HomeMy WebLinkAboutSR 12/13/07 - C26960 - Lndscaping/Screening of PD Mobile Estates CITY OF PALM DESERT
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
STAFF REPORT
REQUEST: Authorization to negotiate an agreement and solicit bids to provide a
landscape buffer between the Palm Desert Mobile Estates and the
Palm Valley Storm Channel, and to suspend enforcement action on
a Notice to Abate for 60 days pending execution of said agreement.
SUBMITTED BY: Lauri Aylaian ������
Director of Community Developme t �F�4'��' QrA�'���(�—a _
� ��;��s��u����_ �— l C� ~ ��
APPLICANT: Mr. Mark Bessire
Palm Desert Mobile Estates " � �"���E�TO 2r�'J���;���
�
DATE: December 13, 2007 �
Recommendation:
That the City Council, by minute motion:
1. Approve a landscape-only approach to screening the recently-exposed north
face of the Palm Desert Mobile Estates RV storage area;
2. Authorize staff to negotiate a three way cost sharing agreement between the City
of Palm Desert, the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD), and Palm Desert
Mobile Estates, and authorize Mayor to execute same;
3. Appropriate necessary funds for the project in an amount not to exceed $15,000
to Account No. 400-4614-433-4001;
4. Suspend enforcement action and continue hearing of appeal of Notice to Abate
for sixty days pending successful resolution of the issue; and,
5. Authorize the City Manager to dismiss the Notice to Abate upon execution by all
parties of cost sharing agreement.
Staff Report
Palm Desert Mobile Estates Landscaping/Screening Agreement
December 13, 2007
Page 2 of 6
Executive Summary:
Approval of the staff recommendation would result in the planting of a natural
landscape screen on the north side of the Palm Desert Mobile Estates, along the
south side of the Palm Valley Storm Channel, and the dismissal of code
enforcement action against the mobile home park. The landscape material
should provide solid screen within four years. The cost of the landscape
installation would be shared between the City, CVWD, and Palm Desert Mobile
Estates.
I. BACKGROUND:
On October 25, 2007, the City Council directed staff to attempt to negotiate an
agreement between CVWD, Palm Desert Mobile Estates, and residents of the
Chaparral Country Club that would result in installation of a fence and
landscaping to screen the Chaparral residents from a view of the mobile home
park that was exposed by CVWD's removal of mature tamarisk trees on the
south side of the Palm Valley Storm Channel. The exposed view of a portion of
the park, that portion that stores recreational vehicles (RVs), is also the subject
of a code enforcement action against Palm Desert Mobile Estates, since the
municipal code requires that RV storage areas be screened from public view.
II. POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS:
Three possible solutions to the screening issue have been identified by the
various involved parties. No solution is perfect; each solution has strengths and
weaknesses. They can be summarized as follows:
Solution Pros Cons
Install a chain link fence Complete visual screening Most expensive solution
with a fabric wind screen almost immediately. Solution is ($100K; City's share $40-
and landscape plant favored by the Chaparral 50K). Fabric screen is likely
material residents to become tattered and
unsightly over time. Screened
chain link fence will be
unattractive, especially in
such a large expanse. Public
Hearing is required if ARC will
not approve use of chain link
fence. Chaparral residents
would not artici ate in cost
Staff Report
Palm Desert Mobile Estates Landscaping/Screening �greement
December 13, 2007
Page 3 of 6
Strict enforcement of the No hard costs to the City. Soft Mobile home park could
code compliance action costs (legal fees) are possible. potentially gain compliance by
moving RVs to south side of
the park, which would still
leave mobile homes exposed
to view. Even screening RVs
in their current location will
leave a portion of the mobile
home park exposed to public
view.
Installation of native plant Cost of the screen is shared Landscape screen will take
material without a fence equitably between three parties: about four years to grow in
City, CVWD, and Palm Desert fully
Mobile Estates. City's share
should be $10,000 or less.
Naturalistic landscape screen
will be an attractive buffer for
the lon term
Ilt. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the third option described above: installation of irrigation,
shrubs, and small trees that will create a natural landscape buffer in several
years. Discussion with the various parties involved indicates that CVWD and the
Palm Desert Mobile Estates will likely share equally in the costs with the City.
Neither the Chaparral HOA nor the residents are willing to participate in the cost
of the work. However, the residents there can easily and economically block
their view of the mobile home park and RV storage area by installation of several
trees on their own (north) side of the channel. (See photos beginning on Page 5
of this report.)
With the concurrence of the City Council, staff proposes to finalize an agreement
between the parties under which:
• The City will solicit bids and award a contract to install irrigation plus 200
five-gallon shrubs and small trees on CVWD's property on the south side
of the channel.
• CVWD will install an irrigation meter to provide water for the landscaping.
• Palm Desert Mobile Estates will pay the ongoing water bills for irrigation of
the landscaping.
Staff Report
Palm Desert Mobile Estates Landscaping/Screening Agreement
December 13, 2007
Page 4 of 6
• Tamarisk trees growing from the roots and seeds of the trees that were
removed will be allowed to grow along with the new landscape material.
The plant material will not be pruned, and will be left to fill in as a natural-
looking, living screen. Palm Desert Mobile Estates will be responsible to
maintaining the landscape at this level.
• Each of the three parties will contribute to the cost of the work. Palm
Desert Mobile Estates has committed to contribute a minimum of$5,000 if
this solution is acceptable to the City Council, and if the code enforcement
action is halted. Additional financial participation, so as to match the
amount contributed by the City and CVWD, will be requested by the
property manager but must be approved by the owner of the mobile home
park. Staff estimates that with equal sharing, each of the three parties
would pay approximately $10,000. In no case should the City's portion
exceed $15,000.
Submitted By:
Lauri Aylaian
Director of Community Development
Approval: Appr
Homer L. Croy Paul Gibson
ACM for DevCe� �ment Services Director of Finance
%
;;ITY COUNCI�.ArTTCtI�3o
APPROVED `� DEt�1IED
E�LCE T VED �?�`�iER
Carlos L. Ort a -
City Manager s"�E�I��; ��-��� - -
AYE�: � Y ( � � >
I�14i,S:
r�aE�lT•
�ssx�zra:
VERIFIED BY:
�riginal on �'ilP wi h City Clerk's Offi��
Staff Report
Palm Desert Mobile Estates Landscaping/Screening Agreement
December 13, 2007
Page 5 of 6
� �.�. ,�
� :���
..,
�� � �
� ��;. �r��� �E�,
,. �:
� �, .� ��
�yy� � ��
k.` � �l,y���"i�" � �`� �"` � ��s' S'�,' ,�*.. f,r �� ues e � � s.�,_. ,,,q, �
""4�`� � �,� �`-, ,K�x
:.� ..
�
„� � :, - r u
'�" �'� ,'�
�. ... , < k^ _ . ., ., ;�
as,�.. - ,�,� j
=„qfl
� t - NS � ' � k. , ' _w ��,
� � �G '�4 � ,'t��'? �1?��
:�i'� � �,.P„��t'�`' "''4 � � a,.b, ��n,�`t$.'��• � �y.
�,
��. � .� � , � . -�. �.e z '.
� . . . . 4. .+n, iP?,-'+ �'
.. .. . . ..� S6�t�.'''� . _ . � t,,a. ... ,.
If the RV storage area (at right) is screened, the remainder of the mobile home park will still be exposed
to view from Portola Avenue.
� . �� �,� F.,,
� � ��� � ��
� � � �-�= # �. � ,� ����� � x��+� ��� ��
__ , �
� ,��
� .
� �
, _,
. .
� � ��. ;.� �;��� �� ����,.� ��.
� ��� ��,: � ; .
.�ry
..r ,
,
�
�: .,,, _�.
rn ..
_ _ .. �..
.�? , :�� �,,�:,,..�,,, .<
�""�"_'�,_ �„t..a:
'�dM�"s.�,
F_„�,,,,
Addition of several trees by Chaparral on the north side of the channel would complete the screening
from their development of the mobile home park and RV storage area.
Stafif Report
P�alm Desert Mobile Estates Landscaping/Screening Agreement
December 13, 2007
Page 6 of 6
.,
�� �� � �� � � � �� � �
� : ���i�F;
�� ;:�: ����
�' �
�:, ��.
4s Jfi
"fz ��'��,�f' �^t t'� . . . . .
�¢',
. . � � � � � �� �"�
t
"�#'i*��' '�r "` � �,
i .:'�� F , F i y
''i 1 f �, '�N '" o"�k�9� � �'��'� �s .s �.��. �
�� 5� ",j{ � �'r` � F b 4 �.
�+ # �
- � � �. �f a�b 1
� P .
. 'm.a:,��.,'", .: n�,.u`�.st�`�;,"�s�,r�+a� .y,,.-= v�r��,sa,.�' � -.»,�:. � ; ' ° .
. . . ,r"`"�'" '�.'�,�.. .. �.,o,,
- ���.� xa `w�+�
. �`;y ;:. .. - .. .�v,�,,. ,, ...
,:��. �;� �'� <.., �
„ µ
�� ,, ��z ;� � �
, , ;
��,. ��
. �; � = r ,.. „ :
., �
r.� e �
. � �.
� T , "
� �.. �
� � >
�� � .- ,
� . . . � .�,,,�
� � �la�, �+e�� � i
Staff believes that the expanse of fence and screen (15' high and 1,350' long) needed for this
application would present an unattractive solution. This photograph shows a chain link fence with tan
coloured wind screen material.