HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUPPTL INFO - SA 07-63 �_�_� CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA
/ �
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL REVIEW
DECISION OF THE Architectural Review Commission
(Name of Determining Body)
Case No. SA 07-63 Date of Decision: June 12. 2007
Project Proponent: First Team Real Estate
Address: 3150 Bristol. Costa Mesa 92637
Description of
Application orMatterConsidered: Final Approval of New Signa eq to replace existinq siqnaqe
at 71-171 Highway 111
� _
U Q
U
p�`'� y� i
�`�� � COPYT �
~YN ��
JWp N
4.-�,"`�-,�_ = DATE " — Member of he ity Council
J �
�C �
�""a. O
O
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Date Filed: ��—�� Received by:
Action Taken:
Date:
Rachelle D. Klassen, City Clerk
H\WPdocs\WPDATA\FINERTY�tst Team Realty Call Up wpd 5/21/03
1 ,
� ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
' MINUTES MAY 8, 2007
be willing to lose a portion of. He thought that the only opportunity
they would have to get the wall further back and around the corners
would be to consider stepping it inside a little to create enough
driveway lane and beef up the landscaping around the corners. Mr.
Bagato stated that the Association had agreed to beef up the
landscaping with desert materials to screen the block wall. In
closing, he stated that the City typically doesn't like six-foot high
walls that close to the street, but this was a unique circumstance
and no one would be impacted.
The Commission reviewed and discussed the plans for the height
of the walls and adding landscaping.
Commissioner Gregory stated that there could be an opportunity to
make an interesting wall and asked the applicant to submit a plan
indicating how they intend to articulate the wall and how it would
come together.
Action:
It was moved by Commissioner Gregory, seconded by Commissioner Van
Vliet, to grant a continuance to allow applicant to submit site plan and
landscaping plans. Motion carried 5-0-0-1, with Commissioner Lambell
absent.
6. CASE NO: SA 07-63
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): FIRST TEAM REAL ESTATE,
3150 Bristol Street, Costa Mesa, CA 92637
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of
new signage to replace existing signage; First Team Real Estate.
LOCATION: 72-171 Highway 111
ZONE: C-I
Mr. Bagato stated that this request was for a new monument sign at
this location, replacing the existing monument and changing the
stone on the building to slate. This sign would include a water
feature and matching slate from the building. Mr. Bagato asked the
representative if this monument was the same length as the
existing monument. Mr. Tridon Freelene, representative stated that
it was slightly longer, but from the curbs edge it was still within the
11 foot setback.
G:1PlanninglJanine Judy\Word F+IesWRC Minutes\2007WR070508.mm.DOC Page 8 of 13
I /
�
` ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
� MINUTES MAY 8, 2007
Commissioner Hanson recommended they make the sign a little
less symmetrical since it appeared odd being that close to the
windows and suggested reducing the length of the sign. Instead of
having the water feature on both ends, she recommended having it
only on the end closest to the street. She thought that having it on
both ends would be irrelevant since it would be shoved up against
the building and you wouldn't really see the water on the other end.
Commission discussed the equipment for the water feature,
landscaping and paint colors for the building. They requested that
the applicant submit a color board, site plan and landscaping plans.
Action:
It was moved by Commissioner Hanson, seconded by Commissioner
Vuksic, to grant a continuance subject to 1) reducing the length of the
signage and removing one water feature; 2) submit site plan and color
board for Staff review; and, 3) submit landscaping plan for review by
Landscape Manager. Motion carried 5-0-0-1, with Commissioner Lambell
absent.
7. CASE NO: MISC 06-45
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): WEA PALM DESERT, LP, c/o
Michael Turner, Westfield, LLC, 11601 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1100,
Los Angeles, CA 90025.
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approva! of
an exterior remodel; Westfield Palm Desert
LOCATION: 72-810 Highway 111
ZONE: PC-3
Action:
!t was moved by Commissioner Vuksic, seconded by Commissioner Lopez,
to grant approval by minute motion. Motion carried 5-0-0-1, with
Commissioner Lambel! absent.
GiPlanrnngWarnne Jutly\Word FdtSWRC Minutes�20071AR070508.min.DOC Page 9 of 13
� ��
ClTY OF Phl �l DESERI
I 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE
PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578
TEL: 760 346—o6�ti
Frvc: 76o 34i-7oq8
i info@palm-desert.org
May 9, 2007
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION
CASE NO: SA 07-63
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESSI: FIRST TEAM REAL ESTATE, 3150 Bristol
Street, Costa Mesa, CA 92637
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of new signage
to replace existing signage; First Team Real Estate.
LOCATION: 72-171 Highway 111
ZONE: C-I:
Upon reviewing the plans and presentations submitted by staff and by the
applicant, the Architectural Review Commission continued Case SA 07-63 subject
to: 1) reducing the length of the signage and removing one water feature; 2) submit
site plan and color board for Staff review; and, 3) submit landscaping plan for
review by Landscape Manager.
Date of Action: May 8, 2007
Vote: Motion carried 5-0-0-1, with Commissioner Lambell absent
(An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the
City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. Any
amendments to this approved plan would need to be re-submitted to Commission
for approval.)
STAFF COMMENTS: It is your responsibility to submit the plans approved
by the Architectural Review Commission to the Department of Building
and Safety.
CONTINUED CASES: In order to be placed on the next meeting's agenda,
new or revised plans must be submitted no later than 9:00 a.m. the
Monday eight days prior to the next meeting.
��mn�o w rtnuro rut�
. l �
, ARCHITECTURAL RE�iEW COMMISSION
' MINUTES MAY 22, 2007
2. CASE NO: SA 07-63
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): FIRST TEAM REAL ESTATE,
3150 Bristol Street, Costa Mesa, CA 92637
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of
new signage to replace existing signage; First Team Real Estate.
LOCATION: 72-171 Highway 111
ZONE: C-I
Mr. Bagato presented modifications to the sign as recommended by
the Commission at the last meeting. In regards to the landscaping,
he had some concerns and stated that when monument signs are
approved, we have to look at them in context with the landscaping;
however, there were concems that this landscape plan was too
dense and tropical for this location. Staff is asking for modifications
to meet the comments recommended by the Landscape
Department. The material samples for the building were expected
for today's meeting, but did not arrive.
Mr. Hudson Hale, representative stated that the paint color
selection was still in committee with First Team Realty and should
be ready in a week or two. Mr. Bagato stated that not only were
they approving the monument signage, they were looking at it in
context with the landscaping and the building; so the Commission
doesn't want to approve material for a sign that they may not
approve for the building.
Commissioner DeLuna stated that the proposed water feature
would use not only water, but power as well. She went on to say
that Palm Desert has a guideline to reduce their water and energy
consumption by 30% and expressed that this wasn't considered a
necessary use. It would be costly and she didn't know what it
would add to the sign.
G:\Plann�ngUanine Judy\Word f�lesV�RC Minutes�2007WR070522.mn.DOC Page 3 of 6
( l
� ARCHITECTURAL RE4�cW COMMISSION
' MINUTES MAY 22, 2007
Commissioner Gregory was concerned about the constant
maintenance of the fountain because the end result of most
fountains was that they break down and are not repaired.
Commissioner Lopez stated that they do work, but require high
maintenance. He also had concems with the maintenance and
� keeping it working.
Commissioner Vuksic stated that the applicant has a right to put in
a fountain and be within their limits of water usage. Mr. Bagato
stated that since they are doing a remodel that is less than 2,000
square feet they are not required to meet the water efficient
ordinance, however we could express our concerns with what is
being proposed. Ms. Lauri Aylaian, Director of Community
Development stated that we couldn't forbid them from having a
fountain because of the consumption of water or power, but there
were concerns with the maintenance that may effect approval.
Commissioner Hanson thought that it was important that the water
and power consumption is noted and if the applicant thinks it would
be a necessary item it would need to be re-evaluated.
Commissioner Hanson pointed out that the plan view was drawn
incorrectly as shown on the elevation and would have to be
modified. She recommended a continuance since it was difficult to
approve without the materials being available. Mr. Hale indicated
that the color palette on the building would be based on the color of
the ledge stone and stated again that the selection was going
through the approvai process with corporate.
Commissioner Vuksic stated that the impression you get with these
plans was that there are masses that have significant offsets, but
when you look at the plan it doesn't look anything like the elevation
because everything is on one plane. To be approvable, it would
need to be modified showing those offsets. Mr. Bagato stated that
part of the problem they were having was that they were trying to
accommodate the fountain, which limited the massing at the base.
Mr. Haie asked if there was a general objection to the kind of
Mediterranean landscape that was proposed. Ms. Diane Hollinger,
Landscape Specialist stated that it was all very tropical and didn't fit
i� with the turf. She pointed out that the landscaping was already
being impacted with the sign and the turf. Mr. Hale stated that it
G'\Piann�ngUan�ne Judy\Word F�ies41RC Minutes�2007WR070522.rrun.DOC Page 4 of 6
. ( i
ARCHITECTURAL REViEW COMMISSION
' t1AINUTES MAY 22, 2007
was very shady on one side of the building; it received the morning
sun and no aftemoon sun. He had some concems with the desert
plants that were being recommended in an area that wouldn't get
much sun. Ms. Hollinger stated not to use tropical and they could
work on that.
Action:
It was moved by Commissioner Hanson, seconded by Commissioner
Lopez, to continue to allow the applicant to: 1) redesign the massing offsets;
2) submit color board for Staff review; and, 3) submit landscaping plan with
desert scheme for review by Landscape Manager. Motion carried 6-0-1-0,
with Commissioner Lambell absent.
CASE NO: SA 07-72
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): DAVID STRAUSS,
PROMOTIONAL SIGNS, 20361 Hermann Circle, Lake Forest, CA
2630
NA URE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Fina! approval of
sign e program; Starbucks.
LOCATI N: 34-300 Monterey Avenue Suite A
ZONE: PC ( FCOZ
Action:
It was moved by Com 'ssioner Hanson, seconded by Commissioner
Vuskic, to grant approval b minute motion with the sign centered in the
tower. Motion carried 6-0-1-0, ith Commissioner Lambell absent.
4. CASE NO: SA 07-76
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESSI: RAVIS DESIGN GROUP, P.O.
Box 1396, Pauma Valley, CA 92061
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL S GHT: Final approval of
new sign program; Palm Desert Professio I Building.
LOCATION: 44-651 Viflage Court
ZONE: OP
G:�PianningWanine JuaylWord FileslARC Minutes�2007WR070522.mn.DOC Page 5 of 6
r
1
� CITY Of Pn�'l �l DESE � 1
i ]j-510 FRED WARING DR[VE
i PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-25]8
� TEL: 76o 346—o6�c
� Fax: 76o 34�-7098
� info@palm-desert.org
May 23, 2007
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION
CASE NO: SA 07-63
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESSI: FIRST TEAM REAL ESTATE, 3150 Bristoi
Street, Costa Mesa, CA 92637
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of new signage
to replace existing signage; First Team Real Estate.
LOCATION: 72-171 Highway 111
ZONE: C-I
Upon reviewing the plans and presentations submitted by staff and by the
applicant, the Architectural Review Commission continued Case No. SA 07-63 to
allow the applicant to 1) redesign the massing offsets; 2) submit color board for
Staff review; and, 3) submit landscaping plan with desert scheme for review by
Landscape Manager.
Date of Action: May 22, 2007
Vote: Motion carried 6-0-1-0, with Commissioner Lambell absent
(An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the
City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. Any
amendments to this approved plan would need to be re-submitted to Commission
for approval.)
STAFF COMMENTS: It is your responsibility to submit the p{ans approved
by the Architectural Review Commission to the Department of Building
and Safety.
CONTINUED CASES: In order to be placed on the next meeting's agenda,
new or revised plans must be submitted no later than 9:00 a.m. the
Monday eight days prior to the next meeting.
h
�)nmto a nnuto run
' � �
� ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
MINUTES JUNE 12, 2007
Mr. Kevin Parker, sign representative, stated that this was basically
Kohl's white-faced logo and he believed that they would be willing
to reduce it down to the allowable square footage.
Action:
It was moved by Commissioner Hanson, seconded by Commissioner
Vuksic, to grant approval with a reduction of letter size from five feet to four
feet. Motion carried 6-0-1-1, with Commissioner DeLuna abstaining and
Commissioner Gregory absent.
5. CASE NO: SA 07-63
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): FIRST TEAM REAL ESTATE�
3150 Bristoi Street, Costa Mesa, CA 92637
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of
new signage to replace existing signage; First Team Real Estate.
LOCATION: 72-171 Highway 111
ZONE: C-I
Mr. Bagato stated that this was a requested approval for signage,
landscaping and color.
Commissioner DeLuna asked if any change or modification had
been made to the water feature or the fountain element as
previously submitted. Ms. Cheri Pulcini, Facilities Manager, stated
that there was a change of 30 inches on the width of the columns
and it was changed symmetrically as requested by the Commission
at a previous meeting. Mr. Bagato stated that there was some
change to the columns architecturally, but they were still proposing
the same water feature.
Commissioner DeLuna asked how much water would be used. Mr.
Freeland stated that it would be a small trough. The trough is only
two feet wide by the length of the sign and the water would be set
as low as possible to keep the splash inside the trough.
Commissioner DeLuna asked why they wanted the water feature
and what it added to the sign. Mr. Freeland stated that it would be
a visual enhancement and add architectural character. Ms. Pulcini
stated that it would pump up that corner 100%.
G:�PlanningUanine Judy\Word FilesWRC Minutes�2007WR07Q612.mn.DOC Page 5 of 15
� ��
" ARCHITECTURAL REV�EW COMMISSION
MINUTES JUNE 12, 2007
The Commission discussed the use of water and electrical power of
this water feature.
Commissioner Vuksic stated that when reviewing the drawings for
the fountain, the elevation didn't match the plan. The elevation
suggested some ins and outs that were not refle�ted in the plan
view. For example, the center portion looked like it was in front of
the pillar, yet when he looked at the plan the pillar was in front of
the center portion. Mr. Freeland indicated that it had changed per
staff's request and stated that it used to be flush and was changed
to be wider. Commissioner Vuksic once again stated that the
elevation didn't match the plan. Commissioner Van Vliet stated that
because of the discrepancy, the Commission was hesitant to
approve anything.
Commission reviewed the elevations with Mr. Freeland and Mr.
Fraser McClellan, Architect. Commissioners Vuksic and Hanson
both sketched a design to explain how to correct the submitted
illustration. The Commission and representatives discussed the
sketch. Commissioner Vuksic stated that he felt that there was a
misinterpretation of what was suggested and the submittal of a plan
and elevation that didn't match. He suggested using the corrected
sketch and stated that it was what the Commission intended to tell
them.
Commissioner DeLuna still had concerns with the water feature.
Commissioner Lambell stated that the building was old and boring
and some attention should be made to that corner and felt that by
adding the sign with the water feature would pump it up.
Commissioner Hanson had concerns with the colors indicated on
the color board and felt that the building would appear striped.
Commission and representatives reviewed the colors and realized
that the colors were not correct. Representatives pointed out the
correct colors and stated they would resubmit the color board.
Commissioner Hanson made the suggestion that the whole lower
section be brown. Mr. McClellan stated that his concern was that
the whole building faced north and was all in shadow and he would
hate to darken it up. He wanted it to b{end into the roof tile.
Commissioner Vuksic stated they could approve this in concept and
!et staff review for final. Commissioner DeLuna asked what they
would be voting on. Commissioner Vuksic stated they would be
G1PlanrnngUarone Judy�Word FilesWRC Minutes�20071AR070612.mn.DOC Page 6 of 15
(� (
` ARCHITECTURAL REVicW COMMISSION
MINUTES JUNE 12, 2007
voting on the colors on the building, and a fountain design with the
concept of massing it as shown on the sketch, where the central
portion is actuafly out further and the other portion comes into it,
and wraps on top of it with water around it.
Action:
It was moved by Commissioner Vuksic, seconded by Commissioner
Lambeli, to grant approval subject to: 1) revising sign to match the
conceptual sketch subject to staff review; 2) revise color from green to dark
brown on the top of the building; and, 3) preliminary approval of landscaping
subject to review by the Landscape Specialist. Motion carried 5-1-0-1, with
Commissioner DeLuna voting NO and Commissioner Gregory absent
6. CASE NO: PP 05-12
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): TAYLOR WOODROW HOMES,
INC., 15 Cushing, Irvine, CA 92618-4200
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of
revision of roof material for Alegria unit; Spanish Walk.
LOCATION: 76-000 Frank Sinatra Drive (former Emerald Desert
site)
ZONE: R-1 M
Mr. Stendell stated that he had a request from one of the
developers within Taylor Woodrow. On one of the product types
they were using a blend of colors on the roof with a Spanish type
material that uses a boost, squish o� heavy concrete with 20% in
the roof tiles. They have requested to remove the 20% and just go
with the concrete tile blend.
Ms. Amy Warren, Taylor-Woodrow representative, stated that their
architect raised a concern about the aesthetics of the 20% boost.
She asked the architect why they were shown on the plans and he
stated that it was an error on their part and apparently wasn't
something that they were conditioned to do, therefore not placed on
the plans. She also stated that the roofer had concerns with the
wind and the 20% boost.
Commissioner Van Vliet asked if this boost would be eliminated on
all units. Ms. Warren stated there wasn't any boost on any other
product there. She stated that they would be doing an S-tile with
G:\PlanningUarnne Judy\Word FilesWRC Minutes�20071AR070612.mn.00C Page 7 of 15
! �.,,r
u' �
_, � A �,
�. �
� j-.� . . �. � � A�
��l '�� � �� A 76 T�
�= = � � w � �d
, ��.'-.' _a � � � z �o
� � �� � � � � ��
�`` y, � 2 .� ? � � �
� G � �y; `� r� ji� o
<
[:� vi / ir y,, 61
N C, � . .� 2� � �
� O
� � •'g �
� � �� ��F � '1,
V� a-.0 N !
� G 1 ,�y �-
V C� {� .X � V�
i1.. `V v) �
� �� C� �%�' �� S Li
.� _ � �; _ � �.� �' � _
� � ��,, �.. �' _ —
v • "`.�•+'.� :",, `v1 i � ;.
�t: - � �! � k i—
� „� � _— . L. z � � �
,�� � �). `�
� -.- -- 1 � ��� � w
� � `� � � `,'3 � t— c0 �
�b�
v�� , '� u tt � 'y � �
�7 � �
N � �•„� ; � ��
\ � r . � QJ "M- �;
�� U) �i a''� L�) �.�- 6
p y V � V ^ -�i
r � � �� ',p��: � � .�.
N �` OY� :' ;j �
c ,d. e'Y^ '!! p�j � ,�
Z t� 7
V� '' r� r o v�
�: Q � �.
Q `''� ? �
� (; r—\ _ ° .;
_ � � n
� �� �.— i � �,'
�. 's� � ; �'
-c � �
� �; � � �.
t� ; � � � � , '•� \ i�'
t�
r / � � �� '� � } �' f!' n11' � �
� � ( � � �s �y i�.
Q S 6 � - J 1� JI T �i
� � ' �
S � .p`-' � ., c � i� � `'
��' c
� � � �- � i� a �
, � ; � 2
"r � _ 4 7 � E�—'
� l� � � � �� e1 � �
"� t4� _Li
�' :v
_ � � � ,.. p
�., s
� � � N , � �:.
r1 � � � . \, ! .! � ' <
,ti� .`�
g �� � � `�Y � t �- �
� `\\ v ay 1 �r � � .i
\ •i t1 ?
� J. 1
� � :�33 , ' "' t r� fi �r��il� r 2 � i`= �.
� c: `� _,.-�: -� �,�„�. � ;•' � �:� � � e'��.
`� �, � '� ��, �`� �
� ��:, , " /,j�, ,— � x '���t,,� �� �� � �, = �
er .y�'�'�' `' � .S1 >oo �(,S'�1` ]% ''
� � o � uoC/ / _ �-;
� �/ � s , ' : -`
� •'1 �/ �J � ��, �' ' �-`� �`
a� �; f��� "� t.4 ,'
e. / �.
� ° � ��, � � � �
� � � � .
.\ ` � � , • � `�
� / �� Y
`� `� -jt _'_ .� `�._ l ,� ' O � �
r � �_,. � ��
��. !�' .,-r
�--..- ---'y -J l
__ ,�,�«��r.�
- � _
; ._ .
,t - � -
�' { A
� � L � �
' �
•�� �� �
_����r{ .r -
����::� - _
���
.. :. ��'� �� -��: �� -� ��� = = .
�'�?' ���.;1 `�:��� � � _
,ra�� . � �.l�i�� r. :
� �,� ` -
�� �;� � t
< ��� � � -
a a�..� ,,,� r:, _
'� ? =^ -
� - :
v �
� � , L
. �./ �
Y .. :� �. �
� - y �
'\' � � � �j�. = � :
'. - Y r.< r Cr h
— += — `:_•� ? ` Y C.i � � _
_ .. .. :. _.. _ .. <$_ ; _
.� � Y .` � .i
.� � - � ^:4^ ,' L . A M
.. .. .♦ . e� ' ' _ .` .. .. .. - � �
� � � — � �
. ` '1 ti y ` r3..`}�f<R� l - _
..T; j ��i� ' - -
' ;�ar°'���� 4 . •��� .a � �j� �""�''�' ' _
i
• � ,i'W' i 't 'k �t i ¢ '�3 _ ��,�� .
�� ' ` aF�! �.: : •• � �; ��y} �7Y �a� �� � . _
1 S .'.�'. � " . . 5��s�'�� �Ni �f i - - -
"� �., ' � �����.��.70.t� �' , _
� :';..� Y t�'� � �,,TII ... �k'i� � •r
— ... ��4 �� ���g �. t
f
� �t..yf.�r Y2�;; . � i
i � ?r,K6 k-
�. � s*t��� l�i�' .3 " ` �R . ,
' 1 1� �,��,.; � �ai..3`.�! _ ��;, _
^ �� '�''�1.`�;{`.s . s � �
.. � �;i�,�:.„� '��� . — 1� � �.,': ' �
� •' i..�� � r
' �_''�, .i �. �� � -j� ���•.:i � . ._ '�`? =� .
' ���n�� �''� v' •_ � ` ,����`x� �6 �� � � �� .1 .V � �
�
� r•
' v� k.� _. { pp, i �; q ._
; � "yK ��,f`` �.3. 3._ la���t �2 �`:�`_ �_ '�� � " ^ � � .�
_ �' := :� � = _
, � w !V "� _
---------...____�.�_ — :t.. `j �1 r^.
— =� • �:
. = � 1+� • :J _
. :� � ey �{ — _
.. � 'J i 1•. .
_� Y � � h r i
• ` . -
—��:y` C
- -. _. ._ s
i'
�� =
� '� � �
�
::J
� �� �
� i� � _
� _ �
J t�; '� ' `` `
. ; •
? � � =
� J - - C
!-� f =
.�, ;; � .=
. � > �� c� }
: � . .� N iI V} .E
�' z :., �� : —
� � � � - _ .c
3 ( '�
n. � a � I � 17�
^ � � �� � �
� � �^+ � ( N _
�' � '�J � _
� � � � ? -v r.
� � Z � Cr y
e:l � Z _;
. � �_ �' r
� (� C12 Q i :
C% ':
� � � s � ', �, -
:' � E
� {3 :J � �
. T a � J J%' � � S
+' L � � �
� � ^ � �
� "s
. 2 —1 � f r _ _ f
r ' � � � } • i
� �S ;_I _
'� � Q � ".
Z 5
� � � � � •�
� � z J r
J i""
J � �++ � �--1 -
J v -
7 � �f � � N -^
� � '� � � � M � � � � S
L � � N S � � J L
� �.. �L � •,_.Xj E:1 �. � ,� C
�J t� Z � J � -� '� O m c z
r ::) J Q, Q � ` iy � '- �
�`' � c� ,1 'c: z S � C� s -
,J t.) 't � iJ " � � = � Q � ` �
- J '- ? J >" M J �' �' 1� „C-0 N _+ t
� :J Q C �I � r,, � J � �i ��. � .� "�
;` �) � G U' -� �. � � ^..�' � ;,;� •C �''t ^ ', t
, r F` "'1 ;:l :�J , y I ;:J ;r ^ �. 3 -
.. � � J } � '�' � J � � . p � • r� c.
, � Q 2 2 �r -s y. " �
� �— r_J �"� � �' C' U ''� �'' � N <: f1 .� r ��
�
v `/: �` " '.� :1; d � '.� U; i� r
f � � •
N. � � ��; � Z � Cl; � Z f
� � � � 5 z � � S :
�` ^J � ,. ;_ � r� ., s.. � —
�- z - ' Q .''�t -J ja � � �
!1- :I;
'`'� "n.'s yyL:a
, �.+:., !' iaR..� `t.. .y � �:. '�:.
: ^'J �'S� Q`�.✓� ..�'.5' �7 . t ' ..;
� "'a k:?i'+�4 h �'¢4 t ��.. �� ,� ,�(:>� X� ..
s � '`a �.. .,w`��tn'�"�,,,�+-, �' � .u��..� 'Y::n i51;: � �'7�.:�L�. ,� .
t diw L, ,t ��d
. ��tY'�i � ��. � Y� .�':
.
.�1¢i"' z � if�pulj 1���`°� �'"
� � � r �: ,r�� li �I.�, ,�, i,
ti�'- - � -[ ���
e �
u `4�' '' , ,�i
� '�
�
4.� $:
C} '6'
r:1..t:'�.
���!
f'.
9_ Yr
, � ; � ���,j
` +,, ,
� >;,:y�; {:_.
'i y.:: �'F' �
"� ��5. *"` � i� �r.
�r -4 '� .i � .. ?. .
y , # + �
�,;' � ��'-� ' -*�`��t; i � �3 . �, � ,,,,,��:,;•
k -: � V � �� �,/s
� �'� . .,...
��1j ^l , y ,Y �rT4-.�,� .i�,u•yyy�� .
� •�::�
�,
rl t .... .�... '.
��.:� . ..... .� .�� ••. • .�
J , .. . t., .� ; �3 .%„ �r.
� •• , �����.�1� L. ��•+•`Xo-?c�f�ry/,�^':. � • � . . ' ��r Y�
����
4Y^ . , , < :q.
l�: 'i;��,T.���+q � � .
._ "� �� . . . .
• . ��..;K._` .�4.. , .
y , ,_. —
_ � . � ',,�.,:..,a�.Y; . � ' . � —�_'_
5
, . 'n ..-.,.,. ' .
� ' �:f ��yt +, . ' .. . .
. . � tj�.-.x 5 i.` . , .
,'1
• � :! � ) .?f Y - _ -
. . ` t4��� � , .
. � . b 1 .. . - ' � .
_ Q. �. ' � ;. . ' .
� ,
"��u;�,r->�
x -.r,� 4� ,� � 4,, ,
� ' y f v e '�kA _
, .., .,... a..: . . .
. � , ;�4�.__ 1 f
.,_. a.� �k�,„ �s �,
. .,. � ,, n.
, ,._
`u",.^'r.....�. �ww-� Y .
. r:..
... _...�._ �.' . .
...`1�...., � `' �''%'�� '
.. ' -.
�... .. � _..
.� '>•�ly ,) . ....�.—.�—�....�...._�" ����� `—�.,.',,,�
.:� k f t A�� �'� :$(t ' �..+.,,�,,, . �___�� ,'"".�-;.._._
w�4��� 4 � ��3� � �'"=�' '"� ..,�__ �- �.,`'�.,."�+u.,.:.
. ,
_ .�. , . . '� 1
��.. ��t`�'a ^t� Q� - a � .. �',��
/� `,., ��� ,t ,.��.. .
�. . � � . �� ( y+., . < 'c. � A
�`r` . �..�� '�. !1� v � p +S; 't i '�7f J, . .. �l`�+�. �'u II
fi
.� ��F 3 J ' . f bw . ��Nvty 114� , �:.'j
s . � cs ""•.�,� ,...�-t. Y ,�f a �i �� d p-yr . 1..
.
e � � �,� f{ ai _.. � j ��,� :� .�.,� - . ,, � � , _
,;
:� ��� � �,:
,� _ _
,
�^�33 �> �i�1�.. . � r w � ° `` @
s i .�f �� , i ,�� �-
t '� �� � ...�j, 'n. _ JtL`.�,\ .. w� . :{� � '�:' `�'�rc�.r+'§i`7$��•.'n«�.� , _ . �"s . .
:. . . f �_.��I�st ,�� .. � lj �e��h 7'�-�+" �{' . � :
., _'+w� . . +� � '"'�'� al�;f��, �t ��,44� . . , y�{;,;t l,�,5,1 1� - !'
',Y � .'�. . e,�.i�„�7� Y - '�, � .. , �FS .,. . .. _ . . . .. . ..
�� ���`a"r:� .1 � � h rT f ��f��1 1 Z.iT+T1YS S .� .� .• _f( !
�'�,,. �'\.,, w ,&_Y `4 ".RT� /fI� 3�3�"3"�' .. �.k
_ )�`�ra .,� f!�/lr �.�3 > „?�'���..F r'
' t � 'T:� . t"'�_�y�����.x> f�. � � ,.'--��`���.�"���` . . .iY t �
J yl,,r �"�`.+.K".. ,� �y<.1 e � .. y: ` � y 1
.Y 4� �.:v. ^^+y, ��..:pt, ...,i " ���f S w . -�' .. ��riE4r'^ j .
� �\5.�� �J. :'VRi. it3,� .., .. � � #• ,'���� . ' / . �.
.N V .
'm^.n. . T -»-i- . '
� �.,y�a"'tt. -— " �,—'t;,�'�.�,r�• : yV� Y �' �:�,.,- x d �::
a � �r;x'{vr�-'f i�'t'' ;.n••it .,{�i . i � r
. . s.��� �s+.?'S��„��I t�•� %:� ��.y�',�,�"'��.r�j+.�..r
,� � t_r �
. . M ,��...� ��",r -'r �',4 �� i.y�, f ...n+. .
` � �/ "nv�✓4�1 �`+s.�'.Y7�Nc _,� � '�
't��Y"Y��?`Y`�� ,/e� �
� � s.� "'! ""�,' �� '`"' ,;, '+' „�, `4'.
,�r t..z
'���,� � Y, �t
.r 4 ��`�� '� I R�-„t r�+""�.+4.,. �:--�'.+'-. � .r���� ��,.ay t . .
N � ���,��y�cy :� �
�ri ' �/ Y.�{�_` �... la s l-y, ' i� / � }'�f�'4 w
�_._) ,� : a
rr ��,• ` �,'�i y '�`� ' '`'�, x����" -s Ci�''` "
.Y! �„a�t �.N,.a,,�' !.
�,^ . �" �
= -�.,t-- s
•,.;.._. � =,�..�
__�. ,
^��' �e�' .....� P�
. `p,"� t
�� '1
� L!