HomeMy WebLinkAboutAB2069 Residential DevelopmentREQUEST:
DATE:
L
CITY OF PALM DESERT
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
CONSIDERATION OF LEGISLATIVE REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION
ON AB 2069 (JONES) AT ITS MEETING OF MARCH 25, 2008
April 10, 2008
CONTENTS: AB 2069 Language
RECOMMENDATION:
By Minute Motion, concur with the action taken by the Legislative Review Committee at its
meeting of March 25, 2008, and direct staff to prepare a letter of opposition for the Mayor's
signature with regard to AB 2069 (Jones) relative to residential development.
BACKGROUND:
The Planning and Zoning Law prohibits a city from reducing, requiring, or permitting the
reduction of residential density for any parcel or to allow the development of any parcel at a
lower residential density unless the City makes certain written findings. If passed, AB 2069
would redefine "lower density" for the purposes of these prohibitions. Because the language of
this bill would specify a blanket density on a State-wide basis, without regard to local general
plan provisions, zoning issues would be controlled by the State rather than local legislative
bodies.
Because the City of Palm Desert opposes any bill which removes local control from the manner
in which it conducts its day-to-day businesses, the Legislative Review Committee recommends
that the City Council oppose AB 2069 and direct staff to prepare a letter stating that position to
appropriate Legislators for the Mayor's signature. o
w
w
0
CA
Q)
1-1
A
H W -i
U
SHEILA R. G IGAN CARLOS L. Oc EGA o '�+
ACM/COMMUNITY SERVI ►-a
0 6G LL ri
d. -rl
W
i ALC'QCO C
U ••Car(p._Z.• Z W (u H .... Z'4 4 H
>i al g V) U) W H H t3)
Hap�t� 01>+41 OWCOW �4
SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANLYST
PATRICIA SCULLY, CFEE
PAUL GIBSON
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE/
CITY TREASURER
CITY MANAGER
AB 2069 Assembly Bill - INTRODUCED Page 1 of 3
RILL NUMBER: AB 2069 INTRODUCED
BILL TEXT
INTRODUCED BY Assembly Member Jones
FEBRUARY 19, 2008
An act to amend Section 65863 of the Government Code, relating to
local planning.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
AB 2069, as introduced, Jones. Local planning: residential
development.
The Planning and Zoning Law prohibits a city, county, or city and
county from reducing, cr requiring or permitting the reduction of,
the residential density for any parcel to, or allow development of
any parcel at, a lower residential density, as defined, unless the
city, county, or city and county makes certain written findings.
This bill would redefine lower residential density, as specified,
for purposes of the above prohibition.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no.
State -mandated local program: no.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Section 65863 of the Government Code is amended to
read:
65863. (a) Each city, county, or city and county shall ensure
that its housing element inventory described in paragraph (3) of
subdivision (a) of Section 65583 or its housing element program to
make sites available pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (c) of
Section 65583 can accommodate its share of the regional housing need
pursuant to Section 65584, throughout the planning period.
(b) No city, county, or city and county shall, by administrative,
quasi-judicial, legislative, or other action, reduce, or require or
permit the reduction of, the residential density for any parcel to,
or allow development of any parcel at, a lower residential density,
as defined in paragraphs (1)— and (2) of
subdivision (h), unless the city, county, or city and county makes
written findings supported by substantial evidence of both of the
following:
(1) The reduction is consistent with the adopted general plan,
including the housing element.
(2) The remaining sites identified in the housing element are
adequate to accommodate the jurisdiction's share of the regional
housing need pursuant to Section 65584.
(c) If a reduction in residential density for any parcel would
result in the remaining sites in the housing element not being
adequate to accommodate the jurisdiction's share of the regional
housing need pursuant to Sectior. 65584, the jurisdiction may reduce
the density on that parcel if it identifies sufficient additional,
adequate, and available sites with an equal or greater residential
density in the jurisdiction so that there is no net loss of
residential unit capacity.
(d) Tne requirements of this section shall be in addition to any
http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/asm/ab_2051-2100/ab_2069_bi11_20080219_introduc... 3/28/2008
AB 2069 Assembly Bill - INTRODUCED Page 2 of 3
other law that may restrict or limit the reduction of residential
density.
(e) If a court finds that an action of a city, county, or city and
county is in violation of this section, the court shall award to the
plaintiff or petitioner who proposed the housing development,
reasonable attorney's fees and costs of suit, except under
extraordinary circumstances in which the court finds that awarding
fees would not further the purposes of this section or the court
finds that the action was frivolous. This subdivision shall remain
operative only until January 1, 2007, and as of that date is no
longer operative, unless a later enacted statute that is enacted
before January 1, 2007, deletes or extends that date.
(f) This section requires that a city, county, or city and county
be solely responsible for compliance with this section, unless a
project applicant requests in his or her initial application, as
submitted, a density that would result in the remaining sites in the
housing element not being adequate to accommodate the jurisdiction's
share of the regional housing need pursuant to Section 65584. In that
case, the city, county, or city and county may require the project
applicant to comply with this section. The submission of an
application for purposes of this subdivision does not depend on the
application being deemed complete or being accepted by the city,
county, or city and county.
(g) This section shall not be construed to apply to parcels that,
prior to January 1, 2003, were either (1) subject to a development
agreement, or (2) parcels for which an application for a subdivision
map had been submitted.
(h) (1) If the local jurisdiction has adopted a housing element
for the current planning period that is in substantial compliance
with Article 10.6 (commencing with Section 65580) of Chapter 3, for
purposes of this section, "lower residential density" means the
following:
(A) For sites on which the
zoning designation permits residential use and that are
identified in the local ' 1-11:.Li,,..
jurisdiction's housing element inventory described in paragraph
(3) of subdivision (a) of Section 65583,
1.,,,..,1..y ,...IL
N� y approval of fewer units on the site than
were projected by the jurisdiction to be accommodated on the site
pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 65583.2 .
(B) For sites that have been or will be rezoned pursuant to the
local jurisdiction's housing element program described in paragraph
(1) of subdivision (c) of Section 65583,
t Cn9ity Cf Ll._ CiiCC�
.t approval of fewer units for the site than were
projected to be developed on the site in the housing element program
(2) (A) If the local jurisdiction has not
adopted a housing element for the current planning period within 90
days of the deadline established by Section 65588 —feet-
-f or the adopted housing element is
not in substantial compliance with Article 10.6 (commencing with
Section 65580) of Chapter 3 within 180 days of the deadline
established by Section 65588, "lower residential density" means
any of the following:
(i) For residentially zoned sites,
a density that is lower than 80 percent of the maximum
allowable residential density for that parcel. —Fe_r—t
L1.1 ., if
http://info. sen.ca. gov/pub/07-08/bill/asm/ab_2051-2100/ab_2069_bi 11_20080219_introduc... 3/28/2008
AB 2069 Assembly Bill - INTRODUCED Page 3 of 3
(ii) For sites on which residential and
nonresidential uses are permitted, approval of a use that would
result in the development of fewer than 80 percent of the number of
residential units that would be allowed under the maximum residential
density for the site.
(B) If the council of governments
fails to complete a final housing need allocation pursuant to the
deadlines established by Section 65584.05, then for purposes of
this section, the deadline <<,_ i L1...
pursuant to Section 65588 shall be extended by a time period
equal to the number of days of delay incurred by the
council of governments in completing the final housing need
allocation.
http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/asm/ab_2051-2100/ab_2069_bill_20080219_introduc... 3/28/2008