portola Ave�'D�n2h 5hOre E.xtension Dramage Fud232 Carryoverof6udget 3��g.a2� Yes Y�;`�
'Alort�SpF.ere Dr�inage Study Pro�ect Drainage Fu�d':t2 Carrywer ot Budyet Yes €e-.,
'Regic�af Park Orahaqe Fvid 2:12 Carr{wer ol 8u�et � �es '�•�"'�
Tota)Fund S a,3o3,309 '
�
PARK 8 RECREA710N FUND
'C�ty Park!h�rovertuwnts r 3!k F�113 1 ���.CXYi '(e;
•Noviey Scx:cer Field L�rr,p G�rk Furxf 239 ' ?�Or�? Yes
�Ha��ey Sa:cer Fi��G rrrgattor,Co�t�or perraration S'a�k fi.�J 233 ± SJ�'A YeS
'F�ae,cr.+1�a�l 8��yc!e and Goi`Cart Pa;h �ark F,nd 233 � i�Yy.�NX� Yes
'Hiking T!�i! Park FEx�d 233 Gartyove:rn 6Wget "13 R�9 Y85 �.
'Cr:iC Cenler Amphith98ter Par4 Furd?73 Carry��xer ot 8udget 7.?.76�?' Y�c
'Hrnfev Soccm Fiefd Lame Park Fund 233 2 ao._'�C: 'r'es
'Ciry•Padc Imp�a�emgnts Fark Funo 233 2 'S.00C Ves
'Har?oy Sa:cer Fietd Lamp park Fv�d z33 3 r>.Cx.�C Yes -
'City P�rf�I[r.pr!rrCmC�ts Park F'und 233 3 ?S.f.�1C YA5
'}i�vlBy SOCCBI Fie!d l.atnp Ratk F�r,y?33 a 2fi�r�� Y_5
•�iry Rark improvsrnen?s Park F�nc1233 4 ?S.JC�J Yaz
'Hovley Soccer F�eld LamG Park F�nd 233 5 2i.x+) '�es �
'C1y Park Imprr,vemonts Park FWO 233 5 15.CC� Y25
1'age 5-4 Totai Fund s 3,DOU,356
�
CITY OF PALM DESERT
PROPOSED FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGAAM
SUMMARY
Fuxanrc e�ayer Mutti•Yaer
PROPOSED PflOJECT LI$T�Y FUNp SOURCES Yeer Punding 8udge»d Funded
TRAFFVC SIGNAL FUND
'Frank Sinatra Onve&Geraid�ord D�ve Traific Si�na!Fw.f 23�� 1 2�s,000 Yes
'Hvry 11 1 -Monterey-Hvry 74 Traflic Signel T�athc Sigrtal F�rq 23a t So,o00 Yes
'Dinah Shore&Portola Avenue Trettic Skjna�Fu�d'i3.t Carryover of Bud8e1 215,OW Yes
`Portola 8 Geratd Ford rratric S�gnai Fv,d 234 Carrywer of 8udger 2oe,a8e Yes
'Portola Ave&Frank Sinaira Orive TraH'�c Sgral Fund 234 Carrywer ol0udget 208,5C0 Yes
'Country Ciub Drive �Via Scena TraKic Stgnal F�nd 234 Carrywer ot eudget r i3,a;t Yes
'Hwy 11 1 -Monterey-Hwy 74 TraHic Signai T�att�c S�gnal Fund 234 2 25o.�U0 Yes
. 'Hwy 74&Mesa TraHic Signel 7ranic Spnal Fvd e'3A 5 a00,00p No
�. Fund Total S �,650,�,7�
���
�"� RECYCUNq FUND
.;.
f,�r
'Presidents'Plaza i Renwation of Waste Colfection;RecyGing RecycF�9 Fund 29s t aeo,000 Yes
�T�Se;
£�
,;r; Fund Total 3 aeo,a0o
�
AIR QUALITY MGNT FUNO
'Bus Shelter Improvement Program Air QueBly MgM F�nd 23B 1 eo,000 Yes
Fund Total i eo,000
��
CAPITAt PROJECT RESERVE�UND
'PortWa Walt&Aesthedc Treatment vear 20�o FwW ao0 1 �,2o0.000 Yes
�, 'Mortterey AvelDinah Shore Landscaping Year 20�0 fund a00 1 i20.000 Note 2
� 'I-10/AAonterey Ave Landscaping Year 201a Fud e00 1 80,000 Note 2
'City Hal)FaCifilie5 Year 2010 Fu�d 400 1 200,000 YeS
'Other City Owned 8uildings Year 20i0 Pund�WO 1 tOG,00� Yes
'Westfield Bus Bey ProJect Year 2oto Fuw aoo 1 535,602 Yos
•F.I.N.D Bullding Year20t0 F�nd aW 1 1.300,OOU Yas
`� 'Audo/Visuel and Recording System Yee�2010 Fu�d 400 1 �5.00o Yes
�`7: •Holiday Decorations(Civic Center&Visitors Center) Y9d�2010 Ftnd A00 1 50.00o Yes
'Preside�ts'Rlaza I Paim Tree Remwat;Sideweik Repairs Year 20�0 Ftnd 400 1 e3,000 Yes
s?' •Presidents'Pia�I Parking Let RepaWng Yeu 20�0 Fu,o acw 1 �,200,000 Yes
`Facade Program Year 2070 Fuhd a00 1 SOO,OCYT Yes
'Major ytreet 18ndsceping Vear 2010 Fu�Q sM 1 ?50.OfJf�
Carryae�of8udget e,i7o.96t �a?.O.9et Yes
`M9;or street Sfdewalk progrem Yenr 2Qt0 Ftx+d 400 f 25Q,OOG
Carryrnar ot BWget d85,532 ?35.532 Y95
'Mor,terey Median Imprtrve��ents YOar 2QF0 FlM 40Q 1 �.OL�
Carrywerot8udpet s3,t17 93,s17 Yes
'Frg�YJB�nq OdVQ W�der,ir:y-f�iifpmi2:C
Wlashtngton STr9et(5ovnd Wail Widenin�j YOar 20t0 F�axi 40p i R.000,000
Carrvover d Hudget 7.82a,Of9 i3.62aA�P Yes
'Portda Ave�Whitewater Brid{�e Year 201C Fuxf app Carrvover o(BuOget 5�,2+6 Yos
'Catle Oe Loc Campasiru�s Yea�20�J Fvx1 ac0 Gsnywar of&,dget 33,s60 Yes
'Community GnrOens Year ZOto F�nd a0� Carrycwer d BWqe� �?5,:�00 Yes
tigm Retrofit Project ��ear n�*a F�e,d aa� CIIRyOVRf Cf BUCkJ9! �s2.�3 Yes
'�"/ashingien Stroot Medfans Study Year z�?io Fux:sQ^ Ca�ryavec at suCga+ +.i5,000 Y�s
'Sh2tlow Mot,�rrtain Onve;Hwy?4?�etf,�Sipnal Yser 2G1�i FiiwJ e0o Carrya�er M 8:xiget 221.722 Yss
'Btt3 fi0p R040CSts,^,n Year 2(`t0 Find 400 r`g�ryINgr of 9tMlqat tMi.300 �{eg .
•Momerey Ave.Bridga exoans�n�ic�rrs veer 2aio F�,nc u7o :.ar.rywer of Budget tjY],09C fes
'CounW C!Ub Medlen Year?,010 Fux�400 Carnpver of Budget 22,903 Yes
Page 6-5
.
CITY OP PALM DESERT
PROPOSEO FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROCiRAM
StJMMARY
FUNDfNG Budget Multl-Yeer
PROPOSEA PAOJECT I.IST BY FUND SOURCES Yeer Funding Budqrred Funded
CAPITAL PROJECT RESERVE FUND(Continues)
'Fred Wanng a!San Pasquel vear 2ptQ Funtl�00 Carryrner ct 8utlget Bt.g55 Yos
'Sewer Lalerals Installations Year 2C70 Fund�C�O Canvover ot BuCget 23.73 Yes �
'Portola Palms Ga2e vear 2oio Fund n0o Carryove�ct Bufget Yes
'Visitor Center EquipmenVFurniNre Yoar 20�0 Fund 400 Carrywe�ot Budgel 2�n.A1a Ves
'Nbnterey AveiDinah Shore Landscapi�g Yaar 2o�e Fv�d�0 2 �.oer,000 Noto 2
'1�10'Monterey Ave lantlscapmg Vear 20�0 Find a00 2 �Zo,�x�o Note 2
'Mapr street sidewa!k Yeer 20�0 fund a0o 2 25o,e0o Yes
'Mapr sireat landc.caping Year 20t0 Fund a00 2 250,00o Yes
'Facade Program vear 20�0 F�nd aoo 2 Sqp,ppo yeg
'Major street sitlewalk program Vear 2010 Furb 400 3 250.000 Yes
'Major street IanCscapirg Year 20�0 Fu�tl 400 3 zso,000 Yes
'Facade Program Year 2oio FuW aoe 3 soo,ou0 Yes ; .
,c;✓
'Major st�eet sidewalk program Vear 20t0 Fund a00 4 250,000 Yes �
'Major street�andscaping Year 2010 Fuid 400 4 ?50.000 Yes �n
'Facade Ptogram Year20t0 Fuid 400 4 5W,000 Yes tt:'
'Major street sid0walk program Year 2010 Fund a00 5 250,000 Yes �`�
'Major street�andscaping Year 20�0 fuW s00 8 250,000 Yes ��.':
'Facade Progrsm Yeer 2010 funtl 400 5 5Co,000 Yes
Total Fund S 28,786,017
���
DRAINAOE FUND
'Nuisance water inleUdryweli program Drainage Fuid a20 1 300,OOo Yes �
'Menterey Avenue-Fred W aring to Whitewater Channef orainege Fuio azo 2 2.t3�.o52 Yos
'Nuisance water inlet/drywell program Orairege Puna a2o 2 :joo,000 Yos
'NUis�nce water�.nleVdrywell progr8m Dratrrage Funtl 420 3 300,000 Yes �
�
Tdal Pund f �,037,052
c�
CP- PARK 8 RECREATIUN FUND
'Civ�c Center HarMbaH Couris Park Fuid a30 1 4g,000
�
CarryoverotBuyget St,000 to0,0o0 Yes �
'Cii�C Conter Pa�k Restrocros Park P�nd a3o 1 2pp,poo /x;,<,
Carryover of Bir,lget /25,Op0 325,OG0 Yes t`Y
,;;c
'Amphitho�ter �ark FusC a'�0 1 250,000 �'
CenytxCr pf&.vJget 84,57s 314,574 Y83 `��
'Satrlite YercJ Renovafi^r Park F�nd d30 1 J.G5,000 yes
'LegendS Field Ccl�m�s Pa�lc Fiax1430 1 t5;b0 Yns
'Clty Park Improver'ier,ts Park Fuxf 130 1 sc.poc Yes
'CC 5occe Bal;iCrt:JPi�r•�c Park find a30 Carryrover of Budget ,-�,ppp Ye5
'AiPP Preject Park FinO 430 Cerryo�aer of BuOger :(3.Or}6 Yes �
'Hfk�rg Trai! Park Fux7 430 :arrywer of&rSgef ?6;.95a •(9,
'City Pflrk lmDro��omect� Pa�.Fux:�;v. 2 5p.�?x� Yas
'�egends Fiala Cclumr.s ParVc Funi a3�J 3 t S,OW Yes
'Ciry Park Im�+ns�emen!s Park f+�rsa 43�; 3 5tS,!�0 Yes
"City pA�k t�,T.vC�r;ertS Pa�k ftrnJ d:�0 4 �,-:'?0 yeq .
`L9G(�dS Fi81d COi���onS Perk F�nd 43^, 5 IS.J`_�C YFS .
':rly Park lrnpra�smer�,:s Park Fuie 430 5 :>0,000 Yes
Tota!Fund S 1,BJ4,533
�
Page 6-6
CITY OF PALM DESERT
PR�P�SEQ FtVE-YEAR CAPRAI IMPROVEMEIJT PROGRAM
SUMMARY
FtINDING Budget Multi-Year
PBOpOSED PRO ECT LIST BY FUND SOURCES Year Funding Budgetatl Funded
ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND
'AIPP ProioCis AVPP Fund 43B Carryover o/0txlget 4n5.J00 Yes
'Alessandro Al!y AIPP Futd d36 2 27.Oo0 Yes
'COD Swimming Peol AIPP FurW 436 3 ao.000 Yes
'Desert Wilbw Parking Structure AIPP Fux1438 3 86.o00 VCs
'Monterey and Dinan Shore Med�an niPP Fua a3e 3 iBo,000 Yes
Totel Fund 5 812,000
��
CP-SIGNAUZATION Ft1ND
'Traffic SignAi Coordination Cam�wer of Budget 791,889 Yes
��" Total Fund S 191,686
a,,:,
�
ri
�� TRUST FUND
A,'�
�"`` 'Homme/Adams Park Trust Fund e8o Carryaver W Budget 273,t2B Yes
Total Fund S 2T3,126
1
��',
CAPITAL•RDA PROJECT AREA 81 FUND
'Portola Ave�W h�tewater Bridge RDA PJNt Fund 850 1 2,000,000
Carryaver of Budget a,000.000 6,000,000 Bo�tl
'Neigfiboihpai Undergrounding ADA PJAt Fund 850 1 2,500.000
Carrywer M Budget 2,000,000 a,50p,000 Bond
'RDA Project-Fred Waring-Deep Canyon-Ciry Boundaries ADA PJM1 Fund BSO 1 �s.000 Yes
'Living Desert Pe!king Lot RDA PJ�ft Fud 850 1 250,000 Yes
'EI Pa3eo Courtesy CeRs RDA PJxt Fund 850 1 i25.000 Yes
a""..
�Y 'Entrada Del Paseo-La Spiga Imprwements RDA P,t�t Fvx185o 1 500,00o Yes
� 'Catalina ReCreaiion Facility FDA PJN1 Fund 850 1 �50,00o Yes
" `WaUaroo Improvements RDA PJx1 FuW 850 1 50,00o Yes
'Frontage Road Impr.kwy 111 -Alessandro Alleyway ROA PJ`t F�nd 850 1 5,000,000 Bond
'EI Paseo Image Exiension end Upgrade ROA PJti Fund eso 1 �,550,000 9ond
�a 'Henderson Building ROA PJNi FuW 850 1 3,500,000 BOnd
� 'Presidents'Plaza I Parking Lot Repaving RDA PJA1 Fud 850 1 �,20o,opo Hond
f� 'Entrada Ei Paseo-12 Acre RDA PJ��Find 850 Carryover of Butlget t.ots,900 Yes
'FrBd Waring Street Improvement RDA PJx/Fund 650 Cartywer of BudQet 688,385 Yes
`" 'Pslfns tD Pin85 E95t Glasser RbA PJA1 Fund 85G Carryover ol Budget 0 Yes
'AlessanQro AAsyway ROA P,M�Fvid 830 Carryovarof BuOgef 2�9.68H Yes
'YYallaroo Chiltl Cara Center RDA PJNt Fun0850 CAffYb�6f Of BIKIgCt t5.8IX3 Yes
•c»ta�ina Rec Faciliq� Ro/.Pds,Fi.,a aso cartyover ct 9uoget ,oz,az8 Yes
'Palm Deasrt AGuatic Facitity �DA PJ#?Purd 85o Carry�r,er et&xf�ei 50�,�5�� Yes
'NeiqhbO�hoO�J Underqrour.•�iny RQA AJkt FtrsdB50 2 2.506.Cn0 BOttd
'Monte�ey Avenus From Fred 1Na^nq to GeraW Ford RDa P.;w�F+nd 850 2 l.Oo0J100 Bond
`EI Pasev Imega Ezter,sia�2rtd Upgrade RDA F.Hri F�a�d 930 2 1.650.�7C Bond
`GO�e CMnmerc��l Arn:�ProjeCt9 iHvry 111.Westfieid,EI Paseo} RDa n.�s�F;x,o a50 2 +s.cx,�.�� 6ond
'Uving OBSErt P9ricir,3 LCt RDA P,rM?Fuxf 896 7 250.OU1 Yes
•EI Peasee��ur.esy Carts FQA.i';M?F�td�.'A 2 i25 o,�e Yes
'Nelghborhood Undergrounding �Da a�r�Find 950 3 3,mo,Aoo Bond
'EI P&seo Imaqe E�ctens�on and Upgrade RDA PJ�7 Fu,d 859 3 �.7�.oCb 8ond
'EI Paseo Oounesv Cnns n0�F,�!+i Find a5o 3 ��S,o�Y� Yas
'EI P3990 CoUrtesy�ar.^, RDA F„bt Gtp�Q y5p S !25.�G Ye3 .
'EI Paseo Cour,esy Caru RDR PJbt Fur�;A50 5 125,UG0 Ye5
Tot91 FunA 5 5t,Z3A,t5�
�
Page 6-7
CITY OF PALM DESERT
PROPOSED FlVE-YEAR CAPITAL 1MPROVEM6NT PROGRA(rl
SUMMARY
FUNDING Budgat Multl-Year
PROPOSEp VROJECT UST 8Y FUND SOURCES Yesr Funding Budgeted Funded
CAPITAL-RDA PROJECT AREA N2 FUND
'Desert WiHow Pad SiabilizaUen R�A PJs2 Furx1 BSf 1 75.0.�0
Carrywer r.t 8idget 8�.578 158,,'9 Yes
'Monterey Ave Ramp Matlification RDA PJ$2 Fund tf5} 1 2,(Xp.ppp gpnd
'Iand AcquiSitionrOpen SpaCe ROA PJR2 Funtl 851 1 �.500.000 Bo�d
'Pedestnan Bndge at University Park RDn PJa2 Fund B51 1 t,sp0.pp0 Bond
'Berger Orive Improvemsnfs ROA PJ�2 Fund 851 1 500.000 Bond �
'Desert W ilfow Rorovation RDA PJA2 Ftnd 851 1 10Q,000 Y@S
'Cal State Campus ROA P,1�2 Fu�cf 851 1 1,gp0.Op0 Yes �
'Freedcm Park RDA PJA'2 Fuq B57 Carryover of Budget - Bpnd
'Land ACqu�sitioniOpen Space 36 AcreS RDA FJx2 FuW 851 Carryover ol Budget 7,000,000 Bpnd
'DW Parking-For Condition ol ApprovaVLykes ROA PJ+2 Fux1851 Carrywer M Btxlget 656,59e Yes �.
'Country CIuG�Via Scena 7raltic Llgh[ RDA PJ�12 Fund 851 Carryover of Budyet t25.000 Yes
'CVWD Weli Site Development-Desert Wflbw RDA PJr2 Find 851 Carryover ol Budpef 7,323,189 Yes
'New Fire StatiOn RDA PJY2 Fund 851 2 4,ppp,ppp BOnd �
'Desert WillOw Hotel Par{cing StruCture AOA PJo2 FurW 851 2 7,ppp,ppp gp�d ?;,'
'Palm Desert Aquetic Faciliry ROA PJK2 Pc�rd B57 2 �.ppp,p�p g�d �h'
'Nbnterey Avenue From Fred W aring to Gerald Ford ROA vJn2 Fux1 s5� 2 z,000,00o Bond .�
'PoAo18 Interchange� I-10 RDA PJd2 Fuid B51 2 a.300,000 NO(2)
'Publk Recfeational FaCilities RDA PJA2 Futc�857 2 3,000,000 BORd ��"
'Desert Willow Pad Sta6iliTalion RDA PJN2 Fund 851 2 80,000 Ye5
•Arterfai Street Undergrounding RDA PJ�t2 Funtl B51 3 3.soo,000 Bond
'Desert Willow Ped Stabilization RDA PJ»2 Fuxf 851 3 s0,000 Yes
'Arteriel Street Undergrounding RDA PJ�2 Fund 857 4 3.300,00p 8ond
'Desert W illow Pad Stabilization RDA PJN2 Fux1851 4 80,000 Yes
'Arterial Street Undergrounding RDA PJk2 Fu�d 851 5 3,�Op,000 Bpnd
'Desert Willow Patl Stabilization RDA PJM2 Funtl 851 5 Bp,pOp Yeg �i
Total Fund f 5�,961,359 �
�
CAPfTAL-pDA PROJECT AREA N3 FUND
'Perimeter Lar�dscaping RpA PJN9 Funtl 053 1 250,o0D Yes
'Cook Streei lmprovements lrom Fre3d Wan�g[o Frank Sinatra RDa Pda3 Fuio B53 1 3,000,00o No�e 1
��
`Desert W illow Hotet Parking Structure RDA PJM3 Fuq 853 2 3,000,000 Bond ��
'POAOIR 1ntBfChengC�I-10 RDA PJR3 FUK1883 2 8,2pp,000 BOhd �'^�
'Public Recreational Facllities HOA PJM3 FinA 853 2 t.000.000 Bond �,
�i.
'Neighborhood Utdity Undergraindi�g qpA P�x3 Fuxi H53 4 2,orA.00o Bond
Total Fund 5 t7,450,000
�.
CAPRAL-RDA PROJECT AREA 84 FUND
'C:d:�E'j5 FtOSlC1u!Hht PDA�J*4'rtnd B54 1 •SC.O�C
CarryoverofBudget s,a20 �5i,421� Ygs
`iJY+d9rg!d�Ml�rtg M9ighbOfi00t! RDA P,;iA F�sW HS7 1 5,Sc.�,S�C
Cerrywer of 3u5get 2,5i3O,CrC 9,O6G,000 BOnd
'Fred'Naring Sound Wafl R0.4 PJ�4 FUn0854 / 3,oUo,Coo Bond
'Fred W a�ng Street Improvemer.t RDA PJsi F:rxf N54 Cam/a+er ot Bufpef 85(7,976 Yes
'�reedom Park RDa PJa4 F:au1 BSa Carrywer of B+xlget 27i.839 Yes
'A.nerial St�et Ur�orgrcvmcling :sDA a,;xa Fx,n 65a 2 5.o0o.rJ00 9ond
TMeI Fund S i8,279,g75
�
Ya�e 6-8
CtTY pF PALM OESERT
PROPOSED FIVE-YEAR CAARAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAAA
SUMMARY
FVNDOVCi Budget Muttl-Vear
PROPOSEO PROJECT LIST BY FUND SOURCES Yesr Funtling Budgetsd Funded
HOUSING FUND
'Home Impr Prg Comp t to 6 N��ing F�B�0 � SOo�x�
Carryove�of&,dpat �f5,750 cii5,750 Yos
'20 Acre De�:elepmont Fiousn9 FuW 87� 1 f8.500.eCp
Carrywerol8udget 1,CV3,674 1',y13.674 Yes
- 'Laguna Palms RAh�h�lil�tion Housng Fuxi 870 � Z ap0 L�Op
Cartyoverol8udget t,388,956 3,JB8,a56 Yes
'Palm Viflage Apertmenls Housing Fuid 8i 0 1 �pp ppp
Carrywar of BuOget - 700.0p0 Yes
{ 'Aca�Rehab.-P.esab-HIP �tng Furd 8�0 �
275.0�00 VOS
/� 'Desert Rose Pro(ect Housing Fund B�o � �� YeS
+�_;�- 'Rental Assistence Houehp Fund 87� i �65.00o Yes
� 'Mortgage Assistance Houeing F�nd e�o i �oy,000 Yes
`Home Buyer Assistance Housirg Fvq B70 1 325,000 Yes
�. 'New ConStrvctiOn SubSidleS Howing Fund B70 � �� �eS
s
'New Acquisltion Rehabilitallon Housing Fund 870 Carryover oi Budget a,000,ppp Yes
� 'Cal'rfomia Viflas Rehabilitation Hous' Fud 870
� Carryover ct BWqet 2.8�5.679 Yes
,k.�. •Property Acquisition Mousinq Fuq 87o Car wer M Bt
. n' �t 3.2 t 0.1'8 Ye5
'Home i.mpr Prg Comp 1 to 6 Hou�Yg Fvid 870 2 soo,0oo Yes
'Acq/Rehab:Resale-HIP HousingFind870 2 275,000 Yes
� 'Desert t�ose Project Mousnq Fund 8�0 2 BS Q00 Yes
'Property Acquisition Ha�kq Fund 870 2 3,o00,OD0 Ye9
'Mul�i-Famity Improvemenl Hassng Fuid 870 2 25,000 Yes
� 'Rentai Assistance Housu�g Fuid B70 2 220.000 Yes
'20 Acre Development Hwn'rg fund B7o 2 500.00o Yes
'20 Acre Site Devebpment MaeYp FuK18T0 2 e0o,0oo Yes
'MOAgage Assistance F�asing Fux1870 2 �03,020 Yes
� 'Home Buyer Assistanc6 yqiy FVW g�p Z
� 300.00o Yes
� 'Self Help Housing Housirg�uxf 8�U 2 e0o,0oo Ves
'New Canstruction Subsidies Hausirq Fund 870 2 �.e32,pp0 Yes
'Home Imp�Prg Comp 1?0 6 Houskq Furxf 870 3 sW.000 Yes
�� 'AccyRehab/Resa4a•HIP
Housk�g FuiA 87n 3 260,500 Yes
'Desert Rose Project Hr�usinq Fuxf 870 3 ��p,ppp Ve,
� 'Proper!y Acquisition Hag'aig Fuid 870 3
2.000.000 Yes
e,;: 'Multi-Famiy Imprwement Houchq FvW B70 3 �,ppp y�
'Rentai Assistarce !iousfng fux187o 3 2�5,or�o Yes
'20 Acre Site Devebpmem Housk�p FW 870 3 �00.00o Yes
_ 'f.k]rtqage ASSiStenCe Housaip FuiO R70 3 +55,pep Ye6
'Se71 Help Fbusln9 Housinp Fis�d 8l0 3
50a.00o Yes
'Homr Bu�er Assistence Housing Fur�E70 3 soC.c� Ves
'fd0ev C6rt;truction Si.�bsitlies HouaEg fui6 B?0 3 tgp,�p yoy
'Home Ir!�r Prg Ccmp t to 6 H��using Find 870 4 �v.Y;,ocv Yes
'Acq�'Rehab:Res?Io-HiF Ho�minp F�ncf 970 d
2EE.7'u Y�s
'Cw?sert RosA Projec; Nnueirq F�aW 97e 4 �25.:�Y.? Yes
'Prcperty Acquis�l:vn H��ing Fvrc1 A70 4 :.XX�,OOC Yes
'Multi-Famity:r.�pra;emen? Houe FUW p-� 4
� ?5.006 Yes
'Rerai Ass:stenr,e Hcusnq Fsxi 87C 4 �.�.rX,A Ycs
'20 Acre Site Deve�opment HousYig FunC 870 4 �ppp •Y03
'�MRgege Assistance Hrnisirg FvW 870 4 50,01?r) Yes
'Horrre Buyer Aa,istarce Hnusnp FuMp70 S 300.W� Yes
'PDHA P���+rty Suts�dies Housng Fuid 87C � i 89a,720 Yes
'NeN•Construr.uan SuGs�dtCS Ntr,rsing Fund 87f d 4A,(X�0 YCS
'Honu,.in��C�r P-g l'.pr,p !�0 6 Housaig Fusd 8'Io 5 �C.00� Yes
'kry'Rehah;Re:.zie..u�p HausirgFu'id670 5 2Pr.832 �es
'pesen Rcse Prcject Ho�irq�u�d 870 5 i25,IX:o Yes
'Preperty Accuisd:c� Housing Fund 870 5 �.iA�.000 Yes
Page 6-9
CITY OF PALM DESERT
PROP�SED FlVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SUMMAFiY
FUND/NG 8udget Muttl•Year
PROPOSED PROJECT L13T BY FUND SOUACES Yser Funding Budgete0 Funded
HOUSINCi FUND(Continues)
'h1u!ti-Family Impr�vement F+ousng Fimd 870 5 ,^rS,C��! Ves
'Ren;al Assistance Housing Ftnd 8i0 5 �?30.cxx7 Yos
'20 Acre Site Deve!cFment Hous.q Fua 870 5 eoo.� Yes
'Mor:gago Assistance Hrwsing Fva g7o 5 :A,qOo Ves
'Home Btryer Assis4�rco Hcusrnp Fund 870 5 700,OOo Yes .
'PDHA Property Subsidios rioushg Fina 8;0 5 t,a9a.720 Yes
'New Constn:ction Subsidies Housmg Fund 870 5 sB4Oc�c Yes
Total Fund S 58,438,217
�
PAIM DESERT HOUSING AUTHORITY FUND
'Celifomiq Viilas Renrnation Houshg AiM�orlry Fu�d 871 1 3.00C,000
Gatryover o!Bud6et - 3,000.000 Yes
'Or.e Oueil Piace Signage Houetriq AWwrity Fund 8�1 1 gp,ppp yes ,;_
'One Quail Place Haaing nuthonry Fund 87t Carryover ot Budget s89,8�3 Yes �,
Total Fund S 3,336,813 ��-
�
TOTAL FIVE YEAR PRQP08E0 BUDGET $288,928,7T3 �
ae� f�.
Note 1:Project will be funded from the 34.745 mfillon bond in ProJect Area N3.
Note 2:Funding with Federal Orant.
No(1)Monterey Ramp Modificatlon:ProJect la short 52,000,000.H Councll contfnued wlth p►oject,the Qeneral Fund would be required to supplement
ths 52,000,000.Tfie RDA coutd fund the project,however,other bond funded pro�cts would have to be canceled.
No(2)Vortola Interchange�1-10:Curnent Project Is not tunaed.CVAO and RDA woutd hew to particlpate far the proJect to be tunded.RDA has
54.3 million and eouid provtde an addttlonal 512,500,000,however,other bo�d turtded pro�ects would have to be canceled.
No(3)Monterey trom Fred WaNng to Gareld Ford:P►oject ie ehort$3,500,000.M Counell contlnued wlth pro�ect,the General Fund woutd be required to
supplement the 53,500.000.The City or CVAQ would have to fund ths 53,500,000.
Bond:Pro�ect fe funded with future bond proceeds.If bonds are not fseued,proJect would not be tunded. �
�
�t.';
�:.�
�:�':
�f'��=.'
P�ge 6-10